Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Innate Recognition of the Microbiota by TLR1 Promotes Epithelial Homeostasis and Prevents Chronic Inflammation

Karishma Kamdar, Andrew M. F. Johnson, Denise Chac, Kalisa Myers, Vrishika Kulur, Kyle Truevillian and R. William DePaolo
J Immunol July 1, 2018, 201 (1) 230-242; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1701216
Karishma Kamdar
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew M. F. Johnson
†Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise Chac
†Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kalisa Myers
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vrishika Kulur
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Vrishika Kulur
Kyle Truevillian
†Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Kyle Truevillian
R. William DePaolo
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90033; and
†Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for R. William DePaolo
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

There is cross-talk between the intestinal epithelium and the microbiota that functions to maintain a tightly regulated microenvironment and prevent chronic inflammation. This communication is partly mediated through the recognition of bacterial proteins by host-encoded innate receptors, such as TLRs. However, studies examining the role of TLR signaling on colonic homeostasis have given variable and conflicting results. Despite its critical role in mediating immunity during enteric infection of the small intestine, TLR1-mediated recognition of microbiota-derived ligands and their influence on colonic homeostasis has not been well studied. In this study, we demonstrate that defective TLR1 recognition of the microbiome by epithelial cells results in disruption of crypt homeostasis specifically within the secretory cell compartment, including a defect in the mucus layer, ectopic Paneth cells in the colon, and an increase in the number of rapidly dividing cells at the base of the crypt. As a consequence of the perturbed epithelial barrier, we found an increase in mucosal-associated and translocated commensal bacteria and chronic low-grade inflammation characterized by an increase in lineage-negative Sca1+Thy1hi innate lymphoid-like cells that exacerbate inflammation and worsen outcomes in a model of colonic injury and repair. Our findings demonstrate that sensing of the microbiota by TLR1 may provide key signals that regulate the colonic epithelium, thereby limiting inflammation through the prevention of bacterial attachment to the mucosa and exposure to the underlying immune system.

This article is featured in In This Issue, p.3

Introduction

The intestinal epithelium is the major interface between the 100 trillion commensal bacteria that comprise our gut microbiome and the immune cells found within the lamina propria (LP). The interactions between the gut microbiota and the epithelium shape important biological processes such as metabolism, development of the mucosal-associated tissues, and immunity against invading pathogens (1–4). Despite the extraordinary microbial burden within the intestine, translocation across the epithelium is a rare event because of the highly specialized cells that form this barrier. Tightly regulated communication via the direct sensing of the microbiome by innate immune receptors encoded within the epithelium is important for the homeostasis of the intestine. This process is mediated by the recognition of commensal ligands by host receptors, such as the TLRs (5–7) and the Nod-like receptors (NLRs) (8–10), and the presence of gut bacteria has been shown to impact the rate of proliferation within the stem cell compartment of the intestinal crypt (5, 8, 11–16). Genetic and environmental factors, such as infection, can also influence the dialogue between the microbiota and epithelium, leading to alterations in proliferation, generation of inflammation, and bacterial translocation (15, 17, 18) traits shared with the two types of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis (16, 19, 20).

TLRs and NLRs are expressed throughout the intestine and have been identified on crypt and intestinal stem cells (17, 19, 21–24). TLR signaling mediates a number of cellular responses (1, 22) and can be classified into two groups based upon the intracellular signaling adaptor. TLR1, 2, 5, 6, and 10 signal through the myeloid differentiation primary response gene-88 (MyD88), whereas TLR3, 4, and 9 signal through the TIR-domain–containing adapter-inducing IFN-β (TRIF)-dependent pathways (1, 19, 22–24). Studies disrupting innate signaling in mice, either through deletion of a specific TLR or through MyD88, have shown that sensing of the microbiota via these receptors is critical in mediating their own epithelial expression, regulating epithelial proliferation, and in the response to intestinal injury (23, 25, 26). TLR2, which is expressed throughout the small intestine and colon (14, 25, 27), recognizes lipoproteins from gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria as well as zymosans from yeast. TLR2 achieves this heterogeneity in ligand recognition by dimerizing with other TLRs, such as TLR1, 6, and 10. Major functions attributed to TLR2 in the maintenance of intestinal epithelial integrity is through the regulation of tight junctional proteins, proliferation/apoptosis signals (23, 26), antimicrobial peptide expression (25, 27), and goblet cell activation (28–30). Although these studies have shed light on the role of TLR2, they have not delineated whether TLR2 signaling alone is sufficient to drive these processes or if other binding partners may be contributing to its effect. Recently, our group has shown that TLR1 is important in coordinating cellular immunity against infection of the small intestine by Yersinia enterocolitica (15, 17, 18). Despite elimination of Y. enterocolitica, TLR1 deficiency promotes dysbiosis of the microbiota and the development of chronic anticommensal immune sequela (18). Therefore, disrupted innate immunity against an enteric pathogen may have long-term consequences and may promote the development of chronic inflammatory disease.

In this study, we show that disruption of TLR1 signaling compromises the colonic epithelium, leading to innate immune activation and chronic inflammation. Upon colonic injury, the chronic inflammatory state prevents healing and promotes more severe disease, suggesting that endogenous sensing of the microbiota through TLR1 contributes to colon homeostasis and prevents epithelial and immune dysfunction.

Materials and Methods

Mice

TLR1 knockout (1KO), TLR1 heterozygote, and TLR1 wild type (WT) mice were generated through the breeding of 1KO males with WT or heterozygous females. Litters were mixed upon separation, and genotypes were cohoused together in cages through the duration of all experiments unless stated otherwise in the figure legends or Materials and Methods. Mice were maintained at the University of Southern California and the University of Washington, and experiments were performed following protocol review and approval by the institutional biosafety committee and the institutional animal care and use committee. Mice were housed in specific pathogen-free (SPF) conditions, administered sterile, nonchlorinated, nonacidified water, and fed a normal mouse chow (AIN-76) ad libitum. The mice in this colony are Helicobacter hepaticus–free and clear of other pathogens, such as murine norovirus or Pasteurella. Rag2 knockout (Rag2KO) mice [B6(Cg)-Rag2tm1.1Cgn/J] were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME) and mated with 1KO mice for at least 10 generations prior to use.

Dextran sulfate sodium treatment

Five- to seven-week-old female mice received 2.5% w/v dextran sulfate sodium (DSS) (m.w. 35,000–50,000 kDa; Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA) in drinking water for 7 d followed by 7 d of regular drinking water.

Immunohistochemistry and Immunofluorescence

Murine colons were rolled using the Swiss roll technique and fixed in 10% neutral buffer formalin (VWR International, Visalia, CA) or methacarn fixative (VWR International) overnight. For preservation of the mucus layer, colon pieces with contents were placed in methacarn fixative (60% dry methanol, 30% chloroform, 10% glacial acetic acid) overnight. Methacarn pieces were washed twice in 100% methanol, once in 100% ethanol, and twice in xylene prior to paraffin embedding. Paraffin-embedded (without formalin) tissues were cut 5 μm thick. H&E, Alcian blue (AB), mucicarmine, and periodic acid–Schiff (PAS) staining was performed by AML Laboratories (Saint Augustine, FL) or in-house using AB pH 2.5 according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Abcam, Cambridge, MA). Quantification of mucus layer thickness and mucin vesicles were conducted by an individual blinded to the experiment groups. Muc2 (1:200, ab76774; Abcam), BrdU, Ki67 (1:500, MKI67; Novus Biologicals), Gob5 (1:50, M-53; Santa Cruz), lysozyme (Lyz) (1:200, catalog no. ab108508; Abcam), α-defensin-1 (DEFA-1) (1:2000, a kind gift from A. Ouellette), rabbit polyclonal IgG, (1:200, ab27472; Abcam), and rabbit monoclonal IgG (1:200, ab172730; Abcam).

For Ag retrieval, slides were placed into tubes containing sodium citrate buffer (pH 6) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and heated at 99°C in water bath. The slides were washed and blocked before staining with primary Ab. The slides with primary Ab were incubated overnight at 4°C in a humid chamber and the following day were washed and incubated with secondary Ab at 37°C for 1 h. The slides were mounted with DAPI, and confocal images were acquired using a Nikon Eclipse C1 Laser Scanning Microscope (Nikon, PA) fitted with a 60 Nikon objective (PL APO, 1.4NA) and Nikon image software.

H&E-stained colonic tissue sections were scored by a blinded gastroenterologist using the following measures: crypt architecture (normal, 0; severe crypt distortion with loss of entire crypts, 3), degree of inflammatory cell infiltration (normal, 0; dense inflammatory infiltrate, 3), muscle thickening (base of crypt sits on the muscularis mucosae, 0; marked muscle thickening present, 3), goblet cell depletion (absent, 0; present, 1), and crypt abscess (absent, 0; present, 1). The histological damage score is the sum of each individual score.

Colonic epithelial cell and LP isolation

The colon was removed, flushed with ice-cold PBS and 1 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich), and shaken at 37°C in HBSS containing 2 mM EDTA (Sigma-Aldrich,) and 2 mM DTT (Sigma-Aldrich) for 10 min, and the supernatants were collected. This was repeated, and supernatants were pooled together and constitute the epithelial fraction. The remaining tissue was digested with Collagenase Type IV (Sigma-Aldrich) in RPMI 1640 with 20% FBS (GE Healthcare, Logan, UT) for 20 min. The supernatants were collected, passed through 70-μM mesh filters (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), and washed in ice-cold PBS.

Detection of bacterial 16S rDNA by using RT-PCR and by plating

16S rDNA was analyzed as previously described (9, 31). Briefly, the DNA from colonic mucosa, stool, or colonic lumen was extracted using the QIAamp DNA stool kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD) and 2 μl of bacterial DNA was used as a template. The gene copy number per microliter of DNA was determined using plasmids expressing the target of the 16S primers (31). For enumeration of bacteria using standard plating techniques, the spleen and liver were aseptically removed and homogenized in 1 ml sterile prereduced oxygen-free tryptic soy agar (TSA) (Anaerobe, Morgan Hill, CA). Samples were serially diluted and plated in duplicate and placed in anaerobic jars (Sigma-Aldrich). Forty-eight hours later, the colonies were enumerated and compared with plates grown in the presence of oxygen.

Bone marrow chimeras

Mice were irradiated with 1000 cGy. The mice were immediately reconstituted i.v. with 10 × 106 cells isolated from indicated donor bone marrow. The mice recovered for 6 wk prior to use.

Fecal microbiota transplants

Mice were treated with a mixture of five antibiotics (ABX): neomycin (1 g/l; Sigma), amoxicillin (1 g/l; VWR International), gentamicin (1 g/l), vancomycin (0.5 g/l; VWR International), and metronidazole (1 g/l; VWR International) in their drinking water for 2 wk and received 150 μl of stool contents from indicated donor by oral gavage every other day for a total of three total gavages. The mice were left undisturbed for up to 4 wk before any procedures were performed.

Anti-Thy1, anti–IL-22, anti–IL-17, and anti–IFN-γ treatment

TLR1-sufficient and -deficient Rag2KO mice were administered 1 mg of anti-Thy1–depleting mAb (YTS 154.7.7.10) or rat isotype control (YKIX 337.217.1), 500 μg anti–IL-17A (rat IgG2a; MAB421; clone 50104; R&D, Minneapolis, MN), 500 μg anti–IL-22 (rat IgG2a; 16-7222-85; clone IL22JOP; eBioscience, San Diego, CA), or 500 μg anti–IFN-γ (rat IgG1; 505802; clone XMG1.2; BioLegend) i.p. the day of DSS administration and then every other day through day 8.

Intestinal permeability and endotoxin measurement

FITC-conjugated dextran (4000 MW) dissolved in water (Sigma-Aldrich) was administered rectally to anesthetized mice at 2 mg/10 g of body weight using a Foley catheter. Whole blood was collected using heparinized needles via cardiac puncture 1 h after FITC-dextran administration. Fluorescence intensity in sera was analyzed using a standard plate reader and determined by comparison with a FITC-dextran standard curve. Bacterial endotoxin in the serum was assayed using an endpoint chromogenic Limulus amebocyte lysate assay (Lonza, Anaheim, CA) per manufacturer’s instructions.

Quantitative real-time RT-PCR

RNA was extracted from mucosal scrapings, isolated LP, intestinal epithelial cells (IEC), or sorted lineage (lin)−Sca1+Thy1hi cells using ISOLATE II RNA Mini Kit (Bioline, Boston, MA). RNA was reverse-transcribed into cDNA with SensiFAST cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bioline). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed on a CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Irvine, CA) using SensiFAST SYBR No-ROX Kit (Bioline). No reverse transcriptase and water controls were performed for each sample. Data were normalized to product and amplified using primers for a housekeeping gene, GAPDH.

Abs, flow cytometry, and cell sorting

The following conjugated Abs were used: Sca1 (D7), Thy1 (G7), and γδ TCR (GL3); our lin-negative panel contained: CD11c (HL3), Gr-1 (Rb8-6CF), CD11b (M1/70), NK1.1 (PK136), CD19 (1D3), CD8a (53-6.7), CD3e (2C11), CD4 (RM4-5), and B220 (RA3-6B2) from BD Pharmingen (San Jose, CA). Flow cytometry analysis was performed with a FACS Canto (BD Biosciences) and analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, Ashland, OR). For sorting, the LP for five to eight mice were pooled and stained with allophycocyanin -conjugated lin markers, followed by labeling with anti-allophycocyanin beads and negative sorting on autoMacs (Miltenyi Biotec, San Diego, CA). Enriched cells were stained with Sca1 and Thy1.2 and sorted on a FACSAria (BD Biosciences).

Detection of cytokines by ELISA

After isolation of the LP, the pellet was homogenized in 2 ml of PBS, and protein was quantified using Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad Laboratories). Cytokine levels in 50 μg/ml of protein were determined using ELISA assays for IL-1β (BD), IL-23 (BD), IL-12p70 (BD), IL-17 (R&D), and IL-22 (eBioscience).

Measurement of reactive oxygen species

Fresh mucosal scrapings were collected into preweighed tubes and homogenized at 40 mg/ml in sterile PBS. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were measured in supernatant using the OxiSelect ROS/RNS Assay Kit (Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Microbiota composition analysis by 16s rDNA sequencing

Cecal contents from littermate 1KO and WT mice were snap-frozen on collection. Genomic DNA was extracted from samples using the Qiagen MagAttract PowerSoil DNA Isolation Kit Optimized for the KingFisher (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s protocol at RTL Genomics (Lubbock, TX). Samples were amplified for sequencing at RTL Genomics (Lubbock, TX) in a two-step process using primers 515F 5′-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3′ and 806R 5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′ (32) and were sequenced using the MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA). Sequencing data were curated using mothur using the MiSeq standard operating procedure (33). Sequences were then classified using the Ribosomal Database Project version 14 and phylotyped to the genus level. Sequence data were deposited in the Sequence Read Archive under accession number SRP143628 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP143628).

Statistics

All data are expressed as the mean ± SEM. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05, using a Student t test (two-tailed), ANOVA test, or Wilcoxon log-rank test as appropriate, and were performed with the statistical analysis software Prism (GraphPad Software). Statistical tests and p values are specified in the figure legends.

Study approval

All mice were maintained at the University of Southern California or the University of Washington, and experiments were performed following protocol review and approval by the institutional biosafety committee and the institutional animal care and use committee.

Results

TLR1-deficiency is associated with mucosal-associated bacteria, gut permeability, and systemic bacteria

Our previous work had shown a critical role for TLR1 signaling in the epithelium of the small intestine during pathogenic Y. enterocolitica infection (18, 22, 34). However, analysis of mRNA transcripts for Tlr1 in naive WT mice revealed that the ileum had significantly less expression of Tlr1 than the proximal colon or distal colon (data not shown). We sought to determine whether the expression of TLR1 may influence colonic homeostasis by assessing the location of the microbiota within the colonic compartment of TLR1-deficient (1KO) and littermate control mice (a mixture of heterozygotes and homozygotes for TLR1, WT) using fluorescent in situ hybridization to visualize bacteria with a probe directed against eubacterial 16S rRNA. Although we observed a clear separation between cells of the epithelium and the 16S rRNA probe in WT colons, this spatial separation was not observed in the 1KO mice (Fig. 1A). Instead, we observed a diverse spectrum of 16S rRNA expression, including areas where the probe was in intimate contact with epithelial cells (Fig. 1A). The increase in epithelial adjacent bacteria in the 1KO mice corresponded with 15-fold more 16S DNA associated with the mucosa than in the WT mice despite equivalent luminal levels (Fig. 1B). To assess whether there was also altered colonic permeability, FITC-labeled dextran was measured in the peripheral blood of WT and 1KO mice 1 h after intrarectal administration. Indeed, there was a significant increase in the amount of FITC in the blood of the 1KO mice, indicating leakage from the colon into the periphery (Fig. 1C) as well as elevated endotoxin levels, suggesting translocated commensal bacteria or their products (Fig. 1D). To determine the extent of bacterial translocation in 1KO mice, the spleen, liver, and blood were plated anaerobically on TSA plates. The liver (Fig. 1E, 1F), spleen, and blood from 1KO mice all had significantly elevated amounts of bacteria compared with littermates (data not shown). Furthermore, the transfer of TLR1-deficient bone marrow to reconstitute an irradiated WT mouse was not sufficient to cause an increase in bacterial colonies in liver (data not shown), indicating that the elevated levels of systemic bacteria in the naive 1KO mice are not due to an ineffectual immune response against mouse pathogens that may be resident in SPF facilities. Gut permeability may result from defects in the regulation of tight junctional proteins, and previous studies have implicated TLR2 in this regulation (10, 21). However, using qPCR, we were unable to find any difference in the expression of Cldn3 (claudin-3), Cldn10 (claudin-10), Ocln (occludin), and Tjp1 (ZO-1) transcripts (data not shown). We also quantified claudin-2 and claudin-3 by Western blot and assessed occludin-1 expression by immunofluorescence and observed no differences between 1KO and WT mice (Supplemental Fig. 1). Altogether, these data demonstrate an inability to maintain normal geographical and spatial localization of commensal bacteria in the absence of TLR1 independent of barrier defects.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Expression of TLR1 prevents mucosal-associated bacteria and their translocation to the periphery. Colons from naive 1KO mice were compared with naive WT colons. (A) Representative original magnification ×40 confocal images from Carnoy’s fixed sections of the distal colon of WT and 1KO mice hybridized with a probe against eubacterial 16S rRNA (red) and counter-stained with DAPI (blue). Image on the far right is a fluorescent microscope image of 1KO using the 16S fluorescent in situ hybridization probe (red), DAPI (blue), and Dolichos biflorus agglutinin (DBA) lectin (green). The white dotted line indicates the apical edge of the epithelium. (B) Fold change of 16S DNA expression from 1KO luminal colonic contents or colonic mucosal scrapings normalized to WT. (C) Relative fluorescent units in the serum of WT and 1KO mice 1 h postintrarectal administration of FITC-Dextran. Each dot represents an individual mouse. (D) Endotoxin units from serum of WT and 1KO mice as determined using the Limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) test. Each dot represents an individual mouse. (E) Representative bacterial plates from livers of 1KO and WT mice. (F) CFU per gram of liver cultured anaerobically on TSA plates. Each dot represents an individual mouse. Data are represented as the mean ± SEM from two to three independent experiments. (A), n = 3 mice per group; (B–F), n = 7–10 mice per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Student unpaired t test.

Elevated innate immune responses in TLR1-deficient mice

Mucosal-associated and translocated commensals are often associated with inflammation because of increased exposure to, and subsequent recognition by, the immune system. As the 1KO mice have inherent bacterial translocation, we evaluated cytokine levels in homogenates of whole colon by ELISA (Fig. 2A). Of the 10 cytokines we evaluated, only IL-1β and IL-23 and the cytokines they play a role in regulating, IL-22 and IL-17 (27, 35, 36), were significantly increased in the colons of the 1KO (Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

TLR1 deficiency is associated with disturbed immune homeostasis in the colonic LP. (A) Cytokine levels in whole colonic lysate were measured and normalized to the weight of the tissue of naive 1KO and WT. Representative FACS plots of naive WT and 1KO LP cells. Dead cells were excluded, and all live cells were gated on forward scatter and side scatter, (B) CD3+ and TCR δ+ T cells, (C) CD3+CD4+ and intracellular IL-17 and IL-10, (D) lin− (CD11b−, CD11c−, NKp44−, F480−, B220−, CD19−, CD3−), and Sca1+ and Thy1hi cells. Relative expression of mRNA transcripts for indicated (E) absolute cell number of lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells in the colonic LP from mice. The lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells were sorted from the colonic LP, and quantitative RT-PCR was performed to obtain relative expression levels of (F) transcription factors and (G) cytokines using GAPDH as a reference housekeeping gene, and showing fold changed to WT using 2−ΔΔct. Data are pooled from two independent experiments; (A and E–G) are expressed as mean ± SEM. (A–E) n = 5–6 mice per group. (F–G) Cells were isolated by pooling isolated and sorted lin−Sca1+Thy1hi from two mice from each genotype, and the experiment was repeated twice. (A) One-way ANOVA; (E–G) Student unpaired t test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

There are three IL-23–responsive cells that produce IL-22 and IL-17 within the colonic mucosa. These include γδ T cells (36–38), IL-17–producing CD4 T cells (TH17/TH22) (19), and type 3 innate lymphoid cells (ILC3) (39). We sought to identify the frequency of these cell populations in naive mice and found no difference in the frequency or numbers of γδ T cells (Fig. 2B) and TH17 cells (Fig. 2C) between 1KO and WT controls (Fig. 2B). However, the frequency (Fig. 2D) and absolute cell number (Fig. 2E) of lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells in the colons of the 1KO mice were significantly elevated compared with naive WT controls (Fig. 2D, 2E). Lin-negative, Sca1-positive, and Thy1-positive cells have been identified as IL-22– and IL-17–producing ILC3 (16). Molecular analysis of the mRNA transcripts from sorted lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells revealed prototypic molecular signatures of ILC3, such as Rorc (Fig. 2F), Il22 (Fig. 2G), Il17, and Il23r (data not shown), to be increased in 1KO compared with WT cells, whereas Ifng expression was not changed (Fig. 2G).

TLR1-sensing of the microbiota by nonhematopoietic cells restrains innate immune responses

Despite the proximity of commensal bacteria to colonic tissue in healthy individuals, there are conflicting reports regarding the role of the microbiota in the development of members of the innate lymphoid cell family. To determine whether the microbiota were necessary for innate immune activation in the 1KO mice, we employed a rigorous ABX treatment regimen to deplete the microbiota. Pregnant dams from a heterozygous cross were administered a mixture of five ABX (amoxicillin, vancomycin, neomycin, metronidazole, and gentamicin) the last week of their pregnancy and were maintained on the ABX water until the pups were weaned. The newly weaned mice continued to receive the ABX water for an additional 7 d, at which time their colons were analyzed for levels of IL-23 and Sca1+Thy1hi cells. This ABX approach generally yields a 5–8-fold reduction in the endogenous commensals (R.W. DePaolo and R. Rankin, unpublished observations). Although the ABX treatment had little effect on the basal level of Sca1+Thy1hi cells in WT mice, it significantly reduced the number of these cells (Fig. 3A) along with colonic level of IL-1β and IL-23 (Fig. 3B) in the 1KO mice. As the microbiota was necessary for the elevated innate immune response, we asked whether the specific composition of the microbiota of 1KO mice would be sufficient to transfer this phenotype to ABX-treated WT mice via fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). WT mice receiving an FMT with stool from a 1KO mouse showed no change in either the lin−Sca1+Thy1hi population (Fig. 3C) or levels of IL-1β and IL-23 (Fig. 3D). In contrast, WT stool given to an ABX-treated 1KO recipient restored both the lin−Sca1+Thy1hi population (Fig. 3C) and IL-1β and IL-23 (Fig. 3D).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

The microbiota of the 1KO mice are required for homeostatic immune regulation. (A and B) 1KO and WT mice born from ABX-treated pregnant dams were maintained on ABX-treated water 1–2 wk after weaning and were analyzed for (A) absolute number of lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells in ABX-treated WT and 1KO mice compared with naive (untreated) mice determined by flow cytometry and (B) the concentration of IL-1β and IL-23 detected in colonic homogenates as measured by ELISA. (C and D) A different set of ABX-treated WT and 1KO mice were given an FMT from the indicated donors and allowed to reconstitute for 2 wk before quantification of (C) absolute cell number of lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells and (D) concentration of IL-1β and IL-23 detected in the colonic LP of FMT-treated WT and 1KO mice. Data are expressed as individual mice pooled from two to three independent experiments with (A and B) n = 5–6 mice per group and (C and D) n = 5–9 mice per group. (E) PCoA analysis based on genus-level identification of 16s rDNA sequences from 1KO (n = 13) or WT (n = 12) mouse cecal contents. (F) Inverse Simpson measurement of α diversity in 1KO and WT mice. (G) Family relative abundance in 1KO and WT cecal contents. Student t test with false discovery rate correction showed no significant difference in relative abundance of different families between 1KO and WT mice. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA.

These data suggest that although bacteria are necessary for the colonic inflammation observed in the 1KO mice, the lack of signaling through TLR1 does not alter the microbiota to cause inflammation when transferred to a WT setting. This was further supported by comparing the 16s rDNA sequencing analysis of cecal contents between 1KO and WT mice. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) (Fig. 3E) and Inverse Simpson index (Fig. 3F) indicated considerable overlap in community structure and no difference in community α diversity between naive WT and 1KO mice, respectively. Differences in the relative abundances of bacterial families in the cecum of 1KO and WT mice were evaluated by Student t tests corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini–Hochberg false discovery rate (set at 5%). Consistent with the α diversity and PCoA, there were no significant differences in bacterial families between 1KO and WT mice (Fig. 3G). To confirm the results obtained using cecal contents and to evaluate specific biogeographical changes in the bacterial community of the colon, we performed compositional analysis on mucosal-associated tissue from the proximal and distal colon in a subset of 1KO and of WT mice. PCoA of the 16S rDNA data again revealed no significant differences in these mucosal-associated communities between 1KO and WT mice (Supplemental Fig. 2). Thus, it is unlikely that the aberrant immune response observed in the 1KO mice is due to a compositional shift in the microbial communities within the colon.

The finding that 1KO mice had elevated innate cytokines and increased lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells after receiving WT stool and the lack of a compositional change in the microbiota of 1KO mice suggests that the dysregulation of the innate immune response may be due to a more general defect in the mucosal response to commensal bacteria. Previously, we have shown that TLR1 can signal in both the intestinal epithelium and in mucosal dendritic cells to induce protective immunity against enteric infections (22, 34). To discern which cellular compartment may be mediating the elevated innate immune activation, we created bone marrow chimeras. Two months after reconstitution, IL-1β and IL-23 concentration in the colonic LP and the bacterial burden in the liver were quantified. The transfer of 1KO bone marrow to WT mice had no effect on colonic LP levels of IL-1β or IL-23 (Fig. 4A), and no increase in bacterial burden was observed (Fig. 4B). In contrast, IL-1β and IL-23 (Fig. 4A) were elevated in the LP, and there was an increase in bacterial counts (Fig. 4B) when 1KO recipients were reconstituted with WT bone marrow. These data suggest that nonhematopoietic cellular expression of TLR1 prevents commensal-mediated inflammation and bacterial translocation. Together, the FMT and bone marrow chimera studies establish that defective TLR1–sensing of the microbiome by nonhematopoietic cells, and not a compositional dysbiosis, is responsible for the innate inflammatory phenotype observed in the 1KO mice.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Aberrant immune activation is due to loss of TLR1 signaling in the epithelium. Bone marrow chimeras were generated using WT and 1KO recipients and WT and 1KO mice as donors. Six weeks after reconstitution, (A) IL-1β and IL-23 levels from the colonic LP were measured and (B) the number of bacteria in the liver was evaluated by qPCR for 16S. (A and B) Data are represented as the mean ± SEM from two independent experiments with n = 7–9 mice per group. **p < 0.01, one-way ANOVA.

TLR1 signaling contributes to homeostasis of the colonic epithelium

The intestinal epithelium is composed of a single layer of cells that form a physical barrier between us and our microbiota. The epithelium is composed of specialized IEC. The four types of IEC are derived from a single crypt progenitor but have distinct developmental pathways. Using immunohistochemistry and gene expression, we evaluated key markers and products of differentiated IEC. Goblet cells are one of the four types of IEC and function to produce a physical mucus barrier. WT colonic sections stained for Muc2, the main peptide component of intestinal mucins, revealed a visible mucus layer and characteristic goblet cell staining (Fig. 5A). In contrast, 1KO mice had large areas completely devoid of MUC2, and there was a lack of intensity in the positively stained goblet cells (Fig. 5A). Further analysis using AB and mucicarmine staining revealed a reduction in acidic mucins in the colons of 1KO mice, whereas PAS staining of neutral mucins appeared more similar between 1KO and WT (Fig. 5A). The reduction in acidic mucins was not due to an exocytosis of the whole endocytic granule, as we were unable to find PAS-, PAS/AB, or AB-positive cells in the lumen, a phenotype recently observed in NLRP6−/− mice (40). However, using confocal microscopy, we did observe a strong reduction in the expression of GOB5, which is found on the outer surface of mucus-containing granules (Fig. 5A). The thickness of the mucus layer was measured at multiple points around distal colonic sections stained with AB to quantify any differences between 1KO and WT mice (Fig. 5B). Quantification revealed a significant reduction in the average thickness of the mucus layer in 1KO compared with WT mice (Fig. 5C). Changes in the mucus layer may be due to either a defect in the production or the secretion of mucus by cells within the crypt. Quantification of the number of AB-positive vesicles per crypt indicated an accumulation of mucus within the epithelial cells of 1KO mice (Fig. 5D). Recently, it has been shown that mucus secretion by sentinel goblet cells in the colon can be induced by TLR1/2 agonism via a mechanism dependent on ROS (29). Consistent with this pathway, we found significantly reduced levels of ROS in the colonic mucosa of the 1KO mice relative to WT counterparts (Fig. 5E).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Reduced mucus secretion and an increase in antibacterial peptides occur in the colonic crypt in the absence of TLR1 signaling. Methacarn-fixed sections from the colons of WT and 1KO mice were stained by immunohistochemistry for the indicated markers. (A) Original magnification ×40 fluorescent microscopy images of colon tissue stained with MUC2 (peptide sequence of mucin), AB (acidic mucins), mucicarmine (acidic mucins), and PAS/AB (neutral/acidic mucins). Scale bar, 50 μm. Confocal images of GOB5 (mCLCA3) staining of the distal colon. (B) AB-stained distal colonic sections from WT and 1KO mice were used for quantification of (C) mucus layer thickness and (D) AB-positive vesicles per crypt. (E) Relative ROS activity in mucosa and colonic contents. (F) Original magnification ×10 and ×40 fluorescent microscope images of distal colon stained with Abs against Lyz and DEFA-1 and 10× image of isotype control. Scale bar, 50 μm. (A, B, and F) Representative images taken from three to five mice per group; (C and D) individual measurements of mucus thickness along the distal colon taken from three mice per group; (E) each point is an individual mouse from two different experiments. (C and D) Mann–Whitney U test; (F) Student t test corrected for multiple comparisons (Holm–Sidak). *p = 0.02, ****p < 0.0001.

Under chronic stress or inflammatory conditions, the colon, which is normally devoid of Paneth cells, will express Paneth cell products, and these cells are referred to as ectopic Paneth cells (41–43). To determine whether the chronic inflammation observed in the 1KO mice was causing a reprogramming of the colonic crypt, we compared the expression of two products normally secreted by small intestinal Paneth cells, Lyz and DEFA-1. As expected, Lyz expression in the colon of healthy, naive WT mice was very low (Fig. 5F), whereas exposure-matched images of colons from 1KO mice demonstrated high expression of Lyz at the top of the crypts (Fig. 5F). WT mice expressed a gradient of DEFA-1 that increased basolaterally (Fig. 5F) and was absent in the 1KO mice (Fig. 5F). Instead, the whole crypt stained uniformly positive for DEFA-1 (Fig. 5F). Taken all together, the absence of TLR1 signaling is associated with alterations in the production and function of factors associated with secretory cells of the epithelium.

TLR1 signaling restrains microbiota-induced epithelial cell proliferation

IEC differentiation is a tightly regulated process involving many important factors that control cellular proliferation as well as differentiation. We began by examining the proliferation of the epithelial cells in naive WT and 1KO mice. Ki67 is a marker used to identify cells that are currently, or have recently, undergone proliferation by labeling cells in S, G1, and G2 phases of the cell cycle. Histological analysis of colonic tissue sections of naive mice revealed an increase in Ki67-positive cells within the colonic epithelium of 1KO mice when compared with WT mice (Fig. 6A). In the colon, rapidly cycling stem cells at the base of the colonic crypt control proliferation and renewal of the epithelium. Aberrant regulation of these crypts may lead to altered IEC differentiation and disrupt epithelial barrier integrity. We used in vivo injections of BrdU to label newly synthesized DNA in actively replicating cells during synthesis phase for 2.5 h. Analysis of BrdU-positive cells by immunohistochemistry confirmed the presence of three to four BrdU-positive cells per WT crypt (Fig. 6B, 6C). In contrast, mice deficient for TLR1 had twice the number of BrdU-positive cells per crypt (Fig. 6B, 6C). Cyclin D1 is a factor downstream in the Wnt signaling cascade involved in cell cycle regulation (5). As expected based upon the Ki67 and BrdU data, transcripts for Ccnd1 (cyclin D1) were elevated in the colonic tissue of 1KO mice (Fig. 6D).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Endogenous TLR1 signaling regulates colonic crypt proliferation. (A–C) Histological sections of the colon from 1KO and WT mice under normal SPF conditions or 1KO and WT mice born from a dam receiving ABX-treated water and then maintained on ABX for another 2 wk postweaning. (A) Original magnification ×40 of colon stained with Ki67. (B) Original magnification ×40 images of colons from mice injected with BrdU 2.5 h prior to euthanasia. (C) Quantification of total BrdU+ cells per crypt. (D) Relative transcript expression of Ccnd1 in colonic crypts isolated from control and ABX-treated WT and 1KO mice. (A and B) Representative original magnification ×40 images taken from five mice. (C) Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM of counts performed independently by two individuals, each counted 30 crypts from five mice. (D) Data are expressed as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments. (D) n = 5–6 mice per group. (C) Student unpaired t test; (D) two-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

ABX depletion was used to assess whether the proliferation in the colonic crypt of the 1KO mice was dependent upon the microbiota. Reducing the bacterial load caused a significant reduction in overall Ki67 (Fig. 6A), BrdU staining (Fig. 6B, 6C), and Ccnd1 expression (Fig. 6D) in the colons of the 1KO mice. These data suggest that TLR1 expression may antagonize or inhibit other innate signals that promote proliferation, or TLR1 regulates the stem cell niche. To test for the latter, we analyzed expression of canonical stem cell genes (Lgr5, Bmi1) and Notch signaling genes that regulate cell differentiation along absorptive and secretory pathways (Notch1, Hes1, Atoh1) and found no differences between 1KO and WT mice (Supplemental Fig. 3).

TLR1 deficiency exacerbates tissue injury and prevents epithelial healing

Basal changes in mucosal and epithelial homeostasis may set the stage for sustained inflammation and chronic intestinal disease following intestinal injury. We sought to determine whether the absence of TLR1 during injury caused by 2.5% DSS may induce a more chronic, long-term inflammatory response. 1KO and WT mice were given 2.5% DSS in their drinking water for 7 d followed by a 7-d recovery period in which normal drinking water was restored. The WT littermate controls followed the typical disease course known for DSS with a transient, mild weight loss (Fig. 7A), very high survival (Fig. 7B), and a shortening of the colon observed on day 7 that returned to normal length by day 14 (Fig. 7C). In contrast, 1KO mice began losing weight earlier than WT controls, lost more weight (Fig. 7A), and only 30% of mice survived treatment (Fig. 7B). The 1KO mice also had shorter colons on both day 7 and day 14 (Fig. 7C) and had higher levels of blood in their stool, which persisted throughout the 14 d (Fig. 7D).

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Loss of TLR1 exacerbates DSS-induced cytokine production and prevents colonic repair. WT and 1KO littermates were administered drinking water containing 2.5% DSS for 7 d to induce epithelial injury followed by a 7-d recovery period in which they were returned to normal drinking water. (A) Percent change in weight, (B) survival, (C) colon length on days 7 and 14, and (D), fecal occult score. On days 7 and 14, colons were fixed and stained with (E) H&E, and (F) histological score was given after analysis by a gastroenterologist. (G) Concentration of IL-1β and IL-23 found in whole colon homogenates. (H) IL-17, IL-22, and IFN-γ levels from the supernatants of colonic explant cultures derived from naive mice or mice treated with DSS for 10 d. (I) Mean number of cells in the colonic LP determined by flow cytometry for indicated cell type gated as described in Fig. 1 legend. (A–D) Data are expressed as mean ± SEM from three independent experiments, n = 8–10 mice per group. (E) The mean of histological scores from two independent experiments, n = 3 mice per group. (F) Representative microscopy images of three mice per group. (G–I) Data are expressed as mean ± SEM from two independent experiments, n = 6–8 mice per group. (A) Wilcoxon log-rank test; (B) Kaplan Meyer; (C, E, and G–I) Student t test; (D) two-way ANOVA. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Histological scoring was performed blinded by gastroenterologist on H&E-stained colonic tissue after injury (day 7) and after repair (day 14). Despite a greater weight loss and less overall survival, the histological score was strikingly similar between the 1KO and WT mice on day 7 (Fig. 7E, data not shown). On day 14, after the mice had been returned to normal drinking water, the histological score of WT mice was improved compared with day 7, indicating effective mucosal repair and resolution (Fig. 7F). In contrast, the colons of 1KO mice showed little resolution on day 14 and, in fact, scored significantly worse than on day 7 (Fig. 7E), with large areas of denuded epithelium, inflammatory cell infiltrate, and loss of goblet cells (Fig. 7F).

Whole colonic tissue was collected on days 0 and 10 for analysis of IL-1β, IL-23, and IL-12. Consistent with our earlier data, colonic tissue from naive 1KO mice had higher levels of IL-1β and IL-23, but not IL-12p70 (Fig. 7G). After receiving DSS for 7 d and normal drinking water for 3 d, there was an increase in the amount of IL-1β and IL-23 in both WT and 1KO mice, with significantly higher levels found in the 1KO (Fig. 7G). Interestingly, IL-12p70 was only detected on day 10 in the colonic homogenate of 1KO mice (Fig. 7G). To assess the IL-23–dependent production of IL-22 and IL-17, colonic explants were performed on tissues harvested at the same time points and restimulated in vitro with recombinant IL-23. Colons from naive WT mice produced detectable IL-22 only in the presence of rIL-23 but failed to produce IL-17 (Fig. 7H). In contrast, the unstimulated colon explants from naive 1KO produced detectable IL-22 and IL-17 that was further increased by the addition of rIL-23 (Fig. 7H). Seven days after initial DSS exposure and 3 d into the repair cycle, IL-22 and IL-17 were elevated in the 1KO explants stimulated with the vehicle control, and the addition of rIL-23 significantly increased these levels (Fig. 7H). Interestingly, IFN-γ levels were not detected in the colons from naive WT and 1KO mice, yet after DSS exposure, IFN-γ production was significantly increased in the cultures containing colons from the 1KO mice (Fig. 7G). Analysis of the major colonic IL-23R responsive cells in the mice on day 7 of DSS revealed elevated numbers of Sca1+Thy1hi cells in both WT and 1KO mice, yet they were significantly higher in the 1KO mice, whereas the numbers of γδ T cells and TH17 cells did not increase (Fig. 7I).

To determine if the severe pathology and inability to recover from intestinal injury in the 1KO mice was due to elevated numbers of Sca1+Thy1hi cells, these mice were bred onto a RAG2-deficient (Rag KO) background, allowing us to deplete Sca1+Thy1hi cells using a polyclonal Ab against Thy1. Confirming our results in Fig. 7, the absence of TLR1 in Rag KO mice resulted in a much more rapid and severe weight loss (Fig. 8A), significantly less survival (Fig. 8B), and a shorter colon length (Fig. 8C) than TLR1-sufficient Rag KO mice. Administration of the anti-Thy1 Ab significantly improved the disease outcome in the DSS-treated Rag KO mice, with less weight loss (Fig. 8A), less mortality (Fig. 8B), and longer colon lengths (Fig. 8C). TLR1-deficient Rag KO mice treated with anti-Thy1 also had significantly fewer IL-22 (Fig. 8D), IL-17 (Fig. 8E), and IFN-γ (Fig. 8F) than control Ab-treated TLR1-deficient Rag KO mice. Interestingly, the depletion of the Sca1+Thy1hi cells in the TLR1-deficient Rag KO mice had no effect on IL-23 or IL-12 (Fig. 8G).

FIGURE 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 8.

IFN-γ contributes to the mortality observed in the context of TLR1 deficiency. RAG2 KO (RAG KO and 1KOxRAG2 KO (1KO–RAG KO) were treated with anti-Thy1–depleting Ab every other day beginning on the day of DSS administration through day 12. (A) Percent change in weight, (B) percent survival, and (C) colon length on day 12 were assessed. Colonic tissue explants were incubated overnight, and the concentration of (D) IL-22 was measured in the supernatant. Levels of (E) IL-17 and (F) IFN-γ were determined from whole mucosal scrapings. All data are expressed as the mean ± SEM pooled from two to three independent experiments. RAG KO and 1KO–RAG KO were treated with polyclonal Abs against (G) IFN-γ, (H) IL-17, or (I) IL-22 throughout the course of both DSS and recovery, and percent change in weight was observed. (A) n = 7–12 mice per group; (B–F, and I) n = 5–7 mice per group. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, Student t test.

To determine if any single cytokine was driving the heightened inflammation and the inability to heal in the 1KO mice, we administered either neutralizing Abs to IFN-γ, IL-17, or IL-22 every other day for the 7-d course of DSS, and weight loss and survival were measured. In line with other studies, there was moderate but significantly less weight loss in Rag KO mice given DSS and treated with anti–IFN-γ (44) (Fig. 8G). In contrast, treatment with anti–IL-17 or anti–IL-22 resulted in much more weight loss (Fig. 8H, 8I, respectively) and a more severe histological disease in WT mice given DSS (data not shown). In the TLR1-deficient Rag KO mice, anti–IFN-γ treatment resulted in a complete reversal of the observed weight loss, whereas anti–IL-17 and anti–IL-22 treatment had little effect on weight loss (Fig. 8H, 8I, respectively). Altogether, these data suggest that in the absence of TLR1 and under chronic inflammation, the Sca1+Thy1hi cell shift produces IFN-γ, which is responsible for the worse pathology and severe disease observed following DSS.

Discussion

In this study, we show that endogenous TLR1 signaling is necessary to regulate homeostasis of the colon. In the absence of these TLR1 signals, there is a disruption of colonic crypt microarchitecture, mucosal-associated and translocated commensal bacteria, and low-level inflammation. The low-level inflammation was characterized by elevated IL-1β and IL-23 production and an increase in IL-22–producing lin−Sca1+Thy1hiRORC+ ILC3. Despite significantly more translocated bacteria, a leaky gut, and heightened colonic inflammation, TLR1-deficient mice do not exhibit any overt phenotype. However, upon intestinal injury induced by DSS, TLR1-deficient mice decline rapidly and are unable to heal after DSS withdrawal. Using neutralizing Abs, we show that an increase in Sca1+Thy1hi ILC3 and a concomitant rise in tissue levels of IFN-γ contribute to this phenotype.

One key question is whether the altered colonic epithelial phenotype of the 1KO is due to a primary impact of TLR1-deficiency, secondary to an altered microbiota, and/or a response to chronic inflammation. 1KO mice had no major alterations in their cecal microbial community, and fecal microbiota transfer between 1KO and WT mice was not sufficient to induce inflammation, arguing against a secondary effect due to a microbial dysbiosis. This is consistent with the work of Ubeda et al. (45), who found only minor differences in microbial community when comparing littermates from TLR-deficient mouse strains. Bone marrow chimera studies determined that barrier function was mediated by TLR1 signaling in the nonhematopoietic cell compartment, further suggesting that a defect of TLR1 in the epithelium is primary in this model. Whether epithelial derangement precedes the chronic inflammatory response or is a symptom of dysregulated immune activation is challenging to determine, and these processes likely develop in concert in vivo.

The intestinal epithelium is in a state of constant renewal, being replaced roughly every 5 d (13, 35, 46), and this renewal is mediated via the coordinated signals of factors that are involved in proliferation and differentiation. In addition to the observation that TLR1-deficiency was associated with an increase in proliferation of the colonic crypt, we also found these mice had spatial and functional differences of the specialized epithelial cell. One intriguing finding was the presence of Lyz- and DEFA-1–expressing cells. These antimicrobial agents are typically restricted to the small intestine where they are coexpressed in Paneth cells. Ectopic expression of Paneth cell markers have been reported in a number of studies (2, 6, 10, 37, 42, 47–49), particularly those examining WNT and Notch signaling because of their roles in proliferation (11, 46) and differentiation (50), respectively. However, we were unable to find any difference in Notch1 and its downstream target genes (R.W. DePaolo and A.M.F. Johnson, unpublished observations).

There is increasing evidence that innate sensing of the microbiota plays an important role in regulating epithelial cell proliferation. Studies using germ-free or ABX-treated mice have shown a reduction in the proliferation of IEC respective to controls (12, 51–53). More recently, a comparison of ABX that favor either the depletion of gram-positive or gram-negative bacteria found a reduction in proliferation when only the gram-positive bacteria were depleted (11). However, the data concerning the role of MyD88 in this process are conflicting. Using MyD88 KO mice, Rakoff-Nahoum et al. (7) reported that commensal TLR signaling was required for homeostasis and, in particular, found an increase in the number of BrdU+ cells in the colons of MyD88 KO mice, suggesting an inhibitory role of TLRs on proliferation, yet subsequent reports have demonstrated that TLR and MyD88 signaling promote epithelial proliferation (5, 11, 14). Our data align with the studies by Rakoff-Nahoum et al., as we identified a significant increase in BrdU+ and Ki67+ cells within the colonic epithelium of naive TLR1-deficient mice. An intriguing possibility is that engagement of commensal-derived TLR1 ligands may induce a genetic program that regulates or coordinates signaling of growth and/or differentiation factors in the colon, leading to regulation of proliferation. However, analysis of Notch1, Wnt5a, Wnt3, Jagged1, and the downstream Notch1-responsive transcription factor Hes1 revealed no difference in expression between the colons of WT and 1KO mice (Supplemental Fig. 2, R.W. DePaolo and A.M.F. Johnson, unpublished observations). The Notch and WNT families contain many members and are both regulated by a variety of different factors. Thus, a much more comprehensive screen looking at the role of TLR1 in the direct regulation of WNT and Notch family members and their inhibitors is currently underway in our laboratory.

In this study, using ABX to deplete the commensal microbiota, we provide evidence that the microbiota is necessary for the increased proliferation observed in the TLR1-deficient mice, yet the composition and the function of the microbiota from TLR1-deficient mice were not sufficient to induce this proliferative response when transferred to ABX-treated WT recipients. These data do not exclude a role for TLR1 in directly regulating the growth and differentiation signals in the crypt, as it is possible that through other innate immune receptors the microbiome drives proliferation, and TLR1 drives regulatory factors that counter this commensal-driven activation.

To our knowledge, our study is also the first to identify a role of TLR1 in regulation of the epithelium and the first to support a regulatory role for this molecule in proliferation. Our data are in sharp contrast to studies using TLR2 agonists (25, 26) and TLR2 KO mice (5, 11, 14), which show increased and decreased proliferation, respectively. TLR1 forms a heterodimer with TLR2 to recognize triacylated lipoproteins (11, 12, 28). Our group, and others, have shown that TLR2/1 signaling induces proinflammatory innate immune responses through activation of MyD88 and NF-κB or Pi3K/Akt and mTOR (3, 22, 23, 34, 38, 54, 55) in immune cells, but its downstream signaling pathways may be different in epithelial cells because of the expression of different coreceptors. The promiscuity in binding by TLR2 allows it to form complexes with coreceptors TLR6, TLR10, Dectin-1, TLR4, CD14, and CD36. Analysis of mRNA transcripts for Tlr1 by our group has revealed increasing expression as you move distally from the ileum to the rectum. In porcine small intestinal tissue, Tlr1 gene expression is low at the base of the crypt and increases as you move toward the villous tip (56). Tlr1 expression has also been observed in the colons of naive mice, yet unlike expression of Tlr2 and Tlr6, which increases during DSS administration, Tlr1 expression remains unchanged (57). Additionally, it is not known whether TLR1, TLR6, and TLR10 compete with each other for binding with TLR2, as no studies to date have analyzed TLR2/6 and TLR2/10 expression in 1KO mice or in individuals with the polymorphisms that disrupt cellular surface expression, such as the TLR1 I602S polymorphism. It is a distinct possibility that shifting recognition of commensal ligands to TLR2/6 or, in humans, TLR2/10, may promote proliferation. Interestingly, analysis of TLR6-deficient crypts revealed no change in the number of BrdU+ cells (R.W. DePaolo and R. Rankin, unpublished observations), further demonstrating the differential effects mediated by TLR1 and TLR6.

We observed a shift in the expression of cytokines and transcription factors in the lin−Sca1+Thy1hi ILC3 in the TLR1-deficient mice. In naive WT and 1KO controls, these cells expressed higher levels of Il22, but the latter also expressed transcripts for Il17. Upon tissue injury induced by DSS, the lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells from WT mice had an increase in Il22 transcripts as well as Il17. In contrast, after DSS-induced injury in the 1KO, there was an increase in Tbet and Ifng expression in the lin−Sca1+Thy1hi cells (data not shown) that correlated with an elevation of IFN-γ protein in the tissue. This phenotype, along with our observed increase in IL-12, is reminiscent of IL-22+Rorγt+ ILC3, which acquire Tbet in the presence of IL-12 and have been termed “exILC3” in both mice and humans (8, 58). It is well established that IFN-γ negatively regulates the epithelial barrier and antagonizes proliferation (15, 59, 60), and thus its presence during DSS in the 1KO mice would block the beneficial effects of IL-22, thereby preventing epithelial proliferation and exacerbating the damage. Indeed, depletion of the Thy1+ cells in the TLR1-deficient Rag KO mice and neutralization of IFN-γ both ameliorated the severity of DSS administration. Other studies have shown that chronic inflammation of the intestine leads to IL-12 production and the expansion of IFN-γ+ cells (48, 49, 61) or the reprogramming of IL-17–expressing cells (36).

Our results provide new insight into the regulation of the colonic crypt and suggest an unexpected role for TLR1 sensing of endogenous ligands in this process. Understanding how the microbiome may contribute to epithelial homeostasis and the consequence of disrupted signaling through host genes or changes in the gut microbiome has broad implications. These data provide biological evidence for the observations of an increased frequency of patients expressing mutations in the TLR1 locus with IBD, and that IBD patients expressing defective TLR1 genes are more likely to have anticommensal Abs (18, 54). These studies also provide a biological framework for the development of TLR1 agonists that could be used to promote a healthy intestinal barrier and suggest that persons expressing variant TLR1 alleles may be at a higher risk for developing systemic inflammation, leaky gut, and long-term chronic intestinal disease.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Denise Chac for assistance in editing the paper.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health R01 Grant DK104908-01 (to R.W.D.).

  • The sequence data presented in this article have been submitted to the Sequence Read Archive (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/SRP143628) under accession number SRP143628.

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    AB
    Alcian blue
    ABX
    antibiotic
    DEFA-1
    α-defensin-1
    DSS
    dextran sulfate sodium
    FMT
    fecal microbiota transplantation
    IBD
    inflammatory bowel disease
    IEC
    intestinal epithelial cell
    ILC3
    type 3 innate lymphoid cell
    KO
    knockout
    1KO
    TLR1 knockout
    lin
    lineage
    LP
    lamina propria
    Lyz
    lysozyme
    MyD88
    myeloid differentiation primary response gene-88
    NLR
    Nod-like receptor
    PAS
    periodic acid–Schiff
    PCoA
    principal coordinate analysis
    qPCR
    quantitative PCR
    ROS
    reactive oxygen species
    SPF
    specific pathogen-free
    TSA
    tryptic soy agar
    WT
    wild type.

  • Received August 25, 2017.
  • Accepted April 16, 2018.
  • Copyright © 2018 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Abreu, M. T.
    2010. Toll-like receptor signalling in the intestinal epithelium: how bacterial recognition shapes intestinal function. [Published erratum appears in 2010 Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10: 215.] Nat. Rev. Immunol. 10: 131–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Andreu, P.,
    2. S. Colnot,
    3. C. Godard,
    4. S. Gad,
    5. P. Chafey,
    6. M. Niwa-Kawakita,
    7. P. Laurent-Puig,
    8. A. Kahn,
    9. S. Robine,
    10. C. Perret,
    11. B. Romagnolo
    . 2005. Crypt-restricted proliferation and commitment to the Paneth cell lineage following Apc loss in the mouse intestine. Development 132: 1443–1451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Garrett, W. S.,
    2. J. I. Gordon,
    3. L. H. Glimcher
    . 2010. Homeostasis and inflammation in the intestine. Cell 140: 859–870.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Tremaroli, V.,
    2. F. Bäckhed
    . 2012. Functional interactions between the gut microbiota and host metabolism. Nature 489: 242–249.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Behrens, J.
    2000. Control of beta-catenin signaling in tumor development. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 910: 21–33; discussion 33–35.
  6. ↵
    1. Andreu, P.,
    2. G. Peignon,
    3. C. Slomianny,
    4. M. M. Taketo,
    5. S. Colnot,
    6. S. Robine,
    7. D. Lamarque,
    8. P. Laurent-Puig,
    9. C. Perret,
    10. B. Romagnolo
    . 2008. A genetic study of the role of the Wnt/beta-catenin signalling in Paneth cell differentiation. Dev. Biol. 324: 288–296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Rakoff-Nahoum, S.,
    2. J. Paglino,
    3. F. Eslami-Varzaneh,
    4. S. Edberg,
    5. R. Medzhitov
    . 2004. Recognition of commensal microflora by toll-like receptors is required for intestinal homeostasis. Cell 118: 229–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Bernink, J. H.,
    2. C. P. Peters,
    3. M. Munneke,
    4. A. A. te Velde,
    5. S. L. Meijer,
    6. K. Weijer,
    7. H. S. Hreggvidsdottir,
    8. S. E. Heinsbroek,
    9. N. Legrand,
    10. C. J. Buskens, et al
    . 2013. Human type 1 innate lymphoid cells accumulate in inflamed mucosal tissues. Nat. Immunol. 14: 221–229.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Barman, M.,
    2. D. Unold,
    3. K. Shifley,
    4. E. Amir,
    5. K. Hung,
    6. N. Bos,
    7. N. Salzman
    . 2008. Enteric salmonellosis disrupts the microbial ecology of the murine gastrointestinal tract. Infect. Immun. 76: 907–915.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Kufer, T. A.,
    2. P. J. Sansonetti
    . 2011. NLR functions beyond pathogen recognition. Nat. Immunol. 12: 121–128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Park, J. H.,
    2. T. Kotani,
    3. T. Konno,
    4. J. Setiawan,
    5. Y. Kitamura,
    6. S. Imada,
    7. Y. Usui,
    8. N. Hatano,
    9. M. Shinohara,
    10. Y. Saito, et al
    . 2016. Promotion of intestinal epithelial cell turnover by commensal bacteria: role of short-chain fatty acids. PLoS One 11: e0156334.
    OpenUrl
  12. ↵
    1. Reikvam, D. H.,
    2. A. Erofeev,
    3. A. Sandvik,
    4. V. Grcic,
    5. F. L. Jahnsen,
    6. P. Gaustad,
    7. K. D. McCoy,
    8. A. J. Macpherson,
    9. L. A. Meza-Zepeda,
    10. F. E. Johansen
    . 2011. Depletion of murine intestinal microbiota: effects on gut mucosa and epithelial gene expression. PLoS One 6: e17996.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Khoury, K. A.,
    2. M. H. Floch,
    3. T. Hersh
    . 1969. Small intestinal mucosal cell proliferation and bacterial flora in the conventionalization of the germfree mouse. J. Exp. Med. 130: 659–670.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Bogunovic, M.,
    2. S. H. Davé,
    3. J. S. Tilstra,
    4. D. T. Chang,
    5. N. Harpaz,
    6. H. Xiong,
    7. L. F. Mayer,
    8. S. E. Plevy
    . 2007. Enteroendocrine cells express functional Toll-like receptors. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 292: G1770–G1783.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Bruewer, M.,
    2. S. Samarin,
    3. A. Nusrat
    . 2006. Inflammatory bowel disease and the apical junctional complex. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1072: 242–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Buonocore, S.,
    2. P. P. Ahern,
    3. H. H. Uhlig,
    4. I. I. Ivanov,
    5. D. R. Littman,
    6. K. J. Maloy,
    7. F. Powrie
    . 2010. Innate lymphoid cells drive interleukin-23-dependent innate intestinal pathology. Nature 464: 1371–1375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Cario, E.,
    2. G. Gerken,
    3. D. K. Podolsky
    . 2004. Toll-like receptor 2 enhances ZO-1-associated intestinal epithelial barrier integrity via protein kinase C. Gastroenterology 127: 224–238.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Kamdar, K.,
    2. S. Khakpour,
    3. J. Chen,
    4. V. Leone,
    5. J. Brulc,
    6. T. Mangatu,
    7. D. A. Antonopoulos,
    8. E. B. Chang,
    9. S. A. Kahn,
    10. B. S. Kirschner, et al
    . 2016. Genetic and metabolic signals during acute enteric bacterial infection alter the microbiota and drive progression to chronic inflammatory disease. Cell Host Microbe 19: 21–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Cua, D. J.,
    2. J. Sherlock,
    3. Y. Chen,
    4. C. A. Murphy,
    5. B. Joyce,
    6. B. Seymour,
    7. L. Lucian,
    8. W. To,
    9. S. Kwan,
    10. T. Churakova, et al
    . 2003. Interleukin-23 rather than interleukin-12 is the critical cytokine for autoimmune inflammation of the brain. Nature 421: 744–748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Gong, J.,
    2. J. Xu,
    3. W. Zhu,
    4. X. Gao,
    5. N. Li,
    6. J. Li
    . 2010. Epithelial-specific blockade of MyD88-dependent pathway causes spontaneous small intestinal inflammation. Clin. Immunol. 136: 245–256.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Hisamatsu, T.,
    2. M. Suzuki,
    3. H. C. Reinecker,
    4. W. J. Nadeau,
    5. B. A. McCormick,
    6. D. K. Podolsky
    . 2003. CARD15/NOD2 functions as an antibacterial factor in human intestinal epithelial cells. Gastroenterology 124: 993–1000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. DePaolo, R. W.,
    2. K. Kamdar,
    3. S. Khakpour,
    4. Y. Sugiura,
    5. W. Wang,
    6. B. Jabri
    . 2012. A specific role for TLR1 in protective T(H)17 immunity during mucosal infection. J. Exp. Med. 209: 1437–1444.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Depaolo, R. W.,
    2. F. Tang,
    3. I. Kim,
    4. M. Han,
    5. N. Levin,
    6. N. Ciletti,
    7. A. Lin,
    8. D. Anderson,
    9. O. Schneewind,
    10. B. Jabri
    . 2008. Toll-like receptor 6 drives differentiation of tolerogenic dendritic cells and contributes to LcrV-mediated plague pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 4: 350–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Yamamoto, M.,
    2. S. Sato,
    3. H. Hemmi,
    4. K. Hoshino,
    5. T. Kaisho,
    6. H. Sanjo,
    7. O. Takeuchi,
    8. M. Sugiyama,
    9. M. Okabe,
    10. K. Takeda,
    11. S. Akira
    . 2003. Role of adaptor TRIF in the MyD88-independent toll-like receptor signaling pathway. Science 301: 640–643.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Dessein, R.,
    2. M. Gironella,
    3. C. Vignal,
    4. L. Peyrin-Biroulet,
    5. H. Sokol,
    6. T. Secher,
    7. S. Lacas-Gervais,
    8. J. J. Gratadoux,
    9. F. Lafont,
    10. J. C. Dagorn, et al
    . 2009. Toll-like receptor 2 is critical for induction of Reg3 beta expression and intestinal clearance of Yersinia pseudotuberculosis. Gut 58: 771–776.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Hörmann, N.,
    2. I. Brandão,
    3. S. Jäckel,
    4. N. Ens,
    5. M. Lillich,
    6. U. Walter,
    7. C. Reinhardt
    . 2014. Gut microbial colonization orchestrates TLR2 expression, signaling and epithelial proliferation in the small intestinal mucosa. PLoS One 9: e113080.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Eberl, G.
    2012. Development and evolution of RORγt+ cells in a microbe’s world. Immunol. Rev. 245: 177–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Farhat, K.,
    2. S. Riekenberg,
    3. H. Heine,
    4. J. Debarry,
    5. R. Lang,
    6. J. Mages,
    7. U. Buwitt-Beckmann,
    8. K. Röschmann,
    9. G. Jung,
    10. K. H. Wiesmüller,
    11. A. J. Ulmer
    . 2008. Heterodimerization of TLR2 with TLR1 or TLR6 expands the ligand spectrum but does not lead to differential signaling. J. Leukoc. Biol. 83: 692–701.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Birchenough, G. M.,
    2. E. E. Nyström,
    3. M. E. Johansson,
    4. G. C. Hansson
    . 2016. A sentinel goblet cell guards the colonic crypt by triggering Nlrp6-dependent Muc2 secretion. Science 352: 1535–1542.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Johansson, M. E.,
    2. G. C. Hansson
    . 2016. Immunological aspects of intestinal mucus and mucins. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16: 639–649.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Winter, S. E.,
    2. P. Thiennimitr,
    3. M. G. Winter,
    4. B. P. Butler,
    5. D. L. Huseby,
    6. R. W. Crawford,
    7. J. M. Russell,
    8. C. L. Bevins,
    9. L. G. Adams,
    10. R. M. Tsolis, et al
    . 2010. Gut inflammation provides a respiratory electron acceptor for Salmonella. Nature 467: 426–429.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Caporaso, J. G.,
    2. C. L. Lauber,
    3. W. A. Walters,
    4. D. Berg-Lyons,
    5. C. A. Lozupone,
    6. P. J. Turnbaugh,
    7. N. Fierer,
    8. R. Knight
    . 2011. Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108(Suppl. 1): 4516–4522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Kozich, J. J.,
    2. S. L. Westcott,
    3. N. T. Baxter,
    4. S. K. Highlander,
    5. P. D. Schloss
    . 2013. Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq illumina sequencing platform. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 79: 5112–5120.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Sugiura, Y.,
    2. K. Kamdar,
    3. S. Khakpour,
    4. G. Young,
    5. W. J. Karpus,
    6. R. W. DePaolo
    . 2013. TLR1-induced chemokine production is critical for mucosal immunity against Yersinia enterocolitica. Mucosal Immunol. 6: 1101–1109.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Guo, X.,
    2. J. Qiu,
    3. T. Tu,
    4. X. Yang,
    5. L. Deng,
    6. R. A. Anders,
    7. L. Zhou,
    8. Y. X. Fu
    . 2014. Induction of innate lymphoid cell-derived interleukin-22 by the transcription factor STAT3 mediates protection against intestinal infection. Immunity 40: 25–39.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Harbour, S. N.,
    2. C. L. Maynard,
    3. C. L. Zindl,
    4. T. R. Schoeb,
    5. C. T. Weaver
    . 2015. Th17 cells give rise to Th1 cells that are required for the pathogenesis of colitis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112: 7061–7066.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Hirata, A.,
    2. J. Utikal,
    3. S. Yamashita,
    4. H. Aoki,
    5. A. Watanabe,
    6. T. Yamamoto,
    7. H. Okano,
    8. N. Bardeesy,
    9. T. Kunisada,
    10. T. Ushijima, et al
    . 2013. Dose-dependent roles for canonical Wnt signalling in de novo crypt formation and cell cycle properties of the colonic epithelium. Development 140: 66–75.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Petermann, F.,
    2. V. Rothhammer,
    3. M. C. Claussen,
    4. J. D. Haas,
    5. L. R. Blanco,
    6. S. Heink,
    7. I. Prinz,
    8. B. Hemmer,
    9. V. K. Kuchroo,
    10. M. Oukka,
    11. T. Korn
    . 2010. γδ T cells enhance autoimmunity by restraining regulatory T cell responses via an interleukin-23-dependent mechanism. Immunity 33: 351–363.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Takatori, H.,
    2. Y. Kanno,
    3. W. T. Watford,
    4. C. M. Tato,
    5. G. Weiss,
    6. I. I. Ivanov II.,
    7. D. R. Littman,
    8. J. J. O’Shea
    . 2009. Lymphoid tissue inducer-like cells are an innate source of IL-17 and IL-22. J. Exp. Med. 206: 35–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Wlodarska, M.,
    2. C. A. Thaiss,
    3. R. Nowarski,
    4. J. Henao-Mejia,
    5. J. P. Zhang,
    6. E. M. Brown,
    7. G. Frankel,
    8. M. Levy,
    9. M. N. Katz,
    10. W. M. Philbrick, et al
    . 2014. NLRP6 inflammasome orchestrates the colonic host-microbial interface by regulating goblet cell mucus secretion. Cell 156: 1045–1059.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Keshav, S.
    2006. Paneth cells: leukocyte-like mediators of innate immunity in the intestine. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80: 500–508.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Ouellette, A. J.
    2010. Paneth cells and innate mucosal immunity. Curr. Opin. Gastroenterol. 26: 547–553.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Steenwinckel, V.,
    2. J. Louahed,
    3. M. M. Lemaire,
    4. C. Sommereyns,
    5. G. Warnier,
    6. A. McKenzie,
    7. F. Brombacher,
    8. J. Van Snick,
    9. J. C. Renauld
    . 2009. IL-9 promotes IL-13-dependent paneth cell hyperplasia and up-regulation of innate immunity mediators in intestinal mucosa. J. Immunol. 182: 4737–4743.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Ito, R.,
    2. M. Shin-Ya,
    3. T. Kishida,
    4. A. Urano,
    5. R. Takada,
    6. J. Sakagami,
    7. J. Imanishi,
    8. M. Kita,
    9. Y. Ueda,
    10. Y. Iwakura, et al
    . 2006. Interferon-gamma is causatively involved in experimental inflammatory bowel disease in mice. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 146: 330–338.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Ubeda, C.,
    2. L. Lipuma,
    3. A. Gobourne,
    4. A. Viale,
    5. I. Leiner,
    6. M. Equinda,
    7. R. Khanin,
    8. E. G. Pamer
    . 2012. Familial transmission rather than defective innate immunity shapes the distinct intestinal microbiota of TLR-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 209: 1445–1456.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Krausova, M.,
    2. V. Korinek
    . 2014. Wnt signaling in adult intestinal stem cells and cancer. Cell. Signal. 26: 570–579.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Feng, Y.,
    2. K. Sentani,
    3. A. Wiese,
    4. E. Sands,
    5. M. Green,
    6. G. T. Bommer,
    7. K. R. Cho,
    8. E. R. Fearon
    . 2013. Sox9 induction, ectopic Paneth cells, and mitotic spindle axis defects in mouse colon adenomatous epithelium arising from conditional biallelic Apc inactivation. Am. J. Pathol. 183: 493–503.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. Matsuoka, K.,
    2. N. Inoue,
    3. T. Sato,
    4. S. Okamoto,
    5. T. Hisamatsu,
    6. Y. Kishi,
    7. A. Sakuraba,
    8. O. Hitotsumatsu,
    9. H. Ogata,
    10. K. Koganei, et al
    . 2004. T-bet upregulation and subsequent interleukin 12 stimulation are essential for induction of Th1 mediated immunopathology in Crohn’s disease. Gut 53: 1303–1308.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Neurath, M. F.,
    2. B. Weigmann,
    3. S. Finotto,
    4. J. Glickman,
    5. E. Nieuwenhuis,
    6. H. Iijima,
    7. A. Mizoguchi,
    8. E. Mizoguchi,
    9. J. Mudter,
    10. P. R. Galle, et al
    . 2002. The transcription factor T-bet regulates mucosal T cell activation in experimental colitis and Crohn’s disease. [Published erratum appears in 2002 J. Exp. Med. 195: 1513.] J. Exp. Med. 195: 1129–1143.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. VanDussen, K. L.,
    2. A. J. Carulli,
    3. T. M. Keeley,
    4. S. R. Patel,
    5. B. J. Puthoff,
    6. S. T. Magness,
    7. I. T. Tran,
    8. I. Maillard,
    9. C. Siebel,
    10. Å. Kolterud, et al
    . 2012. Notch signaling modulates proliferation and differentiation of intestinal crypt base columnar stem cells. Development 139: 488–497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Scoville, D. H.,
    2. T. Sato,
    3. X. C. He,
    4. L. Li
    . 2008. Current view: intestinal stem cells and signaling. Gastroenterology 134: 849–864.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Smith, K.,
    2. K. D. McCoy,
    3. A. J. Macpherson
    . 2007. Use of axenic animals in studying the adaptation of mammals to their commensal intestinal microbiota. Semin. Immunol. 19: 59–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Pull, S. L.,
    2. J. M. Doherty,
    3. J. C. Mills,
    4. J. I. Gordon,
    5. T. S. Stappenbeck
    . 2005. Activated macrophages are an adaptive element of the colonic epithelial progenitor niche necessary for regenerative responses to injury. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 99–104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Pierik, M.,
    2. S. Joossens,
    3. K. Van Steen,
    4. N. Van Schuerbeek,
    5. R. Vlietinck,
    6. P. Rutgeerts,
    7. S. Vermeire
    . 2006. Toll-like receptor-1, -2, and -6 polymorphisms influence disease extension in inflammatory bowel diseases. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 12: 1–8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Santos-Sierra, S.,
    2. S. D. Deshmukh,
    3. J. Kalnitski,
    4. P. Küenzi,
    5. M. P. Wymann,
    6. D. T. Golenbock,
    7. P. Henneke
    . 2009. Mal connects TLR2 to PI3Kinase activation and phagocyte polarization. EMBO J. 28: 2018–2027.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Gourbeyre, P.,
    2. M. Berri,
    3. Y. Lippi,
    4. F. Meurens,
    5. S. Vincent-Naulleau,
    6. J. Laffitte,
    7. C. Rogel-Gaillard,
    8. P. Pinton,
    9. I. P. Oswald
    . 2015. Pattern recognition receptors in the gut: analysis of their expression along the intestinal tract and the crypt/villus axis. Physiol. Rep. 3: e12225.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Zheng, B.,
    2. M. E. Morgan,
    3. H. J. van de Kant,
    4. J. Garssen,
    5. G. Folkerts,
    6. A. D. Kraneveld
    . 2013. Transcriptional modulation of pattern recognition receptors in acute colitis in mice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832: 2162–2172.
    OpenUrl
  57. ↵
    1. Vonarbourg, C.,
    2. A. Mortha,
    3. V. L. Bui,
    4. P. P. Hernandez,
    5. E. A. Kiss,
    6. T. Hoyler,
    7. M. Flach,
    8. B. Bengsch,
    9. R. Thimme,
    10. C. Hölscher, et al
    . 2010. Regulated expression of nuclear receptor RORγt confers distinct functional fates to NK cell receptor-expressing RORγt(+) innate lymphocytes. Immunity 33: 736–751.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Kaiser, G. C.,
    2. D. B. Polk
    . 1997. Tumor necrosis factor alpha regulates proliferation in a mouse intestinal cell line. Gastroenterology 112: 1231–1240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Ruemmele, F. M.,
    2. C. Gurbindo,
    3. A. M. Mansour,
    4. R. Marchand,
    5. E. Levy,
    6. E. G. Seidman
    . 1998. Effects of interferon gamma on growth, apoptosis, and MHC class II expression of immature rat intestinal crypt (IEC-6) cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 176: 120–126.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. Fuss, I. J.,
    2. C. Becker,
    3. Z. Yang,
    4. C. Groden,
    5. R. L. Hornung,
    6. F. Heller,
    7. M. F. Neurath,
    8. W. Strober,
    9. P. J. Mannon
    . 2006. Both IL-12p70 and IL-23 are synthesized during active Crohn’s disease and are down-regulated by treatment with anti-IL-12 p40 monoclonal antibody. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 12: 9–15.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 201 (1)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 201, Issue 1
1 Jul 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Innate Recognition of the Microbiota by TLR1 Promotes Epithelial Homeostasis and Prevents Chronic Inflammation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Innate Recognition of the Microbiota by TLR1 Promotes Epithelial Homeostasis and Prevents Chronic Inflammation
Karishma Kamdar, Andrew M. F. Johnson, Denise Chac, Kalisa Myers, Vrishika Kulur, Kyle Truevillian, R. William DePaolo
The Journal of Immunology July 1, 2018, 201 (1) 230-242; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701216

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Innate Recognition of the Microbiota by TLR1 Promotes Epithelial Homeostasis and Prevents Chronic Inflammation
Karishma Kamdar, Andrew M. F. Johnson, Denise Chac, Kalisa Myers, Vrishika Kulur, Kyle Truevillian, R. William DePaolo
The Journal of Immunology July 1, 2018, 201 (1) 230-242; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701216
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Extracellular Nucleotides and Histamine Suppress TLR3- and RIG-I–Mediated Release of Antiviral IFNs from Human Airway Epithelial Cells
  • RORγt-Expressing Pathogenic CD4+ T Cells Cause Brain Inflammation during Chronic Colitis
  • NLRP1B and NLRP3 Control the Host Response following Colonization with the Commensal Protist Tritrichomonas musculis
Show more MUCOSAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606