Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

In This Issue

J Immunol December 1, 2014, 193 (11) 5355-5356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1490044
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Puncturing the Perforin Problem

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) release of perforin from secretory granules into a target cell is a primary immune defense mechanism. Perforin deficiency or dysfunction in humans results in a predisposition to developing immune-mediated diseases and malignancies. Despite the known importance of this molecule in immunity, a reliable method to detect perforin in experimental assays has not been developed. In this issue, Brennan et al. (p. 5744) describe a technique that enables the detection of perforin by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. They fixed activated OT-I CTLs expressing perforin (Prf1+/+) with Bouin’s solution, a reagent used to preserve cellular morphology and intracellular organelles in immunohistochemistry, and permeabilized these cells in a 0.1% Triton X solution. Short term incubation with an anti-perforin Ab did not result in detectable perforin in fixed/permeabilized cells; however, some, but not all, cells incubated for 16 h with anti-perforin Ab at 4°C displayed a robust intracellular perforin signal when analyzed via confocal microscopy or flow cytometry. Perforin was not detected in cells fixed with paraformaldehyde. In confocal microscopy experiments, perforin was found to colocalize with granzyme B and lysosomal-associated membrane protein 1, and granzyme B and perforin also colocalized at the immune synapse between OT-I Prf1+/+ CTLs and target cells. In flow cytometry experiments, the authors demonstrated that the sensitivity of the perforin staining protocol was sufficient to detect decreased perforin abundance in OT-I Prf1+/− CTLs compared with OT-I Prf1+/+ CTLs. These data suggest that this staining protocol represents a reliable method to detect perforin in CTLs and has the potential to help resolve many unanswered questions in immunology research.

Immunotherapy Enhancement

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is considered one of the most lethal gynecological cancers and effective treatments are actively being sought. Parente-Pereira et al. (p. 5557) examined the use of immunotherapeutic Vγ9Vδ2 γδ T cells in conjunction with liposome-encapsulated aminobisphosphonates (NBPs) for the treatment of ovarian cancer in hopes of improving the pharmacokinetics of NBPs in this therapeutic context. NBPs cause an accumulation of nonpeptide phosphoantigens (PAgs) in tumor cells, which sensitizes them to destruction by γδ T cells. In this study, liposome-encapsulated zoledronic acid (L-ZA) or liposome-encapsulated alendronic acid (L-AA) sensitized autologous or immortalized ovarian tumor cells to destruction in vitro by Vγ9Vδ2 T cells from healthy donors or ovarian cancer patients. Addition of folate to either of these formulations targeted these molecules to folate receptor-α+ ovarian tumor cells, and further improved their efficacy in vitro. In a mouse model of ovarian cancer, L-ZA was highly toxic, but free AA and L-AA were well tolerated and sensitized ovarian tumors to destruction by infused γδ T cells. I.v. delivery of L-AA was more effective than free AA in sensitizing advanced tumors to γδ T cell destruction, but addition of folic acid to L-AA did not significantly improve its efficacy in vivo. Together, these results suggest that liposome-encapsulated NBPs combined with γδ T cells may represent a promising avenue of immunotherapy for ovarian cancer.

Blanket Attack on HCV

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Seventy-five percent of individuals infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) develop chronic infection, which can lead to the development of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. In previous studies, it was found that CD8+ T cells directed against a relatively conserved HCV epitope exhibited broad TCR diversity, whereas CD8+ T cells reactive with the hypervariable immunodominant HLA-B*0801-restricted epitope, 1395HSKKKCDEL1403 (HSK), tended toward decreased TCR variability that was associated with chronic infection. A limited TCR repertoire could potentially aid the ability of hypervariable viruses like HCV to escape immune clearance (resulting in chronic infection) by mutating T cell–targeted residues. To explore whether limited TCR diversity impacts HCV viral escape, Nivarthi et al. (p. 5402) conducted functional and structural studies on TCRs reactive with HSK and its intergenotypic variants and other mutants. They used polyclonal HSK-specific T cell lines derived from an HCV-infected individual (D#1) to assess reactivity of these cells to alanine substitutions at different positions in the HSK peptide and found that peptide residues P4, P6, and P7 were integral to T cell recognition. They also found that most HSK mutant peptides and intergenotypic variants elicited IFN-γ production and cytolytic activity by D#1 HSK-specific T cell lines in functional assays, suggesting that these T cells were cross-reactive with several HSK variants. Structural studies revealed that HSK-specific TCRs in complexes with HSK and HLA-B*0801 contacted all available surface-exposed residues on the peptide, providing maximum coverage of the hypervariable epitope and suggesting a rationale for the ability of this limited TCR repertoire to recognize intergenotypic and quasispecies variants. Together, these results suggest that limited TCR diversity in HSK-reactive T cells is compensated by “blanketing” the hypervariable epitope during TCR–HLA-B*0801–HSK interactions and does not preclude the ability of these cells to mount an effective immune response.

Biography of a Thymic B Cell

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Many studies have detailed the thymic selection process that T cells undergo, but less is known about the development and selection of thymic B cells. Fujihara et al. (p. 5534) examined the role of CD40 in bidirectional T cell–B cell cross-talk in the thymus and how CD40-initiated signals influence the maintenance and function of thymic B cells. Previous studies have shown that thymic B cells can present Ag to shape the T cell repertoire during thymic selection. In this study, Ag recognition by the TCRs of single positive thymocytes was shown to positively regulate the maintenance of thymic B cells, and CD40–CD40L signaling was crucial for supporting thymic B cell proliferation. Further investigation revealed that cell-autonomous expression of CD40 on thymic B cells was crucial to the maintenance of this cell population. T cell–dependent activation of peripheral B cells is known to require the expression of both CD40 and MHCII on B cells, but this study showed that thymic B cell maintenance did not require cell-autonomous expression of MHCII. In addition, thymic B cell expression of CD40 was required for negative selection of superantigen-reactive T cells. These results provide greater insight into the selection and maintenance processes of thymic B cells, particularly how thymic B cell–autonomous expression of CD40 is involved in cross-talk with and negative selection of T cells.

  • Copyright © 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 193 (11)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 193, Issue 11
1 Dec 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In This Issue
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In This Issue
The Journal of Immunology December 1, 2014, 193 (11) 5355-5356; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1490044

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In This Issue
The Journal of Immunology December 1, 2014, 193 (11) 5355-5356; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1490044
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Puncturing the Perforin Problem
    • Immunotherapy Enhancement
    • Blanket Attack on HCV
    • Biography of a Thymic B Cell
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Top Reads
  • In This Issue
  • In This Issue
Show more IN THIS ISSUE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606