Either of the CD45RB and CD45RO Isoforms Are Effective in Restoring T Cell, But Not B Cell, Development and Function in CD45-Null Mice
Sarah Ogilvy, Christine Louis-Dit-Sully, Joanne Cooper, Robin L. Cassady, Denis R. Alexander and Nick Holmes
J Immunol August 15, 2003, 171 (4) 1792-1800; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.171.4.1792
Sarah Ogilvy
*Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signaling and Development, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and
Christine Louis-Dit-Sully
† Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
Joanne Cooper
*Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signaling and Development, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and
Robin L. Cassady
*Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signaling and Development, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and
Denis R. Alexander
*Laboratory of Lymphocyte Signaling and Development, The Babraham Institute, Babraham, Cambridge, United Kingdom; and
Nick Holmes
† Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
In this issue
Either of the CD45RB and CD45RO Isoforms Are Effective in Restoring T Cell, But Not B Cell, Development and Function in CD45-Null Mice
Sarah Ogilvy, Christine Louis-Dit-Sully, Joanne Cooper, Robin L. Cassady, Denis R. Alexander, Nick Holmes
The Journal of Immunology August 15, 2003, 171 (4) 1792-1800; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.4.1792
Either of the CD45RB and CD45RO Isoforms Are Effective in Restoring T Cell, But Not B Cell, Development and Function in CD45-Null Mice
Sarah Ogilvy, Christine Louis-Dit-Sully, Joanne Cooper, Robin L. Cassady, Denis R. Alexander, Nick Holmes
The Journal of Immunology August 15, 2003, 171 (4) 1792-1800; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.171.4.1792