Sex Drives Dimorphic Immune Responses to Viral Infections

Soumitra Ghosh and Robyn S. Klein
J Immunol March 1, 2017, 198 (5) 1782-1790; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1601166

Abstract

New attention to sexual dimorphism in normal mammalian physiology and disease has uncovered a previously unappreciated breadth of mechanisms by which females and males differentially exhibit quantitative phenotypes. Thus, in addition to the established modifying effects of hormones, which prenatally and postpubertally pattern cells and tissues in a sexually dimorphic fashion, sex differences are caused by extragonadal and dosage effects of genes encoded on sex chromosomes. Sex differences in immune responses, especially during autoimmunity, have been studied predominantly within the context of sex hormone effects. More recently, immune response genes have been localized to sex chromosomes themselves or found to be regulated by sex chromosome genes. Thus, understanding how sex impacts immunity requires the elucidation of complex interactions among sex hormones, sex chromosomes, and immune response genes. In this Brief Review, we discuss current knowledge and new insights into these intricate relationships in the context of viral infections.

Introduction

Age, sex, and immune state of the host are considered salient biological factors that determine the extent and strength of pathogen clearance during infectious diseases (1–3). With regard to viral infections, epidemiological studies revealed that males have a higher mortality compared with females, who reportedly display stronger antiviral cellular and humoral immune responses (4). Although stronger immune responses may provide better protection against certain pathogens, in some chronic viral infections it can lead to aberrant antigenic responses with immunopathology (5, 6). Net sex differences or the degree of sexual dimorphism in biological responses derive from genetic differences in chromosome complement and induce their effects via acute activational or prenatal organizational/epigenetic effects of gonadal sex hormones (estrogen, progesterone, and androgens), extragonadal effects of sex chromosome–encoded genes, and compensatory mechanisms, such as reduction in gene-dosage differences through X-chromosome inactivation. These processes underlie sex differences in most tissue responses during normal and disease states, including immunological responses to infectious diseases (Fig. 1).

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

Mechanisms of tissue sexual dimorphism that underlie sex differences in immune responses. Sex hormones, such as estrogens and androgens, contribute to organizational and activational effects via gene effects that include promoter activation and chromatin remodeling (epigenetic modifications). Sex chromosome complement exerts its effect in promoting sexual dimorphism independent of sex hormones. X-dosage compensation and escape from X-inactivation influence differential gene expression of innate immune molecules. Y chromosome contributions include Y gene–associated polymorphisms. Studies evaluating sexual dimorphism in immune responses focus on the interdependence of these factors, as well as their independent contributions.

Differences in susceptibility and response to viral pathogens observed in males and females have primarily been attributed to activational effects of sex hormones and dosages of genes on the X and Y chromosomes (4). The onset of puberty is associated with the numbers and functions of circulating granulocytes and monocytes, which are decreased, but activated, in females as a result of rising levels of progesterone in the setting of ovulation or pregnancy (7, 8). In addition, myeloid cells and lymphocytes express receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and androgens, which orchestrate transcriptional pathways and ligand-dependent or ligand-independent signaling cascades that influence innate and adaptive immune responses to viruses (9–12). With regard to gene dosage on sex chromosomes, X-linked genes, such as IL-13, IL-4, IL-10, XIST, TLR7, FOXP3, and sex-determining region Y box 9 (SOX9), on the X chromosome and sex-determining region Y (SRY; testis-determining factor) and SOX9 on Y chromosome may underlie sexually dimorphic responses that contribute to stronger innate, cellular, and humoral immune responses and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases in females compared with males (13–15). Studies in humans and animal models indicate sexually dimorphic mechanisms that contribute to virologic control during infections with HIV-1, vesicular stomatitis virus, hantavirus (Seoul virus), influenza virus (H1N1), hepatitis C virus, Theiler’s murine encephalomyelitis virus, HSV-1 and coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) (5, 16–20). In this review, we introduce the various mechanisms that impose sexual dimorphism in immune function in males and females. We then discuss the impact of sexually dimorphic immune responses on pathogenesis during viral infections.

Organizational effects of sex hormones on immune function

The initiation of sexual dimorphism occurs through early embryonic development due to effects of genes on sex chromosomes (21, 22). The SRY gene on the Y chromosome induces male supporting cell precursors to differentiate into testosterone-expressing Sertoli cells, leading to masculinization of all tissues within the developing embryo (23–25). During embryonic development, the increased expression of multiple genes maintains the XX sex phenotype and inhibits the expression of genes, such as SOX9, a transcription factor that favors the XY male phenotype (15). In males, expression of SOX9 protein downstream of Sry is crucial in inducing male sex phenotype. SOX9 can independently induce male-to-female sex reversal in male embryos through deletion from chromosome 17 (23, 26, 27). Gonadal R-spondin (RSPO)1 is a secreted protein that is highly expressed in female blastocysts and interacts with Wnt4, which promotes ovarian development and estrogen production via the Wnt4/β-catenin signaling pathway (28, 29). Loss-of-function mutational studies in RSPO1 and RSPO−/− XX mice confirmed this observation (27–30). FOXL2, a forkhead transcriptional regulator, also contributes to ovarian differentiation and maintenance during embryonic development in females via suppression of testis-specific or male sex–determining genes, such as SRY target gene SOX9 and fibroblast growth factor 9, the latter of which represses Wnt4 (31–34). Although SOX9 deletion is embryonically lethal, homozygous conditional inactivation and mutational studies of SOX9 confirmed that SOX9 induces suppression of Wnt4, Foxl2, and β-catenin to prevent feminization of the male embryo (15). In addition, SOX9 increases the expression of genes required for male phenotype development in mammals, including steroidogenic factor1, doublesex and mab-3 related transcription factor 1, and GATA4-binding protein (23, 31, 35, 36).

Studies in rodents show that sexual dimorphism in immune function occurs through embryonic development and is maintained postnatally via the actions of gonadal hormones, such as estrogen and testosterone (37–39). Prenatal castration of male mice results in postpubertal thymic involution and aberrant T cell subset differentiation (40). Females exposed to higher concentrations of androgen prenatally as a result of congenital adrenal hyperplasia exhibit less modeling of behavior shown to them by other females, suggesting that gender-related behavior change is due to prenatal hormonal exposure (41). Surprisingly, immune response to heterologous MLR (MLR-A) is unaffected by perinatal masculinization in both sexes and is strongest in unmanipulated females (42, 43). Consistent with this, loss of feminization at prenatal stages leads to decreased T cell/B cell ratios compared with normally feminized mice, whose ratios mirror those observed in male animals (44). Several studies also report the role of gonadotropin-releasing hormone, which maintains early levels of gonadal hormones in both sexes, in the prenatal patterning of the immune system. Postnatal gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonism, which inhibits expression of gonadal hormones, results in lower numbers of circulating CD8+ T and B cells in male rodents and primates (45). Similar studies in female rats showed reduced numbers of CD4+ T cells and reduced immune responses of thymocytes and splenocytes to T cell–mediated Ag (46, 47). The effects of estrogen and testosterone on B cell development and differentiation also directly influence the production of IgG (48, 49). Prenatal secretion of testosterone limits the ability of males to produce Igs compared with females, who maintain much higher default plasma anti-DNA Ig levels compared with males (2, 50). Additional studies in seagull chicks reveal a reduced T cell and plasma Ig–mediated immunity in prenatal testosterone-treated chicks compared with control chicks (51). Activational effects of hormones at puberty further enhance sex differences in Ab production that are present at birth (see below), leading to persistently higher humoral immune response in females throughout their lifetime.

Activational effects of hormones on immune function

Postpubertal expression of gonadal hormones leads to acute and reversible effects in adulthood that maintain physical and behavioral sex differences (52). Estrogen and progesterone in females and testosterone in males are the prime gonadal hormones secreted during the activational period. The effect of hormonal secretion during this period is not limited to the reproductive system; it extends to multiple tissues, including those of the immune system (53). The androgen testosterone is synthesized in gonadal and adrenal tissues of males and females but is predominantly converted to estrogens via aromatization in the latter (54). Endogenous estrogens produced in female mammals include estrone, 17β-estradiol (E2), and estriol (E3). E2 is the predominant form in females and is produced by theca and granulosa cells of the ovaries in premenopausal women. The level of hormones secreted in postpubertal female mammals varies in a cyclic fashion to facilitate ovulation and subsequent pregnancy.

Estrogen receptors (ERs) exist in two forms, ERα and ERβ, which bind estrone, E2, and E3 ligands to mediate gene expression. B and T lymphocytes, mast cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, and NK cells predominantly express ERα (55). Hematopoietic progenitor cells express ERα and ERβ (56). Based on studies in ERα- and ERβ-deficient mice, ERα appears to be the key regulator in the differentiation of hematopoietic progenitor cells (57). Females produce higher levels of estrogen and regulate ER activation on their immune cells, which helps them to exert a stronger humoral and cellular immune response (37, 58).

ERs play vital roles in several signaling pathways, acting as a signal transduction molecule in calcium regulation across cell membranes and inducing activation of G coupled– and other surface receptors, such as receptors that drive expression of insulin growth factor 1 and activation of ERK/MAPK, protein kinase C, PI3K, and cAMP signaling (59, 60). ERα is also required for proper dendritic cell differentiation and CD40-mediated cytokine production (61). Although ERs can impact signaling pathways in ligand-dependent and -independent manners (62), signaling in immune cells is ligand-dependent, whereas signaling through coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 is ligand independent. E2 receptor [specifically ERα46 (63)] mediates anti-inflammatory signaling in monocytes and macrophages through suppression of CXCL8 (63, 64). ERs activate STAT signaling pathways during T and B cell proliferation, maintenance, and activation. Under inflammatory conditions, ER activation also induces NO synthase and IFN-γ expression in T cells. ER ligands also mediate phosphorylation, nuclear localization, and transcriptional activation of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 in B cells and circulating monocytes (65, 66). E2 additionally regulates STAT activity by increasing expression of cytokine-inhibitor proteins, such as suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 and 5, in T cells and macrophages (67–70). In macrophages, ER signaling mediates inhibitory responses toward proinflammatory genes regulated by NF-κB, such as IL-6. In contrast, E2 directly suppresses the expression of CCL2 in leukocytes, leading to a reduction in migration (71, 72).

It is well established that ERs play an important role in promoting sexual dimorphism in the neonatal brain through chromatin remodeling, particularly via promoter methylation and acetylation. This process is mediated by ERα activation and dimerization, followed by nuclear translocation, DNA binding through estrogen-response elements, and recruitment of receptor coactivators and corepressors, such as nuclear receptor corepressors, leading to epigenetic modifications and regulation of downstream transcriptional factors (73–75). Current studies on epigenetics also indicate that methylation of the ERα promoter contributes to sex differences in the brain, as well as maintains sexual dimorphism throughout life by creating methyl marks on the DNA of the individual (76). However, direct evidence for ER- or androgen receptor (AR)-mediated epigenetic modifications that contribute to immune cell differentiation and function has not been found.

In addition to endogenous ER ligands, ligands that effect ER signaling are found in environmental sources, including food (e.g., phytoestrogens) and pharmaceuticals (e.g., tamoxifen, toremifene and raloxifene, which are selective ER modulators). Selective ER modulators have been used as therapeutics in multiple sclerosis, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and Ebola virus infection to suppress the activity of Th1 cells and induce Th2 cytokine expression (77–81). Further studies are required to understand the impact of environmental and exogenous estrogens, either independently or in combination with other factors, on immune function during exposure to pathogens.

Progesterone also mediates stimulatory and suppressive roles in immune responses. Progesterone receptors are primarily expressed by T and NK cells, but recent studies detected them on dendritic and mesenchymal stem cells, where they suppress Th1 cytokine secretion and increase Th2 cytokine secretion (82, 83). Suppression of T cell cytotoxicity, as well as regulatory T cell (Treg) proliferation, is also mediated by progesterone (84). Progesterone also inhibits the activity of NK cells via downregulation of IFN-γ secretion (85). In macrophages, progesterone suppresses NO levels and inhibits FcγR expression and microparticle release, thereby dampening the initial immune response at initial stages of infection. During pregnancy, progesterone enhances immunomodulatory functions of mesenchymal stem cells through upregulation of PGE-2 and IL-6. This is essential in females to maintain the fetal–maternal interface (83).

Most testosterone (98%) is irreversibly converted to an active metabolite, dihydrotestosterone (86), which binds with higher affinity than testosterone to ARs, which are expressed at various levels by leukocytes (87). In innate immune cells, such as neutrophils, AR signaling maintains cellular differentiation via induction of G-CSF signaling through activation of ERK1/2 and STAT3 (88). In wound-healing studies, AR regulates the chemotactic ability of macrophages through upregulation of CCL2, TNF-α, and CCR2 (89). AR signaling also regulates T and B cell function and development. CD4+ thymocytes express lower levels of inducible AR, whereas CD4− CD8− and CD8+ thymocytes express the highest levels (90). Although AR signaling promotes Th1-mediated T cell immune response, it also acts as an antagonist to NF-κB and IFN type I signaling pathways (91). Specifically, splenic CD4+ and CD8+ T cells express inducible AR that binds to testosterone in males (92). Castration studies revealed that, in the absence of testosterone, AR signaling suppresses the activation of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells via overproduction of IL-2 and IL-2R (47, 93). Moreover, the absence of testosterone leads to dampening of Th1 differentiation from naive CD4 T cells in autoimmune disease conditions through suppression of IFN-γ and IL-2 expression in males (94, 95).

Sex chromosome complement and immune function

Sex chromosome complement arises from fundamental genetic differences in XX and XY cells that are mediated by several processes, such as X chromosome inactivation, X gene dosage, and epigenetic modifications (96). To maintain X gene dosage in the female blastocyst, one of the X chromosomes is inactivated by formation of Barr bodies in individual cells (97). Barr bodies are formed as a result of Xist gene expression and histone modification, making one of the X chromosomes inactive in every cell (98). This process, which is exclusive to XX somatic cells, is random and leads to cells with active maternal or paternal X and compensates X gene dosages in all somatic cells (14). The gene products of X or Y gene also facilitate epigenetic modifications on the DNA of an individual. SRY interacts with Kruppel-associated box domain transcriptional factor through the high mobility group box on SRY to recruit histone-modifying enzymes, such as histone deacetylase and heterochromatin protein 1, which remodels chromatin (99, 100). Few studies evaluated sexual dimorphism in chromatin remodeling, irrespective of hormonal influence, and those that did focused on the CNS. Thus, H3 methylation is more prevalent in cortical regions of the brain in males compared with females (101), and histone deacetylase 2 and 4 bound more prevalently to promoters of Esr1 and Cyp19a during brain differentiation in males compared with females. This increased interaction leads to stronger deacetylation and higher gene expression (102).

microRNAs are also sexually dimorphic in nature and regulate SRY-related genes. For example, in the prenatal stage, miR-124 is highly expressed in female-supporting cells and suppresses SOX9 gene expression. In contrast, miR-202-5p/3p is highly expressed in males through SOX9, which is generated by male-supporting cells, and is necessary for male sex determination. Data also suggest that miR-202-5p is a direct transcriptional target of SOX9 during testis differentiation (103). Interestingly, miR-124 also was shown to inhibit STAT3 signaling, which suppresses T cell proliferation and leads to Foxp3+ Treg induction, including upregulation of IL-2, IFN-γ, and TNF-α (104, 105). Another study using a murine model of multiple sclerosis found that peripheral administration of miR-124 leads to systemic deactivation of macrophages, reduced activation of myelin-specific T cells, and suppression of disease progression (106). Because research regarding the role of sex chromosome complement in many physiologic and disease processes is still in its early stages, less is known about their contributions to antiviral immunity. However, studies using four-core genotype (FCG) mice, in which the role of XX versus XY genes can be separated from those of gonadal hormonal effects, are providing new insights into the impact of sex chromosome complement on immune responses, particularly during autoimmune diseases.

Female bias in disease expression of autoimmunity is well established, with female/male ratios in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and multiple sclerosis approaching 4:1 and 9:1, respectively. A study of sex chromosome aneuploidy in male subjects expressing an excess X chromosome found that they were at a higher risk for SLE (107). Thus, the X chromosome likely plays a crucial role in disease incidence independently of hormonal effects (107, 108). The FCG mouse model is a novel tool for examining the effect of sex chromosome complement XX and XY on phenotypic sex differences induced in male and female mice without the confounding effects of hormonal patterning. In the FCG model, the testis-determining gene Sry is deleted from the Y chromosome on male B6 or SJL mice (XY−), and a transgenic Sry is inserted at multiple sites on an autosome (109). The model generates four genotypes of mice; the Sry transgene is present in XX and XY− mice, which develop testis in contrast to XY− mice, which develop ovaries similar to XX mice (109). Gonadectomy of FCG mice allows further examination of the genetic contributions of sex chromosomes in adult animals that do not express sex steroids.

Using FCG mice, XXSry mice were found to display increased susceptibility for SLE and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis compared with XY−Sry mice. Because both XXSry and XY−Sry mice had testes during development, and the only difference between the two groups is the presence of the Y chromosome complement, this study confirmed that sex complement alone could promote susceptibility to diseases, irrespective of the hormonal secretions (52, 108). Further comparison between XX and XY− mice found higher levels of IL-13Rα2 and reduced levels of Th2 cytokines in spleen cells isolated from XX mice. These results suggest that subdued Th2 cytokine levels that result from an increase in X linked gene IL-13Rα2 expression could be due to X chromosome complement (108).

Sexually dimorphic immunity to viral infections

Differences in susceptibility to viral infections are likely due to inherent differences in the immune system of females and males. Females mount a stronger immune response to viral infections compared with males as the result of more robust humoral and cellular immune responses (Fig. 2). Clinical studies of viral infections in humans are complicated by the impact of nonbiological factors, such as exposure rates, social behavior, habitat and diet, on viral pathogenesis in a sex-specific fashion. However, studies in a controlled setting suggested that levels of estrogen and testosterone differentially alter the expression of genes involved in innate immunity, such as those encoding TLRs and IFNs, in females and males, thereby contributing to sexual dimorphism in viral infections.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

The interplay of sex chromosomes, sex hormones, and immune responses influence sex differences in virologic control. Females display increased innate and adaptive immune responses to most viral infections compared with males as a result of differences in the effects of sex hormones (estrogen, progesterone, and androgen). X and Y chromosome complement also contribute to sexually dimorphic immune responses to viruses in females and males. The relative increase in immune responses in females may contribute to differential levels of virologic control during acute infections and/or immunopathologic effects of antiviral T cells that may lead to chronic inflammation

Immune response to viral infections

The innate immune response is the first line of defense against any viral infection. Males and females exhibit a different pattern of response to viral infections. The innate response is primarily mediated by three classes of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs): TLRs, retinoic acid–inducible gene I–like receptors, and nucleotide oligomerization domain–like receptors (110, 111). These PRRs detect viral components, such as genomic DNA, dsRNA, ssRNA, RNA with 5′-triphosphate ends, and viral proteins. TLRs and retinoic acid–inducible gene I–like receptors specifically regulate the production of type 1 IFNs and other cytokines. In contrast, nucleotide oligomerization domain–like receptors regulate IL-1β through caspase-1 activation (110, 112, 113). Sexual dimorphism is observed during antiviral responses mediated by TLR and IFN pathways (114, 115). Immune cells in females exhibit a 10-fold higher expression of TLRs compared with males (116). In mammals, the number and activity of innate immune cells, such as monocytes, macrophages, and dendritic cells, are higher in females than in males. As a result, responses to Ags, vaccines, and infections are also higher in females compared with males (3, 117). The adaptive immune response also exhibits many sexual differences in response to viral infections. Depending on the stage of the infection, females exhibit higher inflammatory Th1 and anti-inflammatory Th2 compared with males (3). Additionally, upregulation of anti-inflammatory genes and higher cytotoxic T cell activity are observed in females. Some studies also showed higher numbers of Tregs in females compared with males. Clinical investigations in humans also reported lower instances of CD3+, CD4+, and CD4+: CD8+ ratios in Th cells in males compared with females (44, 118).

DNA virus members of the Herpesviridae family

Like many DNA viruses, herpesviruses replicate within host cell nuclei, with their genome persisting as an episome for the life of the host. In this study we will discuss sexually dimorphic responses to herpesvirus infections that have been traced to activational effects of gonadal hormones.

HSV-1 and HSV-2.

Infection with HSVs, DNA viruses that cause oral and genital herpes, and rare encephalitis in immunocompetent individuals can lead to devastating disease in neonates and immunocompromised patients via extensive dissemination to visceral organs and the CNS (119). In males, the T cell–suppressive effects of androgens appear to protect against inflammatory-mediated demyelination infected with HSV-1 (120). Studies in mice showed that E2 treatment increases the chances of survival and decreases vaginal pathology and inflammation in HSV-1–infected females (121). Consistent with this, females infected with HSV generate higher levels of HSV-specific IgG and IgM compared with males (122). Similarly, females infected with HSV-2 are protected against neurologic damage and viral reactivation via virus-specific CD8+ T cell activation (123, 124). Studies in ovariectomized mouse models indicated that progesterone treatment increases the susceptibility of females to genital HSV-2 infection, whereas estrogen treatment helps to clear the infection rapidly. Interestingly, combined treatment with estrogen and progesterone in ovariectomized mice resulted in increased infection spread that was accompanied by persistent inflammation and neutrophil infiltration (125, 126). Although studies do not directly indicate the organizational effect, the effect of estrogen and progesterone in ovariectomized animals suggests an effect of sex hormones in HSV-2 infection.

CMV and murine CMV.

CMV, a member of the Herpesviridae family with a large genome, causes systemic viral infections in immunocompetent individuals that may be devastating and life-threatening in the immunocompromised (127). Knowledge of sexual dimorphism in CMV infection stems from experiments in murine CMV (MCMV), which is genetically similar to CMV and has been used to study the pathogenesis of CMV in mouse models. In MCMV-infected female mice, IFN-α/β production by splenic plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) controls viral replication and is required to prevent viral reactivation (128). Studies in MyD88−/− mice infected with MCMV showed suppression of TLR9 signaling in neutrophils of female mice, which was associated with increased viral replication (129). Additionally, CD4+ T cell–mediated responses, including expression of TNF-α, IL-12, IL-6, and IFN-γ, which are required for clearance of CMV, are also mediated primarily by TLR9 signaling, which is decreased in females (130, 131).

RNA viruses

RNA viruses may replicate in either the nucleus or the cytoplasm and, except for HIV-1, are generally cleared by host adaptive immune responses. In this article we outline sexually dimorphic immune responses to clinically relevant RNA viruses.

Hantavirus.

Hantavirus is a negative-sense RNA virus of the Bunyaviridae family that predominantly infects rodents. Airborne transmission of virus occurs in humans by exposure to rodent urine, feces, and saliva and leads to hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, a severe respiratory disease that may be fatal (132). Male rats infected with the Seoul virus strain exhibit higher viral burdens in target organs and shed virus for a longer duration than do similarly infected female animals (16, 133, 134). Accordingly, antiviral and proinflammatory factors, such as Tlr7, MyD88, Ifn-β, TNF-α, and Ccl5, are more highly expressed in female rodents (16, 135). Consistent with this, acute infection with Puumala virus strain in humans is associated with higher concentrations of IL-9 and GM-CSF in females compared with males (136, 137).

CVB3.

Coxsackieviruses (genus Enterovirus) belong to the Picornaviridae family of positive-sense ssRNA viruses. CVB3 infection leads to myocarditis during the acute and chronic phases, which affects more males than females, with double the mortality in infected individuals under the age of 40 (138). Cardiomyocytes are directly infected by CVB3 during the acute phase, which is followed by a chronic phase with a prolonged T cell–mediated immune response and persistence of CVB3 within the heart (139). Coxsackievirus AR is required for CVB3 entry into cardiomyocytes (140). Chronic-phase CVB3 myocarditis is an autoimmune disease that requires Th17 cells and whose differentiation and expression of IL-17 are suppressed by estrogen, making females less susceptible (138, 141). In contrast, lack of estrogen and the presence of testosterone induce Th17 cell differentiation in CVB3-infected males, enhancing autoimmune-mediated cardiac damage. In females, Th2- and Treg-mediated immune responses, which are increased through ERα signaling in T cells and macrophages in heart tissues, suppress CVB3-mediated immunopathology while clearing infection (139, 142). A recent study also indicates that sex chromosome complement plays a significant role in survival from CVB3 infection. Survival of CVB3-infected B6-ChrY consomic male mice was exclusively dependent on the YCVB3 loci on chromosome Y and independent of prenatal or adult testosterone (24). In summary, the immune make-up of the males and the presence of male sex steroid testosterone promote the spread of CVB3, leading to myocarditis. Sex complement, as well as the activational effect of hormones, contributes to CVB3 pathogenesis.

Influenza.

The incidences of H5N1 avian influenza and H1N1 and H2N2 pandemic influenza, RNA viruses that cause severe, inflammatory-induced respiratory diseases, all demonstrate significant sexual dimorphism, affecting more females than males (143, 144). Reports on H1N1 pandemic influenza indicated higher mortality in females of reproductive age (20–49 y), implicating roles for female gonadal hormones, especially during pregnancy (145). In murine studies, H1N1 infection in female mice prolongs the diestrus cycle, leading to lower serum levels of E2 (5, 145, 146). This reduction in E2 significantly increases the expression of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, including TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-6, and CCL2, the latter of which promoted the influx of mononuclear cells into virally infected lungs and exacerbated immune responses (5, 147). Under chronic infection, low levels of E2 bind to ER-α and modulate NF-κB transcriptional activity, further contributing to augmented inflammatory responses and immunopathology (114, 145). In contrast, lower levels of estrogen and higher levels of androgen in influenza-infected males were linked to immunosuppression and reduced T cell counts, which may limit immunopathology in males (148). Clearly, more studies emphasizing the interplay among sex, hormones, and genes are required to further understand the effect of sexual dimorphism on influenza pathogenesis.

HIV-1.

Untreated HIV-1 infection leads to AIDS, with near-complete loss of CD4+ T cells. Meta-analysis data show 41% less HIV RNA in women compared with men following primary infection, which gradually increase to a higher viral load set point compared with males after chronic infection (149–151). In females, HIV-1 promotes type 1 IFN production by pDCs via TLR7 signaling, which itself is increased downstream of E3 signaling (115, 152). These effects lead to strong, initial cellular responses that limit HIV-1 replication (153). However, continuous production of type 1 IFN by pDCs in females leads to chronic T cell activation with CCR5 expression, providing more targets for HIV-1 (154). In HIV-1–infected women, pDCs produce more IFN-α through TLR7 ligand activation. This results in a secondary activation of CD8+ T cells (115). Follow-up studies showed that, even with the same viral load, pDCs obtained from females showed higher CD8+ T cell activation compared with men (115). Additionally, females mount a stronger B and T cell activation following HIV-1 infection as a result of the higher baseline count of CD4+ T and CD8+ T cells compared with men (115, 151). The concentration of estrogen-binding SHBG is increased in HIV-infected males. Although the mechanism is not well understood, suppressing SHBG levels decreases the severity of HIV infection in male patients (155, 156). Another recent study in SCID mice showed that ERs ESR1 and ESR2 and X chromosome complement in females are necessary for IFN-α and TNF-α production under TLR7 activation in pDCs (157). This study confirmed that estrogen, female sex hormones, and X chromosome dosage confer stronger innate and adaptive immune responses in females compared with males in HIV infection. Altogether, these studies suggest that estradiol treatment could facilitate a stronger immune response to HIV infection.

Although sexual dimorphism is observed in HIV pathogenesis, studies are needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms that contribute to sex-based immune cell regulation in HIV-1–infected patients. These will assist in the design of experiments and the accuracy of clinical trials in HIV-1–infected populations.

Vaccine for viral infections

A sexually dimorphic response to viral vaccines is observed in males and females. Viral vaccines against hepatitis A, hepatitis B, and HSV-2 all exhibit a stronger side effect in young females following immunization. Higher IgA and IgG Ab responses, as well as higher transcriptional activation of genes important in immune cell signaling, such as IFN and TLR7, are also observed in females compared with males (143, 158). These studies clearly demonstrate that the development of vaccines against viral infection should carefully consider the effect of differential immune responses in males and females.

Conclusions

This review highlights early and recent findings regarding the impact of sex on immune cell numbers and function, with a focus on sexually dimorphic phenotypes during viral infections. Although still an emerging field, it is clear that mechanisms by which mammals achieve and maintain sex differences can directly and indirectly influence host–pathogen interactions at the cellular and molecular levels. These findings support the notion that there are, in fact, “two normals” with regard to manifestations of infectious diseases, with sex-specific responses during acute virologic control and in immunopathologic manifestations of viral infections. Accordingly, the development of therapeutics to treat various phases of viral infections will require continued study and comparisons of viral pathogenesis in female and male animals and humans.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 NS052632 and U19 AI083019 and a grant from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (all to R.S.K.).

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    AR
    androgen receptor
    CVB3
    coxsackievirus B3
    E2
    17β-estradiol
    E3
    estriol
    ER
    estrogen receptor
    FCG
    four-core genotype
    MCMV
    murine CMV
    pDC
    plasmacytoid dendritic cell
    RSPO
    R-spondin
    SLE
    systemic lupus erythematosus
    SOX9
    sex-determining region Y box 9
    SRY
    sex-determining region Y
    Treg
    regulatory T cell.

  • Received July 5, 2016.
  • Accepted October 24, 2016.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Marriott I.,
    2. Y. M. Huet-Hudson
    . 2006. Sexual dimorphism in innate immune responses to infectious organisms. Immunol. Res. 34: 177–192.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Butterworth M.,
    2. B. McClellan,
    3. M. Allansmith
    . 1967. Influence of sex in immunoglobulin levels. Nature 214: 1224–1225.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Klein S. L.,
    2. K. L. Flanagan
    . 2016. Sex differences in immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16: 626–638.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Klein S. L.
    2012. Sex influences immune responses to viruses, and efficacy of prophylaxis and treatments for viral diseases. BioEssays 34: 1050–1059.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Larcombe A. N.,
    2. R. E. Foong,
    3. E. M. Bozanich,
    4. L. J. Berry,
    5. L. W. Garratt,
    6. R. C. Gualano,
    7. J. E. Jones,
    8. L. F. Dousha,
    9. G. R. Zosky,
    10. P. D. Sly
    . 2011. Sexual dimorphism in lung function responses to acute influenza A infection. Influenza Other Respi. Viruses 5: 334–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Molina V.,
    2. Y. Shoenfeld
    . 2005. Infection, vaccines and other environmental triggers of autoimmunity. Autoimmunity 38: 235–245.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Lamason R.,
    2. P. Zhao,
    3. R. Rawat,
    4. A. Davis,
    5. J. C. Hall,
    6. J. J. Chae,
    7. R. Agarwal,
    8. P. Cohen,
    9. A. Rosen,
    10. E. P. Hoffman,
    11. K. Nagaraju
    . 2006. Sexual dimorphism in immune response genes as a function of puberty. BMC Immunol. 7: 2.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Luppi P.,
    2. C. Haluszczak,
    3. D. Betters,
    4. C. A. Richard,
    5. M. Trucco,
    6. J. A. DeLoia
    . 2002. Monocytes are progressively activated in the circulation of pregnant women. J. Leukoc. Biol. 72: 874–884.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kaushic C.,
    2. K. L. Roth,
    3. V. Anipindi,
    4. F. Xiu
    . 2011. Increased prevalence of sexually transmitted viral infections in women: the role of female sex hormones in regulating susceptibility and immune responses. J. Reprod. Immunol. 88: 204–209.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Oertelt-Prigione S.
    2012. The influence of sex and gender on the immune response. Autoimmun. Rev. 11: A479–A485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Klein S. L.,
    2. I. Marriott,
    3. E. N. Fish
    . 2015. Sex-based differences in immune function and responses to vaccination. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 109: 9–15.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Fischer J.,
    2. N. Jung,
    3. N. Robinson,
    4. C. Lehmann
    . 2015. Sex differences in immune responses to infectious diseases. Infection 43: 399–403.
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    1. Wang J.,
    2. C. M. Syrett,
    3. M. C. Kramer,
    4. A. Basu,
    5. M. L. Atchison,
    6. M. C. Anguera
    . 2016. Unusual maintenance of X chromosome inactivation predisposes female lymphocytes for increased expression from the inactive X. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113: E2029–E2038.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Dixon-McDougall T.,
    2. C. Brown
    . 2016. The making of a Barr body: the mosaic of factors that eXIST on the mammalian inactive X chromosome. Biochem. Cell Biol. 94: 56–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Barrionuevo F.,
    2. S. Bagheri-Fam,
    3. J. Klattig,
    4. R. Kist,
    5. M. M. Taketo,
    6. C. Englert,
    7. G. Scherer
    . 2006. Homozygous inactivation of Sox9 causes complete XY sex reversal in mice. Biol. Reprod. 74: 195–201.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Hannah M. F.,
    2. V. B. Bajic,
    3. S. L. Klein
    . 2008. Sex differences in the recognition of and innate antiviral responses to Seoul virus in Norway rats. Brain Behav. Immun. 22: 503–516.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Geurs T. L.,
    2. E. B. Hill,
    3. D. M. Lippold,
    4. A. R. French
    . 2012. Sex differences in murine susceptibility to systemic viral infections. J. Autoimmun. 38: J245–J253.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Hagen S.,
    2. M. Altfeld
    . 2016. The X awakens: multifactorial ramifications of sex-specific differences in HIV-1 infection. J Virus Erad 2: 78–81.
    OpenUrl
    1. Fish E. N.
    2008. The X-files in immunity: sex-based differences predispose immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8: 737–744.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Peretz J.,
    2. A. Pekosz,
    3. A. P. Lane,
    4. S. L. Klein
    . 2016. Estrogenic compounds reduce influenza A virus replication in primary human nasal epithelial cells derived from female, but not male, donors. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 310: L415–L425.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Bermejo-Alvarez P.,
    2. D. Rizos,
    3. P. Lonergan,
    4. A. Gutierrez-Adan
    . 2011. Transcriptional sexual dimorphism during preimplantation embryo development and its consequences for developmental competence and adult health and disease. Reproduction 141: 563–570.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Lowe R.,
    2. C. Gemma,
    3. V. K. Rakyan,
    4. M. L. Holland
    . 2015. Sexually dimorphic gene expression emerges with embryonic genome activation and is dynamic throughout development. BMC Genomics 16: 295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Sekido R.,
    2. R. Lovell-Badge
    . 2008. Sex determination involves synergistic action of SRY and SF1 on a specific Sox9 enhancer. Nature 453: 930–934.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Case L. K.,
    2. L. Toussaint,
    3. M. Moussawi,
    4. B. Roberts,
    5. N. Saligrama,
    6. L. Brossay,
    7. S. A. Huber,
    8. C. Teuscher
    . 2012. Chromosome y regulates survival following murine coxsackievirus b3 infection. G3 2: 115–121.
    OpenUrl
  25. ↵
    1. Makiyan Z.
    2016. Studies of gonadal sex differentiation. Organogenesis 12: 42–51.
    OpenUrl
  26. ↵
    1. Durando M.,
    2. L. Cocito,
    3. H. A. Rodríguez,
    4. J. Varayoud,
    5. J. G. Ramos,
    6. E. H. Luque,
    7. M. Muñoz-de-Toro
    . 2013. Neonatal expression of amh, sox9 and sf-1 mRNA in Caiman latirostris and effects of in ovo exposure to endocrine disrupting chemicals. Gen. Comp. Endocrinol. 191: 31–38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Lavery R.,
    2. A. A. Chassot,
    3. E. Pauper,
    4. E. P. Gregoire,
    5. M. Klopfenstein,
    6. D. G. de Rooij,
    7. M. Mark,
    8. A. Schedl,
    9. N. B. Ghyselinck,
    10. M. C. Chaboissier
    . 2012. Testicular differentiation occurs in absence of R-spondin1 and Sox9 in mouse sex reversals. PLoS Genet. 8: e1003170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Tomizuka K.,
    2. K. Horikoshi,
    3. R. Kitada,
    4. Y. Sugawara,
    5. Y. Iba,
    6. A. Kojima,
    7. A. Yoshitome,
    8. K. Yamawaki,
    9. M. Amagai,
    10. A. Inoue,
    11. et al
    . 2008. R-spondin1 plays an essential role in ovarian development through positively regulating Wnt-4 signaling. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17: 1278–1291.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Chassot A. A.,
    2. F. Ranc,
    3. E. P. Gregoire,
    4. H. L. Roepers-Gajadien,
    5. M. M. Taketo,
    6. G. Camerino,
    7. D. G. de Rooij,
    8. A. Schedl,
    9. M. C. Chaboissier
    . 2008. Activation of beta-catenin signaling by Rspo1 controls differentiation of the mammalian ovary. Hum. Mol. Genet. 17: 1264–1277.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Smith C. A.,
    2. C. M. Shoemaker,
    3. K. N. Roeszler,
    4. J. Queen,
    5. D. Crews,
    6. A. H. Sinclair
    . 2008. Cloning and expression of R-Spondin1 in different vertebrates suggests a conserved role in ovarian development. BMC Dev. Biol. 8: 72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Kim Y.,
    2. A. Kobayashi,
    3. R. Sekido,
    4. L. DiNapoli,
    5. J. Brennan,
    6. M. C. Chaboissier,
    7. F. Poulat,
    8. R. R. Behringer,
    9. R. Lovell-Badge,
    10. B. Capel
    . 2006. Fgf9 and Wnt4 act as antagonistic signals to regulate mammalian sex determination. PLoS Biol. 4: e187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Schmidt D.,
    2. C. E. Ovitt,
    3. K. Anlag,
    4. S. Fehsenfeld,
    5. L. Gredsted,
    6. A. C. Treier,
    7. M. Treier
    . 2004. The murine winged-helix transcription factor Foxl2 is required for granulosa cell differentiation and ovary maintenance. Development 131: 933–942.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ottolenghi C.,
    2. S. Omari,
    3. J. E. Garcia-Ortiz,
    4. M. Uda,
    5. L. Crisponi,
    6. A. Forabosco,
    7. G. Pilia,
    8. D. Schlessinger
    . 2005. Foxl2 is required for commitment to ovary differentiation. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14: 2053–2062.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Uhlenhaut N. H.,
    2. S. Jakob,
    3. K. Anlag,
    4. T. Eisenberger,
    5. R. Sekido,
    6. J. Kress,
    7. A. C. Treier,
    8. C. Klugmann,
    9. C. Klasen,
    10. N. I. Holter,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Somatic sex reprogramming of adult ovaries to testes by FOXL2 ablation. Cell 139: 1130–1142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Kashimada K.,
    2. T. Svingen,
    3. C. W. Feng,
    4. E. Pelosi,
    5. S. Bagheri-Fam,
    6. V. R. Harley,
    7. D. Schlessinger,
    8. J. Bowles,
    9. P. Koopman
    . 2011. Antagonistic regulation of Cyp26b1 by transcription factors SOX9/SF1 and FOXL2 during gonadal development in mice. FASEB J. 25: 3561–3569.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Matson C. K.,
    2. M. W. Murphy,
    3. A. L. Sarver,
    4. M. D. Griswold,
    5. V. J. Bardwell,
    6. D. Zarkower
    . 2011. DMRT1 prevents female reprogramming in the postnatal mammalian testis. Nature 476: 101–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kovats S.
    2015. Estrogen receptors regulate innate immune cells and signaling pathways. Cell. Immunol. 294: 63–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Tejera-Alhambra M.,
    2. B. Alonso,
    3. R. Teijeiro,
    4. R. Ramos-Medina,
    5. C. Aristimuño,
    6. L. Valor,
    7. C. de Andrés,
    8. S. Sánchez-Ramón
    . 2012. Perforin expression by CD4+ regulatory T cells increases at multiple sclerosis relapse: sex differences. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13: 6698–6710.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. McCarthy M. M.,
    2. A. P. Arnold
    . 2011. Reframing sexual differentiation of the brain. Nat. Neurosci. 14: 677–683.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Azad N.,
    2. N. LaPaglia,
    3. L. Agrawal,
    4. J. Steiner,
    5. S. Uddin,
    6. D. W. Williams,
    7. A. M. Lawrence,
    8. N. V. Emanuele
    . 1998. The role of gonadectomy and testosterone replacement on thymic luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone production. J. Endocrinol. 158: 229–235.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  41. ↵
    1. Hines M.,
    2. V. Pasterski,
    3. D. Spencer,
    4. S. Neufeld,
    5. P. Patalay,
    6. P. C. Hindmarsh,
    7. I. A. Hughes,
    8. C. L. Acerini
    . 2016. Prenatal androgen exposure alters girls’ responses to information indicating gender-appropriate behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 371: 20150125.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    1. Konstadoulakis M. M.,
    2. K. N. Syrigos,
    3. C. N. Baxevanis,
    4. E. I. Syrigou,
    5. M. Papamichail,
    6. P. Peveretos,
    7. M. Anapliotou,
    8. B. C. Golematis
    . 1995. Effect of testosterone administration, pre- and postnatally, on the immune system of rats. Horm. Metab. Res. 27: 275–278.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Weinstein Y.,
    2. S. Ran,
    3. S. Segal
    . 1984. Sex-associated differences in the regulation of immune responses controlled by the MHC of the mouse. J. Immunol. 132: 656–661.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Amadori A.,
    2. R. Zamarchi,
    3. G. De Silvestro,
    4. G. Forza,
    5. G. Cavatton,
    6. G. A. Danieli,
    7. M. Clementi,
    8. L. Chieco-Bianchi
    . 1995. Genetic control of the CD4/CD8 T-cell ratio in humans. Nat. Med. 1: 1279–1283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Gould K. G.,
    2. M. A. Akinbami,
    3. D. R. Mann
    . 1998. Effect of neonatal treatment with a gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonist on developmental changes in circulating lymphocyte subsets: a longitudinal study in male rhesus monkeys. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 22: 457–467.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Mann D. R.,
    2. H. M. Fraser
    . 1996. The neonatal period: a critical interval in male primate development. J. Endocrinol. 149: 191–197.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Page S. T.,
    2. S. R. Plymate,
    3. W. J. Bremner,
    4. A. M. Matsumoto,
    5. D. L. Hess,
    6. D. W. Lin,
    7. J. K. Amory,
    8. P. S. Nelson,
    9. J. D. Wu
    . 2006. Effect of medical castration on CD4+ CD25+ T cells, CD8+ T cell IFN-gamma expression, and NK cells: a physiological role for testosterone and/or its metabolites. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 290: E856–E863.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Paavonen T.,
    2. L. C. Andersson,
    3. H. Adlercreutz
    . 1981. Sex hormone regulation of in vitro immune response. Estradiol enhances human B cell maturation via inhibition of suppressor T cells in pokeweed mitogen-stimulated cultures. J. Exp. Med. 154: 1935–1945.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Sthoeger Z. M.,
    2. N. Chiorazzi,
    3. R. G. Lahita
    . 1988. Regulation of the immune response by sex hormones. I. In vitro effects of estradiol and testosterone on pokeweed mitogen-induced human B cell differentiation. J. Immunol. 141: 91–98.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Ainbender E.,
    2. R. B. Weisinger,
    3. M. Hevizy,
    4. H. L. Hodes
    . 1968. Difference in the immunoglobulin class of polioantibody in the serum of men and women. J. Immunol. 101: 92–98.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Müller W.,
    2. T. G. Groothuis,
    3. A. Kasprzik,
    4. C. Dijkstra,
    5. R. V. Alatalo,
    6. H. Siitari
    . 2005. Prenatal androgen exposure modulates cellular and humoral immune function of black-headed gull chicks. Proc. Biol. Sci. 272: 1971–1977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Arnold A. P.
    2009. The organizational-activational hypothesis as the foundation for a unified theory of sexual differentiation of all mammalian tissues. Horm. Behav. 55: 570–578.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Gaumond I.,
    2. P. Arsenault,
    3. S. Marchand
    . 2002. The role of sex hormones on formalin-induced nociceptive responses. Brain Res. 958: 139–145.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Lai J. J.,
    2. K. P. Lai,
    3. W. Zeng,
    4. K. H. Chuang,
    5. S. Altuwaijri,
    6. C. Chang
    . 2012. Androgen receptor influences on body defense system via modulation of innate and adaptive immune systems: lessons from conditional AR knockout mice. Am. J. Pathol. 181: 1504–1512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Nilsson S.,
    2. S. Mäkelä,
    3. E. Treuter,
    4. M. Tujague,
    5. J. Thomsen,
    6. G. Andersson,
    7. E. Enmark,
    8. K. Pettersson,
    9. M. Warner,
    10. J. A. Gustafsson
    . 2001. Mechanisms of estrogen action. Physiol. Rev. 81: 1535–1565.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    1. Phiel K. L.,
    2. R. A. Henderson,
    3. S. J. Adelman,
    4. M. M. Elloso
    . 2005. Differential estrogen receptor gene expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cell populations. Immunol. Lett. 97: 107–113.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Nakada D.,
    2. H. Oguro,
    3. B. P. Levi,
    4. N. Ryan,
    5. A. Kitano,
    6. Y. Saitoh,
    7. M. Takeichi,
    8. G. R. Wendt,
    9. S. J. Morrison
    . 2014. Oestrogen increases haematopoietic stem-cell self-renewal in females and during pregnancy. Nature 505: 555–558.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    1. Bird M. D.,
    2. J. Karavitis,
    3. E. J. Kovacs
    . 2008. Sex differences and estrogen modulation of the cellular immune response after injury. Cell. Immunol. 252: 57–67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Zhou T.,
    2. Z. Yang,
    3. Y. Chen,
    4. Y. Chen,
    5. Z. Huang,
    6. B. You,
    7. Y. Peng,
    8. J. Chen
    . 2016. Estrogen accelerates cutaneous wound healing by promoting proliferation of epidermal keratinocytes via Erk/Akt signaling pathway. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 38: 959–968.
    OpenUrl
  60. ↵
    1. Xie H.,
    2. C. Hua,
    3. L. Sun,
    4. X. Zhao,
    5. H. Fan,
    6. H. Dou,
    7. L. Sun,
    8. Y. Hou
    . 2011. 17β-estradiol induces CD40 expression in dendritic cells via MAPK signaling pathways in a minichromosome maintenance protein 6-dependent manner. Arthritis Rheum. 63: 2425–2435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. Douin-Echinard V.,
    2. S. Laffont,
    3. C. Seillet,
    4. L. Delpy,
    5. A. Krust,
    6. P. Chambon,
    7. P. Gourdy,
    8. J. F. Arnal,
    9. J. C. Guéry
    . 2008. Estrogen receptor alpha, but not beta, is required for optimal dendritic cell differentiation and [corrected] CD40-induced cytokine production. [Published erratum appears in 2008 J. Immunol. 180: 7047.] J. Immunol. 180: 3661–3669.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    1. Carascossa S.,
    2. P. Dudek,
    3. B. Cenni,
    4. P. A. Briand,
    5. D. Picard
    . 2010. CARM1 mediates the ligand-independent and tamoxifen-resistant activation of the estrogen receptor alpha by cAMP. Genes Dev. 24: 708–719.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Murphy A. J.,
    2. P. M. Guyre,
    3. C. R. Wira,
    4. P. A. Pioli
    . 2009. Estradiol regulates expression of estrogen receptor ERalpha46 in human macrophages. PLoS One 4: e5539.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Lasarte S.,
    2. D. Elsner,
    3. T. Sanchez-Elsner,
    4. A. Fernandez-Pineda,
    5. L. A. López-Fernández,
    6. A. L. Corbí,
    7. M. A. Muñoz-Fernandez,
    8. M. Relloso
    . 2013. Estradiol downregulates NF-κb translocation by Ikbkg transcriptional repression in dendritic cells. Genes Immun. 14: 462–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    1. Ho H. H.,
    2. L. B. Ivashkiv
    . 2006. Role of STAT3 in type I interferon responses. Negative regulation of STAT1-dependent inflammatory gene activation. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 14111–14118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  66. ↵
    1. Kuchipudi S. V.
    2015. The complex role of STAT3 in viral infections. J. Immunol. Res. 2015: 272359. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/272359.
    OpenUrl
  67. ↵
    1. Alexander W. S.,
    2. R. Starr,
    3. J. E. Fenner,
    4. C. L. Scott,
    5. E. Handman,
    6. N. S. Sprigg,
    7. J. E. Corbin,
    8. A. L. Cornish,
    9. R. Darwiche,
    10. C. M. Owczarek,
    11. et al
    . 1999. SOCS1 is a critical inhibitor of interferon gamma signaling and prevents the potentially fatal neonatal actions of this cytokine. Cell 98: 597–608.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kinjyo I.,
    2. T. Hanada,
    3. K. Inagaki-Ohara,
    4. H. Mori,
    5. D. Aki,
    6. M. Ohishi,
    7. H. Yoshida,
    8. M. Kubo,
    9. A. Yoshimura
    . 2002. SOCS1/JAB is a negative regulator of LPS-induced macrophage activation. Immunity 17: 583–591.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cornish A. L.,
    2. G. M. Davey,
    3. D. Metcalf,
    4. J. F. Purton,
    5. J. E. Corbin,
    6. C. J. Greenhalgh,
    7. R. Darwiche,
    8. L. Wu,
    9. N. A. Nicola,
    10. D. I. Godfrey,
    11. et al
    . 2003. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 has IFN-gamma-independent actions in T cell homeostasis. J. Immunol. 170: 878–886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Brender C.,
    2. R. Columbus,
    3. D. Metcalf,
    4. E. Handman,
    5. R. Starr,
    6. N. Huntington,
    7. D. Tarlinton,
    8. N. Ødum,
    9. S. E. Nicholson,
    10. N. A. Nicola,
    11. et al
    . 2004. SOCS5 is expressed in primary B and T lymphoid cells but is dispensable for lymphocyte production and function. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24: 6094–6103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Pan T.,
    2. L. Zhong,
    3. S. Wu,
    4. Y. Cao,
    5. Q. Yang,
    6. Z. Cai,
    7. X. Cai,
    8. W. Zhao,
    9. N. Ma,
    10. W. Zhang,
    11. et al
    . 2016. 17β-Oestradiol enhances the expansion and activation of myeloid-derived suppressor cells via signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT)-3 signaling in human pregnancy. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 185: 86–97.
    OpenUrl
  72. ↵
    1. Kawana K.,
    2. Y. Kawana,
    3. D. J. Schust
    . 2005. Female steroid hormones use signal transducers and activators of transcription protein-mediated pathways to modulate the expression of T-bet in epithelial cells: a mechanism for local immune regulation in the human reproductive tract. Mol. Endocrinol. 19: 2047–2059.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    1. Schwarz J. M.,
    2. B. M. Nugent,
    3. M. M. McCarthy
    . 2010. Developmental and hormone-induced epigenetic changes to estrogen and progesterone receptor genes in brain are dynamic across the life span. Endocrinology 151: 4871–4881.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pedram A.,
    2. M. Razandi,
    3. M. Lewis,
    4. S. Hammes,
    5. E. R. Levin
    . 2014. Membrane-localized estrogen receptor α is required for normal organ development and function. Dev. Cell 29: 482–490.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Zhang X.,
    2. K. Tanaka,
    3. J. Yan,
    4. J. Li,
    5. D. Peng,
    6. Y. Jiang,
    7. Z. Yang,
    8. M. C. Barton,
    9. H. Wen,
    10. X. Shi
    . 2013. Regulation of estrogen receptor α by histone methyltransferase SMYD2-mediated protein methylation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 17284–17289.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  76. ↵
    1. Edelmann M. N.,
    2. A. P. Auger
    . 2011. Epigenetic impact of simulated maternal grooming on estrogen receptor alpha within the developing amygdala. Brain Behav. Immun. 25: 1299–1304.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  77. ↵
    1. Banchs H. L.,
    2. V. González,
    3. I. González Cancel,
    4. C. Quintana,
    5. R. Calderón,
    6. P. I. Altieri
    . 2005. Heart transplantation in females: the experience in Puerto Rico. Bol. Asoc. Med. P. R. 97: 248–256.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Nalbandian G.,
    2. V. Paharkova-Vatchkova,
    3. A. Mao,
    4. S. Nale,
    5. S. Kovats
    . 2005. The selective estrogen receptor modulators, tamoxifen and raloxifene, impair dendritic cell differentiation and activation. J. Immunol. 175: 2666–2675.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Marino M.,
    2. P. Galluzzo,
    3. P. Ascenzi
    . 2006. Estrogen signaling multiple pathways to impact gene transcription. Curr. Genomics 7: 497–508.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Johansen L. M.,
    2. J. M. Brannan,
    3. S. E. Delos,
    4. C. J. Shoemaker,
    5. A. Stossel,
    6. C. Lear,
    7. B. G. Hoffstrom,
    8. L. E. Dewald,
    9. K. L. Schornberg,
    10. C. Scully,
    11. et al
    . 2013. FDA-approved selective estrogen receptor modulators inhibit Ebola virus infection. Sci. Transl. Med. 5: 190ra79.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Wisdom A. J.,
    2. Y. Cao,
    3. N. Itoh,
    4. R. D. Spence,
    5. R. R. Voskuhl
    . 2013. Estrogen receptor-β ligand treatment after disease onset is neuroprotective in the multiple sclerosis model. J. Neurosci. Res. 91: 901–908.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  82. ↵
    1. Butts C. L.,
    2. S. A. Shukair,
    3. K. M. Duncan,
    4. E. Bowers,
    5. C. Horn,
    6. E. Belyavskaya,
    7. L. Tonelli,
    8. E. M. Sternberg
    . 2007. Progesterone inhibits mature rat dendritic cells in a receptor-mediated fashion. Int. Immunol. 19: 287–296.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Zhao X.,
    2. L. Liu,
    3. D. Liu,
    4. H. Fan,
    5. Y. Wang,
    6. Y. Hu,
    7. Y. Hou
    . 2012. Progesterone enhances immunoregulatory activity of human mesenchymal stem cells via PGE2 and IL-6. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 68: 290–300.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Enninga E. A.,
    2. S. G. Holtan,
    3. D. J. Creedon,
    4. R. S. Dronca,
    5. W. K. Nevala,
    6. S. Ognjanovic,
    7. S. N. Markovic
    . 2014. Immunomodulatory effects of sex hormones: requirements for pregnancy and relevance in melanoma. Mayo Clin. Proc. 89: 520–535.
    OpenUrl
  85. ↵
    1. Arruvito L.,
    2. S. Giulianelli,
    3. A. C. Flores,
    4. N. Paladino,
    5. M. Barboza,
    6. C. Lanari,
    7. L. Fainboim
    . 2008. NK cells expressing a progesterone receptor are susceptible to progesterone-induced apoptosis. J. Immunol. 180: 5746–5753.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Llewelyn D. E.,
    2. G. F. Read,
    3. S. G. Hillier
    . 1975. Proceedings: novel procedure for the simultaneous determination of testosterone and 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone concentrations in unpurified plasma extracts by radioimmunoassay. J. Endocrinol. 67: 7P–8P.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Penning T. M.,
    2. D. R. Bauman,
    3. Y. Jin,
    4. T. L. Rizner
    . 2007. Identification of the molecular switch that regulates access of 5alpha-DHT to the androgen receptor. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 265–266: 77–82.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  88. ↵
    1. Chuang K. H.,
    2. S. Altuwaijri,
    3. G. Li,
    4. J. J. Lai,
    5. C. Y. Chu,
    6. K. P. Lai,
    7. H. Y. Lin,
    8. J. W. Hsu,
    9. P. Keng,
    10. M. C. Wu,
    11. C. Chang
    . 2009. Neutropenia with impaired host defense against microbial infection in mice lacking androgen receptor. J. Exp. Med. 206: 1181–1199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  89. ↵
    1. Lai J. J.,
    2. K. P. Lai,
    3. K. H. Chuang,
    4. P. Chang,
    5. I. C. Yu,
    6. W. J. Lin,
    7. C. Chang
    . 2009. Monocyte/macrophage androgen receptor suppresses cutaneous wound healing in mice by enhancing local TNF-alpha expression. J. Clin. Invest. 119: 3739–3751.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  90. ↵
    1. Olsen N. J.,
    2. W. J. Kovacs
    . 2001. Effects of androgens on T and B lymphocyte development. Immunol. Res. 23: 281–288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  91. ↵
    1. Kissick H. T.,
    2. M. G. Sanda,
    3. L. K. Dunn,
    4. K. L. Pellegrini,
    5. S. T. On,
    6. J. K. Noel,
    7. M. S. Arredouani
    . 2014. Androgens alter T-cell immunity by inhibiting T-helper 1 differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111: 9887–9892.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Benten W. P.,
    2. A. Becker,
    3. H. P. Schmitt-Wrede,
    4. F. Wunderlich
    . 2002. Developmental regulation of intracellular and surface androgen receptors in T cells. Steroids 67: 925–931.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  93. ↵
    1. Lanini S.,
    2. A. Nanni Costa,
    3. P. A. Grossi,
    4. F. Procaccio,
    5. A. Ricci,
    6. M. R. Capobianchi,
    7. N. A. Terrault,
    8. G. Ippolito
    . 2016. Liver transplant recipients and prioritization of anti-HCV therapy: an Italian cohort analysis. Liver Int. 36: 410–417.
    OpenUrl
  94. ↵
    1. Bao M.,
    2. Y. Yang,
    3. H. S. Jun,
    4. J. W. Yoon
    . 2002. Molecular mechanisms for gender differences in susceptibility to T cell-mediated autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. J. Immunol. 168: 5369–5375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  95. ↵
    1. Bebo B. F., Jr.,
    2. J. C. Schuster,
    3. A. A. Vandenbark,
    4. H. Offner
    . 1999. Androgens alter the cytokine profile and reduce encephalitogenicity of myelin-reactive T cells. J. Immunol. 162: 35–40.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  96. ↵
    1. Arnold A. P.,
    2. X. Chen,
    3. Y. Itoh
    . 2012. What a difference an X or Y makes: sex chromosomes, gene dose, and epigenetics in sexual differentiation. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 214: 67–88.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  97. ↵
    1. Ercan S.
    2015. Mechanisms of x chromosome dosage compensation. J Genomics 3: 1–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  98. ↵
    1. Simon M. D.,
    2. S. F. Pinter,
    3. R. Fang,
    4. K. Sarma,
    5. M. Rutenberg-Schoenberg,
    6. S. K. Bowman,
    7. B. A. Kesner,
    8. V. K. Maier,
    9. R. E. Kingston,
    10. J. T. Lee
    . 2013. High-resolution Xist binding maps reveal two-step spreading during X-chromosome inactivation. Nature 504: 465–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  99. ↵
    1. Prokop J. W.,
    2. F. J. Rauscher III.,
    3. H. Peng,
    4. Y. Liu,
    5. F. C. Araujo,
    6. I. Watanabe,
    7. F. M. Reis,
    8. A. Milsted
    . 2014. MAS promoter regulation: a role for Sry and tyrosine nitration of the KRAB domain of ZNF274 as a feedback mechanism. Clin. Sci. 126: 727–738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  100. ↵
    1. Oh H. J.,
    2. Y. Li,
    3. Y. F. Lau
    . 2005. Sry associates with the heterochromatin protein 1 complex by interacting with a KRAB domain protein. Biol. Reprod. 72: 407–415.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  101. ↵
    1. Tsai H. W.,
    2. P. A. Grant,
    3. E. F. Rissman
    . 2009. Sex differences in histone modifications in the neonatal mouse brain. Epigenetics 4: 47–53.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  102. ↵
    1. Matsuda K. I.,
    2. H. Mori,
    3. B. M. Nugent,
    4. D. W. Pfaff,
    5. M. M. McCarthy,
    6. M. Kawata
    . 2011. Histone deacetylation during brain development is essential for permanent masculinization of sexual behavior. Endocrinology 152: 2760–2767.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  103. ↵
    1. Wainwright E. N.,
    2. J. S. Jorgensen,
    3. Y. Kim,
    4. V. Truong,
    5. S. Bagheri-Fam,
    6. T. Davidson,
    7. T. Svingen,
    8. S. L. Fernandez-Valverde,
    9. K. S. McClelland,
    10. R. J. Taft,
    11. et al
    . 2013. SOX9 regulates microRNA miR-202-5p/3p expression during mouse testis differentiation. Biol. Reprod. 89: 34.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  104. ↵
    1. Wei J.,
    2. F. Wang,
    3. L. Y. Kong,
    4. S. Xu,
    5. T. Doucette,
    6. S. D. Ferguson,
    7. Y. Yang,
    8. K. McEnery,
    9. K. Jethwa,
    10. O. Gjyshi,
    11. et al
    . 2013. miR-124 inhibits STAT3 signaling to enhance T cell-mediated immune clearance of glioma. Cancer Res. 73: 3913–3926.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  105. ↵
    1. Jiang S.,
    2. C. Li,
    3. G. McRae,
    4. E. Lykken,
    5. J. Sevilla,
    6. S. Q. Liu,
    7. Y. Wan,
    8. Q. J. Li
    . 2014. MeCP2 reinforces STAT3 signaling and the generation of effector CD4+ T cells by promoting miR-124-mediated suppression of SOCS5. Sci. Signal. 7: ra25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  106. ↵
    1. Ponomarev E. D.,
    2. T. Veremeyko,
    3. N. Barteneva,
    4. A. M. Krichevsky,
    5. H. L. Weiner
    . 2011. MicroRNA-124 promotes microglia quiescence and suppresses EAE by deactivating macrophages via the C/EBP-α-PU.1 pathway. Nat. Med. 17: 64–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  107. ↵
    1. Dillon S. P.,
    2. B. T. Kurien,
    3. S. Li,
    4. G. R. Bruner,
    5. K. M. Kaufman,
    6. J. B. Harley,
    7. P. M. Gaffney,
    8. D. J. Wallace,
    9. M. H. Weisman,
    10. R. H. Scofield
    . 2012. Sex chromosome aneuploidies among men with systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Autoimmun. 38: J129–J134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  108. ↵
    1. Smith-Bouvier D. L.,
    2. A. A. Divekar,
    3. M. Sasidhar,
    4. S. Du,
    5. S. K. Tiwari-Woodruff,
    6. J. K. King,
    7. A. P. Arnold,
    8. R. R. Singh,
    9. R. R. Voskuhl
    . 2008. A role for sex chromosome complement in the female bias in autoimmune disease. J. Exp. Med. 205: 1099–1108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  109. ↵
    1. Itoh Y.,
    2. R. Mackie,
    3. K. Kampf,
    4. S. Domadia,
    5. J. D. Brown,
    6. R. O’Neill,
    7. A. P. Arnold
    . 2015. Four core genotypes mouse model: localization of the Sry transgene and bioassay for testicular hormone levels. BMC Res. Notes 8: 69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  110. ↵
    1. Medzhitov R.
    2007. Recognition of microorganisms and activation of the immune response. Nature 449: 819–826.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  111. ↵
    1. Kanneganti T. D.,
    2. M. Lamkanfi,
    3. G. Núñez
    . 2007. Intracellular NOD-like receptors in host defense and disease. Immunity 27: 549–559.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  112. ↵
    1. Akira S.,
    2. S. Uematsu,
    3. O. Takeuchi
    . 2006. Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124: 783–801.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  113. ↵
    1. Cao X.
    2016. Self-regulation and cross-regulation of pattern-recognition receptor signalling in health and disease. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16: 35–50.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  114. ↵
    1. Robinson D. P.,
    2. M. E. Lorenzo,
    3. W. Jian,
    4. S. L. Klein
    . 2011. Elevated 17β-estradiol protects females from influenza A virus pathogenesis by suppressing inflammatory responses. PLoS Pathog. 7: e1002149.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  115. ↵
    1. Meier A.,
    2. J. J. Chang,
    3. E. S. Chan,
    4. R. B. Pollard,
    5. H. K. Sidhu,
    6. S. Kulkarni,
    7. T. F. Wen,
    8. R. J. Lindsay,
    9. L. Orellana,
    10. D. Mildvan,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Sex differences in the Toll-like receptor-mediated response of plasmacytoid dendritic cells to HIV-1. Nat. Med. 15: 955–959.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  116. ↵
    1. Scotland R. S.,
    2. M. J. Stables,
    3. S. Madalli,
    4. P. Watson,
    5. D. W. Gilroy
    . 2011. Sex differences in resident immune cell phenotype underlie more efficient acute inflammatory responses in female mice. Blood 118: 5918–5927.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  117. ↵
    1. vom Steeg L. G.,
    2. S. L. Klein
    . 2016. SeXX matters in infectious disease pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 12: e1005374.
    OpenUrl
  118. ↵
    1. Wikby A.,
    2. I. A. Månsson,
    3. B. Johansson,
    4. J. Strindhall,
    5. S. E. Nilsson
    . 2008. The immune risk profile is associated with age and gender: findings from three Swedish population studies of individuals 20-100 years of age. Biogerontology 9: 299–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  119. ↵
    1. Kollias C. M.,
    2. R. B. Huneke,
    3. B. Wigdahl,
    4. S. R. Jennings
    . 2015. Animal models of herpes simplex virus immunity and pathogenesis. J. Neurovirol. 21: 8–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  120. ↵
    1. Yirrell D. L.,
    2. W. A. Blyth,
    3. T. J. Hill
    . 1987. The influence of androgens on paralysis in mice following intravenous inoculation of herpes simplex virus. J. Gen. Virol. 68: 2461–2464.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  121. ↵
    1. MacDonald E. M.,
    2. A. Savoy,
    3. A. Gillgrass,
    4. S. Fernandez,
    5. M. Smieja,
    6. K. L. Rosenthal,
    7. A. A. Ashkar,
    8. C. Kaushic
    . 2007. Susceptibility of human female primary genital epithelial cells to herpes simplex virus, type-2 and the effect of TLR3 ligand and sex hormones on infection. Biol. Reprod. 77: 1049–1059.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  122. ↵
    1. Han X.,
    2. P. Lundberg,
    3. B. Tanamachi,
    4. H. Openshaw,
    5. J. Longmate,
    6. E. Cantin
    . 2001. Gender influences herpes simplex virus type 1 infection in normal and gamma interferon-mutant mice. J. Virol. 75: 3048–3052.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  123. ↵
    1. Mueller S. N.,
    2. L. K. Mackay
    . 2016. Tissue-resident memory T cells: local specialists in immune defence. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 16: 79–89.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  124. ↵
    1. van Lint A.,
    2. M. Ayers,
    3. A. G. Brooks,
    4. R. M. Coles,
    5. W. R. Heath,
    6. F. R. Carbone
    . 2004. Herpes simplex virus-specific CD8+ T cells can clear established lytic infections from skin and nerves and can partially limit the early spread of virus after cutaneous inoculation. J. Immunol. 172: 392–397.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  125. ↵
    1. Gillgrass A. E.,
    2. S. A. Fernandez,
    3. K. L. Rosenthal,
    4. C. Kaushic
    . 2005. Estradiol regulates susceptibility following primary exposure to genital herpes simplex virus type 2, while progesterone induces inflammation. J. Virol. 79: 3107–3116.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  126. ↵
    1. Ragupathy V.,
    2. W. Xue,
    3. J. Tan,
    4. K. Devadas,
    5. Y. Gao,
    6. I. Hewlett
    . 2016. Progesterone augments cell susceptibility to HIV-1 and HIV-1/HSV-2 co-infections. J. Mol. Endocrinol. 57: 185–199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  127. ↵
    1. Vancíková Z.,
    2. P. Dvorák
    . 2001. Cytomegalovirus infection in immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals--a review. Curr. Drug Targets Immune Endocr. Metabol. Disord. 1: 179–187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  128. ↵
    1. Chang W. L.,
    2. P. A. Barry,
    3. R. Szubin,
    4. D. Wang,
    5. N. Baumgarth
    . 2009. Human cytomegalovirus suppresses type I interferon secretion by plasmacytoid dendritic cells through its interleukin 10 homolog. Virology 390: 330–337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  129. ↵
    1. Delale T.,
    2. A. Paquin,
    3. C. Asselin-Paturel,
    4. M. Dalod,
    5. G. Brizard,
    6. E. E. Bates,
    7. P. Kastner,
    8. S. Chan,
    9. S. Akira,
    10. A. Vicari,
    11. et al
    . 2005. MyD88-dependent and -independent murine cytomegalovirus sensing for IFN-alpha release and initiation of immune responses in vivo. J. Immunol. 175: 6723–6732.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  130. ↵
    1. Traub S.,
    2. O. Demaria,
    3. L. Chasson,
    4. F. Serra,
    5. B. Desnues,
    6. L. Alexopoulou
    . 2012. Sex bias in susceptibility to MCMV infection: implication of TLR9. PLoS One 7: e45171.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  131. ↵
    1. Lester S. N.,
    2. K. Li
    . 2014. Toll-like receptors in antiviral innate immunity. J. Mol. Biol. 426: 1246–1264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  132. ↵
    1. Jonsson C. B.,
    2. L. T. Figueiredo,
    3. O. Vapalahti
    . 2010. A global perspective on hantavirus ecology, epidemiology, and disease. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 23: 412–441.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  133. ↵
    1. Klein S. L.,
    2. B. H. Bird,
    3. G. E. Glass
    . 2001. Sex differences in immune responses and viral shedding following Seoul virus infection in Norway rats. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 65: 57–63.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  134. ↵
    1. Easterbrook J. D.,
    2. S. L. Klein
    . 2008. Corticosteroids modulate Seoul virus infection, regulatory T-cell responses and matrix metalloprotease 9 expression in male, but not female, Norway rats. J. Gen. Virol. 89: 2723–2730.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  135. ↵
    1. Klein S. L.,
    2. A. Cernetich,
    3. S. Hilmer,
    4. E. P. Hoffman,
    5. A. L. Scott,
    6. G. E. Glass
    . 2004. Differential expression of immunoregulatory genes in male and female Norway rats following infection with Seoul virus. J. Med. Virol. 74: 180–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  136. ↵
    1. Vapalahti O.,
    2. J. Mustonen,
    3. A. Lundkvist,
    4. H. Henttonen,
    5. A. Plyusnin,
    6. A. Vaheri
    . 2003. Hantavirus infections in Europe. Lancet Infect. Dis. 3: 653–661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  137. ↵
    1. Ahlm C.,
    2. M. Linderholm,
    3. P. Juto,
    4. B. Stegmayr,
    5. B. Settergren
    . 1994. Prevalence of serum IgG antibodies to Puumala virus (haemorrhagic fever with renal syndrome) in northern Sweden. Epidemiol. Infect. 113: 129–136.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  138. ↵
    1. Robinson D. P.,
    2. S. A. Huber,
    3. M. Moussawi,
    4. B. Roberts,
    5. C. Teuscher,
    6. R. Watkins,
    7. A. P. Arnold,
    8. S. L. Klein
    . 2011. Sex chromosome complement contributes to sex differences in coxsackievirus B3 but not influenza A virus pathogenesis. Biol. Sex Differ. 2: 8.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  139. ↵
    1. Huber S. A.,
    2. B. Pfaeffle
    . 1994. Differential Th1 and Th2 cell responses in male and female BALB/c mice infected with coxsackievirus group B type 3. J. Virol. 68: 5126–5132.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  140. ↵
    1. Kallewaard N. L.,
    2. L. Zhang,
    3. J. W. Chen,
    4. M. Guttenberg,
    5. M. D. Sanchez,
    6. J. M. Bergelson
    . 2009. Tissue-specific deletion of the coxsackievirus and adenovirus receptor protects mice from virus-induced pancreatitis and myocarditis. Cell Host Microbe 6: 91–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  141. ↵
    1. Li Z.,
    2. Y. Yue,
    3. S. Xiong
    . 2013. Distinct Th17 inductions contribute to the gender bias in CVB3-induced myocarditis. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 22: 373–382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  142. ↵
    1. Frisancho-Kiss S.,
    2. J. F. Nyland,
    3. S. E. Davis,
    4. J. A. Frisancho,
    5. M. A. Barrett,
    6. N. R. Rose,
    7. D. Fairweather
    . 2006. Sex differences in coxsackievirus B3-induced myocarditis: IL-12Rbeta1 signaling and IFN-gamma increase inflammation in males independent from STAT4. Brain Res. 1126: 139–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  143. ↵
    1. Klein S. L.,
    2. A. Pekosz
    . 2014. Sex-based biology and the rational design of influenza vaccination strategies. J. Infect. Dis. 209(Suppl. 3): S114–S119.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  144. ↵
    1. Klein S. L.,
    2. C. Passaretti,
    3. M. Anker,
    4. P. Olukoya,
    5. A. Pekosz
    . 2010. The impact of sex, gender and pregnancy on 2009 H1N1 disease. Biol. Sex Differ. 1: 5.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  145. ↵
    1. Klein S. L.,
    2. A. Hodgson,
    3. D. P. Robinson
    . 2012. Mechanisms of sex disparities in influenza pathogenesis. J. Leukoc. Biol. 92: 67–73.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  146. ↵
    1. Torcia M. G.,
    2. L. Nencioni,
    3. A. M. Clemente,
    4. L. Civitelli,
    5. I. Celestino,
    6. D. Limongi,
    7. G. Fadigati,
    8. E. Perissi,
    9. F. Cozzolino,
    10. E. Garaci,
    11. A. T. Palamara
    . 2012. Sex differences in the response to viral infections: TLR8 and TLR9 ligand stimulation induce higher IL10 production in males. PLoS One 7: e39853.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  147. ↵
    1. Gilliver S. C.
    2010. Sex steroids as inflammatory regulators. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 120: 105–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  148. ↵
    1. Hoffmann J.,
    2. A. Otte,
    3. S. Thiele,
    4. H. Lotter,
    5. Y. Shu,
    6. G. Gabriel
    . 2015. Sex differences in H7N9 influenza A virus pathogenesis. Vaccine 33: 6949–6954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  149. ↵
    1. Sterling T. R.,
    2. D. Vlahov,
    3. J. Astemborski,
    4. D. R. Hoover,
    5. J. B. Margolick,
    6. T. C. Quinn
    . 2001. Initial plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and progression to AIDS in women and men. N. Engl. J. Med. 344: 720–725.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sterling T. R.,
    2. C. M. Lyles,
    3. D. Vlahov,
    4. J. Astemborski,
    5. J. B. Margolick,
    6. T. C. Quinn
    . 1999. Sex differences in longitudinal human immunodeficiency virus type 1 RNA levels among seroconverters. J. Infect. Dis. 180: 666–672.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  151. ↵
    1. Ziegler S.,
    2. M. Altfeld
    . 2016. Sex differences in HIV-1-mediated immunopathology. Curr. Opin. HIV AIDS 11: 209–215.
    OpenUrl
  152. ↵
    1. Sterling T. R.,
    2. T. Pisell-Noland,
    3. J. L. Perez,
    4. J. Astemborski,
    5. J. R. McGriff,
    6. L. Nutting,
    7. D. R. Hoover,
    8. D. Vlahov,
    9. R. C. Bollinger
    . 2005. Sex-based differences in T lymphocyte responses in HIV-1-seropositive individuals. J. Infect. Dis. 191: 881–885.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  153. ↵
    1. Li G.,
    2. M. Cheng,
    3. J. Nunoya,
    4. L. Cheng,
    5. H. Guo,
    6. H. Yu,
    7. Y. J. Liu,
    8. L. Su,
    9. L. Zhang
    . 2014. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells suppress HIV-1 replication but contribute to HIV-1 induced immunopathogenesis in humanized mice. PLoS Pathog. 10: e1004291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  154. ↵
    1. Tsao L. C.,
    2. H. Guo,
    3. J. Jeffrey,
    4. J. A. Hoxie,
    5. L. Su
    . 2016. CCR5 interaction with HIV-1 Env contributes to Env-induced depletion of CD4 T cells in vitro and in vivo. Retrovirology 13: 22.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  155. ↵
    1. Monroe A. K.,
    2. A. S. Dobs,
    3. X. Xu,
    4. F. J. Palella,
    5. L. A. Kingsley,
    6. M. D. Witt,
    7. T. T. Brown
    . 2011. Sex hormones, insulin resistance, and diabetes mellitus among men with or at risk for HIV infection. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 58: 173–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  156. ↵
    1. Martin M. E.,
    2. C. Benassayag,
    3. C. Amiel,
    4. P. Canton,
    5. E. A. Nunez
    . 1992. Alterations in the concentrations and binding properties of sex steroid binding protein and corticosteroid-binding globulin in HIV+patients. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 15: 597–603.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  157. ↵
    1. Laffont S.,
    2. N. Rouquié,
    3. P. Azar,
    4. C. Seillet,
    5. J. Plumas,
    6. C. Aspord,
    7. J. C. Guéry
    . 2014. X-Chromosome complement and estrogen receptor signaling independently contribute to the enhanced TLR7-mediated IFN-α production of plasmacytoid dendritic cells from women. J. Immunol. 193: 5444–5452.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  158. ↵
    1. Lindsey N. P.,
    2. B. A. Schroeder,
    3. E. R. Miller,
    4. M. M. Braun,
    5. A. F. Hinckley,
    6. N. Marano,
    7. B. A. Slade,
    8. E. D. Barnett,
    9. G. W. Brunette,
    10. K. Horan,
    11. et al
    . 2008. Adverse event reports following yellow fever vaccination. Vaccine 26: 6077–6082.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section