Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: A Toll-Like Receptor 2 Polymorphism That Is Associated with Lepromatous Leprosy Is Unable to Mediate Mycobacterial Signaling

Pierre-Yves Bochud, Thomas R. Hawn and Alan Aderem
J Immunol April 1, 2003, 170 (7) 3451-3454; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3451
Pierre-Yves Bochud
*Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas R. Hawn
*Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103; and
†Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan Aderem
*Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98103; and
†Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are key mediators of the innate immune response to microbial pathogens. We investigated the role of TLRs in the recognition of Mycobacterium leprae and the significance of TLR2Arg677Trp, a recently discovered human polymorphism that is associated with lepromatous leprosy. In mice, TNF-α production in response to M. leprae was essentially absent in TLR2-deficient macrophages. Similarly, human TLR2 mediated M. leprae-dependent activation of NF-κB in transfected Chinese hamster ovary and human embryonic kidney 293 cells, with enhancement of this signaling in the presence of CD14. In contrast, activation of NF-κB by human TLR2Arg677Trp was abolished in response to M. leprae and Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The impaired function of this TLR2 variant provides a molecular mechanism for the poor cellular immune response associated with lepromatous leprosy and may have important implications for understanding the pathogenesis of other mycobacterial infections.

Toll-like-receptors (TLRs)3 mediate the innate immune recognition of microbial pathogens and shape development of the adaptive immune response (1, 2, 3, 4). Human (h)TLRs are type I transmembrane proteins with an extracellular leucine-rich repeat domain and an intracellular domain homologous to the IL-1R (Toll-IL receptor (TIR) domain) (5). Upon stimulation, the TIR domain binds to an adapter protein, MyD88, which in turn, through a series of intermediate molecules, causes nuclear translocation of NF-κB and activation of transcription of proinflammatory cytokines (6). These cytokines play an essential role in the host innate immune response and determine the activation of adaptive immune mechanisms.

TLRs confer specificity to the innate immune response through their extracellular domain. TLR4 is responsible for the recognition of LPS (7), and TLR5, for bacterial flagellin (8). TLR2 has been shown to mediate the innate immune response to ligands derived from a variety of pathogens, including Gram-positive bacteria, Mycoplasma, yeasts, and parasites (3, 6). In addition, both Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium stimulate cells through TLR2 (9, 10, 11). The importance of TLRs in human diseases has recently been shown in studies of polymorphisms in TLR4. Two missense mutations (Asp299Gly and Thr399Ile) affecting the extracellular domain of hTLR4 are associated with hyporesponsiveness to LPS (12) and an increased incidence of Gram-negative septic shock (13). A polymorphism situated in the TIR domain of hTLR2 (Arg753Gln) has been detected, although its clinical significance has not yet been elucidated (14).

Leprosy, or Hansen’s disease, is a chronic and debilitating disease that annually affects >700,000 new individuals as reported by the World Health Organization (15). Leprosy is characterized by a large spectrum of clinical manifestations that depend on the host cell-mediated immune response against the pathogen (16). At one pole of the disease, tuberculoid leprosy patients manifest a strong cellular immune response, resulting in few, localized, often self-healing paucibacillary lesions. At the opposite pole, lepromatous leprosy patients have a limited cellular immune response, leading to a disseminated disease, involving extended multibacillary lesions of the skin and nerves. The factors that influence which type of leprosy develops are not well understood. Yet, epidemiologic studies clearly indicate that susceptibility to leprosy has a significant genetic component (17). A recent study showed that a mutation in the intracellular domain of hTLR2 (Arg677Trp) is associated with lepromatous leprosy in a Korean population. The Arg677Trp hTLR2 mutation was found in 10 of 45 lepromatous leprosy patients (22%), whereas it was not observed in 41 tuberculoid leprosy patients nor in 45 healthy controls (18). Of note, the Arg residue at position 677, which is conserved among human and mouse TLRs (TLRs 1–9), is situated in close proximity to the locus corresponding to the dominant-negative mutations of the mouse TLR4 and TLR2 gene (Pro681His) (7, 19).

In this study, we investigated whether Mycobacterium leprae activates the innate immune system through TLR2 and whether the Arg677Trp single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) affects signaling. We demonstrate that TLR2 is necessary to mediate responsiveness to M. leprae. Furthermore, we show that the Arg677Trp mutation abrogates the ability of TLR2 to mediate a response to M. leprae as well as M. tuberculosis stimulation.

Materials and Methods

Cells and reagents

Human embryonic kidney (HEK)293 (ATCC no. CRL-1573; American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) and Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) K1 (ATCC no. CCL-61; American Type Culture Collection) cells were maintained at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator in DMEM (HEK) or Ham’s F12 medium (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) (CHO), both containing 10% heat-inactivated FCS, 1% l-glutamine, 100 IU/ml penicillin, and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Polymixin B was from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO).

Irradiated M. leprae, phenolic glycolipid-1 (PGL-1), and M. leprae SDS-soluble cell wall fraction components (MLcw) were provided by P. Brennan (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO) through the Leprosy Research Support contract (NO1-AI-55262; National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases). M. tuberculosis cell wall fraction components (MTBcw) were obtained from J. Belisle (Colorado State University) through the TB Research Materials and Vaccine Testing contract (NO1-AI-75320; National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases). LPS from Salmonella Minnessota R595 Re was obtained from List Biological Laboratories (Campbell, CA) and Saccharomyces cerevisiae particle zymosan from Molecular Probes (Eugene, OR). Bacterial flagellin was extracted from Salmonella typhimurium TH4778 (fliB−, fliC+) as previously described (8). Synthetic tripalmitoylated lipopeptide (Pam3CSK4) was from EMC Microcollections (Tuebingen, Germany) and peptidoglycan (Staphylococcus aureus) from Fluka (Buchs, Switzerland). Levels of contaminating LPS as determined by the chromogenic Limulus amebocyte lysate test (BioWhittaker) were 0.02, 0.007, 0.0005, and 0.0001 endotoxin U/ml, in wells incubated with zymosan, irradiated M. leprae, MTBcw, and MLcw, respectively. These values correspond to ∼2, 0.7, 0.05, and 0.01 pg/ml endotoxin, respectively. PGL-1 had no detectable endotoxin.

Bone marrow macrophages

The mutant mouse strains deficient in TLR2 and TLR4 have been described previously (20, 21). The TLR2-deficient mice were backcrossed two times with C57BL/6. The TLR4-deficient mice have been backcrossed six times with C57BL/6 mice and wild-type (WT) littermates were used as controls. Bone marrow-derived macrophages were obtained from femoral bone marrow cells that were cultured for 6–9 days in complete DMEM with 20% L929 fibroblast (ATCC no. CCL-1; American Type Culture Collection) conditioned medium. Subsequently, cells were plated in a 96-well dish at 2 × 104/well and stimulated for 24 h. The concentration of TNF-α in supernatant was determined by ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). The University of Washington’s Institutional Animal Care and Use approved all animal protocols.

DNA expression vectors

hTLR2 was amplified from THP1 cDNA (ATCC no. TIB-202; American Type Culture Collection) by using primers 5′-ATGCCACATACTTT GTGG-3′ and 5′-GGACTTTATCGCAGCTCTCAG-3′ and cloned into pEF6/V5-His-TOPO (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA). The TLR2 mutation described in Korean patients (Arg677Trp) (18) and the dominant-negative mutant (Pro681His) (19) were elaborated using Quick Change site-directed mutagenesis (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). The hTLR2 gene cloned into pEF6/V5-His-TOPO (WT) was amplified by PCR using primers 5′-AAGTTGTGTCTG CACAAGTGGGACTTCATTCC-3′ and 5′-GGAAGTTCAACACAGACGTGTTCACCCTGAAGTAA-3′ to generate the Arg677Trp mutant and primers 5′-GACTTCATCCATGGCAAGTGG-3′ and 5′-CGCCCTGAAGT AGGTACCGTTCACCTAG-3′ to generate the Pro681His mutant. DpnI digestion was used to remove methylated DNA before transformation into competent Escherichia coli. The template and both mutants were verified by full-gene sequencing. The CD14 and hTLR5 expression constructs have been described previously (8).

Luciferase assay

The day before transfection, CHO and HEK293 cells were plated in a 96-well dish at 2 × 104 or 6 × 104 per well, respectively. Transient transfection was performed using the Polyfect transfection reagent (Qiagen, Chatsworth, CA). Cells were transfected with 0.25–0.5 μg of endothelial leukocyte molecule-1 (ELAM-1) firefly luciferase construct, 0.025–0.05 μg of the thymidine kinase Renilla luciferase (pRL-TK) vector (Promega, Madison, WI), and 0.25–0.5 μg of the expression vector(s) per well. CHO cells were washed in PBS 2–3 h after transfection. Twenty hours after transfection, cells were stimulated for 4 h. The cells were lysed in passive lysis buffer and the luciferase activity was determined using the dual-luciferase reporter assay system (Promega).

Results

TLR2 mediates innate immune response to M. leprae

We examined the role of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5 in the inflammatory response to M. leprae. First, we analyzed the production of TNF-α in bone marrow macrophages from WT and TLR2- and TLR4-deficient mice upon M. leprae stimulation. Bone-marrow macrophages were cultured with irradiated M. leprae, MLcw, or LPS for 24 h, and the concentration of TNF-α was measured in the supernatant by ELISA. WT and TLR4-deficient macrophages produced similar amounts of TNF-α in response to MLcw and MTBcw. In TLR2-deficient macrophages, the level of TNF-α produced upon mycobacterial stimulation was dramatically reduced (M. leprae) or not detectable (MTBcw) (Fig. 1⇓A). WT and TLR2-deficient macrophages produced similar amounts of TNF-α in response to LPS, whereas TLR4-deficient macrophages produced no detectable TNF-α (20). As a control, assays were also performed with polymixin B (at 10 μg/ml) to inhibit any possible effect of LPS contamination. However, no differences were observed when polymixin B was present.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Innate immune recognition of dead M. leprae cells is mediated by TLR2, but not TLR4 or TLR5. A, Bone marrow macrophages from WT and TLR2- and TLR4-deficient mice were cultured in the presence of irradiated M. leprae (ML; 80 μg/ml), MTBcw (1 μg/ml), and LPS (10 ng/ml) for 24 h. TNF-α production was measured by ELISA. The results are mean ± SD of triplicate wells and are representative of three different experiments. ND, Not detected. B, CHO cells were transiently transfected with a vector expressing hTLR5 or an empty vector (EF6), together with NF-κB reporter (ELAM-1 firefly luciferase) and transfection control (thymidine kinase Renilla luciferase). Cells were stimulated with irradiated M. leprae (80 μg/ml), MTBcw (1 μg/ml), and bacterial flagellin (FL; 5 ng/ml), and luciferase activity was measured with a luminometer. Firefly luciferase units were divided by Renilla units to obtain relative luciferase units (RLU). The results are mean ± SD of triplicate wells and are representative of four separate experiments.

The role of TLR5 in M. leprae-induced signaling was examined in transiently transfected CHO cells, a cell line that does not express functional endogenous TLR2 (22). CHO cells were transfected with a construct expressing hTLR5 together with an NF-κB reporter (ELAM-1), and a transfection control (pRL-TK). The cells were stimulated with irradiated M. leprae cells, MTBcw, and bacterial flagellin as a positive control (8). Expression of hTLR5 did not confer M. leprae nor MTBcw sensitivity (Fig. 1⇑A). As a control, flagellin responsiveness was detected in CHO cells transfected with hTLR5.

These data suggest that the innate immune recognition of irradiated M. leprae cells is mediated by TLR2, but not TLR4 or TLR5. To confirm the role for hTLR2 in M. leprae-induced signaling, we transiently transfected CHO cells with a construct expressing hTLR2, together with a luciferase reporter as described previously. The transfected cells were then stimulated with irradiated M. leprae cells, MLcw, or PGL-1, a specific M. leprae Ag that was recently reported to be directly involved in the neuropathogenesis of leprosy (23, 24). Expression of hTLR2 was sufficient to confer responsiveness to M. leprae and MLcw, but not to PGL-1 (Fig. 2⇓A). Because CD14 is required for the recognition of certain TLR2 ligands (25, 26, 27), we transfected HEK293 cells with hTLR2 together with a construct expressing CD14 as shown in Fig. 2⇓B. HEK293 cells were stimulated with MLcw, PGL-1, and yeast particles (zymosan). Expression of hTLR2 was sufficient to confer responsiveness to MLcw in HEK293 cells, and coexpression of CD14 together with hTLR2 facilitated this response. As a control, coexpression of CD14 was required to activate NF-κB production upon zymosan stimulation. Expression of hTLR2 with or without CD14 did not confer PGL-1 responsiveness.

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

Expression of hTLR2 is sufficient to mediate M. leprae and MLcw-induced NF-κB activation. A, CHO cells were transiently transfected with a vector expressing hTLR2 or an empty vector (EF6) as described in Fig. 1⇑B. Cells were stimulated with M. leprae (80 μg/ml), MLcw (1 μg/ml), and PGL-1 (1 μg/ml). The results expressed in RLU are mean ± SD of triplicate wells and are representative of four different experiments. B, HEK293 cells were transiently transfected as described in Fig. 2⇓. Expression of hTLR2 together with CD14 was compared with expression of hTLR2 alone. The total amount of DNA per well was normalized by addition of EF6. Cells were stimulated with MLcw (1 μg/ml), PGL-1 (1 μg/ml), and the yeast particle zymosan (ZYM, 400 ng/ml). The results are expressed in RLU and represent mean ± SD of triplicate wells. Similar results were obtained in three different experiments.

Polymorphism in hTLR2 affects the innate immune response to mycobacteria

To evaluate the relevance of the hTLR2 SNP described in Korean patients with lepromatous leprosy (Arg677Trp), we transfected HEK293 cells with constructs expressing WT and mutant (Arg677Trp) hTLR2. As a control, we used a construct expressing another hTLR2 mutant (Pro681His) analogous to a mouse TLR2 dominant-negative mutant (19). Transiently transfected HEK293 cells were stimulated with escalating doses of MTBcw (Fig. 3⇓A) and MLcw (Fig. 3⇓B). HEK293 cells transfected with WT hTLR2 induced NF-κB activation in a dose-dependent fashion in response to MLcw and MTBcw. In contrast, NF-κB activation was abolished in HEK293 cells transfected with the Korean (Arg677Trp) and dominant-negative (Pro681His) hTLR2 mutants. All the transfectants expressed equivalent amounts of V5 epitope-tagged hTLR2 as revealed on Western blot (Fig. 3⇓C). Transfection of CD14 together with hTLR2 Arg677Trp did not confer responsiveness to MLcw (Fig. 3⇓D). Of note, Arg677Trp and Pro681His hTLR2 mutants also failed to activate NF-κB in response to Pam3CSK4, peptidoglycan, and zymosan.

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Arg677Trp polymorphism in hTLR2 affects NF-κB activation in response to M. leprae and M. tuberculosis. HEK293 cells were transiently transfected with constructs expressing WT, mutant (Arg677Trp; Pro681His) hTLR2 (0.5 μg each), or an empty vector (EF6) together with an NF-κB reporter as described in Fig. 1⇑B. Cells were stimulated with escalating doses of MTBcw (A) and MLcw (B), as indicated. Results are expressed in RLU and represent mean ± SD of triplicate wells. Similar results have been observed in two separate experiments. C, Anti-V5 Western blot of the lysates shown in A and B. Equal volumes of lysate were loaded on a gel and blotted with anti-V5 Abs. D, HEK293 cells were transiently transfected as described in A and B. In addition, CD14 was added in each well. Cells were stimulated with Pam3CSK4 (PAM3; 400 ng/ml), zymosan (ZYM; 400 ng/ml), peptidoglycan (PGN; 50 μg/ml), and MLcw (1 μg/ml). Results, expressed in RLU, are mean ± SD of triplicate wells and are representative of three separate experiments.

Discussion

In this paper, we show that TLR2 plays an essential role in the innate immune response to M. leprae and that an hTLR2 polymorphism (Arg677Trp) that was associated with lepromatous leprosy in Korea is unable to respond to M. leprae stimulation.

The fact that TLR2 plays a central role of in the innate immune recognition of M. leprae and MLcw is not unexpected. TLR2 recognizes ligands derived from various infectious agents, including Gram-positive bacteria, yeasts, and parasites (reviewed in Refs. 3 and 6). Different mycobacterial products are recognized by TLR2, including the soluble tuberculosis factor (a short-term culture filtrate of M. tuberculosis containing phosphatidylinositolmannan) (28, 29), the 19-kDa protein (a secreted Ag of M. tuberculosis) (30, 31), and lipoarabinomannan purified from rapidly growing avirulent mycobacteria (9). Both live M. avium and live M. tuberculosis are known to activate innate immune cells through TLR2 (9, 10). Our data show that the cell surface molecule CD14 enhances but is not required to mediate M. leprae-induced NF-κB activation through TLR2. Similarly, CD14 has been shown to increase TLR2-mediated response to M. tuberculosis (19) and the 19-kDa protein by ∼2-fold (30).

We found that TLR4 is not necessary for the innate immune recognition of irradiated M. leprae. In contrast, live M. tuberculosis, but not live M. avium, uses both TLR4 and TLR2 (9). Recently, a study in C3HeJ mice suggested a protective role of TLR4 against chronic infection with M. tuberculosis in vivo (32). A role for TLR4 in the recognition of live M. leprae in vivo cannot be excluded by the current studies. Our findings show that TLR5 does not mediate M. leprae signaling. The only TLR5 ligand that has been identified so far is flagellin, the major component of bacterial flagella (8), a protein that is not known to be present in mycobacteria.

We found that the expression of the Arg677Trp variant of hTLR2, which was identified in Korean patients with lepromatous leprosy, was not able to mediate NF-κB activation in response to MLcw and MTBcw. This finding supports the epidemiologic data observed in Korea. Although the results from our reconstitution system show clear signaling differences between WT and mutant TLR2, it will be important to confirm these results in primary cells from individuals that carry the Arg677Trp polymorphism. Arg677Trp is the first TLR2 SNP that has been associated with a clinical disease that is unable to mediate signaling. This nonfunctional SNP variant highlights a possible role for the innate immune response in the pathogenesis of leprosy and other mycobacterial infections. Because the Arg677Trp mutation is situated in the intracellular signaling domain of hTLR2, it is not surprising that it also impairs the response to other TLR2 ligands, like Pam3CSK4, peptidoglycan, and zymosan. Thus, Arg677Trp mutation in hTLR2 may influence the innate immune response to other pathogens that are recognized by TLR2, and may have important implications for understanding the pathogenesis of a wide range of infections.

Acknowledgments

We thank Shizuo Akira (Osaka University, Osaka, Japan) for providing the TLR2- and TLR4-deficient mice. We are thankful to Thomas P. Gillis (Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA) and Patrick J. Brennan and John T. Belisle (Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO) for providing mycobacterial products.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grants AI25032 (to A.A.) and K08-AI49374 (to T.R.H.). A Postdoctoral Physician Fellowship from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute supported T.R.H. A grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation supported P.-Y.B. (81LA-65462).

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Alan Aderem, Institute for Systems Biology, 1441 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103-8904. E-mail address: aderem{at}systemsbiology.org

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: TLR, Toll-like receptor; TIR, Toll-IL receptor; h, human; SNP, single nucleotide polymorphism; HEK, human embryonic kidney; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; MLcw, Mycobacterium leprae cell wall fraction components; MTBcw, Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell wall fraction components; Pam3CSK4, synthetic tripalmitoylated lipopeptide; PGL-1, phenolic glycolipid-1; WT, wild type; ELAM-1, endothelial leukocyte molecule-1; RLU, relative luciferase unit.

  • Received December 2, 2002.
  • Accepted February 6, 2003.
  • Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Aderem, A., R. J. Ulevitch. 2000. Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune response. Nature 406: 782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Akira, S., K. Takeda, T. Kaisho. 2001. Toll-like receptors: critical proteins linking innate and acquired immunity. Nat. Immunol. 2: 675
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Janeway, C. A., Jr., R. Medzhitov. 2002. Innate immune recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20: 197
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Toshchakov, V., B. W. Jones, P. Y. Perera, K. Thomas, M. J. Cody, S. Zhang, B. R. Williams, J. Major, T. A. Hamilton, M. J. Fenton, S. N. Vogel. 2002. TLR4, but not TLR2, mediates IFN-β-induced STAT1α/β-dependent gene expression in macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 3: 392
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Bowie, A., L. A. O’Neill. 2000. The interleukin-1 receptor/Toll-like receptor superfamily: signal generators for pro-inflammatory interleukins and microbial products. J. Leukocyte Biol. 67: 508
    OpenUrlAbstract
  6. ↵
    Underhill, D. M., A. Ozinsky. 2002. Toll-like receptors: key mediators of microbe detection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 14: 103
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Poltorak, A., X. He, I. Smirnova, M. Y. Liu, C. V. Huffel, X. Du, D. Birdwell, E. Alejos, M. Silva, C. Galanos, et al 1998. Defective LPS signaling in C3H/HeJ and C57BL/10ScCr mice: mutations in Tlr4 gene. Science 282: 2085
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Hayashi, F., K. D. Smith, A. Ozinsky, T. R. Hawn, E. C. Yi, D. R. Goodlett, J. K. Eng, S. Akira, D. M. Underhill, A. Aderem. 2001. The innate immune response to bacterial flagellin is mediated by Toll-like receptor 5. Nature 410: 1099
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Means, T. K., S. Wang, E. Lien, A. Yoshimura, D. T. Golenbock, M. J. Fenton. 1999. Human Toll-like receptors mediate cellular activation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Immunol. 163: 3920
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Lien, E., T. J. Sellati, A. Yoshimura, T. H. Flo, G. Rawadi, R. W. Finberg, J. D. Carroll, T. Espevik, R. R. Ingalls, J. D. Radolf, D. T. Golenbock. 1999. Toll-like receptor 2 functions as a pattern recognition receptor for diverse bacterial products. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 33419
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Underhill, D. M., A. Ozinsky, K. D. Smith, A. Aderem. 1999. Toll-like receptor-2 mediates mycobacteria-induced proinflammatory signaling in macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 14459
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Arbour, N. C., E. Lorenz, B. C. Schutte, J. Zabner, J. N. Kline, M. Jones, K. Frees, J. L. Watt, D. A. Schwartz. 2000. TLR4 mutations are associated with endotoxin hyporesponsiveness in humans. Nat. Genet. 25: 187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Lorenz, E., J. P. Mira, K. L. Frees, D. A. Schwartz. 2002. Relevance of mutations in the TLR4 receptor in patients with gram-negative septic shock. Arch. Intern. Med. 162: 1028
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Lorenz, E., J. P. Mira, K. L. Cornish, N. C. Arbour, D. A. Schwartz. 2000. A novel polymorphism in the Toll-like receptor 2 gene and its potential association with staphylococcal infection. Infect. Immun. 68: 6398
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    World Health Organization. 2002. Leprosy: global situation. Wkly. Epidemiol. Rec. 77: 1
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Jacobson, R. R., J. L. Krahenbuhl. 1999. Leprosy. Lancet 353: 655
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Casanova, J. L., L. Abel. 2002. Genetic dissection of immunity to mycobacteria: the human model. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20: 581
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Kang, T. J., G. T. Chae. 2001. Detection of Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) mutation in the lepromatous leprosy patients. FEMS Immunol. Med. Microbiol. 31: 53
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Underhill, D. M., A. Ozinsky, A. M. Hajjar, A. Stevens, C. B. Wilson, M. Bassetti, A. Aderem. 1999. The Toll-like receptor 2 is recruited to macrophage phagosomes and discriminates between pathogens. Nature 401: 811
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Hoshino, K., O. Takeuchi, T. Kawai, H. Sanjo, T. Ogawa, Y. Takeda, K. Takeda, S. Akira. 1999. Cutting edge: Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide: evidence for TLR4 as the Lps gene product. J. Immunol. 162: 3749
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Takeuchi, O., K. Hoshino, T. Kawai, H. Sanjo, H. Takada, T. Ogawa, K. Takeda, S. Akira. 1999. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity 11: 443
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Heine, H., C. J. Kirschning, E. Lien, B. G. Monks, M. Rothe, D. T. Golenbock. 1999. Cutting edge: cells that carry a null allele for Toll-like receptor 2 are capable of responding to endotoxin. J. Immunol. 162: 6971
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Rambukkana, A., G. Zanazzi, N. Tapinos, J. L. Salzer. 2002. Contact-dependent demyelination by Mycobacterium leprae in the absence of immune cells. Science 296: 927
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Ng, V., G. Zanazzi, R. Timpl, J. F. Talts, J. L. Salzer, P. J. Brennan, A. Rambukkana. 2000. Role of the cell wall phenolic glycolipid-1 in the peripheral nerve predilection of Mycobacterium leprae. Cell 103: 511
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Hirschfeld, M., C. J. Kirschning, R. Schwandner, H. Wesche, J. H. Weis, R. M. Wooten, J. J. Weis. 1999. Cutting edge: inflammatory signaling by Borrelia burgdorferi lipoproteins is mediated by Toll-like receptor 2. J. Immunol. 163: 2382
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Schwandner, R., R. Dziarski, H. Wesche, M. Rothe, C. J. Kirschning. 1999. Peptidoglycan- and lipoteichoic acid-induced cell activation is mediated by Toll-like receptor 2. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 17406
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Yoshimura, A., E. Lien, R. R. Ingalls, E. Tuomanen, R. Dziarski, D. Golenbock. 1999. Cutting edge: recognition of Gram-positive bacterial cell wall components by the innate immune system occurs via Toll-like receptor 2. J. Immunol. 163: 1
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Jones, B. W., T. K. Means, K. A. Heldwein, M. A. Keen, P. J. Hill, J. T. Belisle, M. J. Fenton. 2001. Different Toll-like receptor agonists induce distinct macrophage responses. J. Leukocyte Biol. 69: 1036
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Bulut, Y., E. Faure, L. Thomas, O. Equils, M. Arditi. 2001. Cooperation of Toll-like receptor 2 and 6 for cellular activation by soluble tuberculosis factor and Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface protein A lipoprotein: role of Toll-interacting protein and IL-1 receptor signaling molecules in Toll-like receptor 2 signaling. J. Immunol. 167: 987
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Brightbill, H. D., D. H. Libraty, S. R. Krutzik, R. B. Yang, J. T. Belisle, J. R. Bleharski, M. Maitland, M. V. Norgard, S. E. Plevy, S. T. Smale, et al 1999. Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through Toll-like receptors. Science 285: 732
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Faure, E., O. Equils, P. A. Sieling, L. Thomas, F. X. Zhang, C. J. Kirschning, N. Polentarutti, M. Muzio, M. Arditi. 2000. Bacterial lipopolysaccharide activates NF-κB through Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR-4) in cultured human dermal endothelial cells: differential expression of TLR-4 and TLR-2 in endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 11058
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    Abel, B., N. Thieblemont, V. J. Quesniaux, N. Brown, J. Mpagi, K. Miyake, F. Bihl, B. Ryffel. 2002. Toll-like receptor 4 expression is required to control chronic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. J. Immunol. 169: 3155
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 170 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 170, Issue 7
1 Apr 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: A Toll-Like Receptor 2 Polymorphism That Is Associated with Lepromatous Leprosy Is Unable to Mediate Mycobacterial Signaling
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: A Toll-Like Receptor 2 Polymorphism That Is Associated with Lepromatous Leprosy Is Unable to Mediate Mycobacterial Signaling
Pierre-Yves Bochud, Thomas R. Hawn, Alan Aderem
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2003, 170 (7) 3451-3454; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3451

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: A Toll-Like Receptor 2 Polymorphism That Is Associated with Lepromatous Leprosy Is Unable to Mediate Mycobacterial Signaling
Pierre-Yves Bochud, Thomas R. Hawn, Alan Aderem
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2003, 170 (7) 3451-3454; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.7.3451
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: Hypoxia-Induced Ubc9 Promoter Hypermethylation Regulates IL-17 Expression in Ulcerative Colitis
  • Cutting Edge: Mouse SARS-CoV-2 Epitope Reveals Infection and Vaccine-Elicited CD8 T Cell Responses
  • Cutting Edge: Heterogeneity in Cell Age Contributes to Functional Diversity of NK Cells
Show more CUTTING EDGE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606