IFN-α Skews Monocytes into CD56+-Expressing Dendritic Cells with Potent Functional Activities In Vitro and In Vivo

Claudia Papewalis, Benedikt Jacobs, Margret Wuttke, Evelyn Ullrich, Thomas Baehring, Roland Fenk, Holger S. Willenberg, Sven Schinner, Mathias Cohnen, Jochen Seissler, Kai Zacharowski, Werner A. Scherbaum and Matthias Schott
J Immunol February 1, 2008, 180 (3) 1462-1470; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1462

Abstract

The antitumor effect of IFN-α is mediated by the activation of CTLs, NK cells, and the generation of highly potent Ag-presenting dendritic cells (IFN-DCs). In this study, we show that IFN-DCs generated in vitro from monocytes express CD56 on their surface, a marker which has been thought to be specific for NK cells. FACS analyses of CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs showed a nearly identical pattern for most of the classical DC markers. Importantly, however, only CD56+ IFN-DCs exhibited cytolytic activity up to 24% that could almost completely be blocked (−81%) after coincubation with anti-TRAIL. Intracytoplasmatic cytokine staining revealed that the majority of IFN-DCs independently of their CD56 expression were IFN-γ positive as well. In contrast, CD56+ IFN-DCs showed stronger capacity in stimulating allogenic T cells compared with CD56− IFN-DC. Based on these results, five patients with metastasized medullary thyroid carcinoma were treated for the first time with monocyte-derived tumor Ag-pulsed IFN-DCs. After a long term follow-up (in mean 37 mo) all patients are alive. Immunohistochemical analyses of delayed-type hypersensitivity skin reaction showed a strong infiltration with CD8+ cells. In two patients no substantial change in tumor morphology was detected. Importantly, by analyzing PBMCs, these patients also showed an increase of Ag-specific IFN-γ-secreting T cells. In summary, we here describe for the first time that cytotoxic activity of IFN-DCs is mainly mediated by an IFN-DC subset showing partial phenotypic and functional characteristics of NK cells. These cells represent another mechanism of the antitumor effect induced by IFN-α.

Interferon-α is a cytokine belonging to type I IFNs and has been most frequently used in patients with certain types of cancer. For example, patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors such as melanoma, renal carcinoma, Kaposi’s sarcoma, and neuroendocrine malignancies have been treated. Despite many years of work in preclinical as well as in clinical settings, the mechanisms underlying the IFN-induced antitumor response are not well understood. It was thought that the direct inhibitory effects on tumor cell growth and function were the major mechanisms of the IFN-mediated antitumor responses in patients. However, early experiments in mouse tumor models have shown that IFN-α plays an important role in the activation of a long-lasting antitumor response (1). Subsequent studies have also provided evidence for a role of type I IFNs in the differentiation of the Th1 subset, as well as in the generation of CTL and in the promotion of the in vivo proliferation and survival of T cells (2, 3, 4, 5). In parallel to these mechanisms, NK cells may also be activated by IFN-α leading to a strong cytolytic activity of these cells (6). On the in vivo level, the magnitude of naturally occurring IFN-α is secreted from IFN-producing cells, now known as plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs)4 (7). Therefore, DC may directly trigger cytolytic activity of NK cells. In contrast, the interaction between NK cells and DCs has been described to be reciprocal and could lead to the maturation and functional activation of monocyte-derived DCs (8, 9, 10).

In mice, a new immune cell-subset, termed as IFN-producing killer DCs (IKDCs) has been described for the first time (11, 12). These cells are hybrid cells that unify DC and NK functions (11, 12). IKDC are distinct from conventional DCs and plasmacytoid DCs as they show the molecular expression profile of both NK cells and DCs. They produce substantial amounts of IL-12 and IFN-γ, depending on activation stimuli. Most interestingly, IKDCs directly kill typical NK targets mediated by the TRAIL pathway. Most recently, it has been proposed that these cells may belong to the NK cell lineage and could represent a subtype of activated NK cells with the capability to gain APC function (13, 14, 15). Up to now, IKDCs have only been described in rodents, however, not yet in humans.

We here describe that monocyte-derived DCs, generated with IFN-α and GM-CSF, express high levels of CD56 on their surface, a marker thought only to be present on NK cells (16) and NKT cells (17). Former studies already stated that IFN-α-generated DCs reveal direct cytolytic activity (18, 19), however, without identifying a certain DC subset. In addition, Banchereau et al. (20) already reported on the in vivo use of CD34+ progenitors which were activated with type I IFN and which were used for the treatment of stage IV melanoma patients leading to the induction of tumor Ag-specific recall memory CD8+ T cells in the majority of patients (20). In our present study, we describe that CD56+ monocyte-derived IFN-DCs reveal a direct cytolytic activity in vitro, whereas CD56− IFN-DCs do not. In addition, we demonstrate that the cytolytic activity is mediated by the expression of TRAIL. Intracytoplasmatic cytokine staining revealed that most of CD56+ IFN-DCs as well as CD56− IFN-DCs are IFN-γ producing as well. Mixed leukocyte reactions, however, revealed a slightly stronger capacity in stimulating allogenic T cells compared with CD56− IFN-DCs. For evaluating the clinical effectiveness of monocyte-derived IFN-α-generated DCs, we also used these cells for the first time for the treatment of a small number of cancer patients with metastasized medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). MTC belongs to the group of neuroendocrine cancers specifically characterized by the expression of calcitonin, 32-aa-long tumor-specific peptide. In the past, we already described that calcitonin may serve as specific tumor Ag useful for vaccination strategies in patients with MTC (21). Following IFN-DC treatment, we now report that two patients do not show any substantial changes in tumor morphology after long-term follow-up.

Materials and Methods

Cell separation and DC generation

For in vitro experiments, PBMCs from volunteers were used (study number of the local ethical review board: 2608/05). All magnetic separations were performed using microbead technology (Miltenyi Biotec). Untouched CD14+ peripheral blood monocytes were immunomagnetically purified by using a depletion mixture of biotinylated Abs and anti-biotin mAb-conjugated microbeads. As verified by flow cytometry analysis, a purity of >98% of CD14+ cells was obtained by a secondary purification using anti-CD3 and -CD56 microbeads. Monocytes were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen Life Technologies) at 2.5 × 106/ml in the presence of GM-CSF (1000 U/ml; Leukine) and IFN-α (1000 U/ml; Roferon-A, Roche) without FCS. After 3 days of culturing, CD56+ IFN-DCs were purified with CD56 mAb-conjugated microbeads leading to a purity of the CD56+ cells of ≥98%. CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs were then used for further analyses. For in vitro comparison, IL-4-DCs were generated as formerly described (22).

For in vivo use in cancer patients, DCs were generated in a Good Manufacturing Practice facility (permission received from the Regional Council Düsseldorf: No. 24.30-04.01-001) from monocytes from each patient from an initial leukapheresis (≥4.5 × 109 nucleated cells) followed by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation and an adherens step (1–2.5 × 108 DCs/15 ml RPMI 1640 for 2 h). Adherent cells were cultured for 3 days with GM-CSF and IFN-α as described above. After 72 h, DCs were pulsed with full-length human calcitonin (100 μg/ml; cibacalcin; Novartis), known to be a MTC cell-specific Ag 21. After 2 h, cells were harvested, washed four times with isotonic NaCl, and resuspended in 100 μl of NaCl 0.9%. In all preparations, cell viability was >95% as evaluated by the trypan blue exclusion method.

Phenotypic analysis of DCs by flow cytometry analysis

All mAbs used for flow cytometry were purchased from BD Pharmingen if not otherwise indicated. All Abs were FITC-, PE-, PerCP Cy5.5-, or allophycocyanin-conjugated, respectively, and measured in parallel to appropriate isotype controls. Several DC marker were characterized by using anti-CD80, -CD83, -CD86, -CD40, -CD11c, -CD123, -CD209, -CD14, -CD1a, and -HLA-DR, as well as anti-BDCA 1–4 (CD1c, CD303, CD141, and CD304; Miltenyi Biotec) mAbs. Additionally, for characterization of NK cell surface markers mAbs toward CD56, CD16, CD94, CD161, and CD337 (both from BD Pharmingen) and anti-NKG2A, NKG2D, NKp44, and NKp46 (purchased from Beckman Coulter) were used. Annexin V (Abcam) was used for the detection of apoptotic cells. A positive control for annexin V staining was implanted by incubation cell samples with camptothecin (6 μM, 4 h at 37°C).

For detection of intracellular Ags, cells were treated with brefeldin A (Golgi plug) for 3 h and permeabilized using the Cytoperm/Permwash kit (BD Pharmingen) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. For intracellular staining, anti-TRAIL (clone 2E5) was used, purchased from Alexis. Samples were analyzed using a FACSComp device (BD Biosciences). Data were analyzed using CellQuestPRO software (BD Biosciences). A minimum of 10,000 events was measured from each DC preparation before administration.

Cytotoxicity assay

To determine cytotoxic activity of CD56+ DCs, TRAIL-sensitive K562 cells (1 × 106) were labeled with 100 μCi of 51Cr for 1 h at 37°C. Cells were washed three times, resuspended in complete medium, and incubated (104 cells/well) with varying numbers of effector cells including CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs as well as NK cells (for 18 h). In some experiments, anti-TRAIL RIK-2 mAb (10 μg/ml) or TRAIL ligand (eBioscience), respectively, were added. Supernatants were collected and measured by a Wizard Automatic Gamma Counter (Wallac). Data were expressed as the mean ± SD of triplicate wells. The percentage of cytotoxicity was calculated as: cytotoxicity (percent) = ((experimental group cpm − spontaneous cpm)/(total cpm − spontaneous cpm)) × 100.

Mixed lymphocyte reaction

Allogeneic CD3+ T lymphocytes were purified using anti-CD3-conjugated magnetic microbeads and seeded into 96-wells plates at 5 × 105 cells/well. Monocyte-derived cells were added to each well in triplicate at different stimulator-to-responder ratios. After 5 days, 1 μCi of [3H]thymidine (Amersham Pharmacia) was added to each well and incubation was continued for additional 18 h. Cells were finally collected by a Packard Instrument Filtermate Harvester onto Unifilter-96 (PerkinElmer) and thymidine uptake was quantified by scintillation counting using a TriLux MicroBeta (Wallac).

Determination of cytokine production by DCs

Intracellular cytokine staining for IFN-γ of CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs was performed as following: after 3 days of culturing, brefeldin A was added to cell cultures. Cell surface staining was then conducted with PE-labeled mouse anti-CD1c, PerCP-labeled mouse anti-CD45 and allophycocyanin-labeled mouse CD56 Abs, followed by cell permeabilization and staining with FITC-labeled anti-IFN-γ Abs (BD Pharmingen), respectively. After 30 min, cells were thoroughly washed and samples were analyzed by FACS analysis. A minimum of 10,000 events was gathered from each sample.

Measurement of IL-12 in the supernatant was performed by ELISA as described by the manufacturer (Quantikine-ELISA; R&D Systems). Supernatants were collected from a 1-day culture of pure CD56− and CD56+ IFN-DC, respectively, as well as of cocultures with K562 tumor cells.

Electron microscopy

For ultrastructural analysis (electron microscopy), pellets of all samples were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, 1% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 3 h, postfixed for 90 min in 2% OsO4 in 0.1 M cacodylate (pH 7.3), dehydrated in ethanol, and embedded in epoxy resin. Ultra-thin sections (70 nm) were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate and examined at 75 kV under a Hitachi electron microscope H-600.

Patients

Table I⇓ depicts a summary of patient’s characteristics. Patients with histological proven MTC, radiological established disease with pulmonary and hepatic metastases, and postoperative elevated plasma calcitonin levels >500 pg/ml (normal range <10 pg/ml; MTC-specific tumor marker of residual disease) were included into the study.

View this table:
Table I.

Patient’s characteristics and status before DC vaccination

Treatment of patients and clinical response

All five MTC patients received two s.c. injections with a median of 1.9 × 108 IFN-DCs (±0.8 × 108 DCs, range 0.7–4.0 × 108 DCs) per vaccine. Patients were followed up for 18–46 mo (mean 37 mo). Metastatic lesions were evaluated by computed tomography (CT) scans and ultrasonic examinations. World Health Organization definitions were used for stable disease with a change of <25% in tumor size and tumor markers without occurrence of new lesions for a minimum of six weeks. Measurements of CEA (Roche) and calcitonin (Roche Diagnostics) were performed by commercial kits according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Because the cutoff for calcitonin detection is ∼2000 pg/ml (depending on standard curve), all sera were diluted 1/10 with isotonic sodium chloride before assaying. To minimize intra-assay variability, all calcitonin measurement were performed three times and results were given as means (±SD). Calcitonin measurements were done in one run at the end of the follow-up period. A change of tumor markers of >25% difference for at least 3 mo was considered as progression (23).

Intracellular cytokine staining

Autologous, cryopreserved PBMCs (1 × 106 cells/ml) of treated patients were cultured in RPMI 1640 in the presence of full-length calcitonin (32 aa; cibacalcin; Novartis) or human albumin, respectively (each 100 μg/ml). Intracellular cytokine staining was performed in principle as described above. Following cell surface staining with PerCP-labeled mouse anti-CD4 Abs, intracellular staining was performed with PE-labeled anti-IL-4 or FITC-labeled anti-IFN-γ Abs (BD Pharmingen), respectively.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) and immunohistochemistry

DTH skin tests were documented following treatment with calcitonin-pulsed DCs. DCs were injected intradermally into the upper arm. A positive skin-test reaction was defined as >5-mm diameter erythema and induration 24 h after intradermal injection. In one patient (no. 1), we additionally tested DTH reactivity by intradermal injection of pure calcitonin (10 μg in 100 μl of isotonic NaCl) followed by skin biopsy. In this patient, a biopsy (diameter 5 mm) of the DTH site was taken 24 h after injection. Serial paraffin-embedded sections were stained with a mAb against human CD8 (concentration: 1:200; clone C8/144B; DakoCytomation) in a moist chamber at 37°C for 60 min. Bound Ab was detected using avidin-biotin complex (ABC) peroxidase method (ABC Elite kit; Vector Laboratories). The staining reaction was performed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and H2O2. Accurate negative controls were performed.

Statistical analysis

The results were analyzed for statistical significance by paired and unpaired t tests, respectively, depending on the data used for calculation using GraphPad Prism 4.0 computer software (GraphPad Software).

Results

Generation of DCs from monocytes in the presence of IFN-α

To investigate the effect of IFN-α on DC differentiation from human monocytes, we cultured purified CD14+ monocytes with clinical grade GM-CSF and IFN-α. These cells will be referred to as IFN-DCs hereafter. As recently described (24, 25), the monocyte marker CD14 was down-regulated in IFN-DC whereas typical DC lineage markers CD1a and CD11c were expressed on these cells on high levels (in mean 74 (±8) and 97.9% (±7%), respectively). We next analyzed the expression of MHC molecules (HLA-DR), costimulatory molecules (CD40, CD80, and CD86), and the maturation marker CD83. With the exception of extracellular CD83, which has already been described to be only weakly expressed on IFN-DCs (25), all markers were highly positive (Fig. 1⇓). Most interestingly, however, 56% (±14%) of IFN-DCs were positive for CD56. This is absolutely important, as up to now CD56 expression has only been described to be present on NK cells and NKT cells, however, not on APCs such as DCs.

FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.

Immunophenotypic pattern of IFN-DCs. Isolated monocytes (purity >98%) were cultured over 3 days with GM-CSF and IFN-α. Resulting IFN-DCs were stained with a panel of Abs and analyzed by flow cytometry. As demonstrated in previous studies, IFN-DCs reveal a semimature phenotype with a moderate expression of CD83 whereas costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86 as well as HLA class II molecules were strongly expressed. Additionally, IFN-DCs showed surface markers typically for common DCs (CD209, BDCA 1) as well as for plasmacytoid DCs (CD123, CD11c). Contamination with CD3+ and CD19+ cells was low (<1%), whereas a significant number of CD56+ cells were detected. Marker expression is given as mean (±SD) of at least five DC preparations.

Phenotypical and morphological analyses of CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs

After positive selection of CD56+ IFN-DCs (Fig. 2⇓), both IFN-DC subtypes were phenotypically characterized by FACS analyses. Both cell populations showed an almost identical phenotypical pattern in regard to DC lineage markers CD1a and CD11c as well as the MHC class II molecule HLA-DR and the costimulatory molecules CD80 and CD86. The maturation marker CD83, which was only weakly expressed in IFN-DC was lower in CD56+ cells (p = 0.02), whereas CD40 as well as CD123 were significantly higher expressed (CD40: p = 0.02; CD123: p = 0.0096; Fig. 3⇓). Neither CD56+ IFN-DCs nor CD56− IFN-DCs expressed CD16. Interestingly, the reduction of CD14 was lower in CD56− cells, probably an evidence for incomplete maturation (p = 0.029; Fig. 3⇓). These results indicate that CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs are not substantially two distinct cell populations but may originate from identical precursor cells.

FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.

Representative FACS analysis of CD56+ IFN-DCs. After incubation with GM-CSF and IFN-α, CD56+ cells were isolated by positive selection and stained with anti-CD11c, -CD80, -CD86, -HLA-DR, -CD40, -BDCA-1, and -BDCA-2 mAbs. Appropriate isotype controls performed in parallel were nearly identical, therefore only one control is shown (mouse anti-IgG2a). To verify the viability of CD56+ IFN-DCs, annexin V staining was also performed. Camptothecin-treated cells were used as positive control.

FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.

Immunophenotypic pattern of CD56−/CD56+ IFN-DCs. CD56+ IFN-DCs were purified with CD56 mAb-conjugated microbeads leading to a purity of the CD56+ cells of ≥98%. Thereafter, CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs were stained with a panel of Abs and were analyzed by flow cytometry. CD56+ IFN-DCs showed slightly increased marker expression typical for DCs including CD209, BDCA1, and BDCA4. In addition, CD14 was less frequent seen on CD56+ IFN-DCs compared with CD56− IFN-DCs as well as CD40 which was up-regulated on CD56+ IFN-DCs. Marker expression is given as mean (±SD) of at least five DC preparations.

FACS analyses revealed that CD56+ IFN-DC are bigger in size (as calculated by forward scatter analyses with a mean of 635.0 ± 25.1 relative units) compared with CD56− IFN-DCs (577.9 ± 26.6; Fig. 4⇓). CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs were also visualized by using electron microscopy. Here too, CD56+ IFN-DCs appeared to be slightly larger in size compared with CD56− IFN-DC, although cell types showed similar phenotypes with numerous of pseudopodia. The cytoplasm contained few organelles (mitochondria) and the shape of the nucleus did not show marked differences (Fig. 4⇓).

FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.

Morphology of CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs. CD56+ and CD56− cells were purified with CD56 mAb-conjugated microbeads. Thereafter, both cell fractions were analyzed by electron microscopy (A). Both cell types showed similar phenotypes with numerous pseudopodia. The cytoplasm of CD56+ IFN-DCs contained few organelles (mitochondria), the shape of the nucleus of both cell populations did not show marked differences including a same pattern of chromatin. B, Forward sideward scatter, generated by flow cytometry analysis, revealed that CD56+ IFN-DC are bigger in size (mean 635.0) compared with CD56− IFN-DCs (577.9).

TRAIL expression and cytotoxic potential of CD56+ IFN-DCs

Previous reports have already demonstrated that a variety of lymphoid and myeloid cells, including T cells, NK cells, monocytes, and IKDC can express TRAIL and kill TRAIL-sensitive target cells under certain circumstances (11, 12, 18, 26, 27, 28). To determine whether CD56+ IFN-DC also exhibit tumoricidal activity, these cells were cocultured for 18 h with K562 cells at different DC-target ratios. At higher effector/target cell ratios the lysis activity of CD56+ IFN-DC cells were up to 24% (±4%) (Fig. 5⇓A).

FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.

Cytolytic activity of IFN-DCs and involvement of TRAIL. After generation of IFN-DCs CD56+ and CD56− cells were separated. A, Both cell fractions were cocultured with 51Cr-labeled K562 tumor cells for 18 h at different cell/K562 tumor cell ratios. Supernatants were collected and analyzed by gamma-radiation analysis (CD56+ IFN-DCs, ▪; CD56− IFN-DCs, □). For internal control, K562 tumor cells were cultured alone and in the presence of a detergent for direct lysis. NK cells were used as positive control (⋄). Results of three independent experiments are shown. B, CD56+ IFN-DCs were cocultured in a ratio of 1:50 with or without anti-TRAIL (10 μg/ml). The lysis activity could be partially blocked (−81 ± 2%) after coculturing with anti-TRAIL indicating that the majority of lysis activity is mediated by TRAIL. For internal controls, K562 cells were cultured alone. C, Representative FACS analysis for TRAIL of CD56+ IFN-DCs (middle panel) and CD56− IFN-DCs (right panel) showing a weaker TRAIL expression in CD56− IFN-DCs compared with CD56+ IFN-DCs. Isotype control for whole IFN-DCs is given in the left panel.

This lysis activity could be partially blocked (−81 ± 2%) with anti-TRAIL indicating that one of the lysis mechanism of these cells is mediated by TRAIL (Fig. 5⇑B). Intracytoplasmatic cytokine analyses of CD56+ IFN-DCs revealed that in mean 95.2 ± 2.7% of all CD56+ IFN-DCs were positive for TRAIL (representative FACS analysis is given in Fig. 5⇑C). CD56− IFN-DCs also showed a TRAIL expression. This was, however, less pronounced compared with CD56+ IFN-DCs as only 84.7 ± 11.3% were TRAIL positive. The minimal lysis activity (7%) of CD56− IFN-DCs could partially blocked 62 ± 13% with anti-TRAIL.

Cytokine production by IFN-DC

For specific determination of IFN-γ-secreting cells intracellular cytokine staining was performed. After 3 days of culture of CD14+ monocytes with IFN-α, the majority of cells (99.2 ± 0.2%) were IFN-γ positive (representative FACS analysis is shown in Fig. 6⇓A). For specification we could demonstrate that the majority of cells (90.1- ± 1.6%) were BDCA1 positive. Importantly, IFN-γ-producing IFN-DCs consisted of CD56+ as well as of CD56− IFN-DCs indicating that these are not two distinct cell populations rather.

FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.

Cytokine analysis of IFN-DCs. Representative intracellular cytokine staining (A) shows that the majority of IFN-DCs are IFN-γ-producing (upper right panel; isotype control is shown on the upper left panel). Detailed analyses revealed that the majority of cells are BDCA1 positive (gated for R2). Importantly, IFN-γ-producing IFN-DCs consisted of CD56+ as well as CD56− IFN-DCs (gated for R3). Detection of IL-12 is shown in B. CD56+ and CD56− cells were separated after generation of IFN-DCs. Both cell fractions were cultured alone or cocultured with K562 tumor cells in two different ratios, respectively. Supernatants were collected and frozen until analysis. Coculture with K562 tumor cells, resulted in a slight increase of IL-12 production in CD56+ IFN-DCs (up to 49 pg/ml ± 6%) compared with CD56− IFN-DCs (up to 41 pg/ml ± 5%). Results from three independent experiments are shown. Differences between CD56+ IFN-DCs and CD56− IFN-DCs were not significant.

After 3 days of culture with IFN-α, neither CD56− nor CD56+ IFN-DCs produced any significant amounts of IL-12 measured within the supernatants of cells (Fig. 6⇑B). Importantly, however, after additional 24 h of coculture with K562 tumor cells, significant amounts of IL-12 (49 pg/ml ± 6%) were secreted while IL12 production of CD56− IFN-DCs was slightly lower, however, still detectable (41 pg/ml ± 5%; Fig. 6⇑). These differences did, however, not reach statistical significancy.

MLR with CD56+ IFN-DC as APCs

To investigate the function of CD56+ IFN-DCs as stimulators of naive CD3+ T cells, MLR was performed. The results were compared with stimulatory capacity of CD56− IFN-DC, IL-4-DCs, and monocytes, respectively. As formerly described (29), at all stimulator-responder ratios, IFN-DCs were found to be more potent for stimulating T cells compared with immature monocytes (p < 0.0001) and, most importantly, compared with IL-4-DCs (p < 0.0001; Fig. 7⇓). Detailed analyses of CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DC revealed that CD56+ IFN-DC showed a slightly stronger capacity in stimulating allogenic T cells compared with CD56− IFN-DC at all DC-T cell ratios (Fig. 7⇓). These differences also reached statistical significancy (p = 0.036).

FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.

MLR of APCs. CD56+ IFN-DCs and CD56− IFN-DCs, respectively, were cocultured with allogeneic CD3+ T lymphocytes at different stimulator-to-responder ratios for 6 days. [3H]Thymidine (1 μCi) was added for 18 h, and thymidine uptake was quantified by scintillation counting. At all stimulator cell:T cell ratios, CD56+ IFN-DCs (▪) revealed a slightly stronger stimulating capacity compared with CD56− IFN-DCs (□; p = 0.036). Freshly isolated monocytes (○) as well as IL4-generated DCs (•) were used as controls. At all stimulator-to-responder ratios IFN-DCs were more potent in stimulating allogenic T cells compared with immature monocytes (p < 0.0001) and compared with IL4-DCs (p < 0.0001). Results are shown from three independent experiments.

Vaccinations with IFN-DC in patients with medullary thyroid carcinoma

Based on these result an in vivo immunotherapy trial was started in five patients with metastasized MTC. The patient’s characteristics are given in Table I⇑. IFN-DC vaccinations were well tolerated by all patients without experiencing any adverse effects or any clinical signs of autoimmune reaction. To study the in vivo immune response we analyzed DTH skin reactivity. After the second vaccination all patients developed a significant DTH reaction (>1 cm in diameter) characterized by the appearance of erythema and induration at the injection site. In one patient (no. 1), we additionally tested DTH reactivity by intradermal injection of pure calcitonin (10 μg in 100 μl isotonic NaCl) without any IFN-DCs. Forty-eight hours after Ag injection there was a strong perivascular and epidermal infiltration with CD8+ T lymphocytes (Fig. 8⇓A). This clearly indicates the ability of IFN-DCs to induce a Th1-like Ag-specific immune response in vivo.

FIGURE 8.
FIGURE 8.

Delayed-type hypersensitivity skin reaction and CT. A, Skin biopsy of patient 1 demonstrates strong epidermal infiltration with CD8+ CTL 48 h after s.c. administration of calcitonin (10 μg in 100 μl of isotonic NaCl). Paraffin sections were incubated with mAbs against CD8 and stained with the avidin-biotin complex peroxidase method. B, CT of the chest of patient 4. Pretherapeutic scan (upper row) and follow-up examination 44 mo later (bottom row). After a long-term follow-up, there is a tiny increase of small pulmonary metastases (arrows).

During follow-up of (in mean) 37 mo, there were three patients (nos. 1, 2, and 5) who experienced a progression determined by CT and by measurement of serum tumor marker. In two patients (patients 3 and 4), however, neither substantial changes in tumor morphology nor in serum tumor markers were detected. After a long-term follow-up of 44 mo, serum carcinoembryonic Ag in patient 4 showed a slight decrease (332 μg/L after treatment compared with 377 μg/L before treatment), whereas in the CT scan of the lung only a tiny increase was detected (Fig. 8⇑B). Pulmonary CT scan of patient 3 showed a stable disease whereas the tumor markers CEA and calcitonin showed a small increase of <25% (52 μg/L after treatment vs 43 μg/L before treatment for CEA and 2090 vs 2,240 pg/ml for calcitonin, respectively). Importantly, by analyzing PBMC these patients also showed an increase of calcitonin-specific IFN-γ-secreting T cells (Fig. 9⇓).

FIGURE 9.
FIGURE 9.

Percent IFN-γ-producing CD4+ T lymphocytes in response to calcitonin determined by intracytoplasmatic cytokine staining. PBMC from patients 3 and 4 were isolated from blood samples collected monthly. Patient’s PBMC were exposed for 16 h to 100 μg/ml calcitonin (left and right panels) and to a control protein (human albumin, middle panels). For the last 3 h, brefeldin A was added to inhibit protein secretion, cells were stained for extracellular CD4 and intracellular IFN-γ. In two patients, which responded to immunotherapy (patients 3 and 4), there was a significant increase of calcitonin-specific IFN-γ-secreting T lymphocytes after the second vaccination (right panels) compared with pretreatment (left panels). For control, after stimulation of T cells which were collected after therapy and which were stimulated with human serum albumin only a small number of IFN-γ-secreting T cells could be detected (middle panels).

Discussion

Type I IFNs are cytokines exhibiting antitumor effects, including multiple activities on immune cells. The major mechanisms mediating this process is the differentiation of the Th1 subset (2, 3), the generation of CTLs (4) and the activation of NK cells (6). In the last couple of years, another mechanism, namely the differentiation of monocytes into DCs by IFN-α (IFN-DCs) have been proposed to be responsible as well (30, 31). When compared with the classical IL 4-generated DCs (IL-4-DCs), IFN-DCs exhibit a typical DC morphology and express a similar level of costimulatory and class II MHC molecules (31, 32). In contrast, IFN-DCs reveal a significantly higher level of MHC class I molecules as well as other DC markers including CD1a (33), CD208 (DC-LAMP) (34), and CD197 (CCR7) (35).

Depending on their maturation stage, IFN-DCs also secrete large amounts of inflammatory cytokines such as IL-1β, IL-6, IL-10, IL-18, and TNF-α (29). In addition, IFN-DCs induce a higher amount of long-lived CTLs against certain tumor Ags compared with classical DCs (36). Most important, in the context of cytotoxicity, these cells also reveal direct tumoricidal activity via the TRAIL which was shown to be strongly up-regulated on a molecular (18, 31) and protein level (18, 19) and which explains the direct cytolytic activity of IFN-DCs (18, 19). In our present study, we confirm the cytolytic activity of IFN-DC caused by (soluble) TRAIL. Importantly, however, we were able to specify a subpopulation of IFN-DCs with cytolytic activity expressing the surface marker CD56. This is absolutely crucial, as up to now CD56 expression has only been described to be present on NK cells and NKT cells, however not on APCs such as DC. CD56 itself (also known as NCAM) is responsible for cell to cell contact (37, 38). In addition, there is some evidence of a direct CD56-mediated cytolytic activity (39, 40). According to our data, CD56+ IFN-DCs exhibited cytolytic activity up to 24% whereas CD56− IFN-DCs did not. Tumoricidal activity could almost completely be blocked when cells were cocultured with anti-TRAIL indicating that lysis mechanism of CD56+ IFN-DC is mediated by TRAIL. Importantly, however, on the basis of intracellular staining a significant number of CD56− IFN-DCs were TRAIL positive as well. The differences in cytolytic activity between both cell populations could be explained by different amounts of secreted TRAIL reaching target cells because of a closer cell/cell contact. This concept is supported by the fact that cytolytic activity of CD56+ IFN-DCs as well as the minimal cytolytic activity of CD56− IFN-DCs could only incompletely be blocked after coincubation with anti-TRAIL.

For detailed analysis, we also examined other lysis mechanisms including granzyme/perforin and CD95 ligand (FasL). In rodents a Fas-dependent direct lysis activity of bone marrow-derived DCs has already been described (41, 42). In humans HLA-DR+, lineage− DC which were freshly isolated from peripheral blood have also been shown to reveal a high tumoricidal activity against various tumor cell lines depending on the engagement of TNF, TRAIL, lymphotoxin-α1β4, and FasL (43, 44). Most recently, Stary et al. (45) discovered tumor-infiltrating myeloid DCs and pDCs that gained lytic functions and exogenous supply of TLR7 agonists. Furthermore, the authors demonstrated that HLA-DR+ CD11c+ blood-derived myeloid DCs could express perforin and granzyme B in the presence of TLR7/8 agonists, and serve as potent killer DCs against the chronic myelogenous leukemia cell line K562, but not against the Jurkat T cell line (known to be refractory to perforin/granzyme-mediated death) (45). With the exception of TRAIL, all aforementioned lysis mechanisms could not be detected on a phenotypical level on IFNα-generated DCs. This might be explained by the different cell subpopulations investigated, different agonists used for stimulation and possibly by lysis mechanisms not known so far, respectively.

It is important to note that the initial intent of this study was to identify the human counterpart of a new cell population recently identified in mice termed IKDCs (11, 12). These cells are distinct from conventional DCs and pDCs as they show the molecular expression profile of both NK cells and DCs. Moreover, they produce high amounts of IL-12 and IFN-γ. Most importantly, IKDCs directly kill typical NK target cells mediated by the TRAIL pathway. The cytolytic capacity of IKDCs subsequently diminishes, associated with the loss of NKG2D receptor on these cells. Most recently, it has been proposed that IKDCs could rather represent a subtype of activated NK cells that gain the ability to present Ags under certain circumstances, especially in tumoral context (13, 14, 15). As mentioned above, human IFN-DCs generated from monocytes over 3 days of culturing with IFN-α revealed NK cell markers namely CD56 and TRAIL. In contrast, however, we could not identify a significant amount of other NK cell surface markers such as NKp46, NKG2A/CD94, NKG2D, Nkp30 (CD337), Nkp44, and NK cell receptor-P1 (CD161). These markers were only detected on a marginal level (data not shown). The near absence of these receptors, e.g., of the stimulating receptor NKG2D are potentially responsible for the weaker cytolytic activity of CD56+ IFN-DCs compared with classical NK cells. In contrast to NK cells (46), even additional culturing of CD56+ IFN-DCs with K562 tumor cells did not significantly change the quantitative expression profile of any of these NK cell receptors on CD56+ IFN-DCs. We also investigated the ability of IFN-DCs to produce IFN-γ. Intracellular cytokine staining revealed that the majority of IFN-DCs were IFN-γ positive, independent of the expression of CD56, indicating that CD56+ and CD56− IFN-DCs are not two distinct cell populations rather than cells at different stages of development. The amount of secreted IFN-γ in the supernatant was, however, too low to be detectable by ELISA (data not shown). The positive IFN-γ cytokine staining is in line with recent data showing a stimulation-dependent secretion of high amounts of IFN-γ of human cord blood monocyte-derived DCs (47) and IL-4-DCs (48), respectively. So, monocyte-derived IFN-DCs partially reveal phenotypical and functional characteristics of NK cells including CD56 and TRAIL and the production of IFN-γ; however, they cannot be termed as human IKDCs as other classical NK cell markers are still missing and cytolytic activity is much lower compared with NK cells.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report demonstrating monocyte-derived IFN-DC treatment in cancer patients. As demonstrated by DTH skin reaction, our results suggest that IFN-DCs induce Ag-specific CD8+ T cells as an indicator of a potential CTL response in humans. These findings were flanked by a Th1-cytokine pattern which is crucial for the induction and maintenance of an adequate CTL immunity. Our data are in line with a study by Banchereau et al. (20) reporting on the in vivo use of CD34+ progenitors which were activated by type I IFN and which were used for the treatment of patients with stage IV melanoma. The authors reported on no statistically significant survival advantage in these patients. Importantly, however, in six of seven patients tumor Ag-specific recall memory CD8+ T cells able to secret IFN-γ and to proliferate could be detected. More recently, another study from Di Pucchio et al. (49) reported on a pilot study to determine the effects of IFN-α administered as adjuvant of tumor-specific Ags in stage IV melanoma patients. The authors detected an enhancement of CD8+ T cells recognizing native and modified tumor Ags and most important a significant increase of DC precursors. These cells had an enhanced APC function in some patients with stable disease (49). These data are in line with another report from Yamamoto et al. (28) reporting on markedly induced TRAIL expression on CD14+ monocytes and enhanced cytotoxic activity toward hepatocellular carcinoma cells after coincubation with IFN-α.

In summary, our results show that cytotoxic activity of IFN-α-generated monocyte-derived DCs is mainly mediated by a subset of cells expressing CD56. Up to now, it has been thought that this marker is specific for NK and NKT cells but is not expressed on APCs. We also demonstrate that CD56+ IFN-DCs express TRAIL, a major lysis mechanism in cytotoxic immunity. We were, therefore, being able to specify one tumor lysis mechanism induced by IFN-α. Based on our data, it could be postulated that future cancer immunization trials in should be performed with CD56+ IFN-DCs to improve clinical efficacy.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Laurence Zitvogel from the Institute Gustave Roussy (Villejuif, France) for helpful discussion of the data and Dr. Hans-Georg Hartwig (Director, Department of Anatomy II, Heinrich-Heine-University, Düsseldorf, Germany) and Brigitte Rohbeck for performing electron microscopy and for critical review of the manuscript. Moreover, we thank Roswitha Charko for excellent technical support.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; Scho 781/4-1), the American Thyroid Association (ThyCa), and by grant given by the Medical Faculty of Heinrich-Heine-University (Duesseldorf, Germany). E.U. received a fellowship from the DFG.

  • ↵2 C.P. and B.J. contributed equally to this work.

  • ↵3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Matthias Schott, Endocrine Cancer Center, Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Rheumatology, University Hospital, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Duesseldorf, Germany. E-mail address: matthias.schott{at}uni-duesseldorf.de

  • ↵4 Abbreviations used in this paper: pDC, plasmacytoid dendritic cell; IKDC, IFN-producing killer DC; MTC, medullary thyroid carcinoma; CT, computed tomography; DTH, delayed-type hypersensitivity; IFN-DC, IFN-α generated DC.

  • Received June 20, 2007.
  • Accepted November 29, 2007.

References

  1. ↵
    Belardelli, F., I. Gresser. 1996. The neglected role of type I interferon in the T-cell response: implications for its clinical use. Immunol. Today 17: 369-372.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Pfeffer, L. M., C. A. Dinarello, R. B. Herberman, B. R. Williams, E. C. Borden, R. Bordens, M. R. Walter, T. L. Nagabhushan, P. P. Trotta, S. Pestka. 1998. Biological properties of recombinant α-interferons: 40th anniversary of the discovery of interferons. Cancer Res. 58: 2489-2499.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Sun, S., X. Zhang, D. F. Tough, J. Sprent. 1998. Type I interferon-mediated stimulation of T cells by CpG DNA. J. Exp. Med. 188: 2335-2342.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Marrack, P., J. Kappler, T. Mitchell. 1999. Type I interferons keep activated T cells alive. J. Exp. Med. 189: 521-530.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Kolumam, G. A., S. Thomas, L. J. Thompson, J. Sprent, K. Murali-Krishna. 2005. Type I interferons act directly on CD8 T cells to allow clonal expansion and memory formation in response to viral infection. J. Exp. Med. 202: 637-650.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Trinchieri, G., D. Santoli. 1978. Anti-viral activity induced by culturing lymphocytes with tumor-derived or virus-transformed cells: enhancement of human natural killer cell activity by interferon and antagonistic inhibition of susceptibility of target cells to lysis. J. Exp. Med. 147: 1299-1313.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Siegal, F. P., N. Kadowaki, M. Shodell, P. A. Fitzgerald-Bocarsly, K. Shah, S. Ho, S. Antonenko, Y. J. Liu. 1999. The nature of the principal type 1 interferon-producing cells in human blood. Science 284: 1835-1837.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Cooper, M. A., T. A. Fehniger, A. Fuchs, M. Colonna, M. A. Caligiuri. 2004. NK cell and DC interactions. Trends Immunol. 25: 47-52.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Gerosa, F., B. Baldani-Guerra, C. Nisii, V. Marchesini, G. Carra, G. Trinchieri. 2002. Reciprocal activating interaction between natural killer cells and dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 195: 327-333.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Piccioli, D., S. Sbrana, E. Melandri, N. M. Valiante. 2002. Contact-dependent stimulation and inhibition of dendritic cells by natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 195: 335-341.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Taieb, J., N. Chaput, C. Menard, L. Apetoh, E. Ullrich, M. Bonmort, M. Pequignot, N. Casares, M. Terme, C. Flament, et al 2006. A novel dendritic cell subset involved in tumor immunosurveillance. Nat. Med. 12: 214-219.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Chan, C. W., E. Crafton, H. N. Fan, J. Flook, K. Yoshimura, M. Skarica, D. Brockstedt, T. W. Dubensky, M. F. Stins, L. L. Lanier, et al 2006. Interferon-producing killer dendritic cells provide a link between innate and adaptive immunity. Nat. Med. 12: 207-213.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Blasius, A. L., W. Barchet, M. Cella, M. Colonna. 2007. Development and function of murine B220+CD11c+NK1.1+ cells identify them as a subset of NK cells. J. Exp. Med. 204: 2561-2568.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Vosshenrich, C. A., S. Lesjean-Pottier, M. Hasan, O. R. Goff, E. Corcuff, O. Mandelboim, J. P. Di Santo. 2007. CD11cloB220+ interferon-producing killer dendritic cells are activated natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 204: 2569-2578.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Caminschi, I., F. Ahmet, K. Heger, J. Brady, S. L. Nutt, D. Vremec, S. Pietersz, M. H. Lahoud, L. Schofield, D. S. Hansen, et al 2007. Putative IKDCs are functionally and developmentally similar to natural killer cells, but not to dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 204: 2579-2590.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Farag, S. S., M. A. Caligiuri. 2006. Human natural killer cell development and biology. Blood Rev. 20: 123-137.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Ou, D., D. L. Metzger, X. Wang, P. Pozzilli, A. J. Tingle. 2002. β-cell antigen-specific CD56+ NKT cells from type 1 diabetic patients: autoaggressive effector T cells damage human CD56+ β cells by HLA-restricted and non-HLA-restricted pathways. Hum. Immunol. 63: 256-270.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Griffith, T. S., S. R. Wiley, M. Z. Kubin, L. M. Sedger, C. R. Maliszewski, N. A. Fanger. 1999. Monocyte-mediated tumoricidal activity via the tumor necrosis factor-related cytokine, TRAIL. J. Exp. Med. 189: 1343-1354.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Fanger, N. A., C. R. Maliszewski, K. Schooley, T. S. Griffith. 1999. Human dendritic cells mediate cellular apoptosis via tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL). J. Exp. Med. 190: 1155-1164.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Banchereau, J., H. Ueno, M. Dhodapkar, J. Connolly, J. P. Finholt, E. Klechevsky, J. P. Blanck, D. A. Johnston, A. K. Palucka, J. Fay. 2005. Immune and clinical outcomes in patients with stage IV melanoma vaccinated with peptide-pulsed dendritic cells derived from CD34+ progenitors and activated with type I interferon. J. Immunother. 28: 505-516.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Schott, M., J. Feldkamp, M. Klucken, G. Kobbe, W. A. Scherbaum, J. Seissler. 2002. Calcitonin-specific antitumor immunity in medullary thyroid carcinoma following dendritic cell vaccination. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 51: 663-668.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Sallusto, F., A. Lanzavecchia. 1994. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor α. J. Exp. Med. 179: 1109-1118.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Juweid, M. E., G. Hajjar, L. C. Swayne, R. M. Sharkey, S. Suleiman, T. Herskovic, M. Pereira, A. D. Rubin, D. M. Goldenberg. 1999. Phase I/II trial of 131I-MN-14F(ab)2 anti-carcinoembryonic antigen monoclonal antibody in the treatment of patients with metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer 85: 1828-1842.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Dauer, M., K. Pohl, B. Obermaier, T. Meskendahl, J. Robe, M. Schnurr, S. Endres, A. Eigler. 2003. Interferon-α disables dendritic cell precursors: dendritic cells derived from interferon-α-treated monocytes are defective in maturation and T-cell stimulation. Immunology 110: 38-47.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Tosi, D., R. Valenti, A. Cova, G. Sovena, V. Huber, L. Pilla, F. Arienti, F. Belardelli, G. Parmiani, L. Rivoltini. 2004. Role of cross-talk between IFN-α-induced monocyte-derived dendritic cells and NK cells in priming CD8+ T cell responses against human tumor antigens. J. Immunol. 172: 5363-5370.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Kayagaki, N., N. Yamaguchi, M. Nakayama, H. Eto, K. Okumura, H. Yagita. 1999. Type I interferons (IFNs) regulate tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) expression on human T cells: a novel mechanism for the antitumor effects of type I IFNs. J. Exp. Med. 189: 1451-1460.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Zamai, L., M. Ahmad, I. M. Bennett, L. Azzoni, E. S. Alnemri, B. Perussia. 1998. Natural killer (NK) cell-mediated cytotoxicity: differential use of TRAIL and Fas ligand by immature and mature primary human NK cells. J. Exp. Med. 188: 2375-2380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Yamamoto, T., H. Nagano, M. Sakon, H. Wada, H. Eguchi, M. Kondo, B. Damdinsuren, H. Ota, M. Nakamura, H. Wada, et al 2004. Partial contribution of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL)/TRAIL receptor pathway to antitumor effects of interferon-α/5-fluorouracil against hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 10: 7884-7895.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Mohty, M., A. Vialle-Castellano, J. A. Nunes, D. Isnardon, D. Olive, B. Gaugler. 2003. IFN-α skews monocyte differentiation into Toll-like receptor 7-expressing dendritic cells with potent functional activities. J. Immunol. 171: 3385-3393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Paquette, R. L., N. C. Hsu, S. M. Kiertscher, A. N. Park, L. Tran, M. D. Roth, J. A. Glaspy. 1998. Interferon-α and granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor differentiate peripheral blood monocytes into potent antigen-presenting cells. J. Leukocyte Biol. 64: 358-367.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  31. ↵
    Santini, S. M., C. Lapenta, M. Logozzi, S. Parlato, M. Spada, T. Di Pucchio, F. Belardelli. 2000. Type I interferon as a powerful adjuvant for monocyte-derived dendritic cell development and activity in vitro and in Hu-PBL-SCID mice. J. Exp. Med. 191: 1777-1788.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Luft, T., P. Luetjens, H. Hochrein, T. Toy, K. A. Masterman, M. Rizkalla, C. Maliszewski, K. Shortman, J. Cebon, E. Maraskovsky. 2002. IFN-α enhances CD40 ligand-mediated activation of immature monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Int. Immunol. 14: 367-380.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Brigl, M., M. B. Brenner. 2004. CD1: antigen presentation and T cell function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 22: 817-890.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    de Saint-Vis, B., J. Vincent, S. Vandenabeele, B. Vanbervliet, J. J. Pin, S. It-Yahia, S. Patel, M. G. Mattei, J. Banchereau, S. Zurawski, et al 1998. A novel lysosome-associated membrane glycoprotein, DC-LAMP, induced upon DC maturation, is transiently expressed in MHC class II compartment. Immunity 9: 325-336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Parlato, S., S. M. Santini, C. Lapenta, T. Di Pucchio, M. Logozzi, M. Spada, A. M. Giammarioli, W. Malorni, S. Fais, F. Belardelli. 2001. Expression of CCR-7, MIP-3β, and Th-1 chemokines in type I IFN- induced monocyte-derived dendritic cells: importance for the rapid acquisition of potent migratory and functional activities. Blood 98: 3022-3029.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Mailliard, R. B., A. Wankowicz-Kalinska, Q. Cai, A. Wesa, C. M. Hilkens, M. L. Kapsenberg, J. M. Kirkwood, W. J. Storkus, P. Kalinski. 2004. α-type-1 polarized dendritic cells: a novel immunization tool with optimized CTL-inducing activity. Cancer Res. 64: 5934-5937.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Hamerman, J. A., K. Ogasawara, L. L. Lanier. 2005. NK cells in innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 17: 29-35.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Moretta, A.. 2002. Natural killer cells and dendritic cells: rendezvous in abused tissues. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2: 957-964.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Vergelli, M., H. Le, J. M. van Noort, S. Dhib-Jalbut, H. McFarland, R. Martin. 1996. A novel population of CD4+CD56+ myelin-reactive T cells lyses target cells expressing CD56/neural cell adhesion molecule. J. Immunol. 157: 679-688.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. ↵
    Takasaki, S., K. Hayashida, C. Morita, H. Ishibashi, Y. Niho. 2000. CD56 directly interacts in the process of NCAM-positive target cell-killing by NK cells. Cell Biol. Int. 24: 101-108.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Lu, L., S. Qian, P. A. Hershberger, W. A. Rudert, D. H. Lynch, A. W. Thomson. 1997. Fas ligand (CD95L) and B7 expression on dendritic cells provide counter-regulatory signals for T cell survival and proliferation. J. Immunol. 158: 5676-5684.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  42. ↵
    Huang, J., T. Tatsumi, E. Pizzoferrato, N. Vujanovic, W. J. Storkus. 2005. Nitric oxide sensitizes tumor cells to dendritic cell-mediated apoptosis, uptake, and cross-presentation. Cancer Res. 65: 8461-8470.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Janjic, B. M., G. Lu, A. Pimenov, T. L. Whiteside, W. J. Storkus, N. L. Vujanovic. 2002. Innate direct anticancer effector function of human immature dendritic cells. I. Involvement of an apoptosis-inducing pathway. J. Immunol. 168: 1823-1830.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Lu, G., B. M. Janjic, J. Janjic, T. L. Whiteside, W. J. Storkus, N. L. Vujanovic. 2002. Innate direct anticancer effector function of human immature dendritic cells. II. Role of TNF, lymphotoxin-α1β2, Fas ligand, and TNF-related apoptosis-inducing ligand. J. Immunol. 168: 1831-1839.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Stary, G., C. Bangert, M. Tauber, R. Strohal, T. Kopp, G. Stingl. 2007. Tumoricidal activity of TLR7/8-activated inflammatory dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 204: 1441-1451.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Moretta, L., A. Moretta. 2004. Unravelling natural killer cell function: triggering and inhibitory human NK receptors. EMBO J. 23: 255-259.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Yamaguchi, N., Y. Fujimori, Y. Fujibayashi, I. Kasumoto, H. Okamura, K. Nakanishi, H. Hara. 2005. Interferon-γ production by human cord blood monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Ann. Hematol. 84: 423-428.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Fricke, I., D. Mitchell, J. Mittelstadt, N. Lehan, H. Heine, T. Goldmann, A. Bohle, S. Brandau. 2006. Mycobacteria induce IFN-γ production in human dendritic cells via triggering of TLR2. J. Immunol. 176: 5173-5182.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Di Pucchio, T., L. Pilla, I. Capone, M. Ferrantini, E. Montefiore, F. Urbani, R. Patuzzo, E. Pennacchioli, M. Santinami, A. Cova, et al 2006. Immunization of stage IV melanoma patients with Melan-A/MART-1 and gp100 peptides plus IFN-α results in the activation of specific CD8+ T cells and monocyte/dendritic cell precursors. Cancer Res. 66: 4943-4951.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
Back to top

In this issue

Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Email Article
Citation Tools

Jump to section