Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Stathmin Regulates Microtubule Dynamics and Microtubule Organizing Center Polarization in Activated T Cells

Erin L. Filbert, Marie Le Borgne, Joseph Lin, John E. Heuser and Andrey S. Shaw
J Immunol June 1, 2012, 188 (11) 5421-5427; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1200242
Erin L. Filbert
*Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marie Le Borgne
*Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
†Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joseph Lin
*Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John E. Heuser
‡Department of Cell Biology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrey S. Shaw
*Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110;
†Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Polarization of T cells involves reorientation of the microtubule organizing center (MTOC). Because activated ERK is localized at the immunological synapse, we investigated its role by showing that ERK activation is important for MTOC polarization. Suspecting that ERK phosphorylates a regulator of microtubules, we next focused on stathmin, a known ERK substrate. Our work indicates that during T cell activation, ERK is recruited to the synapse, allowing it to phosphorylate stathmin molecules near the immunological synapse. Supporting an important role of stathmin phosphorylation in T cell activation, we showed that T cell activation results in increased microtubule growth rate dependent on the presence of stathmin. The significance of this finding was demonstrated by results showing that CTLs from stathmin−/− mice displayed defective MTOC polarization and defective target cell cytolysis. These data implicate stathmin as a regulator of the microtubule network during T cell activation.

An early step in the activation of T cells is the polarization of the cell. This is demonstrated by the formation of the immunological synapse at the contact surface between the T cells and the APCs (1). At the same time, the microtubule organizing center (MTOC) moves from a position in the trailing uropod of the migrating T cell to a new position between the nucleus and the immunological synapse (2–5). T cell polarization directs intracellular trafficking of vesicles, facilitates the formation of the synapse, and directs the polarized secretion of cytokines and cytolytic granules important in cell lysis (4, 6, 7).

Although the importance of MTOC repositioning in T cell activation is clearly important, the mechanism of its reorientation is less clear. Consistent with a requirement for T cell signaling, it was previously shown that molecules downstream of the TCR such as Lck, Zap70, Lat, SLP76, PI3K, and phospholipase C (PLC)γ are all important for MTOC reorientation to the immune synapse (8–11). Recently, it was shown that accumulation of diacylglycerol (DAG) is sufficient to induce MTOC polarization (10, 12). Although dynein and the protein kinase C (PKC) isozymes θ, η, and ε appear to be important for this process, the exact mechanism explaining how DAG induces MTOC reorientation is not known. Nonetheless, these data demonstrate that local signaling events at the immune synapse lead to reorganization of the microtubule network.

Interestingly, one of the most important effectors of DAG is Ras-GRP, the GTP exchange factor that functions to activate Ras and subsequently the ERK-MAPK pathway (13). A number of studies have shown that active ERK accumulates at the immune synapse (14, 15) and ERK activation is also thought to be important for MTOC polarization in T cells (16–18). Consistent with an important role for ERK in T cell polarization, cytolytic activity mediated by CTLs and NK cells is inhibited with ERK inhibition (16, 17). Additionally, NK cells lacking the ERK-MAPK scaffold KSR1, which is required for the localization of ERK to the immune synapse, also fail to polarize their granules and kill target cells poorly (14).

In this study, we investigated the potential role of ERK in MTOC reorientation. After confirming that ERK is required for MTOC polarization, we hypothesized that a specific substrate of ERK might be a regulator of the microtubule cytoskeleton. Because it is a known ERK substrate (19–23), we focused on the microtubule binding protein stathmin (OP18) as a possible link between ERK and the microtubule cytoskeleton. The stathmin family of proteins is highly conserved and functions by binding to free tubulin heterodimers in the cytoplasm and thereby regulates the concentration of free tubulin (24). Phosphorylation of stathmin by a number of serine-threonine kinases, including ERK, results in release of bound tubulin heterodimers and enhanced polymerization of the microtubule network.

Although stathmin was originally characterized as an oncoprotein overexpressed in T leukemia cells (25), little is known about its function in developing and mature T cells (26). Previous studies verify that it becomes phosphorylated after TCR stimulation, but the biological outcome in T cell activation is not known (27–29). Analysis of stathmin-deficient mice showed a reduction in thymocyte cellularity and peripheral T cell numbers, but additional immune cell analyses were not reported (30).

We found that stathmin is rapidly phosphorylated downstream of the TCR and that phosphorylated stathmin is localized to the immune synapse. Consistent with the importance of ERK localization at the synapse, T cells lacking the MAPK scaffold KSR1 showed defects in stathmin localization. This was important for MTOC polarization, as we found that microtubule growth rates were slowed in the absence of stathmin, resulting in a delay of MTOC reorientation and defects in CTL cytolysis. To our knowledge, these data are the first to implicate stathmin in the regulation of microtubule dynamics in activated T cells.

Materials and Methods

Mice

Stathmin knockout mice on a C57B6/J background have been previously described (30) and were a gift from Dr. Gleb Shumyatsky (Rutgers University). Stathmin−/− mice were crossed with OT-1 TCR (31) and AND TCR (32) transgenic mice. Age- and gender-matched stathmin wild-type or heterozygous littermate controls were used for all experiments. KSR1 knockout mice on a C57B6/J background were previously described (33) and were crossed to AND TCR transgenic mice. All mice were housed under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Washington University animal facilities in accordance with institutional guidelines.

Cell culture and Abs

EL-4, RMA-S, CH27, and Jurkat cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS and 2 mM glutamine. T cells isolated from OT-1 or AND TCR transgenic mice T cells were cultured in IMDM supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM glutamine, nonessential amino acids, sodium pyruvate, 2-ME, penicillin, and streptomycin. TCR stimulation was performed with anti-mouse CD3 (2C11) and anti-mouse CD28 (37.51) or anti-human CD3 (OKT3). Anti-stathmin (O0138), anti–α-tubulin (FITC conjugated), and anti–p-ERK Abs were from Sigma-Aldrich. Anti-stathmin p-S24 Ab (ab47398) was from Abcam. ERK2 and PKCθ Abs were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. PLCγ1 and p-PLCγ1 Abs were from Cell Signaling Technology. Anti-mouse CD107a-PE (1D4B) and anti-mouse CD8-FITC (53-6.7) were from BD Biosciences. All secondary Abs were from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories. CFSE and CMTPX dyes used for APC labeling in some experiments were obtained from Molecular Probes. All inhibitors were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich.

Western blot

Jurkat or primary mouse T cells were starved for 1 h in RPMI 1640. Cells were stimulated with PMA/ionomycin or anti-TCR Ab in suspension for the indicated times. After stimulation, the pellet was resuspended in ice-cold lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris base, 140 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1% Nonidet P-40, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 50 mM sodium fluoride). After centrifugation, proteins from cell lysates were resolved by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated primary Abs followed by incubation with anti-rabbit or anti-mouse IgG coupled to HRP. ECL Western blotting substrate (Pierce) was used for detection. Band intensity for quantification was measured using ImageJ.

Immunofluorescence assays

OT-1 and AND T cell conjugates were made by loading RMA-S or EL-4 cells with 1 μM SIINFEKL peptide, and CH27 cells with 1 μM moth cytochrome c (88–103) peptide, respectively, overnight at 37°C, before mixing with OT-1 or AND T cells at a 1:1 ratio. Cells were pelleted by brief centrifugation and incubated at 37°C for 5–10 min. Conjugates were gently resuspended and allowed to settle on poly-l-lysine–coated slides before fixation in 2% paraformaldehyde. Cells were then permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 and stained with the indicated Abs. For polarization toward anti-TCR, coverslips were coated with anti-CD3 with or without anti-CD28 Ab and cells were pretreated or not for 1 h with indicated inhibitors (e.g., UO126, Rp-cAMP, and cytochalasin D) were allowed to settle onto the coverslips before fixation in 2% paraformaldehyde. Polarization toward the coverslip was scored blinded. Cells were considered polarization positive when the MTOC was clearly visible and it was centrally located within the cell in the focal plane adjacent to the coverslip. All images were collected on an Olympus FV1000 with a 60× objective.

In vivo migration assay

Naive T cells were purified from spleen and lymph nodes of stathmin wild-type or knockout mice, labeled with either CFSE or CMTPX dye, and injected at a 1:1 ratio into the footpad of congenic mice stimulated 16 h before with 1 μg LPS. Popliteal lymph nodes were harvested after 3 h, made into a single-cell suspension, and donor T cell migration was assessed by flow cytometry.

Proliferation assay

Rested T cells from stathmin wild-type or knockout spleen and lymph nodes were stimulated for 48 h with the indicated concentrations of plate-bound anti-CD3/CD28 or PMA/ionomycin, pulsed with 1 μCi [3H]thymidine per well, harvested after 16 h, and scintillation counted.

Cytokine production measurements

OT-1 T cells activated in vitro for 5 d were stimulated with soluble anti–CD3/CD28-biotin plus streptavidin at 37°C. Supernatants were collected after 18 h. Detection of IFN-γ in supernatants was obtained using cytometric bead array flex set (BD Biosciences) and analysis was done on a FACSCanto II (BD Biosciences).

Measurement of intracellular calcium

T cells activated in vitro for 5 d were loaded with 1 μM calcium detection dye fura 2-AM (Invitrogen) for 30 min at 37°C in calcium buffer (135 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM CaCl2, 1 mM MgCl2, 5.6 mM glucose, 10 mM HEPES, 0.1% BSA), plated on a poly-l-lysine–coated 96-well plate, and washed twice in buffer-free calcium. The fluorescence ratio between 340 and 380 nm excitation at 510 nm emission was recorded using a FlexStation. Cells were stimulated after 30 s with anti–CD3-biotin plus anti–CD28-biotin (5 μg/ml each) plus streptavidin (20 μg/ml), and CaCl2 was added after 330 s (1 mM final concentration). Data are represented as changes in the 340/380 ratio compared with the baseline.

Cytolysis assay

Splenocytes from stathmin wild-type (littermate controls) or knockout OT-1 TCR transgenic mice were stimulated by the addition of 1 μM SIINFEKL peptide for 5 d to generate CTLs. A standard [51Cr]-release assay was performed. Briefly, 51Cr-labeled target cells pulsed with SIINFEKL were plated in 96-well U-bottom plates (10,000 cells/well) with CTLs at varying E:T cell ratios and cultured for 4–6 h at 37°C. The supernatants were then collected and read on a MicroBeta counter (PerkinElmer). Specific lysis was calculated as follows: [(average sample cpm − average spontaneous cpm)/(average maximum cpm − average spontaneous cpm)] × 100.

Degranulation assay

OT-1 T cells activated in vitro for 5 d were resuspended in complete media with 10% FCS together with target cells (RMA-S or EL-4) previously loaded with 1 μM SIINFEKL peptide. The cells were incubated at 37°C for 45 min in the presence of 5 mg/ml anti– CD107a (LAMP-1)-PE Ab. Cells were then washed and stained at 4°C with anti-mouse CD8 Ab and analyzed on a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences).

Microtubule growth rate measurements

Whole spleens from stathmin wild-type (littermate controls) or knockout mice were activated with anti-CD3 for 18–20 h and transformed with retrovirus expressing EB3-GFP. At day 4 following transformation, T cells were purified and plated on glass-bottom dishes coated with anti-CD3 or CD45 Abs. Live images were taken using the Olympus FV1000 confocal microscope after cells were settled for 15–45 min on the dishes. Images of individual cells were obtained every 2 s for 3–5 min. Microtubule growth rate measurements were generated using the MTrackJ plugin for ImageJ. Statistical analysis was obtained from >50 microtubule tracks from >10 cells each from three separate experiments.

Results

Inhibition of ERK decreases efficiency of MTOC polarization

ERK was previously shown to be important for cytolysis by CD8 T cells (16), suggesting that it may play a role in T cell polarity. To address this more directly, we tested whether the MTOC can polarize in activated T cells when ERK is inhibited by measuring MTOC polarization in the presence or absence of the MEK inhibitor UO126. Because MEK activation is required for ERK activation, MEK inhibition blocks ERK activation. Mouse T cells were treated with UO126 for 1 h and then plated onto anti-CD3–coated coverslips to induce MTOC polarization. Cells were also treated with inhibitors to block actin polymerization (cytochalasin d) and cAMP (Rp-cAMP) as positive and negative controls, respectively. After staining with anti-tubulin to visualize the MTOC, the percentage of cells whose MTOC was polarized to the Ab-coated surface was measured by confocal microscopy. Cells were scored as polarized when the MTOC was clearly visible in the center of the cell at a focal plane adjacent to the glass coverslip (Fig. 1A). We noted a 40–50% decrease in MTOC polarization in the cells treated with MEK inhibitor (Fig. 1B), confirming that ERK activity is important for MTOC polarization in T cells.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

ERK inhibition decreases MTOC polarization in T cells. T cells from B6 mice were pretreated or not for 1 h with 0.5 μM Rp-cAMP, 10 μM UO126, or 10 μM cytochalasin D and plated on coverslips coated with anti-CD3. Cells were settled for 20 min, fixed, permeabilized, stained with anti-tubulin, and analyzed using confocal microscopy. Images in (A) indicate typical cells scored as polarized and unpolarized. Data in (B) are representative of four individual experiments with >50 cells counted per condition per experiment. Error bars show SEM. *p < 0.01 (two-tailed unpaired t test).

Stathmin is rapidly phosphorylated downstream of the TCR in an ERK-dependent manner

Recently, it was shown that ERK is recruited to the immunological synapse (14, 15). This suggests that the polarized recruitment of ERK may function to phosphorylate proteins at the synapse that may be important for MTOC polarization. We focused on stathmin because it is a well-known ERK substrate and functions to modulate microtubule dynamics. Therefore, we examined the relationship between ERK and stathmin in the regulation of microtubule dynamics in activated T cells.

We first wanted to confirm that stathmin is phosphorylated by ERK following TCR engagement. To test this, Jurkat T cells were treated with PMA (Fig. 2A) or anti-CD3 (Fig. 2B) for various times. Immunoblotting of cell lysates with an Ab that recognizes phosphorylated stathmin showed that stathmin is phosphorylated within 15 min of stimulation and remains phosphorylated for 2 h (Fig. 2A, 2B). This was ERK-specific, as treatment with the MEK inhibitor UO126 largely abrogated stathmin phosphorylation (Fig. 2A, 2B). This finding was confirmed in primary T cells stimulated with peptide-loaded APCs (Fig. 2C and data not shown). Taken together, these data demonstrate that stathmin is phosphorylated in an ERK-dependent manner downstream of the TCR.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Stathmin is rapidly phosphorylated and accumulates at the immune synapse following TCR engagement in an ERK-dependent manner. Jurkat T cells pretreated or not for 1 h with 10 μM UO126 were stimulated for the indicated times with 40 nM PMA (A) or 1 μg/ml anti-CD3 (B), lysed, and resolved on SDS-PAGE gel. Lysates were blotted with Abs to stathmin or p-S24 stathmin. Blots are representative of four experiments. (C and D) Spleens from OT-1 mice were stimulated with 1 μg SIINFEKL peptide for 5 d until rested. CD8+ T cells were purified and conjugated to either RMA-S or EL4 target cells loaded with peptide and labeled with CFSE (green). Conjugates were stained with stathmin (D) or p-S24 (C) Abs (shown in white) and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Arrows point to T cells (D). Images are representative of >50 conjugates. Scale bars, 5 μm.

Phosphorylated stathmin is enriched at the immune synapse of primary CTLs

To determine whether phosphorylated stathmin localizes to the immunological synapse, Abs to p-stathmin were used to stain TCR transgenic primary T cells conjugated with peptide-coated APCs. This demonstrated a clear accumulation of p-stathmin at the immune synapse in ∼72% of conjugates (Figs. 2C, 3). Interestingly, no specific enrichment was seen using an Ab that recognizes all stathmin molecules (Fig. 2D). This suggests that the recruitment of ERK to the synapse allows for local phosphorylation of stathmin molecules. Because stathmin is a cytoplasmic molecule, phosphorylation is likely to be dynamic, resulting in the continuous release of microtubule subunits (34). This suggests that polarized stathmin phosphorylation might be important in the regulation of microtubule dynamics at the immune synapse during T cell activation.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

KSR1 is required for immune synapse localization of phosphorylated stathmin. (A) CD4+ T cells from KSR1 wild-type or knockout AND TCR mice were stimulated with CH27 B cells loaded with 1 μg moth cytochrome c peptide for 5 d until rested. T cells were purified and conjugated with CH27 cells loaded with peptide. Conjugates were stained with p-S24 stathmin Ab and analyzed by confocal microscopy. (B) Graph represents three experiments of >20 conjugates each. Scale bar, 10 μm. *p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired t test).

Synapse localization of phosphorylated stathmin is disrupted in KSR1−/− T cells

We previously showed that the scaffold molecule KSR1 facilitates the localization of p-ERK at the immunological synapse (14). We could therefore use KSR1-deficient cells to confirm whether the localization of p-ERK at the immunological synapse was involved in polarized stathmin phosphorylation. Cell conjugates generated using wild-type or knockout KSR1 TCR transgenic T cells and peptide-pulsed APCs were stained with p-stathmin Abs. As expected, p-stathmin was localized at the immune synapse of wild-type cells, but p-stathmin polarization was significantly decreased in KSR1-deficient T cells (Fig. 3). This supports the idea that KSR1-dependent recruitment of p-ERK to the immune synapse allows for polarized phosphorylation of stathmin at the immune synapse.

T cells from stathmin−/− mice have defects in MTOC polarization and CTL cytolysis

To confirm that stathmin was involved in MTOC polarization, we assessed MTOC polarization in T cells from wild-type and stathmin-deficient mice to anti-CD3–coated coverslips. We observed an ∼50% decrease in MTOC polarization in stathmin knockout T cells compared with wild-type T cells at multiple time points (Fig. 4A). To extend these findings to a more physiologic assay, we assessed MTOC polarization in APC conjugates with wild-type or stathmin knockout T cells (Fig. 4B). Consistent with our data from anti-CD3–coated coverslips, we observed a significant decrease in MTOC polarization after 5 min in stathmin knockout T cells compared with wild-type T cells. These data support a role for stathmin in regulating MTOC reorientation during T cell activation.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Stathmin−/− T cells have impaired MTOC polarization and are defective in cytolysis. (A) Stathmin knockout or littermate control T cells were purified, rested for 30 min, and plated on anti-CD3–coated glass coverslips for the indicated times. Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained with anti–αβ-tubulin and imaged using confocal microscopy. Data are represented as means ± SEM and >50 cells per condition were scored in three experiments. All knockout values are significantly different from wild-type. (B) Rested T cells from stathmin knockout OT-1 or littermate OT-1 controls were conjugated with peptide-pulsed CFSE-labeled RMA-S cells onto glass coverslips for 5 min at room temperature. The cells were then fixed, permeabilized, stained with Hoechst and anti–αβ-tubulin, and analyzed using confocal microscopy. Data are represented as means ± SEM and >50 cells per condition were scored in three experiments. Images represent cells scored as polarized or not polarized. Scale bars, 10 μm. (C) Cytolysis by stathmin knockout or littermate control CTLs was assayed using a standard [51Cr]-release assay. Cells were plated at indicated E:T ratios and incubated for 4–6 h. Supernatants were counted on a MicroBeta counter and specific lysis was calculated. Differences in specific lysis between stathmin wild-type and knockout CTLs are significant at all E:T ratios. Graph is representative of two experiments. (D and E) Degranulation was assayed by LAMP-1 staining during 45 min of OT-1+ stathmin knockout or control T cell incubation with peptide-loaded RMA-S cells. Graphs show means ± SEM and are representative of four experiments. *p < 0.001 (unpaired t test).

To determine whether the defect in MTOC polarization in stathmin-deficient T cells was physiologically significant, we performed a number of assays of T cell function. Because MTOC polarization is required for efficient cytolysis by CD8 T cells, we first tested whether stathmin knockout CTLs were defective in cytolysis. Indeed, CTLs generated from stathmin-deficient animals demonstrated a defect in specific lysis of peptide-loaded targets using a conventional [51Cr]-release assay (Fig. 4C). To determine whether stathmin knockout T cells were defective in degranulation, we also measured surface LAMP-1 staining during a 45-min incubation with target cells (Fig. 4D, 4E). We found that the magnitude of degranulation as measured by LAMP-1 staining was lower in stathmin-deficient cells compared with wild-type cells (Fig. 4E). The basal level of LAMP-1 staining was, however, higher in stathmin-deficient cells, suggesting constitutive nonspecific degranulation in these cells (Fig. 4D). These data support the idea that stathmin is involved in MTOC polarization and cytolysis by CD8+ T cells. Surprisingly, stathmin knockout T cells performed normally in other assays of T cell function, including proliferation and migration (Fig. 5A, 5B). Stathmin knockout T cells also produced similar levels of IFN-γ compared with wild-type T cells (Fig. 5C).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

No defect in proliferation, migration, and cytokine production of stathmin-deficient T cells. (A) Stathmin knockout or littermate control T cells were rested and then restimulated for 48 h with addition of [3H]thymidine for the last 16 h and scintillation was counted. Data are presented as mean ± SEM and represent two experiments. No values are significantly different. (B) Purified T cells from stathmin knockout and control mice were labeled with CFSE and CMTPX, respectively, and injected in a 1:1 ratio into the footpad of LPS-pretreated mice. Cells were harvested and analyzed using flow cytometry after 3 h. FACS plots are shown from one of two experiments. (C) Rested OT-1+ cells from stathmin knockout or wild-type mice were stimulated with 5 μg/μl anti-CD3/CD28 for 18 h and supernatants were assayed using cytokine bead array. Data are presented as means ± SEM and represent two experiments. No values are significantly different.

T cells from stathmin−/− mice have impaired PKCθ polarization and microtubule dynamics

Our data suggest that ERK phosphorylates stathmin at the immune synapse following T cell activation and that this leads to the dynamic restructuring of the microtubule network facilitating MTOC polarization. It is possible, however, that defects in TCR proximal signaling, rather than defects in microtubule dynamics, contribute to the MTOC polarization defect we observed in stathmin-deficient cells. To rule out this possibility, we first tested whether conjugate formation was affected in the absence of stathmin. No difference between wild-type and stathmin-deficient T cells was seen (data not shown). Additionally, activation of ERK and PLCγ was normal in stathmin-deficient T cells (Fig. 6A). Lastly, stathmin-deficient T cells also fluxed calcium at wild-type levels (Fig. 6B). This suggests that proximal TCR signaling is intact in stathmin knockout T cells.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Microtubule growth rate and PKCθ polarization is decreased in stathmin knockout T cells. (A) T cells from stathmin knockout mice or littermate controls were stimulated for the indicated times with anti-CD3/CD28 or PMA for 10 min, lysed, and resolved on SDS-PAGE gel. Lysates were blotted with the indicated Abs. Blots and quantification graphs are representative of three experiments. (B) Rested T cells from stathmin knockout or littermate controls were loaded with 1 mM fura 2-AM and plated in 96-well dishes. The fluorescence ratio between 340 and 380 nm excitation at 510 nm emission was recorded. Cells were stimulated after 30 s with anti–CD3-biotin plus anti–CD28-biotin (5 μg/ml each) plus streptavidin (20 μg/ml), and 1 mM CaCl2 was added after 330 s. Data are represented as means (solid lines) ± SEM (dotted lines) of changes in 340/380 ratio compared with the baseline. Black lines represent stathmin knockout cells and red lines indicated wild-type cells. Graph is representative of three experiments. (C) T cells from stathmin wild-type or knockout OT-1 or AND TCR mice were stimulated with peptide-pulsed APC for 5 d until rested. T cells were purified, conjugated with peptide-pulsed CFSE-labeled APC (green), stained with anti-PKCθ Ab (white), and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Graph represents three experiments of >50 conjugates each. *p < 0.001 (two-tailed unpaired t test). Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) Stathmin knockout or littermate control T cells were activated and transformed with a retrovirus expressing EB3-GFP. At day 4 or 5 after activation, cells were plated onto glass-bottom dishes and imaged live using confocal microscopy. Microtubule growth rate measurements were generated using MTrackJ. Microtubules were tracked only when they could be followed for three or more time points and when they radiated from the MTOC. Data are from >50 microtubules from 10 cells per experiment in three individual experiments. *p < 0.0001 (Mann–Whitney U test).

Because PKCθ polarization was previously shown to precede MTOC polarization in T cells (12), we also assessed PKCθ polarization in stathmin knockout T cells. T cell conjugates were generated and stained using Abs to PKCθ. We found that there was a defect in PKCθ polarization in stathmin-deficient T cells as compared with wild-type cells (Fig. 6C). Although PLCγ is known to control PKCθ recruitment to the immunological synapse (12), we did not detect defects in PLCγ activation in stathmin-deficient T cells (Fig. 6A). Therefore, it seems unlikely that a defect in DAG production is the cause of the PKCθ polarization defect, although we did not directly measure DAG accumulation at the synapse and therefore cannot completely rule out this possibility. Our data suggest, however, that PKCθ polarization may depend on an intact microtubule network. Consistent with this, we found that nocodazole-mediated disruption of microtubules in T cells blocked PKCθ polarization (data not shown).

Because defects in early TCR signaling are probably not responsible for the MTOC polarization defects in stathmin-deficient T cells, we directly tested whether stathmin plays a role in microtubule dynamics by measuring such dynamics in T cells stimulated with anti-CD3 or a control Ab (CD45). To label microtubules, we transduced cells with a GFP fusion protein of EB3, a protein that binds to the ends of growing microtubules (35). Using real-time confocal microscopy, we found that T cell activation strongly enhanced microtubule growth rate with microtubules in activated cells moving at a growth rate of ∼50% greater than cells plated on the control Ab (Fig. 6D). This enhancement appeared to require stathmin, as the microtubule growth rate in stathmin-deficient T cells was much slower compared with wild-type T cells (Fig. 6D). These data support a role for phosphorylated stathmin in regulating microtubule growth in activated T cells, MTOC polarization, and cytolysis by CD8+ T cells.

Discussion

In this study, we showed that the localization of ERK to the immunological synapse plays a role in T cell polarization. By using T cells deficient in KSR1, a scaffolding molecule required for ERK localization at the synapse, we were able to correlate the loss of polarized ERK localization with defective polarized stathmin phosphorylation. This supports the idea that the retention of activated ERK at the synapse allows it to phosphorylate specific substrates at the synapse in a polarized fashion. We suspect that the localized phosphorylation of ERK substrates may play a role in T cell polarization.

We began our studies by trying to identify a specific ERK substrate at the immunological synapse. Given the critical role of MTOC polarization in T cell polarity, we searched for an ERK substrate that might be a regulator of the microtubule cytoskeleton. This led us to examine stathmin, a known ERK substrate and microtubule regulator (19, 21, 22, 24). Stathmin functions by binding to tubulin αβ heterodimers, sequestering them, and preventing them from being assembled into microtubules (36). Because microtubule assembly is critically dependent on the concentration of free tubulin heterodimers (37), the localized release of tubulin is likely to play an important role in localized assembly and growth of microtubules. Consistent with this hypothesis, we showed that microtubule growth was strongly enhanced by T cell activation in a mechanism that was ERK- and stathmin-dependent. To our knowledge, our studies are the first to show that T cell activation enhances the growth rate of microtubule movement. It seems reasonable to speculate that an increased rate of microtubule growth at the immunological synapse may play a role in repositioning of the MTOC.

Previously, it was shown that mice lacking stathmin demonstrate decreased thymocyte and peripheral cell numbers, suggesting an important role for stathmin in T lymphocyte function; however, no other T lymphocyte abnormality was reported (30). In this study, we found that T cells lacking stathmin showed decreased PKCθ polarization, delayed MTOC polarization, decreased microtubule growth rates, and moderate defects in CTL killing, as well as decreased Ag-induced degranulation due to increased basal degranulation. Surprisingly, we did not detect any other defects in T cell function, including proliferation, migration, conjugate formation (data not shown), immune synapse formation (data not shown), and cytokine release. Although this might suggest that there are compensatory pathways activated in the absence of stathmin, we were unable to detect mRNA expression of other stathmin family proteins (RB3, SCLIP, and SGC10) in either wild-type or knockout mice (data not shown), suggesting that there is not a compensatory increase in expression of other stathmin family members.

Given the importance of MTOC reorientation in directing T cell polarity and polarized intracellular trafficking and secretion (4, 7), it is surprising that the role of microtubules during T cell activation is relatively unexplored. This may be due to previous studies that showed that TCR signaling, proliferation, and cytolysis are largely unaffected by treatment with drugs that inhibit microtubules (38–40). Given that these inhibitors profoundly inhibit T cell polarization, our results suggest that role of microtubules in T cell activation be re-examined in more physiological situations. We found, for example, that nocodazole treatment blocked MTOC polarization and also inhibited PLCγ (data not shown). This could also explain some of the inconsistencies in the literature regarding the role of microtubules (41, 42). Nevertheless, our results suggest that microtubule regulation is an important aspect of T cell activation.

Our work also implicates the ERK-MAPK pathway as playing an important role in regulating cell polarity. One function of the immunological synapse may be to help the assembly of a signaling apparatus that directs the reorientation of the cell. It is interesting to speculate that the effects of DAG on cell polarization (10) may be related to the ability of DAG to activate the Ras-MAPK signaling pathway via the activation of Ras-GRP (13). Because DAG is constrained to the plasma membrane and can be quickly inactivated by lipid kinases (43), Ras activation occurs in a localized fashion in the immunological synapse. Previously, we showed that the recruitment of the scaffold KSR1 to the immunological synapse functions to tether and hold activated ERK at the synapse (14). In the absence of KSR1, we speculated that activated ERK would diffuse away from the synapse and into the cytoplasm. Our work suggests that holding ERK at the synapse may function to allow it to phosphorylate specific substrates involved in cell polarization, such as stathmin. Given that ERK can phosphorylate a wide variety of different proteins, it seems likely that stathmin might not be the only protein phosphorylated by ERK involved in cell polarity. The challenge for the immediate future will be to identify these other substrates.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. U.K. Schubart and Dr. G.P. Shumyatsky for providing stathmin 1−/− mice.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R37-AI57966-AS and T32-AI07163-EF and by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    DAG
    diacylglycerol
    MTOC
    microtubule organizing center
    PKC
    protein kinase C
    PLC
    phospholipase C.

  • Received January 18, 2012.
  • Accepted March 28, 2012.
  • Copyright © 2012 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Grakoui A.,
    2. S. K. Bromley,
    3. C. Sumen,
    4. M. M. Davis,
    5. A. S. Shaw,
    6. P. M. Allen,
    7. M. L. Dustin
    . 1999. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285: 221–227.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Kupfer A.,
    2. G. Dennert,
    3. S. J. Singer
    . 1983. Polarization of the Golgi apparatus and the microtubule-organizing center within cloned natural killer cells bound to their targets. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 80: 7224–7228.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kuhn J. R.,
    2. M. Poenie
    . 2002. Dynamic polarization of the microtubule cytoskeleton during CTL-mediated killing. Immunity 16: 111–121.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Stinchcombe J. C.,
    2. E. Majorovits,
    3. G. Bossi,
    4. S. Fuller,
    5. G. M. Griffiths
    . 2006. Centrosome polarization delivers secretory granules to the immunological synapse. Nature 443: 462–465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Kupfer A.,
    2. G. Dennert
    . 1984. Reorientation of the microtubule-organizing center and the Golgi apparatus in cloned cytotoxic lymphocytes triggered by binding to lysable target cells. J. Immunol. 133: 2762–2766.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  5. ↵
    1. Stinchcombe J. C.,
    2. G. Bossi,
    3. S. Booth,
    4. G. M. Griffiths
    . 2001. The immunological synapse of CTL contains a secretory domain and membrane bridges. Immunity 15: 751–761.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Huse M.,
    2. B. F. Lillemeier,
    3. M. S. Kuhns,
    4. D. S. Chen,
    5. M. M. Davis
    . 2006. T cells use two directionally distinct pathways for cytokine secretion. Nat. Immunol. 7: 247–255.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Lowin-Kropf B.,
    2. V. S. Shapiro,
    3. A. Weiss
    . 1998. Cytoskeletal polarization of T cells is regulated by an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif-dependent mechanism. J. Cell Biol. 140: 861–871.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Kuhné M. R.,
    2. J. Lin,
    3. D. Yablonski,
    4. M. N. Mollenauer,
    5. L. I. Ehrlich,
    6. J. Huppa,
    7. M. M. Davis,
    8. A. Weiss
    . 2003. Linker for activation of T cells, ζ-associated protein-70, and Src homology 2 domain-containing leukocyte protein-76 are required for TCR-induced microtubule-organizing center polarization. J. Immunol. 171: 860–866.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    1. Quann E. J.,
    2. E. Merino,
    3. T. Furuta,
    4. M. Huse
    . 2009. Localized diacylglycerol drives the polarization of the microtubule-organizing center in T cells. Nat. Immunol. 10: 627–635.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Robertson L. K.,
    2. L. R. Mireau,
    3. H. L. Ostergaard
    . 2005. A role for phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in TCR-stimulated ERK activation leading to paxillin phosphorylation and CTL degranulation. J. Immunol. 175: 8138–8145.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Quann E. J.,
    2. X. Liu,
    3. G. Altan-Bonnet,
    4. M. Huse
    . 2011. A cascade of protein kinase C isozymes promotes cytoskeletal polarization in T cells. Nat. Immunol. 12: 647–654.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Ebinu J. O.,
    2. S. L. Stang,
    3. C. Teixeira,
    4. D. A. Bottorff,
    5. J. Hooton,
    6. P. M. Blumberg,
    7. M. Barry,
    8. R. C. Bleakley,
    9. H. L. Ostergaard,
    10. J. C. Stone
    . 2000. RasGRP links T-cell receptor signaling to Ras. Blood 95: 3199–3203.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Giurisato E.,
    2. J. Lin,
    3. A. Harding,
    4. E. Cerutti,
    5. M. Cella,
    6. R. E. Lewis,
    7. M. Colonna,
    8. A. S. Shaw
    . 2009. The mitogen-activated protein kinase scaffold KSR1 is required for recruitment of extracellular signal-regulated kinase to the immunological synapse. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29: 1554–1564.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Yachi P. P.,
    2. J. Ampudia,
    3. T. Zal,
    4. N. R. Gascoigne
    . 2006. Altered peptide ligands induce delayed CD8-T cell receptor interaction: a role for CD8 in distinguishing antigen quality. Immunity 25: 203–211.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Lilić M.,
    2. K. Kulig,
    3. I. Messaoudi,
    4. K. Remus,
    5. M. Janković,
    6. J. Nikolić-Zugić,
    7. S. Vukmanović
    . 1999. CD8+ T cell cytolytic activity independent of mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular regulatory kinase signaling (MAP kinase/ERK). Eur. J. Immunol. 29: 3971–3977.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Chen X.,
    2. D. S. Allan,
    3. K. Krzewski,
    4. B. Ge,
    5. H. Kopcow,
    6. J. L. Strominger
    . 2006. CD28-stimulated ERK2 phosphorylation is required for polarization of the microtubule organizing center and granules in YTS NK cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 10346–10351.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    1. Nejmeddine M.,
    2. V. S. Negi,
    3. S. Mukherjee,
    4. Y. Tanaka,
    5. K. Orth,
    6. G. P. Taylor,
    7. C. R. Bangham
    . 2009. HTLV-1-Tax and ICAM-1 act on T-cell signal pathways to polarize the microtubule-organizing center at the virological synapse. Blood 114: 1016–1025.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Di Paolo G.,
    2. B. Antonsson,
    3. D. Kassel,
    4. B. M. Riederer,
    5. G. Grenningloh
    . 1997. Phosphorylation regulates the microtubule-destabilizing activity of stathmin and its interaction with tubulin. FEBS Lett. 416: 149–152.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Lovrić J.,
    2. S. Dammeier,
    3. A. Kieser,
    4. H. Mischak,
    5. W. Kolch
    . 1998. Activated Raf induces the hyperphosphorylation of stathmin and the reorganization of the microtubule network. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 22848–22855.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Burkhard K. A.,
    2. F. Chen,
    3. P. Shapiro
    . 2011. Quantitative analysis of ERK2 interactions with substrate proteins: roles for kinase docking domains and activity in determining binding affinity. J. Biol. Chem. 286: 2477–2485.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Marklund U.,
    2. G. Brattsand,
    3. V. Shingler,
    4. M. Gullberg
    . 1993. Serine 25 of oncoprotein 18 is a major cytosolic target for the mitogen-activated protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 15039–15047.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    1. Leighton I. A.,
    2. P. Curmi,
    3. D. G. Campbell,
    4. P. Cohen,
    5. A. Sobel
    . 1993. The phosphorylation of stathmin by MAP kinase. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 127-128: 151–156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Curmi P. A.,
    2. O. Gavet,
    3. E. Charbaut,
    4. S. Ozon,
    5. S. Lachkar-Colmerauer,
    6. V. Manceau,
    7. S. Siavoshian,
    8. A. Maucuer,
    9. A. Sobel
    . 1999. Stathmin and its phosphoprotein family: general properties, biochemical and functional interaction with tubulin. Cell Struct. Funct. 24: 345–357.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Melhem R. F.,
    2. X. X. Zhu,
    3. N. Hailat,
    4. J. R. Strahler,
    5. S. M. Hanash
    . 1991. Characterization of the gene for a proliferation-related phosphoprotein (oncoprotein 18) expressed in high amounts in acute leukemia. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 17747–17753.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Gratiot-Deans J.,
    2. D. Keim,
    3. J. R. Strahler,
    4. L. A. Turka,
    5. S. Hanash
    . 1992. Differential expression of Op18 phosphoprotein during human thymocyte maturation. J. Clin. Invest. 90: 1576–1581.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Wang Y. K.,
    2. P. C. Liao,
    3. J. Allison,
    4. D. A. Gage,
    5. P. C. Andrews,
    6. D. M. Lubman,
    7. S. M. Hanash,
    8. J. R. Strahler
    . 1993. Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate-induced phosphorylation of Op18 in Jurkat T cells. Identification of phosphorylation sites by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry. J. Biol. Chem. 268: 14269–14277.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. le Gouvello S.,
    2. H. Chneiweiss,
    3. N. Tarantino,
    4. P. Debre,
    5. A. Sobel
    . 1991. Stathmin phosphorylation patterns discriminate between distinct transduction pathways of human T lymphocyte activation through CD2 triggering. FEBS Lett. 287: 80–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. le Gouvello S.,
    2. V. Manceau,
    3. A. Sobel
    . 1998. Serine 16 of stathmin as a cytosolic target for Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II after CD2 triggering of human T lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 161: 1113–1122.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    1. Schubart U. K.,
    2. J. Yu,
    3. J. A. Amat,
    4. Z. Wang,
    5. M. K. Hoffmann,
    6. W. Edelmann
    . 1996. Normal development of mice lacking metablastin (P19), a phosphoprotein implicated in cell cycle regulation. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 14062–14066.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Hogquist K. A.,
    2. S. C. Jameson,
    3. W. R. Heath,
    4. J. L. Howard,
    5. M. J. Bevan,
    6. F. R. Carbone
    . 1994. T cell receptor antagonist peptides induce positive selection. Cell 76: 17–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Kaye J.,
    2. M. L. Hsu,
    3. M. E. Sauron,
    4. S. C. Jameson,
    5. N. R. Gascoigne,
    6. S. M. Hedrick
    . 1989. Selective development of CD4+ T cells in transgenic mice expressing a class II MHC-restricted antigen receptor. Nature 341: 746–749.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Nguyen A.,
    2. W. R. Burack,
    3. J. L. Stock,
    4. R. Kortum,
    5. O. V. Chaika,
    6. M. Afkarian,
    7. W. J. Muller,
    8. K. M. Murphy,
    9. D. K. Morrison,
    10. R. E. Lewis,
    11. et al
    . 2002. Kinase suppressor of Ras (KSR) is a scaffold which facilitates mitogen-activated protein kinase activation in vivo. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 3035–3045.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    1. Blaineau C.,
    2. M. Tessier,
    3. P. Dubessay,
    4. L. Tasse,
    5. L. Crobu,
    6. M. Pagès,
    7. P. Bastien
    . 2007. A novel microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin involved in length control of a eukaryotic flagellum. Curr. Biol. 17: 778–782.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    1. Stepanova T.,
    2. J. Slemmer,
    3. C. C. Hoogenraad,
    4. G. Lansbergen,
    5. B. Dortland,
    6. C. I. De Zeeuw,
    7. F. Grosveld,
    8. G. van Cappellen,
    9. A. Akhmanova,
    10. N. Galjart
    . 2003. Visualization of microtubule growth in cultured neurons via the use of EB3-GFP (end-binding protein 3-green fluorescent protein). J. Neurosci. 23: 2655–2664.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Larsson N.,
    2. B. Segerman,
    3. B. Howell,
    4. K. Fridell,
    5. L. Cassimeris,
    6. M. Gullberg
    . 1999. Op18/stathmin mediates multiple region-specific tubulin and microtubule-regulating activities. J. Cell Biol. 146: 1289–1302.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Kirschner M.,
    2. T. Mitchison
    . 1986. Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis. Cell 45: 329–342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Brown D. L.,
    2. J. E. Little,
    3. N. Chaly,
    4. I. Schweitzer,
    5. M. Paulin-Levasseur
    . 1985. Effects of taxol on microtubule organization in mouse splenic lymphocytes and on response to mitogenic stimulation. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 37: 130–139.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Knox J. D.,
    2. R. E. Mitchel,
    3. D. L. Brown
    . 1993. Effects of taxol and taxol/hyperthermia treatments on the functional polarization of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton 24: 129–138.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Dianzani U.,
    2. A. Shaw,
    3. B. K. al-Ramadi,
    4. R. T. Kubo,
    5. C. A. Janeway Jr..
    1992. Physical association of CD4 with the T cell receptor. J. Immunol. 148: 678–688.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  36. ↵
    1. Huby R. D.,
    2. A. Weiss,
    3. S. C. Ley
    . 1998. Nocodazole inhibits signal transduction by the T cell antigen receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 12024–12031.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    1. Martín-Cófreces N. B.,
    2. J. Robles-Valero,
    3. J. R. Cabrero,
    4. M. Mittelbrunn,
    5. M. Gordón-Alonso,
    6. C. H. Sung,
    7. B. Alarcón,
    8. J. Vázquez,
    9. F. Sánchez-Madrid
    . 2008. MTOC translocation modulates IS formation and controls sustained T cell signaling. J. Cell Biol. 182: 951–962.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Zhong X. P.,
    2. E. A. Hainey,
    3. B. A. Olenchock,
    4. H. Zhao,
    5. M. K. Topham,
    6. G. A. Koretzky
    . 2002. Regulation of T cell receptor-induced activation of the Ras-ERK pathway by diacylglycerol kinase ζ. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 31089–31098.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 188 (11)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 188, Issue 11
1 Jun 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Stathmin Regulates Microtubule Dynamics and Microtubule Organizing Center Polarization in Activated T Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Stathmin Regulates Microtubule Dynamics and Microtubule Organizing Center Polarization in Activated T Cells
Erin L. Filbert, Marie Le Borgne, Joseph Lin, John E. Heuser, Andrey S. Shaw
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 2012, 188 (11) 5421-5427; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200242

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Stathmin Regulates Microtubule Dynamics and Microtubule Organizing Center Polarization in Activated T Cells
Erin L. Filbert, Marie Le Borgne, Joseph Lin, John E. Heuser, Andrey S. Shaw
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 2012, 188 (11) 5421-5427; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1200242
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606