Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Critical YxKxHxxxRP Motif in the C-Terminal Region of GATA3 for Its DNA Binding and Function

Ryo Shinnakasu, Masakatsu Yamashita, Kenta Shinoda, Yusuke Endo, Hiroyuki Hosokawa, Akihiro Hasegawa, Shinji Ikemizu and Toshinori Nakayama
J Immunol November 1, 2006, 177 (9) 5801-5810; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.5801
Ryo Shinnakasu
*Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Masakatsu Yamashita
*Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenta Shinoda
*Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yusuke Endo
*Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hiroyuki Hosokawa
*Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Akihiro Hasegawa
*Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shinji Ikemizu
†Division of Structural Biology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Toshinori Nakayama
*Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A zinc finger transcription factor, GATA3, plays an essential role in the development of T cells and the functional differentiation into type 2 Th cells. Two transactivation domains and two zinc finger regions are known to be important for the GATA3 function, whereas the role for other regions remains unclear. In this study we demonstrated that a conserved YxKxHxxxRP motif (aa 345–354) adjacent to the C-terminal zinc finger domain of GATA3 plays a critical in its DNA binding and functions, including transcriptional activity, the ability to induce chromatin remodeling of the Th2 cytokine gene loci, and Th2 cell differentiation. A single point mutation of the key amino acid (Y, K, H, R, and P) in the motif abrogated GATA3 functions. A computer simulation analysis based on the solution structure of the chicken GATA1/DNA complex supported the importance of this motif in GATA3 DNA binding. Thus, we identified a novel conserved YxKxHxxxRP motif adjacent to the C-terminal zinc finger domain of GATA3 that is indispensable for GATA3 DNA binding and functions.

After antigenic stimulation, naive CD4 T cells differentiate into two distinct helper T cell subsets, Th1 and Th2 cells (1). Th1 cells produce IFN-γ to control cell-mediated immunity against intracellular pathogens, whereas Th2 cells produce IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 and are involved in humoral immunity and allergic reactions (2, 3, 4). IL-4-induced STAT6 activation is crucial for Th2 cell differentiation (5, 6, 7). Several transcription factors that govern Th1/Th2 cell differentiation have been reported. Among them, GATA3 appears to be a key factor for Th2 cell differentiation (8, 9), as is T-bet for Th1 differentiation (10).

GATA3 is abundantly expressed in T lymphocytes and the embryonic brain (11, 12). GATA3 is expressed throughout thymocyte development (13) and its expression is required for the development of T cells in the thymus (14, 15) and for β selection and single positive CD4 thymocyte development (16). The activation of STAT6 induces GATA3 transcription, and the ectopic expression of GATA3 results in Th2 cell differentiation even in the absence of STAT6 (17, 18). The autoactivation of GATA3 transcription was also reported (19, 20). In addition to the transcriptional regulation, the expression of GATA3 is also regulated by a posttranscriptional mechanism. We recently reported that the Ras-ERK MAPK cascade controls GATA3 stability through the ubiquitin/proteasome-dependent pathway (21).

GATA3 binding motifs are identified in the promoters of the IL-5 and IL-13 genes (22, 23, 24), and GATA3 acts as a transcriptional factor for IL-5 and IL-13 genes (25, 26, 27). In addition to the promoter regions, GATA3 also binds to various regulatory regions for Th2 cytokine expression, including the conserved GATA3 response element (CGRE)3 (28), the 3′ site of IL-4 (VA) (29), the IL-4-IL-13 intergenic region (CNS1) (30), and the 3′ end of RAD50 gene (31).

Changes in the chromatin structure of the Th1 cytokine (IFN-γ) and the Th2 cytokine (IL-5/IL-4/IL-13) gene loci occur during Th1/Th2 cell differentiation (32, 33, 34). The histone modifications of the Th2 cytokine gene loci is primarily mediated through GATA3 (28, 35, 36). The binding of GATA3 at the CGRE region appears to initiate the long-range histone hyperacetylation accompanied by intergenic transcription within the IL-13/IL-4 gene loci in developing Th2 and Tc2 cells (28, 35).

GATA3 belongs to a family of zinc finger transcription factors. The six mammalian GATA proteins (GATA1 to GATA6) share related Cys-X2-Cys-X17-Cys-X2-Cys (where X represents any amino acid residue) and bind to the consensus motif 5′-(A/T)GATA(A/G)-3′ (37). GATA3 possesses N-terminal transactivation domains and two zinc fingers, namely the N-terminal zinc finger and the C-terminal zinc finger. The C-terminal zinc finger is essential for DNA binding, whereas the N-terminal zinc finger stabilizes this binding and physically interacts with other zinc finger proteins such as the Friends of GATA (FOG) (38, 39, 40, 41). The N-terminal zinc finger and C-terminal zinc finger thus play different roles in the induction of IL-4, IL-13, and IL-5 (42).

The C-terminal region of GATA3 is highly conserved among the GATA family proteins, whereas the role of the C-terminal region has not been addressed. We herein identified a unique amino acid motif (YxKxHxxxRP) adjacent to C-terminal zinc finger domain of GATA3. The YxKxHxxxRP motif is revealed to be important for GATA3 DNA binding and GATA3 functions, including the transcriptional activity and the ability to induce chromatin remodeling of the Th2 cytokine gene loci leading to Th2 cell differentiation.

Materials and Methods

Mice

C57BL/6 mice were purchased from CLEA Japan. All mice used in this study were maintained under specific-pathogen-free conditions. The animal care was conducted in accordance with the guidelines of Chiba University (Chiba, Japan).

Expression plasmids and transfection

Myc-tagged GATA3 mutants (pCMV Tag 3B-GATA3) were generated by PCR-based mutation. Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK 293) T cells were transfected using FuGENE reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Cell cultures and in vitro Th1/Th2 cell differentiation

CD4 T cells were purified using magnetic beads and an AutoMACS sorter (Miltenyi Biotec) that yielded purity of >98%. The purified CD4 T cells (1.5 × 106) were stimulated for 2 days with an immobilized anti-TCR mAb (H57-597; 3 μg/ml) in the presence of IL-2 (25 U/ml), IL-12 (100 U/ml), and anti-IL-4 mAb (11B11; 25% culture supernatant) for Th1 conditions. The cells were cultured for another 3 days in the presence of cytokines present in the initial culture. The number of Th1/Th2 cells was determined using intracellular staining with anti-IL-4 and anti-IFN-γ (43, 44). The production of cytokines was determined by ELISA as described (45).

Retroviral vectors and infection

The pMX-IRES-hNGFR plasmid was generated from the pMX-IRES-GFP plasmid by replacing the enhanced GFP with the cytoplasmic region-deleted human nerve growth factor receptor p75 (hNGFR) cDNA. The method for the generation of virus supernatant and the infection was described previously (45). Infected cells were subjected to intracellular staining with anti-IL-4 and anti-IFN-γ, a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay, or cell sorting. To prepare a large number of infected cells for ELISA, the infected cells were enriched by MACS with anti-hNGFR (clone C40-1457; BD Pharmingen).

ChIP assay

ChIP was performed using the histone H3 assay kit (catalog no.17-245: Upstate Biotechnology) as described previously (28). Semiquantitative PCR was performed with DNA samples from 3 or 1 × 104 cells at 28 cycles. The PCR products were resolved in an agarose gel and then visualized by ethidium bromide. The images were recorded and quantified using the Atto Lane and Spot analyzer (Atto Bioscience). The primers used have been described previously (28).

Luciferase reporter assay

A single copy of an IL-5 promoter (−1200 bp) and an IL-13 promoter (−254 bp) in the luciferase reporter plasmid pGL3 Basic (Promega) was used. M12 cells (2.5 × 106; B cell line) were used for transfection by electroporation. In addition, 5 ng of a Renilla luciferase reporter vector with HSV thymidine kinase promoter (pRL-TK; Promega) was added into each transfection as an internal control for transfection efficiency as described (28). The transfected cells were stimulated with PMA (30 ng/ml) plus dibutyryl cAMP (1 mM) for the IL-5 reporter assay and PMA (30 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (500 nM) for the IL-13 reporter assay. The cell extracts were prepared and subjected to a luciferase assay using the manufacturer’s instructions for Dual luciferase reporter (Promega).

EMSA

EMSAs were performed using a gel shift assay system (Promega) as described previously (44). In brief, the nuclear extracts were incubated at 4°C with a 32P-labeled, double-stranded oligonucleotide in DNA-binding buffer. Electrophoresis was conducted on 4% native polyacrylamide gel (acrylamide/bisacrylamide ratio 29:10 in 0.5× Tris-borate-EDTA), and the radioactivity was visualized by autoradiography. The oligonucleotides used in this experiment are as follows: GATA consensus, 5′-CACTTGATAACAGAAAGTGATAACTCT-3′; GATA mutant, 5′-CACTCTTAACAGAAAGTCTTAACTCT-3′; CNS1, 5′-CGAGAAATGAATGAAGATAATGAGGCCTC-3′; VA enhancer, 5′-ATCAACAGATAACTAGATAAAGAATAT-3′; CGRE (M5), 5′-ACTGGCGCGGCGATGGCCCGCGGAGATAGAGGCGCGGCTTTTTTTTACGGGAGATGGGGTCGATAAGA-3′; IL-5 promoter, 5′-TGCTAACAATCAGATAGAGG-3′; and IL-13 promoter, 5-′ TTCAAGATGAGTAAAGATGTGGTTTTC-3′. Supershift analysis was performed using anti-Myc tag Ab (clone PL14; MBL).

Results

The C-terminal region of GATA3 is required for Th2 cell differentiation

The aim of this study was to identify the roles of the C-terminal region of GATA3 in Th2 cell differentiation. The wild-type and truncated GATA3 mutant genes (Fig. 1⇓A) were introduced into CD4 T cells cultured under Th1 conditions (developing Th1 cells) using a retrovirus vector system, and IFN-γ/IL-4 production profiles of infected hNGFR-positive cells were determined using an intracellular staining method. Wild-type GATA3 (aa 1–444), dCT-1 (aa 1–407), dCT-2 (aa 1–380), and dCT-3 (aa 1–371) truncated GATA3 mutants succeeded in generating IL-4-producing Th2 cells, whereas dCT-4 (aa 1–345), dCT-5 (aa 1–315), and dCT-6 (aa 1–262) mutants failed to induce IL-4-producing cells (Fig. 1⇓B). Little effect on the inhibition of the generation of IFN-γ-producing cells was observed in dCT-4, dCT-5, or dCT-6 mutants. These results indicate that the C-terminal region of GATA3, particularly the region of aa 346–371, is essential for the induction of Th2 cell differentiation.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

The C-terminal region of GATA3 is required for the GATA3 function. A, Schematic representation of Myc-tagged GATA3 mutants. Wild-type GATA3 (WT) and six mutants (dCT-1, dCT-2, dCT-3, dCT-4, dCT-5, and dCT-6) are shown with location of the Myc tag, transactivation domains (TA1 and TA2), and the N-terminal and C-terminal zinc finger domains (N and C). B, Induction of IL-4-producing Th2 cells under Th1 conditions by GATA3 mutants. Freshly prepared splenic CD4 T cells were stimulated under Th1 culture conditions and infected with a retrovirus encoding wild-type or mutant GATA3 bicistronically with hNGFR on day 2. Control represents infection of a mock vector virus. Three days after infection, cells were stimulated with anti-TCR and subjected to IL-4/IFN-γ staining. The numbers represent the percentages of cells in each quadrant. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results. C, Reporter assays with the IL-5 promoter and the IL-13 promoter were performed using an M12 cell line that expresses no GATA3 family protein. Wild-type GATA3 or mutant dCT-4 cDNA was introduced, and the luciferase activity was measured. The mean values with SD of relative luciferase activity of four different experiments are shown. D, Induction of histone H3 hyperacetylation at the Th2 cytokine gene loci in developing Th1 cells. Wild-type or mutant GATA3 cDNA was introduced by a retrovirus-mediated gene transfer system as described in B. Three days after infection, hNGFR-positive infected CD4 T cells were enriched by cell sorting. The control represents an infection with a mock vector virus. The acetylation status of histone H3 (K9/14) was determined by a ChIP assay. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results. The relative band intensities normalized with input DNA bands are shown in the lower panel. VA enh., VA enhancer.

We next assessed whether the GATA3 dCT-4 mutant showed a transcriptional activity for the IL-5 gene and the IL-13 gene. The introduction of wild-type GATA3 into an M12 B cell line resulted in the induction of reporter activity of the IL-5 promoter and the IL-13 promoter, whereas that of the dCT-4 mutant failed (Fig. 1⇑C). Our previous study revealed that the ectopic expression of GATA3 in developing Th1 cells induced histone hyperacetylation (H3-K9) at the Th2 cytokine gene loci (28). Consequently, the wild type and the dCT-4 mutant were introduced into developing Th1 cells and a ChIP assay was performed using anti-acetyl histone H3 (K9/14) Ab. Wild-type GATA3 but not the dCT-4 mutant induced histone hyperacetylation at the Th2 cytokine gene loci (CGRE, CNS1, VA enhancer, IL-4p, IL-13p, and IL-5p) (Fig. 1⇑D). The acetylation of the RAD50 promoter was not affected by the introduction of either GATA3 molecule. These results indicate that the dCT-4 mutant failed to show either any transcriptional activity on the IL-5 promoter and the IL-13 promoter or the ability to induce chromatin remodeling of the Th2 cytokine gene loci.

Conserved NRPL residues, which are located in the downstream region of the C-terminal zinc finger, are required for GATA3 function

Because the C-terminal region (aa 346–371) of GATA3 appeared to be critical for GATA3 function, we searched conserved amino acid sequences among the GATA family members. As shown in Table I⇓, NRPL residues (aa 352–355) are conserved in human and mouse GATA1, GATA2, and GATA3. A similar conserved (N/S)RPL sequence was found downstream from the N-terminal zinc finger. The core RP residues are conserved in all GATA molecules in mice and humans and also in the nonvertebrate GATA family proteins including Drosophila melanogaster GATA (dGATA-b), Caenorhabditis elegans GATA (END-1), Arabidopsis thaliana GATA (AtGATA-1), Saccharomyces cerevisiae GATA (GZF3), and Aspergillus nidulans GATA (areA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Conserved amino acid sequences in the downstream region of N-terminal and C-terminal zinc fingers among GATA family membersa

Consequently, we addressed the role of NRPL residues (aa 352–355) adjacent to the C-terminal zinc finger domain of GATA3 (C-NRPL) in Th2 cell differentiation, Th2 cytokine production, and chromatin remodeling of the Th2 cytokine gene. Seven amino acid residues from 349 to 355 are missing in the d349/355 mutant, and the C-NRPL residues are substituted for alanine in the C-NRPL/AAAA mutant (Fig. 2⇓A). Wild-type GATA3 and these mutants were introduced into developing Th1 cells to assess their ability to generate IL-4-producing Th2 cells. As we expected, both mutants failed to induce IL-4-producing cells in the culture (Fig. 2⇓B). The inhibitory effect of the generation of IFN-γ producing cells also decreased in these two mutants. The production of IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13 was not induced by the introduction of d349/355 or C-NRPL/AAAA (Fig. 2⇓C). The inhibitory effect on IFN-γ production was also impaired. These mutants failed to induce transcriptional activity for the IL-5 promoter (Fig. 2⇓D) and histone hyperacetylation at the Th2 cytokine gene loci (Fig. 2⇓E). The levels of histone hyperacetylation at the IFN-γ promoter decreased with wild-type GATA3 introduction, but the decrease was marginal in these two mutants. The acetylation of the RAD50 promoter was not affected by the introduction of wild-type or mutant GATA3 molecules. These results indicate that C-NRPL is indispensable for the GATA3 function.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Role of NRPL sequence downstream adjacent to C-terminal zinc finger in GATA3 function. A, Schematic representation of the Myc-tagged GATA3 mutants. Wild-type GATA3 (WT) and two mutants (d349/355 and C-NRPL/AAAA) are shown. B, Induction of IL-4-producing Th2 cells under Th1-conditions with two NRPL mutants. The experiments were performed as described in Fig. 1⇑B. Three independent experiments were performed, and we obtained similar results. C, Two GATA3 NRPL mutants failed to induce Th2 cytokine production. hNGFR-positive infected CD4 T cells were enriched by magnetic cell sorting and stimulated (Stim.) with immobilized anti-TCR mAb for 24 h. The cytokine concentration in culture supernatants was determined by ELISA. D, Two GATA3 NRPL mutants failed to transactivate the IL-5 promoter. A luciferase assay was performed as described in Fig. 1⇑C. The mean values with SD of relative luciferase activity from four different experiments are shown. Med, Medium; Stim, stimulation. E, GATA3 NRPL mutants failed to induce of histone H3 hyperacetylation at the Th2 cytokine gene loci in developing Th1 cells. ChIP assay was performed as in Fig. 1⇑D. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results. The relative band intensities normalized by input DNA bands are shown in the lower panel. VA enh., VA enhancer.

The core R353/P354 residues play a crucial in the GATA3 function

We next introduced a single amino acid substitution to alanine within the C-NRPL residues of GATA3. Each mutant (C-ARPL, C-NAPL, C-NRAL, and C-NRPA) was introduced into developing Th1 cells, and the generation of IL-4-producing Th2 cells was determined. As shown in Fig. 3⇓A, the generation of IL-4-producing cells decreased in C-NAPL and C-NRAL mutants but not substantially in C-ARPL or C-NRPA mutants (Fig. 3⇓A). Similar results were obtained by ELISA (Fig. 3⇓B). Substantial increases in the transcriptional activity on the IL-5 promoter and the IL-13 promoter were detected in C-ARPL, C-NRPA, and C-ARPA mutants but not in the C-NAPL, C-NRAL, or C-NAAL mutants (Fig. 3⇓C). These results indicate that R353/P354 residues are essential for GATA3 function.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

R353 and P354 residues are essential for the GATA3 function. A, A single alanine substitution at the R353 or P354 residue of GATA3 abolished the induction of IL-4-producing cells. Wild-type (WT) and mutant GATA3 genes were introduced as shown in Fig. 1⇑. Three independent experiments were performed and similar results were obtained. B, R353A (C-NAPL) and P354A (C-NRAL) mutants failed to induce Th2 cytokine production. Experiments were performed as described in Fig. 2⇑C. C, R353 and P354 residues of GATA3 are essential for GATA3-dependent transactivation of the IL-5 promoter and the IL-13 promoter. M12 cells were transfected with wild-type or GATA3 mutant cDNA, and a luciferase assay was performed. The mean values with a SD of the relative luciferase activity of four different experiments are shown. Med, Medium; Stim., stimulated.

DNA binding activity was impaired in the C-NAPL and C-NRAL mutants

We next examined the DNA binding activity of each GATA3 mutant (C-ARPL, C-NAPL, C-NRAL, and C-NRPA) using EMSA (Fig. 4⇓). Six different GATA3 binding sequences were used: a GATA3 consensus sequence, a binding sequence existing in CNS1, and sequences from the VA enhancer, CGRE, the IL-5 promoter, and the IL-13 promoter. HEK 293 T cells were transfected with Myc-tagged GATA3 mutant genes, and nuclear protein extracts were prepared. Immunoblotting analysis with anti-Myc tag mAb confirmed the equivalent protein expression of GATA3 mutants (see Fig. 4⇓A, Input). The subcellular localization was not found to change in these GATA3 mutants (data not shown). As shown in Fig. 4⇓, the binding activity was abrogated almost completely by a single alanine mutation at R353 (C-NAPL). The binding of C-NRAL was also substantially reduced in some GATA binding sequences, including a GATA consensus binding site (Fig. 4⇓A), CNS1 (Fig. 4⇓B), IL-5 promoter (Fig. 4⇓E), and IL-13 promoter (Fig. 4⇓F). These results indicate that the R353 residue plays a critical role in the DNA binding activity of GATA3 and that the P354 residue is important for DNA binding activity.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

R353 residue is essential for the DNA-binding activity of GATA3. Myc-tagged wild-type (WT) and mutant GATA3 molecules were expressed in HEK 293 T cells. Nuclear extracts of the transfected cells were prepared and subjected to an EMSA with the following probes: a GATA consensus binding site (A), a GATA binding site within CNS1 (B), VA enhancer (C), CGRE (D), an IL-5 promoter (E) or an IL-13 promoter (F), and a control mutant oligonucleotide sequence for the GATA consensus binding site (G). The expression levels of GATA3 protein in the nuclear extract were examined by immunoblotting with anti-Myc tag mAb (Input) as a loading control. A supershift assay was performed with a control mouse IgG and an anti-Myc tag Ab. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results. 

DNA binding activity and the generation of Th2 cells in a GATA3 R353K mutant (C-NKPL)

To address the role of positive charge for arginine (R353), we generated a GATA3 R353K mutant (C-NKPL). The C-NKPL mutant did not show the ability to generate IL-4 producing Th2 cells (data not shown). An EMSA revealed that the levels of DNA binding activity for C-NKPL were similar to those of C-NAPL (data not shown). These results suggest that the positive charge of R353 itself is not sufficient for either GATA3 to bind to DNA or for the generation of Th2 cells.

Y345 and H349 are critical for GATA3 functions

In addition to C-NRPL, Y345, K347, and H349 adjacent to the C-terminal zinc finger domain of GATA3 are conserved among all mouse and human GATA family members (Table I⇑). Consequently, we generated various single alanine mutants (Y345A, Y346A, L348A, and H349A) and tested their ability to induce IL-4-producing Th2 cells. The generation of IL-4-producing cells dramatically decreased in Y345A and H349A mutants but not in Y346A or L348A mutants (Fig. 5⇓B). Similarly as for the R353A mutant, the DNA binding activity for Y345A and H349A mutants was found to be marginal (Fig. 5⇓C). The K347A mutant also showed also moderately decreased Th2 cell differentiation (data not shown). These results indicate that Y345, K347, and H349 each play a critical role in enabling GATA3 to bind to DNA and thus induce Th2 cell generation.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Y345 and H349 are required for the generation of Th2 cells. A, Schematic representation of the amino acid alignment around Y345 and H349. The amino acid residues substituted to alanine are indicated as gray characters. B, Y345 and H349 residues are required for the induction of IL-4-producing Th2 cells. Wild-type (WT) and mutant GATA3 genes (Y345A, Y346A, L348A, H349A, R353A, and R354A) were introduced as shown in Fig. 1⇑B. Four independent experiments were performed with similar results. C, wild-type and mutant GATA3 genes were expressed in HEK 293 T cells. An EMSA was performed with indicated probes as described in Fig. 4⇑. Three independent experiments were performed with similar results.

Role of the NRPL residues adjacent to the N-terminal zinc finger domain in GATA3 function

Finally, the role of NRPL residues adjacent to the N-terminal zinc finger domain of GATA3 was assessed using a GATA3 mutant with an alanine substitution (N-NRPL/AAAA). The ability to induce IL-4 producing Th2 cells was well preserved in the N-NRPL/AAAA mutant (Fig. 6⇓A). The production of IL-4 was lower than that of wild type but significantly higher than that of C-NRPL/AAAA (Fig. 6⇓B). In contrast, the production of IL-5 and IL-13 was not significantly induced with the N-NRPL/AAAA mutant. The transcription activity on the IL-5 promoter was not detected, and that on the IL-13 promoter was moderately induced (Fig. 6⇓C). Regarding the induction of histone modifications at the Th2 cytokine gene loci, no obvious defect was observed in the N-NRPL/AAAA mutant in H3-K9 acetylation (Fig. 6⇓D) or H3-K4 dimethylation (data not shown). An EMSA revealed that the levels of DNA binding to various GATA motifs for N-NRPL/AAAA were significantly lower than that of the wild type but obviously higher than that of the C-NRPL/AAAA mutant (data not shown). Therefore, although the impact of N-NRPL on GATA3 function was not as dramatic as that of C-NRPL, the N-NRPL residues of GATA3 also appear to play important roles in some GATA3 functions such as the transcription and production of IL-5 and IL-13.

FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Role of N-NRPL motif in GATA3 function. The experiments were performed as shown in Fig. 2⇑. A, The induction of IL-4-producing cells was not affected by the alanine substitution of N-NRPL (N-NRPL/AAAA). Three independent experiments were performed and similar results were obtained. B, GATA3 N-NRPL/AAAA mutant failed to induce IL-5 and IL-13 production. Three independent experiments were performed and similar results were obtained. C, the GATA3 N-NRPL/AAAA mutant failed to induce the transactivation of the IL-5 and IL-13 promoters. The mean values with SD of relative luciferase activity from four different experiments are shown. Med, Medium. D, The normal induction of histone H3 hyperacetylation in the Th2 cytokine gene loci by the N-NRPL/AAAA mutant. Three independent experiments were done with similar results. Relative band intensities normalized with input DNA bands are shown in the lower panel. WT, wild type; VA enh., VA enhancer.

Discussion

In this report we identified a novel conserved amino acid motif, YxKxHxxxRP, which is adjacent to the C-terminal zinc finger domain of GATA3 (C-finger YxKxHxxxRP) and is crucial for GATA3 functions, including its DNA binding, transcriptional activity, and ability to induce chromatin remodeling of the Th2 cytokine gene loci leading to Th2 cell differentiation. A single amino acid mutation in the motif resulted in the abrogation of most of the GATA3 function, indicating a critical role for these amino acids.

A basic local alignment search tool (BLAST) search for hGATA3 (hGATA3; aa 313–368) region, which includes the C-terminal zinc finger and the YxKxHxxxRP motif, listed chicken GATA1 (cGATA1; aa 159–214) with 82.1% (46 of 56 aa) identity and 92.9% (52 of 56 aa) similarity without any gaps. This indicates that the structure of the hGATA3 C-terminal zinc finger and its downstream region are almost identical with that of the cGATA1 C-terminal zinc finger. Consequently, based on the solution structure of the cGATA1/DNA complex (Protein Data Bank accession code 2GAT) (46, 47), the structure of hGATA3 (aa 313–368)/DNA complex model has been manually built on the graphic program “O” (48) (Fig. 7⇓). The Nε2 of H349 and DNA phosphate atoms formed two hydrogen bonds with distances of 2.49 and 2.73Å. The Nη1 of R353 and DNA phosphate also formed a weak hydrogen bond with a distance of 3.62 Å. The H349 and R353 form stacking interaction with Y345 to stabilize these side chains, which are actually suitable positions for interacting with the phosphate groups of DNA. Stabilization of the basic residues H349 and R353 appears to be important for the binding to DNA. These observations are highly consistent with our experimental results, i.e., a point mutation of these conserved amino acid residues resulted in a dramatic decrease in GATA3 DNA binding activity (Figs. 4⇑ and 5⇑C). The Nζ atom of K347, which is 4.05 Å apart from the phosphate of DNA both in the solution structure (Protein Data Bank accession no. 2GAT) and our model, seems to have a very weak electrostatic interaction with DNA phosphate. In line with this finding, the K347A mutant also showed decreased levels in Th2 cell differentiation (T. Nakayama, unpublished observation).

FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Structure model of the mGATA3 (aa 312–367)/DNA complex based on the solution structure of cGATA1/DNA complex. A, Two orthogonal views of the GATA3/DNA complex model. The Cα representation of GATA3 is shown in light blue, and the YxKxHxxxRP motif is highlighted in red. dsDNA is shown in faint purple with ball-and-stick representation. B, Interaction between DNA and the YxKxHxxxRP motif. The orientation is as in the right hand view of A. The key residues of the motif, Y345, K347, H349, R353, and P354 are shown in red. The figures are produced using the Bobscript (54 ) and Raster3D (55 ).

Indeed, 700F and 704H residues in a fungal GATA homolog areA, which correspond to the GATA3 Y345 and H349 residues, have been reported to be involved in the contact sites with DNA (49). Moreover, the Y345/H349 residues are located at the α-helical regions, which is important for the recognition of the major groove surface of DNA (Fig. 7⇑A). These findings all support the importance of Y345/H349 residues for DNA binding.

The P354A mutant impaired GATA3 functions. However, P354 has no interaction with DNA in the complex model or the key residues whose mutations disrupted GATA3 functions. Proline has less structural flexibility of the backbone. Mutation at P354 with alanine seems to induce flexibility around this area. Downstream of P354 there is an essential DNA minor groove binding RxRK (aa 365–368) motif (46). In the P354A mutant, because of the introduced backbone flexibility at position 354 the RxRK (aa 365–368) motif might not be able to bind to DNA or the downstream of P354 might cover the DNA binding area of the C-finger or the YxKxHxxRP motif. This kind of structural restraint seems to play an important role in the P354 function.

In contrast to C-NRPL, a mutation in N-NRPL did not interfere with the histone modifications (H3-K9 acetylation and H3-K4 methylation) at the Th2 cytokine (IL-5/IL-13/IL-4) gene loci (Fig. 6⇑D). This finding is consistent with the observation that the N-terminal zinc finger of GATA3 is dispensable for the induction of DNase I hypersensitive sites within the IL-4/IL-13 gene loci (42). We found that the cytokine production of IL-5 and IL-13 and the transactivation of the IL-5 and IL-13 promoters were impaired in the developing Th1 cells introduced with the N-NRPL/AAAA mutant (Fig. 6⇑, B and C). This finding is also consistent with the results reported by Takemoto et al. (42), where the deletion of N-terminal zinc finger compromised GATA3 binding to the IL-5 promoter. Therefore, N-NRPL appears to play a role in some GATA3 functions that are dependent on the N-terminal zinc finger. Both the C-terminal and N-terminal zinc fingers are reported to be required for the high-affinity interaction between GATA1 and DNA (50). In fact, we observed a decrease in the binding of N-NRPL/AAAA mutant GATA3 to some GATA motifs (T. Nakayama, unpublished observation).

The H349 in the C-finger YxKxHxxxRP residue corresponds to N295 in the N-finger region (YxKxNxxxRP). Although the H349A mutation completely abolished the GATA3 functions (Fig. 5⇑), the H349N mutation had no effect (T. Nakayama, unpublished observation), thus suggesting that H349 and N295 residues are potentially able to play a similar role in the GATA3 DNA binding required for the GATA3 function.

It is known that GATA3 is expressed in the developing parathyroids, inner ear, and kidney (12, 51). GATA3 haploinsufficiency is reported to be associated with the hypoparathyroidism, deafness, and renal dysplasia syndrome (52). A mutation in the splicing acceptor site around the GATA3 intron 5/exon 6 boundary was found in familial hypoparathyroidism, deafness, and renal dysplasia syndrome patients (53). This mutation results in a frame shift that produces mis-sense polypeptides from aa 351 to 367 with a premature termination at position 367. Indeed, this mis-sense GATA3 protein misses R353 and P354 residues, which are key amino acids in the C-finger YxKxHxxxRP motif. This finding indicated that the C-terminal zinc finger YxKxHxxxRP motif therefore plays an important pathophysiological role in human beings.

In summary, we identified a novel conserved amino acid motif, YxKxHxxxRP, adjacent to the C-terminal zinc finger domains of all GATA family proteins in mouse and human. A single amino acid mutation in the motif of GATA3 resulted in the abrogation of most of the GATA3 function, thus indicating that each amino acid plays a crucial role in the GATA3 binding to DNA, thereby leading to chromatin remodeling of the Th2 cytokine gene loci, Th2 cell differentiation, and Th2 cytokine expression.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hikari Asou, Satoko Norikane, and Kaoru Sugaya for their excellent technical assistance.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan (Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research in Priority Areas 17016010 and 17047007; Scientific Research B 17390139, Scientific Research C 18590466; Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists 17790318; and Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology), the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare (Japan), the Program for Promotion of Fundamental Studies in Health Sciences of the National Institute of Biomedical Immovation (Japan), The Japan Health Science Foundation, Kanae Foundation, Uehara Memorial Foundation, and Mochida Foundation.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Toshinori Nakayama, Department of Immunology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba 260-8670 Japan. E-mail address: tnakayama{at}faculty.chiba-u.jp

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CGRE, conserved GATA3 response element; ChIP, chromatin immunoprecipitation; HEK 293, human embryonic kidney 293; hNGFR, human nerve growth factor receptor p75.

  • Received June 9, 2006.
  • Accepted August 9, 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Mosmann, T. R., R. L. Coffman. 1989. TH1 and TH2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 7: 145-173.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Constant, S. L., K. Bottomly. 1997. Induction of Th1 and Th2 CD4+ T cell responses: the alternative approaches. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 15: 297-322.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Seder, R. A., W. E. Paul. 1994. Acquisition of lymphokine-producing phenotype by CD4+ T cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12: 635-673.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Reiner, S. L., R. M. Locksley. 1995. The regulation of immunity to Leishmania major. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 13: 151-177.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Murphy, K. M., W. Ouyang, J. D. Farrar, J. Yang, S. Ranganath, H. Asnagli, M. Afkarian, T. L. Murphy. 2000. Signaling and transcription in T helper development. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18: 451-494.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Nelms, K., A. D. Keegan, J. Zamorano, J. J. Ryan, W. E. Paul. 1999. The IL-4 receptor: signaling mechanisms and biologic functions. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 17: 701-738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    O’Garra, A.. 1998. Cytokines induce the development of functionally heterogeneous T helper cell subsets. Immunity 8: 275-283.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Zhang, D. H., L. Cohn, P. Ray, K. Bottomly, A. Ray. 1997. Transcription factor GATA-3 is differentially expressed in murine Th1 and Th2 cells and controls Th2-specific expression of the interleukin-5 gene. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 21597-21603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Zheng, W., R. A. Flavell. 1997. The transcription factor GATA-3 is necessary and sufficient for Th2 cytokine gene expression in CD4 T cells. Cell 89: 587-596.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Szabo, S. J., B. M. Sullivan, C. Stemmann, A. R. Satoskar, B. P. Sleckman, L. H. Glimcher. 2002. Distinct effects of T-bet in TH1 lineage commitment and IFN-γ production in CD4 and CD8 T cells. Science 295: 338-342.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Yamamoto, M., L. J. Ko, M. W. Leonard, H. Beug, S. H. Orkin, J. D. Engel. 1990. Activity and tissue-specific expression of the transcription factor NF-E1 multigene family. Genes Dev. 4: 1650-1662.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    George, K. M., M. W. Leonard, M. E. Roth, K. H. Lieuw, D. Kioussis, F. Grosveld, J. D. Engel. 1994. Embryonic expression and cloning of the murine GATA-3 gene. Development 120: 2673-2686.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Hendriks, R. W., M. C. Nawijn, J. D. Engel, H. van Doorninck, F. Grosveld, A. Karis. 1999. Expression of the transcription factor GATA-3 is required for the development of the earliest T cell progenitors and correlates with stages of cellular proliferation in the thymus. Eur. J. Immunol. 29: 1912-1918.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Hattori, N., H. Kawamoto, S. Fujimoto, K. Kuno, Y. Katsura. 1996. Involvement of transcription factors TCF-1 and GATA-3 in the initiation of the earliest step of T cell development in the thymus. J. Exp. Med. 184: 1137-1147.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Ting, C. N., M. C. Olson, K. P. Barton, J. M. Leiden. 1996. Transcription factor GATA-3 is required for development of the T-cell lineage. Nature 384: 474-478.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Pai, S. Y., M. L. Truitt, I. C. Ho. 2004. GATA-3 deficiency abrogates the development and maintenance of T helper type 2 cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101: 1993-1998.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Kurata, H., H. J. Lee, A. O’Garra, N. Arai. 1999. Ectopic expression of activated Stat6 induces the expression of Th2-specific cytokines and transcription factors in developing Th1 cells. Immunity 11: 677-688.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Lee, H. J., N. Takemoto, H. Kurata, Y. Kamogawa, S. Miyatake, A. O’Garra, N. Arai. 2000. GATA-3 induces T helper cell type 2 (Th2) cytokine expression and chromatin remodeling in committed Th1 cells. J. Exp. Med. 192: 105-115.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Ouyang, W., M. Lohning, Z. Gao, M. Assenmacher, S. Ranganath, A. Radbruch, K. M. Murphy. 2000. Stat6-independent GATA-3 autoactivation directs IL-4-independent Th2 development and commitment. Immunity 12: 27-37.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Asnagli, H., M. Afkarian, K. M. Murphy. 2002. Cutting edge: identification of an alternative GATA-3 promoter directing tissue-specific gene expression in mouse and human. J. Immunol. 168: 4268-4271.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Yamashita, M., R. Shinnakasu, H. Asou, M. Kimura, A. Hasegawa, K. Hashimoto, N. Hatano, M. Ogata, T. Nakayama. 2005. Ras-ERK MAPK cascade regulates GATA3 stability and Th2 differentiation through ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 280: 29409-29419.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Kishikawa, H., J. Sun, A. Choi, S. C. Miaw, I. C. Ho. 2001. The cell type-specific expression of the murine IL-13 gene is regulated by GATA-3. J. Immunol. 167: 4414-4420.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Siegel, M. D., D. H. Zhang, P. Ray, A. Ray. 1995. Activation of the interleukin-5 promoter by cAMP in murine EL-4 cells requires the GATA-3 and CLE0 elements. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 24548-24555.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Lavenu-Bombled, C., C. D. Trainor, I. Makeh, P. H. Romeo, I. Max-Audit. 2002. Interleukin-13 gene expression is regulated by GATA-3 in T cells: role of a critical association of a GATA and two GATG motifs. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 18313-18321.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Lee, H. J., A. O’Garra, K. Arai, N. Arai. 1998. Characterization of cis-regulatory elements and nuclear factors conferring Th2-specific expression of the IL-5 gene: a role for a GATA- binding protein. J. Immunol. 160: 2343-2352.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Zhang, D. H., L. Yang, A. Ray. 1998. Differential responsiveness of the IL-5 and IL-4 genes to transcription factor GATA-3. J. Immunol. 161: 3817-3821.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Schwenger, G. T., R. Fournier, C. C. Kok, V. A. Mordvinov, D. Yeoman, C. J. Sanderson. 2001. GATA-3 has dual regulatory functions in human interleukin-5 transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 48502-48509.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Yamashita, M., M. Ukai-Tadenuma, M. Kimura, M. Omori, M. Inami, M. Taniguchi, T. Nakayama. 2002. Identification of a conserved GATA3 response element upstream proximal from the interleukin-13 gene locus. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 42399-42408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Agarwal, S., O. Avni, A. Rao. 2000. Cell-type-restricted binding of the transcription factor NFAT to a distal IL-4 enhancer in vivo. Immunity 12: 643-652.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Takemoto, N., Y. Kamogawa, H. Jun Lee, H. Kurata, K. I. Arai, A. O’Garra, N. Arai, S. Miyatake. 2000. Cutting edge: chromatin remodeling at the IL-4/IL-13 intergenic regulatory region for Th2-specific cytokine gene cluster. J. Immunol. 165: 6687-6691.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Fields, P. E., G. R. Lee, S. T. Kim, V. V. Bartsevich, R. A. Flavell. 2004. Th2-specific chromatin remodeling and enhancer activity in the Th2 cytokine locus control region. Immunity 21: 865-876.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Ansel, K. M., I. Djuretic, B. Tanasa, A. Rao. 2006. Regulation of Th2 differentiation and Il4 locus accessibility. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 24: 607-656.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Lee, G. R., S. T. Kim, C. G. Spilianakis, P. E. Fields, R. A. Flavell. 2006. T helper cell differentiation: regulation by cis elements and epigenetics. Immunity 24: 369-379.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  34. ↵
    Lohning, M., A. Richter, A. Radbruch. 2002. Cytokine memory of T helper lymphocytes. Adv. Immunol. 80: 115-181.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Omori, M., M. Yamashita, M. Inami, M. Ukai-Tadenuma, M. Kimura, Y. Nigo, H. Hosokawa, A. Hasegawa, M. Taniguchi, T. Nakayama. 2003. CD8 T cell-specific downregulation of histone hyperacetylation and gene activation of the IL-4 gene locus by ROG, repressor of GATA. Immunity 19: 281-294.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Inami, M., M. Yamashita, Y. Tenda, A. Hasegawa, M. Kimura, K. Hashimoto, N. Seki, M. Taniguchi, T. Nakayama. 2004. CD28 costimulation controls histone hyperacetylation of the interleukin 5 gene locus in developing Th2 cells. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 23123-23133.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Orkin, S. H.. 1992. GATA-binding transcription factors in hematopoietic cells. Blood 80: 575-581.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Tsang, A. P., J. E. Visvader, C. A. Turner, Y. Fujiwara, C. Yu, M. J. Weiss, M. Crossley, S. H. Orkin. 1997. FOG, a multitype zinc finger protein, acts as a cofactor for transcription factor GATA-1 in erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation. Cell 90: 109-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Svensson, E. C., R. L. Tufts, C. E. Polk, J. M. Leiden. 1999. Molecular cloning of FOG-2: a modulator of transcription factor GATA-4 in cardiomyocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 956-961.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Tevosian, S. G., A. E. Deconinck, A. B. Cantor, H. I. Rieff, Y. Fujiwara, G. Corfas, S. H. Orkin. 1999. FOG-2: a novel GATA-family cofactor related to multitype zinc-finger proteins Friend of GATA-1 and U-shaped. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 950-955.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Fox, A. H., K. Kowalski, G. F. King, J. P. Mackay, M. Crossley. 1998. Key residues characteristic of GATA N-fingers are recognized by FOG. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 33595-33603.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Takemoto, N., K. Arai, S. Miyatake. 2002. Cutting edge: the differential involvement of the N-finger of GATA-3 in chromatin remodeling and transactivation during Th2 development. J. Immunol. 169: 4103-4107.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Yamashita, M., M. Katsumata, M. Iwashima, M. Kimura, C. Shimizu, T. Kamata, T. Shin, N. Seki, S. Suzuki, M. Taniguchi, T. Nakayama. 2000. T cell receptor-induced calcineurin activation regulates T helper type 2 cell development by modifying the interleukin 4 receptor signaling complex. J. Exp. Med. 191: 1869-1879.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Kimura, M. Y., H. Hosokawa, M. Yamashita, A. Hasegawa, C. Iwamura, H. Watarai, M. Taniguchi, T. Takagi, S. Ishii, T. Nakayama. 2005. Regulation of T helper type 2 cell differentiation by murine Schnurri-2. J. Exp. Med. 201: 397-408.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Kimura, M., Y. Koseki, M. Yamashita, N. Watanabe, C. Shimizu, T. Katsumoto, T. Kitamura, M. Taniguchi, H. Koseki, T. Nakayama. 2001. Regulation of Th2 cell differentiation by mel-18, a mammalian polycomb group gene. Immunity 15: 275-287.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Omichinski, J. G., G. M. Clore, O. Schaad, G. Felsenfeld, C. Trainor, E. Appella, S. J. Stahl, A. M. Gronenborn. 1993. NMR structure of a specific DNA complex of Zn-containing DNA binding domain of GATA-1. Science 261: 438-446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Tjandra, N., J. G. Omichinski, A. M. Gronenborn, G. M. Clore, A. Bax. 1997. Use of dipolar 1H–15N and 1H–13C couplings in the structure determination of magnetically oriented macromolecules in solution. Nat. Struct. Biol. 4: 732-738.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  48. ↵
    Jones, T. A., J. Y. Zou, S. W. Cowan, M. Kjeldgaard. 1991. Improved methods for building protein models in electron density maps and the location of errors in these models. Acta Crystallogr. A 47: 110-119.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Starich, M. R., M. Wikstrom, S. Schumacher, H. N. Arst, Jr, A. M. Gronenborn, G. M. Clore. 1998. The solution structure of the Leu22–>Val mutant AREA DNA binding domain complexed with a TGATAG core element defines a role for hydrophobic packing in the determination of specificity. J. Mol. Biol. 277: 621-634.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Trainor, C. D., J. G. Omichinski, T. L. Vandergon, A. M. Gronenborn, G. M. Clore, G. Felsenfeld. 1996. A palindromic regulatory site within vertebrate GATA-1 promoters requires both zinc fingers of the GATA-1 DNA-binding domain for high-affinity interaction. Mol. Cell. Biol. 16: 2238-2247.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  51. ↵
    Debacker, C., M. Catala, M. C. Labastie. 1999. Embryonic expression of the human GATA-3 gene. Mech. Dev. 85: 183-187.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Van Esch, H., P. Groenen, M. A. Nesbit, S. Schuffenhauer, P. Lichtner, G. Vanderlinden, B. Harding, R. Beetz, R. W. Bilous, I. Holdaway, et al 2000. GATA3 haplo-insufficiency causes human HDR syndrome. Nature 406: 419-422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Nesbit, M. A., M. R. Bowl, B. Harding, A. Ali, A. Ayala, C. Crowe, A. Dobbie, G. Hampson, I. Holdaway, M. A. Levine, et al 2004. Characterization of GATA3 mutations in the hypoparathyroidism, deafness, and renal dysplasia (HDR) syndrome. J. Biol. Chem. 279: 22624-22634.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  54. ↵
    Esnouf, R. M.. 1997. An extensively modified version of MolScript that includes greatly enhanced coloring capabilities. J. Mol. Graph Model. 15: 132-134.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  55. ↵
    Merritt, E. A., M. E. Murphy. 1994. Raster3D Version 2.0. A program for photorealistic molecular graphics. Acta Crystallogr. D 50: 869-873.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 177 (9)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 177, Issue 9
1 Nov 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Critical YxKxHxxxRP Motif in the C-Terminal Region of GATA3 for Its DNA Binding and Function
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Critical YxKxHxxxRP Motif in the C-Terminal Region of GATA3 for Its DNA Binding and Function
Ryo Shinnakasu, Masakatsu Yamashita, Kenta Shinoda, Yusuke Endo, Hiroyuki Hosokawa, Akihiro Hasegawa, Shinji Ikemizu, Toshinori Nakayama
The Journal of Immunology November 1, 2006, 177 (9) 5801-5810; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.5801

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Critical YxKxHxxxRP Motif in the C-Terminal Region of GATA3 for Its DNA Binding and Function
Ryo Shinnakasu, Masakatsu Yamashita, Kenta Shinoda, Yusuke Endo, Hiroyuki Hosokawa, Akihiro Hasegawa, Shinji Ikemizu, Toshinori Nakayama
The Journal of Immunology November 1, 2006, 177 (9) 5801-5810; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.5801
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606