IL-18-Binding Protein Expression by Endothelial Cells and Macrophages Is Up-Regulated During Active Crohn’s Disease

Specimens

Surgically resected specimens were obtained from patients with active CD undergoing a partial intestinal resection and were immediately snap-frozen. Sixteen CD patients (4 men and 12 women) with a mean age of 42.4 years (range, 27–78 years) and a mean disease duration of 9.5 years (range, 2–21 years) were included. The primary site of involvement was colonic in five patients, ileal in nine patients, and ileocolonic in two patients. The surgically resected specimens contained all layers of the intestinal wall. The diagnosis for the activity of the disease was made by histopathological examination of the surgically resected specimens based on the following criteria: presence of ulcerations, increased numbers of inflammatory cells, and transmural inflammation. At the time of surgery, six patients were on corticosteroids (CS), three on CS plus mesalazine, three on CS plus azathioprine, one on CS plus mesalazine and azathioprine, one on paracetamol, one on CS plus paracetamol, and the remaining one was off treatment. For all patients, indication for surgery was a chronic active course poorly responsive to medical treatment. Control surgically resected specimens (six males and nine females) were obtained from patients undergoing a partial intestinal resection for bowel cancer and were snap-frozen. Control specimens were from macroscopically and microscopically unaffected areas. The mean age of this group was 55.5 years (range: 24–81 years). The surgically resected specimens were used for immunohistochemical studies, real-time PCR, and Western blot analysis. The Medical Ethical Committee of the Academic Medical Center (Amsterdam, The Netherlands) approved the study.

rhIL-18 and rhIL-18BP isoforms

Recombinant human (rh)IL-18 was prepared in E. coli as mutated pro-IL-18 fused to GST, engineered to contain a caspase-8 cleavage site. Following purification, mature human IL-18 was released by caspase-8 cleavage. rhIL-18BP-6His isoforms a–d were transiently expressed in HEK 293 cells as previously described (21). Conditioned media were collected after 72 h and stored at −80°C. rhIL-18BPa-6His was purified to homogeneity from a stable Chinese hamster ovary cell line (21).

Abs to hIL-18BP

Anti-human (h)IL-18BP mAbs 582.10 and 657.27 were used for Western blot analysis, ELISA, and FACS analysis (24). Anti-hIL-18BP mouse polyclonal was generated by injecting BALB/c mice s.c. with rhIL-18BPa-6His and used for Western blot analysis.

Anti-hIL-18BP mAb 95-H20 was generated by injecting BALB/c mice s.c. into the four limbs as well as intranuchally, with 50 μg per injection of rhIL-18BPa-6His in PBS with adjuvant (monophosphoryl lipid A plus trehalose dicorynomycolate Emulsion; RIBI adjuvant system (Corixa, Hamilton, MT)) on days 0, 7, and 28. Four days after the third immunization, the lymph nodes were removed and digested with 2.4 μg/ml collagenase IV (Worthington Biochemical, Lakewood, NJ) and 0.1% DNase (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO). Isolated cells were then fused with Sp2/0 myeloma cells using polyethylene glycol 1000 (Fluka, Buchs, Switzerland). Hybridomas were resuspended in DMEM-F12, 10% FCS (Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) in the presence of hypoxanthine, aminopterin, and thymidine and plated in 96-well plates at a concentration of 5 × 10⁴ cells/ml. Hybridoma culture supernatants were screened for anti-IL-18BP-reactive Abs by ELISA. Briefly, ELISA plates were coated with goat anti-mouse F(ab′)₂ Abs (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). Hybridoma culture supernatants were added followed by biotinylated rhIL-18BP-6His. To select Abs directed against free IL-18BP and IL-18BP bound to IL-18, the screening was performed with or without rhIL-18. Non-neutralizing Abs recognizing free and bound IL-18BP were selected and subcloned. mAb 95-H20, a mouse IgG1 mAb, was used for immunohistochemical studies.

Immunohistochemical studies

Serial cryosections (10 μm) from control or active CD surgically resected specimens were mounted on poly-l-lysine-coated Superfrost/Plus glass slides (Polylabo, Geneva, Switzerland) and fixed in ice-cold acetone. After a brief rehydration in PBS, sections were blocked for 30 min in PBS supplemented with 2% FCS (Cansera, Rexdale, Canada), 1% human serum (AB⁺ serum; Transfusion Center, Annemasse, France) and 0.5% BSA (Sigma-Aldrich). Endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 1% hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂; Fluka) in PBS, 2% FCS, 1% human serum, and 0.5% BSA for 1 h. IL-18BP-producing cells were immunostained overnight with neat culture supernatant containing anti-hIL-18BP mAb 95-H20, followed by biotinylated goat anti-mouse Ab (5 μg/ml; Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories) in PBS containing 0.5% BSA for 1 h and then avidin/biotinylated HRP complex (Vectastain Elite ABC kit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) for 30 min. Slides were developed using 3-amino-1-ethylcarbazole (Sigma-Aldrich) according to the manufacturer’s protocol, counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma-Aldrich), and mounted.

Double immunofluorescence labeling was performed to identify cell types expressing IL-18BP. After rehydration and blocking (as above), sections were incubated overnight with anti-hIL-18BP biotinylated mAb 95-H20 (20 μg/ml) mixed with either the endothelial cell marker, FITC-conjugated mouse anti-human CD31 (1/50; BD PharMingen, San Diego, CA) or the macrophage/monocyte marker, FITC-conjugated anti-human CD68 (1/25; DAKO, Carpinteria, CA), in PBS 0.5% BSA. Following a PBS wash, IL-18BP labeling was visualized using streptavidin-Texas Red (Southern Biotechnology Associates, Birmingham, AL). All isotype-matched controls were negative.

RNA, cDNA, and protein preparation

RNA and protein were extracted from control or active CD surgically resected specimens using TRIzol (Life Technologies) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, which allowed total RNA and protein recovery from the same tissue sample. RNA integrity was assessed by electrophoresis on 1% agarose gels. cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA using a reverse transcription system (Promega, Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After RNA recovery, proteins were extracted by sequential precipitation. Total protein was quantified using the bicinchoninic acid protein assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL). Protein extraction from TRIzol was validated by comparison of proteins directly lysed in Laemmli sample buffer and proteins extracted from TRIzol. Both methods gave identical protein profiles by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie blue staining. Western blotting of both protein preparations also gave identical specificity and intensity.

Real-time PCR

SYBR green real-time PCR primers for human IL-18BP, IL-18, and GAPDH (housekeeping control) were designed using Primer Express software from PE Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA) (Table I⇓). The specificity and optimal primer concentrations were tested. The IL-18BP primers did not distinguish among the various isoforms. Potential genomic DNA contamination was excluded by performing PCR with specific intron-GAPDH primers. The absence of nonspecific amplification was confirmed by analyzing the PCR products by agarose gel electrophoresis. Real-time PCR was performed with 5 μl/well of reverse transcription products (0.5 ng total RNA), 25 μl/well SYBR Green PCR master mix (PE Applied Biosystems) with 0.5 U/well of AmpErase (PE Applied Biosystems) uracil N-glycosylase and 300 nM primers. PCR was performed at 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 10 min, and then run for 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 1 min on the ABI PRISM 7700 Detection System (PE Applied Biosystems). The reverse-transcribed cDNA samples were thus amplified and their cycle threshold values were determined. All cycle threshold values were normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH.

Semiquantitative PCR

Semiquantitative PCR primers for human IL-18BP and β-actin (housekeeping control) were designed (Table I⇑). PCR were performed in a total volume of 50 μl in the presence of 1.25 U of AmpliTaq DNA Polymerase (PerkinElmer, Wellesley, MA), 2.5 mM dNTPs (Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL), and 50 pmol of forward and reverse PCR primers. Reactions were incubated in a PTC-200 Peltier Effect Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Cambridge, MA) under the following conditions: denaturation for 1 min at 94°C, annealing for 1 min at 55°C, and extension for 1 min at 72°C. Absence of contaminating genomic DNA was confirmed by performing PCR on the nontranscribed RNA. PCR products were analyzed by agarose gel electrophoresis and the band size was verified by comparison with a 1-kb ladder (Life Technologies).

ELISA

Maxisorp microtiter 96-well ELISA plates (Labsystems, Chicago, IL) were coated with 100 μl/well anti-hIL-18BP mAb 582.10 (2 μg/ml) overnight at room temperature. Soluble hIL-18BP was then detected using biotinylated anti-hIL-18BP mAb 657.27 (0.5 μg/ml) followed by incubation with peroxidase-conjugated extravidin (1/10,000; Sigma-Aldrich). The sensitivity of the ELISA was 100 pg/ml. Conditioned media from HEK 293 cells transfected with the different hIL-18BP isoforms illustrated that the ELISA recognized only isoforms a and c. IL-18/IL-18BP complexes were then formed using rhIL-18 with conditioned media containing either isoform a or c and tested. This experiment demonstrated that the ELISA detected only free IL-18BP (data not shown).

Levels of IL-18 were quantified by using a commercial ELISA (Medical and Biological Laboratories, Nagoya, Japan; Immunotech, Westbrook, ME) whose sensitivity was 12.5 pg/ml. Experiments, also conducted in our laboratory, showed that this ELISA recognized total IL-18 and thus cannot discriminate between free and IL-18BP-bound IL-18 (data not shown).

Western blot analysis

For the detection of hIL-18BP and hIL-18, 10 μg of protein from control and active CD surgically resected specimens was separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes (Schleicher & Schuell, Keene, NH). Membranes were blocked for 2 h at 37°C with 5% PBS-defatted milk powder and then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with mouse anti-hIL-18BP mAb 657.27 (1 μg/ml), mouse polyclonal anti-hIL-18BP, or goat polyclonal anti-hIL-18 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). Membranes were then washed extensively before incubation with an anti-mouse or anti-goat HRP-conjugated secondary Ab (Sigma-Aldrich), respectively, and visualized by chemiluminescence (ECL reagents, Hyperfilm ECL; Amersham). To confirm the identity of the different isoforms, conditioned media from transiently transfected HEK 293 cells expressing the different isoforms were used as positive controls. For the detection of IL-18/IL-18BP complexes, the molar equivalent of rhIL-18 was incubated with conditioned media from HEK 293 cells transfected with either isoform a or c for 30 min at room temperature before electrophoresis and Western blotting.

Cell culture

Primary HUVECs (Clonetics, San Diego, CA) were cultured according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All experiments were performed using the HUVEC at passage 3. HUVEC were treated with a mixture of cytokines, IL-1β (10 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml), and IFN-γ (20 ng/ml) (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN), for 24 h. Cells were then harvested, and the RNA was isolated and subjected to RT-PCR for analysis of IL-18BP mRNA levels. Supernatants were collected and analyzed for IL-18BP production by ELISA.

Human PBMC were isolated from heparinized blood from healthy donors by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation (Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ). Monocytes/macrophages were isolated from whole PBMC preparations by depletion of non-monocytes using MACS Monocyte Isolation kit (Miltenyi Biotec, Auburn, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity was assessed by FACS analysis (> 93% of CD64⁺ cells). Isolated cells were seeded in 48-well plates at 2 × 10⁷ per ml (6 × 10⁶ per well) and cultured in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% human serum type AB (Sigma-Aldrich), 2 mM l-glutamine, and 10 U/ml penicillin/streptomycin. Total PBMC were stimulated with the mixture of cytokines supplemented with LPS (100 ng/ml; Calbiochem, La Jolla, CA) or with IL-18 (20 ng/ml; Promega), IL-1β (10 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml), IFN-γ (20 ng/ml) (R&D Systems) and LPS alone. Purified monocytes/macrophages were stimulated with IFN-γ (20 ng/ml) and TNF-α (10 ng/ml). Supernatants were analyzed for IL-18BP by ELISA 48 h after stimulation.

Flow cytometry analysis of IL-18BP expression

Intracellular IL-18BP was detected in PBMC by flow cytometry using a FACSCalibur (BD Biosciences, Mountain View, CA). Brefeldin A (5 μg/ml; Sigma-Aldrich) was added 4 h before assay. FITC-labeled anti-CD64 mAb (BD PharMingen) was used as a marker to identify monocytes/macrophages. The proportion of CD64⁺ cells in PBMC preparations was 12%. Intracellular IL-18BP was detected using biotinylated mouse anti-IL-18BP mAb 582.10 followed by streptavidin-PE conjugate. All isotype-matched controls were negative. Data are presented as the difference (Δ) between the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of the positive label (i.e., anti-IL-18BP) and the MFI of the negative control (i.e., mouse IgG1).

Statistical analysis

For IL-18BP and IL-18 mRNA and protein levels, results are expressed as mean ± SEM. Results were analyzed using the Wilcoxon rank test by the statistical program S-Plus 2000 Professional (Release 3; Insightful, Seattle, WA). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.

Immunohistochemical expression and localization of IL-18BP in intestinal tissue

To assess the expression and localization of IL-18BP, immunohistochemistry was performed on cryosections of surgically resected specimens from patients with active CD or from control patients. Evaluating the control sections, vessels and a few scattered cells expressed IL-18BP (Fig. 1⇓, A and B). IL-18BP was also observed associated with the vessels of active CD patients (Fig. 2⇓, A and B). Interestingly, an increased number of IL-18BP-positive cells were scattered in the submucosa (Fig. 2⇓, A–C) and overlying lymphoid aggregates (Fig. 2⇓C). Thus, the endothelial cells within the vessels and the cells infiltrating the submucosa appeared to be the major source for IL-18BP during active CD.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 1.

Immunohistochemistry of IL-18BP in cryosections of intestinal tissue from control patients. A and B, Anti-hIL-18BP mAb 95-H20-labeled vessels within the submucosa and isolated cells scattered within the submucosa. C and D, Similar sections incubated with a mouse IgG1 isotype-matched control. Magnification for A and C is ×100. Magnification for B and D is ×180.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 2.

Immunohistochemistry of IL-18BP in cryosections of intestinal tissue from patients with active CD. A–C, The anti-hIL-18BP mAb, 95-H20, revealed a strong labeling of vessels as well as scattered cells within the submucosa and lymphoid aggregates. D–F, Similar sections incubated with a mouse IgG1 isotype control mAb. Magnification for A, C, D, and F is ×100. Magnification for B and E is ×180.

To further characterize the positive infiltrating cells, immunofluorescent microscopy was used. The IL-18BP-positive cells in active CD cryosections were formally identified as macrophages using an anti-CD68 mAb. Endothelial cell labeling was confirmed using an anti-CD31 mAb. CD68-positive cells (Fig. 3⇓A), CD31-positive cells (Fig. 3⇓D), and IL-18BP-positive cells (Fig. 3⇓, B and E) were detected in the submucosa of active CD. Superimposing the two fluorescent images confirmed that the macrophages and endothelial cells were indeed positive for IL-18BP (Fig. 3⇓, C and F, respectively). Other cell specific markers, e.g. anti-epithelial Ag clone Ber-EP4 (epithelial cells), anti-CD94 (NK cells), anti-CD3 (T cells), anti-CD19, and anti-CD20 (B cells) were analyzed but did not colocalize with the IL-18BP staining (data not shown). Thus, macrophages and endothelial cells appear to be the major source of IL-18BP within intestinal tissues obtained from active CD patients.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 3.

Double immunofluorescence of active CD intestinal sections. CD68, a macrophages marker (A), or CD31, an endothelial cell marker (D, green), were used. IL-18BP-positive cells (B and E, red) were revealed by biotinylated anti-hIL-18BP mAb 95-H20 followed by streptavidin-Texas Red. Double-immunolabeled images (C and F) reveal the colocalization (yellow) of IL-18BP-positive macrophages (C) and IL-18BP-positive endothelial cells (F). Magnification is ×700.

Balance between IL-18BP and IL-18 expression in active CD intestinal tissue

Analysis of IL-18BP and IL-18 expression was performed by real-time PCR on the surgically resected specimens obtained from patients with active CD and from control patients (Fig. 4⇓). IL-18BP mRNA was detectable in control patients (mean, 1.74; SD, 0.1) and the levels were significantly increased in active CD patients (mean, 8.92; SD, 2.4, p < 0.001). Similarly, IL-18 mRNA was present in control patients (mean, 2.83; SD, 0.2), again with increased levels in active CD patients (mean, 4.40; SD, 0.5, p < 0.05).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 4.

IL-18BP and IL-18 mRNA expression in active CD and control intestinal tissue. Quantification by real-time PCR of IL-18BP (A) and IL-18 (B) mRNA transcripts normalized to the housekeeping gene GAPDH in surgically resected specimens from active CD patients (n = 16) and from control patients (n = 15). Results are reported as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences according to the Wilcoxon test between experimental groups (∗, p < 0.05; ∗∗∗, p < 0.001).

To quantify the levels of IL-18BP (free isoform a/c) and total IL-18 (free and bound to IL-18BP), protein extracts from control and active CD surgically resected specimens were analyzed by ELISA. IL-18BP levels were 2-fold higher in specimens from active CD patients (49.5 ± 6 ng/ml for CD vs 20.9 ± 3.2 ng/ml for control; p < 0.001) (Fig. 5⇓A). Total IL-18 in the specimens from active CD patients was also significantly increased compared with control patients (1576 ± 246.3 vs 410.4 ± 75.1 pg/ml, respectively; p < 0.001) (Fig. 5⇓B). Analysis of IL-18BP and IL-18 levels of individual specimens demonstrated a significant positive correlation between the two proteins (r = 0.87; p < 0.0001), revealing that the increase in IL-18BP parallels the IL-18 up-regulation known to be associated with active CD (16, 17, 18, 19). Unbound IL-18BP isoform a/c was in excess compared with total IL-18 (49.5 ng/ml vs 1570 pg/ml, respectively) in active CD specimens.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 5.

IL-18BP and IL-18 protein levels in active CD and control intestinal tissue. IL-18BP (A) and IL-18 (B) levels measured by ELISA from surgically resected specimens of active CD patients (n = 8) compared with control patients (n = 7). Results are reported as the mean ± SEM. Asterisks indicate significant differences according to the Wilcoxon test between experimental groups (∗∗∗, p < 0.001).

To obtain additional information on the expression of the four IL-18BP isoforms as well as being free or bound to IL-18, proteins extracts from CD and control surgically resected specimens were subjected to Western blot analysis. The anti-IL-18BP, mAb 657.27, was first shown to recognize recombinant isoforms a and c with a molecular mass of 42 and 40 kDa, respectively (Fig. 6⇓A), as well as the complexes IL-18/IL-18BPa and IL-18/IL-18BPc with an approximate molecular mass of 58 kDa (Fig. 6⇓B). Bands of 42, 40, and 58 kDa, comigrating with the free and complexed recombinant proteins, were also observed in the specimens, demonstrating that free IL-18BP isoform a and c as well as the IL-18/IL-18BP complex were present in intestinal tissue (Fig. 6⇓C). Using an anti-IL-18 polyclonal Ab further confirmed the presence of the IL-18/IL-18BP complex in the active CD and control specimens (Fig. 6⇓D), suggesting that a proportion of IL-18 is bound to IL-18BP. Free mature IL-18 and pro-IL-18 were also present (Fig. 6⇓D).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 6.

Western blot analysis of IL-18BP and IL-18 protein expression in active CD and control intestinal tissue. A, The specificity of anti-hIL-18BP mAb 657.27 was demonstrated using conditioned media from transiently transfected HEK 293 cells containing rhIL-18BP-6His isoform a–d. Anti-hIL-18BP mAb 657.27 detected only rhIL-18BP-6His isoforms a (42 kDa) and c (40 kDa). B, rhIL-18BP-6His isoform a or c was complexed with rhIL-18 before electrophoresis and Western blotting using anti-hIL-18BP mAb 657.27, which detected IL-18/IL-18BPa/c (∼58 kDa). C, IL-18BP expression in protein extracts from surgically resected specimens of active CD and control patients using the anti-hIL-18BP mAb 657.27. Bands of 42, 40, and 58 kDa (isoform a, isoform c, and IL-18/IL-18BPa/c complex, respectively) comigrating with free and bound rIL-18BP were detected. D, IL-18 expression in protein extracts from surgically resected specimens of active CD and control patients using an anti-hIL-18 Ab. These protein extracts were from the same patients as in C. Bands of 18, 24, and 58 kDa corresponding to mature IL-18, pro-IL-18, and complex IL-18/IL-18BPa/c, respectively, were detected. E, The specificity of anti-hIL-18BP mouse polyclonal Ab was demonstrated using conditioned media from transiently transfected HEK 293 cells containing rhIL-18BP-6His isoform a–d. Anti-hIL-18BP mouse polyclonal Ab detected all four isoforms at 42, 16, 40, and 35 kDa, respectively. F, Protein extracts from active CD and control specimens previously analyzed in C and D were further tested for IL-18BP a–d expression using the anti-hIL-18BP mouse polyclonal Ab. Bands of 42, 40, and 35 kDa comigrating with the rIL-18BP isoforms a, c, and d were detected. A 58-kDa band corresponding to the complex IL-18/IL-18BPa/c was also visualized. Cross-reaction of the polyclonal Ab with a protein of ∼19 kDa not related to IL-18BP was also observed. Each blot is representative of three independent experiments.

The presence of inactive (b and d) vs active (a and c) isoforms in active CD and control specimens was further evaluated by Western blot analysis using an anti-IL-18BP mouse polyclonal Ab that recognizes all four recombinant isoforms as shown in Fig. 6⇑E. Bands of 42, 40, and 35 kDa (isoforms a, c, and d, respectively) were observed in the active CD and control specimens, whereas isoform b was not detected (Fig. 6⇑F). These results further confirm the presence of the IL-18/IL-18BP complex (Fig. 6⇑F). An additional band of ∼19 kDa revealed by the anti-IL-18BP mouse polyclonal Ab was analyzed by mass spectrometry and found to be the actin binding protein (data not shown).

IL-18BP production by endothelial cells and macrophages

To further investigate whether the IL-18BP production by intestinal macrophages and endothelial cells was relevant to other types of macrophages and endothelial cells, experiments were performed with HUVEC and peripheral blood monocytes/macrophages. Interestingly, IL-18BP mRNA was found to be constitutively expressed in HUVEC, which then increased following 24 h of stimulation with inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ) (Fig. 7⇓A). Similar to our in situ observations, a significant increase of IL-18BP production was observed (30-fold) (Fig. 7⇓B).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 7.

IL-18BP mRNA and protein expression in endothelial cells. HUVEC were incubated for 24 h in the absence or presence of inflammatory cytokines: IL-1β (10 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml), and IFN-γ (20 ng/ml). A, HUVEC mRNA levels were analyzed by semiquantitative RT-PCR using primers for hIL-18BP and β-actin. The lane designated Ctrl- was performed in the absence of cDNA template. B, HUVEC supernatants were analyzed for IL-18BP by ELISA. One representative experiment of four independent experiments is shown.

As observed with the endothelial cells, IL-18BP was constitutively expressed in PBMC. Inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ) combined with LPS also induced an significant increase in IL-18BP secretion (p < 0.05) (Fig. 8⇓A). A similar induction was observed after 48 h of stimulation with LPS, IFN-γ, and TNF-α alone, demonstrating their individual potential to induce IL-18BP production (Fig. 8⇓A). IL-1β and IL-18 alone had no significant effect (Fig. 8⇓A).

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

FIGURE 8.

IL-18BP expression in monocytes/macrophages. A, PBMC were incubated for 48 h in the absence or presence of the inflammatory cytokines IL-18 (20 ng/ml), TNF-α (10 ng/ml), IFN-γ (20 ng/ml), and IL-1β (10 ng/ml) in combination with LPS (100 ng/ml) or alone as indicated. Supernatants of PBMC cultures were analyzed for IL-18BP by ELISA. One representative experiment of four independent experiments is shown. B, Intracellular IL-18BP expression in CD64⁺ gated cell population was analyzed by flow cytometry. Numbers refer to the difference (Δ) between the MFI of the positive label (anti-IL-18BP) and the MFI of the negative control (mouse IgG1). One representative experiment of five independent experiments is shown. C, Levels of IL-18BP in purified monocytes/macrophages were assessed after a 48-h incubation in the absence or presence of IFN-γ (20 ng/ml) or TNF-α (10 ng/ml). The supernatants were analyzed for IL-18BP by ELISA. One representative experiment of three independent experiments is shown.

The demonstration that peripheral blood monocytes/macrophages produced IL-18BP was confirmed by IL-18BP intracellular FACS analysis on PBMC (Fig. 8⇑B). IL-18BP was observed primarily in CD64⁺ monocytes/macrophages. Thus, CD64-positive cells appear to be the major source of IL-18BP in PBMC. The ability of these cells to produce IL-18BP was further confirmed using culture supernatants of purified monocytes/macrophages from total PBMC with or without stimulation. A 4-fold increase in IL-18BP levels was observed in 48-h supernatants of TNF-α- or IFN-γ-stimulated monocytes/macrophages (Fig. 8⇑C). A similar induction of IL-18BP was observed using differentiated THP-1 cells (data not shown).