Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Update on Gender Equity in Immunology, 2001 to 2016

Virginia Smith Shapiro, Susan Kovats, Michelle A. Parent, Sarah L. Gaffen, Catherine C. Hedrick, Pooja Jain, Lisa K. Denzin, Malini Raghavan and Robin Stephens
J Immunol November 15, 2016, 197 (10) 3751-3753; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1601644
Virginia Smith Shapiro
*Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Kovats
†Arthritis and Clinical Immunology Research Program, Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation, Oklahoma City, OK 73104;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Susan Kovats
Michelle A. Parent
‡Department of Biological Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah L. Gaffen
§Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine C. Hedrick
¶Division of Inflammation Biology, La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology, La Jolla, CA 92037;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Pooja Jain
‖Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19129;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa K. Denzin
#Department of Pediatrics, Child Health Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Malini Raghavan
**Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for Malini Raghavan
Robin Stephens
††Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0435
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

In 2001, The American Association of Immunologists Committee on the Status of Women conducted a survey examining the percentage of women faculty members within immunology departments or women in immunology graduate programs across 27 institutions in the United States, comparing it to the percentage of women receiving a Ph.D. Here, we examine the representation of women across these same 27 immunology departments and programs to examine changes in gender equity over the last 15 years.

In 2001, The American Association of Immunologists (AAI) Committee on the Status of Women conducted a survey examining the percentage of women faculty members within immunology departments or women in immunology graduate programs across 27 institutions in the United States, comparing it to the percentage of women receiving a Ph.D. This information was first published in the August 2001 AAI Newsletter (1), and was subsequently reported in a Commentary in Nature Immunology (2). Although 48.1% (357/742) of immunology graduate students in 2001 were women, they accounted for just 21.4% of immunology faculty members (178/830). The representation of women varied greatly among institutions, with three institutions having just one woman in their immunology faculty, whereas four other institutions had 30% women or more. At the time, this discrepancy between the number of women receiving their doctorate and the representation of women faculty members in our field was documented to make the community aware of this issue of gender equity, with hopes of initiating productive discussions. Many articles have been published highlighting the challenges and difficulties that women faculty members face in academia, along with possible reasons for the unequal representation of women in faculty positions (3–15).

As a follow up to the initial survey, the AAI Committee on the Status of Women examined the same 27 programs to determine whether advances had been made in the representation of women faculty members in the intervening 15 years. In particular, the committee sought to confirm whether the women who comprised approximately half of the graduate students in immunology in 2001 had progressed over the 15 years to complete their doctorates and postdoctoral fellowships, and remain in academia to obtain employment as either assistant or associate professors. Surveys were sent to faculty members at each of the 27 programs or departments in the 2001 analysis. Of the 27 departments contacted, 25 departments and programs returned the surveys. For the two programs that did not return the surveys, information regarding the number and rank of women faculty members was obtained from publicly available information published on their institutions’ websites. In addition to the data collected in the original survey concerning the number and percentage of women faculty members in the immunology departments or programs, the current survey also broke down the representation of women and men in an assistant professor (nontenured but tenure track), associate professor (tenured or tenure track) or professor (tenured, tenure track) position as well as research or adjunct faculties at any stage (nontenure track). The committee assessed the representation of women faculty members in leadership positions by examining whether the current department or program chair was female, and whether the program or department had ever had a female chair. Information was also requested on the gender of current graduate students and postdoctoral fellows. The data are summarized in Table I.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I. Summary of the data on the representation of women in immunology

In 2001, the aggregate percentage of women faculty members in these immunology departments or programs was 21.4%, with a median percentile per program or department of 21.9% and a median of five women faculty represented in the immunology department or program. In 2016, the percentage of women in these same 27 institutions rose to 29.1% (280/961) with medians of 28.8% and nine women faculty members per program or department. These results are shown as a scatter plot in Figure 1. The changes in the numbers and percentages of women at each institution between 2001 and 2016 were statistically significant. Interestingly, in 2016, women comprised 39.6% (74/187) of tenure-track assistant professors, 31.8% (61/192) of tenured associate professors, and 22.3% (94/422) of tenured professors. We did not find that women were disproportionately over-represented in nontenure track (research track or adjunct) positions, compared with tenure-track assistant professor positions. Women comprised 37.2% (51/137) of the non-tenure-track pool, compared with 39.6% (74/187) of the tenure-track assistant professor pool. As in 2001, when women comprised 48.1% (357/742) of immunology graduate students, women in 2016 comprised 50.5% (384/760) of graduate students. Although we do not have any data from 2001 regarding the representation of women among postdoctoral fellows, in 2016 49% (376/768) of postdoctoral fellows were women. Therefore, at least in immunology, we did not detect a “leaky pipeline” in the transition from graduate student to postdoctoral fellow. Rather, women became underrepresented among immunology faculty members starting at the assistant professor stage (39.6%), with continued decline in representation moving up to the associate professor (31.8%) and professor (22.3%) ranks. The leaky pipeline becomes more of a factor, in academia at least, the higher one climbs in the academic ranks, for the underrepresentation of women is even more pronounced in leadership positions. Only 3 out of the 25 (12%) responding departments or programs currently had a woman serving as chair. In total, 16 of 25 of these departments or programs had never had a woman serve as chair.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Comparison of the number and percentage of women faculty members, 2001–2016. The absolute number or percentages of women faculty members across 27 institutions were analyzed, and each number or percentage from a single institution is represented with a dot. The line represents the median in each group. Differences between the groups were analyzed by two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism and found to be statistically significant as denoted in the figure. The programs and departments compared in 2001–2016 are as follows: Scripps Department of Immunology, University of Washington Department of Immunology, Baylor College of Medicine Department of Immunology, Mayo Clinic Department of Immunology, University of Toronto Department of Immunology, University of Colorado Health Science Center Department of Immunology, Duke University Department of Immunology, Yale University Section of Immunobiology, University of Texas Southwestern Center for Immunology, University of Minnesota Center for Immunology, Washington University in St. Louis Center for Immunology, University of Chicago Committee on Immunology, University of Pennsylvania Graduate Group in Immunology, MD Anderson Cancer Center Graduate Group in Immunology, University of California at Berkeley Division of Immunology, and the Immunology Programs at the University of Texas Health Science Center, Cornell University, University of Pittsburgh, University of Iowa, University of Virginia, Emory University, Harvard University, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Institute, Dartmouth Medical School, LaJolla Institute of Allergy and Immunology, Boston University and Stanford University.

One striking difference between the results of the two surveys arose from this analysis. In 2001, out of 830 faculty members at 27 institutions, 178 were women. In 2016, these same institutions increased the number of total faculty members to 961, of which 280 were women. The net result is that over the last 15 years, a total of 131 additional faculty positions were added to these 27 institutions. If we simply compare the changes in total faculty members from 2001 to 2016, 29 men were added to the immunology faculties whereas 102 women were added. This is probably an underestimate of total hires, as replacement recruitment (retirement followed by a replacement) are not reflected in this analysis. Only the net increase in faculty members was measured over the 15 years. These changes are deemed likely to result from concerted departmental efforts to enhance gender equity.

Even as the AAI Committee on the Status of Women is encouraged by the changes, we recognize there is some distance to be covered before full gender equity is achieved in all faculty ranks and leadership roles. We look with great interest at the prospect of measuring further positive changes over the next 15 years. Meanwhile, the AAI Committee on the Status of Women is committed to fostering awareness of the challenges for women in academic research and to initiatives leading to equal treatment of all professional immunologists on the basis of merit.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

  • Abbreviation used in this article:

    AAI
    The American Association of Immunologists.

  • Copyright © 2016 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. AAI Committee on the Status of Women
    . 2001. Women in Graduate School vs. the Faculty Ranks. AAI Newsletter August/September: 5–6. https://www.aai.org/About/Publications/AAI_Newsletter/PDFs/2001/AAI_NL_2001-08.pdf. Accessed: October 4, 2016.
  2. ↵
    1. Kavathas P.,
    2. L. Soong
    2001. Gender inequity: challenging business as usual. Nat. Immunol. 2: 985–987.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Pell A. N.
    1996. Fixing the leaky pipeline: women scientists in academia. J. Anim. Sci. 74: 2843–2848.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Urry M.
    2015. Science and gender: scientists must work harder on equality. Nature 528: 471–473.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Shen H.
    2013. Inequality quantified: mind the gender gap. Nature 495: 22–24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sege R.,
    2. L. Nykiel-Bub,
    3. S. Selk
    . 2015. Sex differences in Institutional support for junior biomedical researchers. JAMA 314: 1175–1177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ledin A.,
    2. L. Bornmann,
    3. F. Gannon,
    4. G. Wallon
    . 2007. A persistent problem. Traditional gender roles hold back female scientists. EMBO Rep. 8: 982–987.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Martinez E. D.,
    2. J. Botos,
    3. K. M. Dohoney,
    4. T. M. Geiman,
    5. S. S. Kolla,
    6. A. Olivera,
    7. Y. Qiu,
    8. G. V. Rayasam,
    9. D. A. Stavreva,
    10. O. Cohen-Fix
    . 2007. Falling off the academic bandwagon. Women are more likely to quit at the postdoc to principal investigator transition. EMBO Rep. 8: 977–981.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. National Academy of Sciences (US), National Academy of Engineering (US) and Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on Maximizing the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering
    . 2007. Beyond Bias and Barriers: Fulfilling the Potential of Women in Academic Science and Engineering. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC.
    1. Simon K.,
    2. I. Athanassakis,
    3. F. Powrie,
    4. M. Montoya
    . 2012. Gender equality: is it real? Eur. J. Immunol. 42: 3095–3096.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Moss-Racusin C. A.,
    2. J. F. Dovidio,
    3. V. L. Brescoll,
    4. M. J. Graham,
    5. J. Handelsman
    . 2012. Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: 16474–16479.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. DesRoches C. M.,
    2. D. E. Zinner,
    3. S. R. Rao,
    4. L. I. Iezzoni,
    5. E. G. Campbell
    . 2010. Activities, productivity, and compensation of men and women in the life sciences. Acad. Med. 85: 631–639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Smith K. A.,
    2. P. Arlotta,
    3. F. M. Watt,
    4. S. L. Solomon,
    5. Initiative on Women in Science and Engineering Working Group
    . 2015. Seven actionable strategies for advancing women in science, engineering, and medicine. Cell Stem Cell 16: 221–224.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ley T. J.,
    2. B. H. Hamilton
    . 2008. Sociology. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science 322: 1472–1474.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Valian V.
    2005. Beyond gender schemas: improving the advancement of women in academia. Hypatia 20: 198–213.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 197 (10)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 197, Issue 10
15 Nov 2016
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Update on Gender Equity in Immunology, 2001 to 2016
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Update on Gender Equity in Immunology, 2001 to 2016
Virginia Smith Shapiro, Susan Kovats, Michelle A. Parent, Sarah L. Gaffen, Catherine C. Hedrick, Pooja Jain, Lisa K. Denzin, Malini Raghavan, Robin Stephens
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 2016, 197 (10) 3751-3753; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601644

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Update on Gender Equity in Immunology, 2001 to 2016
Virginia Smith Shapiro, Susan Kovats, Michelle A. Parent, Sarah L. Gaffen, Catherine C. Hedrick, Pooja Jain, Lisa K. Denzin, Malini Raghavan, Robin Stephens
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 2016, 197 (10) 3751-3753; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1601644
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Minimal Information about MHC Multimers (MIAMM)
  • The Minority Scientists’ Experience: Challenging and Overcoming Barriers to Enhancing Diversity and Career Advancement
  • Metabolic Regulation of Inflammation and Its Resolution: Current Status, Clinical Needs, Challenges, and Opportunities
Show more IMMUNOLOGY NOTES AND RESOURCES

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606