Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

IgA Enhances NETosis and Release of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps by Polymorphonuclear Cells via Fcα Receptor I

Esil Aleyd, Miel W. M. van Hout, Sonja H. Ganzevles, Kees A. Hoeben, Vincent Everts, Jantine E. Bakema and Marjolein van Egmond
J Immunol March 1, 2014, 192 (5) 2374-2383; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1300261
Esil Aleyd
*Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Miel W. M. van Hout
*Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sonja H. Ganzevles
*Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kees A. Hoeben
†Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vincent Everts
†Department of Cell Biology and Histology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
‡Department of Oral Cell Biology, University of Amsterdam and VU University, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jantine E. Bakema
*Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
§Department of Otolaryngology/Head-Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center, 1077 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marjolein van Egmond
*Department of Molecular Cell Biology and Immunology, VU University Medical Center, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
¶Department of Surgery, VU University Medical Center, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Polymorphonuclear cells (neutrophils) are the first cells that arrive at sites of infections. According to the current dogma, they are involved in eliminating bacteria, after which they die through apoptosis. We now demonstrate that enhanced IgA-induced phagocytosis of bacteria or beads by neutrophils led to increased cell death. Nuclear changes and positivity for the general cell death marker 7-aminoactinomycin D were observed, but the absence of annexin V membrane staining supported that neutrophils did not die via apoptosis, in contrast to neutrophils that had not phagocytosed bacteria. Moreover, increased release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) was observed, which was most likely due to augmented production of reactive oxygen species after uptake of IgA-opsonized particles. Blocking the IgA Fc receptor FcαRI abrogated phagocytosis and NET formation. Thus, FcαRI triggering on neutrophils resulted in a rapid form of cell death that is referred to as NETosis, as it is accompanied by the release of NETs. As such, IgA may play a prominent role in mucosal inflammatory responses, where it is the most prominent Ab, because it enhanced both phagocytosis of bacteria and formation of NETs, which are effective mechanisms that neutrophils employ to eliminate pathogens.

This article is featured in In This Issue, p.1995

Introduction

Immunoglobulin A is the most produced Ab class in the body (66 mg/kg/day) and the predominant Ab in mucosal areas, where it plays an important role in mucosal defense (1). Mucosal IgA is produced by local plasma cells in the lamina propria as a dimeric molecule (dimeric IgA [dIgA]) in which two IgA molecules are coupled via a protein that is referred to as J chain. It is then transported through epithelial cells and released in the lumen as secretory IgA (SIgA), which plays an important role in mucosal defense as SIgA inhibits binding of micro-organisms to mucosal surfaces, and neutralizes bacterial products (2). SIgA contains an additional molecule, the secretory component (SC), which ensures stability of the complex in the hostile luminal environment. However, SC blocks at least partly the binding site for the IgA Fc receptor FcαRI or CD89 (3). As such, SIgA is a poor opsonin.

FcαRI is a member of the Fc receptor Ig superfamily that also includes Fc receptors for IgG and IgE, and is exclusively expressed on myeloid cells, including neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, and Kupffer cells (4–7). Cross-linking of FcαRI induces a multitude of proinflammatory functions that include phagocytosis, respiratory burst, degranulation, Ab-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, Ag presentation, and release of cytokines and inflammatory mediators (4, 8). Few FcαRI-positive cells are observed in mucosal areas in homeostatic conditions (9). In these conditions, dIgA most likely serves as an intermediary molecule, which is released as SIgA after transport through epithelial cells. However, bacteria that are opsonized with dIgA are effectively phagocytosed by polymorphonuclear cells (PMNs) (10). Moreover, we recently demonstrated that cross-linking of FcαRI resulted in PMN recruitment (9, 11), which may play an important role in mucosal immune defense when the lamina propria is invaded by pathogens.

PMNs are the most abundant circulating effector cells of the innate immune system (12). When micro-organisms invade tissues, PMNs rapidly migrate to the site of infection where they play a crucial role in the clearance of pathogens. They are terminally differentiated phagocytes with a short t1/2 and a primary function in immune defense against bacteria. As such, they are packed with an abundance of granules containing cytotoxic molecules (13). Production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and release of intracellular antimicrobial proteins are important for killing of pathogens. Furthermore, the release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) has been described as an additional tool in the arsenal of antimicrobial strategies. NETs are web-like structures that are extruded by neutrophils and have been demonstrated to trap and kill bacteria and fungi. NETs contain DNA, histones, and several granular and cytoplasmic antimicrobial proteins, like elastase and myeloperoxidase (MPO) (14, 15).

Two different forms of NETs have been described. First, rapid formation of NETs (within minutes) was reported, which was independent of oxidants (16). During this process PMN nuclei became condensed, and subsequent separation of the inner and outer nuclear membranes as well as budding of DNA-containing vesicles was observed, after which DNA was released in the extracellular space. This type of NET formation does not require breach of the plasma membrane or cell death. Second, release of NETs after several hours has been shown (14). This process is dependent on the generation of ROS as both the NADPH oxidase enzyme complex and MPO are involved (17–19). Furthermore, generation of these NETs is accompanied by breakdown of the nuclear envelope, decondensation of chromatin, and mixing of nuclear components with antimicrobial proteins. Eventually, the process culminates in cell membrane rupture and expulsion of NETs, resulting in cell death that is referred to as NETosis (17, 18, 20). This is a distinctly different type of cell death compared with apoptosis, which is generally accepted as the main type of cell death involved in PMN clearance after they have executed their antimicrobial functions (12, 21). Apoptosis involves nuclear changes as well. However, these include DNA fragmentation, shrinking of the nucleus without breakdown of membranes (pyknosis), and ultimately nuclear fragmentation. Furthermore, although apoptosis leads to membrane blebbing, the plasma membrane will not rupture, and no leakage of cellular components into the microenvironment will occur.

Because we previously demonstrated that FcαRI potently triggers activation of PMNs, which results in enhanced phagocytosis of IgA-opsonized bacteria as well as PMN migration (4, 7, 9, 11), we now investigated whether FcαRI plays a role in the induction of NETs, as this may represent an important additional defense mechanism in mucosal areas.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of human PMNs

PMNs were isolated from peripheral blood that was obtained from healthy donors using Lymphoprep (Axis-Shield, Oslo, Norway) density gradient centrifugation, after which erythrocytes were lysed in ammonium chloride buffer (155 mM NH4Cl, 10 mM KHCO3, and 0.11 mM EDTA, 10 min, room temperature). After lysis, PMNs were washed with PBS (B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany). Cells were resuspended in RPMI 1640 (Life Technologies, Paisley, U.K.) supplemented with glutamine and antibiotics. Additionally, a low concentration of 1% heat-inactivated (HI) FCS was added (60 min, 70°C), because FCS contains heat-stable nucleases that can interfere or break down NETs (22) (medium hereafter referred to as RPMI 1%). Blood samples were collected according to the guidelines of the Medical Ethical Committee of the VU University Medical Center (Amsterdam, The Netherlands), in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All donors gave informed consent.

Culture and labeling of bacteria

Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Salmonella typhimurium were cultured in standard LB medium (NaCl, BD Bacto tryptose, BD Bacto yeast in a ratio of 2:2:1; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) without antibiotics (rotary shaker). Bacteria were heat killed at 70°C for 60 min. Heat-killed and live bacteria were labeled fluorescently with FITC (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO; 10 μg/ml, 30 min, 37°C). After inactivation and labeling, bacteria were washed with PBS (5 min, 20,000 × g) and resuspended in PBS. Alternatively, unlabeled heat-killed or live bacteria were used to detect ROS or in some live-cell recording experiments (see below).

Preparation of BSA- and IgA-coated latex beads

Latex beads (carboxylate-modified polystyrene, nonfluorescent [0.9 μM] or green fluorescent [1.0 μM]; Sigma-Aldrich) were washed twice with 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic buffer (30 mM, pH 6.1) and resuspended in 2-(N-morpholino) ethanesulfonic buffer with 2 mg/ml BSA (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) or serum IgA (Cappel, MP Biomedicals, Santa Ana, CA) in the presence of N-(3-Dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-acid ethylcarbodimide hydrochloride (Sigma-Aldrich) and incubated for 2 h (overhead shaker). Latex beads were washed twice and resuspended in PBS containing 0.1% BSA.

Detection of IgA opsonization of bacteria

To detect whether bacteria were opsonized with specific IgA, S. aureus, E. coli, and S. typhimurium were incubated with pooled human serum IgA (Cappel; 1 mg/ml; 30 min, 37°C). (Of note, most healthy individuals have Abs against these prevalent bacteria in their serum.) After incubation with or without IgA, bacteria were washed with PBS and further incubated with FITC-conjugated polyclonal rabbit anti-human IgA Ab (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark; 1:50) for 30 min at 4°C. IgA binding to bacteria was analyzed with flow cytometry (FACSCalibur; BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ).

Phagocytosis assays

PMNs were allowed to settle (1 h, 37°C) before experiments. To determine phagocytosis of HI or live bacteria, PMNs (2 × 106) were incubated in glass disposable culture tubes (Duran Group, Wertheim/Main, Germany) for 30 min at 37°C (rotary shaker) in a total volume of 100 μl in the presence of bacteria (FITC labeled, E:T ratio; 1:35) with or without 1 mg/ml serum IgA (Cappel). After 30 min, cells were carefully resuspended in 15 ml PBS and centrifuged for 7 min at 240 × g to remove nonphagocytosed bacteria.

Alternatively, phagocytosis assays were performed with latex beads. PMNs were incubated in 96 (1 × 105)- or 24 (4 × 105)-well plates with green fluorescent BSA beads or IgA beads (E:T ratios; 1:25, 1:75, 1:150, and 1:300). After 30 min, cells were washed with HBSS (Life Technologies). Phagocytosis was detected on microscopic slides or quantified with flow cytometry (FACSCalibur). PMNs were preincubated with anti-FcαRI mAb MIP8a (AbD Serotec, Raleigh, NC; 20 μg/ml) for 20 min on ice to block FcαRI.

Live-cell imaging

PMNs were incubated with bacteria in the absence or presence of IgA for 30 min at 37°C. Cells were washed to remove nonphagocytosed bacteria, after which they were incubated in ibidi μ-slides (ibidi, Martinsried, Germany) (3 × 105/ well) and assayed with live-cell microscopy (Olympus IX81; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). When indicated, PMNs were labeled with Organelle ID Kit (ENZO Life Sciences, Farmingdale, NY; 1:1000), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (30 min, 37°C). In this case, unlabeled bacteria were used to avoid interference with the mitochondria labeling (green). In additional experiments, annexin V-FITC (BD Biosciences; 1:200) and 7-aminoactinomycin D (7-AAD; Invitrogen Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA; 1:1000) were added to the medium, and PMNs were monitored in time. Alternatively, nuclei of live PMNs were labeled with blue nuclear label (provided by ENZO Life Sciences; 1:1000), whereas PE-labeled mouse anti-histone H2A/H2B mAbs were added in the medium during recording (a gift of A. Zychlinsky, Max Planck Institute, Berlin, Germany; 1:200).

Diff-Quik and immunofluorescence staining of NETs

PMNs were inserted in Lab-Tek chamberslides (Nalge NUNC, Rochester, NY; 1.5 × 105/well) or on circular glass coverslips (Ø 12 mm) in 24-well plates (4 × 105/well). Chamberslides were coated overnight with 5% BSA in PBS. PMNs were stimulated with bacteria (E:T ratio of 1:35), in the presence or absence of serum IgA (1 mg/ml), for 3 h. Alternatively, PMNs were stimulated with BSA beads or IgA beads. Where indicated, DNase I (Roche, Penzberg, Germany; 20 U/ml) was added during stimulation. After incubation, cells were fixed for 15 min at room temperature with 4% paraformaldehyde, after which the fixative was removed and slides were stained with the Diff-Quik staining protocol according to the manufacturer’s guidelines (Medion Diagnostics, Düdingen, Switzerland). Alternatively, slides were stained with DAPI (Invitrogen Life Technologies; 1:10,000) to visualize DNA or with PE-labeled mouse anti-histone H2A/H2B mAbs (1:50), anti-MPO rabbit polyclonal Ab, or anti-neutrophil elastase rabbit polyclonal Ab (1:50; Calbiochem, Millipore, Billerica, MA). Cells were visualized using a Leica DM6000 microscope (Leica, Solms, Germany).

Scanning electron microscopy

For electron microscopy, coverslips containing PMNs, as described earlier, were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, after which all liquid was replaced by McDowell fixative solution (1% glutaraldehyde, 4% paraformaldehyde, 0.01 M sodium cacodilate [pH 7.4]). Afterward, cells were dehydrated in a graded ethanol series and hexamethyldisilazane. Samples were mounted on aluminum SEM specimen mount stubs (Electron Microscopy Sciences) and sputter-coated with gold, using Balzers Union SCD 040. Cells were examined in a scanning electron microscope (Model Phillips 525 with Orion Frame Grabler), operated at 15 KV, with a spot size of 30 nm.

Quantitative fluorometric analysis of NET release

After isolation, PMNs were allowed to settle (1 h, 37°C) and cells (1 × 105) were incubated in 96-well plates with nonfluorescent BSA beads or IgA beads (E:T ratios; 1:150 and 1:300) for 30 min at 37°C. After incubation, cells were washed twice with HBSS and carefully resuspended in RPMI 1% in black 96-well plates (FLUOTRAC 200; Greiner Bio-One). When indicated, DNase I (Roche; 20 U/ml) was added and PMNs were incubated for 3 h at 37°C, after which extracellular DNA was detected by adding nucleic acid label SYTOX Green (Invitrogen Life Technologies; 2.5μg/ml). OD was measured using a fluorimeter (FLUOstar/POLARstar; BMG Labtech, Offenburg, Germany) at 480 nm excitation, 520 nm emission.

ROS production and NADPH oxidase inhibition

After isolation, PMNs were allowed to settle (1 h, 37°C) and cells (1 × 105) were preloaded for 20 min at 37°C with the fluorescent probe 5-(and-6)-chloromethyl-2′7′-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (Invitrogen Life Technologies; 10 μM), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. After incubation, cells were washed twice with HBSS and carefully resuspended in RPMI 1% in black 96-well plates (FLUOTRAC 200; Greiner Bio-One). Cells were stimulated with nonfluorescent BSA beads or IgA beads (E:T ratio; 1:150) or bacteria (E:T ratio; 1:35) in the presence or absence of serum IgA (1 mg/ml). When indicated, the NADPH oxidase inhibitor diphenylene iodonium chloride (DPI; Sigma-Aldrich; 25 μM) was added and cells were measured every 5 min for 3 h in a preheated fluorimeter at 37°C (FLUOstar/POLARstar) at 480 nm excitation, 520 nm emission. Experiments were also performed in chamberslides to visualize NET formation after Diff-Quik staining.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 4 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA). Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Statistical differences were determined using unpaired Student two-tailed t test (2 groups), or with two-way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc (>2 groups). A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

IgA induces increased phagocytosis and cell death

To investigate whether targeting of FcαRI on PMNs induces the formation of NETs, PMNs were incubated with bacteria in the presence of serum IgA. dIgA is only produced in mucosal areas and as such difficult to obtain and potentially contaminated with bacterial products after isolation. We therefore used serum IgA, because previous research showed that serum IgA and dIgA are equally capable of activating PMNs (9). Phagocytosis of S. aureus by PMNs was more efficient when IgA was present, compared with phagocytosis of bacteria in the absence of IgA (Fig. 1A, left panels), as previously demonstrated (23). We now demonstrate that when cells were followed in time, great differences were observed in the shape of PMNs that had been incubated with bacteria and IgA compared with either nonstimulated PMNs or PMNs that had been incubated with S. aureus alone. Nonstimulated PMNs had a round shape, which did not alter over time (Fig. 1A, upper panels). PMNs that had been incubated with S. aureus had initially an irregular and elongated shape, but became more round after several hours (Fig. 1A, middle panels). After 16 h, some PMNs were disintegrated, comparable to unstimulated cells. By contrast, expansion in size and disintegration of PMNs that had been incubated with S. aureus and IgA was observed, which increased over time (Fig. 1A [lower panels], 1B, Supplemental Video 1).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

IgA increases phagocytosis and cell death. (A) Histology and time-lapse microscopy images from PMNs that were not stimulated (upper panels), PMNs that were incubated with S. aureus alone (middle panels), or after stimulation with S. aureus in the presence of IgA (lower panels) at different time points. Left column, Illustrates degree of phagocytosis after 30 min of incubation in each condition. This represents t = 0 h, after which the recording was started. The other panels show bright field microscopic images that were taken during live-cell recording at indicated time points. Asterisks (*) indicate disintegrated PMNs. Scale bars, 10 μm. (B) Quantification of the number of disintegrated PMNs at the indicated time points when cells were not stimulated (▪), incubated with S. aureus alone (▴), or after stimulation with S. aureus in the presence of IgA (▼). A representative example of eight experiments is shown.

IgA induces NETosis and release of NETs

Differential cell death of nonstimulated PMNs versus cell death after stimulation with IgA and bacteria was further studied by labeling PMNs with Organelle ID, which stains mitochondria (green fluorescence), lysosomes (red fluorescence), and nuclei (blue fluorescence) of live cells (Fig. 2A, Supplemental Video 2). No segregation of fluorescent staining was observed in nonstimulated cells (Fig. 2A, left panels). Over time, membrane blebbing was observed (in this particular cell after 168 min), which is a hallmark characteristic of apoptosis, after which PMNs rapidly regained a round shape. Nuclear changes were observed as well, as the nuclei became pyknotic or fragmented over time. Furthermore, cell membranes became positive for annexin V (green) as a result of the expression of the phospholipid component phosphatidylserine on the outside of the cell membrane, which represents another key characteristic of apoptosis (Fig. 2B, Supplemental Video 3). Ultimately, cells stained positive for the cell death marker 7-AAD, which binds DNA (red) when the integrity of the cell membrane has been disrupted.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

IgA induces NETosis and not apoptosis. (A) PMNs were labeled with Organelle ID staining and followed over time with live-cell microscopy when cells were not stimulated (left column) or after incubation with S. aureus and IgA (right column). Nuclei were stained in blue, and lysosomes or mitochondria were labeled red or green, respectively. Depicted for each time point are bright field images (upper left panels), nuclear staining (upper right panels), mitochondria and lysosomes combined (lower left panels), and overlays of all stainings and bright field with the time indication in min:sec:msec (lower right panels). (B) PMNs were incubated with the apoptosis marker annexin V (green) and a general cell death marker 7-AAD (red) and followed over time with live-cell microscopy. PMNs were either not stimulated (left column) or incubated with S. aureus and IgA (right column). Depicted for each time point are overlays of fluorescence and bright field with a time indication in min:sec:msec (left panels), bright field images alone (middle panels), or annexin V/7-AAD staining (right panels). Scale bars, 5 μm. The experiment was repeated three times with similar results.

Similar changes were observed when PMNs were incubated with S. aureus (data not shown). In contrast, when PMNs were incubated with IgA-opsonized S. aureus, shrinkage of the nucleus was accompanied by segregation of lysosomes (red) and mitochondria (green), which were relocated toward the cell membrane (Fig. 2A, right panel, in this particular cell at time point 57.32′; see also Supplemental Video 2). Furthermore, nuclear contents then subsequently rapidly diffused throughout the cell. Eventually, the cell membrane disintegrated and the majority of cellular components leaked into the environment, leaving only remnants of the cell. This process was clearly associated with cell death, as PMNs became positive for the general cell death marker 7-AAD (red) (Fig. 2B, Supplemental Video 3). The 7-AAD positivity was not preceded by annexin V membrane staining (green), as occurred in apoptotic cells, but, due to disruption of the cell membrane annexin V, did leak into the cell. Although variation in the onset of cell death was observed in either nonstimulated cells or PMNs that had phagocytosed IgA-opsonized bacteria, on average nonapoptotic cell death occurred at earlier time points (<8 h, compared with apoptosis in nonstimulated cells >8 h).

In addition to PMN cell death at earlier time points, which resembled characteristics of NETosis, such as nuclear disintegration and expansion and subsequent membrane rupture, release of web-like structures was observed when PMNs had phagocytosed IgA-opsonized S. aureus (Fig. 3A, 3B). Moreover, bacteria colocalized in this structure, supporting the formation of NETs after IgA-mediated phagocytosis. The formation of web-like structures was not observed when PMNs were not stimulated (Fig. 3A, 3B), and to a lesser extent after activation by S. aureus in the absence of IgA. The most prominent component of these structures was DNA (Fig. 3C), and NET formation after phagocytosis of IgA-opsonized bacteria was abrogated in the presence of DNase (Fig. 3A, right panel). NETs furthermore contained histones (Fig. 3D), neutrophil elastase (Fig. 3E), and MPO (Fig. 3F), which are prominent components of NETs (14). Real-time video recording demonstrated that NETs were formed immediately following disintegration of the nucleus (Fig. 3G, Supplemental Video 4). Nonstimulated cells went into apoptosis, as shown by blebbing of the membrane and pyknotic nuclei. However, no NETs were formed, even after prolonged time periods (Fig. 3H, Supplemental Video 4).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

IgA triggers NET formation. (A) PMNs were not stimulated (left panel), or stimulated with S. aureus and IgA in the absence (middle panel) or presence of DNase (right panel). After 3 h, slides were stained with Diff-Quik. Red arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bars, 10 μm. (B) PMNs were not stimulated (left panel) or stimulated with S. aureus in the absence (middle panel) or presence of IgA (right panel), and analyzed after 5 h with scanning electron microscopy. Red arrowheads indicate bacteria. (C) PMNs were stimulated with FITC-labeled S. aureus (green) and IgA. Nuclear DNA was stained with DAPI (blue) (left panel; overlay of FITC-bacteria and DNA, middle panel; DNA alone, right panel; FITC-bacteria alone). White arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 10 μm. Of note, cells were overexposed to be able to visualize NETs. (D) Fluorescence microscopy of PMNs stimulated with FITC-labeled (green) S. aureus (left panel) or S. aureus and IgA (right panel). Histones are stained in red. White arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 10 μm. (E, F) PMNs were stimulated with FITC-labeled (green) S. aureus and IgA and (E) neutrophil elastase and (F) MPO in NETs were stained in red. DNA was stained with DAPI (blue). White arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 10 μm. (G, H) PMNs were stained with a nuclear dye (blue), which stains live cells, and incubated in culture medium containing a PE-labeled anti-histone mAb, after which cells were followed over time with live-cell microscopy. (G) PMNs were incubated with S. aureus and IgA or (H) were not stimulated. Depicted for each time point are overlays of fluorescence and bright field with a time indication in min:sec:msec (left panels), bright field images only (middle panels), and nuclear/extracellular histone staining (right panels). Scale bar, 5 μm. Experiments were repeated three times, yielding similar results.

It was previously reported that secreted bacterial products can induce release of NETs (16). To investigate the involvement of IgA and FcαRI and exclude the influence of these bacterial products, we used HI S. aureus in previous experiments. Furthermore, we used different HI bacterial strains, which were incubated with pooled human serum IgA, after which IgA opsonization was determined. A high IgA titer was detected against E. coli, whereas IgA opsonization of S. aureus and S. typhimurium was moderate (Fig. 4A). Nonetheless, uptake of all IgA-opsonized bacteria resulted in NET formation, irrespective of the bacterial strain (Fig. 4B). However, a physiologic scenario most likely also entails phagocytosis of live bacteria. We therefore next studied phagocytosis and NET formation after incubation with either IgA-opsonized HI or live S. aureus. Uptake of bacteria was increased in the presence of IgA, but no differences were observed after incubation with either HI or live S. aureus (Fig. 4C). Similarly, both IgA-opsonized HI and live bacteria induced release of NETs, which was absent when PMNs were incubated with DNase (Fig. 4D).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Live and HI IgA-opsonized bacteria induce similar phagocytosis and NET release. (A) HI S. aureus (left panel), E. coli (middle panel), or S. typhimurium (right panel) were incubated in the absence (gray histogram) or presence (black line) of pooled human serum IgA, after which bacteria were further incubated with anti-human IgA-FITC Ab to determine opsonization with specific IgA. (B) PMNs were stimulated with IgA and S. aureus (left panel), E. coli (middle panel), or S. typhimurium (right panel). Red arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 25 μm. (C) PMNs were stimulated with FITC-labeled HI or live S. aureus, in the absence or presence of IgA, after which phagocytosis was measured with flow cytometry. Phagocytic index was calculated as the percentage of cells that had phagocytosed, multiplied by the geometric mean of FITC-positive cells. Results represent mean ± SEM. Experiments were repeated three times, yielding similar results. (D) PMNs were stimulated with HI (left panels) or live (right panels) S. aureus and IgA in the absence (upper panels) or presence (lower panels) of DNase. After a 3-h incubation period, slides were stained with Diff-Quik. Red arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 10 μm. n.s., nonsignificant.

NET release is dependent on FcαRI and production of ROS

It has been reported that the nonpermeable DNA dye SYTOX Green can be used to quantify NET formation (24). However, this assay proved unsuitable for quantification of NET release after stimulation of PMNs with HI bacteria, as bacterial DNA was stained as well (data not shown). To quantify IgA-induced NET release, we therefore established a phagocytosis assay with IgA-coated latex beads (IgA beads). PMNs and IgA beads were incubated in different E:T ratios. Significantly enhanced phagocytosis was observed when PMNs were incubated with IgA beads compared with phagocytosis of BSA beads, which increased at higher E:T (Fig. 5A). Furthermore, uptake of IgA beads induced release of NETs, as a significant increase in extracellular DNA was detected compared with PMNs that had been stimulated with BSA beads (Fig. 5B, 5C, and data not shown). Addition of DNase furthermore abrogated NET release (Fig. 5B, 5C).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Formation of NETs is dependent on FcαRI. (A) Phagocytosis of BSA beads (white bars) or IgA beads in the absence (black bars) or presence of anti-FcαRI blocking Ab MIP8a (gray bars) by PMNs. Phagocytic index was calculated as the percentage of cells that had phagocytosed, multiplied by the geometric mean of FITC-positive cells. Results represent mean ± SEM. Phagocytic index of IgA beads was significantly higher compared with phagocytic index of BSA beads, or IgA beads in the presence of MIP8a. Experiments were repeated four times with similar results. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01. (B) PMNs were stimulated with IgA beads in the absence (left panel) or presence of DNase (middle panel) or MIP8a (right panel) for 3 h, after which slides were stained with Diff-Quik. Red arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 10 μm. (C) Quantification of extracellular DNA (which reflects NETs) after 3 h when PMNs were either not stimulated (light gray bars) or stimulated with BSA beads (white bars) or IgA beads (black bars) in the absence (filled bars) or presence of DNase (striped bars). Additionally, PMNs were incubated with IgA beads and MIP8a (dark gray bars). Results represent mean ± SEM. Extracellular DNA was significantly higher after incubation with IgA beads compared with BSA beads or in the presence of DNase or MIP8a. One representative example of four experiments is shown. *p < 0.05. (D) PMNs were stimulated with HI (left panels) or live (right panels) S. aureus and IgA in the absence (upper panels) or presence (lower panels) of MIP8a. After a 3-h incubation period, slides were stained with Diff-Quik. Red arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 10 μm.

It was previously shown that activation of PMNs via IgA is mediated through FcαRI (7–10), which can be inhibited by blocking mAbs. Addition of the anti-FcαRI mAb MIP8a did not affect nonstimulated cells or PMNs that had been incubated with bacteria alone (data not shown). However, blocking of FcαRI abrogated both phagocytosis of IgA beads and NET formation (Fig. 5A–C). Similarly, phagocytosis of either HI or live IgA-opsonized S. aureus and concomitant NET release was inhibited by blocking FcαRI (Fig. 5D).

The activation of NADPH oxidase and the production of ROS are essential for the formation of NETs that are associated with NETosis (17, 18). As such, we investigated ROS production after phagocytosis of IgA-opsonized bacteria and IgA beads. Minimal ROS production was observed over time when PMNs were not stimulated, which was slightly increased when PMNs were incubated with BSA beads or live as well as HI S. aureus (Fig. 6A). However, when PMNs were incubated with IgA beads or with live as well as HI S. aureus in the presence of IgA, significantly increased ROS production was observed. This most likely explains why phagocytosis of IgA-opsonized particles resulted in enhanced NETosis and release of NETs. Furthermore, when PMNs were incubated with the NADPH oxidase inhibitor DPI, ROS production was abrogated (Fig. 6B). Even though phagocytosis still occurred in the presence of DPI, NET formation was abrogated upon activation with IgA-opsonized S. aureus (Fig. 6C), confirming that ROS is required for NET formation.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Formation of NETs is dependent on ROS production. (A) ROS production was measured over time (3 h) in unstimulated PMNs (◇) or after stimulation with HI or live S. aureus in the absence (□ or ○) or presence of IgA (▪ or ●). Additionally, PMNs were stimulated with BSA beads (▽) or IgA beads (▼). Results represent mean ± SEM. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. (B) PMNs were either not stimulated (◇) or stimulated with S. aureus and IgA in the absence (●) or presence (○) of the ROS inhibitor DPI. Results represent mean ± SEM. ***p < 0.001. (C) PMNs were stimulated with S. aureus and IgA in the absence (left panel) or presence (right panel) of DPI for 3 h. Slides were stained with Diff-Quik. Red arrowheads indicate NETs. Scale bar, 25 μm. Experiments were repeated three times with similar results.

Discussion

Mucosal surfaces cover a vast area in humans of ∼400 m2, where external influences, like commensal bacteria, food, or inhaled Ags, come into close contact with internal tissues (25). Whereas effective immunological responses against pathogenic micro-organisms must be initiated, disproportionate responses against innocuous Ags must be avoided. As such, a delicate equilibrium is required to maintain mucosal homeostasis. IgA plays an important role in this balance. Whereas SIgA prevents invasion of micro-organisms without inducing prominent inflammatory responses, dIgA can bind to FcαRI and trigger activation of PMNs (3, 9, 10). This is due to the presence of SC in SIgA, which (partly) blocks the binding site for FcαRI. As dIgA lacks SC, it can act as potent opsonin, and previous studies showed that dIgA is equally active in inducing phagocytosis or PMN migration, compared with serum IgA (9, 10). It has been demonstrated that opsonization of E. coli, Streptococcus pneumonia, S. aureus, Bordetella pertussis, Neisseria meningitides, and S. typhimurium with IgA (dIgA or serum IgA) resulted in enhanced uptake by PMNs (7, 9, 10, 26, 27) (data not shown).

We now show that enhanced uptake of IgA-opsonized bacteria or beads through FcαRI led to NETosis and increased release of NETs, compared with uptake of nonopsonized particles. This was presumably due to enhanced ROS production after uptake of IgA-coated particles, because NET formation was abrogated in the presence of a ROS inhibitor. Furthermore, NET release was observed after several hours and associated with cell death, which is different from the rapid, oxidant-independent NET release that has also been described (16). Cross-linking of FcαRI by IgA was sufficient to induce NET formation and did not require bacterial components, as both live and HI IgA-opsonized bacteria as well as IgA beads mediated release of NETs. Blocking FcαRI abrogated NET release after incubation of PMNS with IgA-opsonized particles.

The exact function of NETs in vivo is not yet completely elucidated. Bacterial strains that express DNase as virulence factor were shown to break down NETs and disseminate more efficiently (28–30). Furthermore, it was recently shown that NETs, which are formed in the vasculature, efficiently trapped bacteria in the bloodstream, and in vivo removal of NETs by administration of recombinant DNase promoted hypersusceptibility to sepsis (31–33). It was additionally demonstrated that NETs trap and eliminate HIV or pox virus, illustrating that NETs can act as antiviral immune defenses (34, 35). Thus, a role for NETs in early innate immunity is strongly supported. However, NET formation may also play a role in adaptive immune responses, as it was demonstrated that NETs stimulate plasmacytoid dendritic cells (36). Additionally, NETs were shown to prime T cells by reducing their threshold for activation (37).

The ability of NETs to kill micro-organisms is still debated. Several groups have demonstrated that formation of NETs impaired bacterial survival (14, 30, 38–40). However, others showed entrapment of bacteria or Candida albicans by NETs without killing (41). Also, in our experiments, we observed that IgA-induced NETs were able to ensnare live bacteria, but bacterial viability was not diminished (data not shown). As such, it is possible that, in addition to direct cytotoxic effects, NETs also function to contain bacteria for removal by other immune cells like macrophage (42, 43). In fact, dying of PMNs through NETosis may have a second function besides the release of NETs. It is generally accepted that uptake of apoptotic PMNs by macrophages plays an important role in downregulating immune responses, which is essential in preventing excessive inflammation and tissue damage. However, downregulation of immune responses while pathogens are still present may be counterproductive in preventing infectious complications. As such, we hypothesize that induction of NETosis prevents anti-inflammatory signals in macrophages, as it was shown that histones prevent efferocytosis (uptake of dying host cells) (44). Only after the pathogenic threat has been eliminated do PMNs die through apoptosis and are taken up by macrophages via efferocytosis, which will then result in resolution of inflammation and induction of homeostasis.

Aberrant NET formation has been associated with tissue damage, autoimmunity, and cancer development (45–48). It was recently demonstrated that NETs were involved in transfusion-related acute lung injury (46), neurotoxicity (47), and thrombosis (48). Histones, which are major components of NETs, were furthermore shown to induce epithelial and endothelial cell death (49). Interestingly, it was recently demonstrated that S. aureus can convert NETs into deoxyadenosine, which triggers cell death of immune cells (50). Moreover, as formation of NETs results in exposure of intracellular self molecules, NETs may be involved in the induction of autoimmunity, which is most evident in systemic lupus erythematosus (51, 52). Additionally, NETs are involved in autoimmune vasculitis (53), and impaired NET degradation was associated with lupus nephritis (54). It was recently shown that IgG immune complexes, which are often detected in autoimmune diseases, triggered NET formation (55, 56). We observed release of NETs after phagocytosis of IgG-coated bacteria by PMNs as well (data not shown). As such, IgG-induced NET formation most likely plays a role in systemic immunity, but has also been demonstrated to contribute to development of autoimmunity (55, 56). Furthermore, activation of the classical complement pathway by IgG and additional opsonization of bacteria with complement factors may contribute to activation of neutrophils and NET formation in the circulation or in interstitial fluids where IgG is the main Ab type.

In conclusion, we demonstrated that cross-linking of FcαRI by IgA induced NETosis and release of NETs, which was due to increased ROS production. We propose that this will help to contain infections at mucosal sites. Once bacteria have been able to evade the protective barriers of the mucosal wall, and have infiltrated the intestinal parenchyma, they will be opsonized by dIgA. This will cross-link FcαRI on PMNs that have been recruited into the mucosal tissue, resulting in enhanced NET formation, which can prevent systemic dissemination. Furthermore, induction of NETosis will avoid inappropriate downregulation of immune responses by macrophages at a time at which the infectious threat is still present. Only after pathogens have been cleared will PMNs go into apoptosis, which will signal the end of inflammation, after which anti-inflammatory responses are initiated. As such, our data reinforce the important protective role of IgA to clear infiltrating pathogens and to maintain homeostasis at mucosal sites.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. A. Zychlinsky (Max Planck Institute, Berlin, Germany) for providing anti-histone H2A/H2B mAbs. We also thank R. Korthouwer, M.Sc., R. Braster, M.Sc., and N. Blijleven for expert help with experiments and information technology.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VIDI 016.086.320).

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    7-AAD
    7-aminoactinomycin D
    dIgA
    dimeric IgA
    DPI
    diphenylene iodonium chloride
    HI
    heat inactivated
    MPO
    myeloperoxidase
    NET
    neutrophil extracellular trap
    PMN
    polymorphonuclear cell
    ROS
    reactive oxygen species
    SC
    secretory component
    SIgA
    secretory IgA.

  • Received January 28, 2013.
  • Accepted December 30, 2013.
  • Copyright © 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Fagarasan S.,
    2. T. Honjo
    . 2003. Intestinal IgA synthesis: regulation of front-line body defences. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3: 63–72.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Woof J. M.,
    2. M. A. Kerr
    . 2006. The function of immunoglobulin A in immunity. J. Pathol. 208: 270–282.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Herr A. B.,
    2. E. R. Ballister,
    3. P. J. Bjorkman
    . 2003. Insights into IgA-mediated immune responses from the crystal structures of human FcalphaRI and its complex with IgA1-Fc. Nature 423: 614–620.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Bakema J. E.,
    2. M. van Egmond
    . 2011. The human immunoglobulin A Fc receptor FcαRI: a multifaceted regulator of mucosal immunity. Mucosal Immunol. 4: 612–624.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Monteiro R. C.,
    2. R. W. Hostoffer,
    3. M. D. Cooper,
    4. J. R. Bonner,
    5. G. L. Gartland,
    6. H. Kubagawa
    . 1993. Definition of immunoglobulin A receptors on eosinophils and their enhanced expression in allergic individuals. J. Clin. Invest. 92: 1681–1685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Monteiro R. C.,
    2. H. Kubagawa,
    3. M. D. Cooper
    . 1990. Cellular distribution, regulation, and biochemical nature of an Fc alpha receptor in humans. J. Exp. Med. 171: 597–613.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. van Egmond M.,
    2. E. van Garderen,
    3. A. B. van Spriel,
    4. C. A. Damen,
    5. E. S. van Amersfoort,
    6. G. van Zandbergen,
    7. J. van Hattum,
    8. J. Kuiper,
    9. J. G. van de Winkel
    . 2000. FcalphaRI-positive liver Kupffer cells: reappraisal of the function of immunoglobulin A in immunity. Nat. Med. 6: 680–685.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Monteiro R. C.,
    2. J. G. Van De Winkel
    . 2003. IgA Fc receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21: 177–204.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    van der Steen, L., C. W. Tuk, J. E. Bakema, G. Kooij, A. Reijerkerk, G. Vidarsson, G. Bouma, G. Kraal, H. E. de Vries, R. H. Beelen, and M. van Egmond. 2009. Immunoglobulin A: Fc(alpha)RI interactions induce neutrophil migration through release of leukotriene B4. Gastroenterology 137: 2018–2029.e1–3.
  8. ↵
    1. Vidarsson G.,
    2. W. L. van Der Pol,
    3. J. M. van Den Elsen,
    4. H. Vilé,
    5. M. Jansen,
    6. J. Duijs,
    7. H. C. Morton,
    8. E. Boel,
    9. M. R. Daha,
    10. B. Corthésy,
    11. J. G. van De Winkel
    . 2001. Activity of human IgG and IgA subclasses in immune defense against Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B. J. Immunol. 166: 6250–6256.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. van der Steen L. P.,
    2. J. E. Bakema,
    3. A. Sesarman,
    4. F. Florea,
    5. C. W. Tuk,
    6. G. Kirtschig,
    7. J. J. Hage,
    8. C. Sitaru,
    9. M. van Egmond
    . 2012. Blocking Fcα receptor I on granulocytes prevents tissue damage induced by IgA autoantibodies. J. Immunol. 189: 1594–1601.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Amulic B.,
    2. C. Cazalet,
    3. G. L. Hayes,
    4. K. D. Metzler,
    5. A. Zychlinsky
    . 2012. Neutrophil function: from mechanisms to disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 30: 459–489.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Borregaard N.
    2010. Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity 33: 657–670.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Brinkmann, V., U. Reichard, C. Goosmann, B. Fauler, Y. Uhlemann, D. S. Weiss, Y. Weinrauch, and A. Zychlinsky. 2004. Neutrophil extracellular traps kill bacteria. Science 303: 1532-1535.
  13. ↵
    1. Urban C. F.,
    2. D. Ermert,
    3. M. Schmid,
    4. U. Abu-Abed,
    5. C. Goosmann,
    6. W. Nacken,
    7. V. Brinkmann,
    8. P. R. Jungblut,
    9. A. Zychlinsky
    . 2009. Neutrophil extracellular traps contain calprotectin, a cytosolic protein complex involved in host defense against Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog. 5: e1000639.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Pilsczek F. H.,
    2. D. Salina,
    3. K. K. Poon,
    4. C. Fahey,
    5. B. G. Yipp,
    6. C. D. Sibley,
    7. S. M. Robbins,
    8. F. H. Green,
    9. M. G. Surette,
    10. M. Sugai,
    11. et al
    . 2010. A novel mechanism of rapid nuclear neutrophil extracellular trap formation in response to Staphylococcus aureus. J. Immunol. 185: 7413–7425.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Fuchs T. A.,
    2. U. Abed,
    3. C. Goosmann,
    4. R. Hurwitz,
    5. I. Schulze,
    6. V. Wahn,
    7. Y. Weinrauch,
    8. V. Brinkmann,
    9. A. Zychlinsky
    . 2007. Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Cell Biol. 176: 231–241.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Metzler K. D.,
    2. T. A. Fuchs,
    3. W. M. Nauseef,
    4. D. Reumaux,
    5. J. Roesler,
    6. I. Schulze,
    7. V. Wahn,
    8. V. Papayannopoulos,
    9. A. Zychlinsky
    . 2011. Myeloperoxidase is required for neutrophil extracellular trap formation: implications for innate immunity. Blood 117: 953–959.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Papayannopoulos V.,
    2. K. D. Metzler,
    3. A. Hakkim,
    4. A. Zychlinsky
    . 2010. Neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase regulate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps. J. Cell Biol. 191: 677–691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Remijsen Q.,
    2. T. W. Kuijpers,
    3. E. Wirawan,
    4. S. Lippens,
    5. P. Vandenabeele,
    6. T. Vanden Berghe
    . 2011. Dying for a cause: NETosis, mechanisms behind an antimicrobial cell death modality. Cell Death Differ. 18: 581–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Luo H. R.,
    2. F. Loison
    . 2008. Constitutive neutrophil apoptosis: mechanisms and regulation. Am. J. Hematol. 83: 288–295.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. von Köckritz-Blickwede M.,
    2. O. A. Chow,
    3. V. Nizet
    . 2009. Fetal calf serum contains heat-stable nucleases that degrade neutrophil extracellular traps. Blood 114: 5245–5246.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Gorter A.,
    2. P. S. Hiemstra,
    3. P. C. Leijh,
    4. M. E. van der Sluys,
    5. M. T. van den Barselaar,
    6. L. A. van Es,
    7. M. R. Daha
    . 1987. IgA- and secretory IgA-opsonized S. aureus induce a respiratory burst and phagocytosis by polymorphonuclear leucocytes. Immunology 61: 303–309.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Brinkmann V.,
    2. B. Laube,
    3. U. Abu Abed,
    4. C. Goosmann,
    5. A. Zychlinsky
    . 2010. Neutrophil extracellular traps: how to generate and visualize them. J. Vis. Exp. 24: pii: 1724.
  23. ↵
    1. Pamer E. G.
    2007. Immune responses to commensal and environmental microbes. Nat. Immunol. 8: 1173–1178.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Hellwig S. M.,
    2. A. B. van Spriel,
    3. J. F. Schellekens,
    4. F. R. Mooi,
    5. J. G. van de Winkel
    . 2001. Immunoglobulin A-mediated protection against Bordetella pertussis infection. Infect. Immun. 69: 4846–4850.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. van der Pol W.,
    2. G. Vidarsson,
    3. H. A. Vilé,
    4. J. G. van de Winkel,
    5. M. E. Rodriguez
    . 2000. Pneumococcal capsular polysaccharide-specific IgA triggers efficient neutrophil effector functions via FcalphaRI (CD89). J. Infect. Dis. 182: 1139–1145.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Chang A.,
    2. A. Khemlani,
    3. H. Kang,
    4. T. Proft
    . 2011. Functional analysis of Streptococcus pyogenes nuclease A (SpnA), a novel group A streptococcal virulence factor. Mol. Microbiol. 79: 1629–1642.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Midon M.,
    2. P. Schäfer,
    3. A. Pingoud,
    4. M. Ghosh,
    5. A. F. Moon,
    6. M. J. Cuneo,
    7. R. E. London,
    8. G. Meiss
    . 2011. Mutational and biochemical analysis of the DNA-entry nuclease EndA from Streptococcus pneumoniae. Nucleic Acids Res. 39: 623–634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Uchiyama S.,
    2. F. Andreoni,
    3. R. A. Schuepbach,
    4. V. Nizet,
    5. A. S. Zinkernagel
    . 2012. DNase Sda1 allows invasive M1T1 group A Streptococcus to prevent TLR9-dependent recognition. PLoS Pathog. 8: e1002736.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Clark S. R.,
    2. A. C. Ma,
    3. S. A. Tavener,
    4. B. McDonald,
    5. Z. Goodarzi,
    6. M. M. Kelly,
    7. K. D. Patel,
    8. S. Chakrabarti,
    9. E. McAvoy,
    10. G. D. Sinclair,
    11. et al
    . 2007. Platelet TLR4 activates neutrophil extracellular traps to ensnare bacteria in septic blood. Nat. Med. 13: 463–469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. McDonald B.,
    2. R. Urrutia,
    3. B. G. Yipp,
    4. C. N. Jenne,
    5. P. Kubes
    . 2012. Intravascular neutrophil extracellular traps capture bacteria from the bloodstream during sepsis. Cell Host Microbe 12: 324–333.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Meng W.,
    2. A. Paunel-Görgülü,
    3. S. Flohé,
    4. A. Hoffmann,
    5. I. Witte,
    6. C. Mackenzie,
    7. S. E. Baldus,
    8. J. Windolf,
    9. T. T. Lögters
    . 2012. Depletion of neutrophil extracellular traps in vivo results in hypersusceptibility to polymicrobial sepsis in mice. Crit. Care 16: R137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Jenne C. N.,
    2. C. H. Wong,
    3. F. J. Zemp,
    4. B. McDonald,
    5. M. M. Rahman,
    6. P. A. Forsyth,
    7. G. McFadden,
    8. P. Kubes
    . 2013. Neutrophils recruited to sites of infection protect from virus challenge by releasing neutrophil extracellular traps. Cell Host Microbe 13: 169–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Saitoh T.,
    2. J. Komano,
    3. Y. Saitoh,
    4. T. Misawa,
    5. M. Takahama,
    6. T. Kozaki,
    7. T. Uehata,
    8. H. Iwasaki,
    9. H. Omori,
    10. S. Yamaoka,
    11. et al
    . 2012. Neutrophil extracellular traps mediate a host defense response to human immunodeficiency virus-1. Cell Host Microbe 12: 109–116.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Skrzeczynska-Moncznik J.,
    2. A. Wlodarczyk,
    3. K. Zabieglo,
    4. M. Kapinska-Mrowiecka,
    5. E. Marewicz,
    6. A. Dubin,
    7. J. Potempa,
    8. J. Cichy
    . 2012. Secretory leukocyte proteinase inhibitor-competent DNA deposits are potent stimulators of plasmacytoid dendritic cells: implication for psoriasis. J. Immunol. 189: 1611–1617.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Tillack K.,
    2. P. Breiden,
    3. R. Martin,
    4. M. Sospedra
    . 2012. T lymphocyte priming by neutrophil extracellular traps links innate and adaptive immune responses. J. Immunol. 188: 3150–3159.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Cooper P. R.,
    2. L. J. Palmer,
    3. I. L. Chapple
    . 2013. Neutrophil extracellular traps as a new paradigm in innate immunity: friend or foe? Periodontol. 2000 63: 165–197.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
    1. Parker H.,
    2. A. M. Albrett,
    3. A. J. Kettle,
    4. C. C. Winterbourn
    . 2012. Myeloperoxidase associated with neutrophil extracellular traps is active and mediates bacterial killing in the presence of hydrogen peroxide. J. Leukoc. Biol. 91: 369–376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Sémiramoth N.,
    2. A. Gleizes,
    3. I. Turbica,
    4. C. Sandré,
    5. V. Marin-Esteban,
    6. R. Gorges,
    7. A. Servin,
    8. S. Chollet-Martin
    . 2010. Afa/Dr-expressing, diffusely adhering Escherichia coli strain C1845 triggers F1845 fimbria-dependent phosphatidylserine externalization on neutrophil-like differentiated PLB-985 cells through an apoptosis-independent mechanism. Infect. Immun. 78: 2974–2983.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Menegazzi R.,
    2. E. Decleva,
    3. P. Dri
    . 2012. Killing by neutrophil extracellular traps: fact or folklore? Blood 119: 1214–1216.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Farrera C.,
    2. B. Fadeel
    . 2013. Macrophage clearance of neutrophil extracellular traps is a silent process. J. Immunol. 191: 2647–2656.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Harding M.,
    2. P. Kubes
    . 2012. Innate immunity in the vasculature: interactions with pathogenic bacteria. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 15: 85–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Friggeri, A., S. Banerjee, N. Xie, H. Cui, A. De Freitas, M. Zerfaoui, H. Dupont, E. Abraham, and G. Liu. 2012. Extracellular histones inhibit efferocytosis. Mol. Med. 18: 825-833.
  40. ↵
    1. Cools-Lartigue J.,
    2. J. Spicer,
    3. B. McDonald,
    4. S. Gowing,
    5. S. Chow,
    6. B. Giannias,
    7. F. Bourdeau,
    8. P. Kubes,
    9. L. Ferri
    . 2013. Neutrophil extracellular traps sequester circulating tumor cells and promote metastasis. J. Clin. Invest.123: 3446–3458.
  41. ↵
    1. Caudrillier A.,
    2. K. Kessenbrock,
    3. B. M. Gilliss,
    4. J. X. Nguyen,
    5. M. B. Marques,
    6. M. Monestier,
    7. P. Toy,
    8. Z. Werb,
    9. M. R. Looney
    . 2012. Platelets induce neutrophil extracellular traps in transfusion-related acute lung injury. J. Clin. Invest. 122: 2661–2671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Allen C.,
    2. P. Thornton,
    3. A. Denes,
    4. B. W. McColl,
    5. A. Pierozynski,
    6. M. Monestier,
    7. E. Pinteaux,
    8. N. J. Rothwell,
    9. S. M. Allan
    . 2012. Neutrophil cerebrovascular transmigration triggers rapid neurotoxicity through release of proteases associated with decondensed DNA. J. Immunol. 189: 381–392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. von Brühl M. L.,
    2. K. Stark,
    3. A. Steinhart,
    4. S. Chandraratne,
    5. I. Konrad,
    6. M. Lorenz,
    7. A. Khandoga,
    8. A. Tirniceriu,
    9. R. Coletti,
    10. M. Köllnberger,
    11. et al
    . 2012. Monocytes, neutrophils, and platelets cooperate to initiate and propagate venous thrombosis in mice in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 209: 819–835.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Saffarzadeh M.,
    2. C. Juenemann,
    3. M. A. Queisser,
    4. G. Lochnit,
    5. G. Barreto,
    6. S. P. Galuska,
    7. J. Lohmeyer,
    8. K. T. Preissner
    . 2012. Neutrophil extracellular traps directly induce epithelial and endothelial cell death: a predominant role of histones. PLoS One 7: e32366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Thammavongsa, V., D. M. Missiakas, and O. Schneewind. 2013. Staphylococcus aureus degrades neutrophil extracellular traps to promote immune cell death. Science 342: 863-866.
  46. ↵
    1. Knight J. S.,
    2. M. J. Kaplan
    . 2012. Lupus neutrophils: ‘NET’ gain in understanding lupus pathogenesis. Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 24: 441–450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Lande R.,
    2. D. Ganguly,
    3. V. Facchinetti,
    4. L. Frasca,
    5. C. Conrad,
    6. J. Gregorio,
    7. S. Meller,
    8. G. Chamilos,
    9. R. Sebasigari,
    10. V. Riccieri,
    11. et al
    . 2011. Neutrophils activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells by releasing self-DNA-peptide complexes in systemic lupus erythematosus. Sci. Transl. Med. 3: 73ra19.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Kessenbrock K.,
    2. M. Krumbholz,
    3. U. Schönermarck,
    4. W. Back,
    5. W. L. Gross,
    6. Z. Werb,
    7. H. J. Gröne,
    8. V. Brinkmann,
    9. D. E. Jenne
    . 2009. Netting neutrophils in autoimmune small-vessel vasculitis. Nat. Med. 15: 623–625.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Hakkim A.,
    2. B. G. Fürnrohr,
    3. K. Amann,
    4. B. Laube,
    5. U. A. Abed,
    6. V. Brinkmann,
    7. M. Herrmann,
    8. R. E. Voll,
    9. A. Zychlinsky
    . 2010. Impairment of neutrophil extracellular trap degradation is associated with lupus nephritis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 9813–9818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Chen K.,
    2. H. Nishi,
    3. R. Travers,
    4. N. Tsuboi,
    5. K. Martinod,
    6. D. D. Wagner,
    7. R. Stan,
    8. K. Croce,
    9. T. N. Mayadas
    . 2012. Endocytosis of soluble immune complexes leads to their clearance by FcγRIIIB but induces neutrophil extracellular traps via FcγRIIA in vivo. Blood 120: 4421–4431.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Short K. R.,
    2. M. von Kockritz-Blickwede,
    3. J. D. Langereis,
    4. K. Y. Chew,
    5. E. R. Job,
    6. C. W. Armitage,
    7. B. Hatcher,
    8. K. Fujihashi,
    9. P. C. Reading,
    10. P. W. Hermans,
    11. et al
    . 2014. Antibodies mediate the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) in the middle ear and facilitate secondary pneumococcal otitis media. Infect. Immun. 82: 364-370.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 192 (5)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 192, Issue 5
1 Mar 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IgA Enhances NETosis and Release of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps by Polymorphonuclear Cells via Fcα Receptor I
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
IgA Enhances NETosis and Release of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps by Polymorphonuclear Cells via Fcα Receptor I
Esil Aleyd, Miel W. M. van Hout, Sonja H. Ganzevles, Kees A. Hoeben, Vincent Everts, Jantine E. Bakema, Marjolein van Egmond
The Journal of Immunology March 1, 2014, 192 (5) 2374-2383; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300261

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
IgA Enhances NETosis and Release of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps by Polymorphonuclear Cells via Fcα Receptor I
Esil Aleyd, Miel W. M. van Hout, Sonja H. Ganzevles, Kees A. Hoeben, Vincent Everts, Jantine E. Bakema, Marjolein van Egmond
The Journal of Immunology March 1, 2014, 192 (5) 2374-2383; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1300261
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis Reveals Neutrophil as Orchestrator during β-Glucan–Induced Trained Immunity in a Teleost Fish
  • Ornithine Decarboxylase in Gastric Epithelial Cells Promotes the Immunopathogenesis of Helicobacter pylori Infection
  • Single-Cell Analysis Reveals the Range of Transcriptional States of Circulating Human Neutrophils
Show more INNATE IMMUNITY AND INFLAMMATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606