Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

DNAM-1/CD155 Interactions Promote Cytokine and NK Cell-Mediated Suppression of Poorly Immunogenic Melanoma Metastases

Christopher J. Chan, Daniel M. Andrews, Nicole M. McLaughlin, Hideo Yagita, Susan Gilfillan, Marco Colonna and Mark J. Smyth
J Immunol January 15, 2010, 184 (2) 902-911; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0903225
Christopher J. Chan
*Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne;
†Department of Immunology, Monash University, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniel M. Andrews
*Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nicole M. McLaughlin
*Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hideo Yagita
‡Department of Immunology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Gilfillan
§Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marco Colonna
§Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark J. Smyth
*Cancer Immunology Program, Sir Donald and Lady Trescowthick Laboratories, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, East Melbourne;
†Department of Immunology, Monash University, Alfred Medical Research and Education Precinct, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Cytokine suppression of B16F10 lung metastases requires DNAM-1. A, Groups of 5–20 B6 WT and DNAM-1−/− mice were challenged i.v. with 2 × 105 B16F10 tumor cells as described in Materials and Methods. Groups of mice received PBS or cytokine treatment as follows: 100,000 IU IL-2 i.p. on day −1 relative to tumor inoculation, 50 μg IL-21 i.p. on days −1, 0, 1 and 2, or 500 ng IL-12 i.p. on days −1 and 0. B, Some groups of B6 WT mice were treated with either cIg or anti-mouse DNAM-1 (250 μg i.p. on days −1, 0, and 7 after tumor inoculation). Lungs were harvested on day 14 and fixed in Bouin’s solution. Tumor colonies were counted under a dissecting microscope. Data are depicted as individual mice (each symbol) and mean tumor colonies ± SEM (cross bar) for each group. Statistical differences between treated WT and DNAM-1−/− mice or cIg-treated and anti–DNAM-1–treated WT mice are depicted by asterisks. Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    IL-2 mediated suppression of B16F10 lung metastases requires early NK cell and DNAM-1/CD155 function. A, Groups of 5 B6 WT and DNAM-1−/− mice were challenged i.v. with 2 × 105 B16F10 tumor cells. Groups of mice received PBS or 100,000 IU IL-2 i.p. on day −1 relative to tumor inoculation. Some groups of B6 WT or DNAM-1−/− mice received cIg or were depleted of CD8+ T lymphocytes or NK cells in vivo, by treatment with anti-CD8 mAb or anti-asGM1, respectively, on days −1, 0, and 7. B, Groups of B6 WT mice were treated with either cIg, anti-mouse DNAM-1 (250 μg i.p.), or anti-asGM1 (100 μg) early (on days −1, 0, and 7; d-1) or late (on days 3, 4, and 10; d3). C, Groups of 10 B6 WT and DNAM-1−/− mice were challenged i.v. with 2 × 105 B16F10 tumor cells. Groups of mice received PBS or 100,000 IU IL-2 i.p. on day −1. Some groups of B6 WT or DNAM-1−/− mice were treated with either cIg or anti-mouse CD155 (250 μg i.p.) on days −1, 0, and 7. Lungs were harvested on day 14 and fixed in Bouin’s solution. Tumor colonies were counted under a dissecting microscope. Data are depicted as individual mice (each symbol) and mean tumor colonies ± SEM (cross bar) for each group. Statistical differences between (A) subset depleted and control treated mice and (B, C) treated WT and DNAM-1−/− or anti–DNAM-1–treated or anti-CD155–treated WT mice are depicted by asterisks. Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    DNAM-1-mediated suppression correlates with perforin function. Groups of 5 B6 WT, B6 pfp−/−, B6 IFN-γ−/−, and B6 pfp−/− × IFN-γ−/− mice were challenged i.v. with 2 × 105 B16F10 tumor cells as described in Materials and Methods. Groups of mice received (A) PBS or (B) 100,000 IU IL-2 i.p. on day −1 relative to tumor inoculation. Some groups of B6 WT mice were treated with either cIg or anti-mouse DNAM-1 (250 μg i.p. on days −1, 0, and 7). Lungs were harvested on day 14 and fixed in Bouin’s solution. Tumor colonies were counted under a dissecting microscope. Data are depicted as individual mice (each symbol) and mean tumor colonies ± SEM (cross bar) for each group. Statistical differences between cIg-treated and anti–DNAM-1–treated mice are depicted by asterisks. Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Expression of NK cell ligands on B16F10, B16, and B16 derivatives. NK cell ligand expression was measured by flow cytometry on B16F10, B16, and B16 derivatives derived from cell culture. Isotype staining is shown as filled histograms, and expression of the ligand of interest is shown as open histograms. Histograms are representative of two independent experiments.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    NKG2D-mediated suppression of B16-Rae-1 does not require DNAM-1. Groups of 5 B6 WT and DNAM-1−/− mice were challenged i.v. with (A) 2 × 105 B16-Rae-1ε, (B) 1 × 105 B16, (C) 7.5 × 105 B16-Rae-1ε, and (D) 2 × 105 B16 tumor cells. A and B, Groups of B6 WT or DNAM-1−/− mice were treated with either anti-asGM1 (100 μg i.p. on days −1, 0, and 7 after tumor inoculation), cIg, anti-mouse DNAM-1 or anti-NKG2D (250 μg i.p. on days −1, 0, and 7). C and D, Groups of mice additionally received PBS or 100,000 IU IL-2 i.p. on day −1. Lungs were harvested on day 14 and fixed in Bouin’s solution. Tumor colonies were counted under a dissecting microscope. Data are depicted as individual mice (each symbol) and mean tumor colonies ± SEM (cross bar) for each group. Statistical differences between cIg-treated and anti–DNAM-1–treated WT mice or DNAM-1−/− mice and are depicted by asterisks. Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Costimulator-mediated suppression of B16-CD70 or -CD80 by NK cells requires DNAM-1. Groups of 5 B6 WT mice were challenged i.v. with 2 × 105 (A) B16-CD70 or (B) B16-CD80 tumor cells. Groups of B6 WT mice were treated with either anti-asGM1 (100 μg i.p. on days −1, 0, and 7 after tumor inoculation), cIg, anti-mouse DNAM-1, anti-CD70, anti-CD80 or a combination (250 μg i.p. on days −1, 0, and 7). Some groups of mice additionally received PBS or 100,000 IU IL-2 i.p. on day −1. Lungs were harvested on day 14 and fixed in Bouin’s solution. Tumor colonies were counted under a dissecting microscope. Data are depicted as individual mice (each symbol) and mean tumor colonies ± SEM (cross bar) for each group. Statistical differences between cIg-treated and Ab-treated mice are depicted by asterisks. Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    B16-CD70 or -CD80 suppression requires host DNAM-1. Groups of 5 B6 WT or DNAM-1−/− mice were challenged i.v. with (A) 2 × 105 B16, (B) 7.5 × 105 B16-CD70 or (C) 7.5 × 105 B16-CD80 tumor cells. Groups of mice additionally received PBS or 100,000 IU IL-2 i.p. on day −1 relative to tumor inoculation. Lungs were harvested on day 14 and fixed in Bouin’s solution. Tumor colonies were counted under a dissecting microscope. Data are depicted as individual mice (each symbol) and mean tumor colonies ± SEM (cross bar) for each group. Statistical differences between WT and DNAM-1−/− mice are depicted by asterisks. Mann-Whitney U test, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8.

    DNAM-1 is not required for NKG2D-mediated and ADCC. IL-2–activated NK cells from mice of the indicated genotypes were tested for ex vivo cytotoxicity against parental B16 targets and variants expressing different ligands in a standard 4-h 51Cr-release assay. IL-2 activated NK cell-mediated cytotoxicity of (A) B16 in the presence of cIg, anti–DNAM-1 or anti-CD155; (B) B16-Rae-1ε; (C) B16-CD70; and (D) B16-CD80. Splenocytes (E) or IL-2–activated NK cells (F) were also tested for ADCC against NP-labeled B16 targets in the presence (+) or absence (−) of anti-NP Ab at several E:T ratios as shown. Each data point is the mean ± SEM of two independent experiments done in triplicate for each effector/target ratio.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 184 (2)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 184, Issue 2
15 Jan 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
DNAM-1/CD155 Interactions Promote Cytokine and NK Cell-Mediated Suppression of Poorly Immunogenic Melanoma Metastases
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
DNAM-1/CD155 Interactions Promote Cytokine and NK Cell-Mediated Suppression of Poorly Immunogenic Melanoma Metastases
Christopher J. Chan, Daniel M. Andrews, Nicole M. McLaughlin, Hideo Yagita, Susan Gilfillan, Marco Colonna, Mark J. Smyth
The Journal of Immunology January 15, 2010, 184 (2) 902-911; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903225

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
DNAM-1/CD155 Interactions Promote Cytokine and NK Cell-Mediated Suppression of Poorly Immunogenic Melanoma Metastases
Christopher J. Chan, Daniel M. Andrews, Nicole M. McLaughlin, Hideo Yagita, Susan Gilfillan, Marco Colonna, Mark J. Smyth
The Journal of Immunology January 15, 2010, 184 (2) 902-911; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0903225
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more HOST DEFENSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606