Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Prostaglandin E2 Induces FOXP3 Gene Expression and T Regulatory Cell Function in Human CD4+ T Cells

Felicita Baratelli, Ying Lin, Li Zhu, Seok-Chul Yang, Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc’h, Gang Zeng, Karen Reckamp, Mariam Dohadwala, Sherven Sharma and Steven M. Dubinett
J Immunol August 1, 2005, 175 (3) 1483-1490; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1483
Felicita Baratelli
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ying Lin
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Li Zhu
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seok-Chul Yang
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc’h
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gang Zeng
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Reckamp
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mariam Dohadwala
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sherven Sharma
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Steven M. Dubinett
Lung Cancer Research Program of the Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095; and Veterans Affairs Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA 90073
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells (T reg) are pivotal in suppressing immune responses and maintaining tolerance. The identification of molecules controlling T reg differentiation and function is important in understanding host immune responses in malignancy and autoimmunity. In this study we show that PGE2 enhances the in vitro inhibitory function of human purified CD4+CD25+ T reg cells. Moreover, PGE2 induces a regulatory phenotype in CD4+CD25− T cells. PGE2-treated T cell-mediated inhibition of anti-CD3-stimulated lymphocyte proliferation did not require cell contact. Phenotypic analysis revealed that PGE2 diminished CD25 expression in both CD4+CD25dim T cells and CD4+CD25bright T reg cells. PGE2 exposure induced the T reg cell-specific transcription factor forkhead/winged helix transcription factor gene (FOXP3) in CD4+CD25− T cells and significantly up-regulated its expression in CD4+CD25+ T reg cells. Similarly, 24-h incubation with supernatants from cyclooxygenase-2-overexpressing lung cancer cells that secrete high levels of PGE2 significantly induced FOXP3 in CD4+CD25− T cells. Finally, PGE2 up-regulated FOXP3 at both mRNA and protein levels and enhanced FOXP3 promoter activity. This is the first report indicating that PGE2 can modulate FOXP3 expression and T reg function in human lymphocytes.

Naturally occurring regulatory T (T reg)3 cells have been identified as CD4+CD25+ T lymphocytes that specifically express the forkhead transcription factor forkhead/winged helix transcription factor gene (FOXP3) (1, 2, 3). Their importance resides in their pivotal role in the maintenance of immunological tolerance (4). Although the suppressive capacity of T reg cells has been very well demonstrated, the mechanisms controlling their thymic origin and potential peripheral development have not been fully defined (5). Recent studies indicate that T cells with regulatory function may arise in the periphery upon conversion of CD4+CD25− T cells into CD4+CD25+ T reg cells through FOXP3 gene induction in response to a variety of stimuli (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12).

PGE2 has diverse effects on the regulation and activity of CD4+ T cells, including modulation of proliferation (13). Elevated tumor cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) and PGE2 levels have been described in several malignancies, where they have been implicated in suppression of antitumor immunity (15, 16). In particular, the CD4+CD25+ T reg cell population has been found to be significantly increased in PBL and within the tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes of epithelial cancers, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23). Given that COX-2 overexpression and PGE2 overproduction are highly associated with the progression of this malignancy (16), we hypothesized that PGE2 could contribute to the tumor-induced immunosuppression through modulation of T reg cell function. In this study we demonstrate that PGE2 enhances the inhibitory capacity of in vitro purified human CD4+CD25+ T reg cells and induces a suppressive regulatory phenotype in CD4+CD25− T cells. The PGE2-dependent acquisition of T reg cell function was correlated with induction of FOXP3 gene and protein expression. The enhanced inhibitory activity of PGE2-treated CD4+CD25+ T reg cells was also associated with significant up-regulation of FOXP3. This report highlights novel roles for PGE2 in controlling the generation and function of T reg cells.

Materials and Methods

Cell isolation and culture

Human CD4+C25+ T reg cells and CD4+CD25− T cells were purified from enriched buffy coat from healthy volunteers using the T reg cell isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec) and the AutoMACS cell sorter (Miltenyi Biotec). An institutional review board approval was obtained, and all donors signed informed consent. Cell purity assessed by flow cytometry was ≥92%. Before being used in different experimental conditions, purified CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25− T cell fractions were preincubated for 24 h in X-Vivo 15 (BioWhittaker), 10% FBS, and 1% human serum AB (Gemini) (24) with or without 16,16-dimethyl-PGE2 (Cayman Chemical; 13 or 26 μM). In some experiments, CD4+CD25− T cells (2 × 106) were preincubated for 18–24 h with 2 ml of undiluted tumor supernatant obtained from H157 (human squamous cell carcinoma; American Type Culture Collection) NSCLC, genetically modified to express COX-2 sense (S), COX-2 antisense (AS), or control empty vector (CV) (25). A 2.0-kb cDNA fragment of human COX-2 (provided by Dr. H. Herschman, University of California, Los Angeles, CA) was cloned in S and AS orientations in the retroviral vector pLNCX (BD Clontech) as previously described (25). For each cell line, an ∼10-fold higher level of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production was noted in COX-2 S compared with parental controls or CV (25). To neutralize the activity of the PGE2 contained in the COX-2 S supernatant, anti-PGE2 (10 μg/ml; provided by J. Portanova, Searle, St. Louis, MO) was added, and a mouse IgG (10 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a control Ab. T cell activation was performed by incubation of both CD4+CD25− T cells and CD4+C25+ T reg cells in plate-bound anti-CD3 (1 μg/ml)-coated, 96-well plates (BD Biosciences) from 24 to 120 h. Alternatively, T cells were activated in the presence of PMA (20 ng/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) and ionomycin (1 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich).

Flow cytometric analysis

CD4+CD25− T cells and CD4+CD25+ T reg cells, pretreated with or without PGE2 and cultured with or without anti-CD3 stimulation, were resuspended in PBS/2% FBS and labeled with human anti-CD25 PE (Miltenyi Biotec) and human anti-CD4 FITC Abs or with control isotype (all from BD Biosciences) at the indicated time points. Acquisition was performed using a Life Science Research flow cytometer or a SCAN X instrument (BD Biosciences) using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences) at University of California-Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center Flow Cytometry Core Facility. Data analysis was performed with CellQuest software.

In vitro proliferation assay

T cell proliferation was assessed by BrdU incorporation using a BrdU ELISA colorimetric assay (Roche). Briefly, magnetic bead-purified human CD4+CD25− T cells or CD4+C25+ T reg cells were pretreated with PGE2 (13 or 26 μM) for 24 h. PGE2 was removed by washing before starting the proliferation assay. To rule out the possibility that residual PGE2 would be transferred to the second culture, we performed preliminary experiments in which T cells were pretreated with PGE2 (26 μM; Cayman Chemical; catalogue no. 14010) for 12–18 h. The presence of PGE2 in the supernatant was then assessed by a specific enzyme immunoassay (PGE2 EIA kit; Cayman Chemical) after cell washing. The latter procedure was determined to be effective in removing >99% of the added PGE2 (data not shown). Both CD4+CD25− and CD4+C25+ T cell populations, with or without PGE2 pretreatment, were then cultured at a 1:1 ratio with autologous CD4+CD25− responder T cells (1 × 105) in anti-CD3 plate-bound, 96-well plates. In some experiments IL-2 (Proleukin; biological activity, 18 × 106 IU/1.1 mg; Chiron) or IL-7 (biological activity, 2 × 106 U/mg; PeproTech) was added to the cells. The concentrations of IL-7 and IL-2 used in the proliferation assays (2 ng/ml equivalent to 4 U/ml and 20 IU/ml corresponding to 1.56 ng/ml, respectively) were determined based on previous reports (26, 27) and our own preliminary studies. In four independent experiments, the T cell proliferations expressed as OD values of BrdU incorporation on day 5 of culture were 0.95 ± 0.3 in the presence of IL-2 (20 IU/ml) and 0.93 ± 0.06 in the presence of IL-7 (2 ng/ml). Thus, the concentrations of IL-2 and IL-7 used were comparable based on the capacity of both cytokines to induce a similar degree of proliferation of CD3-activated CD4+ T cells in vitro. After 5 days in culture, cells were pulsed with BrdU and 4 h later were assessed for BrdU incorporation. To analyze cell contact-independent inhibition, 3 × 105 untreated or PGE2-treated CD4+CD25− T cells and untreated or PGE2-treated CD4+CD25+ T reg cells were separated from mitomycin C (50 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich)-treated, allogeneic-dendritic cell-stimulated CD4+CD25− responder T cells (3 × 105) by 3-μm Transwell inserts (Costar; Corning) in 24-well plates. T cell proliferation was then measured after a 5-day culture period by analysis of BrdU incorporation. Results are expressed as the percentage of proliferation of responder T cells alone.

Real-time PCR for FOXP3

For quantitative real-time analysis, RNA was extracted, and cDNA was prepared with a kit (Invitrogen Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Human FOXP3 mRNA expression was quantified using the SYBR Green quantitative PCR kit (Finnzymes) in the iCycler (Bio-Rad) and was corrected with human β-actin housekeeping control amplifications. Amplification was conducted in a total volume of 20 μl for 40 cycles of 15 s at 95°C, 20 s at 60°C, and 30 s at 72°C. Samples were run in triplicate, and their relative expression was determined by normalizing the expression of each target to β-actin and then comparing this normalized value to the normalized expression in a reference sample to calculate a fold change value.

For FOXP3, primers were: forward, 5′-CAA GTT CCA CAA CAT GCG AC-3′; and reverse, 5′-ATT GAG TGT CCG CTG CTT CT-3′. FOXP3 primers were synthesized by Integrated DNA Technologies. For β-actin, primers were: forward, 5′-GATGAGATTGGCATGGCTTT-3′; and reverse, 5′-CACCTTCACCGTTCCAGTTT-3′.

FOXP3 promoter cotransfection of Jurkat T cells and dual luciferase assay

A 350-bp fragment (FOXP3-SubD) containing the FOXP3/scurfin gene intron 0 upstream from the initiation codon, located within the 65,825–65,475 bp region of human chromosome X, multiple clone map pII.23, was inserted into a firefly luciferase reporter vector (pGL3-basic; Promega) as previously described (28). FOXP3-SubD and Renilla luciferase gene CV (pRL-TK Renilla) were then cotransfected into Jurkat T cells using the SuperFect Transfection Reagent (Qiagen). PGE2 (13 μM), PMA (20 ng/ml) plus ionomycin (1 μg/ml) (PI), and PMA, ionomycin, and PGE2 were added separately to Jurkat T cells 24 h after transfection for an additional 18 h. Firefly and Renilla luciferase activities were measured using the dual luciferase reporter assay system (Promega) and a single-sample luminometer (Bacterial Systems; GEM Biomedical). Relative luciferase activity was calculated as the ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase.

Western blot analysis for FOXP3

FOXP3 protein expression was analyzed in the lysate of Jurkat T cells (5.0 × 105 cells). The protein concentration in the cell lysate was determined using a bicinchoninic acid assay (Pierce). Protein-normalized aliquots of the cell lysate (25 μg) were electrophoresed on an 8% SDS-polyacrylamide gel and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes. FOXP3 was immunodetected with 1/5000 rabbit anti-human FOXP3 polyclonal Ab (Abcam), followed by incubation with 1/500 HRP-conjugated donkey anti-rabbit Ig (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Immunoblots were developed using an ECL detection system (Supersignal West Pico chemiluminescence; Pierce), followed by autoradiography. Equal protein loading was confirmed by immunodetecting the membranes with anti-GAPDH Ab (Advanced Immunochemical). Relative protein quantification was determined by computerized densitometric analysis using Scion Image software (version 1.62c).

Statistics

The p values were calculated using unpaired Student’s t test. Values ≤0.05 were considered significant.

Results

PGE2 enhances CD4+CD25+ T regulatory function and confers T regulatory activity in CD4+CD25− T cells

Previous studies have focused on the direct effect of PGE2 in mediating suppression of lymphocyte proliferation, highlighting the role of calcium-dependent mechanisms (29, 30). In the current study we first investigated whether exogenous PGE2 was able to augment the suppressive activity of CD4+CD25+ T reg cells. Purified CD4+CD25+ T reg cells demonstrated significant enhancement of their inhibitory function after incubation with PGE2 for 24 h in vitro (Fig. 1⇓A). Treatment of CD4+CD25+ T reg cells with escalating doses of PGE2 (13 or 26 μM) inhibited T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent pattern (Fig. 1⇓A). The T cell proliferations, expressed as OD values of BrdU incorporation, obtained from seven different donors were 1.04 ± 0.17 (CD4+CD25−), 0.68 ± 0.16 (CD4+CD25+), and 0.34 ± 0.14 (CD4+CD25++ PGE2; 26 μM). During the 5-day culture period of the assay, we examined the T cell proliferative response by light microscopy. Wells containing stimulator T cells not treated with PGE2 displayed numerous homogeneously distributed cell clusters, indicative of ongoing proliferation. In contrast, wells containing stimulator T cells pretreated with PGE2 consistently showed significantly fewer proliferating clusters (data not shown). The OD values of BrdU incorporation reflected the above observations. Accumulating evidence indicates that T cells with regulatory features can be generated in vitro (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13). In the present study, preincubation of CD4+CD25− T cells with PGE2 (13 or 26 μM) conferred regulatory T cell function (Fig. 1⇓B). In fact, the PGE2-treated CD4+CD25− stimulator cells inhibited the CD3-activated proliferation of autologous CD4+CD25− responder T cells. The levels of inhibition demonstrated by CD4+CD25− T cells exposed to PGE2 were similar to those induced by untreated CD4+CD25+T reg cells (Fig. 1⇓B). The T cell proliferations, expressed as OD values of BrdU incorporation, obtained from three different donors were 1.26 ± 0.39 (CD4+CD25−) and 0.65 ± 0.40 (CD4+CD25− plus PGE2 (26 μM)). Addition of IL-7 (2 ng) partially overcame the PGE2-mediated suppression and reversed the CD4+CD25+ T reg cell-mediated inhibition of proliferation (Fig. 1⇓C). The T cell proliferations, expressed as OD values of BrdU incorporation, obtained from three different donors were 0.93 ± 0.06 (CD4+CD25−), 0.72 ± 0.17 (CD4+CD25− plus PGE2 (26 μM)), 0.89 ± 0.07 (CD4+CD25+), and 0.69 ± 0.22 (CD4+CD25+ plus PGE2 (26 μM)). In contrast, IL-2 (20 IU/ml) did not overcome the PGE2-induced or the CD4+CD25+ T reg cell-induced suppression (Fig. 1⇓D). The T cell proliferations, expressed as OD values of BrdU incorporation, obtained from three different donors were 0.95 ± 0.29 (CD4+CD25−), 0.46 ± 0.25 (CD4+ CD25− plus PGE2 (26 μM)), 0.64 ± 0.36 (CD4+CD25+), and 0.31 ± 0.16 (CD4+CD25+ plus PGE2 (26 μM)). In assays that directly assessed CD4+CD25+ T reg cell proliferation, bothIL-7 (≥2 ng/ml) and a high concentration of IL-2 (≥100 IU/ml) demonstrated the capacity to induce proliferation of T reg cells (data not shown) in agreement with previous reports (31, 32). Interestingly, when CD4+CD25− responder T cells were separated by Transwell inserts from PGE2-treated stimulator cells (CD4+CD25− or CD4+CD25+), both PGE2-treated populations maintained the capacity to inhibit T cell proliferation (Fig. 1⇓E). These data taken together suggest that the PGE2-induced T regulatory function does not require cell contact. We have previously found that PGE2 is a potent inducer of lymphocyte IL-10 gene transcription (15), and PGE2 has also been reported to increase TGF-β expression (33, 34, 35). However, neither anti-IL-10 nor anti-TGF-β neutralizing Abs were able to reverse the PGE2-induced inhibitory activity mediated by CD4+CD25− or CD4+CD25+ T reg cells (data not shown). These findings suggest the contribution of additional soluble factors other than IL-10 or TGF-β to PGE2-induced cell-contact independent T regulatory cell function.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

A, PGE2 enhances T reg cell function. Purified CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25− cells, precultured with or without PGE2, were mixed with autologous CD4+ cells in anti-CD3-bound, 96-well plates for 5 days. B, PGE2 induces T reg cell activity in CD4+CD25− T cells. CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25− cells were precultured with increasing concentrations of PGE2 before a 5-day proliferation assay. C and D, IL-7, but not IL-2, overcomes suppression of T cell proliferation. IL-7 (C) or IL-2 (D) was added on day 1 to the proliferation assay described above. E, PGE2 mediates T reg cell activity without the requirement for cell contact. Both untreated and PGE2-treated CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25− cells were separated from dendritic cell-activated CD4+CD25− T cells by Transwell inserts. In all experiments, cell proliferation was measured by BrdU incorporation. Results are expressed as the mean (±SD) of one representative experiment of at least three performed in triplicate from different donors.

Down-regulation of CD25 expression in PGE2-treated CD4+T cells

Because T reg cells are identified as a CD4+CD25brightT cell subset (36), we analyzed whether the PGE2-treated CD4+CD25dim starting population acquired the same phenotype of naturally occurring, thymic-derived CD4+CD25bright T reg cells. As shown in Table I⇓, CD25 was differentially expressed in magnetic bead-purified CD4+CD25dim and CD4+CD25brightT cells. Indeed, with (Fig. 2⇓A and Table II⇓) or without PGE2 preincubation (data not shown), CD4+CD25dim up-regulated CD25 as early as 24 h after stimulation with anti-CD3 plate-bound Ab (Fig. 2⇓A). These T cells maintained high levels of CD25 expression throughout a 96-h culture period (Fig. 2⇓A). However, when anti-CD3 Ab-activated T cells were pretreated with PGE2, CD25 expression declined in both CD4+CD25dim T cells (Fig. 2⇓B, bottom left, and Table II⇓) and CD4+CD25bright T reg cells (Fig. 2⇓B, bottom right, and Table III⇓), compared with their counterparts without PGE2 exposure (Fig. 2⇓, B and C, upper panels, and Tables II⇓ and III⇓). Despite decreased CD25 expression, suppressive T reg function was maintained, as shown in Fig. 1⇑. Other markers indicative of the T reg phenotype, including glucocorticoid-induced TNFR family-related protein, CTLA-4, human latency-associated peptide of TGF-β1, lymphocyte activation Ag 3, PD-1, CD103, CD122, and CCR4, were either not altered or were down-regulated by PGE2 (data not shown).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

PGE2 down-regulates CD25 expression in CD3-activated CD4+ lymphocytes. A, PGE2-treated, CD3-activated CD4+CD25dim T cells up-regulate CD25 expression. Double-positive CD4+CD25+ cells were measured in unstimulated (top panel) and anti-CD3-stimulated (bottom panel), PGE2-treated CD4+CD25− T cells. Density plots of a representative experiment of four performed are shown. A, The number inserted in the upper right quadrant indicates the percentage of double-positive cells (CD4+CD25+). PGE2 decreased CD25 expression in both CD4+CD25dim (B) and CD4+CD25bright starting populations (C). CD25 was measured in anti-CD3-stimulated, CD4+CD25dim T cells and in CD4+CD25bright T reg cells without (−; top panel) or with (+) PGE2 (26 μM; bottom panel) at the indicated time points. Results were obtained from a donor different from that in A. In the histograms, dotted lines represent the isotype control, and bold lines indicate surface marker staining. B, The numbers inserted indicate the mean fluorescent intensity (MFI) of CD25 expression. Results are representative of one experiment of three performed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

CD25 expression in CD4+CD25dim and CD4+CD25bright following magnetic bead purificationa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

CD25 expression in CD4+CD25dim T cells treated with or without PGE2a

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table III.

CD25 expression in CD4+CD25bright Treg cells treated with or without PGE2a

PGE2 induces FOXP3 in CD4+CD25− T cells and up-regulates its expression in CD4+CD25+ T reg cells

Because FOXP3 is specifically expressed in naturally occurring T reg cells and programs their development and function (1, 2, 3, 4, 5), we determined whether PGE2 had an impact on the induction of FOXP3 gene expression in both CD4+CD25+ T reg and CD4+CD25−T cells. As expected, purified, peripheral blood-derived, CD3-activated CD4+CD25+ T reg cells expressed high levels of FOXP3 mRNA compared with CD4+CD25− T cells (Fig. 3⇓A). Furthermore, a 24-h preincubation with PGE2 (26 μM) resulted in >4-fold up-regulation of FOXP3 (Fig. 3⇓A). When CD4+CD25− T cells were cultured under the same stimulatory conditions in the presence of PGE2 (26 μM), FOXP3 mRNA expression was also significantly induced, consistent with the acquisition of a T reg cell suppressive function (Fig. 3⇓B). Thus, PGE2 facilitated the differentiation of CD4+CD25− T cells into a T cell population endowed with inhibitory properties and FOXP3 mRNA expression.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

PGE2 induces FOXP3 mRNA expression in both CD4+CD25+ T reg cells and CD4+CD25− T cells. Purified CD4+CD25+ T reg cells (A) and CD4+CD25− T cells (B) were incubated without (−) or with (+) PGE2 (26 μM) for 24 h. C, Alternatively, CD4+CD25− T cells were cultured for 24 h with medium alone or in tumor supernatant from COX-2 S (with or without anti-PGE2 Ab (10 μg/ml) or mouse IgG control Ab (10 μg/ml)), COX-2 AS, or CV-transfected H157. T cell FOXP3 mRNA expression was quantified after 48-h activation with plate-bound anti-CD3 Ab by real-time PCR as described in Materials and Methods. In CD4+CD25+ T reg cells treated with or without PGE2 (A), the fold increase in FOXP3 mRNA was relative to FOXP3 mRNA expression in CD4+CD25−. In PGE2-treated CD4+CD25− cells (B), the fold change in FOXP3 mRNA was relative to that in untreated CD4+CD25− cells. In CD4+CD25− T cells cultured with gene-modified H157 supernatant (C), the fold change in FOXP3 was relative to that in CD4+CD25− cells in medium alone. Results are expressed as the mean (±SE) of one experiment of at least three performed in triplicate from different donors. Asterisks indicate statistical significance compared with the control value.

Both preclinical and clinical studies have suggested that T reg cells play a role in suppressing the host immune response to malignancy. In particular, recent reports have demonstrated enhanced T reg cell activity in cancer patients (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Among the malignancies associated with augmented T reg cell function are tumors known to overexpress COX-2 and secrete high levels of PGE2 (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Thus, to determine the importance of tumor-derived PGE2, we used COX-2 gene-modified NSCLC cells as an experimental model for the tumor site, which is often enriched for PGE2. For this purpose we genetically modified NSCLC cell lines to express COX-2 S, COX-2 AS, or empty CV, as described in Materials and Methods and as we have previously reported (25). Using this in vitro model we preincubated CD4+CD25− T cells with tumor supernatant from H157 COX-2-gene modified NSCLC cell lines. FOXP3 gene expression was quantified in CD4+CD25− cells after 24-h activation with anti-CD3 plate-bound Ab. A 24-h exposure to H157 COX-2 S supernatant significantly induced FOXP3 gene expression in CD4+CD25− T cells. In contrast, COX-2 AS and CV supernatant had no effect on FOXP3 gene expression. Addition of anti-PGE2 Ab to COX-2 S supernatant blocked the induction of FOXP3 mRNA expression to the levels demonstrated in the AS or CV supernatants (Fig. 3⇑C). Control Ab did not impact the COX-2 S tumor supernatant-mediated induction of FOXP3 mRNA expression (Fig. 3⇑C).

PGE2 up-regulates FOXP3 mRNA and protein expression and induces FOXP3 promoter activity

To determine the mechanisms underlying PGE2-dependent regulation of FOXP3, we analyzed the expression of FOXP3 mRNA and protein levels in untreated or PGE2-treated (13 and 26 μM) Jurkat T cells in the presence or the absence of TCR-activating stimuli. We found that PGE2 up-regulated FOXP3 mRNA levels in both TCR-activated and non-activated Jurkat T cells (Fig. 4⇓, A and C). Consistent with our findings in PBL, PGE2 induced the greatest increase in FOXP3 in TCR-stimulated Jurkat T cells. Western blot analysis showed a similar pattern of expression (Fig. 4⇓B). Non-activated Jurkat T cells, in fact, expressed FOXP3 protein that was significantly up-regulated by both PGE2 concentrations tested (13 and 26 μM). However, maximum FOXP3 up-regulation was obtained in Jurkat T cells stimulated with PGE2 (26 μM) and activated with PMA plus ionomycin (Fig. 4⇓B). Finally, in promoter reporter assays, Jurkat T cells transfected with a FOXP3 promoter construct (FOXP3-SubD) demonstrated significantly enhanced FOXP3 promoter activity in response to PGE2 and costimulatory signals (Fig. 4⇓C). This suggests that PGE2 operates to induce FOXP3 at the level of mRNA transcription.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

PGE2 enhances FOXP3 mRNA expression, gene transcription, and protein. A, Jurkat T cells were activated for 18 h as indicated. FOXP3 mRNA expression was quantified by real-time PCR as described in Materials and Methods. B, Top panel, FOXP3 protein was analyzed by Western blot after stimulation for 18 h as indicated. B, Bottom panel, Densitometric analysis of FOXP3 expression of the Western blot. One representative result of two independent experiments performed is shown. C, PGE2 induces FOXP3 promoter activity. Jurkat T cells cotransfected with FOXP3 promoter and firefly luciferase reporter gene constructs (FOXP3-SubD) or with Renilla luciferase gene (CV) were stimulated for 18 h as indicated. FOXP3 promoter expression was analyzed by a dual luciferase reporter assay system, and relative luciferase activity was expressed as the ratio of firefly to Renilla luciferase. A representative experiment of three performed is shown.

Discussion

Several in vitro studies have reported an immunosuppressive role of PGE2 in T cell proliferation. Most studies focused on the direct effect of PGE2 on the responding T cell in which elevated levels of intracellular cAMP were associated with reduced IL-2 production (36, 37). Several other pathways of PGE2-induced immunosuppression have been described, including inhibition of polyamine synthesis, inhibition of intracellular calcium release, and suppression of p59 (Fyn) protein tyrosine kinase activity (38). However, the contribution of PGE2 in modulating T regulatory cell activity has not previously been defined.

A specific subset of T reg cells bearing a CD4+CD25+ T cell phenotype has now been the focus of extensive investigation (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 35). These T cells, endowed with distinct immunomodulatory properties, are acknowledged as fundamental in the prevention of autoimmunity and may be important in preventing effective immune responses in malignancy (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Although naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ T reg cells develop directly from CD4+ precursors in the thymus, a body of work has now demonstrated the induction of cells with regulatory function in the periphery from naive CD4+ T cells in response to a variety of stimuli (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12).

In this study we report a novel mechanism of PGE2-induced immunosuppression that occurs through the modulation/induction of human T reg cell function. Our results show that PGE2 not only enhances the suppressive capacity of in vitro purified CD4+CD25+ T reg cells, but also induces a CD4+CD25− T cell population to develop T reg cell function. Analysis of this newly induced T reg cell-like population revealed that PGE2 exposure conferred acquisition of FOXP3 expression consistent with the phenotypic feature seen in naturally occurring T reg cells. The original CD25dim population became CD25bright upon anti-CD3 activation. However, PGE2 exposure markedly down-regulated the surface expression of CD25 in these CD3-stimulated CD4+CD25− T cells that typically developed CD25high expression upon stimulation. The down-regulation of CD25, the α-chain of the high affinity IL-2R, was also evident in the purified CD4+CD25+ T reg cells exposed to the same concentration of PGE2. Constitutive expression of CD25 commonly has been used to define CD4+CD25+ T reg cells and IL-2 has been implicated as an important modulator of T reg activity, in vivo (39, 40). Our finding of PGE2-mediated down-regulation of IL-2Rα is consistent with previous studies showing decreased IL-2 production and IL-2Rα expression in TCR-activated, PGE2-stimulated T cells (37, 38, 42, 43). Thus, the PGE2-mediated down-regulation of IL-2Rα may limit typical autocrine and paracrine IL-2-dependent function, such as the TCR-mediated proliferative response. Despite the reduced IL-2Rα expression, both PGE2-treated CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25−T cell subsets retained immunosuppressive capacities and exerted their suppressive functions in a cell contact independent manner.

The biochemical signals generated by the IL-2R are similar to those of the IL-7R (44). The receptors for these cytokines in fact use shared components such as the common γ-chain that appears to be essential for their mitogenic signals (44, 45). It has been shown that IL-2 signaling via STAT5 is required for T reg cell development, and yet this transcription factor is activated by IL-7 (45). In contrast, it has also been shown that, as members of the γ-chain family, IL-2R and IL-7R activate distinct signal-transducing factors, which may be differentially recruited to the receptor complex by their ligand-specific unit (45, 46). In the current study, addition of exogenous IL-7 overcame the suppressive capacity of naturally occurring CD4+CD25+ T reg cells and partially neutralized the inhibition of proliferation mediated by the PGE2-induced regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25− and CD4+CD25+). Exogenous IL-2, however, had no ability to counteract the observed suppressed proliferation. The PGE2-induced IL-2Rα down-regulation may affect T cell IL-2 responsiveness, and perhaps higher concentrations of IL-2 may be required to reverse the inhibitory function of both PGE2-treated CD4+CD25− and CD4+CD25+ T reg cells. Alternatively, IL-2 and IL-7 may activate different signal transduction pathways, ultimately leading to different outcomes (43, 44, 45, 46). Additional studies will be required to define the differences in response to IL-2 and IL-7.

PBL-derived T reg cells have been categorized into T regulatory 1 or Th3 based on their pattern of cytokine secretion, because they have been shown to preferentially produce IL-10 or TGF-β, respectively (46). However, there is as yet no clear consensus regarding their phenotype or their ontogeny (5, 46). Our findings indicate that compared with untreated CD4+CD25− T cells, PGE2-induced T reg-like cells secrete lower levels of IL-10 and similar levels of TGF-β (data not shown). Neither of these cytokines appeared to significantly contribute to the in vitro regulatory function, because Ab-blocking studies could not reverse the inhibitory effect of either PGE2-treated CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25− T cells (data not shown). Taken together, our data indicate that PGE2-induced CD4+CD25− T cells share common features of both thymic and peripheral T reg cells (4, 5, 47, 48).

The transcription factor FOXP3 exerts a key role in the development and function of T reg cells (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 46). This separates FOXP3 from other T reg cell-associated markers such as CD25, glucocorticoid-induced TNFR family-related protein, and CTLA-4, which may be more generally expressed by activated T cells (35, 36). In our study, PGE2-dependent T reg differentiation was indeed associated with induction of the transcription factor FOXP3, whose expression was also significantly up-regulated by PGE2 in purified CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25− T cells. Consistent with previous reports in which TGF-β was investigated (6, 7, 8), PGE2-mediated T reg cell differentiation and FOXP3 induction were evident predominantly in the presence of costimulation by either anti-CD3 or allogeneic dendritic cells (data not shown). Using a variety of approaches, several studies are now modeling the differentiation of cells with T regulatory function arising in the periphery (6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 48). For example, recent studies in mice and humans, have demonstrated that CD4+CD25− T cells treated with TGF-β in the presence of appropriate costimulation lead to T reg cell differentiation with the capacity for suppressive function in vitro (6, 7). It is unclear whether these extrathymic T reg cells represent altered states of differentiation or belong to a unique T cell lineage (48).

Our findings suggest a role for PGE2 in modulating T reg cell function and differentiation. In conditions of PGE2 overproduction, such as described in several malignancies (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22), increased T reg cell differentiation and function could contribute to tumor-induced immunosuppression. Consistent with this concept, malignancies such as lung cancer that have previously been demonstrated to have high COX-2 expression and PGE2 production (16, 49) have also been noted to have increased T reg cell number and function within the PBL as well as the tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte populations (17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22). Extending these previous reports, we found that NSCLC cell lines overexpressing COX-2 were able to induce FOXP3 gene expression in CD4+CD25− T cells in a PGE2-dependent manner. We have recently reported that these relationships are operative in vivo in murine lung cancer models (50). Thus, taken together, our data indicate that regulation of PGE2 production may, in turn, modulate T reg cell development and function. These findings suggest new therapeutic strategies targeting COX-2/PGE2 in the prevention and treatment of cancer. This could include addition of COX-2 inhibitor treatment to immune-based therapies.

Acknowledgments

We thank Lauren Winter and Sandra Tran for their technical assistance. Flow cytometry was performed in the Flow Cytometry Core Facility at the University of California-Los Angeles Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center and Center for AIDS Research.

Disclosures

The authors have no financial conflict of interest.

Footnotes

  • The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the University of California-Los Angeles Lung Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence P50CA90388, National Institutes of Health Grant R01CA85686, Medical Research Funds from the Department of Veteran Affairs, the Research Enhancement Award Program in Cancer Gene Medicine, and the Tobacco-Related Disease Research Program of University of California.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Steven M. Dubinett, Lung Cancer Research Program, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Room 37-131 Center for Health Sciences, 10833 Le Conte Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90095. E-mail address: sdubinett{at}mednet.ucla.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: T reg cell, regulatory T cell; AS, antisense; COX-2, cyclooxygenase-2; CV, control empty vector; FOXP3, forkhead/winged helix transcription factor gene; NSCLC, nonsmall cell lung cancer; S, sense.

  • Received December 23, 2004.
  • Accepted April 29, 2005.
  • Copyright © 2005 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Fontenot, J. D., M. A. Gavin, A. Y. Rudensky. 2003. Foxp3 programs the development and function of CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4: 330-336.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Khattri, R., T. Cox, S. A. Yasako, F. Ramsdell. 2003. An essential role for scurfin in CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cells. Nat. Immunol. 4: 337-342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Hori, S., T. Nomura, S. Sakaguchi. 2003. Control of regulatory T cell development by the transcription factor foxp3. Science 299: 1057-1061.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Fehervari, Z., S. Sakaguchi. 2004. Development and function of CD25+CD4+ regulatory T cells. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 16: 203-208.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Sakaguchi, S.. 2003. The origin of foxp3-expressing CD4+ regulatory T cells: thymus or periphery?. J. Clin. Invest. 112: 1310-1312.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Fantini, M. C., C. Becker, G. Monteleone, F. Pallone, P. R. Galle, M. F. Neurath. 2004. Cutting edge: TGF-β induces a regulatory phenotype in CD4+CD25− T cells through foxp3 induction and down-regulation of Smad7. J. Immunol. 172: 5149-5153.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    WanJun, C., J. Wenwen, N. Hardegen, L. Ke-jian, L. Li, N. Marinos, G. McGrady, S. M. Wahl. 2003. Conversion of peripheral CD+CD25− naive T cells to CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells by TGF-β induction of transcription factor foxp3. J. Exp. Med. 198: 1875-1886.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Walker, M. R., D. J. Kasprowics, V. H. Gersuk, A. Benard, M. V. Landeghen, J. H. Buckner, S. F. Ziegler. 2003. Induction of foxP3 and acquisition of T regulatory activity by stimulated human CD4+CD25− T cells. J. Clin. Invest. 112: 1437-1443.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Jonuleit, H., E. Schmitt, G. Schuler, J. Knop, A. H. Enk. 2000. Induction of IL-10-producing, nonproliferating CD4+ T cells with regulatory properties by repetitive stimulation with allogeneic immature human dendritic cells. J. Exp. Med. 192: 1213-1222.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Steinbrink, K., E. Graulich, S. Kubsch, J. Knop, A. H. Enk. 2002. CD4+ and CD8+ anergic T cells induced by interleukin-10-treated human dendritic cells display antigen-specific suppressor activity. Blood 99: 2468-2476.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Kemper, C., A. C. Chan, J. M. Green, K. M. Murphy, J. P. Atkinson. 2003. Activation of human CD4+ cells with CD3 and CD46 induces a T-regulatory cell 1 phenotype. Nature 421: 388-392.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Walker, M. R., B. D. Carson, G. T. Nepom, S. F. Ziegler, J. H. Buchner. 2005. De novo generation of antigen-specific CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells from CD4+CD25− cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102: 4103-4108.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Harris, S. G., J. Padilla, L. Koumas, D. Ray, R. P. Phipps. 2002. Prostaglandins as modulators of immunity. Trends Immunol. 23: 144-150.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. Stolina, M., S. Sharma, Y. Lin, M. Dohadwala, B. Gardner, J. Luo, L. Zhu, M. Kronenberg, P. W. Miller, J. Portanova, et al 2000. Specific inhibition of cyclooxygenase 2 restores antitumor reactivity by altering the balance of IL-10 and IL-12 synthesis. J. Immunol. 164: 361-370.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Huang, M., S. Sharma, J. T. Mao, S. M. Dubinett. 1996. Non-small cell lung cancer-derived soluble mediators and PGE2 enhance peripheral blood IL-10 transcription and protein production. J. Immunol. 157: 5512-5520.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Dubinett, S. M., S. Sharma, M. Huang, M. Dohadwala, M. Pold, J. Mao. 2003. Cyclooxygenase-2 in lung cancer. A. J. Dannenberg, and R. N. DuBois, eds. COX-2 138 Karger, Basel. .
  17. ↵
    Liyanage, U. K., T. T. Moore, H.-G. Joo, Y. Tanaka, V. Hermann, G. Doherty, J. A. Drebin, S. M. Strasberg, T. J. Eberlein, P. S. Goedegebure, et al 2002. Prevalence of regulatory T cells is increased in peripheral blood and tumor microenvironment of patients with pancreas or breast adenocarcinoma. J. Immunol. 169: 2756-2761.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. ↵
    Sasada, T., M. Kimura, Y. Yoshida, M. Kanai, A. Takabayashi. 2003. CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies. Cancer 98: 1089-1099.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Curiel, T. J., G. Coukos, L. Zou, X. Alvarez, P. Cheng, P. Mottram, M. Evdemon-Hogan, J. R. Conejo-Garcia, L. Zhang, M. Burow, et al 2004. Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinomas fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival. Nat. Med. 10: 942-949.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Woo, E. Y., C. S. Chu, T. J. Goletz, K. Schlienger, R. G. Carrol, J. L. Riley, L. R. Kaiser, C. H. June. 2002. Cutting edge: regulatory T cells from lung cancer patients directly inhibit autologous T cell proliferation. J. Immunol. 168: 4272-4276.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Viguer, M., F. Lemaitre, O. Verola, M.-S. Cho, G. Gorochov, L. Dubertret, H. Bachelez, P. Kourilsky, L. Ferradini. 2004. FOXP3 expressing CD4+CD25high regulatory T cells are overexpressed in human metastatic melanoma lymph nodes and inhibit the function of infiltrating T cells. J. Immunol. 173: 1444-1453.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Ormandy, L. A., T Hillemann, H. Wedemeyer, M. P. Manns, T. F. Greten, F. Korangy. 2005. Increased populations of regulatory T cells in peripheral blood of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Res. 65: 2457-2464.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Levings, M. K., R. Sangregorio, M. G. Roncarolo. 2001. Human CD25+ CD4+ T regulatory cells suppress naive and memory T cell proliferation and can be expanded in vitro without loss of function. J. Exp. Med. 293: 1295-1302.
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Baratelli, F., N. Heuze-Vourch, K. Krysan, M. Dohadwala, K. Riedl, S. Sharma, S. M. Dubinett. 2004. PGE2-dependent enhancement of TIMP-1 production limits dendritic cell migration through extracellular matrix. J. Immunol. 173: 5458-5466.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Dohadwala, M., J. Luo, L. Zhou, Y. Lin, G. Dougherty, S. Sharma, M. Huang, M. Pold, R. K. Batra, S. M. Dubinett. 2001. Non-small cell lung cancer cyclooxygenase-2 dependent invasion is mediated by CD44. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 20809-20812.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Jaleco, S., L. Swainson, V. Dardalhon, M. Burjanadze, S. Kinet, N. Taylor. 2003. Homeostasis of naive and memory CD4+ T cells: IL-2 and IL-7 differentially regulate the balance between proliferation and Fas-mediated apoptosis. J. Immunol. 171: 61-68.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Geginat, J., F. Sallusto, A. Lanzavecchia. 2001. Cytokine-driven proliferation and differentiation of human naive, central memory, and effector memory CD4+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 194: 1711-1719.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Bassuny, W. M., K. Ihara, Y. Sasaki, R. Kuromaru, H. Kohno, N. Matsuura, T. Hara. 2003. A functional polymorphism in the promoter/enhancer region of the FOXP3/Scurfin gene associated with type 1 diabetes. Immunogenetics 55: 149-156.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Choudhry, M. A., P. E. Hockeberger, M. M. Sayeed. 1999. PGE2 suppresses mitogen-induced Ca2+ mobilization in T cells. Am. J. Physiol. 277: R1741-R1748.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  30. ↵
    Choudhry, M. A., S. Ahmad, M. M. Sayeed. 1995. Role of Ca2+ in prostaglandin E2-induced T-lymphocyte proliferative suppression in sepsis. Infect. Immun. 63: 3101-3105.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Jonuleit, H., E. Schmidtt, M. Stassen, A. Tuettenberg, J. Knop, A. H. Enk. 2001. Identification and functional characterization of human CD4+CD25+ T cells with regulatory properties isolated from peripheral blood. J. Exp. Med. 193: 1285-1294.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Dieckmann, D., H. Plottner, S. Berchtold, T. Berger, G. Schuler. 2001. Ex vivo isolation and characterization of CD4+CD25+ T cells with regulatory properties from human blood. J. Exp. Med. 193: 1303-1310.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Keerthisingam, C. B., R. G. Jenkins, N. K. Harrison, N. A. Hernandez-Rodriguez, H. Booth, G. J. Laurent, S. L. Hart, M. L. Foster, R. J. McAnulty. 2001. Cyclooxygenase-2 deficiency results in a loss of the anti-proliferative response to transforming growth factor-β in human fibrotic lung fibroblasts and promotes bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis in mice. Am. J. Physiol. 158: 1411-1422.
    OpenUrl
  34. ↵
    El-Haroun, H., D. Bradbury, A. Clayton, A. J. Knox. 2004. Interleukin-1β, transforming growth factor-β1, and bradykinin attenuate cyclic AMP production by human pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells in response to prostacyclin analogues and prostaglandin E2 by cyclooxygenase-2 induction and downregulation of adenylyl cyclase isoforms 1, 2, and 4. Circ. Res. 94: 353-361.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Shevach, E. M.. 2001. Certified professionals: CD4+C25+ suppressor T cells. J. Exp. Med. 193: F41-F46.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Choudry, M. A., S. Ahmad, Z. Ahmed, M. M. Sayeed. 1998. Prostaglandin E2 down-regulation of T cell IL-2 production is independent of IL-10 during Gram-negative sepsis. Immunol. Lett. 67: 125-130.
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Anastassiou, E. D., F. Paliogianni, J. P. Balow, H. Yamada, D. T. Boumpas. 1992. Prostaglandin E2 and other cyclic AMP-elevating agents modulate IL-2 and IL-2R α gene expression at multiple levels. J. Immunol. 148: 2845.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  38. ↵
    Choudhry, M. A., S. Uddin, M. M. Sayeed. 1998. Prostaglandin E2 modulation of p59fyn tyrosine kinase in T lymphocytes during sepsis. J. Immunol. 160: 929-935.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Nelson, B. H.. 2004. IL-2, regulatory T cells, and tolerance. J. Immunol. 172: 3983-3988.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    de la Rosa, M., S. Rutz, H. Dorninger, A. Scheffold. 2004. Interleukin-2 is essential for CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cell function. Eur. J. Immunol. 34: 2480-2488.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. Kvirkvella, N., I. Vojonic, T. D. Warner, V. Athie-Morales, P. Free, N. Rayment, B. M. Chain, T. W. Rademacher, T. Lund, I. M. Roitt, et al 2002. Placentally derived prostaglandin E2 acts via the EP4 receptor to inhibit IL-2-dependent proliferation of CTLL-2 T cells. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 127: 263-269.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Cosme, R., D. Lublin, V. Takafuji, K. Lynch, J. K. Roche. 2000. Prostanoids in human colonic mucosa: effects of inflammation on PGE2 receptor expression. Hum. Immunol. 61: 684-696.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. ↵
    Benczik, M., S. L. Gaffen. 2004. The interleukin (IL)-2 family cytokines: survival and proliferation signaling pathways in T lymphocytes. Immunol. Invest. 33: 109-142.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Pernis, A., S. Gupta, J. Yopp, E. Garfein, H. Kashleva, C. Schindler, P. Rothman. 1995. γ-Chain-associated cytokine receptors signal through distinct transducing factors. J. Biol. Chem. 270: 14517-14522.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Bensinger, S., P. T. Walsh, J. Zhang, M. Carroll, R. Parsons, J. C. Rathmell, C. B. Thompson, M. A. Burchill, M. A. Farrar, L. A. Turka. 2004. Distinct IL-2 receptor signaling pattern in CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 172: 5287-5296.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Jonuleit, H., E. Schmitt. 2003. The regulatory T cell family: distinct subsets and their interrelations. J. Immunol. 171: 6323-6327.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Barrat, F. J., D. J. Cua, A. Boonstra, D. F. Richards, C. Crain, H. F. Savelkoul, R. Waal-Malefyt, R. L. Coffman, C. M. Hawrylowicz, A. O’Garra. 2002. In vitro generation of interleukin 10-producing regulatory CD4+ T cells is induced by immunosuppressive drugs and inhibited by T helper type I (Th1)- and Th2-inducing cytokines. J. Exp. Med. 195: 603-616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Zheng, S. G., J. H. Wang, J. D. Gray, H. Soucier, D. A. Horowitz. 2004. Natural and induced CD4+CD25+ cells educate CD4+CD25− cells to develop suppressive activity: the role of IL-2, TGF-β, and IL-10. J. Immunol. 172: 5213-5221.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Dannenberg, J. A., K. Subbaramaiah. 2003. Targeting cyclooxygenase-2 in human neoplasia: rationale and promise. Cancer Cell 4: 431-436.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  50. ↵
    Sharma, S., S.-C. Young, L. Zhu, K. Reckamp, B. Gardner, F. Baratelli, M. Huang, R. J. Batra, S. M. Dubinett. 2005. Tumor COX-2/PGE2 dependent promotion of FOXP3 expression and CD4+CD25+ T regulatory cell activities in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 65: 5211-5220.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 175 (3)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 175, Issue 3
1 Aug 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Table of Contents (PDF)
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prostaglandin E2 Induces FOXP3 Gene Expression and T Regulatory Cell Function in Human CD4+ T Cells
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Prostaglandin E2 Induces FOXP3 Gene Expression and T Regulatory Cell Function in Human CD4+ T Cells
Felicita Baratelli, Ying Lin, Li Zhu, Seok-Chul Yang, Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc’h, Gang Zeng, Karen Reckamp, Mariam Dohadwala, Sherven Sharma, Steven M. Dubinett
The Journal of Immunology August 1, 2005, 175 (3) 1483-1490; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1483

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Prostaglandin E2 Induces FOXP3 Gene Expression and T Regulatory Cell Function in Human CD4+ T Cells
Felicita Baratelli, Ying Lin, Li Zhu, Seok-Chul Yang, Nathalie Heuzé-Vourc’h, Gang Zeng, Karen Reckamp, Mariam Dohadwala, Sherven Sharma, Steven M. Dubinett
The Journal of Immunology August 1, 2005, 175 (3) 1483-1490; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.175.3.1483
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Disclosures
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606