Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Metabolic Shifts in Immunity and Inflammation

Douglas J. Kominsky, Eric L. Campbell and Sean P. Colgan
J Immunol April 15, 2010, 184 (8) 4062-4068; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903002
Douglas J. Kominsky
*Department of Anesthesiology,
†Mucosal Inflammation Program, University of Colorado Denver Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eric L. Campbell
†Mucosal Inflammation Program, University of Colorado Denver Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045
‡Department of Medicine, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sean P. Colgan
†Mucosal Inflammation Program, University of Colorado Denver Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO 80045
‡Department of Medicine, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Sites of ongoing inflammation and triggered immune responses are characterized by significant changes in metabolic activity. Recent studies have indicated that such shifts in tissue metabolism result from a combination of profound recruitment of inflammatory cells (neutrophils and monocytes) and high proliferation rates among lymphocyte populations. The resultant shifts in energy supply and demand can result in metabolic acidosis and diminished delivery and/or availability of oxygen, leading to hypoxia extensive enough to trigger transcriptional and translation changes in tissue phenotype. Such phenotypic shifts can imprint fundamental changes to tissue metabolism. In this study, we review recent work addressing metabolic changes and metabolic control of inflammation and immunity.

Ongoing inflammatory and immune responses are associated with dramatic shifts in tissue metabolism. These changes include local depletion of nutrients, increased oxygen consumption, and the generation of large quantities of reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates (1). Such shifts in tissue metabolism result, at least in part, from profound recruitment of inflammatory cell types, particularly myeloid cells, such as neutrophils (polymorphonuclear leukocytes [PMNs]) and monocytes. The vast majority of inflammatory cells are recruited to, as opposed to resident at, inflammatory lesions (2). By stark contrast, adaptive immune responses are characterized by high rates of local T and B cell proliferation and have significantly different metabolic demands (3, 4). In this review, it is important to understand the interactions between microenvironmental metabolic changes (e.g., glucose, oxygen, ATP) as they relate to metabolic triggers and molecular mechanisms immune cell recruitment/activation into these areas (summarized in Table I). Importantly, it is imperative to define whether mechanisms initiated by such metabolic shifts might serve as important therapeutic targets.

Energy metabolism in inflammation and immune responses

One of the fundamental differences between the inflammatory response and the immune response is the means by which leukocytes obtain energy. Cells of myeloid lineages derive their energy almost exclusively from glycolysis, whereas lymphocytes use predominantly oxidative phosphorylation (3, 5). In part, these differences shape the appropriateness of the immune response. For example, evidence in recent years indicates that the abilities of lymphocytes to proliferate and quiesce are strictly controlled by essential metabolites that support anabolic growth (3).

As opposed to lymphocytes that proliferate within tissues, myeloid cells, such as PMNs (neutrophils), macrophages, and dendritic cells, are recruited to sites of inflammation during immune responses. In transit, these cells expend tremendous amounts of energy. Cell migration, for example, requires large amounts of actin turnover, and, by its nature, is particularly ATP demanding (6). Once at sites of inflammation, nutrient, energy, and oxygen demands increase to accomplish processes of phagocytosis and microbial killing. It has long been known that PMNs are primarily glycolytic cells, have few mitochondria, and produce little energy from respiration (7). It is thought predominantly glycolytic metabolism ensures that PMNs can function at low oxygen concentrations (even anoxia) associated with deep inflammatory lesions. In this regard, recent studies have revealed that PMNs have unique mitochondrial properties, namely that the mitochondria maintain a transmembrane potential via the glycerol-3-phosphate shuttle, which functions to regulate aerobic glycolysis as opposed to producing energy (5). This unique mitochondrial phenotype appears to develop along the differentiation pathway from myeloid precursor cells.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I. Metabolic comparisons between innate and adaptive immunity

T and B cells, by contrast, use amino acids, glucose, and lipids as energy sources during oxidative phosphorylation. As one might imagine, mitogenic stimulation of thymocytes or naive T cells is a highly energy-demanding process. As lymphocytes proliferate, they become more and more dependent on glucose uptake. Stimulated proliferation of thymocytes can result in nearly 20-fold increases in glucose uptake, which is accomplished by plasma membrane high expression of glucose transporter-1 (8), which is tightly controlled by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF; see below). Nutrient uptake in naive T cells is strictly instructed through IL-7– and IL-4–dependent pathways (9). During periods of high proliferation, even in the presence of adequate oxygen concentration, lymphocytes become progressively more dependent on aerobic glycolysis for ATP synthesis. Lactate production from glycolysis can increase by as much as 40-fold in mitogen-stimulated T cells. When glucose becomes limiting, as it often does at sites of high immune activity, T cells can use alternative energy sources, such as glutamine, within the TCA cycle (3).

Transcriptional control of immune metabolism by HIF

Sites of ongoing inflammation and high immune activity can become rapidly depleted of both nutrients and oxygen. Activated PMNs, for example, can increase their oxygen demand by as much as 50-fold in the generation of reactive oxygen intermediates (the so-called respiratory burst mediated by NADPH oxidase) necessary to kill bacteria following phagocytosis (10). Somewhat surprisingly, proliferating T cells only moderately increase oxygen consumption (3). As a global regulator of oxygen homeostasis, the αβ-heterodimeric transcription factor HIF is a central part of all cellular metabolism (11, 12). HIF-1 and HIF-2 (also called endothelial Per-ARNT-Sim protein) are members of the Per-ARNT-Sim family of basic helix-loop helix transcription factors. HIF activation is dependent upon stabilization of an O2-dependent degradation domain of the α-subunit and subsequent nuclear translocation to form a functional complex with HIF-1β and cofactors, such as CBP and its ortholog p300 (13). Under conditions of adequate oxygen supply, iron- and oxygen-dependent hydoxylation of two prolines (Pro564 and Pro402) within the oxygen-dependent degradation domain (ODD) of HIF-1α or HIF-2α initiates the association with the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein and rapid degradation via ubiquitin-E3 ligase proteasomal targeting (14, 15). A second hypoxic switch operates in the carboxy terminal transactivation domain of HIF-1 or HIF-2α. In this case, hypoxia blocks the hydroxylation of asparagine-803, consequently facilitating the recruitment of CBP/p300 (16).

HIF-1α was the original isoform purified by oligonucleotide binding to the 3′ region of the EPO gene (17). HIF-2α was subsequently identified by homology searches and as a binding partner for the heterodimeric partner HIF-1β (18). It was originally thought that the HIF-2α isoform was expressed only in endothelial cells (hence the name endothelial Per-ARNT-Sim protein, or EPAS) (19). HIF-3α is a more distantly related isoform, and, when spliced appropriately, can encode a protein that antagonizes hypoxia-responsive element-dependent gene induction (20). For a number of years, it remained poorly understood how hypoxia might stabilize the expression of HIF. In the past several years, the molecular mechanisms of HIF activation have become clarified. These studies have defined two HIF selective iron- and oxygen-dependent hydroxylation enzymes (on HIF prolines 564 and 402) within the ODD of the HIF-α subunit (21–24). Because other mammalian prolyl hydroxylases (e.g., procollagen prolyl hydroxylase domains [PHDs]) were 2-oxoglutarate–dependent (25), it was predicted that the HIF prolyl hydroxylases would also belong to this family of enzymes. Based on conserved structural features (25), a candidate molecular approach was used to define HIF-modifying enzymes. This approach identified the HIF prolyl hydroxylases as the products of genes related to C. elegans egl-9, a gene that was first described in the context of an egg-laying abnormal phenotype (21). In mammalian cells, three PHD isoforms were identified (PHD 1–3) and shown to hydroxylate HIF-α in vitro (22, 24).

The discovery of HIF-selective PHDs as central regulators of HIF expression has now provided the basis for potential development of PHD-based molecular tools and therapies (26, 27). Pharmacological inactivation of the PHDs by 2-oxoglutarate analogs is sufficient to stabilize HIF-α (26), but this action is nonspecific with respect to individual PHD isoforms. In vitro studies do suggest significant differences in substrate specificity. For example, PHD3 does not hydroxylate proline 564 on HIF-α, and comparison of enzyme activity in vitro showed that the ODD sequence is hydroxylated most efficiently by PHD2 (25, 28). These observations have generated an interest in identifying enzyme-modifying therapeutics. Indeed, a number of PHD inhibitors have been described, including direct inhibitors of the prolyl-hydroxylase (29), analogs of naturally occurring cyclic hydroxymates (30), and antagonists of α-keto-glutarate (26).

Activated T cells show increased expression of HIF-1α. In particular, HIF-1α has been shown to provide an important survival signal for T cells, preventing them from undergoing activation-induced cell death in hypoxic settings. T cell survival in hypoxia is, at least in part, mediated by the vasoactive peptide adrenomedullin (31). Other studies using chimeric mice bearing HIF-1α–deficient T and B cells have revealed lineage-specific defects that result in increased autoimmunity, including autoantibodies, increased rheumatoid factor, and kidney damage (4).

HIF function has been studied in some detail in myeloid cells. Cre-LoxP–based elimination of HIF-1α in cells of the myeloid lineage (lysozyme M promoter) have revealed multiple features that importantly implicate metabolic control of myeloid function (32). In particular, these studies have shown that PMN and macrophage bacterial killing capacities are severely limited in the absence of HIF-1α, as HIF-1α is central to production of antimicrobial peptides and granule proteases. These findings are explained, at least in part, by the inability of myeloid cells to mount appropriate metabolic responses to diminished O2 characteristic of infectious sites (32). Finally, compelling evidence has revealed that HIF-1α transcriptionally controls the critical integrin important in all myeloid cell adhesion and transmigration, namely the β2 integrin (CD18) (33, 34).

A growing body of evidence indicates that HIF-mediated signaling pathways in parenchymal cells (e.g., epithelial cells) coordinate inflammatory responses. For instance, intestinal epithelial cells form a critical barrier to the flux of antigenic material across the gut. During episodes of inflammation, barrier function is compromised and can lead to accelerated inflammatory responses. In response to multiple metabolic insults initiated within inflammatory lesions (e.g., decreased O2 supply, increased glucose demand, decreased ATP generation, vasculitis), intestinal epithelial HIF-1α is activated (Fig. 1). Studies in mice lacking intestinal epithelial HIF-1α have revealed that HIF-based signaling is central to the protection of barrier function through the induction of multiple genes and is important in the restitution of barrier function following injury (35). These findings may be somewhat model-dependent, as epithelial HIF-based signaling has also been shown to promote inflammation in some models (36). Nonetheless, ongoing studies targeting the induction of HIF (through inhibition of PHDs) are promising in animal models of intestinal inflammation (37, 38).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Metabolic stress points in inflammation and immunity. Migration of inflammatory cells to sites of infection changes local tissue metabolism in fundamental ways. A number of metabolic limitations contribute to substantial a shift in tissue metabolism (A). In vivo evidence for inflammation-associated hypoxia (so-called “inflammatory hypoxia”) using nitroimidazole-based dye retention in vehicle-treated mouse colon revealing a degree of physiological hypoxia (B) compared with TNBS-induced colitis, resulting in intense and deep-tissue hypoxia (C). Adapted with permission from Fig. 1 in Karhausen et al. (35).

mTOR and innate immunity

The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) is an evolutionary conserved serine-threonine kinase that is central to cellular sensing of environmental stress (39). As an integral part of overall metabolism, mTOR monitors cellular ATP:AMP ratios, insulin, and amino acid levels (39). mTOR functions as part of two major protein complexes (mTORC1 and mTORC2) that coordinate signaling for anabolic and catabolic metabolism. An important function of the mTORC1 complex is integration of PI3K- and Akt-mediated signaling and in complex and is sensitive to rapamycin inhibition (when complexed to FK506-binding protein 12). mTORC2, in contrast, phosphorylates Akt Ser 473 but is insensitive to rapamycin inhibition.

In lymphocytes, mTOR controls cell cycle progression from G1 to S phase and can therefore control proliferative responses. It is through these mechanisms that inhibitors of rapamycin (sirolimus) have been used as a potent immunosuppressive agent (40). mTOR is activated by growth factor, extracellular signaling molecules (e.g., TLR ligands), and through Ag-induced TCR signaling. Activation of mTOR through these various stimuli provides increased capacity for aerobic glycolysis and ATP generation during episodes of high T cell proliferation (3). As such, rapamycin has been shown to enrich CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells, and recent studies have indicated that mTOR intrinsically regulates T cell memory function (41).

In myeloid cells, such as macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs), mTOR1-based metabolism is particularly important in the integration of PI3K and Akt signaling. This nexus between mTOR and Akt forms a critical linkage to multiple cytokine signaling cascades (39). Emerging evidence suggests that this may be one of the most important regulatory pathways for integrating multiple TLR signaling pathways and includes the production of type I IFN, IL-10, and IL-12/23 (39, 40).

Nucleotide metabolism in inflammation and immunity

In addition to its role in intracellular energy transfer, the nucleotide ATP plays an important role in extracellular signaling reactions in inflammation and immune responses. Extracellular ATP (or ADP) can directly bind to cell surface purinergic receptors (termed P2-type) or can be metabolized to adenosine at the cell surface, where it is made available to bind and activate adenosine receptor(s) (P1-type). Extracellular nucleotides are metabolized primarily by cell-surface enzymes called ectonucleotidases whose enzymatic activity is to hydrolyze phosphate groups from circulating nucleotides with varying degrees of specificity for their substrates.

CD39 is one such ectonucleotidase initially observed as an activation marker in paracortical lymphocytes, macrophages, and DCs resident within lymphoid tissue (42). Cloning of CD39 revealed the presence of apyrase conserved regions and striking sequence homology with yeast guanosine diphosphatase, an enzyme involved in catalyzing the removal of a phosphate from GDP after sugar transfer within the Golgi apparatus (42). Further identification of a number of CD39-like NTP diphosphohydrolases (NTPDases) have since revealed a family of eight related proteins, denoted NTPDase1–8 (NTPDase1 representing CD39 under this nomenclature). NTPDase1, -2, -3, and -8 are transmembrane proteins with five apyrase conserved regions situated on the extracellular region, conferring nucleotidase activity to the enzyme and allowing for hydrolysis of extracellular nucleotides (43). Together, these NTPDases act in a concerted manner to regulate the production of extracellular AMP.

The second step in metabolism of extracellular adenosine is conferred by the GPI-anchored membrane protein, ecto-5′ nucleotidase (CD73). CD73 is the predominant source for accumulation of extracellular adenosine from released adenine nucleotides (44). CD73 metabolizes AMP to adenosine, which is then either free to act on adenosine receptors or is transported into the cell by dipyridamole-sensitive channels and degraded by the purine salvage pathway.

Extracellular adenosine binds to one (or more) of four adenosine receptors (ARs; A1AR, A2AAR, A2BAR, and A3AR) (45). A number of studies have addressed the contribution of individual ARs in murine mucosal inflammation. Although less is known about the role of the A1 or A3AR, both A2A and A2BAR have been shown to attenuate mucosal inflammation and to provide tissue protection (46). From this perspective, A2AAR and A2BAR agonists represent a potential group of therapeutics for the treatment of mucosal inflammation. One study found a critical role for the A2AAR signaling in T cell-mediated regulation of colitis and treatment with a specific A2AAR agonist attenuated the production of proinflammatory cytokines and attenuation of colitis (47). Activation of adenosine A2AAR seems to limit reperfusion injury by inhibiting inflammatory processes in neutrophils, platelets, macrophages, and T cells (47). The contribution of A2BAR to mucosal inflammation has been somewhat discrepant, where in two separate studies, mice lacking A2BAR have shown either increased and decreased susceptibility to dextran sodium sulfate-induced intestinal inflammation (48, 49). Additional studies will be necessary to rectify these differences.

Methylation-dependent control of metabolism

Immune responses and cellular differentiation are tightly controlled by epigenetic modifications, which constitute an additional level of control of gene expression. Regulation of gene expression works primarily through modification of chromatin structure, allowing regions of DNA to be more or less accessible to transcription. Epigenetic modifications include ubiquitylation, acetylation, and methylation of histones, proteins that interact with DNA to form the secondary and tertiary structures of chromatin, and DNA methylation of cytosine residues at CpG dinucleotides. All cell types possess a unique epigenetic profile determined early in differentiation and carried through to fully differentiated cells and tissue (50). It is becoming increasingly appreciated, however, that this epigenetic profile can be perturbed by environmental stress (51). For example, it has been known for many years that changes in epigenetic modifications contribute to a number of cancer types (52), and it is now becoming clear that these changes play roles in other disease states as well.

Epigenetic modifications are a crucial part of normal immune system function. The differentiation of T cells from progenitor to the Th1 or Th2 lineage requires silencing of the genes associated with other lineages, which is accomplished via epigenetic mechanisms (53, 54). Similarly, development of two other important T cell lineages, Th17 and regulatory T cells, is controlled through epigenetic modifications (55, 56). Recent studies also suggest that epigenetic changes are important for cells of the innate immune system, such as macrophages (57). Several lines of evidence suggest that aberrant epigenetic regulation plays a role in chronic inflammation. Although no DNA demethylase has been identified, there are types of modifications that occur during chronic inflammation that influence DNA methylation states and render genes more or less accessible to transcription (58). Additionally, methotrexate, a drug commonly used to treat arthritis, actively inhibits DNA methylation by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases (59) and may ameliorate symptoms by upregulation of silenced anti-inflammatory genes. Although histone methylases and demethylases were only identified recently (60, 61), studies have also found that changes in histone methylation play an important role in inflammatory responses as well (62). Also of interest are the recent findings demonstrating the role of hypoxia in epigenetic modification through the significant increase in global DNA methylation (63).

Although histone methylases and demethylases have only recently been identified (60, 61), the discovery of site-specific histone demethylases demonstrates that histone methylation is a dynamic process, providing a mechanism for alteration of chromatin conformation in response to cellular stresses, such as inflammation. Of particular interest are the findings that at least two of these histone demethylase enzymes belonging to the Jumonji gene family, JMJD1A and JMJD2B, are induced by hypoxia in an HIFα-dependent manner (64–67). These studies provide insight into new mechanisms for regulation of the cellular response to limiting O2 supply. Additionally, studies have also demonstrated important links between changes in histone methylation and cellular inflammatory responses as well (62).

Cellular methylation reactions include modification of DNA, RNA, proteins, and lipids. These reactions all require a methyl donor for the modification of the target. The methyl donor for the majority of these reactions is S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) (68). SAM is distributed throughout the cell to act as donor for the various methylases. The donation of its methyl group produces S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) from SAM. SAH is a potent inhibitor of methyltransferase enzymes because these enzymes have a higher affinity for SAH (69), and SAH is rapidly converted to homocysteine and adenosine by SAH hydrolase. Therefore, inhibition of SAH hydrolase represents a powerful means of inhibiting cellular methylation reactions (70). It has been known for several years that inhibition of methylation had immunosuppressive effects (71). This led to the development of more specific, reversible, and less toxic SAH inhibitors for use in animal models of inflammation. Utilizing these compounds, it was demonstrated that SAH hydrolase inhibition particularly downregulates T cell activation and adaptive immune responses. One of these SAH hydrolase inhibitors, DZ2002 [methyl 4-(adenin-9-yl)-2-hydroxybutanoate], has been found to have potent immunosuppressive effects and ameliorates disease in a number of animal models including delayed type hypersensitivity (72), arthritis (72), and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (73). Additionally, inhibition of SAH hydrolase has also been shown to influence cells of the innate immune system, particularly macrophages (74). These studies demonstrate that inhibition of cellular methylation reactions may be an important therapeutic intervention for the treatment of Ag-induced immune responses.

Lipid metabolism and innate immunity

A significant metabolic sink during inflammation and within the immune response involves the generation of lipid mediators. The majority of these short-lived signaling molecules are generated by either cyclooxygenases (COXs) or lipoxygenases. As their names might imply, these enzymatic responses require large amounts of oxygen and as such can function to change intracellular metabolism in fundamental ways.

Polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) are essential to tissue homeostasis but cannot be synthesized in mammals, thus they must be obtained from the diet. PUFAs have received much attention in recent years as the metabolism of ω-6 fatty acids appear to have opposing physiological consequences to ω-3 (75). Dietary ω-6 and ω-3 fatty acids are converted by various desaturases and elongases to arachidonic acid (AA) and eicosapentaenoic acid or docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), respectively, and incorporated into membrane phospholipids. Unsaturated fatty acids are liberated from membranes by phospholipase A2 and are further metabolized to generate what are considered proinflammatory mediators (e.g., eicosanoids, PGs, thromboxanes, leukotrienes) and anti-inflammatory molecules (e.g., lipoxins, resolvins, and protectins). As a general rule, ω-6 PUFAs give rise to proinflammatory lipids, whereas ω-3 PUFAs are metabolized to anti-inflammatory lipid mediators.

Oxygenases, such as COXs and lipoxygenases, are crucial oxygen-dependent, rate-limiting enzymes in the metabolism of PUFAs. COX catalyzes the conversion of AA to PGG2 and subsequently converts PGG2 to PGH2 (76). PGH2 serves as the substrate for numerous enzymes, each resulting in a different PG end product. There are two known isoforms of COX: the COX-1 isoform is constitutively expressed, whereas COX-2 is thought to be inducible (77). As the name suggests, COX requires two molecules of oxygen to catalyze the oxidation of AA to PGG2 (78), thus it may seem intuitive that in an oxygen-depleted environment, such as an inflammatory lesion, eicosanoid production would be attenuated. Contradictory reports exist in the literature. Some groups observe that hypoxia increases COX-2 but not PGE2 (79, 80) or prostacyclin (81) levels. Others reports indicate that hypoxia paradoxically stimulates production of PGs (82), likely via induction of COX-2 expression (83). Furthermore, hypoxia has been demonstrated to increase cytosolic phospholipase A2 activity, liberating more unsaturated fatty acids from lipid membranes to act as substrates for COX or lipoxygenases (84). This disparity between hypoxia-induced changes in PGE2 production may be due to tissue specificity, extenuating metabolic influences, or even time-dependent sampling. A recent report examined the difference in PGE2 levels and COX-2 activity in acute and chronic periodontitis. Their findings indicated that PGE2 and COX-2 activity increases in acute disease but is suppressed in chronic disease states, which was mechanistically attributed to COX-2 promoter hypermethylation (85). Conversely, the contribution of diminished molecular oxygen in inflamed-hypoxic tissue to eicosanoid production has been poorly characterized. The affinities of various oxygenases for molecular O2 have been investigated, but the results appear to inconclusive (86).

Much recent attention has been paid to understanding lipid metabolism involved in the resolution of inflammation and in productive immune responses at mucosal sites. Of particular interest are series of COX-derived lipid mediators termed the resolvins and the maresins (87). Resolvins are the best understood of these molecules and are ω-3 PUFA-derived lipid mediators central to activation of the inflammatory resolution program (88). Among them, RvE1 was the first isolated and has been studied in the greatest detail. RvE1 displays potent stereoselective actions in vivo and in isolated cell systems. At nanomolar levels in vitro, RvE1 potently reduces human PMN transendothelial migration, DC migration, and IL-12 production (87). In several animal models of inflammatory disease, RvE1 and more recently RvE2 (89) display potent counter-regulatory actions that protect against leukocyte-mediated tissue injury and excessive proinflammatory gene expression. The discovery of a novel family of DHA-derived lipid mediators termed maresins (macrophage mediator in resolving inflammation [MaR]) (90). MaRs were identified from murine peritonitis exudates and human macrophages that biosynthesized a new class of lipoxygenase-derived lipids derived from endogenous DHA. MaR1s were demonstrated to promote inflammatory resolution with the potency of resolvins, reflected as decreased neutrophil accumulation and increased macrophage phagocytosis during murine peritonitis.

Ischemia/reperfusion injury is a major cause of tissue damage following stroke or transplantation, whereby reactive oxygen species production and lipid peroxidation generated during hypoxia cause significant tissue damage upon reoxygenation. However, brief intermittent exposure to hypoxia (ischemic preconditioning [IPC]) has been demonstrated to be protective. Adenosine, mentioned earlier, is generated during IPC and capable of eliciting anti-inflammatory effects (91). COX-2 is protective against ischemia/reperfusion injury and mediates the late phase of preconditioning (92), possibly via PGE2 or prostacyclin (PGI2). Sphingosine 1-phosphate (S1P) is a sphingolipid signaling molecule that mediates cardioprotection during IPC (93). Sphingosine kinases catalyze the conversion of sphingosine to S1P, which binds to S1P G-protein–coupled receptors to mediate cell survival signals. Both the SK1 (94) and SK2 (95) isoform of sphingosine kinase are upregulated in hypoxia, resulting in increased S1P. Concomitantly, conversion of sphingosine to S1P prevents its conversion to ceramide, a proapoptotic signaling lipid mediator (96).

Conclusions

The dynamic interplay of leukocytes and parenchymal cells during disease defines an elegant lesson in biology. In particular, studies of model disease systems have allowed for the identification of metabolomic changes now well accepted in the scientific literature. The discovery of differences and similarities between innate and adaptive immune responses will continue to teach us important lessons about the complexity of biological systems. Such information will provide previously unappreciated insight into the pathogenesis of disease and, importantly, will provide new targets as templates for the development of novel therapies for human disease.

Acknowledgments

Disclosures The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

  • This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK50189, DE016191, and HL60569 and by grants from the Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America.

  • Abbreviations used in this paper:

    AA
    arachidonic acid
    AR
    adenosine receptor
    COX
    cyclooxygenase
    DC
    dendritic cell
    DHA
    docosahexaenoic acid
    HIF
    hypoxia-inducible factor
    IPC
    ischemic preconditioning
    MaR
    macrophage mediator in resolving inflammation
    mTOR
    mammalian target of rapamycin
    NTPDase
    NTP diphosphohydrolase
    ODD
    oxygen-dependent degradation domain
    PHD
    prolyl hydroxylase domain
    PMN
    polymorphonuclear leukocyte
    PUFA
    polyunsaturated fatty acid
    S1P
    sphingosine 1-phosphate
    SAH
    S-adenosylhomocysteine
    SAM
    S-adenosylmethionine.

  • Received December 2, 2009.
  • Accepted February 14, 2010.
  • Copyright © 2010 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Taylor C. T.,
    2. S. P. Colgan
    . 2008. Hypoxia and gastrointestinal disease. J. Mol. Med. 85: 1295–1300.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. ↵
    1. Lewis J. S.,
    2. J. A. Lee,
    3. J. C. Underwood,
    4. A. L. Harris,
    5. C. E. Lewis
    . 1999. Macrophage responses to hypoxia: relevance to disease mechanisms. J. Leukoc. Biol. 66: 889–900.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. ↵
    1. Fox C. J.,
    2. P. S. Hammerman,
    3. C. B. Thompson
    . 2005. Fuel feeds function: energy metabolism and the T-cell response. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5: 844–852.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Sitkovsky M.,
    2. D. Lukashev
    . 2005. Regulation of immune cells by local-tissue oxygen tension: HIF1 alpha and adenosine receptors. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 5: 712–721.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. van Raam B. J.,
    2. W. Sluiter,
    3. E. de Wit,
    4. D. Roos,
    5. A. J. Verhoeven,
    6. T. W. Kuijpers
    . 2008. Mitochondrial membrane potential in human neutrophils is maintained by complex III activity in the absence of supercomplex organisation. PLoS One 3: e2013.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Pollard T. D.,
    2. G. G. Borisy
    . 2003. Cellular motility driven by assembly and disassembly of actin filaments. Cell 112: 453–465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Borregaard N.,
    2. T. Herlin
    . 1982. Energy metabolism of human neutrophils during phagocytosis. J. Clin. Invest. 70: 550–557.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Greiner E. F.,
    2. M. Guppy,
    3. K. Brand
    . 1994. Glucose is essential for proliferation and the glycolytic enzyme induction that provokes a transition to glycolytic energy production. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 31484–31490.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Plas D. R.,
    2. J. C. Rathmell,
    3. C. B. Thompson
    . 2002. Homeostatic control of lymphocyte survival: potential origins and implications. Nat. Immunol. 3: 515–521.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    1. Gabig T. G.,
    2. S. I. Bearman,
    3. B. M. Babior
    . 1979. Effects of oxygen tension and pH on the respiratory burst of human neutrophils. Blood 53: 1133–1139.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    1. Kaelin W. G, Jr..,
    2. P. J. Ratcliffe
    . 2008. Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway. Mol. Cell 30: 393–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Semenza G. L.
    2009. Regulation of oxygen homeostasis by hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Physiology (Bethesda) 24: 97–106.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    1. Semenza G. L.
    2001. HIF-1, O(2), and the 3 PHDs: how animal cells signal hypoxia to the nucleus. Cell 107: 1–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    1. Maxwell P. H.,
    2. M. S. Wiesener,
    3. G. W. Chang,
    4. S. C. Clifford,
    5. E. C. Vaux,
    6. M. E. Cockman,
    7. C. C. Wykoff,
    8. C. W. Pugh,
    9. E. R. Maher,
    10. P. J. Ratcliffe
    . 1999. The tumour suppressor protein VHL targets hypoxia-inducible factors for oxygen-dependent proteolysis. Nature 399: 271–275.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    1. Tanimoto K.,
    2. Y. Makino,
    3. T. Pereira,
    4. L. Poellinger
    . 2000. Mechanism of regulation of the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 alpha by the von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor protein. EMBO J. 19: 4298–4309.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. ↵
    1. Lando D.,
    2. D. J. Peet,
    3. D. A. Whelan,
    4. J. J. Gorman,
    5. M. L. Whitelaw
    . 2002. Asparagine hydroxylation of the HIF transactivation domain a hypoxic switch. Science 295: 858–861.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    1. Wang G. L.,
    2. B. H. Jiang,
    3. E. A. Rue,
    4. G. L. Semenza
    . 1995. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 is a basic-helix-loop-helix-PAS heterodimer regulated by cellular O2 tension. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92: 5510–5514.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    1. Ema M.,
    2. S. Taya,
    3. N. Yokotani,
    4. K. Sogawa,
    5. Y. Matsuda,
    6. Y. Fujii-Kuriyama
    . 1997. A novel bHLH-PAS factor with close sequence similarity to hypoxia-inducible factor 1alpha regulates the VEGF expression and is potentially involved in lung and vascular development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94: 4273–4278.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    1. Gu Y. Z.,
    2. S. M. Moran,
    3. J. B. Hogenesch,
    4. L. Wartman,
    5. C. A. Bradfield
    . 1998. Molecular characterization and chromosomal localization of a third alpha-class hypoxia inducible factor subunit, HIF3alpha. Gene Expr. 7: 205–213.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    1. Ratcliffe P. J.
    2007. HIF-1 and HIF-2: working alone or together in hypoxia? J. Clin. Invest. 117: 862–865.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    1. Epstein A. C.,
    2. J. M. Gleadle,
    3. L. A. McNeill,
    4. K. S. Hewitson,
    5. J. O’Rourke,
    6. D. R. Mole,
    7. M. Mukherji,
    8. E. Metzen,
    9. M. I. Wilson,
    10. A. Dhanda,
    11. et al
    . 2001. C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation. Cell 107: 43–54.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    1. Jaakkola P.,
    2. D. R. Mole,
    3. Y. M. Tian,
    4. M. I. Wilson,
    5. J. Gielbert,
    6. S. J. Gaskell,
    7. Av Kriegsheim,
    8. H. F. Hebestreit,
    9. M. Mukherji,
    10. C. J. Schofield,
    11. et al
    . 2001. Targeting of HIF-alpha to the von Hippel-Lindau ubiquitylation complex by O2-regulated prolyl hydroxylation. Science 292: 468–472.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Bruick R. K.,
    2. S. L. McKnight
    . 2001. A conserved family of prolyl-4-hydroxylases that modify HIF. Science 294: 1337–1340.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    1. Hon W. C.,
    2. M. I. Wilson,
    3. K. Harlos,
    4. T. D. Claridge,
    5. C. J. Schofield,
    6. C. W. Pugh,
    7. P. H. Maxwell,
    8. P. J. Ratcliffe,
    9. D. I. Stuart,
    10. E. Y. Jones
    . 2002. Structural basis for the recognition of hydroxyproline in HIF-1 alpha by pVHL. Nature 417: 975–978.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    1. Bruick R. K.
    2003. Oxygen sensing in the hypoxic response pathway: regulation of the hypoxia-inducible transcription factor. Genes Dev. 17: 2614–2623.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    1. Mole D. R.,
    2. I. Schlemminger,
    3. L. A. McNeill,
    4. K. S. Hewitson,
    5. C. W. Pugh,
    6. P. J. Ratcliffe,
    7. C. J. Schofield
    . 2003. 2-oxoglutarate analogue inhibitors of HIF prolyl hydroxylase. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13: 2677–2680.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    1. Masson N.,
    2. P. J. Ratcliffe
    . 2003. HIF prolyl and asparaginyl hydroxylases in the biological response to intracellular O(2) levels. J. Cell Sci. 116: 3041–3049.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    1. Schofield C. J.,
    2. P. J. Ratcliffe
    . 2004. Oxygen sensing by HIF hydroxylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5: 343–354.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    1. Nwogu J. I.,
    2. D. Geenen,
    3. M. Bean,
    4. M. C. Brenner,
    5. X. Huang,
    6. P. M. Buttrick
    . 2001. Inhibition of collagen synthesis with prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibitor improves left ventricular function and alters the pattern of left ventricular dilatation after myocardial infarction. Circulation 104: 2216–2221.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    1. Schlemminger I.,
    2. D. R. Mole,
    3. L. A. McNeill,
    4. A. Dhanda,
    5. K. S. Hewitson,
    6. Y. M. Tian,
    7. P. J. Ratcliffe,
    8. C. W. Pugh,
    9. C. J. Schofield
    . 2003. Analogues of dealanylalahopcin are inhibitors of human HIF prolyl hydroxylases. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 13: 1451–1454.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    1. Makino Y.,
    2. H. Nakamura,
    3. E. Ikeda,
    4. K. Ohnuma,
    5. K. Yamauchi,
    6. Y. Yabe,
    7. L. Poellinger,
    8. Y. Okada,
    9. C. Morimoto,
    10. H. Tanaka
    . 2003. Hypoxia-inducible factor regulates survival of antigen receptor-driven T cells. J. Immunol. 171: 6534–6540.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    1. Nizet V.,
    2. R. S. Johnson
    . 2009. Interdependence of hypoxic and innate immune responses. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9: 609–617.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    1. Kong T.,
    2. H. K. Eltzschig,
    3. J. Karhausen,
    4. S. P. Colgan,
    5. C. S. Shelley
    . 2004. Leukocyte adhesion during hypoxia is mediated by HIF-1-dependent induction of beta2 integrin gene expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101: 10440–10445.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    1. Kong T.,
    2. M. Scully,
    3. C. S. Shelley,
    4. S. P. Colgan
    . 2007. Identification of Pur alpha as a new hypoxia response factor responsible for coordinated induction of the beta 2 integrin family. J. Immunol. 179: 1934–1941.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    1. Karhausen J. O.,
    2. G. T. Furuta,
    3. J. E. Tomaszewski,
    4. R. S. Johnson,
    5. S. P. Colgan,
    6. V. H. Haase
    . 2004. Epithelial hypoxia-inducible factor-1 is protective in murine experimental colitis. J. Clin. Invest. 114: 1098–1106.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    1. Shah Y. M.,
    2. S. Ito,
    3. K. Morimura,
    4. C. Chen,
    5. S. H. Yim,
    6. V. H. Haase,
    7. F. J. Gonzalez
    . 2008. Hypoxia-inducible factor augments experimental colitis through an MIF-dependent inflammatory signaling cascade. Gastroenterology 134: 2036–2048, 2048.e1–3.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    1. Cummins E. P.,
    2. F. Seeballuck,
    3. S. J. Keely,
    4. N. E. Mangan,
    5. J. J. Callanan,
    6. P. G. Fallon,
    7. C. T. Taylor
    . 2008. The hydroxylase inhibitor dimethyloxalylglycine is protective in a murine model of colitis. Gastroenterology 134: 156–165.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    1. Robinson A.,
    2. S. Keely,
    3. J. Karhausen,
    4. M. E. Gerich,
    5. G. T. Furuta,
    6. S. P. Colgan
    . 2008. Mucosal protection by hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibition. Gastroenterology 134: 145–155.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    1. Delgoffe G. M.,
    2. J. D. Powell
    . 2009. mTOR: taking cues from the immune microenvironment. Immunology 127: 459–465.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    1. Saemann M. D.,
    2. M. Haidinger,
    3. M. Hecking,
    4. W. H. Horl,
    5. T. Weichhart
    . 2009. The multifunctional role of mTOR in innate immunity: implications for transplant immunity. Am. J. Transplant. 9: 2655–2661.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    1. Araki K.,
    2. A. P. Turner,
    3. V. O. Shaffer,
    4. S. Gangappa,
    5. S. A. Keller,
    6. M. F. Bachmann,
    7. C. P. Larsen,
    8. R. Ahmed
    . 2009. mTOR regulates memory CD8 T-cell differentiation. Nature 460: 108–112.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    1. Robson S. C.,
    2. J. Sévigny,
    3. H. Zimmermann
    . 2006. The E-NTPDase family of ectonucleotidases: Structure function relationships and pathophysiological significance. Purinergic Signal. 2: 409–430.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    1. Sexl V.,
    2. G. Mancusi,
    3. C. Höller,
    4. E. Gloria-Maercker,
    5. W. Schütz,
    6. M. Freissmuth
    . 1997. Stimulation of the mitogen-activated protein kinase via the A2A-adenosine receptor in primary human endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 5792–5799.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    1. Colgan S. P.,
    2. H. K. Eltzschig,
    3. T. Eckle,
    4. L. F. Thompson
    . 2006. Physiological roles for ecto-5′-nucleotidase (CD73). Purinergic Signal. 2: 351–360.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    1. Burnstock G.
    2007. Purine and pyrimidine receptors. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 64: 1471–1483.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    1. Eltzschig H. K.,
    2. J. Rivera-Nieves,
    3. S. P. Colgan
    . 2009. Targeting the A2B adenosine receptor during gastrointestinal ischemia and inflammation. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 13: 1267–1277.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    1. Naganuma M.,
    2. E. B. Wiznerowicz,
    3. C. M. Lappas,
    4. J. Linden,
    5. M. T. Worthington,
    6. P. B. Ernst
    . 2006. Cutting edge: Critical role for A2A adenosine receptors in the T cell-mediated regulation of colitis. J. Immunol. 177: 2765–2769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    1. Frick J. S.,
    2. C. F. MacManus,
    3. M. Scully,
    4. L. E. Glover,
    5. H. K. Eltzschig,
    6. S. P. Colgan
    . 2009. Contribution of adenosine A2B receptors to inflammatory parameters of experimental colitis. J. Immunol. 182: 4957–4964.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    1. Kolachala V. L.,
    2. M. Vijay-Kumar,
    3. G. Dalmasso,
    4. D. Yang,
    5. J. Linden,
    6. L. Wang,
    7. A. Gewirtz,
    8. K. Ravid,
    9. D. Merlin,
    10. S. V. Sitaraman
    . 2008. A2B adenosine receptor gene deletion attenuates murine colitis. Gastroenterology 135: 861–870.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    1. Morgan H. D.,
    2. F. Santos,
    3. K. Green,
    4. W. Dean,
    5. W. Reik
    . 2005. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(Spec No 1):R47–R58.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    1. Fraga M. F.,
    2. E. Ballestar,
    3. M. F. Paz,
    4. S. Ropero,
    5. F. Setien,
    6. M. L. Ballestar,
    7. D. Heine-Suñer,
    8. J. C. Cigudosa,
    9. M. Urioste,
    10. J. Benitez,
    11. et al
    . 2005. Epigenetic differences arise during the lifetime of monozygotic twins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102: 10604–10609.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    1. Laird P. W.
    2005. Cancer epigenetics. Hum. Mol. Genet. 14(Spec No 1):R65–R76.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    1. Ansel K. M.,
    2. I. Djuretic,
    3. B. Tanasa,
    4. A. Rao
    . 2006. Regulation of Th2 differentiation and Il4 locus accessibility. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24: 607–656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    1. Djuretic I. M.,
    2. D. Levanon,
    3. V. Negreanu,
    4. Y. Groner,
    5. A. Rao,
    6. K. M. Ansel
    . 2007. Transcription factors T-bet and Runx3 cooperate to activate Ifng and silence Il4 in T helper type 1 cells. Nat. Immunol. 8: 145–153.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    1. Akimzhanov A. M.,
    2. X. O. Yang,
    3. C. Dong
    . 2007. Chromatin remodeling of interleukin-17 (IL-17)-IL-17F cytokine gene locus during inflammatory helper T cell differentiation. J. Biol. Chem. 282: 5969–5972.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    1. Floess S.,
    2. J. Freyer,
    3. C. Siewert,
    4. U. Baron,
    5. S. Olek,
    6. J. Polansky,
    7. K. Schlawe,
    8. H. D. Chang,
    9. T. Bopp,
    10. E. Schmitt,
    11. et al
    . 2007. Epigenetic control of the foxp3 locus in regulatory T cells. PLoS Biol. 5: e38.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    1. Foster S. L.,
    2. D. C. Hargreaves,
    3. R. Medzhitov
    . 2007. Gene-specific control of inflammation by TLR-induced chromatin modifications. Nature 447: 972–978.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    1. Valinluck V.,
    2. L. C. Sowers
    . 2007. Inflammation-mediated cytosine damage: a mechanistic link between inflammation and the epigenetic alterations in human cancers. Cancer Res. 67: 5583–5586.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    1. Huber L. C.,
    2. J. Stanczyk,
    3. A. Jüngel,
    4. S. Gay
    . 2007. Epigenetics in inflammatory rheumatic diseases. Arthritis Rheum. 56: 3523–3531.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  59. ↵
    1. Hong S.,
    2. Y. W. Cho,
    3. L. R. Yu,
    4. H. Yu,
    5. T. D. Veenstra,
    6. K. Ge
    . 2007. Identification of JmjC domain-containing UTX and JMJD3 as histone H3 lysine 27 demethylases. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104: 18439–18444.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  60. ↵
    1. Trojer P.,
    2. D. Reinberg
    . 2006. Histone lysine demethylases and their impact on epigenetics. Cell 125: 213–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  61. ↵
    1. De Santa F.,
    2. M. G. Totaro,
    3. E. Prosperini,
    4. S. Notarbartolo,
    5. G. Testa,
    6. G. Natoli
    . 2007. The histone H3 lysine-27 demethylase Jmjd3 links inflammation to inhibition of polycomb-mediated gene silencing. Cell 130: 1083–1094.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  62. ↵
    1. Watson J. A.,
    2. C. J. Watson,
    3. A. M. McCrohan,
    4. K. Woodfine,
    5. M. Tosetto,
    6. J. McDaid,
    7. E. Gallagher,
    8. D. Betts,
    9. J. Baugh,
    10. J. O’Sullivan,
    11. et al
    . 2009. Generation of an epigenetic signature by chronic hypoxia in prostate cells. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18: 3594–3604.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  63. ↵
    1. Beyer S.,
    2. M. M. Kristensen,
    3. K. S. Jensen,
    4. J. V. Johansen,
    5. P. Staller
    . 2008. The histone demethylases JMJD1A and JMJD2B are transcriptional targets of hypoxia-inducible factor HIF. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 36542–36552.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Pollard P. J.,
    2. C. Loenarz,
    3. D. R. Mole,
    4. M. A. McDonough,
    5. J. M. Gleadle,
    6. C. J. Schofield,
    7. P. J. Ratcliffe
    . 2008. Regulation of Jumonji-domain-containing histone demethylases by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1alpha. Biochem. J. 416: 387–394.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Wellmann S.,
    2. M. Bettkober,
    3. A. Zelmer,
    4. K. Seeger,
    5. M. Faigle,
    6. H. K. Eltzschig,
    7. C. Bührer
    . 2008. Hypoxia upregulates the histone demethylase JMJD1A via HIF-1. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 372: 892–897.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  64. ↵
    1. Xia X.,
    2. M. E. Lemieux,
    3. W. Li,
    4. J. S. Carroll,
    5. M. Brown,
    6. X. S. Liu,
    7. A. L. Kung
    . 2009. Integrative analysis of HIF binding and transactivation reveals its role in maintaining histone methylation homeostasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106: 4260–4265.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  65. ↵
    1. Baldessarini R. J.
    1987. Neuropharmacology of S-adenosyl-L-methionine. Am. J. Med. 83(5A): 95–103.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  66. ↵
    1. Clarke S.,
    2. K. Banfield
    . 2001. S-adenosylmethionine-dependent methyltransferases. In Homocysteine in Health and Disease. Carmel R., D.W. Jacobsen, eds. Cambridge University Press, New York. p. 63–78.
  67. ↵
    1. Chiang P. K.
    1998. Biological effects of inhibitors of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase. Pharmacol. Ther. 77: 115–134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  68. ↵
    1. Wolos J. A.,
    2. K. A. Frondorf,
    3. G. F. Babcock,
    4. S. A. Stripp,
    5. T. L. Bowlin
    . 1993. Immunomodulation by an inhibitor of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase: inhibition of in vitro and in vivo allogeneic responses. Cell. Immunol. 149: 402–408.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  69. ↵
    1. Saso Y.,
    2. E. M. Conner,
    3. B. R. Teegarden,
    4. C. S. Yuan
    . 2001. S-Adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase inhibitor mediates immunosuppressive effects in vivo: suppression of delayed type hypersensitivity ear swelling and peptidoglycan polysaccharide-induced arthritis. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 296: 106–112.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  70. ↵
    1. Lawson B. R.,
    2. Y. Manenkova,
    3. J. Ahamed,
    4. X. Chen,
    5. J. P. Zou,
    6. R. Baccala,
    7. A. N. Theofilopoulos,
    8. C. Yuan
    . 2007. Inhibition of transmethylation down-regulates CD4 T cell activation and curtails development of autoimmunity in a model system. J. Immunol. 178: 5366–5374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    1. Wu Q. L.,
    2. Y. F. Fu,
    3. W. L. Zhou,
    4. J. X. Wang,
    5. Y. H. Feng,
    6. J. Liu,
    7. J. Y. Xu,
    8. P. L. He,
    9. R. Zhou,
    10. W. Tang,
    11. et al
    . 2005. Inhibition of S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase induces immunosuppression. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 313: 705–711.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    1. Bagga D.,
    2. L. Wang,
    3. R. Farias-Eisner,
    4. J. A. Glaspy,
    5. S. T. Reddy
    . 2003. Differential effects of prostaglandin derived from omega-6 and omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on COX-2 expression and IL-6 secretion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100: 1751–1756.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  73. ↵
    1. Ueno N.,
    2. M. Murakami,
    3. T. Tanioka,
    4. K. Fujimori,
    5. T. Tanabe,
    6. Y. Urade,
    7. I. Kudo
    . 2001. Coupling between cyclooxygenase, terminal prostanoid synthase, and phospholipase A2. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 34918–34927.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  74. ↵
    1. Vane J. R.,
    2. Y. S. Bakhle,
    3. R. M. Botting
    . 1998. Cyclooxygenases 1 and 2. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 38: 97–120.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  75. ↵
    1. Filimonov I. S.,
    2. P. V. Vrzheshch
    . 2007. Molecular oxygen (a substrate of the cyclooxygenase reaction) in the kinetic mechanism of the bifunctional enzyme prostaglandin-H-synthase. Biochemistry (Mosc.) 72: 944–953.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  76. ↵
    1. Demasi M.,
    2. L. G. Cleland,
    3. R. J. Cook-Johnson,
    4. G. E. Caughey,
    5. M. J. James
    . 2003. Effects of hypoxia on monocyte inflammatory mediator production: Dissociation between changes in cyclooxygenase-2 expression and eicosanoid synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 278: 38607–38616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  77. ↵
    1. Schwartzman M. L.,
    2. A. Bonazzi,
    3. P. Mieyal,
    4. A. Mezentsev,
    5. N. G. Abraham,
    6. M. W. Dunn
    . 2003. COX-2 lack of function in hypoxia-induced ocular surface inflammation. Thromb. Res. 110: 293–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  78. ↵
    1. Juránek I.,
    2. V. Bauer,
    3. J. Donnerer,
    4. F. Lembeck,
    5. B. A. Peskar
    . 2002. Severe hypoxia inhibits prostaglandin I(2) biosynthesis and vasodilatory responses induced by ionophore A23187 in the isolated rabbit ear. Pharmacology 66: 199–205.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  79. ↵
    1. Michiels C.,
    2. T. Arnould,
    3. I. Knott,
    4. M. Dieu,
    5. J. Remacle
    . 1993. Stimulation of prostaglandin synthesis by human endothelial cells exposed to hypoxia. Am. J. Physiol. 264: C866–C874.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  80. ↵
    1. Schmedtje J. F, Jr..,
    2. Y. S. Ji,
    3. W. L. Liu,
    4. R. N. DuBois,
    5. M. S. Runge
    . 1997. Hypoxia induces cyclooxygenase-2 via the NF-kappaB p65 transcription factor in human vascular endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 601–608.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  81. ↵
    1. Barnett J. M.,
    2. G. McCollum,
    3. J. S. Penn
    . 2010. The role of cytosolic phospholipase A(2) in retinal neovascularization. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 51: 1136–1142.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  82. ↵
    1. Zhang S.,
    2. S. P. Barros,
    3. M. D. Niculescu,
    4. A. J. Moretti,
    5. J. S. Preisser,
    6. S. Offenbacher
    . 2010. Alteration of PTGS2 promoter methylation in chronic periodontitis. J. Dent. Res. 89: 133–137.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  83. ↵
    1. Juránek I.,
    2. H. Suzuki,
    3. S. Yamamoto
    . 1999. Affinities of various mammalian arachidonate lipoxygenases and cyclooxygenases for molecular oxygen as substrate. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1436: 509–518.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  84. ↵
    1. Serhan C. N.,
    2. N. Chiang,
    3. T. E. Van Dyke
    . 2008. Resolving inflammation: dual anti-inflammatory and pro-resolution lipid mediators. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 8: 349–361.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  85. ↵
    1. Serhan C. N.,
    2. C. B. Clish,
    3. J. Brannon,
    4. S. P. Colgan,
    5. N. Chiang,
    6. K. Gronert
    . 2000. Novel functional sets of lipid-derived mediators with antiinflammatory actions generated from omega-3 fatty acids via cyclooxygenase 2-nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and transcellular processing. J. Exp. Med. 192: 1197–1204.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  86. ↵
    1. Spite M.,
    2. L. V. Norling,
    3. L. Summers,
    4. R. Yang,
    5. D. Cooper,
    6. N. A. Petasis,
    7. R. J. Flower,
    8. M. Perretti,
    9. C. N. Serhan
    . 2009. Resolvin D2 is a potent regulator of leukocytes and controls microbial sepsis. Nature 461: 1287–1291.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  87. ↵
    1. Serhan C. N.,
    2. R. Yang,
    3. K. Martinod,
    4. K. Kasuga,
    5. P. S. Pillai,
    6. T. F. Porter,
    7. S. F. Oh,
    8. M. Spite
    . 2009. Maresins: novel macrophage mediators with potent antiinflammatory and proresolving actions. J. Exp. Med. 206: 15–23.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  88. ↵
    1. Khoury J.,
    2. J. C. Ibla,
    3. A. S. Neish,
    4. S. P. Colgan
    . 2007. Antiinflammatory adaptation to hypoxia through adenosine-mediated cullin-1 deneddylation. J. Clin. Invest. 117: 703–711.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  89. ↵
    1. Bolli R.,
    2. K. Shinmura,
    3. X. L. Tang,
    4. E. Kodani,
    5. Y. T. Xuan,
    6. Y. Guo,
    7. B. Dawn
    . 2002. Discovery of a new function of cyclooxygenase (COX)-2: COX-2 is a cardioprotective protein that alleviates ischemia/reperfusion injury and mediates the late phase of preconditioning. Cardiovasc. Res. 55: 506–519.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  90. ↵
    1. Vessey D. A.,
    2. L. Li,
    3. N. Honbo,
    4. J. S. Karliner
    . 2009. Sphingosine 1-phosphate is an important endogenous cardioprotectant released by ischemic pre- and postconditioning. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 297: H1429–H1435.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  91. ↵
    1. Anelli V.,
    2. C. R. Gault,
    3. A. B. Cheng,
    4. L. M. Obeid
    . 2008. Sphingosine kinase 1 is up-regulated during hypoxia in U87MG glioma cells. Role of hypoxia-inducible factors 1 and 2. J. Biol. Chem. 283: 3365–3375.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  92. ↵
    1. Schnitzer S. E.,
    2. A. Weigert,
    3. J. Zhou,
    4. B. Brüne
    . 2009. Hypoxia enhances sphingosine kinase 2 activity and provokes sphingosine-1-phosphate-mediated chemoresistance in A549 lung cancer cells. Mol. Cancer Res. 7: 393–401.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  93. ↵
    1. Cuvillier O.,
    2. G. Pirianov,
    3. B. Kleuser,
    4. P. G. Vanek,
    5. O. A. Coso,
    6. S. Gutkind,
    7. S. Spiegel
    . 1996. Suppression of ceramide-mediated programmed cell death by sphingosine-1-phosphate. Nature 381: 800–803.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 184 (8)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 184, Issue 8
15 Apr 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Metabolic Shifts in Immunity and Inflammation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Metabolic Shifts in Immunity and Inflammation
Douglas J. Kominsky, Eric L. Campbell, Sean P. Colgan
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2010, 184 (8) 4062-4068; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903002

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Metabolic Shifts in Immunity and Inflammation
Douglas J. Kominsky, Eric L. Campbell, Sean P. Colgan
The Journal of Immunology April 15, 2010, 184 (8) 4062-4068; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903002
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Dicer and PKR as Novel Regulators of Embryonic Stem Cell Fate and Antiviral Innate Immunity
  • Innate and Adaptive Immunity in Noninfectious Granulomatous Lung Disease
  • Innate Immune Memory and the Host Response to Infection
Show more BRIEF REVIEWS

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606