Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Endothelial Cell Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ Reduces Endotoxemic Pulmonary Inflammation and Injury

Aravind T. Reddy, Sowmya P. Lakshmi, Jennifer M. Kleinhenz, Roy L. Sutliff, C. Michael Hart and Raju C. Reddy
J Immunol December 1, 2012, 189 (11) 5411-5420; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1201487
Aravind T. Reddy
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sowmya P. Lakshmi
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer M. Kleinhenz
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Roy L. Sutliff
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Michael Hart
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Raju C. Reddy
Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Emory University and Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Decatur, GA 30033
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Bacterial endotoxin (LPS)-mediated sepsis involves severe, dysregulated inflammation that injures the lungs and other organs, often fatally. Vascular endothelial cells are both key mediators and targets of LPS-induced inflammatory responses. The nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ (PPARγ) exerts anti-inflammatory actions in various cells, but it is unknown whether it modulates inflammation through actions within endothelial cells. To determine whether PPARγ acts within endothelial cells to diminish endotoxemic lung inflammation and injury, we measured inflammatory responses and mediators in mice with endothelial-targeted deletion of PPARγ. Endothelial cell PPARγ (ePPARγ) knockout exacerbated LPS-induced pulmonary inflammation and injury as shown by several measures, including infiltration of inflammatory cells, edema, and production of reactive oxygen species and proinflammatory cytokines, along with upregulation of the LPS receptor TLR4 in lung tissue and increased activation of its downstream signaling pathways. In isolated LPS-stimulated endothelial cells in vitro, absence of PPARγ enhanced the production of numerous inflammatory markers. We hypothesized that the observed in vivo activity of the ligand-activated ePPARγ may arise, in part, from nitrated fatty acids (NFAs), a novel class of endogenous PPARγ ligands. Supporting this idea, we found that treating isolated endothelial cells with physiologically relevant concentrations of the endogenous NFA 10-nitro-oleate reduced LPS-induced expression of a wide range of inflammatory markers in the presence of PPARγ, but not in its absence, and also inhibited neutrophil mobility in a PPARγ-dependent manner. Our results demonstrate a key protective role of ePPARγ against endotoxemic injury and a potential ePPARγ-mediated anti-inflammatory role for NFAs.

Introduction

Sepsis is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, frequently involving acute lung injury, in hospitalized patients (1, 2). It is often caused by endotoxins, the LPS cell-wall components of Gram-negative bacteria. LPS acts via TLR4 (3) to trigger an innate immune response that is usually protective, but that during endotoxemia can become hyperactivated and dysregulated, thus causing excessive inflammation and widespread organ injury. TLR4 stimulation is a multistep process, activating a cascade of downstream pathways that, via the transcription factors NF-κB and AP-1, upregulate expression of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. Endogenous anti-inflammatory signaling pathways serve to protect the host by restraining such inflammatory responses. Sepsis represents a failure of these counterregulatory mechanisms, which normally keep inflammation in check and allow it to perform its protective functions without excessive tissue injury. Understanding these endogenous anti-inflammatory mechanisms is key to developing new tools to control pathogenic inflammation and sepsis.

Cells of the vascular endothelium are among the first to encounter circulating bacteria and their products including LPS, and they play key roles as both initiators and targets of the innate immune response. Activation of TLR4 in endothelial cells promotes increased production of neutrophil-attracting chemokines, along with integrins and adhesion molecules that promote neutrophil adhesion to the endothelium and migration into surrounding tissue, where they promote further inflammation. These actions contribute to the clinical features of severe endotoxemic sepsis, including increased vascular permeability that causes tissue edema, thereby restricting pulmonary gas exchange, and hypotensive shock (4).

This study seeks to determine whether the ligand-activated nuclear hormone receptor peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ (PPARγ), which has anti-inflammatory activity (5), acts within pulmonary vascular endothelial (VE) cells to protect against endotoxemic lung damage. PPARγ promotes transcription of genes for anti-inflammatory factors, apparently including the antioxidant NF (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2 (Nrf2) (6), and also inhibits activity of NF-κB, AP-1, and other proinflammatory transcription factors, in part by competing for essential coactivators (7). PPARγ is expressed in endothelial cells (8), and PPARγ agonists exert beneficial effects in animal models of inflammatory diseases (9–14) and sepsis (15), but it is unknown whether PPARγ acts within endothelial cells to protect against endotoxemia and sepsis. Also, the identities of physiologically relevant endogenous PPARγ ligands are unresolved. In this study, we used a transgenic mouse model of targeted endothelial cell PPARγ (ePPARγ) deficiency (16) to test the idea that ePPARγ protects against endotoxemic pulmonary inflammation and lung damage. We also discovered that the nitrated fatty acid (NFA) 10-nitro-oleic acid (OA-NO2), a candidate physiological PPARγ agonist, exerts a broad range of anti-inflammatory actions within pulmonary endothelial cells that are mediated via PPARγ.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Wild-type (ePPARγ+/+) and isogenic homozygous ePPARγ knockout (ePPARγ−/−) mice on a C57BL/6 genetic background were expanded from breeding pairs. Mice were housed in microisolator cages under specific pathogen-free conditions and fed autoclaved food. Male mice aged 6–8 wk (20–25 g) were used. All studies were performed according to protocols reviewed and approved by the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

Cells

Mouse lung endothelial cells (MLEC) were isolated as described previously (17). Endothelial identity was confirmed by cobblestone morphology, immunofluorescence staining, and positive Western blotting for PECAM-1, endothelial NO synthase, VE cadherin (BD Pharmingen, San Diego, CA), and negative blots for α-smooth muscle actin (BD Pharmingen). Cells were cultured and grown to confluent monolayers in VascuLife Basal Medium (Lifeline Cell Technology, Frederick, MD) supplemented with 2% FBS, 10 mM l-glutamine, 0.2% EnGS, 5 ng/ml recombinant human epidermal growth factor, 1 μg/ml hydrocortisone hemisuccinate, 0.75 U/ml heparin sulfate (Lifeline Cell Technology), 10,000 U/ml penicillin, and 10,000 μg/ml streptomycin (HyClone, Logan, UT), at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere of 5% CO2/95% air in tissue culture flasks, plates, or dishes coated with 2% gelatin. All cells were used at passages 3–5.

LPS administration

Mice were injected i.p. with 10 mg/kg LPS prepared from Escherichia coli O111:B6 (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). After a further 12 h, the mice were euthanized, blood was obtained by cardiac puncture and plasma prepared, and lung and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples were collected.

Lung wet/dry weight ratio

As an index of lung edema, the proportion of extravascular lung water was calculated. The lower lobe of the right lung was ligated, excised, and the wet weight was recorded. The lung was then placed in an incubator at 60°C for 24 h, the dry weight recorded, and the wet/dry ratio calculated.

BALF collection and cell count

After removal of the lower right lung lobe, BALF was collected by flushing 3 × 1 ml PBS containing 0.1 mM EDTA into the lung via a tracheal cannula. The pooled BALF was centrifuged at 500 × g at 4°C for 5 min. Pelleted cells were then resuspended in 1 ml PBS. Total cell number was counted by hemocytometer, and a differential cell count was performed by cytospin staining with Diff-Quik stain (Siemens, Newark, DE).

BALF protein

Increase in BALF protein concentration was taken as a measure of increased permeability of alveolar–capillary barriers. Total protein concentration in the supernatant after BALF centrifugation was determined using the BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL).

Assessment of capillary leakage

To assess lung capillary permeability, Evans blue dye (EBD; 50 mg/kg; Sigma-Aldrich) dissolved in 200 μl PBS was injected into the tail veins of mice after LPS injection. After 30 min, the animals were euthanized and the lungs perfused with 5 ml PBS, and the lungs then excised en bloc and snap frozen in liquid nitrogen. The frozen lungs were then homogenized in 2 ml PBS and the homogenates diluted with 2 vol formamide, then incubated at 60°C for 18 h followed by centrifugation at 5000 × g for 30 min. Supernatants were collected and absorbance measured at 620 and 740 nm. The EBD concentration was determined from standard absorbance curves evaluated in parallel. Correction for contaminating heme pigments was calculated by the formula E620 (EBD) = E620 − (1.426 × E740 + 0.030). The EBD concentration was expressed as μg/g lung tissue.

Measurement of myeloperoxidase activity

Myeloperoxidase (MPO) activity was determined in BALF and tissue as indices of neutrophil infiltration. Frozen lungs were thawed, weighed, homogenized, and sonicated on ice in radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer. After centrifugation at 10,000 × g at 4°C for 20 min, supernatants were collected. MPO activity in supernatants of tissue and BALF were measured by a fluorometric assay (700160; Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, MI) and expressed as nmol/min/ml.

Measurement of oxidant stress

H2O2 production in lung tissue was determined using the Amplex Red Hydrogen Peroxide Assay kit (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) according to the manufacturer’s directions. The concentrations of nitrate and malondialdehyde (MDA) in lung homogenates were measured using colorimetric assay kits (Cayman Chemical).

Measurement of lung and BALF cytokine levels

Lung and BALF levels of TNF-α, IL-6, KC, and MIP-2 were measured using ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Transcription factor DNA-binding activity assay

Nuclear proteins were extracted using a nuclear extraction kit (Active Motif, Carlsbad, CA), and their concentrations were determined using the BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce). Nuclear extracts were used to quantify DNA-binding activity of PPARγ, Nrf2, and the p65 subunit of NF-κB using ELISA-based TransAM kits (40096, 40696, and 50296; Active Motif) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Western blotting

Total protein extracts were prepared by lysing cells and homogenizing lung tissue in 500 μl ice-cold radioimmunoprecipitation assay buffer supplemented with Halt Protease Inhibitor Cocktail (Pierce). Extracts were incubated for 20 min at 4°C followed by centrifugation at 14,000 × g for 15 min. The supernatants were collected and stored at −80°C. Samples were mixed with sample buffer, separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE gel, and electroblotted onto a polyvinyldifluoride membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). The membrane was blocked with blocking solution (3% BSA in TBST) for 1 h at room temperature. Blots were then incubated overnight at 4°C with primary Ab against the target protein (1:1000). Abs against NF-κB–p65, PPARγ, Nrf2, lamin B1, IL-1R–associated kinase 4 (IRAK-4), TRAF6, and β-actin were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Abs against TLR4, MyD88, p-ERK, p-Akt, p-IKKα/β, p-JNK, and p-p38 MAPK were from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). The membrane was then washed in TBST and incubated with secondary Abs consisting of donkey anti-mouse IR 680 (red; LI-COR, Lincoln, NE) and goat anti-rabbit IR 780 (green; LI-COR), diluted 1:5000, for 1 h at room temperature. The infrared signal was detected using an Odyssey Infrared Imager (LI-COR).

Lung histopathology

The lungs were inflated and fixed with 10% neutral formalin overnight at room temperature. Lung tissue was dehydrated with increasing ethanol concentrations and then embedded in paraffin. Five-micrometer–thick paraffin sections were stained with H&E.

Immunofluorescence staining and confocal imaging

MLEC were cultured on 2% gelatin-coated glass-bottom dishes (MatTek, Ashland, MA) in VascuLife Basal Medium (Lifeline Cell Technology) without growth factors and were treated with 100 ng/ml LPS for 6 h. Cells were then washed twice with PBS and subsequently fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin for 15 min at 37°C. After fixation, cells were permeabilized with Target Retrieval Solution (Dako, Carpinteria, CA) for 10 min at 95°C, allowed to cool to room temperature, and blocked at 37°C for 1 h with 1% BSA in PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 (PBST). After being washed, cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with primary Abs to ICAM-1 or PECAM-1 (BD Pharmingen), diluted 1:50 in PBST-1% BSA. After washing with PBST, cells were incubated at 37°C for 1 h with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rat secondary Ab (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) diluted 1:50 in PBST-1% BSA, and then washed three times with PBST. Coverslips were retrieved and mounted on glass slides with Vectashield mounting medium with DAPI (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). The slides were viewed by an Olympus Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus, Center Valley, PA) using a ×60 fluorescence lens along with Fluoview confocal software (FV10-ASW v1.7; Olympus).

Determination of cellular reactive oxygen species

MLEC were cultured and treated with LPS as described earlier in Immunofluorescence Staining and Confocal Imaging. Production of intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) in live cells was determined using the Amplite Intracellular Fluorimetric Hydrogen Peroxide Assay kit (AAT Bioquest, Sunnyvale, CA). Coverslips were retrieved and mounted on glass slides with Vectashield mounting medium (Vector Laboratories). The slides were viewed by an Olympus Fluoview FV1000 confocal microscope (Olympus) using a ×60 fluorescence lens along with Fluoview confocal software (FV10-ASW v1.7; Olympus).

In vitro neutrophil transmigration assay

MLEC were seeded at a density of 5 × 105 cells in the upper chamber of each transwell (6.5-mm diameter, 3-μm pore size; Costar, Corning, NY), and the cells were grown to form a confluent monolayer. In some experiments, cells were treated with 100 nM OA-NO2 or DMSO along with 100 ng/ml LPS or with PBS and incubated for 6 h. Neutrophils isolated from BALF of LPS-stimulated ePPARγ+/+ mice were added to the top chamber at 4 × 105 cells/well and, where indicated, chemoattractant was added to the lower chamber. The neutrophils were incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h, after which neutrophils that had transmigrated into the lower chamber were collected, counted, and transmigration expressed as percentage of neutrophils added.

RNA isolation and quantitative real-time RT-PCR

MLEC were cultured and treated with LPS as described earlier in Immunofluorescence Staining and Confocal Imaging, but were pretreated with 100 nM OA-NO2 or DMSO for 1 h before LPS exposure. After 6 h, cells were lysed and RNA was isolated using RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), and cDNA were generated from 100 ng total RNA using MultiScribe reverse transcriptase (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using random and oligo-dT primers. Real-time quantitative PCR was performed using 100 ng cDNA with 2X SYBR Green Master mix (Applied Biosystems) and specific primers for the genes of interest (Supplemental Table I). These experiments were performed on an AB 7500 fast thermal cycler using a three-step protocol using the melting curve method. The average of each gene cycle threshold (Ct) was determined for each experiment. Relative cDNA levels (2–ΔΔCt) for the genes of interest were determined by using the comparative Ct method, which generates the ΔΔCt as the difference between the gene of interest and the housekeeping genes GAPDH and 9s rRNA for each sample. Each averaged experimental gene expression sample was compared with the averaged control sample, which was set to 1.

Statistical analysis

Data are presented as mean ± SD. Differences between groups were analyzed using ANOVA, followed by a Bonferroni multiple-comparison test using GraphPad Prism 5.03 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA). A p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

Endotoxemia-induced capillary permeability increases and lung injury is more severe in endothelial PPARγ knockout mice

To test our hypothesis that ePPARγ modulates endotoxemia-induced lung injury, we compared lung edema and inflammation in endothelial PPARγ knockout (ePPARγ−/−) and wild-type (ePPARγ+/+) control mice 12 h after treatment with LPS (10 mg/kg i.p.). ePPARγ deficiency markedly increased all measures of lung injury-associated pulmonary edema and capillary leakage. LPS-induced increases in protein content of BALF (Fig. 1A), an indicator of elevated capillary permeability, and lung wet/dry tissue weight ratio (Fig. 1B) were nearly doubled in ePPARγ−/− versus ePPARγ+/+ mice, as was extravasation of EBD 30 min after i.v. injection (Fig. 1C). Both wild-type (Fig. 1D, left panel) and ePPARγ knockout (KO) mice (Fig. 1D, right panel) treated with LPS exhibited leukocyte infiltration, alveolar distortion, and edema on histological examination, but these were more severe in ePPARγ KO animals.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

ePPARγ deficiency exacerbates LPS-induced lung injury. All measures of LPS (10 mg/kg i.p.)-induced (A, C) capillary leakage, (B) edema, and (D) inflammation were markedly increased in ePPARγ−/− mice versus ePPARγ+/+ controls. Mice were euthanized, BALF collected, and lungs excised 12 h after injection. (A) Protein concentration in BALF. (B) Ratio of lung tissue wet/dry weight. (C) Extravasation of EBD into the lung after i.v. injection, photographed (left panel; note lighter color) and quantitated by spectrophotometry (right panel). (D) Histological appearance (original magnification ×20) with H&E staining, showing intensified infiltration by inflammatory cells in ePPARγ−/− mice (right panel). Each data set is representative of two to three independent experiments with n = 6–8 mice/group. ***p < 0.001.

ePPARγ deletion increases production of ROS and proinflammatory cytokines

To assess the influence of ePPARγ on endotoxemia-associated mediators of pulmonary inflammation in vivo, we compared pulmonary LPS-induced increases of relevant ROS and proinflammatory cytokines in ePPARγ−/− and ePPARγ+/+ mice. ROS production was assessed in lung tissue and BALF by measuring three different indices: H2O2 production (Fig. 2A, 2D); concentrations of nitrate, which is an end product of the key vasodilator NO generated by a different pathway than H2O2 (Fig. 2B, 2E); and MDA, a lipid oxidation product that provides an index of overall oxidant stress (MDA/protein ratio; Fig. 2C, 2F). LPS treatment increased the levels of all these markers in both mouse strains, but the LPS-induced increases seen were significantly greater in ePPARγ KO mice for all ROS-related analytes tested. We also measured LPS-induced increases in expression within lung tissue and BALF of the proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 (Fig. 2G, 2J) and TNF-α (Fig. 2H, 2K), for which endothelial cells are important sources, as well as the chemokine KC (Fig. 2I, 2L). Again, LPS treatment elicited increased cytokine/chemokine levels in both mouse strains, but the increases seen in all markers were significantly greater in ePPARγ KO than in wild-type mice. These results indicate that the greater severity of inflammation seen in ePPARγ KO mice is associated with increases in a range of ROS and key inflammatory cytokines.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Production of ROS and proinflammatory cytokines is elevated after ePPARγ deletion. ePPARγ+/+ and ePPARγ−/− mice were treated with LPS (10 mg/kg i.p.), and after 12 h, ROS and cytokine levels were measured in BALF and lung tissue extracts. LPS-induced elevations in ROS and cytokine levels were increased by ePPARγ KO in lung and BALF for all analytes: (A, D) H2O2, (B, E) total nitrate concentration, (C, F) MDA/protein ratio, (G, J) IL-6, (H, K) TNF-α, and (I, L) KC. Data are representative of three independent experiments with n = 6–8 mice/group. ***p < 0.001.

Endotoxemia-induced neutrophil infiltration into alveolar space is increased in ePPARγ KO mice

Endotoxemia-induced inflammation is associated with infiltration of neutrophils into target tissues including the lung. We found that multiple measures of LPS-induced neutrophil infiltration were markedly increased in ePPARγ KO versus wild-type mice, including total numbers of cells in alveolar space, assessed by measuring those recovered in BALF (Fig. 3A), numbers of neutrophils identified by differential staining (Fig. 3B), and MPO levels in BALF (Fig. 3C) and whole-lung tissue (Fig. 3D). Microscopic examination of BALF with differential staining similarly showed that ePPARγ deficiency led to greater LPS-induced increases in both total cell numbers and proportion of neutrophils (Fig. 3E).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Migration of neutrophils into the lung is increased in ePPARγ KO mice. ePPARγ−/− mice exhibited greater elevations of total numbers of (A) cells, (B) neutrophils (polymorphonuclear cells), and (C) MPO activity in BALF, as well as (D) MPO activity in lung tissue 12 h after injection of LPS (10 mg/kg i.p.). (E) Differential staining of cells in BALF revealed increased numbers of polymorphonuclear cells in ePPARγ−/− (right panel) versus that seen in ePPARγ+/+ mice (left panel). Data are representative of two independent experiments with n = 6–8 mice/group. Original magnification ×40. ***p < 0.001.

Genetic deletion of ePPARγ upregulates LPS signaling

To determine the mechanisms underlying the exaggerated inflammatory responses seen in ePPARγ KO mice, we measured the levels of LPS-associated intermediate signaling proteins after induction of endotoxemia, using Western blots of lung tissue extracts. After LPS treatment, ePPARγ−/− mice exhibited greater expression of TLR4 and the TLR signaling proteins MyD88, IRAK-4, and TRAF6 than did ePPARγ+/+ mice (Fig. 4A). ePPARγ KO mice similarly exhibited greater levels of the phosphorylated (activated) forms of downstream signaling mediators, which serve to activate the transcription factors AP-1 and NF-κB, than did ePPARγ+/+ mice.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Genetic deletion of ePPARγ upregulates in vivo LPS signaling. ePPARγ+/+ and ePPARγ−/− mice were treated with LPS (10 mg/kg i.p.). Twelve hours later, lung tissue protein extracts were prepared and the levels of LPS signaling proteins analyzed. Lungs of ePPARγ−/− mice exhibited higher levels of (A) the LPS receptor TLR4 and its downstream signaling molecules MyD88, IRAK-4, and TRAF6; (B) the phosphorylated (activated) forms of intermediate signaling molecules further downstream (Akt, ERK, p38, JNK, IKKα/β); and (C) the transcription factors NF-κB (p65) and Nrf2. Blots were simultaneously incubated with lamin B1 or β-actin Ab where indicated. Smaller blot represents PBS-treated ePPARγ+/+ mice (left), ePPARγ−/− mice (right). In larger blot, left four lanes represent LPS-treated ePPARγ+/+ mice, and right four lanes represent LPS-treated ePPARγ−/− mice. In separate experiments, we also determined DNA-binding activities of transcription factors in lung extracts. ePPARγ KO abolished the LPS-induced component of (D) PPARγ activity, whereas (E) enhancing the LPS-induced decrease in Nrf2 activity and (F) markedly elevating LPS-induced NF-κB activity. Blots are representative of three independent experiments, with each lane representing a single mouse lung, and activity data of two independent experiments (n = 6–8 mice/group). ***p < 0.001.

Absence of ePPARγ exaggerates LPS-induced changes in activity of NF-κB and Nrf2

Endotoxemia-induced inflammation involves upregulation of proinflammatory transcription factors including NF-κB, which is transrepressed by PPARγ, as well as downregulation of the antioxidant transcription factor Nrf2, which evidence suggests is upregulated by PPARγ (6). To test the influence of PPARγ on LPS-stimulated expression and activity of these signaling proteins in vivo, we compared their levels in ePPARγ KO and wild-type control mice. After LPS treatment, ePPARγ KO mice exhibited increased nuclear p65 and decreased nuclear Nrf2 protein levels versus those in wild-type controls (Fig. 4C), paralleled by an LPS-induced upregulation of NF-κB activity (Fig. 4F) and a decrease in Nrf2 activity (Fig. 4E). KO of PPARγ specifically in endothelial cells did not significantly decrease baseline whole-lung PPARγ activity (Fig. 4D), but it abolished the LPS-induced increase.

PPARγ deletion exaggerates inflammatory responses of endothelial cells in vitro

To ascertain whether ePPARγ acts within lung endothelial cells to modulate inflammatory responses, we compared expression of inflammatory markers induced by LPS in vitro, in MLEC isolated from ePPARγ−/− and ePPARγ+/+ mice. Endothelial identity of the isolated cells was confirmed microscopically (Fig. 5A) and by Western blotting (Fig. 5B). Endothelial cells exhibited the expected abundant expression of the endothelial isoform of NO synthase and the adhesion molecules VE cadherin, the related PECAM-1, and near absence of α-smooth muscle actin, whereas isolated fibroblasts exhibited an opposite expression profile. We confirmed the absence of PPARγ mRNA and of PPARγ protein in endothelial cells from ePPARγ KO mice by real-time RT-PCR and Western blotting, respectively (Fig. 5C, 5E). After stimulation of MLEC from wild-type and ePPARγ KO mice in vitro with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 6 h, PPARγ-deficient MLEC exhibited increased expression of the inflammation-associated adhesion molecules ICAM-1 (Fig. 5F) and PECAM-1 (Fig. 5G), together with increased ROS production (Fig. 5H) versus wild-type MLEC. These results indicate that PPARγ acts within MLEC to reduce LPS-induced inflammatory markers.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Absence of ePPARγ exaggerates inflammatory responses of MLEC in vitro. MLEC were isolated from ePPARγ+/+ and ePPARγ−/− mice (n = 7–8 mice/group) and plated onto 2% gelatin-coated dishes. (A) MLEC exhibit expected endothelial cell morphology. (B) Western blotting showed the expected expression profiles in MLEC and similarly isolated fibroblasts (MLF), respectively, of the endothelium-specific proteins endothelial NO synthase, VE cadherin, and PECAM-1, and the fibroblast-specific protein α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). (C) Relative PPARγ mRNA levels were determined by real-time RT-PCR. In some experiments, MLEC were isolated from ePPARγ+/+ and ePPARγ−/− mice 12 h after treatment with LPS (10 mg/kg, i.p.), and nuclear protein extracts were prepared. (D) PPARγ DNA-binding activity and (E) protein expression by Western blotting were determined. In other experiments, after 2-h serum deprivation, monolayer cultures were treated with LPS (100 ng/ml) for 6 h. After LPS treatment, immunofluorescence microscopy revealed increased ICAM-1 and PECAM-1 in MLEC isolated from (F, G, right panels) ePPARγ−/− versus those from (F, G, left panels) ePPARγ+/+ mice, and also increased (H, right versus left panel) intracellular ROS levels. Blots and images are representative of three independent experiments. ***p < 0.001.

To determine the effects of endotoxemia on PPARγ, endothelial cells were isolated from ePPARγ+/+ and ePPARγ−/− mice 12 h after stimulation in vivo with PBS or LPS. Although there was a significant reduction in PPARγ protein expression (Fig. 5E), a significant increase in PPARγ activity (Fig. 5E) was seen in endothelial cells from LPS-stimulated ePPARγ+/+ mice compared with PBS-stimulated ePPARγ+/+ mice. These data support the concept that LPS induces a PPARγ response via increased production of activating endogenous ligands.

ePPARγ deletion abolishes anti-inflammatory effect of an NFA

PPARγ is ligand activated, but it is unknown which of several classes of candidate endogenous ligands may be physiologically relevant. NFAs, including NO-derived positional isomers of nitro-oleic acid and nitrolinoleic acid, comprise one such group of candidate ligands (18, 19). Their concentrations in plasma are similar to their potencies as PPARγ activators, suggesting a physiological role as PPARγ agonists (18). As agonists of the anti-inflammatory PPARγ, NFAs would be expected to exert anti-inflammatory effects, but some findings suggest that the anti-inflammatory effects of NFAs may not be mediated exclusively by PPARγ activation. We tested these ideas by assessing the effects of OA-NO2 on LPS-induced inflammatory responses within MLEC in vitro and the extent of these effects’ dependence on PPARγ.

We first tested the ability of OA-NO2 to inhibit LPS-induced cytokine production and expression of proinflammatory mediators and adhesion molecules in MLEC. MLEC cultured on 2% gelatin-coated culture dishes without growth factors were pretreated with OA-NO2 at a concentration similar to that found normally in blood (100 nM) or with DMSO vehicle for 1 h, then treated with 100 ng/ml LPS and incubated for another 6 h. OA-NO2 markedly inhibited the robust LPS-induced transcription of all of the following inflammation-associated genes in cells from wild-type mice (Fig. 6A–L): the adhesion-related molecules E-selectin, ICAM-1, PECAM-1, and VCAM-1; the enzymes NOS3, NOS2, NADPH oxidase 4, and cyclooxygenase-2; the chemokine MCP-1; the cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α; and the p65 subunit of NF-κB. The ability of OA-NO2 to reduce LPS-induced expression of each of these genes was completely abolished in MLEC from PPARγ KO mice, indicating strong dependence on the presence of ePPARγ. This was likewise true for expression of the adhesion molecule VE cadherin (Supplemental Fig. 1A) and the two isoforms of IL-12 (Supplemental Fig. 1B, 1C). We also found that in wild-type cells, OA-NO2 upregulated expression of PPARγ, of the scavenger receptor CD36, which is involved in resolution of inflammation, of mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2, and of the antioxidant enzyme heme oxygenase-1 (Fig. 6M–P). These upregulating actions of OA-NO2 were likewise abolished by PPARγ KO. These findings indicate that OA-NO2 at a physiologically relevant concentration exerts a range of anti-inflammatory effects directly on endothelial cells via a PPARγ-dependent mechanism.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

PPARγ deletion eliminates OA-NO2–mediated suppression of LPS-induced expression of inflammatory markers in MLEC in vitro. MLEC were isolated from ePPARγ+/+ and ePPARγ−/− mice (n = 7–8 mice/group), and plated onto 2% gelatin-coated dishes. Monolayer cultures were deprived of serum for 2 h, pretreated with 100 nM OA-NO2 or DMSO for 1 h, then exposed to 100 ng/ml LPS for 6 h. Cells were then harvested, RNA isolated, and expression of the (A–P) indicated genes was determined using real-time PCR. Results are normalized to values for the housekeeping genes GAPDH and 9s rRNA. Data are representative of three independent experiments. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

To assess the influence of NFAs on a major cellular route of lung inflammation, we also tested the ability of OA-NO2 to inhibit neutrophil transmigration across MLEC monolayers in vitro. Endothelial cells were isolated from wild-type and PPARγ KO mice, and cultured in monolayers in the upper chambers of transwells. Transmigration was assessed after pretreating the MLEC monolayers with LPS along with OA-NO2 or vehicle (Fig. 7A). Wild-type neutrophils were then placed in the upper chamber, the chemoattractant stimulus (LPS + TNF-α) was added to the lower chamber, and the number of neutrophils entering each lower chamber in 1.5 h was determined. In wild-type cells, OA-NO2 significantly inhibited neutrophil transmigration (by 45–65%), irrespective of whether LPS was present in the upper chamber (Fig. 7B, 7C). The extent of OA-NO2–induced inhibition of neutrophil transmigration was substantially reduced (to 9–13%) in ePPARγ−/− MLEC, although it did remain statistically significant. The results suggest that the anti-inflammatory effects of OA-NO2 include inhibition of neutrophil transmigration across the endothelium, and are predominantly PPARγ dependent.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

OA-NO2 inhibits LPS-induced neutrophil transmigration in vitro via an ePPARγ–dependent mechanism. MLEC were isolated from ePPARγ+/+ and ePPARγ−/− mice (n = 7–8 mice/group) and then grown to confluent monolayers in transwell chambers. As shown schematically in (A), monolayers were treated with 100 nM OA-NO2 or DMSO (Veh) along with (B) PBS or (C) LPS (100 ng/ml) and incubated for 6 h. After 6 h, neutrophils (4 × 105) were added to each upper chamber, and a chemoattractant mixture of LPS (100 ng/ml) plus TNF-α (25 ng/ml) in RPMI 1640 was added to each lower chamber. The chambers were incubated at 37°C for 1.5 h, and neutrophils that had transmigrated into the lower chambers were collected and counted. Data are representative of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Discussion

Our findings indicate that ePPARγ plays an important protective role in pulmonary endothelial cells during endotoxemia, substantially mitigating lung injury and inflammation. Deficiency of ePPARγ exacerbated LPS-induced pulmonary damage (edema, capillary leakage) and inflammation in vivo, and intensified the activation by LPS of numerous proinflammatory genes, signaling proteins, cytokines, and other mediators both in vivo and in vitro. In isolated MLEC, robust LPS-induced increases seen in adhesion proteins and proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and ROS-generating enzymes were similarly enhanced by ePPARγ deficiency. This indicates that ePPARγ modulates LPS responses by acting within endothelial cells in a manner that is not dependent on participation of other cell types. We found that ePPARγ suppressed LPS-induced expression of endothelial proinflammatory mediators, including cytokines and adhesion molecules that facilitate migration of neutrophils into alveolar spaces, as well as LPS-induced pathophysiological deficits in endothelial cell function that lead to increased capillary permeability and lung edema. Together, these results clearly underscore the roles of endothelial cells as robust mediators and pathogenic targets of LPS during endotoxemia, and point to ePPARγ acting within endothelial cells as a strong suppressor of endothelial LPS-induced cellular responses.

The exaggerated LPS effects we saw in ePPARγ-deficient mice encompassed upregulated expression of LPS receptors along with increased activation of their downstream LPS signaling pathways. The first step in LPS activation of TLR4 is formation of a ternary complex with LPS binding protein and CD14, which then interacts with TLR4 and the adaptor protein MD2, leading to activation of MyD88, which activates IRAK-4 and TRAF6 (20). We found that ePPARγ deficiency increased the robust LPS-induced upregulation of all these proteins in lungs of mice, and that increased expression of additional signaling intermediates with ePPARγ deficiency was associated with increased activation of NF-κB. The enhanced activity of the latter proinflammatory transcription factors seen in ePPARγ-deficient mice probably accounts for the enhanced expression we saw in a variety of proinflammatory cytokines, chemokines, and adhesion molecules. In addition to these observed effects on TLR signaling pathways and intermediates, PPARγ also inhibits activity of NF-κB, AP-1, and similar proinflammatory transcription factors directly, by competing for essential coactivators (7) and by other mechanisms. Although not measured directly in our study, these known actions likely also contributed to the anti-inflammatory effects we observed.

We found that ePPARγ represents a highly specific, LPS-inducible compartment of total PPARγ activity in lungs, because ePPARγ KO had no effect on total baseline tissue PPARγ activity levels in lung, but abolished the LPS-induced increase in whole-lung PPARγ activity seen in wild-type mice. This implies ePPARγ activity is highly recruited in endothelial cells during sepsis and probably accounts for the entire LPS-induced elevation of whole-lung PPARγ activity. Alternatively, it is conceivable that LPS-activated ePPARγ somehow recruits expression of PPARγ in other cell types, contributing part of the total response seen in PPARγ activity. Considering the broad range and strength of the downregulating actions of ePPARγ upon LPS responses that we observed, our results support the idea that LPS-induced upregulation of ePPARγ activity constitutes an important endogenous pathway for adaptive restraint of inflammatory responses, particularly under the relatively severe conditions (LPS dose) tested in this study.

ROS contribute both to the adaptive (antibacterial) and maladaptive (tissue-damaging) effects of inflammation. The transcription factor Nrf2 acts to reduce ROS-induced tissue damage by promoting expression of proteins that have antioxidant effects. In addition, Nrf2 activates the PPARγ transcriptional promoter when transfected into airway epithelial cells, whereas global deficiency of Nrf2 blocked the ability of PPARγ ligands to suppress hyperoxia-induced lung inflammation and injury (6). Currently, we found that LPS reduced Nrf2 activity, and that ePPARγ deficiency exaggerated the LPS-induced decline in Nrf2 levels, which would thus tend to reduce endogenous protection against deleterious effects of the high ROS levels that occur during sepsis. These findings indicate that the promotion of Nrf2 expression by PPARγ is not limited to hyperoxia but also occurs in the high-ROS context of inflammation and sepsis. Also, these effects of PPARγ are seen specifically in endothelial cells. Thus, the more pronounced LPS-induced decline in lung tissue Nrf2 levels caused by ePPARγ deficiency probably contributed to the elevated LPS-induced ROS production seen in isolated PPARγ-deficient MLEC.

We found that ePPARγ deficiency in endothelial cells increased their LPS-induced expression of adhesion proteins including ICAM-1, VCAM-1, and E-selectin, indicating that ePPARγ suppresses induction of adhesion proteins. This action may profoundly influence pulmonary inflammation, because production of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 is required for transmigration of neutrophils into the lungs, as well as into other organs. Similarly, Wang and colleagues (21) found that constitutively active PPARγ suppressed TNF-α– and PMA-induced VCAM-1, ICAM-1, and E-selectin expression, and neutrophil adhesion to HUVECs. Also, PPARγ agonists (22–25) and compounds that upregulate PPARγ expression (26, 27) have generally been found to inhibit neutrophil adhesion and VCAM-1 expression elicited by proinflammatory stimuli. Not all studies have concurred about whether ICAM-1 is downregulated by PPARγ agonists, and the reported effects of individual agonists on adhesion protein expression have been variable (23, 24, 26). The reasons for such apparent discrepancies among reported actions of PPARγ agonists are unknown but are not thought to be attributable to differences in cell origin or in proinflammatory stimulus, although they may reflect differential dosage effects. In any case, the observed results of altered PPARγ expression have been highly consistent, supporting the idea that PPARγ activation serves to inhibit expression of inflammation-promoting adhesion proteins.

Our findings also point to a role of NFAs as potential endogenous agonists that might contribute to the observed actions of the agonist-driven transcriptional activator PPARγ. A variety of endogenous compounds can bind to and activate PPARγ, and have thus been proposed as endogenous agonists, but the physiological relevance of most such agents is doubtful due to insufficient potencies in relation to in vivo concentration ranges. The most plausible identified candidates to date are NFAs, especially positional isomers of nitro-oleic and nitrolinoleic acids (18, 19), which are produced by nonenzymatic reactions of NO and its inorganic reaction products with endogenous unsaturated fatty acids (28). A role of endogenous NFAs as anti-inflammatory mediators has been thought plausible because they are present in body fluids (29), are active at physiological concentrations, and the production of NFA-generating NO is increased during inflammation. We found that exposing MLEC to the NFA OA-NO2 partially or completely blocked LPS-induced expression of adhesion molecules, cytokines, chemokines, and inflammation-associated enzymes in MLEC, in a manner that was completely dependent on ePPARγ expression. All these wide-ranging anti-inflammatory effects were elicited by a concentration of NFA OA-NO2 that is well within its endogenous concentration range (30). Also, OA-NO2 upregulated the expression by MLEC of several anti-inflammatory molecules, including PPARγ, indicating that the observed inhibitory effects on the expression of proinflammatory LPS-induced proteins and mediators are not attributable to any nonspecific toxicity. In addition, we discovered that OA-NO2 inhibited the transmigration of neutrophils across endothelial cell monolayers. Neutrophil transmigration is a function that is fundamental to inflammation, and we have previously found that it is inhibited by PPARγ activation (31). We now show that NFA-mediated inhibition of neutrophil transmigration occurred under both baseline and LPS-stimulated conditions, and is partially dependent on expression of PPARγ by the MLEC. These findings are consistent with, but qualitatively expand, the reported anti-inflammatory actions of NFAs, including inhibition of TNF-α–induced macrophage VCAM-1 and monocyte rolling and adhesion (30); inhibition of superoxide generation, calcium influx, elastase release, and CD11b expression by human neutrophils (32); and upregulation of the anti-inflammatory enzyme heme oxygenase-1 in human aortic endothelial cells (33). Our observations thus support a role for NFAs as physiologically relevant endogenous PPARγ agonists. Further research is required to confirm this possibility in vivo.

Inflammatory responses to pathogens can be destructive and often lethal to the host if unchecked. Endogenous systems operating at many levels have evolved to restrain such damage, whereas permitting effective antimicrobial defense. Our findings indicate that PPARγ acts within pulmonary endothelial cells during endotoxemia to exert such a key mitigating effect, inhibiting the many proinflammatory responses elicited by LPS in endothelial cells, thereby restraining inflammation and reducing pulmonary injury. We also addressed the unresolved question of which candidate molecule(s) serve as endogenous PPARγ agonists by finding unequivocal and novel evidence that the endogenous NFA OA-NO2 completely blocks a wide range of LPS-induced proinflammatory responses in MLEC by via a mechanism specifically dependent on PPARγ. Because our studies were confined to pulmonary endothelial cells and lung tissue, further research will be needed to determine whether they are also broadly applicable to inflammatory pathogenesis involving endothelial cell populations in other organs. These results may help point the way to new pharmacological interventions for sepsis and lung injury.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant HL093196 (to R.C.R.).

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    BALF
    bronchoalveolar lavage fluid
    Ct
    cycle threshold
    EBD
    Evans blue dye
    ePPARγ
    endothelial cell peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ
    IRAK-4
    IL-1R–associated kinase 4
    KO
    knockout
    MDA
    malondialdehyde
    MLEC
    mouse lung endothelial cell
    MPO
    myeloperoxidase
    NFA
    nitrated fatty acid
    Nrf2
    NF (erythroid-derived 2)-like 2
    OA-NO2
    10-nitro-oleic acid
    PBST
    PBS containing 0.05% Tween 20
    PPARγ
    peroxisome proliferator–activated receptor γ
    ROS
    reactive oxygen species
    VE
    vascular endothelial.

  • Received May 29, 2012.
  • Accepted September 22, 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Hotchkiss R. S.,
    2. I. E. Karl
    . 2003. The pathophysiology and treatment of sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 348: 138–150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Vincent J. L.
    2011. Acute kidney injury, acute lung injury and septic shock: how does mortality compare? Contrib. Nephrol. 174: 71–77.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Lu Y. C.,
    2. W. C. Yeh,
    3. P. S. Ohashi
    . 2008. LPS/TLR4 signal transduction pathway. Cytokine 42: 145–151.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Peters K.,
    2. R. E. Unger,
    3. J. Brunner,
    4. C. J. Kirkpatrick
    . 2003. Molecular basis of endothelial dysfunction in sepsis. Cardiovasc. Res. 60: 49–57.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Nencioni A.,
    2. S. Wesselborg,
    3. P. Brossart
    . 2003. Role of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ and its ligands in the control of immune responses. Crit. Rev. Immunol. 23: 1–13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Cho H. Y.,
    2. W. Gladwell,
    3. X. Wang,
    4. B. Chorley,
    5. D. Bell,
    6. S. P. Reddy,
    7. S. R. Kleeberger
    . 2010. Nrf2-regulated PPARgamma expression is critical to protection against acute lung injury in mice. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 182: 170–182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Kostadinova R.,
    2. W. Wahli,
    3. L. Michalik
    . 2005. PPARs in diseases: control mechanisms of inflammation. Curr. Med. Chem. 12: 2995–3009.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Marx N.,
    2. T. Bourcier,
    3. G. K. Sukhova,
    4. P. Libby,
    5. J. Plutzky
    . 1999. PPARgamma activation in human endothelial cells increases plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 expression: PPARgamma as a potential mediator in vascular disease. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 19: 546–551.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Belvisi M. G.,
    2. D. J. Hele,
    3. M. A. Birrell
    . 2006. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonists as therapy for chronic airway inflammation. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 533: 101–109.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ito K.,
    2. J. Shimada,
    3. D. Kato,
    4. S. Toda,
    5. T. Takagi,
    6. Y. Naito,
    7. T. Yoshikawa,
    8. N. Kitamura
    . 2004. Protective effects of preischemic treatment with pioglitazone, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma ligand, on lung ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 25: 530–536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Milam J. E.,
    2. V. G. Keshamouni,
    3. S. H. Phan,
    4. B. Hu,
    5. S. R. Gangireddy,
    6. C. M. Hogaboam,
    7. T. J. Standiford,
    8. V. J. Thannickal,
    9. R. C. Reddy
    . 2008. PPAR-γ agonists inhibit profibrotic phenotypes in human lung fibroblasts and bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 294: L891–L901.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Sundararajan S.,
    2. Q. Jiang,
    3. M. Heneka,
    4. G. Landreth
    . 2006. PPARgamma as a therapeutic target in central nervous system diseases. Neurochem. Int. 49: 136–144.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. van Westerloo D. J.,
    2. S. Florquin,
    3. A. M. de Boer,
    4. J. Daalhuisen,
    5. A. F. de Vos,
    6. M. J. Bruno,
    7. T. van der Poll
    . 2005. Therapeutic effects of troglitazone in experimental chronic pancreatitis in mice. Am. J. Pathol. 166: 721–728.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Zhao W.,
    2. S. G. Thacker,
    3. J. B. Hodgin,
    4. H. Zhang,
    5. J. H. Wang,
    6. J. L. Park,
    7. A. Randolph,
    8. E. C. Somers,
    9. S. Pennathur,
    10. M. Kretzler,
    11. et al
    . 2009. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma agonist pioglitazone improves cardiometabolic risk and renal inflammation in murine lupus. J. Immunol. 183: 2729–2740.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Haraguchi G.,
    2. H. Kosuge,
    3. Y. Maejima,
    4. J. Suzuki,
    5. T. Imai,
    6. M. Yoshida,
    7. M. Isobe
    . 2008. Pioglitazone reduces systematic inflammation and improves mortality in apolipoprotein E knockout mice with sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 34: 1304–1312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Nicol C. J.,
    2. M. Adachi,
    3. T. E. Akiyama,
    4. F. J. Gonzalez
    . 2005. PPARgamma in endothelial cells influences high fat diet-induced hypertension. Am. J. Hypertens. 18: 549–556.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Fehrenbach M. L.,
    2. G. Cao,
    3. J. T. Williams,
    4. J. M. Finklestein,
    5. H. M. Delisser
    . 2009. Isolation of murine lung endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 296: L1096–L1103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Baker P. R. S.,
    2. Y. Lin,
    3. F. J. Schopfer,
    4. S. R. Woodcock,
    5. A. L. Groeger,
    6. C. Batthyany,
    7. S. Sweeney,
    8. M. H. Long,
    9. K. E. Iles,
    10. L. M. S. Baker,
    11. et al
    . 2005. Fatty acid transduction of nitric oxide signaling: multiple nitrated unsaturated fatty acid derivatives exist in human blood and urine and serve as endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor ligands. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 42464–42475.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Schopfer F. J.,
    2. Y. Lin,
    3. P. R. S. Baker,
    4. T. Cui,
    5. M. Garcia-Barrio,
    6. J. Zhang,
    7. K. Chen,
    8. Y. E. Chen,
    9. B. A. Freeman
    . 2005. Nitrolinoleic acid: an endogenous peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ ligand. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 2340–2345.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Kawai T.,
    2. S. Akira
    . 2007. TLR signaling. Semin. Immunol. 19: 24–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Wang N.,
    2. L. Verna,
    3. N. G. Chen,
    4. J. Chen,
    5. H. Li,
    6. B. M. Forman,
    7. M. B. Stemerman
    . 2002. Constitutive activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma suppresses pro-inflammatory adhesion molecules in human vascular endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 34176–34181.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Imamoto E.,
    2. N. Yoshida,
    3. K. Uchiyama,
    4. M. Kuroda,
    5. S. Kokura,
    6. H. Ichikawa,
    7. Y. Naito,
    8. T. Tanigawa,
    9. T. Yoshikawa
    . 2004. Inhibitory effect of pioglitazone on expression of adhesion molecules on neutrophils and endothelial cells. Biofactors 20: 37–47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Jackson S. M.,
    2. F. Parhami,
    3. X. P. Xi,
    4. J. A. Berliner,
    5. W. A. Hsueh,
    6. R. E. Law,
    7. L. L. Demer
    . 1999. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor activators target human endothelial cells to inhibit leukocyte-endothelial cell interaction. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 19: 2094–2104.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Jung Y.,
    2. S. Song,
    3. C. Choi
    . 2008. Peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma agonists suppress TNFalpha-induced ICAM-1 expression by endothelial cells in a manner potentially dependent on inhibition of reactive oxygen species. Immunol. Lett. 117: 63–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Tikellis C.,
    2. K. A. Jandeleit-Dahm,
    3. K. Sheehy,
    4. A. Murphy,
    5. J. Chin-Dusting,
    6. D. Kling,
    7. E. Sebokova,
    8. M. E. Cooper,
    9. J. Mizrahi,
    10. K. J. Woollard
    . 2008. Reduced plaque formation induced by rosiglitazone in an STZ-diabetes mouse model of atherosclerosis is associated with downregulation of adhesion molecules. Atherosclerosis 199: 55–64.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Hwa J. S.,
    2. L. Mun,
    3. H. J. Kim,
    4. H. G. Seo,
    5. J. H. Lee,
    6. J. H. Kwak,
    7. D. U. Lee,
    8. K. C. Chang
    . 2011. Genipin selectively inhibits TNF-α-activated VCAM-1 but not ICAM-1 expression by upregulation of PPAR-γ in human endothelial cells. Korean J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 15: 157–162.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Moon L.,
    2. Y. M. Ha,
    3. H. J. Jang,
    4. H. S. Kim,
    5. M. S. Jun,
    6. Y. M. Kim,
    7. Y. S. Lee,
    8. D. H. Lee,
    9. K. H. Son,
    10. H. J. Kim,
    11. et al
    . 2011. Isoimperatorin, cimiside E and 23-O-acetylshengmanol-3-xyloside from Cimicifugae rhizome inhibit TNF-α-induced VCAM-1 expression in human endothelial cells: involvement of PPAR-γ upregulation and PI3K, ERK1/2, and PKC signal pathways. J. Ethnopharmacol. 133: 336–344.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. O’Donnell V. B.,
    2. J. P. Eiserich,
    3. A. Bloodsworth,
    4. P. H. Chumley,
    5. M. Kirk,
    6. S. Barnes,
    7. V. M. Darley-Usmar,
    8. B. A. Freeman
    . 1999. Nitration of unsaturated fatty acids by nitric oxide-derived reactive species. Methods Enzymol. 301: 454–470.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Baker P. R. S.,
    2. F. J. Schopfer,
    3. S. Sweeney,
    4. B. A. Freeman
    . 2004. Red cell membrane and plasma linoleic acid nitration products: synthesis, clinical identification, and quantitation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 11577–11582.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Cui T.,
    2. F. J. Schopfer,
    3. J. Zhang,
    4. K. Chen,
    5. T. Ichikawa,
    6. P. R. S. Baker,
    7. C. Batthyany,
    8. B. K. Chacko,
    9. X. Feng,
    10. R. P. Patel,
    11. et al
    . 2006. Nitrated fatty acids: endogenous anti-inflammatory signaling mediators. J. Biol. Chem. 281: 35686–35698.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Reddy R. C.,
    2. V. R. Narala,
    3. V. G. Keshamouni,
    4. J. E. Milam,
    5. M. W. Newstead,
    6. T. J. Standiford
    . 2008. Sepsis-induced inhibition of neutrophil chemotaxis is mediated by activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Blood 112: 4250–4258.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Coles B.,
    2. A. Bloodsworth,
    3. S. R. Clark,
    4. M. J. Lewis,
    5. A. R. Cross,
    6. B. A. Freeman,
    7. V. B. O’Donnell
    . 2002. Nitrolinoleate inhibits superoxide generation, degranulation, and integrin expression by human neutrophils: novel antiinflammatory properties of nitric oxide-derived reactive species in vascular cells. Circ. Res. 91: 375–381.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Wright M. M.,
    2. F. J. Schopfer,
    3. P. R. S. Baker,
    4. V. Vidyasagar,
    5. P. Powell,
    6. P. Chumley,
    7. K. E. Iles,
    8. B. A. Freeman,
    9. A. Agarwal
    . 2006. Fatty acid transduction of nitric oxide signaling: nitrolinoleic acid potently activates endothelial heme oxygenase 1 expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 4299–4304.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 189 (11)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 189, Issue 11
1 Dec 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Endothelial Cell Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ Reduces Endotoxemic Pulmonary Inflammation and Injury
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Endothelial Cell Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ Reduces Endotoxemic Pulmonary Inflammation and Injury
Aravind T. Reddy, Sowmya P. Lakshmi, Jennifer M. Kleinhenz, Roy L. Sutliff, C. Michael Hart, Raju C. Reddy
The Journal of Immunology December 1, 2012, 189 (11) 5411-5420; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201487

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Endothelial Cell Peroxisome Proliferator–Activated Receptor γ Reduces Endotoxemic Pulmonary Inflammation and Injury
Aravind T. Reddy, Sowmya P. Lakshmi, Jennifer M. Kleinhenz, Roy L. Sutliff, C. Michael Hart, Raju C. Reddy
The Journal of Immunology December 1, 2012, 189 (11) 5411-5420; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201487
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Introduction
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Antigen presentation by dendritic cells in the aortic wall triggers T helper immune responses in atherosclerosis (54.16)
  • Eph receptors are involved in the pro-inflammatory response following spinal cord injury (54.21)
  • Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells undergo apoptosis during sepsis, leading to organ dysfunction. (54.13)
Show more Inflammation

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606