Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Monkeypox and Other Poxvirus Articles
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Monkeypox and Other Poxvirus Articles
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Role of Mouse and Human Autophagy Proteins in IFN-γ–Induced Cell-Autonomous Responses against Toxoplasma gondii

Jun Ohshima, Youngae Lee, Miwa Sasai, Tatsuya Saitoh, Ji Su Ma, Naganori Kamiyama, Yoshiharu Matsuura, Suh Pann-Ghill, Mikako Hayashi, Shigeyuki Ebisu, Kiyoshi Takeda, Shizuo Akira and Masahiro Yamamoto
J Immunol April 1, 2014, 192 (7) 3328-3335; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1302822
Jun Ohshima
*Department of Immunoparasitology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
†Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
‡Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
§Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Youngae Lee
*Department of Immunoparasitology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
†Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miwa Sasai
*Department of Immunoparasitology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
†Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tatsuya Saitoh
¶Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
‖Laboratory of Host Defense, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ji Su Ma
*Department of Immunoparasitology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
†Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
‡Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Naganori Kamiyama
*Department of Immunoparasitology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
†Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
‡Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshiharu Matsuura
#Department of Molecular Virology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suh Pann-Ghill
**School of Nano-Bioscience and Chemical Engineering, Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology, Ulsan 689-798, Republic of Korea;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mikako Hayashi
§Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shigeyuki Ebisu
§Department of Restorative Dentistry and Endodontology, Graduate School of Dentistry, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kiyoshi Takeda
‡Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
††Laboratory of Mucosal Immunology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan; and
‡‡Core Research for Evolutional Science and Technology, Japan Science and Technology Agency, Saitama 332-0012, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shizuo Akira
¶Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
‖Laboratory of Host Defense, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masahiro Yamamoto
*Department of Immunoparasitology, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
†Laboratory of Immunoparasitology, World Premier International Immunology Frontier Research Center, Osaka University, Suita, Osaka 565-0871, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

IFN-γ mediates cellular innate immunity against an intracellular parasite, Toxoplasma gondii, by inducing immunity-related GTPases such as p47 IFN-γ–regulated GTPases (IRGs) and p65 guanylate-binding proteins (GBPs), which also participate in antibacterial responses via autophagy. An essential autophagy protein, Atg5, was previously shown to play a critical role in anti–T. gondii cell-autonomous immunity. However, the involvement of other autophagy proteins remains unknown. In this study, we show that essential autophagy proteins differentially participate in anti–T. gondii cellular immunity by recruiting IFN-γ–inducible GTPases. IFN-γ–induced suppression of T. gondii proliferation and recruitment of an IRG Irgb6 and GBPs are profoundly impaired in Atg7- or Atg16L1-deficient cells. In contrast, cells lacking other essential autophagy proteins, Atg9a and Atg14, are capable of mediating the anti–T. gondii response and recruiting Irgb6 and GBPs to the parasites. Although IFN-γ also stimulates anti–T. gondii cellular immunity in humans, whether this response requires GBPs and human autophagy proteins remains to be seen. To analyze the role of human ATG16L1 and GBPs in IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii responses, human cells lacking ATG16L1 or GBPs were generated by the Cas9/CRISPR genome-editing technique. Although both ATG16L1 and GBPs are dispensable for IFN-γ–induced inhibition of T. gondii proliferation in the human cells, human ATG16L1 is also required for the recruitment of GBPs. Taken together, human ATG16L1 and mouse autophagy components Atg7 and Atg16L1, but not Atg9a and Atg14, participate in the IFN-γ–induced recruitment of the immunity-related GTPases to the intracellular pathogen.

Introduction

The host immune system produces inflammatory cytokines in response to infection of an intracellular protozoan pathogen Toxoplasma gondii (1). T. gondii is an obligatory intracellular protozoan parasite and the causative agent of toxoplasmosis in humans and animals (2, 3). Although T. gondii infection in healthy animals largely results in opportunistic and latent infection, reactivation of this pathogen in immunocompromised individuals suffering from AIDS or being treated by chemotherapy often leads to lethal encephalitis (4). Eradication of T. gondii requires IFN-γ (5), which indirectly stimulates anti–T. gondii immune responses by robust induction of nearly 2000 genes known as IFN-γ–inducible genes (6, 7). IFN-γ activates antiparasite programs involving IFN-γ–inducible GTPases such as p47 IFN-γ–regulated GTPases (IRGs) and p65 guanylate-binding protein (GBPs) (8). Mice deficient in IRGs such as LRG-47 (also known as Irgm1), IGTP (Irgm3) or IIGP1 (Irga6), or GBPs displayed loss of resistance to T. gondii infection (9–13).

Immunity-related GTPases have been implicated in cellular immunity against bacteria via autophagy (14, 15). Autophagy is a homeostatic fundamental cellular process in which cytoplasmic cargos included in double-membrane structures, called “autophagosomes,” are transported to lysosomes (16). The autophagic process involves a series of autophagy proteins, among which Atg5 was recently linked to the IFN-γ–mediated parasiticidal effect against T. gondii (17). Myeloid-specific ablation of Atg5 in mice culminated in decreased recruitment of an IRG to T. gondii in IFN-γ–activated macrophages and led to high parasite susceptibility in vivo. Furthermore, other autophagy proteins, such as Atg7 and Atg16L1, were recently shown to play a nondegradative role in the IFN-γ–mediated antiviral programs against murine norovirus (18), prompting us to explore the functions of autophagy proteins other than Atg5 in the IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii cellular innate immune responses.

In this study, we characterized the role of essential autophagy proteins, Atg7, Atg16L1, Atg9a, and Atg14 in IFN-γ–mediated inhibition of T. gondii proliferation using mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking these proteins. MEFs lacking Atg7 or Atg16L1 exhibit defects in the reduction of T. gondii by IFN-γ treatment and recruitment of an IRG (Irgb6) and GBPs to the infected parasites. In sharp contrast, Atg9a- or Atg14-deficient cells show normal suppression of T. gondii growth and the accumulation of immunity-related GTPases at levels comparable to wild-type (WT) cells in response to IFN-γ stimulation, indicating differential participation of autophagy regulators in the mouse system. IFN-γ stimulation leads to strong inhibition of T. gondii proliferation in human cells (19). However, the contribution of human immunity-related GTPases and autophagy proteins to the inhibition remains unknown. To analyze the role of ATG16L1 and GBPs in human cells, we generated ATG16L1- or GBP-deficient human cells using Cas9/CRISPR-induced genome editing (20, 21). Although IFN-γ–induced inhibition of T. gondii proliferation is normal in human cells devoid of ATG16L1 or GBPs, IFN-γ–induced recruitment of GBPs to the parasites is defective in ATG16L1-deficient human cells. Thus, these results demonstrate that IFN-γ–mediated recruitment of IRGs and GBPs to T. gondii is differentially regulated by autophagy proteins in mice, and the mechanism for ATG16L1-dependent GBP recruitment to the parasite may be conserved in humans.

Materials and Methods

Cells, mice, and parasites

ME49 expressing luciferase of T. gondii was maintained in Vero cells by biweekly passage in RPMI 1640 (Nacalai Tesque) supplemented with 2% heat-inactivated FCS (JRH Bioscience), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin (Nacalai Tesque) (12). MEFs were maintained in DMEM (Nacalai Tesque) supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FCS (JRH Bioscience), 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin. Cells lacking Atg7, Atg16L1, Atg9a, or Atg14 were described previously (22–25). Human haploid HAP1 cells were described previously (26) and maintained in IMDM (Nacalai Tesque) supplemented with 10% FCS, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.1 mg/ml streptomycin. Animal experiments were conducted with the approval of the Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University.

Reagents

Abs against Irgb6 (TGTP; sc-11079), GBP1-5 (sc-166960), and actin (sc-8432) were purchased from Santa Cruz. Abs against LC3 (PL036 for Fig. 5E) and ATG16L1 (PM040) were purchased from MBL. Ab against LC3B (NB600-1384 for Western blotting) was purchased from Novus. Chloroquine was purchased from Wako. Anti-GAP45 rabbit Ab to stain T. gondii was a kind gift of Dr. D. Soldati-Favre. Recombinant mouse and human IFN-γ were obtained from PeproTech.

Generation of ATG16L1- or GBP-deficient HAP1 cells

The cDNA encoding the Cas9 nuclease for mammalian expression were obtained from Addgene (Plasmid 41815). The Cas9 nuclease cDNA and polyA fragments were recovered and inserted into pEF6 vector harboring the puromycin resistance cassette to generate pEF6-hCas9-Puro vector. The insert fragments of guided RNA (gRNA)1, gRNA2, gRNA3, and gRNA4 were amplified using KODFXNEO (Toyobo) and primers (Supplemental Table I): ATG16L1_gRNA1_F and ATG16L1_gRNA1_R for gRNA1, ATG16L1_gRNA2_F and ATG16L2_gRNA1_R for gRNA2, GBPs_gRNA3_F and GBPs_gRNA3_R for gRNA3, and GBPs_gRNA4_F and GBPs_gRNA4_R for gRNA4. The fragments for gRNA1, gRNA2, gRNA3, and gRNA4 were inserted into the gRNA cloning vector (Plasmid 41824) using Gibson Assembly mix (New England BioLabs) to generate the gRNA-expressing plasmids pgRNA1, pgRNA2, pgRNA3, and pgRNA4, respectively. HAP1 cells were cotransfected with the pEF6-hCas9-Puro vector and pgRNA1/2 (for generation of ATG16L1-deficient cells) or pgRNA3/4 (GBP-deficient cells) using Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies) and cultured in IMDM containing 0.5 μg/ml puromycin for 4 d. Limiting dilution of the surviving cells was performed, and the resultant single colonies were expanded and lysed for PCR analysis to detect the deletion using primers (Supplemental Table I): ATG16L1_indel_F and ATG16L1_indel_R for ATG16L1-deficient cells and GBPs_indel_F and GBPs_indel_R for GBP-deficient cells. PCR+ clones were subsequently tested using Western blotting to confirm the lack of protein expression.

Western blotting

MEFs (5 × 105) were left untreated or were treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h. The cells were lysed in lysis buffer containing 1.0% Nonidet P-40, 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Tris-Cl (pH 7.5), 5 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitor mixture (Roche). The cell lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE, transferred to polyvinyl difluoride membrane, and subjected to Western blotting using the indicated Abs.

Measurement of T. gondii numbers by luciferase assay

MEFs (5 × 105) or HAP1 cells (2 × 106) were left untreated or were treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, followed by infection with luciferase-expressing T. gondii (multiplicity of infection [moi] = 0.5) for 24 h. To measure T. gondii titers, the infected cells were harvested and lysed with 100 μl lysis buffer (Promega) with sonication. After centrifugation at 15,000 rpm at 4°C, the luciferase activity of 5 μl the supernatant was measured using the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay System and a GLOMAX 20/20 luminometer (both from Promega). The percentages of the activities in IFN-γ–stimulated or unstimulated cells over those in unstimulated cells are shown.

Immunofluorescence

MEFs (2.5 × 105) or HAP1 cells (1 × 106) infected with T. gondii (moi = 2) were fixed for 10 min in PBS containing 3.7% formaldehyde. Cells were permeabilized with PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and then blocked with 8% FCS in PBS. Subsequently, cells were incubated with anti-Irgb6 goat Ab (1:50), anti–Gbp1-5 mouse Ab (1:200), anti-GAP45 rabbit Ab (1:1000) (Figs. 1–3, 4, 6), anti-LC3 rabbit Ab (1:500) (Fig. 5), anti-GAP45 rabbit Ab (1:1000), and anti-Irgb6 goat Ab (1:50), for 1 h at 37°C, followed by incubation with donkey IgG Abs (1:10000): Alexa Flour 488–conjugated anti-rabbit IgG, Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated anti-goat, or Alexa Fluor 647– or Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated anti-mouse (Molecular Probes) for 1 h at 37°C in the dark. Finally, the immunostained cells were mounted with PermaFluor (Thermo Scientific) on glass slides and analyzed using a confocal laser microscope (FV1200 IX-83; Olympus); the images were analyzed using FLUOVIEW software (Olympus).

Quantitative real-time PCR

Total RNA was extracted, and cDNA was synthesized using MMLV RT (Promega). Real-time PCR was performed with a CFX Connect qPCR Master mix (Bio-Rad) using the Go-Taq qPCR Master mix (Promega). The values were normalized to the amount of GAPDH in each sample. The following primer sets were used: GBP1_qpF and GBP1_qpR for GBP1, GBP2_qpF and GBP2_qpR for GBP2, GBP3_qpF and GBP3_qpR for GBP3, GBP4_qpF and GBP4_qpR for GBP4, and GBP5_qpF and GBP5_qpR for GBP5. The primer sequences are listed in Supplemental Table I.

Statistical analysis

The unpaired Student t test was used to determine the statistical significance of the experimental data.

Results

Atg7 is required for IFN-γ–dependent recruitment of immunity-related GTPases to T. gondii

Cells lacking an autophagy protein, Atg5, are defective in IFN-γ–dependent host defense against T. gondii (17). A critical step in the regulation of autophagy is the modification of a ubiquitin-like protein called “microtubule-associated L chain 3” (LC3). This modification is carried out by a protein complex nucleated by the conjugation of Atg12 to Atg5. Because Atg7 is an essential enzyme for this conjugation and formation of LC3 puncta in starvation-induced autophagy (27, 28) (Supplemental Fig. 1), we tested whether Atg7 is involved in the IFN-γ–dependent cellular host defense against T. gondii. MEFs from WT and Atg7-deficient mice were stimulated or not with IFN-γ for 24 h and infected with luciferase-expressing type II (ME49) or type I (RH) T. gondii, which are susceptible or resistant to IFN-γ–dependent IRG-induced killing activity, respectively. Twenty-four hours postinfection, parasite number was assessed by the luciferase counts emitted. Despite a significant reduction in the type II parasite load in Atg7-deficient MEFs after IFN-γ stimulation, the extent of the parasite reduction was markedly less than that in WT cells (Fig. 1A). In contrast, a difference in type I T. gondii numbers between WT and Atg7-deficient MEFs was not observed, even after IFN-γ stimulation (Fig. 1A). The recruitment of GBPs and IRGs, such as Irgb6, is a hallmark of IFN-γ–dependent clearance of T. gondii in IFN-γ–activated cells (6). Because Atg7-deficient cells expressed similar levels of Irgb6 and GBPs in response to IFN-γ (Fig. 1B), we next tested the recruitment of Irgb6 and GBPs to parasites in IFN-γ–stimulated cells by indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 1C–F). In cells lacking Atg7, IFN-γ–dependent Irgb6 and GBP accumulation are significantly reduced relative to WT cells, indicating that Atg7 plays an important role in anti–T. gondii cellular host defense.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Atg7 is required for anti–T. gondii cellular immunity. (A) WT and Atg7-deficient MEFs were untreated or treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h. Untreated or IFN-γ–treated cells were infected with ME49 (left panel) or RH (right panel) T. gondii expressing luciferase (moi = 0.5) and harvested at 24 h postinfection. The number of total parasites was monitored by luciferase activity using the lysates. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. *p < 0.002. **p < 0.007. (B) WT and Atg7-deficient MEFs, treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ, for 24 h were lysed. Lysates were detected by Western blot with the indicated Abs. WT and Atg7-deficient MEFs, treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were infected with ME49 T. gondii (moi = 2), fixed at 6 h postinfection, and incubated with rabbit anti–T. gondii (green), goat anti-Irgb6 [red; (C)], or mouse anti-GBP1-5 [red; (E)], and DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. Percentage of parasites positive for Irgb6 (D) or GBP1-5 (F) staining at 6 h postinfection in IFN-γ–stimulated WT and Atg7-deficient MEFs. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. *p < 0.001. Data are representative of two (B) or three (A, C, D, E, and F) independent experiments.

Atg16L1 plays a critical role in IFN-γ–mediated suppression of T. gondii growth and accumulation of GTPases on the parasites

In addition to Atg7, Atg16L1 participates in the modification of LC3 in autophagy and is included in a complex with Atg5 (27) (Supplemental Fig. 1). Therefore, we next assessed whether Atg16L1 is also implicated in the IFN-γ–dependent cellular immunity against type I or type II T. gondii. IFN-γ–stimulated Atg16L1-deficient MEFs decreased the type II T. gondii numbers to a significantly lesser degree than did WT cells (Fig. 2A). However, the extent of type I parasite reduction in IFN-γ–stimulated Atg16L1-deficient cells was comparable to that in WT cells (Fig. 2A). Although the expression levels of Irgb6 and GBPs were comparable between WT and Atg16L1-deficient cells (Fig. 2B), the recruitment of both proteins to parasites was significantly lower in Atg16L1-deficient cells (Fig. 2C–F). Thus, Atg16L1, as well as Atg7, is required for the IFN-γ–induced anti–T. gondii cellular host defense.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Atg16L1 plays a critical role in anti–T. gondii cellular immunity. (A) WT and Atg16L1-deficient MEFs were left untreated or treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h. Untreated or IFN-γ–treated cells were infected with ME49 (left panel) or RH (right panel) T. gondii expressing luciferase (moi = 0.5) and harvested at 24 h postinfection. The number of total parasites was monitored by luciferase activity using the lysates. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. *p < 0.003, **p < 0.002. (B) WT and Atg16L1-deficient MEFs, treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were lysed. The lysates were detected by Western blot with the indicated Abs. WT and Atg16L1-deficient MEFs, treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were infected with ME49 T. gondii (moi = 2), fixed at 6 h postinfection, and incubated with rabbit anti–T. gondii (green), goat anti-Irgb6 [red; (C)] or mouse anti-GBP1-5 [red; (E)], and DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. Percentage of parasites positive for Irgb6 (D) or GBP1-5 (F) staining at 6 h postinfection in IFN-γ–stimulated WT and Atg16L1-deficient MEFs. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. *p < 0.001, **p < 0.002. Data are representative of two (B) or three (A, C, D, E, and F) independent experiments.

Atg9a and Atg14 are dispensable for IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii cellular responses

Atg9a is another essential autophagy protein that plays an important role in the generation of autophagosome membranes. Indeed, starvation-induced formation of LC3 puncta was barely detected in Atg9a-deficient cells, as previously reported (24). We next analyzed whether Atg9a is involved in IFN-γ–dependent responses to T. gondii in MEFs. In sharp contrast to Atg7 and Atg16L1, Atg9a-deficient cells were competent in the IFN-γ–mediated accumulation of Irgb6 and GBPs on parasites (Fig. 3A–D). Consistent with the localization of GTPases, IFN-γ–mediated reduction of parasite numbers in Atg9a-deficient cells was similar to that in WT cells (Fig. 3E), indicating that Atg9a is dispensable for the IFN-γ–induced cellular host defense.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Atg9a is dispensable for anti–T. gondii cellular immunity. WT and Atg9a-deficient MEFs, treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were infected with ME49 T. gondii (moi = 2), fixed at 6 h postinfection, and incubated with rabbit anti–T. gondii (green), goat anti-Irgb6 [red; (A)], or mouse anti-GBP1-5 [red; (C)], and DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. Percentage of parasites positive for Irgb6 (B) or GBP1-5 (D) staining at 6 h postinfection in IFN-γ–stimulated WT and Atg9a-deficient MEFs. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. (E) WT and Atg9a-deficient MEFs were left untreated or treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h. Untreated or IFN-γ–treated cells were infected with ME49 T. gondii expressing luciferase (moi = 0.5) and harvested at 24 h postinfection. The number of the total parasites was monitored by the luciferase activity using the lysates. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. All data are representative of three independent experiments.

Atg14 is also a key player in orchestrating autophagy, participating in a PI3K complex that phosphorylates phosphatidylinositol (29). We used Atg14-deficient MEFs to assess the role of Atg14 in the IFN-γ–dependent recruitment of GTPases to parasites. Although Atg14-deficient MEFs were defective in LC3 puncta formation in the serum-free starved condition (Supplemental Fig. 1), Irgb6 and GBPs were recruited to the parasites in IFN-γ–stimulated Atg14-deficient cells, as well as in WT cells (Fig. 4A–D). In addition, Atg14-deficient MEFs were capable of reducing parasite numbers in response to IFN-γ (Fig. 4E), suggesting that Atg14 function is nonessential for IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii cellular defense. These results demonstrate that some autophagy-related proteins, but not all, are used in the IFN-γ–induced anti–T. gondii machinery.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Atg14 is not involved in anti–T. gondii cellular immunity. WT and Atg14-deficient MEFs, treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were infected with ME49 T. gondii (moi = 2), fixed at 6 h postinfection, and incubated with rabbit anti–T. gondii (green), goat anti-Irgb6 [red; (A)] or mouse anti-GBP1-5 [red; (C)], and DAPI (blue). Scale bars, 5 μm. Percentage of parasites positive for Irgb6 (B) or GBP1-5 (D) staining at 6 h postinfection in IFN-γ-stimulated WT and Atg14-deficient MEFs. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. (E) WT and Atg14-deficient MEFs were left untreated or treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h. Untreated or IFN-γ–treated cells were infected with ME49 T. gondii expressing luciferase (moi = 0.5) and harvested at 24 h postinfection. The number of total parasites was monitored by luciferase activity using the lysates. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. All data are representative of three independent experiments.

Human ATG16L1 is essential for starvation-induced autophagy but not for IFN-γ–induced suppression of T. gondii growth in HAP1 cells

The data showing that the Atg5–Atg7–Atg16L1 axis plays a critical role in the IFN-γ–induced anti–T. gondii program in the mouse system prompted us to examine whether the axis is crucial for anti–T. gondii cellular immunity in the human system. To examine the role of ATG16L1 in human cells, we took advantage of the CRISPR/Cas9 system, which provides an efficient gene-targeting technique that facilitates multiplexed gene targeting (20, 21), and generated haploid human HAP1 cells devoid of ATG16L1 using Cas9 nuclease and single-guided RNAs targeting the open reading frame of the human ATG16L1 gene (Fig. 5A, Supplemental Fig. 2A). We succeeded in obtaining several clones of ATG16L1-deficient cells, in which deletion of the genomic region and proteins for ATG16L1 were analyzed by PCR and Western blotting, respectively (Fig. 5B, 5C). We first analyzed whether human ATG16L1 is required for autophagy induced by nutrient starvation, in which processing of LC3 and formation of the puncta are shown to be observed (30) (Fig. 5D, 5E). The nutrient starvation in ATG16L1-deficient cells completely failed to induce efficient LC3 conjugation to PE, a critical process for autophagosome formation (Fig. 5D) (30). Moreover, the starvation-induced formation of LC3 puncta was not observed in ATG16L1-deficient human cells (Fig. 5E), suggesting an essential role for human ATG16L1 in autophagy. Then, we tested whether human ATG16L1 is involved in the IFN-γ–induced anti–T. gondii response in human cells. IFN-γ suppressed T. gondii proliferation in human WT cells as efficiently as in mouse cells (Fig. 5F). Moreover, T. gondii proliferation was inhibited in IFN-γ–stimulated ATG16L1-deficient human cells in a dose-dependent fashion (Fig. 5F), suggesting that ATG16L1 in the human cell line is dispensable for the IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii response.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Human ATG16L1 is required for starvation-induced autophagy but not for IFN-γ–induced inhibition of T. gondii growth in HAP1 cells. (A) The gene-targeting strategy for human ATG16L1 locus by Cas9-mediated genome editing. (B) PCR detection of cells with deletion of human ATG16L1 locus. Primers used are denoted in (A). Also see Supplemental Fig. 2A for the targeting sequences to design gRNA1 and gRNA2, as well as assessment of the deletions by sequencing the PCR products detected in (B). (C) WT and ATG16L1-deficient HAP1 cells were lysed, and the lysates were detected by Western blot with the indicated Abs. (D) WT and ATG16L1-deficient HAP1 cells, with or without serum-starvation for 6 h in the absence or presence of 80 μM chloroquine for 6 h, were lysed. The lysates were detected by Western blot with the indicated Abs. (E) WT and ATG16L1-deficient HAP1 cells cultured in serum-free media (lower panels) to be starved for 6 h or in serum-containing media (upper panels) were fixed and incubated with rabbit anti-LC3 (green) and DAPI (blue). Arrows indicate puncta of LC3. Scale bar, 10 μm. (F) WT and ATG16L1-deficient HAP1 cells were left untreated or treated with the indicated concentrations of IFN-γ for 24 h. Untreated or IFN-γ–treated cells were infected with ME49 T. gondii expressing luciferase (moi = 0.5) and harvested at 24 h postinfection. The number of total parasites was monitored by luciferase activity using the lysates. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates and are representative of three independent experiments.

Human GBPs are recruited to T. gondii in an ATG16L1-dependent fashion

Murine GBPs play a critical role in anti–T. gondii cell-autonomous immunity (10, 12, 13). In addition, murine GBPs were recruited to the parasites in an Atg7- and Atg16L1-dependent manner (Figs. 1A, 2A). Human GBPs were shown to play a role in controlling intracellular pathogens (31). Therefore, we first assessed whether endogenous human GBPs are recruited to T. gondii using indirect immunofluorescence (Fig. 6A). In unstimulated conditions, almost no parasites were stained with anti–GBP1-5. In contrast, IFN-γ significantly induced accumulation of GBPs on T. gondii in HAP1 cells (Fig. 6A, 6B, Supplemental Fig. 3A, 3B). Next, we analyzed whether the IFN-γ–dependent recruitment of human GBPs to T. gondii is dependent on ATG16L1. In contrast to WT cells, cells lacking ATG16L1 showed a marked defect in the recruitment of GBPs to the parasites (Fig. 6C, 6D, Supplemental Fig. 3A–D), indicating the conserved important role of ATG16L1 in the recruitment of GTPases to T. gondii in humans and mice.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

GBPs are recruited to T. gondii in an ATG16L1-dependent fashion. (A) WT HAP1 cells, which were left untreated or treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were infected with ME49 T. gondii (moi = 2), fixed at 6 h postinfection, and incubated with rabbit anti–T. gondii (green), mouse anti-GBP1-5 (red), and DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 5 μm. Arrows indicate the colocalization of T. gondii and GBPs. (B) Percentage of parasites positive for GBP1-5 staining at 6 h postinfection in WT HAP1 cells that were left unstimulated or stimulated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. *p < 0.001. (C) WT and ATG16L1-deficient HAP1 cells, treated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were infected with ME49 T. gondii (moi = 2), fixed at 6 h postinfection, and incubated with rabbit anti–T. gondii (green), mouse anti-GBP1-5 (red), and DAPI (blue). Scale bar, 5 μm. Arrows indicate the colocalization of T. gondii and GBPs. (D) Percentage of parasites positive for GBP1-5 staining at 6 h postinfection in IFN-γ–stimulated WT and ATG16L1-deficient HAP1 cells. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates. **p < 0.001, ***p < 0.001. Data are representative of three independent experiments.

To elucidate the role of GBPs in anti–T. gondii cellular immunity directly, we generated HAP1 cells lacking all human GBPs using the CRISPR/Cas9 genome-editing technique (Fig. 7A, Supplemental Fig. 2B). These cells completely lacked mRNA and protein expression of GBPs, as confirmed by quantitative real-time PCR and Western blotting, respectively (Fig. 7B–D). Then, we challenged WT and GBP-deficient human cells with T. gondii infection under unstimulated or IFN-γ–stimulated conditions. Both types of cells showed comparable IFN-γ–induced suppression of T. gondii numbers that was dose dependent (Fig. 7E). Taken together, although IFN-γ–induced GBP recruitment does not negatively affect T. gondii numbers in infected cells, the accumulation in humans is regulated by ATG16L1.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Normal IFN-γ–induced suppression of parasite proliferation in HAP1 cells lacking human GBPs. (A) Gene-targeting strategy for the entire human GBP locus using Cas9-mediated genome editing. (B) PCR detection of cells with deletion of entire human GBP locus. Primers used are denoted in (A). Also see Supplemental Fig. 2B for the targeting sequences to design gRNA3 and gRNA4, as well as assessment of the deletions by sequencing the PCR products detected in (B). (C) Quantitative PCR analysis of the expression of the indicated GBP mRNA in WT or GBP-deleted (GBPs KO) HAP1 cells that were left unstimulated or stimulated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ. Data were normalized to the amount of GAPDH in each sample and are mean ± SD of triplicates. (D) WT and GBPs KO HAP1 cells, which were left unstimulated or stimulated with 10 ng/ml IFN-γ for 24 h, were lysed. The lysates were detected by Western blot with the indicated Abs. (E) WT and GBPs KO HAP1 cells were left untreated or treated with the indicated concentrations of IFN-γ for 24 h. Untreated or IFN-γ–treated cells were infected with ME49 T. gondii expressing luciferase (moi = 0.5) and harvested at 24 h postinfection. The number of total parasites was monitored by luciferase activity using the lysates. Data are mean ± SD of triplicates and are representative of three independent experiments.

Discussion

In the current study, we investigated the role of autophagy proteins in IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii cellular immunity using MEFs deficient in some of the essential components. Among them, Atg7 and Atg16L1, but not Atg9a and Atg14, are critically involved in the recruitment of immunity-related GTPases in the mouse system. In addition, we demonstrated that human ATG16L1 is also required for IFN-γ–mediated recruitment of human GBPs to the parasite.

Previous work showed that the IFN-γ–induced antiparasite response requires Atg5, which, together with Atg7 and Atg16L1, modifies LC3 in autophagy (17, 27). Furthermore, Atg7 and Atg16L1 are essential for the IFN-γ–induced nonautophagic antiviral response (18). Given that GBPs, another group of IFN-γ–inducible GTPases, critically control IFN-γ–mediated intracellular elimination of T. gondii in cooperation with Irgb6 in mice (12), Atg7 and Atg16L1, in addition to Atg5, may be integral to the recruitment of Irgb6 and GBPs to T. gondii for clearance. Conversely, we demonstrated that other essential autophagy proteins, including Atg9a and Atg14, are dispensable for the IFN-γ–dependent cellular response. In autophagy, Atg9a and Atg14 are critically involved in autophagosome formation (32–34). However, IFN-γ–mediated Atg5-dependent anti–T. gondii clearance is reported to be independent of autophagosome formation (17). Atg5 and Atg7, but not Atg9a and Atg14, are required for recruitment of LC3 in autophagy against bacteria, whereas they are all essential to suppress the growth of intracellular bacteria by autophagy (25), indicating that Atg5-, Atg7-, and Atg16L1-dependent action is separable from Atg9a and/or Atg14-dependent membrane formation in autophagy against bacteria. Although it remains controversial whether autophagy is involved in the IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii cellular response (17, 35), the recruitment of the immunity-related GTPases to the parasite is regulated independently of at least Atg9a and Atg14, which are key players in autophagosome formation in autophagy. Thus, our current study expands the notion that autophagy proteins differentially participate in mouse IFN-γ–induced anti–T. gondii activity, which originally was proposed by the previous pioneer findings about the essential, but autophagosome-independent, function of Atg5 and the dispensable role of another essential autophagy regulator, Beclin1, in IFN-γ–induced antiparasite activity (17, 36).

In human cells, IFN-γ stimulation also leads to several anti–T. gondii effector mechanisms involving tryptophan degradation (37, 38) and iron depletion (39, 40). In this study, we show that ATG16L1 also plays an important role in the recruitment of GBPs to the parasite in a human cell line. Although we demonstrate that IFN-γ stimulation remains effective to reduce the number of T. gondii in human ATG16L1- or GBP-deficient cells, even at the lower concentrations of IFN-γ, whether the human IFN-γ–dependent immunity to T. gondii is independent of the ATG16L1–GBP axis should be examined carefully in the future. Given the anti–T. gondii function of GBPs in the recruitment or retention of IRGs onto the parasites in mouse (12, 13), the reason why human cells do not require the ATG16L1–GBP system for the IFN-γ–dependent suppression of parasite numbers might be explained, in part, by the fact that humans do not possess the large variety of IRGs found in the mouse system (41). Alternatively, other effector mechanisms described above might be dominant in humans or the human HAP1 cell line, eventually masking the effect of loss of ATG16L1/GBPs in cell-autonomous in vitro immunity. Indeed, IFN-γ–stimulated human fibroblasts were shown to induce cell death and early egress of the parasite, downregulating the parasite numbers (42). Furthermore, given that IFN-γ stimulates accumulation of human GBPs on the parasites in an ATG16L1-dependent fashion, the ATG16L1–GBP axis might play an in vivo role in the anti–T. gondii program involving GBP5 in the NALP3-dependent inflammasome activation that leads to IL-1/IL-18 production (43). To elucidate the physiological role of human ATG16L1 or GBPs in various settings and cell types, the use of human embryonic stem cells or induced pluripotent stem cells lacking these proteins would be of interest.

In conclusion, some mouse autophagy proteins, such as Atg7 and Atg16L1, but not Atg9 and Atg14, are integral to IFN-γ–mediated anti–T. gondii cell-autonomous innate immune responses by controlling the recruitment of the immunity-related GTPases to the parasites. Although human ATG16L1, as well as GBPs, is dispensable for the IFN-γ–dependent cellular inhibition of T. gondii proliferation, the recruitment of GBPs requires ATG16L1. To uncover the underlying mechanism of IFN-γ–induced antiparasite responses, future studies will need to investigate how Atg7 and Atg16L1, together with Atg5, facilitate the anti–T. gondii events by elucidating unidentified regulatory circuits and their sequential programs.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank M. Enomoto and Dr. D.M. Standley for secretarial and technical assistance and reading of the manuscript, respectively. We also thank Drs. M. Komatsu, D. Soldati-Favre, and T.R. Brummelkamp for providing Atg7-deficient mice, anti–T. gondii Ab, and HAP1 cells, respectively.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Japan Science and Technology Agency, the Senri Life Science Foundation, the Tokyo Biochemical Research Foundation, the Research Foundation for Microbial Diseases of Osaka University, the Nakajima Foundation, the Asahi Glass Foundation, the Osaka Foundation for Promotion of Clinical Immunology, the Sumitomo Foundation, the Sagawa Foundation of Promotion of Cancer Research, the Suzuken Memorial Foundation, the Osaka Cancer Research Foundation, the Daiichi-Sankyo Foundation of Life Science, the Uehara Memorial Foundation, the Mochida Foundation for Medical and Pharmaceutical Research, the Ichiro Kanehara Foundation, the Kanae Foundation for the Promotion of Medical Science, and the Japan Intractable Disease Research Foundation.

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    GBP
    p65 guanylate-binding protein
    gRNA
    guided RNA
    IRG
    p47 IFN-γ-regulated GTPases
    LC3
    microtubule-associated L chain 3
    MEF
    murine embryonic fibroblast
    moi
    multiplicity of infection
    WT
    wild-type.

  • Received October 22, 2013.
  • Accepted January 26, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Yarovinsky F.,
    2. A. Sher
    . 2006. Toll-like receptor recognition of Toxoplasma gondii. Int. J. Parasitol. 36: 255–259.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Boothroyd J. C.
    2009. Toxoplasma gondii: 25 years and 25 major advances for the field. Int. J. Parasitol. 39: 935–946.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Hunter C. A.,
    2. L. D. Sibley
    . 2012. Modulation of innate immunity by Toxoplasma gondii virulence effectors. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 10: 766–778.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Israelski D. M.,
    2. J. S. Remington
    . 1993. Toxoplasmosis in patients with cancer. Clin. Infect. Dis. 17(Suppl. 2): S423–S435.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Suzuki Y.,
    2. M. A. Orellana,
    3. R. D. Schreiber,
    4. J. S. Remington
    . 1988. Interferon-gamma: the major mediator of resistance against Toxoplasma gondii. Science 240: 516–518.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Kim B. H.,
    2. A. R. Shenoy,
    3. P. Kumar,
    4. C. J. Bradfield,
    5. J. D. MacMicking
    . 2012. IFN-inducible GTPases in host cell defense. Cell Host Microbe 12: 432–444.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Taylor G. A.,
    2. C. G. Feng,
    3. A. Sher
    . 2004. p47 GTPases: regulators of immunity to intracellular pathogens. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 4: 100–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. MacMicking J. D.
    2012. Interferon-inducible effector mechanisms in cell-autonomous immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12: 367–382.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Collazo C. M.,
    2. G. S. Yap,
    3. G. D. Sempowski,
    4. K. C. Lusby,
    5. L. Tessarollo,
    6. G. F. Vande Woude,
    7. A. Sher,
    8. G. A. Taylor
    . 2001. Inactivation of LRG-47 and IRG-47 reveals a family of interferon gamma-inducible genes with essential, pathogen-specific roles in resistance to infection. J. Exp. Med. 194: 181–188.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Degrandi D.,
    2. E. Kravets,
    3. C. Konermann,
    4. C. Beuter-Gunia,
    5. V. Klümpers,
    6. S. Lahme,
    7. E. Wischmann,
    8. A. K. Mausberg,
    9. S. Beer-Hammer,
    10. K. Pfeffer
    . 2013. Murine guanylate binding protein 2 (mGBP2) controls Toxoplasma gondii replication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 110: 294–299.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Taylor G. A.,
    2. C. M. Collazo,
    3. G. S. Yap,
    4. K. Nguyen,
    5. T. A. Gregorio,
    6. L. S. Taylor,
    7. B. Eagleson,
    8. L. Secrest,
    9. E. A. Southon,
    10. S. W. Reid,
    11. et al
    . 2000. Pathogen-specific loss of host resistance in mice lacking the IFN-gamma-inducible gene IGTP. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 751–755.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Yamamoto M.,
    2. M. Okuyama,
    3. J. S. Ma,
    4. T. Kimura,
    5. N. Kamiyama,
    6. H. Saiga,
    7. J. Ohshima,
    8. M. Sasai,
    9. H. Kayama,
    10. T. Okamoto,
    11. et al
    . 2012. A cluster of interferon-γ-inducible p65 GTPases plays a critical role in host defense against Toxoplasma gondii. Immunity 37: 302–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Selleck E. M.,
    2. S. J. Fentress,
    3. W. L. Beatty,
    4. D. Degrandi,
    5. K. Pfeffer,
    6. H. W. Virgin IV.,
    7. J. D. Macmicking,
    8. L. D. Sibley
    . 2013. Guanylate-binding protein 1 (Gbp1) contributes to cell-autonomous immunity against Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog. 9: e1003320.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Deretic V.
    2012. Autophagy as an innate immunity paradigm: expanding the scope and repertoire of pattern recognition receptors. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 24: 21–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Kim B. H.,
    2. A. R. Shenoy,
    3. P. Kumar,
    4. R. Das,
    5. S. Tiwari,
    6. J. D. MacMicking
    . 2011. A family of IFN-γ-inducible 65-kD GTPases protects against bacterial infection. Science 332: 717–721.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Mizushima N.,
    2. T. Yoshimori,
    3. Y. Ohsumi
    . 2011. The role of Atg proteins in autophagosome formation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27: 107–132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Zhao Z.,
    2. B. Fux,
    3. M. Goodwin,
    4. I. R. Dunay,
    5. D. Strong,
    6. B. C. Miller,
    7. K. Cadwell,
    8. M. A. Delgado,
    9. M. Ponpuak,
    10. K. G. Green,
    11. et al
    . 2008. Autophagosome-independent essential function for the autophagy protein Atg5 in cellular immunity to intracellular pathogens. Cell Host Microbe 4: 458–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Hwang S.,
    2. N. S. Maloney,
    3. M. W. Bruinsma,
    4. G. Goel,
    5. E. Duan,
    6. L. Zhang,
    7. B. Shrestha,
    8. M. S. Diamond,
    9. A. Dani,
    10. S. V. Sosnovtsev,
    11. et al
    . 2012. Nondegradative role of Atg5-Atg12/Atg16L1 autophagy protein complex in antiviral activity of interferon gamma. Cell Host Microbe 11: 397–409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Pfefferkorn E. R.,
    2. P. M. Guyre
    . 1984. Inhibition of growth of Toxoplasma gondii in cultured fibroblasts by human recombinant gamma interferon. Infect. Immun. 44: 211–216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Mali P.,
    2. L. Yang,
    3. K. M. Esvelt,
    4. J. Aach,
    5. M. Guell,
    6. J. E. DiCarlo,
    7. J. E. Norville,
    8. G. M. Church
    . 2013. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339: 823–826.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Cong L.,
    2. F. A. Ran,
    3. D. Cox,
    4. S. Lin,
    5. R. Barretto,
    6. N. Habib,
    7. P. D. Hsu,
    8. X. Wu,
    9. W. Jiang,
    10. L. A. Marraffini,
    11. F. Zhang
    . 2013. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339: 819–823.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Komatsu M.,
    2. S. Waguri,
    3. T. Chiba,
    4. S. Murata,
    5. J. Iwata,
    6. I. Tanida,
    7. T. Ueno,
    8. M. Koike,
    9. Y. Uchiyama,
    10. E. Kominami,
    11. K. Tanaka
    . 2006. Loss of autophagy in the central nervous system causes neurodegeneration in mice. Nature 441: 880–884.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Saitoh T.,
    2. N. Fujita,
    3. M. H. Jang,
    4. S. Uematsu,
    5. B. G. Yang,
    6. T. Satoh,
    7. H. Omori,
    8. T. Noda,
    9. N. Yamamoto,
    10. M. Komatsu,
    11. et al
    . 2008. Loss of the autophagy protein Atg16L1 enhances endotoxin-induced IL-1beta production. Nature 456: 264–268.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Saitoh T.,
    2. N. Fujita,
    3. T. Hayashi,
    4. K. Takahara,
    5. T. Satoh,
    6. H. Lee,
    7. K. Matsunaga,
    8. S. Kageyama,
    9. H. Omori,
    10. T. Noda,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Atg9a controls dsDNA-driven dynamic translocation of STING and the innate immune response. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 20842–20846.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Kageyama S.,
    2. H. Omori,
    3. T. Saitoh,
    4. T. Sone,
    5. J. L. Guan,
    6. S. Akira,
    7. F. Imamoto,
    8. T. Noda,
    9. T. Yoshimori
    . 2011. The LC3 recruitment mechanism is separate from Atg9L1-dependent membrane formation in the autophagic response against Salmonella. Mol. Biol. Cell 22: 2290–2300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Carette J. E.,
    2. M. Raaben,
    3. A. C. Wong,
    4. A. S. Herbert,
    5. G. Obernosterer,
    6. N. Mulherkar,
    7. A. I. Kuehne,
    8. P. J. Kranzusch,
    9. A. M. Griffin,
    10. G. Ruthel,
    11. et al
    . 2011. Ebola virus entry requires the cholesterol transporter Niemann-Pick C1. Nature 477: 340–343.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Fujita N.,
    2. T. Itoh,
    3. H. Omori,
    4. M. Fukuda,
    5. T. Noda,
    6. T. Yoshimori
    . 2008. The Atg16L complex specifies the site of LC3 lipidation for membrane biogenesis in autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell 19: 2092–2100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Weidberg H.,
    2. E. Shvets,
    3. T. Shpilka,
    4. F. Shimron,
    5. V. Shinder,
    6. Z. Elazar
    . 2010. LC3 and GATE-16/GABARAP subfamilies are both essential yet act differently in autophagosome biogenesis. EMBO J. 29: 1792–1802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Itakura E.,
    2. N. Mizushima
    . 2009. Atg14 and UVRAG: mutually exclusive subunits of mammalian Beclin 1-PI3K complexes. Autophagy 5: 534–536.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kabeya Y.,
    2. N. Mizushima,
    3. T. Ueno,
    4. A. Yamamoto,
    5. T. Kirisako,
    6. T. Noda,
    7. E. Kominami,
    8. Y. Ohsumi,
    9. T. Yoshimori
    . 2000. LC3, a mammalian homologue of yeast Apg8p, is localized in autophagosome membranes after processing. EMBO J. 19: 5720–5728.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Nordmann A.,
    2. L. Wixler,
    3. Y. Boergeling,
    4. V. Wixler,
    5. S. Ludwig
    . 2012. A new splice variant of the human guanylate-binding protein 3 mediates anti-influenza activity through inhibition of viral transcription and replication. FASEB J. 26: 1290–1300.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Matsunaga K.,
    2. E. Morita,
    3. T. Saitoh,
    4. S. Akira,
    5. N. T. Ktistakis,
    6. T. Izumi,
    7. T. Noda,
    8. T. Yoshimori
    . 2010. Autophagy requires endoplasmic reticulum targeting of the PI3-kinase complex via Atg14L. J. Cell Biol. 190: 511–521.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Obara K.,
    2. Y. Ohsumi
    . 2011. Atg14: a key player in orchestrating autophagy. Int. J. Cell Biol. 2011: 713435.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Orsi A.,
    2. M. Razi,
    3. H. C. Dooley,
    4. D. Robinson,
    5. A. E. Weston,
    6. L. M. Collinson,
    7. S. A. Tooze
    . 2012. Dynamic and transient interactions of Atg9 with autophagosomes, but not membrane integration, are required for autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell 23: 1860–1873.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Ling Y. M.,
    2. M. H. Shaw,
    3. C. Ayala,
    4. I. Coppens,
    5. G. A. Taylor,
    6. D. J. Ferguson,
    7. G. S. Yap
    . 2006. Vacuolar and plasma membrane stripping and autophagic elimination of Toxoplasma gondii in primed effector macrophages. J. Exp. Med. 203: 2063–2071.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Portillo J. A.,
    2. G. Okenka,
    3. E. Reed,
    4. A. Subauste,
    5. J. Van Grol,
    6. K. Gentil,
    7. M. Komatsu,
    8. K. Tanaka,
    9. G. Landreth,
    10. B. Levine,
    11. C. S. Subauste
    . 2010. The CD40-autophagy pathway is needed for host protection despite IFN-Γ-dependent immunity and CD40 induces autophagy via control of P21 levels. PLoS ONE 5: e14472.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Gupta S. L.,
    2. J. M. Carlin,
    3. P. Pyati,
    4. W. Dai,
    5. E. R. Pfefferkorn,
    6. M. J. Murphy Jr.
    . 1994. Antiparasitic and antiproliferative effects of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase enzyme expression in human fibroblasts. Infect. Immun. 62: 2277–2284.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Pfefferkorn E. R.
    1984. Interferon gamma blocks the growth of Toxoplasma gondii in human fibroblasts by inducing the host cells to degrade tryptophan. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 908–912.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Dimier I. H.,
    2. D. T. Bout
    . 1997. Inhibition of Toxoplasma gondii replication in IFN-gamma-activated human intestinal epithelial cells. Immunol. Cell Biol. 75: 511–514.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Dimier I. H.,
    2. D. T. Bout
    . 1998. Interferon-gamma-activated primary enterocytes inhibit Toxoplasma gondii replication: a role for intracellular iron. Immunology 94: 488–495.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Könen-Waisman S.,
    2. J. C. Howard
    . 2007. Cell-autonomous immunity to Toxoplasma gondii in mouse and man. Microbes Infect. 9: 1652–1661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Niedelman W.,
    2. J. K. Sprokholt,
    3. B. Clough,
    4. E. M. Frickel,
    5. J. P. Saeij
    . 2013. Cell death of gamma interferon-stimulated human fibroblasts upon Toxoplasma gondii infection induces early parasite egress and limits parasite replication. Infect. Immun. 81: 4341–4349.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Shenoy A. R.,
    2. D. A. Wellington,
    3. P. Kumar,
    4. H. Kassa,
    5. C. J. Booth,
    6. P. Cresswell,
    7. J. D. MacMicking
    . 2012. GBP5 Promotes NLRP3 inflammasome assembly and immunity in mammals. Science. 336: 481–485.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 192 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 192, Issue 7
1 Apr 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Role of Mouse and Human Autophagy Proteins in IFN-γ–Induced Cell-Autonomous Responses against Toxoplasma gondii
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Role of Mouse and Human Autophagy Proteins in IFN-γ–Induced Cell-Autonomous Responses against Toxoplasma gondii
Jun Ohshima, Youngae Lee, Miwa Sasai, Tatsuya Saitoh, Ji Su Ma, Naganori Kamiyama, Yoshiharu Matsuura, Suh Pann-Ghill, Mikako Hayashi, Shigeyuki Ebisu, Kiyoshi Takeda, Shizuo Akira, Masahiro Yamamoto
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2014, 192 (7) 3328-3335; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302822

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Role of Mouse and Human Autophagy Proteins in IFN-γ–Induced Cell-Autonomous Responses against Toxoplasma gondii
Jun Ohshima, Youngae Lee, Miwa Sasai, Tatsuya Saitoh, Ji Su Ma, Naganori Kamiyama, Yoshiharu Matsuura, Suh Pann-Ghill, Mikako Hayashi, Shigeyuki Ebisu, Kiyoshi Takeda, Shizuo Akira, Masahiro Yamamoto
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2014, 192 (7) 3328-3335; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302822
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Heterotypic Influenza Infections Mitigate Susceptibility to Secondary Bacterial Infection
  • Duck CD8+ T Cell Response to H5N1 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Virus Infection In Vivo and In Vitro
  • Arid5a Mediates an IL-17–Dependent Pathway That Drives Autoimmunity but Not Antifungal Host Defense
Show more INFECTIOUS DISEASE AND HOST RESPONSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606