Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: TLR9 and TLR2 Signaling Together Account for MyD88-Dependent Control of Parasitemia in Trypanosoma cruzi Infection

Andre Bafica, Helton Costa Santiago, Romina Goldszmid, Catherine Ropert, Ricardo T. Gazzinelli and Alan Sher
J Immunol September 15, 2006, 177 (6) 3515-3519; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3515
Andre Bafica
*Immunobiology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Helton Costa Santiago
†Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Romina Goldszmid
*Immunobiology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Ropert
‡Laboratório de Imunopatologia, CPqRR, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo T. Gazzinelli
†Departamento de Bioquímica e Imunologia, ICB, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
‡Laboratório de Imunopatologia, CPqRR, FIOCRUZ, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Sher
*Immunobiology Section, Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Activation of innate immune cells by Trypanosoma cruzi-derived molecules such as GPI anchors and DNA induces proinflammatory cytokine production and host defense mechanisms. In this study, we demonstrate that DNA from T. cruzi stimulates cytokine production by APCs in a TLR9-dependent manner and synergizes with parasite-derived GPI anchor, a TLR2 agonist, in the induction of cytokines by macrophages. Compared with wild-type animals, T. cruzi-infected Tlr9−/− mice displayed elevated parasitemia and decreased survival. Strikingly, infected Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice developed a parasitemia equivalent to animals lacking MyD88, an essential signaling molecule for most TLR, but did not show the acute mortality displayed by MyD88−/− animals. The enhanced susceptibility of Tlr9−/− and Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice was associated with decreased in vivo IL-12/IFN-γ responses. Our results reveal that TLR2 and TLR9 cooperate in the control of parasite replication and that TLR9 has a primary role in the MyD88-dependent induction of IL-12/IFN-γ synthesis during infection with T. cruzi.

Mammalian TLR are a group of at least eleven structurally related signaling molecules that are thought to play a pivotal role in both innate immunity and the initiation of adaptive responses to pathogens (1, 2, 3). TLR are known to sense distinct molecular structures on microbes and trigger NF-κB-dependent gene functions leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, costimulatory molecules, and other mediators which both restrict early pathogen growth and promote the development of adaptive immunity (2, 3). Nevertheless, the mechanisms by which different pathogen-induced signals are orchestrated in the generation of host resistance are poorly understood.

Trypanosoma cruzi, the causative agent of Chagas disease, is an intracellular trypanosomatid protozoan. Host control of this parasite has been shown to depend on both humoral and cell-mediated adaptive responses as well as elements of the innate immune system (4). A role for TLR signaling in resistance to T. cruzi is supported by the observations that mice deficient in MyD88, an adaptor molecule required for signaling events by most TLR as well as IL-1R and IL-18R, show greatly enhanced susceptibility to infection with this protozoan parasite (5). So far, no single TLR has been shown to account for the acute susceptibility displayed by MyD88-deficient animals (5, 6, 7, 8, 9). For this reason, we hypothesized that more than one TLR might cooperate in controlling T. cruzi infection in vivo.

Mice lacking TLR2 have been shown to display slightly enhanced susceptibility to T. cruzi in vivo (5), whereas macrophages from the same animals present impaired proinflammatory cytokine production when exposed to the live pathogen in vitro (5). GPI anchors are a major class of T. cruzi molecules recognized by TLR2 (6). In addition, other parasite structures such as the T. cruzi-released protein Tc52 and a particular subset of free GPI anchors containing ceramide (GIPL-ceramide) have been shown to stimulate macrophage proinflammatory cytokine production via TLR2 (8) and TLR4 (7), respectively. DNA preparations from both T. cruzi and Trypanosoma brucei have been shown to stimulate cytokine responses from macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) (9), suggesting that the genomes of these trypanosomatids contain sufficient CpG motifs to induce activation of host cells via TLR9 signaling as has been well documented in TLR recognition of bacteria. Indeed, DNA from T. brucei triggers macrophage cytokine production in a TLR9-dependent manner and mice deficient in this TLR display impaired resistance to T. brucei infection (10). Nevertheless, the role of TLR9 in host responses to T. cruzi infection and its possible interaction with the parasite-induced TLR2 signaling pathway described above has not been investigated.

In the present study, we show that mice lacking TLR2 and TLR9 display enhanced susceptibility to T. cruzi infection, which recapitulates the high blood parasitemia observed in mice deficient in MyD88 and correlates with defective Th1-like responses in vivo. Our data thus reveal a role for TLR9 in host resistance to T. cruzi and provide the first evidence for TLR cooperation in the control of protozoan infection in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Mice

C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Taconic Farms. Breeding pairs of B6.129P2-Myd88tmAki (Myd88−/−), B6.129P2-Tlr2tmAki (Tlr2−/−), and B6.129P2-Tlr9tmAki (Tlr9−/−) mice were obtained from Dr. S. Akira (Osaka University, Japan) via Dr. D. Golenbock (University of Massachusetts Medical School, MA) or Dr. R. Seder (Vaccine Research Center, National Institutes of Health). Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice were generated by mating TLR2−/− with TLR9-deficient animals as previously described (11). Animals were bred and maintained at an American Association of Laboratory Animal Care-accredited facility at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health. Mice of both sexes between 8 and 14 wk old were used in all experiments.

T.cruzi culture-derived trypomastigotes and T.cruzi-derived tGPI-mucin

Trypomastigote forms of the Y strain of T. cruzi were grown in a human fibroblast cell line and purified by centrifugation as described previously (12). The tGPI-mucin was isolated from tissue culture trypomastigotes as described elsewhere (13).

TLR agonists and other reagents

Ultra-pure LPS (Escherichia coli 0111:B4) and DNA calf thymus were purchased from Invitrogen and Sigma-Aldrich, respectively. Purified genomic DNA from T. cruzi was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (30266D).

Cell populations

Bone marrow macrophages (BMM) and thioglycollate elicited peritoneal macrophages were obtained from C57BL/6 and knockout (KO) mice as previously described (6). Macrophages were cultured in supplemented DMEM (106 cells/ml) (Invitrogen Life Technologies) and stimulated with live trypomastigotes or TLR ligands for 24 h to evaluate TNF and IL-12p40 production by ELISA (R&D Systems).

Experimental infection with T. cruzi

Mice were i.p. infected with 1000 blood-trypomastigote forms of the Y strain of T. cruzi as previously described (5). Parasitemia levels were evaluated by counting parasites in 5 μl of blood from the tail vein, and mortality was assessed daily. Mice were bled on days 0 and 10 after infection, and the level of serum cytokine was evaluated by ELISA (1/2 sera dilution).

CD4+ T cell recall response assay

Purified CD4+ T spleen cells (106 cells/ml) from T. cruzi-infected wild-type (WT) or KO mice were cocultured with live trypomastigote-infected bone marrow-derived dendritic cell (BMDC) (5 × 105 cells/ml) from WT animals for 72 h (a protocol used elsewhere). IFN-γ (R&D Systems) levels in culture supernatants were then determined by ELISA.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA was used to analyze the significance of differences in means between multiple experimental groups. Survival curves were generated using the Kaplan-Meier method and the significance of differences was calculated by the log-rank test. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

Results and Discussion

DNA from T. cruzi stimulates IL-12 and TNF in a TLR9-dependent manner and synergizes with GPI anchors for proinflammatory cytokine production

Brown and colleagues (9) have demonstrated that T. cruzi DNA activates macrophages to produce cytokines and reactive nitrogen intermediates and stimulates B lymphocyte proliferation. These activities were destroyed with DNase treatment and were dependent on the presence of unmethylated CpG dinucleotides. As indicated in Fig. 1⇓A, purified DNA from T. cruzi stimulated IL-12p40 as well as TNF (data not shown) production by BMM in a TLR9-dependent manner. Similarly, T. cruzi DNA induced IL-12p40 synthesis by CD11c+ splenic DCs through a MyD88- and TLR9-dependent pathway (data not shown).

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Effects of DNA and GPI-mucin from T. cruzi on proinflammatory cytokine responses by macrophages. A, BMM from WT or Tlr9−/− mice were exposed to purified DNA from [DNATc] (10 μg/ml), and 24 h later, IL-12p40 was assayed in supernatants by ELISA. B and C, Peritoneal macrophages from C57BL/6 or Myd88−/− (⋄) mice were stimulated with different concentrations of DNATc (0.1–50 μg/ml), GPI (1 or 10 ng/ml), or both for 24 h. TNF (A) and IL-12p40 (B) production were measured in the culture supernatants by ELISA. Results are means ± SE of triplicate measurements. Experiments shown are representative of two performed. ∗, p < 0.05 between values from DNA plus GPI treatment vs DNA alone (10 or 50 μg/ml) or GPI alone (10 ng/ml). No synergy in proinflammatory cytokine production was observed when macrophages were treated with control calf thymus DNA (50 μg/ml) plus GPI (10 ng/ml) for 24 h.

Because GPI anchors derived from T. cruzi activate TLR2 (6) and trigger the synthesis of various proinflammatory cytokines and reactive nitrogen intermediates (12, 13, 14), we next investigated whether GPI anchors and DNA derived from T. cruzi cooperate in the induction of cytokine synthesis by macrophages. As shown in Fig. 1⇑, B and C, GPI and DNA from T. cruzi synergize in the induction of both IL-12p40 and TNF production by macrophages. Thus, simultaneous stimulation of TLR2 and TLR9 by T. cruzi components is important for the induction of optimal innate immune responses against the parasite.

Proinflammatory cytokine responses by APC exposed to live T. cruzi in vitro are regulated by both TLR2 and TLR9

We next investigated the role of TLR2 or TLR9 in T. cruzi-induced proinflammatory cytokine production by APC in vitro. T. cruzi-exposed peritoneal macrophages from Tlr2−/−, Tlr9−/−, or Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice displayed reduced IL-12p40 responses with double KO cells showing the greater defect (Fig. 2⇓A), suggesting that TLR2 and TLR9 act in concert in triggering IL-12. In contrast, the TNF response appeared to be controlled primarily by TLR2 and not TLR9 (Fig. 2⇓B).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Role of TLR2 and TLR9 in the regulation of proinflammatory cytokine responses by T. cruzi-exposed macrophages in vitro. Peritoneal macrophages from WT, MyD88-, TLR2-, TLR9-, or TLR2/TLR9-deficient mice were exposed to live T. cruzi (1 parasite: 1 cell), DNA from T. cruzi (10 μg/ml), or LPS (1 μg/ml) for 20 h. IL-12p40 (A) and TNF (B) were measured in culture supernatants by ELISA. Results are means ± SE of triplicate measurements. Experiments shown are representative of two performed. ∗, p < 0.05 between WT vs KO values.

TLR2 and TLR9 cooperate in the control of T. cruzi infection

Despite the fact that tGPI-mucins are potent TLR2 agonists, previous studies (5) have shown that infected Tlr2−/− mice mount an unimpaired proinflammatory cytokine response and display no loss in host resistance. To assess the possible role of TLR9 in host defense, WT and TLR-deficient animals were infected with 1000 trypomastigotes of the Y strain T. cruzi and followed for parasitemia as well as survival. As shown in Fig. 3⇓A, Tlr9−/− animals presented elevated parasite numbers in the blood in contrast to Tlr2−/− mice, which failed to display a significant increase in parasitemia. Nevertheless, the Tlr2−/−/Tlr9−/− mice were even more susceptible than the Tlr9−/− mice, indicating that although TLR9 may have a dominant role in innate recognition of the parasite, TLR2 also contributes to this process (Fig. 3⇓A). The enhanced susceptibility to T. cruzi infection was associated with decreased serum levels of IL-12 as well as IFN-γ in the Tlr9−/− and Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice (Fig. 3⇓B).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Interaction of TLR9 and TLR2 in host resistance to T. cruzi infection. A, WT, Myd88−/−, Tlr2−/−, Tlr9−/−, and Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice were infected with 103 trypomastigotes of the Y strain of T. cruzi, parasitemia (left panel) was assessed daily and survival (right panel) was monitored. Left panel, Statistical analysis conducted at day 10 postinfection denotes differences in blood trypomastigotes between animal groups revealed statistically significant differences between Tlr9KO vs WT or Tlr2KO (∗, p < 0.05). When comparing parasitemia from Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− (or Myd88−/−) groups to WT (ψ) or Tlr2−/− mice (Ω), the symbols indicate that differences are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Right panel, Statistical analysis revealed that the MyD88- and TLR2/TLR9-deficient mice were significantly more susceptible (p < 0.01) than WT animals and that the mean survival curve of Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice is significantly different from that of the Myd88−/− (p = 0.01) animal group. The experiment shown is representative of two to three performed. B, Animals described in A were bled at 10 days postinfection and IL-12p40 (▪) as well as IFN-γ (▨) levels were measured in sera by ELISA. C, Purified splenic CD4+ T cells from mice as described in A were cocultured with syngeneic BMDC infected with T. cruzi (multiplicity of infection = 5) for 72 h. IFN-γ was assayed by ELISA in culture supernatants. The means ± SE of measurements from triplicate wells are presented. The experiment shown was performed twice with similar results. ∗, Values significantly different (p < 0.05) between WT and KO cells.

We have previously shown that Myd88−/− mice display a 4-fold enhancement in parasitemia and accelerated mortality when compared with WT mice challenged with T. cruzi (5). Importantly, Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− and Myd88−/− animals displayed similar numbers of circulating parasites in the blood, suggesting that together TLR2 and TLR9 account for most of the Myd88-dependent resistance to acute infection with T. cruzi. However, whereas Myd88−/− mice succumbed by day 30 postinfection, only 40–50% of the Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− animals died in a 50-day period (Fig. 3⇑A), a finding that predicts the involvement of additional MyD88-dependent TLR/IL-1R family member(s) in the control of mortality.

In contrast to TLR2, TLR9 controls IFN-γ recall responses by CD4+ T cells from T. cruzi-infected mice

Because IFN-γ is a major mediator of resistance to T. cruzi and our data indicate an important influence of TLR9 on parasite-induced IFN-γ in vivo, we asked whether defects in in vivo IFN-γ responses are also evident in Tlr9−/− as well as Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice. To do so, we tested the recall responses of splenic CD4+ T cells from 10 day infected mice using BMDC from WT animals that had been infected in vitro with live T. cruzi as APCs. As shown in Fig. 3⇑C, major defects in T. cruzi-specific IFN-γ responses were observed in Myd88−/−, Tlr9−/−, and Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice, but not in the Tlr2−/− animals.

It has been difficult to attribute the documented high susceptibility of Myd88−/− mice to T. cruzi infection to the role of a single TLR (5, 7). Two possible explanations are: 1) that an as yet-to-be-determined TLR accounts for the MyD88-dependent resistance; or 2) that different TLR act in concert in determining pathogen control. In this study, we have demonstrated that TLR9 is activated by T. cruzi genomic DNA and plays a major role in the early recognition of this parasite contributing to the activation of innate immune mechanisms such as DC and macrophage IL-12 production as well as the development of the adaptive immune response to the pathogen. In addition, we provide evidence for the cooperation of TLR9 with a second TLR (TLR2) in the induction of optimal host resistance to T. cruzi.

TLR9 is known to participate in the control of T. brucei infection and the Th1 responses it induces in mice (10). Nevertheless, the role of this receptor and its possible collaboration with other TLR in host resistance to T. cruzi have never been addressed. The findings presented herein confirm that T. cruzi DNA stimulates proinflammatory cytokine production through TLR9 and more importantly establish a role for this TLR in the IL-12 and IFN-γ/Th1 responses to live T. cruzi in vitro as well as in vivo. TLR9 deficiency was also associated with significantly increased parasitemia compared with WT animals and T. cruzi-infected Tlr9−/− but not Tlr2−/− mice showed impaired CD4+ T cell IFN-γ recall responses. However, in contrast to Tlr2−/− macrophages, Tlr9−/− cells did not show defective TNF production in vitro, suggesting that TLR2 and TLR9 control distinct arms of the immune response to the parasite and that stimulation of both TLR2 and TLR9 in vivo (putatively by GPI and DNA) is required for optimal effector function and host resistance against T. cruzi. Because no defects in IL-10 production by spleen cells were noted in the T. cruzi-exposed TLR2−/− animals (data not shown), their resistance to infection cannot be attributed to the absence of TLR2-dependent triggering of this cytokine as described by others (15).

Although Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− and Myd88−/− animals displayed similar peripheral blood parasite counts, the former group did not show the acute mortality exhibited by Myd88−/− mice. This observation suggests that additional TLR/IL-1R family members are involved in the pathogenesis of T. cruzi infection in mice. A role for TLR4 has been suggested by the significantly enhanced susceptibility of mice deficient in this receptor to T. cruzi challenge (7). Therefore, it will be of interest to determine whether greater defects in resistance to T. cruzi will be evident in mice with the appropriate triple receptor (TLR2-TLR4-TLR9) deficiency. Although not evaluated in the present study, the contribution of MyD88-independent TLR-mediated mechanisms such as those involving the adaptor molecule TRIF should be considered. The participation of MyD88-independent signaling pathways in host resistance to T. cruzi is also suggested by the enhanced susceptibility to the parasite of IFN-γ−/− mice relative to MyD88-deficient animals (5).

Th1 responses have previously (1, 4) been demonstrated to play a major role in control of T. cruzi infection. Importantly, in the present study the decreased resistance of both Tlr9−/− and Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice was associated with impaired serum IFN-γ production as well as CD4+/IFN-γ responses suggesting a specific effect on Th1 response generation. A similar effect of TLR9 deficiency on Th1 expression has been noted in recent studies in both T. brucei (10) and mycobacterial experimental infection models (11). Indeed, in the latter report TLR2 and TLR9 were observed to cooperate in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis with TLR2 playing a major role in controlling TNF production by macrophages and lung pathology and TLR9 regulating IFN-γ synthesis by CD4+ T cells (11). In the present experiments, we were unable to detect alterations in liver, spleen, or cardiac tissue pathology in Tlr2−/− mice (data not shown). Instead TLR2 function was primarily detected through its cooperation with TLR9 in control of pathogen load and role in regulating macrophage TNF and IL-12 responses in vitro. Because no effect of TLR2 deficiency on in vivo IL-12 or IFN-γ responses was detected and TNF is known to be crucial for NO synthase 2 expression and host resistance to T. cruzi (16, 17, 18) we speculate that TLR2 regulates control of the parasite through its influence on the latter effector arm. We propose that although asymptomatic in the single Tlr2−/− animals, the effects of this TNF response defect become accentuated in Tlr2−/−Tlr9−/− mice because of the simultaneous reduction in TLR9-dependent IFN-γ response. Although TLR2/TLR9 interaction has now been shown to regulate host resistance to both M. tuberculosis and T. cruzi, the latter pathogen is distinct from the former in that it rapidly escapes host endocytic vacuoles and dwells in the cytoplasm (19), which is thought to be devoid of TLR9 (20, 21). Therefore, it is likely that TLR9 stimulation occurs either during the initial transient residence of the parasite within lysosome fused parasitophorus vacuoles following invasion or through phagocytosis of trypomastigotes already killed through action of other innate defense mechanisms. The cellular pathways leading to TLR9 activation in both T. cruzi and M. tuberculosis infections and the mechanisms underlying cooperation with TLR2 signaling are currently under study in our laboratories.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sara Hieny and Pat Casper for their expert technical assistance and Drs. Carl Feng, Dragana Jankovic, and Georgio Trinchieri for their invaluable suggestions and comments on this work.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 R.T.G. and C.R. are Conselho Nacional de Pesquisas (Brazil) fellowship recipients.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. André Báfica, Immunobiology Section, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases–Laboratory of Parasitic Diseases, 50 NIH South Dr, Room 6146, Bethesda, MD 20892. E-mail address: abafica{at}niaid.nih.gov or Dr. Ricardo T. Gazzinelli, Lab. de Imunopatologia, Centro de Pequisas Rene Rachou–Fundaçao Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Augusto de Lima 1715, B. Horizonte, MG 30190-002. E-mail address: ritoga{at}cpqrr.fiocruz.br

  • ↵3 R.T.G. and A.S. contributed equally to this study.

  • 4 Abbreviations used in this paper: DC, dendritic cells, BMM, bone marrow-derived macrophages; BMDC, bone marrow-derived dendritic cell; KO, knockout; WT, wild type.

  • Received April 3, 2006.
  • Accepted July 14, 2006.
  • Copyright © 2006 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Gazzinelli, R. T., C. Ropert, M. A. Campos. 2004. Role of the Toll/interleukin-1 receptor signaling pathway in host resistance and pathogenesis during infection with protozoan parasites. Immunol. Rev. 201: 9-25.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Takeda, K., T. Kaisho, S. Akira. 2003. Toll-like receptors. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 21: 335-376.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Iwasaki, A., R. Medzhitov. 2004. Toll-like receptor control of the adaptive immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 5: 987-995.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Golgher, D., R. T. Gazzinelli. 2004. Innate and acquired immunity in the pathogenesis of Chagas disease. Autoimmunity 37: 399-409.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Campos, M. A., M. Closel, E. P. Valente, J. E. Cardoso, S. Akira, J. I. Alvarez-Leite, C. Ropert, R. T. Gazzinelli. 2004. Impaired production of proinflammatory cytokines and host resistance to acute infection with Trypanosoma cruzi in mice lacking functional myeloid differentiation factor 88. J. Immunol. 172: 1711-1718.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Campos, M. A., I. C. Almeida, O. Takeuchi, S. Akira, E. P. Valente, D. O. Procopio, L R. Travassos, J. A. Smith, D. T. Golenbock, R. T. Gazzinelli. 2001. Activation of Toll-like receptor-2 by glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors from a protozoan parasite. J. Immunol. 167: 416-423.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Oliveira, A. C., J. R. Peixoto, L. B. de Arruda, M. A. Campos, R. T. Gazzinelli, D. T. Golenbock, S. Akira, J. O. Previato, L. Mendonca-Previato, A. Nobrega, M. Bellio. 2004. Expression of functional TLR4 confers proinflammatory responsiveness to Trypanosoma cruzi glycoinositolphospholipids and higher resistance to infection with T. cruzi. J. Immunol. 173: 5688-5696.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Ouaissi, A., E. Guilvard, Y. Delneste, G. Caron, G. Magistrelli, N. Herbault, N. Thieblemont, P. P. Jeannin. 2002. The Trypanosoma cruzi Tc52-released protein induces human dendritic cell maturation, signals via Toll-like receptor 2, and confers protection against lethal infection. J. Immunol. 168: 6366-6374.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Shoda, L. K., K. A. Kegerreis, C. E. Suarez, I. Roditi, R. S. Corral, G. M. Bertot, J. Norimine, W. C. Brown. 2001. DNA from protozoan parasites Babesia bovis. Trypanosoma cruzi, and T. brucei is mitogenic for B lymphocytes and stimulates macrophage expression of interleukin-12, tumor necrosis factor-α, and nitric oxide. Infect. Immun. 69: 2162-2171.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Drennan, M. B., B. Stijlemans, J. Van den Abbeele, V. J. Quesniaux, M. Barkhuizen, F. Brombacher, P. De Baetselier, B. Ryffel, S. Magez. 2005. The induction of a type 1 immune response following a Trypanosoma brucei infection is MyD88 dependent. J. Immunol. 175: 2501-2509.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Bafica, A., C. A. Scanga, C. Feng, L. Leifer, A. Cheever, A. Sher. 2005. TLR9 regulates Th1 responses and cooperates with TLR2 in mediating optimal responses in host resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Exp. Med. 202: 1715-1724.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Camargo, M. M., I. C. Almeida, M. E. Pereira, M. A. Ferguson, L. R. Travassos, R. T. Gazzinelli. 1997. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored mucin-like glycoproteins isolated from Trypanosoma cruzi trypomastigotes initiate the synthesis of proinflammatory cytokines by macrophages. J. Immunol. 158: 5890-5901.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    Almeida, I. C., M. M. Camargo, D. O. Procopio, L. S. Silva, A. Mehlert, L. R. Travassos, R.T. Gazzinelli, M.A. Ferguson. 2000. Highly purified glycosylphosphatidylinositols from Trypanosoma cruzi are potent proinflammatory agents. EMBO J. 19: 1476-1485.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    Camargo, M. M., A. C. Andrade, I. C. Almeida, L. R. Travassos, R. T. Gazzinelli. 1997. Glycoconjugates isolated from Trypanosoma cruzi but not from Leishmania species membranes trigger nitric oxide synthesis as well as microbicidal activity in IFN-γ-primed macrophages. J. Immunol. 159: 6131-6139.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    Dillon, S., A. Agrawal, T. Van Dyke, G. Landreth, L. McCauley, A. Koh, C. Maliszewski, S. Akira, B. Pulendran. 2004. A Toll-like receptor 2 ligand stimulates Th2 responses in vivo, via induction of extracellular signal-regulated kinase mitogen-activated protein kinase and c-Fos in dendritic cells. J. Immunol. 172: 4733-4743.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Silva, J. S., G. N. Vespa, M. A. Cardoso, J. C. Aliberti, F. Q. Cunha. 1995. Tumor necrosis factor α mediates resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice by inducing nitric oxide production in infected γ interferon-activated macrophages. Infect. Immun. 63: 4862-4867.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Castanos-Velez, E., S. Maerlan, L. M. Osorio, F. Aberg, P. Biberfeld, A. Orn, M. E. Rottenberg. 1998. Trypanosoma cruzi infection in tumor necrosis factor receptor p55-deficient mice. Infect. Immun. 66: 2960-2968.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Aliberti, J. C., J. T. Souto, A. P. Marino, J. Lannes-Vieira, M. M. Teixeira, J. Farber, R. T. Gazzinelli, J. S. Silva. 2001. Modulation of chemokine production and inflammatory responses in interferon-γ- and tumor necrosis factor-R1-deficient mice during Trypanosoma cruzi infection. Am. J. Pathol. 158: 1433-1440.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Andrade, L. O., N. W. Andrews. 2005. The Trypanosoma cruzi-host-cell interplay: location, invasion, retention. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 3: 819-823.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Latz, E., A. Schoenemeyer, A. Visintin, K. A. Fitzgerald, B. G. Monks, C. F. Knetter, E. Lien, N. J. Nilsen, T. Espevik, D.T. Golenbock. 2004. TLR9 signals after translocating from the ER to CpG DNA in the lysosome. Nat. Immunol. 5: 190-198.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Leifer, C. A., M. N. Kennedy, A. Mazzoni, C. Lee, M. J. Kruhlak, D. M. Segal. 2004. TLR9 is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum prior to stimulation. J. Immunol. 173: 1179-1183.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 177 (6)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 177, Issue 6
15 Sep 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
  • Advertising (PDF)
  • Back Matter (PDF)
  • Editorial Board (PDF)
  • Front Matter (PDF)
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: TLR9 and TLR2 Signaling Together Account for MyD88-Dependent Control of Parasitemia in Trypanosoma cruzi Infection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: TLR9 and TLR2 Signaling Together Account for MyD88-Dependent Control of Parasitemia in Trypanosoma cruzi Infection
Andre Bafica, Helton Costa Santiago, Romina Goldszmid, Catherine Ropert, Ricardo T. Gazzinelli, Alan Sher
The Journal of Immunology September 15, 2006, 177 (6) 3515-3519; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3515

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: TLR9 and TLR2 Signaling Together Account for MyD88-Dependent Control of Parasitemia in Trypanosoma cruzi Infection
Andre Bafica, Helton Costa Santiago, Romina Goldszmid, Catherine Ropert, Ricardo T. Gazzinelli, Alan Sher
The Journal of Immunology September 15, 2006, 177 (6) 3515-3519; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3515
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: Hypoxia-Induced Ubc9 Promoter Hypermethylation Regulates IL-17 Expression in Ulcerative Colitis
  • Cutting Edge: Mouse SARS-CoV-2 Epitope Reveals Infection and Vaccine-Elicited CD8 T Cell Responses
  • Cutting Edge: Heterogeneity in Cell Age Contributes to Functional Diversity of NK Cells
Show more Cutting Edge

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606