Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Tumor-Specific CTL Kill Murine Renal Cancer Cells Using Both Perforin and Fas Ligand-Mediated Lysis In Vitro, But Cause Tumor Regression In Vivo in the Absence of Perforin

Naoko Seki, Alan D. Brooks, Clive R. D. Carter, Timothy C. Back, Erin M. Parsoneault, Mark J. Smyth, Robert H. Wiltrout and Thomas J. Sayers
J Immunol April 1, 2002, 168 (7) 3484-3492; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3484
Naoko Seki
*Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan D. Brooks
†Intramural Research Support Program, Science Applications International Corporation, Frederick, MD 21702; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Clive R. D. Carter
*Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Timothy C. Back
†Intramural Research Support Program, Science Applications International Corporation, Frederick, MD 21702; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Erin M. Parsoneault
†Intramural Research Support Program, Science Applications International Corporation, Frederick, MD 21702; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark J. Smyth
‡Cancer Immunology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Institute, East Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert H. Wiltrout
*Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas J. Sayers
†Intramural Research Support Program, Science Applications International Corporation, Frederick, MD 21702; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Effect of inhibitors on T cell lysis of Renca. Cytotoxic activity of CTL was tested against Renca or Renca pretreated with IFN-γ (500 U/ml) and TNF-α (400 U/ml) by [111In]Ox release assay. A, The 8- or 18-h cytotoxicity assays (E:T = 20:1) were performed in the presence or absence of CMA (100 nM), anti-FasL, anti-TRAIL mAb (10 μg/ml), or combinations of these agents. B, An 18-h assay (E:T = 2:1) was performed in the presence or absence of anti-IFN-γ, anti-TNF-α mAb (10 μg/ml), or both of these mAbs. Data represent mean ± SD of triplicate samples. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    Renca was cultured overnight in the presence or absence of IFN-γ (500 U/ml), TNF-α (400 U/ml), and the combination of these two cytokines. These cells were then stained with PE-labeled anti-Fas, or FITC-labeled anti-H-2Kd or ICAM-1 mAb (solid lines). Dotted lines show background staining with isotype-matched control mAbs. Solid lines show staining with test Abs.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    Inhibition of CTL activities to Renca by blocking of LFA-1/ICAM-1 interactions. A, Renca pretreated for 18 h with IFN-γ (500 U/ml) and TNF-α (400 U/ml) were used as targets in a 6 h [111In]Ox release assay (E:T = 20:1) in the presence or absence of anti-LFA-1, anti-ICAM-1, and anti-FasL mAbs (10 μg/ml), or the combination of anti-LFA-1 and anti-FasL mAbs. B, Release of BLT esterase by CTL. CTL (1 × 105) were incubated with Renca or IFN-γ/TNF-α-treated Renca (1 × 104) for 4 h in 96-well tissue culture plates with or without anti-LFA-1 mAb (10 μg/ml). Next, the BLT activity in the supernatants was measured. Data represent mean ± SD of triplicate samples. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Regulation of FasL and TRAIL expression on CTL by various stimuli. CTL were cocultured with Renca, Harvey BALB fibroblasts, or the combination of PMA (20 ng/ml) and ionomycin (1 μg/ml) for 6 h. These CTL were stained with biotinylated anti-FasL or anti-TRAIL mAb and PE-avidin (solid lines). Dotted lines show background staining with biotinylated isotype control and PE-avidin; solid lines show staining with test Abs.

  • FIGURE 5.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 5.

    A, Adoptive transfer of CTL in 3-day experimental metastasis model. Renca cells (1.5 × 105) were injected i.v. to BALB/c mice on day 0. CTL or Con A blasts (107 cells/day) with IL-2 (10,000 U/day) or IL-2 alone were administered on days 3, 4, and 5. On day 17, half of the mice were sacrificed and lung metastasis was quantified. •, A single mouse. A horizontal bar shows the average number of metastases in each group. A vs B, p < 0.01; A vs C, p < 0.01; B vs C, p < 0.05. B, Survival of the remainder of the mice was monitored. The data shown are representative of two independent experiments.

  • FIGURE 6.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 6.

    Activity of CTL generated from pfp−/− mouse. A, Cytotoxic activities of CTL generated from WT mouse and pfp−/− mouse against Renca were tested in an 18 h [111In]Ox release assay (E:T = 20 or 4:1). B, Specific IFN-γ production. CTL generated from WT or pfp−/− mice were incubated with Renca, A20, or medium alone for 18 h at an E:T of 4:1 in the presence or absence of anti-CD4 or anti-CD8 mAb (10 μg/ML). The IFN-γ in the supernatant was measured by ELISA. C, Cytotoxic activities of pfp−/− CTL were tested in an 18 h [111In]Ox release assay in the presence or absence of anti-FasL mAb (10 μg/ml). D, Cytotoxic activities of pfp−/− CTL against Renca pretreated with IFN-γ (500 U/ml) and TNF-α (400 U/ml) were tested in an 8 h [111In]Ox release assay (E:T = 10 or 2:1) in the presence or absence of anti-LFA-1, anti-ICAM-1 mAbs (10 μg/ml), or the combination of anti-LFA-1 and anti-FasL mAbs. Data represent mean ± SD of triplicate samples. Similar results were obtained in three independent experiments.

  • FIGURE 7.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 7.

    Adoptive transfer of pfp−/− CTL in 3-day experimental metastasis model. The mice were injected i.v. with Renca cells (1.5 × 105) on day 0. Three days later, CTL or vehicle were transferred to these tumor-bearing mice. WT CTL or pfp−/− CTL (6 × 106 or 2 × 106) were administered to WT BALB/c recipients. A or B vs E, p < 0.01; C or D vs E, p < 0.05.

  • FIGURE 8.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 8.

    Adoptive transfer of CTL to pfp−/− mice. WT or pfp−/− mice were injected i.v. with 1.5 × 105 Renca cells on day 0. A, WT CTL or pfp−/− CTL (5 × 106 or 1 × 106) were administered to WT or pfp−/− BALB/c recipients, respectively. Lung metastases were quantified 17 days after i.v. injection of tumor cells. •, A single mouse. A horizontal bar shows the average number of metastases in each group. The data shown are representative of two independent experiments. A or B vs C, p < 0.01; D or E vs F, p < 0.01; C vs F, p = 0.09. B, Survival of the remainder of the mice was monitored as shown.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Cytotoxicity and cytokine production by CTL on coincubation with various cell linesa

    HistologyH-2dbmAbLysis (%)IFN-γ (pg/ml)TNF-α (pg/ml)
    RencaRenal cell cancer+–54>8,000488
    Anti-CD457>8,000441
    Anti-CD81200
    Anti-H2-Kd1693197
    Anti-H2-Dd45>8,000527
    STRCC-1Renal cell cancer+–0
    P815Mastocytoma+–400
    C26Colon cancer+–000
    MethAFibrosarcoma+–13
    L10ALymphoma+–0130
    A20Leukemia+–2150
    Harvey BALBFibroblast––000
    Fibroblast+–510
    ConA splenic blast+–0
    B16Melanoma––200
    L929Fibrosarcoma––34
    • a Cytotoxicity against various lines was measured in a 16 h 111In-release assay at an E:T ratio of 20. CTL and stimulator cells were cultured for 16 h (E/S = 4), and IFN-γ and TNF-α release of supernatant was measured by ELISA. For the inhibition experiments, blocking mAb was added to the culture at the concentration of 10 μg/ml. The representative data of three individual experiments are shown.

    • b Expression of H-Kd molecule on cell surface was tested by flow cytometer analysis.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 168 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 168, Issue 7
1 Apr 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Tumor-Specific CTL Kill Murine Renal Cancer Cells Using Both Perforin and Fas Ligand-Mediated Lysis In Vitro, But Cause Tumor Regression In Vivo in the Absence of Perforin
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Tumor-Specific CTL Kill Murine Renal Cancer Cells Using Both Perforin and Fas Ligand-Mediated Lysis In Vitro, But Cause Tumor Regression In Vivo in the Absence of Perforin
Naoko Seki, Alan D. Brooks, Clive R. D. Carter, Timothy C. Back, Erin M. Parsoneault, Mark J. Smyth, Robert H. Wiltrout, Thomas J. Sayers
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2002, 168 (7) 3484-3492; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3484

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Tumor-Specific CTL Kill Murine Renal Cancer Cells Using Both Perforin and Fas Ligand-Mediated Lysis In Vitro, But Cause Tumor Regression In Vivo in the Absence of Perforin
Naoko Seki, Alan D. Brooks, Clive R. D. Carter, Timothy C. Back, Erin M. Parsoneault, Mark J. Smyth, Robert H. Wiltrout, Thomas J. Sayers
The Journal of Immunology April 1, 2002, 168 (7) 3484-3492; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.7.3484
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more HOST DEFENSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606