Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

The Affinity of Integrin α4β1 Governs Lymphocyte Migration

David M. Rose, Valentin Grabovsky, Ronen Alon and Mark H. Ginsberg
J Immunol September 1, 2001, 167 (5) 2824-2830; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.5.2824
David M. Rose
*Department of Vascular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Valentin Grabovsky
†Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ronen Alon
†Department of Immunology, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark H. Ginsberg
*Department of Vascular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The interaction of integrin α4β1 with endothelial VCAM-1 controls the trafficking of lymphocytes from blood into peripheral tissues. Cells actively regulate the affinity of α4β1 for VCAM-1 (activation). To investigate the biological function of α4β1 activation, we isolated Jurkat T cell lines with defective α4β1 activation. Using these cells, we found that α4β1-stimulated αLβ2-dependent cell migration was dramatically reduced in cells with defects in α4β1 activation. These cells required 20 times more VCAM-1 to promote αLβ2-dependent cell migration. This defect was at the level of α4β1 affinity as an activating α4β1 Ab rescued α4β1-stimulated αLβ2-dependent migration. In contrast, migration of α4β1 activation-defective cells on VCAM-1 alone was enhanced at higher VCAM-1 densities. Thus, α4β1 activation determines a set point or threshold at which VCAM-1 can regulate αLβ2-dependent as well as α4β1-dependent cell migration. Changes in this set point may specify preferred anatomical sites of integrin-dependent leukocyte emigration from the bloodstream.

The exit of leukocytes from the vasculature is essential to the development of the immune system, to leukocyte recirculation, and to the control of the inflammatory response (1). Defined subpopulations of leukocytes emigrate at specific sites to produce characteristic leukocyte repertoires in peripheral tissues (2, 3). These emigration decisions are controlled by multiple factors, including leukocyte rolling receptors (e.g., selectins) and the density of their ligands (e.g., P-selectin glycoprotein ligand), site-specific chemokines, and cell migration mediated through the interaction of leukocyte integrins with vascular ligands (4, 5). These three parameters form a leukocyte area code that specifies the composition of leukocyte populations at extravascular sites (4).

Changes in the function of leukocyte integrins may also contribute to the control of leukocyte emigration from blood vessels. Two general mechanisms have been described by which integrin-mediated adhesion is regulated: 1) alterations in integrin affinity for extracellular ligands (activation) and 2) affinity-independent mechanisms such as changes in receptor mobility (6). α4 integrins play a major role in controlling leukocyte emigration, but the role of activation in α4 integrin function has been questioned (7). Recent studies established that α4 integrins undergo active affinity modulation (8). Furthermore, NK cells express constitutively active α4β1, whereas the bulk of resting T cells expresses inactive α4β1. Agonists can activate α4β1 on memory, but not naive T cells. Moreover, integrin affinity can control multiple cellular responses in addition to cell adhesion. Thus, the activation of integrin α4β1 is leukocyte type specific, but its role in the control of leukocyte functions is unclear.

α4 integrins have potent signaling functions that complement their capacity to mediate cell adhesion. For example, α4 integrins strongly promote cell migration (9). Indeed, engagement of α4 integrins by trace quantities of VCAM-1 markedly stimulates β2 integrin-mediated cell adhesion and migration (10, 11). In this sense, VCAM-1 is an agonist for α4β1. The capacity of agonists to initiate cellular responses is a function of the affinity of their cellular receptors. The α4β1 ligand, VCAM-1, is variably expressed at most vascular sites depending on the presence of inflammatory responses (12, 13). Thus, affinity regulation of this integrin might play a role in determining the threshold or sensitivity of leukocytes to stimulation by VCAM-1.

α4β1 affinity modulation could potentially regulate a number of cellular functions such as adhesion, migration, and signaling. In the present study, we have assessed the biological role of activation of integrin α4β1 by deriving novel cell lines that are incapable of activating α4β1. Using these cell lines, we find that α4β1 affinity determines the set point at which 1) VCAM-1 can stimulate αLβ2-dependent cell migration on ICAM-1 and 2) α4β1-dependent migration onVCAM-1 is regulated. In contrast, the activation of α4β1 had little impact on static cell adhesion or adhesion in shear flow. The data suggest that the affinity state of α4 integrins governs the selection of preferred sites of integrin-dependent leukocyte transmigration.

Materials and Methods

Cells

The Jurkat E6-1 T leukemic cell line was purchased from American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, VA) and cultured in RPMI 1640 (BioWhittaker, Walkersville, MD) supplemented with 10% FCS (BioWhittaker), 1% glutamine, 1% penicillin, and 1% streptomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO).

Reagents

The anti-human β1 mAb 8A2 was a generous gift from N. Kovach and J. Harlan (University of Washington, Seattle, WA). The anti-human α4, HP2/1; anti-human α5, SAM1; and anti-human β1, K20 Abs were purchased from Immunotech (Westbrook, ME). The anti-human β2 mAb hybridoma cell line TS1/18 was obtained from American Type Culture Collection and was used to generate ascities fluid. The cDNA encoding the CS-1 region of fibronectin fused to GST was a gift from J. W. Smith (Burnham Institute, La Jolla, CA). The expression and purification of this fusion protein have been previously described (14).

Construction and expression of VCAM-1- and ICAM-1-Ig fusion proteins

The cDNA for human VCAM-1 was a generous gift from T. Collins (Harvard University, Cambridge, MA). The coding sequence of the complete seven Ig domains of the extracellular region of VCAM-1 was PCR amplified and cloned into the NheI site of plasmid pB4Ig (a gift from R. Cobb, Tanabe Research Laboratories, San Diego, CA), which contains the human Fc coding sequence. The resulting VCAM-Ig fusion construct was excised with KpnI and cloned into pcDNA3.1− (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The resulting construct was transfected into Chinese hamster ovary (CHO)3 cells, and stable cell lines were isolated by selection in G418. A VCAM-Ig-expressing clonal cell line was isolated by limited dilution cloning and screening supernatant for VCAM-Ig production with a VCAM-1 ELISA (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN). Recombinant protein was purified from CHO cell supernatant using a protein A column. Similarly, an ICAM-Ig fusion construct, encoding the N-terminal two Ig-like domains of ICAM-1 (a generous gift from D. L. Simmons, CRF Laboratories, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K.), was subcloned into pcDNA3.1− and transfected into CHO cells. ICAM-Ig fusion protein was isolated from the supernatants produced by a clonal cell line by protein A affinity chromatography.

Soluble VCAM-Ig-binding assay

Cells (5 × 105) were resuspended in a modified Tyrode’s buffer (150 mM NaCl, 2.5 mM KCl, 12 mM NaHCO3, 1 mg/ml glucose, and 1 mg/ml BSA) containing 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2. The VCAM-Ig fusion protein was added at a final concentration of 100 nM and incubated for 30 min at room temperature. Cells were washed twice in Tyrode’s buffer and resuspended in the same buffer containing FITC-conjugated donkey anti-human IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch, West Grove, PA) at a 1/100 dilution. After a 30-min incubation at 4°C, cells were washed twice, and bound Ab was detected using a FACSCalibur flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and analyzed using CellQuest software.

Generation and isolation of Jurkat mutants

Jurkat cells were treated with ethyl methane sulfonate (EMS; 200 μg/ml) or ICR-191 (1.5 μg/ml; Sigma) for 24 h. After 5 days in culture, soluble VCAM-1 (sVCAM-1)-binding assays were performed, and low sVCAM-1-binding cells were isolated by cell sorting using a FACStarPlus flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) into 96-well tissue culture-treated plates (Costar, Corning, Corning, NY). Isolated clonal lines were sequentially reassayed for α4 expression with mAb HP2/1 and sVCAM-1 binding by flow cytometry. Jurkat lines with normal α4 expression and low sVCAM-1 binding were used for further analysis.

Cell adhesion assays

Ninety-six-well Immulon 2HB plates (Dynex Technologies, Chantilly, VA) were incubated with indicated concentrations of VCAM-1 or the CS-1-containing fragment of fibronectin overnight at 4°C. Afterward, wells were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Cells in a modified Tyrode’s buffer were added to wells and allowed to adhere for 40 min at 37°C. Nonadherent cells were washed off with Tyrode’s buffer. Adherent cells were stained with 0.5% crystal violet stain in 20% methanol. The cell-incorporated crystal violet was solubilized with 10% acetic acid and measured in a microplate reader (Molecular Devices, Sunnyvale, CA) set at 560 nm.

Cell migration assay

Cell migration was assayed in a modified Boyden chamber assay system. Transwells (Costar; Corning) polycarbonate membranes containing 3-μm pores were incubated with VCAM-1 and/or ICAM-1 in 0.1 M NaHCO3 (pH 8) overnight at 4°C. Membranes were blocked with 2% BSA in PBS for 30 min at room temperature. A total of 2 × 105 cells in RPMI 1640 with 10% FCS was added to the top chamber. Stromal cell-derived factor-1α (R&D Systems) at a final concentration of 15 ng/ml was added to the bottom chamber. Cells were allowed to migrate for 4 h at 37°C. Cells in the bottom chamber were enumerated with a hemocytometer.

VCAM-1 ELISA

The amount of recombinant VCAM-1 bound to the polycarbonate membranes of the transwells was measured by ELISA. Briefly, transwell membranes were coated as described above for cell migration assay, except in the case of the sVCAM-1 studies in which membranes were coated with ICAM-1 and blocked with BSA before addition of sVCAM-1. Afterward, the membranes were washed and anti-human VCAM-1 Ab, P8B1 (1/3000 diluted ascites) was added and incubated for 4 h at room temperature. After extensive washes, an HRP-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (BioSource International, Camarillo, CA) was incubated with the membranes for 2 h at room temperature. Bound Ab was detected with an 80 mM citrate phosphate buffer (pH 5) containing o-phenylenediamine and hydrogen peroxide using a Molecular Devices ELISA plate reader set at 490 nm.

Laminar flow assays

A polystyrene plate coated with sVCAM-1 (affinity-purified seven-domain human VCAM-1, a gift from R. Lobb, Biogen, Cambridge, MA) was assembled in a parallel plate laminar flow chamber (260-μm gap) and mounted on the stage of an inverted phase-contrast microscope (Diaphot 300; Nikon, Tokyo, Japan), as previously described (15). Jurkat cells were perfused at 106 cells/ml of binding medium (HBSS containing 2 mg/ml BSA and 10 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, supplemented with Ca2+ and Mg2+, each at 1 mM) at the desired shear stress generated with an automated syringe pump (Harvard Apparatus, Natick, MA). Cellular interactions on a field of view of 0.34 mm2 were visualized with a ×10 objective and manually quantified by analysis of images directly from the monitor screen. The motion of each interacting cell was monitored for 10 s following its initial tethering, and three categories of tethers were defined: transient, if cells attached briefly (<2 s) to the substrate; rolling, if cells tethered and rolled on the substrate >5 s with a velocity >1 μm/s; arrest, if following rolling or immediately after tethering, cells came to a full arrest and remained stationary on the substrate for at least 20 s. The number of tethers for each category was divided by the flux of freely flowing cells. For calculations of cell flux, only the fraction of perfused cells that came into close proximity with the substrate, and therefore was potentially capable of interacting with the substrate, was considered.

Controlled flow detachment assays were performed on cells that were settled at stasis on ligand-coated plates for 1 min and then were subjected to wall shear stresses increased stepwise every 5 s (by a programmed set of flow rates delivered by the syringe pump). At the end of each 5-s interval of the increase in shear stress, the number of cells that remained bound was expressed relative to the number of cells originally settled on the substrate in stasis. All assays were performed at room temperature. To study peptide inhibition of α4β1-mediated tethering events, cells were suspended in binding medium with 0.5 mM octapeptide EILDVPST (containing the tripeptide very late Ag-4-binding motif leucine-asparatate-valine, LDV) or its control analogue EIDVLPST for 5 min, and then perfused unwashed through the flow chamber over the VCAM-1-coated substrate.

Results

Isolation of Jurkat cell lines with defective integrin α4β1 activation

To evaluate the functional importance α4β1 affinity modulation, we generated a panel of variant Jurkat T cells with defects in α4β1 activation (Act. Defect. Jurkat). Jurkat cells were chemically mutagenized with either EMS or ICR-191, and α4-expressing cells were selected for reduced sVCAM-1 binding by flow cytometry. Clonal lines were isolated that expressed α4, but failed to bind sVCAM-1. The characterization of a representative mutant line, JD6, is shown in Fig. 1⇓. In contrast to wild-type Jurkat cells, the mutant cells showed marked reduction in constitutive sVCAM-1 binding, but binding was reconstituted in the presence of the exogenous β1 integrin-activating mAb, 8A2. Furthermore, α4, α5, β1, and β2 integrin subunit expression was similar to that of wild-type Jurkat cells. These results indicate that these mutant lines have a defect in α4β1 activation, which is not due to a change in integrin expression nor a defect in the integrin’s ligand binding site. Three independent cell lines were isolated from three different mutagenesis experiments, two with EMS and one with ICR-191. Similar results were obtained with all three mutant lines in the experiments to be described.

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

Characterization of mutant Jurkat T cell lines. Top panels, Histograms of sVCAM-1 binding, as measured by flow cytometry. Solid lines are sVCAM-1 binding in a modified Tyrode’s buffer containing 1 mM CaCl2 and 1 mM MgCl2. Filled histograms are the binding with the addition of anti-α4 Ab, HP2/1. Dotted lines are binding with the addition of activating β1 Ab, 8A2. Quantification of sVCAM-1 binding was assessed as an activation index (AI) defined as 100 × (Fo − Fr)/(Fmax − Fr), in which Fo is mean fluorescence intensity of sVCAM-1 binding, Fr is fluorescence intensity in the presence of mAb HP2/1, and Fmax is the fluorescence intensity in the presence of mAb 8A2. Subsequent panels are flow cytometric analysis of integrin expression. Binding of specific mAb for α4 (HP2/1), β1 (8A2), α5 (SAM1), and β2 (TS 1/18) was detected with a FITC-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (filled histograms). Open histograms are the binding of purified mouse IgG. Geometric mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) is shown in each panel. Results are representative of three separate experiments with similar results.

The rescue of sVCAM-1 binding in the mutant lines by mAb 8A2 indicates that the intrinsic ligand-binding capacity of the α4β1 is retained and the defect impacts the activation process. Defective activation could be due to mutations in either subunit of integrin α4β1 or a signaling molecule that is required for α4β1 activation. To distinguish between these two possibilities, mutant lines were transfected with wild-type α4 and β1 integrin subunits. Failure to rescue sVCAM-1 binding by introduction of wild-type α4β1 indicates that cells have a defect in signaling machinery needed to activate α4β1. The mutant lines were transiently transfected with green fluorescent protein (as a markers of transfection) and cDNAs encoding either α4, β1, or a combination of subunits, and sVCAM-1-binding assays performed by flow cytometry. In all three lines examined, transfection of exogenous α4β1 failed to rescue sVCAM-1 binding (data not shown). This result indicates that the defect in integrin activation is not ascribable to integrin mutations, but rather is due to a defect in cellular mechanisms required for activation of α4β1.

The affinity state of α4β1 controls cell migration

α4β1 integrins can regulate adhesion and migration mediated by β2 integrins (10, 11, 16). Under these conditions, VCAM-1 acts as agonist that regulates β2 integrin functions. The regulation of integrin function by soluble agonist, such as chemokines, is a function of the affinity of the agonist receptor. By analogy, we reasoned that the capacity of VCAM-1 to stimulate β2 integrins would be a function of the affinity state of α4β1 (Fig. 2⇓A). To examine α4β1-stimulated β2-dependent migration, Jurkat cells were allowed to migrate on a substrate coated with 200 μg/ml ICAM-1, a ligand for β2 integrins. We examined the effect of addition of trace quantities of VCAM-1 (0.1–10 μg/ml). Under these conditions, the filters were coated with ∼250 molecules/μm2 of ICAM-1, and the addition of small quantities of VCAM-1 did not significantly displace ICAM-1 (Fig. 2⇓B).

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

α4β1 integrin interaction with VCAM-1 stimulates β2 integrin-dependent Jurkat T cell migration. A, Agonist modulation of integrin function. In heterologous modulation, a cell surface receptor (e.g., chemokine receptor) activates a signaling pathway, which modulates integrin function. In homologous modulation, an integrin (integrin 1), engages ligand and activates a signaling pathway that modulates the function of a second integrin (integrin 2). B, Quantification of ICAM-1 coating on polycarbonate membranes of transwell migration chambers. ICAM-1 was radiolabeled with 125I. Membranes (0.33 cm2) were incubated with 125I-labeled ICAM-1 mixed with the indicated amounts of VCAM-1. Specific activity of 125I-labeled ICAM-1 was used to calculate ICAM-1 coating expressed as molecules per square micrometer. C, Migration of wild-type Jurkat T cells. Transwell membranes were coated with 200 μg/ml ICAM-1 and indicated concentrations of VCAM-1. Jurkat cells were added to the top chamber either untreated or with the addition of anti-β2 Ab (TS 1/18) (20 μg/ml) or anti-VCAM-1 (P8B1) (20 μg/ml). SDF-1α (15 ng/ml) was added to the bottom chamber, and cells were allowed to migrate for 4 h at 37°C. Cells in the bottom chamber were enumerated, and migration was expressed as a percent change relative to no VCAM-1 addition. Results are the mean ± SEM of three separate experiments. D, sVCAM-1 stimulates β2-dependent migration of Jurkat T cells. Transwell membranes were coated with ICAM-1 (200 μg/ml). Jurkat cells were pretreated for 5 min with the indicated concentrations of sVCAM-1 and then added to the top chamber of the transwell. SDF-1α (15 ng/ml) was added to the bottom chamber, and cells were allowed to migrate for 4 h at 37°C. Cells in the bottom chamber were enumerated, and migration was expressed as a percent change relative to no VCAM-1 addition. VCAM-1 bound to the transwell membrane was measured by ELISA, as described in Materials and Methods, and expressed as OD units read at 490 nm. For reference, an OD of 0.46 U was observed when the membranes were directly coated with VCAM-1 at a concentration of 1 μg/ml. Results shown are representative of three separate experiments.

Trace quantities of VCAM-1 stimulated Jurkat migration on ICAM-1 (Fig. 2⇑C). The stimulated migration was completely blocked with an anti-β2 Ab, TS1/18, indicating that the migration was β2 dependent. Furthermore, the stimulated migration was blocked with an anti-VCAM-1 Ab, P8B1 (Fig. 2⇑C), as well as an anti-α4 Ab, HP2/1 (data not shown). As an alternative means of assessing VCAM-1 trans activation of β2-dependent cell migration, we used sVCAM-1 to stimulate migration across modified Boyden chambers coated with ICAM-1 alone. As shown in Fig. 2⇑D, the addition of sVCAM-1 to Jurkat cells stimulated β2-dependent cell migration. ELISA confirmed that negligible amounts of the sVCAM-1 became absorbed to the membranes under these conditions (Fig. 2⇑D). These results indicate that the VCAM-1 acted as an agonist, stimulating β2-dependent migration by binding to α4β1.

To investigate the role of α4β1 affinity modulation in α4-stimulated β2-dependent migration, the migration of activation-defective JD6 cells on a mixed substrate of ICAM-1 and VCAM-1 was examined. In contrast to wild-type Jurkat cells, the stimulated migration of activation-defective cells required a more than 20-fold higher concentration of VCAM-1 (Fig. 3⇓A). Since these mutant lines were derived by chemical mutagenesis, it is possible that cellular changes other than those affecting α4β1 affinity could account for the decreased sensitivity of β2-dependent migration to VCAM-1 stimulation. To test this possibility, we used an activating β1 Ab, 8A2, to reconstitute high-affinity α4β1 on the mutant lines. In the presence of 8A2, VCAM-1-stimulated β2-dependent migration was identical in the mutant and wild-type Jurkat T cell lines (Fig. 3⇓B). This rescue in function was not observed when a nonactivating anti-β1 Ab, K20, was used (data not shown). Thus, the capacity of differing quantities of VCAM-1 to stimulate β2 integrin-dependent events is a function of the affinity state of α4β1.

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Loss of α4β1 integrin activation causes decreased sensitivity to VCAM-1-stimulated β2 integrin-dependent migration. A, Migration of wild-type and α4β1 activation-defective Jurkat T cell variants. Transwell membranes were coated with 200 μg/ml ICAM-1 and indicated concentrations of VCAM-1. Migration assays were performed as described in Fig. 2⇑ legend. B, Activating β1 Ab rescues activation-defective Jurkat T cell migration. Migration assays were performed as in A, but cells were either untreated or treated with mAb 8A2 (0.1 μg/ml). Results are means ± SEM of three separate experiments.

We next questioned whether the mutant lines might have a general migration defect. In the absence of VCAM-1, the migration of wild-type and activation-defective Jurkat cells on ICAM-1 was similar (Fig. 4⇓B). The dose-response curve was biphasic, with maximal migration occurring at an ICAM-1-coating concentration of 10 μg/ml. Furthermore, the migration of wild-type Jurkat cells on VCAM-1 in the absence of ICAM-1 was biphasic, with maximal migration occurring at a VCAM-1-coating concentration of ∼10 μg/ml (Fig. 3⇑A). However, the migration of the mutant lines on VCAM-1 was augmented relative to wild-type cells, and maximal migration occurred at a VCAM-1-coating concentration of ∼40 μg/ml. Thus, the mutant cells do not have a general defect in integrin-dependent cell migration. Furthermore, the α4β1-dependent migration on different densities of VCAM-1 is a function of α4β1 affinity state. These effects of α4β1 activation on cell migration were similarly observed in the two other mutant Jurkat lines (Table I⇓).

           FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

Migration of wild-type and activation-defective Jurkat variants on ICAM-1 or VCAM-1. Transwell membranes were coated with the indicated concentrations of either ICAM-1 (left panel) or VCAM-1 (right panel). Wild-type (□) and α4β1 activation-defective (⋄) Jurkat T cell variants were allowed to migrate for 4 h at 37°C using SDF-1α (15 ng/ml) as a chemoattractant. Cells migrating to the bottom chamber were enumerated with a hemocytometer, and migration was expressed as a percentage of input cells. Results are mean ± SEM of three separate experiments.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Migration of α4β1 activation defective Jurkat T cell variantsa

Disruption of α4β1 activation has little effect on cell adhesion under static or flow conditions

We next examined the adhesive properties of the α4 activation-defective Jurkat lines. Under static conditions, adhesion of these lines to a wide concentration range of coating concentrations of VCAM-1 or the CS-1 fragment of fibronectin was not markedly different from wild-type Jurkat cells (Fig. 5⇓). For both cell lines, the adhesion was α4 dependent, as it was blocked with anti-α4 Ab, HP2/1. Thus, α4β1 activation plays little role in regulating static Jurkat cell adhesion.

           FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Static adhesion of wild-type and α4β1 activation-defective Jurkat variants. Plates were coated with the indicated concentrations of either VCAM-1 (left panel) or CS-1 fragment of fibronectin (right panel). Wild-type Jurkat (□) or α4β1 activation-defective Jurkat variants (⋄) alone or with the addition of anti-α4 Ab (HP2/1) (20 μg/ml) were allowed to adhere for 40 min at 37°C. Adhesion was quantified by crystal violet staining and expressed as a percentage of input cells. Results are mean ± SEM of three separate experiments.

Integrin α4β1 supports dynamic and reversible tethering and rolling of cells in flowing blood (17). At a shear flow of 1 dyne/cm2, however, there was no significant difference in the number of activation-defective Jurkat cells rolling and subsequently arresting on VCAM-1 as compared with wild-type Jurkat cells (Fig. 6⇓A). Furthermore, when increasing shear force was applied, there was no difference in the detachment of mutant and wild-type cells from VCAM-1 (Fig. 6⇓B). Thus, the activation-defective cells exhibit similar adhesion strengthening as wild-type cells. Chen and coworkers (15) previously implicated the importance of high-affinity α4β1 in adhesion strengthening of cells under flow conditions. This was partially based on the ability of the LDV-containing peptide to inhibit adhesion strengthening. Consequently, we questioned whether soluble LDV peptide would inhibit adhesion strengthening of the activation-defective Jurkat variants. As shown in Fig. 6⇓C, adhesion of the activation-defective and wild-type Jurkat cells on VCAM-1 was equally inhibited by LDV peptide. This suggests that while the activation-defective Jurkat cells have a reduced affinity for sVCAM-1, their binding affinity for soluble LDV peptide is unaffected. Collectively, these results suggest that loss of α4β1 activation in these Jurkat variants has little effect on cell adhesion to VCAM-1 under static or flow conditions.

           FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Adhesion of wild-type and α4β1 activation-defective Jurkat variants under flow conditions. A, Cells were analyzed at a shear stress of 1 dyne/cm2 on a VCAM-1 (soluble monovalent seven-domain VCAM-1) coated at 1 or 0.2 μg/ml. Cells were monitored for 10 s after the initial tethering event and were grouped into cells either transiently tethered, tethered and rolling, or arresting immediately after tethering to the adhesive substrates (see Materials and Methods). The fraction of cells (of the cell flux coming in close contact with the substrate) is presented in frequency units in a stacked bar graph. B, Resistance to detachment by shear flow. Cells were settled for 1 min on VCAM-1 at a coating of 0.1 μg/ml under static conditions. Shear stress was increased stepwise every 5 s. The number of cells that remained bound was expressed relative to the original number settled on the VCAM-1-coated substrate. C, Effect of LDV octapeptide and DVL octapeptide control on α4β1-mediated tethering of Jurkat and activation-defective Jurkat variant to low-density VCAM-1. Tethering frequencies were determined at a shear stress of 1 dyne/cm2 in binding medium containing 0.5 mM of either peptide. Tethering categories (transient or arrest) are depicted, respectively, in the filled and open bars. Data depicted are representative of three independent flow experiments.

Discussion

Previous work established that cells can actively regulate the affinity of integrin α4β1 for VCAM-1 (activation) (8). In the present study, we have assessed the biological role of α4β1 activation by deriving Jurkat T cell lines that lack high-affinity VCAM-1 binding. Using these cell lines, we observed that loss of α4β1 activation dramatically reduces the sensitivity of cells to VCAM-1-stimulated αLβ2-dependent cell migration. In contrast, defective α4β1 activation enhanced migration on purified VCAM-1 substrates, alone, and had little impact on static cell adhesion to VCAM-1 or on adhesion in shear flow. These results lead us to propose that the activation of integrin α4β1 is involved in the specification of preferred anatomical sites of leukocyte transmigration from the vasculature.

To study the functional role of α4β1 affinity modulation, we used chemical mutagenesis and flow cytometry to isolate Jurkat lines with defects in α4β1 activation. Using a VCAM-Ig fusion protein as a soluble ligand for α4β1, we previously established that ∼20% of α4β1 expressed on Jurkat cells is capable of binding sVCAM-1 with high affinity (EC50 ∼50 nM) (8), whereas <1% of the α4β1 was activated on the defective Jurkat cells. The defect in sVCAM-1 binding in these mutant lines was not due to a reduction in integrin expression, as the mutant lines expressed wild-type levels of α4β1. Furthermore, the loss of sVCAM-1 binding was not due to an intrinsic defect in the ligand binding site as sVCAM-1 binding could be rescued with exogenous integrin activators such as Mn2+ or activating Abs. The defect was not ascribable to an integrin mutation, because overexpression of wild-type α4 and/or β1 subunits failed to rescue sVCAM-1 binding. These results indicate that an element(s) of the intrinsic signaling pathway required for α4β1 activation in these cells was disrupted. These α4β1 activation-defective cells provide a tool to study the role of α4β1 affinity modulation on T cell function.

α4β1 affinity modulation is involved in regulating α4 signaling to β2 integrins. α4 integrins can function as signaling receptors as well as adhesion receptors. α4 integrin engagement influences biochemical pathways that affect cell function such as metalloproteinase gene expression (18). α4 integrin signaling can also affect the function of other integrin family members, a process termed trans activation/suppression or cross-talk (19, 20). α4β1 signaling stimulates β2-dependent cell adhesion (10, 11) and, as confirmed in the present work, β2-dependent cell migration. Coimmobilization of VCAM-1, as a ligand for α4β1, and ICAM-1, as a ligand for β2 integrins, stimulated Jurkat cell migration. The stimulated cell migration was mediated by β2 integrins, as the increased migration was blocked with an anti-β2 Ab. The stimulated migration was also blocked with an anti-VCAM-1 Ab, indicating that engagement of α4β1 with ligand was required for the stimulated migration. Consequently, α4β1 functions as a VCAM-1 receptor to stimulate β2 integrin-dependent cell migration. In contrast to wild-type Jurkat cells, the activation-defective Jurkat cells required 20-fold more VCAM-1 to stimulate β2-dependent migration. The defect in α4β1 signaling to β2 integrins in these Jurkat variants was at the level of VCAM-1 binding, because the rescue of high-affinity α4β1 by an activating β1 Ab also rescued the α4β1-stimulated β2-dependent cell migration. Thus, α4β1 affinity, in conjunction with VCAM-1 ligand density, regulates the migratory function of β2 integrins.

α4β1 activation plays a minor role in the control of Jurkat cell adhesion under static and flow conditions. The wild-type and activation-defective Jurkat lines manifested similar adhesion to VCAM-1 and the CS-1 fragment of fibronectin under static conditions. Thus, the high-affinity α4β1 on Jurkat cells do not appear to play a major role in regulating static cell adhesion. This finding is not unique to α4β1, as integrin α5β1 activation also plays only a minor role in static cell adhesion (21). Furthermore, wild-type and α4β1 activation-defective Jurkat cells showed similar tethering/rolling and adhesion strengthening on VCAM-1 under flowing conditions. These results are in agreement with Yauch et al. (22), who reported that α4β1 affinity modulation plays a minor role in adhesion. However, one study found that Jurkat variants with defective α4β-dependent static adhesion also had a defect in adhesion strengthening under flow (15). In that same study, a small LDV-containing peptide was found to inhibit adhesion strengthening of cells on VCAM-1. This led to the proposal that high-affinity α4β1 was required for adhesion strengthening. It was surprising to find no difference in adhesion strengthening between our α4β1 activation-defective and wild-type Jurkat cells. Furthermore, the soluble LDV peptide inhibited equally well in these two cell types. It is possible that our Jurkat variants may have lost high affinity for VCAM-1, but retained a high-affinity recognition of LDV peptide. Another possibility is that our sVCAM-1-binding mutants may have a specific defect in recognition of Ig domain 4 of VCAM-1. VCAM-1 contains two α4β1 binding sites, Ig domains 1 and 4. It may be that soluble binding of VCAM-1 requires recognition of both domains 1 and 4. A loss of domain 4 recognition could interfere with sVCAM-1 binding and cell signaling without interfering with tethering under flow, which has been found to be dependent on the VCAM-1 Ig domain 1. We are currently testing such a possibility with the use of specific mutants and Abs to VCAM-1 Ig domains 1 and 4.

Integrin activation is one mechanism for regulating integrin function (23). The biologic role of integrin affinity modulation is integrin and cell type specific (24). Activation of αIIbβ3 is critical for platelet aggregation, but it has little impact on platelet adhesion to fibrinogen (25). Similarly, activation of integrin α5β1 appears to play a minor role in static cell adhesion, but is important in fibronectin matrix assembly (26, 27). The results reported in this work show little effect of α4β1 activation on static adhesion. However, they define a new function for integrin activation: regulation of the sensitivity or threshold of leukocytes to stimulation by immobilized integrin ligands, such as VCAM-1.

Leukocyte subpopulations show tissue-specific trafficking patterns that govern immune responses (2, 3). These tropisms are dependent, in part, on adhesion molecule expression on leukocytes and vascular endothelium (5). Integrin abundance on leukocytes and counter ligand density on vascular endothelial cells is one proposed means to regulate leukocyte trafficking (28). For example, a subset of memory T cells, expressing high levels of α4β1, migrates preferentially to nongastrointestinal, extralymphoid inflammatory sites, in which VCAM-1 is expressed (28, 29, 30). Our results suggest that α4β1 activation may play an important role in determining leukocyte responses to different levels of VCAM-1. The affinity of α4β1 acts as a set point for the cells’ response to VCAM-1 and subsequent stimulation of β2-dependent migration. Primary circulating leukocytes express varying levels of high-affinity α4β1 (8), and VCAM-1 expression changes several-fold on blood vessels during the course of inflammation (13, 31). Consequently, the activation of α4β1 may specify preferential recruitment of leukocyte subsets to sites of differing VCAM-1 densities.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Joe Trotter of The Scripps Research Institute Flow Cytometry Core Facility for help in the isolation of Jurkat mutant by FACS, and The National Cell Culture Center (Minneapolis, MN) for their assistance in the isolation and purification of the recombinant VCAM-Ig and ICAM-Ig.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported in part by National Institutes of Health Grants AR27214, HL59007, and HL48728 (to M.H.G.). D.M.R. is the recipient of an Advanced Postdoctoral Fellowship Award from the Juvenile Diabetes Foundation International. This is publication number 13759-VB from The Scripps Research Institute.

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Mark H. Ginsberg, Department of Vascular Biology, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, VB-2, La Jolla, CA 92037. E-mail address: ginsberg{at}scripps.edu

  • ↵3 Abbreviations used in this paper: CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; EMS, ethyl methane sulfonate; SDF, stromal cell-derived factor; sVCAM, soluble VCAM.

  • Received January 24, 2001.
  • Accepted June 18, 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Shimizu, Y., D. M. Rose, M. H. Ginsberg. 1999. Integrins in the immune system. Adv. Immunol. 72: 325
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Butcher, E. C., L. J. Picker. 1996. Lymphocyte homing and homeostasis. Science 272: 60
    OpenUrlAbstract
  3. ↵
    Butcher, E. C., M. Williams, K. Youngman, L. Rott, M. Briskin. 1999. Lymphocyte trafficking and regional immunity. Adv. Immunol. 72: 209
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Springer, T. A.. 1994. Traffic signals for lymphocyte recirculation and leukocyte emigration: the multistep paradigm. Cell 76: 301
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Carlos, T. M., J. M. Harlan. 1994. Leukocyte-endothelial adhesion molecules. Blood 84: 2068
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Faull, R. J., M. H. Ginsberg. 1996. Inside-out signaling through integrins. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 7/8: 1091
    OpenUrlAbstract
  7. ↵
    Bazzoni, G., M. E. Hemler. 1998. Are changes in integrin affinity and conformation overemphasized?. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 30
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Rose, D. M., P. M. Cardarelli, R. R. Cobb, M. H. Ginsberg. 2000. Soluble VCAM-1 binding to α4β1 integrins is cell-type specific and activation dependent and is disrupted during apoptosis in T cells. Blood 95: 602
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Kassner, P. D., R. Alon, T. A. Springer. 1995. Specialized functional properties of the integrin α4 cytoplasmic domain. Mol. Biol. Cell 6: 661
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Chan, J., S. Hyduk, M. I. Cybulsky. 2000. α4β1 integrin/VCAM-1 integration activates αLβ2 integrin-mediated adhesion to ICAM-1 in human T cells. J. Immunol. 164: 746
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    May, A. E., F. J. Neumann, A. Schomig, K. T. Preissner. 2000. VLA-4 engagement defines a novel activation pathway for β2 integrin-dependent leukocyte adhesion involving the urokinase receptor. Blood 96: 506
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Bevilacqua, M. P.. 1993. Endothelial-leukocyte adhesion molecules. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 11: 767
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Henninger, D. D., J. Panes, M. Eppihimer, J. Russell, M. Gerritsen, D. C. Anderson, D. N. Granger. 1997. Cytokine-induced VCAM-1 and ICAM-1 expression in different organs of the mouse. J. Immunol. 158: 1825
    OpenUrlAbstract
  14. ↵
    Jongewaard, I. N., P. M. Tsai, J. W. Smith. 1996. The type III connecting segment of fibronectin contains an aspartic acid residue that regulates the rate of binding of integrin α4β1. Cell Adhes. Commun. 3: 487
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Chen, C., J. L. Mobley, O. Dwir, F. Shimron, V. Grabovsky, R. R. Lobb, Y. Shimizu, R. Alon. 1999. High-affinity very late antigen-4 subsets expressed on T cells are mandatory for spontaneous adhesion strengthening but not rolling on VCAM-1 in shear flow. J. Immunol. 162: 1084
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. ↵
    Weber, C., T. A. Springer. 1998. Interaction of very late antigen-4 with VCAM-1 supports transendothelial chemotaxis of monocytes by facilitating lateral migration. J. Immunol. 161: 6825
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Berlin, C., R. F. Bargatze, J. J. Campbell, U. H. von Andrian, M. C. Szabo, S. R. Hasslen, R. D. Nelson, E. L. Berg, S. L. Erlandsen, E. C. Butcher. 1995. α4 integrins mediate lymphocyte attachment and rolling under physiologic flow. Cell 80: 413
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Romanic, A. M., J. A. Madri. 1994. The induction of 72-kD gelatinase in T cells upon adhesion to endothelial cells is VCAM-1 dependent. J. Biol. Chem. 125: 1165
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Porter, J. C., N. Hogg. 1997. Integrin cross talk: activation of lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 on human T cells alters α4β1- and α5β1-mediated function. J. Cell Biol. 138: 1437
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Porter, J. C., N. Hogg. 1998. Integrins take partners: cross-talk between integrins and other membrane receptors. Trends Cell Biol. 8: 390
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Faull, R. J., N. L. Kovach, J. M. Harlan, M. H. Ginsberg. 1994. Stimulation of integrin-mediated adhesion of T lymphocytes and monocytes: two mechanisms with divergent biological consequences. J. Exp. Med. 179: 1307
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Yauch, R. L., D. P. Felsenfeld, S. K. Kraeft, L. B. Chen, M. P. Sheetz, M. E. Hemler. 1997. Mutational evidence for control of cell adhesion through integrin diffusion/clustering, independent of ligand binding. J. Exp. Med. 186: 1347
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Hughes, P. E., M. Pfaff. 1998. Integrin affinity modulation. Trends Cell Biol. 8: 359
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    O’Toole, T. E., Y. Katagiri, R. J. Faull, K. Peter, R. N. Tamura, V. Quaranta, J. C. Loftus, S. J. Shattil, M. H. Ginsberg. 1994. Integrin cytoplasmic domains mediate inside-out signal transduction. J. Cell Biol. 124: 1047
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Shattil, S. J., H. Kashiwagi, N. Pampori. 1998. Integrin signaling: the platelet paradigm. Blood 91: 2645
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Wu, C., V. M. Keivens, T. E. O’Toole, J. A. McDonald, M. H. Ginsberg. 1995. Integrin activation and cytoskeletal interaction are essential for the assembly of a fibronectin matrix. Cell 83: 715
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Sechler, J. L., S. A. Corbett, J. E. Schwarzbauer. 1997. Modulatory roles for integrin activation and the synergy site of fibronectin during matrix assembly. Mol. Biol. Cell 8: 2563
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Volpes, R., J. J. van den Oord, V. J. Desmet. 1991. Memory T cells represent the predominant lymphocyte subset in acute and chronic liver inflammation. Hepatology 13: 826
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  29. ↵
    Horgan, K. J., G. E. Luce, Y. Tanaka, T. Schweighoffer, Y. Shimizu, S. O. Sharrow, S. Shaw. 1992. Differential expression of VLA-α4 and VLA-β1 discriminates multiple subsets of CD4+CD45RO+ “memory” T cells. J. Immunol. 149: 4082
    OpenUrlAbstract
  30. ↵
    Engelhardt, B., F. C. Conley, P. J. Kilshaw, E. C. Butcher. 1995. Lymphocytes inflitrating the CNS during inflammation display a distinctive phenotype and bind VCAM-1 but not MAdCAM-1. Int. Immunol. 7: 481
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Langley, R. R., J. Russell, M. J. Eppihimer, S. J. Alexander, M. Gerritsen, R. D. Specian, D. N. Granger. 1999. Quantification of murine endothelial cell adhesion molecules in solid tumors. Am. J. Physiol. 277: H1156
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 167 (5)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 167, Issue 5
1 Sep 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The Affinity of Integrin α4β1 Governs Lymphocyte Migration
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The Affinity of Integrin α4β1 Governs Lymphocyte Migration
David M. Rose, Valentin Grabovsky, Ronen Alon, Mark H. Ginsberg
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2001, 167 (5) 2824-2830; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.5.2824

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
The Affinity of Integrin α4β1 Governs Lymphocyte Migration
David M. Rose, Valentin Grabovsky, Ronen Alon, Mark H. Ginsberg
The Journal of Immunology September 1, 2001, 167 (5) 2824-2830; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.5.2824
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Lung dysfunction in a mouse model of inflammation is dependent on T-cell-independent IL-13 expression (54.18)
  • TSG-6, a new protein ligand for CXCL8, modulates the activity of this pro-inflammatory chemokine (54.12)
  • Anti-inflammatory and anti-bacterial effect of polyacetylene compound from Cirsium japonicum var. ussuriense (54.19)
Show more INFLAMMATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606