Abstract
H2-M3-restricted T cells respond more rapidly to primary Listeria monocytogenes infection than conventional MHC class Ia-restricted T cells. Reinfection with L. monocytogenes, while inducing explosive proliferation of H2-Kd-restricted T cells, does not stimulate significant expansion of H2-M3-restricted CTL. These disparate responses to reinfection are apparent within 5 days of primary L. monocytogenes infection. However, H2-M3-restricted memory T cells are generated, and are indistinguishable from classically restricted T cells in terms of cell surface memory markers and longevity. Early responses of H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted memory T cells to reinfection are similar, with increases in size and expression of activation markers. Interestingly, priming of H2-M3-restricted T cells with an L. monocytogenes-derived N-formyl peptide plus anti-CD40 generates memory T cells that expand upon re-exposure to Ag during L. monocytogenes infection. Our data indicate that disparate H2-M3- and MHC class Ia-restricted memory T cell responses reflect intrinsic differences between these T cell populations. Although distinct proliferative programs appear to be hardwired in these populations during primary L. monocytogenes infection, under different inflammatory circumstances M3-restricted T cell populations can maintain the ability to expand upon re-exposure to Ag.
Antigen-specific T cell responses following primary and secondary infections are quantitatively and qualitatively distinct (1, 2, 3). The frequency of pathogen-specific T cells after infection is higher than in naive individuals, a factor that probably contributes to the larger magnitude of memory responses. Qualitative differences between B cell responses to primary and secondary infection are well established (1, 4), and although the picture is somewhat less clear for T cells, there are similarities (1, 2, 3). T cells undergo in vivo selection with expansion of higher affinity clones upon re-exposure to Ag (5, 6, 7, 8), and memory T cells require lower concentrations of Ag (9) and less costimulation (10) than naive T cells for activation. Memory T cells proliferate earlier (11, 12, 13), divide faster (11), and acquire effector functions (13, 14, 15) more rapidly than naive T cells.
However, distinguishing between naive, effector, and memory T cells is an inexact science. Naive T cells are often distinguished from Ag-experienced cells by cell surface expression of activation markers; naive cells are CD44low/CD62Lhigh and become CD44high/CD62Llow upon activation. However, CD62L is often re-expressed on memory cells, especially in the CD8 lineage, and expression of CD44 is not always consistent among mouse strains (16), complicating the use of these markers. The RB isoform of CD45 has been used to distinguish naive (CD45RBhigh) from memory (CD45RBlow) cells, but it is not a reliable marker (2). Distinguishing memory from effector T cells can be even more difficult. Although CD25 (IL-2Rα) and CD69 are expressed on recently activated effector T cells, their expression is rapidly down-regulated during the terminal effector phase of the T cell response. The IL-2Rβ-chain (CD122), which is a component of the IL-2 and IL-15 receptors, is expressed on some memory T cells and binds IL-15, a crucial cytokine for memory CD8+ T cell maintenance (17, 18). In addition, expression of Ly-6C is low and heterogeneous on effector cells and high on memory T cells, providing a convenient marker to distinguish between these two populations (9, 19, 20, 21). Expression of these cell surface markers has been largely characterized on adoptively transferred transgenic T cells in C57BL/6 mice, and their utility for the analysis of complex memory T cell populations in infectious disease models and in other mouse strains has yet to be determined.
The rapid and dramatic expansion of H2-Kd (MHC class Ia)-restricted T cell populations in response to recall infection with Listeria monocytogenes is typical of immunological memory (22). In contrast, expansion of CTL populations restricted by the H2-M3 MHC class Ib molecule, which presents L. monocytogenes-derived N-formyl methionine peptides, is neither faster nor larger following recall Listeria infection than after primary infection (23). In this study, we show that the frequencies of H2-M3/fMIGWII(A) and H2-Kd/listeriolysin O (LLO)491–99 tetramer-positive memory cells are comparable following primary L. monocytogenes infection. To explain these disparate responses to reinfection, we tested two hypotheses: first, that inflammation and/or Ag presentation following reinfection do not provide adequate stimuli to drive H2-M3-restricted T cell expansion; and, second, that H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cells differ intrinsically in their responses to Ag re-exposure. We show that H2-M3-restricted T memory cells are generated, maintained, and do not differ from H2-Kd-restricted memory cells on the basis of cell surface phenotypic markers. Although H2-M3-restricted populations up-regulate expression of activation markers, they do not expand following reinfection with L. monocytogenes. Enhancing in vivo Ag exposure and inflammation did not enhance the expansion of H2-M3-restricted memory cells, arguing against the first hypothesis. Our results support the second hypothesis, suggesting that differences in memory T cell expansion are intrinsic to H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cell populations and reflect either differences in the naive T cell populations recognizing H2-M3 or H2-Kd or differences in the priming of T cells by these two MHC class I molecules.
Materials and Methods
Mice, bacteria, and inoculations
Female CB6/F1 and BALB/c mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). C57BL/6 Kd-transgenic mice were generated by injection of fertilized oocytes with a 20-kDa fragment of the genomic H2-Kd gene, which was kindly provided by Dr. F. Lemonnier (Pasteur Institute, Paris, France). L. monocytogenes strain 10403s was obtained from D. Portnoy (University of California, Berkeley, CA) and grown in brain heart infusion broth at 37°C, shaking, until growth was exponential (OD600 = 0.05–0.1). Titers were calculated based on the following ratio: OD600 of 0.1 = 2 × 108 L. monocytogenes. All infections were performed i.v. by tail vein injection in a volume of 200 μl of PBS. Doses of 2 × 103 or 1 × 105 L. monocytogenes were used for inoculation of mice for primary and recall infections, respectively; any variations in dose are noted in the figures.
For peptide immunization, syngeneic (CB6/F1) splenocytes were harvested as described below, irradiated (1000 rad), incubated with 2 × 10−6 M LLO91–99 and fMIGWII peptides for 2 h at 37°C, and washed twice. Approximately 3 × 107 peptide-coated splenocytes and 100 μg of anti-CD40 mAb (clone FGK45) were injected i.v. in a volume of 200 μl of PBS. For concurrent live infection and anti-CD40 mAb treatment, mice received 100 μg of Ab 48 and 24 h before infection, and a third dose at the time of infection.
Generation of tetramers
MHC class I tetramers were generated following the approach described previously (22, 23, 24). Modification of the murine H2-Kd cDNA to introduce a specific biotinylation site and the amplification of Kd and β2-microglobulin were described in Ref.22 . Modification of H2-M3 cDNA was described in Ref.23 . H2-M3 and Kd H chain and β2-microglobulin were expressed as recombinant proteins in Escherichia coli, purified from inclusion bodies, and refolded in the presence of ∼60 μg/ml LLO91–99 peptide (for H2-Kd) or fMIGWII(A) peptide (for H2-M3). H2-M3 tetramers generated with both the hexamer (fMIGWII) and the heptamer (fMIGWIIA) forms of the listerial LemA epitope specifically stain cells from Listeria-infected mice (25); in the experiments shown in this study, tetramers made with the two peptides were used interchangeably. Peptides were synthesized by Research Genetics (Huntsville, AL).
Enrichment, staining, and FACS analysis of CD8+ T cells
On the indicated day after infection, spleens were harvested, dissociated through wire mesh screens, and incubated for 5 min in ammonium chloride-Tris to lyse erythrocytes. Splenocytes were filtered through mesh before MACS sorting or FACS staining. Staining of splenocytes for FACS analysis was performed on either CD8+-enriched cells or whole splenocytes, as specified in the figures for specific experiments.
MACS (Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) was used to enrich splenocytes for CD8+ T cells by depletion. Cells were first incubated with Abs against CD4 (GK1.5), MHC class II (TIB120), and MAC-1 (TIB128) for 20 min on ice in separation buffer (PBS, 0.5% BSA, and 2 mM EDTA (pH 7.45)). After extensive washing, spleen cells were incubated with goat anti-rat IgG magnetic microbeads (Miltenyi Biotec) for 20 min at 4°C. Splenocytes were washed again, applied to a type LS column (Miltenyi Biotec), and separated using the MidiMACS (Miltenyi Biotec) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Before FACS staining, ∼3 × 105 enriched cells (per well in a 96-well plate) were blocked with unconjugated streptavidin (0.5 mg/ml; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) and Fc-block (BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) in staining buffer (SB; PBS, 0.5% BSA, and 0.02% sodium azide (pH 7.45)) for 20 min on ice. Splenocytes were then stained for 1 h on ice, covered, with anti-CD62L-FITC (clone MEL-14; BD PharMingen); anti-CD8α-CyChrome (clone 53-6.7; BD PharMingen); and PE-conjugated H2-M3/fMIGWII(A) or H2-Kd/LLO91–99 tetrameric complexes (0.25–0.5 mg/ml). After three washes in SB, cells were resuspended in SB (100 μl) and transferred to FACS tubes containing an equal volume of 2% paraformaldehyde/PBS (pH 7.45) (final 1% paraformaldehyde).
Staining of whole splenocytes (1 × 106/well) was performed as above, but different Abs were used. Following the blocking step, cells were stained on ice for 1 h with PE-conjugated tetramers, anti-CD8α-allophycocyanin (clone 53-6.7; BD PharMingen), and one of the following FITC-conjugated Abs specific for murine surface molecules (all from BD PharMingen): CD62L (clone MEL-14), CD44 (clone IM7), CD45RB (clone 16A), CD69 (clone H1.2F3), CD25 (IL-2Rα, clone 7D4), CD122 (IL-2Rβ, clone TM-β1), and Ly-6C (clone AL-21). Either propidium iodide (PI) or ethidium monoazide bromide (EMA; Molecular Probes) was added to stain dead cells (specified in the figures). When PI was used, splenocytes were resuspended in SB after the final wash, transferred to chilled FACS tubes, and kept on ice at 4°C (unfixed) until acquisition. Just before acquisition, an equal volume of 8 μg/ml PI (in SB, final 4 μg/ml) was added to the cells. When EMA was used, a concentration of 1.25 μg/ml (in SB; stock 2.5 mg/ml in dimethylformamide) was added to the buffer during the staining of the cells. For the last 10 min of the (1-h) incubation, the cells were exposed to light to cross-link DNA-bound EMA; unbound EMA was washed away in the three subsequent washes. After the final wash, the splenocytes were fixed as above.
All data were acquired using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer and analyzed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA).
Results
Activation and memory markers on H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cells are similar after primary Listeria infection
Immunological memory is generated after infection with most pathogens, resulting in faster and more effective immune responses when the same pathogen is re-encountered (1). In mice reinfected with L. monocytogenes, H2-Kd-restricted, Listeria-specific T cells respond more quickly and reach much higher frequencies than seen during primary infection (6, 22, 23, 24). In contrast, H2-M3-restricted T cell populations undergo only minimal expansion following a second exposure to Listeria (23, 26). To investigate the differences between MHC class Ia (H2-Kd)- and class Ib (H2-M3)-restricted memory responses, we performed phenotypic analyses of these populations following primary and secondary L. monocytogenes infection.
H2-M3/fMIGWII and H2-Kd/LLO91–99 tetramer-positive cells expressed similar activation and memory markers during primary and secondary L. monocytogenes infection. Seven days following primary infection, M3/fMIGWII and Kd/LLO91–99 tetramers stained ∼4% and 2.3% of CD8+ cells, respectively (Fig. 1⇓, left columns). Both populations were CD62Llow, CD44high, CD45high, CD69low, and CD25low 7 days postinfection and throughout the primary response (days 5, 7, 9, 11, 14, 17, and 21 postinfection). Differences in activation marker expression between the H2-Kd- and H2-M3-restricted populations were detected only for CD122 (IL-2Rβ) and Ly-6C. These differences most likely reflect the distinct kinetics of the T cell populations; on day 5 postinfection (not shown), H2-M3-restricted T cells resembled H2-Kd-restricted T cells that are present 7 days postinfection (Fig. 1⇓), with higher levels of CD122 and more heterogeneous expression of Ly-6C. By day 9 postinfection, LLO91–99-specific cells were CD122low and more uniformly high for Ly-6C (not shown).
Similar expression of T cell activation and memory markers by H2-M3-restricted and H2-Kd-restricted T cells following L. monocytogenes infection. CB6/F1 mice were infected with 2000 L. monocytogenes, and splenocytes were stained with mAb specific for CD8α and activation/memory markers, H2-M3/fMIGWII and H2-Kd/LLO91–99 tetramers, and EMA to exclude dead cells 7 (left columns) or 28 (right columns) days following infection. Activation/memory marker staining (specified to the right) is shown on the x-axis; tetramer staining (tetramer indicated at the top) is on the y-axis. Dot plots are gated on live CD8+ cells. Percentages in the upper right corners represent the percentage of activation/memory marker-positive cells among tetramer-staining cells. Three mice were analyzed each day, and data are shown for one representative animal.
Four weeks following primary L. monocytogenes infection, fMIGWII- and LLO91–99-specific T cell populations constituted ∼0.65% and 0.40% of CD8+ cells, respectively. Both populations had become more heterogeneous in expression of CD62L (Fig. 1⇑, right columns), confirming our previous finding that some LLO91–99-specific T cells re-express CD62L over time (22). Some heterogeneity in the expression of CD44, and particularly CD45RB, also developed 4 wk postinfection, although the majority of epitope-specific cells retained high levels of these markers. Some studies have indicated that memory cells are CD45RBlow; in our system, only a very small percentage of cells would fit that criterion. Finally, in contrast to the memory-like cells that undergo homeostatic expansion in “empty” mice and maintain uniformly high levels of CD122 (17, 20, 21), neither fMIGWII- nor LLO91–99-specific T cells expressed high levels of CD122 in the weeks following primary infection. No clear differences between the H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cell populations were detected, supporting the notion that H2-M3-restricted memory cells are generated and maintained following primary infection with L. monocytogenes.
Recall infection with L. monocytogenes activates H2-M3-restricted T cells
To further characterize the disparity between H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted memory T cells, we measured cell size and intensity of CD8α staining, as an indication of T cell activation, at early time points following reinfection. Changes in both parameters were very similar in the two populations (Fig. 2⇓). Both M3/fMIGWIIA and Kd/LLO91–99 tetramer-positive (and CD62Llow) T cell populations increase in size on day 3 postchallenge and return to a small size (equivalent to the tetramer-negative, CD62Lhigh population) by day 7. H2-M3-restricted CTL also appear to be activated on the basis of CD8 expression levels; the kinetics of CD8 up-regulation and subsequent down-regulation following secondary Listeria infection are nearly identical with those detected for the LLO91–99 peptide-specific population (Fig. 2⇓).
Similar changes in FSC and cell surface CD8α levels are detected for H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cell populations following L. monocytogenes challenge. CB6/F1 mice were immunized with 2000 L. monocytogenes and then, 48 days later, challenged with 1 × 105 bacteria; day 0 represents the memory population after 7 wk (not reinfected). Splenocytes were harvested on the indicated days (left), enriched for CD8+ cells, and stained with mAb specific for CD8α and CD62L and with H2-M3/fMIGWIIA or H2-Kd/LLO91–99 tetramers. After gating on CD8+ cells, M3/fMIGWIIA and Kd/LLO91–99 tetramer-positive and tetramer-negative cells (gates as indicated in dot plot at the top) from the same mice were analyzed by flow cytometry for FSC (left panels) and CD8α (right panels) levels. Each histogram is from one representative mouse (of three; two on day 0) per day.
M3/fMIGWII tetramer-positive T cells also express early activation markers following challenge with L. monocytogenes (Fig. 3⇓). One day following reinfection, fMIGWII- and LLO91–99-specific T cell populations constitute ∼0.5 and 0.3% of total CD8+ T cells, respectively, and significant percentages of both populations express CD69 (>60%) and, particularly for M3/fMIGWII-positive cells, CD25 (20–45%). During primary infection, populations of epitope-specific CTL expressing CD69 and CD25 are not detectable (data not shown) because of the low frequencies at early time points. Three days following reinfection, levels of CD122 are dramatically up-regulated, with 65% of fMIGWII- and nearly 80% of LLO91–99-specific CTL expressing the marker. However, CD122 levels decrease by day 5 postinfection and remain low at subsequent time points (data not shown). Expression of these activation markers is not detected on all tetramer-positive cells, which may reflect heterogeneity within the populations or, given the low frequency of memory T cells, the inadvertent inclusion of nonspecifically stained cells. Nevertheless, by size parameters, modulation of CD8 levels, and expression of early activation markers, the activation states of H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted CTL are indistinguishable at early time points following reinfection.
Up-regulation of early activation markers on H2-M3-restricted T cells following L. monocytogenes reinfection. Four weeks following primary L. monocytogenes infection, CB6/F1 mice were reinfected with 1 × 105 bacteria. Splenocytes were harvested 1 (left columns) and 3 (right columns) days postchallenge and stained as described in Fig. 1⇑. Dot plots are gated on live CD8+ T cells, with staining for activation/memory markers (listed to the right) on the x-axis and tetramer staining on the y-axis. The tetramer used (H2-M3/fMIGWII or H2-Kd/LLO91–99) is specified above each column. The percentage of tetramer-staining cells positive for each activation marker is shown. Three mice were analyzed per day, and representative data for one individual are shown.
Extended exposure to L. monocytogenes during secondary infection does not increase the expansion of H2-M3-restricted T cells
We next considered the possibility that the amount of N-formyl peptide present during secondary infection, although sufficient to induce activation, is not enough to result in dramatic proliferation of H2-M3-restricted T cells. Although immune mice are typically challenged with doses of L. monocytogenes 50-fold larger than the primary inoculum, bacteria are cleared much more quickly (27). To extend secondary infection and increase the duration of in vivo Ag presentation, immune mice were repeatedly infected with high doses of L. monocytogenes (Fig. 4⇓). Infection with 1 × 106 L. monocytogenes for 2 (Fig. 4⇓, middle column) or 3 (right column) consecutive days did not increase expansion of H2-M3/fMIGWII or H2-Kd/LLO91–99 tetramer-positive cells; in fact, frequencies of epitope-specific cells were remarkably similar to expansion detected following a typical challenge with 1 × 105 L. monocytogenes (Refs.22 and23 , and data not shown). The size of the spleens in mice reinfected with one, two, or three doses of L. monocytogenes was similar (2.8, 2.7, and 2.5 × 108 splenocytes, respectively), and viable bacteria were detected at the time of spleen harvest in most repeatedly infected mice (data not shown).
Repeated exposure to L. monocytogenes does not enhance expansion of H2-M3/fMIGWII tetramer-positive memory cells during recall infection. Female CB6/F1 mice were infected with 2000 L. monocytogenes and, 15 wk later, reinfected with 1 × 106 Listeria one, two, or three times at daily intervals (left to right, as indicated above the dot plots). Splenocytes harvested 5 days after the first reinoculation were MACS enriched for CD8+ cells and stained with anti-CD8α and anti-CD62L mAb as well as MHC class I tetramers (listed to the left). Dot plots are gated on CD8+ T cells, with CD62L on the x-axis and tetramer staining on the y-axis. Percentages of activated, tetramer-positive cells among CD8+ cells are indicated in the upper left quadrants.
To rule out the possibility that H2-M3-restricted T cells fail to expand in response to challenge because of overstimulation and subsequent deletion of epitope-specific cells, immune mice were also reinfected with lower doses of L. monocytogenes. Following challenge with 1 × 104 L. monocytogenes, LLO91–99-specific T cells expanded to somewhat lower frequencies than those detected after challenge with higher doses. However, no expansion of H2-M3-restricted T cells was detected (data not shown).
H2-M3-restricted T cells do not undergo enhanced expansion if re-exposed to L. monocytogenes during the primary immune response
H2-M3-restricted T cell populations in Listeria-immune mice become activated, but do not expand dramatically if mice are reinfected 4–7 wk after the primary infection (Ref.23 ; Figs. 2⇑ and 3⇑). To determine whether H2-M3-restricted CTL expand if re-exposed to L. monocytogenes earlier following initial inoculation, immune mice were boosted with 1 × 106 L. monocytogenes 6 days after primary infection. LLO91–99-specific T cells underwent further expansion under these conditions; at the peak of expansion, the LLO91–99-specific CTL population was ∼5-fold larger than the peak response in control mice (Ref.28 ; Fig. 5⇓A). The kinetics of the additional expansion, with a peak 5 days after the boost, suggest that LLO91–99 peptide-specific cells with the potential to undergo memory expansion are present within the primary effector population (22, 23). In contrast to the enhanced expansion of H2-Kd-restricted T cells, there was little additional expansion of fMIGWII-specific T cells following boosting (Fig. 5⇓A). The slight increase in the frequency of fMIGWII-specific T cells is not a consistent finding and was not detected in a similar, independent experiment (D. H. Busch and E. G. Pamer, unpublished results).
Minimal expansion of H2-M3-restricted T cells following rechallenge with L. monocytogenes during the course of primary infection. BALB/c (A) or CB6/F1 (B) mice were infected with 2000 L. monocytogenes (day 0). Six (A) or 4 (B) days after the initial inoculations, one group of mice was reinfected with 1 × 106 L. monocytogenes (▪ and •). The other group was allowed to proceed through the normal course of infection (□ and ○). Splenocytes were isolated and stained on the indicated days. A, CD8+-enriched BALB/c splenocytes were stained with mAb specific for CD8α and CD62L as well as H2-Kd/LLO91–99 or H2-M3/fMIGWIIA PE-conjugated tetramers. The values of two mice per group at each time point (one mouse for fMIGWIIA on day 11) are averaged. B, Unenriched CB6 splenocytes were stained with anti-CD8α and anti-CD62L mAb, H2-Kd/LLO91–99 or H2-M3/fMIGWII tetramers, and PI to exclude dead cells. The averages of three mice per group are shown, with the exception of day 8 (four mice reinfected, two mice not reinfected). The time course of each experiment is shown on the x-axis. Absolute numbers of CD8+, CD62Llow (activated), and tetramer-positive cells were calculated and plotted on the y-axis. □ and ▪, H2-Kd/LLO91–99 tetramer-positive cells; ○ and •, H2-M3/fMIGWII tetramer-positive cells. SD are indicated.
We were concerned that the differences between H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted CTL expansion in response to the day-6 boost might reflect the distinct expansion kinetics of these T cell populations following primary L. monocytogenes infection; on day 6 after primary infection, H2-M3-restricted CTL are beginning the contraction phase, while H2-Kd-restricted T cells are in the midst of vigorous expansion (23). To address this issue, mice were boosted 4 days after primary infection (Fig. 5⇑B) because, on day 4 after primary infection, both H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cell populations are expanding. The results of this experiment also show that LLO91–99-specific T cells undergo additional expansion while fMIGWII-specific T cells are unaffected. Thus, the different capacities of H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cells to respond to an Ag re-exposure are already apparent during the primary expansion phase of the T cell populations.
Peptide immunization primes fMIGWII and LLO91–99 peptide-specific T cells that can respond to subsequent infection with L. monocytogenes
The challenge inoculum of L. monocytogenes, whether administered 4 days or 7 wk after the primary infection, is cleared very rapidly (data not shown). To determine whether Ag-experienced, H2-M3-restricted CTL are capable of expansion under primary infection conditions, we primed epitope-specific T cells by immunization of mice with peptide-coated splenocytes and anti-CD40 mAb. Immunization with fMIGWII- and LLO91–99-coated splenocytes primed peptide-specific T cell responses restricted by H2-M3 and H2-Kd, respectively (Fig. 6⇓). Subsequent L. monocytogenes infection of peptide-immunized mice resulted in impressive expansion of M3/fMIGWII and Kd/LLO91–99 tetramer-positive T cells (Fig. 6⇓). The frequency of LLO91–99-specific T cells 5 days after reinfection was slightly lower in mice that were peptide-immunized than in mice previously immunized with L. monocytogenes (Fig. 6⇓B, left panels). However, the absolute numbers of LLO91–99-specific T cells that expanded under these two conditions were similar (Fig. 6⇓A). The recall frequencies in this experiment are low compared with previous studies (23) because the challenge dose was only 5000 bacteria, because peptide-immunized mice were not expected to have high-level protective immunity. Remarkably, the fMIGWII-specific T cell population expanded to a similar extent as LLO91–99-specific T cells in peptide-primed mice (Fig. 6⇓, B, lower right panel, and A). As expected, the H2-M3 memory response in mice previously immunized with live L. monocytogenes was small (Fig. 6⇓A) and stained with lower intensity with the tetramers (data not shown). It is interesting that LLO91–99-specific T cells did not expand dramatically in L. monocytogenes-primed mice reimmunized with peptide-coated splenocytes. It is possible that LLO-coated APCs are rapidly eliminated by memory T cells in these immune mice.
Memory-like response of H2-M3-restricted T cells to L. monocytogenes following primary exposure to Listeria-derived epitopes. Female CB6/F1 mice were immunized with 2000 L. monocytogenes or peptide-coated splenocytes (fMIGWII and LLO91–99 plus anti-CD40 mAb) at 8 wk of age (1°, Primary exposure). Four weeks later, Listeria- and peptide-immunized groups were exposed again (2°) to either Listeria Ag in the form of 5000 L. monocytogenes or peptide-coated splenocytes. Naive mice from the same cohort were infected with 5000 Listeria (1° Lm) or immunized with peptide-coated splenocytes at the same time (left columns in A). Five days after the 2° exposure, splenocytes were stained with anti-CD8α and anti-CD62L mAb, H2-Kd/LLO91–99 or H2-M3/fMIGWII tetramers, and PI. A, Total CD8+, CD62Llow, and tetramer-positive cells per spleen were averaged (y-axis) for three mice from each immunization protocol (x-axis). SD are indicated. B, Frequencies and FSC data are shown for representative mice from the 1° Listeria→2° Listeria (top panels) and 1° peptide→2° Listeria groups. Dot plots are gated on live CD8+ T cells; CD62L is on the x-axis, with tetramer staining (H2-Kd/LLO91–99 (left) or H2-M3/fMIGWII (right)) on the y-axis. Percentages of activated tetramer-positive cells (among CD8+ cells) are indicated in the upper left quadrants. Histograms of FSC (x-axis) are gated on CD8+ cells and compare activated tetramer-positive cells (bold line) to tetramer-negative, CD62Llow cells. C, C57BL/6-H2-Kd-transgenic mice were either treated with FGK45 anti-CD40, as described in Materials and Methods, or left untreated. Mice were infected with 2,000 L. monocytogenes and, 3 wk later, reinfected with 100,000 bacteria. Five days following reinfection, splenocytes were stained with H2-M3/fMIGWII tetramers or H2-Kd/LLO91–99 tetramers, as indicated.
To determine whether anti-CD40 stimulation during primary infection with live bacteria alters the generation of subsequent H2-M3-restricted memory responses, we treated mice with three doses of 100 μg of FGK45 anti-CD40 Ab, 48 and 24 h before and at the time of primary L. monocytogenes infection. Fig. 6⇑C demonstrates that anti-CD40 treatment in the context of a live infection did not enhance the H2-M3-restricted memory T cell response.
The increased frequencies of fMIGWII- and LLO91–99-specific T cells in peptide-immunized mice (compared with naive mice) indicates that the T cells are Ag experienced. However, the T cell memory responses in mice primed with peptide and live L. monocytogenes are not identical. For example, LLO91–99- and fMIGWII-specific memory T cells in mice immunized with live L. monocytogenes are large, as measured by forward scatter (FSC), 3 days postchallenge and become small by the fifth day (Figs. 2⇑, and 6⇑B, top histograms). In contrast, memory T cells in peptide-immunized mice remain large on the fifth day after live bacterial challenge, suggesting that these T cells are still actively proliferating (Fig. 6⇑B, bottom histograms). Although we interpret these differences in T cell size as a reflection of different kinetics of bacterial clearance and inflammation in the two experimental groups, it is also possible that they result from disparities in the priming of CD8+ T cells by live infection vs peptide immunization.
Discussion
H2-M3-restricted T cells are early participants in the adaptive immune response to primary L. monocytogenes infection, reaching peak numbers before and frequently expanding to greater frequencies than H2-Kd-restricted populations (23, 26). However, in response to secondary infection, which induces dramatic expansion of MHC class Ia (H2-Kd)-restricted CTL, only minimal expansion of H2-M3-restricted T cell populations is detected. In this report, we demonstrate that M3-restricted memory T cells are generated and maintained; the residual populations of H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cells detected weeks after primary infection do not differ in their expression of activation and memory markers. Furthermore, secondary infection activates H2-M3-restricted T cells. Although the extent of recall expansion is small, H2-M3-restricted T cells peak in frequency 5 days postinfection and undergo similar size shifts and CD8 modulation as their class Ia-restricted counterparts. Thus, H2-M3-restricted memory T cell responses share similarities with MHC class Ia-restricted responses but, notably, do not undergo dramatic expansion upon secondary challenge with L. monocytogenes.
We first hypothesized that secondary infection with L. monocytogenes might not provide an adequate stimulus for H2-M3-restricted memory T cells to undergo expansion. In this scenario, H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted memory T cells are not inherently different, but secondary L. monocytogenes infection selectively supports expansion of H2-Kd-restricted T cells, perhaps reflecting better Ag presentation. Primary and secondary L. monocytogenes infections are remarkably different; immune mice rapidly clear viable bacteria in 1–3 days, despite a 50-fold greater dose than that used for primary infection, which requires 5–7 days for clearance (27). Differences between the peptides presented by H2-M3 and H2-Kd might provide an explanation for the lesser expansion of H2-M3-restricted memory T cells. Short N-formyl peptides are shed by bacteria and probably do not require processing before presentation by H2-M3 (29, 30). In contrast, peptides presented by H2-Kd derive from secreted proteins (31) that must be degraded to generate the nonamer peptide epitopes. It is possible that the requirement for processing extends the duration of peptide presentation by H2-Kd beyond clearance of the pathogen, while the duration of N-formyl peptide presentation is restricted to the period of infection with viable bacteria.
Arguing against the role of Ag presentation in the disparate memory responses is our finding that H2-M3-restricted T cells become activated during a secondary Listeria infection. H2-M3-restricted memory T cells up-regulate CD69, CD25, and CD122 early following challenge (Fig. 3⇑), and changes in FSC and CD8 levels exhibited by fMIGWII-specific T cells are indistinguishable from those detected for LLO91–99-specific T cells (Fig. 2⇑). Shifts in FSC and CD8 levels, at least for MHC class Ia-restricted CTL, require in vivo Ag presentation (28). Although Ag presentation is sufficient for activation of H2-M3-restricted T cells following L. monocytogenes challenge, it is possible that this exposure is not sufficient for maximal expansion. However, consecutive daily challenges with high doses of L. monocytogenes failed to increase the frequency of either H2-M3- or H2-Kd-restricted memory T cell responses (Fig. 4⇑), strongly suggesting that Ag is not a limiting factor in H2-M3-restricted T cell responses. These experiments argue against the hypothesis that secondary infection does not provide an adequate stimulus to drive expansion of H2-M3-restricted memory T cells.
Our second hypothesis was that inherent differences between H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted memory T cell populations account for their disparate expansion kinetics in response to secondary L. monocytogenes infection. Because neither enhanced Ag presentation nor inflammation promote the expansion of H2-M3-restricted memory T cells, it is reasonable to suggest that H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted memory T cells may have been programmed differently at the time of primary infection. Recent studies suggest that differences between H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cells result from disparate forms of thymic selection (32). Our finding that Ag responsiveness of H2-Kd- and H2-M3-restricted T cells already differs at early time points during primary infection supports the notion that these T cell populations are intrinsically different.
Because both populations are similarly activated by repeat infection, it is possible that proliferation of H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cells in response to secondary L. monocytogenes infection is equivalent but that expanding H2-M3-restricted populations undergo increased apoptosis. Levels of Bcl-2 are higher in CD8+ memory T cells than in naive or effector cells (33). Bcl-2 is regulated by IL-7, and mice deficient in the IL-7R are unable to maintain CD8+ memory cells (34). Although our studies demonstrate that H2-M3-restricted T cells are generated and maintained, it is conceivable that deficiency or differential regulation of Bcl-2 or other antiapoptotic molecules in H2-M3-restricted memory cells results in decreased cell survival during the proliferative phase that follows reinfection with L. monocytogenes.
Our results with peptide-immunized mice indicate that H2-M3-restricted T cells can, under some circumstances, undergo memory expansion. Immunization with peptide-coated splenocytes primes peptide-specific T cells (35, 36) but does not induce significant immunity to L. monocytogenes infection. Peptide immunization and live infection provide different stimuli to naive T cells, possibly resulting in distinctly programmed, H2-M3-restricted memory T cells. Alternatively, because bacterial clearance is delayed in peptide-immunized relative to bacterially immunized mice, the stimulus for memory expansion of H2-M3-restricted T cells may differ in these two circumstances. Nevertheless, our study shows that Ag-experienced H2-M3-restricted T cells are capable of an expansion comparable to Kd-restricted T cells following Listeria infection. Direct stimulation of CD40 on CD8 T lymphocytes has been shown to enhance their development into memory T cells (37), and may explain our results with combined peptide/anti-CD40 immunization. The inability of anti-CD40 treatment to rescue H2-M3 memory in the setting of live infection is likely multifactorial and requires further investigation.
Rapid expansion of H2-M3-restricted T cells following primary L. monocytogenes infection kinetically resembles a memory T cell response (23). One scenario, which was proposed by Lenz and Bevan (38), is that H2-M3-restricted T cells are preactivated by formyl peptides derived from endogenous, possibly intestinal bacteria. If this is the case, then the secondary H2-M3-restricted T cell response, while still activated by Listeria challenge and active in antilisterial immunity, may be refractory to another dramatic expansion. Analysis of MHC class Ia-deficient (Kb−/−Db−/−) mice indicates that H2-M3-restricted T cells are involved in protection against secondary L. monocytogenes infection in vivo; although MHC class Ib-restricted T cells in these mice do not expand significantly in response to reinfection, depletion of CD8+ T cells, which are primarily H2-M3 restricted, results in decreased protection (26). We also have evidence that the potential of memory T cell expansion is limited; Kd/LLO91–99 tetramer-positive cells, which expand dramatically in response to secondary L. monocytogenes infection, undergo minimal expansion following a third bacterial inoculation (D. H. Busch and E. G. Pamer, unpublished data). Thus, it is possible that murine CD8 T cells have a limited ability to proliferate in vivo, and that H2-M3-restricted T cells may have a history of proliferation before the first infection with L. monocytogenes.
Another intriguing explanation for the minimal expansion of H2-M3-restricted T cells is related to the low surface expression of the MHC class Ib molecule in vivo. Because there are few endogenous N-formyl peptides to enable its trafficking to the cell surface, most H2-M3 is retained intracellularly in the unstimulated cell (39, 40). The results of investigations addressing requirement for MHC in the maintenance of memory T cells would suggest that low H2-M3 expression levels do not lead to a defect in memory cell maintenance (41, 42, 43). Our ability to detect M3-restricted memory T cells with MHC tetramers fits with these findings. However, a recent study found that, although allogenic MHC engagement was not necessary for memory CD4+ T cell survival, it was essential to maintain the full functional capabilities of the memory cells (44). Interestingly, much like H2-M3-restricted memory cells, memory cells with an MHC-deficient history increased in size upon restimulation but were not able to expand. However, the MHC class Ib-mediated protective immunity in class Ia-deficient mice argues against a full functional defect in H2-M3-restricted memory cells (26).
Although many questions about H2-M3-restricted memory responses to L. monocytogenes infection remain, the data presented in this study provide evidence that M3-restricted memory T cells are generated, maintained, and activated in response to challenge with the bacterium. Determination of the mechanisms responsible for differential expansion of H2-M3- and H2-Kd-restricted T cell populations in response to secondary L. monocytogenes infection may provide important insights into the nature of immunological memory.
Footnotes
-
↵1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant RO1 AI49602. K.M.K. was supported by National Institutes of Health Training Grant 5T32AI07019. D.H.B. was a recipient of a Howard Hughes Fellowship for Physicians.
-
↵2 Current address: Institut für Immunologie, Universität München, Goethestrasse 31, 80336 München, Germany.
-
↵3 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Eric G. Pamer, Infectious Diseases Service and Laboratory of Antimicrobial Immunity, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021. E-mail address: pamere{at}mskcc.org
-
4 Abbreviations used in this paper: LLO, listeriolysin O; SB, staining buffer; PI, propidium iodide; EMA, ethidium monoazide bromide; FSC, forward scatter.
- Received July 31, 2002.
- Accepted December 11, 2002.
- Copyright © 2003 by The American Association of Immunologists