Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

The Effect of Inhibitory Signals on the Priming of Drug Hapten–Specific T Cells That Express Distinct Vβ Receptors

Andrew Gibson, Lee Faulkner, Maike Lichtenfels, Monday Ogese, Zaid Al-Attar, Ana Alfirevic, Philipp R. Esser, Stefan F. Martin, Munir Pirmohamed, B. Kevin Park and Dean J. Naisbitt
J Immunol August 15, 2017, 199 (4) 1223-1237; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1602029
Andrew Gibson
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lee Faulkner
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maike Lichtenfels
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Monday Ogese
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
†Pathology Sciences, Drug Safety and Metabolism, AstraZeneca Research and Development, Cambridge CB4 0WG, United Kingdom; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zaid Al-Attar
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Zaid Al-Attar
Ana Alfirevic
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Ana Alfirevic
Philipp R. Esser
‡Allergy Research Group, Department of Dermatology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Stefan F. Martin
‡Allergy Research Group, Department of Dermatology, Medical Center–University of Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Stefan F. Martin
Munir Pirmohamed
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Munir Pirmohamed
B. Kevin Park
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dean J. Naisbitt
*Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Medical Research Council Centre for Drug Safety Science, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GE, United Kingdom;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Clonogram of naive and SMX-NO–primed (A) and piperacillin-primed (B) memory T cell TCR Vβ usage from healthy donors. TCR Vβ subtype expression in naive and drug-primed memory T cells. Data represent mean percentages of T cells expressing the individual TCR Vβ subtypes. Diamonds (◇) indicate skewed TCR Vβ usage, defined as percentage above mean value + 3 SD of TCR Vβ in naive T cells).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Proliferation of SMX-NO–primed naive T cells, with or without coinhibitory receptor-blocking Abs. Naive T cells from healthy donors were cultured with mature autologous monocyte-derived DCs in the presence of SMX-NO (50 μM) for one 1 wk, with or without PD-L1–blocking Abs (5 μg/ml) (A), CTLA4-blocking Abs (5 μg/ml) (B), or TIM-3–blocking Abs (7.5 μg/ml) (C). T cells were harvested and restimulated with fresh mature DCs and SMX-NO (20–50 μM) for 48 h. [3H]Thymidine was added and incubated for an additional 16 h. Data from three representative donors show the mean ± SD of triplicate cultures. Statistical significance denotes a significant increase in the proliferative response compared with medium-only–treated wells within that condition (i.e., TIM-3–blocked cells only). Statistical significance between conditions denotes a significant increase in the proliferative response compared with “no block” wells at a particular drug concentration after normalization of all data values to account for differing basal stimulation. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005, ***p < 0.001.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Proliferation of SMX-NO–exposed memory T cells, with or without coinhibitory receptor-blocking Abs. Memory T cells from healthy donors were cultured with mature autologous monocyte-derived DCs in the presence of SMX-NO (50 μM) for one 1 wk, with or without PD-L1–blocking Abs (5 μg/ml) (A), CTLA4-blocking Abs (5 μg/ml) (B), or TIM-3–blocking Abs (7.5 μg/ml) (C). T cells were harvested and restimulated with fresh mature DCs and SMX-NO (20–50 μM) for 48 h. [3H]Thymidine was added and incubated for an additional 16 h. Data from three representative donors show the mean ± SD of triplicate cultures. Statistical significance denotes a significant increase in the proliferative response compared with medium-only–treated wells within that condition (i.e., TIM-3–blocked cells only). Statistical significance between conditions denotes a significant increase in the proliferative response compared with “no block” wells at a particular drug concentration after normalization of all data values to account for differing basal stimulation. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005, ***p < 0.001.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Coinhibitory receptor expression during the SMX-NO–specific activation of CD4+ and CD8+ naive and memory T cells from healthy donors. Expression of coinhibitory receptors on naive [PD-1 (A), CTLA4 (B), TIM-3 (C)] or memory T cells [PD-1 (D), CTLA4 (E), TIM-3 (F)] from healthy donors during stimulation and during restimulation with SMX-NO (50 μM) using mature autologous DCs. Samples of T cells were harvested at various time points and labeled with CD4, CD8, and PD-1/CTLA4/TIM-3 fluorochrome-bound Abs. Percentages indicate the proportion of cells that stain positive for each coinhibitory receptor.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Expression of CTLA4 and TIM-3 on dividing and nondividing T cells derived from priming healthy donor naive T cells to SMX-NO. Naive T cells from healthy donors were cultured with mature autologous DCs in the presence of SMX-NO (50 μM) for 1 wk. T cells were stained with CFSE and restimulated with fresh mature DCs and SMX-NO (50 μM) for 72 h. T cells were incubated with CTLA4-allophycocyanin or TIM-3–PE, and with CD4- and CD8-specific fluorochromes. Expression of CTLA4 (A) and TIM-3 (B) on CD4+ or CD8+ T cell populations separately (shaded graph, expression on dividing T cells; black line, expression on nondividing T cells). Percentages indicate the percentage of each population gated positive for each coinhibitory receptor. (C) Comparative expression on both dividing and nondividing T cell populations of the respective isotype (IgG1) control Abs for CTLA4 or TIM-3 (dark gray shaded graph, unstained expression; light gray shaded graph, expression of isotype control; black line, expression of CTLA4 or TIM-3).

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Expression–activity relationship of CTLA4 and TIM-3 on SMX-NO–responsive T cell clones. (A) Expression of PD-1, CTLA4, and TIM-3 on 40 representative T cell clones derived from priming healthy donor naive T cells to SMX-NO. (B) The proliferative response of T cell clones expressing varied levels of CTLA4 or TIM-3 in response to SMX-NO stimulation, as measured by [3H]thymidine incorporation. The MFI derived from flow cytometry, indicating the relative expression of CTLA4 or TIM-3, is shown for each clone at the top of the graphs. (C) Expression of CTLA4 and TIM-3 on representative T cell clones over 240 h, with or without SMX-NO stimulation (40 μM).

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Activation of SMX-NO–responsive T cell clones, with or without coinhibitory receptor blockade. Secretion of IFN-γ, IL-13, and granzyme B (A) and the proliferative response of T cell clones in response to SMX-NO stimulation (B), with or without anti-CTLA4 (10 μg/ml) or anti–TIM-3 (7.5 μg/ml) treatment. Cytokine secretion was measured by ELISPOT, and proliferative analysis was by [3H]thymidine incorporation. Statistical significance between conditions denotes a significant increase/decrease in proliferative response or cytokine release.

  • FIGURE 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8.

    Suppressive effect of autologous CD25+ Tregs on the SMX-NO–induced activation of naive and memory T cells from healthy donors. Naive (A) or memory (B) T cells were cultured with mature DCs and SMX-NO (50 μM) for 1 wk, with or without autologous CD25+ Tregs (2–6 × 105 per well). T cells were harvested and restimulated with fresh mature DCs and SMX-NO (20–50 μM) for 48 h before measurement of proliferative capacity through the incorporation of [3H]thymidine. (C) Expression of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, CTLA4, and TIM-3 on autologous Tregs was analyzed by flow cytometry to identify the propensity for coinhibitory pathways to aid Treg-mediated suppression of SMX-NO–induced T cell responses. Statistical significance between conditions denotes a significant increase/decrease in proliferative response. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.005, ***p < 0.001.

  • FIGURE 9.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 9.

    Quantitative effect of CD25+ Treg–mediated inhibition of cytokine secretion on drug Ag–mediated T cell activation. Secretion of IFN-γ and IL-13 after SMX-NO–induced activation of 2.5 × 106 naive (A) or memory (B) T cells from healthy donors, with or without 2–6 × 105 CD25+ Tregs per well. Autologous Tregs were removed from the control naive and memory T cell populations. Tregs were supplemented back into the assays prior to addition of the drug Ag.

Tables

  • Figures
  • Additional Files
    • View popup
    Table I. Coverage of the TCR Vβ repertoire in T cells before (naive) and after (memory) priming to SMX-NO
    TCR Vβ coverage (%)
    S1S2S3S4S5S6
    Naive615652575350
    Memory658378717665
    • View popup
    Table II. Summary of common skewed TCR Vβ usage in SMX-NO–responsive T cells from five healthy donors
    TCR Vβ45.25.391113.61418
    S2●●●●
    S3●●●●●●●●
    S4●●●●●●●●
    S5●●●●●●●●
    S6●●●●
    • Black dots denote skewed usage of TCR Vβ.

    • View popup
    Table III. Spectratyping analysis of TCR Vβ subtypes with oligoclonal distribution of CDR3 sizes following SMX-NO priming
    TCR Vβ123456A6BC789111213A13B14151617182021222324
    S2●XX●●●●●
    S3XSSS●●●●●●S
    S4X●●●●●●●●XX
    S5●XS●●SS●●●S●XS
    S6●X●X●●●●X●●●●●●X●●●
    • S, no sizing data; X, not detected; ●, oligoclonal expansion (oligoclonal distribution of CDR3 lengths defined as skewed Gaussian profile with at least one dominant peak).

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Tables
  • Data Supplement

    • Supplemental Material 1 (PDF)
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 199 (4)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 199, Issue 4
15 Aug 2017
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Effect of Inhibitory Signals on the Priming of Drug Hapten–Specific T Cells That Express Distinct Vβ Receptors
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Effect of Inhibitory Signals on the Priming of Drug Hapten–Specific T Cells That Express Distinct Vβ Receptors
Andrew Gibson, Lee Faulkner, Maike Lichtenfels, Monday Ogese, Zaid Al-Attar, Ana Alfirevic, Philipp R. Esser, Stefan F. Martin, Munir Pirmohamed, B. Kevin Park, Dean J. Naisbitt
The Journal of Immunology August 15, 2017, 199 (4) 1223-1237; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602029

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Effect of Inhibitory Signals on the Priming of Drug Hapten–Specific T Cells That Express Distinct Vβ Receptors
Andrew Gibson, Lee Faulkner, Maike Lichtenfels, Monday Ogese, Zaid Al-Attar, Ana Alfirevic, Philipp R. Esser, Stefan F. Martin, Munir Pirmohamed, B. Kevin Park, Dean J. Naisbitt
The Journal of Immunology August 15, 2017, 199 (4) 1223-1237; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1602029
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Targeting In Vivo Metabolic Vulnerabilities of Th2 and Th17 Cells Reduces Airway Inflammation
  • A Critical Role for Na+/H+ Exchanger Regulatory Factor 1 in Modulating FcεRI-Mediated Mast Cell Activation
  • PRMT1 Modulates Processing of Asthma-Related Primary MicroRNAs (Pri-miRNAs) into Mature miRNAs in Lung Epithelial Cells
Show more ALLERGY AND OTHER HYPERSENSITIVITIES

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606