Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Requirement of Species-Specific Interactions for the Activation of Human γδ T Cells by Pamidronate

Yu Kato, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Hidenori Tanaka, Seiji Yamashita and Nagahiro Minato
J Immunol April 1, 2003, 170 (7) 3608-3613; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3608
Yu Kato
*Department of Immunology and Cell Biology,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Yoshimasa Tanaka
*Department of Immunology and Cell Biology,
‡PRESTO, JST, Kyoto, Japan
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hidenori Tanaka
†Graduate Schools of Biostudies and Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Seiji Yamashita
*Department of Immunology and Cell Biology,
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nagahiro Minato
*Department of Immunology and Cell Biology,
†Graduate Schools of Biostudies and Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Human γδ T cells bearing Vγ2Vδ2-TCR recognize various kinds of small nonpeptide Ags, and activation of them by a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate Ag, pamidronate, requires Ag presentation by cells other than γδ T cells, including many human tumor cells. Present results demonstrated that tumor cell lines of nonhuman origins pulsed with pamidronate failed to activate human γδ T cells without exception, whereas most if not all human tumor cell lines could do so. γδ T cells formed stable conjugates with pamidronate-pulsed human tumor cells and both conjugate formation and γδ T cell activation were inhibited significantly by anti-LFA-1 mAb, suggesting the requirement of LFA-1-mediated interaction with APC for efficient γδ T cell activation. Consistently, ICAM-1low tumor cell lines pulsed with pamidronate induced no or only weak activation of γδ T cells, whereas similarly treated ICAM-1high cell lines could activate them. One of the two ICAM-1low tumor cell lines pulsed with pamidronate induced strong γδ T cell activation after ICAM-1 gene transfer. However, another ICAM-1low human cell line as well as murine tumor cell lines pulsed with pamidronate remained totally defective in γδ T cell activation even after expression of human ICAM-1. These results suggested that activation of human γδ T cells by nonpeptide Ags required species-specific interactions in addition to LFA-1/ICAM-1-mediated cell adhesion with APC.

Human γδ T cells bearing Vγ2Vδ2-γδ TCR, a predominant γδ T cell subset found in adult peripheral blood, specifically recognize various kinds of nonpeptide Ags (reviewed in Ref. 1), such as bacterial pyrophosphomonoesters (2, 3, 4, 5) and alkyl amines (6) as well as synthetic nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (7, 8, 9) in the Vγ2Vδ2- γδ TCR-dependent manner (2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11). However, it remains unknown how the γδ TCR recognizes such nonpeptide Ags of small molecular masses. We previously reported that the recognition was dependent on the lysine residues encoded by a germline Jγ1.2 gene segment proximal to the junctional region (11) located in a putative Ag-binding pocket (12). These lysine residues are not conserved in other human nor murine Jγ segments, which may in part explain why recognition of these nonpeptide Ags is a unique feature of human Vγ2Jγ1.2Vδ2- γδ T cells. Among nonpeptide Ags, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates such as pamidronate were rather unique, in that activation of the primary γδ T cells required the presence of monocytes (9). Furthermore, many if not all human tumor cell lines prepulsed with pamidronate could efficiently activate human γδ T cells, whereas no TCR-dependent recognition was observed in mock-treated tumor cells (13). These results strongly suggested that pamidronate had to be “presented” by selected cells other than γδ T cells per se for effective γδ T cell activation.

In the present study, we show that the optimal activation of γδ T cells by pamidronate-pulsed human tumor cells was dependent on the stable cell adhesion mediated by LFA-1 expressed on γδ T cells and ICAM-1 on the Ag-pulsed tumor cells. Although human tumor cell lines with high ICAM-1 expression (ICAM-1high) could efficiently present pamidronate to γδ T cells, a minor population with little or no expression of ICAMs (ICAM-1low) as well as any of the tumor cell lines of nonhuman origins pulsed with pamidronate failed to activate human γδ T cells. Human ICAM-1 expression by cDNA transfer could confer the strong γδ T cell-activating capacity in one ICAM-1low human tumor cell line. However, no such induction was observed in another ICAM-1low human tumor as well as mouse tumor cell lines, suggesting the requirement of additional species-specific interaction(s) with Ag-presenting tumor cells for the effective activation of γδ T cells by a nonpeptide Ag, pamidronate. These results argue for the presence of a specific mechanism for nonpeptide Ag presentation to human γδ T cells, complementing that for αβ T cell activation by peptide Ags.

Materials and Methods

Nonpeptide Ags

Monoethyl pyrophosphate was synthesized as described previously (4) and pamidronate was purchased from Novartis Pharma (Nuernberg, Germany).

Human γδ T cells

PBMC were separated from healthy volunteers’ blood using Ficoll-Paque (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) and stimulated with 0.2 mM monoethyl pyrophosphate in Yssel’s medium supplemented with 2.5% human serum albumin for 2 days. The cells were further cultured in Yssel’s medium containing 10% human AB sera and IL-2 (100 U/ml) for 14 days. The proportions of Vγ2Vδ2-bearing γδ T cells in such populations were consistently 95% or more in CD3-positive cells and were used as polyclonal γδ T cell lines in the present study.

Tumor cell lines and pulsing with nonpeptide Ag

Tumor cell lines of human and nonhuman origins were supplied from Human Science Research Resource Bank (Osaka, Japan) and cultured according to the original instructions. To pulse the tumor cells with pamidronate, 1.0 × 106 tumor cells were incubated with 0.1 mM pamidronate for 2 h at 37°C and washed extensively with RPMI 1640 containing 10% FCS before use.

Flow cytometry and mAbs

Single- and two-color flow cytometric analyses were conducted using FACScan (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA) as described previously (13). mAbs used in the present study were anti-TCR δ2 (Immunotech, Marseille, France), anti-IFN-γ (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA), anti-ICAM-1, -2, and -3 (BD PharMingen), anti-LFA-1 (TS1/22), and anti-LFA-1 specific for an activated form (NKI-L16), kindly provided by Dr. T. Kinashi (Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan).

Proliferation assay

Human γδ T cells were cocultured at 1.0 × 105/well with varying numbers (1.2 × 103–2.0 × 105) of mitomycin C (100 μg/ml)-treated tumor cells at 37°C for 36 h and pulsed with [3H]thymidine (2 μCi) for 12 h, and radioactivity incorporated in DNA was counted by a MicroBeta scintillation counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences, Norwalk, CT).

Cytotoxicity assay

Tumor cells (1.0 × 106) pretreated with 0.1 mM pamidronate were labeled with 100 μCi of [51Cr]sodium chromate for 1 h at 37°C. Varying numbers of human γδ T cells (0.625 × 104–4.0 × 105) were cocultured with 1.0 × 104 tumor cells for 5 h, and 51Cr release was counted by a gamma counter (PerkinElmer Life Sciences).

Intracellular IFN-γ staining

Human γδ T cells (5.0 × 105/well) were cocultured with pamidronate-pulsed tumor cells (5.0 × 105/well) at 37°C. After 2 h, brefeldin A (10 μg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) was added in the culture and the cells were incubated for another 2 h. The cells were then washed and stained with FITC-conjugated anti-TCR-Vδ2 mAb on ice for 20 min. The cells were washed twice, fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde, permeabilized with 0.5% saponin, and stained with PE-conjugated anti-IFN-γ mAb for 20 min. After washing three times, the cells were analyzed using FACScan (BD Biosciences).

Conjugation assay

Tumor cells were stained with PKH26 (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) at room temperature for 5 min and human γδ T cells were stained with CFSE (Molecular Probes) at 37°C for 15 min. After washing, the labeled γδ T cells and tumor cells were incubated for varying periods and were two-color analyzed after gentle vortexing using FACScan.

Human ICAM-1 cDNA transfection

A full-length human (h)3 ICAM-1 cDNA was kindly provided by Dr. O. Takashi (Daiichi Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan). Tumor cell lines were transfected with hICAM-1 cDNA constructed in a pEF-BOS expression vector, kindly provided by Dr. S. Nagata (Osaka University, Suita, Osaka, Japan), by electroporation using ECM830 (BTX). The cells were cultured in the medium containing 1 mg/ml G418 (Nacalaitescque, Osaka, Japan) and screened for the expression using anti-ICAM-1 mAb to establish stable clones highly expressing hICAM-1.

Results

Pamidronate-pulsed tumor cells derived from nonhuman species fail to activate human γδ T cells

Most human tumor cell lines from various tissues pulsed with pamidronate for 2 h activated human γδ T cells in terms of IFN-γ production, proliferation, and specific cytotoxicity to varying degrees, while a minor population failed to do so, with representative data being shown in Table I⇓. Without Ag pulsing, none of them could induce IFN-γ production or specific proliferation. In contrast, tumor cell lines from nonhuman species similarly pulsed with pamidronate at any doses totally failed to activate human γδ T cells (Table I⇓). As summarized in Table II⇓, none of the 33 tumor cell lines pulsed with pamidronate from 12 different species other than human could activate human γδ T cells, whereas a significant level of IFN-γ was observed in human γδ T cells in response to 21of 26 human tumor cell lines pulsed with pamidronate. An effective Ag-pulsing effect was detected by the incubation with pamidronate for as little as 2 h. After the pulsing with 0.1 mM pamidronate for 2 h, no significant toxic effect was observed as judged by propidium iodide staining in both human and nonhuman tumor cell lines (data not shown), excluding a possibility that the different “pulsing effect” reflected differential sensitivity of each cell line to the toxic metabolic effects by pamidronate. The results strongly suggested that effective presentation of pamidronate to human γδ T cells by tumor cells required species-specific cellular interactions.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Stimulation of human γδ T cells by pamidronate-pulsed tumor cell lines derived from human and other animal speciesa

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

Summary of the human Vγ2Vδ2 γδ T cell activation by pamidronate-pulsed tumor cell lines originated from human and other animal speciesa

Requirement of LFA-1/ICAM-1-mediated adhesive interaction for effective activation of human γδ T cells by pamidronate-pulsed human tumor cells

We previously reported that pamidronate specifically induced the clustering between human γδ T cells and accessory monocytes, suggesting the requirement of direct cellular adhesion for effective γδ T cell activation (9). As indicated in Fig. 1⇓A, both primary and activated human γδ T cells highly expressed LFA-1 in an active form. On the other hand, human tumor cell lines, which could efficiently present pamidronate to γδ T cells, expressed ICAM-1, with representative examples being indicated in Fig. 1⇓B. In contrast, a minor population of human tumor cell lines with no or only weak capacity to activate γδ T cells exhibited only marginal LFA-1 ligand expression including ICAM-1, -2, and -3 (Fig. 1⇓B). Although not shown, ICAM expression levels on tumor cells were not affected by pamidronate-pulsing. γδ T cells and ICAM-1high EJ-1 tumor cells either mock treated or pulsed with pamidronate formed significant cellular conjugates by 30 min after the mixture (Fig. 2⇓A). The conjugate formation with untreated EJ-1 cells was only transient and dissolved nearly to the background level in 2 h. On the other hand, the cellular conjugates between γδ T cells and pamidronate-pulsed EJ-1 cells lasted stably at least for 2 h (Fig. 2⇓A). Inclusion of a blocking anti-LFA-1 mAb in the cocultures of γδ T cells and pamidronate-pulsed EJ-1 cells significantly inhibited the conjugate formation and subsequent IFN-γ production as well (Fig. 2⇓B). These results strongly suggested that LFA-1/ICAM-1-mediated adhesive interaction with pamidronate-pulsed human tumor cells was one of the requirements for effective activation of γδ T cells.

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Expression of LFA-1 on human γδ T cells and ICAMs on human tumor cell lines. A, Two-color staining of freshly isolated normal PBMC with anti-TCR Vδ2 and anti-LFA-1 mAb (upper) or NKI-L16 mAb specific for an activated form of LFA-1 (lower). B, Staining of representative human tumor cell lines capable of strongly activating human γδ T cells with pamidronate (EJ-1, VMRC-RCW, and K562) and those with poor or no activity to stimulate γδ T cells (LK-2 and MKN45) with anti-ICAM-1, -2, and -3 (bold lines). Fine lines indicate control staining.

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

LFA-1-dependent conjugate formation between human γδ T cells and pamidronate-pulsed EJ-1 tumor cells and γδ T cell activation. A, CFSE-labeled γδ T cells and PKH26-labeled EJ-1 tumor cells either unpulsed (○) or pulsed with 0.1 mM pamidronate (•) were mixed at 37°C for indicated periods and were two-color analyzed by FACScan. Percent conjugated cells represent the percentage of double-positive γδ T cells divided by total γδ T cells. A bar indicates background value of the mixture with no prior incubation. B, Similarly labeled γδ T cells and EJ-1 tumor cells pulsed with 0.1 mM pamidronate were incubated at 37°C for 2 h in the absence (□) or presence (▪) of anti-LFA-1 Ab (40 μg/ml), and percent conjugated cells were determined as above. A bar indicates background value of the mixture with no prior incubation. The experiments were repeated twice with identical results. C, γδ T cells and EJ-1 tumor cells mock treated (left) or pulsed with 0.1 mM pamidronate were incubated at 37°C for 2 h in the absence (middle) or presence (right) of anti-LFA-1 Ab (40 μg/ml), and IFN-γ-producing cells were determined by two-color staining. Proportions of IFN-γ-producing γδ T cells are indicated.

LFA-1/ICAM-mediated adhesive interaction is necessary but not sufficient for γδ T cell activation by pamidronate-pulsed human tumor cells

These results raised a possibility that failure of γδ T cell activation by a minor population of human tumor cell lines pulsed with pamidronate was due to the insufficient expression of ICAM-1 on the cell surface. To examine this, we transfected a human ICAM-1 cDNA into ICAM-1low LK-2 and MKN45 cells, which induced only weak or no detectable activation in γδ T cells (see Fig. 1⇑B and Table I⇑), and established ICAM-1high clones (Fig. 3⇓Aa). A pamidronate-pulsed ICAM-1high LK-2 clone induced a much stronger activation of γδ T cells than wild-type cells in terms of both IFN-γ production and specific proliferation (Fig. 3⇓A, b-d). The results confirmed that inefficient activation of γδ T cells by pamidronate-pulsed LK-2 tumor cells was primarily due to the low expression of ICAM-1. In quite a contrast, an ICAM-1high MKN45 clone pulsed with pamidronate remained defective in activating γδ T cells (Fig. 3⇓B). Essentially the same results were obtained by using other independent ICAM-1high MKN45 clones. Thus, it was suggested that LFA-1/ICAM-mediated interaction was required but not sufficient for the effective activation of human γδ T cells by tumor cells pulsed with pamidronate.

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Effect of ICAM-1 cDNA transfection into the ICAM-1low human tumor cell lines on the capacity to activate γδ T cells upon treatment with pamidronate. LK-2 (A) and MKN45 (B) tumor cell lines were transfected with ICAM-1 cDNA and analyzed for ICAM-1 expression (a). Dotted lines, control; solid lines, wild-type tumor cells stained with anti-ICAM-1; and bold line, transfected clones stained with anti-ICAM-1 mAb. Human γδ T cells were incubated with the transfectants mock treated (b) or pulsed with 0.1 mM pamidronate (c) for 4 h, and IFN-γ-producing cells were determined. Human γδ T cells (105 cells/well) were cocultured with varying numbers of wild-type tumor cells (○) or ICAM-1 transfectants (•) pulsed with 0.1 mM pamidronate for 2 days, and the proliferation was assessed. The means and SE of triplicate cultures are indicated.

Expression of human ICAM-1 does not confer the capacity of activating human γδ T cells to murine tumor cell lines

We finally examined the effect of human ICAM-1 expression on murine tumor cell lines. A mouse B16 melanoma clone transfected with human ICAM-1 cDNA (hICAM-1high B16) expressed a high level of human ICAM-1 comparable to that of EJ-1 human tumor cells (Fig. 4⇓A). However, hICAM-1high B16 cells pulsed with pamidronate failed to activate human γδ T cells with respect to either IFN-γ production or specific proliferation (Fig. 4⇓, B and C). In addition, human ICAM-1high B16 cells pulsed with pamidronate remained totally resistant to cytotoxicity elicited by human γδ T cells (data not shown). Identical results were obtained using hICAM-1high P3U1 mouse myeloma clones (data not shown). These results strongly suggested that the lack of human γδ T cell activation by pamidronate-pulsed tumor cells of nonhuman origins was not only due to the defective LFA-1/ICAM-1-mediated interaction with human γδ T cells, but also to the absence of additional human-specific element(s) for the effective activation.

           FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Effect of human ICAM-1 cDNA transfection into a mouse tumor cell line on the activation of human γδ T cells by the treatment with pamidronate. The murine B16 melanoma cell line was transfected with human ICAM-1 cDNA. A, Expression of human ICAM-1. Dotted lines, control; solid lines, wild-type tumor cells stained with anti-hICAM-1; and bold line, transfected clone stained with anti-hICAM-1. B, Human γδ T cells were incubated with transfectants untreated (left) or pulsed with 0.1 mM pamidronate (right) for 4 h, and IFN-γ-producing cells were determined. C, Human γδ T cells (105 cells/well) were cocultured with varying numbers of the wild-type tumor cells (○) or ICAM-1 transfectants (•) pulsed with 0.1 mM pamidronate for 2 days, and the proliferation was assayed.

Discussion

Human γδ T cells bearing Vγ2Jγ1.2Vδ2-TCR recognize several kinds of small nonpeptide Ags with distinct chemical features (1, 10), but the exact mode of Ag recognition remains unknown. Previous reports indicated that homologous aggregation among γδ T cells was required for their activation by some of the nonpeptide Ags (14). More recently, it was reported also that human γδ T cells formed stable conjugation with the susceptible tumor target cells with synaptic molecular transfer resembling immunological synapse between αβ T cells and specific APC (15). Although these results implied that cell-associated presentation of nonpeptide Ags might be required for γδ T cell activation, detailed analysis was hampered by the fact that most of the nonpeptide Ags could efficiently activate γδ T cells even in the absence of other specific cells (14). In this aspect, we indicated that the primary human γδ T cells failed to respond to soluble pamidronate, but recognized the compound in the presence of accessory monocytes (9). In addition, we also showed that many human tumor cells prepulsed with pamidronate could efficiently activate γδ T cells (13). Such a requirement of Ag presentation was a common feature of all of the antigenic nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate molecules (S. Kita, Y. Tanaka, and N. Minato, unpublished observation), which might provide an ideal system for detailed analysis of γδ T cell activation by nonpeptide Ags.

The present results indicated that the majority of pamidronate-pulsed human tumor cell lines of varying tissue origins (21of 26 lines) activated γδ T cells, whereas none of the tumor cell lines of nonhuman origins could activate human γδ T cells (0 of 33 lines). After the pulsing procedure, no significant toxicity was detected in all of the tumor cell lines of both human and nonhuman origins as judged by propidium iodide staining. Thus, it was unlikely that γδ T cells were activated simply by pamidronate nonspecifically bound to the target tumor cells. Incidentally, the present results also suggested that most human Vγ2Vδ2 γδ T cells could not recognize xenogeneic MHC Ags, while human αβ T cells were shown to recognize xenogenic MHC Ags directly and exhibit comparable levels of responses to allogeneic cells (16).

Human γδ T cells highly expressed LFA-1 molecules on their cell surface, and ICAM-1 was detected on most of the human tumor cell lines that could present pamidronate. Then, γδ T cells formed tight conjugates with the pamidronate-pulsed tumor cells. Inclusion of a blocking anti-LFA-1 mAb in the cocultures significantly inhibited the conjugate formation, resulting in the inhibition of IFN-γ production by γδ T cells. The results suggested that LFA-1/ICAM-1-mediated adhesive interaction was required for effective γδ T cell activation. Consistently, ICAM-1low LK-2 lung tumor cell line gained a strong capacity of activating γδ T cells by ICAM-1 cDNA transfection upon pretreatment with pamidronate. Although cell clusters between γδ T cells and mock-treated tumor cells were only transient, γδ T cells formed stable conjugates with pamidronate-pulsed tumor cells, lasting for at least 2 h. In αβ T cells, it is indicated that LFA-1 is activated and reorganized to form stable immunological synapse with APC via “inside-out” signaling mediated by TCR (17, 18, 19, 20). In analogy, we speculate that the γδ TCR signaling via cell-associated pamidronate may induce reorganization of LFA-1 to form stable synapse with the Ag-presenting tumor cells.

The present results further indicated that the integrin-mediated interaction was not sufficient for pamidronate-pulsed tumor cells to activate human γδ T cells. Thus, a high level of ICAM-1 expression by cDNA transfection failed to confer the capacity of γδ T cell activation to the ICAM-1low MKN45 human tumor cell line. Furthermore, expression of human ICAM-1 in murine tumor cell lines could not induce the capacity to activate human γδ T cells at all. These results strongly suggested that additional specific interaction other than integrin-mediated adhesion was required for γδ T cell activation by pamidronate-pulsed tumor cells.

Although the exact nature of interaction between γδ T cells and pamidronate-presenting cells remains to be investigated, at least two possible models are considered, which are not exclusive to each other. First, although the γδ TCR may directly interact with the native nonpeptide Ags presented on the target cells, additional costimulatory signals via specific ligands may be needed for the efficient γδ TCR signaling like the B7 family molecules in the case of αβ T cell activation (21, 22). Although human γδ T cells express a significant level of CD28 (our unpublished data), few tumor cell lines exhibit B7-1 or B7-2 expression, and the candidate molecules remain to be identified. Alternatively, γδ TCR may recognize nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate Ags only in association with specific molecules on the Ag-presenting tumor cells. Our unpublished results indicated that, in addition to the Jγ1.2-encoded lysine residues (11), at least two more additional residues in the putative Ag-binding pocket in Vγ2Jγ1.2Vδ2 TCR were required for γδ T cell activation by diverse nonpeptide Ags (S. Yamashita, Y. Tanaka, and N. Minato, manuscript in preparation). Thus, it is possible that nonpeptide Ags along with specific Ag-presenting molecules optimally fit to the pocket via anchoring residues in much the same way as peptide Ags in complex with MHC molecules for αβ TCR. A number of previous studies provided no evidence for involvement of MHC in γδ T cell activation by nonpeptide Ags (14, 23, 24) and again the candidate molecules remain to be seen.

The present results strongly support the hypothesis that effective activation of human γδ T cells by nonpeptide Ags depends on the immunological synapse formation in which species-specific interactions take place. Nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate Ags are particularly intriguing, in that the vast majority of human tumor cells can efficiently present them to γδ T cells, resulting in the targeted lysis of tumor cells by γδ T cells. It is suggested that the putative molecules required for Ag presentation and effective γδ T cell activation are rather ubiquitously expressed on many human tumor cells. Molecular understanding of the interaction may provide a new clue for potential immunotherapy of human malignancy by targeting tumor cells with chemically defined nonpeptide Ags for γδ T cells.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Culture, Sports, and Technology, Japanese government.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Nagahiro Minato, Department of Immunology and Cell Biology, Graduate School of Biostudies, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-Cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8501, Japan. E-mail address: minato{at}imm.med.kyoto-u.ac.jp

  • ↵3 Abbreviation used in this paper: h, human.

  • Received November 25, 2002.
  • Accepted January 31, 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Hayday, A. C.. 2000. γδ cells: a right time and a right place for a conserved third way of protection. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 18: 975
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Tanaka, Y., S. Sano, E. Nieves, G. De Libero, D. Rosa, R. L. Modlin, M. B. Brenner, B. R. Bloom, C. T. Morita. 1994. Nonpeptide ligands for human γδ T cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 8175
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Constant, P., F. Davodeau, M. A. Peyrat, Y. Poquet, G. Puzo, M. Bonneville, J. J. Fournie. 1994. Stimulation of human γδ T cells by nonpeptidic mycobacterial ligands. Science 264: 267
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    Tanaka, Y., C. T. Morita, E. Nieves, M. B. Brenner, B. R. Bloom. 1995. Natural and synthetic non-peptide antigens recognized by human γδ T cells. Nature 375: 155
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Belmant, C., E. Espinosa, R. Poupot, M. A. Peyrat, M. Guiraud, Y. Poquet, M. Bonneville, J. J. Fournie. 1999. 3-Formyl-1-butyl pyrophosphate: a novel mycobacterial metabolite-activating human γδ T cells. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 32079
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Bukowski, J. F., C. T. Morita, M. B. Brenner. 1999. Human γδ T cells recognize alkylamines derived from microbes, edible plants, and tea: implications for innate immunity. Immunity 11: 57
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Kunzmann, V., E. Bauer, M. Wilhelm. 1999. γδ T-cell stimulation by pamidronate. N. Engl. J. Med. 340: 737
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Kunzmann, V., E. Bauer, J. Feurle, F. Weissinger, H. P. Tony, M. Wilhelm. 2000. Stimulation of γδ T cells by aminobisphosphonates and induction of antiplasma cell activity in multiple myeloma. Blood 96: 384
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Miyagawa, F., Y. Tanaka, S. Yamashita, N. Minato. 2001. Essential requirement of antigen presentation by monocyte lineage cells for the activation of primary human γδ T cells by aminobisphosphonate antigen. J. Immunol. 166: 5508
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Belmant, C., E. Espinosa, F. Halary, Y. Tang, M. A. Peyrat, H. Sicard, A. Kozikowski, R. Buelow, R. Poupot, M. Bonneville, J. J. Fournie. 2000. A chemical basis for selective recognition of nonpeptide antigens by human γδ T cells. FASEB J. 14: 1669
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Miyagawa, F., Y. Tanaka, S. Yamashita, B. Mikami, K. Danno, M. Uehara, N. Minato. 2001. Essential contribution of germline-encoded lysine residues in Jγ1.2 segment to the recognition of nonpeptide antigens by human γδ T cells. J. Immunol. 167: 6773
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Allison, T. J., C. C. Winter, J. J. Fournie, M. Bonneville, D. N. Garboczi. 2001. Structure of a human γδ T-cell antigen receptor. Nature 411: 820
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Kato, Y., Y. Tanaka, F. Miyagawa, S. Yamashita, N. Minato. 2001. Targeting of tumor cells for human γδ T cells by nonpeptide antigens. J. Immunol. 167: 5092
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Morita, C. T., E. M. Beckman, J. F. Bukowski, Y. Tanaka, H. Band, B. R. Bloom, D. E. Golan, M. B. Brenner. 1995. Direct presentation of nonpeptide prenyl pyrophosphate antigens to human γδ T cells. Immunity 3: 495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Espinosa, E., J. Tabiasco, D. Hudrisier, J. J. Fournie. 2002. Synaptic transfer by human γδ T cells stimulated with soluble or cellular antigens. J. Immunol. 168: 6336
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Yamada, K., D. H. Sachs, H. DerSimonian. 1995. Human anti-porcine xenogeneic T cell response: evidence for allelic specificity of mixed leukocyte reaction and for both direct and indirect pathways of recognition. J. Immunol. 155: 5249
    OpenUrlAbstract
  17. ↵
    Monks, C. R., B. A. Freiberg, H. Kupfer, N. Sciaky, A. Kupfer. 1998. Three-dimensional segregation of supramolecular activation clusters in T cells. Nature 395: 82
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Grakoui, A., S. K. Bromley, C. Sumen, M. M. Davis, A. S. Shaw, P. M. Allen, M. L. Dustin. 1999. The immunological synapse: a molecular machine controlling T cell activation. Science 285: 221
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Bromley, S. K., W. R. Burack, K. G. Johnson, K. Somersalo, T. N. Sims, C. Sumen, M. M. Davis, A. S. Shaw, P. M. Allen, M. L. Dustin. 2001. The immunological synapse. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 19: 375
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Katagiri, K., M. Hattori, N. Minato, T. Kinashi. 2002. Rap1 functions as a key regulator of T-cell and antigen-presenting cell interactions and modulates T-cell responses. Mol. Cell. Biol. 22: 1001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Carreno, B. M., M. Collins. 2002. The B7 family of ligands and its receptors: new pathways for costimulation and inhibition of immune responses. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20: 29
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Dustin, M. L., A. S. Shaw. 1999. Costimulation: building an immunological synapse. Science 283: 649
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Holoshitz, J., N. C. Romzek, Y. Jia, L. Wagner, L. M. Vila, S. J. Chen, J. M. Wilson, D. R. Karp. 1993. MHC-independent presentation of mycobacteria to human γδ T cells. Int. Immunol. 5: 1437
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Lang, F., M. A. Peyrat, P. Constant, F. Davodeau, J. David-Ameline, Y. Poquet, H. Vie, J. J. Fournie, M. Bonneville. 1995. Early activation of human Vγ9V δ 2 T cell broad cytotoxicity and TNF production by nonpeptidic mycobacterial ligands. J. Immunol. 154: 5986
    OpenUrlAbstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 170 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 170, Issue 7
1 Apr 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Requirement of Species-Specific Interactions for the Activation of Human γδ T Cells by Pamidronate
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Requirement of Species-Specific Interactions for the Activation of Human γδ T Cells by Pamidronate
Yu Kato, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Hidenori Tanaka, Seiji Yamashita, Nagahiro Minato
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2003, 170 (7) 3608-3613; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3608

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Requirement of Species-Specific Interactions for the Activation of Human γδ T Cells by Pamidronate
Yu Kato, Yoshimasa Tanaka, Hidenori Tanaka, Seiji Yamashita, Nagahiro Minato
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2003, 170 (7) 3608-3613; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3608
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606