Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • Rights and Permissions
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Elimination of an Immunodominant CD4+ T Cell Epitope in Human IFN-β Does Not Result in an In Vivo Response Directed at the Subdominant Epitope

V. Peter Yeung, Judy Chang, Jeff Miller, Christopher Barnett, Marcia Stickler and Fiona A. Harding
J Immunol June 1, 2004, 172 (11) 6658-6665; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6658
V. Peter Yeung
Genencor International, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judy Chang
Genencor International, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeff Miller
Genencor International, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher Barnett
Genencor International, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marcia Stickler
Genencor International, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Fiona A. Harding
Genencor International, Palo Alto, CA 94304
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The BALB/cByJ mouse strain displays an immunodominant T cell response directed at the same CD4+ T cell epitope peptide region in human IFN-β, as detected in a human population-based assay. BALB/cByJ mice also recognize a second region of the protein with a lesser magnitude proliferative response. Critical residue testing of the immunodominant peptide showed that both BALB/cByJ mice and the human population response were dependent on an isoleucine residue at position 129. A variant IFN-β molecule was constructed containing the single amino acid modification, I129V, in the immunodominant epitope. The variant displayed 100% of control antiproliferation activity. Mice immunized with unmodified IFN-β responded weakly in vitro to the I129V variant. However, BALB/cByJ mice immunized with the I129V variant were unable to respond to either the I129V variant or the unmodified IFN-β molecule by either T cell proliferation or Ag-specific IgG1 Ab production. This demonstrates that a single amino acid change in an immunodominant epitope can eliminate an immune response to an otherwise intact therapeutic protein. The elimination of the immunodominant epitope response also eliminated the response to the subdominant epitope in the protein. Modifying functionally immunodominant T cell epitopes within proteins may obviate the need for additional subdominant epitope modifications.

  • Received October 31, 2003.
  • Accepted March 31, 2004.
  • Copyright © 2004 by The American Association of Immunologists
View Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 172 (11)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 172, Issue 11
1 Jun 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Elimination of an Immunodominant CD4+ T Cell Epitope in Human IFN-β Does Not Result in an In Vivo Response Directed at the Subdominant Epitope
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
Citation Tools
Elimination of an Immunodominant CD4+ T Cell Epitope in Human IFN-β Does Not Result in an In Vivo Response Directed at the Subdominant Epitope
V. Peter Yeung, Judy Chang, Jeff Miller, Christopher Barnett, Marcia Stickler, Fiona A. Harding
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 2004, 172 (11) 6658-6665; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6658

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Elimination of an Immunodominant CD4+ T Cell Epitope in Human IFN-β Does Not Result in an In Vivo Response Directed at the Subdominant Epitope
V. Peter Yeung, Judy Chang, Jeff Miller, Christopher Barnett, Marcia Stickler, Fiona A. Harding
The Journal of Immunology June 1, 2004, 172 (11) 6658-6665; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6658
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2019 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606