Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Signaling Pathways That Regulate T Cell Development and Differentiation

Leslie J. Berg
J Immunol December 15, 2012, 189 (12) 5487-5488; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1290076
Leslie J. Berg
Department of Pathology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

As a postdoctoral fellow in Mark Davis’s laboratory at Stanford University Medical School, my work focused on TCR repertoire selection in the thymus. At that time—the late 1980s—the first TCR-transgenic lines were being generated and were used to study positive and negative selection (1–3). The overall conclusion from this work, contributed to by many laboratories, was that strong TCR signaling led to thymocyte cell death, whereas weak or moderate TCR signaling led to thymocyte survival and maturation. Yet the biochemical pathways that regulated these alternative cell fates remained unknown.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Leslie J. Berg

As we learned more about T cells, it became clear that TCR signaling was not the only important input into the process of T cell lineage development. Both in the thymus, as well as during mature T cell differentiation following Ag stimulation, signals mediated by costimulatory molecules and cytokines contribute to the ultimate fate of each cell. Nonetheless, more and more data accumulated to indicate that the relative strength of TCR signaling was a key feature in dictating the outcome during T cell development and activation (4).

Headway in understanding this problem required more detailed knowledge of the biochemistry of TCR signaling. In the early 1980s, relatively little was known about T cell signaling. Numerous changes in cell metabolism had been documented as a result of T cell activation, but most of the specific enzymes involved had not been discovered, and the details of how specific signaling proteins were connected in pathways were not known (5). Important breakthroughs were made during the late 1980s and early 1990s that laid the groundwork for all of the subsequent studies. Following the identification of the TCR αβ heterodimer came the discovery of the TCR αβ-association CD3 subunits, the key signaling components of the receptor complex (6, 7). Shortly thereafter, L. Samelson et al. (8) demonstrated that the activated TCR was tyrosine phosphorylated, and J. Imboden and A. Weiss (9–11), among others, showed that TCR stimulation led to phosphoinositide hydrolysis and calcium influx. The first T cell–specific tyrosine kinase, Lck, along with a second src family kinase, Fyn, was then shown to bind to the TCR and to be required for TCR signaling (12, 13). This discovery was followed soon after by the identification of Zap-70, the key enzyme required for all downstream TCR-signaling events (14).

Our own contribution to this field was the cloning of a third T cell tyrosine kinase important for TCR signaling, the Tec kinase ITK (15). We had set out, in the early 1990s, to identify novel T cell tyrosine kinases using degenerate PCR to amplify conserved kinase domain sequences. This effort led to the discovery of a novel Jak family kinase, Jak3, along with ITK. Although Jak3 was found to be essential for cytokine receptor signaling (16), ITK, we then showed, was involved in TCR signaling (17). Over the next several years, the specific biochemical function of ITK was elucidated. Following TCR stimulation, ITK is activated downstream of Lck and Zap-70 and, in turn, phosphorylates and activates phospholipase C-γ1. Phospholipase C-γ1 then generates the two critical second messengers, diacylglycerol and inositol tris-phosphate, leading to calcium mobilization, protein kinase C activation, and activation of the MAPK cascade. As a consequence, when ITK is absent from T cells, these responses are significantly impaired, and T cells exhibit marked reductions in effector functions, such as cytokine production (18).

It came as a surprise to discover that, despite this signaling defect, T cell development in ITK-deficient mice appeared largely intact (18). However, subsequent studies conducted by several laboratories over the ensuing several years demonstrated that T cell development and function were hardly normal in the absence of ITK. Th cell differentiation was impaired (19–21), T cell responses to some classes of pathogens were defective (19, 20, 22), and a closer look at T cell development revealed that the majority of mature cells in the thymus resembled memory T cells, rather than conventional naive CD4+ and CD8+ thymocytes (23, 24).

Following up on this altered T cell development in Itk−/− mice led us to the finding that the memory-phenotype CD8+ T cells found in these mice expressed high levels of the T-box transcription factor, eomesodermin (24). This factor was previously found to be upregulated in bona fide memory CD8+ T cells, and it can promote memory cell development (25). As shown by Kris Hogquist and colleagues (26, 27), excess IL-4 present in Itk−/− mice was required for eomesodermin upregulation by CD8+ thymocytes. However, we reasoned that reduced TCR signaling in the absence of ITK might also be contributing to the development of memory-phenotype, rather than conventional naive, CD8+ T cells.

To test this hypothesis, we performed a gene-expression microarray experiment, focusing on identifying transcription factors that might be regulated by TCR signaling via ITK and, in turn, be regulating eomesodermin expression. This led us to a second transcriptional regulator, IRF4. IRF4, which is not expressed in naive CD8+ T cells, was rapidly induced by TCR stimulation. Furthermore, IRF4 upregulation was dependent on ITK signaling and was induced in a graded manner dependent on the strength of TCR signaling. Thus, the stronger the TCR signal, the more ITK activation occurred; as a consequence, the entire population of CD8+ T cells expressed higher levels of IRF4 as a function of the magnitude of ITK activation. Most importantly, these studies demonstrated that cells expressing little or no IRF4 upregulated high levels of eomesodermin and that this response occurred within 24 h after TCR stimulation (28).

These experiments led us to conclude that ITK is a distinct type of signaling protein, whose function is to provide a graded response in T cells stimulated by different strengths of TCR signaling. This variation in TCR signaling could result from TCRs recognizing MHC/peptide ligands with distinct affinities, as we showed in our in vitro studies, or it could be due to different amounts of Ag encountered by T cells activated in vivo. We conclude that some signaling proteins, like the essential TCR kinase, Zap-70, provide an “on–off” switch to regulate T cell activation. In contrast, we imagine ITK as the mechanism inside a water faucet: turning the handle a small amount produces a trickle of water, whereas cranking the faucet handle all of the way open produces a gushing stream of water. In the case of ITK, the magnitude of ITK activation is not simply regulating how many cells are responding, but instead is producing a distinct gene-expression program and, thus, a distinct lineage of T cell development or differentiation, depending on the strength of TCR stimulation.

Disclosures

The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

  • Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Kisielow P.,
    2. H. Blüthmann,
    3. U. D. Staerz,
    4. M. Steinmetz,
    5. H. von Boehmer
    . 1988. Tolerance in T-cell-receptor transgenic mice involves deletion of nonmature CD4+8+ thymocytes. Nature 333: 742–746.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Sha W. C.,
    2. C. A. Nelson,
    3. R. D. Newberry,
    4. D. M. Kranz,
    5. J. H. Russell,
    6. D. Y. Loh
    . 1988. Positive and negative selection of an antigen receptor on T cells in transgenic mice. Nature 336: 73–76.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Berg L. J.,
    2. A. M. Pullen,
    3. B. Fazekas de St Groth,
    4. D. Mathis,
    5. C. Benoist,
    6. M. M. Davis
    . 1989. Antigen/MHC-specific T cells are preferentially exported from the thymus in the presence of their MHC ligand. Cell 58: 1035–1046.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Starr T. K.,
    2. S. C. Jameson,
    3. K. A. Hogquist
    . 2003. Positive and negative selection of T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21: 139–176.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Paul W. E.
    , ed. 1984. Fundamental Immunology. Raven Press, New York.
  5. ↵
    1. Samelson L. E.,
    2. J. B. Harford,
    3. R. D. Klausner
    . 1985. Identification of the components of the murine T cell antigen receptor complex. Cell 43: 223–231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Brenner M. B.,
    2. I. S. Trowbridge,
    3. J. L. Strominger
    . 1985. Cross-linking of human T cell receptor proteins: association between the T cell idiotype beta subunit and the T3 glycoprotein heavy subunit. Cell 40: 183–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Samelson L. E.,
    2. M. D. Patel,
    3. A. M. Weissman,
    4. J. B. Harford,
    5. R. D. Klausner
    . 1986. Antigen activation of murine T cells induces tyrosine phosphorylation of a polypeptide associated with the T cell antigen receptor. Cell 46: 1083–1090.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Weiss A.,
    2. J. Imboden,
    3. D. Shoback,
    4. J. Stobo
    . 1984. Role of T3 surface molecules in human T-cell activation: T3-dependent activation results in an increase in cytoplasmic free calcium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 4169–4173.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Imboden J. B.,
    2. A. Weiss,
    3. J. D. Stobo
    . 1985. The antigen receptor on a human T cell line initiates activation by increasing cytoplasmic free calcium. J. Immunol. 134: 663–665.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    1. Imboden J. B.,
    2. J. D. Stobo
    . 1985. Transmembrane signalling by the T cell antigen receptor. Perturbation of the T3-antigen receptor complex generates inositol phosphates and releases calcium ions from intracellular stores. J. Exp. Med. 161: 446–456.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Samelson L. E.,
    2. A. F. Phillips,
    3. E. T. Luong,
    4. R. D. Klausner
    . 1990. Association of the fyn protein-tyrosine kinase with the T-cell antigen receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 4358–4362.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Straus D. B.,
    2. A. Weiss
    . 1992. Genetic evidence for the involvement of the lck tyrosine kinase in signal transduction through the T cell antigen receptor. Cell 70: 585–593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Chan A. C.,
    2. M. Iwashima,
    3. C. W. Turck,
    4. A. Weiss
    . 1992. ZAP-70: a 70 kd protein-tyrosine kinase that associates with the TCR ζ chain. Cell 71: 649–662.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Heyeck S. D.,
    2. L. J. Berg
    . 1993. Developmental regulation of a murine T-cell-specific tyrosine kinase gene, Tsk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 669–673.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Thomis D. C.,
    2. C. B. Gurniak,
    3. E. Tivol,
    4. A. H. Sharpe,
    5. L. J. Berg
    . 1995. Defects in B lymphocyte maturation and T lymphocyte activation in mice lacking Jak3. Science 270: 794–797.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Liu K. Q.,
    2. S. C. Bunnell,
    3. C. B. Gurniak,
    4. L. J. Berg
    . 1998. T cell receptor-initiated calcium release is uncoupled from capacitative calcium entry in Itk-deficient T cells. J. Exp. Med. 187: 1721–1727.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Berg L. J.,
    2. L. D. Finkelstein,
    3. J. A. Lucas,
    4. P. L. Schwartzberg
    . 2005. Tec family kinases in T lymphocyte development and function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 23: 549–600.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Fowell D. J.,
    2. K. Shinkai,
    3. X. C. Liao,
    4. A. M. Beebe,
    5. R. L. Coffman,
    6. D. R. Littman,
    7. R. M. Locksley
    . 1999. Impaired NFATc translocation and failure of Th2 development in Itk-deficient CD4+ T cells. Immunity 11: 399–409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    1. Schaeffer E. M.,
    2. G. S. Yap,
    3. C. M. Lewis,
    4. M. J. Czar,
    5. D. W. McVicar,
    6. A. W. Cheever,
    7. A. Sher,
    8. P. L. Schwartzberg
    . 2001. Mutation of Tec family kinases alters T helper cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 2: 1183–1188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Miller A. T.,
    2. H. M. Wilcox,
    3. Z. Lai,
    4. L. J. Berg
    . 2004. Signaling through Itk promotes T helper 2 differentiation via negative regulation of T-bet. Immunity 21: 67–80.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Schaeffer E. M.,
    2. J. Debnath,
    3. G. Yap,
    4. D. McVicar,
    5. X. C. Liao,
    6. D. R. Littman,
    7. A. Sher,
    8. H. E. Varmus,
    9. M. J. Lenardo,
    10. P. L. Schwartzberg
    . 1999. Requirement for Tec kinases Rlk and Itk in T cell receptor signaling and immunity. Science 284: 638–641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Broussard C.,
    2. C. Fleischacker,
    3. R. Horai,
    4. M. Chetana,
    5. A. M. Venegas,
    6. L. L. Sharp,
    7. S. M. Hedrick,
    8. B. J. Fowlkes,
    9. P. L. Schwartzberg
    . 2006. Altered development of CD8+ T cell lineages in mice deficient for the Tec kinases Itk and Rlk. Immunity 25: 93–104.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Atherly L. O.,
    2. J. A. Lucas,
    3. M. Felices,
    4. C. C. Yin,
    5. S. L. Reiner,
    6. L. J. Berg
    . 2006. The Tec family tyrosine kinases Itk and Rlk regulate the development of conventional CD8+ T cells. Immunity 25: 79–91.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Intlekofer A. M.,
    2. N. Takemoto,
    3. E. J. Wherry,
    4. S. A. Longworth,
    5. J. T. Northrup,
    6. V. R. Palanivel,
    7. A. C. Mullen,
    8. C. R. Gasink,
    9. S. M. Kaech,
    10. J. D. Miller,
    11. et al
    . 2005. Effector and memory CD8+ T cell fate coupled by T-bet and eomesodermin. Nat. Immunol. 6: 1236–1244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Weinreich M. A.,
    2. O. A. Odumade,
    3. S. C. Jameson,
    4. K. A. Hogquist
    . 2010. T cells expressing the transcription factor PLZF regulate the development of memory-like CD8+ T cells. Nat. Immunol. 11: 709–716.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Weinreich M. A.,
    2. K. Takada,
    3. C. Skon,
    4. S. L. Reiner,
    5. S. C. Jameson,
    6. K. A. Hogquist
    . 2009. KLF2 transcription-factor deficiency in T cells results in unrestrained cytokine production and upregulation of bystander chemokine receptors. Immunity 31: 122–130.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Nayar R.,
    2. M. Enos,
    3. A. Prince,
    4. H. Shin,
    5. S. Hemmers,
    6. J. K. Jiang,
    7. U. Klein,
    8. C. J. Thomas,
    9. L. J. Berg
    . 2012. TCR signaling via Tec kinase ITK and interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) regulates CD8+ T-cell differentiation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109: E2794–E2802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 189 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 189, Issue 12
15 Dec 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Signaling Pathways That Regulate T Cell Development and Differentiation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Signaling Pathways That Regulate T Cell Development and Differentiation
Leslie J. Berg
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2012, 189 (12) 5487-5488; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1290076

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Signaling Pathways That Regulate T Cell Development and Differentiation
Leslie J. Berg
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2012, 189 (12) 5487-5488; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1290076
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Disclosures
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Life in the MHC
  • Antibodies and the Brain: Lessons from Lupus
Show more PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606