Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Nα-Terminal Acetylation for T Cell Recognition: Molecular Basis of MHC Class I–Restricted Nα-Acetylpeptide Presentation

Mingwei Sun, Jun Liu, Jianxun Qi, Boris Tefsen, Yi Shi, Jinghua Yan and George F. Gao
J Immunol June 15, 2014, 192 (12) 5509-5519; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1400199
Mingwei Sun
*School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China;
†CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jun Liu
‡National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jianxun Qi
†CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Boris Tefsen
†CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yi Shi
†CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
§Research Network of Immunity and Health, Beijing Institutes of Life Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jinghua Yan
†CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
George F. Gao
*School of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China;
†CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China;
‡National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China; and
§Research Network of Immunity and Health, Beijing Institutes of Life Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

As one of the most common posttranslational modifications (PTMs) of eukaryotic proteins, Nα-terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) generates a class of Nα-acetylpeptides that are known to be presented by MHC class I at the cell surface. Although such PTM plays a pivotal role in adjusting proteolysis, the molecular basis for the presentation and T cell recognition of Nα-acetylpeptides remains largely unknown. In this study, we determined a high-resolution crystallographic structure of HLA (HLA)-B*3901 complexed with an Nα-acetylpeptide derived from natural cellular processing, also in comparison with the unmodified-peptide complex. Unlike the α-amino–free P1 residues of unmodified peptide, of which the α-amino group inserts into pocket A of the Ag-binding groove, the Nα-linked acetyl of the acetylated P1-Ser protrudes out of the groove for T cell recognition. Moreover, the Nt-acetylation not only alters the conformation of the peptide but also switches the residues in the α1-helix of HLA-B*3901, which may impact the T cell engagement. The thermostability measurements of complexes between Nα-acetylpeptides and a series of MHC class I molecules derived from different species reveal reduced stability. Our findings provide the insight into the mode of Nα-acetylpeptide–specific presentation by classical MHC class I molecules and shed light on the potential of acetylepitope-based immune intervene and vaccine development.

Introduction

Produced by Ag processing and proteasomal degradation of intracellular proteins, polypeptides serve as CTL epitopes presented by MHC class I molecules, which play a critical role in cellular immunity (1). Eukaryotic proteins bearing various posttranslational modifications (PTMs) can generate a group of modified Ags, which contribute to a special repertoire of MHC-associated peptides presented at the cell surface as potential targets for TCR-mediated recognition. A modified peptide may become a new Ag because of the distinguished antigenicity compared with its unmodified homolog. A variety of natural peptide Ags containing modification have been observed that can be immunologically discriminated by T cells from their unmodified homologs as “altered self” (2). Thus, the significance of PTMs on epitopes and the application of modified peptides in vaccine development for immunotherapy against cancer and autoimmune diseases have been increasingly appreciated (3, 4).

The molecular bases of the presentation of peptides with several PTMs by MHC class I molecules have been successfully explicated. For instance, the formyl group on an Nt-formylated peptide binds to the bottom of the peptide-binding groove of H2-M3 (5); both the glycan and the phosphate moieties of the central region of the glycopeptides (6, 7) and the phosphopeptides (8, 9), respectively, are exposed to enable TCR binding, and the deimination (citrullination) of arginine on a peptide presented by two HLA-B27 subtypes induces distinct peptide conformations (10).

Nα-terminal acetylation (Nt-acetylation) is one of the most common PTMs, occurring on the vast majority of eukaryotic proteins. In humans, >80% of the different varieties of intracellular proteins are irreversibly Nt-acetylated by Nα-acetyltransferases, often after the removal of the initiator methionine. Only a subset of the penultimate residues (Ala, Ser, Thr, Cys, and Val) or the retained initiator methionine can be acetylated at the α-amino (NH2) groups (11). A recent study found that acetylated N-terminal residues of eukaryotic proteins act as specific degradation signals (Ac-N-degrons) that are recognized by specific ubiquitin ligases (12). A subsequent systematic analysis demonstrated that Nt-acetylation can also represent an early determining factor in the cellular sorting for prevention of protein targeting to the secretory pathway (13). These findings suggested that Nt-acetylation–mediated inhibition of secretion could contribute to the retention of proteins in the cytosol where they may subsequently be ubiquitinylated through the specific recognition of their Ac-N-degrons and thereby generating Nt-acetylated proteasomal digestion products (14). Hence, these Nt-acetylated polypeptides in the form of MHC-associated neoantigens stand a good chance to be recognized by T cells. This has indeed been illuminated in an Nt-acetylated MHC class II–restricted peptide derived from myelin basic protein, which stimulates murine T cells to elicit experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis, whereas the nonacetylated form does not (15). A structural study subsequently suggested that the Nt-acetylation of this peptide is essential for MHC class II binding (16).

For MHC class I, the first Nt-acetylated natural ligand was identified more than a decade ago (17). However, the mode of interaction of this acetylated peptide with class I molecules remained largely enigmatic. To understand this, we determined the crystal structures of a naturally occurring Nt-acetylated self-peptide (NAc-SL9) and two nonmodified variants (SL9 and HL8), respectively, in complex with HLA-B*3901. Taken together with the thermostability analyses of Nα-acetylpeptides complexed with a series of class I molecules of human and murine origin, we elucidated that Nt-acetylation exerts a destabilizing effect on peptide–MHC (pMHC) complex, thereby influencing TCR recognition.

Materials and Methods

Peptide synthesis

All peptides used in this study were synthesized and purified to >90% by ChinaPeptides (Shanghai, China). Each peptide was stored in lyophilized aliquots at −80°C and dissolved in DMSO to a final concentration of 10–50 mg/ml before use. A summary of the peptide characteristics is presented in Table I.

Expression, purification, crystallization and data collection

Briefly, truncated HLA-B*3901 H chain (residues 1–274) and human β2-microglobulin (β2m) were expressed respectively as inclusion bodies using BL21(DE3) strain of Escherichia coli and subsequently refolded and assembled in the presence of peptides as described previously (26, 27). After incubation at 277 K for 24–48 h, the soluble portion of the complexes were concentrated and purified by size exclusion and subsequently by anion-exchange chromatography. The three pHLA-B*3901 complexes were finally concentrated to 4–8 mg/ml (20 mM Tris [pH 8] and 50 mM NaCl) and subsequently crystallized after being mixed in a 1: 1 ratio with crystallization reservoir solution (NAc-SL9: 0.1 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M Bis-Tris [pH 6.5], and 17% [w/v] polyethylene glycol [PEG] 10,000; SL9: 0.1 M ammonium acetate, 0.1 M Bis-Tris [pH 6.5], and 20% [w/v] PEG 10,000; HL8: 0.2 M sodium formate, and 20% [w/v] PEG 3,350) by the hanging-drop vapor diffusion method at 277 K. For cryoprotection, each crystal was first soaked in reservoir solution supplemented with 17% (v/v) glycerol, and then flash-cooled and maintained at 100 K in a cryostream (28). X-ray diffraction data were collected at beamline BL17U on Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility. Raw data were indexed, integrated, corrected for absorption, scaled, and merged using HKL2000 program (29).

Structure determination, refinement, and analysis

All crystals of pHLA-B*3901 belong to the P212121 space group. The structures were solved by molecular replacement method using MOLREP program with HLA-B*2705 (Protein Data Bank 2BST) as a search model (30), which were manually rebuilt with COOT program under the guidance of Fo-Fc and 2Fo-Fc electron density maps (31). Restrained refinements were performed with REFMAC5 program (30) and followed by isotropic atomic displacement parameter refinement and bulk solvent modeling in phenix.refine (32). During the process of model building and refinement, the peptides and water molecules were built into unambiguous electron density. The stereochemical quality of the structure was verified with PROCHECK program (33). Different from the NAc-SL9 complex, two clear solutions in both the rotation and translation functions corresponded to the two molecules in one asymmetric unit of SL9 or HL8 complex. A summary of X-ray data collection, refinement, and validation statistics are presented in Table II. Structural figures were produced with PyMOL program (DeLano Scientific) for displaying molecular three-dimensional model and electron density. Unless otherwise specified, figure generation and calculational analysis were performed based on one uniform molecule in the asymmetric units.

The atomic coordinates of the crystal structures of HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9, HLA-B*3901SL9, and HLA-B*3901HL8 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (http://www.pdb.org/pdb/home/home.do) with accession number 4O2C (http://pdb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4O2C), 4O2E (http://pdb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4O2E), and 4O2F (http://pdb.org/pdb/search/structidSearch.do?structureId=4O2F), respectively.

Thermostability measurements using circular dichroism

The thermostability of MHC class I complexes formed with Nα-acetylpeptides and nonacetylpeptides were tested by circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy. All complexes were refolded and purified beforehand as described above and measured at 150 μg/ml in a solution of 20 mM Tris (pH 8) and 50 mM NaCl. CD spectra at 218 nm were measured on a Chirascan spectrometer (Applied Photophysics) using a thermostatically controlled cuvette at temperature intervals of 0.1°C at a rate of 1°C/min between 25 and 90°C. The denaturation curves were generated by nonlinear fitting with OriginPro 8.0 program (OriginLab).

Results

Overall structures

Eukaryotic proteins having an N-terminal serine are most frequently acetylated (11). The acetylserine-containing peptide NAc-SL9 (NAc-SHVAVENAL) in our study was chosen based on its natural presentation by at least three allotypes of HLA-B39 (B*3901, B*3905, and B*3909), and its direct generation by the 20S proteasome as a major breakdown product of the corresponding parental protein (Table I) (17, 18). The structure of HLA-B*3901 bound with NAc-SL9 was solved in this study to a resolution of 1.8 Å (Table II). The overall structure of HLA-B*3901 resembles that of other published class I allotypes, with a H chain containing three extracellular domains (α1, α2, and α3) for binding peptide ligands (Fig. 1A, 1B).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I. Characteristics of the peptides used in this study
View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II. Data collection and refinement statistics
FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Overall structure of HLA-B*3901 in complex with Nα-acetylpeptide. (A) Overview of HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 structure. Cyan, α1 domain; green, α2 domain; chartreuse, α3 domain; blue, β2m; yellow, NAc-SL9, including an acetyl group (red) covalently linked to P1-Ser. (B) Vertical view of the HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 peptide-binding surface with α1-α2 platform in orthogonal model. White, α1-α2 platform; yellow, NAc-SL9; black and red in ball-and-stick model, acetyl group. Pockets A–F are labeled in black letters. (C) Orientation of the NAc-SL9 and SL9 side chains relative to HLA-B*3901 and the TCR (refer to the direction sign above), viewing along the peptide from the N terminus to the C terminus. Arrows labeled with residues indicate side-chain orientation. Red “Ace” (acetyl) and blue “S1” (P1-Ser) lettering shows a significant positional swap between the acetyl and the P1-Ser side chain.

To assess the influence of Nt-aceylation in the interaction of the acetylpeptide with MHC class I, we also solved the structures of HLA-B*3901 bound with the nonacetylated peptide SL9 (SHVAVENAL). Both the unmodified and Nt-acetylated peptide bind to HLA-B*3901 in a featured mode with a central bulge revealed by the unambiguous electron density (Fig. 2A, 2B). In both peptides, P2-His and Pc-Leu are completely buried as the primary anchor residues, whereas P3-Val also points downward toward pocket D of the Ag-binding groove and subdominantly contributes to peptide binding (Fig. 1C). The surface-exposed residues in the central region of the peptide interact with the H chain via water-mediated hydrogen (H)-bonds (Table III). Moreover, the side chains of P6-Glu and P7-Asn point upward and both comprise potential TCR contact sites. The third peptide of which we solved the structure in complex with HLA-B*3901 is HL8 (HVAVENAL), a natural truncated analog of NAc-SL9 isolated from the same HLA-B39–bound peptide pool (18). The side chain orientations of HL8 residues are essentially identical to those of SL9 residues except for the absence of P1-Ser (Fig. 2C). Summarizing, there is no change in extended direction of the residue side chains between the NAc-SL9 and SL9/HL8 peptides except the P1 residue (Fig. 1C).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Peptide conformations, interactions of the peptide NH2 termini within Ag-binding groove. The peptides have differently colored C-atoms (yellow, NAc-SL9; magenta, SL9; cyan, HL8) and the acetyl is colored pale cyan in all panels. (A–C) The 2Fo-Fc electron density maps of NAc-SL9 (A), SL9 (B), and HL8 (C) contoured at 1.0 σ are shown as colored mesh viewed in profile with the α2 helix removed for clarity. (D–F) H-bonding interactions between the NH2 termini of peptides and the residues constituting components of pocket A. Green indicates H chain side chains. Cyan spheres indicate conserved water molecules. (G–I) Peptide-binding grooves are shown in surface representation with pocket A highlighted in green. The residues that compose pocket A are shown in lines representation and labeled. The P1 residues of three peptides (NAc-Ser in NAc-SL9, Ser in SL9, and His in HL8) are shown in stick representation.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table III. Interactions between the peptides and the HLA-B*3901 residues

Unique rotation of the Nt-acetylated P1 residue

Most peptides presented on MHC class I have their terminal NH2 groups placed in pocket A (34). The free peptide NH2 group binds the class I molecules through two conserved H-bonds to Tyr7 and Tyr171, respectively, at the bottom of pocket A, essentially in a peptide sequence-independent mode (35). These interactions ensure the lowest Gibb’s free-energy for the peptide binding state, and were observed in the HLA-B*3901SL9 structure (Fig. 2E). However, in the HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 structure, the acetyl group added to the N terminus of P1-Ser is energetically unfavorable for burial within the pocket A, resulting in a unique rotation of the P1 dihedral angle ψ by ∼150°, rotating the acetyl group into the position normally occupied by the P1 side chain. A superposition of the Ag-binding grooves reveals a considerable uplift of the P1 residue, which raises the NAc-Ser Cα-atom ∼1.4 Å compared with its Ser counterpart in SL9. The methyl C-atom of the acetyl in NAc-SL9 is also elevated to 3.0 Å higher relative to the P1-Ser Oγ-atom in SL9 (Fig. 3).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Conformational comparison of the three peptides presented by HLA-B*3901. Peptide alignment by superposition of α1 helices of the HLA-B*3901 shows that the majority of conformational alterations are located in the NH2 termini and the central regions of peptide main chain. Yellow, NAc-SL9; magenta, SL9; cyan, HL8. The acetyl group is shown as ball-and-stick model and colored in pale cyan (C atoms) and red (O atom).

Although NAc-SL9 undergoes conformational changes around the acetylation site, similar interactions to those seen in HLA-B*3901SL9 are maintained at the bottom of pocket A. The rotation of the P1 residue eliminates the contacts of Tyr7 and Tyr171 with the NH2 group but the contacts are substituted by the hydroxyl group of NAc-Ser (Fig. 2D, 2E). Specifically, the acetyl interacts with a completely conserved Trp167 residue on the α2-helix of the H chain through an H-bond and indirectly through a water-mediated H-bond (Fig. 2D), both of which seem significant in stabilizing the acetyl binding. The rearrangement of the H-bonding network as well as the rotation of the P1 residue occurring in pocket A are unique features that have never been described in previous reports of MHC class I structures.

Nt-acetylation alters the conformation of the peptide main chain

In addition to the large rotation of the P1 residue, another substantial elevation (1.2 Å) was observed in the central region of the peptide main chain of NAc-SL9 (Figs. 3, 4A), which shows the highest degree of solvent exposure for direct contact with the TCR. The O-atom of the acetyl interacts with the carbonyl O-atom of P2-His via another water-mediated H-bond (Figs. 2F, 4B). Thus, the acetyl group and the P2 main chain are constrained to each other, which stressfully results in deformation of the peptide main chain and an indirect lift of the P6-P7 residues.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Two distinct conformations of peptides presented by HLA-B*3901. (A and C) Elevated residues in the central region of peptides revealed by superposition of the α1 helices. (A) Peptide alignment of NAc-SL9 (yellow) and SL9 (magenta). (B) Water-mediated H-bonds bridge the acetyl and the H2 main chain. Red frames in (A) and (B) correspond to the same area. (C) Peptide alignment of the two molecules in the same asymmetric unit of HLA-B*3901HL8. The peptides with H1 residues shown in stick and the Arg62s in their corresponding molecules were colored in cyan and green, respectively. (D) Arg62 interacts with the H2 main chain via two H-bonds. Blue frames in (C) and (D) correspond to the same area.

A similar elevation of the peptide main chain also was observed when the two molecules in the same asymmetric unit of the HLA-B*3901HL8 structure were compared (Fig. 4C). In both molecules, P1-His of HL8 occupies pocket B to serve as the N-terminal anchor residue without the canonical P1 interaction; the NH2 group of P1-His provides an H-bond with Tyr7 but not with Tyr171, and a water molecule bridges the NH2 group of HL8 and a Tyr159 on the α2-helix as a substitute for the carbonyl of the absent P1 residue (Fig. 2F). However, two distinct conformations of Arg62 were observed in these two molecules (Fig. 4C) (discussed below). One of them has a conformation as the Arg62 in HLA-B*3901SL9, and the other one switches its side chain to stretch over pocket A, and directly contacts the P1-His main chain by H-bonding interactions (Fig. 4D). The interactions appear to have the effect of “pulling” the peptide up out of the binding site creating the same pattern as the water bridge in HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 (Fig. 4B).

A “knife-switch” of Arg62

Comparison of the two HLA-B*3901 molecules in complex with SL9 and NAc-SL9 reveals that dramatic conformational differences in the H chain mainly focus on three residues in the α1-helix [i.e., Glu58, Gln65, and especially Arg62 (Fig. 5A, Supplemental Fig. 1)]. For HLA-B*3901SL9, the Arg62 side chain is captured and tethered down toward the peptide N terminus by an H-bond from the P1-Ser Oγ-atom. For NAc-SL9, in addition to the steric hindrance, the hydrophilic Arg62 guanidine group is not compatible with the hydrophobic environment created by the methyl moiety of the acetyl. Therefore, this Arg62 has to undergo a local reorientation so that its Cγ-atom faces toward the methyl, thereby forming a hydrophobic interaction. The charged Arg62 guanidine group switches away and pulls the Gln65 over via an H-bond. Meanwhile, the flexible Glu58 side chain rotates to interact with its own carbonyl O-atom (Supplemental Fig. 1).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Residue switching around the acetylation site shown by superposition of the α1 helices. (A) Position of Glu58, Arg62, and Gln65 in the HLA-B*3901 bound to NAc-SL9 (orange) and SL9 (lemon). (B) Superposition of the Arg62 of different HLA-B molecules. Red dashed border frames a same position of the area with (A) but in a slightly different angle. Numbers 1–3 indicate three distinct conformational modes of the Arg62 in various HLA-B molecules. Orange, HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9; lemon, HLA-B*3901SL9; light blue, two molecules in the asymmetric unit of HLA-B*3901HL8; wheat, HLA-B8GGK (PDB 1AGD); chocolate, HLA-B8FLR (PDB 1M05); purple, ELS4–HLA-B*3501EPLP (PDB 2NX5). The Cγ-Cζ arm of Arg62 in HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 deflects an angle of 152° from that in HLA-B*3901SL9. Translucent light blue sector indicates a region of flexibility of Arg62 in HLA-B*3901HL8 molecules. (C) An on/off knife-switch symbolizing the Arg62 in position 1 and position 2, respectively.

For ease of analysis, we have divided the conformational modes of Arg62 into different intramolecular locations. The position of the Arg62 in the HLA-B*3901SL9 is defined as position 1, where it is often found binding with TCRs (36), while that in the HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 is defined as position 2 (Fig. 5B). This conformational alteration of Arg62 also has been observed by others in two HLA-B8 structures (Fig. 5B) (37), one of which bound to a peptide with P1-Gly and its Arg62 is at position 1, whereas in the other, the P1-Phe sterically forces the Arg62 away to position 2 where it can engage and trigger various TCRs (38). Taking these previous findings into consideration, we hypothesized that in our structure, the acetyl moiety would provide a similar stereochemical effect as the phenyl group of Phe and that the Arg62 at position 2 might contact with an incoming TCR. Specially in one of the two molecules in the asymmetric unit of the HLA-B*3901HL8, Arg62 is at position 1, whereas in the other, Arg62 extends its side chain to position 3, toward the α2-helix covering the pocket A (Fig. 5B). These alternative conformations reveal the flexibility of the Arg62 in the absence of P1 residue. Thus, interestingly, the Arg62 with its mobile conformational modes in HLA-B*3901 structures can be seen as a structural knife-switch (Fig. 5C). The aliphatic moiety of Arg62 is switched “on” to position 1 for energetic contribution to peptide binding or “off” to position 2 for TCR engagement, respectively. Also, position 3 is in an intermediate state. It is tempting to speculate that these diverse modes might elicit qualitatively different TCR repertoires.

Differential binding stability of Nt-acetylated and nonacetylated peptides

To determine how Nt-acetylation affects the peptide-binding to MHC class I molecules, the thermostability of the three solved pHLA-B*3901 complexes was evaluated. In accordance with previous studies (17), the acetyl in NAc-SL9 exerted a negative influence on Ag-binding and thermodynamic stability of the pHLA-B39 complex relative to SL9, ΔTm = −9.1°C (Fig. 6A, Table I). Moreover, an excellent correlation was observed between the thermal denaturation curves and the volumes of peptide-binding grooves for all three complexes (Fig. 6A, Table IV). The Nt-acetylation of NAc-SL9 observably enlarges the groove in both volume and surface area. The volume of pocket A in the HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 is >50% larger than that in the HLA-B*3901SL9 because of the side-chain reorientation of the Arg62 (Fig. 2G, 2H, Table IV). Also, the elimination of the interactions from Arg62 might explain the lowered peptide binding stability. For HLA-B*3901HL8, one of the alternative conformations of Arg62 in contact with the peptide main chain seems to compensate the absence of the canonical P1 residue for suboptimal peptidic N-terminal interactions as described above (Fig. 4D).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Thermostability of acetylpeptide- and nonacetylpeptide-MHC complexes as revealed by CD spectroscopy. The thermostability with an Nt-acetylated peptide is indicated by a red line and that with their nonacetylated counterpart with a blue line in all panels. (A) Thermostability measurements of three pHLA-B*3901 complexes with the HLA-B*3901HL8 complex represented by a green line. (B–H) Thermostability measurements of different pMHC sets that were chosen from the Immune Epitope Database (IEDB, www.immuneepitope.org). (I) Temperature reductions at the Tm of the complexes after Nt-acetylation of peptides. Differences in mean values were evaluated for statistical significance (p < 0.01) by Student two-tailed t test.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table IV. Volume and surface area quantitations of the pocket A and the peptide-binding grooves

To further test whether Nt-acetylation is universal in decreasing the pMHC stability, we subsequently carried out a series of thermostability measurements with different pMHC sets (Table I). The thermostability of epitopes with Ala, Thr, Cys, Val, and Met (that can be frequently acetylated in vivo) at P1 residues, respectively, bound to HLA-A*1101, -A*3303, -A*2402, -B*3501, and -A*0201 was compared with that of their Nt-acetylated counterparts. Nt-acetylation of all these peptides causes dramatic reductions of the pMHC thermostability by 8.8°C or more in midpoint transition temperature (Tm) (Fig. 6D–I). The similar phenomenon was observed for HLA-A*0201 and H-2Kb when in complex with a peptide containing a P1-Ser (Fig. 6B, 6C). In conclusion, Nt-acetylation decreases the pMHC stability in a class I allele– and epitope-independent manner.

Potential influence of N-acetylation on T cell engagement

Nt-acetylation is predicted to have a significant influence on T cell recognition in three ways. First, incorporation of the acetyl group blocks the positive peptide charge, thereby altering the distribution of electrostatic potential and it creates a prominent solvent exposure around the peptide N terminus. This may contribute to putative TCR docking sites, based on previously determined TCR–pHLA complex structures (Fig. 7A, 7B) (36). Second, the conformationally altered central region of the Nα-acetylpeptide may have different interactions with the TCR, and the lift of the peptide main chain may influence the TCR binding and correspondingly the TCR repertoires (41). Third, the conformational changes within the MHC H chain, indirectly caused by the peptide Nt-acetylation, position the negatively charged Glu58 slightly outward; most notably, the positively charged Arg62 is positioned as a predominant surface residue toward the central region of the peptide, thereby shifting the charge footprint of Ag presentation surface even more (Fig. 7C, 7D). HLA consensus Glu58 is retained in most TCR engagement (42), Arg62 and Gln65 invariably interacts with the TCR CDR1α or CDR3α loops whenever present on the MHC (37, 42). These analyses indicated that not only the acetyl moiety but also the altered residues of MHC class I are highly accessible for interaction with CDR loops of an incoming TCR. To further address this possibility, we superposed the previously solved TCRs in complex with other HLA-B molecules (B*3501 and B8) onto the HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 structure (Fig. 7E, 7F). The modeled complex shows close proximity of the CDR1α and CDR3α loops to the acetyl moiety and the MHC residues near the acetylation site, from which the Arg62 is engulfed by the CDR loops signifying it as a prominent binding target for TCR recognition.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Potential influence of Nα-acetylpeptide presentation on antigenic identification and TCR recognition. (A and B) Surface representation of HLA-B*3901 bound with SL9 (A) and NAc-SL9 (B). The peptides are shown in surface representation with red/blue charge-smoothed potential [red, negative; blue, positive; calculated with GRASP (40)]. The residues of the H chains highlighted in purple indicate the putative TCR footprint area, based on the ELS4 TCR–HLA-B*3501EPLP structure (PDB 2NX5). Red arrows point to the peptide acetylation sites. (C and D) Electrostatic potential molecular surface representation of HLA-B*3901 H chains bound with SL9 (C) and NAc-SL9 (D). Black dashes encircle the regions composed of Glu58, Arg62, and Gln65. (E and F) Proximity of CDR loops to the Nt-acetylation site. Overlay of CDR loops (red, CDR1α; blue, CDR3α) of the TCRs: ELS4 (PDB 2NX5), LC13 (PDB 1MI5), CF34 (PDB 3FFC), and RL42 (PDB 3SJV) onto HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9 complex by superposition of the HLA α1 helices. (F) is consistent with (E) but viewing along the peptide from the N terminus to the C terminus. Peptide-binding grooves are shown both in cartoon and translucent molecular surface representation. The side chains of critical residues (green, Glu58/Arg62/Gln65; yellow, NAc-Ser) that potentially influence TCR engagement are shown in stick representation. Yellow loops indicate NAc-SL9 main chain; ball-and-sticks colored black and red indicate acetyl groups (Ace).

Discussion

Our results here provide the structural and thermodynamic insights into the presentation of Nt-acetylated peptides by MHC class I molecules. The structure of the Nα-acetylpeptide in complex with HLA-B*3901 outlines a molecular interpretation of the reduced stability of MHC class I–bound Nt-acetylated peptides and also highlights a potential influence of Nt-acetylation on antigenic identity and T cell recognition. In addition, the structure elucidation of HLA-B*3901, the predominant B39 subtype, also is valuable in studying immune diseases associated with this MHC allele.

In a previous report, the Nt-formyl group on an Nt-formylated peptide binds to the bottom of the peptide-binding groove of the murine MHC class I H2-M3 playing an anchoring role for MHC class I binding (Supplemental Fig. 2A) (5). In our study, the methyl and carbonyl groups of the acetyl are rotated upwards like two arms that push the peptide-binding groove open (Fig. 2G, Supplemental Fig. 2B), thereby altering its immunogenicity at the expense of the pMHC stability. The thermostability we tested from seven human and one murine complexes indicates a general feature of Nα-acetylpeptide in weakening the binding affinity to MHC class I, which could be revealed by the gel-filtration chromatography of pMHC refolding assays as well (Supplemental Fig. 3). Their instability would partially explain why, as yet, such epitopes are rarely found. Within N-terminal residues of eukaryotic proteins, Ser is the most frequently acetylated in vivo (11). The Ala, Thr, Cys, and Val residues can also be Nt-acetylated and have small side chains like Ser. Thus, the rotation of P1 residues observed in the pHLA-B*3901 complex with an acetylated P1-Ser could very well be a general mode in Nα-acetylpeptide binding. In contrast, the long side chain of Met precludes it from being rotated into pocket A, but a certain reorientation is presumed to take place in the acetylated P1-Met based on the thermal instability (Fig. 6H). Besides the accommodation of the acetyl moiety, Nt-acetylation is presumed to decrease the stability of the pHLA-B*3901 complex as a result of the conformational switch of the Arg62. Arg62 in the α1-helix is largely conserved in almost all HLA-B and -C allotypes (Table V). For other HLA class I (Table V, Fig. 8), the long charged side chains of the residues in position 62 (Glu62 of A24 and Gln62 of A11 and so on) also may interact with the acetyl. Hence, the residue in position 62 plays a key role in the interaction between acetyl group and the H chain, which may influence not only the Nα-acetylpeptide binding to HLA molecules but also the TCR docking.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table V. Polymorphism of amino acids in position 62 of HLA class I protein sequences
FIGURE 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 8.

Structure-based sequence alignment of HLA-B*3901 and other HLA class I molecules. Above the blocks of sequences, symbols correspond to the secondary structure of B*3901 (squiggles indicate α-helices, arrows indicate β-strands, and “TT” letters indicate strict β-turns). Residues in white characters highlighted on a red background are strictly conserved in the column, whereas those well conserved within a group (with similarity > 70%) are in red characters on a white background, which are all rendered with blue frames. Green numbers below the sequences denote residues that form disulfide bonds. Residues that compose pocket A are marked with blue triangles. The sequences were aligned with ClustalW2 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalw2/) (43) and visualized using ESPript 2.2 (http://espript.ibcp.fr/) (44).

The discoveries that intracellular proteins with Ac-N-degrons are inhibited from being secreted (13) and then are degraded via ubiquitylation (12) raise many questions on the biological significance of acetylation-mediated proteolysis (14). The Nt-acetylated peptides with the size of MHC class I ligands (8–11 aa) as neoepitopes for CD8+ T cells, represent one of the possible roles of the Nt-acetylated digestion products. The vast armory of intracellular proteins that are frequently Nt-acetylated can create a large pool of Nα-acetylpeptides for Ag presentation and T cell surveying. The Nt-acetylation potentially impacts the TCR-MHC interaction in three different aspects: 1) the direct interaction of the solvent-exposed acetyl moiety; 2) the altered conformation of the central region of the peptide main chain; and 3) the conformational switches of the MHC residues. The Nt-acetylation creation of a distinctive pMHC landscape and participation in a potential binding element for TCR engagement described in our results highlights needs for further investigation into the Nα-acetylpeptide–specific TCR repertoires.

Although the apparent instability of MHC class I molecules for binding Nt-acetylated self-ligands is likely to be a mechanism of immune tolerance, it cannot yet rule out the possibility that Nt-acetylation of some self peptides are not present during the T cell precursor negative selection in the thymus thus allowing autoreactive T cells to migrate to the periphery. Once in the periphery, T cells encounter the Nα-acetylpeptides, and it is then viewed as “foreign,” which will result in autoimmunity. Conversely, if some Nt-acetylated self-Ags or peptides arise temporally in the course of T cell development, the unmodified form of such peptides under disordered or pathological conditions will become neoantigens to which the immune system has never been exposed or tolerated in the periphery. Certain processes that induce Nt-acetylation for proteolysis, such as apoptosis, do take place in the thymus (3).

Furthermore, there are many examples of viral protein Nt-acetylation that normally uses the Nt-acetylation system of the host eukaryotic cells (11). For instance, the N-terminal peptides detected by Hutchinson et al. (45) from PB1, PA, NP, M1, M2, NS1, and NEP of influenza A virus and from PA, NP, M1, NS1 and NEP of influenza B virus can be acetylated as well as eukaryotic proteins. According to our estimate, some other viral Nα-acetylpeptides also could be important MHC class I–associated epitopes displayed during virus infections (Supplemental Table I). Thus, an acetylated form of the N-terminal epitope corresponding with a certain viral Ag designed into epitope vaccines may gain an antivirus utility. To identify more acetylated epitopes requires further exploration of the immunopeptidome, and current algorithms of MHC-associated epitopes prediction should be improved to take account of Nt-acetylation. Nα-Acetylpeptides represent a library of new potential vaccine candidates that are of considerable interest to be unearthed in the future.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Yue Liu for excellent suggestions regarding the study, Joel Haywood for comments on the manuscript, and the staff at the Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility beamline 17U for assistance.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the National 973 Project of the China Ministry of Science and Technology (Grant 2010CB911902) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grants 31030030 and 81373141). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. G.F.G. is a leading principal investigator of the National Natural Science Foundation of China Innovative Research Group (Grant 81021003).

  • The atomic coordinates of the crystal structures of HLA-B*3901NAc-SL9, HLA-B*3901SL9, and HLA-B*3901HL8 presented in this article have been submitted to the Protein Data Bank (http://www.pdb.org/pdb/home/home.do) under accession numbers 4O2C, 4O2E, and 4O2F.

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    CD
    circular dichroism
    β2m
    β2-microglobulin
    NH2
    α-amino
    Nt-acetylation
    Nα-terminal acetylation
    P1
    N-terminal
    Pc
    C-terminal
    PEG
    polyethylene glycol
    pMHC
    peptide–MHC
    PTM
    posttranslational modification
    Tm
    midpoint transition temperature.

  • Received January 23, 2014.
  • Accepted April 15, 2014.
  • Copyright © 2014 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Rock K. L.,
    2. A. L. Goldberg
    . 1999. Degradation of cell proteins and the generation of MHC class I-presented peptides. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17: 739–779.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Engelhard V. H.,
    2. M. Altrich-Vanlith,
    3. M. Ostankovitch,
    4. A. L. Zarling
    . 2006. Post-translational modifications of naturally processed MHC-binding epitopes. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 18: 92–97.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Doyle H. A.,
    2. M. J. Mamula
    . 2001. Post-translational protein modifications in antigen recognition and autoimmunity. Trends Immunol. 22: 443–449.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Anderton S. M.
    2004. Post-translational modifications of self antigens: implications for autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 16: 753–758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Wang C. R.,
    2. A. R. Castaño,
    3. P. A. Peterson,
    4. C. Slaughter,
    5. K. F. Lindahl,
    6. J. Deisenhofer
    . 1995. Nonclassical binding of formylated peptide in crystal structure of the MHC class Ib molecule H2-M3. Cell 82: 655–664.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Glithero A.,
    2. J. Tormo,
    3. J. S. Haurum,
    4. G. Arsequell,
    5. G. Valencia,
    6. J. Edwards,
    7. S. Springer,
    8. A. Townsend,
    9. Y. L. Pao,
    10. M. Wormald,
    11. et al
    . 1999. Crystal structures of two H-2Db/glycopeptide complexes suggest a molecular basis for CTL cross-reactivity. Immunity 10: 63–74.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Speir J. A.,
    2. U. M. Abdel-Motal,
    3. M. Jondal,
    4. I. A. Wilson
    . 1999. Crystal structure of an MHC class I presented glycopeptide that generates carbohydrate-specific CTL. Immunity 10: 51–61.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Mohammed F.,
    2. M. Cobbold,
    3. A. L. Zarling,
    4. M. Salim,
    5. G. A. Barrett-Wilt,
    6. J. Shabanowitz,
    7. D. F. Hunt,
    8. V. H. Engelhard,
    9. B. E. Willcox
    . 2008. Phosphorylation-dependent interaction between antigenic peptides and MHC class I: a molecular basis for the presentation of transformed self. Nat. Immunol. 9: 1236–1243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Petersen J.,
    2. S. J. Wurzbacher,
    3. N. A. Williamson,
    4. S. H. Ramarathinam,
    5. H. H. Reid,
    6. A. K. Nair,
    7. A. Y. Zhao,
    8. R. Nastovska,
    9. G. Rudge,
    10. J. Rossjohn,
    11. A. W. Purcell
    . 2009. Phosphorylated self-peptides alter human leukocyte antigen class I‑restricted antigen presentation and generate tumor-specific epitopes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 2776–2781.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Beltrami A.,
    2. M. Rossmann,
    3. M. T. Fiorillo,
    4. F. Paladini,
    5. R. Sorrentino,
    6. W. Saenger,
    7. P. Kumar,
    8. A. Ziegler,
    9. B. Uchanska-Ziegler
    . 2008. Citrullination-dependent differential presentation of a self-peptide by HLA-B27 subtypes. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 27189–27199.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Polevoda B.,
    2. F. Sherman
    . 2003. N-terminal acetyltransferases and sequence requirements for N-terminal acetylation of eukaryotic proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 325: 595–622.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Hwang C. S.,
    2. A. Shemorry,
    3. A. Varshavsky
    . 2010. N-terminal acetylation of cellular proteins creates specific degradation signals. Science 327: 973–977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Forte G. M.,
    2. M. R. Pool,
    3. C. J. Stirling
    . 2011. N-terminal acetylation inhibits protein targeting to the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol. 9: e1001073.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Sriram S. M.,
    2. B. Y. Kim,
    3. Y. T. Kwon
    . 2011. The N-end rule pathway: emerging functions and molecular principles of substrate recognition. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 12: 735–747.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Zamvil S. S.,
    2. D. J. Mitchell,
    3. A. C. Moore,
    4. K. Kitamura,
    5. L. Steinman,
    6. J. B. Rothbard
    . 1986. T-cell epitope of the autoantigen myelin basic protein that induces encephalomyelitis. Nature 324: 258–260.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. He X. L.,
    2. C. Radu,
    3. J. Sidney,
    4. A. Sette,
    5. E. S. Ward,
    6. K. C. Garcia
    . 2002. Structural snapshot of aberrant antigen presentation linked to autoimmunity: the immunodominant epitope of MBP complexed with I-Au. Immunity 17: 83–94.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Yagüe J.,
    2. I. Alvarez,
    3. D. Rognan,
    4. M. Ramos,
    5. J. Vázquez,
    6. J. A. de Castro
    . 2000. An N-acetylated natural ligand of human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B39: classical major histocompatibility complex class I proteins bind peptides with a blocked NH2 terminus in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 191: 2083–2092.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Yague J.,
    2. A. Marina,
    3. J. Vazquez,
    4. J. A. Lopez De Castro
    . 2001. Major histocompatibility complex class I molecules bind natural peptide ligands lacking the amino-terminal binding residue in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 43699–43707.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Webb A. I.,
    2. M. A. Dunstone,
    3. W. Chen,
    4. M. I. Aguilar,
    5. Q. Chen,
    6. H. Jackson,
    7. L. Chang,
    8. L. Kjer-Nielsen,
    9. T. Beddoe,
    10. J. McCluskey,
    11. et al
    . 2004. Functional and structural characteristics of NY-ESO-1‑related HLA A2‑restricted epitopes and the design of a novel immunogenic analogue. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 23438–23446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Degano M.,
    2. K. C. Garcia,
    3. V. Apostolopoulos,
    4. M. G. Rudolph,
    5. L. Teyton,
    6. I. A. Wilson
    . 2000. A functional hot spot for antigen recognition in a superagonist TCR/MHC complex. Immunity 12: 251–261.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Li L.,
    2. M. Bouvier
    . 2004. Structures of HLA-A*1101 complexed with immunodominant nonamer and decamer HIV-1 epitopes clearly reveal the presence of a middle, secondary anchor residue. J. Immunol. 172: 6175–6184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lim J. B.,
    2. M. Provenzano,
    3. O. H. Kwon,
    4. M. Bettinotti,
    5. L. Caruccio,
    6. D. Nagorsen,
    7. D. Stroncek
    . 2006. Identification of HLA-A33‑restricted CMV pp65 epitopes as common targets for CD8+ CMV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Exp. Hematol. 34: 296–307.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Oka Y.,
    2. A. Tsuboi,
    3. T. Taguchi,
    4. T. Osaki,
    5. T. Kyo,
    6. H. Nakajima,
    7. O. A. Elisseeva,
    8. Y. Oji,
    9. M. Kawakami,
    10. K. Ikegame,
    11. et al
    . 2004. Induction of WT1 (Wilms’ tumor gene)-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes by WT1 peptide vaccine and the resultant cancer regression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 13885–13890.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Smith K. J.,
    2. S. W. Reid,
    3. D. I. Stuart,
    4. A. J. McMichael,
    5. E. Y. Jones,
    6. J. I. Bell
    . 1996. An altered position of the α2 helix of MHC class I is revealed by the crystal structure of HLA-B*3501. Immunity 4: 203–213.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Collins E. J.,
    2. D. N. Garboczi,
    3. D. C. Wiley
    . 1994. Three-dimensional structure of a peptide extending from one end of a class I MHC binding site. Nature 371: 626–629.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Garboczi D. N.,
    2. D. T. Hung,
    3. D. C. Wiley
    . 1992. HLA-A2‑peptide complexes: refolding and crystallization of molecules expressed in Escherichia coli and complexed with single antigenic peptides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89: 3429–3433.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Liu J.,
    2. S. Zhang,
    3. S. Tan,
    4. Y. Yi,
    5. B. Wu,
    6. B. Cao,
    7. F. Zhu,
    8. C. Wang,
    9. H. Wang,
    10. J. Qi,
    11. G. F. Gao
    . 2012. Cross-allele cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses against 2009 pandemic H1N1 influenza A virus among HLA-A24 and HLA-A3 supertype‑positive individuals. J. Virol. 86: 13281–13294.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Parkin S.,
    2. H. Hope
    . 1998. Macromolecular cryocrystallography: cooling, mounting, storage and transportation of crystals. J. Appl. Cryst. 31: 945–953.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  22. ↵
    1. Otwinowski Z.,
    2. W. Minor
    . 1997. Processing of X-ray diffraction data collected in oscillation mode. Methods Enzymol. 276: 307–326.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4
    . 1994. The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 50: 760–763.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Emsley P.,
    2. K. Cowtan
    . 2004. Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 60: 2126–2132.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Adams P. D.,
    2. R. W. Grosse-Kunstleve,
    3. L. W. Hung,
    4. T. R. Ioerger,
    5. A. J. McCoy,
    6. N. W. Moriarty,
    7. R. J. Read,
    8. J. C. Sacchettini,
    9. N. K. Sauter,
    10. T. C. Terwilliger
    . 2002. PHENIX: building new software for automated crystallographic structure determination. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Crystallogr. 58: 1948–1954.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Laskowski R. A.,
    2. M. W. Macarthur,
    3. D. S. Moss,
    4. J. M. Thornton
    . 1993. PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures. J. Appl. Cryst. 26: 283–291.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  27. ↵
    1. Madden D. R.
    1995. The three-dimensional structure of peptide‑MHC complexes. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13: 587–622.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Matsumura M.,
    2. D. H. Fremont,
    3. P. A. Peterson,
    4. I. A. Wilson
    . 1992. Emerging principles for the recognition of peptide antigens by MHC class I molecules. Science 257: 927–934.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Tynan F. E.,
    2. H. H. Reid,
    3. L. Kjer-Nielsen,
    4. J. J. Miles,
    5. M. C. Wilce,
    6. L. Kostenko,
    7. N. A. Borg,
    8. N. A. Williamson,
    9. T. Beddoe,
    10. A. W. Purcell,
    11. et al
    . 2007. A T cell receptor flattens a bulged antigenic peptide presented by a major histocompatibility complex class I molecule. Nat. Immunol. 8: 268–276.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Webb A. I.,
    2. N. A. Borg,
    3. M. A. Dunstone,
    4. L. Kjer-Nielsen,
    5. T. Beddoe,
    6. J. McCluskey,
    7. F. R. Carbone,
    8. S. P. Bottomley,
    9. M. I. Aguilar,
    10. A. W. Purcell,
    11. J. Rossjohn
    . 2004. The structure of H-2Kb and Kbm8 complexed to a herpes simplex virus determinant: evidence for a conformational switch that governs T cell repertoire selection and viral resistance. J. Immunol. 173: 402–409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Gras S.,
    2. P. G. Wilmann,
    3. Z. Chen,
    4. H. Halim,
    5. Y. C. Liu,
    6. L. Kjer-Nielsen,
    7. A. W. Purcell,
    8. S. R. Burrows,
    9. J. McCluskey,
    10. J. Rossjohn
    . 2012. A structural basis for varied αβ TCR usage against an immunodominant EBV antigen restricted to a HLA-B8 molecule. J. Immunol. 188: 311–321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Dundas J.,
    2. Z. Ouyang,
    3. J. Tseng,
    4. A. Binkowski,
    5. Y. Turpaz,
    6. J. Liang
    . 2006. CASTp: computed atlas of surface topography of proteins with structural and topographical mapping of functionally annotated residues. Nucleic Acids Res. 34(Web Server issue): W116‑W118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Nicholls A.,
    2. K. A. Sharp,
    3. B. Honig
    . 1991. Protein folding and association: insights from the interfacial and thermodynamic properties of hydrocarbons. Proteins 11: 281–296.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Turner S. J.,
    2. P. C. Doherty,
    3. J. McCluskey,
    4. J. Rossjohn
    . 2006. Structural determinants of T-cell receptor bias in immunity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6: 883–894.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Marrack P.,
    2. J. P. Scott-Browne,
    3. S. Dai,
    4. L. Gapin,
    5. J. W. Kappler
    . 2008. Evolutionarily conserved amino acids that control TCR-MHC interaction. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26: 171–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Larkin M. A.,
    2. G. Blackshields,
    3. N. P. Brown,
    4. R. Chenna,
    5. P. A. McGettigan,
    6. H. McWilliam,
    7. F. Valentin,
    8. I. M. Wallace,
    9. A. Wilm,
    10. R. Lopez,
    11. et al
    . 2007. Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Gouet P.,
    2. E. Courcelle,
    3. D. I. Stuart,
    4. F. Métoz
    . 1999. ESPript: analysis of multiple sequence alignments in PostScript. Bioinformatics 15: 305–308.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Hutchinson E. C.,
    2. E. M. Denham,
    3. B. Thomas,
    4. D. C. Trudgian,
    5. S. S. Hester,
    6. G. Ridlova,
    7. A. York,
    8. L. Turrell,
    9. E. Fodor
    . 2012. Mapping the phosphoproteome of influenza A and B viruses by mass spectrometry. PLoS Pathog. 8: e1002993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 192 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 192, Issue 12
15 Jun 2014
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Nα-Terminal Acetylation for T Cell Recognition: Molecular Basis of MHC Class I–Restricted Nα-Acetylpeptide Presentation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Nα-Terminal Acetylation for T Cell Recognition: Molecular Basis of MHC Class I–Restricted Nα-Acetylpeptide Presentation
Mingwei Sun, Jun Liu, Jianxun Qi, Boris Tefsen, Yi Shi, Jinghua Yan, George F. Gao
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2014, 192 (12) 5509-5519; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400199

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Nα-Terminal Acetylation for T Cell Recognition: Molecular Basis of MHC Class I–Restricted Nα-Acetylpeptide Presentation
Mingwei Sun, Jun Liu, Jianxun Qi, Boris Tefsen, Yi Shi, Jinghua Yan, George F. Gao
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2014, 192 (12) 5509-5519; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1400199
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • At Critically Low Antigen Densities, IgM Hexamers Outcompete Both IgM Pentamers and IgG1 for Human Complement Deposition and Complement-Dependent Cytotoxicity
  • Mouse Liver B Cells Phagocytose Streptococcus pneumoniae and Initiate Immune Responses against Their Antigens
  • The Pre-Existing Human Antibody Repertoire to Computationally Optimized Influenza H1 Hemagglutinin Vaccines
Show more ANTIGEN RECOGNITION AND RESPONSES

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606