Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

IN THIS ISSUE

J Immunol December 15, 2009, 183 (12) 7617-7618; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0990105
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Registering MHC II Tetramers

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Tetramers consisting of peptide:MHC class I complexes (pMHCT-1) have been used extensively for the study of CD8+ T cell responses. However, studies with peptide:MHC class II tetramers (pMHCT-2) have been far less successful. In hopes of developing functional pMHCT-2, Landais et al. (p. 7949 ) sought to identify why these tetramers often fail to stain Ag-specific CD4+ T cells. To systematically address this question, the authors analyzed three characteristics of I-Ad-OVA323–339 pMHCT-2 molecules: geometry, stability, and peptide display. Changing the tetramers’ geometry or increasing their stability did not result in T cell staining. In contrast, CD4+ T cells were extremely sensitive to the register in which the OVA peptide was displayed. Both DO11.10 and OT-2 cells could only be stained with tetramers expressing peptide in register 2. Altering the length and composition of the linker attaching the peptide to the MHC β-chain allowed staining optimization, presumably by encouraging peptide binding to the MHC in register 2. Immunization of BALB/c mice with whole OVA protein demonstrated that long peptides could be displayed in multiple registers in vivo, resulting in the selection of register-specific T cell populations. These data have useful implications for the effective design of pMHCT-2 and for the understanding of CD4+ T cell activation.

Cross-Priming Specialization

Dendritic cells (DCs), like most immune cells, consist of several functionally distinct subsets. Previous data have suggested that a fraction of murine CD8α+ DCs is particularly suited to cross-presentation, the MHC class I-mediated presentation of exogenous Ags to CD8+ T cells. Using a mouse model that allowed the selective depletion of langerin (CD207)-expressing cells in vivo, Farrand et al. (p. 7732 ) asked whether langerin+CD8α+ DCs were the DC subset responsible for cross-presentation. Indeed, langerin+CD8α+ DCs were able to effectively shuttle soluble Ag to the cytosol and stimulate CD8+ T cells. Depletion of this DC subset dramatically reduced this cross-presentation. In response to systemic activation via ligands for TLR2 or invariant NKT cells, langerin+CD8α+ DCs up-regulated costimulatory molecules and effectively cross-primed CTL. This DC subset was also responsible for IL-12p40 production in response to these stimuli. Again, depletion of langerin+ cells confirmed these observations by leading to the ablation of IL-12 release and a significant reduction in CD8+ T cell responses following TLR2 or invariant NKT cell activation. This study defines a critical role for langerin+, but not langerin−, CD8α+ splenic DCs in cross-priming and IL-12 production. This advancement in our understanding of DC specialization may guide future vaccination strategies.

Sluggish Signaling

Signaling through TLRs is important for innate immune responses to pathogens. In a genetic screen using N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis to identify defects in TLR signaling, Xiao et al. (p. 7975 ) detected a mutation that they dubbed Sluggish. This mutation was found to affect splicing of the gene encoding tumor progression locus 2 (Tpl2)/MAP3K8, which is a kinase involved in many TLR signaling pathways. The Sluggish mutation caused the removal of exons encoding portions of the Tpl2 kinase domain and led to reduced TLR-induced ERK phosphorylation in vitro. Peritoneal macrophages from Sluggish homozygotes secreted little to no TNF-α in response to all TLR ligands tested and also showed impaired IL-6 secretion. Signaling through TLR7 and TLR9, but not other TLRs, led to reduced type I IFN production in peritoneal macrophages from Sluggish mice compared with those from wild-type mice. Despite this selectively impaired IFN production, Sluggish mice were able to effectively control viral infections. However, these mice were highly susceptible to group B streptococcus infection, and infected macrophages demonstrated profoundly impaired TNF-α and type I IFN production compared with those of wild-type mice. Interestingly, Tpl2 is therefore part of a signaling cascade required for the innate immune response to specific classes of pathogens.

Complex Cytokine Family Dynamics

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Interleukin-27 is a heterodimeric cytokine composed of p28 and EBV-induced gene 3 (EBI3) that binds to an IL-27R composed of gp130 and WSX-1. Differences in the phenotypes of mice deficient in EBI3 vs WSX-1 have suggested that p28 might have EBI3-independent functions. In support of this idea, Crabé et al. (p. 7692 ) found that p28 could also form a secreted complex with cytokine-like factor 1 (CLF-1). Like IL-27, this complex was produced by dendritic cells and was able to stimulate NK cells. p28/CLF bound to a tripartite receptor made up of gp130, WSX-1, and IL-6Rα, leading to STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation and proliferation of receptor-transfected Ba/F3 cells. In primary CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, p28/CLF induced IL-6Rα-dependent STAT1 and STAT3 phosphorylation. This novel cytokine also inhibited CD4+ T cell proliferation but stimulated Th17 differentiation and IL-10 production. This demonstration that p28/CLF and IL-6 can both act through the IL-6R has important therapeutic implications, because blocking Abs to IL-6Rα are being developed as treatments for multiple inflammatory and autoimmune diseases.

Innate Allogeneic Responses

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Much is known about the adaptive immune response to allogeneic tissues, but less is understood about how the innate immune system might recognize allogeneic Ags. It has been observed that invertebrate organisms that lack T, B, and NK cells are still able to reject allogeneic tissues, leading Zecher et al. (p. 7810 ) to assess whether mammalian immune systems might also mount lymphocyte-independent alloimmune responses. RAG−/− mice were preimmunized or grafted with syngeneic or allogeneic RAG−/− cells and then challenged in the ear with syngeneic or allogeneic splenocytes. These lymphocyte-deficient mice generated an alloimmune response that required priming with allogeneic cells and showed characteristics of immune memory. The response was mediated by infiltrating monocytes/macrophages and neutrophils but did not involve NK cells. Alloimmunity could be adoptively transferred to naive RAG−/− mice by allograft-primed monocytes, supporting the existence of innate alloreactivity. Interestingly, the use of congenic mice that differed only at the MHC locus indicated that the innate alloresponse was dependent on non-MHC-linked determinants. Thus, mouse monocytes can mount responses to allogeneic nonself independently of NK cells and the MHC.

Tracking Responders

Responses of Ag-specific CD8+ T cells can be effectively analyzed given knowledge of the cells’ epitope specificity. However, responses to complex Ags such as viruses, bacteria, or transplanted organs are more difficult to assess. A complete understanding of T cell immunity and effective vaccine design in such real-world situations require a mechanism to track responding CD8+ T cells. Rai et al. (p. 7672 ) found that up-regulation of CD11a and down-regulation of CD8α identified responding CD8+ T cells following immunization with OVA-expressing, attenuated Listeria monocytogenes. These cell surface marker alterations were maintained during the establishment of T cell memory and were found to occur in response to Ag rather than inflammation. Enumeration of CD11ahighCD8αlow T cells could be used to determine the magnitude of CD8+ T cell expansion in the blood and spleen following bacterial or viral infection and also allowed tracking of pathogen-specific CD8+ T cells in nonlymphoid organs. In both bacterial and viral infections, the analysis of T cells expressing these markers in outbred mice revealed substantially more variability in the magnitude and kinetics of CD8+ T cell responses compared with inbred mice. Despite this variability, the CD11ahighCD8αlow phenotype consistently identified responder T cells, suggesting that this phenotype could be useful for evaluating immune responses in situations relevant to humans. Thus, these markers allow the effective study of CD8+ T cell responses without knowledge of the target Ags involved.

Manipulating MMP-9

Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-9 is involved in many inflammatory processes, but the regulation of its expression is not completely understood. Steenport et al.(p. 8119 ) asked whether other MMPs present in inflammatory or neoplastic conditions under which MMP-9 is up-regulated might affect its expression. Indeed, MMP-1 and MMP-3 were found to induce MMP-9 expression through a pathway requiring MAPKerk1/2 activation, which induced cyclooxygenase-2 (Cox-2) expression. Cox-2 induced PGE2 expression, and PGE2 binding to the EP4 prostanoid receptor mediated MMP-9 expression. Inhibition of Cox-2, MAPKerk1/2, EP4, or MMP activity attenuated MMP-9 expression, indicating the vital role of each component of the pathway in MMP-9 regulation. Analysis of the culture supernatants of MMP-1- or MMP-3-treated macrophages demonstrated the induction of TNF-α, which was found to be responsible for Cox-2 and MMP-9 induction. The ability of MMP-1 and MMP-3 to induce the Cox-2-dependent expression of MMP-9 reveals a connection between MMPs and prostanoids that the authors propose may be important in inflammatory diseases and cancer. The data also demonstrate that MMP-9 induction is targetable by inhibitors of any step of the pathway, providing possible avenues for therapeutic modulation.

Variety is the Spice of TCR Life

Figure4
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Transcriptional enhancers can affect a linked promoter in either a binary manner, by increasing the probability of its usage, or in a graded manner, by up-regulating the rate of transcription. The TCRβ gene enhancer (Eβ) is deeply involved in both triggering Dβ-Jβ recombination in early thymocytes and driving the expression of the assembled TCRβ gene in mature T cells. It is not known, however, whether Eβ acts in a binary or graded manner. To address this issue, Bonnet et al. (p. 7939 ) developed transgenic mice in which Eβ was replaced by a 169-bp Eβ core enhancer fragment (Eβ169/169). Unlike in Eβ−/− mice, thymocytes in Eβ169/169 mice were able to develop past the double-negative stage; however, αβT cells were produced at reduced efficiency in these mice compared with wild type. Eβ169/169 thymocytes demonstrated a block in the double-negative to double-positive transition that was associated with dysfunctional chromatin remodeling. These observations suggested that Eβ169 acted in a binary mode in early thymocytes. However, mature Eβ169/169 T cells showed heterogeneous expression of TCRβ and a biased Vβ repertoire, suggesting a graded mode of Eβ action. Taken together, these data suggest that an enhancer can have different modes of action at different stages of cellular development, and elucidation of the Eβ mechanisms of action may be important to the understanding of TCR rearrangement and allelic exclusion.

Summaries written by Jennifer Hartt Meyers, Ph.D.

  • Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 183 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 183, Issue 12
15 Dec 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
IN THIS ISSUE
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
IN THIS ISSUE
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2009, 183 (12) 7617-7618; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0990105

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
IN THIS ISSUE
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2009, 183 (12) 7617-7618; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0990105
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Registering MHC II Tetramers
    • Cross-Priming Specialization
    • Sluggish Signaling
    • Complex Cytokine Family Dynamics
    • Innate Allogeneic Responses
    • Tracking Responders
    • Manipulating MMP-9
    • Variety is the Spice of TCR Life
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Top Reads
  • In This Issue
  • In This Issue
Show more IN THIS ISSUE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606