Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Top Reads

J Immunol February 1, 2021, 206 (3) 453; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2090024
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

B Cell Master Regulator

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

The germinal center (GC) is the site where B cells undergo differentiation and fate determination; however, the precise mechanisms driving this process are not well understood. Lee et al. (p. 481) show that glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3) is critical for GC B cell differentiation into Ab-secreting plasma cells (PCs). Previous studies have shown that CD40/CD40L interactions modulate the strength of interactions between GC B cells and T follicular helper (Tfh) cells, as well as subsequent B cell selection and differentiation. CD40 signaling in the presence of IL-21 induces c-Myc, which is essential for modulating Tfh cell engagement and promoting positive selection of GC B cells. c-Myc is a target of GSK3, and here the authors show that inactivation of GSK3 induces c-Myc and Foxo1 expression upon CD40/IL-21 stimulation of GC B cells, which drives expression of additional transcription factors, including IRF4, which are needed for PC differentiation and fate commitment. GSK3 inactivation and increased Foxo1 expression was also associated with facilitating the light zone to dark zone transition of GC B cells, another feature of PC fate commitment. Together, these results define a role for GSK3 as a master regulator of GC B cell differentiation and commitment.

An Unlikely Fibrosis Fellow

Fibrosis typically occurs in response to allergic, autoimmune, and infectious diseases, and has been linked to TH2 and IgG4 responses. In this Top Read, Allard-Chamard et al. (p. 524) now show that fibrosing mediastinitis (FM) resulting from Histoplasma capsulatum infection shares histological features with IgG4-related disease but is associated with the accumulation of CD4+CTLs in fibrotic lesions. Previous work from this group has shown that CD4+ CTLs expand clonally and accumulate in disease lesions for the human autoimmune disorders, IgG4-related disease, and systemic sclerosis. Here they observe that FM patients have clonally expanded effector CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood and these CD4+ CTLs can be found in greater number in disease lesions compared with TH2 cells. CD4+ CTLs from FM patients can be reactivated upon ex vivo exposure to H. capsulatum Ag, suggesting a role for this fungal pathogen in FM pathogenesis. These results indicate that CD4+ CTLs and not TH2 cells are likely to contribute to the pathogenesis of infection-associated fibrosis.

SARS-CoV-2–Specific T Cells

The urgency of the current COVID-19 pandemic has led to the development of new tools and protocols to study immune responses to SARS-CoV-2. In this Top Read, Zelba et al. (p. 580) have developed a protocol to detect SARS-CoV-2–reactive T cells in PBMCs from COVID-19 patients. They adapted an existing protocol designed to detect rare tumor neoantigen-specific memory T cells in cancer patients. Here they expanded CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in vitro for 6 d, then stimulated them for 12 h in the presence of overlapping SARS-CoV-2 peptide libraries. T cell responses were measured using intracellular staining for CD154, TNF, IL-2 and IFN-γ. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells with reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 spike protein were detected in all ten convalescent COVID-10 patient samples, but membrane and nucleocapsid-specific CD4+ T cells were detected in only a subset of patients. No SARS-CoV-2–specific T cells were detected in uninfected individuals using this protocol, but prolonged overnight stimulation with viral peptides did induce cytokine responses in these control samples. These results describe a highly specific tool for measuring SARS-CoV-2–specific T cells in PBMCs and contribute to our understanding of the specificity of these responses in convalescent patients.

MHC March-Ing Along

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Dendritic cells (DCs) require the expression of Ag-specific peptide–MHC class II (pMHC-II) complexes on the cell surface to function as Ag presenting cells that can activate Ag-specific CD4+ T cells. pMHC-II complex turnover decreases in activated DCs, which helps to increase the likelihood of APC–T cell interactions. This turnover process is regulated to ubiquitination of MHC-II by the E3 ubiquitin ligase March-I. Previous studies in March-I knockout (KO) mice have shown that pMHC-II molecules accumulate on the surface of resting DCs, and in this Top Read, Kim et al. (p. 494) show that dysregulation of MHC-II turnover alters DC development and function. DCs from MHC-II ubiquitination–deficient mice (March-I KO mice or MHC-II K225R mice) have high levels of pMHC-II surface expression but do not effectively stimulate CD4+ T cells. This defect was independent of Ag presentation and was cell intrinsic, but it was not due to defects in T or B cell interactions. Expression analysis of DCs from MHC-II K225R mice revealed downregulation of genes involved in cell activation, but stimulation of MHC-II K225R DCs with LPS reversed this defect and enabled DCs to activate T cells. Taken together, these findings show that DC dysfunction in MHC-II ubiquitination–deficient mice is caused by DC intrinsic changes in gene expression.

  • Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 206 (3)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 206, Issue 3
1 Feb 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Top Reads
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Top Reads
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 2021, 206 (3) 453; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2090024

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Top Reads
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 2021, 206 (3) 453; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2090024
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • B Cell Master Regulator
    • An Unlikely Fibrosis Fellow
    • SARS-CoV-2–Specific T Cells
    • MHC March-Ing Along
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Top Reads
  • Top Reads
  • Top Reads
Show more TOP READS

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606