Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: DNAX Accessory Molecule 1–Deficient CD8+ T Cells Display Immunological Synapse Defects That Impair Antitumor Immunity

Kelly M. Ramsbottom, Edwin D. Hawkins, Raz Shimoni, Mairi McGrath, Christopher J. Chan, Sarah M. Russell, Mark J. Smyth and Jane Oliaro
J Immunol January 15, 2014, 192 (2) 553-557; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1302197
Kelly M. Ramsbottom
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Edwin D. Hawkins
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raz Shimoni
†Centre for Micro-Photonics, Swinburne University, Hawthorn 3122, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mairi McGrath
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J. Chan
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia;
‡Department of Immunology, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah M. Russell
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia;
†Centre for Micro-Photonics, Swinburne University, Hawthorn 3122, Victoria, Australia;
§Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark J. Smyth
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia;
‡Department of Immunology, Monash University, Clayton 3168, Victoria, Australia;
¶Immunology in Cancer and Infection Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, Herston 4006, Queensland, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jane Oliaro
*Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne 3002, Victoria, Australia;
§Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville 3052, Victoria, Australia; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

DNAX accessory molecule 1 (DNAM-1) is expressed on all CD8+ T cells and promotes their activation and effector function. DNAM-1 interacts with LFA-1, a critical molecule for immunological synapse formation between T cells and APCs, and for cytotoxic killing of target cells. Mice that lack DNAM-1 display abnormal T cell responses and antitumor activity; however, the mechanism involved is unclear. In this article, we show that DNAM-1 deficiency results in reduced proliferation of CD8+ T cells after Ag presentation and impaired cytotoxic activity. We also demonstrate that DNAM-1–deficient T cells show reduced conjugations with tumor cells and decreased recruitment of both LFA-1 and lipid rafts to the immunological synapse, which correlates with reduced tumor cell killing in vitro. This synapse defect may explain why DNAM-1–deficient mice cannot clear tumors in vivo, and highlights the importance of DNAM-1 and the immunological synapse in T cell–mediated antitumor immunity.

Introduction

Cytotoxic CD8+ T cells form an integral part of the immune response against pathogens (1) and in the immunosurveillance of cancer (2). The activation of naive CD8+ T cells is dependent on TCR–MHC class I interactions with APCs, during which sustained contact between the T cell and APC leads to formation of an immunological synapse. The IS is a polarized structure that brings together the receptors, adhesion molecules, and adaptor proteins necessary for optimal signaling and downstream effector T cell functions such as cytokine secretion and cytotoxic activity (3). The activation and cytotoxic activity of CD8+ T cells is fine-tuned by a range of cosignaling molecules, such as members of the CD28 family (4). Another less characterized group of costimulatory molecules important for CD8+ T cell function are those of the Ig superfamily of receptors. These receptors bind to nectin and nectin-like proteins, and include DNAX accessory molecule 1 (DNAM-1; CD226, PTA-1) and others (5). DNAM-1 interacts with the polarity protein, Discs Large, and the actin binding protein, 4.1G, to mediate cytoskeletal changes important for cell adhesion (6). DNAM-1 also interacts with the integrin LFA-1 (7–9), an important mediator of stable conjugation and synapse formation between T cells and APCs or target cells (10).

Studies using DNAM-1 gene–deficient mice (DNAM-1−/−) have highlighted the importance of DNAM-1 in both protection against infectious agents and control of tumor growth. DNAM-1−/− mice take longer to clear lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection (11). DNAM-1 expression on NK cells promotes cytotoxic activity against DNAM-1 ligand-expressing tumor cells (5, 12), whereas DNAM-1−/− mice show impaired antitumor responses in vivo (13). DNAM-1 ligands are frequently overexpressed by tumor cells (12, 14), and polymorphisms in the DNAM-1 gene are associated with the development of autoimmune diseases (15, 16). However, the mechanism by which DNAM-1 contributes to T cell activation remains unclear. DNAM-1 may be involved in direct T cell signaling pathways or the cell–cell interactions required for optimal T cell activation and effector function. We therefore investigated the response of CD8+ T cells from DNAM-1–deficient mice to Ag presentation and their interaction with tumor cells in vitro. Our results demonstrate that DNAM-1 is required for optimal activation of naive CD8+ T cells, and for efficient conjugation and synapse formation between effector CD8+ T cells and tumor cells.

Materials and Methods

Mice and Abs

The C57BL/6 DNAM-1−/− mice were kindly supplied by Marco Colonna (Washington State University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) and backcrossed onto the T cell transgenic OT-1 mouse background (Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre). OT-1 DNAM-1+/+ and OT-I DNAM-1−/− littermates were used for all experiments. The Abs for flow cytometry were rat anti-Vα2, -CD62L, -CD25, -CD69, -CD44, -CD127, -CD107a, mouse anti–granzyme B, –IFN-γ and –TNF-α (BD Biosciences), and anti-DNAM-1 (Biolegend); for microscopy, they were purified rat anti–LFA-1 and -CD43 (BD Biosciences), phalloidin-rhodamine (Molecular Probes), rabbit anti-GM1 (Calbiochem, MERK Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), and rabbit and rat anti-tubulin (Rockland). Secondary Abs conjugated to Alexa Fluorophores and ProLong antifade with DAPI were purchased from Molecular Probes.

In vitro T cell assays

Naive T cells were purified from splenocytes isolated from OT-1 DNAM-1+/+ or DNAM-1−/− mice by negative selection using an EasySep magnetic separation system (Stemcell Technologies, Vancouver, BC, Canada). Immature dendritic cells (DCs) were generated as previously described (17). For proliferation assays, isolated naive T cells were labeled with CFSE and incubated with 1 μM SIINKEL-pulsed DCs. The cells were harvested and analyzed for proliferation peaks by flow cytometry or for the concentration of cytokines in the supernatant using a Mouse Inflammation Cytometric Bead Array kit (BD Biosciences) after 72 h. Intracellular staining was performed using Cytofix/Cytoperm reagents (BD Biosciences). Cytotoxic activity of activated T cells was measured by a standard chromium release assay (18) using chromium-labeled MC38-OVA tumor cells or labeled/SIINFEKL-pulsed DCs as targets. For the conjugation assay, activated T cells (day 5) were labeled with CellTrace Violet Dye (Molecular Probes) and incubated with CFSE-labeled, SIINFEKL-pulsed EL4 tumor cells at 37°C. The cells were vortexed to separate any non-Ag-specific conjugates, and the cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and analyzed by flow cytometry for the presence of double-positive conjugates.

Immunofluorescent microscopy

MC38-OVA tumor cells were adhered overnight onto eight-well chamber slides (Nalge Nunc, Rochester, NY). Activated T cells were overlaid for 1–2 h and nonadherent cells washed off. Cells were fixed and permeabilized and then labeled with primary Abs, followed by detection with Alexa Fluor–conjugated secondary Abs and mounted in Prolong antifade containing DAPI (Molecular Probes), as previously described (17). The slides were examined using a Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, NY) mounted with a 60× oil immersion objective (NA 1.42). T cells selected for protein scoring had a single contact site with one tumor cell and polarized microtubule-organizing center (MTOC). Polarization to the synapse was determined by quantitating the amount of nonnuclear fluorescence in the proximal (P) region (first third of T cell closest to tumor cell) and distal (D) region (rest of T cell), and the ratio was determined by P-D/P+D where values approaching 1 represent strong polarization to the interface of the two cells (Supplemental Fig. 2C). Data were acquired using Matlab and TACTICS software (19).

Statistical analyses

Statistical significance was determined using an unpaired Student t test.

Results and Discussion

DNAM-1 is required for optimal expansion of naive CD8+ T cells in response to Ag presentation

Because DNAM-1 has been implicated in impaired T cell responses to infection in vivo (11), we first determined whether naive T cells deficient for DNAM-1 responded normally to Ag presentation. We used naive CD8+ T cells from OT-I DNAM-1 wild-type (DNAM-1+/+) or deficient (DNAM-1−/−) mice to assess proliferation and cytokine production in an Ag-specific response to SIINFEKL-pulsed syngeneic DCs in vitro. Although naive DNAM-1−/− T cells displayed a wild-type phenotype (CD62LhiCD44medCD25−CD69−; Supplemental Fig. 1A), they showed reduced proliferation, as measured by dilution of the division tracking dye CFSE, compared with DNAM-1+/+ T cells when stimulated with peptide-pulsed DCs (Fig. 1A). We also detected lower amounts of two key CD8+ T cell effector cytokines, IFN-γ and TNF-α, in the supernatant of DNAM-1−/− T cell–DC cocultures (Fig. 1B). This was a consequence of reduced T cell numbers, because DNAM-1−/− and DNAM-1+/+ T cells produced equivalent levels of intracellular IFN-γ and TNF-α upon stimulation with peptide-pulsed DCs (Supplemental Fig. 1C). This is consistent with previous data demonstrating that during acute lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus priming, CD8+ T cells from DNAM-1−/− mice make equivalent levels of IFN-γ compared with DNAM+/+ T cells (11). The reduced proliferation was not a result of TCR signaling defects, because anti-CD3/CD28 Ab stimulation resulted in proliferation and cytokine levels equivalent between DNAM-1+/+ and DNAM-1−/− T cells (Supplemental Fig. 1D, 1E). These results indicate that expression of DNAM-1 on CD8+ T cells contributes to optimal T cell activation and proliferation in response to Ag presentation by DCs.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

DNAM-1–deficient T cells show reduced proliferation, cytokine production, and cytotoxic activity, but normal polarity. (A) CFSE dilution assay of naive OT-1 DNAM-1+/+ or DNAM-1−/− T cells in response to DCs pulsed with 1 μM SIINFEKL peptide. FACS plots represent T cells at 72 h after incubation with DCs. (B) Naive T cells were cocultured with DCs pulsed with 1 μM SIINFEKL, and the concentration of IFN-γ and TNF-α in the supernatant at 72 h was measured by cytometric bead array. Data are presented as mean and SD of triplicate samples. (C) Activated T cells were cultured in an eight-well chamber slide overnight, then fixed and permeabilized. The cells were stained for actin, tubulin (red), LFA-1, or CD43 (green) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. The protein of interest is costained with tubulin and DAPI (blue), except for tubulin, which is costained with CD8 (green). Images shown are representative of localization of each protein over at least three independent experiments. Scale bar, 10 μM. (D) Activated T cells were tested in a chromium release killing assay with peptide-pulsed DCs as target cells. Data are presented as mean and SD of triplicate samples. All data in (A)–(C) are representative of at least three independent experiments. *p < 0.05.

DNAM-1–deficient CD8+ effector T cells demonstrate normal phenotype and morphology in vitro but reduced cytotoxic activity

Despite a reduction in proliferation and differentiation kinetics, a proportion of DNAM-1−/− T cells were activated and proliferated in vitro. To determine whether this change in activation kinetics affected the phenotype or polarity of responding T cells, we first used flow cytometry to assess the cell-surface profile of the activated T cells. Activated DNAM-1−/− T cells upregulated CD44, CD69, and CD25, and downregulated CD62L to equivalent levels as DNAM-1+/+ T cells (Supplemental Fig. 1B). The activated DNAM-1−/− T cells also displayed no detectable defects in polarization of actin and LFA-1 to the leading edge, CD43 to the uropod, and localization of the MTOC to the base of the uropod, as assessed by confocal microscopy (Fig. 1C). However, activated DNAM-1−/− T cells did show impaired cytotoxic activity against peptide-pulsed DCs (Fig. 1D). Both DNAM-1−/− and DNAM+/+ T cells expressed equivalent levels of the cytotoxic molecule, Granzyme B, and showed no difference in degranulation after TCR stimulation (Supplemental Fig. 2A, 2B). Together, these data suggest that the DNAM-1 is critical for the cell–cell contact required for efficient killing of target cells by CD8+ T cells.

DNAM-1 is required for optimal conjugation and killing of tumor cells by CD8+ effector T cells

To explore potential reasons for the defect in killing shown earlier, we next determined whether activated DNAM-1−/− T cells display normal cytotoxic activity against tumor cells that express the ligands for DNAM-1 (CD155 and CD112) (5). Mice deficient for DNAM-1 have impaired antitumor responses using models dependent on both NK and CD8+ T cell activity (5, 20). Furthermore, the association of DNAM-1 with LFA-1 and proteins that mediate cytoskeletal changes in T cells such as Dlg and 4.1G (6, 21) suggests a role for this accessory molecule in cell–cell interactions. We therefore assessed the ability of the DNAM-1−/− T cells to form conjugates with tumor cells in vitro using a flow cytometry–based conjugation assay. We found that activated DNAM-1−/− effector T cells formed significantly less conjugates than DNAM-1+/+ T cells (Fig. 2A, quantitated on right), confirming that the absence of DNAM-1 impairs the stable interaction between T cells and tumor cells. Furthermore, consistent with our previous data showing that DNAM-1−/− mice do not clear MC38-OVA tumors in vivo (22), the DNAM-1−/− T cells showed reduced cytotoxic activity against MC38-OVA tumor cells in vitro, as determined by a chromium release assay (Fig. 2B). These results demonstrate that DNAM-1 expression on CD8+ T cells is critical for efficient conjugation and killing of Ag-presenting tumor cells.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Activated DNAM-1–deficient T cells show reduced conjugation, cytotoxic activity, and synapse formation with tumor cells. (A) Activated OT-I DNAM-1+/+ or DNAM-1−/− T cells were labeled with Cell Trace and cocultured with CFSE-labeled SIINFEKL-pulsed EL4 tumor cells and analyzed by flow cytometry after 60 min. The graph is of percentage of total T cells conjugated to tumor cells at 60 min and is data pooled from three independent experiments. Data are presented as mean and SD. (B) Activated T cells were tested in a chromium release killing assay with MC38-OVA or empty vector (EV) tumor cells as target cells. Data are representative of at least four independent experiments with mean and SD of triplicate samples from one representative experiment shown. (C) Activated T cells were cocultured with adhered MC38-OVA tumor cells in an eight-well chamber slide. After 1–2 h, the conjugates were fixed, permeabilized, and stained for tubulin (MTOC), actin, LFA-1, and GM1 (lipid rafts). The protein of interest is shown in green, and the merge includes DAPI/nucleus (blue) and tubulin (red), except for tubulin/MTOC, which is costained with actin (red) (D) Quantification of polarization of proteins at the synapse (LFA-1, n = 68; GM1, n = 48; actin, n = 61). (C and D) Images and quantification are pooled from three independent experiments. Scale bar, 10 μM. *p < 0.05.

DNAM-1 deficiency results in impaired immunological synapse formation between CD8+ effector T cells and tumor cells

To determine whether reduced cytotoxic activity of the DNAM-1−/− T cells against MC38-OVA tumor cells was a result of impaired cytotoxic synapse formation between the T cells and tumor cells, we used immunofluorescent microscopy to dissect the polarization of synapse components during T cell–tumor cell interactions. Despite fewer conjugates being formed, in the DNAM-1−/− T cells that attached to a tumor cell, we found the MTOC was recruited to the synapse, along with enrichment of actin at the interface of the two cells. However, we observed significantly impaired polarization of LFA-1 and lipid rafts (as determined by Ganglioside, GM-1, localization) to the interface between the OT-1 DNAM-1−/− T cells and tumor cells (Fig. 2C and quantified in Fig. 2D).

Formation of a “suboptimal” cytotoxic synapse, and subsequent inability to secrete effector molecules in a directed manner, may therefore account for the reduced cytotoxic activity of DNAM-1−/− T cells against tumor cells in vivo. Strong interactions between T cells and target cells is dependent on cell-surface molecules such as TCR and LFA-1, but is also controlled by cytoskeletal dynamics and the integrity of lipid rafts (23). The reduced polarization of both LFA-1 and lipid rafts containing costimulatory molecules such as DNAM-1 (9, 24) would therefore impact on conjugation efficiency and in the activation and cytotoxic activity of the T cells. Indeed, DNAM-1 is important for the LFA-1 costimulatory signal necessary for naive CD4+ T cell differentiation and proliferation (8). LFA-1–deficient mice show normal cytotoxic T cell responses to virus but fail to reject immunogenic tumors (25), suggesting that LFA-1 may also play a significant role in the interaction of CD8+ T cells with tumor cells.

Together, our results suggest that DNAM-1 deficiency affects T cell function in a 2-fold manner: 1) reduced activation of responding effector T cells, and 2) reduced ability of activated T cells to form an IS with target cells and deliver the cytotoxic payload necessary for elimination of target cells. Furthermore, our results demonstrate that these defects are manifested through suboptimal formation of a cytotoxic synapse involving reduced polarization of LFA-1 and lipid rafts. These results highlight the importance of DNAM-1 in the control of optimal synapse formation required for effective antitumor T cell responses.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Marco Colonna (Washington State University School of Medicine) for the DNAM-1 mice and Nicole Haynes (Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre) for the MC38-OVA cell line.

Footnotes

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    D
    distal
    DC
    dendritic cell
    DNAM-1
    DNAX accessory molecule 1
    MTOC
    microtubule-organizing center
    P
    proximal.

  • Received August 22, 2013.
  • Accepted November 15, 2013.
  • Copyright © 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Zhang N.,
    2. M. J. Bevan
    . 2011. CD8(+) T cells: foot soldiers of the immune system. Immunity 35: 161–168.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Vesely M. D.,
    2. M. H. Kershaw,
    3. R. D. Schreiber,
    4. M. J. Smyth
    . 2011. Natural innate and adaptive immunity to cancer. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 29: 235–271.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Dustin M. L.,
    2. A. K. Chakraborty,
    3. A. S. Shaw
    . 2010. Understanding the structure and function of the immunological synapse. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2: a002311.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Chen L.,
    2. D. B. Flies
    . 2013. Molecular mechanisms of T cell co-stimulation and co-inhibition. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 13: 227–242.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Chan C. J.,
    2. D. M. Andrews,
    3. M. J. Smyth
    . 2012. Receptors that interact with nectin and nectin-like proteins in the immunosurveillance and immunotherapy of cancer. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 24: 246–251.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Ralston K. J.,
    2. S. L. Hird,
    3. X. Zhang,
    4. J. L. Scott,
    5. B. Jin,
    6. R. F. Thorne,
    7. M. C. Berndt,
    8. A. W. Boyd,
    9. G. F. Burns
    . 2004. The LFA-1-associated molecule PTA-1 (CD226) on T cells forms a dynamic molecular complex with protein 4.1G and human discs large. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 33816–33828.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Shibuya K.,
    2. L. L. Lanier,
    3. J. H. Phillips,
    4. H. D. Ochs,
    5. K. Shimizu,
    6. E. Nakayama,
    7. H. Nakauchi,
    8. A. Shibuya
    . 1999. Physical and functional association of LFA-1 with DNAM-1 adhesion molecule. Immunity 11: 615–623.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Shibuya K.,
    2. J. Shirakawa,
    3. T. Kameyama,
    4. S. Honda,
    5. S. Tahara-Hanaoka,
    6. A. Miyamoto,
    7. M. Onodera,
    8. T. Sumida,
    9. H. Nakauchi,
    10. H. Miyoshi,
    11. A. Shibuya
    . 2003. CD226 (DNAM-1) is involved in lymphocyte function-associated antigen 1 costimulatory signal for naive T cell differentiation and proliferation. J. Exp. Med. 198: 1829–1839.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Shirakawa J.,
    2. Y. Wang,
    3. S. Tahara-Hanaoka,
    4. S. Honda,
    5. K. Shibuya,
    6. A. Shibuya
    . 2006. LFA-1-dependent lipid raft recruitment of DNAM-1 (CD226) in CD4+ T cell. Int. Immunol. 18: 951–957.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Springer T. A.,
    2. M. L. Dustin
    . 2012. Integrin inside-out signaling and the immunological synapse. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24: 107–115.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Welch M. J.,
    2. J. R. Teijaro,
    3. H. A. Lewicki,
    4. M. Colonna,
    5. M. B. Oldstone
    . 2012. CD8 T cell defect of TNF-α and IL-2 in DNAM-1 deficient mice delays clearance in vivo of a persistent virus infection. Virology 429: 163–170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chan C. J.,
    2. D. M. Andrews,
    3. N. M. McLaughlin,
    4. H. Yagita,
    5. S. Gilfillan,
    6. M. Colonna,
    7. M. J. Smyth
    . 2010. DNAM-1/CD155 interactions promote cytokine and NK cell-mediated suppression of poorly immunogenic melanoma metastases. J. Immunol. 184: 902–911.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Iguchi-Manaka A.,
    2. H. Kai,
    3. Y. Yamashita,
    4. K. Shibata,
    5. S. Tahara-Hanaoka,
    6. S. Honda,
    7. T. Yasui,
    8. H. Kikutani,
    9. K. Shibuya,
    10. A. Shibuya
    . 2008. Accelerated tumor growth in mice deficient in DNAM-1 receptor. J. Exp. Med. 205: 2959–2964.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Castriconi R.,
    2. A. Dondero,
    3. F. Negri,
    4. F. Bellora,
    5. P. Nozza,
    6. B. Carnemolla,
    7. A. Raso,
    8. L. Moretta,
    9. A. Moretta,
    10. C. Bottino
    . 2007. Both CD133+ and CD133- medulloblastoma cell lines express ligands for triggering NK receptors and are susceptible to NK-mediated cytotoxicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 37: 3190–3196.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Qiu Z. X.,
    2. K. Zhang,
    3. X. S. Qiu,
    4. M. Zhou,
    5. W. M. Li
    . 2013. CD226 Gly307Ser association with multiple autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis. Hum. Immunol. 74: 249–255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Song G.,
    2. S. C. Bae,
    3. S. Choi,
    4. J. Ji,
    5. Y. Lee
    . 2012. Association between the CD226 rs763361 polymorphism and susceptibility to autoimmune diseases: a meta-analysis. Lupus 21: 1522–1530.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Oliaro J.,
    2. V. Van Ham,
    3. F. Sacirbegovic,
    4. A. Pasam,
    5. Z. Bomzon,
    6. K. Pham,
    7. M. J. Ludford-Menting,
    8. N. J. Waterhouse,
    9. M. Bots,
    10. E. D. Hawkins,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Asymmetric cell division of T cells upon antigen presentation uses multiple conserved mechanisms. J. Immunol. 185: 367–375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Oliaro J.,
    2. A. Pasam,
    3. N. J. Waterhouse,
    4. K. A. Browne,
    5. M. J. Ludford-Menting,
    6. J. A. Trapani,
    7. S. M. Russell
    . 2006. Ligation of the cell surface receptor, CD46, alters T cell polarity and response to antigen presentation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 18685–18690.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Shimoni R.,
    2. K. Pham,
    3. M. Yassin,
    4. M. Gu,
    5. S. M. Russell
    . 2013. TACTICS, an interactive platform for customized high-content bioimaging analysis. Bioinformatics 29: 817–818.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Fuchs A.,
    2. M. Colonna
    . 2006. The role of NK cell recognition of nectin and nectin-like proteins in tumor immunosurveillance. Semin. Cancer Biol. 16: 359–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Ludford-Menting M. J.,
    2. J. Oliaro,
    3. F. Sacirbegovic,
    4. E. T. Cheah,
    5. N. Pedersen,
    6. S. J. Thomas,
    7. A. Pasam,
    8. R. Iazzolino,
    9. L. E. Dow,
    10. N. J. Waterhouse,
    11. et al
    . 2005. A network of PDZ-containing proteins regulates T cell polarity and morphology during migration and immunological synapse formation. Immunity 22: 737–748.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Gilfillan S.,
    2. C. J. Chan,
    3. M. Cella,
    4. N. M. Haynes,
    5. A. S. Rapaport,
    6. K. S. Boles,
    7. D. M. Andrews,
    8. M. J. Smyth,
    9. M. Colonna
    . 2008. DNAM-1 promotes activation of cytotoxic lymphocytes by nonprofessional antigen-presenting cells and tumors. J. Exp. Med. 205: 2965–2973.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Lim T. S.,
    2. A. Mortellaro,
    3. C. T. Lim,
    4. G. J. Hämmerling,
    5. P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli
    . 2011. Mechanical interactions between dendritic cells and T cells correlate with T cell responsiveness. J. Immunol. 187: 258–265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Shirakawa J.,
    2. K. Shibuya,
    3. A. Shibuya
    . 2005. Requirement of the serine at residue 329 for lipid raft recruitment of DNAM-1 (CD226). Int. Immunol. 17: 217–223.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Schmits R.,
    2. T. M. Kündig,
    3. D. M. Baker,
    4. G. Shumaker,
    5. J. J. Simard,
    6. G. Duncan,
    7. A. Wakeham,
    8. A. Shahinian,
    9. A. van der Heiden,
    10. M. F. Bachmann,
    11. et al
    . 1996. LFA-1-deficient mice show normal CTL responses to virus but fail to reject immunogenic tumor. J. Exp. Med. 183: 1415–1426.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 192 (2)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 192, Issue 2
15 Jan 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: DNAX Accessory Molecule 1–Deficient CD8+ T Cells Display Immunological Synapse Defects That Impair Antitumor Immunity
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: DNAX Accessory Molecule 1–Deficient CD8+ T Cells Display Immunological Synapse Defects That Impair Antitumor Immunity
Kelly M. Ramsbottom, Edwin D. Hawkins, Raz Shimoni, Mairi McGrath, Christopher J. Chan, Sarah M. Russell, Mark J. Smyth, Jane Oliaro
The Journal of Immunology January 15, 2014, 192 (2) 553-557; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302197

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: DNAX Accessory Molecule 1–Deficient CD8+ T Cells Display Immunological Synapse Defects That Impair Antitumor Immunity
Kelly M. Ramsbottom, Edwin D. Hawkins, Raz Shimoni, Mairi McGrath, Christopher J. Chan, Sarah M. Russell, Mark J. Smyth, Jane Oliaro
The Journal of Immunology January 15, 2014, 192 (2) 553-557; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1302197
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: T Cell Responses to B.1.1.529 (Omicron) SARS-CoV-2 Variant Induced by COVID-19 Infection and/or mRNA Vaccination Are Largely Preserved
  • Cutting Edge: SARS-CoV-2 Infection Induces Robust Germinal Center Activity in the Human Tonsil
  • Cutting Edge: Enhanced Antitumor Immunity in ST8Sia6 Knockout Mice
Show more CUTTING EDGE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606