Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Dimethyl Fumarate, an Immune Modulator and Inducer of the Antioxidant Response, Suppresses HIV Replication and Macrophage-Mediated Neurotoxicity: A Novel Candidate for HIV Neuroprotection

Stephanie A. Cross, Denise R. Cook, Anthony W. S. Chi, Patricia J. Vance, Lorraine L. Kolson, Bethany J. Wong, Kelly L. Jordan-Sciutto and Dennis L. Kolson
J Immunol November 15, 2011, 187 (10) 5015-5025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1101868
Stephanie A. Cross
*Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Denise R. Cook
*Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anthony W. S. Chi
*Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Patricia J. Vance
*Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lorraine L. Kolson
*Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bethany J. Wong
*Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kelly L. Jordan-Sciutto
†Department of Pathology, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis L. Kolson
*Department of Neurology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Additional Files
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    DMF and MMF attenuate HIV replication in human MDM. Human MDM infected with 50 ng HIV (p24 ELISA, equivalent to 1.82 ± 0.22 kcpm/μl by RT activity assay) were treated with DMF (A) or MMF (B) over the course of infection at the indicated concentrations (1–30 μM) or with 20 nM of the nonnucleoside RT inhibitor EFZ. Culture supernatants were collected every 2 to 3 d, as indicated, and HIV replication was quantified by RT activity. DMF (C) and MMF (D) cause no cytotoxicity in HIV/MDM as assessed by LDH assay of supernatants harvested at day 14 postinfection. Maximum (Max) LDH release represents the soluble LDH release following cell lysis. RT curves are representative of three to four independent experiments, with each replicate performed on cell preparations from different donors. LDH assays represent data averaged from three to five individual donors. All statistical comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA plus Newman–Keuls post hoc testing. ***p < 0.001 versus EFZ.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    DMF and MMF reduce HIV/MDM-mediated neurotoxicity. Rat cerebrocortical cultures were exposed to supernatant from HIV-infected macrophages that were treated with DMF (A) or MMF (B) at the indicated concentrations (1–30 μM) during the course of infection. Neuronal survival was assessed by MAP2 ELISA and expressed as a percentage of untreated (UT) cultures (n = 6). C, Representative images of rat cerebrocortical cultures immunofluorescently stained for MAP2 (red) and Hoechst 33324 (blue) following 24 h treatment with the indicated HIV/MDM supernatant. Scale bar, 50 μm. All statistical comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA plus Newman–Keuls post hoc testing. ***p < 0.001 versus vehicle.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    DMF inhibits NF-κB nuclear translocation, DNA binding, and TNF-α production in human MDM. DMF (A) and MMF (B) inhibit the nuclear translocation of the NF-κB proteins RelB, p65, and p50 in human MDM in a dose-dependent manner. Cells were treated with DMF or MMF for 24 h, exposed to TNF-α (10 min), separated into cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions, and analyzed by Western blotting. Results of densitometry analysis are presented numerically under each panel as the ratio of NF-κB protein to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, a nuclear marker, and loading control. Blots are representative of four to six independent experiments, with each replicate performed on cell preparations from different donors. C, DMF inhibits nuclear NF-κB p50 binding to DNA in TNF-α–stimulated MDM, as assessed by EMSA. Results of densitometry analysis were normalized to vehicle. D, DMF inhibits the production of TNF-α in MDM stimulated with PHA (10 μg/ml). Values are expressed as percent TNF-α production relative to vehicle-treated cells (227 ± 11.9 pg/ml TNF-α in vehicle). Data are expressed as mean ± SEM and averaged from four different donors. E, TNF-α production in HIV/MDM is inhibited by DMF treatment. HIV/MDM were treated with DMF (1–30 μM) or 20 nM EFZ over the course of infection and culture supernatants from days 14 to 15 postinfection were assayed for TNF-α by ELISA. Values represent the mean ± SEM of data averaged from four different donors. All statistical comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA plus Newman–Keuls post hoc testing. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.01 versus vehicle.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    DMF restores the imbalance in the antioxidant response caused by HIV infection. HIV infection of human MDM reduces HO-1 and GPX1 expression, as assessed by Western blotting (A) and quantified by densitometry analysis (B). Values indicate mean ± SEM of six different donors. Statistical comparisons were made by two-tailed paired t test. C, DMF activates the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant response in HIV/MDM and restores HO-1 and GPX1 levels to that found in uninfected mock cells, as quantified by densitometry analysis (D). MMF activates the Nrf2-dependent antioxidant response in HIV/MDM and restores HO-1 and GPX1 levels to that found in uninfected mock cells (E), as quantified by densitometry analysis (F). Blots are representative of three independent experiments, with each replicate performed on cell preparations from different donors. Densitometry data are expressed as mean ± SEM and averaged from three different donors. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 versus mock.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    HO-1 does not mediate the attenuation of HIV replication or NF-κB signaling induced by DMF. A, SnMP, an inhibitor of HO-1 enzymatic activity, does not inhibit DMF-mediated attenuation of HIV replication. DMF and vehicle-treated HIV/MDM were exposed to 10 μM SnMP from days 6 to 15 postinfection. Culture supernatants were collected every 3 d and assessed for RT activity. RT curves are representative of three independent experiments, with each replicate performed on cell preparations from different donors. B, SnMP and CoPP, a specific inducer of HO-1, do not directly affect or alter DMF-mediated inhibition of the nuclear translocation of NF-κB proteins, as assessed by Western blotting. Human MDM were treated with 10 μM SnMP, 10 μM CoPP, and/or 100 μM DMF for 24 h before treatment with 1 ng/ml TNF-α (10 min) and subcellular fractionation. Western blot is representative of three independent experiments, with each replicate performed on cell preparations from different donors.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    HO-1 induction reduces neurotoxin production in HIV/MDM without affecting HIV replication. SnMP, an inhibitor of HO-1 enzymatic activity, does not directly affect HIV replication (A) and supernatant from these SnMP-treated HIV/MDM is significantly more neurotoxic (B), despite equal levels of HIV replication. C, Uninfected mock/MDM and 20 nM EFZ-treated HIV/MDM, which normally produce minimal neurotoxins, are significantly more neurotoxic when treated with 10 μM SnMP. D, CoPP, a specific inducer of HO-1 expression, does not directly affect HIV replication and supernatant from these CoPP treated HIV/MDM is significantly less neurotoxic (E), despite high levels of virus replication. F, CoPP treatment exponentially increases HO-1 levels without greatly altering the other components of the antioxidant response, as assessed by Western blotting. For A and C, SnMP or CoPP was added at day 6 postinfection onwards and culture supernatants were collected every 3 d and assessed for RT activity. RT curves are representative of three independent experiments, with each replicate performed on cell preparations from different donors. For neuronal survival assays, survival was assessed by MAP2 ELISA and expressed as a percentage of untreated (UT) cultures (n = 6). Statistical comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA plus Newman–Keuls post hoc testing. Western blot is representative of three independent experiments, with each replicate performed on cell preparations from different donors. Two film exposures (short and long) of HO-1 are presented to demonstrate the extent of HO-1 induction over basal levels. ***p < 0.001 versus vehicle-treated paired condition.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    DMF and MMF reduce CCL2-induced chemotaxis in human monocytes. DMF (A) and MMF (B) inhibit CCL2-induced chemotaxis in freshly isolated human monocytes in a dose-dependent manner. Values are expressed as percent migration of unstimulated cells (0 ng/ml CCL2) (n = 10–22). DMF decreases CCR2 expression on CD11b+CD14+ PBMCs (C) following 6 h of treatment, as quantified (D). E, DMF does not cause significant cell death over 6 h of treatment in freshly isolated human monocytes, as measured by DAPI positivity in CD11b+CD14+-gated PBMCs. For all experiments, values represent data averaged from three different donors. All statistical comparisons were made by one-way ANOVA plus Newman–Keuls post hoc testing. Results of posttest for linear trend are also presented. **p < 0.01 versus vehicle. US, unstimulated cells.

Additional Files

  • Figures
  • Data Supplement

    Files in this Data Supplement:

    • Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Figures 1-2 (PDF, 178 Kb) - Description:
      Supplemental Table I: Reduction in RT activity, relative to vehicle control...
      Supplemental Figure 1. Dimethyl fumarate attenuates 89.6 HIV replication in human MDM.
      Supplemental Figure 2. Dimethyl fumarate and efavirenz have additive effects on attenuation of HIV replication and neurotoxin production in human MDM.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 187 (10)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 187, Issue 10
15 Nov 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dimethyl Fumarate, an Immune Modulator and Inducer of the Antioxidant Response, Suppresses HIV Replication and Macrophage-Mediated Neurotoxicity: A Novel Candidate for HIV Neuroprotection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Dimethyl Fumarate, an Immune Modulator and Inducer of the Antioxidant Response, Suppresses HIV Replication and Macrophage-Mediated Neurotoxicity: A Novel Candidate for HIV Neuroprotection
Stephanie A. Cross, Denise R. Cook, Anthony W. S. Chi, Patricia J. Vance, Lorraine L. Kolson, Bethany J. Wong, Kelly L. Jordan-Sciutto, Dennis L. Kolson
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 2011, 187 (10) 5015-5025; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101868

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dimethyl Fumarate, an Immune Modulator and Inducer of the Antioxidant Response, Suppresses HIV Replication and Macrophage-Mediated Neurotoxicity: A Novel Candidate for HIV Neuroprotection
Stephanie A. Cross, Denise R. Cook, Anthony W. S. Chi, Patricia J. Vance, Lorraine L. Kolson, Bethany J. Wong, Kelly L. Jordan-Sciutto, Dennis L. Kolson
The Journal of Immunology November 15, 2011, 187 (10) 5015-5025; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1101868
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF + SI
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606