Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Lpa2 Is a Negative Regulator of Both Dendritic Cell Activation and Murine Models of Allergic Lung Inflammation

Jason Emo, Nida Meednu, Timothy J. Chapman, Fariba Rezaee, Marlene Balys, Troy Randall, Tirumalai Rangasamy and Steve N. Georas
J Immunol April 15, 2012, 188 (8) 3784-3790; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1102956
Jason Emo
*Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nida Meednu
*Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy J. Chapman
*Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fariba Rezaee
†Division of Pediatric Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marlene Balys
*Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Troy Randall
‡Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tirumalai Rangasamy
*Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steve N. Georas
*Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610;
‡Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14610
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Negative regulation of innate immune responses is essential to prevent excess inflammation and tissue injury and promote homeostasis. Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) is a pleiotropic lipid that regulates cell growth, migration, and activation and is constitutively produced at low levels in tissues and in serum. Extracellular LPA binds to specific G protein-coupled receptors, whose function in regulating innate or adaptive immune responses remains poorly understood. Of the classical LPA receptors belonging to the Edg family, lpa2 (edg4) is expressed by dendritic cells (DC) and other innate immune cells. In this article, we show that DC from lpa2−/− mice are hyperactive compared with their wild-type counterparts and are less susceptible to inhibition by different LPA species. In transient-transfection assays, we found that lpa2 overexpression inhibits NF-κB–driven gene transcription. Using an adoptive-transfer approach, we found that allergen-pulsed lpa2−/− DC induced substantially more lung inflammation than did wild-type DC after inhaled allergen challenge. Finally, lpa2−/− mice develop greater allergen-driven lung inflammation than do their wild-type counterparts in models of allergic asthma involving both systemic and mucosal sensitization. Taken together, these findings identify LPA acting via lpa2 as a novel negative regulatory pathway that inhibits DC activation and allergic airway inflammation.

Originally described as an intermediate in intracellular lipid biosynthesis, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA; or monoacyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphate) is now recognized as a pluripotent extracellular mediator that regulates cell growth, migration, and activation (1). Extracellular LPA is generated primarily by hydrolysis of lysophosphatidylcholine by the enzyme autotaxin (or lysophospholipase D) (2, 3). A major advance in the field came from the molecular cloning of specific LPA receptors (4–6). There are at least five established LPA receptors, three of which belong to the Edg G protein-coupled receptor superfamily: LPA1 (Edg2), LPA2 (Edg4), and LPA3 (Edg7) (7). Signal transduction via these classical LPA receptors leads to activation of MAPKs, PI3K, and Rho kinases, which affect cell activation, survival, and migration (reviewed in Ref. 8). Activation of Gαi and PI3K/Akt is emerging as particularly important for LPA-directed cell migration (9–13).

LPA has physiologic roles in wound repair and development (14–20) and emerging roles in disease states, including cancer, atherosclerosis, lung fibrosis, and asthma (21–31). LPA may play a broader role in regulating innate and adaptive immune responses (32). For example, constitutive expression of autotaxin in high endothelial venules contributes to lymphocyte homing to secondary lymphoid organs, presumably by inducing local LPA production and T cell emigration from the vasculature (33). Although LPA has proinflammatory effects (28), it can also inhibit inflammation in some contexts. For example, i.v.-injected LPA protected mice from LPS-induced peritonitis (34), and LPA attenuated cytokine secretion in human monocyte-derived dendritic cells (DC) (9, 35). However, the inhibitory mechanisms and receptor(s) by which LPA attenuates immune responses remain poorly defined.

In this article, we report that LPA2 (edg4) negatively regulates DC activation and allergic airway inflammation using different mouse models of asthma. Compared with wild-type controls, lpa2−/− DC exhibit a hyperactive phenotype both in vitro in DC/T cell coculture, as well as following adoptive transfer into the mouse airway. Although LPA inhibits activation of wild-type DC in response to different pattern recognition receptor ligands, lpa2−/− DC are resistant to LPA-dependent inhibition. In transfection studies, we show that expression of LPA2 inhibits LPS-induced NF-κB activation. Finally, we studied allergic airway inflammation using OVA as a model allergen and protocols known to induce DC activation by either systemic immunization (OVA plus alum i.p.) or mucosal immunization (inhaled OVA plus low-dose LPS); lpa2−/− mice developed greater allergen-driven lung inflammation than did their wild-type counterparts. Taken together, these studies uncover a novel anti-inflammatory role for lpa2 and identify a new pathway involved in the suppression of innate immune responses.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Wild-type mice on the C57BL/6 background were from The Jackson Laboratory. LPA2-deficient (lpa2−/−) mice were derived from frozen gene-targeted embryos provided by Deltagen (San Mateo, CA), in collaboration with GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), and backcrossed for more than six generations onto the C57BL/6 background. Wild-type and gene-targeted mice were maintained at the University of Rochester, and age- and gender-matched littermate controls were used in all experiments. C57BL/6.PL OT-II TCR transgenic mice recognizing OVA peptide OVA323–339 in the context of Iab were a gift of Dr. David Topham (University of Rochester). Mouse protocols were reviewed by the University of Rochester Committee on Animal Resources and the GSK Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines and the GSK Policy on the Care, Welfare, and Treatment of Laboratory Animals.

Bone marrow-derived DC

DC were derived from bone marrow precursors using modifications of previously published protocols (36). Briefly, wild-type and lpa2−/− mice were euthanized and prepared aseptically to remove femurs and tibias for bone marrow harvest. On day 0, bone marrow cells were seeded at a density of 1 × 106 cells/ml in RPMI 1640 media supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS (lot #103057; Tissue Culture Biologicals, Los Alamitos, CA), 1 M HEPES, 0.1 mM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 20 mM 2-ME, and 50 mg/ml gentamicin using six-well plates (media and additives from Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), supplemented with 25 ng/ml GM-CSF (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ). The media were changed and supplemented with the same concentration of GM-CSF together with 10 ng/ml IL-4 (PeproTech) on days 2, 5, and 7. Bone marrow-derived DC (BM-DC) grown using this protocol typically express CD11c, high levels of MHC class II (Ia/Ie) and CD11b, and low levels of CD8α and plasmacytoid dendritic cell Ag 1 (Ab panels available upon request). On day 8, DC were harvested and cocultured with allogeneic T cells at DC/T cell ratios of 1:1, 1:5, 1:25, 1:125, and 1:625. Cell proliferation was analyzed 72 h following coculture using a BrdU Cell Proliferation ELISA (Roche). Cell supernatants were analyzed by ELISA (IL-6 detection limit: 1.6 pg/ml, TNF-α detection limit: 1.8 pg/ml, vascular endothelial growth factor [VEGF] detection limit: 3 pg/ml; Quantikine kits, R&D Systems) or multiplex cytokine/chemokine bead array (IL-1α, IL-1β, IL-2, IL-3, IL-4, IL-5, IL-9, IL-10, IL-12p40, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-17A, TNF-α, eotaxin, G-CSF, GM-CSF, IFN-γ, MCP-1, MIP-1α, MIP-1β, RANTES, and KC; Bio-Plex Pro Mouse Cytokine 23-plex Assay; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), according to the manufacturers’ instructions.

Transfection of HEK293T cells with LPA2

HEK293T cells stably transfected with TLR4 and MD2 (a kind gift of Dr. Jian Dong Li, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY) were maintained in DMEM (Life Technologies Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) containing heat-inactivated 10% FBS (Tissue Culture Biologicals), 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 100 U/ml penicillin, and 0.5 mg/ml Geneticin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 37°C in 5% CO2. Confluent HEK293-TLR4/MD2 cells were detached with 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA (Invitrogen) and subcultured every 2–3 d. A full-length lpa2 cDNA expression vector was obtained from University of Missouri-Rolla cDNA Resource Center (Rolla, MO). HEK293-TLR4/MD2 cells were grown to ∼80% confluency and transfected using jetPRIME transfection reagent (Polyplus Transfection, New York, NY), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, cells were seeded in 10% serum DMEM on poly-d-lysine–coated 24-well plates for 24 h. One microgram of plasmid DNA and 2 μl jetPRIME transfection reagent were mixed with transfection buffer and incubated for 10 min at room temperature (RT), after which 25 μl the mixture was added to each well. For NF-κB reporter assay, cells were transfected with pNFκB-luc (Stratagene) and pcDNA–3HA–LPA2 or pcDNA empty plasmid at a 1:1 ratio using jetPRIME transfection reagent, as described above. Twenty-four hours after transfection, cells were washed with PBS; the medium was replaced with 1% serum DMEM containing 0.5 mg/ml Geneticin, with or without LPS as indicated, and then incubated with reporter lysis buffer; and reporter gene activity measured by luminometry using a Monolight 3010 luminometer (Analytical Luminescence Laboratory, San Diego, CA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Protein concentration was determined by Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL).

Western blot assays

HEK293T cells were collected and lysed with RIPA buffer supplemented with protease inhibitors. Protein concentrations were determined using Pierce BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific). Protein samples were prepared by adding 6× Laemmli sample buffer to a final concentration of 1× plus an equal amount of 8 M urea and incubated at RT for 20 min with occasional mixing. The samples were then loaded on 10% SDS gel and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membrane was blocked with 5% milk/TBST for 1 h at RT. Anti-hemagglutinin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) was diluted at 1:200 in 5% milk/TBST and incubated with the membrane overnight at 4°C. After washing with TBST, the membrane was incubated with 1:1000 anti mouse-HRP conjugate (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA) for 1 h at RT. The signal was developed using Amersham ECL Plus (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, U.K.). As a loading control, the membrane was also probed for GAPDH (ab8245; 20 ng/ml final; Abcam, Cambridge, MA).

Cell stimulation and luciferase assay

Cell culture was carried out using medium supplemented with 10% FCS, unless otherwise indicated. The following reagents were used in cell culture experiments to stimulate cells. Escherichia coli LPS (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was prepared in PBS. Pertussis toxin (PTX) was from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Different species of LPA, including 16:0 (1-palmitoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphate), 18:1 (1-oleoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphate), and 20:4 (1-arachidonoyl-2-hydroxy-sn-glycero-3-phosphate; all from Avanti Polar Lipid, Alabaster, AL) were stored in methanol:H2O. Working solutions were prepared fresh by evaporating methanol under N2 gas and dissolving the residue in PBS containing 1% fatty acid free BSA. Ki16425 was kindly provided by Dr. Andrew Tager (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA), and wortmannin was purchased from Calbiochem.

DC adoptive transfer

Wild-type and lpa2−/− BM-DC were generated, as described above. On day 8, DC were plated at 8 × 106 cells/condition and pulsed with 400 μg/ml Grade V OVA (Sigma-Aldrich) or saline control. On day 9, 1 × 106 OVA and control wild-type and lpa2−/− DC were intratracheally instilled by oropharyngeal aspiration (50 μl) into wild-type recipients. The recipients were then aerosol challenged with Grade V OVA inhalation on days 19–22 (1%, 30 min) and sacrificed for analysis of airway inflammation.

OVA sensitization and challenge

Female wild-type and lpa2−/− littermates were used at 6–8 wk of age. We used systemic and mucosal protocols to sensitize and challenge mice using OVA as a model allergen. In the systemic protocol, mice were immunized by i.p. injection of Grade II OVA (20 and 100 μg) plus alum (1.3 and 6.5 mg; Thermo Scientific) on days 0 and 14, respectively, followed by aerosol challenge with Grade V OVA inhalation (1%, 30 min) on days 24, 26, and 28. Some mice were sacrificed on day 10 for analysis of OVA-specific serum IgE levels using a commercially available ELISA (MD Biosciences). To immunize mice via the airway, separate groups of mice were exposed to Grade V OVA (100 μg, Sigma-Aldrich), purified by Endotoxin Removing Columns (Thermo Scientific), either alone or together with low-dose LPS (100 ng; Sigma-Aldrich) by oropharyngeal aspiration (50 μl), followed by aerosol challenge with Grade V OVA inhalation on days 14–16 (1%, 30 min). Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was collected for analysis of cell counts and differentials using standard techniques, as previously reported (37). BAL supernatants were analyzed for expression of IL-13 and VEGF using commercially available ELISA kits (eBioscience). Some lungs were inflated with 4% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin, and 8-μm sections were stained with H&E. Lung sections were scored by blinded observers using a semiquantitative scoring system, which takes into account extent and severity of inflammation, on a 0–4 scale.

Bone marrow chimeras

Female wild-type and lpa2−/− littermates were exposed to 1000 rad delivered via a [137Cs] source using whole-body radiation without shielding. The radiation was delivered in a split dose (500 rad) 4 h apart. Immediately following the second round of radiation, the mice were infused with 1 × 107 bone marrow cells from wild-type and lpa2−/− donor mice via the tail vein. To permit complete chimerism, we allowed 6 wk of reconstitution before sensitizing and challenging wild-type and lpa2−/− bone marrow chimeras using the mucosal immunization protocol described above.

Results

BM-DC from lpa2−/− mice are hyperactive and not susceptible to inhibition by exogenous LPA

Using primers specific for the classical Edg family of LPA receptors, we confirmed that BM-DC constitutively express lpa1, lpa2, and lpa3, as previously reported for human monocyte-derived DC (Fig. 1A) (35). The yield of cells and cell surface expression of MHC class II and costimulatory molecules, including CD40, CD80, and CD86, were similar when comparing DC derived from wild-type and lpa2−/− littermates (data not shown). However, when comparing the ability of DC to stimulate allogeneic naive CD4+ T cells in coculture assays, we found that lpa2−/− DC induced significantly more T cell proliferation than did their wild-type counterparts, especially at lower DC/T ratios (black bars, Fig. 1B). In coculture supernatants, we detected almost twice as much IL-13 secretion from T cells stimulated with lpa2−/− DC compared with their wild-type counterparts (Fig. 1C). In contrast, DC obtained from lpa1 gene-targeted mice behaved similarly to wild-type mice in these assays (gray bars, Fig. 1). Pretreating DC with the LPA1/3 antagonist Ki16425 had no effect on the ability of DC to induce T cell proliferation or activation (38), whereas the PI3K inhibitor wortmannin (0.1–10 μM) inhibited the ability of both wild-type and lpa2−/− DC to stimulate T cells equally well (data not shown, Supplemental Fig. 1). These data indicate that, in the absence of lpa2, DC acquire a hyperactive phenotype and suggest that LPA2 is an inhibitory receptor that attenuates DC activation.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

lpa2-deficient DC are hyperactive in vitro: T cell stimulation. (A) Expression of LPA1–3 by BM-DC using RT-PCR. Wild-type (white bars), lpa1-deficient (gray bars), and lpa2-deficient DC (black bars) on the C57BL/6 background were incubated with allogeneic (BALB/c) naive CD4+ T cells at the indicated DC:T ratios for 72 h, followed by analysis of T cell proliferation (B) and IL-13 production (C). Results are mean ± SEM (n = 5–6 mice). *p < 0.05.

We explored this possibility further using two approaches. First, we studied the secretion of inflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines by wild-type and lpa2−/− DC in response to LPS, which is known to activate DC in a TLR4/MyD88-dependent manner. We first confirmed that the expression of TLR4 was not affected by lpa2 deficiency (data not shown). Compared with their wild-type counterparts, we found that when stimulated in the presence of 10% serum, lpa2−/− DC secreted significantly more VEGF than did their wild-type counterparts, whereas secretion of other cytokines, including IL-6, IL-12p70, and TNF-α, was similar between genotypes (data not shown, Supplemental Fig. 2). One explanation for this finding is that LPA present in serum-containing tissue culture medium is sufficient to suppress LPS-dependent DC activation in an lpa2-dependent manner. To test this possibility, we next stimulated wild-type and lpa2−/− DC under reduced serum conditions with LPS (1 μM), alone or together with 16:0, 18:1, or 20:4 LPA (1–10 μM). If lpa2 normally inhibits DC activation, then wild-type DC should be more susceptible to LPA-dependent inhibition than lpa2−/− DC. Fig. 2 shows that exogenous LPA inhibited LPS-driven IL-6 secretion from wild-type (open bars) but not lpa2−/− DC (closed bars); the data are expressed as relative inhibition compared with cells stimulated with LPS alone, and the dotted line indicates no inhibition. Table I shows that, under reduced serum conditions, LPS-stimulated lpa2−/− DC secreted significantly less IL-10 and more TNF-α than did their wild-type counterparts, whereas IL-12p70 secretion was comparable between genotypes. Furthermore, three exogenous LPA species partially suppressed LPS-driven TNF-α secretion in wild-type DC, an effect that was lost using lpa2−/− DC (Table I). Interestingly, both saturated and unsaturated LPA species inhibited LPS-driven IL-6 and TNF-α secretion, which contrasts with the preferential ability of unsaturated LPA species to induce DC migration in vitro (39) (see Discussion).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

lpa2-deficient DC are refractory to inhibition by different LPA species. Wild-type and lpa2-deficient DC were stimulated under reduced serum conditions with LPS alone or together with increasing concentrations of the indicated LPA species (1–10 μM) for 48 h, followed by analysis of IL-6 secretion by ELISA. Results are expressed relative to LPS-induced IL-6 production in the absence of LPA and are the mean ± SEM of n = 3 mice/group. *p < 0.05.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I. Cytokine production (pg/ml) by wild-type and LPA2−/− BM-DC

Expression of lpa2 inhibits LPS-dependent NF-κB activation

Signal transduction via the TLR4 receptor complex is known to induce cytokine secretion in an NF-κB–dependent manner. To test the possibility that lpa2 interferes with NF-κB–dependent gene expression, we used HEK293T cells stably expressing TLR4 and MD2, which do not express LPA2 at baseline (data not shown). We first confirmed that, after cotransfection with a full-length expression vector, LPA2 is expressed in these cells and localizes to the cell membrane (data not shown, Supplemental Fig. 3). As expected, LPS induced transcriptional activation of an NF-κB–driven reporter construct in cells cotransfected with an empty expression vector (Fig. 3). In contrast, LPS-dependent NF-κB activation was significantly attenuated in LPA2-expressing cells. Levels of secreted IL-6 were at or below detection limits in these experiments (data not shown). Treatment with exogenous 16:0 LPA alone, or in combination with LPS, did not result in additional inhibition of reporter gene activity (data not shown). Interestingly, transient transfection of an LPA1 expression vector also attenuated LPS-dependent NF-κB activation in HEK293T cells expressing TLR4/MD2 (N. Meednu, unpublished observations): the mechanisms and consequences of this effect are being pursued in a separate study. Taken together, these data support the idea that endogenous serum LPA inhibits LPS-induced NF-κB–dependent gene expression, at least in part, in an lpa2-dependent manner.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Expression of lpa2 inhibits NF-κB activation. TLR4/MD2-expressing HEK293T cells were cotransfected with an empty or LPA2 expression vector (3HA-LPA2) as indicated, together with an NF-κB–dependent luciferase reporter construct. Cells were then incubated in medium control (open bars) or with LPS (1 μM, closed bars) for 48 h, followed by analysis of reporter gene activity using luminometry. Data are expressed as luciferase activity relative to unstimulated cells and are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05.

PTX augments the ability of wild-type, but not lpa2−/−, DC to stimulate T cell proliferation

Many of the effects of LPA2 are mediated by coupling with Gαi. If lpa2 were inhibiting DC activation in a Gαi-dependent manner, we reasoned that we should be able to augment the activation of wild-type DC more than lpa2−/− DC using PTX. Fig. 4 shows that pretreatment with PTX significantly augmented the ability of wild-type DC to induce T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly to Fig. 1, we found that untreated lpa2-deficient DC induced more proliferation in responding T cells than did their wild-type counterparts (white bars; p < 0.05 versus wild-type); in contrast to wild-type cells, preincubation with PTX had no significant effect on the T cell-stimulating capacity of lpa2-deficient DC. Because no exogenous LPA was supplied in this experiment, these data further support the idea that LPA present in serum transduces a tonic inhibitory signal that dampens DC activation via LPA2.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

PTX enhances the ability of wild-type, but not lpa2-deficient, DC to stimulate T cells. DC from wild-type or lpa2−/− mice were pretreated with 0.1 or 1 μg/ml PTX, washed, and then cocultured with allogeneic naive T cells for 48 h. T cell proliferation was measured using BrdU incorporation. Results are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05.

Lpa2-deficient DC are hyperactive and proallergic in vivo

Using in vitro assays, we found that lpa2-deficient DC induced more T cell proliferation and IL-13 production, as well as secreted more VEGF, than did their wild-type counterparts, suggesting that they may promote Th2-driven allergic immune responses in vivo (40, 41). To test this possibility, we used an adoptive-transfer model in which wild-type mice received allergen-pulsed wild-type or lpa2−/− DC by intratracheal administration, followed by aerosol allergen challenge using OVA as a model allergen (modified from Refs. 42–44). Mice receiving control, saline-pulsed DC followed by OVA aerosol challenge developed little or no lung inflammation, as determined by BAL cell counts (>95% macrophages), whereas significant lung eosinophilia developed in mice that received OVA-pulsed wild-type DC followed by OVA aerosol challenge (Fig. 6B, data not shown). Interestingly, adoptive transfer of lpa2-deficient, OVA-pulsed DC resulted in substantially more lung inflammation than did transfer of wild-type DC following OVA challenge (Fig. 5). Taken together with the results shown in Figs. 1–4, these data indicate that lpa2-deficient DC are hyperactive in both in vitro and in vivo assays.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

lpa2-deficient mice develop more eosinophilic airway inflammation than do wild-type littermates after systemic immunization. Wild-type and lpa2−/− mice were sensitized with OVA plus alum by i.p. injection, followed by OVA aerosol challenge, and were sacrificed 48 h later for analysis of BAL cell counts and cytokines. Total numbers of macrophages (A) and BAL eosinophils (B) were significantly elevated in lpa2-deficient mice compared with wild-type mice. (C) BAL IL-13 levels were also increased in lpa2−/− mice. (D) Wild-type and lpa2−/− mice were sensitized with OVA plus alum by i.p. injection, and serum OVA-specific IgE was measured 10 d later. Results are the mean ± SEM of six mice/time point. *p < 0.05, wild-type versus gene-targeted littermates.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

lpa2-deficient DC are hyperactive and proallergic in vivo. DC from wild-type or lpa2−/− mice were pulsed with 400 μg/ml OVA for 24 h, and adoptively transferred intratracheally into wild-type recipients. Control mice received unpulsed DC from wild-type mice. Ten days later, mice were challenged for four consecutive days with 1% OVA aerosol and sacrificed 24 h later for analysis of total BAL cell counts (A) and BAL cell differentials using cytospin (B). Results are the mean ± SEM of three independent experiments. *p < 0.05, recipients of wild-type versus lpa2-deficient DC.

Greater allergen-driven airway inflammation in lpa2−/− mice compared with controls

Finally, we compared wild-type mice with lpa2-deficient mice in two models of allergic airway inflammation known to involve DC activation. First, we used the well-established model of systemic immunization using i.p. injection of OVA plus alum. Second, we used a mucosal immunization approach and sensitized mice with inhaled endotoxin-free OVA using low-dose LPS (100 ng) as adjuvant (45). Using both systemic- and mucosal-immunization approaches, we found that lpa2-deficient mice developed greater allergic sensitization, airway inflammation, and airway hyperresponsiveness than did their wild-type counterparts (Figs. 6, 7). In the OVA-plus-alum model, lpa2-deficient mice developed more airway eosinophilia and higher BAL IL-13 and VEGF levels at 48 and 72 h following allergen challenge (Fig. 6A–C, data not shown), indicative of greater Th2-driven allergic airway inflammation. To determine whether lpa2 deficiency resulted in augmented allergen sensitization, we sacrificed a separate group of mice 10 d after OVA-plus-alum immunization and found that serum OVA-specific IgE levels were almost twice as high in lpa2-deficient mice compared with wild-type controls (Fig. 6D).

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

lpa2-deficient mice develop more airway inflammation and hyperreactivity than do wild-type mice after mucosal immunization in a manner dependent on a radiosensitive hematopoietic cell. Wild-type (open bars) or lpa2−/− (closed bars) mice were sensitized with endotoxin-free OVA together with 100 ng LPS as adjuvant by inhalation, followed by OVA aerosol challenge 2 wk later. Twenty-four hours after the last OVA challenge, total BAL cell counts were determined (A), and airway hyperreactivity to methacholine (0.1 mg/ml) was measured in a separate group of sedated and paralyzed mice (B). (C) Reciprocal donor/recipient bone marrow chimeras were created, as indicated, and subjected to the mucosal-immunization protocol, demonstrating enhanced recovery of BAL cells from wild-type recipients of lpa2-deficient bone marrow. Results are the mean ± SEM of 5–12 mice/condition. *p < 0.05, ANOVA, followed by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

Mucosal immunization protocols result in less severe airway inflammation than does systemic immunization following recall allergen challenge, but they are a more physiological route of allergen encounter. Using the approach described by Eisenbarth et al. (45), with low-dose LPS as inhaled adjuvant, we found that lpa2-deficient mice developed a greater influx of inflammatory cells into BAL fluids than did their wild-type counterparts 48 h after allergen challenge (Fig. 7A). Interestingly, although the percentages of eosinophils and neutrophils were similar between the groups (eosinophils: 22 ± 2% versus 17 ± 2% and neutrophils: 8 ± 2% versus 11 ± 3%, wild-type versus lpa2 knockout, respectively, mean ± SEM of n = 9–11), airway hyperreactivity measured in sedated and paralyzed mice was significantly greater in lpa2-deficient mice compared with wild-type controls (Fig. 7B). We used reciprocal bone marrow chimeras to investigate the requirement for LPA2 in hematopoietic and nonhematopoietic cells in suppressing allergic lung inflammation following mucosal immunization. We found that wild-type mice reconstituted with lpa2-deficient bone marrow developed significantly greater airway inflammation than did those reconstituted with wild-type bone marrow (Fig. 7C). Furthermore, lpa2-deficient recipients of either wild-type or lpa2-deficient bone marrow reacted similarly to wild-type recipients of wild-type bone marrow. These data indicate that lpa2 expression by a radiosensitive bone marrow-derived cell(s) normally restrains allergic lung inflammation.

Discussion

Using complementary approaches, we uncovered a novel role for lpa2 (Edg4) in suppressing DC activation and allergic immune responses. DC from lpa2-deficient mice were hyperactive using in vitro assays compared with their wild-type counterparts and induced greater allergic airway inflammation after adoptive transfer in vivo. Wild-type (but not LPA2-deficient) DC were susceptible to inhibition by different exogenous LPA species, and PTX enhanced the ability of wild-type DC to induce T cell proliferation, an effect not seen using LPA2-deficient DC. Collectively, these data support a model in which LPA, acting via LPA2 coupled to Gαi, acts to tonically inhibit DC activation. Thus, in addition to regulating cell recruitment and survival, our data establish a novel role for LPA as a negative regulator of innate immunity.

Negative regulation of innate immune responses is important to prevent excess inflammation and tissue injury (46). Negative regulatory mechanisms have been identified that suppress activation of innate immune cells and the dysfunction of which may be associated with disease states (47). Because LPA is constitutively present in serum and BAL fluids (48, 49), one possibility is that the extravasation of LPA-containing serum into tissues that occurs during inflammation may be sensed as an anti-inflammatory or proresolution signal (50). In support of this notion, LPA promotes epithelial barrier function, a key step in the restoration of normal tissue integrity following inflammatory insults (51). A corollary of this hypothesis is that dysfunction of the LPA/lpa2 axis may contribute to persistent inflammation in chronic disease states. Taken together, these findings suggest that lysolipids may play a broader role in dampening immune responses than previously suspected.

Our data support a model in which LPA2 coupling to Gαi suppresses NF-κB–dependent DC activation. Precedence for the idea that PTX can augment DC activation is provided by the work of Ausiello et al. (52), and our data firmly implicate a role for LPA2 in this regard. The C-terminal tail of LPA2 contains unique sequences that support macromolecular complex formation (53), and it is attractive to speculate that this complex negatively regulates TLR4-dependent activation of NF-κB. Future studies will be needed to explore this and other mechanistic possibilities.

We found that allergic lung inflammation was substantially greater in lpa2−/− mice compared with wild-type littermates using both systemic- and mucosal-immunization strategies. Our data contrast with the observations of Zhao et al. (54), who reported that heterozygous lpa2+/− mice were partially protected from lung inflammation following challenge with Schistosoma egg Ag. The reasons for this apparent discrepancy are not immediately obvious, but they may relate to the nature of the Ags used, immunization protocols, or genetic backgrounds. Using bone marrow chimeras, we uncovered a key role for lpa2 expression by radiosensitive hematopoietic cells in suppressing allergic airway inflammation. Our results using adoptive-transfer experiments firmly implicate DC in this regard and are supported by the observation that OVA-specific IgE responses are enhanced in the absence of LPA2.

LPA is constitutively present in epithelial lining fluids of the human lung and is significantly enriched during the late-phase response following segmental allergen challenge (49). Based on our findings and previously published research, we can construct a working model in which LPA has both pro- and anti-inflammatory effects in asthma. Proinflammatory effects can result from the ability of LPA to promote cell recruitment or activation (9, 27–29), especially in response to submaximal stimuli (55). LPA can also augment airway hyperresponsiveness by direct effects on smooth muscle cells (30, 31). However, because LPA also restores epithelial barrier function (51), enhances IL-13Rα2 expression (56), inhibits epithelial RANTES production (57), and attenuates DC activation (this report), it has the potential to dampen airway inflammation. The observation that LPA is constitutively present in epithelial lining fluids supports its potential role in maintaining lung homeostasis. One intriguing possibility is that LPA contributes to airway remodeling in long-standing asthma. By promoting fibroblast recruitment (25) and smooth muscle mitogenesis (58), local generation of LPA during cycles of airway injury and repair could lead to airway fibrosis and smooth muscle hypertrophy. More research is needed to understand the mechanisms and timing of LPA generation in the airway, as well as the roles of different LPA receptors and target cells in airway inflammation and remodeling.

Taken together, our results establish a novel role for lpa2 as an inhibitory receptor of a key innate immune cell type and uncover a new pathway involved in tonic dampening of allergic immune responses. Future studies investigating the function of the inhibitory LPA/lpa2 axis in inflammatory diseases should prove worthwhile. We also speculate that LPA2-specific agonists may have anti-inflammatory properties and therapeutic efficacy in allergic and inflammatory diseases.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Siva Sugunan for technical assistance and Drs. Andrew Tager (Harvard University) and Viswanathan Natarajan (University of Illinois, Chicago, IL) for reagents and/or helpful advice.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant R01HL071933 (to S.N.G.). Pilot project funding was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants P30ES01247 (to S.N.G.), T32 HD057821 (to F.R.), and T32 HL066988 (to T.J.C.) and the University of Rochester Department of Medicine.

  • The online version of this article contains supplemental material.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    BAL
    bronchoalveolar lavage
    BM-DC
    bone marrow-derived dendritic cell
    DC
    dendritic cell
    GSK
    GlaxoSmithKline
    LPA
    lysophosphatidic acid
    PTX
    pertussis toxin
    RT
    room temperature
    VEGF
    vascular endothelial growth factor.

  • Received October 12, 2011.
  • Accepted February 7, 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Choi J. W.,
    2. D. R. Herr,
    3. K. Noguchi,
    4. Y. C. Yung,
    5. C. W. Lee,
    6. T. Mutoh,
    7. M. E. Lin,
    8. S. T. Teo,
    9. K. E. Park,
    10. A. N. Mosley,
    11. J. Chun
    . 2010. LPA receptors: subtypes and biological actions. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 50: 157–186.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Umezu-Goto M.,
    2. Y. Kishi,
    3. A. Taira,
    4. K. Hama,
    5. N. Dohmae,
    6. K. Takio,
    7. T. Yamori,
    8. G. B. Mills,
    9. K. Inoue,
    10. J. Aoki,
    11. H. Arai
    . 2002. Autotaxin has lysophospholipase D activity leading to tumor cell growth and motility by lysophosphatidic acid production. J. Cell Biol. 158: 227–233.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. van Meeteren L. A.,
    2. P. Ruurs,
    3. C. Stortelers,
    4. P. Bouwman,
    5. M. A. van Rooijen,
    6. J. P. Pradère,
    7. T. R. Pettit,
    8. M. J. Wakelam,
    9. J. S. Saulnier-Blache,
    10. C. L. Mummery,
    11. et al
    . 2006. Autotaxin, a secreted lysophospholipase D, is essential for blood vessel formation during development. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26: 5015–5022.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Fukushima N.,
    2. J. Chun
    . 2001. The LPA receptors. Prostaglandins 64: 21–32.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Hla T.,
    2. M. J. Lee,
    3. N. Ancellin,
    4. J. H. Paik,
    5. M. J. Kluk
    . 2001. Lysophospholipids--receptor revelations. Science 294: 1875–1878.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Choi J. W.,
    2. C. W. Lee,
    3. J. Chun
    . 2008. Biological roles of lysophospholipid receptors revealed by genetic null mice: an update. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1781: 531–539.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Chun J.,
    2. T. Hla,
    3. K. R. Lynch,
    4. S. Spiegel,
    5. W. H. Moolenaar
    . 2010. International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology. LXXVIII. Lysophospholipid receptor nomenclature. Pharmacol. Rev. 62: 579–587.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Pyne N. J.,
    2. S. Pyne
    . 2008. Sphingosine 1-phosphate, lysophosphatidic acid and growth factor signaling and termination. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1781: 467–476.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Panther E.,
    2. M. Idzko,
    3. S. Corinti,
    4. D. Ferrari,
    5. Y. Herouy,
    6. M. Mockenhaupt,
    7. S. Dichmann,
    8. P. Gebicke-Haerter,
    9. F. Di Virgilio,
    10. G. Girolomoni,
    11. J. Norgauer
    . 2002. The influence of lysophosphatidic acid on the functions of human dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 169: 4129–4135.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Gustin C.,
    2. M. Van Steenbrugge,
    3. M. Raes
    . 2008. LPA modulates monocyte migration directly and via LPA-stimulated endothelial cells. Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol. 295: C905–C914.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wang L.,
    2. E. Knudsen,
    3. Y. Jin,
    4. S. Gessani,
    5. A. A. Maghazachi
    . 2004. Lysophospholipids and chemokines activate distinct signal transduction pathways in T helper 1 and T helper 2 cells. Cell. Signal. 16: 991–1000.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lee Z.,
    2. C. T. Cheng,
    3. H. Zhang,
    4. M. A. Subler,
    5. J. Wu,
    6. A. Mukherjee,
    7. J. J. Windle,
    8. C. K. Chen,
    9. X. Fang
    . 2008. Role of LPA4/p2y9/GPR23 in negative regulation of cell motility. Mol. Biol. Cell 19: 5435–5445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Kim E. K.,
    2. S. J. Yun,
    3. K. H. Do,
    4. M. S. Kim,
    5. M. Cho,
    6. D. S. Suh,
    7. C. D. Kim,
    8. J. H. Kim,
    9. M. J. Birnbaum,
    10. S. S. Bae
    . 2008. Lysophosphatidic acid induces cell migration through the selective activation of Akt1. Exp. Mol. Med. 40: 445–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Balazs L.,
    2. J. Okolicany,
    3. M. Ferrebee,
    4. B. Tolley,
    5. G. Tigyi
    . 2001. Topical application of the phospholipid growth factor lysophosphatidic acid promotes wound healing in vivo. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 280: R466–R472.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rivera R.,
    2. J. Chun
    . 2008. Biological effects of lysophospholipids. Rev. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 160: 25–46.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Stortelers C.,
    2. R. Kerkhoven,
    3. W. H. Moolenaar
    . 2008. Multiple actions of lysophosphatidic acid on fibroblasts revealed by transcriptional profiling. BMC Genomics 9: 387.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Estivill-Torrús G.,
    2. P. Llebrez-Zayas,
    3. E. Matas-Rico,
    4. L. Santín,
    5. C. Pedraza,
    6. I. De Diego,
    7. I. Del Arco,
    8. P. Fernández-Llebrez,
    9. J. Chun,
    10. F. R. De Fonseca
    . 2008. Absence of LPA1 signaling results in defective cortical development. Cereb. Cortex 18: 938–950.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. Skoura, A., and T. Hla. 2009. Lysophospholipid receptors in vertebrate development, physiology and pathology. J. Lipid Res. 50(Suppl.): S293–S298.
    1. Fukushima N.
    2004. LPA in neural cell development. J. Cell. Biochem. 92: 993–1003.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Saba J. D.
    2004. Lysophospholipids in development: Miles apart and edging in. J. Cell. Biochem. 92: 967–992.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Mills G. B.,
    2. A. Eder,
    3. X. Fang,
    4. Y. Hasegawa,
    5. M. Mao,
    6. Y. Lu,
    7. J. Tanyi,
    8. F. H. Tabassam,
    9. J. Wiener,
    10. R. Lapushin,
    11. et al
    . 2002. Critical role of lysophospholipids in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of ovarian cancer. Cancer Treat. Res. 107: 259–283.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Zhang C.,
    2. D. L. Baker,
    3. S. Yasuda,
    4. N. Makarova,
    5. L. Balazs,
    6. L. R. Johnson,
    7. G. K. Marathe,
    8. T. M. McIntyre,
    9. Y. Xu,
    10. G. D. Prestwich,
    11. et al
    . 2004. Lysophosphatidic acid induces neointima formation through PPARgamma activation. J. Exp. Med. 199: 763–774.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Panchatcharam M.,
    2. S. Miriyala,
    3. F. Yang,
    4. M. Rojas,
    5. C. End,
    6. C. Vallant,
    7. A. Dong,
    8. K. Lynch,
    9. J. Chun,
    10. A. J. Morris,
    11. S. S. Smyth
    . 2008. Lysophosphatidic acid receptors 1 and 2 play roles in regulation of vascular injury responses but not blood pressure. Circ. Res. 103: 662–670.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Rahaman M.,
    2. R. W. Costello,
    3. K. E. Belmonte,
    4. S. S. Gendy,
    5. M. T. Walsh
    . 2006. Neutrophil sphingosine 1-phosphate and lysophosphatidic acid receptors in pneumonia. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 34: 233–241.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Tager A. M.,
    2. P. LaCamera,
    3. B. S. Shea,
    4. G. S. Campanella,
    5. M. Selman,
    6. Z. Zhao,
    7. V. Polosukhin,
    8. J. Wain,
    9. B. A. Karimi-Shah,
    10. N. D. Kim,
    11. et al
    . 2008. The lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA1 links pulmonary fibrosis to lung injury by mediating fibroblast recruitment and vascular leak. Nat. Med. 14: 45–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. Xu, M. Y., J. Porte, A. J. Knox, P. H. Weinreb, T. M. Maher, S. M. Violette, R. J. McAnulty, D. Sheppard, and G. Jenkins. 2009. Lysophosphatidic acid induces alphavbeta6 integrin-mediated TGF-beta activation via the LPA2 receptor and the small G protein G alpha(q). Am. J. Pathol. 174: 1364–1279.
  16. ↵
    1. Hashimoto T.,
    2. M. Yamashita,
    3. H. Ohata,
    4. K. Momose
    . 2003. Lysophosphatidic acid enhances in vivo infiltration and activation of guinea pig eosinophils and neutrophils via a Rho/Rho-associated protein kinase-mediated pathway. J. Pharmacol. Sci. 91: 8–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. Cummings R.,
    2. Y. Zhao,
    3. D. Jacoby,
    4. E. W. Spannhake,
    5. M. Ohba,
    6. J. G. Garcia,
    7. T. Watkins,
    8. D. He,
    9. B. Saatian,
    10. V. Natarajan
    . 2004. Protein kinase Cdelta mediates lysophosphatidic acid-induced NF-kappaB activation and interleukin-8 secretion in human bronchial epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 41085–41094.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Medoff B. D.,
    2. A. L. Landry,
    3. K. A. Wittbold,
    4. B. P. Sandall,
    5. M. C. Derby,
    6. Z. Cao,
    7. J. C. Adams,
    8. R. J. Xavier
    . 2009. CARMA3 mediates lysophosphatidic acid-stimulated cytokine secretion by bronchial epithelial cells. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 40: 286–294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Toews M. L.,
    2. E. E. Ustinova,
    3. H. D. Schultz
    . 1997. Lysophosphatidic acid enhances contractility of isolated airway smooth muscle. J. Appl. Physiol. 83: 1216–1222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Tatler A. L.,
    2. A. E. John,
    3. L. Jolly,
    4. A. Habgood,
    5. J. Porte,
    6. C. Brightling,
    7. A. J. Knox,
    8. L. Pang,
    9. D. Sheppard,
    10. X. Huang,
    11. G. Jenkins
    . 2011. Integrin αvβ5-mediated TGF-β activation by airway smooth muscle cells in asthma. J. Immunol. 187: 6094–6107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Georas, S. N. 2009. Lysophosphatidic acid and autotaxin: emerging roles in innate and adaptive immunity. Immunol Res. 45: 229–238.
  22. ↵
    1. Kanda H.,
    2. R. Newton,
    3. R. Klein,
    4. Y. Morita,
    5. M. D. Gunn,
    6. S. D. Rosen
    . 2008. Autotaxin, an ectoenzyme that produces lysophosphatidic acid, promotes the entry of lymphocytes into secondary lymphoid organs. Nat. Immunol. 9: 415–423.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Fan H.,
    2. B. Zingarelli,
    3. V. Harris,
    4. G. E. Tempel,
    5. P. V. Halushka,
    6. J. A. Cook
    . 2008. Lysophosphatidic acid inhibits bacterial endotoxin-induced pro-inflammatory response: potential anti-inflammatory signaling pathways. Mol. Med. 14: 422–428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Chen R.,
    2. J. Roman,
    3. J. Guo,
    4. E. West,
    5. J. McDyer,
    6. M. A. Williams,
    7. S. N. Georas
    . 2006. Lysophosphatidic acid modulates the activation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Stem Cells Dev. 15: 797–804.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Williams M. A.,
    2. T. Rangasamy,
    3. S. M. Bauer,
    4. S. Killedar,
    5. M. Karp,
    6. T. W. Kensler,
    7. M. Yamamoto,
    8. P. Breysse,
    9. S. Biswal,
    10. S. N. Georas
    . 2008. Disruption of the transcription factor Nrf2 promotes pro-oxidative dendritic cells that stimulate Th2-like immunoresponsiveness upon activation by ambient particulate matter. J. Immunol. 181: 4545–4559.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Guo, J., X. Lin, M. A. Williams, Q. Hamid, and S. N. Georas. 2008. Yin-Yang 1 regulates effector cytokine gene expression and T(H)2 immune responses. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 122: 195–201, 201.e1–5.
  27. ↵
    1. Ohta H.,
    2. K. Sato,
    3. N. Murata,
    4. A. Damirin,
    5. E. Malchinkhuu,
    6. J. Kon,
    7. T. Kimura,
    8. M. Tobo,
    9. Y. Yamazaki,
    10. T. Watanabe,
    11. et al
    . 2003. Ki16425, a subtype-selective antagonist for EDG-family lysophosphatidic acid receptors. Mol. Pharmacol. 64: 994–1005.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Chan L. C.,
    2. W. Peters,
    3. Y. Xu,
    4. J. Chun,
    5. R. V. Farese Jr..,
    6. S. Cases
    . 2007. LPA3 receptor mediates chemotaxis of immature murine dendritic cells to unsaturated lysophosphatidic acid (LPA). J. Leukoc. Biol. 82: 1193–1200.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Wills-Karp M.,
    2. J. Luyimbazi,
    3. X. Xu,
    4. B. Schofield,
    5. T. Y. Neben,
    6. C. L. Karp,
    7. D. D. Donaldson
    . 1998. Interleukin-13: central mediator of allergic asthma. Science 282: 2258–2261.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Lee C. G.,
    2. H. Link,
    3. P. Baluk,
    4. R. J. Homer,
    5. S. Chapoval,
    6. V. Bhandari,
    7. M. J. Kang,
    8. L. Cohn,
    9. Y. K. Kim,
    10. D. M. McDonald,
    11. J. A. Elias
    . 2004. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces remodeling and enhances TH2-mediated sensitization and inflammation in the lung. Nat. Med. 10: 1095–1103.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Sung S.,
    2. C. E. Rose,
    3. S. M. Fu
    . 2001. Intratracheal priming with ovalbumin- and ovalbumin 323-339 peptide-pulsed dendritic cells induces airway hyperresponsiveness, lung eosinophilia, goblet cell hyperplasia, and inflammation. J. Immunol. 166: 1261–1271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kuipers H.,
    2. T. Soullié,
    3. H. Hammad,
    4. M. Willart,
    5. M. Kool,
    6. D. Hijdra,
    7. H. C. Hoogsteden,
    8. B. N. Lambrecht
    . 2009. Sensitization by intratracheally injected dendritic cells is independent of antigen presentation by host antigen-presenting cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 85: 64–70.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Koya T.,
    2. H. Matsuda,
    3. S. Matsubara,
    4. N. Miyahara,
    5. A. Dakhama,
    6. K. Takeda,
    7. E. W. Gelfand
    . 2009. Differential effects of dendritic cell transfer on airway hyperresponsiveness and inflammation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 41: 271–280.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Eisenbarth S. C.,
    2. D. A. Piggott,
    3. J. W. Huleatt,
    4. I. Visintin,
    5. C. A. Herrick,
    6. K. Bottomly
    . 2002. Lipopolysaccharide-enhanced, toll-like receptor 4-dependent T helper cell type 2 responses to inhaled antigen. J. Exp. Med. 196: 1645–1651.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Liew F. Y.,
    2. D. Xu,
    3. E. K. Brint,
    4. L. A. O’Neill
    . 2005. Negative regulation of toll-like receptor-mediated immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5: 446–458.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Kawai T.,
    2. S. Akira
    . 2010. The role of pattern-recognition receptors in innate immunity: update on Toll-like receptors. Nat. Immunol. 11: 373–384.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Block R. C.,
    2. R. Duff,
    3. P. Lawrence,
    4. L. Kakinami,
    5. J. T. Brenna,
    6. G. C. Shearer,
    7. N. Meednu,
    8. S. Mousa,
    9. A. Friedman,
    10. W. S. Harris,
    11. et al
    . 2010. The effects of EPA, DHA, and aspirin ingestion on plasma lysophospholipids and autotaxin. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fatty Acids 82: 87–95.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Georas S. N.,
    2. E. Berdyshev,
    3. W. Hubbard,
    4. I. A. Gorshkova,
    5. P. V. Usatyuk,
    6. B. Saatian,
    7. A. C. Myers,
    8. M. A. Williams,
    9. H. Q. Xiao,
    10. M. Liu,
    11. V. Natarajan
    . 2007. Lysophosphatidic acid is detectable in human bronchoalveolar lavage fluids at baseline and increased after segmental allergen challenge. Clin. Exp. Allergy 37: 311–322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Serhan C. N.,
    2. N. Chiang,
    3. T. E. Van Dyke
    . 2008. Resolving inflammation: dual anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution lipid mediators. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8: 349–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. He D.,
    2. Y. Su,
    3. P. V. Usatyuk,
    4. E. W. Spannhake,
    5. P. Kogut,
    6. J. Solway,
    7. V. Natarajan,
    8. Y. Zhao
    . 2009. Lysophosphatidic acid enhances pulmonary epithelial barrier integrity and protects endotoxin-induced epithelial barrier disruption and lung injury. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 24123–24132.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Ausiello C. M.,
    2. G. Fedele,
    3. F. Urbani,
    4. R. Lande,
    5. B. Di Carlo,
    6. A. Cassone
    . 2002. Native and genetically inactivated pertussis toxins induce human dendritic cell maturation and synergize with lipopolysaccharide in promoting T helper type 1 responses. J. Infect. Dis. 186: 351–360.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Shuyu, E., Y. J. Lai, R. Tsukahara, C. S. Chen, Y. Fujiwara, J. Yue, J. H. Yu, H. Guo, A. Kihara, G. Tigyi, and F. T. Lin. 2009. Lysophosphatidic acid 2 receptor-mediated supramolecular complex formation regulates its antiapoptotic effect. J. Biol. Chem. 284: 14558–14571.
  42. ↵
    1. Zhao Y.,
    2. J. Tong,
    3. D. He,
    4. S. Pendyala,
    5. B. Evgeny,
    6. J. Chun,
    7. A. I. Sperling,
    8. V. Natarajan
    . 2009. Role of lysophosphatidic acid receptor LPA2 in the development of allergic airway inflammation in a murine model of asthma. Respir. Res. 10: 114.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Rubenfeld J.,
    2. J. Guo,
    3. N. Sookrung,
    4. R. Chen,
    5. W. Chaicumpa,
    6. V. Casolaro,
    7. Y. Zhao,
    8. V. Natarajan,
    9. S. Georas
    . 2006. Lysophosphatidic acid enhances interleukin-13 gene expression and promoter activity in T cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 290: L66–L74.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Zhao Y.,
    2. D. He,
    3. J. Zhao,
    4. L. Wang,
    5. A. R. Leff,
    6. E. W. Spannhake,
    7. S. Georas,
    8. V. Natarajan
    . 2007. Lysophosphatidic acid induces interleukin-13 (IL-13) receptor alpha2 expression and inhibits IL-13 signaling in primary human bronchial epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 10172–10179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Matsuzaki S.,
    2. T. Ishizuka,
    3. T. Hisada,
    4. H. Aoki,
    5. M. Komachi,
    6. I. Ichimonji,
    7. M. Utsugi,
    8. A. Ono,
    9. Y. Koga,
    10. K. Dobashi,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Lysophosphatidic acid inhibits CC chemokine ligand 5/RANTES production by blocking IRF-1-mediated gene transcription in human bronchial epithelial cells. J. Immunol. 185: 4863–4872.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    1. Cerutis D. R.,
    2. M. Nogami,
    3. J. L. Anderson,
    4. J. D. Churchill,
    5. D. J. Romberger,
    6. S. I. Rennard,
    7. M. L. Toews
    . 1997. Lysophosphatidic acid and EGF stimulate mitogenesis in human airway smooth muscle cells. Am. J. Physiol. 273: L10–L15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 188 (8)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 188, Issue 8
15 Apr 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lpa2 Is a Negative Regulator of Both Dendritic Cell Activation and Murine Models of Allergic Lung Inflammation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lpa2 Is a Negative Regulator of Both Dendritic Cell Activation and Murine Models of Allergic Lung Inflammation
Jason Emo, Nida Meednu, Timothy J. Chapman, Fariba Rezaee, Marlene Balys, Troy Randall, Tirumalai Rangasamy, Steve N. Georas
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2012, 188 (8) 3784-3790; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102956

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Lpa2 Is a Negative Regulator of Both Dendritic Cell Activation and Murine Models of Allergic Lung Inflammation
Jason Emo, Nida Meednu, Timothy J. Chapman, Fariba Rezaee, Marlene Balys, Troy Randall, Tirumalai Rangasamy, Steve N. Georas
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2012, 188 (8) 3784-3790; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102956
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606