Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Unmasking the Mysteries of MYC

Rajeev M. Nepal and Alberto Martin
J Immunol May 1, 2019, 202 (9) 2517-2518; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1900186
Rajeev M. Nepal
*Pfizer Canada, Kirkland, Quebec H9J 2M5, Canada; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alberto Martin
†Department of Immunology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

In the early 1980s, when the oncogenic potential of MYC was established, the scientific community was somewhat perplexed (1). Contrary to other oncogenes known at the time, such as HRAS, which induced neoplasia only if it harbored mutations in the open reading frame, MYC-induced neoplastic transformation was possible from the activation of a nonmutated form (1). Chromosomal translocation into the IgH locus is one mechanism by which MYC is overexpressed to cause cancer and is present in virtually all cases of Burkitt lymphoma in humans and plasmacytomas in rodents (2). Another important and unexpected discovery in the early 1980s was the detection of transcriptional enhancers, first in the genome of the SV40 virus and subsequently in IgH (3). Indeed, the landmark paper published by Jerry Adams and colleagues (4) modeled the Burkitt lymphoma chromosomal translocation by creating the Eμ-myc mice, which involved coupling the MYC gene to the IgH enhancer (this article is available at https://www.nature.com/articles/318533a0). This transgene converted MYC into a potent oncogene in vivo and predisposed the Eμ-myc mice to B lymphoid lymphoma/leukemia with 100% penetrance (4). Ever since, the Eμ-myc mouse model has proven invaluable in establishing causal links between this genetic anomaly and the imbalance in downstream processes involving cellular division, differentiation, and apoptosis, which eventually lead to tumorigenesis.

Eμ-myc mice invariably developed tumors, and these tumors corresponded to different stages of B cell ontogeny, including pre-B, immature B, mature B, or mixed pre-B/immature B (4). The endogenous MYC gene in Eμ-myc tumors is transcriptionally silent, just as in Burkitt lymphoma, likely due to negative feedback regulation by MYC expressed from the translocated allele (4), indicative of tight regulation of MYC in untransformed cells. Further characterization of these mice revealed that most young Eμ-myc mice exhibited a variable period of benign overgrowth of pre–B cells, whereas mature B cells developed in reduced number despite increased cell proliferation (5). Thus, the MYC-induced proliferative potential and the availability of a large pool of rapidly dividing cells likely promoted tumorigenesis (5, 6). This observation was consistent with early studies showing that mitogenic stimulation of cells induced the expression of MYC in a cell cycle–dependent manner (7) and that MYC played a key role in DNA replication (8, 9).

Interestingly, constitutive expression of MYC alone was not sufficient to transform B cells. B cell lymphomas arose in Eμ-myc mice in a stochastic manner between 6 and 83 wk of age (4, 6). In addition, the tumors were mainly monoclonal, but from different stages of B cell development (4). Together, these results suggested that further somatic mutations were required for tumorigenesis and triggered the search for genetic events that cooperate with MYC-induced tumorigenesis in the Eμ-myc murine model.

One hallmark of most, if not all, types of cancers is acquired resistance to apoptosis (10). In the early 1990s, the thinking behind the oncogenic mechanism of MYC changed when its role was extended beyond cellular proliferation and implicated in activation-induced apoptosis (11). This finding explained the early nonlymphomatous state in Eμ-myc mice, in which MYC-induced rapid cellular proliferation was likely offset by MYC-induced apoptosis, thereby protecting Eμ-myc mice from tumor development (4, 12). Subsequent studies showed that deregulated MYC induced apoptosis by activating the tumor suppressor p53 via ARF, which ultimately triggered a cohort of genes involved in apoptosis and cell cycle arrest (13, 14). Hence, it was hypothesized that secondary mutations might allow B cells to circumvent MYC-induced apoptosis, likely resulting in clonal tumors. Indeed, the Eμ-myc murine model was critical in identifying MYC-induced pathways that promote apoptosis (15); more than half of tumors arising in Eμ-myc mice had inactivated the ARF–Mdm2–p53 apoptotic axis (15). Consistent with these findings, Eμ-myc mice heterozygous for p53 or ARF showed accelerated lymphomagenesis (16). However, almost one fourth of the analyzed tumors did not have any conspicuous signs of perturbations in ARF, p53, or Mdm2, implying that multiple pathways were involved (15).

In 1983, Land et al. (17) showed that primary rat embryo fibroblasts only became transformed when MYC was introduced along with RAS, thus pioneering the concept of oncogene cooperation. Based on these results, the Adams Laboratory showed that BCL-2, which, on its own, was weakly transformative, greatly promoted the immortalization of B lineage cells from Eμ-myc mice in vitro (18). Thus, whereas MYC provided cells with proliferative potential, BCL-2 provided cells with a survival capacity, and their synergy promoted lymphocyte tumorigenesis (18). MYC-dependent oncogene cooperation was, for the first time, shown in vivo in 1990 with the creation of doubly transgenic Eμ-bcl-2/myc mice, which developed tumors much faster and more synchronously than their Eμ-myc littermate counterparts, producing tumors with a more primitive lymphoid origin (12). Consistent with these findings, half of high-grade lymphomas arising from single Bcl-2 transgenic mice harbored somatic translocations that activated MYC (19). Subsequent studies showed that apoptosis is controlled by the interplay between proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins. In 2004, Egle et al. (20) reported that in the absence of Bim, which is a major physiological antagonist of Bcl2, Eμ-myc mice showed accelerated MYC-induced lymphomagenesis, the kinetics being similar to the gain of Bcl2 (12). Further characterization revealed that the p53 apoptotic pathway was intact in Bim-deficient Eμ-myc tumors, indicating that loss of apoptosis due to Bim reduction could be an independent alternative to loss of p53 function during tumorigenesis. These studies have collectively helped the clinical development of Bcl2 inhibitors as therapeutic agents of different malignancies (21, 22).

Eμ-myc tumors arise from early stages of B cell development, whereas human Burkitt lymphomas and murine plasmacytomas exclusively arise from germinal center B cells and plasma cells, respectively. In 2008, Mori et al. (23) reported that several forms of B cell tumors are found in Eμ-myc mice. They used previously developed expression signatures of oncogenic pathways to characterize the heterogeneity of Eμ-myc tumors and reported that early-onset and late-onset tumors have gene expression characteristics corresponding to Burkitt lymphomas and diffuse large B cell lymphoma, respectively (23). Together, with results that further dissected the spectrum of tumors, the Eμ-myc mouse model has been used to understand the complexity of the molecular processes of other B cell malignancies and to help develop diagnostics and therapeutics (23).

MYC overexpression occurs in almost half of human tumors and is associated with more clinically aggressive tumors that have a worse prognosis (24). In addition, MYC is estimated to bind to thousands of sites in the human genome (25). Thus, the Eμ-myc model described in this landmark paper (4) has a potential to help identify many other MYC-affected cellular processes in addition to continuing to be a widely appreciated model of MYC-induced transformation and tumorigenesis.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by a grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Grant PJT153307) to A.M.

  • Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Meyer, N.,
    2. L. Z. Penn
    . 2008. Reflecting on 25 years with MYC. Nat. Rev. Cancer 8: 976–990.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Klein, G.,
    2. E. Klein
    . 1985. Myc/Ig juxtaposition by chromosomal translocations: Some new insights, puzzles and paradoxes. Immunol. Today 6: 208–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  3. ↵
    1. Schaffner, W.
    2015. Enhancers, enhancers from their discovery to today’s universe of transcription enhancers. Biol. Chem. 396: 311–327.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. ↵
    1. Adams, J. M.,
    2. A. W. Harris,
    3. C. A. Pinkert,
    4. L. M. Corcoran,
    5. W. S. Alexander,
    6. S. Cory,
    7. R. D. Palmiter,
    8. R. L. Brinster
    . 1985. The c-myc oncogene driven by immunoglobulin enhancers induces lymphoid malignancy in transgenic mice. Nature 318: 533–538.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Langdon, W. Y.,
    2. A. W. Harris,
    3. S. Cory,
    4. J. M. Adams
    . 1986. The c-myc oncogene perturbs B lymphocyte development in E-mu-myc transgenic mice. Cell 47: 11–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Harris, A. W.,
    2. C. A. Pinkert,
    3. M. Crawford,
    4. W. Y. Langdon,
    5. R. L. Brinster,
    6. J. M. Adams
    . 1988. The E mu-myc transgenic mouse. A model for high-incidence spontaneous lymphoma and leukemia of early B cells. J. Exp. Med. 167: 353–371.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Kelly, K.,
    2. B. H. Cochran,
    3. C. D. Stiles,
    4. P. Leder
    . 1983. Cell-specific regulation of the c-myc gene by lymphocyte mitogens and platelet-derived growth factor. Cell 35: 603–610.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Studzinski, G. P.,
    2. Z. S. Brelvi,
    3. S. C. Feldman,
    4. R. A. Watt
    . 1986. Participation of c-myc protein in DNA synthesis of human cells. Science 234: 467–470.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Iguchi-Ariga, S. M.,
    2. T. Itani,
    3. Y. Kiji,
    4. H. Ariga
    . 1987. Possible function of the c-myc product: Promotion of cellular DNA replication. EMBO J. 6: 2365–2371.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Hanahan, D.,
    2. R. A. Weinberg
    . 2000. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 100: 57–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Shi, Y.,
    2. J. M. Glynn,
    3. L. J. Guilbert,
    4. T. G. Cotter,
    5. R. P. Bissonnette,
    6. D. R. Green
    . 1992. Role for c-myc in activation-induced apoptotic cell death in T cell hybridomas. Science 257: 212–214.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Strasser, A.,
    2. A. W. Harris,
    3. M. L. Bath,
    4. S. Cory
    . 1990. Novel primitive lymphoid tumours induced in transgenic mice by cooperation between myc and bcl-2. Nature 348: 331–333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Hermeking, H.,
    2. D. Eick
    . 1994. Mediation of c-Myc-induced apoptosis by p53. Science 265: 2091–2093.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Zindy, F.,
    2. C. M. Eischen,
    3. D. H. Randle,
    4. T. Kamijo,
    5. J. L. Cleveland,
    6. C. J. Sherr,
    7. M. F. Roussel
    . 1998. Myc signaling via the ARF tumor suppressor regulates p53-dependent apoptosis and immortalization. Genes Dev. 12: 2424–2433.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Eischen, C. M.,
    2. J. D. Weber,
    3. M. F. Roussel,
    4. C. J. Sherr,
    5. J. L. Cleveland
    . 1999. Disruption of the ARF-Mdm2-p53 tumor suppressor pathway in Myc-induced lymphomagenesis. Genes Dev. 13: 2658–2669.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Schmitt, C. A.,
    2. M. E. McCurrach,
    3. E. de Stanchina,
    4. R. R. Wallace-Brodeur,
    5. S. W. Lowe
    . 1999. INK4a/ARF mutations accelerate lymphomagenesis and promote chemoresistance by disabling p53. Genes Dev. 13: 2670–2677.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Land, H.,
    2. L. F. Parada,
    3. R. A. Weinberg
    . 1983. Tumorigenic conversion of primary embryo fibroblasts requires at least two cooperating oncogenes. Nature 304: 596–602.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Vaux, D. L.,
    2. S. Cory,
    3. J. M. Adams
    . 1988. Bcl-2 gene promotes haemopoietic cell survival and cooperates with c-myc to immortalize pre-B cells. Nature 335: 440–442.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. McDonnell, T. J.,
    2. S. J. Korsmeyer
    . 1991. Progression from lymphoid hyperplasia to high-grade malignant lymphoma in mice transgenic for the t(14; 18). Nature 349: 254–256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Egle, A.,
    2. A. W. Harris,
    3. P. Bouillet,
    4. S. Cory
    . 2004. Bim is a suppressor of Myc-induced mouse B cell leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 6164–6169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Cang, S.,
    2. C. Iragavarapu,
    3. J. Savooji,
    4. Y. Song,
    5. D. Liu
    . 2015. ABT-199 (venetoclax) and BCL-2 inhibitors in clinical development. J. Hematol. Oncol. 8: 129.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Del Poeta, G.,
    2. M. Postorino,
    3. L. Pupo,
    4. M. I. Del Principe,
    5. M. Dal Bo,
    6. T. Bittolo,
    7. F. Buccisano,
    8. B. Mariotti,
    9. E. Iannella,
    10. L. Maurillo, et al
    . 2016. Venetoclax: Bcl-2 inhibition for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Drugs Today (Barc) 52: 249–260.
    OpenUrl
  23. ↵
    1. Mori, S.,
    2. R. E. Rempel,
    3. J. T. Chang,
    4. G. Yao,
    5. A. S. Lagoo,
    6. A. Potti,
    7. A. Bild,
    8. J. R. Nevins
    . 2008. Utilization of pathway signatures to reveal distinct types of B lymphoma in the Emicro-myc model and human diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Cancer Res. 68: 8525–8534.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Arvanitis, C.,
    2. D. W. Felsher
    . 2006. Conditional transgenic models define how MYC initiates and maintains tumorigenesis. Semin. Cancer Biol. 16: 313–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Adhikary, S.,
    2. M. Eilers
    . 2005. Transcriptional regulation and transformation by Myc proteins. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 6: 635–645.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 202 (9)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 202, Issue 9
1 May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Unmasking the Mysteries of MYC
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Unmasking the Mysteries of MYC
Rajeev M. Nepal, Alberto Martin
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2019, 202 (9) 2517-2518; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900186

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Unmasking the Mysteries of MYC
Rajeev M. Nepal, Alberto Martin
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2019, 202 (9) 2517-2518; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1900186
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Conceiving the Inconceivable: The Function of Aire in Immune Tolerance to Peripheral Tissue-Restricted Antigens in the Thymus
  • Glial Cells as Regulators of Neuroimmune Interactions in the Central Nervous System
  • The Colon as a Major Site of Immunoregulation by CD4+ T Cell Subsets in the Steady State
Show more PILLARS OF IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606