Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

EZH2 Represses the B Cell Transcriptional Program and Regulates Antibody-Secreting Cell Metabolism and Antibody Production

Muyao Guo, Madeline J. Price, Dillon G. Patterson, Benjamin G. Barwick, Robert R. Haines, Anna K. Kania, John E. Bradley, Troy D. Randall, Jeremy M. Boss and Christopher D. Scharer
J Immunol February 1, 2018, 200 (3) 1039-1052; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1701470
Muyao Guo
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
†Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Muyao Guo
Madeline J. Price
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dillon G. Patterson
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Dillon G. Patterson
Benjamin G. Barwick
‡Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert R. Haines
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna K. Kania
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Anna K. Kania
John E. Bradley
§Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Troy D. Randall
§Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy M. Boss
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Jeremy M. Boss
Christopher D. Scharer
*Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Christopher D. Scharer
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Epigenetic remodeling is required during B cell differentiation. However, little is known about the direct functions of epigenetic enzymes in Ab-secreting cells (ASC) in vivo. In this study, we examined ASC differentiation independent of T cell help and germinal center reactions using mice with inducible or B cell–specific deletions of Ezh2. Following stimulation with influenza virus or LPS, Ezh2-deficient ASC poorly proliferated and inappropriately maintained expression of inflammatory pathways, B cell–lineage transcription factors, and Blimp-1–repressed genes, leading to fewer and less functional ASC. In the absence of EZH2, genes that normally gained histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation were dysregulated and exhibited increased chromatin accessibility. Furthermore, EZH2 was also required for maximal Ab secretion by ASC, in part due to reduced mitochondrial respiration, impaired glucose metabolism, and poor expression of the unfolded-protein response pathway. Together, these data demonstrate that EZH2 is essential in facilitating epigenetic changes that regulate ASC fate, function, and metabolism.

Introduction

The humoral immune response is initiated when B cells are stimulated to differentiate into Ab-secreting cells (ASC), also known as plasma cells. Irrespective of how they are activated or the availability of T cell help, a distinct set of reprogramming events are required to terminate the B cell–fate program and initiate a new gene expression program that supports enhanced metabolism and Ab secretion (1–3). The ASC transcriptional program is enabled by the expression of transcription factors—such as Blimp-1, XBP1, and IRF4, which reinforce and support ASC transcriptional changes (2, 4)—that are coupled to a reorganization of the epigenome (5–7). Although the transcription factors and genes they regulate have been studied biochemically and genetically, little is known about the role of epigenetic modifiers in ASC function and programming.

Epigenetic modifications are dynamic during distinct stages of B cell differentiation. In both mice and humans, DNA methylation is primarily lost as B cells differentiate to ASC in response to both T cell–dependent and –independent stimuli (8–10). Deletion of the maintenance methyltransferase Dnmt1 leads to a reduction in germinal center (GC) B cells (11), but whether de novo DNA methylation is required for B cell differentiation is not known. Histone modifications, characterized by chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sequencing (ChIP-seq), have cell type–specific patterns in naive B cells (nB), ex vivo–differentiated ASC, and in GC B cells (12–16). However, few studies have examined the role of histone-modifying enzymes using genetic approaches (5). Deletion of the histone acetyltransferase, MOZ, reduces GC B cells and skews responding B cells toward low-affinity IgM+ memory B cells (17). Additionally, treatment of mice with histone deacetylase inhibitors reduces B cell responses (18), indicating that both erasing and writing de novo epigenetic modifications is an essential process in B cell differentiation. Importantly, epigenetic modifiers are frequent targets of both activating and inactivating mutations in lymphomas (19, 20). Therefore, a full understanding of epigenetic mechanisms and targets for distinct enzymes is important to manipulate B cell differentiation and to understand the effects of therapeutics targeting these enzymes.

One of the best characterized repressive epigenetic histone modifications is the trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 27 (H3K27me3), which is mediated by the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) (21, 22). Enhancer of zest 2 (EZH2) is the catalytic subunit of the PRC2 complex and functions as an essential transcriptional silencer (23–25). EZH2 is upregulated in pre–B cells, in which it is necessary for VDJ recombination during B cell development (26) and to repress germline Igκ transcription (27). EZH2 is expressed at low levels in quiescent, nB, but is highly upregulated in GC B cells where it facilitates cellular proliferation, protects from activation-induced cytidine deaminase (AID) off-target activity, and represses the differentiation of GC B cells into ASC (15, 16, 28, 29). EZH2 interacts with distinct sets of transcription factors, such as BCL6 in GC B cells (29) and Blimp-1 in ASC (30), to direct cell type–specific gene repression programs. B cell–specific deletion of Ezh2 leads to a loss of GC formation, thereby leading to defects in the formation of ASC (15, 16). However, no studies have directly assessed whether or how EZH2 functions in ASC.

In this study, we tested the role of EZH2 in two T-independent models of ASC differentiation, one initiated by the T-independent Ag, LPS, and the other initiated by influenza infection in the absence of CD4 T cells. We found that EZH2 was progressively upregulated in stimulated B cells, with expression peaking in ASC. In addition, B cell–specific genes gained H3K27me3 in their promoters as ASC differentiation progressed, indicating that EZH2 may repress these genes. Following immunization with the T-independent Ag, LPS, or infection with influenza virus in the absence of T cells, mice with a tamoxifen-inducible Ezh2 deletion generated fewer ASC. The EZH2-dependent defect was cell intrinsic to B cells and resulted in the enhanced expression and increased chromatin accessibility of B cell genes that gain H3K27me3 and are normally repressed in ASC, including Blimp-1 target genes and inflammatory genes. Ezh2-deficient ASC failed to upregulate oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis pathways, as well as the unfolded-protein response (UPR), resulting in decreased secreted Ig. Together, these data demonstrate a critical role for EZH2 in the programming of T-independent B cell differentiation and define specific roles for EZH2 in regulating ASC function.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Ezh2fl/fl (022626; JAX) (31), Rosa26CreERT2 (08463; JAX) (32), CD19Cre (06785; JAX) (33), CD45.1 (002014; JAX), C57BL/6J (00664; JAX), and μMT mice (02288; JAX) (34) were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and bred on site. CD45.2 μMT mice were bred onto the CD45.1 background. All animal protocols were approved by the Emory Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee. Mice used for experiments were between 6.5 and 10 wk old and were age and gender matched. Cre-mediated deletion was induced by the treatment of 100 μl of 40 mg/ml tamoxifen (J63509; Alfa Aesar) by daily i.p. injection for five consecutive days. For LPS experiments, 50 μg (ALX-581-008; Enzo Life Sciences) was administered i.v. and mice were analyzed 3 d after inoculation. For mixed bone marrow chimera experiments, 10 × 106 bone marrow cells from Ezh2fl/+CD45.1/2 and Ezh2fl/flRosa26CreERT2/+CD45.2 were mixed at 1:1 ratios, transferred to lethally irradiated CD45.1 hosts, and the immune system allowed to reconstitute for 6 wk. For wild-type cell division experiments, 20 × 106 splenic CD45.1 B cells were labeled with CFSE and adoptively transferred into CD45.2 μMT hosts. For competitive cell division experiments, 10 × 106 splenic B cells from Ezh2fl/+CD45.1/2 and Ezh2fl/flRosa26CreERT2/+CD45.2 mice were mixed at a 1:1 ratio, labeled with CellTrace Violet (CTV), and adoptively transferred to CD45.1 μMT hosts.

CD4+ T cell depletion and influenza infection

For depletion of CD4+ T cells, mice were treated with 200 μg anti-mouse CD4 (GK1.5, BE0003-1; Bio X Cell) by i.p. injection 3 and 1 d before infection. Mice were infected intranasally with 15,000 viral focal units of A/PR8/34 influenza virus (PR8) and analyzed 7 d later.

Magnetic enrichment procedures

B cells were enriched from splenocytes from naive mice by negative selection using CD43 microbeads (130-090-862; Miltenyi Biotec). LPS-induced ASC were enriched by positive selection of CD138+ cells from the spleens of mice 3 d post–LPS inoculation. Splenocytes were first stained with CD138-allophycocyanin (14205, clone 281-2; BioLegend) and immunomagnetic enrichment was performed using anti-allophycocyanin microbeads (130-090-855; Miltenyi Biotec). Enriched populations were analyzed for purity by flow cytometry (Supplemental Fig. 1A, 1B). For FACS sorting of cellular division samples in Fig. 1: following 3 d LPS inoculation, adoptively transferred CD45.1 cells were stained with CD45.1-PE (12-0453-82, clone A20; Bioscience) and immunomagnetic enrichment was performed using anti-PE microbeads (130-048-801; Miltenyi Biotec) prior to FACS sorting as previously described (8).

Flow cytometry and cell sorting

For staining, cells were resuspended at 1 × 106 cells/100 μl in FACS buffer (1× PBS, 1% BSA, 2 mM EDTA) and blocked with anti-Fc (2.4G2; Tonbo Biosciences) at a concentration of 0.25 μg/1 × 106 cells for 15 min on ice. The following Abs were used for FACS analysis: B220-PE-Cy7 (60-0452-U100, clone RA3-6132; Tonbo Biosciences), CD43-FITC (553270, clone S7; BD Pharmingen), CD19-PerCP-Cy5.5 (65-0193-U100, clone 1D3; Tonbo Biosciences), CD138-BV711 (563193, clone 281-2; BD Horizon), GL7-eFlour 660 (50-5902-82, clone GL-7; Invitrogen), CD45.1-FITC (35-0453-U500, clone A20; Tonbo Biosciences), CD45.2-PerCP-Cy5.5 (65-0454-U100, clone 104; Tonbo Biosciences), CD23-eFlour 450 (48-0232-80, clone B3B4; eBioscience), CD21-allophycocyanin-Cy7 (47-0211-80, clone eBio8D9; eBioscience), IgM-FITC (11-5890-85, clone eB121-15F9; eBioscience), IgD-BV605 (583003, 11-26c.2a; BD Horizon), CD11b-allophycocyanin-Cy7 (25-0112-U100, clone M1/70; Tonbo Biosciences), F4/80-allophycocyanin-Cy7 (123118, clone BM8; BioLegend), Thy1.2-allophycocyanin-Cy7 (105328, clone 30-H12; BioLegend), Ezh2-PE (562478, clone 11/Ezh2; BD Pharmingen), Annexin V-FITC (BMS500FI/100; eBioscience), Annexin V-allophycocyanin (17-8007-74; Invitrogen), Viability Ghost Dye-Red 780 (13-0865-T500; Tonbo Biosciences), and Zombie yellow dye (77168; BioLegend). Influenza-specific, PE-conjugated hemagglutinin (HA) tetramers were previously described (35). Cells were stained for 30 min on ice, protected from light, and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. Intracellular staining was performed with the Fixation/Permeabilization Kit (555028; BD Biosciences) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Flow cytometry was performed on a BD Biosciences LSR II Flow Cytometer using FACSDiva (version 6.2). Flow cytometry data were processed by FlowJo (version 9.9.6). Sorting of nB and ASC by FACS was performed on a BD FACSAriaII at the Emory Flow Cytometry Core. The following gating strategy preceded all flow cytometry analyses presented. Cells were gated on 1) lymphocytes (forward light scatter [FSC]–area × side scatter [SSC]–area), 2) singlets (FSC-width × FSC-height and SSC-width × SSC-height), and 3) live cells (Viability Dye−). Finally, non–B cell lineage cells were removed from the analyses based on the presence of Thy1.1, F4/80, and CD11c.

Deletion genotyping

DNA was extracted from purified splenic B cells following tamoxifen injection using the DNeasy Blood and Tissue kit (Qiagen). A total of 45 ng was used in a 35 cycle PCR with a three-primer design that amplified either the wild-type or deleted alleles. PCR products were resolved on a 1.5% agarose gel. The following primers were used: Ezh2.del-fwd 5′-GCTAGGCCTGCTGGTAAATA-3′, Ezh2-del-rev 5′-AGGAAATGGCAGGGTCTTTAG-3′, and Ezh2-del 5′-CAGTACAATCTCCTGTGTC-3′.

ELISA

ELISA plates (52-333801301F; Evergreen Scientific) were coated with 5 μg/ml capture Ab (5300-01B; Southern Biotech) or 1 μg/ml influenza HA at 4°C overnight and blocked with 1% nonfat dry milk at room temperature for 2 h. Standard Abs and serum were bound to the plates at 4°C overnight, plates were washed, and secondary HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgM or IgG Abs were added for 2 h at room temperature. Plates were developed with TMB ELISA peroxidase substrate (800-666-7625; Rockland) and the reaction was stopped with 0.2 M sulfuric acid. Plates were read at 450 nm with the Gen5 software.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

Total RNA was extracted from B cells and ASC using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and cDNA was synthesized with SuperScriptII Reverse Transcriptase (Invitrogen) as described (36). Real-time PCR was performed using SybrGreen incorporation on a BioRad CFX96 Thermocycler measuring the deleted exon of Ezh2 (Ezh2-del-fwd 5′-CAGGATGAAGCAGACAGAAGAG-3′ and Ezh2-del-rev 5′-TTGTTGCCCTTTCGGGTT-3′) and normalized to 18S rRNA (18s-fwd 5′-GTAACCCGTTGAACCCCATT-3′ and 18s-rev 5′-CCATCCAATCGGTAGTAGCCG-3′).

RNA sequencing

Tamoxifen-treated Ezh2fl/fl (control [Ctl]) and Ezh2fl/flRosa26CreERT2/+ (ERT2-Ezh2KO) CD138+ ASC were magnetically enriched 3 d following LPS inoculation. Three independent replicates were generated for Ctl and KO ASC. RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen) and sequencing libraries were generated using the mRNA HyperPrep Kit with poly(A) selection beads (KAPA Biosystems) using 500 ng total RNA as input according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Final libraries were quality checked on a bioanalyzer, quantitated by quantitative PCR (qPCR), pooled at equimolar ratio, and sequenced on a HiSeq2500 using paired-end, 50-bp sequencing chemistry. Raw fastq files were mapped to the mm9 version of the mouse genome using TopHat2 (37) (version 2.0.13) with the University of California, Santa Cruz mm9 knownGene table (38) as the reference transcriptome. PCR duplicates were removed from all downstream analyses with Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Reads that overlapped exons were summarized into unique EntrezID genes using the GenomicRanges (39) (version 1.22.4) package in R/Bioconductor. Genes that were not expressed at one read per million in at least three samples were discarded for low expression. Differential expression was tested using a pairwise test in edgeR (40) (version 3.12.1). For gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA), all detected genes were ranked by multiplying the sign of the fold change (FC) (+/−) by the −log10 of the p value. This ranked gene list was used as input for the GSEA preranked analysis. To determine the genes involved in protein secretion and transport, the UPR and XBP1 up gene lists were annotated using the Gene Ontology Consortium web portal (41). Genes categorized into protein transport (GO:0015031), protein localization (GO:0008104), or Golgi vesicle transport (GO:0048193) biological processes were annotated. Sequencing depth for each gene was normalized to fragments per kilobase per million using custom scripts implemented in R/Bioconductor.

Preparation of Tn5 for the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing

In-house purification of adapter-loaded Tn5 transposase was performed as previously described (42). Briefly, the pTXB1-Tn5 plasmid (60240; Addgene) was transformed into C3013 cells (C3013l; NEB) and a single colony grown in 250 ml of Luria Broth, Miller with 100 μg/ml ampicillin at 37°C until the culture reached an A600 of 0.75–0.9. To induce Tn5 expression, isopropyl β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside was added to a final concentration of 0.25 mM for 4 h at 23°C. Cells were then pelleted at 2800 rpm for 15 min, resuspended in 15 ml HEGX (20 mM HEPES-KOH at pH 7.2, 0.8 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.2% Triton X-100, 10% glycerol, complete with Roche protease inhibitors), and lysed with a French pressure cell (9000 lb/in2). The resulting lysate was pelleted at 15,000 rpm for 30 min, and 550 μl of 10% polyethyleneimine was added to the supernatant on a magnetic stirrer. The precipitate was removed via centrifugation at 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was then loaded onto a 1-ml chitin column (S6651S; NEB) and washed with 20 ml HEGX. On-column loading of Tn5 with preannealed mosaic end double-stranded (MEDS) oligonucleotides was achieved by adding 60 nmol of mixed and annealed Tn5 MED-p7/-p5 (ME-p7, 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-3′; ME-p5, 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG-3′; and ME-rev, 5′-[phos]-CTGTCTCTTATACACATCT-3′) to the column in 1.2 ml HEGX buffer. After 48 h, the column was washed with 20 ml of HEGX to remove unbound MEDS and cleavage of Tn5-MEDS was initiated by adding 1.2 ml HEGX with 100 mM DTT to the column. After 48–72 h, small elution fractions were collected and those with the highest protein concentration were pooled and dialyzed overnight versus 2× Tn5 dialysis buffer (100 mM HEPES at pH 7.2, 0.2 M NaCl, 0.2 mM EDTA, 2 mM DTT, 0.2% Triton X-100, 20% glycerol). Following dialysis, 0.6 vol of glycerol was added to make the final storage buffer (50 mM HEPES at pH 7.2, 0.1 M NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton X-100, 50% glycerol). Tn5 was dispensed into 50-μl aliquots and placed at −80°C for long-term storage.

Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing

Tagmentation was performed as described in detail previously (43, 44). Briefly, 2000–4000 cells from Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) and ERT2-Ezh2KO nB and ASC from tamoxifen-treated bone marrow chimeras 3 d following LPS inoculation were FACS sorted and tagmentation was performed using 2.5 μl of Tn5 in 1× TD Buffer (Illumina) in 25 μl total volume for 1 h at 37°C. Tagmented nuclei were lysed, DNA was purified using a double solid phase reversible immobilization-bead size selection (0.7× negative followed by 1× positive selection), and PCR amplified using Nextera Indexing Primers (Illumina) and the HiFi HotStart Polymerase (KAPA Biosystems) for 14 cycles of PCR. Final libraries were purified using a second double SPRI-bead size selection (0.2× negative followed by 1× positive selection), quantitated using the Illumina qPCR Quant Kit (KAPA Biosystems), and sequenced using 50-bp, paired-end chemistry on a HiSeq2500.

Assay for transposase-accessible chromatin using sequencing data analysis

Raw reads from the assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) were mapped to the mm9 version of the mouse genome using Bowtie (45) (version 1.1.1) with the default parameters. PCR duplicates were removed from all downstream analyses with Picard (http://broadinstitute.github.io/picard/). Enriched regions were identified using MACS2 (46) (version 2.1.0.20140616). A composite list of all identified peaks in any sample was generated using the HOMER (47) (version 4.8.2) “mergePeaks” function. The read depth for each sample was then annotated for all peaks and differential accessibility was calculated using the GLM function of edgeR (40) (version 3.12.1), controlling for the mouse each sample originated from. Principal component (PC) analysis plots were generated using all differentially accessible regions (DAR) and the vegan (version 2.4-3) package in R/Bioconductor. Genomic annotation of peaks was performed using HOMER (47) (version 4.8.2). Peaks that overlapped a promoter (+500 and −2000 bp surrounding the transcription start site) were k-means clustered using the Biganalytics package (https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=biganalytics). Enriched transcription factor motifs were identified using HOMER (47) (version 4.8.2) and the findMotifsGenome.pl script. Histograms of read depth surrounding each motif were generated using custom R/Bioconductor scripts.

ChIP-seq

ChIP was performed as described previously (48). For each immunoprecipitation, 10 × 106 CD43− splenic B cells or 1 × 106 CD138+ splenic ASC were fixed in 1% formaldehyde for 10 min, chromatin was isolated, and then sonicated to an average size of 400 bp. One microgram of anti-H3K27me3 (07-449; EMD Millipore) was prebound to Dynal Protein G magnetic beads (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and DNA–chromatin complexes immunoprecipitated overnight at 4°C. DNA was reverse cross-linked and purified using a PCR Cleanup Kit (Qiagen). ChIP–DNA was diluted 1:20 and enrichment of the Hoxa9 (positive) and Actb (negative) loci was tested by qPCR. The remaining ChIP–DNA was used as input for the KAPA HyperPrep Kit (KAPA Biosystems). ChIP-seq libraries were sequenced on a HiSeq2500 using 50-bp, paired-end chemistry. Raw sequencing reads were mapped to the mm9 version of the mouse genome using Bowtie (45). Uniquely mappable and nonredundant reads were used for subsequent analyses. HOMER (47) software was used for peak calling and annotation. Data were normalized to reads per peak per million (rppm) as previously described (44) using Eq. 1:Embedded ImageFor the generation of scatterplots between nB and ASC samples the rppm read depth was quantile normalized and the log2FC and the average log2 rppm between nB and ASC samples were calculated.

Data availability

All sequencing data are available at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus database (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under the accession number GSE103195. All code and data processing scripts are available upon request.

Extracellular flux assays

A Seahorse Bioanalyzer XFe96 instrument was used for all extracellular flux assays. A FluxPak cartridge was hydrated at least 12 h prior to running each assay with 200 μl dH2O in a 37°C non-CO2 incubator. One hour prior to each assay, dH2O was removed and 200 μl prewarmed Seahorse Calibrant solution (103059-000; Agilent) was added to all experimental wells. For the mitochondrial stress test and measurement of oxygen consumption, purified cell populations were washed in Seahorse XF Assay Media, pH 7.4 ± 0.1, supplemented with 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM l-glutamine (G7513; Sigma), and 5.5 mM glucose at 37°C. For the glycolysis stress test and extracellular acidification measurements, purified cell populations were washed in Seahorse XF Assay Media, pH 7.4 ± 0.1, supplemented with 2 mM l-glutamine. Cells were washed once in appropriate media and counted by flow cytometry using AccuCheck counting beads (PCB100; Invitrogen). Prior to each experiment, CellTak (354420; Corning) was diluted in sterile 1× PBS to a final concentration of 22.4 μg/ml, and 25 μl was added to each well of a Seahorse XFe96 cell culture plate, incubated for 20 min at room temperature. The plates were washed with 200 μl dH2O and then 400,000 cells per well were plated and incubated in a 37°C non-CO2 incubator for 45 min prior to beginning the assay. The indicated drugs were diluted in assay-specific media for injection into each port. For the mitochondrial stress test the ports were as follows: port A, oligomycin (75351; Sigma) was used at a final concentration of 1 μM; port B, carbonyl cyanide-4-(triflurome-thoxy) phenylhydrazone (C2920; Sigma) was used at a final concentration of 2.5 μM; and port C was injected a combination of Rotenone (R8875; Sigma) and Antimycin A (A8674; Sigma), each at a final concentration of 1 μM. For the glycolysis stress test the ports were as follows: port A, glucose (G8270; Sigma) was used at a final concentration of 10 mM; port B, oligomycin was used at a final concentration of 1 μM; and Port C, 2-deoxyglucose (D8375; Sigma) was used at a final concentration of 50 mM.

Results

EZH2 is progressively upregulated during type-I, T-independent B cell differentiation

Ezh2 is progressively upregulated during ex vivo B cell differentiation in response to LPS (49). To assess its expression pattern in vivo, we transferred CFSE-labeled CD45.1 B cells into CD45.2 μMT mice and subsequently inoculated the recipients with LPS to induce differentiation (8). Distinct divisions (Div0, -1, -3, -5, -8+) were FACS isolated and gene expression was quantitated by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR). For consistency across the differentiation models, we define plasma cells that have acquired CD138 expression as ASC. Ezh2 mRNA was upregulated during the divisions, peaking in CD138+ ASC at Div8+ (Fig. 1A). EZH2 protein levels were quantified in splenic nB and 3 d after LPS stimulation in B220+GL7+CD138− activated B cells (actB) and CD138+ ASC. Similar to previous reports (15), EZH2 protein was relatively low in nB, elevated in actB, and peaked in ASC (Fig. 1B).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

EZH2 is progressively upregulated during B cell differentiation in response to type-I, T-independent stimuli. (A) The indicated divisions were isolated by FACS (left) and Ezh2 mRNA levels (right) quantitated by RT-qPCR and expressed relative to 18s rRNA as mean ± SD. These data are representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05 by Student two-tailed t test. (B) Protein levels of EZH2 in nB and LPS-induced actB and CD138+ ASC. Data are representative of two experiments. FMO, fluorescence minus one. (C) Scatterplot of the average promoter H3K27me3 in nB and ASC versus the log2FC of H3K27me3 as determined by ChIP-seq. ChIP-seq data are summarized from two biological replicates of nB and ASC. (D) REVIGO (50) plot summarizing Gene Ontology terms for the 1623 genes that gain promoter H3K27me3 in ASC from (C).

To determine what genes might be affected by EZH2-mediated histone methylation, we performed ChIP-seq for H3K27me3 in nB and ASC, which were enriched to >94% purity (Supplemental Fig. 1A, 1B). We found that 1623 gene promoters gained H3K27me3 in ASC (Fig. 1C), suggesting that these were targets of EZH2-mediated repression. Gene Ontology functional analysis, summarized and condensed by REVIGO (50) (Fig. 1D), indicated that these genes were enriched in pathways associated with B cell functions that are repressed in ASC, such as cell cycle (e.g., Cdkn1a), response to LPS (e.g., Nfkb1 and Tnf), and Ag presentation by MHC (e.g., H2-Ab1 and Cd74). Thus, these data indicate that the progressive upregulation of Ezh2 during B cell differentiation coincides with repression of the B cell transcriptional program in ASC.

ASC differentiation in response to type I, t-independent stimuli requires EZH2

To determine the role of Ezh2 in vivo, we crossed Ezh2fl/fl mice (31) with tamoxifen-inducible Rosa26CreERT2 mice (32). Following tamoxifen treatment, we observed genomic rearrangement of the Ezh2 locus in splenic B cells and a significant reduction in Ezh2 transcripts, and protein was observed (Supplemental Fig. 1C–E). Ezh2 is essential for B cell development (26, 51); however, it is dispensable for peripheral B cell homeostasis (26). Consistent with previous findings, following tamoxifen-induced deletion of Ezh2, a block in B cell development at the pre-B stage was observed (Supplemental Fig. 1F). However, in the short time frame following deletion, no defect was observed in the viability of peripheral splenic B cells or in the frequency of marginal zone or follicular B cells (Supplemental Fig. 1G–I).

To test the function of EZH2, ERT2-Ezh2KO and Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) mice were treated with tamoxifen and subsequently inoculated with LPS to induce B cell differentiation. In ERT2-Ezh2KO mice, we observed a significant reduction in the frequency and absolute numbers of splenic and lymph node ASC and actB (Fig. 2A–E). These differences were not due to changes in the viability of ERT2-Ezh2KO splenocytes (Fig. 2G). Following LPS inoculation, a sharp increase in IgM titers occurred in control mice; however, ERT2-Ezh2KO mice failed to reach the same titers of serum IgM (Fig. 2H), a reduction that correlated with the decreased ASC response. IgG levels were also measured by ELISA and showed a similar reduction in ERT2-Ezh2KO mice; however, the overall levels of IgG were very low in response to LPS (data not shown).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Maximal ASC differentiation in response to T-independent stimuli requires EZH2. Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) and ERT2-Ezh2KO (KO) mice were treated with tamoxifen followed by inoculation with LPS and analyzed as follows. (A) Frequency and (B) absolute number of splenic CD138+ ASC 3 d after LPS inoculation. A representative example is plotted on the left and the mean ± SD of four biological replicates is shown on the right. (C) Frequency of CD138+ ASC from the lymph nodes of mice treated as above. (D) Frequency and (E) absolute number of splenic B220+GL7+ actB. (F) Frequency of B220+GL7+ actB from the lymph nodes of mice treated above. (G) Frequency of viable cells from the spleen. (H) Serum IgM titers measured before (D0) and 3 d after LPS inoculation (D3) for the indicated genotype. Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) and CD19-Ezh2KO mice were analyzed by flow cytometry as follows. (I) Frequency and (J) absolute numbers of splenic CD138+ ASC. (K) Frequency and (L) absolute numbers of splenic B220+GL7+ actB cells. See also Supplemental Fig. 2. Each point represents independent biological samples and data are summarized as mean ± SD. The data presented represent between two and five groups of mice containing three to four mice per cohort. Significance was determined by Student two-tailed t test.

The expression of Cre recombinase can negatively impact rapidly proliferating cells (52). To ensure that the observed phenotype was specific to deletion of Ezh2, we compared hemizygous Ezh2fl/+Rosa26CreERT2/+ (ERT2-Cre Ctl) mice with ERT2-Ezh2KO and the Cre− control mice described above. Three days after LPS inoculation, ERT2-Cre Ctl mice had similar frequencies of splenic actB and ASC as control mice and significantly more of each population than ERT2-Ezh2KO mice (Supplemental Fig. 2A, 2B). To further assess this system, the Cre recombinase expressed from the Cd19 locus was used (33) because it bypasses the developmental defects observed in the ERT2-Ezh2KO strain, allowing normal B cell development to occur (26) and facilitating B cell–specific deletion. In this study, Ezh2fl/flCD19Cre/+ (CD19-Ezh2KO), CD19Cre/+ (CD19-Cre Ctl), and Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) mice were inoculated with LPS and differentiation tested as above. Similar to tamoxifen-induced Ezh2 deletion, CD19-Ezh2KO mice formed 50% fewer ASC and actB compared with controls (Fig. 2I–L, Supplemental Fig. 2C, 2D). Together, these data demonstrated that Ezh2 was required for efficient ASC differentiation in response to type-I, T-independent stimuli.

EZH2 controls the early T-independent burst of influenza-specific ASC

During the humoral response to protein Ags and pathogens, a burst of ASC provides an initial surge of serum Abs before T cell–dependent processes facilitate affinity maturation and class-switched B cell responses (53, 54). In response to the hapten NP, EZH2-deficient B cells displayed reduced NP-specific serum Ab titers as early as day 7 (15), suggesting defects in early ASC responses. To assess the early T cell–independent differentiation events, CD4 T cells were first depleted from CD19-Ezh2KO and control cohorts of mice using an anti-CD4 Ab and subsequently infected with PR8. CD4 T cells were fully depleted at both the time of PR8 infection and the assay end point at day 7, at which no GC B cells were detected (Supplemental Fig. 3A, 3B). At day 7, control mice exhibited expanded lymph node CD138+ ASC, whereas the frequency and absolute number of ASC were significantly reduced in CD19-Ezh2KO mice (Fig. 3A, 3B). Ag-specific, PR8-responding cells were identified using B cell tetramers against HA (35), and the frequency of HA+ ASC, HA+ actB, and total HA+ cells was significantly reduced in CD19-Ezh2KO compared with control mice (Fig. 3C–G, Supplemental Fig. 3C, 3D). Additionally, assessment of Ab levels revealed an increase in HA-specific IgM titers from day 0 to 7 in control mice but significantly reduced levels in CD19-Ezh2KO at mice at day 7 (Fig. 3H). Together, these data define an essential role for EZH2 in the formation of T-independent ASC in response to both nonprotein and protein Ags.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

EZH2 is required for the early burst of influenza-specific ASC in the absence of CD4 T cells. Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) and CD19-Ezh2KO (KO) mice were CD4 T cell depleted and infected with PR8 and analyzed by flow cytometry 7 d postinfection. (A) Frequency and (B) absolute number of CD138+ ASC in the bronchial lymph node. (C) Frequency and (D) absolute number of HA-specific ASC cells. (E) Frequency of B220+GL7+ actB in the bronchial lymph node. (F) Frequency of HA-specific actB. (G) Frequency of HA-specific lineage negative (Thy1.1−F4/80−CD11c−) B cells. (H) ELISA for HA-specific IgM in naive (D0) and 7 d (D7) postinfection of PR8. See also Supplemental Fig. 3. Each point represents independent biological samples and data are summarized as mean ± SD. The data presented represent between two and five groups of mice containing three to four mice per cohort. Significance was determined by Student two-tailed t test.

Cell-intrinsic requirement for EZH2 in ASC differentiation

To determine a cell-intrinsic role for Ezh2 in ASC differentiation, bone marrow from CD45.2 ERT2-Ezh2KO and CD45.1/2 control mice were mixed 1:1 and transferred into lethally irradiated CD45.1 hosts. At 4 wk, the percentages of CD45.2 and CD45.1/2 donor cells in the periphery of recipient mice were similar (Fig. 4A). After 6 wk, mice were treated with tamoxifen (as above) to induce EZH2 deletion and subsequently inoculated with LPS. Three days after LPS, both ERT2-Ezh2KO (CD45.2) and control cells were identified (Fig. 4B) and a significant reduction in CD138+ ASC in the spleen (Fig. 4C) and lymph nodes (Fig. 4D) was observed in cells transferred from ERT2-Ezh2KO mice. Additionally, the frequency of actB was significantly reduced (Fig. 4E, 4F). These data indicate that EZH2 performs an essential cell-intrinsic function during LPS-induced B cell differentiation.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Cell-intrinsic requirement for EZH2 in ASC differentiation. The bone marrow from Ezh2fl/+CD45.1/2 (Ctl) and ERT2-Ezh2KO CD45.2 (KO) mice was transferred to lethally irradiated CD45.1 wild-type hosts and analyzed at 4 wk for chimerism. (A) At 6 wk, the mice were treated with tamoxifen and inoculated with LPS and analyzed 3 d later. (B) Frequencies of chimeric populations following LPS treatment. Quantitation of CD138+ ASC frequencies from the (C) spleen and (D) lymph nodes of LPS inoculated mice. Quantitation of B220+GL7+ actB frequencies from the (E) spleen and (F) lymph nodes of LPS-inoculated mice. Each point represents independent biological samples and data are summarized as mean ± SD. Data are representative of two independent experiments with four to five mice per group. Significance was determined by Student two-tailed t test.

EZH2 represses B cell transcription factor networks

Transcriptome profiling was performed on tamoxifen-treated ERT2-Ezh2KO or control ASC following LPS stimulation to determine the molecular consequences of Ezh2 deletion. In ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC, 1498 genes were significantly upregulated (false discovery rate [FDR] < 0.05, log2FC > 1) whereas only 79 were downregulated (Fig. 5A). Although not entirely, these data are largely consistent with a repressive function for EZH2. Confirming the tamoxifen-induced deletion in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC, an 18-fold reduction in the transcripts across Ezh2’s deleted exons was observed compared with wild type (Supplemental Fig. 4A). Moreover, in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC, Ezh2 was the most significantly downregulated gene by an FDR differential of 10113. GSEA (55, 56) indicated that, in the absence of Ezh2, genes involved in the regulation of inflammation and NF-κB–mediated TNF-α signaling and the p53 pathway were upregulated (Fig. 5B). During B cell development, EZH2 repressed the cell cycle inhibitor Cdkn2a and prevented p53 activation (51); thus, EZH2 may be performing a similar role in ASC.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

EZH2 is a transcriptional repressor in ASC. RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) was performed on enriched splenic ASC from tamoxifen-treated Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) and ERT2-Ezh2KO (KO) mice 3 d after LPS inoculation. (A) Volcano plot summarizing DEG (FDR < 0.05, log2FC > 1) between Ctl and KO ASC. RNA-seq data represent three biological replicates of Ctl and KO ASC. (B) Top GSEA gene sets. (C) The log2FC for DEG was plotted versus the log2FC in promoter H3K27me3 enrichment between nB and ASC. (D) Heatmap of H3K27me3 enrichment for 2 kb surrounding promoters of 1498 upregulated DEG. Data were ranked by the change in H3K27me3 in ASC versus nB. Color bars map distinct clusters of genes from (C). ATAC-seq was performed on Ctl and KO nB and ASC from tamoxifen-treated bone marrow chimeras 3 d following LPS inoculation (see Fig. 4). (E) Promoter accessibility (ATAC-seq) heatmap for genes in (D) was categorized using k-means clustering (k = 3). Three independent replicates of Ctl nB, Ctl ASC, and KO ASC, and two replicates of KO nB are shown. (F) ATAC-seq–derived volcano plot showing DAR (FDR < 0.05, log2FC > 1) comparing KO and Ctl ASC. (G) For the indicated genes, the change in expression by RNA-seq is plotted with a genome plot depicting chromatin accessibility and H3K27me3-enrichment data for each locus. ATAC-seq data are summarized as mean of three biological replicates for Ctl nB, Ctl ASC, and KO ASC, and two replicates for KO nB. H3K27me3 ChIP-seq data represent the mean of two biological replicates for nB and ASC. Promoter regions are highlighted. FPKM, fragments per kilobase per million; rpm, reads per million. See also Supplemental Fig. 4.

To determine if the differentially expressed genes (DEG) were direct targets of EZH2, we compared the change in promoter H3K27me3 enrichment between nB and ASC with the change in expression between ERT2-Ezh2KO versus control ASC. We found that 923 genes were upregulated in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC and gained promoter H3K27me3 compared with nB (Fig. 5C, 5D), indicating that these DEG are direct repression targets of EZH2. Bcl6 was among the top genes that gained promoter H3K27me3 in wild-type ASC and was increased in expression in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC, suggesting that other B cell transcription factors could be dysregulated. GSEA analysis was performed using a set of transcription factors specifically expressed in follicular B cells compared with bone marrow ASC (57) and showed that this set of transcription factors were significantly upregulated in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC (Fig. 5B). Other examples of genes that were significantly upregulated in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC and demonstrated extensive gains in H3K27me3 in ASC included the developmental transcription factor Klf4, inflammatory genes Ifit3 and Lta, and cell cycle inhibitors Cdkn1a and Slfn1 (Fig. 5G, Supplemental Fig. 4B). These results indicate that EZH2 functions to epigenetically silence key B cell genes involved in inflammatory responses.

EZH2 controls chromatin accessibility in ASC

The derepression of 923 genes could be directly attributed to a failure to gain H3K27me3 in ASC. However, an additional 575 DEG gained expression and were marked by H3K27me3 in both nB and ASC, suggesting they are normally repressed in both cell types. To further understand the consequences of Ezh2 deletion, we performed ATAC-seq (43, 44) on nB and ASC from ERT2-Ezh2KO and control mice. PC analysis of all DAR revealed a large difference between nB and ASC regardless of EZH2 status defined by PC1 (Supplemental Fig. 4C), indicating that in the absence of EZH2, most differentiation-associated chromatin accessibility changes occurred normally. PC2 separated control and ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC but not nB, which contained minimal DAR (Supplemental Fig. 4D), indicating chromatin accessibility differences were primarily specific to Ezh2-deficient ASC.

Promoter accessibility of genes upregulated in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC was annotated in nB and ASC and the patterns were categorized by k-means clustering. Three distinct patterns of promoter chromatin accessibility were observed: k1, promoters that lost accessibility between nB and ASC; k2, promoters that were minimally accessible in nB, remained such in control ASC yet gained accessibility in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC; and k3, promoters that were inaccessible in nB and control ASC and only gained accessibility in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC (Fig. 5E). We found that promoters of DEG in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC were more accessible than those in control ASC. Direct comparison with control ASC revealed 1317 loci that gained accessibility in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC compared with only 347 that decreased (Fig. 5F). Examples of chromatin accessibility changes include specific regions located in Bcl6 and Klf4 (k1), Hoxa1 (k2), and Eml6 (k3) (Fig. 5G).

The failure to repress key B cell transcription factors suggested that such factors may contribute to a unique accessibility footprint in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC. Analysis of DNA sequence motifs within regions of increased accessibility revealed an enrichment for CTCF, ETS, OCT, and IRF family transcription factor binding sites (Fig. 6A). Although CTCF was expressed at similar levels in nB and ASC, the presence of CTCF sites within DAR suggests a potential defect in rearranging the three-dimensional genome during ASC differentiation (58). Transcription factor footprinting for the occurrence of each motif revealed unique patterns at each binding site and clear increases in accessibility surrounding each motif in ERT2-Ezh2KO compared with control ASC (Fig. 6A). Increased accessibility could be due to an increase in expression of a transcription factor family member that binds to a specific motif, such as the ETS factor SPIB that is upregulated, or due to a failure to recruit EZH2 to a region. Thus, these data depict the epigenetic derepression of loci controlled by EZH2 through increases in gene expression and chromatin accessibility at sites normally repressed in ASC.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Blimp-1 target genes are upregulated in EZH2-deficient ASC. (A) ATAC-seq–based transcription factor footprinting histograms for motifs enriched in KO versus Ctl ASC from Fig. 5F. The significance of enrichment for each motif is indicated and the enriched motif is displayed. Histograms summarize three independent replicates of ATAC-seq data from Ctl and KO ASC. rpm, reads per million. (B) GSEA assessing the enrichment of Blimp-1–repressed genes (30) in Ctl and KO RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) data. (C) Representative RNA-seq data summaries for the indicated genes. Data are representative of three biological replicates and are summarized as mean ± SD. (D) Genome plots depicting the loci in (C). ASC–Blimp-1 data were previously reported and normalized to reads per million (30). H3K27me3 ChIP-seq data represent the mean of two biological replicates for nB and ASC.

Blimp-1–repressed genes are upregulated in the absence of EZH2

Blimp-1 can elicit gene repression through physical interactions with epigenetic modifiers (59–61), including EZH2 (30). GSEA was performed using a high-confidence set of Blimp-1–repressed target genes derived from transcriptional profiling of genetic deletions and ChIP-seq data (30). Of the 109 genes that overlapped in the data sets, 96% demonstrated higher expression in the absence of EZH2 (Fig. 6B). Examples included the ETS family transcription factor gene Spib, which was upregulated and contained one of the strongest Blimp-1 binding sites (Fig. 6C, 6D). Additionally, genes for Klf2, a transcription factor involved in B cell homing and migration (62); the TLR Tlr9; and Btg1, which functions as a negative regulator of cellular proliferation and apoptosis (63, 64); all contained Blimp-1 binding sites at regions that gained H3K27me3 in ASC and were upregulated in the absence of EZH2. These data provide an in vivo link between EZH2 and Blimp-1 in ASC and demonstrate that epigenetic modifications via EZH2 may be required for the Blimp-1–mediated gene repression program.

Deletion of Ezh2 impairs the proliferation of actB

Recent studies in B cells and B cell–derived lymphomas demonstrated that inhibition or depletion of EZH2 resulted in cell cycle arrest, impaired proliferation, and apoptosis (16, 28, 65–67). Indeed, a cell cycle gene set was one of the most downregulated gene sets in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC (Fig. 5B). Additionally, the EZH2 target gene Cdkn1a (16), which encodes the P21 cell cycle inhibitory kinase, is upregulated in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC (Supplemental Fig. 4B). These data suggest that the observed decrease in actB and ASC was due to an EZH2-mediated defect in the proliferative phase of B cell differentiation. To test this hypothesis, tamoxifen-treated CD45.2 ERT2-Ezh2KO and CD45.1/2 control B cells were labeled with CTV, transferred into congenically marked CD45.1 μMT hosts, and stimulated to differentiate by inoculation with LPS. After 3 d, ERT2-Ezh2KO and control B cells were analyzed for their ability to divide and differentiate (Fig. 7A). Consistent with previous results (8), eight cellular divisions were typically observed with control B cells (Fig. 7B, 7C). In contrast, ERT2-Ezh2KO B cells initially proliferated normally through three cellular divisions but were reduced in number at all subsequent divisions. The B cell activation marker GL7 was progressively upregulated in control cells through eight divisions. However, ERT2-Ezh2KO B cells failed to gain additional GL7 expression after three divisions (Fig. 7D, 7E). Analysis of differentiation kinetics through expression of CD138 revealed that B cells from control and ERT2-Ezh2KO mice both achieved seven to eight divisions before an accumulation of CD138+ ASC were observed, however the ERT2-Ezh2KO CD138+ cells were reduced in frequency (Fig. 7F, 7G). These data indicated that in the absence of EZH2, a defect in the ability to proliferate, possibly through the failure to repress negative regulators of the cell cycle, contributes to the reduced numbers of differentiated ASC.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Deletion of Ezh2 impairs B cell activation and proliferation in vivo. B cells isolated from tamoxifen-treated Ezh2fl/+CD45.1/2 (Ctl) and Ezh2fl/flRosa26CreERT2/+CD45.2 (KO) mice were labeled with CTV, transferred into CD45.1 μMT mice, and inoculated with LPS as above. (A) Frequencies of transferred populations in the spleens of mice 3 d following LPS treatment. (B) Histograms and (C) absolute numbers of CTV labeled in Ctl and KO cells. (D) Representative flow cytometry plot and summary of the frequency of GL7+ cells. (E) The absolute number of B220+GL7+ cells in each division from (D). (F) Representative and summary of the frequency of CD138+ cells from the above cells. (G) The absolute number of CD138+ cells in each division from (F). For summary graphs, the mean ± SD is shown. Data are representative from two independent experiments containing cohorts of five animals each. Significance was determined by paired Student t test.

EZH2 is required for the metabolic programming of ASC

Although a subset of ERT2-Ezh2KO B cells could undergo eight rounds of division and differentiate into ASC, the molecular phenotype of these cells indicated that they were likely dysfunctional (Fig. 5). To directly measure the Ab-secreting capacity of these cells, control and ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC—derived following LPS-induced differentiation in vivo—were purified, equal numbers cultured for 3.5 h, and Ab titers from the resulting supernatant measured by ELISA. On a per-cell basis, ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC secreted 50% fewer molecules of IgM (Fig. 8A). However, no difference in the levels of IgM mRNA transcripts (Fig. 8B) or intracellular IgM protein levels (Fig. 8C) were observed between control and ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC, indicating that the IgM deficiency may lie in protein secretion.

FIGURE 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 8.

EZH2 is required for maximal Ab secretion and ASC metabolism. Ezh2fl/fl (Ctl) and ERT2-Ezh2KO (KO) mice were treated with tamoxifen and inoculated with LPS as above and analyzed as follows. (A) ELISA measuring IgM titers at 3.5 h of culture from 1 × 106 LPS-induced splenic CD138+ ASC from Ctl and KO mice. (B) Expression of IgM transcripts measured by RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) from splenic Ctl and KO CD138+ cells following LPS inoculation. See Fig. 5. (C) Measurement of intracellular IgM in Ctl and KO CD138+ ASC. Representative flow cytometry data are plotted and the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) summarized as mean ± SD. (D) GSEA assessment of RNA-seq data from Fig. 5A for the indicated gene sets. “Xbp1 up” genes were previously described (68). False discovery corrected q value is shown. Genes involved in protein secretion and transport are indicated in red below. (E) GSEA assessment of RNA-seq data from Fig. 5A for the indicated gene sets. (F) Extracellular flux analysis of Ctl and KO ASC described above. Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) before and after treatment with the indicated pharmacological inhibitors. Data represent the combination of two independent experiments containing cohorts of four animals. Each point represents the mean ± SD. (G) Extracellular acidification rate (ECAR) of ASC as in (F), measured at steady state without glucose, after addition of glucose, oligomycin, and 2-deoxy-d-glucose (2DG). Data represent the combination of two independent experiments containing cohorts of four animals. Each point represents the mean ± SD. Significance determined by Student two-tailed t test.

Consistent with this idea, GSEA indicated that the UPR and genes upregulated by the transcription factor XBP1 (68) failed to be induced in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC (Fig. 8D). Annotation of genes involved in protein secretion and transport revealed that these genes were more highly expressed in control than in ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC, consistent with decreased IgM levels in the cultures of ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC. XBP1-mediated induction of the UPR pathway is also important for increased mitochondrial function (69), and ASC require a high metabolic capacity to support synthesis and secretion of Ab molecules (70). Indeed, GSEA revealed the expression of oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis metabolic pathways were enriched in control but not ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC (Fig. 8E). Moreover, EZH2 regulates the mTOR pathway in follicular lymphoma (71), suggesting the reduced IgM secretion in ASC may be due to a metabolic defect.

To test the hypothesis that ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC were metabolically distinct, extracellular flux assays were performed to probe both mitochondrial respiration and glucose metabolism. The oxygen consumption rate was measured as a readout for mitochondrial respiration. At basal levels, ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC consumed significantly less oxygen than control ASC (Fig. 8F). Following inhibition of ATP synthase with oligomycin, similar declines were observed in oxygen consumption. Maximal respiration rates were also greater in control ASC compared with ERT2-Ezh2KO, as shown by the addition of carbonyl cyanide-4-(triflurome-thoxy) phenylhydrazone to the system. This suggests that control ASC are more capable of using the oxidative phosphorylation metabolic pathway than ERT2-Ezh2KO. Because metabolism is a balance between multiple metabolic pathways and the expression of the glucose transporter Glut1 was upregulated after LPS stimulation ex vivo (72), the ability of ASC to metabolize glucose was assessed. The extracellular acidification rate, which is measured by pH changes associated with excretion of lactic acid generated from pyruvate (73), can be used to measure rates of glucose metabolism. Addition of glucose to glucose-deprived ASC resulted in enhanced lactate secretion in control compared with ERT2-Ezh2KO ASC, resulting in a significantly higher ability to perform glycolysis (Fig. 8G). These data therefore define EZH2 as an essential upstream regulator of ASC metabolic potential.

Discussion

In this article, we tested whether EZH2 regulated ASC differentiation using both type-I and type-II T-independent B cell responses in vivo. Consistent with other data (26), we found that EZH2 is not required for homeostasis of naive follicular and marginal zone B cells. However, immunization with T-independent Ags or protein Ags in the absence of T cell help generated poor B cell responses in Ezh2-deficient mice. The role of EZH2 was B cell intrinsic as Ezh2-deficient B cells also poorly differentiated into ASC in mixed bone marrow chimeric mice. As EZH2 is the continued target of therapeutic intervention, these data have implications for the effect of inhibitors on normal humoral immune responses.

The poor differentiation of Ezh2-deficient ASC could be due, in part, to a defect in the ability of Ezh2-deficient ASC to upregulate genes involved in the cell cycle. In fact, the top upregulated gene sets in Ezh2-deficient ASC were inflammatory and p53 pathways, with each consisting of genes that function to negatively regulate the cell cycle. Among the most induced genes within these sets was Cdkn1a, which encodes the G1/S cell cycle checkpoint inhibitor P21 (74). ChIP-seq data showed that Cdkn1a has increased H3K27me3 across its promoter and proximal upstream sequences, confirming a previously described direct role for EZH2 in its regulation (15, 16, 28). In vivo, B cells undergo approximately eight cell divisions before differentiating into ASC (8). Ezh2-deficient cells went through fewer divisions, resulting in fewer cells that acquired the actB phenotype (GL7+) and fewer CD138+ ASC, consistent with the continued activity of cell cycle inhibitors. This result is consistent with findings in multiple myeloma in which EZH2 is overexpressed and pharmacological inhibition limits cell growth (75, 76). Thus, the failure to repress cell cycle inhibitors, such as Cdkn1a, is a likely mechanism leading to decreased numbers of observed ASC.

Ezh2-deficient ASC also failed to repress the transcriptional program associated with mature B cells, including the accumulation of H3K27me3 at genes, such as Ciita which functions in MHC class II Ag processing, B cell transcription factors like Bcl6, as well as NF-κB–mediated inflammatory genes. Transcriptome profiling of discrete divisions in vivo following B cell activation with LPS revealed that the third cell division following activation was the first stage in which gene repression occurred. This division also coincided with the downregulation of NF-κB–regulated genes (8). Ezh2-defient cells displayed a proliferation defect at division three as well, suggesting that this stage may be an initial differentiation checkpoint requiring the repression of a set of genes to continue the process.

The failure to repress B cell–associated transcriptional programs was also associated with the enrichment of transcription factor binding motifs in regulatory regions of those genes. For example, in Ezh2-deficient ASC, CTCF and the ETS family transcription factor binding motifs were significantly more accessible. The chromatin landscape associated with CTCF within the MHC class II region is reorganized during B cell differentiation in response to LPS (58), and CTCF is known to function in the maintenance of GC B cells (77). It is possible that this architecture may not be properly organized in the absence of EZH2. The most differentially regulated ETS family member was Spib, which is normally silenced in ASC through direct repression by Blimp-1 (30, 78). Furthermore, genes normally repressed in both B cells and ASC and marked by H3K27me3, including Hoxa1 and Eml6, failed to remain repressed. Of note, the classification of promoter accessibility changes of genes that failed to be repressed by EZH2 revealed a category of promoters that lost accessibility normally in ASC. This indicates that chromatin accessibility data derived from ATAC-seq may not correlate with failed epigenetic processes at all loci, and that additional epigenetic mechanisms are required for full repression of the B cell transcriptome.

Deficiencies in proliferation and repression of B cell fate accounted for reduced ASC numbers; however, Ezh2-deficient ASC secreted less IgM on a per cell basis, indicating that ASC-specific pathways were dysregulated. From the adoptive transfer proliferation experiment in which splenic B cells were transferred into μMT hosts (Fig. 7), it is likely that the observed EZH2 defect lies in the marginal zone B cell compartment; however, we did not specifically assess the impact of EZH2 deletion on B1 B cells, which secrete IgM in response to LPS (79). ASC have enhanced metabolic potential and upregulate endoplasmic reticulum stress response pathways to facilitate Ab secretion (3, 8, 80). Transcriptome profiling demonstrated that both of these processes were altered in the absence of EZH2 with reduced expression of genes in the UPR, glycolysis, and oxidative phosphorylation pathways. Oxidative phosphorylation is fueled by pyruvate molecules derived from both glycolysis and fatty acid oxidation. In this study only glycolysis was assayed; therefore, we cannot rule out a role for EZH2 in regulating fatty acid metabolism. Ezh2-deficient ASC failed to upregulate XBP-1 target genes, which is required for the induction of the UPR (81). Cellular metabolism is regulated through the PI3K signaling pathway, with the mTORC1 and mTORC2 kinases representing essential nodes (3). ASC require the continued activity of mTORC1 to maintain maximal levels of Ab secretion (82). In the absence of EZH2, the ability of ASC to perform oxidative phosphorylation and metabolize glucose through the glycolysis pathway was reduced and correlated with a reduced ability to secrete Abs. These data converge with recent results describing a role for EZH2-mediated control of mTORC1 in follicular lymphoma (71) and indicate that there is an epigenetic component to the induction and/or maintenance of ASC metabolism. Therefore, Ezh2-dependent and possibly other epigenetic mechanisms are required to program ASC metabolic potential and facilitate Ab secretion.

Metabolic reprogramming following activation in immune cells is necessary for effector functions in both the myeloid and lymphoid lineages, and epigenetic enzymes require cofactors synthesized during metabolism (83). However, it is less clear how the metabolic changes are programmed and inherited through cell fate transitions. Although not essential for their survival, bone marrow ASC require the continued activity of Blimp-1 to sustain the UPR and secrete Abs (68). These results pose that EZH2 may also be continually required for these ASC functions. If ASC require the constant activity of transcription factors and epigenetic enzymes to maintain metabolic potential, this suggests that throughout their lifetime ASC may be able to adapt to nutrient availability and respond to environmental cues. These data therefore identify an Ezh2-dependent epigenetic process that facilitates ASC metabolism.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge the members of the Boss laboratory for scientific contributions and editorial input to the project, the Emory Flow Cytometry Core for FACS expertise, the Emory Integrated Genomics Core for sequencing library quality control, and the New York University Genome Technology Center for Illumina sequencing.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants 1R01AI123733 to J.M.B.; P01 AI 125180-02 to J.M.B. and T.D.R.; T32 GM0008490 to R.R.H., A.K.K., and B.G.B.; F31 AI112261 to B.G.B.; and F31 1F31 AI131532 to R.R.H.

  • The sequencing data presented in this article have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information’s Gene Expression Omnibus (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE103195.

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    actB
    activated B cell
    AID
    activation-induced cytidine deaminase
    ASC
    Ab-secreting cell
    ATAC-seq
    assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing
    CD19-Ezh2KO
    Ezh2fl/flCD19Cre/+
    ChIP
    chromatin immunoprecipitation
    ChIP-seq
    ChIP sequencing
    Ctl
    control
    CTV
    CellTrace Violet
    DAR
    differentially accessible region
    DEG
    differentially expressed gene
    ERT2-Cre Ctl
    Ezh2fl/+Rosa26CreERT2/+
    ERT2-Ezh2KO
    Ezh2fl/flRosa26CreERT2/+
    EZH2
    enhancer of zest 2
    FC
    fold change
    FDR
    false discovery rate
    FSC
    forward light scatter
    GC
    germinal center
    GSEA
    gene set enrichment analysis
    HA
    hemagglutinin
    H3K27me3
    histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation
    KO
    knockout
    MEDS
    mosaic end double stranded
    nB
    naive B cell
    PC
    principal component
    PR8
    A/PR8/34 strain of influenza
    PRC2
    polycomb repressive complex 2
    qPCR
    quantitative PCR
    rppm
    reads per peak per million
    RT-qPCR
    quantitative RT-PCR
    SSC
    side scatter
    UPR
    unfolded-protein response.

  • Received October 23, 2017.
  • Accepted November 29, 2017.
  • Copyright © 2018 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fairfax, K. A.,
    2. A. Kallies,
    3. S. L. Nutt,
    4. D. M. Tarlinton
    . 2008. Plasma cell development: from B-cell subsets to long-term survival niches. Semin. Immunol. 20: 49–58.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Nutt, S. L.,
    2. P. D. Hodgkin,
    3. D. M. Tarlinton,
    4. L. M. Corcoran
    . 2015. The generation of antibody-secreting plasma cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15: 160–171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Boothby, M.,
    2. R. C. Rickert
    . 2017. Metabolic regulation of the immune humoral response. Immunity 46: 743–755.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Nutt, S. L.,
    2. N. Taubenheim,
    3. J. Hasbold,
    4. L. M. Corcoran,
    5. P. D. Hodgkin
    . 2011. The genetic network controlling plasma cell differentiation. Semin. Immunol. 23: 341–349.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Good-Jacobson, K. L.
    2014. Regulation of germinal center, B-cell memory, and plasma cell formation by histone modifiers. Front. Immunol. 5: 596.
    OpenUrl
    1. Li, G.,
    2. H. Zan,
    3. Z. Xu,
    4. P. Casali
    . 2013. Epigenetics of the antibody response. Trends Immunol. 34: 460–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Zan, H.,
    2. P. Casali
    . 2015. Epigenetics of peripheral B-cell differentiation and the antibody response. Front. Immunol. 6: 631.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Barwick, B. G.,
    2. C. D. Scharer,
    3. A. P. R. Bally,
    4. J. M. Boss
    . 2016. Plasma cell differentiation is coupled to division-dependent DNA hypomethylation and gene regulation. Nat. Immunol. 17: 1216–1225.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Lai, A. Y.,
    2. D. Mav,
    3. R. Shah,
    4. S. A. Grimm,
    5. D. Phadke,
    6. K. Hatzi,
    7. A. Melnick,
    8. C. Geigerman,
    9. S. E. Sobol,
    10. D. L. Jaye,
    11. P. A. Wade
    . 2013. DNA methylation profiling in human B cells reveals immune regulatory elements and epigenetic plasticity at Alu elements during B-cell activation. Genome Res. 23: 2030–2041.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Kulis, M.,
    2. A. Merkel,
    3. S. Heath,
    4. A. C. Queirós,
    5. R. P. Schuyler,
    6. G. Castellano,
    7. R. Beekman,
    8. E. Raineri,
    9. A. Esteve,
    10. G. Clot, et al
    . 2015. Whole-genome fingerprint of the DNA methylome during human B cell differentiation. Nat. Genet. 47: 746–756.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Shaknovich, R.,
    2. L. Cerchietti,
    3. L. Tsikitas,
    4. M. Kormaksson,
    5. S. De,
    6. M. E. Figueroa,
    7. G. Ballon,
    8. S. N. Yang,
    9. N. Weinhold,
    10. M. Reimers, et al
    . 2011. DNA methyltransferase 1 and DNA methylation patterning contribute to germinal center B-cell differentiation. Blood 118: 3559–3569.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Frangini, A.,
    2. M. Sjöberg,
    3. M. Roman-Trufero,
    4. G. Dharmalingam,
    5. V. Haberle,
    6. T. Bartke,
    7. B. Lenhard,
    8. M. Malumbres,
    9. M. Vidal,
    10. N. Dillon
    . 2013. The aurora B kinase and the polycomb protein ring1B combine to regulate active promoters in quiescent lymphocytes. Mol. Cell 51: 647–661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Revilla-I-Domingo, R.,
    2. I. Bilic,
    3. B. Vilagos,
    4. H. Tagoh,
    5. A. Ebert,
    6. I. M. Tamir,
    7. L. Smeenk,
    8. J. Trupke,
    9. A. Sommer,
    10. M. Jaritz,
    11. M. Busslinger
    . 2012. The B-cell identity factor Pax5 regulates distinct transcriptional programmes in early and late B lymphopoiesis. EMBO J. 31: 3130–3146.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Zhang, J.,
    2. D. Jima,
    3. A. B. Moffitt,
    4. Q. Liu,
    5. M. Czader,
    6. E. D. Hsi,
    7. Y. Fedoriw,
    8. C. H. Dunphy,
    9. K. L. Richards,
    10. J. I. Gill, et al
    . 2014. The genomic landscape of mantle cell lymphoma is related to the epigenetically determined chromatin state of normal B cells. Blood 123: 2988–2996.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Caganova, M.,
    2. C. Carrisi,
    3. G. Varano,
    4. F. Mainoldi,
    5. F. Zanardi,
    6. P. L. Germain,
    7. L. George,
    8. F. Alberghini,
    9. L. Ferrarini,
    10. A. K. Talukder, et al
    . 2013. Germinal center dysregulation by histone methyltransferase EZH2 promotes lymphomagenesis. J. Clin. Invest. 123: 5009–5022.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Béguelin, W.,
    2. R. Popovic,
    3. M. Teater,
    4. Y. Jiang,
    5. K. L. Bunting,
    6. M. Rosen,
    7. H. Shen,
    8. S. N. Yang,
    9. L. Wang,
    10. T. Ezponda, et al
    . 2013. EZH2 is required for germinal center formation and somatic EZH2 mutations promote lymphoid transformation. Cancer Cell 23: 677–692.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Good-Jacobson, K. L.,
    2. Y. Chen,
    3. A. K. Voss,
    4. G. K. Smyth,
    5. T. Thomas,
    6. D. Tarlinton
    . 2014. Regulation of germinal center responses and B-cell memory by the chromatin modifier MOZ. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 9585–9590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Waibel, M.,
    2. A. J. Christiansen,
    3. M. L. Hibbs,
    4. J. Shortt,
    5. S. A. Jones,
    6. I. Simpson,
    7. A. Light,
    8. K. O’Donnell,
    9. E. F. Morand,
    10. D. M. Tarlinton, et al
    . 2015. Manipulation of B-cell responses with histone deacetylase inhibitors. Nat. Commun. 6: 6838.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Pasqualucci, L.,
    2. D. Dominguez-Sola,
    3. A. Chiarenza,
    4. G. Fabbri,
    5. A. Grunn,
    6. V. Trifonov,
    7. L. H. Kasper,
    8. S. Lerach,
    9. H. Tang,
    10. J. Ma, et al
    . 2011. Inactivating mutations of acetyltransferase genes in B-cell lymphoma. Nature 471: 189–195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Shih, A. H.,
    2. O. Abdel-Wahab,
    3. J. P. Patel,
    4. R. L. Levine
    . 2012. The role of mutations in epigenetic regulators in myeloid malignancies. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12: 599–612.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Bernstein, B. E.,
    2. T. S. Mikkelsen,
    3. X. Xie,
    4. M. Kamal,
    5. D. J. Huebert,
    6. J. Cuff,
    7. B. Fry,
    8. A. Meissner,
    9. M. Wernig,
    10. K. Plath, et al
    . 2006. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 125: 315–326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Cao, R.,
    2. L. Wang,
    3. H. Wang,
    4. L. Xia,
    5. H. Erdjument-Bromage,
    6. P. Tempst,
    7. R. S. Jones,
    8. Y. Zhang
    . 2002. Role of histone H3 lysine 27 methylation in polycomb-group silencing. Science 298: 1039–1043.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Müller, J.,
    2. C. M. Hart,
    3. N. J. Francis,
    4. M. L. Vargas,
    5. A. Sengupta,
    6. B. Wild,
    7. E. L. Miller,
    8. M. B. O’Connor,
    9. R. E. Kingston,
    10. J. A. Simon
    . 2002. Histone methyltransferase activity of a Drosophila polycomb group repressor complex. Cell 111: 197–208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Czermin, B.,
    2. R. Melfi,
    3. D. McCabe,
    4. V. Seitz,
    5. A. Imhof,
    6. V. Pirrotta
    . 2002. Drosophila enhancer of Zeste/ESC complexes have a histone H3 methyltransferase activity that marks chromosomal polycomb sites. Cell 111: 185–196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Kuzmichev, A.,
    2. K. Nishioka,
    3. H. Erdjument-Bromage,
    4. P. Tempst,
    5. D. Reinberg
    . 2002. Histone methyltransferase activity associated with a human multiprotein complex containing the Enhancer of Zeste protein. Genes Dev. 16: 2893–2905.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Su, I. H.,
    2. A. Basavaraj,
    3. A. N. Krutchinsky,
    4. O. Hobert,
    5. A. Ullrich,
    6. B. T. Chait,
    7. A. Tarakhovsky
    . 2003. Ezh2 controls B cell development through histone H3 methylation and Igh rearrangement. Nat. Immunol. 4: 124–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Mandal, M.,
    2. S. E. Powers,
    3. M. Maienschein-Cline,
    4. E. T. Bartom,
    5. K. M. Hamel,
    6. B. L. Kee,
    7. A. R. Dinner,
    8. M. R. Clark
    . 2011. Epigenetic repression of the Igk locus by STAT5-mediated recruitment of the histone methyltransferase Ezh2. Nat. Immunol. 12: 1212–1220.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Velichutina, I.,
    2. R. Shaknovich,
    3. H. Geng,
    4. N. A. Johnson,
    5. R. D. Gascoyne,
    6. A. M. Melnick,
    7. O. Elemento
    . 2010. EZH2-mediated epigenetic silencing in germinal center B cells contributes to proliferation and lymphomagenesis. Blood 116: 5247–5255 .
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Béguelin, W.,
    2. M. Teater,
    3. M. D. Gearhart,
    4. M. T. Calvo Fernández,
    5. R. L. Goldstein,
    6. M. G. Cárdenas,
    7. K. Hatzi,
    8. M. Rosen,
    9. H. Shen,
    10. C. M. Corcoran, et al
    . 2016. EZH2 and BCL6 cooperate to assemble CBX8-BCOR complex to repress bivalent promoters, mediate germinal center formation and lymphomagenesis. Cancer Cell 30: 197–213.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  25. ↵
    1. Minnich, M.,
    2. H. Tagoh,
    3. P. Bönelt,
    4. E. Axelsson,
    5. M. Fischer,
    6. B. Cebolla,
    7. A. Tarakhovsky,
    8. S. L. Nutt,
    9. M. Jaritz,
    10. M. Busslinger
    . 2016. Multifunctional role of the transcription factor Blimp-1 in coordinating plasma cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 17: 331–343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Shen, X.,
    2. Y. Liu,
    3. Y. J. Hsu,
    4. Y. Fujiwara,
    5. J. Kim,
    6. X. Mao,
    7. G. C. Yuan,
    8. S. H. Orkin
    . 2008. EZH1 mediates methylation on histone H3 lysine 27 and complements EZH2 in maintaining stem cell identity and executing pluripotency. Mol. Cell 32: 491–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Ventura, A.,
    2. D. G. Kirsch,
    3. M. E. McLaughlin,
    4. D. A. Tuveson,
    5. J. Grimm,
    6. L. Lintault,
    7. J. Newman,
    8. E. E. Reczek,
    9. R. Weissleder,
    10. T. Jacks
    . 2007. Restoration of p53 function leads to tumour regression in vivo. Nature 445: 661–665.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Rickert, R. C.,
    2. J. Roes,
    3. K. Rajewsky
    . 1997. B lymphocyte-specific, Cre-mediated mutagenesis in mice. Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 1317–1318.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Kitamura, D.,
    2. J. Roes,
    3. R. Kühn,
    4. K. Rajewsky
    . 1991. A B cell-deficient mouse by targeted disruption of the membrane exon of the immunoglobulin mu chain gene. Nature 350: 423–426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Ballesteros-Tato, A.,
    2. B. León,
    3. B. A. Graf,
    4. A. Moquin,
    5. P. S. Adams,
    6. F. E. Lund,
    7. T. D. Randall
    . 2012. Interleukin-2 inhibits germinal center formation by limiting T follicular helper cell differentiation. Immunity 36: 847–856.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Scharer, C. D.,
    2. N. M. Choi,
    3. B. G. Barwick,
    4. P. Majumder,
    5. S. Lohsen,
    6. J. M. Boss
    . 2015. Genome-wide CIITA-binding profile identifies sequence preferences that dictate function versus recruitment. Nucleic Acids Res. 43: 3128–3142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kim, D.,
    2. G. Pertea,
    3. C. Trapnell,
    4. H. Pimentel,
    5. R. Kelley,
    6. S. L. Salzberg
    . 2013. TopHat2: accurate alignment of transcriptomes in the presence of insertions, deletions and gene fusions. Genome Biol. 14: R36.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Hsu, F.,
    2. W. J. Kent,
    3. H. Clawson,
    4. R. M. Kuhn,
    5. M. Diekhans,
    6. D. Haussler
    . 2006. The UCSC known genes. Bioinformatics 22: 1036–1046.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Lawrence, M.,
    2. W. Huber,
    3. H. Pagès,
    4. P. Aboyoun,
    5. M. Carlson,
    6. R. Gentleman,
    7. M. T. Morgan,
    8. V. J. Carey
    . 2013. Software for computing and annotating genomic ranges. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9: e1003118.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Robinson, M. D.,
    2. D. J. McCarthy,
    3. G. K. Smyth
    . 2010. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26: 139–140.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Gene Ontology Consortium
    . 2015. Gene Ontology Consortium: going forward. Nucleic Acids Res. 43: D1049–D1056.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Picelli, S.,
    2. A. K. Björklund,
    3. B. Reinius,
    4. S. Sagasser,
    5. G. Winberg,
    6. R. Sandberg
    . 2014. Tn5 transposase and tagmentation procedures for massively scaled sequencing projects. Genome Res. 24: 2033–2040.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Buenrostro, J. D.,
    2. P. G. Giresi,
    3. L. C. Zaba,
    4. H. Y. Chang,
    5. W. J. Greenleaf
    . 2013. Transposition of native chromatin for fast and sensitive epigenomic profiling of open chromatin, DNA-binding proteins and nucleosome position. Nat. Methods 10: 1213–1218.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Scharer, C. D.,
    2. E. L. Blalock,
    3. B. G. Barwick,
    4. R. R. Haines,
    5. C. Wei,
    6. I. Sanz,
    7. J. M. Boss
    . 2016. ATAC-seq on biobanked specimens defines a unique chromatin accessibility structure in naïve SLE B cells. Sci. Rep. 6: 27030.
    OpenUrl
  40. ↵
    1. Langmead, B.,
    2. C. Trapnell,
    3. M. Pop,
    4. S. L. Salzberg
    . 2009. Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome. Genome Biol. 10: R25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Zhang, Y.,
    2. T. Liu,
    3. C. A. Meyer,
    4. J. Eeckhoute,
    5. D. S. Johnson,
    6. B. E. Bernstein,
    7. C. Nusbaum,
    8. R. M. Myers,
    9. M. Brown,
    10. W. Li,
    11. X. S. Liu
    . 2008. Model-based analysis of ChIP-Seq (MACS). Genome Biol. 9: R137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Heinz, S.,
    2. C. Benner,
    3. N. Spann,
    4. E. Bertolino,
    5. Y. C. Lin,
    6. P. Laslo,
    7. J. X. Cheng,
    8. C. Murre,
    9. H. Singh,
    10. C. K. Glass
    . 2010. Simple combinations of lineage-determining transcription factors prime cis-regulatory elements required for macrophage and B cell identities. Mol. Cell 38: 576–589.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Scharer, C. D.,
    2. C. D. McCabe,
    3. M. Ali-Seyed,
    4. M. F. Berger,
    5. M. L. Bulyk,
    6. C. S. Moreno
    . 2009. Genome-wide promoter analysis of the SOX4 transcriptional network in prostate cancer cells. Cancer Res. 69: 709–717.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Yoon, H. S.,
    2. C. D. Scharer,
    3. P. Majumder,
    4. C. W. Davis,
    5. R. Butler,
    6. W. Zinzow-Kramer,
    7. I. Skountzou,
    8. D. G. Koutsonanos,
    9. R. Ahmed,
    10. J. M. Boss
    . 2012. ZBTB32 is an early repressor of the CIITA and MHC class II gene expression during B cell differentiation to plasma cells. J. Immunol. 189: 2393–2403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Supek, F.,
    2. M. Bošnjak,
    3. N. Škunca,
    4. T. Šmuc
    . 2011. REVIGO summarizes and visualizes long lists of gene ontology terms. PLoS One 6: e21800.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Jacobsen, J. A.,
    2. J. Woodard,
    3. M. Mandal,
    4. M. R. Clark,
    5. E. T. Bartom,
    6. M. Sigvardsson,
    7. B. L. Kee
    . 2017. EZH2 regulates the developmental timing of effectors of the pre-antigen receptor checkpoints. J. Immunol. 198: 4682–4691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Schmidt-Supprian, M.,
    2. K. Rajewsky
    . 2007. Vagaries of conditional gene targeting. Nat. Immunol. 8: 665–668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    1. MacLennan, I. C.,
    2. K. M. Toellner,
    3. A. F. Cunningham,
    4. K. Serre,
    5. D. M. Sze,
    6. E. Zúñiga,
    7. M. C. Cook,
    8. C. G. Vinuesa
    . 2003. Extrafollicular antibody responses. Immunol. Rev. 194: 8–18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Jacob, J.,
    2. R. Kassir,
    3. G. Kelsoe
    . 1991. In situ studies of the primary immune response to (4-hydroxy-3-nitrophenyl)acetyl. I. The architecture and dynamics of responding cell populations. J. Exp. Med. 173: 1165–1175.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Subramanian, A.,
    2. P. Tamayo,
    3. V. K. Mootha,
    4. S. Mukherjee,
    5. B. L. Ebert,
    6. M. A. Gillette,
    7. A. Paulovich,
    8. S. L. Pomeroy,
    9. T. R. Golub,
    10. E. S. Lander,
    11. J. P. Mesirov
    . 2005. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 15545–15550.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Mootha, V. K.,
    2. C. M. Lindgren,
    3. K. F. Eriksson,
    4. A. Subramanian,
    5. S. Sihag,
    6. J. Lehar,
    7. P. Puigserver,
    8. E. Carlsson,
    9. M. Ridderstråle,
    10. E. Laurila, et al
    . 2003. PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 34: 267–273.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    1. Shi, W.,
    2. Y. Liao,
    3. S. N. Willis,
    4. N. Taubenheim,
    5. M. Inouye,
    6. D. M. Tarlinton,
    7. G. K. Smyth,
    8. P. D. Hodgkin,
    9. S. L. Nutt,
    10. L. M. Corcoran
    . 2015. Transcriptional profiling of mouse B cell terminal differentiation defines a signature for antibody-secreting plasma cells. Nat. Immunol. 16: 663–673.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Majumder, P.,
    2. C. D. Scharer,
    3. N. M. Choi,
    4. J. M. Boss
    . 2014. B cell differentiation is associated with reprogramming the CCCTC binding factor-dependent chromatin architecture of the murine MHC class II locus. J. Immunol. 192: 3925–3935.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Gyory, I.,
    2. J. Wu,
    3. G. Fejér,
    4. E. Seto,
    5. K. L. Wright
    . 2004. PRDI-BF1 recruits the histone H3 methyltransferase G9a in transcriptional silencing. Nat. Immunol. 5: 299–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Su, S. T.,
    2. H. Y. Ying,
    3. Y. K. Chiu,
    4. F. R. Lin,
    5. M. Y. Chen,
    6. K. I. Lin
    . 2009. Involvement of histone demethylase LSD1 in Blimp-1-mediated gene repression during plasma cell differentiation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29: 1421–1431.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Yu, J.,
    2. C. Angelin-Duclos,
    3. J. Greenwood,
    4. J. Liao,
    5. K. Calame
    . 2000. Transcriptional repression by blimp-1 (PRDI-BF1) involves recruitment of histone deacetylase. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 2592–2603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Hoek, K. L.,
    2. L. E. Gordy,
    3. P. L. Collins,
    4. V. V. Parekh,
    5. T. M. Aune,
    6. S. Joyce,
    7. J. W. Thomas,
    8. L. Van Kaer,
    9. E. Sebzda
    . 2010. Follicular B cell trafficking within the spleen actively restricts humoral immune responses. Immunity 33: 254–265.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Rouault, J. P.,
    2. N. Falette,
    3. F. Guéhenneux,
    4. C. Guillot,
    5. R. Rimokh,
    6. Q. Wang,
    7. C. Berthet,
    8. C. Moyret-Lalle,
    9. P. Savatier,
    10. B. Pain, et al
    . 1996. Identification of BTG2, an antiproliferative p53-dependent component of the DNA damage cellular response pathway. Nat. Genet. 14: 482–486.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Lee, H.,
    2. S. Cha,
    3. M. S. Lee,
    4. G. J. Cho,
    5. W. S. Choi,
    6. K. Suk
    . 2003. Role of antiproliferative B cell translocation gene-1 as an apoptotic sensitizer in activation-induced cell death of brain microglia. J. Immunol. 171: 5802–5811.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  59. ↵
    1. Qi, W.,
    2. H. Chan,
    3. L. Teng,
    4. L. Li,
    5. S. Chuai,
    6. R. Zhang,
    7. J. Zeng,
    8. M. Li,
    9. H. Fan,
    10. Y. Lin, et al
    . 2012. Selective inhibition of Ezh2 by a small molecule inhibitor blocks tumor cells proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 21360–21365.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Knutson, S. K.,
    2. T. J. Wigle,
    3. N. M. Warholic,
    4. C. J. Sneeringer,
    5. C. J. Allain,
    6. C. R. Klaus,
    7. J. D. Sacks,
    8. A. Raimondi,
    9. C. R. Majer,
    10. J. Song, et al
    . 2012. A selective inhibitor of EZH2 blocks H3K27 methylation and kills mutant lymphoma cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 8: 890–896.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  60. ↵
    1. McCabe, M. T.,
    2. A. P. Graves,
    3. G. Ganji,
    4. E. Diaz,
    5. W. S. Halsey,
    6. Y. Jiang,
    7. K. N. Smitheman,
    8. H. M. Ott,
    9. M. B. Pappalardi,
    10. K. E. Allen, et al
    . 2012. Mutation of A677 in histone methyltransferase EZH2 in human B-cell lymphoma promotes hypertrimethylation of histone H3 on lysine 27 (H3K27). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 2989–2994.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  61. ↵
    1. Tellier, J.,
    2. W. Shi,
    3. M. Minnich,
    4. Y. Liao,
    5. S. Crawford,
    6. G. K. Smyth,
    7. A. Kallies,
    8. M. Busslinger,
    9. S. L. Nutt
    . 2016. Blimp-1 controls plasma cell function through the regulation of immunoglobulin secretion and the unfolded protein response. Nat. Immunol. 17: 323–330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Shaffer, A. L.,
    2. M. Shapiro-Shelef,
    3. N. N. Iwakoshi,
    4. A. H. Lee,
    5. S. B. Qian,
    6. H. Zhao,
    7. X. Yu,
    8. L. Yang,
    9. B. K. Tan,
    10. A. Rosenwald, et al
    . 2004. XBP1, downstream of Blimp-1, expands the secretory apparatus and other organelles, and increases protein synthesis in plasma cell differentiation. Immunity 21: 81–93.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  63. ↵
    1. Lam, W. Y.,
    2. A. M. Becker,
    3. K. M. Kennerly,
    4. R. Wong,
    5. J. D. Curtis,
    6. E. M. Llufrio,
    7. K. S. McCommis,
    8. J. Fahrmann,
    9. H. A. Pizzato,
    10. R. M. Nunley, et al
    . 2016. Mitochondrial pyruvate import promotes long-term survival of antibody-secreting plasma cells. Immunity 45: 60–73.
    OpenUrl
  64. ↵
    1. Oricchio, E.,
    2. N. Katanayeva,
    3. M. C. Donaldson,
    4. S. Sungalee,
    5. J. P. Pasion,
    6. W. Béguelin,
    7. E. Battistello,
    8. V. R. Sanghvi,
    9. M. Jiang,
    10. Y. Jiang, et al
    . 2017. Genetic and epigenetic inactivation of SESTRIN1 controls mTORC1 and response to EZH2 inhibition in follicular lymphoma. Sci. Transl. Med. 9: eaak9969.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Caro-Maldonado, A.,
    2. R. Wang,
    3. A. G. Nichols,
    4. M. Kuraoka,
    5. S. Milasta,
    6. L. D. Sun,
    7. A. L. Gavin,
    8. E. D. Abel,
    9. G. Kelsoe,
    10. D. R. Green,
    11. J. C. Rathmell
    . 2014. Metabolic reprogramming is required for antibody production that is suppressed in anergic but exaggerated in chronically BAFF-exposed B cells. J. Immunol. 192: 3626–3636.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. TeSlaa, T.,
    2. M. A. Teitell
    . 2014. Techniques to monitor glycolysis. Methods Enzymol. 542: 91–114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    1. El-Deiry, W. S.
    2016. p21(WAF1) mediates cell-cycle inhibition, relevant to cancer suppression and therapy. Cancer Res. 76: 5189–5191.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    1. Alzrigat, M.,
    2. A. A. Párraga,
    3. P. Agarwal,
    4. H. Zureigat,
    5. A. Österborg,
    6. H. Nahi,
    7. A. Ma,
    8. J. Jin,
    9. K. Nilsson,
    10. F. Öberg, et al
    . 2017. EZH2 inhibition in multiple myeloma downregulates myeloma associated oncogenes and upregulates microRNAs with potential tumor suppressor functions. Oncotarget 8: 10213–10224.
    OpenUrl
  69. ↵
    1. Pawlyn, C.,
    2. M. D. Bright,
    3. A. F. Buros,
    4. C. K. Stein,
    5. Z. Walters,
    6. L. I. Aronson,
    7. F. Mirabella,
    8. J. R. Jones,
    9. M. F. Kaiser,
    10. B. A. Walker, et al
    . 2017. Overexpression of EZH2 in multiple myeloma is associated with poor prognosis and dysregulation of cell cycle control. Blood Cancer J. 7: e549.
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    1. Pérez-García, A.,
    2. E. Marina-Zárate,
    3. A. F. Álvarez-Prado,
    4. J. M. Ligos,
    5. N. Galjart,
    6. A. R. Ramiro
    . 2017. CTCF orchestrates the germinal centre transcriptional program and prevents premature plasma cell differentiation. Nat. Commun. 8: 16067.
    OpenUrl
  71. ↵
    1. Shaffer, A. L.,
    2. K. I. Lin,
    3. T. C. Kuo,
    4. X. Yu,
    5. E. M. Hurt,
    6. A. Rosenwald,
    7. J. M. Giltnane,
    8. L. Yang,
    9. H. Zhao,
    10. K. Calame,
    11. L. M. Staudt
    . 2002. Blimp-1 orchestrates plasma cell differentiation by extinguishing the mature B cell gene expression program. Immunity 17: 51–62.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  72. ↵
    1. Genestier, L.,
    2. M. Taillardet,
    3. P. Mondiere,
    4. H. Gheit,
    5. C. Bella,
    6. T. Defrance
    . 2007. TLR agonists selectively promote terminal plasma cell differentiation of B cell subsets specialized in thymus-independent responses. J. Immunol. 178: 7779–7786.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Gass, J. N.,
    2. N. M. Gifford,
    3. J. W. Brewer
    . 2002. Activation of an unfolded protein response during differentiation of antibody-secreting B cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 49047–49054.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Calfon, M.,
    2. H. Zeng,
    3. F. Urano,
    4. J. H. Till,
    5. S. R. Hubbard,
    6. H. P. Harding,
    7. S. G. Clark,
    8. D. Ron
    . 2002. IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. [Published erratum appears in 2002 Nature 420: 202.] Nature 415: 92–96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Jones, D. D.,
    2. B. T. Gaudette,
    3. J. R. Wilmore,
    4. I. Chernova,
    5. A. Bortnick,
    6. B. M. Weiss,
    7. D. Allman
    . 2016. mTOR has distinct functions in generating versus sustaining humoral immunity. J. Clin. Invest. 126: 4250–4261.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  76. ↵
    1. Phan, A. T.,
    2. A. W. Goldrath,
    3. C. K. Glass
    . 2017. Metabolic and epigenetic coordination of T cell and macrophage immunity. Immunity 46: 714–729.
    OpenUrl
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 200 (3)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 200, Issue 3
1 Feb 2018
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
EZH2 Represses the B Cell Transcriptional Program and Regulates Antibody-Secreting Cell Metabolism and Antibody Production
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
EZH2 Represses the B Cell Transcriptional Program and Regulates Antibody-Secreting Cell Metabolism and Antibody Production
Muyao Guo, Madeline J. Price, Dillon G. Patterson, Benjamin G. Barwick, Robert R. Haines, Anna K. Kania, John E. Bradley, Troy D. Randall, Jeremy M. Boss, Christopher D. Scharer
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 2018, 200 (3) 1039-1052; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701470

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
EZH2 Represses the B Cell Transcriptional Program and Regulates Antibody-Secreting Cell Metabolism and Antibody Production
Muyao Guo, Madeline J. Price, Dillon G. Patterson, Benjamin G. Barwick, Robert R. Haines, Anna K. Kania, John E. Bradley, Troy D. Randall, Jeremy M. Boss, Christopher D. Scharer
The Journal of Immunology February 1, 2018, 200 (3) 1039-1052; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1701470
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Naturally Occurring Anti-Idiotypic Antibodies Portray a Largely Private Repertoire in Immune-Mediated Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura
  • Berberine Modulates Macrophage Activation by Inducing Glycolysis
  • Adipocyte CD1d Gene Transfer Induces T Cell Expansion and Adipocyte Inflammation in CD1d Knockout Mice
Show more IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606