Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

In This Issue

J Immunol July 15, 2013, 191 (2) 523-524; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1390038
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Selecting for Length

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

While Class I HLAs present peptides varying from eight to ten amino acids in length, how different HLA polymorphisms “select” these peptide lengths to initiate CD8+ T cell responses has remained unclear. To clarify this, Rist et al. (p. 561) looked at the binding properties of the HLA-B*44 supertype, which includes the common alleles HLA-B*44:03 and HLA-B*18:01. The BLZF1 Ag of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), used as a model Ag, is responsible for the switch in gene expression from latent to lytic forms of the virus, and has overlapping sequences of different lengths that conform to the HLA-B*44 supertype binding motif. Individuals with HLA-B*18:01 exclusively responded to an octamer, 173SELEIKRY180, whereas individuals carrying HLA-B*44:03 responded to an atypically large dodecamer peptide, 169EECDSELEIKRY180. HLA-B*18:01 binding to the octamer was found to be more stable than to the dodecamer. HLA-B*44:03 was only able to bind the dodecamer. Crystal structures of the viral peptide–HLA complexes revealed that the Ag binding clefts of HLA-B*18:01 and HLA-B*44:03 were specifically suited to binding shorter and longer peptides, respectively. Further analysis of >1000 naturally presented ligands by mass spectroscopy showed that HLA-B*18:01 presented shorter peptides compared with HLA-B*44:03. Thus, the authors demonstrate how polymorphisms within an HLA Class I supertype can add to the diversity of ligands selected for presentation and how CD8+ T cell responses can be initiated against Ags of varied lengths.

Complementing CD14 Blockade

Both complement and TLRs are necessary for innate immune function. However, inhibiting these players may be necessary to alleviate the consequences of sepsis. To build on previous work demonstrating that blocking the TLR coreceptor CD14 inhibited inflammation and thrombogenicity in porcine sepsis, Barratt-Due et al. (p. 819) investigated the effects of the C5 and leukotriene B4 inhibitor OmCI (coversin) and anti-CD14 in Escherichia coli–induced sepsis. In septic animals, treatment with OmCI blocked C5 activation and terminal complement complex formation, and lowered leukotriene B4 levels compared with controls. The authors also found that TNF-α, IL-6, granulocyte tissue factor, and thrombin-antithrombin complexes were all inhibited by OmCI treatment. With a combined treatment of anti-CD14 and OmCI, all of these markers of sepsis were significantly decreased (p < 0.001) or completely absent. OmCI and anti-CD14 combined therapy also abolished plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, IL-1β, and IL-8 production, and CD11b (wCD11R3) expression on granulocytes. Plasma concentrations of IL-10 increased under combined therapy and increases in heart rate and pulmonary artery pressure were delayed. Thus, the authors found that combining OmCI and anti-CD14 was a useful therapy in treating porcine sepsis, significantly abrogating inflammatory and thrombogenic aspects of the innate immune response.

Innate CD4 TCRs Regulate Selection

Innate CD4+ T cells have an effector/memory-like phenotype, coexpress the transcription factor Promyelocytic leukemia zinc finger (PLZF) and the cytokine IL-4, and engage in important immunosuppressive functions in vivo. These cells undergo selection in the thymus, but unlike conventional CD4+ T cells that are selected by thymic epithelial cells (TECs), MHC II–expressing thymocytes drive selection of innate CD4+ T cells (T-CD4s). Because mice transgenic for MHC II–restricted OVA and cytochrome c-specific TCRs demonstrate poor T-CD4 selection by thymocytes, Zhu et al. (p. 737) hypothesized that T-CD4s may express a specific but diverse TCR repertoire that plays an instructive role in the T-CD4 selection process. To test this hypothesis, the authors generated a T-CD4–derived TCR Transgenic mouse (3T) and found that T-CD4 selection occurred efficiently when thymocytes (but not TECs) expressed MHC II. 3T thymocytes required SAP and PLZF for development and acquired PLZF and IL-4 expression at the double positive stage in a heterogeneous manner, suggesting that 3T T-CD4s acquire effector function soon after positive selection, but that TCR specificity alone was not sufficient to induce a uniform PLZF+IL-4+ innate CD4+ T cell phenotype. These data indicate that TCR specificity regulates T-CD4 development, but other factors likely define T-CD4 programming.

Malaria in the Crosshairs

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

One of the biggest challenges when developing a vaccine to a complex human pathogen, such as malaria, is determining which Ags to target. Richards et al. (p. 795) attempted to address this challenge by analyzing potential Ags that the malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum expresses during its extracellular blood (merozoite) phase. Ninety-one recombinant proteins, chosen because of their expression on the merozoite surface or parasite invasion organelles, were analyzed for their ability to elicit Ab reactivity in malaria-infected individuals. As a result of this analysis, 46 Ag-specific Abs were identified and followed in a longitudinal cohort of 206 New Guinean children (aged 5–14 years). Individuals were examined to determine at what age Ab responses could be measured and which Ab profiles correlated with protective immunity. Older children with active parasitemia had higher levels of antimalarial Abs. Interestingly, the presence of Ab responses to two erythrocyte invasion proteins, rhoptry and microneme, had the strongest correlation with protective immunity. Additionally, a number of the newly identified Ags appeared to have a greater correlation with protection than many malaria vaccine candidate Ags currently under investigation. The authors found that some combinations of Ab responses were more closely associated with protective immunity than were single Ag-specific Ab responses. Thus, the authors successfully identified a number of target Ags that were strongly correlated with protective immunity, identifying excellent candidates for future antimalarial vaccines and biomarkers of effective malarial surveillance.

SARM Deficit Shields CNS from Harm

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

The highly conserved Toll/IL-1R (TIR) domain-containing adaptor family members signal downstream of TLRs and are components of pathways essential to type-1 IFN production and NF-κB activation in innate immune responses. However, the function of one family member, sterile alpha and TIR domain–containing 1 (SARM), is not well characterized. SARM is expressed in the CNS and mediates axonal destruction in the brain. Previous work also demonstrated a role for SARM in innate immunity in C. elegans, prompting Hou et al. (p. 875) to determine whether SARM is involved in innate immune responses in mammals. To do this, the authors challenged SARM−/− mice with myriad bacterial and viral pathogens and examined the resulting immune responses. They found that SARM−/− mice had normal responses to most pathogens, but, unlike WT mice, were protected from death after CNS infection with vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Using mixed bone marrow chimeras, the authors determined that SARM−/− nonhematopoietic cells, possibly neurons, had reduced levels of inflammatory cytokine production in the brain, and that there was reduced CNS injury after VSV infection. These results suggested that SARM deficiency in these cells afforded mice protection from neuropathology. Thus, SARM may positively regulate inflammatory cytokine production by nonhematopoietic cells in the brain during innate immune responses and inhibition of this process could reduce the extent of CNS injury that occurs during neural pathogen challenge.

Orchestrating Tolerance with p38α

A subset of dendritic cells (DCs) expressing CD103 helps maintain immune tolerance in the intestine by promoting the differentiation of induced regulatory T cells (iTregs) and the expression of lymphocyte gut-homing receptors. Signaling in DCs via the MAPK p38α has been found to support inflammatory T cell differentiation. Huang et al. (p. 650) investigated whether p38α also plays a role in DC-mediated tolerance by analyzing mice specifically lacking this kinase in DCs (p38αΔDC). Oral tolerance and the development of iTregs, but not thymus-derived natural Tregs, were impaired in p38αΔDC mice. This defect in iTreg generation was specifically linked to p38α-dependent production of TGF-β2 by CD103+ DCs from the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs). In addition to inducing iTreg differentiation, signaling via p38α in CD103+ DCs also downregulated Th1 differentiation in a TGF-β2–dependent manner. In contrast, T cells from mice bearing a T cell–specific deletion of p38α showed no changes in iTreg or Th1 differentiation. Relative to WT DCs, p38αΔDC CD103+ MLN DCs had lower expression of retinaldehyde dehydrogenase (Aldh1a2), which reduced DC retinoic acid synthesis and led to impaired expression of gut-homing receptors in T cells. Taken together, these data reveal that p38α in CD103+ MLN DCs both controls the balance of iTreg/Th1 differentiation via TGF-β2 expression and regulates T cell trafficking via Aldh1a2 expression.

  • Copyright © 2013 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 191 (2)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 191, Issue 2
15 Jul 2013
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In This Issue
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
In This Issue
The Journal of Immunology July 15, 2013, 191 (2) 523-524; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1390038

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
In This Issue
The Journal of Immunology July 15, 2013, 191 (2) 523-524; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1390038
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Selecting for Length
    • Complementing CD14 Blockade
    • Innate CD4 TCRs Regulate Selection
    • Malaria in the Crosshairs
    • SARM Deficit Shields CNS from Harm
    • Orchestrating Tolerance with p38α
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Top Reads
  • In This Issue
  • In This Issue
Show more IN THIS ISSUE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606