Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Sequential Cooperation of CD2 and CD48 in the Buildup of the Early TCR Signalosome

Arshad Muhammad, Herbert B. Schiller, Florian Forster, Paul Eckerstorfer, Rene Geyeregger, Vladimir Leksa, Gerhard J. Zlabinger, Maria Sibilia, Alois Sonnleitner, Wolfgang Paster and Hannes Stockinger
J Immunol June 15, 2009, 182 (12) 7672-7680; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.0800691
Arshad Muhammad
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Herbert B. Schiller
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Florian Forster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Paul Eckerstorfer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Rene Geyeregger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Vladimir Leksa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gerhard J. Zlabinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Maria Sibilia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alois Sonnleitner
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wolfgang Paster
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hannes Stockinger
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The buildup of TCR signaling microclusters containing adaptor proteins and kinases is prerequisite for T cell activation. One hallmark in this process is association of the TCR with lipid raft microdomains enriched in GPI-proteins that have potential to act as accessory molecules for TCR signaling. In this study, we show that GPI-anchored CD48 but not CD59 was recruited to the immobilized TCR/CD3 complex upon activation of T cells. CD48 reorganization was vital for T cell IL-2 production by mediating lateral association of the early signaling component linker for activated T cells (LAT) to the TCR/CD3 complex. Furthermore, we identified CD2 as an adaptor linking the Src protein tyrosine kinase Lck and the CD48/LAT complex to TCR/CD3: CD2 associated with TCR/CD3 upon T cell activation irrespective of CD48 expression, while association of CD48 and LAT with the TCR/CD3 complex depended on CD2. Consequently, our data indicate that CD2 and CD48 cooperate hierarchically in the buildup of the early TCR signalosome; CD2 functions as the master switch recruiting CD48 and Lck. CD48 in turn shuttles the transmembrane adapter molecule LAT.

Efficient activation of T cells entails numerous interactions of a plethora of receptors and signaling molecules and results in production of cytokines, such as IL-2, and clonal expansion and differentiation to effector T lymphocytes. This process is induced by a primary Ag-specific signal via TCR engagement by peptide-MHC as well as a second signal provided by costimulatory receptors engaged by their respective ligands on an APC (1). T cell activation commences with an early wave of protein tyrosine kinase activity, which is mediated by the Src-family kinase Lck, the Syk family kinase ZAP70 and members of the Tec kinase family. A central target for ZAP70 phosphorylation is the transmembrane adapter molecule linker for activated T cells (LAT)3 (2). Phosphorylated LAT serves as crucial link between TCR-proximal events and distal signaling pathways and is indispensable for T cell development and function (3, 4).

T cells reorganize their surface molecules to form a well-structured contact zone with APCs known as immunological synapse (IS) (5, 6). It is an emerging concept in T cell biology that TCR-microclusters in the periphery of the IS are the main source of sustained TCR signaling, whereas the center of the synapse might play a role in signal termination (7). Lipid rafts may play a role in the formation of these signaling microclusters by providing a platform for molecular association and segregation processes (8, 9).

Central components of lipid rafts are GPI-anchored receptors that are enriched in the rafts via their glycolipid anchors. Others and we have shown that cross-linking of GPI-anchored proteins on T cells, such as CD90, Ly-6, CD48, and CD59 results in phosphorylation of protein tyrosine kinases like Lck (10, 11). Thus, GPI-anchored proteins have potential to provide costimulatory signals during T cell activation. CD48 in particular was firmly demonstrated to amplify TCR signaling (12, 13).

Recently, we analyzed the dynamics of the TCR, the lipid raft-associated GPI-proteins CD48 and CD59, and the major leukocyte phosphatase CD45 in living naive human peripheral blood T lymphocytes by a noninvasive single-molecule imaging approach. We found that T cell stimulation on planar CD3 mAb coated surfaces induced the immobilization of CD48 in the center of the T cell interface whereas the second GPI protein, CD59, remained highly mobile (14). Heterogeneity in the behavior of lipid raft molecules and different lipid composition of microdomains has been already demonstrated by others (15, 16, 17), however, it is still not clear what molecular interactions determine this diversity. In the murine and human system, CD48 has been described as a ligand for CD2 in both cis-and trans-configuration (18, 19, 20, 21), and CD2 has been ascribed to signaling microdomains built up of Lck and LAT in Jurkat cells stimulated on TCR mAb coated surfaces (22). CD2 may additionally serve as a ligand for the GPI-molecule CD59 (23, 24); however, this binding is highly questionable as it could not be confirmed by others (21, 25). Therefore, we hypothesized that CD2 could be responsible for the specific immobilization of CD48 upon T cell activation. Indeed, according to our new data, CD2 is crucial for localization of CD48 to the TCR/CD3 complex, whereas CD48 in turn is not required for TCR recruitment of CD2. Both CD48 and CD2 knockdown cells display similar defects in IL-2 expression due to defective recruitment of essential signaling molecules to the TCR/CD3 complex. Thus, the lateral association of CD2 with CD48 is required for productive T cell activation.

Materials and Methods

Cells

The human Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells, stably transfected with an IL-2 promoter luciferase reporter construct, were a gift of Dr. Thomas Baumruker (Novartis Institutes for BioMedical Research, Vienna, Austria). The Jurkat T cell line E6.1 and the B cell line Raji were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection. Human PBMCs were isolated from blood of healthy donors by standard density-gradient centrifugation using Lymphoprep (Nycomed). Cells were maintained in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 100 μg/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine (Invitrogen), and 10% heat inactivated FCS (PAA). For Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells, 1 mg/ml G418 was added additionally. HEK 293T cells were maintained in DMEM (Sigma-Aldrich) supplemented with 100 μg/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, 2 mM l-glutamine (Invitrogen), and 10% heat inactivated FCS (PAA). All cells were grown at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.

Antibodies

The mAbs to CD3 (MEM-57; IgG2a and MEM-92; IgM), CD48 (MEM-102; IgG1), CD59 (MEM-43/5; IgG2b), CD2 (MEM-65; IgG1), and MHC class II (MEM-136; IgG1) were a kind gift of Dr. Václav Hořejší (Institute of Molecular Genetics, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Prague, Czech Republic); the anti-TCR β-chain mAb C305 (IgM) was provided by Dr. Arthur Weiss (University of California, San Francisco, CA). The mAb OKT3 to CD3 was obtained from Ortho Pharmaceuticals. The mAb Leu28 to CD28 was purchased from Becton Dickinson (BD Biosciences). The CD3 mAb UCH-T1 to the CD3 ε-chain was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, rabbit polyclonal Abs to Lck and LAT and the anti-phosphotyrosine mAb 4G10 (HRP conjugated) were from Upstate Biotechnology. The mAb to phosphorylated Tyr 505 on Lck (pY505) was purchased from Cell Signaling Technology and Ab to pLAT was purchased from Biosource. Goat anti-rabbit IgG and rabbit anti-mouse IgG, both HRP conjugated, were from Bio-Rad and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively.

Immunoprecipitation and Western blotting

Jurkat T cells (5 × 106 to 1 × 107/ml) were lysed for 25 min at 4°C in ice-cold lysis buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA and protease inhibitors (5 μM aprotinin, 5 μM leupeptin, 5 μM pepstatin, 1 mM PMSF; all from Sigma-Aldrich) containing 1% Nonidet P-40 (Pierce) or 0.5% N-dodecyl-d-maltoside]. The insoluble material was removed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 2 min at 4°C and the supernatant was distributed into the wells of a 96-well plate which were precoated with the respective mAbs (20 μg/ml in PBS) as described (14). After incubating the wells with the cell lysate (50 μl/well) over night at 4°C, the wells were washed with PBS, after which 1× SDS-PAGE loading buffer was added (7–10 μl/well). The immunoprecipitates were collected and analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.

Solid phase signalosome precipitation (SPSP)

Jurkat T cells (7 × 106/ml) were incubated in ice-cold RPMI 1640 medium with 5% FCS and 20 mM HEPES for 1 h at 4°C. Then, the cells were added into six-well plates (1 ml/well) coated with the CD3 mAb OKT3 (10 μg/ml) and shortly spun down. The six-well plates were incubated at 37°C for the indicated periods of time. After stimulation, the medium was carefully removed and the attached cells were lysed for 12 min at 4°C using ice-cold lysis buffer (see above) supplemented with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate and 50 mM NaF. Subsequently, the lysate was collected and the insoluble material removed by centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 2 min at 4°C. Afterward, the six-well plates with the precipitated protein complexes were washed three times with ice-cold washing buffer [20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM sodium orthovanadate] containing 0.1% Tween 20 (Sigma-Aldrich). The immunoprecipitated protein complexes were harvested in 150 μl of 1× SDS-PAGE loading buffer. Finally, both the lysates and the immunoprecipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting.

Analysis of protein tyrosine phosphorylation

Before stimulation, Jurkat T cells were incubated in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 1% FCS for 4 h at 37°C. Cells were stimulated for different durations at 37°C using CD3 mAb MEM-92 (10 μg/ml). The reactions were stopped by addition of ice-cold washing buffer (see above). After centrifugation (2 min, 850 × g, 4°C), cells were immediately lysed for 30 min in ice-cold lysis buffer (see above) supplemented with 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, 50 mM NaF. After centrifugation, lysates were analyzed by reducing SDS-PAGE conditions (10% gel) and immunoblotting using HRP-labeled anti-pTyr mAb 4G10 (Upstate Biotechnology).

Lipid-raft separation by sucrose-gradient centrifugation

Cell lysates were adjusted to 40% (w/v) sucrose by adding an equal volume of an 80% sucrose solution (TBS containing 80% w/v sucrose, 2 mM EDTA, and protease inhibitors). These preparations were placed on top of a 60% sucrose layer in a centrifuge tube (Sorvall Instruments-DuPont). On top of this, layers of 20%, 10% and 5% sucrose were placed. After ultracentrifugation (180,000 × g, 16 h, 4°C), 375 μl fractions were collected from the top. Aliquots of each fraction were diluted in a 4× gel loading SDS-buffer. Proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted followed by probing the membranes with the respective mAbs.

Flow cytometry

Cells were washed with staining buffer (PBS/1% BSA/0.02% NaN3) and incubated for 30 min with 4 μg/ml human Ig on ice to prevent nonspecific binding of the mAb to Fc receptors. Primary Ab (10 μg/ml) was added and the cells were incubated for 30 min on ice. Cells were washed with staining buffer and incubated with secondary Ab for 30 min on ice. After a final wash, cells were analyzed on an LSRII or FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences).

Coverslip preparation and confocal microscopy

For confocal microscopy, epoxide-bearing glass slides were prepared as described (26). The cells were washed twice in PBS containing 2% FCS (PBS-FCS) and then resuspended (2 × 106 cells/ml) in HBSS containing 1 mM Ca2+ and 1 mM Mg2+. The cell suspension was gently placed on the CD3 mAb (MEM-57)-coated cover slips. Cells were stimulated at 37°C for various time intervals. The incubation was stopped by fixing the cells with 3.75% paraformaldehyde in PBS. After washing twice with PBS-FCS, the cells were blocked with 4 μg/ml human Ig in PBS for 20 min. Then, the cells were incubated for 30 min with directly labeled Alexa Fluor (AF) mAbs against CD3 (MEM-57/AF647), CD48 (MEM-102/AF555), or CD59 (MEM-43/5/AF555) at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml. Following staining, the cells were washed twice with PBS-FCS and analyzed on a confocal LSM 510 Zeiss microscope (Carl Zeiss AG) by making serial z stacks from bottom to top.

Knockdown of CD2 and CD48 expression by RNA interference

The following oligonucleotides were annealed and cloned via EcoRI/AgeI to the lentiviral short hairpin RNA (shRNA) expression vector pLKOpuro1 (provided by Dr. Sheila Stewart, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO): shCD2 sense at position 341 (5′-CCGGTGACCGATGATCAGGATATCTTCAAGAGAGATATCCTGATCATCGGTCTTTTTG-3′) and shCD2 anti-sense at position 341 (5′-AATTCAAAAAGACCGATGATCAGGATATCTCTCTTGAAGATATCCTGATCATCGGTCA-3); shCD2 sense at position 864 (5′-CCGGTCCTCAGAATCCAGCAACTTTTCAAGAGAAAGTTGCTGGATTCTGA GGTTTTTG-3′) and shCD2 anti-sense at position 864 (5′-AATTCAAAAACCTCAGAATCCAGCAACTTTCTCTTGAAAAGTTGCTGGATTCTGAGGA-3′); shCD48 sense at position 884 (5′-CCGGTGCATGCTGCTGAATTATCATTCAAGAGATGATAATTCAGCAGCATGCTTTTTG-3′) and shCD48 anti-sense at position 884 (5′-AATTCAAAAAGCATGCTGCTGAATTATCATCTCTTGAATGATAATTCAGCAGCATGCA-3′); shCD48 sense at position 193 (5′-CCGGTGCCTGCCTGAGAACTACAATTCAAGAGATTGTAGTTCTCAGGCAGGCTTTTTG-3′) and shCD48 anti-sense at position 193 (5′-AATTCAAAAAGCCTGCCTGAGAACTACAATCTCTTGAATTGTAGTTCTCAGGCAGGCA-3′). Gene-specific shRNA-target sequences are indicated on the sense strand in italic. As control, we used the MISSION Non-Target pLKOpuro1 Control Vector (Sigma-Aldrich). Production of lentiviral supernatants was performed in 293T cells by cotransfection of the appropriate pLKOpuro1 vector with the packaging plasmids psPAX2 and pMD2.G (Addgene plasmids 10703 and 12259; constructed by Dr. Didier Trono, Ecole Polytechnique Federal de Lausanne; obtained via Addgene). Forty-eight hours after transfection, viral supernatants were harvested, filtered, and used freshly for the transduction of cells. The transduction was done overnight in the presence of 5 μg/ml polybrene. Transduced cells were selected with puromycin (1 μg/ml).

For shRNA-mediated gene silencing in human peripheral blood T cells, freshly isolated PBMCs were stimulated with plate-bound CD3 mAb OKT-3 (5 μg/ml) and soluble CD28 mAb Leu28 (2 μg/ml) for 24 h and infected with freshly prepared virus, which was concentrated by ultracentrifugation from the supernatant of the producer cells. Twenty-four hours later, a second round of infection was performed. Transduced T cells were selected by stimulation for further 3 days under puromycin (1 μg/ml). Then, the T cells were washed and rested for 5 days. For the cytokine assay, the T cells were restimulated with plate-bound CD3 mAb OKT-3 and soluble CD28 mAb Leu28 as indicated.

Luciferase assay

Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells were stimulated as indicated at 37°C. Luciferase assays were performed using the luciferase reporter gene assay kit (Roche Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Luciferase activity was measured in the Berthold Lumat LB 9501 device (Berthold Technologies GmbH) and normalized for protein content with the Bio-Rad protein assay (Bio-Rad). Each luciferase assay experiment was performed in triplicates and repeated at least three times. The bars represent triplicates with indicated SD. Statistical significance was evaluated using a two-tailed, paired Student’s t test.

Measurement of secreted IL-2

Samples were analyzed using the Luminex xMAP suspension array technology. Thirty microliters of culture supernatants were used undiluted. Standard curves were generated using rIL-2 (R&D Systems). All incubation steps were performed at room temperature and in the dark to protect the beads from light. To avoid inconsistencies, all samples from an individual experiment were measured in the same run. Control samples were included in all runs. Detection limits were 30 pg/ml for IL-2. The experiments were performed at least two times in at least triplicates, and the data were expressed as mean values with SD. Statistical significance was evaluated using a two-tailed, paired Student’s t test.

Calcium flux measurement

Cells were stained with 5.5 μM Fura Red AM-ester and 2.6 μM Fluo-4 AM-ester (Molecular Probes) in RPMI 1640 medium for 45 min at 37°C. After washing twice with medium, cells were again incubated for 30 min at 37°C. Fluo-4/Fura-red loaded cells were then analyzed by flow cytometry using a LSRII flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). Calcium mobilization was monitored within the first three minutes after TCR cross-linking with the anti-TCR mAb C305 by analyzing the fluorescence emission ratio of Fura Red and Fluo-4 as previously described (27).

Immune synapse assay

Raji B cells transduced with either control shRNA or CD48 specific shRNA were labeled with CellTracker Orange (chloromethyl-tetramethylrhodamine methyl ester; Molecular Probes) and pulsed with 5 μg/ml staphylococcal enterotoxin E (SEE; Toxin Technology) in HBSS at 37°C for 20 min. After washing, the Raji cells were incubated with shRNA vector-transduced Jurkat E6.1 T cells (shCtr, shCD2, or shCD48) at a ratio of 1:1 at 37°C for 20 min. The reaction was stopped by adding ice-cold HBSS. Cells were plated on poly-l-lysine-coated slides (Marienfeld) and allowed to settle for 15 min on ice. For staining of CD3ε and LAT, cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde in PBS for 15 min at room temperature, permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS for 15 min at room temperature (except for staining with CD3ε), and treated with the mouse anti-human CD3 mAb UCH-T1 and the rabbit anti-human polyclonal LAT Ab followed by the appropriate AF488-labeled goat-anti-mouse or goat-anti-rabbit Abs (Molecular Probes) for 30 min at room temperature. Using a ×40 magnification on an Aristoplan fluorescence microscope (Leica Microsystems), two individuals determined independently the percentage of cells showing CD3ε and LAT relocalization to the IS by counting at least 100 conjugates per blinded sample.

Results

CD2 is necessary for recruitment of CD48 to the TCR/CD3 complex

We have previously demonstrated that CD48 but not CD59 gets immobilized in the center of a CD3 mAb-induced artificial immunological synapse together with the TCR/CD3 complex (14). In the present study, we asked whether the differential behavior of these two lipid raft markers was dependent on interaction with CD2, which is a central molecule in TCR signaling microclusters (22). To study this, we performed lentiviral shRNA-mediated gene knockdown of CD2 in the human T leukemia cell Jurkat IL-2-Luc, stably transfected with an IL-2 promoter luciferase reporter construct. We obtained a quantitative knockdown of almost 100% of CD2 expression by the shRNA targeting position 341; the staining of CD3, CD48, and CD59 remained unaffected (Fig. 1⇓A). A similar effect but with weaker down-regulation of CD2 was obtained with an shRNA targeting position 864 (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Recruitment of CD48 to the TCR/CD3 complex requires expression of CD2. A, Lentiviral shRNA-mediated gene knockdown of CD2 expression in Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells. Staining of control shRNA transduced cells (shCtr) is shown in filled gray histograms, CD2 knockdown cells (shCD2) are in black. The dashed line represents staining of the isotype matched control mAbs. B, Confocal imaging of a semiartificial IS formed by control and CD2 silenced Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells on a CD3 mAb (MEM-57) coated glass surface. Jurkat cells were incubated on the stimulatory surface for the indicated times at 37°C. Afterward, cells were fixed and stained with AF-labeled mAbs to CD3 (MEM-57; AF647), CD48 (MEM-102; AF555), and CD59 (MEM-43/5; AF555). The analysis was performed using an LSM 510 Meta laser scanning microscope system from Zeiss. Individual cells were scored for central or peripheral distribution of CD48 and CD59 in the semiartificial IS. The table summarizes 34 cells from two independent experiments. C, Analysis of TCR/CD3-complex associated molecules by standard immunoprecipitation in resting Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells (left) and by SPSP (right) in control and CD2-silenced Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells. The SPSP method makes use of CD3 mAb (OKT3) coated surfaces for both T cell stimulation and precipitation of CD3-associated signaling complexes. Cells were allowed to settle on the stimulatory surface of a six-well plate for the indicated times and then were lysed. The supernatant containing nonprecipitated material was removed and the CD3-associated complexes were harvested by the addition of SDS-PAGE sample buffer to the wells. Both the precipitated and the nonprecipitated materials were analyzed under reducing conditions using a 10% SDS-PAGE gel followed by immunoblotting.

First, we subjected these cells to confocal microscopy analysis. We allowed Jurkat T cells to settle and spread on CD3 mAb-coated glass slides. The cells were fixed after different time points followed by staining with specific mAbs. In accord with our previous study (14), in Jurkat cells transduced with the control shRNA, after 20 min of stimulation we found CD48 in the centre of the spreading zone colocalized with CD3. In the CD2-silenced cells reorganization and colocalization of CD48 with CD3 did not occur. CD59 was mostly restricted to peripheral regions of the artificial immunological synapse in the control as well as the CD2 silenced cells (Fig. 1⇑B).

As the next step, we analyzed the role of CD2 for CD48 recruitment to the TCR/CD3 complex at the biochemical level. We did not observe an interaction of CD3 with CD2, CD48, or CD59 in resting Jurkat cells when using standard immunoprecipitation (Fig. 1⇑C, left). We next analyzed molecules associating with the TCR/CD3 complex upon stimulation. To preserve signaling associates we used SPSP described earlier by us (14). This method allows T cell stimulation with a surface-immobilized Ab and isolation of molecules associated with the ensuing semiartificial immunological synapse. In brief, to synchronize cell spreading, the cells were shortly centrifuged (at 4°C) onto tissue culture plates coated with a CD3 specific mAb (OKT3). After different time periods of stimulation at 37°C, the cells were lysed with 1% Nonidet P-40 as a detergent, and both the precipitated and nonprecipitated material was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. Using mAbs against other T cell surface markers such as MHC class I we confirmed the specificity of the assay (14) (data not shown). A similar approach using magnetic beads coated with TCR mAb and mechanical cell disruption has been also successfully used for isolation of TCR-associated membrane patches (28).

When we subjected shRNA expressing control cells to SPSP, CD48 readily coprecipitated with CD3 after 10 min of incubation (Fig. 1⇑C, right). The association of CD48 was transient because we could not detect CD48 molecules in the CD3 precipitates of these cells after 60 min of stimulation. At this time point, only CD2 stayed in complex with CD3. CD59 did not associate at any time with CD3 confirming our data from single molecule microscopy (14). In contrast, in the CD2 knockdown cells the CD3 precipitates were completely devoid of CD48 (Fig. 1⇑C). CD2 is thus crucial for recruitment of CD48 to the TCR/CD3 complex upon T cell activation.

CD48 is dispensable for recruitment of CD2 but necessary for association of LAT to the TCR complex

Next, we were interested whether the CD2 ligand CD48 might influence the recruitment of CD2 and TCR signalosome components to the TCR complex. To answer this question, we subjected the Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells to shRNA-mediated gene knockdown of CD48. With an shRNA targeting position 884, again we obtained a sufficient knockdown efficiency of >90% (Fig. 2⇓A). An shRNA targeting position 193 reduced also significantly CD48 expression but the effect was weaker as found with position 884 (data not shown).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

CD2 and CD48 are key mediators of LAT recruitment to the TCR/CD3 complex. A, Lentiviral shRNA-mediated gene knockdown of CD48 expression in Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells. Staining of control shRNA transduced cells (shCtr) is shown in filled gray histograms, CD48 knockdown cells (shCD48) are in black. The dashed line represents staining of the isotype matched control mAbs. B, SPSP of control and CD48 silenced Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells, stimulated and precipitated on CD3 mAb (OKT3) surfaces for the indicated times. The precipitated as well as the nonprecipitated material was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the indicated Abs. C, Sample material obtained from SPSP with CD2 silenced cells was subjected to specific immunoblotting using CD3ε, Lck, and LAT Abs.

Using the CD48 knockdown cells, we analyzed the influence of CD48 on association and reorganization of CD2, CD59, LAT, and Lck with the TCR/CD3. After 10 min of stimulation on the CD3 mAb-coated surface, we found quantitative association of CD3, CD2, CD48, LAT, and Lck in control cells (Fig. 2⇑B). In the CD48 silenced cells, CD2 coprecipitated with CD3, while Lck recruitment was reduced and that of LAT completely lost. When we used instead of 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% N-dodecyl-D-maltoside as a detergent, we detected no interaction of CD3 with either CD48 or CD2 both in control and silenced cells (data not shown). As solubilization of lipids from membrane compartments by N-dodecyl-D-maltoside is significantly enhanced compared with Nonidet P-40 (29), the differential results indicate a role for protein-lipid interactions, i.e., lipid rafts, in the recruitment of these molecules. We also tested the recruitment of Lck and LAT to the TCR/CD3 complex of CD2-silenced cells and found a complete loss of LAT recruitment. In contrast to CD48 silenced cells, CD2 silencing also led to a defect in Lck association to the TCR/CD3 complex (Fig. 2⇑C).

Because CD2 was needed for association of CD48 with the TCR/CD3 complex, we assumed that the CD2-CD48 interaction might be important for recruiting the TCR to lipid rafts. If this were true, we would expect reduced distribution of the CD3/TCR to the lipid raft containing low-density fractions in a sucrose gradient. Therefore, we stimulated control and CD2-silenced Jurkat cells in solution with a soluble CD3 IgM mAb (MEM-92). Then, we subjected the cell lysates to ultracentrifugation on a sucrose gradient. CD3 stimulation led to redistribution of CD3 to lipid raft fractions of the sucrose gradient, and indeed, CD2 silencing led to a significant decrease of CD3 in lipid raft fractions (Fig. 3⇓A). A similar result was obtained with CD48 silenced cells (data not shown).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Lipid raft partitioning of the TCR, LAT phosphorylation, and calcium mobilization upon T cell activation depend on CD2 and CD48. A, Jurkat control and CD2 silenced cells were stimulated with the CD3 mAb MEM-92 in solution (10 μg/ml). At the indicated time points, cells were lysed and the lipid raft partitioning of CD3 was analyzed by sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation and immunoblotting as described in Materials and Methods. B, LAT phosphorylation is dependent on CD2 expression. Immunoblot analysis of control and CD2 silenced Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells stimulated for the indicated times with the CD3 mAb MEM-92 in solution (10 μg/ml). Cells were lysed, subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the indicated Abs. C, Reduced calcium flux upon TCR cross-linking in CD2 and CD48 silenced Jurkat cells. Jurkat cells were stained with Fluo-4 and Fura-red. Calcium transients in response to the anti-TCR mAb C305 and the calcium ionophore ionomycin were measured by flow cytometry.

The observed defects of LAT and Lck recruitment and the aberrant raft distribution of CD3 in CD2 or CD48 silenced cells should affect tyrosine phosphorylation and calcium mobilization upon TCR engagement. To assess the influence of CD2 on proximal TCR signaling, we stimulated the CD2-silenced Jurkat cells with CD3 mAb MEM-92 and analyzed the total cell lysates by Western blotting. We found a strongly diminished phosphorylation of LAT at all time points in CD2-silenced cells compared with the control cells. We did not detect any difference in phosphorylation of the negative regulatory Tyr 505 of Lck when comparing CD2 silenced with control Jurkat cells (Fig. 3⇑B). Next, we analyzed the calcium mobilization of control, CD2- or CD48-silenced Jurkat cells upon TCR cross-linking with the anti-TCR mAb C305 and found a significant reduction of the calcium flux in both silenced cells (Fig. 3⇑C).

To get hold of the TCR-proximal signalosome dependent on CD2 and CD48, we again applied the SPSP method and analyzed the pool of phosphorylated proteins coprecipitated with CD3 (Fig. 4⇓). Anti-phosphotyrosine blots showed an overall reduction in phosphoprotein bands associated with TCR/CD3 in both CD2 and CD48 silenced Jurkat cells, especially at early time points of stimulation (Fig. 4⇓, A and B). Interestingly, we did not detect any difference in the phosphoprotein patterns of control and silenced cells in the nonprecipitated material. This indicates that signal transduction still occurs in the absence of CD2 and CD48 but the lack of formation of a stable signalosome at the TCR impairs channeling the signals into the required downstream signaling pathways. These data are in accord with depletion studies of cholesterol that destroyed lipid rafts resulting in uncontrolled T cell activation by transient tyrosine phosphorylation of multiple proteins (30).

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Both CD2 and CD48 are essential for a stable associate of tyrosine phosphorylated signaling proteins in the TCR signalosome. A, SPSP of control and CD2 silenced Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells, stimulated, and precipitated on CD3 mAb (OKT3) surfaces for the indicated times. The precipitated as well as the nonprecipitated material was subjected to SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with the phosphotyrosine specific mAb 4G10. B, CD48 silenced cells were analyzed as in A.

Next, we tested whether CD2 or CD48 silencing resulted in a defect of LAT reorganization to the IS. To test this, we induced a T/B cell synapse by stimulating the Jurkat T cells with Raji B cells pulsed with SEE. As verified by flow cytometry, Raji B-cells were negative for CD2 but expressed CD48 (Fig. 5⇓A). Therefore, to exclude a potential costimulatory effect of CD48 by trans interaction, we silenced the CD48 expression on Raji B cells using the CD48 shRNA constructs. Similar to Jurkat cells, the shRNA construct targeting position 884 had the strongest down-regulatory effect. Other markers such as MHC class II were not affected (Fig. 5⇓A). Fixed B/T cell conjugates were stained for CD3 and LAT (Fig. 5⇓B). Indeed, we found decreased recruitment of LAT to the contact plane between Jurkat T cells silenced for either CD2 or CD48 and SEE pulsed Raji B cells. This microscopic observation is in accord with the biochemical signalosome precipitation data shown in Fig. 2⇑, B and C.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Impaired recruitment of LAT to the immune synapse of CD2 or CD48 silenced Jurkat cells. A, Expression analysis of CD2, CD48, and MHC class II on control shRNA (shCtr, filled gray histograms) and shCD48 (black lines) transduced Raji B cells. The dashed line represents staining of the isotype matched control mAbs. B, CellTracker Orange labeled Raji B cells were pulsed with or without SEE and mixed with Jurkat T cells. Then, the B cell/T cell conjugates were fixed and stained with either a CD3 mAb or an Ab against LAT. C, shCtr- or CD48-silenced Raji B cells were pulsed with SEE and incubated with either shCtr-, shCD2-, or shCD48-silenced Jurkat T cells. The B cell/T cell conjugates were analyzed for redistribution of LAT to the B cell/T cell interface. Two individuals analyzing at least 100 conjugates counted the number of conjugates with redistributed LAT from two independent blinded samples.

Then, we analyzed the influence of CD2 and CD48 silencing on the IL-2 expression of T cells in a functional assay. In agreement with earlier data (12, 31), CD2- and CD48-silenced Jurkat T cells showed strongly decreased IL-2 promoter activity (Fig. 6⇓A) and IL-2 levels in the culture supernatant when stimulated with Raji B-cells SEE (Fig. 6⇓B). We found the same or an even stronger inhibition of IL-2 promoter activity when CD48 was silenced in the Raji cells (Fig. 6⇓A). Furthermore, we found decreased IL-2 promoter activity in CD2 and CD48 silenced cells when stimulated via plate-bound OKT3 against CD3, with or without soluble CD28 Abs (Fig. 6⇓A).

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

cis-interaction of CD2 and CD48 is critical for T cell IL-2-expression. A, Control, CD2 or CD48 silenced Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells were stimulated in different ways or left unstimulated. For stimulation, the cells were either cocultured for 8 h at a 1:1 ratio with SEE pulsed Raji B cells as APCs, or stimulated for 16 h with plate-bound CD3 mAb OKT3 (5 μg/ml), with or without soluble CD28 mAb Leu28 (3 μg/ml). The CD2-negative Raji B cells were either transduced with control shRNA or CD48 specific shRNA to silence CD48 on the APC. After stimulation, the cells were lysed and luciferase activity was measured. One representative experiment of three is shown. In this experiment, for silencing of CD2 and CD48 the shRNA constructs targeting positions 341 and 864, respectively, were used. Similar results were obtained when using the alternative constructs targeting positions 884 and 193, respectively. B, ELISA measurement of IL-2 secretion of control, CD2-, or CD48-silenced Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells upon stimulation with SEE-pulsed Raji B cells.

Finally, to exclude the possibility that the functions of CD2 and CD48 in organizing the TCR signalosome in Jurkat T cells are peculiar for and restricted to this cell line, we silenced CD2 or CD48 in primary human peripheral blood T cells. To down-regulate the target molecules in these cells, we performed a primary stimulation via CD3 and CD28 in the presence of control, CD2, or CD48 shRNA containing lentiviruses over a period of 6 days. After a resting period of 5 days, we found a significant reduction of surface expression of both CD2 (35% down-regulation) and CD48 (50% down-regulation) (Fig. 7⇓A). Then, we restimulated these cells via CD3 plus CD28 and measured the IL-2 secretion. In agreement with the results obtained with Jurkat T cells, CD2 silencing resulted in >90% and CD48 silencing in ∼65% inhibition of IL-2 secretion (Fig. 7⇓B). Taken together, our data are pointing to the engagement of CD2 in lateral interactions of the TCR/CD3 complex with other T cell membrane molecules, in particular CD48, for signal transduction.

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Silencing of CD2 or CD48 in human peripheral blood T cells impairs TCR signaling for IL-2 expression. Human peripheral blood T lymphocytes silenced for CD2 or CD48 were generated as described in Materials and Methods. A, Surface expression analysis of CD2 and CD48 on control shRNA, shCD2-, and shCD48-treated T cells blasts. The black lines represent the staining with the specific CD2 and CD48 mAbs; the dashed lines represent staining of the isotype matched control mAbs. B, For the analysis of IL-2 secretion, the cells were stimulated for 24 h with the indicated concentrations of plate-bound CD3 mAb OKT3 plus soluble CD28 mAb Leu28 (2 μg/ml). After 24 h, the culture supernatants were harvested and secreted IL-2 quantified by the Luminex assay.

Discussion

GPI-anchored proteins are well-characterized components of membrane microdomains, so-called lipid rafts that are rich in signaling molecules (9). Engagement of GPI-anchored surface proteins can deliver TCR-like signals leading to a rise in intracellular calcium and a wave of protein tyrosine phosphorylation. GPI-anchored proteins have thus potential to play a role as co-stimulatory molecules in T cell activation (11). Indeed, for GPI-anchored CD48, a role in amplification of TCR signaling has been firmly demonstrated (12). By using specific mAbs, a similar role has been ascribed to CD59, the second abundant GPI-protein expressed by T cells (32, 33). However, recent data using cells and mice deficient in CD59 rather indicate an inhibitory role of this molecule in T cell biology (34).

Heterogeneity in protein content and lipid composition of lipid rafts has been reported (15, 16, 17). Whether the lipid environment or protein-protein interactions are the major determinants of this heterogeneity is a matter of debate. We recently showed by single molecule microscopy and immunobiochemistry that the GPI-anchored molecules CD48 and CD59 reorganized and arranged differently in semiartificial synapses of human peripheral blood T lymphocytes induced on CD3 mAb coated glass slides. Although CD48 was rapidly immobilized and pulled to the TCR/CD3 complex, CD59 stayed highly mobile and away from CD3 (14). It is now generally believed that the TCR complex, which resides outside lipid rafts in resting T cells, gets associated with rafts upon TCR engagement (35). As commonly used biochemical extraction methods assign CD48 and CD59 to the same “detergent resistant” membrane fraction, in a simplified view, raft-recruitment of the TCR should lead to equal colocalization with different raft markers. However, this is not the case and hence lipid-mediated protein associations alone cannot fully explain the differential behavior of CD48 and CD59.

Protein-protein interactions may be an additional determinant for CD48 recruitment to the TCR. Work of Douglass and Vale described that CD2, Lck, and LAT coclustered in microdomains on Jurkat cells stimulated on TCR Ab coated surfaces (22). Clustering was dependent on phosphorylation of LAT and functional Lck, thus protein-protein interactions are a likely explanation for the microcluster formation.

In the murine system, CD48 is a well-described ligand for CD2 in both trans- and cis-configurations (18, 19, 20). Human CD2-CD48 interactions were reported to be of lower affinity (21). We thus reasoned that CD48 recruitment to the TCR/CD3 complex could be associated with the above-described CD2/LAT/Lck clusters via a cis-interaction of CD2 with CD48 on the surface of T cells. Indeed, our CD2 knockdown completely abrogated TCR/CD3 association with CD48 (Fig. 1⇑), Lck, and LAT (Fig. 2⇑C). This means that CD2 is required for efficient association of the TCR with Lck, CD48, and LAT. CD2 was found to physically interact with the Src family kinases Lck and Fyn and treatment of T cells with CD2 mAbs led to an increase in Lck kinase activity (12, 36). This interaction might be mediated by binding of the kinases’ SH3-domains to a series of proline-rich stretches in the cytoplasmic domain of CD2. A similar mechanism of Lck activation via proline-containing sequences has been proposed for CD28 (37). However, in contrast to humans, this proline stretch might not be sufficient in the murine system where CD2 contains further a CIC motif at the membrane-proximal region for interaction with Lck (38).

The impact of CD48 on T cell activation has been recognized with the description of severe T cell signaling defects in the CD48 knockout mouse (13). Coengagement of the TCR with CD48 via mAb enhances localization of tyrosine-phosphorylated TCR-ζ to lipid rafts and boosts Ag-induced T cell activation, most probably via its association to Lck (12). In accordance with published data, our CD48 silenced T cells showed reduced IL2 synthesis upon TCR-stimulation. We thus conclude that TCR-CD48 clustering is an important early event for an efficient initiation of T cell signaling. In fact, CD48 knockdown in Jurkat cells led to a complete absence of LAT-recruitment to the TCR/CD3 complex (Figs. 2⇑ and 5⇑), providing a mechanistic insight into CD48-mediated modulation of TCR-signaling.

Taken together, our results reveal a hierarchy in the recruitment of early signaling molecules to the TCR/CD3 complex mediated by a cis-interaction of CD2 and CD48. We could demonstrate that CD2 acts as master regulator of Lck and CD48 association to the TCR/CD3 complex. CD48, in turn, assists as a molecular carrier of LAT.

Acknowledgments

We thank Vaclav Horejsi for providing Abs, Thomas Baumruker for providing Jurkat IL-2-Luc cells, and Sheila Stewart for providing the plasmid pLKO-puro1. We are grateful to Eva Steinhuber and Margarethe Merio for general technical assistance and LUMINEX quantification of cytokines, respectively.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was funded by the GEN-AU program of the Austrian Federal Ministry of Science and Research, the PhD program Cell Communication in Health and Disease, the Competence Centre for Biomolecular Therapeutics and the Higher Education Commission of Pakistan.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Wolfgang Paster or Dr. Hannes Stockinger, Centre for Physiology, Pathophysiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Lazarettgasse 19, Vienna, Austria. E-mail address: wolfgang.paster{at}meduniwien.ac.at or hannes.stockinger{at}meduniwien.ac.at

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: LAT, linker for activated T cell; IS, immunological synapse; SPSP, solid phase signalosome precipitation; AF, Alexa Fluor; shRNA, short hairpin RNA; SEE, staphylococcus enterotoxin E.

  • Received February 29, 2008.
  • Accepted April 6, 2009.
  • Copyright © 2009 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

References

  1. ↵
    Weiss, A., D. R. Littman. 1994. Signal transduction by lymphocyte antigen receptors. Cell 76: 263-274.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Lindquist, J. A., L. Simeoni, B. Schraven. 2003. Transmembrane adapters: attractants for cytoplasmic effectors. Immunol. Rev. 191: 165-182.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Zhang, W., C. L. Sommers, D. N. Burshtyn, C. C. Stebbins, J. B. DeJarnette, R. P. Trible, A. Grinberg, H. C. Tsay, H. M. Jacobs, C. M. Kessler, et al 1999. Essential role of LAT in T cell development. Immunity 10: 323-332.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Zhang, W., B. J. Irvin, R. P. Trible, R. T. Abraham, L. E. Samelson. 1999. Functional analysis of LAT in TCR-mediated signaling pathways using a LAT-deficient Jurkat cell line. Int. Immunol. 11: 943-950.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Monks, C. R., B. A. Freiberg, H. Kupfer, N. Sciaky, A. Kupfer. 1998. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395: 82-86.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Bunnell, S. C., D. I. Hong, J. R. Kardon, T. Yamazaki, C. J. McGlade, V. A. Barr, L. E. Samelson. 2002. T cell receptor ligation induces the formation of dynamically regulated signaling assemblies. J. Cell Biol. 158: 1263-1275.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Saito, T., T. Yokosuka. 2006. Immunological synapse and microclusters: the site for recognition and activation of T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 18: 305-313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Montixi, C., C. Langlet, A. M. Bernard, J. Thimonier, C. Dubois, M. A. Wurbel, J. P. Chauvin, M. Pierres, H. T. He. 1998. Engagement of T cell receptor triggers its recruitment to low-density detergent-insoluble membrane domains. EMBO J. 17: 5334-5348.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  9. ↵
    Horejsi, V.. 2003. The roles of membrane microdomains (rafts) in T cell activation. Immunol. Rev. 191: 148-164.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Stefanova, I., V. Horejsi, I. J. Ansotegui, W. Knapp, H. Stockinger. 1991. GPI-anchored cell-surface molecules complexed to protein tyrosine kinases. Science 254: 1016-1019.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Loertscher, R., P. Lavery. 2002. The role of glycosyl phosphatidyl inositol (GPI)-anchored cell surface proteins in T-cell activation. Transplant. Immunol. 9: 93-96.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Moran, M., M. C. Miceli. 1998. Engagement of GPI-linked CD48 contributes to TCR signals and cytoskeletal reorganization: a role for lipid rafts in T cell activation. Immunity 9: 787-796.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Gonzalez-Cabrero, J., C. J. Wise, Y. Latchman, G. J. Freeman, A. H. Sharpe, H. Reiser. 1999. CD48-deficient mice have a pronounced defect in CD4+ T cell activation. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 1019-1023.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Drbal, K., M. Moertelmaier, C. Holzhauser, A. Muhammad, E. Fuertbauer, S. Howorka, M. Hinterberger, H. Stockinger, G. J. Schutz. 2007. Single-molecule microscopy reveals heterogeneous dynamics of lipid raft components upon TCR engagement. Int. Immunol. 19: 675-684.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Schade, A. E., A. D. Levine. 2002. Lipid raft heterogeneity in human peripheral blood T lymphoblasts: a mechanism for regulating the initiation of TCR signal transduction. J. Immunol. 168: 2233-2239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Brugger, B., C. Graham, I. Leibrecht, E. Mombelli, A. Jen, F. Wieland, R. Morris. 2004. The membrane domains occupied by glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored prion protein and Thy-1 differ in lipid composition. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 7530-7536.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Kiyokawa, E., T. Baba, N. Otsuka, A. Makino, S. Ohno, T. Kobayashi. 2005. Spatial and functional heterogeneity of sphingolipid-rich membrane domains. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 24072-24084.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Kato, K., M. Koyanagi, H. Okada, T. Takanashi, Y. W. Wong, A. F. Williams, K. Okumura, H. Yagita. 1992. CD48 is a counter-receptor for mouse CD2 and is involved in T cell activation. J. Exp. Med. 176: 1241-1249.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Kaplan, A. J., K. D. Chavin, H. Yagita, M. S. Sandrin, L. H. Qin, J. Lin, G. Lindenmayer, J. S. Bromberg. 1993. Production and characterization of soluble and transmembrane murine CD2: demonstration that CD48 is a ligand for CD2 and that CD48 adhesion is regulated by CD2. J. Immunol. 151: 4022-4032.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    Zhu, B., E. A. Davies, P. A. van der Merwe, T. Calvert, D. E. Leckband. 2002. Direct measurements of heterotypic adhesion between the cell surface proteins CD2 and CD48. Biochemistry 41: 12163-12170.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Arulanandam, A. R., P. Moingeon, M. F. Concino, M. A. Recny, K. Kato, H. Yagita, S. Koyasu, E. L. Reinherz. 1993. A soluble multimeric recombinant CD2 protein identifies CD48 as a low affinity ligand for human CD2: divergence of CD2 ligands during the evolution of humans and mice. J. Exp. Med. 177: 1439-1450.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Douglass, A. D., R. D. Vale. 2005. Single-molecule microscopy reveals plasma membrane microdomains created by protein-protein networks that exclude or trap signaling molecules in T cells. Cell 121: 937-950.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Hahn, W. C., E. Menu, A. L. Bothwell, P. J. Sims, B. E. Bierer. 1992. Overlapping but nonidentical binding sites on CD2 for CD58 and a second ligand CD59. Science 256: 1805-1807.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Deckert, M., J. Kubar, D. Zoccola, G. Bernard-Pomier, P. Angelisova, V. Horejsi, A. Bernard. 1992. CD59 molecule: a second ligand for CD2 in T cell adhesion. Eur. J. Immunol. 22: 2943-2947.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    van der Merwe, P. A., A. N. Barclay, D. W. Mason, E. A. Davies, B. P. Morgan, M. Tone, A. K. Krishnam, C. Ianelli, S. J. Davis. 1994. Human cell-adhesion molecule CD2 binds CD58 (LFA-3) with a very low affinity and an extremely fast dissociation rate but does not bind CD48 or CD59. Biochemistry 33: 10149-10160.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Pammer, P., R. Schlapak, M. Sonnleitner, A. Ebner, R. Zhu, P. Hinterdorfer, O. Hoglinger, H. Schindler, S. Howorka. 2005. Nanopatterning of biomolecules with microscale beads. Chemphyschem. 6: 900-903.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Bailey, S., P. J. Macardle. 2006. A flow cytometric comparison of Indo-1 to fluo-3 and Fura Red excited with low power lasers for detecting Ca2+ flux. J. Immunol. Methods 311: 220-225.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Harder, T., M. Kuhn. 2001. Immunoisolation of TCR signaling complexes from Jurkat T leukemic cells. Sci. STKE 2001: PL1
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. ↵
    Davidson, D., M. Bakinowski, M. L. Thomas, V. Horejsi, A. Veillette. 2003. Phosphorylation-dependent regulation of T-cell activation by PAG/Cbp, a lipid raft-associated transmembrane adaptor. Mol. Cell Biol. 23: 2017-2028.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Kabouridis, P. S., J. Janzen, A. L. Magee, S. C. Ley. 2000. Cholesterol depletion disrupts lipid rafts and modulates the activity of multiple signaling pathways in T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 30: 954-963.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Teh, S. J., N. Killeen, A. Tarakhovsky, D. R. Littman, H. S. Teh. 1997. CD2 regulates the positive selection and function of antigen-specific CD4− CD8+ T cells. Blood 89: 1308-1318.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Deckert, M., M. Ticchioni, B. Mari, D. Mary, A. Bernard. 1995. The glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored CD59 protein stimulates both T cell receptor ζ/ZAP-70-dependent and -independent signaling pathways in T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 25: 1815-1822.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Korty, P. E., C. Brando, E. M. Shevach. 1991. CD59 functions as a signal-transducing molecule for human T cell activation. J. Immunol. 146: 4092-4098.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  34. ↵
    Longhi, M. P., B. Sivasankar, N. Omidvar, B. P. Morgan, A. Gallimore. 2005. Cutting edge: murine CD59a modulates antiviral CD4+ T cell activity in a complement-independent manner. J. Immunol. 175: 7098-7102.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Miceli, M. C., M. Moran, C. D. Chung, V. P. Patel, T. Low, W. Zinnanti. 2001. Co-stimulation and counter-stimulation: lipid raft clustering controls TCR signaling and functional outcomes. Semin. Immunol. 13: 115-128.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Marie-Cardine, A., I. Maridonneau-Parini, M. Ferrer, S. Danielian, B. Rothhut, R. Fagard, A. Dautry-Varsat, S. Fischer. 1992. The lymphocyte-specific tyrosine protein kinase p56lck is endocytosed in Jurkat cells stimulated via CD2. J. Immunol. 148: 3879-3884.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  37. ↵
    Holdorf, A. D., J. M. Green, S. D. Levin, M. F. Denny, D. B. Straus, V. Link, P. S. Changelian, P. M. Allen, A. S. Shaw. 1999. Proline residues in CD28 and the Src homology (SH)3 domain of Lck are required for T cell costimulation. J. Exp. Med. 190: 375-384.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Nunes, R. J., M. A. Castro, C. M. Goncalves, M. Bamberger, C. F. Pereira, G. Bismuth, A. M. Carmo. 2008. Protein interactions between CD2 and Lck are required for the lipid raft distribution of CD2. J. Immunol. 180: 988-997.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 182 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 182, Issue 12
15 Jun 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Sequential Cooperation of CD2 and CD48 in the Buildup of the Early TCR Signalosome
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Sequential Cooperation of CD2 and CD48 in the Buildup of the Early TCR Signalosome
Arshad Muhammad, Herbert B. Schiller, Florian Forster, Paul Eckerstorfer, Rene Geyeregger, Vladimir Leksa, Gerhard J. Zlabinger, Maria Sibilia, Alois Sonnleitner, Wolfgang Paster, Hannes Stockinger
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2009, 182 (12) 7672-7680; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800691

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Sequential Cooperation of CD2 and CD48 in the Buildup of the Early TCR Signalosome
Arshad Muhammad, Herbert B. Schiller, Florian Forster, Paul Eckerstorfer, Rene Geyeregger, Vladimir Leksa, Gerhard J. Zlabinger, Maria Sibilia, Alois Sonnleitner, Wolfgang Paster, Hannes Stockinger
The Journal of Immunology June 15, 2009, 182 (12) 7672-7680; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.0800691
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • The Crystal Structure of the MHC Class I (MHC-I) Molecule in the Green Anole Lizard Demonstrates the Unique MHC-I System in Reptiles
  • Structure and Functional Characterization of a Humanized Anti-CCL20 Antibody following Exposure to Serum Reveals the Formation of Immune Complex That Leads to Toxicity
  • Loss of the Transfer RNA Wobble Uridine–Modifying Enzyme Elp3 Delays T Cell Cycle Entry and Impairs T Follicular Helper Cell Responses through Deregulation of Atf4
Show more MOLECULAR AND STRUCTURAL IMMUNOLOGY

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606