Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

C-Reactive Protein Enhances Immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae by Targeting Uptake to FcγR on Dendritic Cells

Deirdre Thomas-Rudolph, Terry W. Du Clos, Clifford M. Snapper and Carolyn Mold
J Immunol June 1, 2007, 178 (11) 7283-7291; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7283
Deirdre Thomas-Rudolph
*Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Terry W. Du Clos
†Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico School of Medicine, Albuquerque, NM 87131;
‡Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albuquerque, NM 87108; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clifford M. Snapper
§Department of Pathology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20814
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Carolyn Mold
*Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Increased uptake of CRP-opsonized R36a by wild-type, but not by FcR γ-chain−/− DC. A, R36a were labeled with CM-DiI, treated with 100 μg/ml CRP for 30 min, and added to BMDC at a ratio of 800:1 (R36a:DC). Cells were incubated for 1 h, then washed and stained with FITC anti-CD11c. Uptake of R36a was determined by two-color flow cytometry. Results are presented as the CM-DiI fluorescence of the CD11c+ cells. Mean ± SEM of four experiments. B, The same experiment was done with the addition of 10−4 M PC where indicated. Mean ± SEM of two experiments. C, Representative two-color flow diagrams for C57BL/6 DC after incubation with R36a (left) or CRP-treated R36a (right).

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Effect of CRP and R36a on DC maturation markers. R36a were incubated with 100 μg/ml CRP for 30 min and added to BMDC at a ratio of 800:1 (R36a:DC). DC were stained for maturation markers after 20 h. The geometric mean fluorescence intensity for each marker relative to the isotype control was determined. Results from three experiments were normalized to the unpulsed DC control to allow presentation of combined data. The markers were MHC class II (A), CD40 (B), CD80 (C), and CD86 (D). Significant differences between R36a and R36a + CRP are indicated by ∗, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    CRP opsonization increases IgG responses to PC and PspA in recipients of DC pulsed with R36a. BMDC from C57BL/6 mice were pulsed for 4.5 h with R36a or CRP-treated R36a and washed extensively to remove free bacteria. Recipient mice (n = 5/group) were injected with 106 DC i.p. on day 0. On day 28 (arrow), all mice were injected i.p. with 5 × 106 free R36a. Serum was collected weekly for Ab determinations by ELISA. Results are expressed as the absorbance readings multiplied by the serum dilution. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Significant differences between R36a and R36a + CRP groups are indicated by ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.0001. Results are representative of two independent experiments using BMDC. A, IgM anti-PC response. B, IgG anti-PC response. C, IgG anti-PspA response.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    CRP opsonization increases IgG responses to PC and PspA in recipients of Jaws II DC pulsed with R36a. The Jaws II DC line was pulsed for 4.5 h with R36a or CRP-treated R36a and washed extensively to remove free bacteria. C57BL/6 recipient mice (n = 5/group) were injected with 106 Jaws II DC i.p. on day 0. On day 28 (arrow), all mice were injected i.p. with 5 × 106 free R36a. Serum was collected weekly for Ab determinations by ELISA. Results are expressed as the absorbance readings multiplied by the serum dilution. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Significant differences between R36a and R36a + CRP groups are indicated by ∗∗, p < 0.01; ∗∗∗, p < 0.0001. Results are representative of two experiments using the Jaws II C57BL/6 DC cell line transferred into C57BL/6 recipients. A, IgM anti-PC response. B, IgG anti-PC response. C, IgG anti-PspA response.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    CRP opsonization has no effect on Ab responses to PC and PspA in C57BL/6 recipients of FcR γ-chain−/− (N12) DC pulsed with R36a. BMDC from C57BL/6 FcR γ-chain−/− mice were pulsed for 4.5 h with R36a or CRP-treated R36a and washed extensively to remove free bacteria. C57BL/6 recipient mice (n = 5/group) were injected with 106 BMDC i.p. on day 0. On day 28 (arrow), all mice were injected i.p. with 5 × 106 free R36a. Serum was collected weekly for Ab determinations by ELISA. Results are expressed as the absorbance readings multiplied by the serum dilution. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. No significant differences were seen between the R36a and R36a + CRP groups. Results are from one experiment using C57BL/6 FcR γ-chain−/− DC transferred into C57BL/6 recipients. Similar results were seen in two additional experiments using B6 × 129 FcR γ-chain−/− DC transferred into B6 × 129 recipients. A, IgM anti-PC response; B, IgG anti-PC response; and C, IgG anti-PspA response.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    CRP opsonization increases late IgG responses to PC and PspA in C57BL/6 recipients of DC pulsed with R36a. Ab responses to PC and PspA in C57BL/6 recipients of C57BL/6 DC or B6 × 129 recipients of B6 × 129 FcR γ-chain−/− DC pulsed with R36a or CRP-R36a. DC were pulsed for 4.5 h with R36a or CRP-treated R36a and washed extensively to remove free bacteria. Recipient mice (n = 5/group) were injected with 106 DC i.p. on day 0. On day 28 (data not shown) and day 98 (arrow), all mice were injected i.p. with 5 × 106 free R36a. Serum was collected weekly for Ab determinations. Results are expressed as the absorbance readings multiplied by the serum dilution. Data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA. Significant differences were seen between the R36a and R36a + CRP groups in the recipients of wild-type (A and C), but not DC from FcR γ-chain−/− mice (B and D). ∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗, p < 0.01. A and B, IgG anti-PC response; C and D, IgG anti-PspA response.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    CRP opsonization increases survival in recipients of DC pulsed with R36a challenged with Pn3. BMDC were pulsed for 4.5 h with R36a or CRP-treated R36a and washed extensively to remove free bacteria. Recipient mice were injected with 106 DC i.p. on day 0. On day 28, all mice were infected intranasally under anesthesia with 5 × 106 Pn3. A, Survival of C57BL/6 mice immunized with C57BL/6 DC that were unpulsed or pulsed with R36a or CRP-opsonized R36a. B, B6 × 129 mice immunized with BMDC from FcR γ-chain−/− mice that were unpulsed or pulsed with R36a or CRP-opsonized R36a. Two experiments were combined (n = 12/group). For the C57BL/6 mice, p < 0.05 for immunization with CRP-treated R36a vs either other group. For the recipients of FcR γ-chain−/− DC, there were no significant differences in survival among the three groups.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 178 (11)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 178, Issue 11
1 Jun 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
C-Reactive Protein Enhances Immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae by Targeting Uptake to FcγR on Dendritic Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
C-Reactive Protein Enhances Immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae by Targeting Uptake to FcγR on Dendritic Cells
Deirdre Thomas-Rudolph, Terry W. Du Clos, Clifford M. Snapper, Carolyn Mold
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 2007, 178 (11) 7283-7291; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7283

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
C-Reactive Protein Enhances Immunity to Streptococcus pneumoniae by Targeting Uptake to FcγR on Dendritic Cells
Deirdre Thomas-Rudolph, Terry W. Du Clos, Clifford M. Snapper, Carolyn Mold
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 2007, 178 (11) 7283-7291; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7283
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more HOST DEFENSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606