Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

IN THIS ISSUE

J Immunol November 1, 2009, 183 (9) 5435-5436; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0990090
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

RANKLing Intestinal Antigen Uptake

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Microfold (M) cells are specialized epithelial cells in the follicle-associated epithelium (FAE) of the Peyer’s patches (PP) and the isolated lymphoid follicles of the intestine. These cells are important for the sampling of particulate Ags, including commensal bacteria, from the intestinal lumen. In this issue, Knoop et al. (p. 5738 ) found that the TNF superfamily member receptor activator of NF-κB ligand (RANKL) was required for M cell development. Mice deficient in RANKL demonstrated a severe reduction in M cell numbers in the FAE of the PP that was associated with a defect in particulate Ag uptake in PP follicles and impaired intestinal IgA responses. Administration of exogenous RANKL could rescue the development of M cells and associated Ag uptake. This exogenous RANKL also caused an increase in villous M cells that were capable of taking up particulate Ags and transporting them across the epithelium. Neutralizing anti-RANKL Ab also caused a dramatic reduction in M cells, indicating that the M cell defect in RANKL-deficient mice was not due to the general developmental defects that these mice display. RANK, the receptor for RANKL, was expressed in intestinal epithelial cells, whereas RANKL was expressed by subepithelial stromal cells in PP domes. This study suggests that the RANK:RANKL interaction is required for the induction and maintenance of intestinal Ag-sampling M cells, and this information could be of use in mucosal vaccine development.

Activation amid Adenosine

Extracellular adenosine accumulates in inflamed tissues and tumors, especially under hypoxic conditions, and can suppress inflammatory responses. Its immunosuppressive activities may protect against excess inflammation but may also shield tumors from immune attack. To understand how extracellular adenosine might alter T cell responses, Ohta et al. (p. 5487 ) analyzed the effects of adenosine receptor A2AR signaling during T cell activation. Although only minor suppression of T cell proliferation was observed, IFN-γ production was severely inhibited by A2AR agonists. This pattern of IFN-γ suppression despite continued proliferation was observed in both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. Additionally, IL-2 production and cytotoxic activity were suppressed, but no increases in apoptosis or Th2 skewing were detected. Reduced IFN-γ was still observed several days after A2AR agonist removal, suggesting that adenosine treatment resulted in the persistent impairment of T cell effector functions. These data indicate that an adenosine-rich environment allows T cell expansion but protects tissues against inflammatory responses and may allow tumors to escape immune attention by inhibiting T cell effector functions.

Stopping Anthrax at Death’s Door

Bacillus anthracis, the causative agent of inhalational anthrax, suppresses macrophage responses via lethal toxin (LT), one of its virulence toxins. It has therefore been presumed that alveolar macrophages at the site of infection can do little to protect the host against anthrax. However, human autopsies and studies with mouse models of inhalational anthrax have demonstrated that B. anthracis is effectively cleared from human and mouse alveolar space. To attempt to explain these observations, Wu et al. (p. 5799 ) asked whether human alveolar macrophages (HAM) were resistant to the immunosuppressive effects of LT. Indeed, compared with RAW 264.7 macrophages, HAM were resistant to LT-mediated cytokine suppression and MAPK inhibition. In addition, both human and mouse alveolar macrophages were resistant to LT-mediated apoptosis. Although anthrax toxin receptors were present in HAM at the mRNA level, little or no protein expression was observed, supporting an observed failure of protective Ag (PA), an LT component, to bind to HAM. HAM therefore appear to be protected from the immunosuppressive effects of LT and thus, rather than serving as a target for B. anthracis infection, may instead act as an obstacle that the pathogen must overcome to cause disease.

How DCs Establish Oral Tolerance

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Although the mechanism by which they act is unclear, dendritic cells (DCs) in the mesenteric lymph nodes (MLN-DCs) are known to be important for the induction of tolerance to the harmless bacteria and food Ags that are constantly present in the intestine. Onodera et al. (p. 5608 ) found that MLN-DCs, but not splenic DCs, constitutively expressed the immunoregulatory enzyme IDO, which has been implicated in many forms of immunological tolerance. Previous in vitro studies demonstrated that IDO could be induced in DCs through an interaction between CTLA-4 on regulatory T cells (Tregs) and B7 molecules on DCs. Suggesting that this interaction might also occur in vivo, the IDO-expressing MLN-DCs, but not splenic DCs, were observed to colocalize with Tregs. Indeed, CTLA-4 expression in Tregs was important for IDO expression in these DCs, but not for the DC/Treg colocalization. The subset of MLN-DCs that expressed IDO also produced CCL22, which was involved in IDO induction through CCR4 signaling in Tregs. Additional experiments suggested that induction of CCL22 expression in these DCs could be triggered by the phagocytosis of apoptotic cells. Taken together, these data allowed the authors to propose a model of DC-mediated oral tolerance induction requiring CCL22:CCR4 and CLTA-4:B7 interactions that lead to the expression of IDO in MLN-DCs.

p110δ Controls “Innate” B Cells

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
The p110δ isoform of the PI3K p110 catalytic subunit is known to be important for conventional B cell development and function. However, its role in B-1 and marginal zone (MZ) B cell activity is unknown, because p110δ-deficient mice lack these subsets of “innate” B cells. To fill this gap in our knowledge, Durand et al. (p. 5673 ) analyzed the effects of a specific p110δ inhibitor, IC87114, on B-1 and MZ B cell function. Use of this inhibitor demonstrated that p110δ was important for Akt phosphorylation in response to signaling through the BCR, TLR9, and chemoattractant receptors in B-1, B-2, and MZ B cells. IC87114 also inhibited both the TLR-driven proliferation of B-1 and MZ B cells and chemotaxis of these cells toward CXCL13 and sphingosine 1-phosphate. Furthermore, p110δ activity was found to be involved in MZ B cell localization in the spleen and in TLR-stimulated Ab production in B-1 and MZ B cells. In vivo, p110δ was required for the production of natural Abs, including pathogenic self-reactive Abs, and p110δ inhibitors could inhibit autoantibody production. These data indicate that the p110δ isoform of PI3K is required for many of the functions of “innate-like” B cells, and inhibitors of this subunit could be useful in the treatment of B cell-driven autoimmunity.

Tracking Down Human Th17 Cells

The recently identified proinflammatory Th17 subset of T cells has been the subject of intense study, but the lack of a specific cell surface marker has hindered analysis of human Th17 cells. In this issue, Brucklacher-Waldert et al. (p. 5494 ) found that IL-17A was specifically expressed on the surface of human Th17 cells. This cytokine was not presented by the IL-17R and was not observed to have a transmembrane domain, but may instead have been expressed in heterodimers with IL-17F. The IL-17A+CD4+ T cells stably secreted IL-17A and expressed RORγt, supporting their identification as Th17 cells. Following in vitro stimulation with PMA and ionomycin, these IL-17A+ T cells demonstrated increased levels of basal activation and up-regulation of costimulatory molecules, adhesion molecules, and CCR6 compared with cells lacking IL-17A. T cells expressing surface IL-17A also coexpressed CD161, providing further support for a Th17 phenotype. Interestingly, analysis of Th1, Th17, and Th1/17 clones (which expressed an intermediate level of cell surface IL-17A) revealed that Th1/17 and Th17 cells demonstrated phenotypic plasticity in response to IL-12 and IL-23. Human Th17 cells can therefore be clearly identified by the expression of IL-17A on the cell surface, and the use of this marker should allow more rapid progress in the understanding of the roles these cells play in human host defense and autoimmunity.

SCF + IL-25 + Complexity = Allergy

Both stem cell factor (SCF) and IL-25 promote Th2-driven allergic responses in the lung by acting on a variety of cell types. Dolgachev et al. (p. 5705 ) analyzed the effects of blocking SCF to better understand how these factors might influence one another and airway inflammation in mice. Anti-SCF treatment reduced leukocyte accumulation in the lungs and Th2 cytokine production in the lungs, but not the lymph nodes, of allergic mice. SCF depletion also caused a reduction in IL-25 expression, and further analysis identified eosinophils as a major source of IL-25. To further address the role of IL-25 during allergic inflammation, the authors examined IL-25-induced cytokine production and determined that Th2 cytokine-producing, IL-25-responsive cells were increased in both lung and bone marrow during chronic allergic responses. IL-25 administration could exacerbate airway hyperreactivity (AHR) and reconstitute AHR in anti-SCF-treated mice, suggesting that both SCF and IL-25 were important for asthmatic disease. IL-4-producing, IL-25-responsive cells in both the lung and bone marrow were found to express CD11b and GR1, and these cells were depleted in both tissues following SCF neutralization in the airways. Together, these data demonstrate that local blockade of SCF can have systemic effects and suggest that SCF could serve as an attractive therapeutic target for the suppression of allergic asthmatic responses through the down-regulation of IL-25 and Th2 cytokines.

Survival via Shc

Figure4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
The adaptor protein Shc links multiple receptors to Ras signaling and is important for T cell development at the β selection checkpoint. Signaling through Ras is required for B cell development, but the potential role of Shc in B cell development has not been determined. Giles et al. (p. 5468 ) took two genetic approaches to tease apart the specific steps of B cell development in which Shc might be involved. They created transgenic mice conditionally expressing a dominant-negative Shc protein (ShcFFF) and also conditionally deleted Shc1 at different stages of B cell development. Analysis of B cell development in these mice revealed a nonredundant role for Shc in the pre-pro-B to early pro-B cell transition, a step at which Ras signaling is also required. Pro-B cells from mice with impaired Shc signaling were defective in their ability to respond to IL-7 despite normal expression of the IL-7R. In fact, pro-B cells expressing ShcFFF underwent apoptosis in response to IL-7, although their IL-7-driven proliferation was not impaired. Signaling via Shc therefore plays a role in the IL-7-mediated survival pathway in pro-B cells and is critical for early B cell development in the bone marrow.

Summaries written by Jennifer Hartt Meyers, Ph.D.

  • Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 183 (9)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 183, Issue 9
1 Nov 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IN THIS ISSUE
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
IN THIS ISSUE
The Journal of Immunology November 1, 2009, 183 (9) 5435-5436; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0990090

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
IN THIS ISSUE
The Journal of Immunology November 1, 2009, 183 (9) 5435-5436; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0990090
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • RANKLing Intestinal Antigen Uptake
    • Activation amid Adenosine
    • Stopping Anthrax at Death’s Door
    • How DCs Establish Oral Tolerance
    • p110δ Controls “Innate” B Cells
    • Tracking Down Human Th17 Cells
    • SCF + IL-25 + Complexity = Allergy
    • Survival via Shc
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Top Reads
  • In This Issue
  • In This Issue
Show more IN THIS ISSUE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606