Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Pulmonary Surfactant Protein A Up-Regulates Activity of the Mannose Receptor, a Pattern Recognition Receptor Expressed on Human Macrophages

Alison A. Beharka, Cecilia D. Gaynor, Byoung K. Kang, Dennis R. Voelker, Francis X. McCormack and Larry S. Schlesinger
J Immunol October 1, 2002, 169 (7) 3565-3573; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3565
Alison A. Beharka
*Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, Interdisciplinary Immunology Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cecilia D. Gaynor
*Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, Interdisciplinary Immunology Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Byoung K. Kang
*Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, Interdisciplinary Immunology Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Dennis R. Voelker
†Lord and Taylor Laboratory for Lung Biochemistry, Program in Cell Biology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Center for Immunology and Respiratory Medicine and Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80206;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Francis X. McCormack
‡Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Larry S. Schlesinger
*Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Division of Infectious Diseases, Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, Interdisciplinary Immunology Program, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Inhaled particulates and microbes are continually cleared by a complex array of lung innate immune determinants, including alveolar macrophages (AMs). AMs are unique cells with an enhanced capacity for phagocytosis that is due, in part, to increased activity of the macrophage mannose receptor (MR), a pattern recognition receptor for various microorganisms. The local factors that “shape” AM function are not well understood. Surfactant protein A (SP-A), a major component of lung surfactant, participates in the innate immune response and can enhance phagocytosis. Here we show that SP-A selectively enhances MR expression on human monocyte-derived macrophages, a process involving both the attached sugars and collagen-like domain of SP-A. The newly expressed MR is functional. Monocyte-derived macrophages on an SP-A substrate demonstrated enhanced pinocytosis of mannose BSA and phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan-coated microspheres. The newly expressed MR likely came from intracellular pools because: 1) up-regulation of the MR by SP-A occurred by 1 h, 2) new protein synthesis was not necessary for MR up-regulation, and 3) pinocytosis of mannose BSA via MR recycling was increased. AMs from SP-A−/− mice have reduced MR expression relative to SP-A+/+. SP-A up-regulation of MR activity provides a mechanism for enhanced phagocytosis of microbes by AMs, thereby enhancing lung host defense against extracellular pathogens or, paradoxically, enhancing the potential for intracellular pathogens to enter their intracellular niche. SP-A contributes to the alternative activation state of the AM in the lung.

Particles and microbes are inhaled into lung alveoli, where they are subsequently phagocytosed. Alveolar macrophages (AMs),3 which are situated at the air-tissue interface in the alveoli, are the first professional phagocytes to encounter inhaled microbes. AMs recognize and remove microbes in part by using a variety of pattern recognition receptors (PRRs). PRRs are so called because of their ability to recognize pathogen-associated molecular patterns (1). The mannose receptor (MR), a prototypic PRR, is expressed in abundance on AMs, monocyte-derived macrophages (MDMs), and dendritic cells, but not on monocytes (2, 3). The MR mediates both pinocytosis and phagocytosis and can serve as a molecular link between innate and adaptive immune responses (4). Enhanced PRR expression by AMs is one marker of an alternatively activated cell with enhanced phagocytic function and reduced microbicidal activity (5, 6). IL-4 potently enhances macrophage MR activity, thus generating an alternative activation phenotype (5).

Due to their location in the lung, AMs come in contact with the surfactant monolayer. Pulmonary surfactant is a multimolecular complex composed of proteins and lipids and serves to reduce the surface tension of the alveoli, allowing expansion of the lung during inspiration. Surfactant protein A (SP-A), a member of the collectin family, is the most abundant surfactant-associated protein (7). Monomeric SP-A subunits are 28- to 36-kDa (rat) or 35-kDa (human) polypeptides that contain one (human) or two (rat) N-linked oligosaccharide attachment sites, a hydroxyproline-rich collagen-like domain, and carbohydrate recognition domains (CRDs) (8). Subunits of SP-A assemble into trimers and then further associate into 18 mers composed of six trimers through interchain disulfide bond formation at the N terminus and noncovalent interactions between the collagen-like sequences. The resulting “bouquet of tulips” configuration, containing CRDs arranged on stalk-like scaffolding of collagen tails (9), provides a high valency of binding sites for microbe and host cell molecules (8). Human SP-A isolated from patients with the lung disease alveolar proteinosis (APP-SP-A) forms even larger aggregates by self-association of multiple “bouquets” (10, 11). Mutational analyses have been performed on recombinant rat SP-A synthesized in insect cells. Wild-type recombinant rat SP-A produced in this manner retains the functional properties of the natural protein despite simplified, mannose-rich glycosylation and incomplete proline hydroxylation and oligomeric assembly (8). Studies using recombinant proteins with site-directed mutations have revealed that the attached carbohydrate of SP-A is important for SP-A-mediated phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis(M.tb) (12) and that the collagen-like domain is required for complete oligomeric assembly and binding to the SP-A receptor on alveolar epithelial cells (8).

Recent studies using SP-A−/− mice provide evidence that SP-A plays an important role in innate immunity (13). SP-A−/− mice are susceptible to infection with a variety of extracellular bacteria (13, 14, 15, 16). SP-A can interact with both microorganisms and leukocytes in vitro (reviewed in Refs. 7 and 17). Our laboratory has demonstrated that SP-A enhances phagocytosis of the intracellular pathogen M.tb by human macrophages and that this response is mediated through a direct interaction between SP-A and the macrophage (12). SP-A-enhanced phagocytosis of M.tb by macrophages, including human AMs, occurs rapidly (within 1–2 h). Because phagocytosis of M.tb is a receptor-mediated event, one mechanism for the effect of SP-A on macrophages may be to enhance the surface expression and/or function of phagocyte receptors (18, 19). In our prior work, inhibitor studies suggested a role for the macrophage MR in SP-A enhancement of phagocytosis (12). Here we examined the effect of SP-A and its distinct structural components on MR expression and function. Our results demonstrate that SP-A up-regulates surface expression of functional MR, but does not alter complement receptor (CR) expression on human macrophages. Both the collagen region and sugars of SP-A are needed to optimize this effect.

Materials and Methods

Buffers, reagents, and media

Dulbecco’s PBS with and without Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) and RPMI 1640 medium with l-glutamine (RPMI) (Life Technologies) were purchased. RPMI medium was used alone or with 20 mM HEPES buffer (pH 7.2; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and 1 mg/ml human serum albumin (HSA) (Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA). Polymyxin B sulfate (PMB) was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Lipoarabinomannan (LAM) from the Erdman strain of M. tb was provided by Dr. P. J. Brennan and colleagues (Colorado State University, Ft. Collins, CO; National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Contract 25147).

Antibodies

Mouse anti-human mAb against CR1 (anti-CD35; clone J3D3), CR4 (anti-CD11c; clone BU15), and CR3 (anti-CD11b; clone Bear 1) were purchased from Immunotech (Westbrook, ME). Bear 1 recognizes an epitope on the α-chain of CR3 (20), BU15 recognizes the α-chain of CR4 (21), and J3D3 recognizes CR1 (22). Mouse mAb IgG1 from Immunotech was used as the isotypic control for the above mAb. Purified and PE-labeled mouse anti-human MR and its purified and PE-conjugated subtypic control mAb, mouse IgG1κ, were purchased from BD PharMingen (San Diego, CA). Polyclonal rabbit anti-human MRs and rabbit anti-mouse MRs were provided by Dr. P. Stahl (Washington University, St. Louis, MO). A polyclonal rabbit anti-human Ab against SP-A was used (12). Normal rabbit serum (NRS) was used as one control for the experiments involving polyclonal Ab. FITC- or PE-conjugated goat anti-rabbit Ab and FITC- or PE-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ab were used as secondary Abs and were purchased from Cappel (West Chester, PA).

SP-A proteins

The SP-A proteins used in this study were developed and purified as previously described (23) (Fig. 1⇓). In brief, bronchoaveolar lavage was used to obtain APP-SP-A from healthy volunteers (native human SP-A) (24). Native rat SP-A was purified from silica-pretreated Sprague Dawley rat lungs (25, 26). Recombinant rat SP-A (which is deficient in hydroxyproline content and hence designated SP-Ahyp) was produced from SF-9 insect cells after infection with a recombinant baculovirus containing a 1.6-kb cDNA for rat SP-A (23). Recombinant rat SP-A proteins devoid of oligosaccharides at one or both of the consensus sequences for N-linked glycosylation were generated by amino acid substitutions at the Asn (SP-Ahyp,thr1) or Asn187 site (SP-Ahyp,ser187) or at both sites (SP-Ahyp,thr1,ser187) (23). Carbohydrate-deficient recombinant SP-A proteins retain structural and biologic functions, including oligomerization, aggregation of phospholipid liposomes, binding to immobilized carbohydrate, inhibition of lipid secretion from type II cells, and competition for receptor occupancy on type II cells (23). The synthesis of the mutant recombinant rat SP-A protein containing a nested deletion of the proximal collagen-like region (Gly8–Gly44) (TM2), truncation of the protein at the neck region resulting in a protein lacking the collagen and the NH2-terminal regions (TM1-2-3), and an amino acid substitution at the Asn187 site (TM1-2-3ser187) were made as previously described (27, 28). Purity of the SP-A preparation was assessed by SDS-PAGE. Bacterial endotoxin levels were determined using the Limulus amebocyte lysate kit (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD). Endotoxin levels in SP-A preparations ranged from undetectable to 300 pg/μg protein, with an average of 15 pg of endotoxin per microgram of protein.

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Schematic of rat and recombinant rat (hyp) SP-As. Native rat SP-A is composed of two isoforms, which are defined the by presence or absence of an interchain disulfide-forming N-terminal extension composed of amino acids Ile-Lys-Cys (IKC). The long and short isoforms are otherwise identical, containing an N-terminal segment (NTS) denoted domain 1, a collagen-like region divided by a midpoint interruption at Gly44– into domains 2 and 3, a neck region, and a carbohydrate recognition domain. Sites of N-linked glycosylation (complex branching structure) are found at Asn1 of the NTS and Asn187 of the CRD. Recombinant rat SP-A synthesized in insect cells is similar to the native protein, except for simplified mannose-rich glycosylation (Y-shaped structure), incomplete proline hydroxylation, and oligomeric assembly as nonamers rather than octadecamers. Mutant recombinant SP-As devoid of attached carbohydrate at the 1 (hyp, thr1) or 1 and 187 (hyp, thr1, ser187) positions were generated by Asn1Thr and Asn187Ser substitutions. Truncated mutant (TM) recombinant SP-As containing deletions of first half of the collagen-like region (TM2), the NTS, and the entire collagen-like region (TM1, 2, 3), or the NTS, the collagen-like region and the carbohdyrate attached to Asn187 (TM1, 2, 3, ser187) are shown.

Human monocytes and macrophages

Blood was obtained from healthy adult volunteers who were purified protein derivative skin test negative. Mononuclear cells from single donors were isolated from heparinized blood on Ficoll-sodium diatrizoate (Pharmacia Fine Chemical, Piscataway, NJ) and cultured in Teflon wells (Savillex, Minnetonka, MN) for 1 (monocytes) or 5 days (MDMs) in the presence of 20% autologous serum (1.5–2.0 × 106 mononuclear cells/ml) at 37°C (29). On the day of each experiment, PBMCs were removed from Teflon wells and washed extensively, and the monocyte or MDM fraction was purified by adherence.

SP-A−/− and SP-A+/+ mice

Breeder pairs of gene-targeted SP-A-deficient mice (SP-A−/−) and wild-type (SP-A+/+) controls of the same strain (129J background) were kindly provided by Drs. J. Whitsett and T. Korfhagen (University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH) (30). The mice used in the current study were the progeny of these original breeders and were bred at the University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA). Pathogen-free female and male 8- to 14-wk-old mice were housed under barrier conditions with an environmentally controlled atmosphere. All conditions and handling of the animals were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at University of Iowa and followed National Institutes of Health Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.

Mice were sacrificed via CO2 asphyxiation. Resident peritoneal macrophages were obtained by peritoneal lavage with ice-cold HBSS supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (Life Technologies). AMs were obtained by bronchoalveolar lavage with 37°C HBSS supplemented with 10 mM HEPES (31).

Flow cytometry

PBMCs (29) were incubated with SP-A proteins (10 μg/ml) or HSA (control) in Teflon wells for various time periods. After washing, cells were incubated with PE-conjugated mAbs to CR1, CR3, or CR4. PBMCs incubated with the appropriate PE-conjugated subtypic control mAb served as negative controls. Additionally, in the initial experiments, after washing, the cells were incubated with rabbit anti-human MR Ab or NRS followed by PE-conjugated anti-rabbit secondary Ab. Subsequent experiments used PE-conjugated mAb against human MR or the appropriate PE-conjugated subtypic control mAb. As a positive control for up-regulation of the MR, MDMs were incubated with IL-4 (Genzyme, Cambridge, MA) for 20 h before staining (5). To determine whether new protein synthesis was involved in MR up-regulation, 10 μg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) was added to select wells for 60 min before addition of SP-A. To determine whether LPS was contributing to the response, LPS at double the highest level found in the SP-A preparations (15 ng/ml) was added to select wells. Additionally, in some experiments, the LPS neutralizer PMB (5 μg/ml) (32) was added to select wells 30 min before or simultaneous with SP-A. Because the results were the same with both approaches, experiments using PMB were combined.

In experiments using mouse peritoneal or alveolar macrophages, 5 × 105 cells were incubated with rabbit anti-mouse MR (1/200) or NRS (control). After washing, cells were incubated with FITC-conjugated goat anti-rabbit Ig as the secondary Ab.

Cells were fixed in paraformadehyde and were analyzed for mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) and percentage of positive cells (95/5% cutoff) using a FACScan Flow Cytometry System (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ). Macrophages were identified using side scatter vs forward scatter. MFI due to nonspecific binding (using a subtypic control Ab) was subtracted out to provide a specific MFI. The percent change in specific MFI in each experiment was calculated as the percentage change in positive cells.

ELISA to determine possible cross-reactivity between SP-A and Abs against MR

APP-SP-A from 0 to 500 ng/well was adhered to a Costar medium binding ELISA plate (Cambridge, MA) using 0.05 M carbonate/bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6). After washing, nonspecific binding sites were blocked with 5% BSA in PBS for 60 min at 4°C. Anti-SP-A, polyclonal anti-MR, monoclonal anti-MR, NRS, or isotypic control Ab was added to appropriate wells overnight at 4°C. After washing, the appropriate HRP secondary Ab (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Richmond, CA) was incubated with the monolayers for 2 h at room temperature. The developing reaction (Bio-Rad Laboratories) was stopped with 5% oxalic acid (J. T. Baker Chemical Company, Phillipsburg, NJ). The plate was read at 405 nm on a microplate autoreader (Bio-Tek Instruments, Winooski, VT). The mean ± SD of the absorbance for triplicate wells of each type was calculated. The OD of control wells devoid of Ag or primary Ab (typically ≤0.10) was subtracted out from each test group.

Immunofluorescence microscopy

MDMs in monolayer culture on glass coverslips were incubated with APP-SP-A (10 μg/ml) or HSA for 1 h at 37°C and then were washed, incubated for an additional 10 min at 37°C, and then cooled to 4°C. The cells were next fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde for 5 min, washed, and incubated with monoclonal anti-MR (1/500) in 0.2% BSA in PBS without Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions for 1 h, followed by FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse Ab (1/100; Cappel) for 1 h. In certain experiments, lysosome-associated membrane protein-1 Ab, which stains intracellular late endosomal and lysosomal compartments (33), served as a control to confirm a nonpermeabilized cell membrane. To determine the possible effect of LPS contamination of the SP-A preparation, certain MDM monolayers were incubated with either 5 μg/ml PMB before SP-A or 15 ng/ml LPS.

The coverslips were mounted on glass slides and examined by confocal, scanning laser microscope (Zeiss, Thornwood, NY). Fluorescence intensity of each cell section was quantitated using the line intensity option of the Laser Sharp Reference Program (Bio-Rad Laboratories). A line was placed through the cell membrane of each cell at four points, corresponding to 12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock on the cell, and MFI of that area of the cell was calculated using the software program. The values presented represent specific MFIs in which the MFI of the subtypic control slides has been subtracted out. MFI was determined for 20 cells per coverslip in each test group, three coverslips per donor, and a minimum of two donors were used for each treatment.

Iodination of mannose-BSA

Mannose-BSA was iodinated by the lactoperoxidase method in the core radioisotope faculty at the Veterans Affairs Medical Center (Iowa City, IA). Specific activity was typically 2–4 mCi/μg mannose-BSA protein, with 95% of total counts being TCA precipitable. The preparation was used within 3 wk of iodination (29).

Uptake of 125I-labeled mannose-BSA by monocyte-derived macrophages

PBMCs in Teflon wells (cells is suspension) were incubated with 10 μg/ml APP-SP-A or HSA for 60 min at 37°C. After washing, cells were incubated in PBS containing Ca2+ and Mg2+ with or without 2.5 mg/ml mannan for 20 min at 37°C. One microgram of 125I-labeled mannose-BSA was then added for 10 min at 37°C. The cells were cooled to 4°C and washed six times, and the final pellet was collected and counted using a Beckman gamma counter (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, CA). In other experiments, 5-day-old MDMs were placed in monolayer culture on glass coverslips. The monolayers were incubated with 10–20 μg/ml SP-A or HSA for 60 min at 37°C. After washing, separate wells were incubated with PBS or 4 mg/ml mannan in PBS for 10 min at 37°C. Then, 1 μg of 125I-labeled mannose BSA was incubated with the monolayers for 10 min at 37°C. The monolayers were cooled to 4°C and the glass coverslips were transferred to a new 24-well tissue culture pate and were washed eight times. The cells were lysed with 1% SDS and the lysates were counted in a Beckman gamma counter. MR functional activity was defined as mannan-inhibitable uptake of 125I-labeled mannose-BSA. As a positive control, MDMs in Teflon wells were incubated with IL-4 (Genzyme) for 20 h before analysis.

Preparation of LAM-coated microspheres

LAM-coated microspheres were prepared as described (34). Briefly, polybead polystyrene microspheres (Polysciences, Warrington, PA) (2.0 × 108) that were 1 μm in diameter were washed two times in 0.05 M carbonate-bicarbonate buffer (pH 9.6) in presiliconized polypropylene tubes (National Scientific Supply, San Rafael, CA) and then incubated with 50 μg of Erdman M.tb strain LAM or buffer (control) for 1 h at 37°C on an Adams Nutator. The microspheres were then washed twice and incubated in 5% HSA in PBS (2 h at 37°C) to block nonspecific binding sites. Lastly, the microspheres were washed, resuspended in 0.5% HSA, and used in the adherence assay described below.

Phagocytosis of LAM- and HSA-coated microspheres by SP-A-treated macrophages

MDMs (2 × 105) were plated on a substrate of SP-A or HSA (control) for 90 min (12). After washing, monolayers were incubated with LAM-coated or HSA-coated microspheres (2.0 × 107) in RPMI + HEPES + HSA at 37°C for 60 min. After 60 min, the MDMs were washed to remove nonadherent microspheres and were fixed in 10% formalin. In certain wells, monolayers were preincubated with 2.5 mg/ml mannan for 20 min to inhibit MR activity (29). The mean number (±SD) of microspheres per MDM on each of duplicate or triplicate coverslips was determined by counting a minimum of 200 consecutive MDMs per coverslip by phase contrast microscopy.

Statistics

A two-tailed Student’s t test was used for analyzing differences between specific test groups and control groups in each experiment.

Results

SP-A up-regulates expression of the MR on human macrophages

SP-A up-regulates the phagocytosis of M. tb rapidly (within 60 min) via a direct interaction with the macrophage, indicating that SP-A influences macrophage receptor activity (12). We used flow cytometry to determine whether SP-A up-regulates the expression of the MR on MDMs. The results of a typical experiment are displayed as histograms (Fig. 2⇓) and cumulative data are presented in Table I⇓. The MR was constitutively expressed on MDMs incubated with HSA (control) (Fig. 2⇓A). After exposure to SP-A for 60 min, expression of the MR (based on both percent change in MFI and percent positive cells) was enhanced (p < 0.05) when compared with the control (Fig. 2⇓A and Table I⇓). IL-4 up-regulated MR expression as a positive control (5) (Fig. 2⇓C and Table I⇓). SP-A effects can be influenced by LPS contamination (35, 36). Incubation of macrophages with PMB and then SP-A did not affect the SP-A-induced up-regulation of MR expression (p > 0.1) (Table I⇓), and PMB alone had no effect on MR expression (p > 0.05) (data not shown). Additionally, incubation with LPS alone did not increase MR expression (p > 0.1) (Table I⇓).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Effect of SP-A on phagocytic receptor expression on human MDMsa

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

MR but not CR4 expression is up-regulated after exposure to SP-A. In this representative experiment (n = 6), 5-day-old PBMCs in Teflon wells were incubated with APP-SP-A or HSA (control) for 1 h. After washing, the SP-A-treated and control MDMs were incubated with either polyclonal rabbit anti-human MR Ab or NRS (as a negative control) followed by PE-conjugated anti-rabbit Ig (A). Additionally, PBMCs were incubated with PE-conjugated CR4 or subtypic control mAb (B). As a positive control for the MR, PBMCs were incubated with IL-4 before staining for the MR (C). The stained cells were analyzed by flow cytometry; the average of duplicate samples is shown. In each histogram, the thin, broken line represents the fluorescence intensity of HSA-treated cells incubated with the appropriate control Ab (SP-A-treated cells incubated with subtypic control Ab gave the same results; data not shown). The dotted line represents the fluorescence intensity of HSA-treated cells stained for the MR or CR4, and the thick, solid line represents the fluorescence intensity of APP-SP-A- or IL-4-treated cells stained for the MR or CR4.

To determine whether SP-A selectively up-regulated MR expression or was capable of up-regulating other receptors involved in phagocytosis, we assessed the surface expression of CRs after SP-A incubation by flow cytometry. CR4 was constitutively expressed on MDMs (Fig. 2⇑B). Incubation with SP-A did not significantly alter expression of CR4 (Fig. 2⇑B and Table I⇑) or CR1 and CR3 (Table I⇑).

We next assessed the location of the MR on control or APP-SP-A-treated monocytes or MDMs by confocal microscopy (Fig. 3⇓ and Table II⇓). As reported (3), monocytes did not express MR (Fig. 3⇓A), and exposure to SP-A for 1 h did not induce MR expression on monocytes (p > 0.1) (Fig. 3⇓B). In contrast, MDMs expressed a low level of MR constitutively (Fig. 3⇓C and Table II⇓), and SP-A markedly increased the expression of MR on MDMs (Fig. 3⇓D and Table II⇓). Similar to the flow cytometry data, incubation of monolayers with LPS or with PMB before SP-A had no effect on MR expression in control-treated or SP-A-treated cells, respectively (Table II⇓). At any given time, 20–25% of total MR protein exists on the cell surface, with the majority residing in intracellular pools (37). For confocal microscopy experiments, MDMs were fixed with paraformaldehyde and thus were nonpermeabilized. Consistent with this, fixed MDMs incubated with Ab to lysosome-associated membrane protein-1, an intracellular late endosomal and lysosomal marker (33), revealed no significant staining (data not shown). Therefore, the MR expression being measured in these experiments represented cell surface protein only.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table II.

Effect of SP-A on macrophage mannose surface receptor expressiona

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

MDMs treated with APP-SP-A demonstrate enhanced expression of the MR. One-day-old monocytes (A and B) or 5-day-old MDMs (C and D) in monolayer culture were incubated with HSA (A and C) or APP-SP-A (10 μg/ml) (B and D) for 1 h. After washing, cells were fixed in paraformaldehyde and sequentially stained with mouse anti-human MR mAb or subtypic control mAb (data not shown) followed by a secondary FITC-anti-mouse Ab. Glass coverslips were mounted and visualized by confocal microscopy. A representative experiment is presented (n = 2–6).

We next determined whether the increased MR expression was due to outward movement of the intracellular pools or to new protein synthesis by incubating MDMs with CHX before SP-A to prevent protein synthesis. Pretreatment with CHX had only a small effect on the magnitude of SP-A-induced MR up-regulation (Table I⇑), supporting the notion that MR up-regulation was dependent primarily upon recycling of preformed MR rather than on newly synthesized MR.

To rule out cross-reactivity of anti-MR for SP-A as previously reported (38), an SP-A ELISA was performed. Polyclonal anti-human Ab against SP-A recognized APP-SP-A (500 ng/well) with an OD405 of 1.2 ± 0.2 (n = 3). Neither the polyclonal anti-human MR Ab nor the monoclonal anti-human MR recognized APP-SP-A (OD405 of 0.062 ± 0.003 and 0.069 ± 0.005, respectively; n = 3). Additionally, APP-SP-A was examined by Western blotting using the Abs mentioned above. Again, the polyclonal anti-human SP-A Ab recognized SP-A and the anti-MR Ab did not (data not shown). To rule out the possibility that SP-A remained on the surface of the MDMs after incubation and washing in our assays and was being recognized by the anti-MR Ab, we performed confocal microscopy experiments as above using a polyclonal Ab to SP-A as the primary Ab instead of the anti-MR Ab. No specific detection of SP-A on the cell surface was found (data not shown). These data are consistent with the results in our earlier study (12) that showed that SP-A is internalized rapidly by the MDMs.

The source of the SP-A affects the degree of MR expression

To test whether SP-A proteins from different sources were equally capable of up-regulating MR expression, we incubated MDMs with APP, native human or rat SP-A, as well as recombinant SP-A (SP-Ahyp) and measured MR expression compared with control MDMs using flow cytometry (Table I⇑). All four sources of SP-A examined significantly increased MR expression compared with control cells. Incubation with APP-SP-A consistently induced numerically higher levels of MR expression than did the other proteins, but the APP-SP-A-induced increase was only significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the level induced by SP-Ahyp.

The carbohydrate- and collagen-like domains of SP-A are both involved in SP-A-induced MR expression

We next explored the structural components of SP-A that mediate the enhanced MR response. To study the potential influence of the carbohydrate moieties of SP-A, we used recombinant SP-A proteins devoid of oligosaccharides at one (Asn187) site (SP-Ahyp,ser187) or both (Asn1 and Asn187) sites (SP-Ahyp,thr1,ser187) of the consensus sequence sites for glycosylation. The absence of carbohydrates on the variant proteins used in these studies has been demonstrated previously (23). MDMs were incubated with variant SP-A proteins and MR expression was measured using flow cytometry (Table I⇑). Although not statistically significant, addition of the SP-A carbohydrate variant proteins resulted in a 60% increase in MFI and a 45–61% increase in positive cells relative to control MDMs. Incubation of MDMs with SP-A protein devoid of N-linked carbohydrates at the Asn187 site (SP-Ahyp,ser187) resulted in MR expression similar to that seen with SP-A devoid of carbohydrate (SP-Ahyp,thr1,ser187) and was particularly evident for the percent change in positive cells. These results provide evidence that glycosylation is important for optimal up-regulation of MR expression.

In parallel experiments, we investigated the importance of the collagen-like region of SP-A for up-regulation of MR expression (Table I⇑). SP-A-truncated proteins lacking the first half of the collagen region but still possessing both carbohydrate attachment sites (TM2), lacking the collagen region and the N-terminal segment but still possessing the carbohydrate attachment site at Asn187 (TM1-2-3), or lacking the collagen region, the N terminus, and both sugar attachment sites (TM1-2-3ser187) were added to MDMs. The truncated proteins were capable of increasing MR expression to a small extent, but less than that of APP-SP-A or SP-Ahyp. The level of MR expression achieved was similar among truncated proteins. Taken together, these studies demonstrate a critical role for both the carbohydrates and collagen region of SP-A in mediating its effect.

SP-A enhances the uptake of 125I-labeled mannose-BSA by MDMs

To assess whether the MR newly induced by SP-A was functional, we studied mannan-inhibitable pinocytosis of 125I-labeled mannose-BSA, an assay of MR recycling (39). When APP-SP-A (10 μg/ml) was added to MDMs in suspension, the uptake of mannose-BSA was increased from 0.55 ± 0.13 to 1.64 ± 0.61 ng (198 ± 35% increase, n = 4, p < 0.05) and was comparable to the increase seen with IL-4 (0.55 ± 0.13 to 1.16 ± 0.37 ng for control vs IL-4, respectively; 110% increase, n = 6, p < 0.05). The addition of APP-SP-A (10 μg/ml) to MDM monolayers also enhanced the uptake of 125I-labeled mannose-BSA compared with control cells. However, the percent increase was lower (37 ± 15% increase in mannose-BSA uptake, mean ± SEM, n = 4) than that recorded for MDMs in suspension, suggesting that the state of the cell (adherent vs nonadherent) may be a factor in dictating the magnitude of the response to SP-A.

MDMs in monolayer culture on a substrate of SP-A demonstrate enhanced phagocytosis of LAM-coated microspheres

We have determined that a major capsular lipoglycan, LAM, from M.tb serves as a ligand for the MR during phagocytosis of bacteria (34). Microspheres coated with LAM serve as model phagocytic particles for studies of MR-mediated phagocytosis (34). To determine whether SP-A enhances phagocytosis of LAM microspheres, we studied mannan-inhibitable phagocytosis of LAM microspheres and control microspheres by MDMs in monolayer culture (40) on an SP-A or HSA substrate (Fig. 4⇓). SP-A significantly enhanced the phagocytosis of LAM microspheres in a mannan-inhibitable fashion (168 ± 63% enhancement, mean ± SEM, p < 0.05, n = 8) compared with the HSA substrate (Fig. 4⇓).

           FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

MDMs on a substrate of APP-SP-A demonstrate enhanced phagocytosis of Erdman LAM microspheres. MDMs were plated on a substrate of either HSA or APP-SP-A. After washing, monolayers were incubated with either HSA (control) or Erdman LAM microspheres (2.0 × 107) in the presence or absence (control) of soluble mannan. After washing, MDMs were fixed in paraformaldehyde, and microsphere uptake was enumerated by phase microscopy. Data are the mean ± SD of triplicate coverslips per test group. Within a given substrate, an asterisk indicates values significantly different from HSA microspheres, p < 0.05 by Student’s t test. Representative experiment of n = 8.

AMs from SP-A−/− mice express less MR than AMs from SP-A+/+ mice

To determine whether SP-A up-regulates MR expression on AMs in vivo, we studied the expression of the MR on alveolar and peritoneal macrophages isolated from SP-A−/− and SP-A+/+ mice using flow cytometry. Alveolar and peritoneal macrophages from both mouse types constitutively expressed MR (Table III⇓). MR expression on peritoneal macrophages did not differ between mouse types. In contrast, the MR expression (reflected by MFI) on AMs from SP-A−/− mice was only approximately one-half of the MR expression on AMs from SP-A+/+ mice (Table III⇓), approaching the level of expression seen on peritoneal macrophages. Thus, this result provides evidence that macrophages exposed to SP-A in the alveolus exhibit up-regulated MR expression and is consistent with our findings using human MDMs in in vitro culture.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table III.

MR expression on primary mouse macrophages from SP-A−/− and SP-A+/+ micea

Discussion

In the healthy host, the majority of immune cells in the lower respiratory tract at the lung/environment interface are AMs, which constitute the first line of defense against organisms, particles, or allergens that reach the distal airspaces. Macrophages are optimally positioned to clear inhaled particles and microbes by phagocytosis. To avoid compromising gas exchange, the host tightly regulates the inflammatory process accompanying AM phagocytosis. Therefore, it is not surprising that AMs possess a unique phenotype compared with macrophages in other tissue compartments. This phenotype, which has been termed an “alternative state of activation” (6), includes a greater phagocytic capacity for both nonopsonized and opsonized particles, a reduced oxidative burst, and decreased expression of costimulatory molecules (41). As part of their distinctive repertoire, AMs exhibit enhanced expression of the receptors of innate immunity, such as the MR, which acts as a PRR recognizing an array of mannoproteins and mannose-coated microbes (4).

AMs originate from circulating monocytes that immigrate into the pulmonary environment, where they encounter SP-A, an interaction that may contribute to the unique biological properties of AMs. SP-A is capable of a direct interaction with AMs through binding to cell surface receptor(s), resulting in modulation of macrophage functions such as enhanced chemotaxis, modified respiratory burst, and increased phagocytosis of microbes and apoptotic cells (7, 42). Here we demonstrate that the interaction between SP-A and human macrophages results in increased expression of the MR.

MR, a member of the C-type lectin super family (4), binds with high affinity to glycoconjugates containing mannose, fucose, or N-acetyl glucosamine. MR is not present on monocytes, but is constitutively present on macrophages including MDMs and dendritic cells (2, 3). AMs express particularly high levels of functional MR. In the current study, SP-A increased MDM expression of MR, as demonstrated by both flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. The newly expressed MR was functional, as determined by mannan-inhibitable pinocytosis of the ligand mannose-BSA and phagocytosis of M.tb LAM-coated particles after SP-A treatment. It is unlikely that the increased uptake of ligands was due to an SP-A-induced change in affinity of the receptor for the ligand because there are no reports of affinity modification of MR as described for CR3 (43).

The effect of SP-A on MR expression was selective for cell type and receptor type. In contrast to its effect on macrophages, short-term (60-min) incubation with SP-A did not induce MR expression on monocytes. MR expression becomes apparent upon monocyte maturation over 3–4 days in culture (3). Thus, expression is differentiation dependent. The mechanisms for regulation of MR expression have not been clearly elucidated, but potentially include transcriptional regulation via the PU.1 site in the MR gene promoter (44, 45, 46). The effect of SP-A is receptor specific under the conditions of our assays. SP-A did not affect expression of CRs on macrophages in our present study or FcγR function in a previous study (12). In contrast with our results, Tenner et al. (18) reported that SP-A increased phagocytosis of both E-IgG by FcR on monocytes and complement-coated erythrocytes by CR1 on macrophages. SP-A up-regulation of cell surface expression of FcγR or CR1 was not addressed in their study (18). Additionally, Kremlev et al. (19) reported that SP-A treatment of the human monocytic cell line THP-1 significantly increased the levels of expression of CD14, ICAM-1, and CD11b as measured by flow cytometry. Possible explanations for these apparent discordant data include the assay conditions such as the ligand density on the phagocytic particles or, alternatively, the cell types used. Another difference between the current study and that by Kremlev et al. (19) is the method used to purify SP-A. Kremlev et al. (19) used an isoelectric focusing method after solubilization of APP-SP-A.

MR is synthesized as a 154-kDa precursor, which is processed to its mature form of 162 kDa in ∼90 min. (47, 48). Permeabilization studies indicate that in differentiated macrophages, 80% of the MR is localized intracellularly in vesicles (49, 50). The intracellular pool may include newly synthesized receptor en route to the endosomal apparatus and receptors moving from one pool to another. Newly synthesized MR has a half-life of 33 h as determined by pulse-chase studies. This indicates that on the average each molecule recycles between the cell surface and endosomes hundreds of time before degradation (47).

Viewed as a whole, our data favor the idea that short-term incubation of SP-A increases trafficking of preformed MR to the cell surface. First, increased surface expression of MR in response to SP-A can be seen as early as 1 h. Second, uptake of 125I-labeled mannose-BSA at 37°C, a temperature at which receptor recycling occurs, increased in the presence of SP-A. Third, the addition of CHX before SP-A did not significantly reduce the up-regulation of MR, indicating that new protein synthesis was not necessary for the SP-A induction of MR. Phagocytosis of LAM microspheres is rapid and MR specific. Both surface-expressed MR and preformed intracellular MRs that are recycled to the surface are involved in phagocytosis of LAM microspheres. Thus, the fact that CHX had only a small effect on both MR expression and the phagocytosis of microspheres (40) supports the notion that SP-A primarily affects recycling of preformed MR in macrophages rather than induction of newly synthesized MR. They do not, however, rule out that SP-A could also affect transcription and/or posttranscriptional modification of the MR during longer periods of incubation. MR expression and function is highly regulated (4).

The magnitude of the SP-A-induced MR expression was dependent on the type of SP-A used: APP-SP-A consistently induced a larger increase in expression than did native human or native rat SP-A and a significantly larger increase in expression was induced than did recombinant rat SP-A. This is consistent with our previous finding that APP-SP-A was more effective than native human or recombinant rat SP-A in enhancing phagocytosis of M.tb by MDMs (12). These differences may reflect the degree of oligomerization and/or self-association of SP-A, or the preferential interactions of human cells with human SP-A species. Thus, both the form of SP-A and the nature of the host cell appear to influence the magnitude of MR response to SP-A.

The present study, combined with our previous work (12), shows that the magnitude of MR expression is also dependent on whether SP-A is presented in solution or on a matrix. We speculate that macrophages will encounter SP-A in different contexts within the alveoli, i.e., immigrating as a monocyte from the microvasculature into the alveoli and as a resident macrophage in the alveolus. These functional differences may give clues as to how blood monocytes uniquely differentiate to the AM.

Our data using macrophages from SPA−/− mice support our hypothesis that continuous interactions between alveolar surface lining constituents, particularly SP-A, and AMs affect the phenotype and function of these cells. AMs from the SP-A−/− mice express less MR than do those from control mice, and they phenotypically resemble peritoneal macrophages. In contrast, no differences in MR expression were found in peritoneal macrophages between SP-A−/− and SP-A+/+ mice. The observed differences in MR expression can be attributed to differences in SP-A levels because surfactant isolated from SP-A-deficient mice appears to function normally, and lungs of these mice appear normal histologically and ultrastructurally, except for the absence of tubular myelin (30).

The primary structure of an SP-A subunit is composed of several discrete domains including the following: 1) a short N-terminal segment, 2) a collagen-like sequence of Gly-X-Y repeats, where X is any amino acid and Y is often proline or hydroyproline, 3) a hydrophobic neck domain, and 4) a CRD. This monomer trimerizes by the folding of the collagen-like domains into triple helices (8, 51). Six SP-A trimers form an octadecamer through covalent and noncovalent interactions between the N-terminal segment and the first half of the collagen-like domain (8, 51). Although the structures of APP and native and recombinant SP-A are very similar, subtle differences have been noted that affect the level of protein multimerization. Differences in multimerization may potentially affect receptor binding, signaling, and consequently up-regulation of MR expression. APP-SP-A octadecamers can self-associate to form multimolecular complexes not found in SP-A obtained from healthy volunteers (10, 11). In contrast, recombinant SP-A synthesized in invertebrate cells is deficient in hydroxyproline and does not oligomerize to the same extent as native SP-A. Mutants lacking the collagen region can only form trimers and hexamers, whereas mutants lacking both the N-terminal and collagen regions can form only trimers (8). Neither of these variants was capable of stimulating an optimal increase in MR expression, but the experiments do not discriminate between the direct effects of deletional mutations on SP-A/SP-A receptor interactions (8, 52, 53) and indirect effects due to altered oligomerization (52, 53).

Our studies demonstrate that both the sugars and collagen-like domain of the protein play a role in SP-A induction of MR. SP-A contains two sugars at Asn1 in the N terminus region and Asn187 in the CRD region (8). The carbohydrate moieties of SP-A have been reported to be important for binding to macrophages (12) and herpes simplex virus type 1-infected cells (54), but not to type II epithelial cells (8). Our results indicate that the carbohydrates play a role in SP-A up-regulation of MR expression (12). Although it is true that the insect expression system modifies proteins in a simple, mannose-rich manner, which is different from native SP-A (23), this knowledge does not alter our interpretation of the data. TM2, which contains high mannose oligosaccharides, remains inactive. Collectively, our data argue most strongly for the three-dimensional oligomeric context of the oligosaccharides being important for full SP-A function.

The precise domains of SP-A involved in receptor binding are not well characterized. This may be due to the existence of more than one SP-A receptor, that a receptor complex is involved in binding, and/or that receptor expression varies with cell type (55). Thus, different cell types may vary in their host cell response to SP-A. Several proteins have been identified as putative receptors for SP-A, some of which are present on macrophages (24, 38, 56, 57, 58). Our studies suggest that SP-A binds to its receptor(s) on macrophages and induces the activation of a signal transduction pathway(s) leading to increased MR trafficking to the plasma membrane. The signal transduction pathways involved in this process are the focus of our current studies.

In conclusion, SP-A increases the surface expression of functional MR on macrophages. Up-regulation of the MR by SP-A provides a mechanism for enhanced phagocytosis of invading infectious organisms. Our data indicate that the majority of newly expressed MR comes from the preformed intracellular receptor pool and is induced to traffic to the cell surface by SP-A. The source of SP-A influences the magnitude of MR expressed, and an intact glycoprotein is necessary for optimal SP-A induction of MR expression. In most scenarios, up-regulation of MR expression on a professional phagocyte such as a macrophage would be beneficial for the host by initiating phagocytosis and killing of nonopsonized microbes, thereby participating in first-line host defense. However, intracellular pathogens such as M.tb may use increased levels of MR to reach their intracellular niche, the AM. The current study supports the idea that the alveolar lung constituent, SP-A, contributes to the outcome of lung invasion by inhaled particles and bacteria by modifying the biological properties of AM.

Acknowledgments

We thank Tom Kaufman for his technical assistance and Deb Nollen-Richter for her help with writing the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (Grants AI33004 and HL51990 to L.S.S., Grant AI01355 to C.D.G., Grant HL61612 to F.X.M., and Grants HL45286 and HL66235 to D.V.) and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Larry S. Schlesinger, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa, 200 Hawkins Drive SE-318 GH, Iowa City, IA 52242. E-mail address: larry-schlesinger{at}uiowa.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: AM, alveolar macrophage; PRR, pattern recognition receptor; MR, mannose receptor; MDM, monocyte-derived macrophage; SP-A, surfactant protein A; CRD, carbohydrate recognition domain; APP, alveolar proteinosis; M.tb, Mycobacterium tuberculosis; CR, complement receptor; HSA, human serum albumin; PMB, polymyxin B; LAM, lipoarabinomannan; NRS, normal rabbit serum; CHX, cycloheximide; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

  • Received April 17, 2002.
  • Accepted July 3, 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Medzhihtov, R., C. Janeway, Jr. 2000. Innate immunity. N. Engl. J. Med. 343: 338
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Cochand, L., P. Isler, F. P., F. Songeon, L. P. Nicod. 1999. Human lung dendritic cells have an immature phenotype with efficient mannose receptors. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 21: 547
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Speert, D. P., S. C. Silverstein. 1985. Phagocytosis of unopsonized zymosan by human monocyte-derived macrophages: maturation and inhibition by mannan. J. Leukocyte Biol. 38: 655
    OpenUrlAbstract
  4. ↵
    Stahl, P. D., R. A. Ezekowitz. 1998. The mannose receptor is a pattern recognition receptor involved in host defense. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 10: 50
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Stein, M., S. Keshav, N. Harris, S. Gordon. 1992. Interleukin 4 potently enhances murine macrophage mannose receptor activity: a marker of alternative immunologic macrophage activation. J. Exp. Med. 176: 287
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Goerdt, S., C. E. Orfanos. 1999. Other functions, other genes: alternative activation of antigen-presenting cells. Immunity 10: 137
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Crouch, E., J. R. Wright. 2001. Surfactant proteins A and D and pulmonary host defense. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 63: 521
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    McCormack, F. X.. 1998. Structure, processing and properties of surfactant protein A. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1408: 109
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Kuroki, Y., D. R. Voelker. 1994. Pulmonary surfactant proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 25943
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Hattori, A., Y. Kuroki, T. Katoh, H. Takahashi, H. Q. Shen, Y. Suzuki, T. Akino. 1996. Surfactant protein A accumulating in the alveoli of patients with pulmonary alveolar proteinosis-oligomeric structure and interaction with lipids. Am. J. Repir. Cell Mol. Biol. 14: 608
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Hattori, A., Y. Kuroki, H. Sohma, Y. Ogasawara, T. Akino. 1996. Human surfactant protein A with two distinct oligomeric structures which exhibit different capacities to interact with alveolar type II cells. Biochem. J. 317: 939
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Gaynor, C. D., F. X. McCormack, D. R. Voelker, S. E. McGowan, L. S. Schlesinger. 1995. Pulmonary surfactant protein A mediates enhanced phagocytosis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by a direct interaction with human macrophages. J. Immunol. 155: 5343
    OpenUrlAbstract
  13. ↵
    LeVine, A. M., J. A. Whitsett, J. A. Gwozdz, T. R. Richardson, J. H. Fisher, M. S. Burhans, T. R. Korfhagen. 2000. Distinct effects of surfactant protein A or D deficiency during bacterial infection on the lung. J. Immunol. 165: 3934
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    LeVine, A. M., M. D. Bruno, K. M. Huelsman, G. F. Ross, J. A. Whitsett, T. R. Korfhagen. 1997. Surfactant protein A-deficient mice are susceptible to group B streptococcal infection. J. Immunol. 158: 4336
    OpenUrlAbstract
  15. ↵
    LeVine, A. M., K. E. Kurak, M. D. Bruno, J. M. Stark, J. A. Whitsett, T. R. Korfhagen. 1998. Surfactant protein-A-deficient mice are susceptible to Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 19: 700
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    LeVine, A. M., K. E. Kurak, J. R. Wright, W. T. Watford, M. D. Bruno, G. F. Ross, J. A. Whitsett, T. R. Korfhagen. 1999. Surfactant protein-A binds group B streptococcus enhancing phagocytosis and clearance from lungs of surfactant protein-A-deficient mice. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 20: 279
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Ferguson, J. S., L. S. Schlesinger. 2000. Pulmonary surfactant in innate immunity and the pathogenesis of tuberculosis. Tuber. Lung Dis. 80: 173
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Tenner, A. J., S. L. Robinson, J. Borchelt, J. R. Wright. 1989. Human pulmonary surfactant protein (SP-A), a protein structurally homologous to C1q, can enhance FcR- and CR1-mediated phagocytosis. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 13923
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Kremlev, S. G., D. S. Phelps. 1997. Effect of SP-A and surfactant lipids on expression of cell surface markers in the THP-1 monocytic cell line. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 272: L1070
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Keizer, G. D., J. Borst, C. G. Figdor, H. Spits, F. Miedema, C. Terhorst, J. E. De Vries. 1985. Biochemical and functional characteristics of the human leukocyte membrane antigen family LFA-1, Mo-1 and p150, 95. Eur. J. Immunol. 15: 1142
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Hogg, N., M. A. Horton. 1987. Myeloid antigens: new and previously defined clusters. A. J. McMichael, Jr, ed. Leucocyte Typing: White Cell Differentiation Antigens 576 Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  22. ↵
    Cook, J., E. Fischer, C. Boucheix, M. Mirsrahi, M.-H. Jouvin, L. Weiss, R. M. Jack, M. D. Kazatchkine. 1985. Mouse monoclonal antibodies to the human C3b receptor. Mol. Immunol. 22: 531
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    McCormack, F. X., H. M. Calvert, P. A. Watson, D. L. Smith, R. J. Mason, D. R. Voelker. 1994. The structure and function of surfactant protein A: hydroxyproline- and carbohydrate-deficient mutant proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 5833
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Kuroki, Y., R. J. Mason, D. R. Voelker. 1988. Alveolar type II cells express a high-affinity receptor for pulmonary surfactant protein A. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 5566
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Dethloff, L. A., L. B. Gilmore, A. R. Brody, G. E. Hook. 1986. Induction of intra- and extra-cellular phospholipids in the lungs of rats exposed to silica. Biochem. J. 233: 111
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Hawgood, S., B. J. Benson, R. L. Hamilton, Jr. 1985. Effects of a surfactant-associated protein and calcium ions on the structure and surface activity of lung surfactant lipids. Biochemistry 24: 184
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    McCormack, F. X., M. Damodarasamy, B. M. Elhalwagi. 1999. Deletion mapping of N-terminal domains of surfactant protein A. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 3173
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Elhalwagi, B. M., M. Damodarasamy, F. X. McCormack. 1997. Alternate amino terminal processing of surfactant protein A results in cysteinyl isoforms required for multimer formation. Biochemistry 36: 7018
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Schlesinger, L. S.. 1993. Macrophage phagocytosis of virulent but not attenuated strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is mediated by mannose receptors in addition to complement receptors. J. Immunol. 150: 2920
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Korfhagen, T. R., M. D. Bruno, G. F. Ross, K. M. Huelsman, M. Ikegami, A. H. Jobe, S. E. Wert, B. R. Stripp, R. E. Morris, S. W. Glasser, et al 1996. Altered surfactant function and structure in SP-A gene targeted mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 9594
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Reynolds, H. Y.. 1987. Bronchoalveolar lavage. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 135: 250
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. ↵
    Issekutz, A. C.. 1983. Removal of Gram-negative endotoxin from solutions by affinity chromatography. J. Immunol. Methods 61: 275
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Chen, J. W., T. L. Murphy, M. C. Willingham, I. Pastan, J. T. August. 1985. Identification of two lysosomal membrane glycoproteins. J. Cell Sci. 101: 85
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  34. ↵
    Schlesinger, L. S., S. R. Hull, T. M. Kaufman. 1994. Binding of the terminal mannosyl units of lipoarabinomannan from a virulent strain of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to human macrophages. J. Immunol. 152: 4070
    OpenUrlAbstract
  35. ↵
    Van Iwaarden, J. F., J. C. Pikaar, J. Storm, E. Brouwer, J. Verhoef, R. S. Oosting, L. M. G. van Golde, J. A. G. Van Strijp. 1994. Binding of surfactant protein A to the lipid A moiety of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Biochem. J. 303: 407
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Wright, J. R.. 1997. Immunomodulatory functions of surfactant. Physiol. Rev. 77: 931
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Tietze, C., P. Schlesinger, P. Stahl. 1982. Mannose-specific endocytosis receptor of alveolar macrophages: demonstration of two functionally distinct intracellular pools of receptors and their roles in receptor recycling. J. Cell Sci. 92: 417
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  38. ↵
    Chroneos, Z. C., R. Abdolrasulnia, J. A. Whitsett, W. R. Rice, V. L. Shepherd. 1996. Purification of a cell-surface receptor for surfactant protein A. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 16375
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Stahl, P., P. H. Schlesinger, E. Sigardson, J. S. Rodman, Y. C. Lee. 1980. Receptor-mediated pinocytosis of mannose glycoconjugates by macrophages: characterization and evidence for receptor recycling. Cell 19: 207
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Kang, B. K., L. S. Schlesinger. 1998. Characterization of mannose receptor-dependent phagocytosis mediated by Mycobacterium tuberculosis lipoarabinomannan. Infect. Immun. 66: 2769
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  41. ↵
    Chelen, C. J., Y. Fang, G. J. Freeman, H. Secrist, J. D. Marshall, P. T. Hwang, L. R. Frankel, R. H. DeKruyff, D. T. Umetsu. 1995. Human alveolar macrophages present antigen ineffectively due to defective expression of B7 costimulatory cell surface molecules. J. Clin. Invest. 95: 1415
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Schagat, T. L., J. A. Wofford, J. R. Wright. 2001. Surfactant protein A enhances alveolar macrophage phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils. J. Immunol. 166: 2727
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Plow, E. F., T. A. Haas, L. Zhang, J. Loftus, J. W. Smith. 2000. Ligand binding to integrins. J. Biol. Chem. 275: 21785
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Rouleux, F., M. Monsigny, A. Legrand. 1994. A negative regulator element of the macrophage-specific human mannose receptor gene represses its expression in nonmeyloid cells. Exp. Cell Res. 214: 113
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Eichbaum, Q., D. Heney, D. Raveh, M. Chung, M. Davidson, J. Epstein, R. A. B. Ezekowitz. 1997. Murine macrophage mannose receptor promoter is regulated by the transcription factors PU.1 and SP1. Blood 90: 4135
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Egan, B. S., K. B. Lane, V. L. Shepherd. 1999. PU.1 and USF are required for macrophage-specific mannose receptor promoter activity. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 9098
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Lennartz, M. R., F. S. Cole, P. D. Stahl. 1989. Biosynthesis and processing of the mannose receptor in human macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 264: 2385
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  48. ↵
    Pontow, S. E., J. S. Blum, P. D. Stahl. 1996. Delayed activation of the mannose receptor following synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 30736
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  49. ↵
    Wileman, T., R. L. Boshans, P. H. Schlesinger, P. H. Stahl. 1984. Monensin inhibits recycling of macrophage mannose-glycoprotein receptors and ligand delivery to lysosomes. Biochem. J. 220: 665
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Stahl, P. D., T. E. Wileman, S. Diment, V. L. Shepherd. 1984. Mannose-specific oligosaccharide recognition by mononuclear phagocytes. Biol. Cell 51: 215
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    King, R., D. Simon, P. M. Horowitz. 1989. Aspects of secondary and quaternary structure of surfactant protein A from canine lung. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1001: 294
    OpenUrlPubMed
  52. ↵
    Manz-Keinke, H., H. Plattner, J. Schlepper-Schäfer. 1992. Lung surfactant protein A (SP-A) enhances serum-independent phagocytosis of bacteria by alveolar macrophages. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 57: 95
    OpenUrlPubMed
  53. ↵
    Ohmer-Schröck, D., C. Schlatterer, H. Plattner, J. Schlepper-Schäfer. 1993. Interaction of lung surfactant protein A with alveolar macrophages. Microsc. Res. Tech. 26: 374
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  54. ↵
    Van Iwaarden, J. F., J. A. G. Strijp, M. J. M. Ebskamp, A. C. Welmers, J. Verhoef, L. M. G. van Golde. 1991. Surfactant protein A is opsonin in phagocytosis of herpes simplex virus type 1 by rat alveolar macrophages. Am. J. Physiol. 261: L204
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  55. ↵
    Wright, J. R., P. Borron, K. G. Brinker, R. J. Folz. 2001. Surfactant protein A: regulation of innate and adaptive immune responses in lung inflammation. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 24: 513
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  56. ↵
    Pison, U., J. R. Wright, S. Hawgood. 1992. Specific binding of surfactant protein SP-A to rat alveolar macrophages. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 262: L412
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  57. ↵
    Malhotra, R., J. Haurum, S. Thiel, R. B. Sim. 1992. Interaction of C1q receptor with lung surfactant protein A. Eur. J. Immunol. 22: 1437
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  58. ↵
    Malhotra, R., S. Thiel, K. B. M. Reid, R. B. Sim. 1990. Human leukocyte Clq receptor binds other soluble proteins with collagen domains. J. Exp. Med. 172: 955
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 169 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 169, Issue 7
1 Oct 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Pulmonary Surfactant Protein A Up-Regulates Activity of the Mannose Receptor, a Pattern Recognition Receptor Expressed on Human Macrophages
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Pulmonary Surfactant Protein A Up-Regulates Activity of the Mannose Receptor, a Pattern Recognition Receptor Expressed on Human Macrophages
Alison A. Beharka, Cecilia D. Gaynor, Byoung K. Kang, Dennis R. Voelker, Francis X. McCormack, Larry S. Schlesinger
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2002, 169 (7) 3565-3573; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3565

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Pulmonary Surfactant Protein A Up-Regulates Activity of the Mannose Receptor, a Pattern Recognition Receptor Expressed on Human Macrophages
Alison A. Beharka, Cecilia D. Gaynor, Byoung K. Kang, Dennis R. Voelker, Francis X. McCormack, Larry S. Schlesinger
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2002, 169 (7) 3565-3573; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.7.3565
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innate Immunity Together with Duration of Antigen Persistence Regulate Effector T Cell Induction
  • Regulatory Roles of IL-2 and IL-4 in H4/Inducible Costimulator Expression on Activated CD4+ T Cells During Th Cell Development
  • Induction of CD4+ T Cell Apoptosis as a Consequence of Impaired Cytoskeletal Rearrangement in UVB-Irradiated Dendritic Cells
Show more CELLULAR IMMUNOLOGY AND IMMUNE REGULATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606