Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Cutting Edge: CD91-Independent Cross-Presentation of GRP94(gp96)-Associated Peptides

Brent Berwin, Justin P. Hart, Salvatore V. Pizzo and Christopher V. Nicchitta
J Immunol May 1, 2002, 168 (9) 4282-4286; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4282
Brent Berwin
*Cell Biology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Justin P. Hart
†Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Salvatore V. Pizzo
†Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher V. Nicchitta
*Cell Biology and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

GRP94(gp96) elicits CD8+ T cell responses against its bound peptides, a process requiring access of its associated peptides into the MHC class I cross-presentation pathway of APCs. Entry into this pathway requires receptor-mediated endocytosis, and CD91 (low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein) has been reported to be the receptor mediating GRP94 uptake into APC. However, a direct role for CD91 in chaperone-based peptide Ag re-presentation has not been demonstrated. We investigated the contribution of CD91 to GRP94 cell surface binding, internalization, and trafficking in APCs. Whereas a clear role for CD91 in α2-macroglobulin binding and uptake was readily obtained, the addition of excess CD91 ligand, activated α2-macroglobulin, or receptor-associated protein, an antagonist of all known CD91 ligands, did not affect GRP94 cell surface binding, receptor-mediated endocytosis, or peptide re-presentation. These data identify a CD91-independent, GRP94 internalization pathway that functions in peptide Ag re-presentation.

The molecular chaperone GRP94(gp96) is one of several molecular chaperones that have been shown to elicit antitumor responses in murine models (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). Recent studies demonstrate that GRP94 functions in both prophylactic and therapeutic protocols to reduce or eliminate tumor growth and progression. The basis for the immunological capabilities of these proteins is thought to reflect two intrinsic properties: 1) they act as general adjuvants to the innate immune system, promoting the maturation and activation of dendritic cells and macrophages and eliciting cytokine secretion (2, 6, 7); and 2) as vehicles for associated peptides, they deliver their bound Ags to professional APCs, to yield peptide-specific T cell stimulation (8, 9, 10, 11). This latter function is thought to reflect high-affinity, cell surface chaperone receptors on APCs, which direct GRP94 into the MHC class I re-presentation pathway. It is exclusively the receptor-mediated pathway that is reported to function in the re-presentation of GRP94-associated peptides (8).

Recently, a member of the low-density lipoprotein (LDL)3 family of scavenger receptors, CD91 (α2-macroglobulin (α2M) receptor; LDL receptor-related protein), was proposed to serve as the unique receptor responsible for directing GRP94 into the class-I Ag processing pathways of APCs (12, 13, 14). The conclusion that CD91 functions as the GRP94 receptor stems from the observation that α2M, the active form (α2M*) of which is an established, endogenous ligand for CD91, abrogates GRP94-mediated, APC-dependent T cell stimulation (12). Although consistent with a role for CD91 in GRP94-based Ag re-presentation, previous observations call into question whether the effects of CD91-directed ligands on GRP94-based peptide re-presentation reflect a direct role of CD91 in chaperone uptake and processing. Primarily, CD91 is expressed on a diverse array of cell types, including fibroblasts and hepatocytes, the majority of which do not function as professional APCs (15). Additionally, in affinity chromatography and chemical cross-linking studies of GRP94-interacting proteins, GRP94 was recovered with a single proteolytic product of CD91; no interactions of GRP94 with intact CD91 were reported (12).

In the present study, CD91 function in the receptor-mediated endocytosis and trafficking of GRP94 in APCs was analyzed. It is well established that ligand binding functions of CD91 are regulated by receptor-associated protein (RAP) (16, 17, 18), which efficiently blocks the cell surface binding and uptake of all known CD91 ligands (16, 17, 18, 19). We report in this work that the binding of GRP94 to APC cell surface receptors was RAP and α2M*-insensitive. Furthermore, CD91 and its ligand, Pseudomonas exotoxin, segregated from receptor-internalized GRP94 in early compartments of the endocytic pathway. Additionally, re-presentation of GRP94-associated peptides was α2M* insensitive. These data identify a primary, CD91-independent re-presentation pathway for GRP94-associated peptides in APCs.

Materials and Methods

Cells and tissue culture

C57BL/6 mice (Charles River Breeding Laboratories, Wilmington, MA) were used to prepare thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal macrophages. Macrophages were harvested 4–5 days postinjection and enriched by adherence selection.

Protein purification and labeling

GRP94 was purified by the method of Wearsch and Nicchitta (20). Pseudomonas exotoxin was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Texas Red-, biotin-, and fluorescein-succinymidyl esters (Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) were used to label proteins according to manufacturer’s protocols. Abs against Kb-OVA complex (25-D1.16) and CD91 were the kind gifts of Dr. J. Yewdell (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) and Dr. S. Argraves (University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC), respectively.

α2M was purified as previously described (21). Purified α2M was converted to the CD91-binding, thiol ester-cleaved derivative (α2M*) by incubation with 0.2 M NH4HCO3. α2M* was then labeled with Alexa Fluor (Molecular Probes). RAP was purified as previously described (22). Dr. J. Herz (University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX) kindly provided pGEX-RAP expression vectors.

Cell surface binding and uptake

Receptor-mediated uptake reactions were performed as described previously (23). For confocal microscopy analysis, cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde and mounted under 10% PBS, 90% glycerol, and 1 mg/ml phenylenediamine.

Biotin-GRP94 cell surface receptor binding interactions were analyzed by incubating 106 cells/assay with increasing concentrations of biotin-GRP94 for 30 min on ice. Cells were then washed and resuspended in SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and extracts were prepared for SDS-PAGE. Following transfer to nitrocellulose membranes, biotin-GRP94 levels were determined by ECL, following avidin-HRP detection of biotin-GRP94. Quantification of cell surface-bound biotin-GRP94 was determined against a standard curve prepared from serial dilutions of biotin-GRP94.

Adherent macrophages were incubated at 4°C in RPMI 1640, 0.5% BSA for 30 min with the following ligands: fluorescein-GRP94 and Alexa-α2M* in the presence or absence of RAP. For competition assays final concentrations used were 25 nM for GRP94 and α2M* and 2500 nM for RAP (100-fold molar excess). After the 30-min binding period, macrophages were washed and then fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde/PBS. Following fixation, the cells were rinsed and unreacted paraformaldehyde was quenched with 0.05 M NH4Cl. Coverslips were then mounted onto slides in mounting medium. All images were obtained on a Zeiss LSM 410 laser scanning confocal microscope (Thornwood, NY) using Zeiss LSM version 3.95 software. All image size and contrast adjustments were performed with PhotoShop (version 4) software (Adobe Software, Palo Alto, CA).

For study of CD91 binding and RAP competition by FACS, adherent macrophages were incubated for 30 min at 4°C with fluorescein-GRP94 or α2M*-AF488, in the presence or absence of RAP. Ligand and RAP concentrations were as indicated above. Following incubation, cells were rinsed and fixed in 1% paraformaldehyde. Cells were analyzed for fluorescence by FACS and analysis was performed using CellQuest (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA).

Chaperone-based re-presentation

Peptide re-presentation assays were performed with GRP94 complexed with SIINFEKL peptide (by heat shock, 15 min at 50°C) (24, 25) and subsequently isolated from free peptide by Sephadex G-75 size exclusion chromatography (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). This preparation does not contain free peptide (26). To assay GRP94/peptide re-presentation, GRP94/peptide complexes and, where indicated, α2M* were incubated with elicited primary peritoneal macrophages and, following a 3-h incubation at 37°C, subsequently stained with 25-D1.16 Ab (27). The cells were then fixed in 2% paraformaldehyde for FACS analysis.

Results and Discussion

Trafficking itineraries of GRP94 and CD91

CD91 has been identified as the unique receptor responsible for directing GRP94 into MHC class I re-presentation pathways of APCs (12, 13, 14). CD91 is a member of the LDL family of lipoprotein receptors, which bind and internalize an array of ligands, the majority of which are targeted to lysosomes (28). Because little is known regarding the CD91-dependent trafficking of GRP94, the trafficking itineraries of CD91, GRP94, and known CD91 ligands were examined.

To evaluate the subcellular trafficking of CD91 ligands, the trafficking pattern of GRP94 was compared with that of Pseudomonas exotoxin, an obligate CD91 ligand (29). In these experiments, fluor-labeled GRP94 and Pseudomonas exotoxin were bound to macrophage cell surface receptors, the cells were washed, and the staining pattern was analyzed following warming to 37°C. As is evident in Fig. 1⇓A, receptor-internalized GRP94 (red channel) and Pseudomonas exotoxin (green channel) were trafficked to distinct subcellular compartments. The lack of costaining suggested that GRP94 and CD91 were rapidly segregated upon internalization to yield distinct trafficking itineraries. To examine this hypothesis, we determined whether, at early time points, internalized GRP94 and CD91 colocalized. Surprisingly, and as shown in Fig. 1⇓B, GRP94 (red channel) taken up by receptor-mediated endocytosis did not colocalize with internalized CD91 (green channel). This is in direct contrast to the colocalization observed of receptor-internalized GRP94 and IgG (Fig. 1⇓C), which traffic to a FcR+rab5a− endosomal compartment (26). In interpreting these data with respect to a role for CD91 in chaperone-mediated cross-presentation, it is important to note that a functional role for CD91 in this process has been proposed not on the basis of direct trafficking studies but rather from the observed inhibition of peptide re-presentation by CD91-specific Abs and by α2M competition (12). To reconcile these differences, a direct analysis of CD91 function in GRP94 cell surface binding and uptake was performed.

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Divergent trafficking pathways for GRP94, CD91, and Pseudomonas exotoxin. Texas Red (TR)-GRP94 and fluorescein (Fl)-labeled Pseudomonas exotoxin (PE) (A), fluorescein-labeled Abs against CD91 (B), or fluorescein-labeled IgG (C) were bound to primary peritoneal macrophage cell surface receptors on ice, the cells were washed, and receptor-mediated uptake was initiated by warming the cells to 37°C. After a 30-min (A) or 7-min (B and C) trafficking period, cells were processed for confocal microscopy. Colocalization is observed in the two-channel merge as yellow.

Analysis of LDL receptor-related protein family activity in receptor-mediated uptake of GRP94

CD91 is expressed on a diverse array of cell types, including, but not limited to, APCs (15). Previously, we reported that HepG2, a CD91-positive human hepatoma cell line, did not display GRP94 cell surface binding (23, 30). To examine whether there was a positive correlation between CD91 expression and cell surface binding of GRP94, these two parameters were evaluated in an additional CD91-positive cell line, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), and in RAW264.7 macrophages, a cell line that is CD91 positive and that binds GRP94 (12, 23, 31, 32). As depicted in Fig. 2⇓A, both CHO and RAW264.7 cells express nearly identical levels of CD91, findings consistent with previous reports (14, 31, 32). However, though both cell types were CD91 positive, only RAW264.7 cells display appreciable cell surface binding of GRP94; thus, as previously concluded with regard to HepG2 cells, a positive correlation between CD91 expression and GRP94 cell surface binding could not be demonstrated.

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

CD91-independent cell surface binding of GRP94 to elicited macrophages. A, CHO and RAW264.7 macrophages were incubated with fluorescein-GRP94 on ice, the unbound GRP94 was removed, and the cells were subsequently decorated with anti-CD91 mAb (rhodamine channel). Bound GRP94 and CD91 levels were determined by FACS. B, Fluorescein-GRP94 binding to the cell surface of RAW264.7 macrophages was conducted in the presence of BSA, BSA plus α2M* (400 μg/ml), or DMEM plus 10% bovine serum, followed by FACS analysis. Inset, Scatchard analysis of GRP94 binding to macrophages. GRP94 exhibits a Kd of ∼2 × 10−7 M to macrophages, occupying ∼106 high-affinity sites per cell. C, The effects of the CD91 ligand α2M* on the receptor-mediated internalization of GRP94 was examined in RAW264.7 macrophages. Fluorescein-GRP94 was allowed to bind to RAW264.7 macrophages in the presence of 200 μg/ml α2M*, the free ligand was removed, and the cells were subsequently warmed to 37°C for 7 min to promote internalization.

Subsequently, the capacity of the CD91 ligand, α2M*, to compete for GRP94 cell surface binding was examined. Previously, Binder et al. (12) reported that α2M efficiently inhibits re-presentation of GRP94-associated peptides, as assayed using peptide-dependent stimulation of T cells as a surrogate for receptor function in GRP94 peptide uptake. This observation is surprising, as CD91 ligands generally do not cross-compete for binding (28). However, a second high-affinity α2M* binding site has been demonstrated on the surface of APCs (33); thus, it was considered that GRP94 cell surface binding was conferred by this related activity. Therefore, we performed competition experiments with highly purified α2M*, the CD91 binding form of α2M, or serum, which contains ∼2 mg/ml α2M (34). As shown in Fig. 2⇑B, BSA, BSA supplemented with α2M*, and DMEM plus 10% serum had no effect on the binding of GRP94 to thioglycolate-elicited macrophages. Indeed, GRP94 was observed to bind to and be internalized by elicited macrophages in the presence of 200 μg/ml α2M* (Fig. 2⇑C). High-affinity binding of GRP94 to macrophage cell surfaces has previously been shown to be specific (8, 13) and saturable (Fig. 2⇑B). Because α2M* constitutes ∼1% of total α2M (35),the α2M* levels (200 μg/ml) used in these experiments are equivalent to a total α2M concentration of 20 mg/ml, a concentration in vast excess to that necessary for competition at a shared site(s).

Re-presentation of GRP94-associated peptides via a CD91-independent pathway

RAP is a 39-kDa protein that acts as a universal antagonist to all known CD91 ligands, including α2M* (16, 17, 19). If CD91 functions in the internalization of GRP94, and as α2M has been reported to block the interaction of GRP94 with CD91, RAP would be predicted to antagonize the binding of GRP94 to APCs. Therefore, we tested the effects of RAP on cell surface binding of GRP94, using an established ligand, α2M*, as a positive control. Fig. 3⇓B indicates that RAP, at a 100-fold molar excess, did not inhibit GRP94 binding to elicited macrophages. Importantly, under identical assay conditions, α2M* binding was efficiently blocked by RAP (Fig. 3⇓C). The inhibition of GRP94 binding by RAP was not due to GRP94 displaying a higher affinity for APCs than α2M*, as GRP94 exhibits an overall Kd of ∼2 × 10−7 M to elicited macrophages (Fig. 2⇑B, inset), as compared with a low nanomolar Kd for α2M* binding to CD91 (36). The effects of RAP on cell surface binding of fluorescein-labeled GRP94 and Texas Red-labeled α2M* was also examined by confocal microscopy (Fig. 3⇓, D and E). Consistent with the FACS data, RAP was without effect on GRP94 binding (green channel), whereas α2M* binding (red channel) was efficiently blocked (Fig. 3⇓, compare D, minus RAP, with E, plus RAP). Finally, we tested whether α2M* directly blocked the re-presentation of GRP94-associated peptides. In these experiments, it was observed that SIINFEKL peptide, complexed with GRP94, was re-presented both in the presence of α2M-containing serum and in the presence of serum supplemented with 100 μg/ml α2M* (Fig. 3⇓F), a level previously reported to abolish GRP94-dependent cross-priming of T cells (12).

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

GRP94 binding to macrophages is not inhibited by the CD91 antagonist RAP, nor is peptide re-presentation suppressed by α2M*. A, Elicited peritoneal macrophages were assayed by FACS analysis for their ability to bind 25 nM GRP94 (B) or α2M* (C) in absence or presence of a 100-fold molar excess of RAP. As illustrated in D and E, RAP competition of α2M* but not GRP94 was confirmed by confocal microscopy. These experiments were conducted identically to those illustrated in A–C. F, Elicited peritoneal macrophages were incubated in the presence of 50 μg/ml GRP94-OVA complex in the absence (GRP94/OVA), or the presence of 100 μg/ml α2M* (GRP94/OVA/α2M) for 3 h at 37°C. Peptide re-presentation was assessed by subsequent staining with the Kb-OVA-specific Ab 25-D1.16 and FACS analysis. Also shown is 25-D1.16 staining of macrophages incubated in the absence of GRP94-OVA.

In noting the marked time interval differences in assays of peptide re-presentation on cell surface class I molecules (≤3 h) and GRP94-mediated T cell activation (>20 h) (12), it should be considered that the reported inhibition of T cell activation by CD91 Ab and α2M may reflect physiological responses of the cells to prolonged culture with these reagents. For example, ligand-bound CD91 elicits pronounced cell activation; thus, we suggest that CD91 Ab and α2M may disrupt the ability of APC to activate cognate T cells (37, 38, 39).

In summary, the included data indicate that macrophage CD91 displays biochemical properties consistent with its role as a α2M* receptor. However, the lack of a positive correlation between CD91 expression and GRP94 cell surface binding, the absence of colocalization between GRP94 and CD91 in the early trafficking itinerary of the two proteins, the inability of α2M* to inhibit the binding or internalization of GRP94 or the re-presentation of its associated peptides, and the observation that RAP, a biological antagonist for CD91 receptor ligands, is without effect on GRP94 binding argue strongly against a role for CD91 in the receptor-mediated internalization of GRP94. From these data, it is equally evident that APCs bear cell surface receptors that are capable of directing GRP94 into the class I Ag re-presentation pathway.

Acknowledgments

We thank the Duke University University Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center Shared Flow Cytometry Facility for FACS analyses and acknowledge the support of the Duke University Medical Center Comprehensive Cancer Center Shared Confocal Microscopy Facility.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported by National Institutes of Health Grant DK53058 (to C.V.N.) and HL24066 (to S.P.), National Research Service Award Fellowship 1F32CA9016901 (to B.B.), and the H. H. Gibson Cancer Fellowship (to B.B.).

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Christopher V. Nicchitta, Department of Cell Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710. E-mail address: c.nicchitta{at}cellbio.duke.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: LDL, low-density lipoprotein; RAP, receptor-associated protein; α2M, α2-macroglobulin; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary.

  • Received January 11, 2002.
  • Accepted February 27, 2002.
  • Copyright © 2002 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Yamazaki, K., T. Nguyen, E. R. Podack. 1999. Cutting edge: tumor-secreted heat shock-fusion protein elicits CD8 cells for rejection. J. Immunol. 163: 5178
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    Zheng, H., J. Dai, D. Stoilova, Z. Li. 2001. Cell surface targeting of heat shock protein gp96 induces dendritic cell maturation and antitumor immunity. J. Immunol. 167: 6731
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Srivastava, P. K., H. Udono. 1994. Heat shock protein-peptide complexes in cancer immunotherapy. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 6: 728
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Srivastava, P. K., L. J. Old. 1988. Individually distinct transplantation antigens of chemically induced mouse tumors. Immunol. Today 9: 78
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Tamura, Y., P. Peng, K. Liu, M. Daou, P. K. Srivastava. 1997. Immunotherapy of tumors with autologous tumor-derived heat shock protein preparations. Science 278: 117
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Singh-Jasuja, H., H. U. Scherer, N. Hilf, D. Arnold-Schild, H. G. Rammensee, R. E. Toes, H. Schild. 2000. The heat shock protein gp96 induces maturation of dendritic cells and down-regulation of its receptor. Eur. J. Immunol. 30: 2211
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Basu, S., R. J. Binder, R. Suto, K. M. Anderson, P. K. Srivastava. 2000. Necrotic but not apoptotic cell death releases heat shock proteins, which deliver a partial maturation signal to dendritic cells and activate the NF-κB pathway. Int. Immunol. 12: 1539
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Singh-Jasuja, H., R. E. Toes, P. Spee, C. Munz, N. Hilf, S. P. Schoenberger, P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli, J. Neefjes, H. G. Rammensee, D. Arnold-Schild, H. Schild. 2000. Cross-presentation of glycoprotein 96-associated antigens on major histocompatibility complex class I molecules requires receptor-mediated endocytosis. J. Exp. Med. 191: 1965
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Srivastava, P. K., R. J. Amato. 2001. Heat shock proteins: the “Swiss army knife” vaccines against cancers and infectious agents. Vaccine 19: 2590
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Lammert, E., D. Arnold, M. Nijenhuis, F. Momburg, G. J. Hammerling, J. Brunner, S. Stevanovic, H. G. Rammensee, H. Schild. 1997. The endoplasmic reticulum-resident stress protein gp96 binds peptides translocated by TAP. Eur. J. Immunol. 27: 923
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Argon, Y., B. B. Simen. 1999. GRP94, an ER chaperone with protein and peptide binding properties. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 10: 495
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Binder, R. J., D. K. Han, P. K. Srivastava. 2000. CD91: a receptor for heat shock protein gp96. Nat. Immunol. 1: 151
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Basu, S., R. J. Binder, T. Ramalingam, P. K. Srivastava. 2001. CD91 is a common receptor for heat shock proteins gp96, hsp90, hsp70, and calreticulin. Immunity 14: 303
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Binder, R. J., D. Karimeddini, P. K. Srivastava. 2001. Adjuvanticity of α2-macroglobulin, an independent ligand for the heat shock protein receptor CD91. J. Immunol. 166: 4968
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Chu, C. T., S. V. Pizzo. 1994. α2-Macroglobulin, complement, and biologic defense: antigens, growth factors, microbial proteases, and receptor ligation. Lab. Invest. 71: 792
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Herz, J., J. L. Goldstein, D. K. Strickland, Y. K. Ho, M. S. Brown. 1991. 39-kDa protein modulates binding of ligands to low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/α2-macroglobulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 266: 21232
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Bu, G., M. P. Marzolo. 2000. Role of RAP in the biogenesis of lipoprotein receptors. Trends Cardiovasc. Med. 10: 148
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Williams, S. E., J. D. Ashcom, W. S. Argraves, D. K. Strickland. 1992. A novel mechanism for controlling the activity of α2-macroglobulin receptor/low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein: multiple regulatory sites for 39-kDa receptor-associated protein. J. Biol. Chem. 267: 9035
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. ↵
    Bu, G., H. J. Geuze, G. J. Strous, A. L. Schwartz. 1995. 39 kDa receptor-associated protein is an ER resident protein and molecular chaperone for LDL receptor-related protein. EMBO J. 14: 2269
    OpenUrlPubMed
  20. ↵
    Wearsch, P. A., C. V. Nicchitta. 1996. Purification and partial molecular characterization of GRP94, an ER resident chaperone. Protein Expression Purif. 7: 114
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Gron, H., S. V. Pizzo. 1998. Nonproteolytic incorporation of protein ligands into human α2-macroglobulin: implications for the binding mechanism of α2-macroglobulin. Biochemistry 37: 6009
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Howard, G. C., U. K. Misra, D. L. DeCamp, S. V. Pizzo. 1996. Altered interaction of cis-dichlorodiammineplatinum(II)-modified α2-macroglobulin (α2M) with the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/α2M receptor but not the α2M signaling receptor. J. Clin. Invest. 97: 1193
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Wassenberg, J. J., C. Dezfulian, C. V. Nicchitta. 1999. Receptor mediated and fluid phase pathways for internalization of the ER Hsp90 chaperone GRP94 in murine macrophages. J. Cell Sci. 112: 2167
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. ↵
    Blachere, N. E., Z. Li, R. Y. Chandawarkar, R. Suto, N. S. Jaikaria, S. Basu, H. Udono, P. K. Srivastava. 1997. Heat shock protein-peptide complexes, reconstituted in vitro, elicit peptide-specific cytotoxic T lymphocyte response and tumor immunity. J. Exp. Med. 186: 1315
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Suto, R., P. K. Srivastava. 1995. A mechanism for the specific immunogenicity of heat shock protein-chaperoned peptides. Science 269: 1585
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Berwin, B., M. F. N. Rosser, K. G. Brinker, and C. V. Nicchitta. 2002. Transfer of GRP94(gp96)-associated peptides onto endosomal MHC class I molecules. Traffic. In press.
  27. ↵
    Porgador, A., J. W. Yewdell, Y. Deng, J. R. Bennink, R. N. Germain. 1997. Localization, quantitation, and in situ detection of specific peptide-MHC class I complexes using a monoclonal Ab. Immunity 6: 715
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. ↵
    Krieger, M., J. Herz. 1994. Structures and functions of multiligand lipoprotein receptors: macrophage scavenger receptors and LDL receptor-related protein (LRP). Annu. Rev. Biochem. 63: 601
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Willnow, T. E., J. Herz. 1994. Genetic deficiency in low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein confers cellular resistance to Pseudomonas exotoxin A: evidence that this protein is required for uptake and degradation of multiple ligands. J. Cell Sci. 107: 719
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Quinn, K. A., P. G. Grimsley, Y. P. Dai, M. Tapner, C. N. Chesterman, D. A. Owensby. 1997. Soluble low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein (LRP) circulates in human plasma. J. Biol. Chem. 272: 23946
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Hussaini, I. M., J. LaMarre, J. J. Lysiak, L. R. Karns, S. R. VandenBerg, S. L. Gonias. 1996. Transcriptional regulation of LDL receptor-related protein by IFN-γ and the antagonistic activity of TGF-β1 in the RAW 264.7 macrophage-like cell line. J. Leukocyte Biol. 59: 733
    OpenUrlAbstract
  32. ↵
    FitzGerald, D. J., C. M. Fryling, A. Zdanovsky, C. B. Saelinger, M. Kounnas, J. A. Winkles, D. Strickland, S. Leppla. 1995. Pseudomonas exotoxin-mediated selection yields cells with altered expression of low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein. J. Cell Biol. 129: 1533
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Misra, U. K., C. T. Chu, G. Gawdi, S. V. Pizzo. 1994. Evidence for a second α2-macroglobulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 269: 12541
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Ganea, D., S. Dray, M. Teodorescu. 1983. α-macroglobulins: enzyme-binding proteins modulating lymphocyte function. Surv. Immunol. Res. 2: 367
    OpenUrlPubMed
  35. ↵
    Adlakha, C. L., J. P. Hart, S. V. Pizzo. 2001. Kinetics of nonproteolytic incorporation of a protein ligand into thermally activated α2-macroglobulin: evidence for a novel nascent state. J. Biol. Chem. 276: 41547
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. ↵
    Howard, G. C., Y. Yamaguchi, U. K. Misra, G. Gawdi, A. Nelsen, D. L. DeCamp, S. V. Pizzo. 1996. Selective mutations in cloned and expressed α-macroglobulin receptor binding fragment alter binding to either the α2-macroglobulin signaling receptor or the low density lipoprotein receptor-related protein/α2-macroglobulin receptor. J. Biol. Chem. 271: 14105
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  37. ↵
    Misra, U. K., G. Gawdi, S. V. Pizzo. 1995. Ligation of the α2-macroglobulin signalling receptor on macrophages induces protein phosphorylation and an increase in cytosolic pH. Biochem. J. 309: 151
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Misra, U. K., C. T. Chu, D. S. Rubenstein, G. Gawdi, S. V. Pizzo. 1993. Receptor-recognized α2-macroglobulin-methylamine elevates intracellular calcium, inositol phosphates and cyclic AMP in murine peritoneal macrophages. Biochem. J. 290: 885
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Howard, G. C., B. C. Roberts, D. L. Epstein, S. V. Pizzo. 1996. Characterization of α2-macroglobulin binding to human trabecular meshwork cells: presence of the α2-macroglobulin signaling receptor. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 333: 19
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 168 (9)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 168, Issue 9
1 May 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Cutting Edge: CD91-Independent Cross-Presentation of GRP94(gp96)-Associated Peptides
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Cutting Edge: CD91-Independent Cross-Presentation of GRP94(gp96)-Associated Peptides
Brent Berwin, Justin P. Hart, Salvatore V. Pizzo, Christopher V. Nicchitta
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2002, 168 (9) 4282-4286; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4282

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Cutting Edge: CD91-Independent Cross-Presentation of GRP94(gp96)-Associated Peptides
Brent Berwin, Justin P. Hart, Salvatore V. Pizzo, Christopher V. Nicchitta
The Journal of Immunology May 1, 2002, 168 (9) 4282-4286; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.9.4282
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results and Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Cutting Edge: Hyperinflammatory Monocytes Expressing CD56 Abound in Severe COVID-19 Patients
  • Cutting Edge: Promoting T Cell Factor 1+ T Cell Self-Renewal to Improve Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Blockade
  • Cutting Edge: T Cell Responses to B.1.1.529 (Omicron) SARS-CoV-2 Variant Induced by COVID-19 Infection and/or mRNA Vaccination Are Largely Preserved
Show more CUTTING EDGE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606