Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

By IL-1 Signaling, Monocyte-Derived Cells Dramatically Enhance the Epidermal Antimicrobial Response to Lipopolysaccharide

Lide Liu, Alice A. Roberts and Tomas Ganz
J Immunol January 1, 2003, 170 (1) 575-580; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.575
Lide Liu
*Will Rogers Pulmonary Research Laboratory, Departments of Medicine and Pathology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alice A. Roberts
†Department of Pathology, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Tomas Ganz
*Will Rogers Pulmonary Research Laboratory, Departments of Medicine and Pathology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Induction of HBD-2 peptide expression in epidermal cultures. Epidermal cultures were stained for HBD-2 2 days after stimulation with IL-1α (50 ng/ml) or CM. Tissue sections with or without stimulus stained with preimmune serum were used as negative controls. The HBD-2 peptide is immunostained and developed with fast red chromogen and counterstained with Harris hematoxylin. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Western analysis of time course of HBD-2 induction. HBD-2 expression was analyzed at 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after stimulation with 1/8 dilution of CM. Groups of normal epidermal cultures not exposed to the stimulus were harvested at 0 and 48 h for controls. HBD-2 peptide was detectable at 12 h after CM stimulation and accumulated in keratinocytes thereafter.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Northern blot analysis of HBD-2 expression in stimulated epidermal cultures. Epidermis stimulated by dilute (1/8) CM was analyzed for HBD-2 mRNA expression at 2, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h after stimulation. Unstimulated epidermal cultures (−) were harvested at 0 and 48 h. Total RNA samples were loaded at 10 μg/lane. The blot was hybridized with 32P-labeled HBD-2 and G3PD cDNAs.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Effects of IL-1Ra on LPS-induced HBD-2 mRNA expression. CM-induced HBD-2 mRNA expression. Northern blot, film exposure time of 3 h. Epidermis stimulated for 48 h by diluted CM with or without IL-1Ra (200 ng/ml) was analyzed for HBD-2 mRNA expression. For comparison, epidermis exposed to LPS and culture medium for monocytes, but without monocytes, was harvested at 48 h. RNA from unstimulated epidermis cultures is shown as a control. HBD-2 mRNA was strongly induced by CM, and the induction was blocked by adding IL-1Ra.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    Western analysis of the effects of IL-1Ra, CM, and LPS on HBD-2 expression. Epidermis was harvested after 48 h of exposure to the stimuli. Unstimulated epidermal cultures (−) were harvested with the stimulated groups and used as controls. HBD-2 peptide expression was detected only in the epidermis stimulated by CM and completely inhibited by adding IL-1Ra.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Gene expression changes induced by CM, IL-1α, CM plus IL-1Ra, or LPS stimulation for 24 h. Each dot on the linear scatter plot compares the expression of a single gene in stimulated epidermis (vertical axis) to the baseline expression in unstimulated epidermis (horizontal axis). The signal from HBD-2 is marked by a circle. Signals from genes whose expression is unchanged line up on or near the diagonal (solid line). Two-fold increase or decrease from control is shown by dashed lines.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Effects of stimuli and inhibitors on the expression of antimicrobial peptide mRNAs. HBD-2 mRNA is the only antimicrobial peptide induced substantially by CM. The mean signal for all genes on the Affymetrix HG-U133A is also shown for comparison. Antimicrobial peptides include the α-defensins: human neutrophil peptides (HNP)-1 and -4, human defensins (HD)-5 and -6; the β-defensins: HBD-1, -2, and -3; and the cathelicidin, LL-37. Similar results were obtained in a second experiment with CM from a second donor and another sample of epidermis.

  • FIGURE 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8.

    Induction of HBD-2 mRNA by LPS in whole human skin. Fresh whole human skin mRNA fragments were treated with solvent, LPS alone (100 ng/ml), or LPS with IL-1Ra (200 ng/ml). The Northern blot was probed with HBD-2 cDNA and G3PD cDNA. Similar results were obtained with skin samples from two other donors.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Abundant mRNAs >2-fold inducible by IL-1 and CMa

    Stimulus, Expt. No.HBD-2 Fold InductionHBD-2 Signal RankPsoriasin Fold InductionPsoriasin Signal RankSPRR-2B Fold InductionSPRR-2B Signal Rank
    IL-1α, no. 14223012.23
    IL-1α, no. 224.6312.422.91
    CM, no. 110.634.44Suppressed−
    CM, no. 223.8411.722.41
    • a Signal rank is determined relative to all mRNAs induced >2-fold.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 170 (1)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 170, Issue 1
1 Jan 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
By IL-1 Signaling, Monocyte-Derived Cells Dramatically Enhance the Epidermal Antimicrobial Response to Lipopolysaccharide
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
By IL-1 Signaling, Monocyte-Derived Cells Dramatically Enhance the Epidermal Antimicrobial Response to Lipopolysaccharide
Lide Liu, Alice A. Roberts, Tomas Ganz
The Journal of Immunology January 1, 2003, 170 (1) 575-580; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.575

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
By IL-1 Signaling, Monocyte-Derived Cells Dramatically Enhance the Epidermal Antimicrobial Response to Lipopolysaccharide
Lide Liu, Alice A. Roberts, Tomas Ganz
The Journal of Immunology January 1, 2003, 170 (1) 575-580; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.575
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Antigen presentation by dendritic cells in the aortic wall triggers T helper immune responses in atherosclerosis (54.16)
  • Eph receptors are involved in the pro-inflammatory response following spinal cord injury (54.21)
  • Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells undergo apoptosis during sepsis, leading to organ dysfunction. (54.13)
Show more Inflammation

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606