Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

TLR3-Specific Double-Stranded RNA Oligonucleotide Adjuvants Induce Dendritic Cell Cross-Presentation, CTL Responses, and Antiviral Protection

Ivett Jelinek, Joshua N. Leonard, Graeme E. Price, Kevin N. Brown, Anna Meyer-Manlapat, Paul K. Goldsmith, Yan Wang, David Venzon, Suzanne L. Epstein and David M. Segal
J Immunol February 15, 2011, 186 (4) 2422-2429; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1002845
Ivett Jelinek
*Experimental Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Joshua N. Leonard
*Experimental Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Graeme E. Price
†Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20852;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kevin N. Brown
*Experimental Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Anna Meyer-Manlapat
*Experimental Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul K. Goldsmith
‡Antibody and Protein Purification Unit, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yan Wang
*Experimental Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Venzon
§Biostatistics and Data Management Section, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Suzanne L. Epstein
†Division of Cellular and Gene Therapies, Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD 20852;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David M. Segal
*Experimental Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Maturation of dendritic cells (DC) to competent APC is essential for the generation of acquired immunity and is a major function of adjuvants. dsRNA, a molecular signature of viral infection, drives DC maturation by activating TLR3, but the size of dsRNA required to activate DC and the expression patterns of TLR3 protein in DC subsets have not been established. In this article, we show that cross-priming CD8α+ and CD103+ DC subsets express much greater levels of TLR3 than other DC. In resting DC, TLR3 is located in early endosomes and other intracellular compartments but migrates to LAMP1+ endosomes on stimulation with a TLR3 ligand. Using homogeneous dsRNA oligonucleotides (ONs) ranging in length from 25 to 540 bp, we observed that a minimum length of ∼90 bp was sufficient to induce CD86, IL-12p40, IFN-β, TNF-α, and IL-6 expression, and to mature DC into APC that cross-presented exogenous Ags to CD8+ T cells. TLR3 was essential for activation of DC by dsRNA ONs, and the potency of activation increased with dsRNA length and varied between DC subsets. In vivo, dsRNA ONs, in a size-dependent manner, served as adjuvants for the generation of Ag-specific CTL and for inducing protection against lethal challenge with influenza virus when given with influenza nucleoprotein as an immunogen. These results provide the basis for the development of TLR3-specific adjuvants capable of inducing immune responses tailored for viral pathogens.

Successful immunization requires both an Ag and a signal that induces dendritic cells (DC) to mature into competent APC (1, 2). DC take up and process Ags from peripheral microenvironments, then migrate to the draining lymph nodes (LNs) where they present the processed Ags on MHC class I and II molecules to T cells (3–7). Under homeostatic conditions, DC tolerize T cells to self-Ags. However, at sites of infection or immunization, pathogen-derived substances or adjuvants activate DC, inducing expression of costimulatory molecules and cytokines, which together with MHC-Ag complexes induce cognate T cells to differentiate into Ag-specific CTL and Th cells (8–11). DC recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and many adjuvants using receptors of the innate immune system including members of the TLR family (12–17). Subsets of DC vary in TLR expression and responses to different PAMPs (18). Therefore, by activating specific subsets of DC, TLR ligands can promote immune responses appropriate for particular types of pathogens (19, 20).

TLR3 is an endosomal receptor that recognizes dsRNA, a common viral replication intermediate and a potent indicator of viral infection (16, 21–26). The recognition of dsRNA by TLR3 is independent of its base sequence (27, 28) which prevents viruses from avoiding detection through genomic mutations. dsRNA from virally infected cells enters TLR3-containing endosomes of neighboring uninfected cells by direct uptake from the medium or by phagocytosis of infected cells (29, 30). There, it activates TLR3 and triggers defensive responses, including cytokine and chemokine production, and DC maturation. Because dsRNA is a viral PAMP, it is reasonable to hypothesize that recognition of dsRNA by TLR3 will induce antiviral responses and that a TLR3 agonist, given as an adjuvant with viral immunogens, would generate immune responses that are tailored to prevent viral infection and dissemination. The most commonly used experimental TLR3 agonist is polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid (pIC), which is a large, dsRNA-like, synthetic polymeric complex. pIC preparations vary in distribution of strand lengths, solubility, and biological properties including toxicity (25, 31, 32). Recently, we characterized the interaction of homogeneous dsRNA oligonucleotides (ONs) of defined lengths with TLR3 extracellular domain (ECD) protein (27), and in this study, we examine their capacity to serve as adjuvants in generating immune responses. We previously showed that the shortest dsRNA ON capable of binding TLR3 is ∼45 bp in length, and that TLR3 binds as dimers to 45-bp segments of dsRNA (27, 28). In transfected cells that express high amounts of TLR3, a 45-bp ON was sufficient for activation, but in cells expressing less TLR3, longer ONs were required for signaling (27). However, the minimum length of dsRNA ON required to activate TLR3 in primary cells, including DC, is currently unknown. In this article, we studied the capacity of dsRNA ONs of defined size to activate DC subsets from wild-type (WT) and TLR3−/− mice, to induce Ag-specific CTL responses, and to serve as adjuvants for an experimental influenza vaccine. We found that TLR3 is most highly expressed in cross-presenting DC subsets, and that homogeneous dsRNA ONs can serve as effective adjuvants capable of activating DC and promoting strong adaptive immunity.

Materials and Methods

Animals

C57BL/6 and B6-Ly5.2 mice were purchased from the Frederick Cancer Research Center (Frederick, MD), TLR3−/− mice were provided by Dr. Daniela Verthelyi (Center for Drug Evaluation and Research/Food and Drug Administration, Bethesda, MD), melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5-deficient (MDA5−/−) mice were provided by Dr. Marco Colonna (Washington University, St. Louis, MO), and OT-I mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. Female mice were used at 6–10 wk of age. All mice were cared for in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines and with the approval of the National Cancer Institute and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research/Food and Drug Administraton Animal Care and Use Committees.

Dendritic cells

DC were differentiated either from WT, TLR3−/−, or MDA5−/− bone marrow cells as described previously (33, 34). For FLT-3 ligand-generated DC (FL-DC), bone marrow cells were cultured for 10 d in 6-well plates at 1 × 106 cells/ml, 5 ml/well in complete medium (RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS, 55 μM 2-ME, glutamine, antibiotics, nonessential amino acids, and sodium pyruvate) containing 50 ng/ml FLT3 ligand (PeproTech, Rocky Hill, NJ). For GM-CSF–generated DC (GM-DC), cells were cultured for 7 d in 10-cm dishes at 0.5 × 106 cells/ml, 20 ml/dish in complete medium containing 10 ng/ml GM-CSF (GeneScript, Piscataway, NJ). Splenic and LN DC were positively selected using CD11c microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions (purity > 80%).

Flow cytometry

Abs for flow cytometry were purchased from BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA), Miltenyi Biotec, or eBioscience (San Diego, CA), with the exception of the anti-mTLR3 mAb (clone 11F8), which was generated in rats with the aid of Green Mountain Abs (Burlington, VT) using the mTLR3 ECD as the immunogen. The 11F8 Ab is a rat IgG2a and was initially selected by ELISA for binding to purified TLR3 ECD protein, and then for the ability to label HEK293 cells transfected with mTLR3. Purified anti-TLR3 Ab was labeled using an Alexa 647 mAb Labeling Kit (Invitrogen/Molecular Probes, Carlsbad, CA). For intracellular staining, cells were fixed and permeabilized using a Cytofix/Cytoperm Kit (BD Biosciences) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. To characterize OVA-specific CD8+ T cells, we performed staining with SIINFEKL H-2Kb-pentamer (ProImmune, Bradenton, FL) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All Ab staining was performed in the presence of purified 2.4G2 Ab (Fc block; BD Biosciences). Flow cytometry was performed using a FACSCalibur or LSR II instrument (BD Biosciences), and data were analyzed using FlowJo (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). FL-DC subsets were sorted based on CD24 and CD11b expression using a BD FACSAria (BD Biosciences).

Confocal microscopy

FL-DC were seeded on CC2-treated Lab-TekII Chamber Slides (Nalge Nunc/Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rochester, NY) for 24 h and treated with 10 μg/ml dsRNA ONs or pIC (InvivoGen, San Diego, CA), or left untreated. Then cells were fixed for 1 h with 2% PFA and permeabilized for 30 min with block/perm buffer (PBS containing 1% BSA, 0.05% saponin, 10 mM glycine, and 10% FBS). Cells were stained with either anti-calnexin, anti-EEA1, or anti–LAMP-1 primary Abs (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), followed by goat anti-rabbit IgG-Alexa 546 (Invitrogen) together with 11F8 (anti-TLR3), followed by goat anti-rat IgG-Alexa 488 (Invitrogen). Staining was done in the presence of block/perm buffer. Slides were mounted using ProLong Gold antifade reagent (Invitrogen). Images were acquired with a Zeiss LSM510 META confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Thornwood, NY) equipped with a 63× Plan-apochromat (numerical aperature 1.4) oil immersion objective lens.

DC activation

DC were activated for 24 h with pIC or homogeneous dsRNA ONs 25, 60, 62, 90, 139, and 540 bp in length (10 μg/ml for unseparated DC or 25 μg/ml when sorted subsets were treated), synthesized as described previously (27). Preliminary experiments indicated that these concentrations of ON or pIC were on or near the plateau of the dose-response curve. CD86 upregulation was determined by FACS, and cytokine production was analyzed using a CBA inflammation kit (BD Biosciences), except for IFN-β and IL-12p40, which were measured by standard ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

In vitro cross-presentation

DC (1 × 106/ml) were incubated overnight with 0.1 μg/ml OVA (Acros Organics, Geel, Belgium) in the presence of either 10 μg/ml pIC, 10 μg/ml dsRNA ONs, or 2 μg/ml CpG 1d (35). The following day, CD8+ T cells were isolated from OT-I spleens and LN using a MACS CD8+ T cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) and then labeled with 1 μM CFSE (Invitrogen). DC were washed extensively and then cocultured with an equal number (1 × 105) of CFSE-labeled OT-I CD8+ T cells in complete medium in 96-well round-bottom plates. After 60 h, 3 × 104 polystyrene beads (15 μm; Fluka/Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) were added to each well. Cells and beads were recovered and CFSE dilution was measured by FACS. The number of beads measured in each sample, relative to the total number added to the well, was used to calculate the total number of dividing OT-I cells per well for each sample.

In vivo CTL generation

WT and TLR3−/− mice were immunized in the footpads with OVA alone (0.25 μg), OVA plus 2 μg dsRNA ONs (90, 139, or 540 bp), or OVA plus 2 μg pIC. After 7 d, CD8+ T cells from draining popliteal LNs were labeled with SIINFEKL H-2Kb-pentamer to measure OVA-specific T cells. On day 6 after immunization, spleen cells from B6-Ly5.2 (CD45.1+) mice were loaded with 1 μM OVA peptide (Genscript, Piscataway, NJ) for 1 h or left untreated, then cells were labeled with 5 or 0.5 μM CFSE for 5 min at 37°C, respectively. Labeled splenocytes were mixed in a 1:1 ratio and injected i.v. into immunized mice (107 cells/mouse). The following day, popliteal LNs were harvested and the ratios of the CFSE bright to dim peaks in the CD45.1+ population were calculated. Percent-specific lysis was calculated using the formula: [1 − (CFSE ratio in mice immunized with adjuvant/CFSE ratio of mice immunized without adjuvant)] × 100, as described by Ingulli (36).

Immunization against influenza infection

Mice were primed with 20 μg recombinant influenza A nucleoprotein (rNP; Imgenex, San Diego, CA) alone, with 540 bp dsRNA ON alone (10 μg), or with rNP (20 μg) in combination with 90, 139, 540 bp dsRNA ONs or pIC (10 μg each) i.m. into the rear quadriceps, 7–10 mice/group. Four weeks later, animal groups were boosted using the same protocol. Three weeks after boosting, mice were challenged with 10 LD50 of influenza strain A/PR/8/34 (H1N1) intranasally under ketamine anesthesia and monitored for survival.

Statistical analysis

Statistical significance between different experimental groups was assessed using either simple or unbalanced ANOVA for independent data and repeated-measures ANOVA for multiple responses in the same mice. Data distributions were positively skewed, and appropriate transformations (primarily logarithmic and square root) were applied before analysis to maintain consistency with model assumptions. A binomial-gaussian mixed form likelihood method was used for data with a high proportion of zero values. Significance of differences in survival was tested by the exact two-tailed log-rank test. The p values were corrected for multiple simultaneous comparisons by the method of Hochberg and by Dunnett’s test against a common control. The p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results are represented as means + SEM.

Results

High TLR3 expression in cross-presenting DC

Although TLR3 mRNA expression has been measured in isolated DC subsets (33, 37), the relative levels of TLR3 protein have not been analyzed at the single-cell level. Therefore, we examined TLR3 protein expression in lymphocytes, macrophages, and DC subsets by intracellular FACS staining using a novel anti-mTLR3 mAb. We found that splenic T and NK cells express no TLR3, B cells express low levels, and peritoneal macrophages expressed moderate amounts of TLR3 (Fig. 1A). By contrast, TLR3 expression in DC was heterogeneous, with a minor fraction expressing high amounts of TLR3. All DC in the spleen are “resident” DC and are derived from blood precursors. They contain three major subsets (all CD11c+): B220+ plasmacytoid DC (pDC), and CD11b+ CD8α− and CD11b− CD8α+ conventional DC (cDC) (18, 38, 39). As shown in Fig. 1B, the CD8α+ cDC express high amounts of TLR3, whereas the CD8α− subset expresses low levels of TLR3, and the pDC express none. FL-DC, similar to splenic DC, contain pDC and two subsets of cDC, with the CD24high (CD8α+ equivalent) (33, 40) subset expressing high amounts of TLR3 (Fig. 1C). GM-DC, which represent monocyte-derived inflammatory DC (39, 41), express uniformly low levels of TLR3 (Fig. 1D).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

High TLR3 expression in cross-presenting DC. Cells were fixed, permeabilized, and stained for surface markers and TLR3. The same populations of cells from TLR3−/− mice were used as negative controls. A, TLR3 expression in splenic T cells (CD3ε+), NK cells (DX5+), B cells (B220+), peritoneal macrophages (MΦ, CD11b+), and DC (CD11c+). B–D, TLR3 expression in (B) CD11c-enriched splenic DC subsets, (C) FL-DC subsets, (D) GM-DC, and (E) CD11c-enriched LN DC subsets. All cells were electronically gated for CD11c expression and further gated as indicated in the figure. Histograms are representative of at least three experiments.

In addition to resident DC subsets, LNs contain DC that migrate from peripheral tissues to the LNs via the lymphatics. These migratory DC express DEC205 (CD205) and can be subdivided on the basis of CD103 expression. The CD103− subset includes classic dermal DC and Langerhans cells, whereas the CD103+ subset derives from langerin+ dermal DC (38). As shown in Fig. 1E, the CD103+ subset of migratory DC expresses high levels of TLR3, whereas the CD103− migratory DC express much lower amounts. We conclude that most cDC express low levels of TLR3, but two subsets of DC, the CD8+ resident cDC and the CD103+ DEC205+ CD8− migratory cDC, express much greater levels of TLR3 than other DC. These two DC subsets and the CD24high FL-DC uniquely cross-present Ags to CD8+ T cells (42–45). Thus, we conclude that high TLR3 expression is a phenotypic characteristic of cross-presenting DC within LN and splenic CD11c+ DC populations.

Intracellular localization of TLR3 in FL-DC

To examine where TLR3 localizes in resting DC and how activation affects its intracellular trafficking, we stained unstimulated and pIC-stimulated FL-DC for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) marker calnexin, the early endosome marker EEA-1, and the late endosome/lysosome marker LAMP-1, and analyzed for TLR3 coexpression. In resting DC, TLR3 appeared to colocalize with the early endosome marker and, to a lesser extent, with the ER and late endosomes markers; TLR3 was not expressed on the plasma membrane or in the nucleus, as expected (Fig. 2A). By contrast, in DC activated by pIC, almost all TLR3 colocalized with LAMP-1. We next asked whether dsRNA ONs could effectively induce TLR3 redistribution. As shown in Fig. 2B, the capacity of dsRNA ONs to induce TLR3 redistribution increased with the length of the ON. Thus, the 25- and 62-bp ONs failed to induce TLR3 redistribution, whereas the 90- and 139-bp ONs caused partial redistribution, and the 540-bp ON was as effective as pIC. These results suggest that TLR3 resides in the ER and early and late endosomes in resting DC, but after ligation with dsRNA ONs >100 bp in length and pIC, TLR3 traffics to late endosomes and lysosomes.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Intracellular localization of TLR3 in FL-DC. A, Unstimulated or pIC-stimulated FL-DC were fixed, permeabilized, and stained intracellularly for the ER-resident protein calnexin, early endosome marker EEA-1, or late endosome/lysosome marker LAMP-1 (red), together with anti-TLR3 (green), and examined by confocal microscopy. B, FL-DC were stimulated with 25, 60, 90, 139, or 540 bp dsRNA ONs, and costained for TLR3 and LAMP-1. Scale bars, 10 μm. Boxed areas in left panels are shown magnified in the three right panels. Bottom right panels, TLR3 alone; middle right panels, vesicle marker alone; top right panels, TLR3 and vesicle markers merged.

TLR3 dependence of activation of DC by dsRNA

We next asked whether DC from spleen and bone marrow cultures would respond to dsRNA in a TLR3-dependent manner. dsRNA can trigger the release of type I IFNs and inflammatory cytokines, and upregulation of costimulatory molecules using either TLR3 or two related cytoplasmic receptors, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I) and MDA5, collectively known as RIG-I like receptors (RLRs) (46, 47). Because TLR3 and RLRs trigger the same types of responses, the loss of responsiveness to dsRNA in TLR3 or RLR-deficient mice would indicate that the deleted receptor alone mediates the response to dsRNA. We expected that the DC response to exogenous ONs would be predominantly TLR3 dependent, because exogenously added dsRNA ONs are taken into endosomes, the intracellular location of TLR3, rather than into the cytoplasm where RLRs reside. To test this, we treated spleen cells, FL-DC, and GM-DC with medium, dsRNA (540 bp), or pIC, and after 24 h, CD11c+ cells were examined for upregulation of the costimulatory molecule, CD86. As shown in Fig. 3, dsRNA and pIC induced CD86 expression in splenic DC and in FL-DC from WT mice, but not from TLR3−/− mice, as expected. By contrast, the dsRNA ON failed to activate GM-DC from either WT or TLR3−/− mice, but surprisingly, pIC activated GM-DC from both WT and TLR3−/− mice, suggesting that RLRs might be responsible for the GM-DC response to pIC. It has been shown that MDA5, but not RIG-I, responds to pIC (46, 47). We therefore asked whether the induction of CD86 by pIC required MDA5. As seen in Fig. 3, deletion of MDA5 abrogated the responsiveness of GM-DC, but not splenic DC or FL-DC, to pIC, suggesting that pIC enters the cytoplasm in GM-DC, where it activates MDA5. Thus, FL-DC and splenic DC respond differently from GM-DC to dsRNA and pIC stimulation, and pIC can activate at least one type of DC independently of TLR3.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

TLR3 dependence of activation of splenic and bone marrow-derived DC. CD86 expression of WT, MDA5−/−, and TLR3−/− splenic DC, FL-DC, and GM-DC after 24 h of treatment with dsRNA (540 bp), pIC, or medium alone (Ctrl). Data shown are mean + SEM of triplicate DC cultures and are representative of four independent experiments.

Dependence of DC activation on dsRNA ON size

In view of the large differences in TLR3 expression between DC subsets, we asked how different subsets would respond to dsRNA. For these experiments, CD24high and CD11bhigh FL-DC were isolated by cell sorting and treated with 25, 60, 90, 139, and 540 bp dsRNA ONs or pIC at concentrations predetermined to lie at or near the plateau on the dose-response curve. The CD24high/TLR3high FL-DC subset responded strongly to the dsRNA stimuli, and the responses increased with dsRNA length and required TLR3 (Fig. 4, left panels). The 60-bp ON was sufficient to upregulate CD86 expression, but larger dsRNA ONs were required to induce IL-12p40, TNF-α, IL-6, and IFN-β. The CD11bhigh/TLR3low subset of FL-DC (Fig. 4, right panels) constitutively expressed high levels of CD86 (normalized in Fig. 4) and TNF-α, which were marginally increased by dsRNA. These cells gave a weak IL-12p40 response to dsRNA but did secrete IFN-β and IL-6 in a TLR3-dependent manner, indicating that despite their low TLR3 expression, the CD11bhigh DC are able to respond to dsRNA. Taken together, these data show that qualitatively different responses are generated by treating DC with different sized dsRNA ONs, and that the responses vary between DC subsets.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

DC activation increases with dsRNA length. FACS-sorted CD24high and CD11bhigh FL-DC subsets from WT and TLR3−/− mice were stimulated with 25, 60, 90, 139, and 540 bp dsRNA with pIC or were left untreated (Ctrl). After 24 h, CD86 upregulation and cytokine production were determined. pIC and dsRNA ON concentrations were at or near the plateau on dose-response curves. Values depicted are means + SEM from three independent experiments. Asterisks designate significant differences compared with untreated control (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001), whereas daggers indicate significant differences between WT and TLR3−/− DC (†p < 0.05; ††p < 0.01; †††p < 0.001).

Because dsRNA ONs stimulate CD86 and cytokine expression in CD24high/TLR3high FL-DC, we asked whether ONs could induce FL-DC to efficiently cross-present exogenous Ags to CD8+ T cells. FL-DC were incubated with OVA and dsRNA ONs, then cultured with naive CD8+ T cells from OT-I mice that express a TCR transgene specific for OVA peptide bound to H-2kb. Fig. 5 shows that DC treated with OVA alone or OVA plus 25 or 62 bp dsRNA were unable to induce proliferation of the OT-I CD8+ T cells. However, ONs ≥90 bp and pIC were able to mature WT, but not TLR3−/− DC, into competent cross-presenting APC capable of activating T cells in vitro, and the Ag-presenting capacity of DC increased with dsRNA length. As a control, the TLR9 ligand CpG oligodeoxynucleotide was able to induce maturation of both WT and TLR3−/− DC, indicating that the TLR3−/− DC had not lost the capacity to mature in response to other stimuli. We conclude that dsRNA ONs induce DC maturation by processes that require TLR3 and depend on dsRNA length.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

dsRNA size dependently induces cross-presentation. WT and TLR3−/− FL-DC were incubated overnight with OVA alone (Ctrl) or OVA plus dsRNA ONs with specified length, pIC, or CpG, then were cocultured with CFSE-labeled OT-I CD8+ T cells. Proliferation was detected by CFSE dilution. A, Representative histograms of proliferating T cells induced by DC that had been treated with OVA and the indicated stimulants. B, Number of proliferating T cells are shown; n = 6 from two independent experiments; means + SEM. Asterisks designate significant differences compared with OVA alone control (***p < 0.001), whereas daggers indicate significant differences between T cells stimulated with WT and TLR3−/− DC (††p < 0.01; †††p < 0.001).

dsRNA ONs induce Ag-specific CTL in vivo

Because dsRNA ONs drive DC maturation in vitro, we asked whether the same ONs could serve as adjuvants for the generation of Ag-specific CD8+ T cells in vivo. Mice were immunized with OVA and dsRNA ONs or pIC, and 7 d later, CD8+ cells from draining LNs were examined for OVA specificity by pentamer staining. As seen in Fig. 6A, dsRNA ONs served as effective adjuvants for the generation of OVA-specific T cells. No expansion of Ag-specific T cells was seen in the absence of dsRNA, and even the smallest ON tested (90 bp) showed significant adjuvant activity. The 540-bp ON was as effective as pIC, and both exhibited some TLR3-independent activity. OVA-immunized mice were also tested for the generation of CTL activity, using an in vivo cytotoxicity assay (Fig. 6B, 6C). We observed that all ONs tested and pIC were effective at inducing OVA-specific cytotoxicity. The 139-bp ON produced a near-optimal CTL response that was completely TLR3 dependent, but pIC and 540-bp dsRNA were able to induce CTL responses by both TLR3-dependent and TLR3-independent pathways.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

In vivo CTL induction by dsRNA. WT and TLR3−/− mice were immunized with OVA alone (Ctrl) or OVA plus the indicated dsRNA ON or pIC. A, Percentages of OVA-specific (pentamer-positive) CD8+ T cells 7 d after immunization. B, Representative histograms showing in vivo cytotoxicity assay. Six days after immunization, mice were injected with OVA peptide- coated target cells labeled with high amounts of CFSE and control cells labeled with low amounts of CFSE. One day later, cytotoxicity was detected as a loss in CFSE bright cells relative to CFSE dull cells. C, Percent specific lysis. Data are from at least three mice per group (mean + SEM). Asterisk designates significant differences compared with control (**p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001), whereas dagger indicates significant differences between WT and TLR3−/− mice (†p < 0.05; †††p < 0.001).

Protection against influenza virus infection

Finally, we investigated whether dsRNA ONs could improve the effectiveness of an experimental influenza virus subunit vaccine as a first step in their development as immunization adjuvants. As the immunogen, we used rNP, which is weakly immunogenic but highly conserved between virus strains (48). Mice were immunized and boosted 4 wk later with rNP either alone or in the presence of pIC or dsRNA ONs, 90, 139, or 540 bp in length. Two weeks after the boost, mice were challenged with 10 LD50 of H1N1 influenza virus, strain A/PR/8/34, and survival was monitored thereafter. As shown in Fig. 7, no mice survived past 9 d in the groups that were either not immunized or that were given 540 bp dsRNA alone. Immunization with rNP alone prolonged survival slightly. By contrast, long-term survival was seen when mice were immunized with rNP using either pIC or dsRNA ONs as adjuvants. Adjuvant effectiveness increased with dsRNA length (Fig. 7B), and the 540-bp ON was about as effective as pIC (Fig. 7A). Thus, dsRNA ONs can provide protection against infection when administered with a viral Ag.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

dsRNA ONs serve as effective adjuvants for an influenza nucleoprotein vaccine. WT mice were primed and boosted with rNP plus pIC or 540 bp dsRNA (A) or rNP plus 90, 139, or 540 bp dsRNA ONs (B). Controls (dashed lines) include untreated naive mice, mice treated with rNP alone, and mice treated with 540 bp dsRNA alone. Three weeks after the boost, mice were challenged with 10 LD50 of influenza virus, and survival was monitored thereafter. Asterisks indicate a significant difference in the percentage of survival between naive and immunized mice (*p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001).

Discussion

Recent studies have demonstrated that TLR3 forms dimeric complexes with 45-bp segments of dsRNA, and that single TLR3 dimers formed with a 48-bp dsRNA ON are capable of activating transfected cells expressing high amounts of TLR3 (27). A goal of this study was to determine how TLR3/dsRNA complexes, formed with dsRNA ONs of varying lengths, function in primary cells, and to translate these findings into the development of well-defined, TLR3-dependent adjuvants. In this study, we examined the activation of DC by dsRNA ONs because this response is key for inducing acquired antiviral immunity. We have previously shown that the interaction of TLR3-ECD protein with dsRNA is highly dependent on dsRNA length and TLR3-ECD concentration (27), which implies that the ability of a specifically sized dsRNA ON to bind TLR3 and activate a cell is governed, in part, by the membrane density of TLR3 in the endosomes. Thus, the large differences in TLR3 expression levels that we observed between DC subsets are predicted to play an important role in determining their responsiveness to dsRNA ONs. Two subsets of DC that expressed the highest levels of TLR3 are the resident CD8+ cDC and the migratory CD103+ dermal DC. These two subsets are known to cross-present exogenous Ags to CD8+ T cells (38, 43–45, 49, 50) and are related by requiring Batf3 and IRF8 for their development (50). The human DC subset equivalent to murine CD8+ cDC has recently been identified and shown to express TLR3 mRNA (51–54). However, it is not known whether this human DC subset expresses TLR3 protein at the distinctively high levels that we observed in mice. It has been shown that CD8+ DC phagocytose virally infected cells and undergo maturation in a TLR3/dsRNA-dependent process. These DC then cross-present viral Ags to CD8+ T cells, inducing them to proliferate and differentiate into virus-specific CTL (30). Thus, the high expression of TLR3 in cross-presenting DC represents one way in which a viral molecular pattern can induce a virus-specific response.

As expected from their high TLR3 expression, cross-presenting DC were highly responsive to dsRNA ONs in vitro. ONs as short as 60 bp induced phenotypic maturation of the CD24high cross-priming subset of FL-DC in a TLR3-dependent manner, and 90 bp dsRNA matured FL-DC into potent APC that activated CD8+ T cells. By contrast, GM-DC, which express low levels of TLR3, were not activated by a 540-bp dsRNA ON but were activated by pIC. However, activation of GM-DC by pIC was mediated by MDA5, a cytosolic receptor for dsRNA, and not by TLR3. This suggests that pIC was taken into the cytoplasm of GM-DC, whereas the 540-bp ON was not, or alternatively, both pIC and the ON entered the cytoplasm, but only pIC activated MDA5 (55, 56). In vivo, the 90-bp dsRNA ON was capable of inducing Ag-specific CD8+ T cell proliferation and CTL generation. This was most likely mediated by the cross-presenting DC subsets because previous studies using mice deficient in CD8α+ and CD103+ DC showed that these subsets were essential for cross-presentation of exogenous Ags to CD8+ T cells (49, 50). Although the 90- and 139-bp ONs induced Ag-specific CD8+ T cell expansion and CTL generation in a TLR3-dependent manner, pIC and, to a lesser extent, 540-bp dsRNA operated, in part, through a TLR3-independent pathway. This suggests that long pieces of dsRNA and pIC may exert a qualitatively different effect on the immune system than shorter dsRNA ONs.

dsRNA ONs have several properties that render them advantageous as adjuvants. First, dsRNA is stable, because it is resistant to digestion by the ubiquitous RNases that rapidly degrade single-stranded RNA, a ligand for TLR7 and TLR8 (57, 58). dsRNA ONs are soluble, homogeneous molecules that can be manufactured in a consistent fashion. By contrast, other TLR3-stimulating adjuvants including pIC, polyI:C12U (59), polyI:CLC (60), and PIKA (61) are heterogeneous and may vary between batches in both chemical structure and biological function, particularly with regard to their capacity to promiscuously activate non-TLR3–dependent pathways with unpredictable consequences. The efficacy of a dsRNA ON as an activator of TLR3 depends on its length and not its nucleotide sequence, in contrast with CpG oligodeoxynucleotides that are being tested as TLR9-based adjuvants (62). Thus, it may be possible to fine-tune the adjuvant properties of dsRNA ONs simply by varying their lengths.

Adjuvant design is especially important for developing effective subunit protein-based vaccines. Virus subunit proteins are easy to produce, stable during storage, and safe, but these proteins are poor at generating T cell immunity and therefore require adjuvants to generate protective immunity (19, 20). To test whether dsRNA ONs could serve as effective adjuvants in an experimental subunit vaccine, we immunized mice with rNP with or without dsRNA ONs or pIC and then challenged the mice with influenza virus. Nucleoprotein (NP) varies much less between influenza subtypes than do the major Ab epitopes on the hemagglutinin and neuraminidase subunits. For this reason, a strong anti-NP response could be cross-protective against multiple influenza A subtypes (63, 64). However, NP is a poor immunogen when it is administered as a recombinant protein rather than expressed in situ from plasmid or viral vectors (48). We found that rNP alone did not confer protection against lethal influenza infection, but that coadministration of rNP with dsRNA ONs enhanced survival and that protection increased with the length of the dsRNA. The level of protection induced by the 540-bp ON was similar to pIC. Thus, dsRNA ONs can serve as effective adjuvants in an experimental vaccination system.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Daniela Verthelyi (Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Rockville, MD) for TLR3−/− mice and Dr. Marco Colonna (Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO) for MDA5−/− mice. We also thank Chia-Yun Lo, Julia Ann Misplon (Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD), and Lana Stepanian (Bioqual, Rockville, MD) for expertise in immunizing and handling mice. We thank Dr. Michael Kruhlak (Experimental Immunology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) for help with confocal imaging, image processing, and figure preparation.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Cancer Institute and by a National Institutes of Health/Food and Drug Administration Intramural Biodefense Award from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases.

  • Abbreviations used in this article:

    cDC
    conventional dendritic cell
    DC
    dendritic cell
    ECD
    extracellular domain
    ER
    endoplasmic reticulum
    FL-DC
    FLT-3 ligand-generated dendritic cell
    GM-DC
    GM-CSF–generated dendritic cell
    LN
    lymph node
    MDA5
    melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5
    NP
    nucleoprotein
    ON
    oligonucleotide
    PAMP
    pathogen-associated molecular pattern
    pDC
    plasmacytoid DC
    pIC
    polyinosinic:polycytidylic acid
    RIG-I
    retinoic acid-inducible gene-I
    RLR
    RIG-I like receptor
    rNP
    recombinant influenza A nucleoprotein
    WT
    wild-type.

  • Received August 24, 2010.
  • Accepted December 14, 2010.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Banchereau J.,
    2. R. M. Steinman
    . 1998. Dendritic cells and the control of immunity. Nature 392: 245–252.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Steinman R. M.
    2007. Dendritic cells: understanding immunogenicity. Eur. J. Immunol. 37(Suppl. 1): S53–S60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Batista F. D.,
    2. N. E. Harwood
    . 2009. The who, how and where of antigen presentation to B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9: 15–27.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Guermonprez P.,
    2. J. Valladeau,
    3. L. Zitvogel,
    4. C. Théry,
    5. S. Amigorena
    . 2002. Antigen presentation and T cell stimulation by dendritic cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20: 621–667.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Kapsenberg M. L.
    2003. Dendritic-cell control of pathogen-driven T-cell polarization. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 3: 984–993.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Segura E.,
    2. J. A. Villadangos
    . 2009. Antigen presentation by dendritic cells in vivo. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 21: 105–110.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Vyas J. M.,
    2. A. G. Van der Veen,
    3. H. L. Ploegh
    . 2008. The known unknowns of antigen processing and presentation. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8: 607–618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Steinman R. M.
    2003. The control of immunity and tolerance by dendritic cell. Pathol. Biol. (Paris) 51: 59–60.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Steinman R. M.,
    2. D. Hawiger,
    3. K. Liu,
    4. L. Bonifaz,
    5. D. Bonnyay,
    6. K. Mahnke,
    7. T. Iyoda,
    8. J. Ravetch,
    9. M. Dhodapkar,
    10. K. Inaba,
    11. M. Nussenzweig
    . 2003. Dendritic cell function in vivo during the steady state: a role in peripheral tolerance. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 987: 15–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Granucci F.,
    2. I. Zanoni,
    3. P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli
    . 2008. Central role of dendritic cells in the regulation and deregulation of immune responses. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 65: 1683–1697.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Lutz M. B.,
    2. C. Kurts
    . 2009. Induction of peripheral CD4+ T-cell tolerance and CD8+ T-cell cross-tolerance by dendritic cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 39: 2325–2330.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Hemmi H.,
    2. S. Akira
    . 2005. TLR signalling and the function of dendritic cells. Chem. Immunol. Allergy 86: 120–135.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Benko S.,
    2. Z. Magyarics,
    3. A. Szabó,
    4. E. Rajnavölgyi
    . 2008. Dendritic cell subtypes as primary targets of vaccines: the emerging role and cross-talk of pattern recognition receptors. Biol. Chem. 389: 469–485.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Iwasaki A.,
    2. R. Medzhitov
    . 2010. Regulation of adaptive immunity by the innate immune system. Science 327: 291–295.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Reis e Sousa C.
    2004. Activation of dendritic cells: translating innate into adaptive immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 16: 21–25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Kawai T.,
    2. S. Akira
    . 2008. Toll-like receptor and RIG-I-like receptor signaling. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1143: 1–20.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Kumar H.,
    2. T. Kawai,
    3. S. Akira
    . 2009. Pathogen recognition in the innate immune response. Biochem. J. 420: 1–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Naik S. H.
    2008. Demystifying the development of dendritic cell subtypes, a little. Immunol. Cell Biol. 86: 439–452.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Kwissa M.,
    2. S. P. Kasturi,
    3. B. Pulendran
    . 2007. The science of adjuvants. Expert Rev. Vaccines 6: 673–684.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wilson-Welder J. H.,
    2. M. P. Torres,
    3. M. J. Kipper,
    4. S. K. Mallapragada,
    5. M. J. Wannemuehler,
    6. B. Narasimhan
    . 2009. Vaccine adjuvants: current challenges and future approaches. J. Pharm. Sci. 98: 1278–1316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Pichlmair A.,
    2. C. Reis e Sousa
    . 2007. Innate recognition of viruses. Immunity 27: 370–383.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Takeuchi O.,
    2. S. Akira
    . 2009. Innate immunity to virus infection. Immunol. Rev. 227: 75–86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Botos I.,
    2. L. Liu,
    3. Y. Wang,
    4. D. M. Segal,
    5. D. R. Davies
    . 2009. The toll-like receptor 3:dsRNA signaling complex. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1789: 667–674.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Vercammen E.,
    2. J. Staal,
    3. R. Beyaert
    . 2008. Sensing of viral infection and activation of innate immunity by toll-like receptor 3. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 21: 13–25.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Matsumoto M.,
    2. T. Seya
    . 2008. TLR3: interferon induction by double-stranded RNA including poly(I:C). Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 60: 805–812.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Alexopoulou L.,
    2. A. C. Holt,
    3. R. Medzhitov,
    4. R. A. Flavell
    . 2001. Recognition of double-stranded RNA and activation of NF-kappaB by Toll-like receptor 3. Nature 413: 732–738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Leonard J. N.,
    2. R. Ghirlando,
    3. J. Askins,
    4. J. K. Bell,
    5. D. H. Margulies,
    6. D. R. Davies,
    7. D. M. Segal
    . 2008. The TLR3 signaling complex forms by cooperative receptor dimerization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 105: 258–263.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Liu L.,
    2. I. Botos,
    3. Y. Wang,
    4. J. N. Leonard,
    5. J. Shiloach,
    6. D. M. Segal,
    7. D. R. Davies
    . 2008. Structural basis of toll-like receptor 3 signaling with double-stranded RNA. Science 320: 379–381.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Diebold S. S.,
    2. O. Schulz,
    3. L. Alexopoulou,
    4. W. W. Leitner,
    5. R. A. Flavell,
    6. C. Reis e Sousa
    . 2009. Role of TLR3 in the immunogenicity of replicon plasmid-based vaccines. Gene Ther. 16: 359–366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Schulz O.,
    2. S. S. Diebold,
    3. M. Chen,
    4. T. I. Näslund,
    5. M. A. Nolte,
    6. L. Alexopoulou,
    7. Y. T. Azuma,
    8. R. A. Flavell,
    9. P. Liljeström,
    10. C. Reis e Sousa
    . 2005. Toll-like receptor 3 promotes cross-priming to virus-infected cells. Nature 433: 887–892.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Homan E. R.,
    2. R. P. Zendzian,
    3. L. D. Schott,
    4. H. B. Levy,
    5. R. H. Adamson
    . 1972. Studies on poly I:C toxicity in experimental animals. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 23: 579–588.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Robinson R. A.,
    2. V. T. DeVita,
    3. H. B. Levy,
    4. S. Baron,
    5. S. P. Hubbard,
    6. A. S. Levine
    . 1976. A phase I-II trial of multiple-dose polyriboinosic-polyribocytidylic acid in patieonts with leukemia or solid tumors. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 57: 599–602.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Naik S. H.,
    2. A. I. Proietto,
    3. N. S. Wilson,
    4. A. Dakic,
    5. P. Schnorrer,
    6. M. Fuchsberger,
    7. M. H. Lahoud,
    8. M. O’Keeffe,
    9. Q. X. Shao,
    10. W. F. Chen,
    11. et al
    . 2005. Cutting edge: generation of splenic CD8+ and CD8- dendritic cell equivalents in Fms-like tyrosine kinase 3 ligand bone marrow cultures. J. Immunol. 174: 6592–6597.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Inaba K.,
    2. M. Inaba,
    3. N. Romani,
    4. H. Aya,
    5. M. Deguchi,
    6. S. Ikehara,
    7. S. Muramatsu,
    8. R. M. Steinman
    . 1992. Generation of large numbers of dendritic cells from mouse bone marrow cultures supplemented with granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor. J. Exp. Med. 176: 1693–1702.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    1. Krieg A. M.,
    2. A. K. Yi,
    3. S. Matson,
    4. T. J. Waldschmidt,
    5. G. A. Bishop,
    6. R. Teasdale,
    7. G. A. Koretzky,
    8. D. M. Klinman
    . 1995. CpG motifs in bacterial DNA trigger direct B-cell activation. Nature 374: 546–549.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    1. Ingulli E.
    2007. Tracing tolerance and immunity in vivo by CFSE-labeling of administered cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 380: 365–376.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Edwards A. D.,
    2. S. S. Diebold,
    3. E. M. Slack,
    4. H. Tomizawa,
    5. H. Hemmi,
    6. T. Kaisho,
    7. S. Akira,
    8. C. Reis e Sousa
    . 2003. Toll-like receptor expression in murine DC subsets: lack of TLR7 expression by CD8 alpha+ DC correlates with unresponsiveness to imidazoquinolines. Eur. J. Immunol. 33: 827–833.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    1. Heath W. R.,
    2. F. R. Carbone
    . 2009. Dendritic cell subsets in primary and secondary T cell responses at body surfaces. Nat. Immunol. 10: 1237–1244.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Steinman R. M.,
    2. J. Idoyaga
    . 2010. Features of the dendritic cell lineage. Immunol. Rev. 234: 5–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    1. Liu K.,
    2. M. C. Nussenzweig
    . 2010. Origin and development of dendritic cells. Immunol. Rev. 234: 45–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Xu Y.,
    2. Y. Zhan,
    3. A. M. Lew,
    4. S. H. Naik,
    5. M. H. Kershaw
    . 2007. Differential development of murine dendritic cells by GM-CSF versus Flt3 ligand has implications for inflammation and trafficking. J. Immunol. 179: 7577–7584.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Belz G. T.,
    2. C. M. Smith,
    3. D. Eichner,
    4. K. Shortman,
    5. G. Karupiah,
    6. F. R. Carbone,
    7. W. R. Heath
    . 2004. Cutting edge: conventional CD8 alpha+ dendritic cells are generally involved in priming CTL immunity to viruses. J. Immunol. 172: 1996–2000.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. den Haan J. M.,
    2. S. M. Lehar,
    3. M. J. Bevan
    . 2000. CD8(+) but not CD8(-) dendritic cells cross-prime cytotoxic T cells in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 192: 1685–1696.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bedoui S.,
    2. P. G. Whitney,
    3. J. Waithman,
    4. L. Eidsmo,
    5. L. Wakim,
    6. I. Caminschi,
    7. R. S. Allan,
    8. M. Wojtasiak,
    9. K. Shortman,
    10. F. R. Carbone,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Cross-presentation of viral and self antigens by skin-derived CD103+ dendritic cells. Nat. Immunol. 10: 488–495.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    1. Shortman K.,
    2. W. R. Heath
    . 2010. The CD8+ dendritic cell subset. Immunol. Rev. 234: 18–31.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    1. Kato H.,
    2. O. Takeuchi,
    3. E. Mikamo-Satoh,
    4. R. Hirai,
    5. T. Kawai,
    6. K. Matsushita,
    7. A. Hiiragi,
    8. T. S. Dermody,
    9. T. Fujita,
    10. S. Akira
    . 2008. Length-dependent recognition of double-stranded ribonucleic acids by retinoic acid-inducible gene-I and melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5. J. Exp. Med. 205: 1601–1610.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    1. Pichlmair A.,
    2. O. Schulz,
    3. C. P. Tan,
    4. J. Rehwinkel,
    5. H. Kato,
    6. O. Takeuchi,
    7. S. Akira,
    8. M. Way,
    9. G. Schiavo,
    10. C. Reis e Sousa
    . 2009. Activation of MDA5 requires higher-order RNA structures generated during virus infection. J. Virol. 83: 10761–10769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Epstein S. L.
    2003. Control of influenza virus infection by immunity to conserved viral features. Expert Rev. Anti. Infect. Ther. 1: 627–638.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Hildner K.,
    2. B. T. Edelson,
    3. W. E. Purtha,
    4. M. Diamond,
    5. H. Matsushita,
    6. M. Kohyama,
    7. B. Calderon,
    8. B. U. Schraml,
    9. E. R. Unanue,
    10. M. S. Diamond,
    11. et al
    . 2008. Batf3 deficiency reveals a critical role for CD8alpha+ dendritic cells in cytotoxic T cell immunity. Science 322: 1097–1100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Edelson B. T.,
    2. W. KC,
    3. R. Juang,
    4. M. Kohyama,
    5. L. A. Benoit,
    6. P. A. Klekotka,
    7. C. Moon,
    8. J. C. Albring,
    9. W. Ise,
    10. D. G. Michael,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Peripheral CD103+ dendritic cells form a unified subset developmentally related to CD8alpha+ conventional dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 207: 823–836.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    1. Jongbloed S. L.,
    2. A. J. Kassianos,
    3. K. J. McDonald,
    4. G. J. Clark,
    5. X. Ju,
    6. C. E. Angel,
    7. C. J. Chen,
    8. P. R. Dunbar,
    9. R. B. Wadley,
    10. V. Jeet,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Human CD141+ (BDCA-3)+ dendritic cells (DCs) represent a unique myeloid DC subset that cross-presents necrotic cell antigens. J. Exp. Med. 207: 1247–1260.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Crozat K.,
    2. R. Guiton,
    3. V. Contreras,
    4. V. Feuillet,
    5. C. A. Dutertre,
    6. E. Ventre,
    7. T. P. Vu Manh,
    8. T. Baranek,
    9. A. K. Storset,
    10. J. Marvel,
    11. et al
    . 2010. The XC chemokine receptor 1 is a conserved selective marker of mammalian cells homologous to mouse CD8alpha+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 207: 1283–1292.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Poulin L. F.,
    2. M. Salio,
    3. E. Griessinger,
    4. F. Anjos-Afonso,
    5. L. Craciun,
    6. J. L. Chen,
    7. A. M. Keller,
    8. O. Joffre,
    9. S. Zelenay,
    10. E. Nye,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Characterization of human DNGR-1+ BDCA3+ leukocytes as putative equivalents of mouse CD8alpha+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 207: 1261–1271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    1. Bachem A.,
    2. S. Güttler,
    3. E. Hartung,
    4. F. Ebstein,
    5. M. Schaefer,
    6. A. Tannert,
    7. A. Salama,
    8. K. Movassaghi,
    9. C. Opitz,
    10. H. W. Mages,
    11. et al
    . 2010. Superior antigen cross-presentation and XCR1 expression define human CD11c+CD141+ cells as homologues of mouse CD8+ dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 207: 1273–1281.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    1. Yoneyama M.,
    2. T. Fujita
    . 2010. Recognition of viral nucleic acids in innate immunity. Rev. Med. Virol. 20: 4–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Takeuchi O.,
    2. S. Akira
    . 2008. MDA5/RIG-I and virus recognition. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 20: 17–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    1. Diebold S. S.,
    2. T. Kaisho,
    3. H. Hemmi,
    4. S. Akira,
    5. C. Reis e Sousa
    . 2004. Innate antiviral responses by means of TLR7-mediated recognition of single-stranded RNA. Science 303: 1529–1531.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    1. Heil F.,
    2. H. Hemmi,
    3. H. Hochrein,
    4. F. Ampenberger,
    5. C. Kirschning,
    6. S. Akira,
    7. G. Lipford,
    8. H. Wagner,
    9. S. Bauer
    . 2004. Species-specific recognition of single-stranded RNA via toll-like receptor 7 and 8. Science 303: 1526–1529.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    1. Jasani B.,
    2. H. Navabi,
    3. M. Adams
    . 2009. Ampligen: a potential toll-like 3 receptor adjuvant for immunotherapy of cancer. Vaccine 27: 3401–3404.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Poast J.,
    2. H. M. Seidel,
    3. M. D. Hendricks,
    4. J. A. Haslam,
    5. H. B. Levy,
    6. S. Baron
    . 2002. Poly I:CLC induction of the interferon system in mice: an initial study of four detection methods. J. Interferon Cytokine Res. 22: 1035–1040.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    1. Lau Y. F.,
    2. L. H. Tang,
    3. A. W. McCall,
    4. E. E. Ooi,
    5. K. Subbarao
    . 2010. An adjuvant for the induction of potent, protective humoral responses to an H5N1 influenza virus vaccine with antigen-sparing effect in mice. J. Virol. 84: 8639–8649.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. McCluskie M. J.,
    2. A. M. Krieg
    . 2006. Enhancement of infectious disease vaccines through TLR9-dependent recognition of CpG DNA. Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol. 311: 155–178.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Epstein S. L.,
    2. W. P. Kong,
    3. J. A. Misplon,
    4. C. Y. Lo,
    5. T. M. Tumpey,
    6. L. Xu,
    7. G. J. Nabel
    . 2005. Protection against multiple influenza A subtypes by vaccination with highly conserved nucleoprotein. Vaccine 23: 5404–5410.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    1. Ulmer J. B.,
    2. J. J. Donnelly,
    3. S. E. Parker,
    4. G. H. Rhodes,
    5. P. L. Felgner,
    6. V. J. Dwarki,
    7. S. H. Gromkowski,
    8. R. R. Deck,
    9. C. M. DeWitt,
    10. A. Friedman,
    11. et al
    . 1993. Heterologous protection against influenza by injection of DNA encoding a viral protein. Science 259: 1745–1749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 186 (4)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 186, Issue 4
15 Feb 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
TLR3-Specific Double-Stranded RNA Oligonucleotide Adjuvants Induce Dendritic Cell Cross-Presentation, CTL Responses, and Antiviral Protection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
TLR3-Specific Double-Stranded RNA Oligonucleotide Adjuvants Induce Dendritic Cell Cross-Presentation, CTL Responses, and Antiviral Protection
Ivett Jelinek, Joshua N. Leonard, Graeme E. Price, Kevin N. Brown, Anna Meyer-Manlapat, Paul K. Goldsmith, Yan Wang, David Venzon, Suzanne L. Epstein, David M. Segal
The Journal of Immunology February 15, 2011, 186 (4) 2422-2429; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002845

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
TLR3-Specific Double-Stranded RNA Oligonucleotide Adjuvants Induce Dendritic Cell Cross-Presentation, CTL Responses, and Antiviral Protection
Ivett Jelinek, Joshua N. Leonard, Graeme E. Price, Kevin N. Brown, Anna Meyer-Manlapat, Paul K. Goldsmith, Yan Wang, David Venzon, Suzanne L. Epstein, David M. Segal
The Journal of Immunology February 15, 2011, 186 (4) 2422-2429; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002845
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more HOST DEFENSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606