Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Dual Control of Antitumor CD8 T Cells through the Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Pathway and Immunosuppressive CD4 T Cells: Regulation and Counterregulation

Andrew J. Currie, Amy Prosser, Alison McDonnell, Amanda L. Cleaver, Bruce W. S. Robinson, Gordon J. Freeman and Robbert G. van der Most
J Immunol December 15, 2009, 183 (12) 7898-7908; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0901060
Andrew J. Currie
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amy Prosser
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alison McDonnell
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Amanda L. Cleaver
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bruce W. S. Robinson
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gordon J. Freeman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robbert G. van der Most
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    PD-L1 is expressed in the AB1-HA tumor microenvironment. A and B, AB1-HA tumor cells growing in vitro were stained for PD-L1 expression before (A) and after (B) exposure to 20 ng/ml murine IFN-γ (R & D Systems) for 24 h and analyzed using FACS. C and D, Expression of PD-L1 in the ex vivo tumor milieu before (C) and after (D) exposure to 20 ng/ml murine IFN-γ for 24 h. Whole tumor was removed at day 15, homogenized, exposed to IFN-γ or PBS, and analyzed for PD-L1 expression. Percentages of tumor cells in the marked gates are indicated. E, PD-L1 expression on tumor-resident DCs. Homogenized tumor samples were gated on CD11chigh (left panel) or CD11clow (right panel) and analyzed for PD-L1 expression. F, PD-L1 expression on CD11chigh DCs from the tumor-draining lymph nodes (DLN, left panel) and nondraining lymph nodes (NDLN, right panel).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    PD-1 expression on CD4 and CD8 T cells in the tumor and the local lymph nodes. A, PD-1 expression on CD8+ T cells from the tumor-draining lymph nodes (DLN) was significantly increased compared with non-DLN (NDLN); unpaired Student’s t test. Representative dot plots gated on lymphocytes show PD-1 expression on CD8+ T cells from the non-DLN (left panel) and DLN (right panel). Percentage of PD-1high CD8+ T cells is indicated. B, TCR-transgenic HA-specific CD8+ T cells from the NDLN (left panel), DLN (center panel), and tumor (right panel) were analyzed for expression of PD-1 and LFA-1. Percentages of PD-1+CD8+ T cells are indicated. Cells shown are gated on CD8+ cells. C, PD-1 expression on CD4+ T cells from the tumor nondraining lymph nodes (left panel) and draining lymph nodes (right panel). Percentages of PD-1+CD4+ T cells are indicated.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Impact of in vivo PD-L1 blockade on tumor growth and T cell activation. A, Tumor growth in AB1-HA tumor-bearing BALB/c mice treated with 200 μg of anti-PD-L1 Ab (days 8, 11, and 14 posttumor inoculation). Data shown are mean ± SEM (n = 3) from one experiment. ∗∗, p < 0.05 when untreated is compared with anti-PD-L1. B, PD-1 and ICOS expression on CD4+ T cells from the nondraining lymph nodes (NDLN; left panels) and draining lymph nodes (DLN; right panels) from untreated (top panels) or anti-PD-L1-treated (bottom panels) mice. Tumor-bearing mice were left untreated or treated with anti-PD-L1 (days 11 and 14), and lymph nodes were harvested at day 16. C, PD-1 and ICOS expression on CD8+ cells, as per B.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Increased activation of CD8 T cells by PD-L1 blockade after CD4 depletion. Representative depletion data are shown for PBL samples at day 3 after GK1.5 Ab injection (A) and for lymph nodes at day 16 after GK1.5 Ab injection (B). C, Effect of CD4 depletion on the activation of T cells in the tumor-draining lymph nodes. Tumor-bearing mice were left untreated or depleted of CD4+ T cells (days 8, 11, and 14) with or without PD-L1 blockade (days 8, 11, and 14). Draining lymph node cells were harvested on day 16 and were gated on CD8+ (upper row) or CD4+ (lower row) cells and analyzed for PD-1 and ICOS expression. D, As per C, but showing expression of PD-1 and Ki-67.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    A, CD4 depletion with PD-L1 blockade promotes CTL activity. Mice were either left untreated or treated with anti-PD-L1, CD4 depletion, or a combination of the two (days 7, 10, and 13). Two days after the last dose of treatment (day 15), 2 × 107 HA-coated CFSE-labeled target splenocytes were injected i.v., and their recovery in the draining lymph nodes (DLN), nondraining lymph nodes (NDLN), spleen, and tumor was measured 18 h later. Responses of individual mice are shown with group mean (horizontal scale bar; n = 3 per group). ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗∗, p < 0.005 (unpaired Student’s t test). B, MHC I pentamer staining on tumor-draining lymph nodes in CD4-depleted and/or PD-L1-blocked mice. Tumor-bearing mice were treated with Abs from day 7 onward (anti-CD4 on day 7; anti-PD-L1 on days 8 and 11), and lymph nodes were harvested on day 14 and used for pentamer analysis. C, Expression of ICOS on pentamer+ CD8 T cells, as shown in B.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Effect of CD4 depletion on effect of PD-L1 blockade. Tumor-bearing mice were left untreated or depleted of CD4+ T cells using GK1.5-depleting Ab (days 6, 9, and 12) with or without PD-L1 blockade (days 10, 13, and 16). Data shown are mean (n = 5) from one experiment. ∗∗, p < 0.005, anti-PD-L1 vs anti-PD-L1 + anti-CD4, day 13–28; ∗, p < 0.05, anti-PD-L1 vs anti-PD-L1 + anti-CD4, day 28–41.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    PD-L1 blockade increases CD4+ regulatory T cell numbers. A, Percentage of foxp3+CD4+ T cells present in the draining lymph nodes of untreated mice or mice treated with poly(I:C), anti-PD-L1, or both (days 7, 10, and 13; top panel). Lymph nodes were harvested at day 14. ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01; unpaired Student’s t test. Representative plots of the same data (bottom panel). Numbers indicated represent the percentage of CD4+ T cells positive for foxp3. B, ICOS expression on CD4+ foxp3+ T regulatory cells from the draining lymph nodes of mice treated, as for A. C, ICOS-L expression on tumor-infiltrating CD11c+ DCs. CD11c+ DCs were gated (left panel) and analyzed for ICOS-L expression (green graph). Isotype control staining is shown in red.

  • FIGURE 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8.

    Schematic representation of the impact of PD-L1 blockade in the antiviral vs the antitumor setting. T cells are indicated in red as antiviral (A) or antitumor (B) effector cells, and in blue as immunosuppressive protumor T cells (B). Impact of PD-L1 blockade is indicated.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 183 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 183, Issue 12
15 Dec 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Dual Control of Antitumor CD8 T Cells through the Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Pathway and Immunosuppressive CD4 T Cells: Regulation and Counterregulation
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Dual Control of Antitumor CD8 T Cells through the Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Pathway and Immunosuppressive CD4 T Cells: Regulation and Counterregulation
Andrew J. Currie, Amy Prosser, Alison McDonnell, Amanda L. Cleaver, Bruce W. S. Robinson, Gordon J. Freeman, Robbert G. van der Most
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2009, 183 (12) 7898-7908; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901060

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Dual Control of Antitumor CD8 T Cells through the Programmed Death-1/Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Pathway and Immunosuppressive CD4 T Cells: Regulation and Counterregulation
Andrew J. Currie, Amy Prosser, Alison McDonnell, Amanda L. Cleaver, Bruce W. S. Robinson, Gordon J. Freeman, Robbert G. van der Most
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2009, 183 (12) 7898-7908; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0901060
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606