Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Infiltrating Monocyte-Derived Macrophages and Resident Kupffer Cells Display Different Ontogeny and Functions in Acute Liver Injury

Ehud Zigmond, Shany Samia-Grinberg, Metsada Pasmanik-Chor, Eli Brazowski, Oren Shibolet, Zamir Halpern and Chen Varol
J Immunol July 1, 2014, 193 (1) 344-353; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1400574
Ehud Zigmond
*The Research Center for Digestive Tract and Liver Diseases, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel;
†Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shany Samia-Grinberg
*The Research Center for Digestive Tract and Liver Diseases, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel;
†Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Metsada Pasmanik-Chor
‡Bioinformatics Unit, G.S. Wise Faculty of Life Science, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eli Brazowski
*The Research Center for Digestive Tract and Liver Diseases, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel;
†Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Oren Shibolet
*The Research Center for Digestive Tract and Liver Diseases, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel;
†Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Zamir Halpern
*The Research Center for Digestive Tract and Liver Diseases, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel;
†Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chen Varol
*The Research Center for Digestive Tract and Liver Diseases, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel;
†Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 69978, Israel; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The liver has a remarkable capacity to regenerate after injury; yet, the role of macrophages (MF) in this process remains controversial mainly due to difficulties in distinguishing between different MF subsets. In this study, we used a murine model of acute liver injury induced by overdose of N-acetyl-p-aminophenol (APAP) and defined three distinct MF subsets that populate the liver following injury. Accordingly, resident Kupffer cells (KC) were significantly reduced upon APAP challenge and started recovering by self-renewal at resolution phase without contribution of circulating Ly6Chi monocytes. The latter were recruited in a CCR2- and M-CSF–mediated pathway at the necroinflammatory phase and differentiated into ephemeral Ly6Clo MF subset at resolution phase. Moreover, their inducible ablation resulted in impaired recovery. Microarray-based molecular profiling uncovered high similarity between steady-state KC and those recovered at the resolution phase. In contrast, KC and monocyte-derived MF displayed distinct prorestorative genetic signature at the resolution phase. Finally, we show that infiltrating monocytes acquire a prorestorative polarization manifested by unique expression of proangiogenesis mediators and genes involved with inhibition of neutrophil activity and recruitment and promotion of their clearance. Collectively, our results present a novel phenotypic, ontogenic, and molecular definition of liver-MF compartment following acute injury.

Introduction

Macrophages (MF) are a heterogeneous population of immune cells that are strategically positioned at distinct anatomic locations, where they are transcriptionally programmed to perform tissue-specific functions (1). A foundational dogma has been that homeostasis of tissue-resident MF relies on the constant recruitment of blood monocytes (2). However, several recent pioneering studies revealed two parallel developmental pathways of mammalian MF (3–9). Accordingly, most tissue-resident MF, including liver Kupffer cells (KC), are derived from progenitor cells generated during development in the yolk sac and/or fetal liver and maintain themselves through adulthood by self-renewal independent from blood-borne monocytes. A second MF system originates from hematopoietic stem cells and is based on definitive hematopoiesis. Short-lived circulating Ly6Chi monocytes generated in this pathway are recruited to tissues in homeostasis and injury-associated inflammation. Ly6Chi monocytes and their MF descendants are plastic and can either promote inflammation or assist the healing process depending on the type of injury and the tissue milieu (1, 10, 11).

The role of MF in liver injury is controversial with plethora of studies reporting on both deleterious and hepatoprotective functions of these cells (12–23). This discrepancy could arise from the heterogeneity of liver-MF and the difficulty in distinguishing between distinct subpopulations of MF, especially under inflammatory conditions. Studies in human and murine models of acute and chronic liver injury attempted to discriminate between resident KC and infiltrating Ly6Chi monocytes recruited to the inflamed liver (12, 13, 17, 18, 20, 22, 24, 25). Yet, the recent progress in multiparameter flow cytometry and transcriptome analyses allowed more accurate distinguishing between MF subsets unraveling higher complexity in MF compartment at other organs (5, 11, 26–28). Moreover, the question whether monocytes can contribute to the maintenance of KC following inflammatory insults or, alternatively, give rise into a functionally distinct MF entity remained elusive.

Using these techniques, we wished in this study to perform in-depth phenotypic, ontogenic and functional characterization of liver-MF compartment at steady state and following acute injury. To do that, we took advantage of the acetaminophen (N-acetyl-p-aminophenol [APAP]; paracetamol)–induced liver injury (AILI) model. APAP, a widely used analgesic/antipyretic, is a type A hepatotoxin causing dose-dependent severe hepatic necrosis that results in innate immune activation (29, 30). We show that resident KC constituted the main MF population in the steady-state liver, but were significantly reduced 24 h following AILI and started recovering 72 h later by self-renewal of residual cells. In contrast, circulating Ly6Chi monocytes, recruited in a CCR2-dependent manner and controlled by M-CSF, massively infiltrated the injured liver, becoming the dominant liver-MF subset at both necroinflammatory and early resolution phases and had no contribution to the recovery of resident KC. Selective ablation of monocyte-derived MF (MoMF) resulted in impaired recovery manifested by greater hepatotoxic damage. Finally, microarray-based molecular profiling of MF subsets uncovered that resident KC and infiltrating MoMF acquire a distinct gene-expression signature, suggesting different prorestorative functions of these cells.

Materials and Methods

Mice

The following 8–12-wk-old male mouse strains were used: C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Harlan Laboratories and Zbtb46gfp/+ mice from The Jackson Laboratory (B6; 129P2-Zbtb7btm2Litt/JAX). CD45.1 and CD45.2 Cx3cr1gfp/+ and Ccr2−/−Cx3cr1gfp/+ mice were bred at the Sourasky Medical Center animal facility. All murine experiments were approved by the Sourasky Medical Center Animal Care Committee.

AILI

Mice were fasted overnight for 12 h prior to administration of vehicle or 300 mg/kg APAP (Tiptipot Novimol; CST, Kiryat Malakhi, Israel; 100 mg paracetamol/ml) by oral gavage. Water was returned with APAP administration and the food 2 h later.

Isolation of hepatic nonparenchymal cells

Perfused livers were cut into small fragments and incubated (37°C, 250 rpm for 40 min) with 5 ml digestion buffer (5% FBS, 0.5 mg/ml collagenase VIII [Sigma-Aldrich, Rehovot, Israel], and 0.1 mg/ml DNase I [Roche] in PBS+/+). This was followed by three cycles of washings with PBS−/− at 400 rpm from which the supernatant was taken, omitting the parenchymal cell pellet. The supernatant cell pellet was then lysed for erythrocytes by 2-min incubation with ACK buffer (0.15 M NH4C and 0.01 M KHCO3).

Flow cytometry analysis, sorting of liver-MF subsets, and ELISA

Abs used for liver-MF characterization included: CD45 (30-F11), CD45.2 (104), CD45.1 (A20), Ly6C (HK1.4), CD64 (X54-5/7.1), CD11c (N418), CD11b (M1/70), IAb (AF6-120.1), CD19 (HIB19), TCRβ (H57-597), B220 (RA3-6B2), and MPDCA1 (927) (all from BioLegend, San Diego, CA); NK1.1 (PK136) (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA); F4/80 (CI: A3-1) (AbD Serotec); and Ki67 (SolA15; eBioscience, San Diego, CA). Abs used for the sorting of bone marrow (BM) monocytes used in the adoptive transfer experiments included: CD45.1 (A20), CD11b (M1/70), CD115 (AFS98), Ly6C (HK1.4), and c-Kit (2B8). Cells were analyzed with LSR Fortessa or FACSCanto II flow cytometers (BD Biosciences) and sorted with an FACSAria machine (BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry analysis was performed using FlowJo software (TreeStar, Ashland, OR). PGE2 levels were examined in supernatants isolated from overnight incubated sorted Ly6Chi monocytes from APAP 24 h–challenged livers using the PGE2 ELISA Kit-Monoclonal (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

BrdU pulsing

Mice received three i.p. injections of 2 mg BrdU (BD Biosciences) 3 h apart. To assess BrdU incorporation, isolated nonparenchymal cells were stained, fixed, and permeabilized using the Cytofix/Cytoperm and Perm/Wash buffer (BD Biosciences). Cells were incubated at 37°C for 60 min in 30 μg DNase1 and subsequently stained with anti–BrdU-allophycocyanin.

MC21 and M-CSF treatment

Mice were i.p injected with 150 μl anti-CCR2 mAb (clone MC21)–conditioned media (29 μg Ab/ml), starting at 12 h prior to APAP challenge and every day, with the last treatment at 48 h post–APAP treatment. rM-CSF (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ) was given by i.p. injection (25 μg/mouse) for 3 d, everyday from the beginning of APAP treatment until 24 h before sacrificing.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted from murine liver tissue with the Perfect Pure RNA Tissue Kit (5 PRIME, Hilden, Germany) and from sorted MF subsets with the microRNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Limburg, The Netherlands). RNA was reverse transcribed with a High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). PCRs were performed with the SYBR Green PCR Master Mix Kit (Applied Biosystems). Quantification of the PCR signals of each sample was performed by comparing the cycle threshold values, in duplicate, of the gene of interest with the cycle threshold values of the TBP housekeeping gene. The genes and primers were as follows: TBP, 5′-GAAGCTGCGGTACAATTCCAG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CCCCTTGTACCCTTCACCAAT-3′ (reverse); Ptgs2, 5′-TGAGCAACTATTCCAAACCAGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCACGTAGTCTTCGATCACTATC-3′ (reverse); Annexin 1 (Anxa1), 5′-ATGTATCCTCGGATGTTGCTGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-'TGAGCATTGGTCCTCTTGGTA-3′ (reverse); TNFaip6, 5′-GGGATTCAAGAACGGGATCTTT-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCAAATTCACATACGGCCTTGG-3′ (reverse); lipocalin-2 (Lcn2), 5′-TGGCCCTGAGTGTCATGTG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CTCTTGTAGCTCATAGATGGTGC-3′ (reverse); M-CSF, 5′-GACAGCCAGCTACTACCAGACATACT-3′ (forward) and 5′-CGCATAGGTGGTAACTTGTGTTTC-3′ (reverse); GM-CSF, 5′-GGCGCTCAATGCTGGCTTCA-3′ (forward) and 5′-TCTGCCTCCAGCCTCAGGTT-3′ (reverse); IL34, 5′-CTTTGGGAAACGAGAATTTGGAGA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCAATCCTGTAGTTGATGGGGAAG-3′ (reverse); and IL4, 5′-CCAGCTAGTTGTCATCCTGCTCTTCTTTCTCG-3′ (forward) and 5′-CAGTGATGTGGACTTGGACTCATTCATGGTGC-3′ (reverse).

Microarray performance

Total RNA was extracted from freshly flow cytometry–sorted liver-MF subsets with the microRNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Venlo, Limburg, Netherlands). Infiltrating Ly6Chi monocytes were sorted from a pool of five mice at the inflammatory peak of the necrotic phase, 24 h post-AILI (3× biological repeats). Their Ly6Clo MoMF descendants were sorted at the recovery phase, 72 h post-AILI from pool of seven mice (3× biological repeats). Finally, resident KC were sorted from both pool of seven steady-state mice (2× biological repeats) and a pool of seven mice at 72 h post-AILI (3× biological repeats), for a total of 11 arrays. RNA purity was assessed with BioAnalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The cDNA was hybridized to GeneChip Mouse Gene 1.0 ST arrays (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Hybridized chips were stained, washed, and scanned with the Affymetrix GeneChip 3000 7G plus scanner (Affymetrix). Microarray analysis was performed using Partek Genomics Suite version 6.6 (Partek, St. Louis, MO). Data were normalized and summarized with the robust multiaverage method (31). Heat maps and Venn diagrams were performed using Partek Genomics Suite software with Pearson’s dissimilarity correlation and average linkage methods. Functional enrichment analysis was performed using DAVID and GOEAST tools.

All microarray data have been deposited at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus public database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE55606.

Histopatological quantification of hepatic damage

Liver samples were obtained at steady state and 24 and 48 h after AILI, fixed (4% paraformaldehyde), paraffin embedded, sectioned, and stained with H&E, and pathologic evaluation was performed by a pathologist (E.B.). Necrosis was scored as 0 (no necrosis), 1 (spotty necrosis), 2 (confluent, zone 3 necrosis), 3 (confluent, zone 2 plus 3 necrosis), or 4 (panlobular necrosis). Bridging necrosis was scored as 0 (absent) or 1 (present) and ballooning of hepatocytes as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe).

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed either by ANOVA followed by Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test or by unpaired, two-tailed t test with GraphPad Prism 4 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA). Data are presented as mean ± SEM; p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Phenotypic characterization of liver-MF compartment in steady state and following AILI

Given the broad expression of the fractalkine receptor Cx3cr1 gene within the mononuclear phagocyte system, we characterized the composition of the liver-MF compartment using the Cx3cr1gfp/+ reporter mice (32) and multiparameter flow cytometry analysis. Liver-MF were defined as cells mutually positive for CD45, CD11b, MHC class II (MHC II), F4/80, and the FcγR1 (CD64) markers. Using this gating strategy, we show that CX3CR1-GFP expression could discriminate under homeostatic conditions between a predominant population of CX3CR1neg/lo KC and a significantly smaller population of CX3CR1hi MF (Fig. 1A, 1B). At 24 h following AILI, there was a massive infiltration of circulating monocytes characterized as Ly6ChiCD11bhiMHC IInegCX3CR1-GFP+ cells concomitantly with marked reduction in the frequency of resident KC. Notably, at 72 h following AILI, the liver-MF compartment was dominated by CX3CR1-GFPhiLy6Clo–infiltrating MF, whereas KC did not yet fully recover (Fig. 1A, 1B). At 120 h following AILI, the KC returned to be the predominant liver-MF subset, similar to pre-APAP administration, whereas the CX3CR1+Ly6Clo–infiltrating MF were hardly detectable (Fig. 1A, 1B).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Phenotypic characterization of mouse liver-MF compartment in health and following AILI. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of nonparenchymal Cx3cr1gfp/+ liver cells isolated from steady state or at 24, 72, and 120 h following AILI. (B) Dynamics of liver-MF subsets in steady state and at different time points following AILI: resident CX3CR1-GFPneg/lo KC (circle), infiltrating Ly6Chi CX3CR1-GFP+ monocytes (square), and Ly6CloCX3CR1-GFPhi MF (triangle), presented as percentage out of CD45+ living cells (mean [SEM]; n ≥ 5 for any time point).

Importantly, flow cytometry analysis of APAP 72-h livers of Zbtb46gfp/+ transgenic mice, in which cells positive for the dendritic cell (DC)–associated transcription factor Zbtb46 are labeled with GFP (33), confirmed that GFP+ liver-DC are excluded from our gating strategy for liver-MF (Supplemental Fig. 1A). Moreover, staining for TCRβ, NK1.1, plasmacytoid DC Ag-1, SiglecF, and Ly6G confirmed that our gating strategy excludes contamination with T cells, NK cells, plasmacytoid DC, eosinophils, and neutrophils, respectively (Supplemental Fig. 1B).

Ly6Chi monocytes are recruited in a CCR2- and M-CSF–dependent manner and give rise to the CX3CR1+Ly6Clo liver-MF subset

To investigate the contribution of circulating Ly6Chi monocytes to the ontogeny of liver-MF subsets following AILI, we performed adoptive transfer experiments of purified BM-derived CD45.1 Cx3cr1gfp/+ Ly6Chi monocytes into APAP-challenged wild-type recipients. The monocyte graft was administered by i.v. injection at 12 h following AILI, and recipient mice were sacrificed at following consecutive time points (Fig. 2A). The engrafted Ly6Chi monocytes infiltrated the injured liver already by 24 h following APAP challenge and, subsequently, started differentiating toward the Ly6CloF4/80hiCX3CR1-GFP+ MF population we named MoMF. At 96 h post–APAP administration, the MoMF could hardly be detected, suggesting that these cells are ephemeral (Fig. 2B). Importantly, at all examined time points, the engrafted Ly6Chi monocytes did not differentiate to CX3CR1-GFPneg cells.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

CX3CR1-GFP+ infiltrating liver-MF, but not KC, arise from Ly6Chi monocytes following AILI in a CCR2-dependent pathway. (A and B) Flow cytometry analysis of recipient wild-type mice receiving adoptive transfer of 1.5 × 106 purified BM-derived CD45.1-Cx3cr1gfp/+ Ly6Chi monocytes. Analysis was performed at 24, 48, and 72 h following APAP administration (n = 3 for any time point). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of Ccr2−/−Cx3cr1gfp/+ mice versus Cx3cr1gfp/+ mice comparing levels of CD45+CD11b+MHC II+CD64+F4/80+ liver MF at steady state or after AILI (24 and 72 h). (D) Graphical summery showing the percentage of indicated liver-MF subsets out of CD45+ living cells (mean [SEM]; n ≥ 5 for any time point). *p < 0.05.

The chemokine receptor CCR2 is required for emigration of Ly6Chi monocytes from the BM (34). Flow cytometry analysis of Ccr2−/−Cx3cr1gfp/+ mice subjected to APAP overdose revealed a failure of these animals to accumulate Ly6Chi monocytes (24 h) and Ly6CloCX3CR1-GFP+ MoMF (72 h) in their livers (Fig. 2C, 2D). Importantly, maintenance and recovery of KC were not affected by CCR2 deficiency (Fig. 2C, 2D). M-CSF controls the differentiation, proliferation, and survival of certain MF subsets (35). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis of M-CSF expression in APAP-challenged livers revealed a 4-fold increase at 24 h that remained above baseline level during the recovery phase (72–120 h) (Fig. 3A). Interestingly, we could not detect any significant change in the expression of other factors associated with MF differentiation including IL-4, IL-34, and GM-CSF during the course of AILI (Fig. 3B). Injection of recombinant mouse M-CSF resulted in a significant increase in the cell number of liver Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF, but had no effect on KC levels (Fig. 3C, 3D). Collectively, these results show that the recovery of KC does not relay on CCR2+Ly6Chi monocytes or M-CSF.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

M-CSF specifically promotes the differentiation of MoMF. (A and B) Graphical summary of qPCR analysis showing mRNA expression of M-CSF, GM-CSF, IL-34, and IL-4 in livers isolated from steady-state mice and at 24, 48, 72, and 120 h following AILI (mean [SEM]; n = 5). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of Cx3cr1gfp/+ mouse livers at 72 h following AILI gated on CD45+CD11b+MHC II+CD64+F4/80+ liver-MF subsequent to treatment with rM-CSF or saline. (D) Graphical summary showing the cell number of indicated liver-MF subsets normalized for liver tissue weight (mean [SEM]; n = 5). *p < 0.05.

Liver-KC recover by self-renewal following AILI

To investigate whether KC can self-renew by local proliferation, we resorted to BrdU pulsing regimen as it is empirically incorporated into dividing cell. BrdU labeling was performed at 48 h following AILI with the initiation of KC recovery (Fig. 1). Flow cytometry analysis 24 h later revealed incorporation of BrdU in >5% of KC and <2% of MoMF (Fig. 4A). To delineate whether BrDU+ KC were recently derived from proliferating precursor or, alternatively, are capable of self-renewal, we stained for the Ki67 proliferation marker present only during active phases of cell cycle. Flow cytometry analysis revealed a 7-fold increase in the fraction of Ki67+ KC at 72 h following AILI (Fig. 4B, 4C). In contrast, we could not observe any increase in the fraction of proliferating cells within the MoMF compartment. Furthermore, introduction of rM-CSF had no effect on the frequency of Ki67+-proliferating KC or MoMF (Fig. 4B, 4C).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

KC recovery by local proliferation following AILI. (A) Representative flow cytometry analysis images of nonparenchymal cells isolated from perfused livers of Cx3cr1gfp/+ mice at 72 h post-AILI and 24 h post–3× consecutive pulses with BrdU. Bottom panel: graphical summary indicating the percentage of BrdU+ cells out of indicated cell subsets (mean [SEM]; n = 3). (B) Graphical summary showing percentage of Ki67+ cells out of KC or MoMF at steady state or AILI 72 h, with or without concomitant treatment with M-CSF (mean (SEM); n = 5). (C) Flow cytometry analysis of Ki67 proliferation marker in KC and MoMF in steady-state Cx3cr1gfp/+ mouse livers and at 24, 48, and 72 h following AILI. *p < 0.05.

Ablation of Ly6Chi monocytes and their MoMF descendants impairs the recovery from AILI

To investigate the contribution of Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF in AILI, we took advantage of the anti-CCR2 MC21-depleting Ab (11, 24, 36). MC21 treatment specifically eliminated the Ly6Chi monocytes and their MoMF progenies, but had no effect on resident KC (Fig. 5A, 5B). Histopathological analysis revealed more extensive damage, with bridging necrosis and ballooning degeneration in livers of MC21-treated mice at both 24 and 48 h following APAP administration (Fig. 5C). Pathological scoring confirmed a significant prolonged hepatic damage (Fig. 5D). Thus, MoMF contribute to the recovery from liver injury.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Inducible ablation of Ly6Chi monocytes and their MoMF descendants impairs recovery from AILI. (A) Flow cytometry analysis images of Cx3cr1gfp/+ mouse livers demonstrating the inducible ablation of Ly6Chi monocytes and their MoMF descendants following treatment with MC21. (B) Graphical summary presenting cell number normalized for liver tissue weight of indicated subsets (mean [SEM]; n = 10). (C) Representative images of H&E-stained liver sections at 24 and 48 h following AILI. Original magnification ×10. (D) Histopathological score at 24 and 48 h post-AILI in mice treated simultaneously with saline or MC21 (mean [SEM]; n = 10). *p < 0.05.

Molecular characterization of resident KC, infiltrating liver monocytes and their MoMF descendants

We next sought to molecularly define the distinct liver-MF subsets during the inflammatory and resolution phases of liver injury. To do that, we performed a transcriptome microarray analysis of highly purified cell populations freshly sorted from the livers of APAP-challenged Cx3cr1gfp/+ mice (Supplemental Fig. 2). Specifically, Ly6Chi-infiltrating liver monocytes were sorted from APAP 24-h livers, whereas KC and MoMF were sorted from APAP 72-h livers. These were compared with resident liver KC from unchallenged mice. Microarray analysis performed with a stringent statistical significance cutoff of p < 0.05 (with false discovery rate correction) revealed very high resemblance between steady-state KC and recovered KC, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.975 in support of their self-renewal (Fig. 6A, 6B). Nevertheless, there were 2196 genes that were differentially expressed between the distinct liver-MF subsets with at least 2-fold change. In particular, there was high variability between steady-state KC and both Ly6Chi monocytes and their MoMF descendants, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.38 and 0.73, respectively (Fig. 6B). Indeed, we identified 2059 genes that exhibited at least a 2-fold change in expression between Ly6Chi monocytes and steady-state KC and 802 genes between MoMF and steady-state KC (Fig. 6C). In addition, the Ly6Chi monocytes induced a major gene expression shift upon their differentiation into MoMF manifested by a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.76 and 1267 genes with at least 2-fold change in their expression (Fig. 6B). Importantly, our microarray results show that the expression of CD169 (Siglec1), F4/80 (Emr1), CD64 (Fcgr1), MER receptor tyrosine kinase (Mertk), macrosialin (CD68), the AXL receptor tyrosine kinase, and MHC II, all extensively used in the literature as definitive markers of resident tissue MF, were similarly expressed in KC and infiltrating MoMF. Instead, the molecular profiling revealed 603 genes that were differentially expressed by at least a 2-fold change between these subsets. Among them, there were various cell-surface markers that can be used for discrimination (Fig. 6D).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Molecular characterization of liver-MF subsets. (A) Affymetrix microarray hierarchical clustering performed on mRNA of sorted liver-MF subsets. A colored bar indicating the standardized log2 intensities accompanies the expression profile. (B) Correlation matrix with Pearson correlation coefficient performed for all genes above background and above 2-fold change. (C) Venn diagram of liver-MF subsets showing the distribution of the 2196 genes with above 2-fold expression difference in comparison with steady-state KC. (D) Heat map analysis showing the differential raw expression level of MF-associated genes.

Infiltrating liver Ly6Chi monocytes regulate neutrophil recruitment, activity, and removal

Corroborating previous results (13), we show in this study a significant increase in the frequency of neutrophils in the livers of Ccr2−/− mice at 24 h following APAP administration (Fig. 7A). Supportively, the inducible ablation of Ly6Chi monocytes and their MoMF descendants resulted in a profound increase in neutrophil levels (Fig. 7B), suggesting that the former negatively regulate the latter. PGE2 has been recently established as a potent inhibitor of neutrophil activation (10). In this relation, the Ly6Chi monocytes expressed uniquely high levels of the Ptgs2 gene, which encodes for cyclooxygenase-2 (COX2), and of the microsomal PGE synthase-1 (Ptges), both of which constitute key enzymes in PGE2 synthesis (37, 38), as well as lower levels of the Hpgd gene encoding for the PG-degrading enzyme hydroxyl-PG dehydrogenase 15-(NAD), overall resulting in higher PGE2 levels. Moreover, both Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF produced Anxa1 (Fig. 7C), a positive regulator of PGE2 synthesis, a potent anti-inflammatory mediator in MF and an inhibitor of neutrophil migration (39). Conversely, KC expressed higher levels of Ptgs1 gene encoding for COX1 and of the Hpgds gene encoding for hematopoietic PGD synthase that catalyzes the conversion of PGH2 to PGD2 (Fig. 7C). qPCR and ELISA analyses further confirmed the unique activation of the PGE2 metabolic pathway in Ly6Chi monocytes (Fig. 7D, 7E).

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Infiltrating liver Ly6Chi monocytes regulate neutrophil recruitment, activity, and removal. (A) Graphical summary showing neutrophil percentage out of total CD45+ liver hematopoietic cells. (B) Graphical summary presenting neutrophil cell number normalized for liver tissue weight (mean [SEM]; n = 10). (C) Heat map analysis showing the differential raw expression level of selected genes associated with regulation of neutrophil activity by liver-MF. (D) Graphical summary of qPCR analysis showing the mRNA expression level ratio of Anxa1, Ptgs2, Lcn2, and Tnfaip6 genes in distinct liver-MF subsets versus steady-state KC. (E) Graphical summary showing ELISA readout for the production of PGE2 in Ly6Chi monocytes with or without simultaneous LPS activation. *p < 0.05, ***p = 0.001.

The Ly6Chi monocytes also expressed the product of TNF-stimulated gene-6 (Tnfaip6), a potent inhibitor of neutrophil migration (40) and a positive regulator of COX2 expression in MF (41). Moreover, they expressed Lcn2 that induces cell death in neutrophils (42) and plays a significant hepatoprotective role in liver injury (43) (Fig. 7C). Validating qPCR analysis confirmed the expression of Lcn2 and TNFaip6 specifically in Ly6Chi monocytes (Fig. 7D). The Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF also expressed genes involved in the removal of apoptotic neutrophils such as thrombospondin-1 (Thbs1) and its receptor CD36 (44) and the αL (Itgal) and β2 (Itgb2) integrin components of the lymphocyte function-associated Ag 1 that is involved with engulfment of ICAM-3+ apoptotic neutrophils (45). In this relation, they also expressed the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Vav3, which is essential for the β2 integrin–dependent MF phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils in wound healing (46) (Fig. 7C). Collectively, these results suggest a hepatoprotective role for infiltrating liver monocytes in mediating neutrophil recruitment, activity, and clearance.

Hepatoprotective polarization of Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF

Shaping of MF function is an essential component of tissue damage and repair (47, 48). The Ly6Chi monocytes expressed exclusively proinflammatory genes associated with classical activation M1 phenotype including triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (Trem1), NO synthase 2 (Nos2), COX2 (Ptgs2), and the chemokines Ccl2 and Ccl7. Nevertheless, they expressed a wider panel of genes associated with both alternatively activated regulatory M2 and prorestorative wound-healing MF phenotypes (48), including arginase I (Arg1), Lcn2, chitinase-3-like protein 3 (Chil3l3, also known as Ym1), IL-4R subunit α (Il4ra), TNF ligand superfamily member 14 (Tnfsf14), TNF, TNFAIP3-interacting protein 3 (Tnip3, also named Abin3), and the α-induced protein 3 (Tnfaip3, also named A20). They also uniquely expressed oncostatin M (Osm) reported to be indispensable for liver regeneration following injury (49, 50) (Supplemental Fig. 3A, 3B). Upon their differentiation into MoMF, the Ly6Chi monocytes downregulated their expression of the proinflammatory mediators mentioned above while upregulating the expression of other prorestorative wound healing genes including Trem2, Gpnmb, insulin-like growth factor 1 (Igf1), mannose receptor 1 (Mrc1), the resistin-like molecule α (Retnla, also known as Fizz-1), Scarf1, and Cd163 (Supplemental Fig. 3).

Interestingly, Ly6Chi monocytes expressed high levels of key proangiogenesis mediators including vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A; Vegfa), semaphorin 4A and D (Sema4a and Sema4d), hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (Hif1a), the plasminogen activator urokinase receptor gene (Plaur), Thbs1, Vav3, Anxa2, ephrin type A receptor 2 (Epha2), fibronectin 1 (Fn1), the cytokines TGF-β1 (Tgfb1), ILe-6 (Il6), and IL-1β (Il1b) as well as the extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling enzymes matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) 18, a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain (ADAM) 8, and heparanase (Hpse) (Supplemental Fig. 3A). Collectively, these results establish that following AILI, monocytes undergo genetic reprogramming, acquiring alternatively activated and proresolution phenotypes important for wound healing.

KC and MoMF display distinct prorestorative molecular signature

The microarray results revealed major gene expression differences that strongly imply task division between KC and MoMF in the resolution from liver injury. In this relation, functional enrichment analysis based on the DAVID and GOEAST bioinformatics tools revealed variable expression of wound healing associated genes between the recruited MoMF and liver-resident KC (Supplemental Table I). Deeper overview revealed that both liver-MF subsets displayed variable expression of pattern recognition receptors including scavenger receptors and C-type lectins important for the clearance of apoptotic cells and cellular debris (Supplemental Fig. 3C). Specifically, KC displayed exclusive expression of the T cell Ig mucin 4 (gene Timd4) and stabilin 2 (Stab2) receptors, both of which mediate the engulfment of phosphatidylserine-expressing apoptotic cells (51, 52). They also expressed higher levels of the scavenger receptors Marco, CD163, Colec12, and mannose receptor (Mrc1) as well as of the C-type lectin genes Clec1b, Clec4f, and Clec9a and DC-specific ICAM3-grabbing nonintegrin isoform Cd209f. In contrast, Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF expressed uniquely high levels of T cell Ig mucin 3 (Havcr2), TLR2 gene (Tlr2), the C-type lectin genes Clec4d, Cle4e, and Clec5a, and DC-specific ICAM3-grabbing nonintegrin isoform Cd209a. They also expressed uniquely the C1q receptor CD93, shown to be important for the removal of apoptotic cells (53).

Extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling is of major importance in resolution from liver injury. The microarray results revealed variable expression of ECM-remodeling enzymes. Accordingly, KC expressed higher levels of genes encoding for matrix metalloproteinases-12 and 13 (Mmp12 and -13) and ADAM-23 as well as Adamdec1, Tgm1, and Timp2 and -3. In contrast, Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF expressed higher levels of MMP-8, -14, and -19, ADAM-8, -15, and -19, and heparanase (Hpse). With respect to ECM structural components, they also expressed higher levels of the thrombospondin-1 (Thbs1), fibronectin-1 (Fn1), versican (Vcan), emilin-2, and embigin (Emb) genes, whereas KC expressed higher levels of nidogen-1, 2 (Nid1 and -2), biglycan (Bgn), and osteonectin (Sparc) (Supplemental Fig. 3D). Finally, the activation of coagulation and complement cascades are also important for resolution. The microarray results revealed variable expression of coagulation mediators and complement system factors (Supplemental Fig. 3E).

Discussion

Recent studies have highlighted marked heterogeneity in the origins of tissue MF. Fate-mapping approaches revealed that most tissue-resident MF have a prenatal origin and do not rely on blood monocytes for their renewal under steady-state conditions (3–9). We have shown that intestinal lamina propria MF are exceptional and maintained by Ly6Chi monocytes (11, 54). In respect to KC, their ontogeny and maintenance is disputed. Thymidine incorporation experiments revealed that KC are in mitosis at any given time in the healthy liver (21, 55). Yet, other studies suggested that KC are generated by BM-derived cells or by local proliferation, depending on the nature of stimulation (56–59). Nevertheless, emerging studies have shown that liver-KC are established prenatally by yolk sac–derived precursors and can persist in adult mice independently of hematopoietic stem cells (3, 4). Yet the question whether circulating monocytes can contribute to the renewal of KC following inflammatory insults remained elusive. In this study, using several complementary approaches, including adoptive transfer, selective ablation, and molecular profiling, we report that following liver injury, Ly6Chi monocytes infiltrate the liver in a CCR2- and M-CSF–dependent manner and give rise to a phenotypically and transcriptionally distinct MF population and do not contribute to the replenishment of resident KC. Instead, the latter are replenished following liver injury, at least partially, by self-renewal independently of CCR2 and M-CSF. Confirmatively, our microarray results revealed very high similarity between steady state and recovered KC.

Ly6Chi monocytes display high plasticity and are directly involved in both the establishment and resolution of inflammatory reactions. Previous studies based on the use of Ccr2−/− and Ccl2−/− transgenic mice revealed an impaired recovery from AILI, strongly suggesting that infiltrating MF play a pivotal hepatoprotective role in the resolution phase (13, 25, 60). In this study, we further substantiated these findings, demonstrating that inducible and selective ablation of Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF results in impaired recovery manifested by greater hepatotoxic damage. Indeed, our microarray profiling provides compelling evidence that Ly6Chi monocytes and MoMF express a genetic signature associated with alternatively activated and prorestorative phenotypes. Worth mentioning is the unique expression of key angiogenesis mediators by the Ly6Chi monocytes. These include VEGF-A, which is critically important to the process of hepatocyte regeneration and restoration of liver microvasculature following AILI (61). Moreover, VEGF-A induces the paracrine release of hepatocyte growth factor, IL-6, and other hepatotrophic molecules by liver sinusoidal endothelial cells and the protection from hepatotoxic damage (62). Moreover, they expressed the urokinase plasminogen activator and its receptor, which are central players in wound healing and angiogenesis and in liver repair (63, 64).

Neutrophils recruited to inflammatory sites release a diverse set of deleterious substances and take substantial part in the collateral damage to the tissue. Thus, opportune termination of neutrophil activity is essential for resolution from liver injury. Holt et al. (13) were the first to make the association between absence of infiltrating MF and increased frequency of neutrophils following AILI. Substantiating these results, we show in this study increased accumulation of neutrophils at 24 h following APAP administration in Ccr2−/− mice and in mice subjected to inducible ablation of the Ly6Chi monocytes. Our results revealed several hepatoprotective mechanisms used by these cells to regulate neutrophil activity, apoptosis, and removal. In particular, we show their unique activation of the PGE2 synthesis pathway recently shown in a murine model of acute mucosal infection with Toxoplasma gondii to inhibit neutrophil activation (10).

Impaired recovery from AILI has been demonstrated in mice lacking KC (65) or MoMF (13) and was greater in mice deficient for both MF subsets (23), suggesting that both play critical role in this process. Nevertheless, the question of whether MoMF compensate functionally for the reduced presences of KC at the initial phase of recovery, or, oppositely, these MF subsets are functionally distinct has not been addressed. In an effort to unravel new insights on the task division between KC and MoMF in the recovery from liver injury, we have performed in-depth gene-expression microarray analysis at 72 h postinduction of AILI, when both MF subsets coexist. Our molecular profiling revealed 603 genes that were differentially expressed by at least 2-fold change between these subsets. Among them, using bioinformatics tools, we were able to provide a list of genes associated with wound healing that were differently expressed between the resident KC and the infiltrating monocyte-derived MF and may hence include known and novel subset-specific resolution markers. Specifically, we chose to demonstrate their variable expression of scavenger receptors, as timely removal of apoptotic cells and cellular debris is critical to the initiation of tissue repair. Another important phase of wound resolution is remodeling of the ECM, which is capable of modulating cellular behavior and phenotype, sequestering and activating specific cytokines and growth factors, as well as organizing the geometric framework that controls cell migration and interactions. We show in this study variable expression of ECM-remodeling enzymes as well as glycoproteins and proteoglycans by the distinct liver-MF subsets. Thus, these results imply strongly that the infiltrating MoMF and resident KC contribute differently to the resolution from liver injury, when according to the kinetics, the MoMF dominate the early phase and KC the later phase once they complete their recovery.

Infiltrating monocytes and resident MF play crucial and distinct roles in liver homeostasis and immunity, but also contribute to a broad spectrum of liver pathologies and are thus attractive therapeutic targets. Potential intervention strategies aiming at manipulation of these cells require in-depth insights of their origins and division of labor. In this study, we distinguish phenotypically and molecularly among three distinct MF subsets that populate the liver through the inflammatory and resolution phases of acute liver injury. We show that during the necrotic phase of AILI, the liver is massively infiltrated by Ly6Chi monocytes in a CCR2- and M-CSF–mediated manner. Subsequently, these cells differentiate into Ly6Clo MoMF to become the dominant liver-MF population at the early resolution phase. In contrast, resident KC are significantly reduced upon APAP challenge and recover at the resolution phase by self-renewal. Moreover, we show that the monocyte-derived MF critically contribute to the resolution from AILI. Finally, microarray based molecular profiling uncover substantial gene-expression differences among these three liver-MF subsets. Specifically, we show that infiltrating Ly6Chi monocytes acquire a prorestorative phenotype manifested by expression of proangiogenesis mediators and negative regulation of neutrophil activity. Moreover, KC and MoMF isolated at the resolution phase display distinct pattern of prorestorative genes. Importantly, our up-to-date phenotypic, ontogenic, and molecular definition of liver-MF compartment under inflammatory settings refers to the context of AILI and differences related to the representation and function of liver-MF subsets are possible in other liver disorders and should be elucidated in the future.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. Matthias Mack from the Department of Internal Medicine at Regensburg University (Regensburg, Germany) for the generous gift of the anti-CCR2 MC21 Ab. We also thank M. Kaplan (Sourasky Medical Center) for excellent animal care.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by an internal grant of Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (to C.V.).

  • The microarray data presented in this article have been submitted to the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gene Expression Omnibus public database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE55606.

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    ADAM
    a disintegrin and metalloprotease domain
    AILI
    acetaminophen-induced liver injury
    Anxa1
    Annexin 1
    APAP
    N-acetyl-p-aminophenol
    BM
    bone marrow
    COX
    cyclooxygenase
    DC
    dendritic cell
    ECM
    extracellular matrix
    KC
    Kupffer cell
    Lcn2
    lipocalin-2
    MF
    macrophage
    MHC II
    MHC class II
    MMP
    matrix metalloproteinase
    MoMF
    monocyte-derived MF
    qPCR
    quantitative PCR
    Thbs1
    thrombospondin-1
    VEGF
    vascular endothelial growth factor.

  • Received March 6, 2014.
  • Accepted April 25, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Davies L. C.,
    2. S. J. Jenkins,
    3. J. E. Allen,
    4. P. R. Taylor
    . 2013. Tissue-resident macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 14: 986–995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. van Furth R.,
    2. Z. A. Cohn
    . 1968. The origin and kinetics of mononuclear phagocytes. J. Exp. Med. 128: 415–435.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. ↵
    1. Schulz C.,
    2. E. Gomez Perdiguero,
    3. L. Chorro,
    4. H. Szabo-Rogers,
    5. N. Cagnard,
    6. K. Kierdorf,
    7. M. Prinz,
    8. B. Wu,
    9. S. E. Jacobsen,
    10. J. W. Pollard,
    11. et al
    . 2012. A lineage of myeloid cells independent of Myb and hematopoietic stem cells. Science 336: 86–90.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Yona S.,
    2. K. W. Kim,
    3. Y. Wolf,
    4. A. Mildner,
    5. D. Varol,
    6. M. Breker,
    7. D. Strauss-Ayali,
    8. S. Viukov,
    9. M. Guilliams,
    10. A. Misharin,
    11. et al
    . 2013. Fate mapping reveals origins and dynamics of monocytes and tissue macrophages under homeostasis. Immunity 38: 79–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Jenkins S. J.,
    2. D. Ruckerl,
    3. P. C. Cook,
    4. L. H. Jones,
    5. F. D. Finkelman,
    6. N. van Rooijen,
    7. A. S. MacDonald,
    8. J. E. Allen
    . 2011. Local macrophage proliferation, rather than recruitment from the blood, is a signature of TH2 inflammation. Science 332: 1284–1288.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hashimoto D.,
    2. A. Chow,
    3. C. Noizat,
    4. P. Teo,
    5. M. B. Beasley,
    6. M. Leboeuf,
    7. C. D. Becker,
    8. P. See,
    9. J. Price,
    10. D. Lucas,
    11. et al
    . 2013. Tissue-resident macrophages self-maintain locally throughout adult life with minimal contribution from circulating monocytes. Immunity 38: 792–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ginhoux F.,
    2. M. Greter,
    3. M. Leboeuf,
    4. S. Nandi,
    5. P. See,
    6. S. Gokhan,
    7. M. F. Mehler,
    8. S. J. Conway,
    9. L. G. Ng,
    10. E. R. Stanley,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Fate mapping analysis reveals that adult microglia derive from primitive macrophages. Science 330: 841–845.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Hoeffel G.,
    2. Y. Wang,
    3. M. Greter,
    4. P. See,
    5. P. Teo,
    6. B. Malleret,
    7. M. Leboeuf,
    8. D. Low,
    9. G. Oller,
    10. F. Almeida,
    11. et al
    . 2012. Adult Langerhans cells derive predominantly from embryonic fetal liver monocytes with a minor contribution of yolk sac-derived macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 209: 1167–1181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Ajami B.,
    2. J. L. Bennett,
    3. C. Krieger,
    4. W. Tetzlaff,
    5. F. M. Rossi
    . 2007. Local self-renewal can sustain CNS microglia maintenance and function throughout adult life. Nat. Neurosci. 10: 1538–1543.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Grainger J. R.,
    2. E. A. Wohlfert,
    3. I. J. Fuss,
    4. N. Bouladoux,
    5. M. H. Askenase,
    6. F. Legrand,
    7. L. Y. Koo,
    8. J. M. Brenchley,
    9. I. D. Fraser,
    10. Y. Belkaid
    . 2013. Inflammatory monocytes regulate pathologic responses to commensals during acute gastrointestinal infection. Nat. Med. 19: 713–721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Zigmond E.,
    2. C. Varol,
    3. J. Farache,
    4. E. Elmaliah,
    5. A. T. Satpathy,
    6. G. Friedlander,
    7. M. Mack,
    8. N. Shpigel,
    9. I. G. Boneca,
    10. K. M. Murphy,
    11. et al
    . 2012. Ly6C hi monocytes in the inflamed colon give rise to proinflammatory effector cells and migratory antigen-presenting cells. Immunity 37: 1076–1090.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Antoniades C. G.,
    2. A. Quaglia,
    3. L. S. Taams,
    4. R. R. Mitry,
    5. M. Hussain,
    6. R. Abeles,
    7. L. A. Possamai,
    8. M. Bruce,
    9. M. McPhail,
    10. C. Starling,
    11. et al
    . 2012. Source and characterization of hepatic macrophages in acetaminophen-induced acute liver failure in humans. Hepatology 56: 735–746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Holt M. P.,
    2. L. Cheng,
    3. C. Ju
    . 2008. Identification and characterization of infiltrating macrophages in acetaminophen-induced liver injury. J. Leukoc. Biol. 84: 1410–1421.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ju C.,
    2. T. P. Reilly,
    3. M. Bourdi,
    4. M. F. Radonovich,
    5. J. N. Brady,
    6. J. W. George,
    7. L. R. Pohl
    . 2002. Protective role of Kupffer cells in acetaminophen-induced hepatic injury in mice. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 15: 1504–1513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Laskin D. L.,
    2. C. R. Gardner,
    3. V. F. Price,
    4. D. J. Jollow
    . 1995. Modulation of macrophage functioning abrogates the acute hepatotoxicity of acetaminophen. Hepatology 21: 1045–1050.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Michael S. L.,
    2. N. R. Pumford,
    3. P. R. Mayeux,
    4. M. R. Niesman,
    5. J. A. Hinson
    . 1999. Pretreatment of mice with macrophage inactivators decreases acetaminophen hepatotoxicity and the formation of reactive oxygen and nitrogen species. Hepatology 30: 186–195.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Heymann F.,
    2. L. Hammerich,
    3. D. Storch,
    4. M. Bartneck,
    5. S. Huss,
    6. V. Rüsseler,
    7. N. Gassler,
    8. S. A. Lira,
    9. T. Luedde,
    10. C. Trautwein,
    11. F. Tacke
    . 2012. Hepatic macrophage migration and differentiation critical for liver fibrosis is mediated by the chemokine receptor C-C motif chemokine receptor 8 in mice. Hepatology 55: 898–909.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Karlmark K. R.,
    2. R. Weiskirchen,
    3. H. W. Zimmermann,
    4. N. Gassler,
    5. F. Ginhoux,
    6. C. Weber,
    7. M. Merad,
    8. T. Luedde,
    9. C. Trautwein,
    10. F. Tacke
    . 2009. Hepatic recruitment of the inflammatory Gr1+ monocyte subset upon liver injury promotes hepatic fibrosis. Hepatology 50: 261–274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Liaskou E.,
    2. H. W. Zimmermann,
    3. K. K. Li,
    4. Y. H. Oo,
    5. S. Suresh,
    6. Z. Stamataki,
    7. O. Qureshi,
    8. P. F. Lalor,
    9. J. Shaw,
    10. W. K. Syn,
    11. et al
    . 2013. Monocyte subsets in human liver disease show distinct phenotypic and functional characteristics. Hepatology 57: 385–398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Ramachandran P.,
    2. A. Pellicoro,
    3. M. A. Vernon,
    4. L. Boulter,
    5. R. L. Aucott,
    6. A. Ali,
    7. S. N. Hartland,
    8. V. K. Snowdon,
    9. A. Cappon,
    10. T. T. Gordon-Walker,
    11. et al
    . 2012. Differential Ly-6C expression identifies the recruited macrophage phenotype, which orchestrates the regression of murine liver fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: E3186–E3195.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Souhami R. L.,
    2. J. W. Bradfield
    . 1974. The recovery of hepatic phagocytosis after blockade of Kupffer cells. J. Reticuloendothel. Soc. 16: 75–86.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Zimmermann H. W.,
    2. S. Seidler,
    3. J. Nattermann,
    4. N. Gassler,
    5. C. Hellerbrand,
    6. A. Zernecke,
    7. J. J. Tischendorf,
    8. T. Luedde,
    9. R. Weiskirchen,
    10. C. Trautwein,
    11. F. Tacke
    . 2010. Functional contribution of elevated circulating and hepatic non-classical CD14CD16 monocytes to inflammation and human liver fibrosis. PLoS ONE 5: e11049.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. You Q.,
    2. M. Holt,
    3. H. Yin,
    4. G. Li,
    5. C. J. Hu,
    6. C. Ju
    . 2013. Role of hepatic resident and infiltrating macrophages in liver repair after acute injury. Biochem. Pharmacol. 86: 836–843.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Avraham-Davidi I.,
    2. S. Yona,
    3. M. Grunewald,
    4. L. Landsman,
    5. C. Cochain,
    6. J. S. Silvestre,
    7. H. Mizrahi,
    8. M. Faroja,
    9. D. Strauss-Ayali,
    10. M. Mack,
    11. et al
    . 2013. On-site education of VEGF-recruited monocytes improves their performance as angiogenic and arteriogenic accessory cells. J. Exp. Med. 210: 2611–2625.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Dambach D. M.,
    2. L. M. Watson,
    3. K. R. Gray,
    4. S. K. Durham,
    5. D. L. Laskin
    . 2002. Role of CCR2 in macrophage migration into the liver during acetaminophen-induced hepatotoxicity in the mouse. Hepatology 35: 1093–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Gautier E. L.,
    2. T. Shay,
    3. J. Miller,
    4. M. Greter,
    5. C. Jakubzick,
    6. S. Ivanov,
    7. J. Helft,
    8. A. Chow,
    9. K. G. Elpek,
    10. S. Gordonov,
    11. et al,
    12. Immunological Genome Consortium
    . 2012. Gene-expression profiles and transcriptional regulatory pathways that underlie the identity and diversity of mouse tissue macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 13: 1118–1128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Davies L. C.,
    2. M. Rosas,
    3. S. J. Jenkins,
    4. C. T. Liao,
    5. M. J. Scurr,
    6. F. Brombacher,
    7. D. J. Fraser,
    8. J. E. Allen,
    9. S. A. Jones,
    10. P. R. Taylor
    . 2013. Distinct bone marrow-derived and tissue-resident macrophage lineages proliferate at key stages during inflammation. Nat. Commun. 4: 1886.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Epelman S.,
    2. K. J. Lavine,
    3. A. E. Beaudin,
    4. D. K. Sojka,
    5. J. A. Carrero,
    6. B. Calderon,
    7. T. Brija,
    8. E. L. Gautier,
    9. S. Ivanov,
    10. A. T. Satpathy,
    11. et al
    . 2014. Embryonic and adult-derived resident cardiac macrophages are maintained through distinct mechanisms at steady state and during inflammation. Immunity 40: 91–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Lee W. M.
    2003. Drug-induced hepatotoxicity. N. Engl. J. Med. 349: 474–485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Yuan L.,
    2. N. Kaplowitz
    . 2013. Mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury. Clin. Liver Dis. 17: 507–518, vii.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Irizarry R. A.,
    2. B. Hobbs,
    3. F. Collin,
    4. Y. D. Beazer-Barclay,
    5. K. J. Antonellis,
    6. U. Scherf,
    7. T. P. Speed
    . 2003. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4: 249–264.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. ↵
    1. Jung S.,
    2. J. Aliberti,
    3. P. Graemmel,
    4. M. J. Sunshine,
    5. G. W. Kreutzberg,
    6. A. Sher,
    7. D. R. Littman
    . 2000. Analysis of fractalkine receptor CX(3)CR1 function by targeted deletion and green fluorescent protein reporter gene insertion. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20: 4106–4114.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Satpathy A. T.,
    2. W. Kc,
    3. J. C. Albring,
    4. B. T. Edelson,
    5. N. M. Kretzer,
    6. D. Bhattacharya,
    7. T. L. Murphy,
    8. K. M. Murphy
    . 2012. Zbtb46 expression distinguishes classical dendritic cells and their committed progenitors from other immune lineages. J. Exp. Med. 209: 1135–1152.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Serbina N. V.,
    2. E. G. Pamer
    . 2006. Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat. Immunol. 7: 311–317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Hume D. A.,
    2. K. P. MacDonald
    . 2012. Therapeutic applications of macrophage colony-stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1) and antagonists of CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling. Blood 119: 1810–1820.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Brühl H.,
    2. J. Cihak,
    3. J. Plachý,
    4. L. Kunz-Schughart,
    5. M. Niedermeier,
    6. A. Denzel,
    7. M. Rodriguez Gomez,
    8. Y. Talke,
    9. B. Luckow,
    10. M. Stangassinger,
    11. M. Mack
    . 2007. Targeting of Gr-1+,CCR2+ monocytes in collagen-induced arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 56: 2975–2985.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. O’Banion M. K.,
    2. H. B. Sadowski,
    3. V. Winn,
    4. D. A. Young
    . 1991. A serum- and glucocorticoid-regulated 4-kilobase mRNA encodes a cyclooxygenase-related protein. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 23261–23267.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Lazarus M.,
    2. B. K. Kubata,
    3. N. Eguchi,
    4. Y. Fujitani,
    5. Y. Urade,
    6. O. Hayaishi
    . 2002. Biochemical characterization of mouse microsomal prostaglandin E synthase-1 and its colocalization with cyclooxygenase-2 in peritoneal macrophages. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 397: 336–341.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Parente L.,
    2. E. Solito
    . 2004. Annexin 1: more than an anti-phospholipase protein. Inflamm. Res. 53: 125–132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Getting S. J.,
    2. D. J. Mahoney,
    3. T. Cao,
    4. M. S. Rugg,
    5. E. Fries,
    6. C. M. Milner,
    7. M. Perretti,
    8. A. J. Day
    . 2002. The link module from human TSG-6 inhibits neutrophil migration in a hyaluronan- and inter-alpha -inhibitor-independent manner. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 51068–51076.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Mindrescu C.,
    2. J. Le,
    3. H. G. Wisniewski,
    4. J. Vilcek
    . 2005. Up-regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 expression by TSG-6 protein in macrophage cell line. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 330: 737–745.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Devireddy L. R.,
    2. J. G. Teodoro,
    3. F. A. Richard,
    4. M. R. Green
    . 2001. Induction of apoptosis by a secreted lipocalin that is transcriptionally regulated by IL-3 deprivation. Science 293: 829–834.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Borkham-Kamphorst E.,
    2. E. van de Leur,
    3. H. W. Zimmermann,
    4. K. R. Karlmark,
    5. L. Tihaa,
    6. U. Haas,
    7. F. Tacke,
    8. T. Berger,
    9. T. W. Mak,
    10. R. Weiskirchen
    . 2013. Protective effects of lipocalin-2 (LCN2) in acute liver injury suggest a novel function in liver homeostasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1832: 660–673.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    1. Savill J.,
    2. N. Hogg,
    3. Y. Ren,
    4. C. Haslett
    . 1992. Thrombospondin cooperates with CD36 and the vitronectin receptor in macrophage recognition of neutrophils undergoing apoptosis. J. Clin. Invest. 90: 1513–1522.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Kristof E.,
    2. G. Zahuczky,
    3. K. Katona,
    4. Z. Doro,
    5. E. Nagy,
    6. L. Fesus
    . 2013. Novel role of ICAM3 and LFA-1 in the clearance of apoptotic neutrophils by human macrophages. Apoptosis 18: 1235–1251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Sindrilaru A.,
    2. T. Peters,
    3. J. Schymeinsky,
    4. T. Oreshkova,
    5. H. Wang,
    6. A. Gompf,
    7. F. Mannella,
    8. M. Wlaschek,
    9. C. Sunderkötter,
    10. K. L. Rudolph,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Wound healing defect of Vav3-/- mice due to impaired beta2-integrin-dependent macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils. Blood 113: 5266–5276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Sica A.,
    2. A. Mantovani
    . 2012. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J. Clin. Invest. 122: 787–795.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Mosser D. M.,
    2. J. P. Edwards
    . 2008. Exploring the full spectrum of macrophage activation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8: 958–969.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Hamada T.,
    2. A. Sato,
    3. T. Hirano,
    4. T. Yamamoto,
    5. G. Son,
    6. M. Onodera,
    7. I. Torii,
    8. T. Nishigami,
    9. M. Tanaka,
    10. A. Miyajima,
    11. et al
    . 2007. Oncostatin M gene therapy attenuates liver damage induced by dimethylnitrosamine in rats. Am. J. Pathol. 171: 872–881.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Nakamura K.,
    2. H. Nonaka,
    3. H. Saito,
    4. M. Tanaka,
    5. A. Miyajima
    . 2004. Hepatocyte proliferation and tissue remodeling is impaired after liver injury in oncostatin M receptor knockout mice. Hepatology 39: 635–644.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Miyanishi M.,
    2. K. Tada,
    3. M. Koike,
    4. Y. Uchiyama,
    5. T. Kitamura,
    6. S. Nagata
    . 2007. Identification of Tim4 as a phosphatidylserine receptor. Nature 450: 435–439.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Park S. Y.,
    2. M. Y. Jung,
    3. H. J. Kim,
    4. S. J. Lee,
    5. S. Y. Kim,
    6. B. H. Lee,
    7. T. H. Kwon,
    8. R. W. Park,
    9. I. S. Kim
    . 2008. Rapid cell corpse clearance by stabilin-2, a membrane phosphatidylserine receptor. Cell Death Differ. 15: 192–201.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Norsworthy P. J.,
    2. L. Fossati-Jimack,
    3. J. Cortes-Hernandez,
    4. P. R. Taylor,
    5. A. E. Bygrave,
    6. R. D. Thompson,
    7. S. Nourshargh,
    8. M. J. Walport,
    9. M. Botto
    . 2004. Murine CD93 (C1qRp) contributes to the removal of apoptotic cells in vivo but is not required for C1q-mediated enhancement of phagocytosis. J. Immunol. 172: 3406–3414.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Varol C.,
    2. A. Vallon-Eberhard,
    3. E. Elinav,
    4. T. Aychek,
    5. Y. Shapira,
    6. H. Luche,
    7. H. J. Fehling,
    8. W. D. Hardt,
    9. G. Shakhar,
    10. S. Jung
    . 2009. Intestinal lamina propria dendritic cell subsets have different origin and functions. Immunity 31: 502–512.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. North R. J.
    1969. The mitotic potential of fixed phagocytes in the liver as revealed during the development of cellular immunity. J. Exp. Med. 130: 315–326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Crofton R. W.,
    2. M. M. Diesselhoff-den Dulk,
    3. R. van Furth
    . 1978. The origin, kinetics, and characteristics of the Kupffer cells in the normal steady state. J. Exp. Med. 148: 1–17.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gale R. P.,
    2. R. S. Sparkes,
    3. D. W. Golde
    . 1978. Bone marrow origin of hepatic macrophages (Kupffer cells) in humans. Science 201: 937–938.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Klein I.,
    2. J. C. Cornejo,
    3. N. K. Polakos,
    4. B. John,
    5. S. A. Wuensch,
    6. D. J. Topham,
    7. R. H. Pierce,
    8. I. N. Crispe
    . 2007. Kupffer cell heterogeneity: functional properties of bone marrow derived and sessile hepatic macrophages. Blood 110: 4077–4085.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    1. Wacker H. H.,
    2. H. J. Radzun,
    3. M. R. Parwaresch
    . 1986. Kinetics of Kupffer cells as shown by parabiosis and combined autoradiographic/immunohistochemical analysis. Virchows Arch. B Cell Pathol. Incl. Mol. Pathol. 51: 71–78.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Hogaboam C. M.,
    2. C. L. Bone-Larson,
    3. M. L. Steinhauser,
    4. A. Matsukawa,
    5. J. Gosling,
    6. L. Boring,
    7. I. F. Charo,
    8. K. J. Simpson,
    9. N. W. Lukacs,
    10. S. L. Kunkel
    . 2000. Exaggerated hepatic injury due to acetaminophen challenge in mice lacking C-C chemokine receptor 2. Am. J. Pathol. 156: 1245–1252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    1. Donahower B.,
    2. S. S. McCullough,
    3. R. Kurten,
    4. L. W. Lamps,
    5. P. Simpson,
    6. J. A. Hinson,
    7. L. P. James
    . 2006. Vascular endothelial growth factor and hepatocyte regeneration in acetaminophen toxicity. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 291: G102–G109.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. LeCouter J.,
    2. D. R. Moritz,
    3. B. Li,
    4. G. L. Phillips,
    5. X. H. Liang,
    6. H. P. Gerber,
    7. K. J. Hillan,
    8. N. Ferrara
    . 2003. Angiogenesis-independent endothelial protection of liver: role of VEGFR-1. Science 299: 890–893.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  53. ↵
    1. Bezerra J. A.,
    2. T. H. Bugge,
    3. H. Melin-Aldana,
    4. G. Sabla,
    5. K. W. Kombrinck,
    6. D. P. Witte,
    7. J. L. Degen
    . 1999. Plasminogen deficiency leads to impaired remodeling after a toxic injury to the liver. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 15143–15148.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    1. Bezerra J. A.,
    2. A. R. Currier,
    3. H. Melin-Aldana,
    4. G. Sabla,
    5. T. H. Bugge,
    6. K. W. Kombrinck,
    7. J. L. Degen
    . 2001. Plasminogen activators direct reorganization of the liver lobule after acute injury. Am. J. Pathol. 158: 921–929.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    1. Holt M. P.,
    2. H. Yin,
    3. C. Ju
    . 2010. Exacerbation of acetaminophen-induced disturbances of liver sinusoidal endothelial cells in the absence of Kupffer cells in mice. Toxicol. Lett. 194: 34–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 193 (1)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 193, Issue 1
1 Jul 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Infiltrating Monocyte-Derived Macrophages and Resident Kupffer Cells Display Different Ontogeny and Functions in Acute Liver Injury
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Infiltrating Monocyte-Derived Macrophages and Resident Kupffer Cells Display Different Ontogeny and Functions in Acute Liver Injury
Ehud Zigmond, Shany Samia-Grinberg, Metsada Pasmanik-Chor, Eli Brazowski, Oren Shibolet, Zamir Halpern, Chen Varol
The Journal of Immunology July 1, 2014, 193 (1) 344-353; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400574

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Infiltrating Monocyte-Derived Macrophages and Resident Kupffer Cells Display Different Ontogeny and Functions in Acute Liver Injury
Ehud Zigmond, Shany Samia-Grinberg, Metsada Pasmanik-Chor, Eli Brazowski, Oren Shibolet, Zamir Halpern, Chen Varol
The Journal of Immunology July 1, 2014, 193 (1) 344-353; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400574
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Identification and Characterization of Zebrafish Tlr4 Coreceptor Md-2
  • Activated Neutrophils Propagate Fetal Membrane Inflammation and Weakening through ERK and Neutrophil Extracellular Trap–Induced TLR-9 Signaling
  • Salmonella Flagellin Activates NAIP/NLRC4 and Canonical NLRP3 Inflammasomes in Human Macrophages
Show more INNATE IMMUNITY AND INFLAMMATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606