Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Neutralization of the Chemokine CXCL10 Reduces Inflammatory Cell Invasion and Demyelination and Improves Neurological Function in a Viral Model of Multiple Sclerosis

Michael T. Liu, Hans S. Keirstead and Thomas E. Lane
J Immunol October 1, 2001, 167 (7) 4091-4097; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.7.4091
Michael T. Liu
*Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Hans S. Keirstead
†Anatomy and Neurobiology, and
‡Reeve-Irvine Research Center, University of California, Irvine, CA 92612
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Thomas E. Lane
*Molecular Biology and Biochemistry and
†Anatomy and Neurobiology, and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Figures

  • Tables
  • FIGURE 1.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 1.

    Clinical disease is decreased in anti-CXCL10-treated mice. Mice were infected intracranially with 1000 PFU of MHV and treated i.p. with anti-CXCL10, anti-CXCL9, or NRS at days 12, 14, 16, and 19 p.i. Three days following the first injection (15 days p.i.) mice treated with anti-CXCL10 displayed a significant decrease in clinical disease that lasted until 21 days p.i. Treatment was stopped at day 19 p.i. for all groups. By 23 days p.i., mice formerly treated with anti-CXCL10 began to display an increase in the severity of clinical symptoms and eventually developed comparable levels of clinical disease as mice formerly treated with either anti-CXCL9 or NRS. Dark arrow indicates start treatment date (day 12 p.i.), open arrow indicates final treatment date (day 19 p.i.) (anti-CXCL10, n = 12; anti-CXCL9, n = 9; NRS, n = 12). ∗, p < 0.001 when compared with both anti-CXCL9- and NRS-treated mice. The clinical data are presented as mean ± SEM and represent the results of three separate experiments.

  • FIGURE 2.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 2.

    A, CXCR3 mRNA expression. CXCR3 mRNA expression in CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes isolated from the CNS of mice treated with either anti-CXCL10 or NRS at 21 and 28 days p.i. CD4+ T lymphocytes obtained from mice treated with anti-CXCL10 display a reduced expression of CXCR3 mRNA transcripts when compared with control mice treated with NRS at 21 days p.i. In contrast, comparable levels of CXCR3 mRNA expression in CD8+ T lymphocytes are found in mice treated with anti-CXCL10 and NRS at 21 and 28 days p.i., supporting FACS data showing similar levels of CD8+ T lymphocyte infiltration into the CNS at all times examined. Corresponding to the return of inflammatory cells into the CNS at 28 days p.i., CD4+ T lymphocytes isolated from mice formerly treated with anti-CXCL10 display increased expression of CXCR3 mRNA when compared with those observed at 21 days p.i. Top panel, CXCR3 (111 bp); bottom panel, L32 (183 bp). The results presented represent enriched lymphocytes pooled (three mice per group) at each time point. B, CCL5 protein levels at 21 days p.i. CCL5 protein levels from brains of mice at 21 days p.i were determined by ELISA. Mice treated with anti-CXCL10 displayed significantly decreased levels of CCL5 when compared with either NRS- or anti-CXCL9-treated mice (21 days p.i.). ∗, p < 0.05 (anti-CXCL10: n = 3; anti-CXCL9: n = 3; and NRS: n = 3). C, IFN-γ mRNA levels at 21 days p.i. IFN-γ protein was not detected by ELISA; therefore, RT-PCR analysis was used to evaluate IFN-γ expression at day 21 p.i. Mice treated with anti-CXCL10 show a marked decrease in the levels of IFN-γ mRNA transcripts in the CNS when compared with NRS-treated mice. Top panel, IFN-γ (365 bp); bottom panel, L32 control (183 bp). Each lane represents an individual mouse. D, CCL5 and IFN-γ mRNA levels at 28 days p.i. RT-PCR analysis of CCL5 and IFN-γ expression within the CNS of MHV-infected mice at 28 days p.i. Total RNA was extracted from the brains of MHV-infected mice formerly treated with either anti-CXCL10 or NRS at 28 days p.i. and subjected to RT-PCR. Mice formerly treated with anti-CXCL10 and NRS show comparable levels of both CCL5 and IFN-γ mRNA transcripts in the CNS. Top panel, CCL5 (312 bp); middle panel, IFN-γ (365 bp); bottom panel, L32 control (183 bp). Each lane represents an individual mouse.

  • FIGURE 3.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 3.

    LFB staining of spinal cords. Demyelination is reduced in mice treated with anti-CXCL10 as compared with NRS- or anti-CXCL9-treated mice at day 21 p.i. Representative spinal cord sections from mice treated with anti-CXCL10 21 days p.i. (A), mice treated with anti-CXCL9 21 days p.i. (B), or mice treated with NRS 21 days p.i. (C). Sections were stained with LFB to assess the severity of demyelination. Numerous inflammatory foci and areas of myelin stripping are present within the white matter tracts of NRS- or anti-CXCL9-treated mice, whereas limited numbers of inflammatory cells are detected in white matter tracts of anti-CXCL10-treated mice, and only minimal damage is detected. (magnification, ×100, inset ×400).

  • FIGURE 4.
    • Download figure
    • Open in new tab
    • Download powerpoint
    FIGURE 4.

    Toluidine blue-stained photomicrographs and electron micrographs of anti-CXCL10-treated mice (A, C, and E) and NRS-treated mice (B, D, and F). A, Toluidine blue-stained transverse section of an anti-CXCL10-treated mouse, showing that the region of demyelination is well defined and limited to the ventral column. B, Toluidine blue-stained transverse section of an NRS-treated mouse, showing that the lesion extends throughout the ventral and lateral columns. C, Higher magnification of a toluidine blue-stained transverse section of the lateral column in an anti-CXCL10-treated mouse, showing normal myelination. D, Higher magnification of a toluidine blue-stained transverse section of the lateral column in an NRS-treated mouse, showing extensive demyelination, vacuolization, and debris-laden macrophages. E, Electron micrograph of an anti-CXCL10-treated mouse showing axons within the ventral column with thin myelin sheaths (denoted by M and arrow) surrounding axon (a) characteristic of remyelination. F, Electron micrograph of an NRS-treated mouse, showing axons (a) within the ventral column with no evidence of remyelination. ×200 for A and B; ×600 for C and D; ×8000 for E and F.

Tables

  • Figures
    • View popup
    Table I.

    Cellular infiltration and demyelination is reduced in anti-CXCL10-treated micea

    TreatmentDay p.i.nDemyelinationPercent Infiltration
    CD4CD8F480
    Sham12200.32 ± 0.13b0.45 ± 0.16.57 ± 0.7
    No treatment1222.3 ± 0.216.4 ± 1.020.7 ± 2.326.7 ± 1.7
    NRS2162.8 ± 0.118.1 ± 2.510.2 ± 2.028.9 ± 2.7
    2852.3 ± 0.511.1 ± 0.84.70 ± 1.716.3 ± 0.4
    Anti-CXCL92143.3 ± 0.119.3 ± 2.37.40 ± 2.431.9 ± 4.5
    2832.8 ± 0.412.4 ± 2.71.30 ± 1.5ND
    Anti-CXCL102160.8 ± 0.3c8.10 ± 1.9d7.50 ± 2.114.5 ± 1.9e
    2853.0 ± 0.514.8 ± 1.36.90 ± 1.719.1 ± 0.1
    • a Data represent results of two independent experiments.

    • b Data presented as mean ± SEM.

    • c p < 0.001 when compared to both NRS- and anti-CXCL9-treated mice.

    • d p < 0.02 when compared to both NRS- and anti-CXCL9-treated mice.

    • e p < 0.01 when compared to both NRS- and anti-CXCL9-treated mice.

PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 167 (7)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 167, Issue 7
1 Oct 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Neutralization of the Chemokine CXCL10 Reduces Inflammatory Cell Invasion and Demyelination and Improves Neurological Function in a Viral Model of Multiple Sclerosis
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Neutralization of the Chemokine CXCL10 Reduces Inflammatory Cell Invasion and Demyelination and Improves Neurological Function in a Viral Model of Multiple Sclerosis
Michael T. Liu, Hans S. Keirstead, Thomas E. Lane
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2001, 167 (7) 4091-4097; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.7.4091

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Neutralization of the Chemokine CXCL10 Reduces Inflammatory Cell Invasion and Demyelination and Improves Neurological Function in a Viral Model of Multiple Sclerosis
Michael T. Liu, Hans S. Keirstead, Thomas E. Lane
The Journal of Immunology October 1, 2001, 167 (7) 4091-4097; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.7.4091
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Differential Susceptibility to Staphylococcal Superantigen (SsAg)-Induced Apoptosis of CD4+ T Cells from Atopic Dermatitis Patients and Healthy Subjects: The Inhibitory Effect of IL-4 on SsAg-Induced Apoptosis
  • HIV-1 Vaccination Administered Intramuscularly Can Induce Both Systemic and Mucosal T Cell Immunity in HIV-1-Uninfected Individuals
  • Osteopontin (Eta-1) and Fibroblast Growth Factor-2 Cross-Talk in Angiogenesis
Show more Clinical Immunology

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • Public Access
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606