Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • Log in
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Administration of Dehydroepiandrosterone Suppresses Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice

Caigan Du, M. Wahid Khalil and Subramaniam Sriram
J Immunol December 15, 2001, 167 (12) 7094-7101; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.7094
Caigan Du
*Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Wahid Khalil
†Lawson Research Institute, St. Josephs Care Center, and Department of Medicine, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Subramaniam Sriram
*Department of Neurology, Multiple Sclerosis Research Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) is a Th1-mediated inflammatory demyelinating disease in the CNS, an animal model of multiple sclerosis. We have examined the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on the development of EAE in mice. The addition of DHEA to cultures of myelin basic protein-primed splenocytes resulted in a significant decrease in T cell proliferation and secretion of (pro)inflammatory cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-12 p40, and TNF-α) and NO in response to myelin basic protein. These effects were associated with a decrease in activation and translocation of NF-κB. In vivo administration of DHEA significantly reduced the severity and incidence of acute EAE, along with a decrease in demyelination/inflammation and expressions of (pro)inflammatory cytokines in the CNS. These studies suggest that DHEA has potent anti-inflammatory properties, which at least are in part mediated by its inhibition of NF-κB activation.

Experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE)2 is an inflammatory demyelinating disease in the CNS, and it shows many pathological and clinical similarities with multiple sclerosis (MS; Refs. 1, 2). The disease is induced in susceptible strains of rodents or primates by either immunization with neural Ags or adoptive transfer of neural Ag-specific T cells. Ags well known to induce EAE are myelin basic protein (MBP), proteolipoprotein, and myelin oligodendrocyte protein. EAE is an archetypal CD4+ Th1 cell-mediated autoimmune disease in which Th1 cells, infiltrating macrophages, proinflammatory cytokines (e.g., IL-12, IFN-γ, and TNF-α), and NO (free radical NO) play a critical role in the pathogenesis of the disease (1, 2, 3).

NF-κB, a nuclear transcriptional factor, is activated in response to inflammatory factors such as microbial products (e.g., LPS, dsRNA, and DNA) and cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1, lymphotoxin, and IL-2; Refs. 4, 5). At least five members of NF-κB family have been identified: p50/p105 (NF-κB1), p52/p100 (NF-κB2), p65 (RelA), RelB, and c-rel, which form homo- and/or heterodimers. Of them, the p50/p65 dimer is the most abundant complex (4, 6). Activation of NF-κB plays a critical role in innate immune responses by up-regulating expression of cytokines and chemokines (6, 7). Some of these cytokines (IL-1, TNF-α, lymphotoxin, IL-2, IL-12, and IFN-γ) also directly contribute to the development of Th1-mediated immune response (8).

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA), a C19 adrenal steroid, and its sulfated form (DHEAS) are synthesized by the adrenal glands, gonadal tissue, and CNS cells (9, 10, 11). In young adult humans, the levels of DHEAS (5–6 μg/ml) and DHEA (2–4 ng/ml) in plasma are considerably higher than any other steroids (9). DHEAS is converted to the bioactive form DHEA by intracellular sulfatases, which are present in a number of cell types, including monocytes and macrophages (12, 13). Although DHEA is an abundant steroid hormone in serum, its biological functions are still unclear.

Although DHEA is widely considered to be a precursor of androgens and/or estrogens (14), increasing evidence indicates that DHEA has, in addition, potent immunoregulatory functions. In animal model systems, administration of DHEA enhances the ability of mice to resist experimental viral and bacterial diseases (15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20). In humans, many chronic inflammatory diseases are associated with lower serum levels of DHEA or DHEAS (21). Therapy with DHEA has shown benefit in some patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (22) and HIV infection (23). Our previous study has shown that the addition of DHEA to in vitro cultures inhibits the development of Th1 cells (24). In the present study, we examined the effect of DHEA on EAE. We predicted that administration of exogenous DHEA would inhibit Th1-mediated inflammatory responses and would consequently prevent the development of EAE.

Materials and Methods

Animals and reagents

Female SJL/J mice (6–8 wk old) were purchased from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD) and were maintained in the animal care facility at Vanderbilt University (Nashville, TN). DHEA was obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). The DHEA stock solution (10 mM) was prepared by dissolving it in DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich), and it was diluted to the experimental concentrations (2–20 μM) in the culture medium. The monoclonal anti-mIL-12 Abs (C17.5 and C15.6), gifts from Dr. G. Trinchieri (Wister Institute, Boston, MA), were purified by QAE Sephadex A-50 and Sephadex G-25 M column (Pharmacia Biotech, Uppsala, Sweden) from hybridoma ascetic fluid. C15.6 was biotinylated according to manufacturer’s protocol and was used as a detecting Ab, whereas C17.5 was used as a capture Ab for IL-12 p40 ELISA. Abs against p50 and p65 of NF-κB were brought from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). rmIL-12 was kindly provided by Genetics Institute (Cambridge, MA). MBP was purified from guinea pig spinal cord (Rockland, Gibertsville, PA) by the methods described previously (25).

ELISA of cytokines

Levels of cytokines (IL-12 p40, IFN-γ, IL-4, and TNF-α) were measured by ELISA as described previously (26). The matched Ab pairs and standards for IL-4, IFN-γ, and TNF-α were purchased from Endogen (Woburn, MA), and the Abs and standards used for IL-12 p40 ELISA were described above.

Measurement of NO

NO secreted from cells is rapidly oxidized to nitrite in the culture medium, therefore, determination of nitrite concentrations was used as a measurement of NO production. Fifty microliters of culture supernatant was mixed with 50 μl of Greiss reagent (1% sulfanilamide, 0.1% naphthylethyline diamine dihydrochloride, and 2.5% phosphoric acid) per well in a 96-well plate in triplicate. After incubation at 25°C for 10 min, the absorbance was read at 550 nm. The levels of NO in the culture medium were calculated based on sodium nitrite standards.

Proliferation assay

T cell cultures were grown in a 96-well microtiter plate in triplicate. MBP-primed lymphocytes (2 × 105 per well) were cultured in the presence of MBP for 72 h in RPMI 1640 complete medium (RPMI 1640 medium, 100 U/ml penicillin, 100 μg/ml streptomycin, and 10% FBS; Life Technologies, Rockville, MD) under the atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air at 37°C. The cultures were harvested using a Harvester96 (Tomtec, Orange, CT) after incubation with 0.5 μCi/well [3H]thymidine (DuPont Pharmaceuticals, Boston, MA) for the last 18 h. The radioisotope incorporation as index of T cell proliferation was determined using a betaplate liquid scintillation counter (Wallac, Turku, Finland).

Nuclear extraction and EMSA

After treatment, MBP-primed or naive splenocytes (2.5 × 106 cells/ml) were added to 1 mM Na3VO4 at a final concentration and were pelleted by centrifugation at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The pellets were washed with 0.5 ml of buffer A (10 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 10 mM KCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, 0.1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 1 mM PMSF, 1 mM Na3VO4, and 5 μg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin, chymostatin, and antipain) and were centrifuged again at 1,000 × g for 5 min at 4°C. The cells were lysed in 100 μl of buffer A containing 0.5% Igepal CA-630 (Sigma-Aldrich) for 15 min at 4°C. The resultant nuclei were harvested by centrifugation at 1,500 × g for 15 min at 4°C, resuspended in 30 μl of buffer B (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.42 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 25% glycerol, 0.5 mM PMSF, and 5 μg/ml each of aprotinin, leupeptin, pepstatin, chymostatin, and antipain), and extracted by vigorous whirling for 15 min at 4°C. The nuclear extracts were cleared by centrifugation at 16,000 × g for 10 min at 4°C. Two microliters of nuclear extract from each sample was taken for measurement of protein content by Bio-Rad Protein Assay (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), and the final nuclear extracts were equalized among samples using buffer B, frozen in liquid nitrogen, and kept at −75°C.

The activation or nuclear translocation of NF-κB was performed by using EMSAs. NF-κB consensus oligonucleotide (5′-AGTTGAGGGGACTTTCCCAGGC-3′) was purchased from Promega (Madison, WI), and nuclear factor-Y box binding (NF-Y) oligonucleotide (5′-GATCTGAGAATTTTCTGATTGGTTCTGGCGAGTTTGG-3′) (27) was synthesized at IDT (Coralville, IA) and purified by polyacrylamide gel. Double-stranded oligonucleotide probe was labeled by 32P in a reaction containing 2 μl of probe (3.5 pmol), 1 μl of T4 polynucleotide kinase buffer (10×), 1 μl of [γ-32P]ATP (3000 Ci/mmol; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL), 1 μl of T4 polynucleotide kinase (5–10 U; New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA), and 5 μl of nuclease-free water for 10 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by the addition of 1 μl of 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8.0). The labeled probe was purified with a Micro Bio-Spin 30 Chromatography Column (Bio-Rad). DNA-nuclear protein binding reactions were done in a final volume of 20 μl for 30 min at 25°C. NF-κB-binding reactions contained 5 μg of nuclear protein, 4 μl of binding buffer (5×) (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 20% glycerol, and 0.25 mg/ml fish sperm DNA) and 0.5–1 × 106 cpm 32P-labeled probe; NF-Y-binding reactions contained 5 μg of nuclear protein, 4 μl of binding buffer (5×) (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.9, 50 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, 0.5 mM EDTA, 0.5 mM DTT, 20% glycerol, and 0.25 mg/ml poly(dI-dC)), and 2–5 × 105 cpm 32P-labeled probe. For supershift assays, 2 μl of anti-NF-κB (p50 or p65) Abs was added to NF-κB-binding reactions after binding reaction completed, and they were then incubated for 1 h. The complex of probe and binding proteins was electrophoresed in a 4% polyacrylamide gel (16 × 20 cm) in 1× Tris-borate-EDTA at 100 V, and was autoradiographed at −75°C.

Induction of EAE

Active EAE was induced by s.c. immunization with 800 μg of mouse spinal cord homogenate (MSCH) in CFA (Sigma-Aldrich) on days 0 and 7, along with i.p. injection of pertussis toxin (200 ng in 0.5 ml of PBS per animal; Sigma-Aldrich) on days 0 and 2. Passive EAE was induced by adoptive transfer of MBP-sensitized T lymphocytes (28). Briefly, SJL/J mice were s.c. immunized with 400 μg of MBP in CFA on days 0 and 7. On day 14, the lymph nodes and spleen cells from the immunized mice were harvested and purified by gradient centrifugation (Histopaque-1077; Sigma-Aldrich), and then incubated in RPMI 1640 complete medium in the presence of 50–100 μg/ml MBP. A proliferation assay of MBP Ag-reactive T cells was performed at the time the lymph nodes and spleen cells were harvested. Cells (2 × 105 per well) were incubated in RPMI 1640 complete medium in the presence of various concentrations of MBP Ag, and the Ag-reactive T cell proliferation assay was conducted as described above. To induce EAE, viable T cell blasts were harvested from MBP-stimulated cultures (a 96-h culture), washed twice with PBS, and injected i.p. into recipient mice (1.0 × 107 cells in 0.5 ml of PBS per animal).

Treatment of animals, and clinical and pathologic evaluation of disease

Mice were treated with DHEA (2 mg/dose) or its carrier, DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich), daily by s.c. injection in a volume of 50 μl. The treatment began from the time of the first immunization (active EAE) or T cell transfer (passive EAE; day 0) until disease recovery. Paralysis was graded as follows: 0, normal; 0.5, still tail; 1, limp tail; 1.5, limp tail with inability to right; 2, paralysis of one limb; 2.5, paralysis of one limb and weakness of one other limb; 3, complete paralysis of both hind limbs; 4, moribund state; and 5, dead.

To assess the degree of inflammation or demyelination, EAE mice with were euthanized on day 25 and were perfused by intracardiac injection of 4% paraformaldehyde and 1% glutaraldehyde in PBS. Transverse sections of the cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spinal cord were stained with Luxol Fast Blue or H&E. Each spinal cord section was further subdivided into an anterior, posterior, and two lateral columns. Each of them that displayed either lymphocyte infiltration or demyelination was assigned a score of one, thus, each animal had a potential maximum score of 16.

Isolation of total RNA and semiquantitative RT-PCR

Mice with EAE were randomly selected by cage numbers for mRNA isolation and analysis on day 20. Following perfusion with PBS, total RNA from the spinal cord tissue was extracted using TRI Reagent (Sigma-Aldrich) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. If necessary, RNA was further purified by digestion using DNase I. Four micrograms of total RNA was reverse transcribed (RT) to cDNA using a GeneAmp RNA PCR kit with oligo d(T)16 primers (PerkinElmer, Branchburg, NJ; RT reaction). PCR amplification of each cDNA target (CD3γ, IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-12 p40, TNF-α, and inducible NO synthase (iNOS)) was performed from the same RT reaction as an internal control GAPDH. Each PCR contained 5 μl of cDNA, 2 μl of 10× PCR buffer (PerkinElmer), 1 μl of 25 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μl of each dNTP (10 mM), 0.5 μl of sense and antisense target gene-specific primers (50 pmol/μl), 0.25 μl of AmpliTaq DNA polymerase (5 units/μl; PerkinElmer), and 13.75 μl of nuclease-free H2O, and was conducted in PTC-200 Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA). The specific sense and antisense oligonucleotide PCR primers for each cDNA target are listed in Table I⇓. Amplification conditions including annealing temperatures, number of cycles, and extension times were optimized for each target. PCR products were run on a 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide, and were visualized under UV light. The density of the band was quantitated using a Digital Imaging System (IS-1000 Version 2.0; Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Primers used in PCR amplicationa

Results

DHEA inhibits lymphocyte proliferation in response to MBP

The addition of DHEA to the MBP-primed lymphocyte cultures resulted in a decrease of MBP-stimulated T cell proliferation, which was dependent on the doses of both DHEA and MBP (Fig. 1⇓). Following stimulation with 100 μg/ml MBP, the proliferative response of T cells was suppressed at all concentrations of DHEA. When 50 μg/ml MBP was added, no inhibition was seen in the cultures with the addition of 5 μM of DHEA, but significant reduction was observed at 10 or 20 μM of DHEA. These results are similar to those observed in our earlier studies with keyhole limpet hemocyanin-primed lymphocytes (24), indicating that the inhibitory effect of DHEA on the Ag-stimulated T proliferation depends upon stimulation of Ag. In addition, although the background of [3H]thymidine incorporation was low in the cultures without stimulation of MBP, it was reduced by the presence of DHEA as well.

           FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

DHEA inhibits Ag MBP-stimulated T cell proliferation. MBP-primed splenocytes were harvested from mice after 14 days of immunization with 400 μg of MBP in CFA on days 0 and 7. The splenocytes (2 × 105 cells/well in a 96-well plate) were stimulated with indicated MBP in the presence or absence of DHEA. The data represent the mean values (cpm) and SD of triplicates at each point from a representative of three separate experiments. ∗, Significantly reduced from the controls (0 μM DHEA: addition of DMSO only), p < 0.001 (n = 9).

DHEA inhibits secretion of Th1-associated cytokines (IFN-γ, IL-12, and TNF-α) and NO in MBP-primed splenocyte cultures

We examined whether the inhibition of lymphocytic proliferation by DHEA was accompanied by a reduction in the levels of Th1-associated cytokines and NO. As shown in Fig. 2⇓, the addition of DHEA reduced production of IFN-γ, IL-12 p40, TNF-α, and NO in MBP-stimulated culture supernatants in a dose-dependent manner. In cultures treated with 20 μM DHEA, inhibition of IFN-γ was complete (100% reduction), IL-12 p40 levels decreased from 3.5 ± 0.12 ng/ml to 1 ± 0.008 ng/ml (72% reduction), TNF-α decreased from 101.4 ± 9.7 pg/ml to 32.3 ± 3.3 pg/ml (68% reduction), and NO levels were reduced from 9.5 ± 0.5 μM to 2.4 ± 0.002 μM (75% reduction). These observations indicate that DHEA reduces Th1-mediated inflammatory responses in MBP-primed T cells following stimulation with Ag. In addition, Th2 cytokine IL-4 production in these cultures following stimulation of MBP was very low (64 ± 10 pg/ml), and was reduced to undetectable levels by the presence of DHEA.

           FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

DHEA inhibits secretion of (pro)inflammatory cytokines/mediator in the cultures of MBP-primed splenocytes in response to the Ag. The MBP-primed splenocytes (2.5 × 106 cells/ml) were stimulated with 75 μg/ml MBP in the presence or absence of DHEA for 72 h. The levels of cytokine (IFN-γ, IL-12 p40, and TNF-α) and NO in the supernatant of the cultures were determined by ELISA. The data represent the mean and SD of triplicates at each point from a representative of three separate experiments. ∗, Significantly reduced from the controls (0 μM DHEA: addition of DMSO only), p < 0.001 (n = 9).

DHEA inhibits Ag-stimulated nuclear translocation of NF-κB

The activation of NF-κB is a prerequisite for the expression of a number of proinflammatory cytokines and mediators, including TNF-α, IL-12 p40, IL-2, and iNOS (4, 29). To determine whether the molecular mechanism of DHEA action occurred at a site proximal or distal to NF-κB, we examined the effect of DHEA on the induction of NF-κB activation by EMSA in MBP-primed splenocytes. As shown in Fig. 3⇓, nuclear translocation of NF-κB was seen in response to stimulation with MBP in the MBP-primed splenocytes. Supershift studies showed that the migration of NF-κB was retarded completely by anti-p50 Ab and to a lesser degree by anti-p65 Ab, indicating that the NF-κB complex included, at least in part, a heterodimer of p50/p65. Because the entire panel of anti-NF-κB Abs was not examined, the presence of other Rel proteins and homodimers of p50/p50 could not be excluded. The addition of DHEA to the cultures of MBP-primed splenocytes reduced the activation of NF-κB in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 4⇓). Using a digital image system to quantity the levels of NF-κB, the translocation of NF-κB to the nucleus was inhibited by 43% following the addition of 20 μM DHEA (Fig. 4⇓B). Furthermore, kinetic studies showed that in the cultures treated with 10 μM DHEA, inhibition occurred at as early as 1 h and reached it maximum at 8 h (Fig. 5⇓). These data suggest that DHEA inhibits T cell proliferation and proinflammatory cytokine/mediator production at least in part by inhibiting translocation of NF-κB. Because mixed cultures were used in these investigations, our studies do not identify the phenotype of the cell in which the effects of DHEA on NF-κB activation are maximal.

           FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

Activation of NF-κB in MBP-primed splenocytes following stimulation with MBP. The MBP-primed or naive splenocytes (2.5 × 106 cells/ml) were stimulated with 75 μg/ml MBP for 3 h. NF-κB in the nuclear extracts (5 μg of total protein) was identified by EMSA with 32P-labeled NF-κB oligonucleotide probe (pointed by a big arrow), which was further confirmed by supershift assay using anti-p50 and anti-p65 Abs (pointed by small arrows; representative of three experiments).

           FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

DHEA inhibits activation of NF-κB in MBP-primed splenocytes in a dose-dependent manner. The MBP-primed splenocytes (2.5 × 106 cells/ml) were stimulated with 75 μg/ml MBP in the presence or absence of DHEA for 3 h. The levels of NF-κB and internal control NF-Y in the nuclear extracts (5 μg of total protein) were determined by EMSA with their own specific binding probes. A, Autoradiographs of NF-κB and NF-Y in the nuclear extracts; B, The levels of NF-κB and NF-Y on the autoradiograph were quantitated using a digital imaging system. In each sample, the activation of NF-κB was normalized with internal control NF-Y, and the inhibition (%) of NF-κB was calculated by the decrease from the DHEA-untreated sample (representative of three experiments).

           FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Kinetics of inhibition of NF-κB in MBP-primed splenocytes by the presence of DHEA. The MBP-primed splenocytes (2.5 × 106 cells/ml) were stimulated with 75 μg/ml MBP in the presence of 10 μM DHEA. The levels of NF-κB and internal control NF-Y in the nuclear extracts (5 μg of total protein) were determined by EMSA with their own specific binding probes. A, Autoradiographs of NF-κB and NF-Y in the nuclear extracts from each time point; B, The levels of NF-κB and NF-Y on the autoradiograph were quantitated using a digital imaging system. In each sample, the activation of NF-κB was normalized with internal control NF-Y, and the inhibition (%) of NF-κB was calculated by the decrease from the DHEA-untreated sample at the same time point (representative of three experiments).

DHEA prevents development of EAE

The development of EAE is closely regulated by the expression of proinflammatory cytokines/mediators (30). Our data has shown that DHEA inhibited immune responses of MBP-specific T cells against MBP by decreasing production of (pro)inflammatory cytokines and NO and/or proliferation. Therefore, we predicted that parental administration of DHEA in vivo would alter the development of autoantigen specific T cells and thereby the incidence and severity of EAE.

When EAE was induced by active immunization in the absence of pertussis toxin (Fig. 6⇓A), only one of six mice treated with DHEA was paralyzed (mean maximal clinical score: 0.17), whereas in the vehicle-treated group, five of six mice were paralyzed (mean maximal clinical score: 1.42; p < 0.01). In the second experiment, EAE was induced with the addition of pertussis toxin (Fig. 6⇓B). Seven of nine DHEA-treated mice developed clinical paralysis of EAE. All nine mice treated with vehicle were paralyzed with high severity, and one died from disease attack. The severity of EAE was reduced by DHEA treatment from a mean maximal clinical score of 2.82 in the control group to 1.25 (p < 0.01). In the adoptive transfer model of EAE (Fig. 6⇓C), none of the nine mice that received DHEA developed clinical paralysis of EAE, whereas seven of nine mice in the control group developed clinical signs of EAE with a mean maximal clinical score of 1.2 (p < 0.001). These data indicate that administration of DHEA protects animals from the development of active and adoptively transferred EAE.

           FIGURE 6.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 6.

Prevention of EAE by treatment with DHEA in SJL/J mice. A, Active EAE was induced by immunization with MSCH in CFA on days 0 and 7 (n = 6); B, Active EAE was induced by immunization with MSCH in CFA on days 0 and 7 along with i.p. injection of pertussis toxin on days 0 and 2 (n = 9); and C, Passive EAE was induced by adoptive transfer of MBP-sensitized T cells (10 × 106 cells/animal) to the naive mice (n = 9). In all these experiments, mice received either 2 mg of DHEA in 50 μl of DMSO or 50 μl of DMSO alone daily. The data represent the mean clinical score of each group, respectively.

To confirm whether the beneficial actions of DHEA against clinical paralysis were due to a decrease in demyelination and inflammation in the CNS, the spinal cords of EAE mice were examined histologically (Fig. 7⇓). In the mice receiving DMSO (mean clinical score: 1.33), the mean pathologic scores were 3.5 for demyelination and 4.5 for lymphocyte infiltration. However, in DHEA-treated mice (mean clinical score: 0), the score of demyelination or lymphocytes infiltration was reduced to 0.4 or 0.7, respectively (Fig. 7⇓B). These data indicate that the reduction of EAE severity in the DHEA-treated mice closely correlates with a decrease of demyelination and/or lymphocyte infiltration in the CNS.

           FIGURE 7.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 7.

Administration of DHEA reduces demyelination and inflammation in the CNS of SJL/J mice with EAE. Three mice were randomly selected from DMSO- or DHEA-treated groups as described in Fig. 6⇑B on day 25 (clinical score of DMSO-treated mice: 2, 2, and 0; of DHEA-treated mice: 0, 0, and 0). Spinal cords were isolated after perfusion with PBS containing 4% paraformaldehyde and 1% gluteraldehyde. Transverse sections of the cervical, upper thoracic, lower thoracic, and lumbar regions of the spinal cord were stained with Luxol Fast Blue-Periodic acid (Schiff’s; showing demyelination) or with H&E (showing lymphocyte infiltration): a representative section showing demyelination (A; pointed by arrow) and lymphocyte infiltration (B; pointed by arrows). C, Mean pathologic score of demyelination or lymphocyte infiltration from each group (n = 3), respectively.

DHEA reduced Th1 immune responses in the CNS of mice with EAE

To examine whether the reduction of demyelination/lymphocyte infiltration following DHEA treatment was accompanied by a decrease in inflammatory mediators in the CNS, we analyzed the expression of inflammation/Th1-related genes (CD3γ, IFN-γ, IL-12 p40, IL-4, TNF-α, and iNOS) from the spinal cord of mice with EAE. As shown in Fig. 8⇓, four mice randomly selected from the DHEA-treated group showed a decrease in levels of all targeted mRNA (CD3γ, IFN-γ, IL-12 p40, TNF-α, and iNOS) as compared with four mice from the vehicle-treated group. The level of each mRNA in each mouse closely correlated with its clinical score. The digital image analysis indicated that the levels of expression of CD3γ, IFN-γ, IL-12 p40, TNF-α, and iNOS were higher in the vehicle-treated animals (clinical scores: 3, 2, 3, and 3) than those in the DHEA-treated mice (clinical scores: 0, 2, 0, and 0; p < 0.05; Fig. 8⇓B). Among the DHEA-treated mice, one animal with paralysis showed comparable levels of the presence of T cells (marked by CD3γ) and (pro)inflammatory cytokines/mediator in the CNS, but in the remaining animals in which no clinical paralysis was observed, the levels of all targeted mRNA were either lower (one mouse) or the same as seen in the naive animal. No expression of IL-4 was seen, and this would argue against a switch in the immune response from Th1 to Th2 following treatment with DHEA. These data indicate that in vivo administration of DHEA reduces Th1-mediated autoimmune responses in the CNS via inhibition of T cell proliferation and/or production of Th1-related cytokines and inflammatory mediator; as a result, it prevents EAE.

           FIGURE 8.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 8.

Administration of DHEA inhibits expression of Th1/inflammation-related genes in the CNS of SJL/J mice with EAE. The total RNA was extracted from the PBS-perfused spinal cords of EAE mice treated with DMSO or DHEA as described in Fig. 6⇑B on day 20, and of one naive mouse. The mRNA expression of CD3γ, IFN-γ, IL-12 p40, IL-4, TNF-α, iNOS, and internal control GAPDH were determined by semiquantitative RT-PCR. A, PCR products were visualized in a 1.5% agarose gel containing 0.5 μg/ml ethidium bromide; B, Levels of each target mRNA were measured by a digital image system and were presented after they were normalized with the internal control GAPDH. Naive, Naive spinal cord.

Discussion

Our studies show a profound anti-inflammatory effect of DHEA on the immune response to MBP and on the development of EAE. We have shown three major effects of DHEA on immune function: DHEA inhibits T cell proliferation and secretion of (pro)inflammatory cytokines/mediators in Ag-activated cultures of MBP-primed splenocytes; DHEA inhibits activation and translocation of NF-κB in splenocytes following stimulation with Ag; and in vivo administration of DHEA inhibits Th1-mediated inflammatory responses in the CNS, and ameliorates the development of EAE.

DHEA is the most abundant steroid in the circulation of humans and many other warm-blooded animals (9, 31). Plasma levels of DHEA peak in early adulthood (reaching levels of 2–4 ng/ml) and then decline through adult life (9). In adult mice, DHEA levels are ∼1 ng/ml and they dramatically increase following parental administration of DHEA (32). In the present investigation, the DHEA doses (2–20 μM) we tested in vitro are undoubtedly high when compared with its levels in sera, but the levels of local and intracellular DHEA in the steroid target tissue are uncertain. The average serum DHEAS level in healthy “younger” adults is ∼7.5 μM, and increases to 20–70 μM following administration of pharmacological dosages of DHEA without any sign of systemic toxicity (33). These high levels of recirculating DHEAS can be converted to DHEA by ubiquitous steroid sulfatase. Therefore, DHEA levels in plasma may not reflect the real concentrations of DHEA in the target tissue, which could be much higher than that observed in the circulation.

The ability of DHEA to regulate proliferation and cytokine production suggests its potential role in mediating inflammatory response. Prior studies of DHEA on T cell function have shown conflicting results. It has been reported that DHEA enhances IL-2 production and, consequently, T cell proliferation in murine and human T cells (34, 35), whereas others have noted an inhibition of lymphocyte proliferation and IL-2 production in the presence of DHEA (36, 37, 38). Our previous work also has demonstrated that the addition of DHEA in vitro inhibits T lymphocyte proliferation stimulated by ligation of TCR complex and favors the induction of a Th2 immune response to Ag (24). In LPS-stimulated macrophages, DHEA reduces the production of IL-12 (24), TNF-α, IL-1 (39), and NO (data not shown). In this study, the most dramatic effect of DHEA was in the suppression of the T cell proliferative response and the development of EAE.

EAE is a Th1 cell-mediated inflammatory autoimmune disease of the central nervous system that serves as a prototypic animal model for MS. The suppression of this disease by DHEA (Fig. 6⇑) disagrees with the data presented by Kipper-Galperin et al. (40). This conflicting result could be due to the differences in the dosage and the route of administration of DHEA. In this study, we used 2 mg/mouse every day by s.c. injection, by which way the highest bioavailability of DHEA in vivo is obtained (41). Although Kipper-Galperin et al. gave 0.5 mg/mouse every other day by i.p. injection (40), that may not be enough to suppress the autoimmune responses in the EAE animals.

The mechanism by which DHEA mediates its effect on T cells in vitro and in vivo is not known. So far, all known steroid receptors belong to a group of nuclear (orphan) receptors, including those for glucocorticoid and progesterone. They undergo structural alternation upon binding to the steroid ligands, conferring upon it the ability to bind DNA and regulate gene transcription (42). The receptors for DHEA/DHEAS are not identified yet, but DHEA binding activity has been detected in murine and human T cells, suggesting that receptors for DHEA may be present in T cells (43, 44). The action of DHEA in vivo is also not fully understood. One of the important questions is whether exogenous DHEA acts directly on T cells and/or other immune cells in vivo as it does in vitro. In many peripheral steroid tissues such as the prostate and mammary glands, DHEA can be converted into androgens and/or estrogens (45), which also have immunomodulatory functions. However, a role independent of its metabolic functions and, in particular, on immune regulation has been previously observed (31, 46). For example, DHEA was shown to have immunomodulatory properties in androgen-unresponsive mice (47). Further studies using an inhibitor of DHEA metabolic conversion or androgen/estrogen receptors double knockout mice are needed to clarify this point.

NF-κB is clearly one of the most important transcriptional factors regulating expression of many proinflammatory genes, including IL-2, IL-12 p40, TNF-α, IL-1, and iNOS (4, 29). Our gel shift assay showed that activation of NF-κB was reduced in the presence of DHEA in Ag-primed splenocytes (Figs. 4⇑ and 5⇑), indicating that the inhibitory action of DHEA on nuclear translocation of NF-κB is a key mechanism mediating the reduction of the proliferative response and (pro)inflammatory cytokine production. GRs, structurally similar to DHEA, are known to inhibit the activation of NF-κB. Activated GR directly inhibits activation of NF-κB subunits and/or up-regulates transcriptional activity of IκBα, resulting in inactivation of NF-κB (48). It is possible that activated DHEA receptor inhibits NF-κB activation in Ag-primed splenocytes in our study through one of these mechanisms.

It has been demonstrated that the development of the autoimmune disease EAE requires the activation of inflammation-related genes such as IL-12, TNF-α, and iNOS (2, 49). Virtually all of these genes have shown the presence of binding sites for NF-κB in their promotor regions (4, 29). In rats with EAE, the activation of NF-κB (p50/p65) is seen in the spinal cord and persists throughout the disease (50, 51). Disruption of the NF-κB gene or treatment with pyrrodine dithiocarbomate, an inhibitor of NF-κB activation, prevents the development of EAE (51, 52, 53). We believe that the immunosuppressive effect of DHEA on EAE is closely associated with the inhibition of activation of NF-κB. Because glial cells synthesize DHEA (10), our findings imply that the presence of the neurosteriod DHEA may protect the CNS against autoimmune injury. Additionally, it is possible that genetic differences in the levels of DHEA in the brain and/or plasma may predict susceptibility to autoimmune diseases including EAE.

In conclusion, a number of strategies aimed at interrupting the proinflammatory cascade are currently being applied to the treatment of human diseases. Invariably, they are initially tested in experimental model systems with the hope that they will be successful in human disease. Our data show that DHEA has potent anti-inflammatory properties in vitro and in preventing the development of EAE. Furthermore, because the inhibition of EAE was seen in adoptive transfer model system, it is likely that the effect of DHEA is present even after the generation of an immune response. Because DHEA does not possess the undesirable side effects of glucocorticoids, it has the potential to be applied to the treatment of chronic inflammatory diseases in the CNS such as MS.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sandy Watkins for her administrative assistance and Åsa Ljunggren-Rose for her technical assistance.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Caigan Du, Multiple Sclerosis Research Laboratory, 1222H Vanderbilt Stallworth Rehabilitation Hospital, 2201 Capers Avenue, Nashville, TN 37212. E-mail address: caigan.du{at}mcmail.vanderbilt.edu

  • ↵2 Abbreviations used in this paper: EAE, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis; DHEA, dehydroepiandrosterone; DHEAS, sulfated form of DHEA; MBP, myelin basic protein; MS, multiple sclerosis; MSCH, mouse spinal cord homogenate; NF-Y, nuclear factor-Y; iNOS, inducible NO synthase.

  • Received August 14, 2001.
  • Accepted October 11, 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Scolding, N. J., J. P. Zajicek, D. A. S. Compston. 1994. The pathogenesis of demyelinating disease. Prog. Neurobiol. 43: 143
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Owens, T., S. Sriram. 1995. The immunology of multiple sclerosis and its animal model, experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Neurol. Clin. 13: 51
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. ↵
    Begolka, W. S., S. D. Miller. 1998. Cytokines as intrinsic and exogenous regulators of pathogenesis in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. Res. Immunol. 149: 771
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Siebenlist, U., G. Franzoso, K. Brown. 1994. Structure, regulation and function of NF-κB. Annu. Rev. Cell Biol. 10: 405
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  5. ↵
    Baeuerle, P. A., V. R. Baichwal. 1997. NF-κB as a frequent target for immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory molecules. Adv. Immunol. 65: 111
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Ghosh, S., M. J. May, E. B. Kopp. 1998. NF-κB and Rel proteins: evolutionarily conserved mediators of immune response. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 16: 225
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Kopp, E., S. Ghosh. 1995. NF-κB and rel proteins in innate immunity. Adv. Immunol. 58: 1
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    Mosmann, T. R., S. Sad. 1996. The expanding universe of T-cell subsets: Th1, Th2 and more. Immunol. Today 17: 138
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Orentreich, N., J. L. Brind, J. H. Vogelman, R. Andres, H. Baldwin. 1992. Long-term longitudinal measurement of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in normal men. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 75: 1002
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Baulieu, E. E., P. Robel. 1998. Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) a neuroactive neurosteroids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 4089
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Brown, R. C., C. Cascio, V. Papadopoulos. 2000. Pathways of neurosteroid biosynthesis in cell lines from human brain: regulation of dehydroepiandrosterone formation by oxidative stress and β-amyloid peptide. J. Neurochem. 74: 847
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Ruoff, B. M., W. L. Daniel. 1991. Comparative biochemistry of mammalian arylsulfatase C and steroid sulfatase. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 96B: 313
    OpenUrl
  13. ↵
    Hennebold, J. D., R. A. Daynes. 1994. Regulation of macrophage dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate metabolism by inflammatory cytokines. Endocrinology 135: 67
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Labrie, F., A. Belanger, J. Simard, V. Luu-The, C. Labrie. 1995. DHEA and peripheral androgen and estrogen formation: intracrinology. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 774: 16
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Jiang, S., J. Lee, Z. Zhang, P. Inserra, D. Solkoff, R. R. Watson. 1998. Dehydroepiandrosterone synergizes with antioxidant supplements for immune restoration in old as well as retrovirus-infected mice. J. Nutr. Biochem. 9: 362
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  16. ↵
    Zhang, Z., M. Araghi-Niknam, B. Liang, P. Inserra, S. K. Ardestani, S. Jiang, S. Chow, R. R. Watson. 1999. Prevention of immune dysfunction and vitamin E loss by dehydroepiandrosterone and melatonin supplementation during murine retrovirus infection. Immunology 96: 291
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Hernandez-Pando, R., M. D. L. L. Streber, H. Orozco, K. Arriaga, L. Pavon, S. A. Al-Nakhli, G. A. Rook. 1998. Effects of androstenediol and dehydroepiandrosterone on the course and cytokine profile of tuberculosis in BALB/c mice. Immunology 95: 234
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Carr, D. J.. 1998. Increased levels of IFN-γ in the trigeminal ganglion correlate with protection against HSV-1-induced encephalitis following subcutaneous administration with androstenediol. J. Neuroimmunol. 89: 160
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  19. ↵
    Araghi-Niknam, M., Z. Zhang, S. Jiang, O. Call, C. D. Eskelso, R. R. Watson. 1997. Cytokine dysregulation and increased oxidation is prevented by dehydroepiandrosterone in mice infected with murine leukemia retrovirus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 216: 386
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Ben, N. D., D. A. Padgett, R. M. Loria. 1999. Androstenediol and dehydroepiandrosterone protect mice against lethal bacterial infections and lipopolysaccharide toxicity. J. Med. Microbiol. 48: 425
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Straub, R. H., J. Scholmerich, B. Zietz. 2000. Replacement therapy with DHEA plus corticosteroids in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases-substitutes of adrenal and sex hormones. Z. Rheumatol. 59: (Suppl. 2):108
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Vollenhoven, R. F. V., E. G. Engleman, J. L. McGuire. 1994. An open study of dehydroepiandrosterone in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 37: 1305
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. ↵
    Dyner, T. S., W. Lang, J. Geaga, A. Golub, D. Stites, E. Winger, M. Galmarini, J. Masterson, M. A. Jacobson. 1993. An open-label dose-escalation trial of oral dehydropeiandrosterone tolerance and pharmacokinetics in patients with HIV disease. J. Acquired Immune Defic. Syndr. Hum. Retrovirol. 6: 459
    OpenUrl
  24. ↵
    Du, C., Q. Guan, M. W. Khalil, and S. Sriram. 2001. Stimulation of Th2 response by high doses of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) in KLH-primed splenocytes. Exp. Biol. Med. In press.
  25. ↵
    Johns, L. D., K. C. Flanders, G. E. Ranges, S. Sriram. 1991. Successful treatment of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis with TGF-β. J. Immunol. 147: 1792
    OpenUrlAbstract
  26. ↵
    Du, C., S. Sriram. 1998. Mechanism of inhibition of LPS-induced IL-12p40 production by IL-10 and TGF-β in ANA-1 cells. J. Leukocyte Biol. 64: 92
    OpenUrlAbstract
  27. ↵
    Zhang, L., T. R. Torgerson, X.-Y. Liu, S. Timmons, A. D. Colosia, J. Hawiger, J. P. Tam. 1998. Preparation of functionally active cell-permeable peptides by single-step ligation of two peptide modules. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95: 9184
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Bright, J. J., C. Du, M. Coon, S. Sriram, S. J. Klaus. 1998. Prevention of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis via inhibition of IL-12 signaling and IL-12-mediated Th1 differentiation: an effect of the novel anti-inflammatory drug lisofylline. J. Immunol. 161: 7015
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Murphy, T. L., M. G. Cleveland, P. Kulesza, J. Magram, K. M. Murphy. 1995. Regulation of interleukin 12 p40 expression through an NF-κB half-site. Mol. Cell. Biol. 15: 5258
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Olsson, T.. 1995. Cytokine-producing cells in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and multiple sclerosis. Neurology 45: (Suppl. 6):S11
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Regelson, W., R. Loria, M. Kalimi. 1988. Hormonal intervention: “buffer hormones” or “state dependency.”. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 521: 260
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Blauer, K. L., M. Poth, W. M. Rogers, E. W. Bernton. 1991. Dehydroepiandrosterone antagonizes the suppressive effects of dexamethasone on lymphocyte proliferation. Endocrinology 129: 3174
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. ↵
    Svec, F., J. R. Porter. 1998. The actions of exogenous dehydroepiandrosterone in experimental animals and humans. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 218: 174
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Suzuki, T., N. Suzuki, R. A. Daynes, E. G. Engleman. 1991. Dehydroepiandrosterone enhances IL2 production and cytotoxic effector function of human T cells. Clin. Immunol. Immunopathol. 61: 202
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Daynes, R. A., D. J. Dudley, B. A. Araneo. 1990. Regulation of murine lymphokines production in vivo. II. Dehydroepiandrosterone is a natural enhancer of interleukin 2 synthesis by helper T cells. Eur. J. Immunol. 20: 793
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Young, D. G., G. Skibinski, A. Skibinska, J. I. Mason, K. James. 2001. Preliminary studies on the effect of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) on both constitutive and phytohaemagglutinin (PHA)-inducible IL-6 and IL-2 mRNA expression and cytokine production in human spleen mononuclear cell suspensions in vitro. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 123: 28
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Moynihan, J. A., T. A. Callahan, S. P. Kelley, L. M. Campbell. 1998. Adrenal hormone modulation of type 1 and type 2 cytokine production by spleen cells: dexamethasone and dehydroepiandrosterone suppress interleukin-2, interleukin-4, and interferon-γ production in vitro. Cell. Immunol. 184: 58
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  38. ↵
    Loria, R. M., D. A. Padgett, P. N. Huynh. 1996. Regulation of the immune response by dehydroepiandrosterone and its metabolites. J. Endocrinol. 150: (Suppl.):S209
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Padgett, D. A., R. M. Lora. 1998. Endocrine regulation of murine macrophage function: effect of dehydroepiandrosterone androstenediol, and androstenetroil. J. Neuroimmunol. 84: 61
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. ↵
    Kipper-Galperin, M., R. Galilly, H. D. Danenberg, T. Brenner. 1999. Dehydroepiandrosterone selectively inhibits production of tumor necrosis factor α and interlukin-6 in astrocytes. Int. J. Dev. Neurosci. 17: 765
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Labrie, C., M. Flamand, A. Belanger, F. Labrie. 1996. High bioavailability of dehydroepiandrosterone administered percutaneously in the rat. J. Endocrinol. 150: S107
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  42. ↵
    Soontjens, C. D., J. J. Rafter, J.-A. Gustafsson. 1996. Ligands for orphan receptors?. J. Endocrinol. 150: S241
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    Meikle, A. W., R. W. Dorchuck, B. A. Araneo, J. D. Stringham, T. G. Evans, S. L. Spruance, R. A. Daynes. 1992. The presence of a dehydroepiandrosterone-specific receptor binding complex in murine T cells. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 42: 293
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  44. ↵
    Okabe, T., M. Haji, R. Takayanagi, M. Adachi, K. Imasaki, F. Kurimoto, T. Watanabe, H. Nawata. 1995. Up-regulation of high-affinity dehydroepiandrosterone binding activity by dehydroepiandrosterone in activated human T lymphocytes. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 80: 2993
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  45. ↵
    Tyrell, J. B., P. H. Forsham. 1988. Glucocorticoids and adrenal androgens. F. S. Greespan, and P. H. Forsham, eds. Basic and Clinical Endocrinology 258 Lange Medical Publications, Los Altos, CA.
  46. ↵
    Pang, S. Y., A. Legido, L. S. Levine, J. W. Temeck, M. I. New. 1987. Adrenal androgen response to metyrapone, adrenocorticotropin, and corticotropin-releasing hormone stimulation in children with hypopituitarism. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 65: 282
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  47. ↵
    Risdon, G., J. Cope, M. Bennett. 1990. Mechanisms of chemoprevention by dietary dehydroepiandrosterone. Am. J. Pathol. 136: 759
    OpenUrlPubMed
  48. ↵
    Baldwin, A. S. J.. 1996. The NF-κB and IκB proteins: new discoveries and insights. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 14: 649
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Sriram, S., M. Rodriguez. 1997. Indictment of the microglia as the villain in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 48: 464
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Kaltschmidt, C., B. Kaltschmidt, J. Lannes-Vieira, G. W. Kreutzberg, H. Wekerle, P. A. Baeuerle, J. Gehrmann. 1994. Transcription factor NF-κB is activated in microglia during experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J. Neuroimmunol. 55: 99
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  51. ↵
    Pahan, K., M. Schmid. 2000. Activation of nuclear factor-κB in the spinal cord of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis. Neurosci. Lett. 287: 17
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  52. ↵
    Vanderlugt, C. L., S. M. Rahbe, P. J. Elliott, M. C. D. Canto, S. D. Miller. 2000. Treatment of established relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis with the proteasome inhibitor PS-519. J. Autoimmun. 14: 205
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  53. ↵
    Hilliard, B., E. B. Samoilova, T.-S. T. Liu, A. Rostami, Y. Chen. 1999. Experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in NF-κB-deficient mice: roles of NF-κB in the activation and differentiation of autoreactive T cells. J. Immunol. 163: 2937
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 167 (12)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 167, Issue 12
15 Dec 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Administration of Dehydroepiandrosterone Suppresses Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Administration of Dehydroepiandrosterone Suppresses Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice
Caigan Du, M. Wahid Khalil, Subramaniam Sriram
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2001, 167 (12) 7094-7101; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.7094

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Administration of Dehydroepiandrosterone Suppresses Experimental Allergic Encephalomyelitis in SJL/J Mice
Caigan Du, M. Wahid Khalil, Subramaniam Sriram
The Journal of Immunology December 15, 2001, 167 (12) 7094-7101; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.12.7094
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Anti-inflammatory activity of Dioscoreae rhizome in macrophages by inhibition of pro-inflammatory cytokines via NF-κB signaling pathway (54.11)
  • Lung dysfunction in a mouse model of inflammation is dependent on T-cell-independent IL-13 expression (54.18)
  • TSG-6, a new protein ligand for CXCL8, modulates the activity of this pro-inflammatory chemokine (54.12)
Show more INFLAMMATION

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2022 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606