Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

CXCR5+CD8+ T Cells: A Review of Their Antibody Regulatory Functions and Clinical Correlations

Steven M. Elzein, Jason M. Zimmerer, Jing L. Han, Bryce A. Ringwald and Ginny L. Bumgardner
J Immunol June 15, 2021, 206 (12) 2775-2783; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.2100082
Steven M. Elzein
*Medical Student Research Program, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason M. Zimmerer
†Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jing L. Han
†Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and
‡Biomedical Sciences Graduate Program, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bryce A. Ringwald
*Medical Student Research Program, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ginny L. Bumgardner
†Comprehensive Transplant Center, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ginny L. Bumgardner
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

CD8+ T cells have conventionally been studied in relationship to pathogen or tumor clearance. Recent reports have identified novel functions of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that can home to lymphoid follicles, a key site of Ab production. In this review, we provide an in-depth analysis of conflicting reports regarding the impact of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells on Ab production and examine the data supporting a role for Ab enhancement (B cell helper) and Ab downregulation (Ab-suppressor) by CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets. CXCR5+CD8+ T cell molecular phenotypes are associated with CD8-mediated effector functions, including distinct subsets that regulate Ab responses. Coinhibitory molecule PD-1, among others, distinguishes CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets. We also provide, to our knowledge, the first in-depth review of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in the context of clinical outcomes and discuss the potential utility of monitoring the quantity of peripheral blood or tissue infiltrating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells as a prognostic tool in multiple disease states.

Areview of the subset of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells must first acknowledge the abundance of work that identifies the critical role of CD8+ T cells in pathogen clearance. Cytotoxic type 1 CD8+ T (Tc1) cells that produce proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-γ and TNF-α are among the most well-defined CD8+ T cell subsets involved in clearance of intracellular pathogens and tumors. Tc1 cells kill target cells via release of cytotoxic molecules, such as perforin and granzyme, and comprise the majority of CD8+ T cell subsets in the peripheral blood of healthy human blood donors (1). These cells are critical to the defense against intracellular bacteria, viruses, and protozoa and clear immunogenic targets in a variety of conditions, including autoimmune, tumor, transplant, and other inflammatory milieus. In addition to the Tc1 cell subset, other less-abundant CD8+ T effector cell subsets include inducible IL-4– and IL-5–producing (Tc2; active in mediating allergy, asthma, and defense against helminths and venoms), IL-9–producing [Tc9; active in preventing CD4+ T cell–mediated inflammation in the small intestine (2), exacerbating asthma and allergic inflammation in atopic dermatitis (3), and mediating antitumor effects (4)], IL-17–producing (Tc17; active in the defense against extracellular bacteria and fungi), and Foxp3-expressing regulatory (active in maintaining immune homeostasis) CD8+ T cells (5, 6). Given the disparate effector functions and plasticity of CD8+ T cell subsets, a more in-depth understanding of CD8+ T cell subpopulations is critical to their phenotypic and functional classification and to determination of their potential clinical utility in monitoring, preventing, and/or treating immune mediated disease.

Recent work in various models and disease states has identified unique subsets of CD8+ T cells expressing the chemokine receptor CXCR5, which directs these cells into secondary lymphoid follicles (7). Within these secondary follicles, CXCR5+CD8+ T cells may encounter a rich milieu of Ags, APCs, and other follicular cells and are reported to display a range of effector functions in distinct viral, tumor, and autoimmune settings. The bulk of literature to date has focused on CXCR5+CD8+ T cell–mediated clearance of viruses that have predilection for sequestration in lymphoid follicles, including HIV/SIV (8–17) and lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) (18–20), as well as prognostic associations of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells detected in tumors and draining lymph nodes with improved clinical outcomes for malignancies such as colorectal (21, 22) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (23, 24).

This review builds upon prior analyses of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that have examined their role in viral immunity, autoimmunity, and tumor immunity (7, 25–27) by focusing on this subset’s divergent roles on humoral immunity and by categorizing molecular phenotypes reported for subsets with distinct effector functions. Although the full spectrum of CXCR5+CD8+ T cell function is included, we focus on an analysis of the data supporting a role for CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets on enhancement of Ab production (B cell helper function) versus downregulation of Ab production (Ab-suppressor). We also provide an in-depth analysis of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in a variety of clinical conditions (including viral or bacterial infection, malignancy, autoimmunity, and transplantation) and discuss their potential clinical utility.

CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that enhance Ab production

Similar to CXCR5+PD-1hiCD4+ T follicular helper (TFH) cells that support Ab production (28, 29), CXCR5+PD-1hiCD8+ T subsets have also been reported to exhibit a B cell helper function. CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in various disease states and models, ranging from colorectal malignancy to viral hepatitis to LCMV infection, have been reported to enhance Ab production by 1) direct interaction with B cells in coculture (23, 30–37) or 2) synergistic interactions with CD4+ T cells and B cells in coculture (38, 39).

In the first such study to examine CXCR5+CD8+ T cell enhancement of Ab through direct interaction with B cells, Quigley et al. (32) demonstrated that CXCR5+CD8+ T cells from human tonsillectomy specimens increase both the survival and nonspecific IgG production of CD19+ B cells when cocultured for 7 d. Although specific cellular mechanisms of B cell help were not explored by Quigley et al. (32), it was noted that in vitro–stimulated CXCR5+CD8+ T cells exhibited upregulated expression of molecules necessary for T cell–dependent humoral immune responses (32), including CD70 (40), OX40 (41), and ICOS (42). The capacity of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cells to upregulate Ab production nearly 2-fold or greater in culture has been reported in a number of other studies using human-derived cells from patients with various diseases including chronic hepatitis B infection (33), classical Hodgkin lymphoma (34), nasal polyps (35), and HCC (23). Since then, several groups have identified CXCR5+CD8+ T cells as direct B cell helpers in murine models.

In an IL-2 knockout (KO) murine model of autoimmunity (autoimmune hemolytic anemia) that develops because of the absence of CD4+ T regulatory cells (TReg), the authors observed an increase in CXCR5+PD-1hiCD4+ T cells and CXCR5+PD-1hiCD8+ T cells in lymphoid tissue. Both subsets upregulated ICOS and Bcl6, known to be important for interactions between CD4+ TFH and follicular B cells (38). Depletion of either CD4+ T cells or CD8+ T cells resulted in increased survival, improved anemia, decreased frequency of B cells, and decreased IgG autoantibody binding of erythrocytes. Interestingly, the reduction of IgG was predominantly for IgG1 (IL-4 dependent) for CD4+ T cell depletion and both IgG1 and IgG3 (IFN-γ dependent) for CD8+ T cell depletion, suggesting some differences in CD4- and CD8-mediated enhancement of autoantibody production in this model. Furthermore, supernatant from in vitro–stimulated CXCR5+PD-1hiCD8+ T cells significantly upregulated IgG production by in vitro–stimulated (anti-CD40 and anti-IgM) wild-type B cells. Notably, these CD8+ T cells supported IgG production to levels comparable to those observed with supernatants from CD4+ TFH cells (38). In contrast to these studies, cocultures consisting of B cells and CXCR5+PD-1+CD8+ T cells from LCMV-infected wild-type mice resulted in only mild increases in the percentage of IgG1+ B cells and in vitro production of IgG1 in the supernatant compared with B cells cultured alone (and significantly less than cocultures of B cells with CXCR5+PD-1+CD4+ TFH cells) (31).

In Bcl6 KO mice that have functional B cells but abrogated endogenous CD4+ TFH cell responses, the adoptive transfer of Runx3-deficient transgenic (LCMV GP33/Db-reactive) P14 CD8+ T cells enriched for CXCR5+CD8+ T cells promoted Ab production in response to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH)–GP33 immunization (but to half the extent when compared with adoptive transfer of CD4+ TFH cells) (30). However, the increase in IgG Ab production occurred in the absence of germinal center (GC) formation, suggesting an extrafollicular mechanism of B cell help. This observation is consistent with studies in the IL-2 KO mouse model, in which adoptive transfer of IL-2 KO CD8+ T cells (enriched for CXCR5+PD-1hiCD8+ T cells) into TCRα KO mice resulted in increased plasma cells, but not GC B cells. In contrast, adoptive transfer of CD4+ TFH cells resulted in expansion of both GC B cells and plasma cells (30).

In these murine and human studies, Ab-enhancing CXCR5+CD8+ T cells have routinely been reported to express IL-21, CD40L, ICOS, PD-1, and Bcl-6, although not necessarily to the extent expressed by CD4+ TFH cells. When comparing CXCR5+CD8+ T cells isolated from peritumoral tissue versus peripheral blood, HCC-infiltrating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells were noted to express higher levels of IL-21, ICOS, and PD-1, illustrating the heterogeneity of CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets’ phenotypic expression and function not only between various disease states but even in different immune locales within the same patient (23).

A few studies have investigated the specific cellular mechanisms by which CXCR5+CD8+ T cell–mediated upregulation of Ab production occurs. CXCR5+CD8+ T cells isolated from human tonsillectomy specimens and cocultured with CD19+ B cells alone significantly increased levels of IgG, IgM, and IgA in a dose-dependent manner, albeit not to the level of CD4+ T cell/B cell cocultures (36). Interestingly, the addition of anti–IL-21 or anti-CD40L to CXCR5+CD8+ T/B cell cocultures reduced production of IgG and IgM by 40–60%, supporting a contact-dependent (CD40L-dependent) and soluble factor–mediated (IL-21–dependent) mechanism of Ab upregulation by these cells (36). The importance of CD40/CD40L interactions in CXCR5+CD8+ T cell–mediated help to B cells has also been reported in an LCMV mouse model, in which addition of anti-CD40L neutralizing Ab to CXCR5+PD-1+CD8+ T/B cell cultures, or coculture with CD40-deficient B cells, abrogated IgG1 production similar to levels observed in cultures of B cells alone (31). Contact-dependent B cell help for in vitro (and in vivo) Ab production provided by CXCR5+PD-1+CD8+ T cells was further supported by the requirement for MHC class I (MHC-I) matching between CD8+ T cells and B cells.

In contrast to the preceding data suggesting provision of direct help to B cells by CXCR5+PD-1+CD8+ T cells, two groups have demonstrated CD8+ T cell–mediated help to B cells through synergistic interactions with CD4+ TFH cells to enhance Ab production (38, 39). In one study, when CXCR5+CD8+ T cells from human patients (with hepatitis B) were incubated with either CD19+CD27− naive B cells or CD19+CD27+ memory B cells alone (stimulated with staphylococcal enterotoxin B), they failed to upregulate in vitro Ab production (despite expressing IL-21, a cytokine known to induce B cell Ab production). However, addition of the CXCR5+CD8+ T cells to CXCR5+CD4+ T/B cell coculture elicited significantly increased IgG Ab production (∼2-fold) compared with CXCR5+CD4+ T/B cell coculture alone (39). TCRα KO mice immunized with KLH, followed by adoptive transfer of IL-2 KO CD8+ T cells (CXCR5+PD-1hiBcl-6+IL-21+CD8+ T cells) alone, were associated with increased frequency of B220intCD138+ plasma cells, but not B220+GL-7+Fas+ GC B cells in recipient spleens, and did not promote IgG production. However, when IL-2 KO CD8+ T cells were transferred along with IL-2 KO CD4+ TFH cells, a synergistic effect resulting in increased IgG2b titer (to a greater extent than IgG1 and no effect on IgG2a titer) was observed (38). The results of these studies suggest that CXCR5+CD8+T cell subsets under some circumstances may act synergistically with CD4+ TFH cells (rather than through independent stimulation of B cells) to enhance Ab production.

It remains elusive whether Ag immunogenicity, genetic, and/or acquired immune conditions or immune locales play a key role in driving CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets’ differentiation, effector function, and capacity to influence Ab production. Phenotypic markers, cytokines, effector molecules, and transcription factors characterizing CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets investigated in specific models are shown in Table I. Most CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets that are reported to enhance humoral immunity or regulate viral, tumor, and autoimmunity express some similar transcription factors, coinhibitory molecules, costimulation molecules, cytokines, and effector molecules. In contrast, Ab-suppressor CXCR5+CD8+ T cells identified in transplantation models are distinguished from all of these other subsets by the absence of the coinhibitory molecule PD-1, absence of the costimulatory molecules ICOS/ICOSL, and lack of production of IL-10 or IL-21 (43). Furthermore, Ab-suppressor CXCR5+CD8+ T cells are distinguished from CD8+ TReg (44–49) by their expression of IFN-γ, perforin/granzyme, and CD28 and the lack of expression of PD-1, IL-10, and the transcription factor Foxp3 (Table I). Further investigation of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells with complex immunophenotyping may improve the categorization of these heterogeneous subsets, clarify mechanisms of action, and implicate lineage relationships.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table I.

Phenotype of CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets by function

CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that mediate downregulation of Ab production

In contrast to the literature supporting an Ab-enhancing function of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells, our research group has identified, to our knowledge, a novel subset of Ab-suppressor CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells (CD8+ T Ab-suppressor [TAb-supp] cells) using in vivo transplant experimental murine models. We have reported that this subset suppresses in vivo alloantibody production 5- and 10-fold following allogeneic kidney (50) and hepatocyte transplant (51), respectively. This reduction in alloantibody formation is associated with significant enhancement of graft survival following CD8+ TAb-supp adoptive cellular therapy in both kidney (15–52 d) (50) and hepatocyte (14–35 d) (51) transplant recipients using models in which graft loss occurs by Ab-mediated rejection. Alloantibody suppression is mediated, in part, by CD8-mediated clearance of Ab-producing B cells through both FasL and perforin mechanisms (52). This cytotoxic clearance is Ag specific, as CD8+ TAb-supp cells do not kill naive or third party–primed IgG+ B cells in vitro or in vivo (51, 52). Recently, our group has identified CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of human kidney transplant recipients. The quantity of both CXCR5+CD8+ and CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells inversely associates with the incidence of de novo donor-specific Ab (DSA) (53), suggesting a human correlate of murine CD8+ TAb-supp cells. In experimental murine models, we found that IFN-γ is critical to Ab-suppressor CD8+ T cell function (54) because CD8+ T cells isolated from IFN-γ KO mice do not develop Ab-suppressor function. Approximately 70% of CD44+CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in both murine (51) and human (53) transplant recipients express IFN-γ. The CD8+ TAb-supp cells that our group has investigated lack expression of PD-1, ICOS/ICOSL, and CD8+ TReg markers IL-10, CD103, and Foxp3 (51) and, thus, represent a subset of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that are distinct from CD8+ TReg (44–49) as well as PD-1+CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets with antiviral, antitumor, anti-autoimmune (Qa-1–restricted), and Ab-enhancing functions (Table I). Furthermore, although Ab-suppressor CXCR5+CD8+ T cells are Ag specific, the Ag specificity of the CXCR5+PD-1hiCD8+ T cells that enhance Ab production has not been tested. Collectively, these findings raise the prospect of further refining and developing this CD8+ T cell subset as a cellular therapy for the prevention or treatment of Ab-mediated rejection.

Another subset with Ab suppressive function, identified as CD3+CD8+CXCR5hiCD44hi T follicular regulatory (TFR) cells, has been reported to inhibit ex vivo CD4+ TFH IL-21 production and GC B cell (CpG-TLR9–stimulated CD19+CD38+) IgG production in the setting of HIV infection (55). These CD8+ TFR cells exhibit enhanced expression of IL-10, as well as Tim-3, CD122, and GITR, but reduced expression of perforin compared with conventional CD8+ T cells. Many other markers shown in Table I have not been reported for this subset. CD8+ TFR cell suppression of CD4+ TFH IL-21 production in culture was Tim-3 dependent because addition of anti-Tim3 Ab abrogated the effect. Virus-primed tonsillar CD8+ TFR cells reduced IgG production in coculture >3-fold when compared with IgG production by virus-infected GC B cells alone (55). However, the exact mechanism of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cell–mediated inhibition of Ab production in these studies, whether via cytokine-facilitated suppression or direct cytotoxicity to B cells, was not explored. CD8+ TFR cells are distinguished from CD8+ TAb-supp cells by expression of IL-10.

An additional subset of Ab-downregulating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells has been identified in the setting of murine autoimmunity models and is characterized by the triad of CD44, CD122, and Ly-49 (an MHC-I inhibitory receptor) surface marker expression (56). These cells express ICOSL and PD-1 and are restricted to interaction with Qa-1+CD4+ T cells and protect against autoimmunity (many other markers shown in Table I have not been reported for this subset). Qa-1, a murine homolog of HLA-E, is expressed on activated T and B lymphocytes and dendritic cells and promotes expansion of Ag-specific CD8+ T cells when bound to their TCR (57). Adoptive transfer of Qa-1–restricted effector CD8+ T cells (CD44+CD122+Ly-49+) into Rag2−/− hosts reconstituted with Qa-1+ B and Qa-1+CD4+ T cells inhibits primary autoantibody responses by 10-fold (58). In the setting of rheumatoid arthritis, cellular therapy with Qa-1–restricted effector CD8+ T cells resulted in clearance of autoreactive CD4+Qa-1+ TFH cells, suppression of downstream autoantibody, and amelioration of disease progression (as evidenced by assessment score of limb swelling and erythema) (56). Recently, CXCR5+CD44+CD122+Ly-49+CD8+ TReg were reported to mediate key protection against lethal autoimmunity that is distinct from CD4+ TReg (59). Genetic deletion of TGF-βR and the transcription factor Eomesodermin (Eomes) resulted in enhanced spontaneous GCs in the spleen, increased percentage of GC B cells, increased CD4+ TFH cells, increased anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, and reduced overall survival. These double-KO mice had unaltered CD4+ TFR cells, but significantly decreased quantity of CXCR5+CD44+CD122+Ly-49+CD8+Helios+ TReg, and only adoptive transfer of the latter CD8+ TReg population could rescue the autoimmune phenotype. CD122hiLy-49hiCD8+ T cells from double-KO mice displayed increased effector molecules and markers such as granzyme A, granzyme B, and KLRG-1, consistent with their lower expression of the transcription factor Helios, which is associated with TReg identity. Furthermore, these authors reported that although TGF-βR is critical for expression of the transcription factor Helios and CD8+ TReg development, the transcription factor Eomes regulates the expression of CXCR5 critical for follicular localization and GC regulation. However, both TGF-βR and Eomes contribute to expression of prosurvival Bcl-2 and in vivo CD8+ TReg survival and homeostasis. Interestingly, Choi et al. (60) reported that host mice with a mutation impairing Qa-1 interaction with the CD8+ TCR resulted in robust alloantibody response after full MHC disparate heart transplant and accelerated rejection despite peri-transplant treatment with CTLA-4 Ig, owing to disruption of Qa-1–restricted CD8+ TReg inhibition of CD4+ TFH expansion (61). In contrast, CD8+ TAb-supp cells that also significantly suppress alloantibody production after transplant express KLRG-1 (associated with effector cell function) and mediate Ag-specific Ab suppression, features that distinguish them from KLRG-1–negative, Qa-1–restricted CD8+ TFR cells that downregulate excessive or dysregulated Qa-1+–expressing CD4+ TFH cells (59). Furthermore, although these Qa-1–restricted CD8+ TFR have been reported to eliminate target Qa-1+CD4+ TFH cells in a perforin-dependent manner, their inhibitory effect on Ab production does not occur through direct interaction with B cells. Thus, although Qa-1–restricted CD8+ TFR have capacity to inhibit Ab production, their exclusive targeting of CD4+ TFH cells is decidedly different from B cell helper CXCR5+PD-1hiCD8+ T cells and Ab-suppressor CXCR5+PD-1−CD8+ T cells that exert direct effects on B cells (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets. Distinct mechanisms by which CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets impact humoral immunity. CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets are reported to mediate different effects upon Ab production. Ab-enhancing CXCR5+CD8+ T cells express PD-1, ICOS, CD40L, and cytokines such as IFN-γ and IL-21. In vitro coculture studies suggest that Ab-enhancing CXCR5+CD8+ T cells interact directly with Ab-producing B cells, or synergistically with CD4+ TFH cells, to increase Ab production by Ab-secreting cells (ASC). In contrast, one subset of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that protects against autoimmunity is Qa-1 restricted (CD44+ICOSL+PD-1+CD122+Ly-49+) and exerts cytotoxic killing of autoreactive CD4+ TFH cells, resulting in decreased autoantibody production. Another subset of Ab-suppressor CXCR5+CD8+ T cells (CD44+ICOSL−PD-1−IFN-γ+) is MHC-I restricted and Ag specific and directly mediates killing of allo-primed IgG+ B cells, resulting in reduction of alloantibody production after transplant.

Clinical correlations of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cells

Given the identification of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in a wide array of both clinical diseases and murine models, their potential to serve as indicators of disease severity and/or as useful predictive tools warrants consideration. Table II provides a comprehensive listing of all reports of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cells and their clinical correlations in patients with viral infection, bacterial infection, malignancy, or autoimmune disease or after kidney transplantation. Owing to their unique CD8+ T cell follicular-homing capabilities, several groups have noted a direct correlation between the quantity of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells with the suppression of viral load for viruses known to sequester in lymphoid follicles, such as HIV and SIV (8, 14, 18, 33, 62, 63). CXCR5+CD8+ T cell quantity is increased in HIV-infected patients compared with healthy controls, and their frequency is inversely correlated with HIV viral load (8). In addition, CXCR5+CD8+ T cell quantity has been introduced as an indicator of disease severity because among HIV-infected patients, those with lower frequencies of circulating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells also have lower CD4+ T cell counts (8). None of the aforementioned studies reported concurrent antiviral Ab titers. However, Roider et al. (64) identified a significant positive correlation between the frequency of circulating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells and HIV neutralization by plasma from HIV-infected and antiretroviral therapy naive children who reportedly have higher titers of broadly neutralizing Ab compared with adults. Perinatally infected HIV-positive children exhibit significantly lower CXCR5+CD8+T cell frequencies compared with HIV-negative unexposed children (65).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

Clinical correlations and phenotype of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets

Qiu et al. (66) noted, in a study of 36 patients infected with dengue virus 2, that higher quantity of peripheral blood PD-1+CXCR5+CD8+ T cells correlated with decreased viral load at time of diagnosis. In addition, their quantity was protective for virally mediated kidney injury (a common complication of dengue virus 2 infection), as patients without kidney injury exhibited significantly higher quantities of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells compared with those with kidney injury (66). These results were not correlated with antiviral Ab responses.

In a study of 65 patients hospitalized for bacterial pneumonia, Shen et al. (67) found that quantity of peripheral blood CXCR5+CD8+ T cells correlated with the severity of community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia, noting a nearly 3-fold or greater increase in circulating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells during community-acquired and hospital-acquired pneumonia exacerbations, respectively, compared with patients with controlled disease. Furthermore, in assessing the diagnostic correlation associated with monitoring of these cells, the area under the curve for the ratio of CXCR5+CD8+ T/CD8+ T cells was determined to be 0.944 (sensitivity, 90.5%; specificity, 93%), leading the authors to suggest that CXCR5-expressing CD8+ T cell quantity alone can predict exacerbation of community- or hospital-acquired pneumonia (67). This direct correlation with disease severity suggests a deleterious proinflammatory immunity or an inhibitory impact of these cells on protective immunity. However, the correlation of CXCR5+CD8+ T cell quantity with the strength of humoral immunity to specific pathogens was not assessed in these studies.

The prevalence and phenotypic characteristics of CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets also correlate with patient outcomes in nonviral disease states, such as with malignancy. In patients with HCC, a high percentage of tumor-infiltrating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells correlated with a lower risk of early recurrence (within 3 y) and metastasis (23). Interestingly, Ye et al. (23) also noted a colocalization of IL-21+CXCR5+CD8+ T cells and CD19+ B cells in some patients and a positive correlation between the frequency of tumor-infiltrating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells and tumor-infiltrating CD19+ B cells. Furthermore, coculture of tumor-infiltrating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells with autologous CD19+ B cells resulted in significantly higher in vitro IgG production than coculture of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells and B cells from healthy donors. The frequency of tumor-infiltrating CD138+ plasmablasts in these HCC patients also positively correlated with overall and disease-free survival. However, these authors did not investigate tumor Ag-specific Ab production in these patients.

In a study of 12 patients with pancreatic cancer, high quantities of tumor-infiltrating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells (at the time of tumor resection) correlated with prolonged disease-free survival time (68). CXCR5+CD8+ T cells are a small population of total CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of healthy controls (0.4–5.0%). However, in pancreatic cancer patients, circulating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells were significantly increased and comprised 7–21% of total peripheral CD8+ T cells. Furthermore, CXCR5+CD8+ T cells comprised more than 50% of total CD8+ T cells in pancreatic tumor specimens. CXCR5+CD8+ T cells were PD-1+Tim-3+ and mediated higher in vitro cytotoxicity to target cells compared with CXCR5−CD8+ T cells. Interestingly, these investigators used autologous human B cells as targets in these in vitro cytotoxicity assays, which are analogous to the CD8/B cell cytotoxicity assays used in our murine studies to investigate CD8+Ab-supp T cell–mediated B cell killing.

In patients with bladder cancer, high quantities of tumor-infiltrating CXCR5+CD8+ T cells also correlated with higher overall and disease-free survival (69). In another study involving 44 patients with stage II colorectal cancer, patients with high quantity of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in tumors or tumor-draining lymph node and patients with high IFN-γ, perforin, and granzyme B expression by tumor CXCR5+CD8+ T cells exhibited significantly longer disease-free survival (22). Taken together, these studies highlight an important positive correlation between quantity of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells detected in tumors and/or tumor-draining lymph nodes with enhanced tumor immunity and raise the potential for including quantitative assessment of tumor-infiltration by CXCR5+CD8+ T cells as an additional prognostic tool for some malignancies. More studies are warranted to investigate the cellular and humoral immune mechanism(s) associated with these improved clinical outcomes.

One study investigated CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in human follicular lymphoma, a non–Hodgkin lymphoma that arises from malignant GC B cells (70). The authors found that CXCR5+CD8+ T cells were more abundant in follicular lymphoma compared with normal human tonsillar tissue. Coculture of autologous flow–sorted CXCR5+CD8+ T cells (expanded in vitro with anti-CD3/CD28, TGF-β, and IL-23) with autologous follicular lymphoma tumor cells (activated with soluble CD40L and IL-4) revealed in vitro tumor killing. They also determined that autologous CXCR5+CD8+ T cells suppressed CD4+ TFH–mediated differentiation of CD38+CD19+ plasmablasts (stimulated with staphylococcal enterotoxin B) in a cell contact–independent mechanism. Thus, although Chu et al. (70) focused on CXCR5+CD8+ T cell–mediated cytotoxic killing of tumor cells, these tumor cells were malignant GC B cells and are consistent with the CD8+ TAb-supp cells that our group has reported have the functional capacity to kill alloprimed B cells and reduce alloantibody production after transplant in mice (51).

A recent study reported the critical roles of TFG-βR and transcription factor Eomes on development, homeostasis, and survival of Ly-49+CD122hiCXCR5+CD8+ TReg that control GC reactions and mediate protection against lethal autoimmunity in mice. These authors also analyzed PBMCs from patients with the autoimmune disease systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and found that SLE patients compared with healthy controls had reduced quantity of CD158e+CD8+ T cells with reduced expression of Helios, a key TReg-associated transcription actor. Corresponding autoantibody titers in these SLE patients were not reported (59). The CD158 gene family encodes killer cell Ig-like receptors (KIR). In these studies, CD158e+CD8+ T cells were analyzed based on their presumed similarity to human CD122hiKIR+Eomes+CD8+ T cells described in other studies (71) and resemblance to murine anti-autoimmune Qa-1–restricted Ly-49+CD122hiCD8+ T cells.

In a prospective study of 95 first-time kidney transplant recipients, our group demonstrated an inverse association between the quantity of peripheral blood CXCR5+CD8+ T cells (and CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells) and risk for development of de novo DSA after transplant. Transplant recipients who developed de novo DSA exhibited 2-fold lower quantity of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells (and CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells) both pretransplant as well as posttransplant compared with recipients who did not develop DSA. Furthermore, pretransplant quantity of CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells <3,300 per million PBMCs was highly associated with the development of de novo DSA (area under the curve, 0.81; sensitivity, 93%; specificity, 62%) (53). This pretransplant immune assessment suggests that prospective kidney transplant recipients could be stratified into groups that are low or high risk for de novo DSA production. This is the only prospective study reporting a direct correlation between the quantity of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cells with in vivo Ab responses.

Although the clinical utility of monitoring CXCR5+CD8+ T cells is promising, several potential barriers exist to their routine use in assessing clinical disease or for their development as a cellular therapy. First, the relatively low percentage of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells, comprising 1.9% of all PBMCs in healthy individuals (32) and ranging from <1% of all PBMC (22, 37) to 5% of CD3+ T cells even in active disease (68, 72), renders the isolation, consistent quantification, and characterization of these cells challenging. Second, although expression of CXCR5 differentiates a subset of effector CD8+ T cells in various models and diseases, its expression in PBLs may fluctuate over time as CXCR5+CD8+ T cells traffic in and out of the circulation from their functional niches in lymphoid follicles and other sites. More research is needed to understand how the quantity of peripheral blood CXCR5+CD8+ T cells correlates with their quantity and differentiated phenotype in lymphoid depots or other tissues. Third, the marked phenotypic heterogeneity of CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets, as highlighted in this review, further complicates the categorization and separation of disease related CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets by effector (including regulatory) functions. Finally, factors that contribute to expansion of the various CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets (in vivo or in vitro) require further investigation. Despite these and other challenges ahead, significant potential exists to enhance existing knowledge and to develop the prognostic and therapeutic potential of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells. Promising results from murine models in which CXCR5+CD8+ T cells tested as a cellular therapy reduced autoantibody (56, 58) or alloantibody (50, 51) levels and associated Ab-mediated tissue damage encourage the clinical translation of these studies. This review highlights the need for further studies to elucidate the biology of this newly emerging subset, including its role in modulating Ab responses in a variety of clinical conditions, including transplantation.

Conclusions

Emerging interest in immune properties of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells has led to investigation of their role in a variety of experimental and clinical settings in the past few years. These cells, owing to their follicular-homing capabilities unique among known CD8+ T cell subsets, participate in a wide variety of functions in lymphoid-associated viral, tumor, and auto- and alloimmune disease processes. CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets in some studies have been reported to enhance Ab production, whereas in others have been reported to downregulate Ab production. It is likely then that phenotypic and functional differentiation of distinct CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets account for these differences. It remains to be determined how the diverse phenotypes and effector functions reported to date for CXCR5+CD8+ T cells correlate with their lineage, differentiation, and plasticity. Knowledge gained from these future studies is critical to refine the application of CXCR5+CD8+ T cell subsets for potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic purposes.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

BioRender was used to generate (Fig. 1.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by The Ohio State University, Department of Surgery; Division of Transplant Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, The Ohio State University College of Medicine; and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health Grant AI139913. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

  • Abbreviations used in this article

    DSA
    donor-specific Ab
    Eomes
    Eomesodermin
    GC
    germinal center
    HCC
    hepatocellular carcinoma
    KIR
    killer cell Ig-like receptor
    KO
    knockout
    LCMV
    lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus
    MHC-I
    MHC class I
    SLE
    systemic lupus erythematosus
    TAb-supp
    T Ab-suppressor
    Tc1
    cytotoxic type 1 CD8+ T
    TFH
    T follicular helper
    TFR
    T follicular regulatory
    TReg
    T regulatory cell

  • Received February 1, 2021.
  • Accepted March 29, 2021.
  • Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Amancha P. K.
    2. C. G.Ackerley
    3. C.Duphare
    4. M.Lee
    5. Y. J.Hu
    6. R. R.Amara
    7. C. F.Kelley
    . 2019. Distribution of functional CD4 and CD8 T cell subsets in blood and rectal mucosal tissues. [Published erratum appears in 2020 Sci. Rep. 10: 10096.] Sci. Rep. 9: 6951.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chang S. Y.
    2. J. H.Song
    3. B.Guleng
    4. C. A.Cotoner
    5. S.Arihiro
    6. Y.Zhao
    7. H. S.Chiang
    8. M.O’Keeffe
    9. G.Liao
    10. C. L.Karp, et al.
    2013. Circulatory antigen processing by mucosal dendritic cells controls CD8(+) T cell activation. Immunity 38: 153–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Visekruna A.
    2. J.Ritter
    3. T.Scholz
    4. L.Campos
    5. A.Guralnik
    6. L.Poncette
    7. H.Raifer
    8. S.Hagner
    9. H.Garn
    10. V.Staudt, et al.
    2013. Tc9 cells, a new subset of CD8(+) T cells, support Th2-mediated airway inflammation. Eur. J. Immunol. 43: 606–618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Lu Y.
    2. B.Hong
    3. H.Li
    4. Y.Zheng
    5. M.Zhang
    6. S.Wang
    7. J.Qian
    8. Q.Yi
    . 2014. Tumor-specific IL-9-producing CD8+ Tc9 cells are superior effector than type-I cytotoxic Tc1 cells for adoptive immunotherapy of cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 2265–2270.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Mittrücker H. W.
    2. A.Visekruna
    3. M.Huber
    . 2014. Heterogeneity in the differentiation and function of CD8+ T cells. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. (Warsz.) 62: 449–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    1. Annunziato F.
    2. C.Romagnani
    3. S.Romagnani
    . 2015. The 3 major types of innate and adaptive cell-mediated effector immunity. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 135: 626–635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. Fousteri G.
    2. M.Kuka
    . 2020. The elusive identity of CXCR5+ CD8 T cells in viral infection and autoimmunity: cytotoxic, regulatory, or helper cells? Mol. Immunol. 119: 101–105.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.↵
    1. Jiao Y. M.
    2. H. G.Yang
    3. H. H.Huang
    4. B.Tu
    5. S. J.Xing
    6. L.Mao
    7. W.Xia
    8. R.He
    9. J. Y.Zhang
    10. R. N.Xu, et al.
    2017. Dichotomous roles of programmed cell death 1 on HIV-specific CXCR5+ and CXCR5- CD8+ T cells during chronic HIV infection. Front. Immunol. 8: 1786.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.
    1. Leong Y. A.
    2. Y.Chen
    3. H. S.Ong
    4. D.Wu
    5. K.Man
    6. C.Deleage
    7. M.Minnich
    8. B. J.Meckiff
    9. Y.Wei
    10. Z.Hou, et al.
    2016. CXCR5(+) follicular cytotoxic T cells control viral infection in B cell follicles. Nat. Immunol. 17: 1187–1196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.
    1. Yang H. G.
    2. Y. M.Jiao
    3. H. H.Huang
    4. C.Zhang
    5. J. Y.Zhang
    6. R. N.Xu
    7. J. W.Song
    8. X.Fan
    9. L.Jin
    10. M.Shi
    11. F. S.Wang
    . 2020. Transforming growth factor-β promotes the function of HIV-specific CXCR5+ CD8 T cells. Microbiol. Immunol. 64: 458–468.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.
    1. Velu V.
    2. G.Mylvaganam
    3. C.Ibegbu
    4. R. R.Amara
    . 2018. Tfh1 cells in germinal centers during chronic HIV/SIV infection. Front. Immunol. 9: 1272.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.
    1. Perdomo-Celis F.
    2. M. G.Feria
    3. N. A.Taborda
    4. M. T.Rugeles
    . 2019. Induction of follicular-like CXCR5+ CD8+ T cells by TGF-β1/IL-23 is limited during HIV infection. Viral Immunol. 32: 278–288.
    OpenUrl
  13. 13.
    1. Reuter M. A.
    2. P. M.Del Rio Estrada
    3. M.Buggert
    4. C.Petrovas
    5. S.Ferrando-Martinez
    6. S.Nguyen
    7. A.Sada Japp
    8. Y.Ablanedo-Terrazas
    9. A.Rivero-Arrieta
    10. L.Kuri-Cervantes, et al.
    2017. HIV-specific CD8+ T cells exhibit reduced and differentially regulated cytolytic activity in lymphoid tissue. Cell Rep. 21: 3458–3470.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  14. 14.↵
    1. Starke C. E.
    2. C. L.Vinton
    3. K.Ladell
    4. J. E.McLaren
    5. A. M.Ortiz
    6. J. C.Mudd
    7. J. K.Flynn
    8. S. H.Lai
    9. F.Wu
    10. V. M.Hirsch, et al.
    2020. SIV-specific CD8+ T cells are clonotypically distinct across lymphoid and mucosal tissues. J. Clin. Invest. 130: 789–798.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.
    1. Xiao M.
    2. X.Chen
    3. R.He
    4. L.Ye
    . 2018. Differentiation and function of follicular CD8 T cells during human immunodeficiency virus infection. Front. Immunol. 9: 1095.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.
    1. Mylvaganam G. H.
    2. L. S.Chea
    3. G. K.Tharp
    4. S.Hicks
    5. V.Velu
    6. S. S.Iyer
    7. C.Deleage
    8. J. D.Estes
    9. S. E.Bosinger
    10. G. J.Freeman, et al.
    2018. Combination anti-PD-1 and antiretroviral therapy provides therapeutic benefit against SIV. JCI Insight 3: e122940.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.↵
    1. Mylvaganam G. H.
    2. D.Rios
    3. H. M.Abdelaal
    4. S.Iyer
    5. G.Tharp
    6. M.Mavigner
    7. S.Hicks
    8. A.Chahroudi
    9. R.Ahmed
    10. S. E.Bosinger, et al.
    2017. Dynamics of SIV-specific CXCR5+ CD8 T cells during chronic SIV infection. [Published erratum appears in 2017 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114: E3366.] Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 114: 1976–1981.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    1. He R.
    2. S.Hou
    3. C.Liu
    4. A.Zhang
    5. Q.Bai
    6. M.Han
    7. Y.Yang
    8. G.Wei
    9. T.Shen
    10. X.Yang, et al.
    2016. Follicular CXCR5- expressing CD8(+) T cells curtail chronic viral infection. [Published erratum appears in 2016 Nature 540: 470.] Nature 537: 412–428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.
    1. Im S. J.
    2. B. T.Konieczny
    3. W. H.Hudson
    4. D.Masopust
    5. R.Ahmed
    . 2020. PD-1+ stemlike CD8 T cells are resident in lymphoid tissues during persistent LCMV infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117: 4292–4299.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. 20.↵
    1. Huang Z.
    2. J.Zak
    3. I.Pratumchai
    4. N.Shaabani
    5. V. F.Vartabedian
    6. N.Nguyen
    7. T.Wu
    8. C.Xiao
    9. J. R.Teijaro
    . 2019. IL-27 promotes the expansion of self-renewing CD8+ T cells in persistent viral infection. J. Exp. Med. 216: 1791–1808.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Löfroos A. B.
    2. M.Kadivar
    3. S.Resic Lindehammer
    4. J.Marsal
    . 2017. Colorectal cancer-infiltrating T lymphocytes display a distinct chemokine receptor expression profile. Eur. J. Med. Res. 22: 40.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    1. E J.
    2. F.Yan
    3. Z.Kang
    4. L.Zhu
    5. J.Xing
    6. E.Yu
    . 2018. CD8 + CXCR5 + T cells in tumor-draining lymph nodes are highly activated and predict better prognosis in colorectal cancer. Human Immunol. 79: 446–452.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    1. Ye L.
    2. Y.Li
    3. H.Tang
    4. W.Liu
    5. Y.Chen
    6. T.Dai
    7. R.Liang
    8. M.Shi
    9. S.Yi
    10. G.Chen
    11. Y.Yang
    . 2019. CD8+CXCR5+T cells infiltrating hepatocellular carcinomas are activated and predictive of a better prognosis. Aging (Albany NY) 11: 8879–8891.
    OpenUrl
  24. 24.↵
    1. Jin Y.
    2. C.Lang
    3. J.Tang
    4. J.Geng
    5. H. K.Song
    6. Z.Sun
    7. J.Wang
    . 2017. CXCR5+CD8+ T cells could induce the death of tumor cells in HBV-related hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. Immunopharmacol. 53: 42–48.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Perdomo-Celis F.
    2. N. A.Taborda
    3. M. T.Rugeles
    . 2017. Follicular CD8+ T cells: origin, function and importance during HIV infection. Front. Immunol. 8: 1241.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.
    1. Yu D.
    2. L.Ye
    . 2018. A portrait of CXCR5+ follicular cytotoxic CD8+ T cells. Trends Immunol. 39: 965–979.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.↵
    1. Valentine K. M.
    2. K. K.Hoyer
    . 2019. CXCR5+ CD8 T cells: protective or pathogenic? Front. Immunol. 10: 1322.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.↵
    1. Breitfeld D.
    2. L.Ohl
    3. E.Kremmer
    4. J.Ellwart
    5. F.Sallusto
    6. M.Lipp
    7. R.Förster
    . 2000. Follicular B helper T cells express CXC chemokine receptor 5, localize to B cell follicles, and support immunoglobulin production. J. Exp. Med. 192: 1545–1552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. 29.↵
    1. Schaerli P.
    2. K.Willimann
    3. A. B.Lang
    4. M.Lipp
    5. P.Loetscher
    6. B.Moser
    . 2000. CXC chemokine receptor 5 expression defines follicular homing T cells with B cell helper function. J. Exp. Med. 192: 1553–1562.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    1. Shan Q.
    2. Z.Zeng
    3. S.Xing
    4. F.Li
    5. S. M.Hartwig
    6. J. A.Gullicksrud
    7. S. P.Kurup
    8. N.Van Braeckel-Budimir
    9. Y.Su
    10. M. D.Martin, et al.
    2017. The transcription factor Runx3 guards cytotoxic CD8+ effector T cells against deviation towards follicular helper T cell lineage. Nat. Immunol. 18: 931–939.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    1. Chen Y.
    2. M.Yu
    3. Y.Zheng
    4. G.Fu
    5. G.Xin
    6. W.Zhu
    7. L.Luo
    8. R.Burns
    9. Q. Z.Li
    10. A. L.Dent, et al.
    2019. CXCR5+PD-1+ follicular helper CD8 T cells control B cell tolerance. Nat. Commun. 10: 4415.
    OpenUrl
  32. 32.↵
    1. Quigley M. F.
    2. V. D.Gonzalez
    3. A.Granath
    4. J.Andersson
    5. J. K.Sandberg
    . 2007. CXCR5+ CCR7- CD8 T cells are early effector memory cells that infiltrate tonsil B cell follicles. Eur. J. Immunol. 37: 3352–3362.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.↵
    1. Li Y.
    2. L.Tang
    3. L.Guo
    4. C.Chen
    5. S.Gu
    6. Y.Zhou
    7. G.Ye
    8. X.Li
    9. W.Wang
    10. X.Liao, et al.
    2020. CXCL13-mediated recruitment of intrahepatic CXCR5+CD8+ T cells favors viral control in chronic HBV infection. J. Hepatol. 72: 420–430.
    OpenUrl
  34. 34.↵
    1. Le K. S.
    2. P.Amé-Thomas
    3. K.Tarte
    4. F.Gondois-Rey
    5. S.Granjeaud
    6. F.Orlanducci
    7. E. D.Foucher
    8. F.Broussais
    9. R.Bouabdallah
    10. T.Fest, et al.
    2018. CXCR5 and ICOS expression identifies a CD8 T-cell subset with TFH features in Hodgkin lymphomas. Blood Adv. 2: 1889–1900.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    1. Xiao L.
    2. L.Jia
    3. L.Bai
    4. L.He
    5. B.Yang
    6. C.Wu
    7. H.Li
    . 2016. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of IL-21-expressing CD8(+) T cells in human nasal polyps. Sci. Rep. 6: 30362.
    OpenUrl
  36. 36.↵
    1. Shen J.
    2. X.Luo
    3. Q.Wu
    4. J.Huang
    5. G.Xiao
    6. L.Wang
    7. B.Yang
    8. H.Li
    9. C.Wu
    . 2018. A subset of CXCR5+CD8+ T cells in the germinal centers from human tonsils and lymph nodes help B cells produce immunoglobulins. Front. Immunol. 9: 2287.
    OpenUrl
  37. 37.↵
    1. Xing J.
    2. C.Zhang
    3. X.Yang
    4. S.Wang
    5. Z.Wang
    6. X.Li
    7. E.Yu
    . 2017. CXCR5+CD8+ T cells infiltrate the colorectal tumors and nearby lymph nodes, and are associated with enhanced IgG response in B cells. Exp. Cell Res. 356: 57–63.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    1. Valentine K. M.
    2. D.Davini
    3. T. J.Lawrence
    4. G. N.Mullins
    5. M.Manansala
    6. M.Al-Kuhlani
    7. J. M.Pinney
    8. J. K.Davis
    9. A. E.Beaudin
    10. S. S.Sindi, et al.
    2018. CD8 follicular T cells promote B cell antibody class switch in autoimmune disease. J. Immunol. 201: 31–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. 39.↵
    1. Jiang H.
    2. L.Li
    3. J.Han
    4. Z.Sun
    5. Y.Rong
    6. Y.Jin
    . 2017. CXCR5+ CD8+ T cells indirectly offer B cell help and are inversely correlated with viral load in chronic hepatitis B infection. DNA Cell Biol. 36: 321–327.
    OpenUrl
  40. 40.↵
    1. Agematsu K.
    2. T.Kobata
    3. F. C.Yang
    4. T.Nakazawa
    5. K.Fukushima
    6. M.Kitahara
    7. T.Mori
    8. K.Sugita
    9. C.Morimoto
    10. A.Komiyama
    . 1995. CD27/CD70 interaction directly drives B cell IgG and IgM synthesis. Eur. J. Immunol. 25: 2825–2829.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. 41.↵
    1. Stüber E.
    2. W.Strober
    . 1996. The T cell-B cell interaction via OX40-OX40L is necessary for the T cell-dependent humoral immune response. J. Exp. Med. 183: 979–989.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. 42.↵
    1. Wikenheiser D. J.
    2. J. S.Stumhofer
    . 2016. ICOS co-stimulation: friend or foe? Front. Immunol. 7: 304.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.↵
    1. Yu Y.
    2. X.Ma
    3. R.Gong
    4. J.Zhu
    5. L.Wei
    6. J.Yao
    . 2018. Recent advances in CD8+ regulatory T cell research. Oncol. Lett. 15: 8187–8194.
    OpenUrl
  44. 44.↵
    1. Agle K.
    2. B. G.Vincent
    3. C.Piper
    4. L.Belle
    5. V.Zhou
    6. W.Shlomchik
    7. J. S.Serody
    8. W. R.Drobyski
    . 2018. Bim regulates the survival and suppressive capability of CD8+ FOXP3+ regulatory T cells during murine GVHD. Blood 132: 435–447.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. 45.
    1. Churlaud G.
    2. F.Pitoiset
    3. F.Jebbawi
    4. R.Lorenzon
    5. B.Bellier
    6. M.Rosenzwajg
    7. D.Klatzmann
    . 2015. Human and mouse CD8(+)CD25(+)FOXP3(+) regulatory T cells at steady state and during interleukin-2 therapy. Front. Immunol. 6: 171.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. 46.
    1. Elizondo D. M.
    2. T. E.Andargie
    3. N. L.Haddock
    4. R. L. L.da Silva
    5. T. R.de Moura
    6. M. W.Lipscomb
    . 2019. IL-10 producing CD8+ CD122+ PD-1+ regulatory T cells are expanded by dendritic cells silenced for allograft inflammatory factor-1. J. Leukoc. Biol. 105: 123–130.
    OpenUrl
  47. 47.
    1. Barbon C. M.
    2. J. K.Davies
    3. A.Voskertchian
    4. R. H.Kelner
    5. L. L.Brennan
    6. L. M.Nadler
    7. E. C.Guinan
    . 2014. Alloanergization of human T cells results in expansion of alloantigen-specific CD8(+) CD28(-) suppressor cells. Am. J. Transplant. 14: 305–318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. 48.
    1. Vuddamalay Y.
    2. M.Attia
    3. R.Vicente
    4. C.Pomié
    5. G.Enault
    6. B.Leobon
    7. O.Joffre
    8. P.Romagnoli
    9. J. P.van Meerwijk
    . 2016. Mouse and human CD8(+) CD28(low) regulatory T lymphocytes differentiate in the thymus. Immunology 148: 187–196.
    OpenUrl
  49. 49.↵
    1. Uss E.
    2. A. T.Rowshani
    3. B.Hooibrink
    4. N. M.Lardy
    5. R. A.van Lier
    6. I. J.ten Berge
    . 2006. CD103 is a marker for alloantigen-induced regulatory CD8+ T cells. J. Immunol. 177: 2775–2783.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. 50.↵
    1. Han J. L.
    2. J. M.Zimmerer
    3. Q.Zeng
    4. B. A.Ringwald
    5. C.Cassol
    6. R. T.Warren
    7. M.Abdel-Rasoul
    8. C. K.Breuer
    9. G. L.Bumgardner
    . 2020. Antibody-suppressor CD8+ T cells ameliorate antibody-mediated rejection following kidney transplant in mice. J. Immunol. 204: 87.16.
    OpenUrl
  51. 51.↵
    1. Zimmerer J. M.
    2. B. A.Ringwald
    3. S. M.Elzein
    4. C. L.Avila
    5. R. T.Warren
    6. M.Abdel-Rasoul
    7. G. L.Bumgardner
    . 2019. Antibody-suppressor CD8+ T cells require CXCR5. Transplantation 103: 1809–1820.
    OpenUrl
  52. 52.↵
    1. Zimmerer J. M.
    2. T. A.Pham
    3. C. L.Wright
    4. K. J.Tobin
    5. P. B.Sanghavi
    6. S. M.Elzein
    7. V. M.Sanders
    8. G. L.Bumgardner
    . 2014. Alloprimed CD8(+) T cells regulate alloantibody and eliminate alloprimed B cells through perforin- and FasL-dependent mechanisms. Am. J. Transplant. 14: 295–304.
    OpenUrl
  53. 53.↵
    1. Zimmerer J. M.
    2. M. W.Basinger
    3. B. A.Ringwald
    4. M.Abdel-Rasoul
    5. R. P.Pelletier
    6. A.Rajab
    7. A.El-Hinnawi
    8. H.Parekh
    9. K.Washburn
    10. G. L.Bumgardner
    . 2020. Inverse association between the quantity of human peripheral blood CXCR5+IFN-γ+CD8+ T cells with de novo DSA production in the first year after kidney transplant. Transplantation 104: 2424–2434.
    OpenUrl
  54. 54.↵
    1. Zimmerer J. M.
    2. T. A.Pham
    3. V. M.Sanders
    4. G. L.Bumgardner
    . 2010. CD8+ T cells negatively regulate IL-4-dependent, IgG1-dominant posttransplant alloantibody production. J. Immunol. 185: 7285–7292.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. 55.↵
    1. Miles B.
    2. S. M.Miller
    3. J. M.Folkvord
    4. D. N.Levy
    5. E. G.Rakasz
    6. P. J.Skinner
    7. E.Connick
    . 2016. Follicular regulatory CD8 T cells impair the germinal center response in SIV and ex vivo HIV infection. PLoS Pathog. 12: e1005924.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  56. 56.↵
    1. Leavenworth J. W.
    2. X.Tang
    3. H. J.Kim
    4. X.Wang
    5. H.Cantor
    . 2013. Amelioration of arthritis through mobilization of peptide-specific CD8+ regulatory T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 123: 1382–1389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. 57.↵
    1. Kim H. J.
    2. H.Cantor
    . 2011. Regulation of self-tolerance by Qa-1-restricted CD8(+) regulatory T cells. Semin. Immunol. 23: 446–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. 58.↵
    1. Kim H. J.
    2. B.Verbinnen
    3. X.Tang
    4. L.Lu
    5. H.Cantor
    . 2010. Inhibition of follicular T-helper cells by CD8(+) regulatory T cells is essential for self tolerance. Nature 467: 328–332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. 59.↵
    1. Mishra S.
    2. W.Liao
    3. Y.Liu
    4. M.Yang
    5. C.Ma
    6. H.Wu
    7. M.Zhao
    8. X.Zhang
    9. Y.Qiu
    10. Q.Lu
    11. N.Zhang
    . 2021. TGF-β and Eomes control the homeostasis of CD8+ regulatory T cells. J. Exp. Med. 218: e20200030.
    OpenUrl
  60. 60.↵
    1. Choi J. Y.
    2. S. K.Eskandari
    3. S.Cai
    4. I.Sulkaj
    5. J. P.Assaker
    6. H.Allos
    7. J.AlHaddad
    8. S. A.Muhsin
    9. E.Alhussain
    10. A.Mansouri, et al.
    2020. Regulatory CD8 T cells that recognize Qa-1 expressed by CD4 T-helper cells inhibit rejection of heart allografts. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117: 6042–6046.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. 61.↵
    1. Lu L.
    2. H. J.Kim
    3. M. B.Werneck
    4. H.Cantor
    . 2008. Regulation of CD8+ regulatory T cells: Interruption of the NKG2A-Qa-1 interaction allows robust suppressive activity and resolution of autoimmune disease. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 19420–19425.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. 62.↵
    1. Connick E.
    2. J. M.Folkvord
    3. K. T.Lind
    4. E. G.Rakasz
    5. B.Miles
    6. N. A.Wilson
    7. M. L.Santiago
    8. K.Schmitt
    9. E. B.Stephens
    10. H. O.Kim, et al.
    2014. Compartmentalization of simian immunodeficiency virus replication within secondary lymphoid tissues of rhesus macaques is linked to disease stage and inversely related to localization of virus-specific CTL. J. Immunol. 193: 5613–5625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. 63.↵
    1. Perdomo-Celis F.
    2. N. A.Taborda
    3. M. T.Rugeles
    . 2018. Circulating CXCR5-expressing CD8+ T-cells are major producers of IL-21 and associate with limited HIV replication. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 78: 473–482.
    OpenUrl
  64. 64.↵
    1. Roider J.
    2. T.Maehara
    3. A.Ngoepe
    4. D.Ramsuran
    5. M.Muenchhoff
    6. E.Adland
    7. T.Aicher
    8. S. W.Kazer
    9. P.Jooste
    10. F.Karim, et al.
    2018. High-frequency, functional HIV-specific T-follicular helper and regulatory cells are present within germinal centers in children but not adults. Front. Immunol. 9: 1975.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  65. 65.↵
    1. McCarty B.
    2. M.Mwamzuka
    3. F.Marshed
    4. M.Generoso
    5. P.Alvarez
    6. T.Ilmet
    7. A.Kravietz
    8. A.Ahmed
    9. W.Borkowsky
    10. D.Unutmaz
    11. A.Khaitan
    . 2018. Low peripheral T follicular helper cells in perinatally HIV-infected children correlate with advancing HIV disease. Front. Immunol. 9: 1901.
    OpenUrl
  66. 66.↵
    1. Qiu L.
    2. H.Wang
    3. Q.Yu
    4. J.Liu
    5. S.Chen
    6. Z.Zhao
    . 2019. Protective role of follicular CXCR5+CD8+ T cells against dengue virus 2 infection. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 83: 12–19.
    OpenUrl
  67. 67.↵
    1. Shen Y.
    2. Q. X.Qu
    3. M. N.Jin
    4. C.Chen
    . 2019. Investigating the role of circulating CXCR5-expressing CD8+ T-cells as a biomarker for bacterial infection in subjects with pneumonia. Respir. Res. 20: 54.
    OpenUrl
  68. 68.↵
    1. Bai M.
    2. Y.Zheng
    3. H.Liu
    4. B.Su
    5. Y.Zhan
    6. H.He
    . 2017. CXCR5+ CD8+ T cells potently infiltrate pancreatic tumors and present high functionality. Exp. Cell Res. 361: 39–45.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  69. 69.↵
    1. Huang Q.
    2. Q.Zhou
    3. H.Zhang
    4. Z.Liu
    5. H.Zeng
    6. Y.Chen
    7. Y.Qu
    8. Y.Xiong
    9. J.Wang
    10. Y.Chang, et al.
    2020. Identification and validation of an excellent prognosis subtype of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients with intratumoral CXCR5+ CD8+ T cell abundance. OncoImmunology 9: 1810489.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  70. 70.↵
    1. Chu F.
    2. H. S.Li
    3. X.Liu
    4. J.Cao
    5. W.Ma
    6. Y.Ma
    7. J.Weng
    8. Z.Zhu
    9. X.Cheng
    10. Z.Wang, et al.
    2019. CXCR5+CD8+ T cells are a distinct functional subset with an antitumor activity. Leukemia 33: 2640–2653.
    OpenUrl
  71. 71.↵
    1. Jacomet F.
    2. E.Cayssials
    3. S.Basbous
    4. A.Levescot
    5. N.Piccirilli
    6. D.Desmier
    7. A.Robin
    8. A.Barra
    9. C.Giraud
    10. F.Guilhot, et al.
    2015. Evidence for eomesodermin-expressing innate-like CD8(+) KIR/NKG2A(+) T cells in human adults and cord blood samples. Eur. J. Immunol. 45: 1926–1933.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. 72.↵
    1. Xing J.
    2. X.Li
    3. J.E
    4. C.Wang
    5. H.Wang
    . 2020. Inverse relationship between CD40L expression and cytolytic molecule expression by CD8 + CXCR5 + T follicular cytotoxic cells in colorectal cancer. Exp. Cell Res. 389: 111892.
    OpenUrl
  73. 73.
    1. Im S. J.
    2. M.Hashimoto
    3. M. Y.Gerner
    4. J.Lee
    5. H. T.Kissick
    6. M. C.Burger
    7. Q.Shan
    8. J. S.Hale
    9. J.Lee
    10. T. H.Nasti, et al.
    2016. Defining CD8+ T cells that provide the proliferative burst after PD-1 therapy. Nature 537: 417–421.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  74. 74.
    1. Brummelman J.
    2. E. M. C.Mazza
    3. G.Alvisi
    4. F. S.Colombo
    5. A.Grilli
    6. J.Mikulak
    7. D.Mavilio
    8. M.Alloisio
    9. F.Ferrari
    10. E.Lopci, et al.
    2018. High-dimensional single cell analysis identifies stem-like cytotoxic CD8+ T cells infiltrating human tumors. J. Exp. Med. 215: 2520–2535.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  75. 75.
    1. Chatterjee B.
    2. Y.Deng
    3. A.Holler
    4. N.Nunez
    5. T.Azzi
    6. L. D.Vanoaica
    7. A.Müller
    8. H.Zdimerova
    9. O.Antsiferova
    10. A.Zbinden, et al.
    2019. CD8+ T cells retain protective functions despite sustained inhibitory receptor expression during Epstein-Barr virus infection in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 15: e1007748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. 76.
    1. Zhou Y.
    2. L.Guo
    3. H.Sun
    4. J.Xu
    5. T.Ba
    . 2018. CXCR5+ CD8 T cells displayed higher activation potential despite high PD-1 expression, in tumor-involved lymph nodes from patients with thyroid cancer. Int. Immunopharmacol. 62: 114–119.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  77. 77.
    1. Ma Q. Y.
    2. J.Chen
    3. J.Zhao
    . 2020. Follicular cytotoxic CD8 T cells present high cytokine expression, and are more susceptible to Breg-mediated suppression in non-small cell lung cancer. Immunol. Res. 68: 54–62.
    OpenUrl
  78. 78.
    1. Tang J.
    2. J.Zha
    3. X.Guo
    4. P.Shi
    5. B.Xu
    . 2017. CXCR5+CD8+ T cells present elevated capacity in mediating cytotoxicity toward autologous tumor cells through interleukin 10 in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Int. Immunopharmacol. 50: 146–151.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 206 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 206, Issue 12
15 Jun 2021
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
CXCR5+CD8+ T Cells: A Review of Their Antibody Regulatory Functions and Clinical Correlations
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
CXCR5+CD8+ T Cells: A Review of Their Antibody Regulatory Functions and Clinical Correlations
Steven M. Elzein, Jason M. Zimmerer, Jing L. Han, Bryce A. Ringwald, Ginny L. Bumgardner
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2021, 206 (12) 2775-2783; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100082

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
CXCR5+CD8+ T Cells: A Review of Their Antibody Regulatory Functions and Clinical Correlations
Steven M. Elzein, Jason M. Zimmerer, Jing L. Han, Bryce A. Ringwald, Ginny L. Bumgardner
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2021, 206 (12) 2775-2783; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100082
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that enhance Ab production
    • CXCR5+CD8+ T cells that mediate downregulation of Ab production
    • Clinical correlations of human CXCR5+CD8+ T cells
    • Conclusions
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Dietary Cholesterol Metabolite Regulation of Tissue Immune Cell Development and Function
  • γδ T, NKT, and MAIT Cells During Evolution: Redundancy or Specialized Functions?
  • Innate and Innate-like Effector Lymphocytes in Health and Disease
Show more BRIEF REVIEWS

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606