Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Costimulation of Multiple NK Cell Activation Receptors by NKG2D

Emily L. Ho, Leonidas N. Carayannopoulos, Jennifer Poursine-Laurent, Jeremy Kinder, Beatrice Plougastel, Hamish R. C. Smith and Wayne M. Yokoyama
J Immunol October 1, 2002, 169 (7) 3667-3675; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3667
Emily L. Ho
Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonidas N. Carayannopoulos
Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jennifer Poursine-Laurent
Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jeremy Kinder
Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Beatrice Plougastel
Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hamish R. C. Smith
Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wayne M. Yokoyama
Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine and Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The activation of NK cells is mediated through specific interactions between activation receptors and their respective ligands. Little is known, however, about whether costimulation, which has been well characterized for T cell activation, occurs in NK cells. To study the function of NKG2D, a potential NK costimulatory receptor, we have generated two novel hamster mAbs that recognize mouse NKG2D. FACS analyses demonstrate that mouse NKG2D is expressed on all C57BL/6 IL-2-activated NK (lymphokine-activated killer (LAK)) cells, all splenic and liver NK cells, and ∼50% of splenic NKT cells. Consistent with limited polymorphism of NKG2D, its sequence is highly conserved, and the anti-NKG2D mAbs react with NK cells from a large number of different mouse strains. In chromium release assays, we show that stimulation of NK cells with anti-NKG2D mAb can redirect lysis. Also, enhanced lysis of transfected tumor targets expressing NKG2D ligand could be inhibited by addition of anti-NKG2D mAb. Interestingly, stimulation of LAK cells via NKG2D alone does not lead to cytokine release. However, stimulation of LAK via both an NK activation receptor (e.g., CD16, NK1.1, or Ly-49D) and NKG2D leads to augmentation of cytokine release compared with stimulation through the activation receptor alone. These results demonstrate that NKG2D has the ability to costimulate multiple NK activation receptors.

Natural killer cells constitute a subset of lymphocytes that contributes to the innate immune response against intracellular pathogens (1, 2) and may mediate tumor surveillance (3). Unlike B cells, which produce Abs, NK cells use effector mechanisms similar to those of T cells. They engage in cell-mediated cytolysis by releasing granules containing perforin and granzymes that result in target cell apoptosis (4), and secrete cytokines such as IFN-γ, GM-CSF, and TNF-α that can modulate adaptive immune responses (5).

NK cells were originally characterized (and named) for their ability to lyse target cells without prior sensitization, i.e., natural killing (6, 7). It is now known that NK cells use specific receptors to mediate killing through the recognition of distinct ligands expressed on target cells (8). These NK receptors fall into two functional types, inhibitory and stimulatory (9). Much more is known about the inhibitory receptors, which in turn can be organized into two structural categories: killer Ig-like type I integral membrane receptors, encoded in the leukocyte receptor complex, and lectin-like type II integral membrane receptors, encoded in the NK gene complex (NKC)3 (10, 11, 12, 13). Despite their structural differences, the inhibitory NK receptors share many functional characteristics. Where defined, they interact with MHC class I on the target, and this interaction prevents activation of NK effector function by eliciting a potent inhibitory signal mediated by an immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif (ITIM) in the cytoplasmic domain. When NK inhibitory receptors are engaged, the ITIM is tyrosine phosphorylated and SHP-1 phosphatase is recruited and activated, which presumably then dephosphorylates signaling molecules involved in the activation cascade (14, 15, 16, 17).

Comparatively less is known about the nature of NK activation receptors. Individual NK cells express multiple different activating NK receptors of both Ig and lectin-like structural families that lack cytoplasmic ITIMs (18, 19, 20). These receptors contain charged amino acids in their transmembrane domains, permitting interaction with distinct signaling chains containing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motifs (ITAMs). NK cells express multiple ITAM signaling chains, including KARAP/DAP12, CD3ζ, and FcεRIγ (8). Ly-49D and Ly-49H associate with KARAP/DAP12 (21, 22), NKR-P1 associates with FcεRIγ (23), and CD16 associates with CD3ζ (24, 25) and FcεRIγ (26). Although it is not yet known whether these signaling chains are functionally equivalent, when activating receptors are cross-linked, the ITAMs in the associated signaling chain become tyrosine phosphorylated. These ITAMs then recruit downstream signaling kinases such as Syk and ZAP70, triggering activation of cytotoxic, proliferative, and/or secretory responses (27, 28). Thus, NK cell activation is similar to T cell signaling in that both cells use comparable signaling cascades.

T cell activation is a complex process that involves activation through the TCR and a second receptor, a costimulatory receptor, which by the simplest definition, potentiates signals from the TCR. Experiments using anti-TCR Abs and APCs showed that stimulation through TCR alone is insufficient for activation of naive T cells (29). Full activation requires simultaneous engagement of the TCR and costimulatory molecules, resulting in triggering of T cell effector function, survival, and proliferation (30). The prototypical T cell costimulatory molecule is CD28, which recognizes B7.1 and B7.2 (31, 32). CD28 recruits and activates various tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins, including kinases, Lck and Itk, and the adaptor protein, phospholipase Cγ1 (33, 34, 35). CD28 also signals through a YxxM motif present in its cytoplasmic domain, which is a consensus binding site for the p85 subunit of phosphatidylinositol 3 (PI3)-kinase (36, 37, 38). Thus, CD28 may enhance T cell activation through distinct biochemical pathways.

Like T cells, NK cells may also use costimulatory pathways, but until recently, it has not been feasible to dissect costimulation on NK cells because the nature of activation receptors, the molecules responsible for primary activation, was unclear. For example, the T cell costimulatory receptor, CD28, and its ligands, B7.1 and B7.2, appear to play a role in NK cell activation against tumor targets (39, 40). Despite this, it was unclear which activation receptor on an NK cell was costimulated by CD28.

One recently characterized activation molecule expressed on both human and mouse NK cells is the lectin-like NKG2D molecule (41, 42, 43, 44). Human NKG2D recognizes the stress-inducible MIC family (MICA and MICB) (43). In addition, it interacts with the ULBP family of molecules (ULBP-1, -2, -3), which also bind the CMV-encoded UL16 molecule (45). Mouse NKG2D binds the minor histocompatibility molecule H60, as well as the retinoic acid-inducible RAE1 family (RAE1α, -β, -γ, -δ, -ε) (44, 46, 47). Mouse and human NKG2D trigger NK cytolytic killing of target cells transfected to express NKG2D ligands.

NKG2D, however, may not directly stimulate NK cell killing because in previous studies other activating receptors may have contributed to target killing. Moreover, unlike other activating NK receptors, NKG2D does not appear to signal through ITAM-containing signaling chains. Instead, it selectively pairs with KAP/DAP10, which can recruit the p85 subunit of PI3-kinase through the YxxM motif contained in its intracellular domain (48, 49). This signaling motif is related to a similar functional motif contained in the cytoplasmic domain of CD28, suggesting NKG2D may costimulate rather than directly activate effector function. Recent studies indicate that human T cells may use NKG2D for costimulation (43, 50), and biochemical results on human KARAP/DAP12 and KAP/DAP10 have suggested that these two signaling chains may function cooperatively (51). However, other studies on NKG2D suggest that it is a primary activation receptor (47, 52, 53). In addition, whether the signal from NKG2D can cooperate with the signals originating from NK-activating receptors associated with signaling chains other than KARAP/DAP12 is as yet unknown.

To further study the function of NKG2D, we generated two mAbs that specifically recognize mouse NKG2D expressed by all NK cells and a subset of NKT cells. Cross-linking of NKG2D by ligand-transfected cells stimulates target killing, which can be blocked by anti-NKG2D. Importantly, immobilized anti-NKG2D does not directly stimulate NK cell activation unless another receptor is coligated, including CD16, Ly-49D, or NKR-P1. These results indicate that NKG2D functions as a costimulatory molecule on NK cells for NK activation receptors associated with different ITAM-containing signaling chains.

Materials and Methods

Animals

C57BL/6 (B6), A, BALB/c, DBA/2, and B6.129P2S-FCGR3TM1SJV (CD16−/−; C57BL/6 background) mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory (Bar Harbor, ME). Armenian hamsters were purchased from Cytogen Research and Development (West Roxbury, MA). All animals were housed in a specific pathogen-free barrier facility at Washington University.

Cells and cell lines

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)-dihydrofolate reductase (dhfr−) cells were previously described (54). B cell hybridomas were grown in D10 medium (DMEM containing 10% FCS (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN), 2 mM glutamine, 100 μM nonessential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 100 μM 2-ME (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA)) at 37°C in 5% CO2. The LL/2 Lewis lung carcinoma line and Daudi B cell lymphoma line were purchased from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA) and grown in D10 medium. The YAC-1 lymphoma line was obtained from ATCC, and the IL-3-producing X63Ag8-653 was kindly provided by H. Karasuyama (Tokyo, Japan). Both cell lines were grown in R10 medium (RPMI containing 10% FCS, 2 mM glutamine, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 100 μM 2-ME). Ba/F3 cells obtained from M. Thomas (Washington University) were grown in D10 containing 10% supernatant from spent X63Ag8-653 cell cultures. Sf9 insect cells were kindly provided by G. Broze (Washington University) and grown in Grace’s medium (Life Technologies) supplemented with 10% FCS. Hi5 insect cells were obtained from J. Sadler (Washington University) and grown in Express5 medium (Life Technologies) with 9 mM glutamine.

Adult and neonatal splenocytes and thymocytes were prepared by passing spleen and thymus tissues through a 70-μm cell filter (BD Biosciences, Lexington, KY) and lysing the RBCs, as described previously (55). For IL-2-activated NK cells from A/J, B6, BALB/cJ, CD16−/−, and DBA/2J mice, nylon wool nonadherent cells were grown in R10 medium with 1000 U/ml human rIL-2 (Chiron, Emeryville, CA) for 3–4 days. Plastic nonadherent cells were discarded, and the remaining adherent cells were cultured in 1000 U/ml IL-2 for another 3–4 days before being harvested with EDTA (Versene; Life Technologies). The resulting culture resulted in an NK cell population that was typically 90% CD3− and NK1.1+ or DX5+.

CDNAs, expression constructs, and transfections

The NKG2D cDNA was cloned as previously described (42). The expressed sequence tag encoding for RAE1δ was obtained from Incyte Genomics (St. Louis, MO; accession AI785864) and cloned into the pMX-IRES-GFP (PIG) retroviral vector (kindly provided by T. Kitamura, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan). Full-length RAE1δ was amplified using oligonucleotides (BglII-containing 5′-GGAAGAGATCTACCATGGCCAAGGCAGCAGTGA-3′ and XhoI-containing 5′-GGAAACTCGAGTCACATTGCAAATGCAAATGCAA-3′) and cloned into PIG using BamHI and XhoI. PLAT-E cells (obtained from T. Kitamura, University of Tokyo (56)) were transfected with the retroviral vector using FuGENE6 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland), and the retroviral supernatants obtained were used to infect Ba/F3 cells. The resulting cells were analyzed by flow cytometry for green fluorescent protein expression and cloned by limiting dilution.

The chimeric Ly-49A-NKG2D cDNA was created using PCR by amplifying the intracellular and transmembrane domains of Ly-49A using the primers (5′-CTTTGCGGCCGCTCAATGAGGGAATTTATCCAG-3′ and 5′-GGAATTCTATGAGTGAGCAGGAGGTCAC-3′). The extracellular domain of NKG2D was amplified using sequence-specific primers (5′-GAGAGCGGCCGCTTACACCGCCCTTTTCATGCAGA-3′ and 5′-TAGGAATTCTATGGCATTGATTCGTGATCG-3′). Both PCR fragments were then sequentially cloned into pBluescript (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA) using SalI and EcoRI, and EcoRI and XbaI, respectively. The resulting chimeric molecule was sequenced on both strands and removed from pBluescript using SalI and XbaI restriction enzymes and ligated into pHβAP-r-1-neo-dhfr vector (54). This chimeric construct was transfected into CHO-dhfr− cells using lipofectamine (Life Technologies), and individual clones were obtained by limiting dilution. Protein expression of the chimeric molecule by CHO clones was detected by Western blot analysis of cell lysates obtained from each individual cell clone using the 1298 rabbit antisera, which recognizes the Ly-49A cytoplasmic domain (57). CHO clone F11 (CHO.F11) expresses a high level of the chimeric Ly-49A-NKG2D molecule, while clone E7 (CHO.E7) does not.

Isolation by RT-PCR and sequencing of NKG2D cDNA alleles

Total RNA was prepared from lymphokine-activated killer (LAK) cells using TRIzol (Invitrogen, San Diego, CA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and was quantitated by UV spectrophotometer. RT-PCR was conducted using the Superscript One-Step RT-PCR kit (Life Technologies), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, using the following NKG2D-specific primers: EcoRI-containing 5′-TAGGAATTCTATGGCATTGATTCGTGATCG-3′ and NotI-containing 5′-GAGAGCGGCCGCTTACACCGCCCTTTTCATGCAGA-3′. The PCR products were visualized on an agarose gel, purified using the Qiaquick PCR Purification kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), digested with restriction enzymes EcoRI and NotI, and cloned into pBluescript SK II (Stratagene). The DNA was transformed into XL-1 Blue (Stratagene), and multiple individual colonies were picked for further analysis. The DNA was prepared using the Spin Miniprep kit (Qiagen) and sequenced using ABI Bigdye, version 3 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA).

Production of soluble NKG2D (sNKG2D)

The entire extracellular domain of mouse NKG2D was cloned into the pFASTBAC vector using PCR and the sequence-specific primers (EcoRI-containing 5′-CGGAATTCGGATCTATGCTACT-3′, 5′-ATGGAGCTGCGGGACGGCAGTCCAGTATTGTGCAACAAGGAA-3′, 5′-TTCCTTGTTGCACAATACTGGACTGCCGTCCCGCAGCTCCAT-3′, and KpnI-containing 5′-GGGGTACCTTTTTACACCGCCCTAAACAT-3′). The resulting construct contains the gp67 secretion signal, a 6-His tag, and a BirA recognition domain upstream from the intact NKG2D extracellular domain. Sf9 insect cells were transfected with this construct using Cellfectin (Life Technologies). Primary NKG2D baculovirus was produced in Sf9 insect cells using the Bac-to-Bac system (Life Technologies), and sNKG2D was produced in Hi5 insect cells using secondarily amplified baculovirus. sNKG2D was purified from Hi5 insect cell supernatant using a Ni-NTA column (Qiagen). This sNKG2D was used to immunize Armenian hamsters.

Subsequently, a second sNKG2D was constructed (58). Briefly, this molecule is identical with the first described sNKG2D with a factor Xa cleavage site inserted between the BirA recognition site and the NKG2D extracellular domain sequence. This sNKG2D was biotinylated with N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin (Pierce, Rockford, IL), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, tetramerized around streptavidin-PE, and used for cell-staining purposes.

Production of anti-NKG2D Abs

Armenian hamsters were inoculated i.p. with 20–100 μg sNKG2D emulsified in synthetic trehalose dicorynomycolate-monophosphoryl lipid A adjuvant (Corixa, Seattle, WA) and boosted three times at 3-wk intervals. Splenic B cell hybridomas were produced by the Washington University Hybridoma Center from one Armenian hamster after FACS analysis showed that antisera from this animal stained CHO.F11, but not CHO.E7 cells. Culture supernatants from ∼300 hybridomas were screened by flow cytometry for Ab binding to a cell population containing a 1:3 mix of CHO.E7:CHO.F11 cells in each tube. Culture supernatants that shifted 75% of the cells were presumed to contain Ab that specifically recognized NKG2D. This screen resulted in 17 independent hybridomas, which underwent three rounds of subcloning. Two clones, A10 and C7, were selected for further analysis.

Antibodies

The following Abs were purchased from PharMingen: anti-CD3 APC, anti-CD3 CyChrome, anti-CD3 PE, anti-CD3 PerCP, anti-CD4 PE, anti-CD8 PE, anti-CD44 FITC, anti-γδ-FITC, APC PK136, PE PK136 (anti-NK1.1), and anti-TNP-1 biotin (used as hamster IgG control). Hamster IgG was purchased from ICN Biomedical, Costa Mesa, CA and used as Ab control.

A10, C7, and 2.4G2 Abs were purified from spent D10 culture supernatants by ammonium sulfate precipitation (55% saturation) and affinity purification on a protein A-Sepharose column (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ) using standard methods (59). Purified Abs were biotinylated with N-hydroxysuccinimide-biotin (Pierce), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. FITC-2C11 (anti-CD3) mAb was produced using FITC-celite (FITC isomer 1; Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) (60).

Flow cytometric analysis

Adherent LAK cells, thymocytes, and splenocytes were washed three times in sorter buffer (HBSS without phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), 3% FCS, 0.05% NaN3). Thymocytes and splenocytes were then filtered through nylon mesh. Cells were incubated in spent 2.4G2 hybridoma culture supernatant to block nonspecific FcγRIII binding for 20 min before addition of Abs. For Ab staining, ∼5–10 × 105 cells were incubated with 2–10 μg/ml Abs for 20 min, washed twice, and then incubated with secondary reagents, such as streptavidin-PE (0.2 μg/ml). Cells were gated using forward and side scatter and cell marker staining. Dead cells were excluded by gating with propidium iodide staining. A total of 1–10 × 104 gated events was collected from each flow cytometry sample.

51Cr release assay and redirected lysis assay

51Cr release assay was performed using 51Cr-labeled targets, as previously described (55). YAC-1 tumor targets were used as positive controls for killing. Redirected lysis assay using 51Cr-labeled Daudi cells were performed as previously described (57). Purified Abs were used at a final concentration of 10 μg/ml (redirected lysis) and 30 μg/ml (51Cr release) and incubated with effector cells for 20 min before adding targets.

Cytokine release assay

Stimulation of B6 and CD16−/− LAK cells was performed as previously described (61). Briefly, 96-well Immulon-2 plates (Dynatech Laboratories, Chantilly, VA) were coated with 20 μg/ml streptavidin (Sigma-Aldrich) overnight at 4°C. Triplicate wells were then coated with biotinylated purified Ab and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. Blocking buffer (2% BSA (V fraction) in PBS; Sigma-Aldrich) was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature. Wells were washed three times with PBS. A total of 2 × 105 washed LAK cells resuspended in R10 was added to each well (200 μl final vol) and incubated at 37°C for 5–6 h. For anti-CD16-blocking studies, cells were first incubated with purified soluble 2.4G2 mAb (10 μg/ml) for 15 min. For PMA/ionomycin stimulation, cells were incubated with PMA at 10 ng/ml and ionomycin at 0.5 μg/ml final concentration. Culture supernatants were harvested, diluted 1/3, and assayed for GM-CSF by ELISA (Endogen, Woburn, MA; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), according to manufacturer’s instructions. In each experiment, ELISA standard curves were derived using recombinant cytokines.

Bioinformatics from Celera Genomics database

Mouse NKG2D sequences from C57BL/6 (42), 129 × 1/SvJ, DBA/J, and A/J mouse strains were compared for putative NKG2D amino acid identity between strains of mice. The data for the 129 × 1/SvJ strain were generated through use of the Celera Discovery System and Celera Genomics’ associated databases (Celera Genomics, Rockville, MD; http://celera.com).

Results

Generation of mAbs specific for mouse NKG2D

To generate reagents that would aid analysis of mouse NKG2D, we produced soluble amino-terminal His-tagged NKG2D ectodomain. The disulfide-linked dimers were purified by nickel affinity chromatography (data not shown). Armenian hamsters were immunized with sNKG2D, and subsequent antisera stained a stable transfectant (CHO.F11) expressing the NKG2D ectodomain (data not shown). Upon fusion and screening for FACS reactivity with CHO.F11, we generated two novel mAbs, A10 and C7, which specifically recognize the mouse NKG2D transfectant (Fig. 1⇓A). These mAbs do not stain CHO cells expressing distantly related lectin-like NK cell receptors CD94/NKG2A and CD94/NKG2C by FACS analysis (data not shown). In addition, they compete with each other for binding to CHO.F11, as assessed by FACS, indicating that they may share similar epitopes or block each other by steric hindrance (data not shown).

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Specificity of mAbs A10 and C7. A, CHO.F11, which expresses the chimeric Ly-49A/NKG2D molecule, stained with mAb A10 and C7. B, mAb A10 staining of C57BL/6 IL-2-activated NK (LAK) cells. Comparable staining was obtained with mAb C7 (data not shown).

NKG2D is also expressed on C57BL/6 IL-2-activated (LAK) cells, indicating that the native conformation of NKG2D can be recognized by the A10 and C7 mAbs (Fig. 1⇑B). These results are consistent with previously published data using polyclonal antisera that recognized NKG2D, which were performed without controlling for potential FcγRIII-mediated (nonspecific) binding (62).

Expression of NKG2D on all NK cells and a subpopulation of splenic NK T cells

NKG2D is expressed on all splenic and liver NK cells (NK1.1+CD3−), ∼50% of splenic NK T (NK1.1+CD3+) cells, and a minor population of NK1.1−CD3+ cells by flow cytometry using mAbs A10 and C7 (Fig. 2⇓A). In the thymus, NKG2D is expressed on NK1.1+ thymocytes, but not on CD4+ or CD8+ single-positive cells, CD4+CD8+ double-positive cells, or γδ T cells (data not shown). In addition, NKG2D expression on mouse NK cells can be detected as early as day 1 postpartum (Fig. 2⇓B). This is in contrast to Ly-49 receptors, which have been shown in previous studies (57) to be undetectable in neonatal NK cells wk 1 postpartum, suggesting that the function of NKG2D may differ from that of Ly-49.

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

FACS analysis of NKG2D expression on C57BL/6 spleen and liver cells. A, FACS plot of C57BL/6 NK1.1+CD3− (NK) and NK1.1+CD3+ (NKT) splenocytes stained with mAb A10. As indicated, the x-axes show control mAb and anti-NKG2D mAb staining, and the y-axes show NK1.1 staining. These results are representative of three independent experiments. B, FACS analysis of day 1 and day 21 postpartum and adult C57BL/6 liver NK cells (NK1.1+CD3−) with mAb A10.

Expression of NKG2D on NK cells from disparate inbred mouse strains

In contrast to other signaling receptors on mouse NK cells, which display significant allelic poymorphism, NKG2D expression was found on BALB/c DX5+CD3− spleen cells (Fig. 3⇓A) and LAKs (Fig. 3⇓B), suggesting that NKG2D is expressed by all NK cells in this strain. Furthermore, the anti-NKG2D mAbs reacted with DX5+CD3− cells from a wide variety of other strains (Table I⇓). It is unlikely that the mAbs are reacting with different molecules in these strains because there is only one NKG2D gene in the mouse genome (42) and there is minimal allelic polymorphism of NKG2D among C57BL/6, 129 × 1/SvJ, A/J, BALB/cJ, and DBA/2J mouse strains (Fig. 3⇓C and see below). From the full-length NKG2D sequences derived from 129 × 1/SvJ, A/J, BALB/cJ, and DBA/2J, we observed little or no amino acid differences in the putative NKG2D protein sequence. For instance, the 129 × 1/SvJ NKG2D sequence is identical with the C57BL/6 sequence. In A/J, BALB/cJ, and DBA/2J, there are amino acid changes at residue 10, in which a tyrosine is substituted for a histidine, and at residue 71, in which a leucine is substituted for a valine. Because there is minimal polymorphism in the putative cytoplasmic and transmembrane domains (residues 10 and 71, respectively), and no amino acid changes were observed in the extracellular domains, these data indicate that NKG2D is highly conserved between inbred strains of mice. These results strongly suggest that the molecule reacting with the mAb A10 is likely to be NKG2D for all of the mouse strains tested and that NKG2D functions similarly in different strains (see below).

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

NKG2D expression on NK cells from different strains of mice. A, Splenic NK cells (gated on DX5+CD3−), and B, IL-2-activated NK cells from BALB/c mice stained with mAb A10. C, Alignment of putative NKG2D protein sequence translated from cDNA sequences of LAK cells derived from C57BL/6 (42 ), A/J, and DBA/2J strains of mice and from genomic sequences derived from the 129 × 1/SvJ strain (Celera Genomics database). The NKG2D transmembrane domain is indicated by the line. The extracellular domain of this type II integral membrane receptor spans residues 90–232.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Ab staining of splenic NK cells from various mouse strainsa

Activation function of NKG2D

To explore the capacity of the anti-NKG2D mAbs to block NKG2D recognition of its ligands, we infected Ba/F3 cells with retrovirus directing expression of RAE1δ (Ba/F3-RAE1δ). Staining with a sNKG2D tetramer revealed that the infected Ba/F3 cells express a high level of RAE1δ, while uninfected Ba/F3 and Ba/F3 cells expressing vector only (Ba/F3-PIG) showed nonspecific staining (Fig. 4⇓A). The surface expression of RAE1δ on Ba/F3 resulted in a significant increase in susceptibility to lysis compared with untransfected Ba/F3 and Ba/F3-PIG in a 51Cr release cytotoxicity assay (Fig. 4⇓B). The addition of mAb C7 blocked lysis of Ba/F3-RAE1δ to levels below that of Ba/F3-PIG by C57BL/6 LAK cells, implying mAb C7 may be interfering with the interaction of another ligand recognized by NKG2D. Meanwhile, mAb A10 did not affect lysis compared with control Ab (Fig. 4⇓C). We obtained similar results using BALB/c LAKs, indicating that NKG2D also serves as an activating receptor in BALB/c that also recognizes RAE1δ (Fig. 4⇓D). These results indicate differences in functional capacities of the anti-NKG2D mAbs. More importantly, mAb C7 can specifically block the NKG2D-RAE1δ interaction that otherwise enhances target killing.

           FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

RAE1δ activates NK cytolysis of Ba/F3 tumor targets via NKG2D. A, sNKG2D tetramer staining (10 μg/ml) of untransfected Ba/F3 cells, Ba/F3 cells transfected with vector only (Ba/F3-PIG), and Ba/F3 transfected with RAE1δ (Ba/F3-RAE1δ). For each FACS plot, the dark shading indicates unstained cells, the light line indicates staining with streptavidin-PE only, and the heavy line indicates staining with sNKG2D streptavidin-PE tetramer. B, In a 51Cr release assay using C57BL/6 LAKs as effector cells, expression of RAE1δ on Ba/F3 cells increased lysis compared with that of untransfected Ba/F3 and Ba/F3-PIG. C, This increase in lysis was inhibited by the addition of mAb C7, but not mAb A10. D, BALB/c LAKs also recognize RAE1δ expressed on Ba/F3 cells in a 51Cr release assay.

Many tumors constitutively express the ligands recognized by NKG2D, as indicated by a sNKG2D tetramer and flow cytometry (data not shown) (44, 46). One such tumor is LL/2, which expresses a high level of RAE1 and H60 on the cell surface. In a chromium release assay, LL/2 is lysed well by C57BL/6 LAK cells. This killing is significantly blocked by the addition of mAb C7 (Fig. 5⇓A). Comparable with the functional effects on Ba/F3-RAE1δ (Fig. 4⇑C), the addition of mAb A10 does not block killing compared with control Ab. Interestingly, the blocking effect with mAb C7 was not always observed with other tumors that also express RAE1, such as Mlg and YAC-1 (data not shown). Because natural killing involves the interaction of many NK receptors (activation and inhibitory) with their respective ligands, the contribution of NKG2D to tumor lysis may not always be readily apparent. Nevertheless, our data show that NKG2D does have a role in killing by B6 LAKs of certain tumors that constitutively express NKG2D ligands.

           FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

NKG2D has activating function on NK cells. A, Lysis of RAE1-expressing LL/2 tumor target can be partially inhibited with mAb C7. B, Daudi targets can be lysed by mAb A10, but not mAb C7 in a redirected lysis assay.

In redirected lysis assays, mAb A10 can stimulate NK cells to kill Daudi targets (Fig. 5⇑B). Interestingly, mAb C7 failed to stimulate redirected lysis, again indicating different functional properties of the anti-NKG2D mAbs. Taken together, these data indicate that NKG2D can contribute to NK cell activation in target killing.

NKG2D has costimulatory function

These data and those of published studies on NKG2D function in NK cells do not distinguish between direct activation or costimulation of NK cells by NKG2D recognition of ligand. To address this issue, we stimulated NK cells on immobilized anti-NKG2D mAb. Cytokine release assays revealed that stimulation via NKG2D using immobilized mAb A10 led to production of GM-CSF by KY-1 NK clones and C57BL/6 LAK cells (data not shown and Fig. 6⇓A). Comparable with the redirected lysis assays, neither immobilized mAb C7 nor isotype controls stimulated cytokine production (data not shown), demonstrating the specificity of the mAb A10 effect. However, the addition of affinity-purified 2.4G2 mAb inhibited mAb A10 stimulation of B6 LAKs, suggesting that stimulation by A10 may require concomitant CD16 (FcγRIII) engagement. To test this hypothesis, we were not able to produce F(ab′)2 because digestion of hamster Ig is problematic. However, when we stimulated LAKs from CD16−/− mice with immobilized anti-NKG2D alone, we failed to induce GM-CSF production (Fig. 6⇓A). This result was not due to the inability of CD16−/− LAKs to be stimulated because the level of GM-CSF production stimulated by PMA and ionomycin was comparable for both B6 and CD16−/− LAKs. Instead, these results suggest that activation of KY-1 and B6 LAK cells with mAb A10 alone was due to costimulation of CD16 activation by NKG2D.

           FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

NKG2D costimulates CD16, NK1.1, and Ly-49D activation. A, C57BL/6 LAKs are stimulated by plate-bound mAb A10 (1 μg/ml final concentration). This activation is inhibited by addition of soluble anti-CD16 (2.4G2) mAb. B, CD16−/− LAKs are not activated with A10 or C7 Ab alone (5 μg/ml). Addition of mAb PK136 (anti-NK1.1) with mAb A10 (5 μg/ml) leads to GM-CSF production at a significantly higher level compared with that of PK136 or PK136 with control Ab alone. mAb 4E4 (anti-Ly-49D)-mediated activation of CD16−/− LAKs is also augmented by addition of mAb A10, but not by mAb C7 or control mAb. For this particular experiment, the GM-CSF produced by cells stimulated with control mAb alone in the PK136 assay (left panel) was unusually high. Usually, control mAb leads to GM-CSF production at background or below (as seen in the 4E4 assay (right panel)).

To extend these observations, we examined the effect of NKG2D cross-linking on stimulation through other NK cell activation receptors. To avoid inadvertent FcR effects, we also used CD16−/− NK cells in these assays. The level of GM-CSF measured with the addition of both mAbs PK136 and A10 was significantly higher compared with stimulation with mAb PK136 alone (Fig. 6⇑B). In contrast, addition of mAb C7 with mAb PK136 did not lead to cytokine production by CD16−/− LAKs, again reflecting differences between the anti-NKG2D mAbs in terms of functional effects in these assays and ruling out a nonspecific effect simply due to mAb binding to NK cells. In addition, similar results were obtained in analysis of Ly-49D cross-linking using mAb 4E4. Stimulation of CD16−/− LAK cells using mAbs 4E4 and A10 led to significantly higher levels of GM-CSF production compared with stimulation with 4E4 alone. Thus, our data indicate that NKG2D synergizes with various activating NK receptors such as NKR-P1C, Ly-49D, and CD16, to produce a potent stimulatory signal.

Discussion

To fully activate T cells, signals must be delivered through the T cell Ag receptor and the costimulatory molecule, CD28 (35). The TCR is coupled to ITAM-associated signaling chains, which recruit and activate the Syk family tyrosine kinase ZAP-70. The relatively nonpolymorphic receptor, CD28, through recruitment of PI3-kinase, provides additional costimulatory signals through the Akt pathway. In this study, we have determined that all mature NK cells express the NKG2D receptor and that NK cell activation is potentiated by costimulation through NKG2D. In contrast to T cells, NK cells express multiple different ITAM signaling chains, and both Syk family tyrosine kinases (ZAP-70 and Syk). Whereas the contributions of the Syk family tyrosine kinases are incompletely understood, we have shown in this work that NKG2D can costimulate signals delivered by NK cell activation receptors that are coupled to KARAP/DAP12, CD3ζ, and FcεRIγ. Thus, these data strongly suggest that NKG2D may potentiate signals delivered by all known NK cell-expressed ITAM-associated signaling chains. Together with the expression of NKG2D on virtually all NK cells, our data suggest that NKG2D represents a global costimulatory receptor for NK cells.

In terms of the role of this costimulatory function in natural killing, we found that the C7 anti-NKG2D mAb blocks enhanced Ba/F3 target killing by transfection of the NKG2D ligand RAE1δ. In addition, C7 partially blocks the killing of the LL/2 tumor target that constitutively expresses NKG2D ligands. These data suggest that NKG2D synergizes with the action of a primary NK cell activation receptor in the killing of Ba/F3-RAE1δ and LL/2 tumors. In contrast, because mAb C7 did not always block lysis of other tumor targets expressing RAE1, it is possible that these particular tumors express ligands to trigger other primary activation NK receptors. Alternatively, in light of the known function of CD28 on T cells, CD28 may also costimulate NK cell activation, particularly because previous work has shown that it is expressed on all C57BL/6 NK cells (63). Although the relationship of NKG2D to CD28 remains to be defined, this may explain why mAb C7 only partially blocks LL/2 tumor lysis. Nevertheless, our data show that NKG2D is involved in the natural killing of some tumor targets even though it is not yet known what primary NK cell activation receptor confers specificity.

The functional differences we observed between mAbs A10 and C7 are intriguing. mAb A10 can trigger NKG2D, while mAb C7 cannot, and mAb C7 can block NKG2D recognition of RAE1δ, while mAb A10 cannot. These differences could be due to several factors. For example, the epitope recognized by mAb C7 may be similar to the one used by NKG2D to interact with RAE1δ. In addition, it is possible that mAb A10 recognizes a triggering epitope on NKG2D or perhaps is a better cross-linker of NKG2D molecules. Further studies mapping the epitope domains recognized by these two Abs should elucidate the functional differences between mAbs A10 and C7.

In contrast to other mouse NK gene complex-encoded lectin-like receptors, NKG2D is unique in that it is relatively nonpolymorphic. Furthermore, it does not belong to the NKG2 family of molecules, despite its name. It forms a homodimer, whereas the other NKG2 molecules heterodimerize with CD94 (64, 65, 66). It has just 25% amino acid identity to these molecules, comparable with the relationship of NKRP1 molecules with the Ly-49 family or the general relationship of NKC-encoded molecules to the lectin superfamily. Within a family, there is ∼85% amino acid identity.

For other NKC-encoded molecules, this homology can lead to significant serologic differences between mouse strains. mAbs specific for a given molecule in one strain may react with a functionally different family member in another mouse strain, as well as allelic forms. For example, Abs against activation receptors NKRP1C and Ly-49D in C57BL/6 mice react with related inhibitory receptors in other mouse strains (67, 68), while Abs against inhibitory Ly-49A in C57BL/6 react with related activation receptors in C57L and 129/J (68, 69). These studies highlight the distinct repertoire of NK receptors expressed within a strain as well as allelic polymorphisms between strains. This is not surprising given that the known ligands for these receptors are MHC class I molecules, which include several family members and are among the most polymorphic molecules encoded in the genome.

Strikingly, despite the evolving polymorphism that characterizes the NKC genetic regions flanking the NKG2D gene (M. G. Brown, L. Nadler, A. A. Scalzo, and W. M. Yokoyama, manuscript in preparation), there is little polymorphism observed for NKG2D. NKG2D does not appear to belong to a family of related molecules because there is evidence for only one NKG2D gene by Southern analysis of genomic clones from the NKC and by bioinformatics analysis of the Celera Genomics database. Between strains, NKG2D shows minimal amino acid sequence differences between four mouse strains. These molecules most likely represent alleles with the same function because of conservation of the transmembrane and cytoplasmic domains. The charged amino acid responsible for NKG2D interaction with its signaling chain DAP10 (arginine at residue 69) is conserved in all four mouse strains. Finally, our mAbs react with all NK cells from all strains with similar levels of expression, and the extracellular domain sequences are identical. Thus, NKG2D is unique among NKC-encoded molecules in showing little polymorphism.

With respect to its own ligands, the limited polymorphism of NKG2D is somewhat surprising because the ligands for NKG2D are numerous and heterogeneous, and display significant allelic polymorphism. NKG2D binds MICA, MICB, and several ULBP molecules, whereas mouse NKG2D binds H60, and several RAE1 family members (45, 46, 52, 70). Other than an apparent null allele of H60, significant allelic polymorphisms of its ligands have not been described in the mouse (71). By contrast, the human MICA and MICB genes are the most highly polymorphic of the MHC class Ib loci (72, 73). Although there are differences in ligand-binding affinities to mouse NKG2D, the affinities do not correlate with ligand sequence relationships (58). One possible explanation may be that NKG2D possesses multiple ligand-binding sites. This has been suggested by the recent crystal structure of NKG2D (74). Each one of these domains may provide an evolutionary advantage, again highlighting the functional importance of NKG2D.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge Adrian Davies and Dr. Mark Soloski for help in determining the specificities of the anti-NKG2D; Erika Blattenberger and Chad Dubbelde for expert technical assistance; Kim Marlotte for animal care; Laura Belorgey for initial studies on NKG2D expression in neonatal mice; and Drs. Marco Colonna, Susan Gilfillan, Jonathan Heusel, and Sungjin Kim for helpful discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the Barnes-Jewish Hospital Foundation, the Cancer Research Institute, and grants from the National Institutes of Health to W.M.Y. E.L.H. is in the Medical Scientist Training Program. L.N.C. is a physician research fellow of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute. W.M.Y. is an Investigator of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Wayne M. Yokoyama, Division of Rheumatology/Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8045, 660 South Euclid, St. Louis, MO 63110. E-mail address: yokoyama{at}imgate.wustl.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: NKC, NK gene complex; ITAM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based activation motif; ITIM, immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif; PI3, phosphatidylinositol 3; PIG, pMX-IRES-GFP; RAE, retinoic acid inducible early; sNKG2D, soluble NKG2D; LAK, lymphokine-activated killer; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary,; dhfr, dihydrofolate reductase.

  • Received February 12, 2002.
  • Accepted July 29, 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Biron, C. A., K. S. Byron, J. L. Sullivan. 1989. Severe herpesvirus infections in an adolescent without natural killer cells. N. Engl. J. Med. 320: 1731
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Ballas, Z. K., J. M. Turner, D. A. Turner, E. A. Goetzman, J. D. Kemp. 1990. A patient with simultaneous absence of “classical” natural killer cells (CD3−, CD16+, and NKH1+) and expansion of CD3+, CD4−, CD8−, NKH1+ subset. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 85: 453
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Trinchieri, G.. 1989. Biology of natural killer cells. Adv. Immunol. 47: 187
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Berke, G.. 1994. The binding and lysis of target cells by cytotoxic lymphocytes: molecular and cellular aspects. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 12: 735
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Perussia, B.. 1991. Lymphokine-activated killer cells, natural killer cells and cytokines. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 3: 49
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Kiessling, R., E. Klein, H. Wigzell. 1975. Natural killer cells in the mouse. I. Cytotoxic cells with specificity for mouse Moloney leukemia cells: specificity and distribution according to genotype. Eur. J. Immunol. 5: 112
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Herberman, R. B., M. E. Nunn, D. H. Lavrin. 1975. Natural cytotoxic reactivity of mouse lymphoid cells against syngeneic and allogeneic tumors. I. Distribution of reactivity and specificity. Int. J. Cancer 16: 216
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Lanier, L. L.. 2000. Turning on natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 191: 1259
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Lanier, L. L.. 1997. Natural killer cells: from no receptors to too many. Immunity 6: 371
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Ciccone, E., D. Pende, O. Viale, A. Than, C. Di Donato, A. M. Orengo, R. Biassoni, S. Verdiani, A. Amoroso, A. Moretta, L. Moretta. 1992. Involvement of HLA class I alleles in natural killer (NK) cell-specific functions: expression of HLA-Cw3 confers selective protection from lysis by alloreactive NK clones displaying a defined specificity (specificity 2). J. Exp. Med. 176: 963
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Moretta, A., M. Vitale, C. Bottino, A. M. Orengo, L. Morelli, R. Augugliaro, M. Barbaresi, E. Ciccone, L. Moretta. 1993. P58 molecules as putative receptors for major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules in human natural killer (NK) cells: anti-p58 antibodies reconstitute lysis of MHC class I-protected cells in NK clones displaying different specificities. J. Exp. Med. 178: 597
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Colonna, M., J. Samaridis. 1995. Cloning of immunoglobulin-superfamily members associated with HLA-C and HLA-B recognition by human natural killer cells. Science 268: 367
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Karlhofer, F. M., R. K. Ribaudo, W. M. Yokoyama. 1992. MHC class I alloantigen specificity of Ly-49+ IL-2-activated natural killer cells. Nature 358: 66
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Burshtyn, D. N., A. M. Scharenberg, N. Wagtmann, S. Rajagopalan, K. Berrada, T. Yi, J. P. Kinet, E. O. Long. 1996. Recruitment of tyrosine phosphatase HCP by the killer cell inhibitor receptor. Immunity 4: 77
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Campbell, K. S., M. Dessing, M. Lopez-Botet, M. Cella, M. Colonna. 1996. Tyrosine phosphorylation of a human killer inhibitory receptor recruits protein tyrosine phosphatase 1C. J. Exp. Med. 184: 93
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Nakamura, M. C., E. C. Niemi, M. J. Fisher, L. D. Shultz, W. E. Seaman, J. C. Ryan. 1997. Mouse Ly-49A interrupts early signaling events in natural killer cell cytotoxicity and functionally associates with the Shp-1 tyrosine phosphatase. J. Exp. Med. 185: 673
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Vely, F., S. Olivero, L. Olcese, A. Moretta, J. E. Damen, L. Liu, G. Krystal, J. C. Cambier, M. Daeron, E. Vivier. 1997. Differential association of phosphatases with hematopoietic co-receptors bearing immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibition motifs. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 1994
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Biassoni, R., C. Cantoni, M. Falco, S. Verdiani, C. Bottino, M. Vitale, R. Conte, A. Poggi, A. Moretta, L. Moretta. 1996. The human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-C-specific “activatory” or “inhibitory” natural killer cell receptors display highly homologous extracellular domains but differ in their transmembrane and intracytoplasmic portions. J. Exp. Med. 183: 645
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Bottino, C., S. Sivori, M. Vitale, C. Cantoni, M. Falco, D. Pende, L. Morelli, R. Augugliaro, G. Semenzato, R. Biassoni, et al 1996. A novel surface molecule homologous to the p58/p50 family of receptors is selectively expressed on a subset of human natural killer cells and induces both triggering of cell functions and proliferation. Eur. J. Immunol. 26: 1816
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Smith, H. R. C., F. M. Karlhofer, W. M. Yokoyama. 1994. Ly-49 multigene family expressed by IL-2-activated NK cells. J. Immunol. 153: 1068
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Smith, K. M., J. Wu, A. B. Bakker, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier. 1998. Cutting edge: Ly-49D and Ly-49H associate with mouse DAP12 and form activating receptors. J. Immunol. 161: 7
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Gosselin, P., L. H. Mason, J. Willette-Brown, J. R. Ortaldo, D. W. McVicar, S. K. Anderson. 1999. Induction of DAP12 phosphorylation, calcium mobilization, and cytokine secretion by Ly49H. J. Leukocyte Biol. 66: 165
    OpenUrlAbstract
  23. ↵
    Arase, N., H. Arase, S. Y. Park, H. Ohno, C. Ra, T. Saito. 1997. Association with FcR-γ is essential for activation signal through NKR-P1 (CD161) in natural killer (NK) cells and NK1.1+ T cells. J. Exp. Med. 186: 1957
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Lanier, L. L., G. Yu, J. H. Phillips. 1989. Co-association of CD3ζ with a receptor (CD16) for IgG Fc on human natural killer cells. Nature 342: 803
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. ↵
    Anderson, P., M. Caligiuri, C. O’Brien, T. Manley, J. Ritz, S. F. Schlossman. 1990. Fcγ receptor type III (CD16) is included in the ζ NK receptor complex expressed by human natural killer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 2274
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Wirthmueller, U., T. Kurosaki, M. S. Murakami, J. V. Ravetch. 1992. Signal transduction by FcγRIII (CD16) is mediated through the γ chain. J. Exp. Med. 175: 1381
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  27. ↵
    Lanier, L. L., B. C. Cortiss, J. Wu, C. Leong, J. H. Phillips. 1998. Immunoreceptor DAP12 bearing a tyrosine-based activation motif is involved in activating NK cells. Nature 391: 703
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    McVicar, D. W., L. S. Taylor, P. Gosselin, J. Willette-Brown, A. I. Mikhael, R. L. Geahlen, M. C. Nakamura, P. Linnemeyer, W. E. Seaman, S. K. Anderson, et al 1998. DAP12-mediated signal transduction in natural killer cells: a dominant role for the syk protein-tyrosine kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 273: 32934
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Schwartz, R. H.. 1996. Models of T cell anergy: is there a common molecular mechanism?. J. Exp. Med. 184: 1
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Bretscher, P.. 1992. The two-signal model of lymphocyte activation twenty-one years later. Immunol. Today 13: 74
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. ↵
    Aruffo, A., B. Seed. 1987. Molecular cloning of a CD28 cDNA by a high-efficiency COS cell expression system. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84: 8573
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  32. ↵
    June, C. H., J. A. Bluestone, L. M. Nadler, C. B. Thompson. 1994. The B7 and CD28 receptor families. Immunol. Today 15: 321
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    August, A., S. Gibson, Y. Kawakami, T. Kawakami, G. B. Mills, B. Dupont. 1994. CD28 is associated with and induces the immediate tyrosine phosphorylation and activation of the Tec family kinase ITK/EMT in the human Jurkat leukemic T-cell line. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 9347
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    August, A., B. Dupont. 1994. CD28 of T lymphocytes associates with phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. Int. Immunol. 6: 769
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. ↵
    Chambers, C. A., J. P. Allison. 1997. Co-stimulation in T cell responses. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 396
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    August, A., B. Dupont. 1994. Activation of src family kinase lck following CD28 crosslinking in the Jurkat leukemic cell line. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 199: 1466
    OpenUrl
  37. ↵
    Prasad, K. V., Y. C. Cai, M. Raab, B. Duckworth, L. Cantley, S. E. Shoelson, C. E. Rudd. 1994. T-cell antigen CD28 interacts with the lipid kinase phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase by a cytoplasmic Tyr(P)-Met-Xaa-Met motif. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 2834
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Truitt, K. E., C. M. Hicks, J. B. Imboden. 1994. Stimulation of CD28 triggers an association between CD28 and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase in Jurkat T cells. J. Exp. Med. 179: 1071
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Azuma, M., M. Cayabyab, D. Buck, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier. 1992. Involvement of CD28 in MHC-unrestricted cytotoxicity mediated by a human natural killer leukemia cell line. J. Immunol. 149: 1115
    OpenUrlAbstract
  40. ↵
    Chambers, B. J., M. Salcedo, H. G. Ljunggren. 1996. Triggering of natural killer cells by the costimulatory molecule CD80 (B7-1). Immunity 5: 311
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Houchins, J. P., T. Yabe, C. McSherry, F. H. Bach. 1991. DNA sequence analysis of NKG2, a family of related cDNA clones encoding type II integral membrane proteins on human natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 173: 1017
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Ho, E. L., J. W. Heusel, M. G. Brown, K. Matsumoto, A. A. Scalzo, W. M. Yokoyama. 1998. Murine Nkg2d and Cd94 are clustered within the natural killer complex and are expressed independently in natural killer cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 6320
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Bauer, S., V. Groh, J. Wu, A. Steinle, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier, T. Spies. 1999. Activation of NK cells and T cells by NKG2D, a receptor for stress- inducible MICA. Science 285: 727
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Diefenbach, A., A. M. Jamieson, S. D. Liu, N. Shastri, D. H. Raulet. 2000. Ligands for the murine NKG2D receptor: expression by tumor cells and activation of NK cells and macrophages. Nat. Immun. 1: 119
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Cosman, D., J. Mullberg, C. L. Sutherland, W. Chin, R. Armitage, W. Fanslow, M. Kubin, N. J. Chalupny. 2001. ULBPs, novel MHC class I-related molecules, bind to CMV glycoprotein UL16 and stimulate NK cytotoxicity through the NKG2D receptor. Immunity 14: 123
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  46. ↵
    Cerwenka, A., A. B. H. Bakker, T. McClanahan, J. Wagner, J. Wu, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier. 2000. Retinoic acid early inducible genes define a ligand family for the activating NKG2D receptor in mice. Immunity 12: 721
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Girardi, M., D. E. Oppenheim, C. R. Steele, J. M. Lewis, E. Glusac, R. Filler, P. Hobby, B. Sutton, R. E. Tigelaar, A. C. Hayday. 2001. Regulation of cutaneous malignancy by γδ T cells. Science 294: 605
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Wu, J., Y. Song, A. B. Bakker, S. Bauer, T. Spies, L. L. Lanier, J. H. Phillips. 1999. An activating immunoreceptor complex formed by NKG2D and DAP10. Science 285: 730
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Chang, C., J. Dietrich, A. G. Harpur, J. A. Lindquist, A. Haude, Y. W. Loke, A. King, M. Colonna, J. Trowsdale, M. J. Wilson. 1999. Cutting edge: KAP10, a novel transmembrane adapter protein genetically linked to DAP12 but with unique signaling properties. J. Immunol. 163: 4651
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Groh, V., R. Rhinehart, J. Randolph-Habecker, M. S. Topp, S. R. Riddell, T. Spies. 2001. Costimulation of CD8αβ T cells by NKG2D via engagement by MIC induced on virus-infected cells. Nat. Immun. 2: 255
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Wu, J., H. Cherwinski, T. Spies, J. H. Phillips, L. L. Lanier. 2000. DAP10 and DAP12 form distinct, but functionally cooperative, receptor complexes in natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 192: 1059
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Diefenbach, A., E. R. Jensen, A. M. Jamieson, D. H. Raulet. 2001. Rae1 and H60 ligands of the NKG2D receptor stimulate tumor immunity. Nature 413: 165
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Pende, D., C. Cantoni, P. Rivera, M. Vitale, R. Castriconi, S. Marcenaro, M. Nanni, R. Biassoni, C. Bottino, A. Moretta, L. Moretta. 2001. Role of NKG2D in tumor cell lysis mediated by human NK cells: cooperation with natural cytotoxicity receptors and capability of recognizing tumors of nonepithelial origin. Eur. J. Immunol. 31: 1076
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Wang, L. L., D. T. Chu, A. O. Dokun, W. M. Yokoyama. 2000. Inducible expression of the gp49B inhibitory receptor on NK cells. J. Immunol. 164: 5215
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Idris, A. H., K. Iizuka, H. R. C. Smith, A. A. Scalzo, W. M. Yokoyama. 1998. Genetic control of natural killing and in vivo tumor elimination by the Chok locus. J. Exp. Med. 188: 2243
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  56. ↵
    Morita, S., T. Kojima, T. Kitamura. 2000. Plat-E: an efficient and stable system for transient packaging of retroviruses. Gene Ther. 7: 1063
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  57. ↵
    Smith, H. R., H. H. Chuang, L. L. Wang, M. Salcedo, J. W. Heusel, W. M. Yokoyama. 2000. Nonstochastic coexpression of activation receptors on murine natural killer cells. J. Exp. Med. 191: 1341
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  58. ↵
    Carayannopoulos, L. N., O. V. Naidenko, J. Kinder, E. L. Ho, D. H. Fremont, and W. M. Yokoyama. 2002. Ligands for murine NKG2D display heterogeneous binding behavior. Eur. J. Immunol. In press.
  59. ↵
    Harlow, E., D. Lane. 1988. Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor.
  60. ↵
    Coligan, J. E., A. M. Kruisbeek, D. H. Margulies, E. M. Shevach, W. Strober. 1996. Current Protocols in Immunology Wiley, New York.
  61. ↵
    Wang, L. L., J. Blasioli, D. R. Plas, M. L. Thomas, W. M. Yokoyama. 1999. Specificity of the SH2 domains of SHP-1 in the interaction with the immunoreceptor tyrosine-based inhibitory motif-bearing receptor gp49B. J. Immunol. 162: 1318
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  62. ↵
    Diefenbach, A., A. M. Jamieson, S. D. Liu, N. Shastri, D. H. Raulet. 2000. Novel ligands for the murine NKG2D receptor: expression by tumor cells and activation of NK cells and macrophages. Nat. Immun. 1: 119
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  63. ↵
    Nandi, D., J. A. Gross, J. P. Allison. 1994. CD28-mediated costimulation is necessary for optimal proliferation of murine NK cells. J. Immunol. 152: 3361
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  64. ↵
    Phillips, J. H., C. W. Chang, J. Mattson, J. E. Gumperz, P. Parham, L. L. Lanier. 1996. CD94 and a novel associated protein (94ap) form a NK cell receptor involved in the recognition of HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C allotypes. Immunity 5: 163
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  65. ↵
    Lazetic, S., C. Chang, J. P. Houchins, L. L. Lanier, J. H. Phillips. 1996. Human natural killer cell receptors involved in MHC class I recognition are disulfide-linked heterodimers of CD94 and NKG2 subunits. J. Immunol. 157: 4741
    OpenUrlAbstract
  66. ↵
    Carretero, M., C. Cantoni, T. Bellon, C. Bottino, R. Biassoni, A. Rodriguez, J. J. Perezvillar, L. Moretta, A. Moretta, M. Lopez-Botet. 1997. The CD94 and NKG2-A C-type lectins covalently assemble to form a natural killer cell inhibitory receptor for HLA class I molecules. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 563
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  67. ↵
    Kung, S. K., R. C. Su, J. Shannon, R. G. Miller. 1999. The NKR-P1B gene product is an inhibitory receptor on SJL/J NK cells. J. Immunol. 162: 5876
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  68. ↵
    Makrigiannis, A. P., P. Gosselin, L. H. Mason, L. S. Taylor, D. W. McVicar, J. R. Ortaldo, S. K. Anderson. 1999. Cloning and characterization of a novel activating Ly49 closely related to Ly49A. J. Immunol. 163: 4931
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  69. ↵
    Mehta, I. K., H. R. C. Smith, J. Wang, D. H. Margulies, W. M. Yokoyama. 2000. A “chimeric” C57L-derived Ly49 inhibitory receptor resembling the Ly49D activation receptor. Cell. Immunol. 209: 29
    OpenUrl
  70. ↵
    Groh, V., S. Bahram, S. Bauer, A. Herman, M. Beauchamp, T. Spies. 1996. Cell stress-regulated human major histocompatibility complex class I gene expressed in gastrointestinal epithelium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 12445
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  71. ↵
    Malarkannan, S., P. P. Shih, P. A. Eden, T. Horng, A. R. Zuberi, G. Christianson, D. Roopenian, N. Shastri. 1998. The molecular and functional characterization of a dominant minor H antigen, H60. J. Immunol. 161: 3501
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  72. ↵
    Fodil, N., L. Laloux, V. Wanner, P. Pellet, G. Hauptmann, N. Mizuki, H. Inoko, T. Spies, I. Theodorou, S. Bahram. 1996. Allelic repertoire of the human MHC class I MICA gene. Immunogenetics 44: 351
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  73. ↵
    Bahram, S.. 2000. MIC genes: from genetics to biology. Adv. Immunol. 76: 1
    OpenUrlPubMed
  74. ↵
    Li, P., D. L. Morris, B. E. Willcox, A. Steinle, T. Spies, R. K. Strong. 2001. Complex structure of the activating immunoreceptor NKG2D and its MHC class I-like ligand MICA. Nat. Immun. 2: 443
    OpenUrl
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 169 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 169, Issue 7
1 Oct 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Costimulation of Multiple NK Cell Activation Receptors by NKG2D
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Costimulation of Multiple NK Cell Activation Receptors by NKG2D
Emily L. Ho, Leonidas N. Carayannopoulos, Jennifer Poursine-Laurent, Jeremy Kinder, Beatrice Plougastel, Hamish R. C. Smith, Wayne M. Yokoyama
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2002, 169 (7) 3667-3675; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3667

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Costimulation of Multiple NK Cell Activation Receptors by NKG2D
Emily L. Ho, Leonidas N. Carayannopoulos, Jennifer Poursine-Laurent, Jeremy Kinder, Beatrice Plougastel, Hamish R. C. Smith, Wayne M. Yokoyama
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2002, 169 (7) 3667-3675; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3667
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606