Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Secondary Immunization Generates Clonally Related Antigen-Specific Plasma Cells and Memory B Cells

Daniela Frölich, Claudia Giesecke, Henrik E. Mei, Karin Reiter, Capucine Daridon, Peter E. Lipsky and Thomas Dörner
J Immunol September 1, 2010, 185 (5) 3103-3110; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.1000911
Daniela Frölich
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin;Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Claudia Giesecke
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin;Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Henrik E. Mei
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin;Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karin Reiter
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin;Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Capucine Daridon
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin;Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Peter E. Lipsky
National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Dörner
Department of Medicine, Rheumatology, and Clinical Immunology, Charité University Medicine Berlin;Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum Berlin, Berlin, Germany; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

This article has a correction. Please see:

  • Errata - January 01, 2014

Abstract

Rechallenge with T cell-dependent Ags induces memory B cells to re-enter germinal centers (GCs) and undergo further expansion and differentiation into plasma cells (PCs) and secondary memory B cells. It is currently not known whether the expanded population of memory B cells and PCs generated in secondary GCs are clonally related, nor has the extent of proliferation and somatic hypermutation of their precursors been delineated. In this study, after secondary tetanus toxoid (TT) immunization, TT-specific PCs increased 17- to 80-fold on days 6–7, whereas TT-specific memory B cells peaked (delayed) on day 14 with a 2- to 22-fold increase. Molecular analyses of VHDJH rearrangements of individual cells revealed no major differences of gene usage and CDR3 length between TT-specific PCs and memory B cells, and both contained extensive evidence of somatic hypermutation with a pattern consistent with GC reactions. This analysis identified clonally related TT-specific memory B cells and PCs. Within clusters of clonally related cells, sequences shared a number of mutations but also could contain additional base pair changes. The data indicate that although following secondary immunization PCs can derive from memory B cells without further somatic hypermutation, in some circumstances, likely within GC reactions, asymmetric mutation can occur. These results suggest that after the fate decision to differentiate into secondary memory B cells or PCs, some committed precursors continue to proliferate and mutate their VH genes.

Serological memory plays a pivotal role in systemic protection of the host during re-exposure to hazardous pathogens and toxins. Vaccination strategies aim to stimulate this aspect of immunologic memory. The goals of vaccination are to generate Ag-specific memory B cells capable of responding to the immunizing Ag more quickly and robustly and plasma cells (PCs) secreting Abs specific for the immunizing Ag.

Primary Ag challenge leads to activation of naive B cells and subsequently generation of memory B cells expressing BCRs of increased avidity and PCs secreting high-avidity Abs. A very heterogeneous repertoire of naive B cells expressing primary BCRs is generated during B cell development by random rearrangement of V, D, and J segments of both H and L chains (1–4). Activation by T cell-dependent Ags can result in extrafollicular PC generation and formation of germinal centers (GCs). Within GCs, B cells undergo clonal expansion, somatic hypermutation, and selection as well as class switch recombination (5). These processes yield memory B cells with high-avidity BCRs and PCs secreting specific high-avidity Abs and ensure serological and reactive memory to protect the host during secondary challenge with potentially injurious foreign materials.

Upon rechallenge with T cell-dependent Ags, memory B cells can re-enter GCs and undergo further expansion and differentiation into PCs secreting high-avidity Abs, usually of the IgG or IgA H chain isotype, and secondary memory B cells with highly mutated Ig VH gene rearrangements. Whether the expanded population of memory B cells and PCs generated in secondary GCs are clonally related and the extent of proliferation of their precursors are currently not known.

The current study was, therefore, undertaken to address whether clonally related PCs and memory B cells emerge after antigenic rechallenge. The approach involved the simultaneous analysis of tetanus toxoid (TT)-specific PCs and memory B cells after secondary TT immunization in healthy individuals. This approach permitted the delineation of the timing of the generation of Ag-specific PCs and memory B cells. After single-cell sorting of both cell types and detailed molecular characterization of the rearranged VHDJHCα/γ/μ genes, clonal relationships of PCs and memory B cells were clearly identified. Moreover, detailed analysis of somatic hypermutation of IgVH genes of clonally related cells indicated that in some circumstances there was a remarkable degree of divergent base pair changes consistent with extensive proliferation and mutation after commitment to PC and secondary memory B cell differentiation. In other examples, memory B cells and PCs shared the same IgVH gene rearrangements and no additional mutations, consistent with immediate PC differentiation from memory B cells without activation of somatic hypermutation.

Materials and Methods

Immunization

Six healthy Caucasian individuals (five female, one male) with a mean age of 28 y (25–33 y) received a booster immunization against TT/diphtheria toxoid (20 I.E. TT and 2 I.E. diphtheria toxoid; Sanofi Pasteur MSD, Leimen, Germany) after informed consent had been obtained from the individual patients and after approval by the local ethics committee of the Charité University Medicine.

Cell preparation and staining

Peripheral blood was collected before and at various time points after immunization, and PBMCs were prepared by density gradient centrifugation using Ficoll-Paque Plus (GE Healthcare Bio-Science AB, Uppsala, Sweden) as reported previously (6). For single-cell sorting, B cells were enriched using a RosetteSep B cell enrichment kit according to the manufacturer's instructions (StemCell Technologies, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada).

For cytometric analyses, PBMCs were incubated at 4°C for 10 min with the following fluorochrome-labeled anti-human mAbs in PBS/0.2% BSA: anti-CD19–PerCP (SJ25C1; BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA), anti-CD27–Cy5 (clone 2E4; a kind gift from René van Lier, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands), anti-CD3–FITC (clone UCHT-1; Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany), anti-CD14–FITC (clone TM1; Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum). TT-specific B cells were identified by binding to PE-labeled TT, and the specificity of staining was confirmed by blocking using unconjugated TT (7).

For single-cell sorting, PBMCs were stained as described above using anti-CD3–Pacific blue, anti-CD14–Pacific blue (clone M5E2; BD Biosciences), anti-CD19–PECy7, anti-CD27–Cy5, anti-CD20–PerCP (clone L27; BD Biosciences) and digoxigenated recombinant C-fragment of tetanus toxin (rTT.C; Hoffmann-La Roche, Indianapolis, IN, conjugated to digoxigenin, Boehringer, Mannheim, Germany). This approach was employed because it consistently gave better separation of Ag-specific and nonspecific cells. After being washed with PBS/BSA, cells were incubated with anti-digoxigenin–FITC (Boehringer and Deutsches Rheumaforschungszentrum) at 4°C for 10 min. DAPI (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was added immediately before cytometric analysis or cell sorting to exclude dead cells.

Cytometric analyses, phenotyping, and cell enumeration

Cytometric analyses of TT-specific cells were performed for three donors (#1, #2, and #3) on days 0, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 14, and 20 and additionally for donor #2 on day 41 after vaccination. Flow cytometric data were analyzed using FlowJo software (Tree Star, Ashland, OR). Peripheral blood B cells were quantified as described previously using the TruCount system (BD Biosciences) (8). Absolute numbers of TT-specific PCs (CD19+, CD27++, CD3−, CD14−) and memory B cells (CD19+, CD27+, CD3−, CD14−) were then calculated.

Cell sorting and cDNA synthesis

Seven days after immunization single CD19+, CD27++, CD20−, CD3−, CD14−, rTT.C-specific PCs and 9 d after immunization single CD19+, CD27+, CD20+, CD3−, CD14−, rTT.C-specific memory B cells of three donors (#4, #5, and #6) were sorted into 96-well plates using a FACSAria (BD Biosciences). Each well contained a reaction mix as described elsewhere (9), and first strand cDNA was generated at 50°C for 60 min.

Nested PCR

Nested isotype-specific (IgA/IgG/IgM) PCRs were performed to amplify the rearranged VHDJHCα/γ/μ cDNAs, respectively. For external PCR, 5 μl of the amplified cDNA was used as template and a PCR mix as previously described (10). The cycle program consisted of 7 min at 95°C, 1 min at 50°C, 90 s at 72°C, followed by 50 cycles of 1 min at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C, 90 s at 72°C, and to finish 1 min at 94°C, 30 s at 50°C, 10 min 72°C. The internal PCR was performed in an identical manner, except for the annealing temperature, which was set to 58°C, and 5 μl of the reaction products from the external PCR was used as template.

The sequences of the isotype-specific 3′ primers are shown in Table I. For the family-specific external and internal 5′ primers, oligonucleotides were employed as described previously (11, 12).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I. Sequences of isotype-specific primers for nested PCR

Sequence analysis

PCR products were separated by agarose gel electrophoresis, visualized with ethidium bromide by exposure to UV light, cut out and purified using a QIAquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Products were sequenced at Eurofins MWG Operon (Martinsried, Germany). Sequences were analyzed using the Chromas 2.33 sequence viewer (Chromas Technelysim, Helensvale, Australia), the basic local alignment search tool algorithm of the National Center for Biotechnology Information (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov), and the software JOINSOLVER (http://joinsolver.niams.nih.gov) (13). Sequences containing a stop codon or an out-of-frame rearrangement were considered as nonproductive and excluded from the analysis. Genomatix (www. genomatix.de/cgi-bin/dialign/dialign.pl) (14) was used for alignments and homology analyses of the sequences. Phylograms were created using Phylogeny.fr (www.phylogeny.fr) (15).

Statistical analysis

Prism, version 4, for Windows (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA; www.graphpad.com) was used for statistical analyses. To determine significant differences in distributions of gene usage, replacement (R) to silent (S) mutations ratio, and mutational hotspots between rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells, the χ2 test was used. Additionally, Mann-Whitney U tests were performed to analyze CDR3 lengths and mutational rates. Dependence of mutation frequency on VH family was tested using one-way ANOVA. The p values ≤0.05 were considered to reflect a significant difference.

Statistical calculation of repertoire sizes

The theoretical repertoire size and the potential number of Ag-specific clones were calculated according to Behlke et al. (16) based on the obtained data. Therefore, the probability P(d) of observing d different gene rearrangements (i.e., distinct sequences) among a total number of r examined sequences for a fixed number n of different gene rearrangements is

Embedded Image(1)

where S(r,d) are Stirling’s numbers of the second kind. A 95% one-sided confidence of the estimates was calculated by determining the smallest value of n for which the probability of observing d different gene rearrangements among r examined sequences was <0.05.

Results

Different kinetics of TT-specific PCs and memory B cells after tetanus booster

Direct labeling of PBMCs with PE-conjugated TT was used to determine the kinetics of the appearance of TT-specific PCs and memory B cells in the blood of three healthy donors after secondary TT immunization. Simultaneous cytometric detection of TT-specific PCs (CD19+, CD27++) and memory B cells (CD19+, CD27+) was performed (Fig. 1A, donor #2), and their absolute cell numbers were calculated (Fig. 1B). Specificity of the staining was confirmed by blocking using unconjugated TT as reported previously (7).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Kinetics of TT-specific PCs and memory B cells in peripheral blood. A, Dot plots of cytometric analysis of PE-labeled TT-specific CD19+, CD27++, CD3−, CD14− PCs and CD19+, CD27+, CD3−, CD14− memory B cells of donor #2. B, Time course of appearance of PCs and memory B cells for each donor. Blue diamonds and orange squares indicate time points of blood analyses.

Before TT vaccination (day 0), a mean of 87 TT-specific PCs per milliliter (range 31–168) and a mean of 73 memory B cells per milliliter (range 31–122) were detected. After secondary immunization, the total number of TT-specific PCs and memory B cells increased. The kinetics of appearance of each TT-specific cell type was similar for all three donors analyzed. TT-specific PCs increased to an average of 5239 cells per milliliter (range 1037–13,493) on days 6–7, which approximates a 17- to 80-fold increase. In contrast, TT-specific memory B cells peaked on day 14 after secondary immunization with a maximum of 651 cells per milliliter (range 175–1486), approximating a 2- to 22-fold increase. In each donor, the increase in TT-specific memory B cells appeared delayed and had a consistently lower maximum peak compared with that of TT-specific PCs (3.5- to 9-fold difference).

Molecular analyses

The reproducible time shift in the maximal appearance of TT-specific memory B cells compared with that of PCs led to the question whether they were clonally related. To determine the relationship between these cell populations, single CD19+, CD27++, CD20−, CD3−, CD14−, rTT.C-specific PCs and single CD19+, CD27+, CD20+, CD3−, CD14−, rTT.C-specific memory B cells from three donors were sorted and analyzed for rearranged VHDJHCα/γ/μ genes after secondary immunization.

For donor #4, 77 productive sequences out of 96 sorted PCs (77/96) were obtained, and 1 sequence out of 10 sorted memory B cells (1/10) was obtained. For donor #5 30/34 PCs and 12/54 memory B cells and for donor #6 19/25 PCs and 7/26 memory B cells were obtained. Altogether, six nonproductive sequences were found and were not further included in the statistical analysis. Accordingly, 126 Ig VH sequences from PCs (recovery rate 81.3%) and 20 memory B cell-derived IgVH sequences (recovery rate 22.2%) were available for analyses.

Initially, the isotypes of the expressed Igs were determined by sequence comparison of the isotype-specific fragment with germline constant regions (basic local alignment search tool). Approximately 95% of rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells expressed the IgG isotype. The most commonly expressed subclass was IgG1 (116 cells out of 126 analyzed PCs, 18 cells out of 20 analyzed memory B cells), followed by IgG2 (5/126, 1/20), IgA1 (2/126, 1/20), IgG4 (2/126, 0/20), and IgM (1/126, 0/20). The subclasses IgG3 and IgA2 were not found among the sequences analyzed. No significant difference was found in the distribution of IgH isotypes between rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells.

Next, all of the sequences were analyzed with regard to their VH and JH gene segment usage, CDR3 length, and sequence as well as the frequency and distribution of somatic hypermutations. Clonally related sequences from each donor were found. From donor #4, 44 clonally related PC sequences out of 77 analyzed were found, whereas in donor #5 8 out of 30 and in donor #6 5 out of 19 analyzed PC sequences were found. Among the memory B cells two clonally related sequences were found (donor #6). Thus, clonally related cells with the same VHDJH rearrangements and CDR3 sequences were routinely found.

Comparable usage of VH and JH gene segments in rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells

To determine the individual gene segments employed by VHDJH rearrangements, the closest germline gene segments were identified using JOINSOLVER and the Kabat et al. (17) database. For this analysis, only clonally unrelated sequences were used (69 from PCs, 19 from memory B cells), whereas clonally related cells were considered in the molecular analyses as one cell (separately for each cell population). The distributions of the VH gene segments and JH gene segments by rTT.C-specific PC and memory B cell sequences are shown in Fig. 2. Except for VH6 and VH7, gene segments of all VH and JH families were found. VH4 was expressed most frequently by PCs (29/69), followed by VH3 (21/69), VH1 (7/69), VH2 (7/69), and VH5 (5/69). In memory B cells, VH3 (7/19) was the most frequently expressed VH family, followed by VH4 (5/19), VH1 (4/19), VH5 (2/19), and VH2 (1/19) (Fig. 2A).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Similar distributions of VH and JH family usage by rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells of three donors after tetanus booster. A, Distribution of VH family usage. B, Distribution of JH family usage. PCs were collected 7 d after tetanus immunization, and memory B cells were collected 9 d after tetanus immunization. Pooled results from three donors are shown. No significant differences were observed (χ2 test) in the VH and JH family usage between PCs and memory B cells.

Analysis of the JH gene segment usage revealed that JH4 was used most frequently by PCs (29/69), followed by JH5 (17/69), JH3 (11/69), JH6 (10/69), and JH1 (2/69). In memory B cells, JH4 (8/19) was also used most frequently, followed by JH3 (5/19), JH5 (4/19), JH2 (1/19), and JH6 (1/19) (Fig. 2B). Of note, no significant difference was found in the distribution of VH and JH family usage between rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells.

Similar distribution of CDR3 lengths in rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells

CDR3 lengths (Fig. 3A) and CDR3 sequences (data not shown) critically involved in Ag recognition by epitope binding were further analyzed in detail. In rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells, the respective CDR3s comprised 30–69 bp, whereas maxima of occurrence were found at 30 and 45 bp in both populations.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

CDR3 lengths and mutation frequencies of rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells. A, Distribution of CDR3 length. Frequencies refer to absolute numbers of analyzed PCs and respective memory B cells. B, Scatter plot of mutation frequencies. The bar indicates the median. No significant differences were observed (χ2 test, Mann-Whitney U test) between PCs and memory B cells in both parameters. Clonally related cells were counted only once.

Similar frequency and distribution of somatic hypermutations

The frequency and characteristics of somatic hypermutations in rearranged VH gene segments were analyzed using JOINSOLVER. Mutation frequencies ranged between 0 and 18.2% (median 9.65%) in PCs and between 2.2 and 20.3% (median 9.61%) in memory B cells (Fig. 3B). Of note, the mutation frequencies were independent of the individual VH family used (one-way ANOVA).

An important characteristic of affinity maturation in B cells is the enhanced R/S ratio of R to S mutations within the expressed VH gene segment. In CDRs as well as framework regions (FRs), more R than S mutations were found. Some sequences lacked S mutations, especially in the CDRs, and therefore, the R/S ratio was calculated using the accumulated number of R and S mutations. The R/S ratios within CDRs were increased (3.6 in PCs and 3.7 memory B cells) compared with those in FRs (1.5 and 1.6). Analysis of R/S ratios of additional accumulated mutations within trees of clonally related PCs and memory B cells (Fig. 4B, clones a, b, d, g) revealed a lower R/S ratio of 1.2 within CDRs and a ratio of 1.7 within FRs.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Relationship between rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells. A, Phylogram of the relationship between rTT.C-specific PCs (blue) and memory B cells (orange) of one donor (donor #6). Clonally related cells (same VHDJH recombination and same CDR3 nucleotide sequence [data not shown]) are boxed by a green rectangle. Clones a, b, and c are clusters of clonally related cells containing both PCs and memory B cells, which are further analyzed in B. The table gives further specifications for each cell including the amino acid sequence of each respective CDR3. The phylogram was created using Phylogeny.fr (accessed July 20, 2009). B, Schematic mutation trees showing memory B cells with their clonally related PCs (donors #4, #5, and #6). Blue circles indicate found PC sequences, and orange circles found memory B cell sequences. Gray circles denote hypothetical intermediate sequences (cells) that are not found but have mutations that are shared by all subsequent sequences (cells). Numbers in branches indicate the numbers of mutations to the next node. Clones a, b, and c (donor #6) represent schematic trees of clonally related cells that are derived from the phylogram in A. Clones a, b, d, and g were further analyzed for their additional mutations (i.e., additional accumulated mutations not yet present in the predicted precursors).

Of note, the mutational machinery targets mutations into specific RGYW/WRCY motifs on both DNA strands. Accordingly, 55% of the mutations found in PCs occurred within a mutation hotspot (RGYW or WRCY) (18), whereas 49% of mutations were identified within these motifs in sequences obtained from memory B cells (p = 0.0213, χ2 test). Interestingly, the observed frequencies were ∼2-fold higher than expected (18).

Sequence alignments of PCs and memory B cells disclosed clonal relationships

To determine the relationship between rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells for each donor, all of the sequences (VHDJH region) were aligned. In all three donors, clonally related PCs and memory B cells based on the same VH and JH gene segment usage and CDR3 sequence were found. The phylogram in Fig. 4A illustrates the clonal relationships for donor #6.

For 8 out of 20 rTT.C-specific memory B cells, clonally related PCs were found (1–3 PCs). Within a family of clonally related cells, the sequence homology ranged between 87 and 100%. In one case, two clonally related memory B cells were present (sequence homology 88%), and 21 groups of clonally related PCs (2–14 cells) were found. Within families of clonally related cells, detailed analysis of sequences revealed that these cells shared a number of mutations but often also expressed additional base pair changes (Fig. 4B). For example, one clonal tree from donor #6 (clone b) showed that clonally related PCs and memory B cells had as many as 18 and 17 different base pair changes. Similarly, clonally related memory B cells and PCs from donor #5 (clone d) had as many as 27 different mutations. In both circumstances, the differences related to the acquisition of new mutations by both rTT.C-specific memory B cells and PCs. In two clones from donor #5 (clones e and f), no additional mutations were found in memory B cells and PCs. It is notable that in these clones a large number of mutations (23 and 22) were likely to have occurred in the common precursor. Notably, no cell with the same or related sequence was found in any two of the three donors. Finally, the IgVH rearrangement sequences of clonally related memory cells and PCs were identical with those of their presumed precursor in three examples of donor #1 (clone c) and #2 (clones e and f) (Fig. 4B), whereas in all three donors continuous acquisition of mutations within memory cells and PCs was identified (clones a, b, d, and g).

Statistical analysis of repertoire sizes

As shown in the analyses described above, for each donor the number of different VHDJH rearrangements (i.e., sequences) was lower than the total number of analyzed sequences. Accordingly, for donor #4, 33 unequal PC sequences out of 77 analyzed PC were obtained, for donor #5 22 out of 30, and for donor #6 14 out of 19. On the basis of this data, the theoretical statistical repertoire size specific against TT was calculated. For this calculation, it was assumed that no significant skewing of the data set by nonrandom gene segment usage occurred as described elsewhere (16).

For each donor, the statistical/theoretical rTT.C-specific repertoire size (i.e., theoretical number of all rTT.C-specific distinct rearrangements) has been calculated from the number of examined sequences and the number of different rearrangements observed. This analysis revealed a 95% one-sided confidence bound n for each donor by determining the smallest value of n for which the probability of observing at most d different sequences among r total examined sequences was <0.05. Thus, n is the theoretical statistical calculated quantity of different clones within one individual to ensure (with a 95% confidence) the empirical found numbers of observed distinct sequences among all of the examined sequences. As a result and by application of this equation, the statistical estimated repertoire size n for donor #4 was 44, for donor #5 79, and for donor #6 64, which appeared to be remarkably similar between the different individuals.

Discussion

The differentiation pathway of memory B cells after secondary immunization is not well understood. For the first time, to the best of our knowledge, molecular characteristics of both tetanus-specific human PCs and memory B cells after secondary immunization have been analyzed within the same donors. PCs and memory B cells having identical CDR3 sequences were identified in the blood, clearly indicating that precursors of secondary memory B cells and PCs are clonally related. The observation that some of the clones have divergent patterns of somatic hypermutation suggests that memory B cell precursors of both secondary memory B cells and PCs mainly continue to divide and undergo further rounds of somatic hypermutation after the decision to differentiate into one or the other has been completed. Although this represents a new alternative, other clones of memory B cells and PCs carrying the very same IgVH gene sequences with no additional mutations were also found, consistent with the conclusion that they were induced simultaneously out of their precursor cells without activation of somatic hypermutation.

Kinetics

To investigate the kinetics and magnitude of the human PC and memory B cell response after TT booster, absolute numbers of these two cell populations were determined in the peripheral blood. The maximum of TT-specific PC and memory B cell numbers were observed on day 7 and day 14, respectively, after secondary immunization. This is in concordance with previous studies monitoring immune responses after TT (7, 19) or influenza immunization (20, 21). In these studies, peaks of Ag-specific PCs and memory B cells could be observed on days 6–8 and 14–28, respectively. Furthermore, the smaller absolute number of memory B cells compared with PCs (3.5- to 9-fold) is consistent with results of a previous study (10-fold) (7). At the peak of the response, TT-specific PCs represented ∼13% of the total CD19+/CD27++ population (data not shown). Moreover, these cells were both Ki-67+ and HLA-DRhigh, marking them as plasmablasts recently generated from proliferating precursors (7, 20). The distinct kinetics of rapid detection of increased numbers of Ag-specific PCs and delayed occurrence of increases in memory B cell numbers suggest either a difference in the timing of their generation or a dichotomy in the expression or function of adhesion molecules, chemokine receptors, or other molecules involved in their migration and/or tissue localization. In this regard, in mice and humans, it has been shown that PCs lack CXCR5 expression or express it at marginal levels (22, 23). CXCR5 is important for follicular localization (24) and essential for homing to secondary lymphoid tissues (25). Thus, PCs may have decreased migratory capacities toward the follicles in lymph nodes or spleen. Memory B cells still express CXCR5, and their egress from GCs apparently is differently regulated (24).

Molecular analyses

To determine the relationship between rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells, comprehensive molecular analyses of single sorted cells were performed. The analyses of rTT.C-specific PCs revealed that ∼95% of these cells expressed the IgG H chain isotype, suggesting their origin from T cell-dependent memory B cell activation. This is in line with previous reports in which >90% of tetanus-fragment C+ PCs produced IgG (19). In addition, influenza-vaccine–specific Ab-secreting cells were reported to secrete mainly IgG (20). In contrast, most of the human peripheral blood PCs in the steady state expressed intracellular IgA (8), likely being induced in the gut instructed under the influence of the IgA switch factors, TGF-β and a proliferation-inducing ligand (26, 27).

The VH and JH family usage of rTT.C-specific PCs showed no statistical difference among the three analyzed donors. This is in contrast to a previous study that reported an extensive diversity in the TT-specific repertoires from different subjects (28). However, when the rTT.C-specific VH and JH family usage was compared with a previously reported unselected repertoire from peripheral IgM+ B cells (29), a significant difference (p < 0.0001, χ2 test) was found, presumably as a result of selection, suggesting the possibility that elements of both VH and JH segments might contribute to Ag specificity.

Notably, rTT.C-specific PCs had highly mutated VH gene rearrangements (a mean of ∼20.5 mutations), comparable to other reports of the highly mutated nature of the Ig VH genes of Ag-specific PCs (mean of 18–19 mutations) (20). On the basis of the very high frequency of mutations and the development of increased numbers of circulating PCs 6–7 d after secondary immunization, it can be assumed that pre-existing memory B cells and not naive B cells were the major precursor of the PCs analyzed. On the basis of the previous estimate of the mutation rate as one mutation per 1000 bp per cell division (30), it would require more than 90 cell divisions to result in a mean of 20 mutations per 210 bp of analyzed VH region. Such a scenario appears to be unlikely within a 6–7 d period because the minimal cell cycle length of GC B cells ranges between 6 (31) and 12 h (32). Consistent with this, a previous study showed that after primary immunization of mice Ag-specific GC-derived B cells in the peripheral blood 7 d later exhibited a mean mutation frequency of 0.1%. By 10 d, this had increased to 1.2%, and even on day 28 after primary immunization the mutation frequency was <5% (33). These results are, therefore, most consistent with the conclusion that the rTT.C-specific PCs are the progeny of previously mutated memory B cells.

Additionally, the data also suggest that the immediate precursors of these memory B cell-derived PCs retain the capacity to undergo further somatic hypermutation. Whether the capacity to undergo additional somatic hypermutation contributes to further avidity maturation is currently unknown. The presence of additional mutations implies that PC precursors may continue to mutate and proliferate. The finding that the PCs induced by secondary immunization with TT are Ki-67+ is consistent with this conclusion (8). Finally, the observation that both rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells have acquired unique mutations indicates that each committed precursor retained the capacity to mutate and proliferate after the decision to become either effector cell type had been made. Of interest, the finding that clonally related rTT.C-specific memory B cells and PCs have different mutational patterns suggests that they may not have the exact same Ag binding characteristics.

High R/S ratios were demonstrated in the memory B cell and PC VH sequences and indicate a preference of R mutations within the CDRs. This is considered to be an indication of affinity maturation and antigenic selection (19), although the general tendency of the mutational machinery to introduce R mutations in the CDRs of VH segments makes this contention uncertain (34). Intriguingly, a 3-fold reduced R/S ratio (1.2) was detected within CDRs compared with the R/S ratio within CDRs (∼3.6) for all mutations when the R/S ratio of additional mutations accumulated uniquely within clonally related PCs and memory B cells was analyzed. This is consistent with the hypothesis that the cells analyzed in this study were derived from already existent memory B cells with high-affinity BCRs. Additional activity of the mutation machinery is unlikely to increase avidity greatly but also carries the risk of inducing nonsense mutations leading to a loss of the B cell from the repertoire (34). The accumulated mutations within RGYW/WRCY motifs were much greater than expected from random chance and are consistent with T cell-dependent and CD40- and CD154-mediated responses, because targeting of mutations into RGYW/WRCY motifs is deficient in CD154-deficient subjects (35). Taken together, the mutational data imply that the base pair changes found in both secondary memory B cells and PCs arose from T cell-dependent responses and perhaps reflect avidity maturation.

rTT.C-specific memory B cells did not differ significantly from the rTT.C-specific PCs regarding their VH and JH family usage, CDR3 lengths, mutation frequencies, and R/S ratios. Thus, most of the rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells may have passed through a similar microenvironment in the GC. Moreover, the evidence indicates that PCs and secondary memory B cells can arise from the same memory B cell precursor. In support of this conclusion, a phylogram identified clonally related PCs and memory B cells within all three donors. Because of the random rearrangement of gene segments (VH, D, and JH) and the activity of exonuclease and terminal desoxynucleotidyl transferase activity editing the junctional regions of the segments, a theoretically infinite number of possible BCR sequences can be produced. Therefore, the probability of finding independently developed B cells with identical BCR sequences is highly unlikely. Consistent with this conclusion, no sequences with the same VHDJH recombination were found among the three individual donors. However, the study identified clonally related rTT.C-specific PCs and memory B cells within each donor, suggesting that these cells descended from a common precursor even though they appeared in the peripheral blood at different time points. Because the clonally related memory B cells and PCs shared a number of common mutations, it is highly likely that both originated from previously mutated memory B cell precursors. In this context, the theoretical rTT.C-specific repertoire size was estimated. As a result, the calculated rTT.C-specific repertoire sizes ranged between 44 and 79 different clones among the three donors. This is comparable to a previous study where the TT-specific repertoire was estimated to be on the order of 100 distinct B cell clones using different detection methods (28). However, the actual repertoire sizes might be slightly larger than estimated by the statistical calculation, because rTT.C contains only ∼50% of the TT epitopes.

As discussed above, the timing of the appearance of secondary memory B cells and PCs in the blood makes their origin from naive B cells unlikely. Although some examples of clonally related cells with identical sequences support the classical view that memory B cells and PCs are induced from memory B cells without additional somatic hypermutation, it is important to emphasize that in other examples both rTT.C-specific memory B cell and PC clones expressed independent mutations in all three donors, suggesting the possibility that each cell maintained the capacity to proliferate and mutate after a fate decision had been made to mature into either of the effector B cell types. Finally, it should be noted that it is possible that the commitment to differentiate into a secondary memory B cell or a PC did not occur in response to the secondary immunization but rather had occurred during a previous antigenic exposure. Although the current data do not address that possibility, it is important to realize that in either scenario memory B cell precursors of secondary memory B cells and PCs would be required to proliferate and mutate after a fate decision concerning further differentiation had been made.

Accordingly, an alternative hypothetical model compared with that of Liu et al. (36) can be proposed (Fig. 5) in which resting memory B cells that divide rarely in the context of self renewing (37–39) are induced to undergo rapid clonal expansion in response to Ag activation. Some of these cells rapidly differentiate into PCs and memory B cells with no further somatic hypermutation. Others have the capacity to enter a GC to undergo further proliferation and somatic hypermutation. At some point during the GC reaction, a fate decision is made concerning subsequent differentiation into secondary memory B cells or PCs. After this decision, the committed precursors continue to proliferate and mutate their Ig VH genes. Expression of master regulatory genes, such as BLIMP-1, determines this decision, probably influenced by both Ag avidity and density, and the impact of T cells helps, including CD40 and IL-21 signaling (40–42).

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Schematic model for the generation of Ag-specific PCs and memory B cells after booster. Ag-specific memory B cells (A), generated during previous Ag challenges, become rapid proliferating cells (B) upon activation. These can either directly undergo differentiation into PCs (C) or secondary memory B cells (D) sharing identical sequences or enter into GCs. Here, after the fate decision between secondary memory B cells and PCs, committed GC B cells undergo further proliferation and somatic hypermutation. Eventually high-affinity PCs (E) and secondary memory B cells (F) differing in their mutational patterns are released from the GC.

Acknowledgments

We thank T. Kaiser and K. Raba for excellent assistance with cell sorting.

Disclosures The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Projects Do491/7-1,2 and DO 491/5-4 and Sonderforschungsbereich 650 Project TP16.

  • Abbreviations used in this paper:

    FR
    framework
    GC
    germinal center
    PC
    plasma cell
    R
    replacement
    rTT.C
    recombinant tetanus toxoid C fragment
    S
    silent
    TT
    tetanus toxoid.

  • Received March 22, 2010.
  • Accepted June 23, 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Ollila J.,
    2. M. Vihinen
    . 2005. B cells. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 37: 518–523.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Rajewsky K.
    1996. Clonal selection and learning in the antibody system. Nature 381: 751–758.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Grawunder U.,
    2. R. B. West,
    3. M. R. Lieber
    . 1998. Antigen receptor gene rearrangement. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10: 172–180.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Jung D.,
    2. F. W. Alt
    . 2004. Unraveling V(D)J recombination; insights into gene regulation. Cell 116: 299–311.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Klein U.,
    2. R. Dalla-Favera
    . 2008. Germinal centres: role in B-cell physiology and malignancy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8: 22–33.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Odendahl M.,
    2. A. Jacobi,
    3. A. Hansen,
    4. E. Feist,
    5. F. Hiepe,
    6. G. R. Burmester,
    7. P. E. Lipsky,
    8. A. Radbruch,
    9. T. Dörner
    . 2000. Disturbed peripheral B lymphocyte homeostasis in systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Immunol. 165: 5970–5979.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Odendahl M.,
    2. H. Mei,
    3. B. F. Hoyer,
    4. A. M. Jacobi,
    5. A. Hansen,
    6. G. Muehlinghaus,
    7. C. Berek,
    8. F. Hiepe,
    9. R. Manz,
    10. A. Radbruch,
    11. T. Dörner
    . 2005. Generation of migratory antigen-specific plasma blasts and mobilization of resident plasma cells in a secondary immune response. Blood 105: 1614–1621.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. Mei H. E.,
    2. T. Yoshida,
    3. W. Sime,
    4. F. Hiepe,
    5. K. Thiele,
    6. R. A. Manz,
    7. A. Radbruch,
    8. T. Dörner
    . 2009. Blood-borne human plasma cells in steady state are derived from mucosal immune responses. Blood 113: 2461–2469.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. Hansen A.,
    2. K. Reiter,
    3. T. Dörner,
    4. A. Pruss
    . 2005. Cryopreserved human B cells as an alternative source for single cell mRNA analysis. Cell Tissue Bank. 6: 299–308.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Foster S. J.,
    2. H. P. Brezinschek,
    3. R. I. Brezinschek,
    4. P. E. Lipsky
    . 1997. Molecular mechanisms and selective influences that shape the kappa gene repertoire of IgM+ B cells. J. Clin. Invest. 99: 1614–1627.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    1. Campbell M. J.,
    2. A. D. Zelenetz,
    3. S. Levy,
    4. R. Levy
    . 1992. Use of family specific leader region primers for PCR amplification of the human heavy chain variable region gene repertoire. Mol. Immunol. 29: 193–203.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Marks J. D.,
    2. M. Tristem,
    3. A. Karpas,
    4. G. Winter
    . 1991. Oligonucleotide primers for polymerase chain reaction amplification of human immunoglobulin variable genes and design of family-specific oligonucleotide probes. Eur. J. Immunol. 21: 985–991.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    1. Souto-Carneiro M. M.,
    2. N. S. Longo,
    3. D. E. Russ,
    4. H. W. Sun,
    5. P. E. Lipsky
    . 2004. Characterization of the human Ig heavy chain antigen binding complementarity determining region 3 using a newly developed software algorithm, JOINSOLVER. J. Immunol. 172: 6790–6802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    1. Morgenstern B.,
    2. A. Dress,
    3. T. Werner
    . 1996. Multiple DNA and protein sequence alignment based on segment-to-segment comparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12098–12103.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Dereeper A.,
    2. V. Guignon,
    3. G. Blanc,
    4. S. Audic,
    5. S. Buffet,
    6. F. Chevenet,
    7. J. F. Dufayard,
    8. S. Guindon,
    9. V. Lefort,
    10. M. Lescot,
    11. et al
    . 2008. Phylogeny.fr: robust phylogenetic analysis for the non-specialist. Nucleic Acids Res. 36(Web Server issue): W465–W469.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Behlke M. A.,
    2. D. G. Spinella,
    3. H. S. Chou,
    4. W. Sha,
    5. D. L. Hartl,
    6. D. Y. Loh
    . 1985. T-cell receptor beta-chain expression: dependence on relatively few variable region genes. Science 229: 566–570.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Kabat E. A.,
    2. T. T. Wu,
    3. H. M. Perry,
    4. K. S. Gottesman,
    5. C. Foeller
    . 1991. Sequences of Proteins of Immunological Interest, 5th Ed. Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health, Washington, DC.
  16. ↵
    1. Rogozin I. B.,
    2. N. A. Kolchanov
    . 1992. Somatic hypermutagenesis in immunoglobulin genes. II. Influence of neighbouring base sequences on mutagenesis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1171: 11–18.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  17. ↵
    1. González-García I.,
    2. B. Rodríguez-Bayona,
    3. F. Mora-López,
    4. A. Campos-Caro,
    5. J. A. Brieva
    . 2008. Increased survival is a selective feature of human circulating antigen-induced plasma cells synthesizing high-affinity antibodies. Blood 111: 741–749.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Wrammert J.,
    2. K. Smith,
    3. J. Miller,
    4. W. A. Langley,
    5. K. Kokko,
    6. C. Larsen,
    7. N. Y. Zheng,
    8. I. Mays,
    9. L. Garman,
    10. C. Helms,
    11. et al
    . 2008. Rapid cloning of high-affinity human monoclonal antibodies against influenza virus. Nature 453: 667–671.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    1. Pinna D.,
    2. D. Corti,
    3. D. Jarrossay,
    4. F. Sallusto,
    5. A. Lanzavecchia
    . 2009. Clonal dissection of the human memory B-cell repertoire following infection and vaccination. Eur. J. Immunol. 39: 1260–1270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Medina F.,
    2. C. Segundo,
    3. A. Campos-Caro,
    4. I. González-García,
    5. J. A. Brieva
    . 2002. The heterogeneity shown by human plasma cells from tonsil, blood, and bone marrow reveals graded stages of increasing maturity, but local profiles of adhesion molecule expression. Blood 99: 2154–2161.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    1. Nakayama T.,
    2. K. Hieshima,
    3. D. Izawa,
    4. Y. Tatsumi,
    5. A. Kanamaru,
    6. O. Yoshie
    . 2003. Cutting edge: profile of chemokine receptor expression on human plasma cells accounts for their efficient recruitment to target tissues. J. Immunol. 170: 1136–1140.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    1. Wehrli N.,
    2. D. F. Legler,
    3. D. Finke,
    4. K. M. Toellner,
    5. P. Loetscher,
    6. M. Baggiolini,
    7. I. C. MacLennan,
    8. H. Acha-Orbea
    . 2001. Changing responsiveness to chemokines allows medullary plasmablasts to leave lymph nodes. Eur. J. Immunol. 31: 609–616.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    1. Förster R.,
    2. A. E. Mattis,
    3. E. Kremmer,
    4. E. Wolf,
    5. G. Brem,
    6. M. Lipp
    . 1996. A putative chemokine receptor, BLR1, directs B cell migration to defined lymphoid organs and specific anatomic compartments of the spleen. Cell 87: 1037–1047.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Stavnezer J.,
    2. J. Kang
    . 2009. The surprising discovery that TGF beta specifically induces the IgA class switch. J. Immunol. 182: 5–7.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. He B.,
    2. W. Xu,
    3. P. A. Santini,
    4. A. D. Polydorides,
    5. A. Chiu,
    6. J. Estrella,
    7. M. Shan,
    8. A. Chadburn,
    9. V. Villanacci,
    10. A. Plebani,
    11. et al
    . 2007. Intestinal bacteria trigger T cell-independent immunoglobulin A(2) class switching by inducing epithelial-cell secretion of the cytokine APRIL. Immunity 26: 812–826.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Poulsen T. R.,
    2. P. J. Meijer,
    3. A. Jensen,
    4. L. S. Nielsen,
    5. P. S. Andersen
    . 2007. Kinetic, affinity, and diversity limits of human polyclonal antibody responses against tetanus toxoid. J. Immunol. 179: 3841–3850.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Brezinschek H. P.,
    2. S. J. Foster,
    3. R. I. Brezinschek,
    4. T. Dörner,
    5. R. Domiati-Saad,
    6. P. E. Lipsky
    . 1997. Analysis of the human VH gene repertoire. Differential effects of selection and somatic hypermutation on human peripheral CD5(+)/IgM+ and CD5(-)/IgM+ B cells. J. Clin. Invest. 99: 2488–2501.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. McKean D.,
    2. K. Huppi,
    3. M. Bell,
    4. L. Staudt,
    5. W. Gerhard,
    6. M. Weigert
    . 1984. Generation of antibody diversity in the immune response of BALB/c mice to influenza virus hemagglutinin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81: 3180–3184.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Zhang J.,
    2. I. C. MacLennan,
    3. Y. J. Liu,
    4. P. J. Lane
    . 1988. Is rapid proliferation in B centroblasts linked to somatic mutation in memory B cell clones? Immunol. Lett. 18: 297–299.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Allen C. D.,
    2. T. Okada,
    3. H. L. Tang,
    4. J. G. Cyster
    . 2007. Imaging of germinal center selection events during affinity maturation. Science 315: 528–531.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Blink E. J.,
    2. A. Light,
    3. A. Kallies,
    4. S. L. Nutt,
    5. P. D. Hodgkin,
    6. D. M. Tarlinton
    . 2005. Early appearance of germinal center-derived memory B cells and plasma cells in blood after primary immunization. J. Exp. Med. 201: 545–554.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    1. Dörner T.,
    2. H. P. Brezinschek,
    3. R. I. Brezinschek,
    4. S. J. Foster,
    5. R. Domiati-Saad,
    6. P. E. Lipsky
    . 1997. Analysis of the frequency and pattern of somatic mutations within nonproductively rearranged human variable heavy chain genes. J. Immunol. 158: 2779–2789.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  33. ↵
    1. Longo N. S.,
    2. P. L. Lugar,
    3. S. Yavuz,
    4. W. Zhang,
    5. P. H. Krijger,
    6. D. E. Russ,
    7. D. D. Jima,
    8. S. S. Dave,
    9. A. C. Grammer,
    10. P. E. Lipsky
    . 2009. Analysis of somatic hypermutation in X-linked hyper-IgM syndrome shows specific deficiencies in mutational targeting. Blood 113: 3706–3715.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Liu Y. J.,
    2. J. Banchereau
    . 1997. Regulation of B-cell commitment to plasma cells or to memory B cells. Semin. Immunol. 9: 235–240.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Lanzavecchia A.,
    2. N. Bernasconi,
    3. E. Traggiai,
    4. C. R. Ruprecht,
    5. D. Corti,
    6. F. Sallusto
    . 2006. Understanding and making use of human memory B cells. Immunol. Rev. 211: 303–309.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Luckey C. J.,
    2. D. Bhattacharya,
    3. A. W. Goldrath,
    4. I. L. Weissman,
    5. C. Benoist,
    6. D. Mathis
    . 2006. Memory T and memory B cells share a transcriptional program of self-renewal with long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103: 3304–3309.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    1. Schmidlin H.,
    2. S. A. Diehl,
    3. B. Blom
    . 2009. New insights into the regulation of human B-cell differentiation. Trends Immunol. 30: 277–285.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Ozaki K.,
    2. R. Spolski,
    3. R. Ettinger,
    4. H. P. Kim,
    5. G. Wang,
    6. C. F. Qi,
    7. P. Hwu,
    8. D. J. Shaffer,
    9. S. Akilesh,
    10. D. C. Roopenian,
    11. et al
    . 2004. Regulation of B cell differentiation and plasma cell generation by IL-21, a novel inducer of Blimp-1 and Bcl-6. J. Immunol. 173: 5361–5371.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Ettinger R.,
    2. G. P. Sims,
    3. A. M. Fairhurst,
    4. R. Robbins,
    5. Y. S. da Silva,
    6. R. Spolski,
    7. W. J. Leonard,
    8. P. E. Lipsky
    . 2005. IL-21 induces differentiation of human naive and memory B cells into antibody-secreting plasma cells. J. Immunol. 175: 7867–7879.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    1. Bryant V. L.,
    2. C. S. Ma,
    3. D. T. Avery,
    4. Y. Li,
    5. K. L. Good,
    6. L. M. Corcoran,
    7. R. de Waal Malefyt,
    8. S. G. Tangye
    . 2007. Cytokine-mediated regulation of human B cell differentiation into Ig-secreting cells: predominant role of IL-21 produced by CXCR5+ T follicular helper cells. J. Immunol. 179: 8180–8190.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Thoree V. C.,
    2. S. J. Golby,
    3. L. Boursier,
    4. M. Hackett,
    5. D. K. Dunn-Walters,
    6. J. D. Sanderson,
    7. J. Spencer
    . 2002. Related IgA1 and IgG producing cells in blood and diseased mucosa in ulcerative colitis. Gut 51: 44–50.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Yavuz S.,
    2. A. C. Grammer,
    3. A. S. Yavuz,
    4. T. Nanki,
    5. P. E. Lipsky
    . 2001. Comparative characteristics of mu chain and alpha chain transcripts expressed by individual tonsil plasma cells. Mol. Immunol. 38: 19–34.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 185 (5)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 185, Issue 5
1 Sep 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Secondary Immunization Generates Clonally Related Antigen-Specific Plasma Cells and Memory B Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Secondary Immunization Generates Clonally Related Antigen-Specific Plasma Cells and Memory B Cells
Daniela Frölich, Claudia Giesecke, Henrik E. Mei, Karin Reiter, Capucine Daridon, Peter E. Lipsky, Thomas Dörner
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2010, 185 (5) 3103-3110; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000911

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Secondary Immunization Generates Clonally Related Antigen-Specific Plasma Cells and Memory B Cells
Daniela Frölich, Claudia Giesecke, Henrik E. Mei, Karin Reiter, Capucine Daridon, Peter E. Lipsky, Thomas Dörner
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2010, 185 (5) 3103-3110; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1000911
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Differential Susceptibility to Staphylococcal Superantigen (SsAg)-Induced Apoptosis of CD4+ T Cells from Atopic Dermatitis Patients and Healthy Subjects: The Inhibitory Effect of IL-4 on SsAg-Induced Apoptosis
  • HIV-1 Vaccination Administered Intramuscularly Can Induce Both Systemic and Mucosal T Cell Immunity in HIV-1-Uninfected Individuals
  • Osteopontin (Eta-1) and Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Cross-Talk in Angiogenesis
Show more CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606