Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

p21-Activated Kinase 2 in Neutrophils Can Be Regulated by Phosphorylation at Multiple Sites and by a Variety of Protein Phosphatases

Qian Zhan, Qingyuan Ge, Taisuke Ohira, Thomas Van Dyke and John A. Badwey
J Immunol October 1, 2003, 171 (7) 3785-3793; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3785
Qian Zhan
*Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Reperfusion Injury, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Qingyuan Ge
†Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA 01915; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Taisuke Ohira
*Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Reperfusion Injury, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
‡Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas Van Dyke
‡Goldman School of Dental Medicine, Boston University, Boston, MA 02118
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
John A. Badwey
*Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Reperfusion Injury, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The p21-activated kinase(Pak) 2 undergoes rapid autophosphorylation/activation in neutrophils stimulated with a variety of chemoattractants (e.g., fMLP). Phosphorylation within the activation loop (Thr402) and inhibitory domain (Ser141) is known to increase the activity of Pak in vitro, whereas phosphorylation within the Nck (Ser20) and Pak-interacting guanine nucleotide exchange factor (Ser192 and Ser197) binding sites blocks the interactions of Pak 2 with these proteins. A panel of phosphospecific Abs was used to investigate the phosphorylation of Pak 2 in neutrophils at these sites. Pak 2 underwent rapid (≤15 s) phosphorylation at Ser20, Ser192/197, and Thr402 in neutrophils stimulated with fMLP. Phosphorylation at Ser192/197 and Thr402 were highly transient events, whereas that at Ser20 was more persistent. In contrast, Pak 2 was constitutively phosphorylated at Ser141 in unstimulated neutrophils and phosphorylation at this site was less sensitive to cell stimulation than at other residues. Studies with selective inhibitors suggested that a variety of phosphatases might be involved in the rapid dephosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils. This was consistent with biochemical studies which showed that the activation loop of GST-Pak 3, which is homologous to that in Pak 2, was a substrate for protein phosphatase 1, 2A, and a Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent phosphatase(s) which exhibited properties different from those of the conventional isoforms of protein phosphatase 2C. The data indicate that Pak 2 undergoes a complex pattern of phosphorylation in neutrophils and that dephosphorylation at certain sites may involve multiple protein phosphatases that exhibit distinct modes of regulation.

Neutrophils stimulated with a variety of chemoattractants exhibit rapid activation of p21-activated kinase (Pak)3 2 (1, 2, 3, 4). Pak 2 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that undergoes autophosphorylation/activation upon binding the activated (GTP-bound) forms of the small GTPases Rac or Cdc42 (5). A variety of studies suggest that Paks participate in a wide range of cellular events that include rapid cytoskeletal responses, certain long-term transcriptional events and the development of malignancy (for review, see Ref. 6). For example, Paks are involved in altering cell morphology/chemotaxis (e.g., Refs. 7 and 8), activation/potentiation of several distinct mitogen-activated protein kinase cascades (e.g., Ref. 9), activation of NF-κB in macrophages (10), and NFAT in T cells (11). Recent studies have also implicated Pak in Ras-mediated transformation (12), Fas-mediated apoptosis (e.g., Refs. 13 and 14), invasiveness of breast cancer cells (15), and the pathogenesis of HIV (e.g., Refs. 16, 17, 18). In addition to activated Rac/Cdc42, Pak 2 also contains binding sites for the βγ subunits of complex G-proteins, certain adaptor proteins (Nck), and Pak-interacting guanine nucleotide exchange factors (PIXs) (for review, see Ref. 6). Thus, Paks are capable of receiving messages from a variety of signal transduction pathways.

Considerable effort has been made to understand the regulation of Pak at the molecular level. The kinase domain (KD) of Pak is located in the C-terminal region of this enzyme, whereas the N-terminal region contains a Cdc42/Rac interactive binding motif and an autoinhibitory domain (ID; e.g., Ref. 19). Biochemical and biophysical studies have demonstrated that the ID interacts with KD to maintain Pak in an inactive/low affinity state (e.g., Refs. 20 and 21). Pak 1 and 2 can form homodimers in vivo (21). Dimerized Pak adopts a trans-inhibited conformation with the N-terminal domain of one Pak molecule inhibiting the catalytic domain of the other (21). Binding of one activated Rac or Cdc42 to this dimer disrupts these interactions and promotes autophosphorylation of the activation loop (AL) (Thr402) of both kinases (21). Phosphorylation at Thr402 results in a marked increase in the activity of Pak 2 toward certain substrates that persist even in the absence of the small GTPase (e.g., Ref. 22). In addition to the Thr402, peptide mapping studies have revealed that Pak 2 can also undergo autophosphorylation in vitro at several other residues including Ser20, Ser141, Ser192, and Ser197 (e.g., Ref. 23). Serines 20, 141, and 192/197 are located within the Nck binding site, the ID and PIX binding site, respectively. Phosphorylation within the ID (Ser141) partially activates Pak (24), whereas phosphorylation at Ser20 and Ser192 blocks binding to Nck and PIX, respectively (25). To date, few studies have focused on the phosphorylation of Pak 2 in vivo, particularly on residues outside of the AL (e.g., Ref. 26).

Pak 2 undergoes a rapid but transient activation in chemoattractant-stimulated neutrophils (1, 4) with activation/inactivation corresponding to phosphorylation and subsequent dephosphorylation at Thr402 (27). Distinct signals appear to be required for the activation and inactivation of Pak 2 in neutrophils (4). Thus, phosphatase(s) active against Pak are likely to play major roles in regulating this enzyme. Studies on cells other than neutrophils have shown that Pak can exist in complexes with protein phosphatase (PP) 2A (28) and/or with a highly specific phosphatase termed FEM-2 (29). The phosphatases active against Pak 2 in neutrophils have not been studied until now. In this paper, we have investigated the phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Ser20, Ser141, Ser192/197, and Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils along with the PPs which are active at some of these sites. Ancillary data on Pak 1 are also provided. The data indicate that Pak 2 undergoes multisite phosphorylation in neutrophils in a manner that is considerably different from that predicted from in vitro studies, and highlight the complex regulation of this kinase in vivo.

Materials and Methods

Materials

A phosphospecific Ab (pAb) that only recognized Pak 1, 2, or 3 when phosphorylated in the AL (pPak(AL) Ab) (Thr402 in Pak 2) was generated in rabbits (Research Genetics, Huntsville, AL) and purified/characterized in our laboratory (27). A similar affinity purified pAb to the AL of Pak 1, 2, and 3 along with affinity purified rabbit pAbs that react with Pak 2 when phosphorylated at Ser20 (pPak2(Ser20) Ab), Paks 1 and 2 when phosphorylated at Ser144 and Ser141, respectively (pPak1/2(Ser144/141) Ab) and Paks 1 and 2 when phosphorylated at Ser199 and/or Ser204, and Ser192 and/or Ser197, respectively (pPak1/2(Ser199 and Ser204/Ser192 and Ser197) Ab) were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). The sequences of the phosphopeptide Ags used to generate these pAbs are provided in Fig. 1⇓. The phosphopeptide Ags used to generate the pAbs described above and a rabbit polyclonal Ab that recognized both the phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Pak 2 (Pak 2 Ab) were also obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Beverly, MA). Goat polyclonal Abs raised to peptides derived from the N terminus of human Pak 2 (γ-Pak(N-19) Ab) and human Pak 3 (β-Pak(N-19) Ab) were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Recombinant calmodulin produced in Escherichia coli, PP 2B/calcineurin isolated from bovine brain, recombinant human PP 2Cα, PP 2A purified from human RBCs, PP 1 purified from rabbit skeletal muscle, recombinant PP 1α from rabbit muscle produced in E. coli and a sheep Ab to PP 2C generated to full-length human PP 2C were obtained from Upstate Biotechnology (Lake Placid, NY). Mouse mAbs generated to human PP 2A, human PP 1α, and human calcineurin were obtained from BD Transduction Laboratories (San Diego, CA). Okadaic acid, calyculin A, ascomycin, FK-506, and cyclosporin A were purchased from Calbiochem (La Jolla, CA). Plasmid pGST-mPak 3 carrying mouse fibroblast mPak 3 fused to GST in pGEX-KG was a gift from Dr. A. Mak (Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada). Immobilon-P transfer membranes (0.45 μm) were obtained from Millipore (Bedford, MA). Sources of all other materials are described elsewhere (1, 3, 4, 27).

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Amino acid sequences of the phosphopeptide Ags used to generate the pAbs used in this study and the corresponding sequences in Paks 1, 2, and 3.

Methods

Preparation of neutrophils and the neutrophil soluble fraction.

Guinea pig neutrophils were prepared as described previously (30). These preparations contained >90% neutrophils with viabilities always >95%. The studies described herein were performed in compliance with all institutional policies and federal guidelines governing the use of animals in research.

Neutrophils (1.0 × 108) were suspended in 1.0 ml of ice-cold phosphatase buffer (50 mM HEPES, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 0.20 mM EDTA) containing 0.025 ml of protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and freeze-thawed three times with a mixture of dry ice and ethanol. The homogenate was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 45 min and the resulting supernatant was used immediately as the source of Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent PP(s) that has certain properties that are different from those of conventional PP 2Cs.

Immunoblotting/detection of phosphorylated Pak 2 in neutrophils.

Neutrophils (1.9 × 106/ml) were stimulated in disposable 1-cm plastic cuvettes at 37°C. The standard assay mixture consisted of a modified Dulbecco’s PBS medium (135 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 16.2 mM Na2PO4, 1.47 mM KH2PO4 0.90 mM CaCl2, and 0.50 mM MgCl2, pH 7.35) containing 7.5 mM d-glucose. Cells were generally incubated in this medium for 10.0–30.0 min with or without inhibitors before stimulation. Concentrations of inhibitors and stimulation times are presented in the figure legends. At the appropriate time, the cells were rapidly lysed by adding 0.25 ml of 5× concentrated solubilization buffer (SDS-B) to 1.0 ml of the reaction mixture and the samples were boiled for 4.0 min. The final composition of SDS-B after mixing was 2.3% (w/v) SDS, 62.5 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8, 5.0 mM EDTA, 10.0% (v/v) glycerol, 5.0% (v/v) 2-ME, and 0.002% (w/v) bromophenol blue. Aliquots of these samples were separated by SDS-PAGE (35 μg/lane) on 9.0% (v/v) polyacrylamide slab gels and transferred electrophoretically to Immobilon P-membranes (1). Specific phosphorylation of Pak was assayed by Western blotting with the appropriate pAb (e.g., Ref. 27). Membranes were incubated with the pAb (∼1/1,000 dilution) overnight at 4°C. Phosphorylated Pak 2 was visualized with a luminol-ECL detection system (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Conditions for Western blotting are detailed elsewhere (4). At the end of these experiments, both the immunodetection system and the bound Ab were removed from the blot by incubating the membrane with ImmunoPure elution buffer (Pierce) for 30–60 min at room temperature followed by two washes in TBST (20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.01% (v/v) Tween 20, pH 7.4). The blots were then stained with an Ab that recognized both the phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Pak 2 or 3.

The concentrations of inhibitors and conditions used in these studies did not affect cell viability, as measured by the exclusion of trypan blue or by the release of lactate dehydrogenase (data not shown; Ref. 31).

Preparation of phosphorylated GST-Pak 3 and in vitro dephosphorylation of this protein catalyzed by PP 1, PP 2A, PP 2B, and PP 2C.

The GST-Pak 3 (β-Pak) fusion protein was expressed in E. coli, purified on a glutathione-sepharose affinity column and eluted with reduced glutathione (GSH) (e.g., Refs. 32 and 33).

Dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 by PP 1 or PP 2A was carried out at 30°C for 15 min in a 0.10-ml reaction mixture containing 30 μg/ml GST-Pak 3 in 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 2.0 mM MnCl2, 1.0 mM EDTA, 0.50 mM DTT and 0.10 mg/ml BSA. The assay conditions for PP 2B (calcineurin) were identical to those described above but also included 0.20 mM CaCl2 and 70 μg/ml calmodulin (34). The assay conditions for PP 2C were identical to those for PP 1 and PP 2A but in this case MnCl2 was replaced by 5.0 mM MgCl2 (e.g., Ref. 35). The assay mixtures were allowed to equilibrate for 10 min at 30°C before the reactions were initiated by the addition of phosphatase. The units of phosphatase activity used are provided (see Fig. 7⇓). Reactions were terminated by the addition of 20 μl of 5× concentrated SDS-B and the samples boiled for 4.0 min. Aliquots of these samples were subjected to SDS-PAGE on 7.0% (w/v) slab gels and dephosphorylation of Pak at a particular site was monitored by Western blotting with the appropriate pAb as described above.

Dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 by Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent phosphatases in neutrophils.

These assay conditions were modified from those used for the phosphatase FEM-2 (36). Dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 was carried out in a reaction mixture of 0.20 ml containing 10.0 μg/ml GST-Pak 3 in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM KCl, 0.20 mM EDTA, 1.0 μM orthovanadate, 100 nM calyculin A, 0.10 mg/ml BSA, and 10 μl of the neutrophil soluble fraction described above. This reaction mixture was allowed to equilibrate for 30 min at 30°C before dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 was initiated by the addition of 10 mM MgCl2 and/or 10 mM MnCl2 for time periods of 10–13 min (see Fig. 8⇓). Reactions were terminated by the addition of 40 μl of 5× concentrated SDS-B and the samples boiled for 4 min. Dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 was monitored by SDS-PAGE/Western blotting as described above.

Analysis of data

Unless otherwise noted, all of the autoradiographic observations were confirmed in at least three separate experiments performed on different cell preparations. The loss of phosphate from Pak was estimated by densitometry by comparing the peak heights of the Pak bands with a Hoeffer GS 300 scanning densitometer. The numbers of observations (n) are based on different cell preparations.

Results

Phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Ser20, Ser141, and Ser192/197 in chemoattractant-stimulated neutrophils

We have previously reported that Thr402 in the AL of Pak 2 always undergoes rapid and transient phosphorylation in fMLP-stimulated neutrophils (Ref. 27 ; Fig. 2⇓A). In contrast, phosphorylation of Thr423 in the AL of Pak 1 was only observed in some of these experiments (e.g., Fig. 2⇓B). Phosphorylation at these residues was monitored with a pAb that only recognized Pak 1/2 when phosphorylated at these sites (27). Maximal phosphorylation at Thr402 occurred within 15 s of cell stimulation followed by significant dephosphorylation at 2.0–3.0 min (Fig. 2⇓A; Ref. 27). Identical kinetics were observed for the activation of Rac and Pak 2 in these cells (e.g., Refs. 1 and 31).

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Progress curves for phosphorylation of Pak 2 on different residues in stimulated neutrophils. Specificity of the pAbs. A, Neutrophils were stimulated with 1.0 μM fMLP for different time periods and phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402, Ser20, Ser141, and Ser192/197 was monitored by Western blotting with pAbs generated to these sites. Data on the phosphorylation of Pak 1 on Ser144 and Ser199/204 are also presented. A Western blot with a Pak 2 Ab that reacts with both the phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Pak 2 (Pak 2 Ab) is also shown. B, Lysates of neutrophils were blotted with the pAbs listed above in the absence (−) or presence of the Ser20, Ser144, Ser199/204, or Thr423 phosphopeptide Ags used to generate these pAbs (5.0 μg/ml). Unstimulated neutrophils (pPak 1/2(Ser144/141) Ab) and neutrophils stimulated with 1.0 μM fMLP for 15 s (pPak(AL) Ab and pPak 1/2(Ser199/204 and Ser192/197) Ab) or 3.0 min (pPak(Ser20) Ab) were used in these competition experiments. Conditions for cell stimulation and Western blotting are provided in Materials and Methods.

We have now used a panel of pAbs to examine the phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Ser20, Ser141, and Ser192/197 in fMLP-stimulated neutrophils (Fig. 2⇑A). The sequences of the phosphopeptide Ags used to generate these pAbs are provided in Fig. 1⇑. Serines 20 and 192/197 exhibited rapid phosphorylation during cell stimulation with optimal phosphorylation occurring within 15 s. Phosphorylation at the Ser192/197 sites was transient. The pAb used to monitor phosphorylation at Ser192/197 in Pak 2 was generated to a peptide that was phosphorylated at two sites (Fig. 1⇑). Thus, the decrease in reactivity to the pPak 1/2(Ser199 and Ser204/Ser192 and Ser197) Ab may reflect dephosphorylation at Ser192 alone, Ser197 alone, or at both residues. We are not currently capable of distinguishing between these possibilities. In contrast to Ser192/197, phosphorylation at Ser20 was sustained with most of the phosphorylation at this site still evident at 3.0 min. The double band observed for Ser20 at certain time points is likely to be the result of a mobility shift due to phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of Pak 2 at other sites (e.g., Thr402; see below) because both of these bands were specifically blocked by the Ser20 phosphopeptide Ag (see below). The pPak 2(Ser20) Ab did not detect Ser21 in Pak 1. Only three of the nine amino acids in the −4 to +4 positions are identical when the sequences surrounding Ser21 in Pak 1 and Ser20 in Pak 2 are compared (Fig. 1⇑). In contrast to other sites, Ser141 in Pak 2 was constitutively phosphorylated in unstimulated neutrophils. A similar situation was observed for Ser144 in Pak 1.

A variety of data indicate that the pAbs used in these experiments were specific for the designated residues. For example, these pAbs reacted with only one or two major proteins when blotted against a lysate of neutrophils with the major bands corresponding to the masses of Pak 2 and/or 1. When the blots shown in Fig. 2⇑A were washed and restained with a regular Ab to Pak 2, the resulting bands overlapped the bands observed with the pAbs (data not shown). Most importantly, the bands observed with each pAb were specifically blocked by the phosphopeptide Ag (5.0 μg/ml) used to generate the pAb but not by phosphopeptides corresponding to the other phosphorylation sites in Pak 1 or 2 (Fig. 2⇑B). Finally, the unique kinetics of phosphorylation observed with three of four of these pAbs along with the different sensitivities of the various sites to phosphatases and inhibitors monitored with these reagents (see below) strongly suggest that each pAb reacts with a distinct site in Pak.

It is noteworthy that the pPak(AL) Ab recognized only one form of Pak 2 in stimulated neutrophils, whereas the pPak 2(Ser20) Ab recognized both slow and fast migrating bands (Fig. 2⇑A). One explanation for these data is that the slow migrating band results from phosphorylation at Thr402. Thus, the pPak(AL) Ab would only recognize this form of Pak 2. Under these circumstances, the mobility shift observed with the pPak(Ser20) Ab would be due to phosphorylation at Ser20 occurring both during and after phosphorylation at Thr402 such that this pAb would bind to both the slow and fast migrating forms of Pak 2. In contrast, the rapid dephosphorylation of Pak 2 at Ser192/197 would preclude detection of the lower band with the pPak1/2(Ser199/204 and Ser192/197) Ab. Consistent with this interpretation, a proteolytic fragment of Pak 1 (residues 201–491) which contains only the AL phosphorylation site (Thr423) exhibits a mobility shift when phosphorylated in vitro (20).

Interestingly, evidence of a possible mobility shift and/or dephosphorylation of Pak 2 with the pPak 1/2(Ser144/141) Ab was only observed in stimulated cells at 15 s (Fig. 2⇑A). These data may indicate that any Pak 2 which undergoes phosphorylation at both Ser141 and Thr402 is particularly sensitive to dephosphorylation, and/or that Pak 2 phosphorylated at Ser141 does not undergo significant phosphorylation at Thr402.

Effects of inhibitors of PPs on the phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils

The effects of inhibitors of PP 2A (100 nM okadaic acid) (e.g., Refs. 35 and 37) and/or PP 2B (200 nM ascomycin) (e.g., Ref. 38) on the phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 were evaluated to obtain information on the PPs that were active at or controlled phosphorylation at this residue (Fig. 3⇓). Neutrophils were treated with these inhibitors for 30 min at 37°C and then stimulated with 1.0 μM fMLP for 15 s. Both okadaic acid and ascomycin increased phosphorylation at Thr402 in stimulated cells (Fig. 3⇓). The combination of these inhibitors also increased the basal phosphorylation at Thr402 in unstimulated neutrophils (Fig. 3⇓B). Similar results were observed with two other, structurally distinct inhibitors of PP 2B (1.0 μM cyclosporin A, 100 nM FK-506) (e.g., Ref. 38) (data not shown). Okadaic acid directly inhibits PP 2A, whereas cyclosporin A, FK-506, and ascomycin induce conformational changes in certain proteins (immunophilins) which then enable these proteins to inhibit PP 2B (38). In addition to PP 2A, okadaic acid also inhibits PP 1 but at substantially higher concentrations than that needed to block PP 2A (e.g., Refs. 35 and 37). Okadaic acid inhibits dilute solutions of PP 1 and PP 2A in vitro at concentrations of 1.0–2.0 μM and 1.0–2.0 nM, respectively (35, 37). However, the effective concentrations of this inhibitor towards PP 1 and PP 2A in vivo are considerably higher due to the high concentrations of these phosphatases in cells (e.g., Refs. 35 and 37). Thus, the ability of 100 nM okadaic acid to enhance phosphorylation at Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils is consistent with the involvement of PP 2A in this reaction. Inhibitors of PP 1 (e.g., okadaic acid >1.0 μM, calyculin A) (37) could not be used in these studies because these compounds are known to reduce phosphorylation at Thr402 and block activation of Pak 2 in neutrophils (1, 3, 27). Selective inhibitors of PP 2C are not yet available.

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Effects of okadaic acid and/or ascomycin on the phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils. A, Neutrophils were treated with 100 nM okadaic acid or 200 nM ascomycin for 30 min at 37°C and then stimulated with 1.0 μM fMLP for 15 s. Phosphorylation at Thr402 was monitored by Western blotting with the pPak(AL) Ab. Equal loading of protein per lane was monitored with an Ab that recognized both the phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Pak 2 (Pak 2 Ab). B, Summarizes data from three to five separate experiments (mean ± SD). The amount of phosphorylation at Thr402 was estimated by densitometry with the 100% value being that exhibited by cells not treated with inhibitors but stimulated with 1.0 μM fMLP for 15 s. Conditions for cell stimulation and Western blotting are provided in Materials and Methods.

Fig. 4⇓ presents the progress curves for phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 in fMLP-stimulated neutrophils with and without okadaic acid (100 nM) plus ascomycin (200 nM). Interestingly, while these inhibitors were effective at increasing phosphorylation at all time points examined, they did not prevent the pronounced loss of phosphate at 1 and 3 min. Restaining this blot with an Ab that recognized both the phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Pak 2 (γ-Pak(N-19) Ab) demonstrated that this loss of phosphate was not due to a proteolytic event (Fig. 4⇓). These data indicate that neutrophils are likely to contain phosphatase(s) in addition to PP 2A and/or PP 2B that are active against Thr402.

           FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Effects of okadaic acid and ascomycin on the progress curve for phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils. A, Neutrophils were treated with 0.50% (v/v) DMSO or 100 nM okadaic acid plus 200 nM ascomycin for 30 min at 37°C and then stimulated with 1.0 μM fMLP for the indicated time periods. The cell lysates were subjected to Western blotting with the Abs listed. B, Summary of data from four separate experiments detecting phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 in the absence (▪) and presence of 100 nM okadaic acid plus 200 nM ascomycin (⧫) (means ± SD). Phosphorylation at Thr402 was estimated by densitometry with the 100% value being that exhibited by cells not treated with inhibitors but stimulated with 1.0 μM fMLP for 15 s. Conditions for cell stimulation and Western blotting are provided in Materials and Methods.

In contrast to the pPak(AL) Ab, the combination of okadaic acid plus ascomycin produced only a small increase in the reactivity of the pPak 1/2(Ser199/204 and Ser192/197) Ab at 15 and 30 s with no increases at 1.0 and 3.0 min (Fig. 4⇑A). Thus, it is unlikely that the effects of these inhibitors on Thr402 were the result of a general/overall enhancing effect of okadaic acid plus ascomycin on protein phosphorylation in neutrophils.

Dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 by PPs

Many serine/threonine PPs can be broadly divided into different categories (e.g., PP 1, PP 2A, PP 2B, PP 2C) on the basis of their substrate specificity, requirement for divalent cations, and sensitivity to various tumor promoters (e.g., okadaic acid, calyculinA) (e.g., Ref. 35). The presence of PP 1, PP 2A, PP 2B, and PP 2C in neutrophils was demonstrated with a panel of Abs that specifically reacted with the catalytic subunits of these enzymes (Fig. 5⇓). Each of these Abs reacted with a major protein when blotted against a lysate of unfractionated neutrophils with the resulting bands corresponding to the expected molecular masses of these phosphatases.

           FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Western blots detecting PP 1, 2A, 2B, and 2Cα in neutrophils. Lysates from guinea pig neutrophils (42 μg/lane) were subjected to Western blotting with Abs to various PPs. The positions of the phosphatases are indicated by arrows. Positions of the molecular markers are presented on the left.

The ability of these phosphatases to catalyze dephosphorylation of the AL and ID of Pak in vitro was investigated with a GST-Pak 3 fusion protein serving as the substrate. The GST-Pak 3 fusion protein was expressed in E. coli containing mouse Pak 3 fused to GST in the pGEX vector by incubation with isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) and purified with GSH-sepharose beads as referenced in Materials and Methods (Fig. 6⇓). As reported previously, GST-Pak 3 is susceptible to degradation (33). The resulting fusion protein reacted with the pPak(AL) Ab and the pPak 1/2(Ser144/141) Ab (Figs. 6⇓ and 7⇓) which indicted that a portion/population of this protein was phosphorylated at Thr421 and Ser139. Perturbation of the N-terminal region of Pak by fusion to GST results in activation of a portion of this kinase in the absence of activated Rac or Cdc42 (32). GST-Pak 3 was used in these studies because this isoform is easily expressed in E. coli (Fig. 6⇓) and the sequences surrounding the critical phosphorylation site in the AL of Pak 2 and Pak 3 are completely homologous (i.e., Thr402 in Pak 2 is analogous to Thr421 in Pak 3; Fig. 1⇑). Similarly, there is very strong homology between the sequence within the ID surrounding Ser141 in Pak 2 and Ser139 in Pak 3 (Fig. 1⇑). Thus, this fusion protein may serve as a substrate to gain information on potential phosphatases that recognize phosphorylated residues in the AL and ID of Pak.

           FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Expression of partially phosphorylated GST-Pak 3 in bacteria. Pak 3 (β-Pak) from fibroblasts fused to GST in the pGEX vector was induced in E. coli with 0.10 μM IPTG (lane b) and isolated on GSH-agarose beads (lane c). Lane a is for E. coli not treated with IPTG. Expression of GST-Pak 3 was monitored with an Ab (β-Pak(N-19) Ab) that recognized both the phosphorylated and nonphosphorylated forms of Pak 3 and with the pPak(AL) Ab.

           FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

In vitro dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 catalyzed by PPs. GST-Pak 3 was purified as shown in Fig. 6⇑ and treated for 15 min at 37°C with various amounts of recombinant PP 1α (rabbit muscle) (A), PP 2A purified from human RBCs (B), PP 2B purified from rabbit brain (C), and recombinant PP 2Cα (human) (D). Each phosphatase was assayed under optimal conditions as described in Materials and Methods. Dephosphorylation at Thr421 and Ser139 in Pak 3 (analogous to Thr402 and Ser141 in Pak 2, respectively) was monitored with the pPak(AL) Ab and pPak 1/2(Ser144/141) Ab, respectively. The arrow indicates the position of the GST-Pak3 fusion protein before treatment with the phosphatase.

GST-Pak 3 was treated with purified PP 1α, PP 2A, PP 2B, and PP 2C for 15 min at 37°C under conditions known to be effective for each of these phosphatases (34) and phosphorylation at Thr421 and Ser139 was monitored with the pAbs described above (Fig. 7⇑). PP 1 and PP 2A, but not PP 2B or PP 2C, were effective against Thr421 under the conditions used. In contrast, all four phosphatases were capable of catalyzing dephosphorylation at Ser139 which established that these phosphatases were active under the assay conditions used (Fig. 7⇑). The PP 2B catalyzed dephosphorylation at Ser139 exhibited a strong activation by calmodulin (Fig. 7⇑C). The insensitivity of the AL phosphorylation site to PP 2B suggests that the ability of ascomycin to enhance phosphorylation at Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils (Figs. 3⇑ and 4⇑) may occur indirectly provided that the in vitro experiments summarized in Fig. 7⇑ adequately reflect the situation for native Pak 2 in vivo (see Discussion).

Effects of neutrophil lysates on the phosphorylation of GST-Pak 3; dephosphorylation of Pak by novel phosphatase(s)

Studies were undertaken to determine if neutrophils contain novel phosphatase(s) active against the AL of Pak (Fig. 8⇓). Incubation of GST-Pak 3 with the undialyzed, soluble fraction of neutrophils resulted in an increased detection of phosphate at Thr421 and Ser139 but less so at Ser200/205 when monitored with the pAbs described above (Fig. 8⇓, lanes a and b). However, addition of 10.0 mM Mg2+ to the reaction mixture 30 min after the addition of the soluble fraction resulted in a pronounced, time-dependent loss of phosphate from Thr421 but not from the Ser139 or Ser200/205 sites. A similar loss of phosphate from Thr421 was also observed when 10.0 mM MnCl2 was added to the assay mixture. Because the Thr421 site was highly phosphorylated at the time the divalent cation was added, these data are consistent with Mg2+/Mn2+ stimulating the activity of highly specific phosphatase(s) that recognize the AL of Pak. It is unlikely that this activity is due to PP 1, PP 2A, or a typical isoform of PP 2C because inhibitors of these phosphatases were present in the assay system at optimal concentrations (100 nM calyculin A, 1.0 μM orthovanadate) (e.g., Refs. 36 and 37). Moreover, a typical isoform of PP 2C from humans was not active against the AL in GST-Pak 3 but did recognize the Ser139 site (Fig. 7⇑). Finally, sodium fluoride (100 mM) partially inhibited the Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent phosphatase(s) from neutrophils that were active against the AL of GST-Pak 3 (Fig. 8⇓, compare lanes f and h). Sodium fluoride (100 mM) does not inhibit the typical isoforms of PP 2C (39). The effects of Mg2+ and F− were estimated by densitometry by comparing the heights of bands b, f, and h in Fig. 8⇓. Treatment of the fusion protein for 30 min with 10.0 mM MgCl2 alone or 10.0 mM MgCl2 plus 100 mM NaF reduced the signal with the pPak(AL) Ab by 79 ± 7% and 36 ± 15% (SD, n = 3–4), respectively. Thus, a variety of data suggest that this specific Mg2+/Mn2+-AL phosphatase present in neutrophils is not a typical form of PP 2C. This Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent activity may be responsible for the dephosphorylation of the AL of Pak 2 that occurred in stimulated neutrophils in the presence of okadaic acid and ascomycin (Fig. 4⇑).

           FIGURE 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 8.

In vitro dephosphorylation of the activation loop of GST-Pak 3 catalyzed by Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent phosphatase(s) present in neutrophils. GST-Pak 3 was treated with the 100,000 × g soluble fraction from unstimulated neutrophils for 30 min at 37°C (lane b) and then treated with 10.0 mM MgCl2 (lanes d–f) or 10.0 mM MnCl2 (lane g) for different time periods. Lane c shows the effect of increasing the incubation time of the GST-Pak 3 fusion protein with the soluble fraction from 30 to 60 min. Lane h shows the effect of NaF (100 mM) on the dephosphorylation of GST-Pak 3 when added to the reaction mixture with MgCl2. The amount of phosphorylation at Thr421, Ser139, and Ser200/205 was monitored with the pPak(AL) Ab, pPak 1/2(Ser144/141) Ab, and the pPak 1/2(Ser199/204 and Ser192/197) Ab, respectively.

Discussion

Although autophosphorylation of Pak 2 in vitro has been investigated for nearly a decade, relatively few studies have focused on these reactions in intact cells, particularly on residues outside of the AL. We have now investigated the multisite phosphorylation of Pak 2 in stimulated neutrophils along with the PPs that are active against the AL and ID of this kinase. As noted above, phosphatases active against Pak are likely to play major roles in regulating this kinase. The significance of these studies is developed below.

Incubation of baculovirus expressed Pak 2 or Pak 2 purified from rabbit reticulocytes with Mg · ATP alone results in autophosphorylation at Ser19, Ser20, Ser55, Ser192, and Ser197. Addition of activated Cdc42 to the reaction mixture results in additional phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Ser141, Ser165, and Thr402 (23). In contrast, Pak 2 was not phosphorylated on Ser20 and Ser192/197 in unstimulated neutrophils but was phosphorylated on Ser141. Stimulation of neutrophils with fMLP resulted in rapid phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Ser20, Ser192/197, and Thr402 (Fig. 2⇑A). Elicited guinea pig neutrophils and human blood neutrophils stimulated with fMLP exhibit rapid activation of Cdc42 and Rac with kinetics consistent with these GTPases functioning upstream of Pak (e.g., Refs. 31 and 40). This rapid accumulation of activated Cdc42/Rac in stimulated neutrophils would promote autophosphorylation of Pak 2 on Thr402 as predicted by the in vitro studies. Why phosphorylation of Pak 2 on Ser20, Ser192/197, and Ser141 in neutrophils does not conform to the in vitro pattern is not known, but may reflect the activities of phosphatases and kinases that are present in neutrophils and active at these sites. The peritoneal cells used here are likely to be primed to exhibit enhanced responses upon stimulation (e.g., Ref. 41). Whether this priming also effects the phosphorylation of Pak is not known. Thus, the phosphorylation/regulation of Pak 2 in stimulated neutrophils is considerably different from that predicted by in vitro studies.

We have previously reported that the rapid activation/inactivation of Pak 2 in fMLP-stimulated neutrophils is closely associated with phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of this kinase at Thr402 (27). A variety of data implicate PP 2A in the dephosphorylation/inactivation of Pak. PP 2A catalyzes dephosphorylation of the AL of Pak 2 immunoprecipitated from neutrophils (27) and an inhibitor of PP 2A (100 nM okadaic acid) increased phosphorylation at this site in stimulated cells (Fig. 3⇑). PP 2A is present in neutrophils (Fig. 5⇑) and can exist in complexes with Pak in certain cell types (28). However, it is likely that phosphatases in addition to PP 2A are also active against the AL of Pak 2 because 100 nM okadaic acid did not prevent the pronounced dephosphorylation at Thr402 that occurred in neutrophils at 1.0 and 3.0 min after stimulation (Fig. 4⇑). Other potential phosphatases that can catalyze this reaction are PP 1 and FEM-2 (Fig. 7⇑; Ref. 29). We have detected PP 1 in neutrophils (Fig. 5⇑) along with a specific Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent AL phosphatase. This Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent phosphatase differs from conventional PP 2Cs in that it is active in the presence of 1.0 μM orthorvanadate and is partially inhibited by 100 mM NaF (Fig. 8⇑; Refs. 36 and 39). Moreover, a typical isoform of PP 2C was not found to be active against the AL of GST-Pak 3 (Fig. 7⇑). FEM-2 is a possible candidate for this Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent phosphatase because it is activated by Mg2+, catalyzes dephosphorylation of the AL of Pak, is partially inhibited by F− and insensitive to orthorvanadate and calyculin A (29, 36, 39). Chronic activation of Pak can promote viral replication, metastasis, and cellular transformation (e.g., Refs. 6, 12, 18). Perhaps the presence of multiple phosphatases active at the Thr421 site are a safeguard against these possibilities. Interestingly, the Mg2+/Mn2+-dependent AL phosphatase in neutrophils was not active against phosphorylation sites in the ID and PIX-binding region of Pak 3 (Fig. 8⇑) which suggests that different sites in Pak can be recognized by distinct phosphatases that are susceptible to different modes of regulation.

PIX can function as a scaffold protein because it binds Pak and FEM-2 simultaneously (29). Thus, PIX may participate in the activation and subsequent inactivation of Pak 2 through its GTP/GDP exchange activity and ability to serve as a targeting subunit that colocalizes Pak and FEM-2 (29). As noted earlier, Pak 2 in fMLP-stimulated neutrophils undergoes a rapid and transient phosphorylation on serines 192/197 (Fig. 2⇑A), and these modifications may promote dissociation of the PIX-FEM-2 complex from Pak (25). The physiological significance of these reactions is not yet known because isoforms of PIX have been described that have activating, inhibiting, and permissive effects on Pak (42). The isoforms of PIX in neutrophils remain to be characterized. PIX itself can undergo phosphorylation which does not affect its GTP/GDP exchange activity (43). It is interesting to note that while inhibitors of PP 2B enhanced phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Thr402 in stimulated neutrophils, isolated PP 2B did not catalyze dephosphorylation of the AL in the GST-Pak 3 fusion protein (Fig. 7⇑). If these data with the GST-Pak 3 fusion protein adequately reflect the situation in vivo, they indicate that PP 2B regulates Pak indirectly, perhaps by catalyzing the dephosphorylation of PIX or some unknown protein that is also involved in the regulation of Pak.

As noted above, Pak 1 or 2 can form dimers with the ID of one Pak molecule inhibiting the catalytic domain of the other (21). Monomeric Pak possesses considerable intrinsic kinase activity even in the absence of activated Rac or Cdc42 (cf, Ref. 21). Dimerization severely restricts this intrinsic/basal activity of Pak (21). Serine 141 resides within the ID and phosphorylation at this site partially activates Pak 2 by preventing the ID from packing against the kinase domain (21, 24). The constitutive phosphorylation of Pak 2 at Ser141 (and Pak 1 at Ser144) may provide for a pool of monomeric, partially active Pak that may be necessary for certain cellular functions in unstimulated neutrophils. Constitutive phosphorylation at Ser141 may also provide a population of Pak that is primed for rapid activation during cell stimulation. This may be particularly important for chemoattractants where different biological responses are triggered by increasing concentrations of agonists (e.g., Ref. 44). Finally, it is noteworthy that phosphorylation at Ser141 persisted in unstimulated neutrophils despite the fact that PP 1, PP 2A, PP 2B, and PP 2C were readily detected in these cells (Fig. 5⇑) and active at this site (Fig. 7⇑). Perhaps this site associates with a protein that shields it from these and other phosphatases.

In summary, we report that Pak 2 undergoes phosphorylation in neutrophils on multiple sites in a manner that exhibits significant differences from that observed during activation of this kinase in vitro. Dephosphorylation at some sites may involve multiple protein phosphatases that are susceptible to different modes of regulation. These data highlight the complex regulation that is necessary for coordinating the many cellular functions of Pak 2.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Dr. Stephen Harrison for discussions on the structure of Pak and possible effects of phosphorylation on this structure.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 These studies were supported by National Institutes of Health Grants DK-50015, AI-23323, and PO1 DE-13499.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. John A. Badwey, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Center for Experimental Therapeutics and Reperfusion Injury, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Thorn Building, Room 703, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115. E-mail address: Badwey{at}zeus.bwh.harvard.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: Pak, p21-activated kinase; PIX, Pak-interacting guanine nucleotide exchange factor; KD, kinase domain; ID, autoinhibitory domain; AL, activation loop; PP, protein phosphatase; pAb, phosphospecific Ab; IPTG, isopropyl β-d-thiogalactopyranoside; GSH, reduced glutathione.

  • Received December 11, 2002.
  • Accepted July 25, 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Ding, J., J. A. Badwey. 1993. Stimulation of neutrophils with a chemoattractant activates several novel protein kinases that can catalyze the phosphorylation of peptides derived from p47phox and MARKS. J. Biol. Chem. 268:17326.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Knaus, U. G., S. Morris, H. Dong, J. Chernoff, G. M. Bokoch. 1995. Regulation of human leukocyte p21-activated kinases through G-protein coupled receptors. Science 269:221.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Ding, J., U. G. Knaus, J. P. Lian, G. M. Bokoch, J. A. Badwey. 1996. The renaturable 69 and 63 kDa protein kinases that undergo rapid activation in chemoattractant-stimulated guinea pig neutrophils are p21-activated kinases (Paks). J. Biol. Chem. 271:24869.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Huang, R., J. P. Lian, D. Robinson, J. A. Badwey. 1998. Neutrophils stimulated with a variety of chemoattractants exhibit rapid activation of p21-activated kinases (Paks): separate signals are required for activation and inactivation of Paks. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:7130.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Manser, E., T. Leung, H. Salihuddin, Z.-S. Zhao, L. Lim. 1994. A brain serine/threonine protein kinase activated by Cdc42 and Rac 1. Nature 367:40.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Kumar, R., R. K. Vadlamudi. 2002. Emerging functions of p21-activated kinases in human cancer cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 193:133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Sells, M. A., J. T. Boyd, J. Chernoff. 1999. p21-Activated kinase 1 (Pak 1) regulates cell motility in mammalian fibroblasts. J. Cell Biol. 114:503.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    Vadlamudi, R. K., F. Li, L. Adam, D. Nguyen, Y. Ohata, T. P. Stossel, R. Kumar. 2002. Filamin is essential in actin cytoskeletal assembly mediated by p21-activated kinase 1. Nat. Cell Biol. 4:681.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Bagrodia, S., B. Derijard, R. J. Davis, R. A. Cerione. 1995. Cdc42 and Pak-mediated signaling leads to JUN kinase and p38 MAP kinase activation. J. Biol. Chem. 270:22731.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Frost, J. A., J. L. Swantek, S. Stippec, M. J. Yin, R. Gaynor, M. H. Cobb. 2000. Stimulation of NF-κB activity by multiple signaling pathways requires Pak 1. J. Biol. Chem. 275:19693.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Yablonski, D., L. P. Kane, D. Qian, A. Weiss. 1998. A Nck-Pak 1 signaling module is required for T-cell receptor-mediated activation of NFAT, but not JNK. EMBO J. 17:5647.
    OpenUrlAbstract
  12. ↵
    Tang, Y., J. Yu, J. Field. 1999. Signals from the Ras, Rac and Rho GTPases converge on the Pak protein kinase in Rat-1 fibroblasts. Mol. Cell. Biol. 19:1881.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Lee, N., H. MacDonald, C. Reinhard, R. Halenbeck, A. Roulston, T. Shi, L. T. Williams. 1997. Activation of hPak65 by caspase cleavage induces some of the morphological and biochemical changes of apoptosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:13642.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Rudel, T., G. M. Bokoch. 1997. Membrane and morphological changes in apoptotic cells regulated by caspase-mediated activation of Pak 2. Science 276:1571.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Bagheri-Yarmand, R., M. Mandal, A. H. Taludker, R.-A. Wang, R. K. Vadlamudi, H.-J. Kung, R. Kumar. 2001. Etk/Bmx tyrosine kinase activates Pak 1 and regulates tumorigenicity of breast cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 276:29403.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Fackler, O. T., X. Lu, J. A. Frost, M. Geyer, B. Jiang, W. Luo, A. Abo, A. S. Alberts, B. M. Peterlin. 2000. p21-activated kinase 1 plays a critical role in cellular activation by Nef. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:2619.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Wolf, D., V. Witte, B. Laffert, K. Blume, E. Stromer, S. Trapp, P. D’Aloja, A. Schürmann, A. S. Baur. 2001. HIV-1 Nef associated Pak and PI 3-kinases stimulate Akt-independent Bad-phosphorylation to induce anti-apoptotic signals. Nat. Med. 1:1217.
    OpenUrl
  18. ↵
    Linnemann, T., Y.-H. Zheng, R. Mandic, B. M. Peterlin. 2002. Interaction between Nef and phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase leads to activation of p21-activated kinase and increased production of HIV. Virology 294:246.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Zhao, Z.-S., E. Manser, X.-Q. Chen, C. Chong, T. Leung, L. Lim. 1998. A conserved negative regulatory region in αPak: inhibition of Pak kinases reveals their morphological roles downstream of Cdc42 and Rac1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 18:2153.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Buchwald, G., E. Hostinova, M. G. Rudolph, A. Kraemer, A. Sickmann, H. E. Meyer, K. Scheffzek, A. Wittinghofer. 2001. Conformational switch and role of phosphorylation in Pak activation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:5179.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Parrini, M. C., M. Lei, S. C. Harrison, B. J. Mayer. 2002. Pak 1 kinase homodimers are autoinhibited in trans and dissociated upon activation by Cdc42 and Rac1. Mol. Cell 9:73.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Zenke, F. T., C. C. King, B. P. Bohl, G. M. Bokoch. 1999. Identification of a central phosphorylation site in p21-activated kinase regulating autoinhibition and kinase activity. J. Biol. Chem. 274:32565.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Gatti, A., Z. Huang, P. T. Tuazon, J. A. Traugh. 1999. Multisite autophosphorylation of p21-activated protein kinase γ-Pak as a function of activation. J. Biol. Chem. 274:8022.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Chong, C., L. Tan, L. Lim, E. Manser. 2001. The mechanism of Pak activation: autophosphorylation events in both regulatory and kinase domains control activity. J. Biol. Chem. 276:17347.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Zhao, Z.-S., E. Manser, L. Lim. 2000. Interaction between Pak and Nck: a template for Nck targets and role of Pak autophosphorylation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 20:3906.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Howe, A. K.. 2001. Cell adhesion regulates the interaction between Nck and p21-activated kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 276:14541.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Lian, J. P., A. Toker, J. A. Badwey. 2001. Phosphorylation of the activation loop of γ-p21-activated kinase (γ-Pak) and related kinases (MSTs) in normal and stressed neutrophils. J. Immunol. 166:6349.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Westphal, R. S., R. L. Coffee, Jr, A. Marotta, S. L. Pelech, B. E. Wadzinski. 1999. Identification of kinase-phosphatase signaling modules composed of p70 S6 kinase-protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) and p21-activated kinase-PP2A. J. Biol. Chem. 274:687.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Koh, C.-G., E.-J. Tan, E. Manser, L. Lim. 2002. The p21-activated kinase Pak is negatively regulated by POPX1 and POPX2, a pair of serine/threonine phosphatases of the PP2C family. Curr. Biol. 12:317.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Badwey, J. A., M. L. Karnovsky. 1986. NADH-oxidase and aldehyde oxidase from polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Methods Enzymol. 132:365.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Lian, J. P., L. Crossley, Q. Zhan, R. Huang, P. Coffer, A. Toker, D. Robinson, J. A. Badwey. 2001. Antagonists of calcium fluxes and calmodulin block activation of the p21-activated protein kinases in neutrophils. J. Immunol. 166:2643.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Bagrodia, S., S. Taylor, C. L. Creasy, J. Chernoff, R. A. Cerione. 1995. Identification of a murine p21 Cdc42/Rac activated protein kinase (Pak). J. Biol. Chem. 270:22731.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Van Eyk, J. E., D. K. Arrell, D. B. Foster, J. D. Strauss, T. Y. K. Heinonen, E. Furmaniak-Kazmierczak, G. P. Cote, A. S. Mak. 1998. Different molecular mechanisms for Rho family GTPase-dependent, Ca2+-independent contraction of smooth muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 273:23433.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Ambach, A., J. Saunus, M. Knostandin, S. Wesselborg, S. C. Meuer, Y. Samstag. 2000. The serine phosphatases PP1 and PP2A associate with and activate the actin-binding protein cofilin in human T lymphocytes. Eur. J. Immunol. 30:3422.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Cohen, P., S. Klumpp, D. L. Schelling. 1989. An improved procedure for identifying and quantitating protein phosphatases in mammalian tissues. FEBS Lett. 25:596.
    OpenUrl
  36. ↵
    Tan, K. M. L., S.-L. Chan, K. O. Tan, V. C. Yu. 2001. The Caenorhabditis elegans sex-determining protein FEM-2 and its human homologue, hFEM-2, are Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase phosphatases that promote apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 276:44193.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Ishihara, H., B. L. Martin, D. L. Brautigan, H. Karaki, H. Ozaki, Y. Kato, Y. Fusetani, S. Watanabe, K. Hashimoto, D. Vemura, D. J. Hartshorne. 1990. Calyculin A and okadaic acid inhibitors of protein phosphatase activity. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 159:871.
    OpenUrl
  38. ↵
    Liu, J., M. W. Albers, T. J. Wandless, S. Luan, D. G. Alberg, P. J. Belshaw, P. Cohen, C. MacKintosh, C. B. Klee, S. L. Schreiber. 1992. Inhibition of T cell signaling by immunophilin-ligand complexes correlates with loss of calcineurin phosphatase activity. Biochemistry 31:3896.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  39. ↵
    Ishida, A., I. Kameshita, H. Fujisawa. 1998. A novel protein phosphatase that dephosphorylates and regulates a Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II. J. Biol. Chem. 273:1904.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Bernard, V., B. P. Bohl, G. M. Bokoch. 1999. Characterization of Rac and Cdc42 activation in chemoattractant-stimulated human neutrophils utilizing a novel assay for active GTPases. J. Biol. Chem. 274:13198.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Almkvist, J., C. Dahlgren, H. Leffler, A. Karlsson. 2002. Activation of the neutrophil nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase by galectin-1. J. Immunol. 168:4034.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Feng, Q., J. G. Albeck, R. A. Cerione, Y. Wang. 2002. Regulation of Cool/PIX proteins: key binding partners of the Cdc42/Rac targets, the p21-activated kinases. J. Biol. Chem. 277:5644.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Koh, C.-G., E. Manser, Z.-S. Zhao, C.-P. Ng, L. Lim. 2001. β1PIX, the Pak-interacting exchange factor, requires localization via a coiled-coil region to promote microvillus-like structures and membrane ruffles. J. Cell Sci. 114:4239.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Synderman, R., M. C. Pike. 1989. Chemoattractant receptors on phagocytic cells. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2:257.
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 171 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 171, Issue 7
1 Oct 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
p21-Activated Kinase 2 in Neutrophils Can Be Regulated by Phosphorylation at Multiple Sites and by a Variety of Protein Phosphatases
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
p21-Activated Kinase 2 in Neutrophils Can Be Regulated by Phosphorylation at Multiple Sites and by a Variety of Protein Phosphatases
Qian Zhan, Qingyuan Ge, Taisuke Ohira, Thomas Van Dyke, John A. Badwey
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2003, 171 (7) 3785-3793; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3785

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
p21-Activated Kinase 2 in Neutrophils Can Be Regulated by Phosphorylation at Multiple Sites and by a Variety of Protein Phosphatases
Qian Zhan, Qingyuan Ge, Taisuke Ohira, Thomas Van Dyke, John A. Badwey
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2003, 171 (7) 3785-3793; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.7.3785
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung dysfunction in a mouse model of inflammation is dependent on T-cell-independent IL-13 expression (54.18)
  • TSG-6, a new protein ligand for CXCL8, modulates the activity of this pro-inflammatory chemokine (54.12)
  • Anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial effect of polyacetylene compound from Cirsium japonicum var. ussuriense (54.19)
Show more INFLAMMATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606