Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

MHC Class II Tetramers

Gerald T. Nepom
J Immunol March 15, 2012, 188 (6) 2477-2482; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1102398
Gerald T. Nepom
Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

MHC class II tetramers have emerged as an important tool for characterization of the specificity and phenotype of CD4 T cell immune responses, useful in a large variety of disease and vaccine studies. Issues of specific T cell frequency, biodistribution, and avidity, coupled with the large genetic diversity of potential class II restriction elements, require targeted experimental design. Translational opportunities for immune disease monitoring are driving the rapid development of HLA class II tetramer use in clinical applications, together with innovations in tetramer production and epitope discovery.

The concept of using soluble labeled ligands to detect cell surface receptors is a standard approach for understanding molecular specificity and function. However, only in the last 15 y has this general strategy been successfully applied to the analysis of Ag-specific T cells through the use of soluble MHC-peptide ligands that engage the αβTCR. Originally developed for MHC class I recognition in the context of CD8 T cells (1, 2), over the last decade similar approaches have been successfully used for MHC class II recognition in the context of CD4 T cells for a wide variety of Ags. From this experience, it is now evident that interrogating CD4 T cells using soluble tetramers has matured into a robust technology, notably useful in numerous translational and clinical contexts. However, several constraints that limit their use are also now understood. In this Brief Review, key issues governing CD4 T cell identification by MHC class II tetramers are discussed, and examples from human immune monitoring studies illustrate the lessons learned.

Adding specificity to the T cell flow cytometry toolkit

Peptide-MHC (pMHC) class II multimers display an antigenic peptide in the class II-binding groove, functioning as a surrogate for recognition events that occur as part of the T cell interaction with APCs. Various methods for displaying pMHC class II molecules have been successfully used, ranging from monomeric pMHC bound to solid substrates or soluble in solution to higher-order multimers complexed with various scaffold molecules. The most prevalent form of multimer in use today consists of biotin-labeled pMHC displayed on streptavidin molecules, forming ostensibly tetravalent complexes; hence, the common use of the term “tetramers” for this detection method.

Tetramer assays are widely used for single-cell phenotyping and enumeration and offer an important advantage over other methods, such as ELISPOT and single-cell PCR, by enabling the recovery and further study of sorted cells based on fluorescent tetramer binding in flow cytometry. As a cytometry-based application, tetramers also provide the prospect of ease of use and short assay time, analogous to Ab-based flow cytometry studies. The major limitation to their use is the requirement to have some knowledge of the specific pMHC components involved in the recognition events being studied, because these are necessary to construct the tetramer reagents. A corollary to this element of MHC restriction is the consideration that humans have very diverse HLA class II molecules, so that random sampling or clinical monitoring studies may require the use of many different tetramers to include a broad representation of the population.

Straightforward solutions exist for both of these limitations—HLA diversity and epitope identification—by making the investment necessary to produce a universal set of class II tetramers for most HLA alleles, as well as by using functional selection of relevant epitopes as a criterion for study design. With these advances, discussed below, there has been a rapid expansion of studies using tetramers to study CD4 T cell response to vaccines, allergens, and a variety of Ags associated with autoimmune diseases. There has also been an improved understanding surrounding the potential use of tetramers, because as the technological problems have been largely solved, there is now realization of some important biological barriers associated with interrogating the specific TCR–tetramer interaction.

Rare CD4 T cell detection using class II pMHC tetramers

A major challenge for studies using HLA class II tetramers is the low frequency of Ag-specific CD4 T cells in peripheral blood. Highly boosted responses, such as tetanus-specific or influenza-specific CD4 T cells after immunization, display transient levels of Ag-specific cells in the 1:1,000–1:20,000 range; specific memory T cells without recent boosting are more often found in the 1:20,000–1:100,000 range; and rare responses or autoantigen-specific responder cells are detectable in the 1:100,000–1:1 million range. Naive T cell frequencies to particular pMHC are also ∼1:200,000–1:1 million. Because of these low cell frequencies, the first generation of tetramer-based immunoassays used in vitro activation and/or expansion to enable T cell detection (3), somewhat analogous to the historically used techniques of limiting dilution-proliferation assays and ELISPOT analysis. Of course, a major problem with such an approach was the potential for phenotypic changes introduced by in vitro manipulation; therefore, these studies were limited primarily to the estimates of cell frequency and specificity.

Current second-generation tetramer assays avoid the use of in vitro expansion and are either based on single-cell capture technology (4–6) or on direct flow cytometry staining analysis (7–10). In the latter, stringent “dumping” criteria and enrichment with magnetic bead-trapping procedures are used to remove cells that lack tetramer specificity, enriching the Ag-specific population as much as 10,000-fold, allowing for detection of rare events (e.g., 10 tetramer-binding T cells from 20 ml of peripheral blood). In addition, multiparameter flow cytometry analysis using a variety of mAbs simultaneously with tetramer assays allows for direct phenotyping of the Ag-specific cells, a major advance toward discriminating T cell functional subsets directed to a single Ag.

HLA class II tetramers are now widely used in studies of pathogen immunity and vaccine development, in evaluation of antitumor responses, in allergy monitoring and desensitization studies, and in autoimmunity (Fig. 1). Examples of each are summarized below and illustrate particular issues faced in these different applications.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Molecular design schematic of a class II tetramer molecule, illustrating four pMHC domains tethered to a central streptavidin molecule through flexible linker sequences and leucine zipper motifs to provide structural stability. Some of the major areas of tetramer analysis in human disease applications are listed.

Monitoring immunity to infectious pathogens

Class II tetramers have been used for analysis of a variety of human CD4 T cell responses to pathogens, including influenza A, Borrelia, EBV, CMV, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, human T-lymphotropic virus 1, hepatitis C, anthrax, severe acute respiratory syndrome virus, human papillomavirus, and HIV (3, 7, 11–30). Ag-specific T cells are detected in peripheral blood, with a very broad range of frequency, depending on prior Ag exposure, vaccination history, and timing of immunization. The most significant limitation for these studies is simply the large number of potential epitopes present in complex organisms; not only are there multiple potential protein targets within each pathogen, but a huge number of processed and presented peptides are potentially targets for CD4 T cell recognition. For example, within the protective Ag of Bacillus anthracis, multiple epitopes are present; as expected, the dominance of each epitope varies depending on the HLA genotype of the individual subject (23). Therefore, selection of tetramers for studies of the T cell response to anthrax or similarly complex agents involves matching the HLA class II genotype of each subject with appropriately tailored pMHC tetramers (31). In contrast, occasionally there are immunodominant epitopes from pathogens that bind promiscuously to multiple HLA class II molecules. When this occurs, production and use of appropriate pMHC tetramers becomes straightforward. For example, the hemagglutinin protein of influenza A H1N1 contains a peptide epitope (aa 306–319) that binds to at least five common human class II molecules and is recognized by T cells in each case. Most people, through either natural exposure or periodic flu vaccination, contain peripheral CD4 T cells recognizing this epitope (14). A similar strategy has been adopted to search for conserved epitopes in pandemic strain H5N1, after vaccination (32). T cells recognizing additional influenza epitopes can be found simultaneously in the same blood samples using other tetramers but appear to be more specific to a given individual (12, 33). An interesting exception was seen in tetramer analysis with pMHC corresponding to the H5N1 influenza strain hemagglutinin, with cross-reactivity from pre-existing immunity to other influenza strains, allowing detection of T cells reactive to H5N1, even in the absence of direct exposure to this strain (24).

With hundreds of potential peptide epitopes to choose from, selecting pMHC tetramers for studying infectious pathogens or vaccines is challenging. Traditional methods involving functional testing of individual peptides from large libraries are laborious and, when based on a particular functional parameter (e.g., IFN ELISPOT analysis), may omit epitopes that are important for other T cell subsets or lineages. To address this issue, an unbiased platform has been developed for a tetramer-binding and flow cytometry screening method that directly determines suitable pMHC tetramers. This technique, called tetramer-guided epitope mapping (TGEM), involves the display of large peptide libraries loaded into HLA class II molecules (Fig. 2). Pools of tetramers are used to probe the T cell population of interest, and positive tetramer binding, assessed by flow cytometry, is deconvoluted in a second flow cytometry step into individual pMHC targets (34, 35). This approach has been applied to a variety of infectious agents, with epitope identification information deposited in the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases-sponsored Immune Epitope Database and Analysis Resource, IEDB.org.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Epitope identification using a tetramer-guided mapping strategy. Large peptide libraries, separated into sets of pooled sequences, are loaded into the binding groove of recombinant class II molecules and assembled into tetramers. Direct flow cytometry analysis of T cell populations identifies peptides containing actual epitopes representative of the natural immune response.

Allergen tetramers: a tool for improved immunotherapy?

Translation from a laboratory tool to a clinically useful biomarker is a difficult transition for any technology, but in the area of allergy desensitization therapy, human class II tetramers have their most immediate translational potential. Similar to the study of infectious pathogens, tetramer development for allergens is complicated by the diversity and number of potential CD4 T cell epitopes. However, for many of the major allergic disorders, including allergies to foods, pollen, and dander, there is a large body of knowledge narrowing the field of target allergen proteins. The TGEM technique has been applied to several of these, resulting in the identification of epitopes and tetramers suitable for analysis of peripheral T cell recognition to major allergens (10, 16, 26, 29). In allergic individuals, the frequency of tetramer-binding CD4 T cells in peripheral blood, particularly during periods of allergen exposure, is suitably high, allowing direct detection by flow cytometry after tetramer binding. In a recent study by Wambre et al. (10), multiparameter flow analysis documented progressive shifts in cell surface marker profiles associated with T cell deviation during s.c. allergen immunotherapy. Current clinical desensitization protocols use allergen extracts, require very long-term administration, and carry significant risk for adverse allergic response, making it attractive to consider using tetramer-based immune monitoring in this context. Also, because one approach to improve allergy immunotherapy is to use peptides instead of allergen extracts (19, 36), the TGEM technique and tetramer monitoring may help to identify appropriate peptide epitopes for use, particularly if stratification based on HLA genotype is needed.

Tetramer profiling of low-avidity T cells in autoimmunity

Human class II pMHC tetramers containing autoantigenic specificities have been used to study T cell responses in a variety of diseases, including type 1 diabetes (T1D), celiac disease, pemphigus vulgaris, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, and uveitis (37–47). These studies have highlighted a fundamental point: the avidity of the TCR interaction with its pMHC target is influenced by selection against high-affinity self-Ag recognition. Unlike tetramer analyses in the infectious pathogen and allergen studies cited above, in which most of the responding T cells have a high-avidity binding to appropriate pMHC tetramers, tetramer binding to peripheral T cells in the context of autoimmunity displays a much wider spectrum of relative strength of interaction. In addition, the frequency of autoreactive CD4 T cells specific for a particular pMHC–self-Ag complex is quite low in peripheral blood, often less than five per million lymphocytes, requiring large sample volumes and careful handling for reliable detection.

The most complete autoimmunity studies have been performed in the context of T1D, a disease in which several major autoantigens are well characterized. Class II tetramers specific for the T1D autoantigens glutamate dehydrogenase, proinsulin, IA-2, and ZnT8 have all been used to evaluate T cell frequencies in peripheral blood. Findings from these studies support the concept that the autoreactive repertoire matures during disease progression. First, normal individuals, as well as T1D subjects, have low, but detectable, levels of circulating tetramer-binding CD4 cells. However, these display markers of naive lymphocytes in the former group, whereas they are predominantly memory phenotype in the latter, presumably reflect a history of prior activation in vivo. Second, although some high-avidity autoreactive T cells are present and can be expanded in culture, the population of tetramer-binding cells contains both low- and high-avidity TCR for the autoantigen pMHC. By taking advantage of the unique genetics of human T1D, in which a polymorphism in the proinsulin promoter region controls levels of thymic expression (48, 49), Durinovic-Belló et al. (44) demonstrated that the strength of tetramer binding to proinsulin-specific T cells correlated with this genotype, directly linking thymic Ag expression with avidity selection for the CD4 repertoire. Third, when T1D patients undergo pancreas transplantation, they essentially receive an immunological challenge with islet autoantigens, in addition to the alloreactivity associated with an organ transplant. Tetramer analysis of such subjects, followed for several years after transplantation, documented both the expansion of autoantigen pMHC tetramer-binding CD4 T cells and, more remarkably, the persistence of unique clonotypic TCR sequences within this population, indicating a recurrence of memory responses from a pre-existing autoreactive repertoire (50, 51).

The low frequency and low avidity of T cells specific for autoantigens present special technical challenges, but several creative approaches have shown promise for improving tetramer-detection strategies. In a recent study of subjects with rheumatoid arthritis, class II tetramers were used to test an intriguing mechanistic hypothesis: posttranslational modification of peptide epitopes creates neoantigenic specificities targeted in the disease setting (52). James et al. (45) also prepared HLA class II tetramers containing citrulline-modified peptides based on fibrinogen protein sequences found in joint tissue, and they documented the presence of T cells that bound these tetramers and responded to the corresponding autoantigen. In celiac disease, where there is also posttranslational modification of target Ags, class II tetramers composed of gliadin pMHC complexes were shown to bind peripheral CD4 T cells; however, these cells were only detectable when the subjects consumed gluten-containing bread for 3 d (53). This finding strongly suggests that mobilization of the Ag-specific cells from tissue to blood was necessary for visualization, and it may provide a generalizable strategy, involving Ag challenge, for improving the detection threshold for rare autoreactive cells.

A related issue, particularly relevant to the analysis of low-avidity T cell responses in autoimmunity, is the definition of a precise peptide-binding register for docking within the class II molecule. The presence of more than one binding register within long peptides generated during Ag processing can result in presentation of pMHC ligands to distinct TCR, with potentially different roles in selection and autoreactivity (54, 55).

Tetramer studies of tumor Ags are similar to the autoantigen approach, with an opportunity to help inform both disease mechanism and therapy. Although most tumor Ags are self-Ags or modified self-Ags, intentional immunization with these Ags is conducted for therapeutic benefit. For example, class II tetramer studies in patients with malignant melanoma after experimental vaccine therapies documented evidence of immunogenicity, measured the effects of adjuvant on T cell lineage, and have been used to evaluate shifts in T cell subsets (56–59). Indeed, because the pMHC complex is itself a surrogate for Ag recognition, it is feasible that tetramers might be considered for therapeutic expansion of Ag-specific effector T cells (60).

Variations on the tetramer theme

Biophysical studies and off-rate analysis suggest that multivalent binding of pMHC to the TCR is essential for successful tetramer imaging of Ag-specific T cells. Monomeric and dimeric forms of pMHC are much less efficient than tetramers (61), whereas higher-order multimers, such as octomers, decamers, or pMHC-coated beads, are all successful reagents, generally comparable to tetramers. However, a caveat to this interpretation is that streptavidin aggregates during storage, so that experiments ostensibly using tetrameric forms of pMHC linked to streptavidin may, in fact, be using higher-order complexes, at least in part.

A variety of methods has been successfully used to manufacture pMHC class II tetramers, with expression of HLA class II molecules as “empty” (without intentional loading of peptide into the class II Ag-binding groove); “loaded,” in which the expression system is coupled to a facilitated peptide-loading process, resulting in production of complete pMHC; or “covalent,” in which an MHC expression vector is engineered to cotranslationally express the peptide, with a flexible and/or removable linker sequence allowing for 1:1 stoichiometry of peptide/MHC and directed peptide binding into the class II-binding groove. Expression systems have included mammalian, insect cell, or bacterial sources (62). There are advantages to each system, depending on the intended type of tetramer assay planned. For example, covalent pMHC are well suited for consistent production systems and for situations in which a small number of specific pMHC combinations are used. They are not well suited to screening assays involving hundreds of different potential peptide Ags, and neoepitope exposure due to the presence of linker sequence or a too-stringent binding register is a potential concern. An important use of noncovalent peptide-loaded pMHC production systems is the ability to assess many different tetramer-binding specificities at the same time. This has been exploited in the TGEM technique described above, in which large mixtures of peptides, most commonly representing the entire protein sequence of potential antigenic targets, are interrogated to determine which peptides within the mixture contain actual T cell epitopes.

Because of the high specificity and sensitivity of TCR recognition for pMHC, tetramer-binding studies can also be designed to identify unconventional antigenic epitopes. For example, many protein therapeutics that are administered to patients are potentially immunogenic. Analysis of the T cell response in these cases, using tetramers containing pMHC specificities from the therapeutic molecule, can readily identify the specific epitopes that trigger immunogenicity, as illustrated in a study of Factor VIII administration in hemophilia A (63).

Examples of technical variations that are designed to improve the efficiency of tetramer production include coexpression with chaperone proteins (64), biotinylation of the expressed MHC molecule during synthesis (65), modifications of peptide linkers used to dock covalent peptides in the coexpressed MHC groove (66), or the use of cleavable CLIP peptides (7), which take advantage of the natural role of invariant chain residues (CLIP) that are a functional intermediate in loading peptides into class II molecules. One of the most intriguing innovations is the use of entire libraries of class II pMHC molecules plated on arrays designed to capture Ag-specific T cells (67), similar to earlier studies using class I tetramers (68).

Conclusions

After more than a decade of experience, class II tetramer analysis has become a regular component of T cell-specificity studies across the entire landscape of immunological investigation. However, a decision to include class II tetramer studies, as well as how to use them, is not as routine as selecting Abs for flow cytometry. There are four key issues that should be considered and used as the basis for experimental choice.

First, what is the anticipated frequency of CD4 T cells recognizing immunodominant epitopes in the system? If there is no prior evidence for immunodominance and no information from previous T cell assays regarding prevalence, then it is a challenge to select a particular pMHC tetramer that will be representative of the T cell response profile. Either multiple different pMHC can be selected, individually or as a mixed tetramer pool, or a technique such as TGEM can be used in pilot studies to directly determine the appropriate pMHC combinations.

Second, what is the likely biodistribution of CD4 T cells of interest? In cases such as celiac disease, as described above, mobilization of the Ag-specific T cells into the bloodstream was accomplished by Ag challenge. This may have general applicability, supported by the observations in T1D that tetramer-positive cells are much higher after pancreas transplantation or after glutamate dehydrogenase immunization (H. Reijonen, personal communication) compared with unimmunized diabetic subjects. If the Ag-specific cells are at tissue sites of interest, more complex biopsy and in situ histochemistry techniques are needed.

Third, avidity matters. Unlike foreign Ag responses in vaccine or allergy studies, self-Ag responses in autoimmunity or tumor immunology reflect a diverse spectrum of TCR avidity for pMHC complexes, including interactions that are near or below the threshold for robust tetramer-binding detection. If the experimental system requires detection of such low-avidity interactions, methods to amplify the tetramer-binding signals may be helpful. Alternatively, T cell activation triggered by tetramer binding can be used as a surrogate measure, with a threshold lower than conventional flow cytometry detection (62, 69).

Fourth, how genetically diverse is the population being studied? The requirement for pMHC cognate recognition by the CD4 T cell dictates that at least one of the class II molecules in each subject corresponds to the HLA molecule used for the tetramer. For populations that are highly enriched for particular HLA class II genes, such as in T1D, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, or celiac disease, this is not a limiting factor. However, for population-based vaccine studies or allergy monitoring trials, a large number of tetramers is needed or, alternatively, subjects are preselected based on HLA genotype. Either way, a significant complexity is added to the study. HLA class II tetramers for 25 of the most common genotypes are now available, so this is not an insurmountable barrier, if taken into account in experimental design (http://www.benaroyaresearch.org/our-research/core-resources/tetramer-core-laboratory).

Disclosures

The author has no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The work of numerous colleagues at the Benaroya Research Institute and elsewhere, who have pioneered the class II tetramer technology, is gratefully acknowledged, and any omissions from the citation list, limited by space, are inadvertent.

Footnotes

  • Work in the author’s laboratory cited in this article was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    pMHC
    peptide-MHC
    T1D
    type 1 diabetes
    TGEM
    tetramer-guided epitope mapping.

  • Received December 7, 2011.
  • Accepted January 6, 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Altman J. D.,
    2. P. A. H. Moss,
    3. P. J. R. Goulder,
    4. D. H. Barouch,
    5. M. G. McHeyzer-Williams,
    6. J. I. Bell,
    7. A. J. McMichael,
    8. M. M. Davis
    . 1996. Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes. Science 274: 94–96.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Lebowitz M. S.,
    2. S. M. O’Herrin,
    3. A. R. Hamad,
    4. T. Fahmy,
    5. D. Marguet,
    6. N. C. Barnes,
    7. D. Pardoll,
    8. J. G. Bieler,
    9. J. P. Schneck
    . 1999. Soluble, high-affinity dimers of T-cell receptors and class II major histocompatibility complexes: biochemical probes for analysis and modulation of immune responses. Cell. Immunol. 192: 175–184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Novak E. J.,
    2. A. W. Liu,
    3. G. T. Nepom,
    4. W. W. Kwok
    . 1999. MHC class II tetramers identify peptide-specific human CD4(+) T cells proliferating in response to influenza A antigen. J. Clin. Invest. 104: R63–R67.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Cameron T. O.,
    2. G. B. Cohen,
    3. S. A. Islam,
    4. L. J. Stern
    . 2002. Examination of the highly diverse CD4(+) T-cell repertoire directed against an influenza peptide: a step towards TCR proteomics. Immunogenetics 54: 611–620.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Newell E. W.,
    2. L. O. Klein,
    3. W. Yu,
    4. M. M. Davis
    . 2009. Simultaneous detection of many T-cell specificities using combinatorial tetramer staining. Nat. Methods 6: 497–499.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Song Q.,
    2. Q. Han,
    3. E. M. Bradshaw,
    4. S. C. Kent,
    5. K. Raddassi,
    6. B. Nilsson,
    7. G. T. Nepom,
    8. D. A. Hafler,
    9. J. C. Love
    . 2010. On-chip activation and subsequent detection of individual antigen-specific T cells. Anal. Chem. 82: 473–477.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Day C. L.,
    2. N. P. Seth,
    3. M. Lucas,
    4. H. Appel,
    5. L. Gauthier,
    6. G. M. Lauer,
    7. G. K. Robbins,
    8. Z. M. Szczepiorkowski,
    9. D. R. Casson,
    10. R. T. Chung,
    11. et al
    . 2003. Ex vivo analysis of human memory CD4 T cells specific for hepatitis C virus using MHC class II tetramers. J. Clin. Invest. 112: 831–842.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Scriba T. J.,
    2. M. Purbhoo,
    3. C. L. Day,
    4. N. Robinson,
    5. S. Fidler,
    6. J. Fox,
    7. J. N. Weber,
    8. P. Klenerman,
    9. A. K. Sewell,
    10. R. E. Phillips
    . 2005. Ultrasensitive detection and phenotyping of CD4+ T cells with optimized HLA class II tetramer staining. J. Immunol. 175: 6334–6343.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Chu H. H.,
    2. J. J. Moon,
    3. K. Takada,
    4. M. Pepper,
    5. J. A. Molitor,
    6. T. W. Schacker,
    7. K. A. Hogquist,
    8. S. C. Jameson,
    9. M. K. Jenkins
    . 2009. Positive selection optimizes the number and function of MHCII-restricted CD4+ T cell clones in the naive polyclonal repertoire. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 106: 11241–11245.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Wambre E.,
    2. J. H. DeLong,
    3. E. A. James,
    4. R. E. Lafond,
    5. D. Robinson,
    6. W. W. Kwok
    . 2012. Differentiation stage determines pathologic and protective allergen-specific CD4(+) T-cell outcomes during specific immunotherapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 129: 544–551.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Meyer A. L.,
    2. C. Trollmo,
    3. F. Crawford,
    4. P. Marrack,
    5. A. C. Steere,
    6. B. T. Huber,
    7. J. Kappler,
    8. D. A. Hafler
    . 2000. Direct enumeration of Borrelia-reactive CD4 T cells ex vivo by using MHC class II tetramers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11433–11438.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Danke N. A.,
    2. W. W. Kwok
    . 2003. HLA class II-restricted CD4+ T cell responses directed against influenza viral antigens postinfluenza vaccination. J. Immunol. 171: 3163–3169.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Lucas M.,
    2. C. L. Day,
    3. J. R. Wyer,
    4. S. L. Cunliffe,
    5. A. Loughry,
    6. A. J. McMichael,
    7. P. Klenerman
    . 2004. Ex vivo phenotype and frequency of influenza virus-specific CD4 memory T cells. J. Virol. 78: 7284–7287.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Ye M.,
    2. S. Kasey,
    3. S. Khurana,
    4. N. T. Nguyen,
    5. S. Schubert,
    6. C. T. Nugent,
    7. K. Kuus-Reichel,
    8. J. Hampl
    . 2004. MHC class II tetramers containing influenza hemagglutinin and EBV EBNA1 epitopes detect reliably specific CD4(+) T cells in healthy volunteers. Hum. Immunol. 65: 507–513.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Bronke C.,
    2. N. M. Palmer,
    3. G. H. Westerlaken,
    4. M. Toebes,
    5. G. M. van Schijndel,
    6. V. Purwaha,
    7. K. E. van Meijgaarden,
    8. T. N. Schumacher,
    9. D. van Baarle,
    10. K. Tesselaar,
    11. A. Geluk
    . 2005. Direct ex vivo detection of HLA-DR3-restricted cytomegalovirus- and Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T cells. Hum. Immunol. 66: 950–961.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Macaubas C.,
    2. J. Wahlstrom,
    3. A. P. Galvão da Silva,
    4. T. G. Forsthuber,
    5. G. Sønderstrup,
    6. W. W. Kwok,
    7. R. H. DeKruyff,
    8. D. T. Umetsu
    . 2006. Allergen-specific MHC class II tetramer+ cells are detectable in allergic, but not in nonallergic, individuals. J. Immunol. 176: 5069–5077.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ulsenheimer A.,
    2. M. Lucas,
    3. N. P. Seth,
    4. J. Tilman Gerlach,
    5. N. H. Gruener,
    6. A. Loughry,
    7. G. R. Pape,
    8. K. W. Wucherpfennig,
    9. H. M. Diepolder,
    10. P. Klenerman
    . 2006. Transient immunological control during acute hepatitis C virus infection: ex vivo analysis of helper T-cell responses. J. Viral Hepat. 13: 708–714.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Höhn H.,
    2. C. Kortsik,
    3. I. Zehbe,
    4. W. E. Hitzler,
    5. K. Kayser,
    6. K. Freitag,
    7. C. Neukirch,
    8. P. Andersen,
    9. T. M. Doherty,
    10. M. Maeurer
    . 2007. MHC class II tetramer guided detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T cells in peripheral blood from patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Scand. J. Immunol. 65: 467–478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Kinnunen T.,
    2. K. Jutila,
    3. W. W. Kwok,
    4. M. Rytkönen-Nissinen,
    5. A. Immonen,
    6. S. Saarelainen,
    7. A. Närvänen,
    8. A. Taivainen,
    9. T. Virtanen
    . 2007. Potential of an altered peptide ligand of lipocalin allergen Bos d 2 for peptide immunotherapy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 119: 965–972.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Laughlin E. M.,
    2. J. D. Miller,
    3. E. James,
    4. D. Fillos,
    5. C. C. Ibegbu,
    6. R. S. Mittler,
    7. R. Akondy,
    8. W. Kwok,
    9. R. Ahmed,
    10. G. Nepom
    . 2007. Antigen-specific CD4+ T cells recognize epitopes of protective antigen following vaccination with an anthrax vaccine. Infect. Immun. 75: 1852–1860.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Nose H.,
    2. R. Kubota,
    3. N. P. Seth,
    4. P. K. Goon,
    5. Y. Tanaka,
    6. S. Izumo,
    7. K. Usuku,
    8. Y. Ohara,
    9. K. W. Wucherpfennig,
    10. C. R. Bangham,
    11. et al
    . 2007. Ex vivo analysis of human T lymphotropic virus type 1-specific CD4+ cells by use of a major histocompatibility complex class II tetramer composed of a neurological disease-susceptibility allele and its immunodominant peptide. J. Infect. Dis. 196: 1761–1772.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ebinuma H.,
    2. N. Nakamoto,
    3. Y. Li,
    4. D. A. Price,
    5. E. Gostick,
    6. B. L. Levine,
    7. J. Tobias,
    8. W. W. Kwok,
    9. K. M. Chang
    . 2008. Identification and in vitro expansion of functional antigen-specific CD25+ FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in hepatitis C virus infection. J. Virol. 82: 5043–5053.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Kwok W. W.,
    2. J. Yang,
    3. E. James,
    4. J. Bui,
    5. L. Huston,
    6. A. R. Wiesen,
    7. M. Roti
    . 2008. The anthrax vaccine adsorbed vaccine generates protective antigen (PA)-Specific CD4+ T cells with a phenotype distinct from that of naive PA T cells. Infect. Immun. 76: 4538–4545.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Roti M.,
    2. J. Yang,
    3. D. Berger,
    4. L. Huston,
    5. E. A. James,
    6. W. W. Kwok
    . 2008. Healthy human subjects have CD4+ T cells directed against H5N1 influenza virus. J. Immunol. 180: 1758–1768.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Yang J.,
    2. E. James,
    3. M. Roti,
    4. L. Huston,
    5. J. A. Gebe,
    6. W. W. Kwok
    . 2009. Searching immunodominant epitopes prior to epidemic: HLA class II-restricted SARS-CoV spike protein epitopes in unexposed individuals. Int. Immunol. 21: 63–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Kinnunen T.,
    2. A. Nieminen,
    3. W. W. Kwok,
    4. A. Närvänen,
    5. M. Rytkönen-Nissinen,
    6. S. Saarelainen,
    7. A. Taivainen,
    8. T. Virtanen
    . 2010. Allergen-specific naïve and memory CD4+ T cells exhibit functional and phenotypic differences between individuals with or without allergy. Eur. J. Immunol. 40: 2460–2469.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Vingert B.,
    2. S. Perez-Patrigeon,
    3. P. Jeannin,
    4. O. Lambotte,
    5. F. Boufassa,
    6. F. Lemaître,
    7. W. W. Kwok,
    8. I. Theodorou,
    9. J. F. Delfraissy,
    10. J. Thèze,
    11. L. A. Chakrabarti,
    12. ANRS EP36 HIV Controllers Study Group
    . 2010. HIV controller CD4+ T cells respond to minimal amounts of Gag antigen due to high TCR avidity. PLoS Pathog. 6: e1000780.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Cusick M. F.,
    2. M. Yang,
    3. J. C. Gill,
    4. D. D. Eckels
    . 2011. Naturally occurring CD4+ T-cell epitope variants act as altered peptide ligands leading to impaired helper T-cell responses in hepatitis C virus infection. Hum. Immunol. 72: 379–385.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. DeLong J. H.,
    2. K. H. Simpson,
    3. E. Wambre,
    4. E. A. James,
    5. D. Robinson,
    6. W. W. Kwok
    . 2011. Ara h 1-reactive T cells in individuals with peanut allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 127: 1211–1218, e3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. James E. A.,
    2. J. A. DeVoti,
    3. D. W. Rosenthal,
    4. L. J. Hatam,
    5. B. M. Steinberg,
    6. A. L. Abramson,
    7. W. W. Kwok,
    8. V. R. Bonagura
    . 2011. Papillomavirus-specific CD4+ T cells exhibit reduced STAT-5 signaling and altered cytokine profiles in patients with recurrent respiratory papillomatosis. J. Immunol. 186: 6633–6640.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. James E. A.,
    2. J. Bui,
    3. D. Berger,
    4. L. Huston,
    5. M. Roti,
    6. W. W. Kwok
    . 2007. Tetramer-guided epitope mapping reveals broad, individualized repertoires of tetanus toxin-specific CD4+ T cells and suggests HLA-based differences in epitope recognition. Int. Immunol. 19: 1291–1301.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Wang S. F.,
    2. L. Yao,
    3. S. J. Liu,
    4. P. Chong,
    5. W. T. Liu,
    6. Y. M. Chen,
    7. J. C. Huang
    . 2010. Identifying conserved DR1501-restricted CD4(+) T-cell epitopes in avian H5N1 hemagglutinin proteins. Viral Immunol. 23: 585–593.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Yang J.,
    2. E. A. James,
    3. L. Huston,
    4. N. A. Danke,
    5. A. W. Liu,
    6. W. W. Kwok
    . 2006. Multiplex mapping of CD4 T cell epitopes using class II tetramers. Clin. Immunol. 120: 21–32.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Novak E. J.,
    2. A. W. Liu,
    3. J. A. Gebe,
    4. B. A. Falk,
    5. G. T. Nepom,
    6. D. M. Koelle,
    7. W. W. Kwok
    . 2001. Tetramer-guided epitope mapping: rapid identification and characterization of immunodominant CD4+ T cell epitopes from complex antigens. J. Immunol. 166: 6665–6670.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Kwok W. W.,
    2. J. A. Gebe,
    3. A. Liu,
    4. S. Agar,
    5. N. Ptacek,
    6. J. Hammer,
    7. D. M. Koelle,
    8. G. T. Nepom
    . 2001. Rapid epitope identification from complex class-II-restricted T-cell antigens. Trends Immunol. 22: 583–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Worm M.,
    2. H. H. Lee,
    3. J. Kleine-Tebbe,
    4. R. P. Hafner,
    5. P. Laidler,
    6. D. Healey,
    7. C. Buhot,
    8. A. Verhoef,
    9. B. Maillere,
    10. A. B. Kay,
    11. M. Larche
    . 2011. Development and preliminary clinical evaluation of a peptide immunotherapy vaccine for cat allergy. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 127: 89–97, 97.e1–14.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Danke N. A.,
    2. D. M. Koelle,
    3. C. Yee,
    4. S. Beheray,
    5. W. W. Kwok
    . 2004. Autoreactive T cells in healthy individuals. J. Immunol. 172: 5967–5972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Danke N. A.,
    2. J. Yang,
    3. C. Greenbaum,
    4. W. W. Kwok
    . 2005. Comparative study of GAD65-specific CD4+ T cells in healthy and type 1 diabetic subjects. J. Autoimmun. 25: 303–311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mallone R.,
    2. S. A. Kochik,
    3. H. Reijonen,
    4. B. D. Carson,
    5. S. F. Ziegler,
    6. W. W. Kwok,
    7. G. T. Nepom
    . 2005. Functional avidity directs T-cell fate in autoreactive CD4+ T cells. Blood 106: 2798–2805.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Oling V.,
    2. J. Marttila,
    3. J. Ilonen,
    4. W. W. Kwok,
    5. G. Nepom,
    6. M. Knip,
    7. O. Simell,
    8. H. Reijonen
    . 2005. GAD65- and proinsulin-specific CD4+ T-cells detected by MHC class II tetramers in peripheral blood of type 1 diabetes patients and at-risk subjects. J. Autoimmun. 25: 235–243.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Veldman C.,
    2. R. Eming,
    3. S. Wolff-Franke,
    4. G. Sonderstrup,
    5. W. W. Kwok,
    6. M. Hertl
    . 2007. Detection of low avidity desmoglein 3-reactive T cells in pemphigus vulgaris using HLA-DR beta 1*0402 tetramers. Clin. Immunol. 122: 330–337.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Yang J.,
    2. N. Danke,
    3. M. Roti,
    4. L. Huston,
    5. C. Greenbaum,
    6. C. Pihoker,
    7. E. James,
    8. W. W. Kwok
    . 2008. CD4+ T cells from type 1 diabetic and healthy subjects exhibit different thresholds of activation to a naturally processed proinsulin epitope. J. Autoimmun. 31: 30–41.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Long S. A.,
    2. M. R. Walker,
    3. M. Rieck,
    4. E. James,
    5. W. W. Kwok,
    6. S. Sanda,
    7. C. Pihoker,
    8. C. Greenbaum,
    9. G. T. Nepom,
    10. J. H. Buckner
    . 2009. Functional islet-specific Treg can be generated from CD4+CD25− T cells of healthy and type 1 diabetic subjects. Eur. J. Immunol. 39: 612–620.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Durinovic-Belló I.,
    2. R. P. Wu,
    3. V. H. Gersuk,
    4. S. Sanda,
    5. H. G. Shilling,
    6. G. T. Nepom
    . 2010. Insulin gene VNTR genotype associates with frequency and phenotype of the autoimmune response to proinsulin. Genes Immun. 11: 188–193.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. James E. A.,
    2. A. K. Moustakas,
    3. J. Bui,
    4. G. K. Papadopoulos,
    5. G. Bondinas,
    6. J. H. Buckner,
    7. W. W. Kwok
    . 2010. HLA-DR1001 presents “altered-self” peptides derived from joint-associated proteins by accepting citrulline in three of its binding pockets. Arthritis Rheum. 62: 2909–2918.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Mattapallil M. J.,
    2. P. B. Silver,
    3. J. J. Mattapallil,
    4. R. Horai,
    5. Z. Karabekian,
    6. J. H. McDowell,
    7. C. C. Chan,
    8. E. A. James,
    9. W. W. Kwok,
    10. H. N. Sen,
    11. et al
    . 2011. Uveitis-associated epitopes of retinal antigens are pathogenic in the humanized mouse model of uveitis and identify autoaggressive T cells. J. Immunol. 187: 1977–1985.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Raddassi K.,
    2. S. C. Kent,
    3. J. Yang,
    4. K. Bourcier,
    5. E. M. Bradshaw,
    6. V. Seyfert-Margolis,
    7. G. T. Nepom,
    8. W. W. Kwok,
    9. D. A. Hafler
    . 2011. Increased frequencies of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein/MHC class II-binding CD4 cells in patients with multiple sclerosis. J. Immunol. 187: 1039–1046.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    1. Pugliese A.,
    2. M. Zeller,
    3. A. Fernandez Jr..,
    4. L. J. Zalcberg,
    5. R. J. Bartlett,
    6. C. Ricordi,
    7. M. Pietropaolo,
    8. G. S. Eisenbarth,
    9. S. T. Bennett,
    10. D. D. Patel
    . 1997. The insulin gene is transcribed in the human thymus and transcription levels correlated with allelic variation at the INS VNTR-IDDM2 susceptibility locus for type 1 diabetes. Nat. Genet. 15: 293–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Chentoufi A. A.,
    2. C. Polychronakos
    . 2002. Insulin expression levels in the thymus modulate insulin-specific autoreactive T-cell tolerance: the mechanism by which the IDDM2 locus may predispose to diabetes. Diabetes 51: 1383–1390.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Laughlin E.,
    2. G. Burke,
    3. A. Pugliese,
    4. B. Falk,
    5. G. Nepom
    . 2008. Recurrence of autoreactive antigen-specific CD4+ T cells in autoimmune diabetes after pancreas transplantation. Clin. Immunol. 128: 23–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Vendrame F.,
    2. A. Pileggi,
    3. E. Laughlin,
    4. G. Allende,
    5. A. Martin-Pagola,
    6. R. D. Molano,
    7. S. Diamantopoulos,
    8. N. Standifer,
    9. K. Geubtner,
    10. B. A. Falk,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Recurrence of type 1 diabetes after simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation, despite immunosuppression, is associated with autoantibodies and pathogenic autoreactive CD4 T-cells. Diabetes 59: 947–957.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Snir O.,
    2. M. Rieck,
    3. J. A. Gebe,
    4. B. B. Yue,
    5. C. A. Rawlings,
    6. G. Nepom,
    7. V. Malmström,
    8. J. H. Buckner
    . 2011. Identification and functional characterization of T cells reactive to citrullinated vimentin in HLA-DRB1*0401-positive humanized mice and rheumatoid arthritis patients. Arthritis Rheum. 63: 2873–2883.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Ráki M.,
    2. L. E. Fallang,
    3. M. Brottveit,
    4. E. Bergseng,
    5. H. Quarsten,
    6. K. E. Lundin,
    7. L. M. Sollid
    . 2007. Tetramer visualization of gut-homing gluten-specific T cells in the peripheral blood of celiac disease patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104: 2831–2836.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Crawford F.,
    2. B. Stadinski,
    3. N. Jin,
    4. A. Michels,
    5. M. Nakayama,
    6. P. Pratt,
    7. P. Marrack,
    8. G. Eisenbarth,
    9. J. W. Kappler
    . 2011. Specificity and detection of insulin-reactive CD4+ T cells in type 1 diabetes in the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 108: 16729–16734.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Landais E.,
    2. P. A. Romagnoli,
    3. A. L. Corper,
    4. J. Shires,
    5. J. D. Altman,
    6. I. A. Wilson,
    7. K. C. Garcia,
    8. L. Teyton
    . 2009. New design of MHC class II tetramers to accommodate fundamental principles of antigen presentation. J. Immunol. 183: 7949–7957.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Wong R.,
    2. R. Lau,
    3. J. Chang,
    4. T. Kuus-Reichel,
    5. V. Brichard,
    6. C. Bruck,
    7. J. Weber
    . 2004. Immune responses to a class II helper peptide epitope in patients with stage III/IV resected melanoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 10: 5004–5013.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Aloysius M. M.,
    2. A. J. Mc Kechnie,
    3. R. A. Robins,
    4. C. Verma,
    5. J. M. Eremin,
    6. F. Farzaneh,
    7. N. A. Habib,
    8. J. Bhalla,
    9. N. R. Hardwick,
    10. S. Satthaporn,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Generation in vivo of peptide-specific cytotoxic T cells and presence of regulatory T cells during vaccination with hTERT (class I and II) peptide-pulsed DCs. J. Transl. Med. 7: 18.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Slingluff C. L, Jr..,
    2. G. R. Petroni,
    3. W. C. Olson,
    4. M. E. Smolkin,
    5. M. I. Ross,
    6. N. B. Haas,
    7. W. W. Grosh,
    8. M. E. Boisvert,
    9. J. M. Kirkwood,
    10. K. A. Chianese-Bullock
    . 2009. Effect of granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor on circulating CD8+ and CD4+ T-cell responses to a multipeptide melanoma vaccine: outcome of a multicenter randomized trial. Clin. Cancer Res. 15: 7036–7044.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Ayyoub M.,
    2. D. Dojcinovic,
    3. P. Pignon,
    4. I. Raimbaud,
    5. J. Schmidt,
    6. I. Luescher,
    7. D. Valmori
    . 2010. Monitoring of NY-ESO-1 specific CD4+ T cells using molecularly defined MHC class II/His-tag-peptide tetramers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 7437–7442.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Maus M. V.,
    2. J. L. Riley,
    3. W. W. Kwok,
    4. G. T. Nepom,
    5. C. H. June
    . 2003. HLA tetramer-based artificial antigen-presenting cells for stimulation of CD4+ T cells. Clin. Immunol. 106: 16–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Cochran J. R.,
    2. T. O. Cameron,
    3. L. J. Stern
    . 2000. The relationship of MHC-peptide binding and T cell activation probed using chemically defined MHC class II oligomers. Immunity 12: 241–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Vollers S. S.,
    2. L. J. Stern
    . 2008. Class II major histocompatibility complex tetramer staining: progress, problems, and prospects. Immunology 123: 305–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. James E. A.,
    2. S. D. van Haren,
    3. R. A. Ettinger,
    4. K. Fijnvandraat,
    5. J. A. Liberman,
    6. W. W. Kwok,
    7. J. Voorberg,
    8. K. P. Pratt
    . 2011. T-cell responses in two unrelated hemophilia A inhibitor subjects include an epitope at the factor VIII R593C missense site. J. Thromb. Haemost. 9: 689–699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Fourneau J. M.,
    2. H. Cohen,
    3. P. M. van Endert
    . 2004. A chaperone-assisted high yield system for the production of HLA-DR4 tetramers in insect cells. J. Immunol. Methods 285: 253–264.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Yang J.,
    2. A. Jaramillo,
    3. R. Shi,
    4. W. W. Kwok,
    5. T. Mohanakumar
    . 2004. In vivo biotinylation of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II/peptide complex by coexpression of BirA enzyme for the generation of MHC class II/tetramers. Hum. Immunol. 65: 692–699.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Cunliffe S. L.,
    2. J. R. Wyer,
    3. J. K. Sutton,
    4. M. Lucas,
    5. G. Harcourt,
    6. P. Klenerman,
    7. A. J. McMichael,
    8. A. D. Kelleher
    . 2002. Optimization of peptide linker length in production of MHC class II/peptide tetrameric complexes increases yield and stability, and allows identification of antigen-specific CD4+T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 32: 3366–3375.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Ge X.,
    2. J. A. Gebe,
    3. P. L. Bollyky,
    4. E. A. James,
    5. J. Yang,
    6. L. J. Stern,
    7. W. W. Kwok
    . 2010. Peptide-MHC cellular microarray with innovative data analysis system for simultaneously detecting multiple CD4 T-cell responses. PLoS ONE 5: e11355.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Soen Y.,
    2. D. S. Chen,
    3. D. L. Kraft,
    4. M. M. Davis,
    5. P. O. Brown
    . 2003. Detection and characterization of cellular immune responses using peptide-MHC microarrays. PLoS Biol. 1: E65.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Mallone R.,
    2. S. A. Kochik,
    3. E. M. Laughlin,
    4. V. H. Gersuk,
    5. H. Reijonen,
    6. W. W. Kwok,
    7. G. T. Nepom
    . 2004. Differential recognition and activation thresholds in human autoreactive GAD-specific T-cells. Diabetes 53: 971–977.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 188 (6)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 188, Issue 6
15 Mar 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MHC Class II Tetramers
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MHC Class II Tetramers
Gerald T. Nepom
The Journal of Immunology March 15, 2012, 188 (6) 2477-2482; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102398

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
MHC Class II Tetramers
Gerald T. Nepom
The Journal of Immunology March 15, 2012, 188 (6) 2477-2482; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1102398
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Adding specificity to the T cell flow cytometry toolkit
    • Rare CD4 T cell detection using class II pMHC tetramers
    • Variations on the tetramer theme
    • Conclusions
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Dicer and PKR as Novel Regulators of Embryonic Stem Cell Fate and Antiviral Innate Immunity
  • Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Noninfectious Granulomatous Lung Disease
  • Innate Immune Memory and the Host Response to Infection
Show more BRIEF REVIEWS

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606