Skip to main content

Main menu

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
      • Neuroimmunology: To Sense and Protect
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
The Journal of Immunology
  • Other Publications
    • American Association of Immunologists
    • ImmunoHorizons
  • Subscribe
  • My alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
The Journal of Immunology

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Next in The JI
    • Archive
    • Brief Reviews
    • Pillars of Immunology
    • Translating Immunology
    • Most Read
    • Top Downloads
    • Annual Meeting Abstracts
  • COVID-19/SARS/MERS Articles
  • Info
    • About the Journal
    • For Authors
    • Journal Policies
    • Influence Statement
    • For Advertisers
  • Editors
  • Submit
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Journal Policies
  • Subscribe
    • Journal Subscriptions
    • Email Alerts
    • RSS Feeds
    • ImmunoCasts
  • More
    • Most Read
    • Most Cited
    • ImmunoCasts
    • AAI Disclaimer
    • Feedback
    • Help
    • Accessibility Statement
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on Twitter
  • Follow The Journal of Immunology on RSS

Activation of Toll-Like Receptor-2 by Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors from a Protozoan Parasite

Marco A. S. Campos, Igor C. Almeida, Osamu Takeuchi, Shizuo Akira, Eneida P. Valente, Daniela O. Procópio, Luiz R. Travassos, Jason A. Smith, Douglas T. Golenbock and Ricardo T. Gazzinelli
J Immunol July 1, 2001, 167 (1) 416-423; DOI: https://doi.org/10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.416
Marco A. S. Campos
*Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Biological Sciences Institute, Federal University of Minas Gerais and Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Igor C. Almeida
†Department of Parasitology, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Osamu Takeuchi
‡Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Shizuo Akira
‡Department of Host Defense, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Eneida P. Valente
*Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Biological Sciences Institute, Federal University of Minas Gerais and Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Daniela O. Procópio
*Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Biological Sciences Institute, Federal University of Minas Gerais and Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Luiz R. Travassos
§Unit for Experimental Oncology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil; and
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Jason A. Smith
¶Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Douglas T. Golenbock
¶Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA 02118
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ricardo T. Gazzinelli
*Department of Biochemistry and Immunology, Biological Sciences Institute, Federal University of Minas Gerais and Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation, Belo Horizonte, Brazil;
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors and glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs) from parasitic protozoa have been shown to exert a wide variety of effects on cells of the host innate immune system. However, the receptor(s) that are triggered by these protozoan glycolipids has not been identified. Here we present evidence that Trypanosoma cruzi-derived GPI anchors and GIPLs trigger CD25 expression on Chinese hamster ovary-K1 cells transfected with CD14 and Toll-like receptor-2 (TLR-2), but not wild-type (TLR-2-deficient) Chinese hamster ovary cells. The protozoan-derived GPI anchors and GIPLs containing alkylacylglycerol and saturated fatty acid chains or ceramide were found to be active in a concentration range of 100 nM to 1 μM. More importantly, the GPI anchors purified from T. cruzi trypomastigotes, which contain a longer glycan core and unsaturated fatty acids in the sn-2 position of the alkylacylglycerolipid component, triggered TLR-2 at subnanomolar concentrations. We performed experiments with macrophages from TLR-2 knockout and TLR-4 knockout mice, and found that TLR-2 expression appears to be essential for induction of IL-12, TNF-α, and NO by GPI anchors derived from T. cruzi trypomastigotes. Thus, highly purified GPI anchors from T. cruzi parasites are potent activators of TLR-2 from both mouse and human origin. The activation of TLR-2 may initiate host innate defense mechanisms and inflammatory response during protozoan infection, and may provide new strategies for immune intervention during protozoan infections.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs)3 have been identified as ancient receptors that confer specificity to the host innate immune system allowing the recognition of ‘pathogen-associated molecular patterns’ (1, 2, 3), including bacterial glycolipids such as LPS from Gram-negative bacteria (4), peptidoglycan from Gram-positive bacteria (5), and lipopeptides from diverse species of bacteria including Mycobacterium tuberculosis (6), Mycoplasma fermentans, Treponema pallidum, and Borrelia burgdorferi (5, 7). Cells of the macrophage lineage exposed to these microbial components synthesize high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-12 and TNF-α, two mediators that appear to be important for the initiation of IFN-γ synthesis by NK cells (8). Recognition of bacterial glycolipids by IFN-γ-exposed phagocytic leukocytes is also responsible for the rapid triggering of a variety of protective immune processes, including the synthesis of reactive oxygen and nitrogen intermediates (9). Animals that have not yet developed adaptive immune responses to pathogens depend upon these processes for survival. Similar cytokine circuits and effector mechanisms appear to be involved in resistance to early infection by various protozoan parasites (8, 10), which are common etiologic agents of medical and veterinary diseases.

Glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchors are abundant molecules in the membrane of parasitic protozoa (11). Recent studies have documented the immunostimulatory and regulatory activity of protozoan-derived GPI anchors and related structures (12). Among the biological properties of these protozoan GPI anchors is their ability to elicit the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines as well as NO by host macrophages (12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19), similar in many respects to the LPS of Gram-negative bacteria. In contrast, purified glycoinositolphospholipids (GIPLs) and lipophosphoglycan from protozoan parasites suppress several functions of the host immune system, especially at higher concentrations (20, 21, 22, 23, 24).

Trypanosoma cruzi is the causative agent of Chagas’ disease, a parasitic infection of enormous importance in Central and South America. To better understand the early stimulation of the innate immune system by parasitic protozoa, we have focused on the identification and chemical characterization of T. cruzi products that trigger the pro-inflammatory and effector functions of macrophages (17, 19). These studies indicate that GPI anchors purified from mucin-like glycoproteins (tGPI-mucin) of T. cruzi trypomastigotes (tGPI) play an essential role in triggering various macrophage functions. In addition, our data show that the potent pro-inflammatory activity of tGPI is dependent on its fine structure, which apart from its longer glycan core includes an unsaturated fatty acid at the sn-2 position of the alkylacylglycerolipid component (17, 19).

Despite the growing evidence implicating GPI structures from parasitic protozoa in the induction of cytokine synthesis as well as in effector functions by macrophages, not much is known about the receptor(s) and signaling pathways that are triggered by these GPI anchors. Nevertheless, different studies indicate a similarity of signaling pathways, gene expression, and functions displayed by macrophages exposed to either purified tGPI anchors or tGPI-mucin (12, 17, 18, 19, 25) and bacterial glycolipids/lipopeptides (4, 5, 6, 7). Recent studies demonstrate that TLR-2 or TLR-4 are responsible for triggering various functions in macrophages exposed to Gram-positive, Mycoplasma spp. and M. tuberculosis (5, 6, 7, 26) or Gram-negative bacteria (4, 26), respectively. Here, we tested the ability of T. cruzi-derived GPI anchors and GIPLs to trigger TLR-2 and TLR-4, and studied the role of such receptors in the ability of parasitic glycolipids to elicit IL-12, TNF-α, and NO by murine macrophages. Our results show that protozoan-derived GPI anchors and GIPLs preferentially activate TLR-2, which is largely responsible for the initiation of the various macrophage functions induced by these protozoan-derived glycolipids.

Materials and Methods

T. cruzi- and parasite-derived glycolipids

Green monkey kidney-derived LLC-MK2 cells (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA) were grown at 37°C in DMEM (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY) containing 5% heat-inactivated FBS, 40 μg of gentamicin sulfate/ml, 0.3% sodium bicarbonate in a 5% CO2 atmosphere. Trypomastigote forms of T. cruzi (Y strain) were obtained from the supernatant of LLC-MK2 cells 6–8 days after infection with 10 trypomastigotes per cell. Epimastigote forms, from either Y or CL strain, were grown at 28°C in cell-free liver infusion tryptose medium supplemented with 10% FBS. Live parasites were collected from either tissue or liquid culture, washed three times in ice-cold PBS, and used in the assays with transfected Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells or kept at −70°C for purification of GPI-mucins, GPI anchors, or GIPLs. The epimastigote- and trypomastigote-derived GPI-mucins and GIPLs were purified by sequential organic solvent extraction and hydrophobic interaction chromatography as described elsewhere (19, 27). The following glycolipids were purified from T. cruzi parasites and used in the experiments presented here: tGPI-mucin, derived from tissue culture trypomastigotes of Y strain of T. cruzi containing a 1-O-(C16:O)-2-O-alkyl-(C18:1 or C18:2) acylglycerol; eGPI-mucin, derived from epimastigotes of Y strain of T. cruzi containing a 1-O-(C16:O)-2-O-alkyl-(C16:0) acylglycerol; eGIPL Y CER, derived from epimastigotes of Y strain of T. cruzi containing a ceramide (C24:0) fatty acid-(C18:0) sphinganine; eGIPL CL AAG, derived from epimastigotes of CL strain of T. cruzi containing a (C16:O)-2-O-alkyl-(C16:0) acylglycerol; and eGIPL CL CER, derived from epimastigotes of CL strain of T. cruzi containing a ceramide (C24:0) fatty acid-(C18:0) sphinganine. These GPI-anchored molecules also vary according to their glycan core composition and ethanolaminephosphate and ethanolaminephosphonate head groups. Detailed compositional and structural analyses of each of the GPI-anchored preparations are described in Almeida et al. (19). Nitrous acid deamination was used to produce the phosphatidylinositol (PI) and glycan core of tGPI or tGPI-mucins, as previously described (19). Edman microsequencing (five cycles) and positive-ion mode matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (19), positive-ion mode electrospray mass spectrometry, and Mycoplasma spp. detection ELISA tests were used to exclude the possibility that T. cruzi-derived glycolipids were contaminated with Mycoplasma spp.-derived lipopeptides. These results indicated that T. cruzi-derived glycolipids were free of Mycoplasma spp. lipopeptides. Furthermore, N-acetylation abolished NO-, TNF-α-, and IL-12-inducing activity of mycoplasma macrophage-activating lipopeptide (MALP), but had no significant effect on bioactivity of the tGPI-mucin (Ref. 28 ; data not shown).

Bacteria and bacteria-derived glycolipids/lipopeptides

The UV killing of Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 12.692) and Escherichia coli (HB101) followed the same procedure. Bacteria were grown overnight in 200 ml of Luria Broth, centrifuged for 30 min at 1200 × g, and resuspended in 20 ml PBS. Bacterial density was resolved by limiting dilution of washed bacteria, determining the CFUs. A UV germicide lamp (G15T8; General Electric, Fairfield, CT) was used at 10 cm of an open petri dish with 2 ml of bacteria for 20 min, and the bacteria were stored at −20°C until use. LPS from E. coli serotype O55:B5 prepared by the Westphal method was obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). Outer surface protein A (Osp A) was purified from B. burgdorferi (5), and synthetic MALP from M. fermentans was obtained as previously described (29).

CHO cell lines

The CHO reporter cell lines (CHO/CD14, CHO/CD14/TLR-2, and CHO/CD14/TLR-4) (5) were maintained as adherent monolayers in Ham’s F-12/DMEM supplemented with 5% FBS, at 37°C, 5% CO2, and antibiotics. All of the cell lines are derived from clone 3E10, a CHO/CD14 cell line that has been stably transfected with a reporter construct containing the structural gene for CD25 under the control of the human E-selectin promoter. This promoter contains a NF-κB binding site; CD25 expression is completely dependent upon NF-κB translocation to the cell nucleus (30). Cells expressing TLRs were constructed by stable transfection of the CHO/CD14 reporter cell line with the cDNA for human TLR-2 or TLR-4 as described (5). In addition to the LPS responsive cell lines described above, we also tested an LPS nonresponder cell line (30) designated clone 7.19 as well as a clonal line derived from this mutant that was transfected with CD14 and TLR-2 (7.19/CD14/TLR-2). This cell line was derived from 3E10, and reports NF-κB activation via the surface expression of CD25, similarly to the other CHO lines described. The LPS nonresponsive phenotype of the 7.19 cell lines appears to be due to a mutation in the MD-2 gene, and thus is defective in signaling via TLR-4 (30).

Flow cytometry analysis

CHO reporter cells were plated at a density of 1 × 105 cells/well in 24-well tissue culture dishes. The following day, either bacteria, live protozoa, or purified glycolipids were added as indicated, in a total volume of 0.25 ml of medium/well, for 18 h. The cells were then harvested with trypsin-EDTA and washed once with medium and again with PBS. Subsequently, the cells were counted and 1 × 105 cells stained with PE-labeled anti-CD25 (mouse mAb to human CD25, R-PE conjugate; Caltag Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) 1:200 in PBS, on ice, in the dark, for 30 min. After labeling, the cells were washed twice with 1 mM sodium azide in PBS, resuspended in 1 mM sodium azide in PBS, and examined by flow cytometry (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) for the expression of surface CD25 as described (5). Analyses were performed using CellQuest software (BD Biosciences).

Inflammatory and bone marrow macrophages

Wild-type, TLR-2 knockout (KO), and TLR-4 KO mice (4, 26) were inoculated i.p. with 2 ml of 3% thioglycollate and, 4 days later, the elicited peritoneal exudate cells were harvested in cold serum-free DMEM. The medium used in the macrophage cultures (MacMed) consisted of DMEM supplemented with 40 μg of gentamicin/ml and 5% heat-inactivated FCS. Bone marrow was washed from the femur of 8- to 12-wk-old wild-type or TLR-2 KO mice with DMEM supplemented with gentamicin. Cells were washed, resuspended in marrow culture medium, and plated at 10–15 × 106 cells/10 ml/plate on 100-mm nontissue culture-treated petri dishes. Marrow culture medium consisted of DMEM supplemented with 10% FCS and gentamicin, plus 30% supernatant from confluent cultures of L929 fibroblasts, as a source of macrophage-CSF. After 5–7 days of culture at 37°C, 5% CO2, plates were gently washed to remove nonadherent cells. Plates contained 3–5 × 106 macrophages, >95% pure.

Peritoneal and bone marrow-derived macrophages were resuspended in MacMed at 2 × 106/ml, and 100-μl aliquots were dispensed into wells of a 96-well plate. Cells were allowed to adhere at 37°C and 5% CO2 for 3 h, and were then washed once with serum-free DMEM and 150 μl of MacMed was added to each well in the presence or absence of 50 U/ml IFN-γ and incubated overnight at 37°C and 5% CO2. Different macrophage-stimulating preparations were added to the macrophage cultures in a final volume of 200 μl/well. Aliquots of the supernatant (50 and 100 μl) were collected after 24 and 48 h of culture for nitrite, TNF-α, and IL-12 (p70 or p40, as indicated) measurements, respectively (17, 19). The concentration of nitrite was determined by the Griess reaction (31). Levels of TNF-α and IL-12 (p70 or p40, as indicated) in the supernatants were measured by a commercially available ELISA kit (Duoset; R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN).

Results

Live T. cruzi trypomastigotes trigger NF-κB-dependent expression of CD25 in CHO cells transfected with TLR-2

CHO reporter cell lines that were stably transfected with CD14 alone (CHO/CD14), TLR-2 and CD14 (CHO/CD14/TLR-2), or TLR-4 and CD14 (CHO/CD14/TLR-4) were exposed for 24 h to live T. cruzi trypomastigotes (17), and NF-κB activation was assessed by measuring the expression of CD25 by flow cytometry (5, 30). No increase in the induction of CD25 expression by CHO/CD14 cells exposed to T. cruzi parasites was observed (Fig. 1⇓A). In contrast, live T. cruzi trypomastigotes enhanced the CD25 expression in the CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cell line (Fig. 1⇓B), indicating that TLR-2 expression had led to the activation of NF-κB. Activation of NF-κB was dependent on the parasite-to-CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cell ratio (Fig. 1⇓C), the maximum effect being reached with 10 parasites per cell. This concentration of parasites saturated the response; we observed similar levels of activation when the CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells were exposed to 50 trypomastigotes per cell (data not shown). Mock parasite pellets obtained from LLC-MK2 cell supernatants were unable to trigger CD25 expression on the CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cell line (data not shown). As positive controls, we stimulated CHO/CD14 and CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells with either UV-killed E. coli or S. aureus (5). Data in Fig. 1⇓, D and E, show that E. coli induced expression of CD25 in both CHO/CD14 and CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells. In contrast, S. aureus induced expression of CD25 only on the surface of CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (Fig. 1⇓E), but not on CHO/CD14 cells (Fig. 1⇓D). The maximal CD25 expression on CHO cells was obtained at a bacteria-to-cell ratio of 500:1 (Fig. 1⇓F) and 5000:1 (Fig. 1⇓G) for E. coli and S. aureus, respectively. We conclude that live T. cruzi trypomastigotes were capable of triggering TLR-2.

FIGURE 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 1.

TLR-2 mediates cellular activation upon exposure to live T. cruzi trypomastigotes. CHO/CD14 (A) or CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (B) cells were left untreated (in black) or exposed to live trypomastigote at parasite: CHO cell ratio of 10:1 (gray lines) and the expression of the reporter transgene (CD25) was measured 18 h later. C, Parasite dose effect, as indicated by parasite: CHO cell ratio on expression of CD25 in CHO/CD14 (open columns) and CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (filled columns). CHO/CD14 (D) or CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (E) cells were left untreated (in black) or exposed to UV killed S. aureus (gray lines) or to UV killed E. coli (dotted lines) at 104 bacteria/cell. F (E. coli) and G (S. aureus), Bacteria dose effect on fold increase of CD25 expression on CHO/CD14 (□) and on CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells (▪). The expression of the reporter transgene (surface CD25) was measured by flow cytometry. The fold increase on expression of CD25 was calculated by dividing the median fluorescence from stimulated by the median fluorescence from corresponding unstimulated control cells. The data presented reflect at least three independent experiments.

Highly purified GPI anchors from T. cruzi trypomastigotes are potent activators of TLR-2

The CHO cells transfected with human CD14 alone or human CD14 and TLR-2 were also exposed to tGPI-mucin (17, 19) or LPS, and NF-κB activation was evaluated by measuring the expression of the CD25 reporter transgene by flow cytometry (5, 30). CD25 expression was enhanced in both CHO/CD14 (Fig. 2⇓A) and CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (Fig. 2⇓B) exposed to LPS, because both lines of CHO cells express endogenous TLR-4. In contrast, tGPI-mucin induced expression of CD25 on CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (Fig. 2⇓B), but not on CHO/CD14 (Fig. 2⇓A) cells. Fig. 2⇓C shows the titration of LPS activity in CHO/CD14 cells. It is noteworthy that maximal expression of CD25 in CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells exposed to tGPI-mucin (Fig. 2⇓D) was observed at 10 nM, but even at subnanomolar concentrations (i.e., 0.1 nM), a significant increase in the expression of CD25 was achieved. These data indicate that the tGPI-mucin is among the most potent TLR-2 agonists thus far described (5, 6, 7).

FIGURE 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 2.

TLR-2 expression imparts CHO cell responsiveness to tGPI-mucin. CHO/CD14 (A) or CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (B) cells were exposed to medium (in black), to tGPI-mucin at 10 nM (gray lines), or to LPS at 100 ng/ml (dotted lines). The cells were subjected to flow cytometric analysis for the CD25 transgene expression. The CHO/CD14 (□) or CHO/CD14/TLR-2 (▪) cells were exposed to different concentrations of LPS (C) or tGPI-mucin (D), and the expression of the gene reporter was measured by flow cytometry. The fold increase on expression of CD25 was calculated by dividing the median fluorescence from stimulated cells by the median fluorescence from unstimulated control cells. The data presented are typical of the results from three independent experiments.

Other studies, using different protozoan GPI anchors have suggested distinct activities of the diacylglycerol (Trypanosoma brucei) (16) or dimyristoylglycerol (Plasmodium falciparum) (32) components, compared with the glycosylinositolphosphate moiety of GPI anchors isolated from these parasites (16, 32). Our previous results suggested that the tGPI is responsible for the ability of tGPI-mucin to induce cytokine and NO synthesis by murine macrophages and that both the sn-2 unsaturated acyl chain and periodate-sensitive units from tGPI are essential for their activity on macrophages (17, 19). In the experiments shown in Fig. 3⇓, A and B, we confirmed that the ability of tGPI-mucin to activate NF-κB via TLR-2 was mostly recovered using a highly purified tGPI preparation. Removal of the lipid moiety from the tGPI (Fig. 3⇓B) or tGPI-mucin (data not shown) by nitrous acid deamination (19) completely abolished the activity of tGPI anchors in CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells. The resulting PI also failed to elicit expression of the CD25 reporter transgene in these cells, even at 100 nM (Fig. 3⇓B). These results indicate that both the lipid tail and the glycan moiety of the tGPI are necessary for triggering TLR-2, which is in agreement with our previous studies indicating that the cytokine and/or NO-inducing activity could not be dissociated (19).

FIGURE 3.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 3.

TLR-2 mediates cellular activation upon exposure to T. cruzi-derived GPI anchors and GIPLs. A, CHO/CD14/TLR-2 reporter cells were exposed to medium (in black), to 10 nM of tGPI-mucin (gray lines), or to 10 nM of highly purified tGPI (dotted lines). Again, cellular activation was analyzed by flow cytometry. B, CHO/CD14/TLR-2 were exposed to medium, tGPI-mucin (10 nM), tGPI (10 nM), the glycan (100 nM), or to PI (100 nM) portions of tGPI, and CD25 expression was measured by flow cytometry. C, CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells were exposed to various concentrations of different T. cruzi-derived glycoconjugates: tGPI-mucin (□), eGPI-mucin (○), eGIPL Y CER (▴), eGIPL CL AAG (•), and eGIPL CL CER (▵). Expression of CD25 was evaluated 18 h later. The y-axis of both B and C indicated fold increase obtained by dividing the median fluorescence of activated cells by median fluorescence of unstimulated cells. The data presented here reflect the results of three independent experiments.

Highly purified GPI anchors and GIPLs from T. cruzi epimastigotes are less potent activators of TLR-2

Recently, we compared the bioactivity of 12 different preparations of GPI anchors or GIPLs derived from either trypomastigote or epimastigote developmental stages of T. cruzi. All these preparations were highly purified and had defined structures as determined by electrospray mass spectrometry and electrospray-mass spectrometry-collision-induced dissociation/mass spectrometry (ES-MS-(CID)-/MS) (19). We found that the unsaturated fatty acids at the sn-2 position of the alkylacylglycerol is likely to be essential for the extremely potent bioactivity of tGPI-mucin or tGPI on murine inflammatory macrophages. We also tested different GPI-mucins (eGPI-mucins) and GIPLs (eGIPLs) from the epimastigote stage of T. cruzi for their ability to induce the expression of CD25 by CHO/CD14/TLR-2. The eGPI-mucins and eGIPLs differ in their fine structure from tGPI in that they contain a lipid moiety with either ceramide or alkylacylglycerol containing only saturated fatty acid chains. Furthermore, they contain a shorter glycan moiety when compared with the tGPI one (19). As shown in Fig. 3⇑C, eGPI-mucin or eGIPL activated NF-κB-mediated CD25 expression in CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells, but only at micromolar concentrations. The bioactivity of eGPI-mucin and eGIPLs on CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells was higher than that previously observed in murine inflammatory macrophages (Refs. 17, 18, 19 and Fig. 3⇑C). This could be explained in part by the high degree of expression of TLR-2 in the transfected CHO cells, which may be higher than macrophages. Together, these findings are consistent with our previous study (17, 18, 19) and indicate that in general eGPI-mucin or eGIPL are at least 100- to 1000-fold less active in triggering the TLR-2 than the tGPI-mucin or tGPI.

GPI anchors and GIPLs derived from both trypomastigotes and epimastigotes trigger NF-κB-dependent expression of CD25 in CHO cells transfected with TLR-2, but containing defective TLR-4 signaling

CHO cells express endogenous TLR-4, and low levels of activation were observed in CHO cells transfected with CD14, but not with TLR-2, when T. cruzi-derived tGPI anchors were used at high concentrations (i.e., 0.1–1 μM). It was important to test the ability of different GPI/GIPL preparations in triggering CD25 expression in CHO cells with a defective TLR-4 signaling complex (clone 7.19, a mutant LPS nonresponder cell line that is defective in the expression of MD-2; Ref. 30) because of the possibility that small amounts of contaminating endotoxin in our preparations might confound interpretation of the results. As shown in Fig. 4⇓, A-E, clones of 7.19 transfected with CD14 only or CD14 plus TLR-2 were highly refractory to LPS stimulation. These findings are in agreement with previous studies showing that TLR-4, but not TLR-2, is responsible for the CHO cell activation by highly purified LPS (4, 33). In contrast, the 7.19 transfected with CD14 and TLR-2, but not with CD14 only, were responsive to tGPI-mucins, eGIPLs, or to the lipopeptide, OspA (5). These results show that TLR-2 is sufficient for responsiveness to these lipids, and does not require a functional TLR-4/MD-2 signal transduction complex to mediate NF-κB activation in transfected CHO cells exposed to GPI anchors or GIPLs derived from T. cruzi parasites. Consistent with the results presented in Fig. 3⇑, tGPI-mucin was more active than eGPI-mucin (data not shown) or GIPLs in activating 7.19/CD14/TLR-2.

FIGURE 4.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 4.

GPI anchors and GIPLs activate LPS nonresponder CHO/CD14 cells transfected with TLR-2 (clone 7.19). 7.19/CD14/TLR-2 cells were stimulated with IL-1β, LPS, or outer surface protein A (A), different concentrations of eGIPL CL AAG (B), or tGPI-mucin (C), and expression of CD25 was evaluated 18 h later. The fold increase values of CD25 expression on 7.19 cells transfected with CD14 only (□) or CD14 and TLR-2 (▪) exposed to different stimuli are presented in D and E. The y-axis of D and E indicated fold increase obtained by dividing the median fluorescence of activated cells by median fluorescence of unstimulated cells. The data presented here reflect the results of three independent experiments.

TLR-2 is essential for the pro-inflammatory activity of T. cruzi trypomastigote-derived GPI anchors on macrophages

We have shown previously that tGPI-mucin or tGPI induces high levels of NO and IL-12 in IFN-γ-primed inflammatory macrophages (17, 19). In contrast, the induction of high TNF-α levels by protozoan glycolipids occurs in either IFN-γ-primed or unprimed inflammatory macrophages. Our previous studies also show that although the receptors triggered by tGPI-mucin and LPS are functionally similar (12, 25), they are not identical, because macrophages from TLR-4 mutant C3H/HeJ mice can mount a major cytokine and NO response upon stimulation with tGPI-mucin or tGPI (17, 18, 19). Therefore, we tested the involvement of TLR-2 and TLR-4 on cytokine induction by tGPI-mucin and tGPI in murine inflammatory macrophages. Macrophages from TLR-4 KO or TLR-2 KO mice were exposed to the prototypical TLR-4 and TLR-2 “ligands” LPS (4) and MALP (7), respectively. The data presented in Fig. 5⇓ confirm the results obtained with CHO/CD14/TLR-2 cells, showing that IFN-γ-primed inflammatory macrophages from TLR-2 KO mice did not produce NO, TNF-α, and IL-12 upon stimulation with either tGPI-mucin or tGPI. The inflammatory macrophages from TLR-4 KO were still responsive to the T. cruzi glycolipids, producing levels of NO, TNF-α, or IL-12 comparable to macrophages from wild-type mice. In contrast, macrophages from TLR-4 KO mice, but not from TLR-2 KO mice, were unresponsive to LPS. As previously reported (17, 18, 19), eGPI-mucin and eGIPLs at 100 nM were unable to elicit NO, TNF-α, or IL-12 synthesis by macrophages from either wild-type or TLR-2 KO mice. Consistently, eGPI-mucins and eGIPLs (17, 18, 19) as well as GPI anchors from T. brucei (16) and P. falciparum (13) elicited NO and TNF-α synthesis by murine inflammatory macrophages only at micromolar concentrations. As shown in Table I⇓, although less responsive than inflammatory macrophages, bone marrow macrophages also produced significant amounts of NO, TNF-α, and IL-12 upon stimulation with tGPI-mucin. We observed TNF-α synthesis by either unprimed or IFN-γ-primed macrophages exposed to tGPI-mucin. In essence, the results with macrophages derived from TLR-2 KO and TLR-4 KO mice show that TLR-2 is not only a major receptor triggered by GPI anchors from parasitic protozoa, but is also essential for the macrophage response to tGPI or tGPI-mucin.

FIGURE 5.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
FIGURE 5.

Inflammatory macrophages derived from TLR-2-KO mice were unresponsive to tGPI-mucin or tGPI. Peritoneal macrophages from wild-type (▪), TLR-2 KO (Embedded Image), or TLR-4 KO mice (□) were isolated 4 days after i.p. thioglycollate injection. The cells were exposed to medium, to tGPI (10 nM), tGPI-mucin (10 nM), eGPI-mucin Y (100 nM), eGIPL CER Y (100 nM), eGIPL CER CL (100 nM), LPS (100 ng/ml), or to MALP (100 nM), in the presence of IFN-γ (50 IU/ml), and supernatants were harvested 24 h later to measure nitrite (A), TNF-α (B), and IL-12 (p70) (C). The results shown here are representative of one of two experiments performed.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table I.

Levels of TNF-α, IL-12(p40), and nitrite in the supernatants from inflammatory and bone-marrow macrophages derived from wild-type or TLR-2 KO micea

Discussion

The ability of T. cruzi trypomastigotes to signal host cells is well established as an important strategy for infection of the vertebrate host (34). For instance, trypomastigotes trigger the calcium influx in nonprofessional phagocytic cells, triggering lysosome recruitment, and enhancing susceptibility of host cells to infection with T. cruzi (35). Similarly, T. cruzi parasites stimulate a TGF-β signaling pathway that also enhances host cell susceptibility to infection (36). In contrast, induction of a NF-κB-dependent mechanism by the parasite results in enhancement of resistance to T. cruzi infection in nonimmune host cells (37). Independent studies have shown the ability of parasite molecules to trigger different activities in cells from host innate immune system, which are also important determinants of host resistance to T. cruzi infection (38, 39, 40). In fact, an early study demonstrated that host resistance/susceptibility to infection is, at least in part, determined at the very early stages of infection, before the development of acquired immunity (41). Therefore, the combinatory effect of these different signaling pathways triggered by T. cruzi parasites in nonimmune cells and/or cells from innate immune system may have important consequences in different aspects of T. cruzi infection such as load of tissue parasitism, tissue tropism, and the pathogenesis of Chagas’ disease.

Studies using infection with different parasitic protozoa, including T. cruzi, have demonstrated the importance on the early IL-12-induced T cell-independent IFN-γ synthesis on host protection, before the development of parasite-specific immune responses (8, 10, 40). The nature of protozoan-stimulatory molecule(s) that trigger the cells from host innate immune system is still not entirely resolved, although recent reports (17, 18, 19, 42, 43, 44, 45) have reflected serious efforts to address this question. The GPI anchors and GIPLs are excellent candidates for important parasitic molecules that initiate the recognition of protozoan parasites by the host innate immune system (13, 19, 21, 25, 42, 43). Several studies indicate that GPI anchors derived from T. cruzi trypomastigotes have the ability to trigger the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines by cells of monocytic lineage (17, 19), as previously reported for P. falciparum (13) and T. brucei (14, 16). Despite the growing evidence implicating GPI structures from parasitic protozoa in the induction of cytokine synthesis by macrophages, not much is known about the counterpart receptor(s) and signaling pathways that are triggered by protozoan GPI-anchors. Our recent study (46) demonstrated that like LPS, tGPI-mucin or tGPI are capable of triggering phosphorylation of extracellular signal-related kinases-1 and -2, stress-activated protein kinase kinase-1/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase-4, and stress-activated protein kinase-2. Furthermore, using different specific inhibitors for mitogen-activated protein kinase and NF-κB, we found that similar IC50 values are required to inhibit cytokine synthesis induced by LPS and tGPI-mucins (or tGPI). However, macrophages from LPS-hyporesponsive mice were still responsive to tGPI-mucins. Together, these results suggest that although functionally similar, the receptors used by LPS and tGPI-mucin are not the same.

In this study, we investigated the ability of T. cruzi parasites to trigger TLR-2 and TLR-4. Our results show that different GPI anchors and GIPLs derived from trypomastigote and epimastigote stages of T. cruzi present variable potency in activating NF-κB-dependent CD25 expression in CHO cells transfected with both human CD14 and TLR-2. As shown here, most protozoan-derived GPI anchors had the ability to trigger TLR-2 function in the range of 0.1–1 μM. In addition, our results show that tGPI anchors containing extra galactose residues in the glycan core and unsaturated fatty acids in the sn-2 position of the alkylacylglycerolipid component present maximal activity in the range of 1–10 nM. This activity was shown to be independent of TLR-4 and essential for induction of the pro-inflammatory cytokines (i.e., TNF-α and IL-12) as well as NO by murine macrophages.

The GPI-linked proteins are also ubiquitous on the plasma membrane of higher eukaryotic cells. Despite their diversity, all GPI anchors share a common core structure (11). Thus, our initial findings indicating that parasite GPI anchors are important in initiating host immune responses lead to the important question as to why mammalian GPI anchors do not ordinarily induce unrestrained autoimmunity. Mammalian cells typically express 105 copies of GPI anchors per cell, whereas parasitic protozoa express up to 1–10 million copies of GPI anchors (and related structures) per cell (11). In addition, as shown here, subtle changes in the GPI structure may confer an extreme potency in triggering TLR-2. Consequently, both the amounts as well as the fine structure of protozoan-derived GPI anchors may be important aspects in determining the activation of innate defense mechanisms in the vertebrate host.

It is well established that T. cruzi parasites are potent nonspecific stimulators of the host innate immune system (38, 39, 40). The data presented here suggest that tGPI activation of TLR-2 may directly initiate IL-12, TNF-α, and NO production in vivo, thus fostering host resistance during early infection with this parasite. Inflammation elicited by the parasite is thought to play a role on the genesis of cardiac and/or esophageal pathology observed in Chagas’ disease (40, 47, 48, 49). In addition to TLR-2 and TLR-4, many other members of this receptor family have been identified (1, 2, 3). The distribution of these different members belonging to the family of TLRs appears to vary among immune and nonimmune host cells (50, 51, 52). Thus, it is possible that other TLRs may be triggered by parasite-derived molecules, and not only be important on macrophage parasite interaction, but also be involved in the interplay of parasites and nonimmune host cells.

Finally, TLRs appear to be highly conserved, being ancient receptors that confer a certain degree of specificity to the innate immune system in both insects and mammals (1, 2, 3). Therefore, it seems reasonable to argue that the interaction of TLRs and GPI anchors from parasitic protozoa may have the important role of determining the fate of parasitism both in invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, thus being a significant element in the protozoan life cycle. Further understanding of the interaction of GPI anchors and related structures with receptors from TLR family, both from invertebrate and vertebrate hosts, may be helpful to develop new prophylactic and therapeutic means to fight the debilitating and often fatal diseases caused by distinct protozoan parasites.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to C. Kirschning and M. Rothe (Tularik Inc., South San Francisco, CA) for the pFLAG-CMV-1 vector, where the cDNA of the human genes CD14, TLR-2, and TLR-4 were inserted.

Footnotes

  • ↵1 This work was supported in part by the World Health Organization-Special Program for Research and Training in Tropical Diseases Pathogenesis Committee (A00477), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (522.056/95-4 and 521.117/98). M.A.S.C. is a visiting scientist from CNPq. I.C.A., L.R.T., and R.T.G. are Research Fellows from CNPq. I.C.A. is supported by Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo Grant 98/10495-5. This work was also supported by National Institutes of Health Grants GM54060, DK50305, and AI32725 (to D.T.G. and J.A.S.).

  • ↵2 Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Ricardo T. Gazzinelli, Laboratory of Immunopathology, Centro de Pesquisas René Rachou, FIOCRUZ, Avenida Augusto de Lima 1715, Barro Preto, 30190-002, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. E-mail address: ritoga{at}dedalus.lcc.ufmg.br

  • 3 Abbreviations used in this paper: TLR, Toll-like receptor; CHO, Chinese hamster ovary; eGIPL, epimastigote derived glycoinositolphospholipids; eGPI-mucin, GPI-anchored mucin-like glycoproteins derived from T. cruzi epimastigotes; GIPLs, glycoinositolphospholipids; GPI, glycosylphosphatidylinositol; MALP, macrophage-activating lipopeptide; tGPI, GPI anchor purified from tGPI-mucin; tGPI-mucin, GPI-anchored mucin-like glycoproteins derived from T. cruzi trypomastigotes; KO, knockout; PI, phosphatidylinositol; CER, ceramide; AAG, alkylacylglycerol; Osp A, outer surface protein A.

  • Received January 4, 2001.
  • Accepted April 23, 2001.
  • Copyright © 2001 by The American Association of Immunologists

References

  1. ↵
    Kopp, E. B., R. Medzhitov. 1999. The Toll-receptor family and control of innate immunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 11: 13
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Hoffmann, J. A., F. C. Kafatos, C. A. Janeway, R. A. Ezekowitz. 1999. Phylogenetic perspectives in innate immunity. Science 284: 1313
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    Aderem, A., R. J. Ulevitch. 2000. Toll-like receptors in the induction of the innate immune response. Nature 406: 782
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    Hoshino, K., O. Takeuchi, T. Kawai, H. Sanjo, T. Ogawa, Y. Takeda, K. Takeda, S. Akira. 1999. Toll like receptor 4 (TLR4)-deficient mice are hyporesponsive to lipopolysaccharide: evidence for TLR4 as the LPS gene product. J. Immunol. 162: 3749
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Lien, E., T. J. Sellati, A. Yoshimura, T. H. Flo, G. Rawadi, R. W. Finberg, J. D. Carroll, T. Espevik, R. R. Ingalls, J. D. Radolf, D. T. Golenbock. 1999. Toll-like receptor 2 functions as a pattern recognition receptor for diverse bacterial products. J. Biol. Chem. 274: 33419
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Brightbill, H. D., H. D. Libraty, S. R. Krutzick, R. B. Yang, J. T. Beliste, J. R. Bleharski, M. Maitland, M. V. Norgard, S. E. Plevy, S. T. Smale, et al 1999. Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through Toll-like receptors. Science 285: 732
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Takeuchi, O., A. Kaufmann, K. Grote, T. Kawai, K. Hoshino, M. Morr, P. F. Mühlradt, S. Akira. 2000. Preferentially the R-stereoisomer of the mycoplasmal lipopeptide macrophage-activating lipopeptide-2 activates immune cells through a Toll-like receptor 2 and MyD88-dependent signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 164: 554
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Biron, C. A., R. T. Gazzinelli. 1995. Effects of IL-12 on immune response to microbial infections: a key mediator in regulating disease outcome. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 7: 485
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. ↵
    Shiloh, M. U., J. D. MacMicking, S. Nicholson, J. E. Brause, S. Potter, M. Marino, F. Fang, M. Dinauer, C. Nathan. 1999. Phenotype of mice and macrophages deficient in both phagocyte oxidase and inducible nitric oxide synthase. Immunity 10: 29
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Sharton-Kersten, T., A. Sher. 1997. Role of natural killer cells in innate resistance to protozoan infection. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 9: 44
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  11. ↵
    Ferguson, M. A.. 1999. The structure, biosynthesis and functions of glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol anchors, and the contributions of trypanosome research. J. Cell Sci. 112: 2799
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  12. ↵
    Ropert, C., R. T. Gazzinelli. 2000. Signaling of immune system cells by glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI) anchor and related structures derived from parasitic protozoa. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 3: 395
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Schofield, L., F. Hackett. 1993. Signal transduction in host cells by glysosylphosphatidylinositol toxin of malaria parasites. J. Exp. Med. 177: 145
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Tachado, S. D., L. Schofield. 1994. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol toxin of Trypanosoma brucei regulates IL-1-α and TNF-α expression in macrophages by protein tyrosine kinase mediated signal transduction. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 205: 984
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Tachado, S. D., P. Gerold, M. J. McConville, T. Baldwin, D. Quilici, R. T. Schwarz, L. Schofield. 1996. Glycosylphosphatidylinositol toxin of Plasmodium induces nitric oxide synthase expression in macrophages and vascular endothelial cells by a protein tyrosine kinase-dependent and protein kinase C-dependent signaling pathway. J. Immunol. 156: 1897
    OpenUrlAbstract
  16. ↵
    Magez, S., B. Stijlemans, M. Radwanska, E. Pays, M. A. Ferguson, P. Debestlier. 1998. The glycosyl-inositol-phosphate and dimyristoylglycerol moieties of the glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor of the Trypanosoma variant-specific surface glycoprotein are distinct macrophage activating factors. J. Immunol. 160: 1949
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Camargo, M. M., I. C. Almeida, M. E. S. Pereira, M. A. J. Ferguson, L. R. Travassos, R. T. Gazzinelli. 1997. GPI-anchored mucin-like glycoprotein isolated from Trypanosoma cruzi initiate the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines by macrophages. J. Immunol. 158: 5890
    OpenUrlAbstract
  18. ↵
    Camargo, M. M., A. C. Andrade, I. C. Almeida, L. R. Travassos, R. T. Gazzinelli. 1997. Glycoconjugates isolated from Trypanosoma cruzi but not from Leishmania sp. parasite membranes trigger nitric oxide synthesis as well as microbicidal activity by IFN-γ-primed macrophages. J. Immunol. 159: 6139
    OpenUrl
  19. ↵
    Almeida, I. C., M. M. Camargo, D. O. Procopio, L. S. Silva, A. Mehlert, L. R. Travassos, R. T. Gazzinelli, M. A. J. Ferguson. 2000. Highly purified glycosylphosphatidylinositols from Trypanosoma cruzi are potent proinflammatory agents. EMBO J. 19: 1476
    OpenUrlAbstract
  20. ↵
    Descoteaux, A., G. Matlashewski, S. J. Turco. 1992. Inhibition of macrophage protein kinase C mediated protein phosphorylation by Leishmania donovani lipophosphoglycan. J. Immunol. 149: 3008
    OpenUrlAbstract
  21. ↵
    Proudfoot, L., C. A. O’Donnell, F. Y. Liew. 1995. Glycoinositolphospholipids of Leishmania major inhibit nitric oxide synthesis and reduce leishmanicidal activity in murine macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 25: 745
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. ↵
    Hatzigeorgiou, D. E., J. Geng, B. Zhu, Y. Zhang, K. Liu, W. N. Rom, M. J. Fenton, S. J. Turco, J. L. Ho. 1996. Lipophosphoglycan from Leishmania suppresses agonist-induced interleukin 1β gene expression in human monocytes via a unique promoter sequence. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 93: 14708
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  23. ↵
    Gomes, N. A., J. O. Previato, B. Zingales, L. Mendonca-Previato, G. A. Dos Reis. 1996. Down-regulation of T lymphocyte activation in vitro and in vivo induced by glycoinositolphospholipids from Trypanosoma cruzi: assignment of the T cell-suppressive determinant to the ceramide domain. J. Immunol. 156: 628
    OpenUrlAbstract
  24. ↵
    Feng, G.-J., H. S. Goodridge, M. M. Harnett, X.-Q. Wei, A. V. Nikolaev, A. P. Higson, F.-Y. Liew. 1999. Extracellular signal-related kinase (ERK) and p38 mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases differentially regulate the lipopolysaccharide-mediated induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase and IL-12 in macrophages: Leishmania phosphoglycans subvert macrophage IL-12 production by targeting ERK MAP kinase. J. Immunol. 163: 6403
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Procopio, D. O., M. M. Teixeira, M. M. Camargo, L. R. Travassos, M. A. J. Ferguson, I. C. Almeida, R. T. Gazzinelli. 1999. Differential inhibitory mechanism of cyclic AMP on TNF-α and IL-12 synthesis by macrophages exposed to microbial stimuli. Br. J. Pharmacol. 127: 1195
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Takeuchi, O., K. Hoshino, T. Kawai, H. Sanjo, H. Takahada, T. Ogawa, K. Takeda, S. Akira. 1999. Differential roles of TLR2 and TLR4 in recognition of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial cell wall components. Immunity 11: 443
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Almeida, I. C., M. A. J. Ferguson, S. Schenkman, L. R. Travassos. 1994. Lytic anti-α-galactosyl antibodies from patients with chronic Chagas’ disease recognize novel O-linked oligosaccharides on mucin-like glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-anchored glycoproteins of Trypanosoma cruzi. Biochem. J. 304: 793
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  28. ↵
    Mühlradt, P. F., M. Kiess, H. Meyer, R. Sussmuth, G. Jung. 1998. Structure and specific activity of macrophage-stimulating lipopeptides from Mycoplasma hyorhinis. Infect. Immun. 66: 4804
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  29. ↵
    Mühlradt, P. F., M. Kiess, H. Meyer, R. Sussmuth, G. Jung. 1997. Isolation, structure and synthesis of a macrophage stimulatory lipopeptide from Mycoplasma fermentans acting at picomolar concentration. J. Exp. Med. 185: 1951
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. ↵
    Delude, R. L., A. Yoshimura, R. R. Ingalls, D. T. Golenbock. 1998. Construction of a lipopolysaccharide reporter cell line and its use in identifying mutants defective in endotoxin, but not TNF-α, signal transduction. J. Immunol. 161: 3001
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  31. ↵
    Drapier, J. C., J. Wietzerbin, J. B. Hibbs, Jr. 1988. Interferon-γ and tumor necrosis factor induce the L-arginine-dependent cytotoxic effector mechanism in murine macrophages. Eur. J. Immunol. 18: 1587
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Tachado, S. D., P. Gerold, R. Schwarz, S. Novakovic, M. Mc Conville, L. Schofield. 1997. Signal transduction in macrophages by glycosylphosphatidylinositols of Plasmodium, Trypanosoma, and Leishmania: activation of protein tyrosine kinases and protein kinase C by inositolglycan and diacylglycerol moieties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 4022
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  33. ↵
    Hirschfeld, M., Y. Ma, J. H. Weis, S. N. Vogel, J. J. Weis. 2000. Repurification of lipopolysaccharide eliminates signaling through both human and murine Toll-like receptor 2. J. Immunol. 165: 618
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  34. ↵
    Burleigh, B. A., N. W. Andrews. 1998. Signaling and host cell invasion by Trypanosoma cruzi. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 1: 461
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  35. ↵
    Tardieux, I., P. Webster, J. Ravesloot, W. Boron, J. A. Lunn, J. E. Heuser, N. W. Andrews. 1992. Lysosome recruitment and fusion are early events required for trypanosome invasion of mammalian cells. Cell 71: 1117
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  36. ↵
    Ming, M., M. E. Ewen, M. E. Pereira. 1995. Trypanosome invasion of mammalian cells requires activation of the TGF-β signaling pathway. Cell 82: 287
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. ↵
    Hall, B. S., W. Tam, R. Sen, M. E. Pereira. 2000. Cell-specific activation of nuclear factor-κB by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi promotes resistance to intracellular infection. Mol. Biol. Cell. 11: 153
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  38. ↵
    Aliberti, J. C. S., M. A. G. Cardoso, G. A. Martins, R. T. Gazzinelli, L. Q. Vieira, J. S. Silva. 1996. IL-12 mediates resistance to Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice and is produced by normal murine macrophages in response to live trypomastigote. Infect. Immun. 64: 1961
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  39. ↵
    Cardillo, F., J. C. Voltarelli, S. G. Reed, J. S. Silva. 1996. Regulation of Trypanosoma cruzi infection in mice by γ interferon and interleukin 10: role of NK cells. Infect. Immun. 64: 128
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  40. ↵
    Brener, Z., R. T. Gazzinelli. 1997. Immunological control of Trypanosoma cruzi infection and pathogenesis of Chagas’ disease. Intern. Arch. Allergy. Immunol. 114: 103
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  41. ↵
    Trischmann, T. M.. 1986. Trypanosoma cruzi: early parasite proliferation and host resistance in inbred strains of mice. Exp. Parasitol. 62: 194
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. ↵
    Freire-de-Lima, C. G., M. P. Nunes, S. Corte-Real, M. P. Soares, J. O. Previato, L. Mendonça-Previato, G. A. Dos Reis. 1998. Proapoptotic activity of a Trypanosoma cruzi ceramide-containing glycolipid turned on in macrophages by IFN-γ. J. Immunol. 161: 4909
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  43. ↵
    De Arru, G. A., L. B. da Hinds, L. M. Previato, J. O. Previato, Q. Vos, J. J. Mond, L. M. Peçanha. 1999. Modulation of B-lymphocyte and NK cell activities by glycoinositolphospholipid purified from Trypanosoma cruzi. Infect. Immun. 67: 6177
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  44. ↵
    Fernandez-Gomez, R., S. Esteban, R. Gomez-Corvera, K. Zoulika, A. Ouaissi. 1998. Trypanosoma cruzi: Tc52 released protein-induced increased expression of nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide production by macrophages. J. Immunol. 160: 3471
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  45. ↵
    Saavedra, E., M. Herrera, W. Gao, H. Uemura, M. A. Pereira. 1999. The Trypanosoma cruzi trans-sialidase, through its COOH-terminal tandem repeat, upregulates interleukin 6 secretion in normal human intestinal microvascular endothelial cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J. Exp. Med. 190: 1825
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  46. ↵
    Ropert, C., I. C. Almeida, M. Closel, L. R. Travassos, M. A. J. Ferguson, P. Cohen, R. T. Gazzinelli. 2001. Requirement of MAP kinases and IκB phosphorylation for induction of pro-inflammatory cytokines synthesis by macrophages indicates functional similarity of receptors triggered by glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchors from parasitic protozoa and bacterial LPS. J. Immunol. 166: 3423
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  47. ↵
    Higuchi, M. L., T. Brito, M. M. Reis, A. Barbosa, G. Bellotti, A. C. Pereira-Barreto, F. Pileggi. 1993. Correlation between Trypanosoma cruzi parasitism and myocardial inflammatory infiltrate in human chronic chagasic myocarditis: light microscopy and immuno-histochemical findings. Cardiovasc. Pathol. 2: 101
    OpenUrl
  48. ↵
    Vago, A. R., A. M. Macedo, S. J. Adad, D. D. Reis, R. Corrêa-Oliveira. 1996. PCR detection of Trypanosoma cruzi in oesophageal tissues of patients with chronic digestive Chagas’ disease. Lancet 348: 891
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  49. ↵
    Tarleton, R. L., L. Zhang, M. O. Downs. 1997. “Autoimmune rejection” of neonatal heart transplants in experimental Chagas’ disease is a parasite-specific response to infected host tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94: 3932
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  50. ↵
    Muzio, M., N. Polentarutti, D. Bosisio, M. K. Prahladan, A. Mantovani. 2000. Toll-like receptors: a growing family of immune receptors that are differentially expressed and regulated by different leukocytes. J. Leukocyte Biol. 67: 450
    OpenUrlAbstract
  51. ↵
    Chaudhary, P. M., C. Ferguson, V. Nguyen, O. Nguyen, H. F. Massa, M. Eby, A. Jasmin, B. J. Trask, L. Hood, P. S. Nelson. 1998. Cloning and characterization of two Toll/interleukin-1 receptor-like genes TIL3 and TIL4: evidence for a multi-gene receptor family in humans. Blood 91: 4020
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  52. ↵
    Frantz, S., L. Kobzik, Y. D. Kim, R. Fukazawa, R. Medzhitov, R. T. Lee, R. A. Kelly. 1999. Toll 4 (TLR4) expression in cardiac myocytes in normal and failing myocardium. J. Clin. Invest. 104: 271
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

The Journal of Immunology: 167 (1)
The Journal of Immunology
Vol. 167, Issue 1
1 Jul 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • About the Cover
Print
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Sign In to Email Alerts with your Email Address
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word about The Journal of Immunology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Activation of Toll-Like Receptor-2 by Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors from a Protozoan Parasite
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from The Journal of Immunology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from the The Journal of Immunology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Activation of Toll-Like Receptor-2 by Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors from a Protozoan Parasite
Marco A. S. Campos, Igor C. Almeida, Osamu Takeuchi, Shizuo Akira, Eneida P. Valente, Daniela O. Procópio, Luiz R. Travassos, Jason A. Smith, Douglas T. Golenbock, Ricardo T. Gazzinelli
The Journal of Immunology July 1, 2001, 167 (1) 416-423; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.416

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Share
Activation of Toll-Like Receptor-2 by Glycosylphosphatidylinositol Anchors from a Protozoan Parasite
Marco A. S. Campos, Igor C. Almeida, Osamu Takeuchi, Shizuo Akira, Eneida P. Valente, Daniela O. Procópio, Luiz R. Travassos, Jason A. Smith, Douglas T. Golenbock, Ricardo T. Gazzinelli
The Journal of Immunology July 1, 2001, 167 (1) 416-423; DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.167.1.416
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Early Self-Regulatory Mechanisms Control the Magnitude of CD8+ T Cell Responses Against Liver Stages of Murine Malaria
  • Sublethal Hyperoxia Impairs Pulmonary Innate Immunity
  • Dependence of IL-4, IL-13, and Nematode-Induced Alterations in Murine Small Intestinal Smooth Muscle Contractility on Stat6 and Enteric Nerves
Show more HOST DEFENSE

Similar Articles

Navigate

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • Next in The JI
  • Archive
  • Brief Reviews
  • Pillars of Immunology
  • Translating Immunology

For Authors

  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Instructions for Authors
  • About the Journal
  • Journal Policies
  • Editors

General Information

  • Advertisers
  • Subscribers
  • Rights and Permissions
  • Accessibility Statement
  • FAR 889
  • Privacy Policy
  • Disclaimer

Journal Services

  • Email Alerts
  • RSS Feeds
  • ImmunoCasts
  • Twitter

Copyright © 2021 by The American Association of Immunologists, Inc.

Print ISSN 0022-1767        Online ISSN 1550-6606